Assessing copy number aberrations and copy neutral loss of heterozygosity across the genome as best practice: An evidence based review of clinical utility from the cancer genomics consortium (CGC) working group for myelodysplastic syndrome, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative and myeloproliferative neoplasms

Pretransplant Chromosome Genomic Array Testing Improves Prognostication for Myelofibrosis Patients Undergoing Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite its known superior diagnostic yield for chromosomal anomalies compared with karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies, chromosome genomic array testing (CGAT) is not used as a routine clinical test for myelofibrosis. Although many prognostic systems exist that risk stratify patients at diagnosis, limited tools are available to prognosticate transplant outcome.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed at testing whether CGAT results obtained before transplantation improves prognosis of post-transplant outcome in patients with myelofibrosis compared with current risk categorization systems, for example, DIPSS plus (Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System).

STUDY DESIGN

We studied patients with myelofibrosis who underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation between 2000 and 2017 at our center (N = 44). We assessed the prognostic significance of CGAT, DIPSS plus, and the total count of gene mutations for post-transplant clinical outcomes, including relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD).

RESULTS

Abnormal CGAT results were seen in 24 patients (55%), including 18 with copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH, 41%). With a median follow-up of 91 (range 2-258) months starting from the CGAT sample date, RFS was 59% and OS was 68%. The outcome analysis showed significant prognostic implication from CGAT (normal vs. abnormal), specifically for patients with intermediate risk by DIPSS-plus scores and those with 0∼2 mutations. CGAT alone significantly stratified the patients' RFS outcome (P = .03). The addition of CGAT to DIPSS-plus improved the significance from a P value of .08 to .003, whereas the addition of CGAT to mutation count improved the P value from .02 to .01. The best stratification system for RFS was achieved when CGAT, DIPSS-plus, and mutation count were all considered (P = 1e-08). The current study also confirmed individual anomalies that are prognostically significant, including U2AF1 mutation (n = 5, P = .03) and 1q gain (n = 3, P = .01), which were associated with worse RFS. ASXL1 mutations (n = 14) appeared to associate with a later onset of chronic GVHD (P =.03).

CONCLUSION

Pretransplant CGAT analysis augments the existing risk stratification tools and may be considered as routine clinical testing for myelofibrosis.

Cytogenetics in the management of hematological malignancies: An overview of alternative technologies for cytogenetic characterization

Genomic characterization is an essential part of the clinical management of hematological malignancies for diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic purposes. Although CBA and FISH are still the gold standard in hematology for the detection of CNA and SV, some alternative technologies are intended to complement their deficiencies or even replace them in the more or less near future. In this article, we provide a technological overview of these alternatives. CMA is the historical and well established technique for the high-resolution detection of CNA. For SV detection, there are emerging techniques based on the study of chromatin conformation and more established ones such as RTMLPA for the detection of fusion transcripts and RNA-seq to reveal the molecular consequences of SV. Comprehensive techniques that detect both CNA and SV are the most interesting because they provide all the information in a single examination. Among these, OGM is a promising emerging higher-solution technique that offers a complete solution at a contained cost, at the expense of a relatively low throughput per machine. WGS remains the most adaptable solution, with long-read approaches enabling very high-resolution detection of CAs, but requiring a heavy bioinformatics installation and at a still high cost. However, the development of high-resolution genome-wide detection techniques for CAs allows for a much better description of chromoanagenesis. Therefore, we have included in this review an update on the various existing mechanisms and their consequences and implications, especially prognostic, in hematological malignancies.

