Factors influencing five-year adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients: A systematic review

Non-adherence of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors reduces overall and progression-free survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy improve survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR + /HER2-) breast cancer (BC). This retrospective study aimed to evaluate CDK4/6i adherence, factors associated with non-adherence, the impact of health-system specialty pharmacy on adherence, and effects of non-adherence on survival outcomes in HR + /HER2- BC patients.

METHODS

Data was collected from Houston Methodist Hospital System (HM) from HR + /HER2- BC patients with medication fill history utilizing electronic medical records. CDK4/6i adherence was calculated using the mean possession ratio ≥ 80%. Multivariable logistic regression model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were utilized to evaluate factors associated with non-adherence and its impact on survival, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients were assessed and analyzed; 55% patients received abemaciclib, 40% were on palbociclib, and 4% were on ribociclib. More patients were on aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen (79%) than fulvestrant (21%). Most of the patients were Caucasian (64%), non-Hispanic or Latino (84%), and postmenopausal (66%). Overall, 52 patients (43%) were non-adherent. Patients ≥ 65 years of age (OR: 0.304, [95% CI: 0.110-0.840], P-value: 0.022) and those of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (OR: 0.291, [95% CI: 0.086-0.985], P-value: 0.047) were more likely to be non-adherent to CDK4/6i. Non-adherence to CDK4/6i was associated with worse overall survival and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

43% patients were non-adherent to CDK4/6i. Older patients and those of Hispanic ethnicity were more likely to be non-adherent. Non-adherent patients had worse survival outcomes, highlighting the unmet need to implement interventions to improve CDK4/6i adherence in these patients.

Oral Anticancer Therapies: Addressing Nonadherence in Patients With Breast Cancer

This review aims to investigate the issue of treatment nonadherence and to present the available strategies to improve adherence to oral treatments in breast cancer. A literature search was conducted to contextualise the issue of nonadherence, investigate the reasons behind nonadherence, and demonstrate strategies to address treatment nonadherence in breast cancer. Findings indicate that adherence rates decrease while discontinuation rates increase with increasing lengths of breast cancer treatment course. Lack of adherence is proven to be detrimental to treatment outcomes. Patients struggle to adhere to treatment due to inadequate relationships with healthcare providers, lack of information, psychological distress, and side effects. Healthcare providers should evaluate patient's experience to provide the necessary support. Following this assessment, healthcare providers may recommend interventions addressing patient knowledge, psychological distress or side effects. Treatment adherence remains an issue for oral therapeutics in breast cancer. After patient assessment, healthcare providers can offer personalised strategies to improve treatment adherence. The most crucial interventions address patient knowledge, psychological distress, and side effects.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer Treated with Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor: Results from the NATALEE Trial

PURPOSE

The phase III NATALEE trial reported a statistically significant invasive disease-free survival benefit with ribociclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) versus an NSAI alone in stage II/III hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer. In this study, we report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data from NATALEE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive ribociclib plus NSAI or NSAI alone. Patient-reported outcome scores [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life questionnaire global health status and physical, social, and emotional functioning domains; the supplementary European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific QOL questionnaire breast symptoms scale; health on a visual analog scale of the generic EuroQOL 5-level instrument; and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale] were assessed. The prespecified primary HRQOL endpoint was physical functioning. Mean scores and time-categorical and prespecified linear-time repeated-measure models were used to evaluate HRQOL changes during treatment.

RESULTS

HRQOL was evaluated in all patients in the ribociclib plus NSAI (n = 2,549) and NSAI alone (n = 2,552) arms. Compliance was high in both arms (≈93%-97%). Mean scores did not differ meaningfully from baseline for any analyzed domain. Likewise, neither a meaningful change from baseline (in either treatment arm) nor a difference between arms was observed during treatment in the time-categorical, model-adjusted mean scores for any HRQOL domains-using published thresholds for interpreting longitudinal and between-group differences, with all values being within 0.5 SD of their baseline values. Linear-time regression analysis confirmed these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses of NATALEE show that adding adjuvant ribociclib to an NSAI does not negatively affect HRQOL in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.

Exploring the real-world experience of abemaciclib treatment for HR +, HER2 - metastatic breast cancer-a qualitative analysis of the IMPACTOR study

PURPOSE

The IMPACTOR study (IMPact of AbemaCiclib on patienTs' rOles and Responsibilities-ISRCTN17281696) was developed to capture experiences of women with MBC being treated with abemaciclib in a real-world setting. The primary aim was to explore changes to quality of life over time and our secondary aim was to understand these changes in detail via qualitative interviews, as presented here.

METHODS

A singular interview was offered to participants who had expressed an interest at the point of consent. These were all conducted remotely using a semi-structured interview topic guide.

RESULTS

Twenty interviews were completed and analysed using a framework approach to thematic analysis. Eight themes were developed-COVID-19, experience of MBC, side effects, side effect management, treatment information and support, relationship impacts, impact on daily life, and finances and employment.

CONCLUSIONS

It was apparent that participants faced side effects from treatment but undertook steps to manage these as much as possible. Adaptations were often led by a belief about the benefits of remaining on treatment. Adjustments ranged from modifying routines to carrying personal hygiene supplies when out in public in case of diarrhoea. While this was anticipated, other side effects were less well known with variable clinical support and available information. Family support was raised frequently, predominantly in relation to the impact MBC had on roles and relationships. Themes from this work can be thought of via theories about treatment belief and adherence, such as the common-sense and self-regulation models, as participants reflected on both emotional and cognitive coping strategies. Trial registration - ISRCTN17281696.

A Multi-Omics-Based Prognostic Model for Elderly Breast Cancer by Machine Learning: Insights From Hypoxia and Immunity of Tumor Microenvironment

INTRODUCTION

Older adult breast cancer (OABC) patients (≥ 65 years) frequently experience poorer prognoses compared to younger adults, attributed to complex tumor biology and age-related factors. The present study employs a multiomics approach combined with machine learning to develop a novel prognostic model for OABC, with a focus on the hypoxic and immune characteristics of the tumor microenvironment.

METHODS

Genetic and molecular data from 503 OABC and 589 younger adult breast cancer (YABC) patients were analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. An ensemble machine-learning model was developed, integrating multiomics data-including mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, copy number variations (CNVs), and single nucleotide variants (SNVs)-along with clinicopathological features, to predict survival outcomes. The model was trained on 300 OABC samples and validated on 203 samples.

RESULTS

The ensemble machine-learning model achieved a predictive accuracy of 69.5% for survival outcomes in OABC patients. Distinct hypoxia-related gene expression patterns and reduced immune cell infiltration were observed in OABC compared to YABC. Hypoxia was significantly associated with poorer disease-free survival (DFS) in OABC (P = .037), but not in YABC (P = .38).

CONCLUSIONS

The multiomics-based prognostic model developed for OABC showed clinical potential, and the findings highlight the critical role of hypoxia and the immune microenvironment in the prognosis of OABC. Further research is warranted to validate this model in larger cohorts and to explore its potential application in guiding personalized treatment strategies for OABC patients.

Long-Term Outcomes of Radiation Monotherapy Versus Combined Radiation Monotherapy + Hormone Therapy in Low-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients 70 Years or Older After Breast-Conserving Surgery

PURPOSE

Standard therapy for breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery is radiation therapy (RT) plus hormone therapy (HT). For patients with a low-risk of recurrence, there is an interest in deescalating therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective study was carried out for patients treated at the Swedish Cancer Institute from 2000 to 2015, aged 70 years or older, with pT1N0 or pT1NX estrogen receptor-positive and ERBB2-negative unifocal breast cancer without positive surgical margins, high nuclear grade, or lymphovascular invasion.

RESULTS

Patient numbers were sufficient to carry out analyses for RT + HT (n = 307) and RT alone (n = 148). The median follow-up was 9.6 years. There were no statistically significant differences in adjusted overall survival (OS), disease-specific death, progression-free survival (PFS), distant recurrence, and second primary cancers with RT monotherapy compared with RT + HT. Cumulative rates of all of these outcomes were <5%, even at 15 years of follow-up, regardless of treatment, greatly outweighed by the incidence of death from other causes in this elderly population. In matched analysis, we calculated a hazard ratio of 1.12 (95% CI, 0.82-1.53) for RT versus RT + HT for OS and a hazard ratio of 1.12 (95% CI, 0.82-1.53) for RT versus RT + HT for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that elderly, low-risk breast cancer patients have similarly high OS and PFS with low rates of local recurrence, distant recurrence, and death from breast cancer with much higher rates of death from competing causes, whether treated with RT or HT + RT. These patients are likely to die of other causes without disease recurrence, regardless of which of these treatments is used. Thus, they may benefit from the administration of more modern forms of breast irradiation without the need for adjuvant systemic hormone therapy. A detailed analysis of which clinical, pathologic, genomic, and comorbidity variables are needed to select these patients.

