Tumor dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in stage II and III colorectal cancer: low level expression is a beneficial marker in oral-adjuvant chemotherapy, but is also a predictor for poor prognosis in patients treated with curative surgery alone

The Prognostic and Predictive Value of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase-Related Indicators in Clinical Outcomes of Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. Predictive biomarkers are needed to predict patients' outcomes and to select a chemotherapy regimen. We assessed whether dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-related indicators can predict CRC patients' outcomes. We searched the studies in PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library up to March 4, 2018. We mainly analyzed different CRC patients' outcomes according to specific DPD-related indicators. Twenty-five articles were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that for disease-free survival (DFS), low DPD expression was significantly superior to high expression (I² = 72%; HR: 1.59; 95%CI: 1.21-2.09; p = 0.001). However, this result had a potential publication bias (Begg's test: p = 0.007; Egger's test: p = 0.004). Among patients treated with chemotherapy, a high thymidylate phosphorylase (TP)/DPD ratio was advantageous for DFS (I² = 63.7%; HR: 0.65; 95%CI: 0.46-0.92; p = 0.015), and this result did not have a publication bias. For overall survival (OS), low DPD expression was superior to high expression (I² = 74.4%; HR: 2.11; 95%CI: 1.48-3.00; p < 0.001), although this result had a publication bias (Egger's test: p = 0.003; Begg's test: p = 0.010). There was no difference in OS according to the TP/DPD ratio (I² = 0%; HR: 0.92; 95%CI: 0.75-1.13; p = 0.420). DFS and OS were better in CRC patients with low DPD expression than in those with high DPD expression. However, because of publication bias, more DPD indicator-related studies, especially with negative results, are still needed. Patients with a high TP/DPD ratio have better DFS but not OS.

Prognostic Value of Excision Repair Cross-Complementing Gene 1, Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase, and Human Equilibrative Nucleotide Transporter 1 Expression and Their Implications for Adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Ampullary Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to characterize the intratumoral expression profiles of excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and human equilibrative nucleotide transporter 1 (hENT1) in ampullary carcinomas (ACs) to evaluate their prognostic values and better tailor adjuvant chemotherapy for individual patients with AC after surgery.

METHODS

This study included 49 patients with AC who underwent a curative pancreaticoduodenectomy. Various clinicopathological factors, including ERCC1, DPD, and hENT1, were analyzed in relation to postoperative disease recurrence and the patients' survival.

RESULTS

The median recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 24.5 months and 32.4 months, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of recurrence-free survival identified a DPD expression (hazard ratio [HR], 8.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.00-34.8; P = 0.003) and combined ERCC1/DPD expression (HR, 134.8; 95% CI, 11.8-1920; P < 0.001) as independent predictors of disease recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of overall survival also identified a DPD expression (HR, 8.48; 95% CI, 1.71-46.3; P = 0.008) and combined ERCC1/ DPD expression (HR, 135.6; 95% CI, 11.8-1940; P < 0.001) as independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The DPD and ERCC1 expression profile could potentially serve as a useful prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for surgically resected patients with AC.

Bax expression is a candidate prognostic and predictive marker of colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Since the anti-tumor activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is due to induction of apoptosis, we assessed the value of expression of key apoptotic molecules (Bax, Bcl-2 and p53) in predicting the efficacy of 5-FU therapy for colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRCs).

METHODS

Archival tissues of CRCs from 56 patients who received a complete regimen of 5-FU-based chemotherapy after surgery, and 56 patients matched for age, gender, ethnicity, tumor stage, tumor location, and tumor differentiation who had undergone only surgery (without any pre- or post-surgery therapy), were evaluated for immunophenotypic expression of Bax, Bcl-2, and p53. Also, these CRCs were evaluated for Bax mutations. The predictive capacity or prognostic value of these markers was assessed by estimating overall survival.

RESULTS

The majority of low Bax expressing CRCs have exhibited mutations at the G (8) tract. There was no significant difference in overall survival rates between the categories of surgery alone and 5-FU-treated patients. However, a better survival was observed for patients who received chemotherapy when their CRCs had low Bax/Bcl2 ratio (HR, 1.55; 95% CI: 1.46-31.00). Patients who received surgery alone and whose CRCs lacked Bax expression had 5.33 times higher mortality than those with high Bax expression (95% CI: 1.78-15.94), when controlled for tumor stage and other confounders. Bcl-2 and nuclear p53 accumulation had no predictive value in either patient group.