Section E6.1-6.6 of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Technical Laboratory Standards: Cytogenomic studies of acquired chromosomal abnormalities in neoplastic blood, bone marrow, and lymph nodes

Cytogenomic analyses of acquired clonal chromosomal abnormalities in neoplastic blood, bone marrow, and/or lymph nodes are instrumental in the clinical management of patients with hematologic neoplasms. Cytogenetic analyses assist in the diagnosis of such disorders and can provide important prognostic information. Furthermore, cytogenetic studies can provide crucial information regarding specific genetically defined subtypes of these neoplasms that may have targeted therapies. At time of relapse, cytogenetic analysis can confirm recurrence of the original neoplasm, detect clonal disease evolution, or uncover a new unrelated neoplastic process. This section deals specifically with the technical standards applicable to cytogenomic studies of acquired clonal chromosomal abnormalities in neoplastic blood, bone marrow, and/or lymph nodes. This updated Section E6.1-6.6 supersedes the previous Section E6 in Section E: Clinical Cytogenetics of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Technical Standards for Clinical Genetics Laboratories.

Comprehensive Study of Chromosomal Copy Number Variations and Genomic Variations Predicting Overall Survival in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by cytopenia, marrow dysplasia and has a propensity to develop into acute myeloid leukemia. The disease progression is majorly affected by genetic defects. However, about 40-50% of patients with MDS present with a normal karyotype and develop different courses of disease. Hence, there remains a room to advance the biological understanding and find molecular prognostic markers for cytogenetically normal MDS.

METHODS

We performed a high-resolution CGH + SNP array along with next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 77 primary diagnosed MDS patients, and also they were clinically followed up.

RESULTS

Our study revealed 82 clinically significant genomic lesions (losses/gains) in 49% of MDS patients. CGH + SNP array reduced the proportion of normal karyotype by 30%. SNP array in combination with NGS confirmed the biallelic loss of function of the TP53 gene (2/6), which is a clinically relevant biomarker and new genetic-based MDS entity, i.e., MDS-biTP53, as per the new WHO classification 2022. Genomic region 2p22.3 presented with frequent lesions and also with a more hazard ratio (2.7, 95% CI: 0.37-21) when analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

CONCLUSION

CGH + SNP array changed the cytogenetic and IPSS-R risk group in 18% and 13% of patients, respectively, with an improved prediction of prognosis. This study emphasizes the cytogenetic heterogeneity of MDS and highlights that abnormality with chromosome 2 may have a diagnostic and prognostic impact.

Martin A, Wang Y, He M, Spellman SR, Wang T, Deeg HJ, Gupta V, Lee SJ, Bolon YT, Chanock SJ, Machiela MJ, Saber W, Gadalla SM. JAK2 V617F mutation and associated chromosomal alterations in primary and secondary myelofibrosis and post-HCT outcomes

JAK2 V617F is the most common driver mutation in primary or secondary myelofibrosis for which allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative treatment. Knowledge of the prognostic utility of JAK2 alterations in the HCT setting is limited. We identified all patients with MF who received HCT between 2000 and 2016 and had a pre-HCT blood sample (N = 973) available at the Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research biorepository. PacBio sequencing and single nucleotide polymorphism-array genotyping were used to identify JAK2V617F mutation and associated mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs), respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were used for HCT outcome analyses. Genomic testing was complete for 924 patients with MF (634 primary MF [PMF], 135 postpolycythemia vera [PPV-MF], and 155 postessential thrombocytopenia [PET-MF]). JAK2V617F affected 562 patients (57.6% of PMF, 97% of PPV-MF, and 42.6% of PET-MF). Almost all patients with mCAs involving the JAK2 region (97.9%) were JAK2V617-positive. In PMF, JAK2V617F mutation status, allele burden, or identified mCAs were not associated with disease progression/relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), or overall survival. Almost all PPV-MF were JAK2V617F-positive (97%), with no association between HCT outcomes and mutation allele burden or mCAs. In PET-MF, JAK2V617F high mutation allele burden (≥60%) was associated with excess risk of NRM, restricted to transplants received in the era of JAK inhibitors (2013-2016; hazard ratio = 7.65; 95% confidence interval = 2.10-27.82; P = .002). However, allele burden was not associated with post-HCT disease progression/relapse or survival. Our findings support the concept that HCT can mitigate the known negative effect of JAK2V617F in patients with MF, particularly for PMF and PPV-MF.