Can De-Escalation of Adjuvant Therapy Be Considered for Older Adults with Breast Cancer?

AbstractThe trimodal approach of lumpectomy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy may represent overtreatment for certain older patients with early-stage breast cancer. Treatment guidelines permit adjuvant endocrine monotherapy, based on older randomized trials comparing adjuvant endocrine therapy with radiotherapy versus without radiotherapy. There are limited data on radiotherapy with endocrine therapy versus without endocrine therapy, and therefore, the incremental benefits versus burdens of endocrine therapy, specifically in older (≥70 years of age) women with favorable-risk breast cancer are unknown. With the routine use of molecular genomic assays that identify low-risk breast cancer and advances in radiotherapy delivery that have reduced treatment burden, many older women might consider radiotherapy alone without endocrine therapy if offered. This article reviews the relevant literature and proposes a trial to inform the de-escalation of adjuvant therapy in older patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative breast cancer.

Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Nonmetastatic Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Brazilian Real-World Data Study

PURPOSE

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improves the prognosis of patients with nonmetastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast carcinoma; however, adherence is crucial to ensure its efficacy. In Brazil, data regarding adherence to ET are limited. We aimed to evaluate the adherence to ET across Brazil and the characteristics associated with adherence.

METHODS

Women with nonmetastatic ER+ invasive breast carcinoma who underwent ET for at least 6 months were enrolled. Adherence was assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) and defined as an MMAS-8 score of 8. The groups were compared using the chi-square or exact chi-square tests for qualitative variables and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables.

RESULTS

Between June 2021 and September 2023, 726 patients were included in this analysis. The adherence to ET was 58.7%. The median age of the adherent women was higher than that of the nonadherent women (58.3 years v 54.8 years; P = .009). Factors associated with adherence were nonuse of ovarian suppression (P = .004), use of anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy (P = .007), high European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 scores on global health status (P = .0004), role functioning (P = .03), emotional functioning (P = .0007), cognitive functioning (P < .001), and social functioning (P = .0005), and EORTC BR23 scores on body image (P < .001) and future perspective domains (P = .0198).

CONCLUSION

More than one third of the patients evaluated were not adherent to ET. Although the study did not assess the impact of interventions to improve adherence to adjuvant ET, the 58.7% adherence rate shows that this study is of utmost importance.

Real-world breast cancer treatment patterns and guideline-concordant treatment completion among Malawian women

PURPOSE

In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), resource-stratified guidelines for breast cancer treatment are increasingly recommended, but treatment receipt and outcomes according to these guidelines are underreported. Here, we describe breast cancer treatment patterns by stage and curative-intent guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) receipt among Malawian women.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of breast cancer patients were enrolled from December 2016 to October 2018 at Kamuzu Central Hospital with an assessment of demographics, stage, and treatment received, including neoadjuvant (NAC), adjuvant (AdC) and palliative chemotherapy and breast surgery. Curative-intent GCT was defined as having completed breast surgery and at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan Meier methods and odds ratios using logistic regression.

RESULTS

91 patients were included, of whom 13 (14%) presented as stage II, 54 (59%) as stage III, and 24 (26%) as stage IV. Curative treatment was recommended for 65 of 91 (71%) patients, of whom 47 (72%) were initiated on NAC, 14 (22%) on upfront breast surgery, and 4 (6%) received no treatment. Only 63% (41/65) of patients received curative-intent GCT as recommended with non-GCT associated with stage III (vs. stage II) disease (OR 0.10 CI (0.01-0.89)), HIV positivity ((OR 0.25 CI (0.06-0.99)) and hormone receptor (HR) negative/HER2 positive subtype ((OR 0.07 CI (0.01-0.49)). Curative-intent GCT was associated with improved OS (44.1 vs. 23.2 months; p = 0.00) compared to non-GCT.

CONCLUSION

While curative-intent GCT was associated with improved survival in this Malawian cohort, treatment completion rates were suboptimal. Resource-stratified guidelines must be paired with locally relevant, multilevel implementation strategies to target barriers to treatment completion.

New Therapeutic Scenarios in the Context of Adjuvant Treatment for HR+/HER2-Breast Cancer: The Possible Role of Ribociclib in Treatment Algorithms for Stage II and III

Early breast cancer (EBC) treatment has evolved from radical surgery to a multidisciplinary approach, integrating radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and hormone therapy with surgery to ensure the best possible outcome. Despite these advancements, hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative (HER2-) EBC still faces high recurrence rates after endocrine therapy. A panel of oncologists from Central-Southern Italy discussed the profile of ribociclib as an adjuvant therapy, based on the results of the NATALEE study, focusing on efficacy, safety, patient profiles, and regional challenges in treatment access. The experts identified ribociclib as suitable adjuvant treatment for stage II and III HR+/HER2- EBC patients, including those without lymph node involvement but with biologically aggressive disease. In their view, ribociclib could be an interesting option for patients not eligible for chemotherapy due to contraindications. Key challenges in translating the evidence on ribociclib in EBC into clinical practice include treatment duration, patient follow-up, and adverse events management. Strategies to address these challenges range from telemedicine and support from local clinics to tailored communication to improve adherence. Ribociclib is expected to significantly impact adjuvant treatment for HR+/HER2- EBC by addressing broader patient needs and potentially improving long-term outcomes through enhanced adherence and personalized management strategies.

Mapping the patient journey: Understanding oral anticancer medication use among patients diagnosed with breast cancer

IntroductionA growing number of patients with breast cancer use oral anticancer medications (OAMs) but may face barriers in managing their therapy at home, potentially impacting their treatment outcomes. Understanding these barriers is essential to designing effective interventions. This study aimed to identify unmet medication management needs of patients with breast cancer receiving OAMs.MethodsQualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted to create patient-specific journey maps describing OAM use. Participants were recruited from a federally qualified health center's breast cancer clinic in central Indiana. Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older, diagnosed with breast cancer, and currently receiving OAMs. Participants completed a sociodemographic survey, and researchers and participants collaborated to create visual storyboards of medication use experiences, highlighting timelines, key markers, and barriers. Journey maps were consolidated, and personas were created to represent patients with similar characteristics. Participants were categorized by medication type: specialty (requiring specialty pharmacies) or traditional (available at community pharmacies).ResultsTwelve participants (11 females, 1 male; median age 65.5 years, range 37-75) were interviewed. Four were receiving specialty medications (palbociclib, ribociclib), and eight were receiving traditional medications (tamoxifen, anastrozole, exemestane). Two personas were created. The specialty medication group reported difficulties navigating the insurance system, whereas the traditional group did not. All participants experienced side effects, and sub-optimal adherence (n = 2) was reported only in the traditional group.ConclusionThis study provides insights into the patient experience with OAMs. Personas and journey maps can guide the development of tailored interventions to improve treatment outcomes.

Physical Health Decline After Chemotherapy or Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors

Importance

Women with a history of breast cancer (BC) experience greater physical health decline compared with age-matched women without cancer. However, whether this decline differs in patients who received chemotherapy and endocrine therapy is not well understood.

Objective

To investigate physical health decline in BC survivors who received chemotherapy or endocrine therapy compared with age-matched women without cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study was conducted as part of the Cancer Prevention Study-3, a prospective US cohort study that enrolled participants in 35 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico between 2006 and 2013. Follow-up for this analysis was through April 1, 2020. Statistical analyses were conducted between May 2023 and December 2024. Female participants diagnosed with nonmetastatic BC who returned a survey at least 90 days after their diagnosis were matched on age and year of survey return with up to 5 women without cancer.

Exposure

Cancer status and treatment information.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes of interest were measures of physical health, assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Scale instrument. Linear regression was used to estimate associations (β) and 95% CIs of treatment with physical health.

Results

This analysis included 2566 individuals diagnosed with BC and 12 826 age-matched women without cancer. Median (IQR) age at diagnosis was 56.3 (49.9-61.9) years. Of women with BC, 1223 (47.7%) received endocrine therapy, 276 (10.8%) received chemotherapy, and 634 (24.7%) received both. Compared with women without cancer, there was a greater physical health decline within 2 years of diagnosis for BC survivors receiving endocrine therapy (β = -1.12; 95% CI, -1.64 to -0.60), chemotherapy (β = -3.13; 95% CI, -4.19 to -2.07), or both (β = -3.26; 95% CI, -3.97 to -2.55). The decline among endocrine therapy users was restricted to women receiving aromatase inhibitors. More than 2 years after diagnosis, the decline was only observed in women who received chemotherapy.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of 15 392 BC survivors and age-matched women without cancer, BC survivors who received chemotherapy had a long-lasting physical health decline, unlike survivors who received endocrine therapy without chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to better understand the health consequences of these treatments.

