1
|
Horvath AR, Bell KJL, Ceriotti F, Jones GRD, Loh TP, Lord S, Sandberg S. Outcome-based analytical performance specifications: current status and future challenges. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024; 0:cclm-2024-0125. [PMID: 38836433 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Analytical performance specifications (APS) based on outcomes refer to how 'good' the analytical performance of a test needs to be to do more good than harm to the patient. Analytical performance of a measurand affects its clinical performance. Without first setting clinical performance requirements, it is difficult to define how good analytically the test needs to be to meet medical needs. As testing is indirectly linked to health outcomes through clinical decisions on patient management, often simulation-based studies are used to assess the impact of analytical performance on the probability of clinical outcomes which is then translated to Model 1b APS according to the Milan consensus. This paper discusses the related key definitions, concepts and considerations that should assist in finding the most appropriate methods for deriving Model 1b APS. We review the advantages and limitations of published methods and discuss the criteria for transferability of Model 1b APS to different settings. We consider that the definition of the clinically acceptable misclassification rate is central to Model 1b APS. We provide some examples and guidance on a more systematic approach for first defining the clinical performance requirements for tests and we also highlight a few ideas to tackle the future challenges associated with providing outcome-based APS for laboratory testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Rita Horvath
- Department of Chemical Pathology, New South Wales Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital , Sydney, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Katy J L Bell
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ferruccio Ceriotti
- Clinical Laboratory, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Graham R D Jones
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Chemical Pathology, SydPath, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Tze Ping Loh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sally Lord
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sverre Sandberg
- Norwegian Organization for Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (NOKLUS), Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Norwegian Porphyria Centre, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Institute of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang X, Bai S, Luo Y. Advances in research on biomarkers associated with acute myocardial infarction: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e37793. [PMID: 38608048 PMCID: PMC11018244 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the most severe cardiovascular event in clinical settings, imposes a significant burden with its annual increase in morbidity and mortality rates. However, it is noteworthy that mortality due to AMI in developed countries has experienced a decline, largely attributable to the advancements in medical interventions such as percutaneous coronary intervention. This trend highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis and effective treatment to preserve the myocardium at risk and improve patient outcomes. Conventional biomarkers such as myoglobin, creatine kinase isoenzymes, and troponin have been instrumental in the diagnosis of AMI. However, recent years have witnessed the emergence of new biomarkers demonstrating the potential to further enhance the accuracy of AMI diagnosis. This literature review focuses on the recent advancements in biomarker research in the context of AMI diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suwen Bai
- Central Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen & Longgang District People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yumei Luo
- Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
- Cardiology Department of The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen & Longgang District People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Merriel SW, Archer S, Forster AS, Eldred-Evans D, McGrath JS, Ahmed HU, Hamilton W, Walter FM. Acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis with patients and GPs: a qualitative interview study. Br J Gen Pract 2024:BJGP.2023.0083. [PMID: 38575181 PMCID: PMC11005921 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate is a new, more accurate, non-invasive test for prostate cancer diagnosis. AIM To understand the acceptability of MRI for patients and GPs for prostate cancer diagnosis. DESIGN AND SETTING Qualitative study of men who had undergone a prostate MRI for possible prostate cancer, and GPs who had referred at least one man for possible prostate cancer in the previous 12 months in West London and Devon. METHOD Semi-structured interviews, conducted in person or via telephone, were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Deductive thematic analysis was undertaken using Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, retrospectively for patients and prospectively for GPs. RESULTS Twenty-two men (12 from Devon, age range 47-80 years), two patients' partners, and 10 GPs (6 female, age range 36-55 years) were interviewed. Prostate MRI was broadly acceptable for most patient participants, and they reported that it was not a significant undertaking to complete the scan. GPs were more varied in their views on prostate MRI, with a broad spectrum of knowledge and understanding of prostate MRI. Some GPs expressed concerns about additional clinical responsibility and local availability of MRI if direct access to prostate MRI in primary care were to be introduced. CONCLUSION Prostate MRI appears to be acceptable to patients. Some differences were found between patients in London and Devon, mainly around burden of testing and opportunity costs. Further exploration of GPs' knowledge and understanding of prostate MRI could inform future initiatives to widen access to diagnostic testing in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Wd Merriel