Refined cytogenetic IPSS-R evaluation by the use of SNP array in a cohort of 290 MDS patients

Genetic testing plays a central role in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic decisions. The widely applied cytogenetic revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) was based on chromosome banding analysis (CBA). However, subsequently developed genetic methodologies, such as single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, demonstrated to be a valid alternative test for MDS. SNP array is, in fact, able to detect the majority of MDS-associated cytogenetic aberrations, by providing further genomic information due to its higher resolution. In this study, 290 samples from individuals with a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of MDS were tested by both CBA and SNP array, in order to evaluate and compare their cytogenetic IPSS-R score in the largest MDS cohort reported so far. A concordant or better refined cytogenetic IPSS-R array-based score was obtained for 95% of cases (277). Therefore, this study confirms the effective applicability of SNP array toward the cytogenetic IPSS-R evaluation and consequently, toward the molecular international prognostic scoring system for MDS (IPSS-M) assessment, which ensures an improved MDS risk stratification refinement. Considering the advent of additional genetic technologies interrogating the whole genome with increased resolutions, counting cytogenetic abnormalities based on their size may result in a simplistic approach. On the contrary, assessing overall genomic complexity may provide additional crucial information. Independently of the technology used, genetic results should indeed aim at ensuring a highly refined stratification for MDS patients.

Regions of homozygosity confer a worse prognostic impact in myelodysplastic syndrome with normal karyotype

Half of the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have normal karyotype by conventional banding analysis. The percentage of true normal karyotype cases can be reduced by 20-30% with the complementary application of genomic microarrays. We here present a multicenter collaborative study of 163 MDS cases with a normal karyotype (≥10 metaphases) at diagnosis. All cases were analyzed with the ThermoFisher® microarray (either SNP 6.0 or CytoScan HD) for the identification of both copy number alteration(CNA) and regions of homozygosity (ROH). Our series supports that 25 Mb cut-off as having the most prognostic impact, even after adjustment by IPSS-R. This study highlights the importance of microarrays in MDS patients, to detect CNAs and especially to detect acquired ROH which has demonstrated a high prognostic impact.

Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies

Cytogenetics has long represented a critical component in the clinical evaluation of hematologic malignancies. Chromosome banding studies provide a simultaneous snapshot of genome-wide copy number and structural variation, which have been shown to drive tumorigenesis, define diseases, and guide treatment. Technological innovations in sequencing have ushered in our present-day clinical genomics era. With recent publications highlighting novel sequencing technologies as alternatives to conventional cytogenetic approaches, we, an international consortium of laboratory geneticists, pathologists, and oncologists, describe herein the advantages and limitations of both conventional chromosome banding and novel sequencing technologies and share our considerations on crucial next steps to implement these novel technologies in the global clinical setting for a more accurate cytogenetic evaluation, which may provide improved diagnosis and treatment management. Considering the clinical, logistic, technical, and financial implications, we provide points to consider for the global evolution of cytogenetic testing.

The clinical and laboratory evaluation of patients with suspected hypocellular marrow failure

The overlap in clinical presentation and bone marrow features of acquired and inherited causes of hypocellular marrow failure poses a significant diagnostic challenge in real case scenarios, particularly in nonsevere disease. The distinction between acquired aplastic anemia (aAA), hypocellular myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and inherited bone marrow failure syndromes presenting with marrow hypocellularity is critical to inform appropriate care. Here, we review the workup of hypocellular marrow failure in adolescents through adults. Given the limitations of relying on clinical stigmata or family history to identify patients with inherited etiologies, we outline a diagnostic approach incorporating comprehensive genetic testing in patients with hypocellular marrow failure that does not require immediate therapy and thus allows time to complete the evaluation. We also review the clinical utility of marrow array to detect acquired 6p copy number-neutral loss of heterozygosity to support a diagnosis of aAA, the complexities of telomere length testing in patients with aAA, short telomere syndromes, and other inherited bone marrow failure syndromes, as well as the limitations of somatic mutation testing for mutations in myeloid malignancy genes for discriminating between the various diagnostic possibilities.