Experience of hormone therapy among postmenopausal women diagnosed with early breast cancer receiving a multimodal exercise and health education programme: A qualitative study

PURPOSE

Hormone therapy (HT) is safe and effective in reducing breast cancer (BC) relapse rates and increasing disease-free periods. However, its various adverse physical and psychological effects could affect women's quality of life. These could be improved through a multimodal programme including physical exercise and health education. There is limited evidence regarding the experience of HT and the impact such a programme might have among women with breast cancer.

METHODS

This is a qualitative phenomenological study with a descriptive approach. Data were collected using face-to-face semi-structured interviews; the content analysis technique was applied. The study population were women diagnosed with localized BC under treatment with HT, who were participating in a multimodal physical exercise and health education programme as a supplementary oncological therapy.

RESULTS

Fifteen interviews were conducted. Four main themes emerged: adverse effects of the HT, experience with professionals, support from family and friends with the HT and the programme, and the impact of the multimodal exercise programme as a therapeutic complement.

CONCLUSION

The participants identified physical and psychological adverse effects of HT. Most of them reported that when receiving usual care, they received reduced attention to their mental health, observed a lack of time in their appointments with professionals, and an absence of information about HT and the self-care it entails to maintain health. The multimodal programme was seen as a tool for improving their physical, emotional and social health, reducing the adverse effects of the adjuvant HT, a comprehensive source of information and a motivational boost for performing their self-care.

Prodrugs in Oncology: Bioactivation and Impact on Therapeutic Efficacy and Toxicity

A prodrug is a molecule that lacks pharmacological activity, but upon enzymatic bioactivation, it can generate a therapeutically active molecule. The primary reason behind the design of a prodrug is to help circumvent challenges associated with the physicochemical properties of a drug molecule, such as solubility, absorption, distribution, and instability. Chemotherapy has been at the forefront of cancer treatment for over 70 years due to its ability to target rapidly proliferating tumor cells. However, a major concern with conventional chemotherapy is the lack of selectivity and its associated side toxicity, which can severely impact patients' quality of life. In oncology, prodrugs have been explored to enhance the bioavailability, improve efficacy, and minimize systemic toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. Prodrugs activated by enzymes unique to a tumor microenvironment can significantly increase targeted delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs. This review aims to highlight commonly used chemotherapeutic prodrugs, including both alkylating and non-alkylating agents, and discuss their clinical relevance, mechanisms of bioactivation, and toxicity concerns.

Perspectives of Women with Breast Cancer and Healthcare Providers Participating in an Adherence-Enhancing Program for Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is prescribed for 5-10 years to women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer to prevent recurrence. However, a significant proportion of women do not adhere to AET. We developed SOIE, a one-year program designed to enhance the AET experience and adherence. SOIE was pilot-tested in a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial. This report presents the experience of women and healthcare providers (HCPs) with SOIE.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis was conducted with 20 women and 7 HCPs who participated in the program.

RESULTS

Most women and HCPs reported high satisfaction with the program. Women felt it addressed their need for information and strategies to manage side effects. They felt supported and developed a more positive attitude toward AET, which contributed to their intention to pursue AET. They perceived that the program helped them navigate the AET experience and reduced their stress or fear regarding AET. HCPs corroborated these benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that SOIE can enhance the experience and motivation to pursue the AET treatment by meeting important needs for information, side-effects management, and psycho-emotional support. Programs like SOIE can have benefits beyond adherence by improving patients' well-being during this crucial long-term treatment.

Effect of depression and empowerment on medication adherence in patients with breast cancer: a descriptive survey

BACKGROUND

Given the global prevalence of breast cancer and its high mortality rate, adherence to long-term anti-hormonal therapy is crucial for preventing recurrence and improving survival outcomes. Previous research demonstrates how psychological factors including depression and empowerment impact medication adherence. However, comprehensive studies remain limited, especially in Korea. This study explores the effects of depression and empowerment on medication adherence among patients with breast cancer undergoing anti-hormonal therapy.

METHODS

This descriptive survey involved 183 patients with breast cancer from one hospital in South Korea; participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Self-reported questionnaires were used to assess medication adherence, depression levels using the Korean version of the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and empowerment levels using a tool developed for women with breast cancer. Hierarchical regression explored relationships and influences between variables.

RESULTS

Participants demonstrated an average depression score of 19.67 ± 11.25, with medication adherence measured at 18.06 ± 5.15 and empowerment at 106.40 ± 18.15, revealing that, among patients with breast cancer, many experienced depression with varying levels: 16.9% mild, 27.3% moderate, and 21.9% severe. Medication adherence levels were distributed, with 58.5% of patients categorized as non-adherent and 41.5% categorized as adherent. The results indicated a significant negative correlation between depression and medication adherence and a positive correlation between empowerment and medication adherence. Higher empowerment levels were associated with improved adherence. Conversely, high depression levels were associated with low medication adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study enhances understandings of psychosocial factors influencing medication adherence in patients with breast cancer, highlighting patient empowerment as crucial for healthcare interventions. Thus, healthcare providers should implement targeted interventions including educational programs to inform patients about their treatment regimens, provide counseling services addressing mental health concerns such as depression, and establish support groups fostering a sense of community and shared experiences among patients. By integrating these strategies into patient care, healthcare professionals can significantly enhance patient empowerment and improve medication adherence toward better health outcomes for breast cancer patients. Future research could explore the long-term effects of these interventions on adherence and overall patient well-being.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the simple Chinese version of the medication adherence reasons scale in patients undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is essential for improving survival and reducing mortality and recurrence rates in breast cancer (BrCa) patients. However, the adherence to AET among BrCa patients is poor, and there is no scale to measure adherence to AET or the reasons for non-adherence among BrCa patients in mainland China. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the simple Chinese version of the Medication Adherence Reasons (MAR) scale in BrCa patients undergoing AET. This study utilized a cross-sectional research design with two phases: (1) translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original English version of the MAR scale into simple Chinese and (2) validation of the simple Chinese version of the MAR scale (s-ChMAR scale) in BrCa patients. Instrument assessments included content validity, face validity, item analysis, construct validity, criterion-related validity and reliability testing. This study recruited participants using convenience sampling to investigate adherence to AET among BrCa patients. Inclusion criteria were: (a) female, (b) aged 18 years or older, (c) diagnosed with Stage I to III BrCa, (d) completed primary treatment for hormone receptor-positive BrCa and had been on AET for more than six months but less than five years, (e) proficient in Mandarin, and (f) provided informed consent. Exclusion criteria included psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment, or a diagnosis of another cancer type. The sample size for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was determined based on a ratio of five to ten participants per scale item to ensure sufficient statistical power. Data were collected from a sample of 325 participants who received AET for over six months. All the items had a content validity index (CVI) of more than 0.80. Regarding construct validity, the s-ChMAR scale fit a four-dimensional model, the same as the original MAR scale tested in asthma patients. The s-ChMAR scale had good internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.896) and good stability (ICC = 0.837). In terms of quantifying non-adherence, the s-ChMAR scale identified a non-adherent participant rate of over 50%. The study findings support the reliability and validity of the s-ChMAR scale in measuring the non-adherence of Chinese BrCa patients to AET.

Supporting endocrine therapy adherence in women with breast cancer: findings from the ROSETA pilot fractional factorial randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in women with breast cancer is poor. Multicomponent intervention packages are needed to address adherence barriers. Optimizing these packages prior to definitive evaluation can increase their effectiveness, affordability, scalability, and efficiency.

PURPOSE

To pilot procedures for an optimization-randomized controlled trial (O-RCT) of the 'Refining and Optimizing Strategies to support Endocrine Therapy Adherence' (ROSETA) intervention.

METHODS

This was a multisite individually randomized external pilot trial using a 24-1 fractional factorial design (ISRCTN10487576). Breast cancer survivors prescribed AET were recruited from 5 hospitals and randomized to one of 8 conditions, each comprising a combination of 4 intervention components set to "on" or "off" (SMS messages, information leaflet, guided self-help, and self-management website). We set criteria to inform the decision to progress to an O-RCT for consent rate, component adherence, and availability of outcome measures, with predefined cutoffs for "green" (proceed), "amber" (minor changes), and "red" (major changes).