CONCLUSION

These findings are the first to demonstrate that high Bax expression is a good prognosticator for patients who underwent surgery alone, and that patient with low Bax/Bcl-2 expression ratio benefit from 5-FU-based adjuvant therapies.

Evaluations of biomarkers associated with sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil and taxanes for recurrent/advanced breast cancer patients treated with capecitabine-based first-line chemotherapy

The aim of the present study was to investigate the gene expression of biomarkers associated with the sensitivity to fluoropyrimidine and taxanes in recurrent/advanced breast cancer patients treated with first-line capecitabine chemotherapy. We evaluated the clinicopathological/prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), class III β-tubulin (βIII-tubulin), and stathmin-1 or oncoprotein-18 (STMN1). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 42 patients were used for analysis of TS, DPD, TP, βIII-tubulin, and STMN1 expression with a real-time reverse transcription-PCR technique. Patients were classified into the high-expression and low-expression groups according to the median value of the expression level of each biomarker. There was a significantly longer time to progression (TTP) in the high-TP group (P=0.018). The multivariate analysis revealed that the TP expression (hazard ratio for the low-TP group vs. the high-TP group, 2.873; 95% confidence interval, 1.143-7.223; P=0.025) is independent of prognostic factors for TTP. In the subgroup of patients treated with capecitabine plus taxanes as first-line chemotherapy, TTP was significantly longer in the low-βIII-tubulin group (P=0.047). The gene expression of TS, DPD, and STMN1 failed to have any significant impact on the outcome. These results provide further evidence that the TP expression may be a prognostic factor in breast cancer patients treated with capecitabine-based first-line chemotherapy, and βIII-tubulin can be used to predict the outcome of capecitabine in combination with taxanes as first-line chemotherapy. Therefore, these potential biomarkers should be further evaluated.

Thymidilate synthase expression predicts longer survival in patients with stage II colon cancer treated with 5-flurouracil independently of microsatellite instability

BACKGROUND

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most commonly used therapeutic agent for colon cancer treatment. Several studies have evaluated in patients with colon cancer, either the role of genes involved in the 5-FU pathway, such as thymidylate synthase (TS), thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) or the role of microsatellite instability (MSI) as prognostic or predictive markers for adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy, with discordant results. In this study we investigated the combined effect of TS, TP, DPD mRNA expression and MSI status in primary tumors of patients with colon cancer, all treated with 5-FU adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

TS, TP and DPD expression levels were investigated by real-time quantitative RT-PCR on RNA extracts from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues of 55 patients with colon adenocarcinoma. In the same case study MSI status was assessed on DNA extracts.

RESULTS

A higher TS expression was significantly associated with a longer survival for patients with cancers of stage II (P < 0.01), but not for those with stage III (P = 0.68). In addition, in multivariate analysis, a higher TS expression was significantly associated with a decreased risk of death (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.59, P < 0.01), while the MSI status did not have effects on patients' survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective investigation suggests that TS gene expression at mRNA level can be a useful marker of better survival in patients (especially of those with cancers of stage II) receiving 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy, independently of the MSI status.

Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer and association with thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression

Background

Microsatellite instability (MSI) refers to mutations in short motifs of tandemly repeated nucleotides resulting from replication errors and deficient mismatch repair (MMR). Colorectal cancer with MSI has characteristic biology and chemosensitivity, however the molecular basis remains unclarified. The association of MSI and MMR status with outcome and with thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) expression in colorectal cancer were evaluated.

Methods

MSI in five reference loci, MMR enzymes (hMSH2, hMSH6, hMLH1 and hPMS2), thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) expression were assessed in paraffin embedded tumor specimens, and associated with outcome in 340 consecutive patients completely resected for colorectal cancer stages II-IV and subsequently receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil therapy.

Results

MSI was found in 43 (13.8%) tumors. Absence of repair protein expression was assessed in 52 (17.0%) tumors, which had primarily lost hMLH1 in 39 (12.7%), hMSH2 in 5 (1.6%), and hMSH6 in 8 (2.6%) tumors. In multivariate analysis MSI (instable) compared to MSS (stable) tumors were significantly associated with lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2–0.7; P = 0.0007) and death (HR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2–0.9; P = 0.02) independently of the TS and DPD expressions. A direct relationship between MSI and TS intensity (P = 0.001) was found, while there was no significant association with DPD intensity (P = 0.1).