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester; Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter
| | - Stephanie Archer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | | | | | - John S McGrath
- Department of Urological Surgery, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London
| | - Willie Hamilton
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ovesen SH, Clausen AH, Kirkegaard H, Løfgren B, Aagaard R, Skaarup SH, Arvig MD, Lorentzen MH, Kristensen AH, Cartuliares MB, Falster C, Tong L, Rabajoli A, Leth R, Desy J, Ma IWY, Weile J. Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review With an Interactive Database. Chest 2024:S0012-3692(24)00290-3. [PMID: 38458431 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This scoping review was conducted to provide an overview of the evidence of point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) in emergency medicine. By emphasizing clinical topics, time trends, study designs, and the scope of the primary outcomes, a map is provided for physicians and researchers to guide their future initiatives. RESEARCH QUESTION Which study designs and primary outcomes are reported in published studies of LUS in emergency medicine? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We performed a systematic search in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for LUS studies published prior to May 13, 2023. Study characteristics were synthesized quantitatively. The primary outcomes in all papers were categorized into the hierarchical Fryback and Thornbury levels. RESULTS A total of 4,076 papers were screened and, following selection and handsearching, 406 papers were included. The number of publications doubled from January 2020 to May 2023 (204 to 406 papers). The study designs were primarily observational (n = 375 [92%]), followed by randomized (n = 18 [4%]) and case series (n = 13 [3%]). The primary outcome measure concerned diagnostic accuracy in 319 papers (79%), diagnostic thinking in 32 (8%), therapeutic changes in 4 (1%), and patient outcomes in 14 (3%). No increase in the proportions of randomized controlled trials or the scope of primary outcome measures was observed with time. A freely available interactive database was created to enable readers to search for any given interest (https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/blinded/viz/LUSinEM_240216/INFO). INTERPRETATION Observational diagnostic studies have been produced in abundance, leaving a paucity of research exploring clinical utility. Notably, research exploring whether LUS causes changes to clinical decisions is imperative prior to any further research being made into patient benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stig Holm Ovesen
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Denmark; Emergency Department, Horsens Regional Hospital, Denmark.
| | | | - Hans Kirkegaard
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Emergency Department, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Bo Løfgren
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Denmark; Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark
| | - Rasmus Aagaard
- Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Søren Helbo Skaarup
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Michael Dan Arvig
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Slagelse Hospital; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
| | - Morten Hjarnø Lorentzen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Sønderjylland, Aabenraa, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne Heltborg Kristensen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Sønderjylland, Aabenraa, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Sønderjylland, Aabenraa, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark
| | - Casper Falster
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital; Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark
| | - Liting Tong
- Emergency Department, Nykøbing F. Hospital, Zealand Denmark Region
| | - Alessandra Rabajoli
- Division of Emergency Medicine and High Dependency Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Ronja Leth
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Denmark; Emergency Department, Horsens Regional Hospital, Denmark
| | - Janeve Desy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary; Office of Undergraduate Medical Education, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
| | - Irene W Y Ma
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
| | - Jesper Weile
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Denmark; Emergency Department, Horsens Regional Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reijnders E, van der Laarse A, Ruhaak LR, Cobbaert CM. Closing the gaps in patient management of dyslipidemia: stepping into cardiovascular precision diagnostics with apolipoprotein profiling. Clin Proteomics 2024; 21:19. [PMID: 38429638 PMCID: PMC10908091 DOI: 10.1186/s12014-024-09465-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
In persons with dyslipidemia, a high residual risk of cardiovascular disease remains despite lipid lowering therapy. Current cardiovascular risk prediction mainly focuses on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels, neglecting other contributing risk factors. Moreover, the efficacy of LDL-c lowering by statins resulting in reduced cardiovascular risk is only partially effective. Secondly, from a metrological viewpoint LDL-c falls short as a reliable measurand. Both direct and calculated LDL-c tests produce inaccurate test results at the low end under aggressive lipid lowering therapy. As LDL-c tests underperform both clinically and metrologically, there is an urging need for molecularly defined biomarkers. Over the years, apolipoproteins have emerged as promising biomarkers in the context of cardiovascular disease as they are the functional workhorses in lipid metabolism. Among these, apolipoprotein B (ApoB), present on all atherogenic