Chromosomal microarray analysis, including constitutional and neoplastic disease applications, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

Chromosomal microarray technologies, including array comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism array, are widely applied in the diagnostic evaluation for both constitutional and neoplastic disorders. In a constitutional setting, this technology is accepted as the first-tier test for the evaluation of chromosomal imbalances associated with intellectual disability, autism, and/or multiple congenital anomalies. Furthermore, chromosomal microarray analysis is recommended for patients undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis with one or more major fetal structural abnormalities identified by ultrasonographic examination, and in the evaluation of intrauterine fetal demise or stillbirth when further cytogenetic analysis is desired. This technology also provides important genomic data in the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of neoplastic disorders, including both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. To assist clinical laboratories in the validation of chromosomal microarray methodologies for constitutional and neoplastic applications, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee has developed these updated technical laboratory standards, which replace the ACMG technical standards and guidelines for microarray analysis in constitutional and neoplastic disorders previously published in 2013.

Next Generation Cytogenetics in Myeloid Hematological Neoplasms: Detection of CNVs and Translocations

Simple Summary

Conventional cytogenetic approaches are the gold standard for the identification of chromosomal alterations in myeloid neoplasms. Next-generation sequencing panels are a new approach for the detection of copy number variations (CNV) or translocations. Here we report on a commercial panel utility including frequent mutations, CNVs and translocations in myeloid neoplasms. A total of 135 patients with myeloid neoplasms and three with acute lymphoblastic leukemia were analyzed by NGS. When comparing with gold standard techniques, 48 frequent alterations were detected by both methodologies, ten of them observed only by conventional methods and another eight only by NGS. Additionally, 38 secondary CNVs were detected in any of the genes included in the panel for mutational analysis. With those results we determine that NGS represents a reliable complementary source of information for the analysis of CNVs and translocations.

Abstract

Conventional cytogenetics are the gold standard for the identification of chromosomal alterations recurrent in myeloid neoplasms. Some next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels are designed for the detection of copy number variations (CNV) or translocations; however, their use is far from being widespread. Here we report on the results of a commercial panel including frequent mutations, CNVs and translocations in myeloid neoplasms. Frequent chromosomal alterations were analyzed by NGS in 135 patients with myeloid neoplasms and three with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. NGS analysis was performed using the enrichment-capture Myeloid Neoplasm-GeneSGKit (Sistemas Genómicos, Spain) gene panel including 35 genes for mutational analysis and frequent CNVs and translocations. NGS results were validated with cytogenetics and/or MLPA when possible. A total of 66 frequent alterations included in NGS panel were detected, 48 of them detected by NGS and cytogenetics. Ten of them were observed only by cytogenetics (mainly trisomy 8), and another eight only by NGS (mainly deletion of 12p). Aside from this, 38 secondary CNVs were detected in any of the genes included mainly for mutational analysis. NGS represents a reliable complementary source of information for the analysis of CNVs and translocations. Moreover, NGS could be a useful tool for the detection of alterations not observed by conventional cytogenetics.

Genetic Aspects of Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Simple Summary

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are clonal myeloid neoplasms characterized, at the time of their presentation, by the simultaneous presence of both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. In MDS/MPN, the karyotype is often normal but mutations in genes that are common across myeloid neoplasms can be detected in a high proportion of cases by targeted sequencing. In this review, we intend to summarize the main genetic findings across all MDS/MPN overlap syndromes and discuss their relevance in the management of patients.