Conclusion

The favourable outcome of MSI colorectal carcinomas is ascribed mainly to the tumor biology and to a lesser extent to antitumor response to 5-fluorouracil therapy. There is no evidence that differential TS or DPD expression may account for these outcome characteristics.

Thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, ERCC1, and thymidine phosphorylase gene expression in primary and metastatic gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma tissue in patients treated on a phase I trial of oxaliplatin and capecitabine

Background

Over-expression of thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in tumor tissue is associated with insensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Over-expression of ERCC1 correlates with insensitivity to oxaliplatin (OX) therapy, while high thymidine phosphorylase (TP) levels predict for increased sensitivity to capecitabine (Xel).

Methods

Biopsies of metastatic tumor were taken before OX (130 mg/m² day 1) given with Xel (1200–3000 mg/m² in two divided doses days 1–5 and 8–12) every 3-weeks. Micro-dissected metastatic and primary tumors were analyzed for relative gene expression by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The clinical protocol prospectively identified the molecular targets of interest that would be tested. Endpoints for the molecular analyses were correlation of median, first and third quartiles for relative gene expression of each target with response, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival.

Results

Among 91 patients participating in this trial; 97% had colorectal cancer. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2, and most had prior 5-FU and irinotecan. In paired samples, median mRNA levels were significantly higher in metastatic versus primary tumor (-fold): TS (1.9), DPD (3.8), ERCC1 (2.1) and TP (1.6). A strong positive correlation was noted between DPD and TP mRNA levels in both primary (r = 0.693, p < 0.0005) and metastatic tissue (r = 0.697, p < 0.00001). There was an association between TS gene expression and responsive and stable disease: patients whose intratumoral TS mRNA levels were above the median value had significantly greater risk of early disease progression (43% vs 17%), but this did not translate into a significant difference in TTF. ERCC1 gene expression above the third quartile was associated with a shorter TTF (median 85 vs 162 days, p = 0.046). Patients whose TS mRNA levels in metastatic tumor tissue were below the median had a longer overall survival (median 417 vs 294 days, p = 0.042).

Conclusion

Target gene expression in primary tumor was significantly lower than that in paired metastatic tissue. High ERCC1 mRNA levels in metastatic tumor was associated with a shorter TTF. Lower expression of TS mRNA correlated with a lower chance of early PD with XelOX therapy and improved overall survival.

Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase protein expression in colorectal cancer patients treated with or without 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Low tumour expression levels of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) have been linked with improved outcome for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). It is unclear whether this occurs because such tumours have better prognosis or they are more sensitive to 5-FU treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Associations between TS, DPD and TP levels, determined by tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry, and survival was evaluated in 945 CRC patients according to treatment status.

RESULTS

Low TS and DPD expression associated with worse prognosis in stage II [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.09-2.63) and HR = 1.92 (95% CI 1.23-2.94), respectively] and stage III CRC patients treated by surgery alone [HR = 1.39 (95% CI 0.92-2.13) and HR = 1.49 (95% CI 1.02-2.17), respectively]. Low TS, DPD and TP associated with trends for better outcome in stage III patients treated with 5-FU [HR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.49-1.33), HR = 0.70 (95% CI 0.42-1.15) and HR = 0.66 (95% CI 0.39-1.12), respectively].

CONCLUSION

Low TS and DPD expression are prognostic for worse outcome in CRC patients treated by surgery alone, whereas low TS, DPD and TP expression are prognostic for better outcome in patients treated with 5-FU chemotherapy. These results provide indirect evidence that low TS, DPD and TP protein expression are predictive of good response to 5-FU chemotherapy.

The multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal cancer. The use of molecular markers in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer

Rapidly growing insights into the molecular biology of colorectal cancer led to high hopes for the identification of molecular markers to be used in optimised and tailored treatment regimens for this disorder. However, no molecular marker has yet made it into daily practice. In this review we will discuss some of the potential molecular markers, focus on the lessons learnt from marker development and identify strategies for the future.