lipoprotein particles, has demonstrated to clinically outperform LDL-c. Other apolipoproteins, such as Apo(a) - the characteristic apolipoprotein of the emerging risk factor lipoprotein(a) -, and ApoC-III - an inhibitor of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein clearance -, have attracted attention as well. To support personalized medicine, we need to move to molecularly defined risk markers, like the apolipoproteins. Molecularly defined diagnosis and molecularly targeted therapy require molecularly measured biomarkers. This review provides a summary of the scientific validity and (patho)physiological role of nine serum apolipoproteins, Apo(a), ApoB, ApoC-I, ApoC-II, ApoC-III, ApoE and its phenotypes, ApoA-I, ApoA-II, and ApoA-IV, in lipid metabolism, their association with cardiovascular disease, and their potential as cardiovascular risk markers when measured in a multiplex apolipoprotein panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Reijnders
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Arnoud van der Laarse
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - L Renee Ruhaak
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Christa M Cobbaert
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bachmann TT, Mitsakakis K, Hays JP, van Belkum A, Russom A, Luedke G, Simonsen GS, Abel G, Peter H, Goossens H, Moran-Gilad J, Vila J, Becker K, Moons P, Sampath R, Peeling RW, Luz S, van Staa T, Di Gregori V. Expert guidance on target product profile development for AMR diagnostic tests. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:e012319. [PMID: 38114235 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Diagnostics are widely considered crucial in the fight against antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which is expected to kill 10 million people annually by 2030. Nevertheless, there remains a substantial gap between the need for AMR diagnostics versus their development and implementation. To help address this problem, target product profiles (TPP) have been developed to focus developers' attention on the key aspects of AMR diagnostic tests. However, during discussion between a multisectoral working group of 51 international experts from industry, academia and healthcare, it was noted that specific AMR-related TPPs could be extended by incorporating the interdependencies between the key characteristics associated with the development of such TPPs. Subsequently, the working group identified 46 characteristics associated with six main categories (ie, Intended Use, Diagnostic Question, Test Description, Assay Protocol, Performance and Commercial). The interdependencies of these characteristics were then identified and mapped against each other to generate new insights for use by stakeholders. Specifically, it may not be possible for diagnostics developers to achieve all of the recommendations in every category of a TPP and this publication indicates how prioritising specific TPP characteristics during diagnostics development may influence (or not) a range of other TPP characteristics associated with the diagnostic. The use of such guidance, in conjunction with specific TPPs, could lead to more efficient AMR diagnostics development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till T Bachmann
- Center for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Konstantinos Mitsakakis
- Laboratory for MEMS Applications, IMTEK-Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Hahn-Schickard, Freiburg, Germany
| | - John P Hays
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Centre (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alex van Belkum
- BioMérieux Open Innovation & Partnerships, La Balme Les Grottes, France
| | - Aman Russom
- Division of Nanobiotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Gunnar Skov Simonsen
- Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Gyorgy Abel
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harald Peter
- Branch Bioanalytics and Bioprocesses, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Herman Goossens
- Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jacob Moran-Gilad
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Jordi Vila
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Biomedical Diagnostic Centre (CDB), Hospital Clínic, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Pieter Moons
- Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Rosanna W Peeling
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London, UK
| | - Saturnino Luz
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tjeerd van Staa
- Health eResearch Centre, Farr Institute for Health Informatics Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Greaves R, Kricka L, Gruson D, Ferrari M, Martin H, Loh TP, Bernardini S. Toolkit for emerging technologies in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 61:2102-2114. [PMID: 37314970 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
An emerging technology (ET) for laboratory medicine can be defined as an analytical method (including biomarkers) or device (software, applications, and algorithms) that by its stage of development, translation into broad routine clinical practice, or geographical adoption and implementation has the potential to add value to clinical diagnostics. Considering the laboratory medicine-specific definition, this document examines eight key tools, encompassing clinical, analytical, operational, and financial aspects, used throughout the life cycle of ET implementation. The tools provide a systematic approach starting with identifying the unmet need or identifying opportunities for improvement (Tool 1), forecasting (Tool 2), technology readiness assessment (Tool 3), health technology assessment (Tool 4), organizational impact map (Tool 5), change management (Tool 6), total pathway to method evaluation checklist (Tool 7), and green procurement (Tool 8). Whilst there are differences in clinical priorities between different settings, the use of this set of tools will help support the overall quality and sustainability of the emerging technology implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronda Greaves