Abstract

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are myeloid neoplasms characterized by the presentation of overlapping features from both myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Although the classification of MDS/MPN relies largely on clinical features and peripheral blood and bone marrow morphology, studies have demonstrated that a large proportion of patients (~90%) with this disease harbor somatic mutations in a group of genes that are common across myeloid neoplasms. These mutations play a role in the clinical heterogeneity of these diseases and their clinical evolution. Nevertheless, none of them is specific to MDS/MPN and current diagnostic criteria do not include molecular data. Even when such alterations can be helpful for differential diagnosis, they should not be used alone as proof of neoplasia because some of these mutations may also occur in healthy older people. Here, we intend to review the main genetic findings across all MDS/MPN overlap syndromes and discuss their relevance in the management of the patients.

A Single-Run Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Assay for the Simultaneous Detection of Both Gene Mutations and Large Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Related Myeloid Neoplasms

Simple Summary

Chromosomal abnormalities and somatic mutations are found in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) in around 50–80% of cases. The identification of these alterations is important for the accurate diagnosis and prognostic classification of these patients. Often, an apparently normal or failed karyotype might lead to an inadequate estimation of the prognostic risk, and several strategies should be combined to solve these cases. The aim of this study was to introduce a novel next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based strategy for the simultaneous detection of all the clinically relevant genetic alterations associated with these disorders. We validated this approach on a large cohort of patients by comparing our findings with those obtained with standard-of-care methods (i.e., karyotype and SNP-arrays). We show that our platform represents a significant improvement on current strategies in defining diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with MDS and myeloid-related disorders.

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms are clonal disorders that share most of their cytogenetic and molecular alterations. Despite the increased knowledge of the prognostic importance of genetics in these malignancies, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has not been incorporated into clinical practice in a validated manner, and the conventional karyotype remains mandatory in the evaluation of suspected cases. However, non-informative cytogenetics might lead to an inadequate estimation of the prognostic risk. Here, we present a novel targeted NGS-based assay for the simultaneous detection of all the clinically relevant genetic alterations associated with these disorders. We validated this platform in a large cohort of patients by performing a one-to-one comparison with the lesions from karyotype and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. Our strategy demonstrated an approximately 97% concordance with standard clinical assays, showing sensitivity at least equivalent to that of SNP arrays and higher than that of conventional cytogenetics. In addition, this NGS assay was able to identify both copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity events distributed genome-wide and copy number alterations, as well as somatic mutations within significant driver genes. In summary, we show a novel NGS platform that represents a significant improvement to current strategies in defining diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with MDS and myeloid-related disorders.

Clinical implications of copy number alteration detection using panel-based next-generation sequencing data in myelodysplastic syndrome

Recent advancements in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies allow the simultaneous identification of targeted copy number alterations (CNAs) as well as somatic mutations using the same panel-based NGS data. We investigated whether CNAs detected by the targeted NGS data provided additional clinical implications, over somatic mutations, in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Targeted deep sequencing of 28 well-known MDS-related genes was performed for 266 patients with MDS. Overall, 215 (80.8 %) patients were found to have at least one somatic mutation; 67 (25.2 %) had at least one CNA; 227 (85.3 %) had either a somatic mutation or CNA; and 12 had CNA without somatic mutations. Considering the clinical variables and somatic mutations alone, multivariate analysis demonstrated that sex, revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), and NRAS and TP53 mutations were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. For AML-free survival, these factors were sex, IPSS-R, and mutations in NRAS, DNMT3A, and complex karyotype/TP53 mutations. When we consider clinical variables along with somatic mutations and CNAs, genetic alterations in TET2, LAMB4, U2AF1, and CBL showed additional significant impact on the survivals. In conclusion, our study suggests that the concurrent detection of somatic mutations and targeted CNAs may provide clinically useful information for the prognosis of MDS patients.