RESULTS

Among 141 eligible patients, 54 (38.3%) consented (green range). At least 50.0% of participants adhered to the minimum threshold set for each intervention component (green range). Data for one of the 3 medication adherence measures were available (amber range). Most (86.8%) participants were satisfied with their trial experience. Exploratory analysis indicated some evidence of a negative main effect of the information leaflet on medication adherence (adjusted mean difference = 0.088, 95% CI, 0.018, 0.158).

CONCLUSIONS

Progression to a fully powered O-RCT of the ROSETA intervention package is feasible, but review of medication adherence measures is required.

Adherence, clinical benefits, and adverse effects of endocrine therapies among women with nonmetastatic breast cancer in developing countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advances in breast cancer control and survival with endocrine therapies (ETs), treatment utilization and outcomes in developing countries have not been adequately explored. This review evaluated ET adherence, potential benefits, and harms in populations across developing countries.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through August 2023 in five databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Global Health, and WHO Global Index Medicus. Retrieved records were screened to identify observational research presenting at least one outcome in women with nonmetastatic breast cancer in developing countries who received ET (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors). A random effects model was used to compute the rates of adherence, discontinuation, adverse events (AEs), disease progression, and death.

RESULTS

A total of 104 studies met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was low in most studies, and a large portion of the patients involved Asians. The overall heterogeneity between studies was partially attributed to variations in study design or outcome measurement method. Results showed a pooled adherence rate of 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-81%) and a discontinuation rate of 16% (95% CI, 10%-25%). Treatment side effects and young age consistently emerged as significant predictors of nonadherence. A wide range of AEs was identified in our analysis. The estimated average rates of cancer recurrence and mortality at 5-years were 16% and 8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study underscore suboptimal ET use in developing countries and provide comprehensive insights into treatment experiences in the real-world setting. Targeted strategies are warranted to enhance adherence and subsequently optimize treatment benefits.

A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial on purified and specific Cytoplasmic pollen extract for hot flashes in breast cancer survivors

OBJECTIVE

evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of PureCyTonin against hot flashes (HF) in breast cancer survivors (BCS).

METHODS

a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Italy.

INTERVENTIONS

administration of PureCyTonin or placebo, for 3 months. Effectiveness was investigated through the compilation of a daily diary for HF and of validated questionnaires (Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Visual Analogical Scales (VAS) for HF, sweating, irritability, fatigue, sleep, quality of life), carried out before starting the treatment (T0), after 1 month (T1) and after 3 months (T2). Any side effects and HF diary were recorded at each visit.

RESULTS

19 women were randomized to receive PureCyTonin and 20 to placebo. At T2 compared to T0, in the PureCyTonin group, we found a reduction in the number of HF (p = 0.02) measured by daily diary. An improvement in the subjective perception of women regarding HF intensity (p = 0.04), sweat nuisance (p = 0.02), irritability (p = 0.03) and fatigue (p = 0.04) was observed through VAS scale measurement at T2 compared to T0.The total MRS score was significantly better in the PureCyTonin group at T1 (p = 0.03) compared to T0.

CONCLUSIONS

PureCyTonin significantly reduces HF number after 3 months of therapy in BCS and it is well-tolerated.

Disparities in postoperative adjuvant therapy utilization and factors impacting survival among anaplastic thyroid cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is highly aggressive with a poor prognosis. Adjuvant systemic therapy and radiation post-surgery are endorsed by NCCN and ATA guidelines. Our study aimed to identify those at risk of forgoing postoperative adjuvant treatment and to determine survival predictors.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify ATC patients who underwent upfront thyroidectomy from 2010 to 2017, excluding those opting for palliative care. We compared demographics, characteristics, treatments, and outcomes between those who received adjuvant therapy and those who did not. Predictors of receiving adjuvant therapy were identified using logistic regression, while Cox regression identified survival factors.

RESULTS

Of 563 patients, 160 received no adjuvant treatment, 82 received radiation only, 16 received systemic therapy only, and 305 received combination therapy. Notably, over 75 ​% of patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment had it excluded from their treatment plan, not due to refusal. Older age (OR 0.92) and non-white race/ethnicity (OR 0.33) were significant predictors of not receiving adjuvant therapy. Undergoing a total thyroidectomy, an R0 or R1 resection, and radiation or combination therapy were associated with better survival, while non-metropolitan location, primary tumor size >7.5 ​cm, and stage IVC disease were negative factors.

CONCLUSION

Total thyroidectomy, R0/R1 resection, and adjuvant therapy reduce mortality in ATC patients. However, older patients and minorities are less likely to receive adjuvant therapy, underscoring disparities in treatment adherence.

Effects of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy-Specific Perceptions on Response to a Behavioral Intervention for Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Adherence in Patients With Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is a life-saving medication for patients with hormone-sensitive breast cancer, yet many struggle with adherence, warranting behavioral intervention. In our recent trial, participation in a group cognitive behavioral intervention (STRIDE) for symptom management and adherence was associated with improvements in symptom distress, coping, quality of life, and mood. We now explore whether baseline patient- and medication-specific factors-which may be modifiable by clinician-led discussions-moderated the effect of STRIDE on adherence rates.

METHODS

From October 2019 to June 2021, 100 patients with early-stage breast cancer reporting AET-related distress were enrolled and randomly assigned to STRIDE or a medication monitoring (MM) control group. All patients stored their AET in electronic pill bottles to track objective adherence. Patients also self-reported their adherence on the Medication Adherence Report Scale-5 and their perceptions of AET on the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire at baseline. We conducted hierarchical linear modeling to test moderators of intervention effects on objective adherence rates. We report the time × group × moderator effects.

RESULTS

Among patients reporting greater perceived difficulties with AET adherence at baseline, STRIDE participants had higher adherence rates over time compared with MM (b = -13.80; SE = 4.56; P < .01). Patients with greater expectations of therapeutic benefit from AET also had improved adherence rates if they were assigned to STRIDE, versus MM (b = 0.25; SE = 0.10; P = .01). Patients who perceived taking AET as convenient and had been taking their AET for less time had higher adherence rates in STRIDE, versus MM.

CONCLUSION

The current study identified patient- and medication-specific factors that may augment AET adherence interventions and may be modifiable through clinician-led discussions, such as perceptions of adherence problems, therapeutic efficacy, and convenience of AET.

Follow-up of early breast cancer in a public health system: A 2024 AIGOM consensus project

Breast cancer stands as the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the primary cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide, including Italy. With the increasing number of survivors, many are enrolled in regular follow-up programs. However, adherence to recommendations from scientific societies (such as ASCO, ESMO, AIOM) for breast cancer follow-up management varies in daily clinical practice across different cancer centers, potentially resulting in unequal management and escalating costs. To address these concerns, the Italian Association of Multidisciplinary Oncology Groups (AIGOM) orchestrated a Consensus on early Breast Cancer follow-up utilizing the Estimate-Talk-Estimate methodology. Following the identification of 18 Items and 38 statements by a select Board, 46 out of 54 (85.1%) experts comprising a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional panel expressed their degree of consensus (Expert Panel). The Expert Panel underscores the potential for the multidisciplinary team to tailor follow-up intensity based on the individual risk of recurrence. In selected cases, the general practitioner may be recommended as the clinical lead for breast cancer follow-up, both after completion of adjuvant treatment and at early initiation of endocrine therapy in low-risk patients. Throughout follow-up, and alongside oncologic surveillance, the expert panel advises osteometabolic, cardiologic, and gynecologic surveillance for the early detection and management of early and late treatment toxicities. Moreover, preserving quality of life is emphasized, with provisions for psycho-oncologic support and encouragement to adopt protective lifestyle behaviors.

Initiation of Oral Endocrine Therapy and Survival Benefit Among Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Introduction: Endocrine therapy (ET) is the cornerstone of systemic treatment for patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer, but its uptake and adherence need further improvement. This observational study assessed ET initiation and 1-year adherence and its survival benefit among female Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage breast cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the linked 2011-2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. Female beneficiaries newly diagnosed with hormone receptor positive, stage I-III breast cancer were included. Beneficiaries who initiated tamoxifen, anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane within 3 months after cancer diagnosis were defined as initiators (n = 24,289), and those who never initiated these treatments were noninitiators (n = 8,899). Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC) in the continuous 12 months follow-up period. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with ET initiation and adherence (PDC ≥ 80%), controlling for covariates. Weighted Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all-cause and breast cancer related mortality between initiators and noninitiators and by adherence status. Results: Among eligible female beneficiaries (n = 55,893), 43% initiated ET within 3 months of cancer diagnosis. Among initiators, 77% had PDC ≥ 80% during the first year. Patient's demographics (e.g., older age, race/ethnicity) and baseline health services utilization (e.g., mammography) were associated with ET initiation and adherence. ET initiation and adherence was associated with reduced risk of all-cause (adjusted HR = 0.62, 0.59-0.66; HR = 0.55, 0.53-0.59; respectively) and breast cancer related (adjusted HR = 0.57, 0.50-0.64; HR = 0.41, 0.36-0.47; respectively) mortality compared with noninitiators. Conclusion: Women with early-stage breast cancer who initiate ET and are adherent to treatment may achieve survival benefits compared with noninitiators.