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Larry Kricka
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Damien Gruson
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Département des Laboratoires Cliniques, Biochimie Médicale, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Tze Ping Loh
- National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sergio Bernardini
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Badrick T, Bowling F. Clinical utility - Information about the usefulness of tests. Clin Biochem 2023; 121-122:110656. [PMID: 37802380 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
The clinical utility of a diagnostic test refers to its usefulness in improving patient outcomes, informing clinical decision-making, and optimizing healthcare resources. A diagnostic test with high clinical utility provides accurate, reliable, and actionable information that can guide appropriate treatment decisions, monitor treatment response, and identify potential adverse events or complications. Ultimately, the clinical utility of a diagnostic test depends on how well it can improve patient outcomes by guiding appropriate treatment decisions, improving clinical outcomes, and optimizing healthcare resource utilization. Healthcare providers need to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of using a particular diagnostic test in their clinical practice to determine its clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Badrick
- Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, St Leonards, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Francis Bowling
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bowling F, Badrick T. Methods for determining clinical utility. Clin Biochem 2023; 121-122:110674. [PMID: 37844681 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Measuring the clinical utility of a diagnostic test involves evaluating its impact on patient outcomes, clinical decision-making, and healthcare resource utilization. Determining clinical utility requires accessing patient medical history and outcomes data. These studies involve enrolling patients undergoing diagnostic tests and tracking their clinical outcomes. Researchers can determine the test's clinical utility by comparing the outcomes of patients who receive the diagnostic test to those who do not. These outcomes include benefits and harm. The highest level of evidence to support clinical utility determinations may be obtained from clinical trials. However, clinical laboratories are often not involved in clinical trials, and laboratory specialists may not be experienced in conducting such trials. Many established laboratory tests have never had clinical utility determined. Prospective studies assessing a diagnostic test's impact on clinical outcomes may require long-term patient monitoring, which is problematic. This paper presents methods that may be used to assess clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis Bowling
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tony Badrick
- Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, St Leonards, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bresalier RS, Senore C, Young GP, Allison J, Benamouzig R, Benton S, Bossuyt PMM, Caro L, Carvalho B, Chiu HM, Coupé VMH, de Klaver W, de Klerk CM, Dekker E, Dolwani S, Fraser CG, Grady W, Guittet L, Gupta S, Halloran SP, Haug U, Hoff G, Itzkowitz S, Kortlever T, Koulaouzidis A, Ladabaum U, Lauby-Secretan B, Leja M, Levin B, Levin TR, Macrae F, Meijer GA, Melson J, O'Morain C, Parry S, Rabeneck L, Ransohoff DF, Sáenz R, Saito H, Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S, Schoen RE, Selby K, Singh H, Steele RJC, Sung JJY, Symonds EL, Winawer SJ. An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles. Gut 2023; 72:1904-1918. [PMID: 37463757 PMCID: PMC10511996 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE New screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) are rapidly emerging. Conducting trials with mortality reduction as the end point supporting their adoption is challenging. We re-examined the principles underlying evaluation of new non-invasive tests in view of technological developments and identification of new biomarkers. DESIGN A formal consensus approach involving a multidisciplinary expert panel revised eight previously established principles. RESULTS Twelve newly stated principles emerged. Effectiveness of a new test can be evaluated by comparison with a proven comparator non-invasive test. The faecal immunochemical test is now considered the appropriate comparator, while colonoscopy remains the diagnostic standard. For a new test to be able to meet differing screening goals and regulatory requirements, flexibility to adjust its positivity threshold is desirable. A rigorous and efficient four-phased approach is proposed, commencing with small studies assessing the test's ability to discriminate between CRC and non-cancer states (phase I), followed by prospective estimation of accuracy across the continuum of neoplastic lesions in neoplasia-enriched populations (phase II). If these show promise, a provisional test positivity threshold is set before evaluation in typical screening populations. Phase III prospective studies determine single round intention-to-screen programme outcomes and confirm the test positivity threshold. Phase IV studies involve evaluation over repeated screening rounds with monitoring for missed lesions. Phases III and IV findings will provide the real-world data required to model test impact on CRC mortality and incidence. CONCLUSION New non-invasive tests can be efficiently evaluated by a rigorous phased comparative approach, generating data from unbiased populations that inform predictions of their health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Bresalier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carlo Senore
- Epidemiology and screening unit, Centro di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia e la Prevenzione Oncologica in Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Graeme P Young