Genomic variations in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and karyotypes without numerical or structural changes

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is an onco-hematologic disease with distinct levels of peripheral blood cytopenias, dysplasias in cell differentiation and various forms of chromosomal and cytogenomic alterations. In this study, the Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) was performed in patients with primary MDS without numerical and/or structural chromosomal alterations in karyotypes. A total of 17 patients was evaluated by GTG banding and eight patients showed no numerical and/or structural alterations. Then, the CMA was carried out and identified gains and losses CNVs and long continuous stretches of homozygosity (LCSHs). They were mapped on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, X, and Y. Ninety-one genes that have already been implicated in molecular pathways important for cell viability were selected and in-silico expression analyses demonstrated 28 genes differentially expressed in mesenchymal stromal cells of patients. Alterations in these genes may be related to the inactivation of suppressor genes or the activation of oncogenes contributing to the evolution and malignization of MDS. CMA provided additional information in patients without visible changes in the karyotype and our findings could contribute with additional information to improve the prognostic and personalized stratification for patients.

Genomic arrays identify high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia with genomic complexity: a multi-center study

Complex karyotype (CK) identified by chromosome-banding analysis (CBA) has shown prognostic value in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Genomic arrays offer high-resolution genome-wide detection of copy-number alterations (CNAs) and could therefore be well equipped to detect the presence of a CK. Current knowledge on genomic arrays in CLL is based on outcomes of single center studies, in which different cutoffs for CNA calling were used. To further determine the clinical utility of genomic arrays for CNA assessment in CLL diagnostics, we retrospectively analyzed 2293 arrays from 13 diagnostic laboratories according to established standards. CNAs were found outside regions captured by CLL FISH probes in 34% of patients, and several of them including gains of 8q, deletions of 9p and 18p (p<0.01) were linked to poor outcome after correction for multiple testing. Patients (n=972) could be divided in three distinct prognostic subgroups based on the number of CNAs. Only high genomic complexity (high-GC), defined as ≥5 CNAs emerged as an independent adverse prognosticator on multivariable analysis for time to first treatment (Hazard ratio: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.36-3.41; p=0.001) and overall survival (Hazard ratio: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.54-4.17; p<0.001; n=528). Lowering the size cutoff to 1 Mb in 647 patients did not significantly improve risk assessment. Genomic arrays detected more chromosomal abnormalities and performed at least as well in terms of risk stratification compared to simultaneous chromosome banding analysis as determined in 122 patients. Our findings highlight genomic array as an accurate tool for CLL risk stratification.

Clinical Applications of Chromosomal Microarray Testing in Myeloid Malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Knowledge of both somatic mutations and copy number aberrations are important for the understanding of cancer pathogenesis and management of myeloid neoplasms. The currently available standard of care technologies for copy number assessment such as conventional karyotype and FISH are either limited by low resolution or restriction to targeted assessment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is effective in characterization of chromosomal and gene aberrations of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance at a higher resolution than conventional karyotyping. These results are complementary to NGS mutation studies. Copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH), which is prognostic in AML, is currently only identified by CMA. Yet, despite the widespread availability, CMA testing is not routinely performed in diagnostic laboratories due to lack of knowledge on best-testing practices for clinical work-up of myeloid neoplasms. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical significance of CMA in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN). We will also elaborate the specific clinical scenarios where CMA can provide additional information essential for management and could potentially alter treatment. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is an effective technology for characterizing chromosomal copy number changes and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance at a high resolution in myeloid malignancies.