Pharmacogenomics in colorectal cancer: The first step for individualized-therapy

Interindividual differences in the toxicity and response to anticancer therapies are currently observed in practically all available treatment regimens. A goal of cancer therapy is to predict patient response and toxicity to drugs in order to facilitate the individualization of patient treatment. Identification of subgroups of patients that differ in their prognosis and response to treatment could help to identify the best available drug therapy according the genetic profile. Several mechanisms have been suggested to contribute to chemo-therapeutic drug resistance: amplification or overexpression of membrane transporters, changes in cellular proteins involved in detoxification or in DNA repair, apoptosis and activation of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is regarded as intrinsically resistant to chemotherapy. Several molecular markers predictive of CRC therapy have been included during the last decade but their results in different studies complicate their application in practical clinical. The simultaneous testing of multiple markers predictive of response could help to identify more accurately the true role of these polymorphisms in CRC therapy. This review analyzes the role of genetic variants in genes involved in the action mechanisms of the drugs used at present in colorectal cancer.

The prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in colorectal cancer of 303 patients adjuvantly treated with 5-fluorouracil

Cytotoxic effect of 5-fluorouracil 5-FU is mediated through inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS), and 5-FU is catabolised by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Efficacy of 5-FU may therefore depend on the TS and DPD activity of colorectal cancer. Archival tumour specimens from 303 consecutive patients were analysed for the expression of TS and DPD using immunohistochemistry. All patients were completely resected for colorectal cancer stages II-III and have subsequently received adjuvant treatment with 5-FU. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for the impact of bowel obstruction and vascular tumour invasion, diffuse TS pattern was significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-3.2; p = 0.02), but without significant association to death (HR = 1.6; 95% CI: 0.9-2.8; p = 0.08). High TS intensity was not significantly associated with lower risk of recurrence (HR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.3-1.1; p = 0.07) or death (HR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.3-1.2; p = 0.2). High DPD intensity was significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence (HR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.3; p = 0.03) and death (HR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.5; p = 0.02). Patients with a combination of low TS and high DPD intensity were at significantly increased risk of both recurrence (HR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.0-4.2; p = 0.04) and death (HR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.0-4.0; p = 0.05). No relationship between tolerability and toxicity of 5-FU and TS and DPD expression was found. It is concluded that characterizing colorectal carcinomas by TS and DPD expression may disclose subsets of patients with significantly greater risk of disease recurrence and early death. This may be utilized in the selection of patients for treatment approaches and for decision on follow-up programs.

ASCO 2006 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Purpose

To update the recommendations for the use of tumor marker tests in the prevention, screening, treatment, and surveillance of gastrointestinal cancers.

Methods

For the 2006 update, an update committee composed of members from the full Panel was formed to complete the review and analysis of data published since 1999. Computerized literature searches of Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library were performed. The Update Committee's literature review focused attention on available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of published tumor marker studies.

Recommendations and Conclusion

For colorectal cancer, it is recommended that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) be ordered preoperatively, if it would assist in staging and surgical planning. Postoperative CEA levels should be performed every 3 months for stage II and III disease for at least 3 years if the patient is a potential candidate for surgery or chemotherapy of metastatic disease. CEA is the marker of choice for monitoring the response of metastatic disease to systemic therapy. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine use of p53, ras, thymidine synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidine phosphorylase, microsatellite instability, 18q loss of heterozygosity, or deleted in colon cancer (DCC) protein in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. For pancreatic cancer, CA 19-9 can be measured every 1 to 3 months for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease receiving active therapy. Elevations in serial CA 19-9 determinations suggest progressive disease but confirmation with other studies should be sought. New markers and new evidence to support the use of the currently reviewed markers will be evaluated in future updates of these guidelines.

Tumor quantification of several fluoropyrimidines resistance gene expression with a unique quantitative RT-PCR method. Implications for pretherapeutic determination of tumor resistance phenotype

Pretherapeutic determination of tumor resistance to chemotherapy is a main challenge, hindered by the low number of mechanisms characterized at the same time, the small size of the clinical specimens and the heterogeneity of the techniques or the lack of true quantification. The aim of the present study was to determine in real time quantitative RT-PCR, tumor cell expression of several transcripts involved in cancer cell resistance with a unique cDNA sample from a tumor biopsy. The technique had to be suitable in clinical practice for determination of several factors involved in resistance to a given drug family, for example, fluoropyrimidines resistance factors: thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), thymidine kinase (TK), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS). A frame-shifted artificial construct was designed specifically to work within the same conditions. We validated our technique by quantifying expressions of these 5 genes starting from tissue samples of colorectal carcinoma and the surrounding normal mucosa of 33 different patients. That real time quantitative RT-PCR technique using the frame-shifted artificial construct as a standard provided a real comparison and quantification of different resistance factors. Tumor resistance phenotype determination based on that approach will be investigated in a control study.