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James Allison
- Internal Medicine/Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert Benamouzig
- Gastroenterology & Digestive Oncology Department, Hôpital Avicenne University Paris Nord La Sorbonne, Bobigny, France
| | - Sally Benton
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and NHS Bowel Cancer Screening South of England Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Patrick M M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luis Caro
- Carrera de especialista de Endoscopia Digestiva, Institución GEDYT (Gastroenterologia diagnostico y terapéutica), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn de Klaver
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clasine Maria de Klerk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology C2-310, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology C2-115, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sunil Dolwani
- Dept of Gastroenterology, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee School of Medicine, Dundee, UK
| | - William Grady
- Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lydia Guittet
- ERI3 Cancers & Populations, Normandie University, UNICAEN, Caen, France
| | - Samir Gupta
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Ulrike Haug
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany
| | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
- Department of CRC screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Steven Itzkowitz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tim Kortlever
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Beatrice Lauby-Secretan
- Section of Evidence Synthesis and Classification, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Mārcis Leja
- Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Bernard Levin
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Finlay Macrae
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The University of Melbourne Department of Medicine Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joshua Melson
- High-Risk Clinic for Gastrointestinal Cancers, University of Arizona Cancer Center Division of Gastroenterology, Banner University, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Colm O'Morain
- Gastroenterology, Trinity College Dublin Faculty of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susan Parry
- National Bowel Screening Programme, National Screening Unit, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David F Ransohoff
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Roque Sáenz
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Hiroshi Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | | | - Robert E Schoen
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kevin Selby
- Department of ambulatory Care, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Harminder Singh
- Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Joseph J Y Sung
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Erin Leigh Symonds
- Department of Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sidney J Winawer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Charrière K, Pazart L. Clinical evidence requirements according to the IVDR 2017/746: practical tools and references for underpinning clinical evidence of IVD-MDs. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 61:1150-1157. [PMID: 36919280 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
In May 2022, the European Regulation 2017/746 (IVDR) came into force. It changes the approach of in vitro medical devices (IVD-MDs) for industry and institutions. It reinforces the clinical evidence requirements to improve performance, safety and transparency. Despite extended transition periods and existing guides, IVDR remains difficult to interpret and bringing devices into compliance requires efforts. The generation of clinical evidence is essential to demonstrate compliance with IVDR, and encompasses scientific validity, analytical performance and clinical performance. It is required to demonstrate, per intended use in the target population and clinical care pathway, IVD-MDs clinical performance (compared to a predefined clinical performance). Thus, there is a need for IVD-manufacturers and end-users in health care institutions, to obtain guidance on how to generate this clinical evidence. This article aims industrials and clinicians to identify key steps imposed by the IVDR for bringing IVD-MDs to the EU-market. We propose a general view of performance evaluation requirements for IVD-MDs and provide key references, including how to establish study design that will enable to document clinical performance of existing, refined or emerging medical tests. Finally, we propose a roadmap to address the relevant questions and studies in relation to the documents requested in the IVDR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Charrière
- Université de Franche-Comté, LINC, CIC 1431 INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Lionel Pazart
- Université de Franche-Comté, LINC, CIC 1431 INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
- Tech4Health Network, FCRIN, Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cobbaert CM. Implementing cardiovascular precision diagnostics: laboratory specialists as catalysts? Ann Clin Biochem 2023; 60:151-154. [PMID: 37018480 DOI: 10.1177/00045632231166855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
|
13
|