Sticking to the script: Breast cancer patients' decision making regarding oral endocrine therapy

OBJECTIVES

We sought to understand why some women with early-stage breast cancer decide to forgo or discontinue endocrine therapy (ET), and to identify factors that might lead to greater acceptance of, and long-term adherence to, this treatment.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth interviews with N = 53 stage I-III HR+ women who were either non-initiators of ET, initiators who discontinued or initiators who continued with variable daily patterns of adherence. An inductive content analysis was performed to explore the decision-making process of women prescribed ET.

RESULTS

Qualitative analyses revealed 55 themes that drove complex decision making. The initiators generally trusted their physicians and did little research before starting the medication. Non-initiators were more suspicious of the medical system, believing that ET presented more risks than benefits. Most discontinuers stopped ET because of side effects. Both non-initiators and discontinuers indicated that push-back from their physicians could have changed their decision. Stories and social support were important in decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ET can significantly reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence, substantial barriers prevent many women from initiating or continuing it.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Physicians have powerful influence over patients' decisions to initiate ET and can be important levers for motivating patients to persist.

Overtreatment and Undertreatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Older Women: Evaluating the POWER Trial

INTRODUCTION

Radiation therapy (RT) omission is acceptable in older women with early-stage estrogen receptor + breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). However, RT rates in this population remain high, causing concern for overtreatment. Conversely, patients who omit RT and do not complete a course of AET are at risk of undertreatment. In the Pre-Operative Window of Endocrine Therapy to Inform Radiation Therapy Decisions (POWER) trial, participants receive 90 days of preoperative endocrine therapy to assess tolerance before deciding about RT. This study aimed to determine the rates of undertreatment and overtreatment institutionally and among POWER trial participants.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of women aged ≥ 65 years diagnosed with invasive, estrogen receptor +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- breast cancer, ≤ 3 cm, who had BCS between 2012 and 2022. Patients were categorized as undertreated (BCS alone), overtreated (BCS + RT + AET), or appropriately treated (BCS + RT or BCS + AET).

RESULTS

The cohort included 478 patients, of whom 62 (12.97%) were undertreated, 202 (42.26%) were overtreated, and 214 (44.77%) were appropriately treated. Appropriately treated patients were more likely to be aged 70-79 years (P < 0.0001) and have high health literacy (P = 0.0003). Of the 37 patients (7.71%) in the POWER trial, more were appropriately treated than patients not in the POWER trial (81.1% versus 44.8%) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite long-standing guideline changes, RT utilization remains high. This study highlights how a novel patient-centered approach to guide adjuvant therapy decisions may increase the number of appropriately treated patients.

Social Characteristics and Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer

PURPOSESocial characteristics, including cohabitation/marital status and socioeconomic position (SEP)-education level, employment status, and income-influence breast cancer prognosis. We investigated the impact of these social characteristics on adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) from treatment initiation to 5 years after diagnosis.METHODSWe assembled a nationwide, population-based cohort of premenopausal women diagnosed in Denmark with stage I-III, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer during 2002-2011. We ascertained prediagnostic social characteristics from national registries. AET adherence was based on information from the Danish Breast Cancer Group and operationalized as (1) adherence trajectories (from group-based trajectory modeling) and (2) early discontinuation. We computed odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% CI to estimate the association of cohabitation and SEP with AET adherence using multinomial and logistic regression models adjusted according to directed acyclic graphs.RESULTSAmong 4,353 patients, we identified three adherence trajectories-high adherence (57%), slow decline (36%), and rapid decline (6.9%). Compared with cohabiting women, those living alone had higher ORs of slow (1.26 [95% CI, 1.08 to 1.46]) or rapid decline (1.66 [95% CI, 1.27 to 2.18]) versus high adherence. The corresponding ORs for women not working versus employed women were 1.22 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.45) and 1.76 (95% CI, 1.30 to 2.38). For early discontinuation (17%), the ORs were 1.48 (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.78) for living alone and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.17 to 1.78) for women not working.CONCLUSIONAdherence to AET was lower among women living alone or unemployed than cohabiting or employed women, respectively. These women may benefit from support programs to enhance AET adherence.

Factors influencing 5-year persistence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in young women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Although younger age has been negatively associated with persistence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), factors contributing to non-persistence remain poorly understood. We assessed factors associated with non-persistence to ET and described the 5-year trajectories of quality of life (QoL) and symptoms in young women (≤40 years) with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

We retrieved data on clinical characteristics and non-persistence from the medical annual records in the European cohort of the "Helping Ourselves, Helping Others: The Young Women's BC Study" (IBCSG 43-09 HOHO). Women completed surveys at baseline, biannually for three years, and annually for another seven years. Data collection included sociodemographic information, QoL aspects assessed by the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form and symptoms assessed by the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial symptom scales. Cox regression models were applied to identify factors associated with non-persistence.

RESULTS

The cumulative risk of interrupting ET within 5 years was 27.7 % (95 % CI, 21.5-35.2). The QoL subscale scores remained stable over 5 years, with slight improvements in the physical subscale. Hot flashes decreased (p < 0.001), while vaginal problems intensified (p < 0.001) over time. Being married without children and having difficulties interacting and communicating with the medical team were significantly associated with non-persistence.

CONCLUSIONS

Discussing the desire to conceive with partnered childless women and establishing a good relationship with the medical team may be important in addressing the non-persistence in young BC survivors. As recent data suggests the safety of pausing ET to conceive, this approach may be a reasonable future option to limit non-persistence.

Newly Diagnosed Mental Health Disorders in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Patients with a mental health disorder (MHD) have higher age-adjusted mortality compared with the general population. Few reports investigate factors contributing to MHD among patients with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy. We report the incidence of acquired MHD after the diagnosis of breast cancer and treatment with radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using a single institution, prospectively maintained database, we analyzed patients with breast cancer treated with radiation therapy between 2012 and 2017. We cross-referenced these patients with newly acquired International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) MHD codes (F01-F99) within 3 years postbreast cancer diagnosis. The study included baseline National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN) distress tool scores and area deprivation index (ADI). Univariate and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression analyses were conducted to evaluate factors affecting new MHD onset.

RESULTS

Of the 967 included patients, 318 (33%) developed an MHD after their breast cancer diagnosis, which was predominately anxiety (45.1%) and depression (20.1%) related, with a median (IQR) time to diagnosis of 30 (24-33) months. Univariate analysis showed lymph node-positive disease, receipt of chemotherapy, receipt of a mastectomy, high comorbidity index, divorced status, retired status, and fourth-quartile ADI as significant predictors. On MVA, only receipt of chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; P = .014) and divorced status (HR, 2.04; P = .009) remained significant. Fourth-quartile ADI, retired status, and high comorbidity index showed trends toward significance (HR, 1.78, P = .065; HR, 1.46, P = .094; HR, 1.41, P = .059, respectively). On MVA examining the effects of the radiation therapy type on MHD, whole breast with regional nodal irradiation (HR, 2.31, P = .015) and postmastectomy radiation therapy (HR, 1.88, P = .024) were both strong predictors of MHD development. Additionally, an NCCN distress tool score of >3 was also predictive of MHD onset.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, 1 in 3 patients with localized breast cancer developed a new MHD, predominantly related to anxiety and depression. MHD risk was higher among divorced patients, those receiving chemotherapy, and patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy or whole breast with regional nodal irradiation. These findings highlight the importance of future studies and targeted interventions to support this vulnerable population.

Hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in young women: A comprehensive review

The incidence of breast cancer in ≤ 40 yr-old women (YWBC) has been steadily increasing in recent decades. Although this group of patients represents less than 10 % of all newly diagnosed BC cases it encompasses a significant burden of disease. Usually underrepresented in clinical trials, YWBCs are also characterized by late diagnoses and poorly differentiated, aggressive-subtype disease, partly explaining its poor prognosis along with a high recurrence risk, and high mortality rates. On the other hand, YWBC treatment poses unique challenges such as preservation of fertility, and long-term toxicity and adverse events. Herein, we summarize the current evidence in hormone receptor-positive YWBC including specific risk factors, clinicopathologic and genomic features, and available evidence on response to chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Overall, we advocate for a more comprehensive multidisciplinary healthcare model to improve the outcomes and the quality of life of this subset of younger patients.