Clinical Validation of Somatic Mutation Detection by the OncoScan CNV Plus Assay

The OncoScan CNV Plus Assay (OS+) is a single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray platform that can detect 74 hotspot somatic mutations (SMs) in nine genes via molecular inversion probes. We report validation of the SM component of OS+ using a cohort of pediatric high-grade brain tumor specimens. SM calls were generated from 46 brain tumor cases, most tested orthogonally via bidirectional Sanger sequencing. The initial calling algorithm result showed that 31 tumors were positive and 15 were negative for SM, with a total of 71 OS+ SM calls [28 high-confidence (HC) and 43 low-confidence (LC)]. Sanger sequencing was performed for 54 of the 71 calls (27 HC and 27 LC), as well as for 21 randomly selected hotspots across the 15 OS+ negative cases. HC calls (except EGFR) Sanger sequencing confirmed positive, negative calls confirmed negative, but none of the LC calls were Sanger-confirmed positive. An update of the OS+ algorithm resolved the LC calls, but of the 11 HC SM EGFR calls, Sanger sequencing confirmed only one. Two PTEN SM calls by OS+ in two separate cases were also negative per Sanger sequencing. We conclude that a majority of HC OS+ SM calls were accurate, except calls identified in EGFR and PTEN. Clinically, we report SMs identified by OS+ only after Sanger sequencing verification.

Integrated genomic analysis using chromosomal microarray, fluorescence in situ hybridization and mate pair analyses: Characterization of a cryptic t(9;22)(p24.1;q11.2)/BCR-JAK2 in myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia

The 2016 World Health Organization entity 'Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1, or with PCM1-JAK2' encompasses a group of rare neoplasms that result from the formation of a fusion gene that leads to expression of an aberrant tyrosine kinase. This entity also contains variant JAK2 fusion partners, and detection of this defining event can be facilitated by various cytogenetic and molecular methods. Cryptic rearrangements of 9p24/JAK2 can be particularly challenging to identify. We describe the use of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with a probe for JAK2, and genomic mate pair analysis to describe a complex karyotype with a t(9;22) that produced a functional BCR-JAK2 fusion, leading to the appropriate diagnosis for the patient. This case highlights the importance of using an integrated genomic approach to fully define complex aberrations to assign proper diagnoses.

[Research progress on uniparental disomy in cancer]

Uniparental disomy (UPD) refers to a chromosome defect that an individual's homologous chromosome or segments are inherited from one parent. UPD can cause either aberrant patterns of genomic imprinting or homozygosity of mutations, leading to various diseases, including cancer. The mechanisms of UPD formation are diverse but largely due to the incorrect chromosome separation during cell division. UPD does not alter the number of gene copies, thus is difficult to be detected by conventional cytogenetic techniques effectively. Assisted by the new techniques such as single nucleotide polymorphism arrays, more and more UPD-related cases have been reported recently. UPD events are non-randomly distributed across cancer types, which play important role in the occurrence, development and metastasis of cancer. Here we review the research progress on the formation mechanisms, detection methods, the involved chromosomal regions and genes, and clinical significance of UPD; and also discuss the directions for future studies in this field.

Technical laboratory standards for interpretation and reporting of acquired copy-number abnormalities and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity in neoplastic disorders: a joint consensus recommendation from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC)

The detection of acquired copy-number abnormalities (CNAs) and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) in neoplastic disorders by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has significantly increased over the past few years with respect to both the number of laboratories utilizing this technology and the broader number of tumor types being assayed. This highlights the importance of standardizing the interpretation and reporting of acquired variants among laboratories. To address this need, a clinical laboratory-focused workgroup was established to draft recommendations for the interpretation and reporting of acquired CNAs and CN-LOH in neoplastic disorders. This project is a collaboration between the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC). The recommendations put forth by the workgroup are based on literature review, empirical data, and expert consensus of the workgroup members. A four-tier evidence-based categorization system for acquired CNAs and CN-LOH was developed, which is based on the level of available evidence regarding their diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic relevance: tier 1, variants with strong clinical significance; tier 2, variants with some clinical significance; tier 3, clonal variants with no documented neoplastic disease association; and tier 4, benign or likely benign variants. These recommendations also provide a list of standardized definitions of terms used in the reporting of CMA findings, as well as a framework for the clinical reporting of acquired CNAs and CN-LOH, and recommendations for how to deal with suspected clinically significant germline variants.