Vanstapel FJLA, Orth M, Streichert T, Capoluongo ED, Oosterhuis WP, Çubukçu HC, Bernabeu-Andreu FA, Thelen M, Jacobs LHJ, Linko S, Bhattoa HP, Bossuyt PMM, Meško Brguljan P, Boursier G, Cobbaert CM, Neumaier M. ISO 15189 is a sufficient instrument to guarantee high-quality manufacture of laboratory developed tests for in-house-use conform requirements of the European In-Vitro-Diagnostics Regulation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 61:608-626. [PMID: 36716120 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The EU In-Vitro Diagnostic Device Regulation (IVDR) aims for transparent risk-and purpose-based validation of diagnostic devices, traceability of results to uniquely identified devices, and post-market surveillance. The IVDR regulates design, manufacture and putting into use of devices, but not medical services using these devices. In the absence of suitable commercial devices, the laboratory can resort to laboratory-developed tests (LDT) for in-house use. Documentary obligations (IVDR Art 5.5), the performance and safety specifications of ANNEX I, and development and manufacture under an ISO 15189-equivalent quality system apply. LDTs serve specific clinical needs, often for low volume niche applications, or correspond to the translational phase of new tests and treatments, often extremely relevant for patient care. As some commercial tests may disappear with the IVDR roll-out, many will require urgent LDT replacement. The workload will also depend on which modifications to commercial tests turns them into an LDT, and on how national legislators and competent authorities (CA) will handle new competences and responsibilities. We discuss appropriate interpretation of ISO 15189 to cover IVDR requirements. Selected cases illustrate LDT implementation covering medical needs with commensurate management of risk emanating from intended use and/or design of devices. Unintended collateral damage of the IVDR comprises loss of non-profitable niche applications, increases of costs and wasted resources, and migration of innovative research to more cost-efficient environments. Taking into account local specifics, the legislative framework should reduce the burden on and associated opportunity costs for the health care system, by making diligent use of existing frameworks.
Collapse
Key Words
- AB, accrediting body
- BRCA1/2, breast cancer genes 1 and 2
- CA, competent authority
- CAPA, corrective and preventive actions
- CDx, companion diagnostics
- CGP, comprehensive genomic profile
- CRGA, clinically relevant genomic alterations
- EEA, European economic area
- EFLM, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- EMA, European Medicines Agency
- EU, European Union
- European Regulation 2017/746 on In-Vitro-Diagnostic Devices
- FMEA, failure-mode effects analysis
- GA, genomic alterations
- GDPR, General Data Protection Regulation
- HI, health institution
- HRD, homologous recombination deficiency
- HRR, homologous recombination repair
- ISO 15189:2012
- ISO, International Organization for Standardization
- IVDD, In-Vitro Diagnostic Device Directive
- IVDR, In-Vitro Diagnostic Device Regulation
- LDT, laboratory-developed test
- MDCG, Medical Device Coordination Group
- MSI, micro satellite instability
- MU, measurement uncertainty
- NB, notified body
- NGS, next generation sequencing
- NTRK, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase
- PARPi, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors
- PRRC, person responsible for regulatory compliance
- PT, proficiency testing
- RUO, research use only
- RiliBÄk, Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung Laboratoriums medizinischer Untersuchungen
- SOP, standard operating procedure
- TMB, tumor mutational burden
- UDI, unique device identifier
- VAF, variant allele frequency
- iQC, internal quality control
- laboratory-developed tests for in-house use
- method validation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florent J L A Vanstapel
- Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Public Health, Biomedical Sciences Group, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthias Orth
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Vinzenz von Paul Kliniken gGmbH, Stuttgart, Germany
- Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Thomas Streichert
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ettore D Capoluongo
- Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Wytze P Oosterhuis
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Reinier Haga Medical Diagnostic Centre, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Hikmet Can Çubukçu
- Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Ankara, Türkiye
- Department of Rare Diseases, General Directorate of Health Services, Turkish Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Francisco A Bernabeu-Andreu
- Servicio Bioquímica Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (Madrid), Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Marc Thelen
- Result Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leo H J Jacobs
- Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harjit Pal Bhattoa
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Patrick M M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pika Meško Brguljan
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Guilaine Boursier
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Cytogenomics, Rare and Autoinflammatory Diseases Unit, CHU Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Christa M Cobbaert
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Neumaier
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Electrochemical ELASA: improving early cancer detection and monitoring. Anal Bioanal Chem 2023:10.1007/s00216-023-04546-5. [PMID: 36702904 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-023-04546-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The discovery of new molecular biomarkers of cancer during the last decades and the development of new diagnostic devices exploiting those have significantly contributed to the clinical analysis of cancer and to improve the outcomes. Among those, liquid biopsy sensors exploiting aptamers for the detection of cancer biomarkers in body fluids are useful and accurate tools for a fast and inexpensive non-invasive screening of population. The incorporation of aptamers in electrochemical sandwich biosensors using enzyme labels, a so-called ELASA, has demonstrated its utility to improve the detection schemes. In this review, we overview the existing ELASA assays for numerous cancer biomarkers as alternatives to the traditional ELISA and discuss their possibilities to reach the market, currently dominated by optical immunoassays.