Development and application of a weighted change score to evaluate interventions for vasomotor symptoms in patients with breast cancer using regression trees: a cohort study

PURPOSE

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are common among individuals with breast cancer (BC) and poorly managed symptoms are associated with reduced quality of life, treatment discontinuation, and poorer breast cancer outcomes. Direct comparisons among therapies are limited, as prior studies evaluating VMS interventions have utilized heterogeneous change measures which may not fully assess the perceived impact of change in VMS severity.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study where BC patients chose one of four categories of interventions to manage VMS. Change in VMS severity at 6 weeks was assessed using the validated Hot Flush Rating Scale (HFRS). A novel weighted change score integrating baseline symptom severity and directionality of change was computed to maximize the correlation between the change score and a perceived treatment effectiveness score. Variables influencing change in VMS severity were included in a regression tree to model factors influencing the weighted change score.

RESULTS

100 baseline and follow-up questionnaires assessing VMS were completed by 88 patients. Correlations between treatment effectiveness and VMS outcomes strengthened following adjustment for baseline symptoms. Patients with low VMS severity at baseline did not perceive change in treatment effectiveness. Intervention category was predictive of change in HFRS at 6 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Baseline symptom severity and the directionality of change (improvement or deterioration of symptoms) influenced the perception of clinically meaningful change in VMS severity. Future interventional studies utilizing the weighted change score should target moderate-high baseline severity patients.

Challenges in Obtaining and Seeking Information Among Breast Cancer Survivors in an Asian Country: a Qualitative Study

Breast cancer survivors on adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) have distinct information-seeking experience compared to those in the diagnosis and intensive treatment phase. This study aimed to understand the challenges in obtaining and seeking information among Malaysian breast cancer survivors. We conducted semi-structured, one-to-one interviews among patients using AET from two hospitals and a local cancer organization. Interviews were conducted until theme saturation was achieved (N = 25). Interviews were de-identified, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis. To ensure rigor, coding was conducted through regular discussions between two researchers and the findings were shared with several participants after analysis was completed. Three main themes were identified: limitations in the healthcare system, pitfalls of seeking information online, and limited information from local sources. The participants perceived that their information needs were not met by their healthcare providers and sought information on the Internet to complement their information needs. However, they were faced with risks of misinformation, information overload, and unethical promotion of health products. Those with limited English proficiency had difficulties in accessing quality information, and suggested that there should be more content created by local health advocates in local languages, with information that is tailored for local cultures. As the Internet has become an important medium of health education, healthcare providers and patients should be equipped with the skills to share and search for information online. Digital health literacy needs to be incorporated in patient education modules to create a more informed and empowered patient community.

Trends in Presentation, Management, and Survival of Women With Breast Cancer in a Multiethnic, Middle-Income Asian Setting

PURPOSE

Granular data on breast cancer (BC) are pertinent for surveillance, planning, and monitoring of cancer care delivery. We determined the trends in clinical presentation, management, and survival of women with BC in a multiethnic middle-income Asian setting over 15 years.

METHODS

Data of 7,478 Malaysian women newly diagnosed with invasive BC between 2005 and 2019 from three hospital-based cancer registries were included. Trends in demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared across period 1 (P1): 2005-2009, period 2 (P2): 2010-2014, and period 3 (P3): 2015-2019. Overall survival and net survival were determined.

RESULTS

More women in P3 than P1 were older than 60 years at diagnosis. Only a marginal increase in proportion of women with stage I disease was observed (23.7% v 27.2% in P1 and P3, respectively, P = .004). Nonetheless, patients were increasingly presenting with smaller tumors, fewer axillary node involvement, well-differentiated tumors, and hormone receptor expression in recent times. Proportion of women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressed tumors significantly decreased. Among indicated patients, receipt of anticancer therapies was somewhat similar over the calendar periods, except for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy, where increases in administration were noted. Significant improvements in survival were observed over the 15 years, particularly for HER2-overexpressed BCs.

CONCLUSION

Although the improvements in BC survival that we have observed validate ongoing cancer control efforts and treatment advances, study findings suggest that more could be done for earlier detection and improved access to effective therapies in our settings.

Clinical Pharmacist-Led Interventions for Improving Breast Cancer Management-A Scoping Review

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide and the fifth most common cause of cancer death overall. Most women with breast cancer have a good prognosis if the cancer is detected at an early stage and the patients have access to the appropriate treatment and disease management. This study aims to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led interventions on breast cancer management and health outcomes. A literature review was carried out through the scientific databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using predefined keywords. Only full-text original articles written in English that investigated the role of the pharmacist in the management of breast cancer were included in the final analysis. No publication date limits were set. A total of 1625 articles were retrieved from the electronic databases, of which 14 met the inclusion criteria. The current scoping review consists of different study types, including randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, pre-post studies, retrospective cohort studies, quality improvement projects, case-control studies, and one pharmacoeconomic study. Pharmacists commonly provided the following interventions: consultations regarding chemotherapy treatment, risk assessment and patient education, adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions detection, and adherence assessment. This scoping review highlights the beneficial effects of the involvement of pharmacists in breast cancer management, such as better quality of life, reduced drug interaction risk, greater adherence rates, and improved patient knowledge. This confirms the importance of including the pharmacist in the oncology team caring for patients with breast cancer.

Utilisation of endocrine therapy for cancer in Indigenous peoples: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Indigenous peoples worldwide experience inequitable cancer outcomes, and it is unclear if this is underpinned by differences in or inadequate use of endocrine treatment (ET), often used in conjunction with other cancer treatments. Previous studies examining ET use in Indigenous peoples have predominately focused on the sub-national level, often resulting in small sample sizes with limited statistical power. This systematic review aimed to collate the findings ofarticles on ET utilisation for Indigenous cancer patients and describe relevant factors that may influence ET use.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting ET use for cancer among Indigenous populations worldwide. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for relevant articles. A random-effect meta-analysis was used to pool proportions of ET use. We also performed a subgroup analysis (such as with sample sizes) and a meta-regression to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. A socio-ecological model was used to present relevant factors that could impact ET use.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles reported ET utilisation among Indigenous populations, yielding a pooled estimate of 67% (95% CI:54 - 80), which is comparable to that of Indigenous populations 67% (95% CI: 53 - 81). However, among studies with sufficiently sized study sample/cohorts (≥ 500), Indigenous populations had a 14% (62%; 95% CI:43 - 82) lower ET utilisation than non-Indigenous populations (76%; 95% CI: 60 - 92). The ET rate in Indigenous peoples of the USA (e.g., American Indian) and New Zealand (e.g., Māori) was 72% (95% CI:56-88) and 60% (95% CI:49-71), respectively. Compared to non-Indigenous populations, a higher proportion of Indigenous populations were diagnosed with advanced cancer, at younger age, had limited access to health services, lower socio-economic status, and a higher prevalence of comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Indigenous cancer patients have lower ET utilisation than non-Indigenous cancer patients, despite the higher rate of advanced cancer at diagnosis. While reasons for these disparities are unclear, they are likely reflecting, at least to some degree, inequitable access to cancer treatment services. Strengthening the provision of and access to culturally appropriate cancer care and treatment services may enhance ET utilisation in Indigenous population. This study protocol was registered on Prospero (CRD42023403562).

Associations between HIV infection status, psychosocial factors, and adjuvant endocrine therapy adherence among South African women with early-stage breast cancer

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate for associations between HIV status, psychosocial factors, and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) adherence in South African (SA) women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC).

Methods

We enrolled South African women with early-stage ER + BC in remission and prescribed tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor to the prospective observational study. We performed AET pill counts at enrollment, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks, and calculated adherence ratios of pills consumed between visits to days between visits. Women completed questionnaires on social support, attitude towards medication, health literacy, self-efficacy, mental health, and AET toxicity. We collected household wealth data. We used hierarchical linear (HLM) and structural equation modelling (SEM) to compare adherence ratios between women with and without HIV while adjusting for psychosocial factors.

Results

We collected adherence data from 239 women, 63 (26.4%) with co-morbid HIV. Comparing women with and without HIV, median AET adherence ratio was 0.88 vs 0.89, respectively (HLM p = 0.31). In our SEM model for the full cohort, mental health, healthcare savvy, and side effect burden latent variables were not significantly associated with adherence. In the subgroup of women living with HIV, lower SES quintile (β 0.04, SE 0.02, p = 0.08) and poorer mental health (β -0.02, SE 0.01, p = 0.10) showed trends toward association with adherence.

Conclusions

HIV status is not predictive of AET adherence among SA women with ER + BC, though decreasing SES status and increasing mental health symptoms are marginally associated with adherence in women with BC and HIV.