Predictive value of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase protein expression on survival in adjuvantly treated stage III colon cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The predictive value of thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) expression on long-term survival by influencing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) effect were determined in primary tumours and node metastases of stage III colon cancer patients treated adjuvantly with 5-FU regimens (n=391). The effect of TP 53 mutation status, which is thought to be functionally linked to TS inhibition, was also examined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

TS and DPD protein expression was determined by immunohistochemical analysis using tissue microarrays of these colon tumours. Two hundred and twenty tumours had already been screened in a previous study for TP 53 mutations.

RESULTS

Low TS protein levels in primary stage III colon tumours appeared to be associated with mucinous histology and low DPD protein levels with young age at time of randomisation. Concordance between TS and DPD expression in primary and metastatic tumours was low. No associations were found between disease-free survival (DFS) and TS or DPD protein levels. When stratified by TP 53 mutation status DFS did not differ with TS expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Expression of TS and DPD proteins is not predictive for survival in patients with stage III colon cancer treated adjuvantly with 5-FU regimens. TS protein levels did not alter the effect of TP 53 mutation status.

Have we made progress in pharmacogenomics? The implementation of molecular markers in colon cancer

For the last 40 years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has remained the treatment of choice in both the adjuvant and advanced treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, 5-FU monotherapy produces response rates of only 10–20% in the advanced setting. 5-FU has been combined with newer agents, such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and this has significantly increased response rates to 40–50% in the advanced setting. More recently, novel biological agents, such as the monoclonal antibodies targeting either the epidermal growth factor receptor or vascular endothelial growth factor, have shown to provide additional clinical benefit for patients with metastatic CRC. A number of predictive markers have been identified for CRC to date. However, their usefulness as individual markers of response has led to somewhat inconclusive results. Therefore, there is a need to identify panels of predictive markers of response to therapy for advanced CRC, in order to improve these disappointing response rates. The advent of high-throughput methodologies, such as microarrays, enables tumor samples to be profiled on a global scale. This technology has been utilized to develop predictive markers for a wide range of tumor types to date, and hopefully this technology can be translated into the CRC setting with the hope of predicting the response of each individual tumor to chemotherapy.

Role of Genomic Markers in Colorectal Cancer Treatment

For the last four decades, fluorouracil (FU) has been the main treatment of choice in colorectal cancer (CRC) in both the advanced and adjuvant settings. In the advanced setting, FU monotherapy produces response rates of only 10% to 20%. Furthermore, in resected stage III CRC, FU monotherapy has increased overall survival by only 20%. The combination of FU with newer therapies such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan has significantly improved response rates to 40% to 50%. Despite these improvements, more than half of advanced CRC patients derive no benefit from treatment; this is due to either acquired or inherent drug resistance. This review aims to highlight the current prognostic and predictive markers that have been identified for CRC to date. The limited use of these predictive markers underscores the importance of and need for multiple marker testing in order to improve response rates and decrease toxicity. This review will also focus on high throughput methods to identify panels of predictive markers for CRC, which ultimately aim to tailor treatment according to an individual patient and tumor profile.

Intratumoral molecular or genetic markers as predictors of clinical outcome with chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Identification of molecular markers at either the intragenic, chromosomal, mRNA, or protein level that might predict whether colorectal cancer patients are likely to benefit from adjuvant or palliative therapy is a high priority. The majority of clinical studies addressing this issue, particularly those done in the adjuvant setting, analyzed tumor samples from patients treated in the era when 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone or combined with leucovorin or levamisole were the mainstay of therapy. This review highlights some of the intratumoral molecular markers that may have importance as predictors of benefit with 5-FU-based therapy. Although the goal of these investigations is to one day permit selection of therapy for an individual patient based on the tumor phenotype, prospective studies have yet to be conducted that test whether selection of therapy based on molecular markers results in an improved outcome.