Familial adversity: association with discontinuation of adjuvant hormone therapy and breast cancer prognosis

BACKGROUND

Many studies have examined patient-related factors affecting adjuvant hormone therapy adherence in patients with breast cancer. Our study aimed to examine associations of family-related factors with adjuvant hormone therapy discontinuation and breast cancer-specific mortality.

METHODS

By cross-linking 7 Swedish health registers, we performed a cohort study that included all patients with breast cancer who initiated adjuvant hormone therapy during 2006-2019 in Sweden (N = 10 701). A group-based multitrajectory model was used to identify familial adversity groups based on 3 dimensions: material deprivation, negative family dynamics, and loss or threat of loss. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate associations of familial adversity with hormone therapy discontinuation and breast cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 5 distinctive familial adversity groups among the cohort participants. Compared with women who had low familial adversity, higher risks to discontinue adjuvant hormone therapy were observed among women with material deprivation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20 to 1.43), negative family dynamics (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.28), loss or threat of loss (HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.32), or high familial adversity (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.40 to 1.68). Furthermore, women with material deprivation (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.79), negative family dynamics (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.97), or high adversity (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.26 to 2.23) were at higher risk of dying from breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Familial adversity is associated with a higher risk of adjuvant hormone therapy discontinuation and breast cancer-specific mortality. Family-related factors identified in our study may help identify high-risk patients for interventions to prevent treatment discontinuation and subsequently improve breast cancer outcomes.

Symptoms and need for individualised support during the first year after primary treatment for breast cancer-A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The survival rate among patients with breast cancer is high. It is well described that after primary treatment patients may experience symptoms and concerns but the needs and resources during the first year to manage everyday life are not well described.

AIM

To describe experiences of symptom distress, needs and support during the first year after primary treatment for breast cancer from the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive.

METHODS

Data collection through individual interviews with patients (n = 17) and a focus group interview with healthcare professionals (n = 7). Data was analysed using thematic analysis and resulted in three themes.

RESULTS

The first theme, 'Struggling with symptoms and changes in everyday life' shows how symptoms and concerns interfered with the everyday life of patients and in some situations even impeded them. Patients try to adapt to their new situation by creating new routines and managing symptoms through self-care. The second theme, 'Adaption in a period of uncertainty' describes thoughts about cancer recurrence and doubts about continuing with the endocrine therapy if symptoms prolong. In the third theme, 'Support and need for individualized follow-up care' healthcare professionals described that they provide support by being available and by giving both verbal and written information. Patients expressed that the information could be too general and voiced a need for more individually tailored support.

CONCLUSION

During the first year after primary treatment, patients with breast cancer describe how they try to manage by themselves, but express both unmet needs and a wish for extended and more individually tailored support. The healthcare professionals recognised that patients lack a structured plan for the first year and the need for continued support. This stresses a need for development of care models with special consideration towards individualised support after breast cancer treatment.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

There was no patient or public involvement in the design or conduct of the study. The interview study was not considered to benefit from involving patients or healthcare professionals when designing the interview guides as they were developed through literature and previous research of patients treated for breast cancer.

How to Optimize Deimplementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy?

Background

The omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in low-risk elderly breast cancer patients has been introduced in several guidelines. Despite evidence to support its safety, this recommendation has not been implemented by many clinicians. We have examined two aspects of this recommendation that may explain why sentinel lymph node biopsy continues to be performed in most of these patients. Firstly, we quantified the proportion of patients diagnosed with axillary metastases postoperatively. Secondly, we examined adherence to antihormonal therapy in the same group of patients.

Methods

In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, the study population comprised 98 patients with breast cancer. Patients were aged ≥70 years and diagnosed with hormone receptor positive breast cancers less than 20 mm (T1). All patients underwent surgery and were subsequently prescribed five years of adjuvant antihormonal treatment.

Results

Axillary lymph node metastases, as confirmed by the postoperative histology report, were seen in 36.3%. Nonadherence was seen in 33.7% of the patients. Primary nonadherence, that is, patients that never collect their first or subsequent prescriptions at the pharmacy, comprised 11.2% of the total study population.

Conclusion

The high proportion of axillary metastases demonstrated suggests that clinical examination of the axilla alone is not sufficient in the preoperative assessment of the axilla. The less-than-optimal adherence rates show that adherence in these patients cannot be taken for granted. We suggest that these factors reflect some of the reluctance among clinicians to omit the sentinel lymph node procedure in these patients.

Pilot randomized controlled trial of a program to enhance experience and adherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy among women with non-metastatic breast cancer: 12-month quantitative results

PURPOSE

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces recurrence risk after hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but non-adherence is common. We pilot-tested SOIE, a program to enhance AET experience and adherence, to assess its acceptability, feasibility, and effects on psychosocial precursors of AET adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a 12-month pilot randomized controlled trial among women who had a first AET prescription. Intervention group received SOIE while control group received usual care. Psychosocial factors from the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (intention - primary outcome -, attitude, subjective norm, behavioral control), additional constructs (AET knowledge, social support, coping planning), impact of AET services received, and adherence were measured by questionnaires at baseline, 3-month, and 12-month endpoints. Group patterns were compared using repeated measures analyses with generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

A total of 106 women were randomized (participation = 54.9%; intervention n = 52; control n = 54; retention = 93.8%). Among SOIE women, ≥ 90% received the program components and were satisfied. Both groups scored high on adherence intentions and group patterns over time were not statistically different. In the intervention group, AET knowledge and coping planning with side effects increased (group-by-time p-value = .002 and .016), a higher proportion reported that AET services received helped them take their AET (p < .05) and have a consistent daily intake (p = .01).

CONCLUSION

SOIE is feasible and acceptable for survivors with an AET. SOIE did not significantly impact adherence intentions but was beneficial for other program outcomes and daily intake.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

SOIE may represent an encouraging avenue to enhance supportive care and empower survivors with managing AET.

Mapping the Evidence on the Impact of mHealth Interventions on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To comprehensively synthesize the existing evidence concerning mHealth interventions for patients with breast cancer (BC).

DESIGN

On July 30, 2023, we searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar for articles using the following inclusion criteria: evaluation of mHealth interventions in patients with cancer, at least 30 participants with BC, randomized control trials or prospective pre-post studies, determinants of health (patient-reported outcomes [PROs] and quality of life [QoL]) as primary outcomes, interventions lasting at least 8 weeks, publication after January 2015. Publications were excluded if they evaluated telehealth or used web-based software for desktop devices only. The quality of the included studies was analyzed with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.

RESULTS

We included 30 studies (20 focused on BC), encompassing 5,691 patients with cancer (median 113, IQR, 135.5). Among these, 3,606 had BC (median 99, IQR, 75). All studies contained multiple interventions, including physical activity, tailored information for self-management of the disease, and symptom tracker. Interventions showed better results on self-efficacy (3/3), QoL (10/14), and physical activity (5/7). Lifestyle programs (3/3), expert consulting (4/4), and tailored information (10/11) yielded the best results. Apps with interactive support had a higher rate of positive findings, while interventions targeted to survivors showed worse results. mHealth tools were not available to the public in most of the studies (17/30).

CONCLUSION

mHealth interventions yielded heterogeneous results on different outcomes. Identifying lack of evidence on clinical scenarios (eg, patients undergoing systemic therapy other than chemotherapy) could aid in refining strategic planning for forthcoming research endeavors within this field.

Clinical factors associated with patterns of endocrine therapy adherence in premenopausal breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer are recommended at least five years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, but adherence to this treatment is often suboptimal. We investigated longitudinal trends in adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) adherence among premenopausal breast cancer patients and identified clinical characteristics, including baseline comorbidities and non-cancer chronic medication use, associated with AET adherence.

METHODS

We included stage I-III premenopausal breast cancer patients diagnosed during 2002-2011 and registered in the Danish Breast Cancer Group clinical database who initiated AET. We used group-based trajectory modeling to describe AET adherence patterns. We also linked patients to Danish population-based registries and fit multinomial logistic models to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) associating clinical characteristics with AET adherence patterns.

RESULTS

We identified three adherence patterns among 4,353 women-high adherers (57%), slow decliners (36%), and rapid decliners (6.9%). Women with stage I disease (vs. stage II; OR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.5, 2.5), without chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy; OR: 4.3, 95% CI 3.0, 6.1), with prevalent comorbid disease (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 1 vs. 0; OR: 1.6, 95% CI 1.1, 2.3), and with a history of chronic non-cancer medication use (vs. none; OR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.0, 1.8) were more likely to be rapid decliners compared with high adherers.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with stage I cancer, no chemotherapy, higher comorbidity burden, and history of chronic non-cancer medication use were less likely to adhere to AET. Taking steps to promote adherence in these groups of women may reduce their risk of recurrence.

Polypharmacy, over-the-counter medications, and aromatase inhibitor adherence in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

Polypharmacy is associated with negative health outcomes and decreased medication adherence. Polypharmacy is common in cancer populations, but few studies have evaluated the relationship between polypharmacy and aromatase inhibitor (AI) adherence. No studies have evaluated the relationship between over-the-counter (OTC) supplements and AI adherence. Our primary hypothesis was that polypharmacy would be associated with increased risk of premature AI discontinuation.

METHODS

This exploratory analysis used data from the Exemestane and Letrozole Pharmacogenetics (ELPh) trial, a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled participants from 2005 to 2009. Included patients were female, postmenopausal, with stage 0-III breast cancer, who had completed indicated chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. Participants were randomized to adjuvant exemestane or letrozole and completed serial clinical examinations and questionnaires for two years. Concomitant medication data were collected prospectively. Cox proportion models were used for statistical analysis of the relationship between polypharmacy, OTCs, medication class, and AI adherence.

RESULTS

In the 490 analyzed participants, use of any prescription medications at baseline was associated with decreased risk of premature AI discontinuation (HR 0.56, p = 0.02). Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) at baseline was associated with decreased risk of premature AI discontinuation (HR 0.67, p = 0.04). Use of any OTCs was not associated with AI discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Baseline use of prescription medications but not OTCs was associated with increased AI persistence. Future research is needed to understand how this can be utilized to promote AI adherence.

Effect of telehealth interventions on adherence to endocrine therapy among patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of telehealth interventions on adherence to endocrine therapy among patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search of five English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the American Psychological Association PsycNet, and the Cochrane Library) and four Chinese databases (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, WanFang Data, and WeiPu Data) was performed from inception to March 31, 2023. Two investigators independently screened the available studies for eligibility and extracted relevant data. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The effect size was computed based on the risk ratio for dichotomous data and standardized mean difference for continuous data using Review Manager 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 1,780 participants from eight randomized controlled trials were included. These studies involved treatment with aromatase inhibitors only (n = 3) or aromatase inhibitors plus tamoxifen (n = 5). Telehealth interventions involved web-based interventions, telephone-based interventions, interventions via mobile applications, and interventions based on technology. In three studies, subjective measures were used, while objective measures were utilized in another three. Two studies incorporated a combination of both subjective and objective measures. The duration of the interventions varied among studies, ranging from a week to 36 months. The follow-up duration ranged from 4 weeks to 36 months. The quality of included studies was moderate to high. The meta-analysis of the five studies reporting dichotomous data showed that telehealth interventions had a significant effect on adherence to endocrine therapy (RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76-0.97). Moreover, four studies reported continuous data. The meta-analysis demonstrated that telehealth interventions significantly improved adherence to endocrine therapy at 1 month (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.10-0.90), 3 months (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.17-0.99), and 6 months (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.08-0.47) of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Telehealth interventions may facilitate adherence to endocrine therapy among patients with breast cancer. Further research should adopt a theory-based design and explore the longer-term effects.

Identifying determinants of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy following breast cancer: A systematic review of reviews

BACKGROUND

In oestrogen-receptor positive breast cancer, daily oral adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for at least 5 years significantly reduces risks of recurrence and breast cancer-specific mortality. However, many women are poorly adherent to ET. Development of effective adherence support requires comprehensive understanding of influences on adherence. We undertook an umbrella review to identify determinants of ET adherence.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane and PROSPERO (inception to 08/2022) to identify systematic reviews on factors influencing ET adherence. Abstracted determinants were mapped to the World Health Organization's dimensions of adherence. Reviews were quality appraised and overlap assessed.

RESULTS

Of 5732 citations screened, 17 reviews were eligible (9 quantitative primary studies; 4 qualitative primary studies; 4 qualitative or quantitative studies) including 215 primary papers. All five WHO dimensions influenced ET non-adherence: The most consistently identified non-adherence determinants were patient-related factors (e.g. lower perceived ET necessity, more treatment concerns, perceptions of ET 'cons' vs. 'pros'). Healthcare system/healthcare professional-related factors (e.g. perceived lower quality health professional interaction/relationship) were also important and, to a somewhat lesser extent, socio-economic factors (e.g. lower levels of social/economic/material support). Evidence was more mixed for medication-related and condition-related factors, but several may be relevant (e.g. experiencing side-effects, cost). Potentially modifiable factors are more influential than non-modifiable/fixed factors (e.g. patient characteristics).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence-base on ET adherence determinants is extensive. Future empirical studies should focus on less well-researched areas and settings. The determinants themselves are numerous and complex in indicating that adherence support should be multifaceted, addressing multiple determinants.

Effects of Reishimmune-S, a Fungal Immunomodulatory Peptide Supplement, on the Quality of Life and Circulating Natural Killer Cell Profiles of Patients With Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of Reishimmune-S, a fungal immunomodulatory peptide, on the quality of life (QoL) and natural killer (NK) cell subpopulations in patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

Patients who received adjuvant ET for stage I-III hormone receptor-positive BC without active infection were enrolled in this prospective pilot study. Reishimmune-S was administered sublingually daily for 6 months. QoL scores, circulating immune cell levels, including lymphocyte/NK cell subpopulations, and plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α were measured at baseline and every 4 weeks. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effect regression models.

RESULTS

Nineteen participants were included in the analyses. One patient with underlying asthma did not complete the study owing to the occurrence of skin rashes 15 days after the initiation of Reishimmune-S. No other adverse events were reported. Reishimmune-S supplementation significantly improved the cognitive function at 3 months and significantly decreased the fatigue and insomnia levels at 3 and 6 months, respectively. There was no significant change in the global health/QoL score between baseline and week 4 of treatment. The proportion of CD19+ lymphocytes was significantly higher at 3 and 6 months, and that of NKG2A+ and NKp30+ NK cells was significantly lower at 6 months than at baseline. In addition, fatigue positively correlated with the proportion of NKp30+ NK cells (β ± standard error: 24.48 ± 8.75, P = .007 in the mixed-effect model).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term supplementation with Reishimmune-S affected the circulating immune cell composition and exerted positive effects on cognitive function, fatigue, and insomnia in patients with BC undergoing adjuvant ET, providing a potential approach for the management of treatment-related adverse reactions in this patient population.

Medication Adherence in Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Review

Cancer is a complex disease that can affect different parts of the body. The rates of cancer have shown an increasing trend in the past decade. A majority of cancers are detected late, therefore becoming untreatable and resulting in significant mortality. Additionally, the lack of awareness about cancers, their risk factors, diagnostic modalities, and preventive measures contributes to increased burden among people. Despite significant developments in the therapeutic and comprehensive management of cancers, the cause for concern is the lack of medication adherence. This is majorly attributed to the adverse effects of the medication, the cost of the drugs, and other reasons. This review comprehensively discusses various aspects of cancer medication adherence that include therapeutic modalities for treating cancers, factors influencing medication adherence, barriers, and facilitators to medication adherence.

Predictive Models of Psychological Distress, Quality of Life, and Adherence to Medication in Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review

Purpose

An interplay of clinical and psychosocial variables affects breast cancer patients' experiences and clinical trajectories. Several studies investigated the role of socio-demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors in predicting relevant outcomes in breast cancer care, thus developing predictive models. Our aim is to summarize predictive models for specific psychological and behavioral outcomes: psychological distress, quality of life, and medication adherence. Specifically, we aim to map the determinants of the outcomes of interest, offering a thorough overview of these models.

Methods

Databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase) have been searched to identify studies meeting the inclusion criteria: a breast cancer patients' sample, development/validation of a predictive model for selected psychological/behavioral outcomes (ie, psychological distress, quality of life, and medication adherence), and availability of English full-text.

Results

Twenty-one papers describing predictive models for psychological distress, quality of life, and adherence to medication in breast cancer were included. The models were developed using different statistical approaches. It has been shown that treatment-related factors (eg, side-effects, type of surgery or treatment received), socio-demographic (eg, younger age, lower income, and inactive occupational status), clinical (eg, advanced stage of disease, comorbidities, physical symptoms such as fatigue, insomnia, and pain) and psychological variables (eg, anxiety, depression, body image dissatisfaction) might predict poorer outcomes.

Conclusion

Predictive models of distress, quality of life, and adherence, although heterogeneous, showed good predictive values, as indicated by the reported performance measures and metrics. Many of the predictors are easily available in patients' health records, whereas others (eg, coping strategies, perceived social support, illness perceptions) might be introduced in routine assessment practices. The possibility to assess such factors is a relevant resource for clinicians and researchers involved in developing and implementing psychological interventions for breast cancer patients.