Collapse
|
15
|
Vogeser M, Bendt AK. From research cohorts to the patient - a role for "omics" in diagnostics and laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 61:974-980. [PMID: 36592431 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Human pathologies are complex and might benefit from a more holistic diagnostic approach than currently practiced. Omics is a concept in biological research that aims to comprehensively characterize and quantify large numbers of biological molecules in complex samples, e.g., proteins (proteomics), low molecular weight molecules (metabolomics), glycans (glycomics) or amphiphilic molecules (lipidomics). Over the past decades, respective unbiased discovery approaches have been intensively applied to investigate functional physiological and pathophysiological relationships in various research study cohorts. In the context of clinical diagnostics, omics approaches seem to have potential in two main areas: (i) biomarker discovery i.e. identification of individual marker analytes for subsequent translation into diagnostics (as classical target analyses with conventional laboratory techniques), and (ii) the readout of complex, higher-dimensional signatures of diagnostic samples, in particular by means of spectrometric techniques in combination with biomathematical approaches of pattern recognition and artificial intelligence for diagnostic classification. Resulting diagnostic methods could potentially represent a disruptive paradigm shift away from current one-dimensional (i.e., single analyte marker based) laboratory diagnostics. The underlying hypothesis of omics approaches for diagnostics is that complex, multigenic pathologies can be more accurately diagnosed via the readout of "omics-type signatures" than with the current one-dimensional single marker diagnostic procedures. While this is indeed promising, one must realize that the clinical translation of high-dimensional analytical procedures into routine diagnostics brings completely new challenges with respect to long-term reproducibility and analytical standardization, data management, and quality assurance. In this article, the conceivable opportunities and challenges of omics-based laboratory diagnostics are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Vogeser
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anne K Bendt
- Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dewez JE, Pembrey L, Nijman RG, del Torso S, Grossman Z, Hadjipanayis A, Van Esso D, Lim E, Emonts M, Burns J, Gras-LeGuen C, Kohlfuerst D, Dornbusch HJ, Brengel-Pesce K, Mallet F, von Both U, Tsolia M, Eleftheriou I, Zavadska D, de Groot R, van der Flier M, Moll H, Hagedoorn N, Borensztajn D, Oostenbrink R, Kuijpers T, Pokorn M, Vincek K, Martinón-Torres F, Rivero I, Agyeman P, Carrol ED, Paulus S, Cunnington A, Herberg J, Levin M, Mujkić A, Geitmann K, Da Dalt L, Valiulis A, Lapatto R, Syridou G, Altorjai P, Torpiano P, Størdal K, Illy K, Mazur A, Spreitzer MV, Rios J, Wyder C, Romankevych I, Basmaci R, Ibanez-Mico S, Yeung S. Availability and use of rapid diagnostic tests for the management of acute childhood infections in Europe: A cross-sectional survey of paediatricians. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0275336. [PMID: 36538525 PMCID: PMC9767335 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Point-of-care-tests (POCTs) have been advocated to optimise care in patients with infections but their actual use varies. This study aimed to estimate the variability in the adoption of current POCTs by paediatricians across Europe, and to explore the determinants of variability. METHODS AND FINDINGS A cross-sectional survey was conducted of hospital and primary care paediatricians, recruited through professional networks. Questions focused on the availability and use of currently available POCTs. Data were analysed descriptively and using Median Odds Ratio (MOR) to measure variation between countries. Multilevel regression modelling using changes in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of models were used to assess the contribution of individual or workplace versus country level factors, to the observed variation. The commonest POCT was urine dipsticks (UD) which were available to >80% of primary care and hospital paediatricians in 68% (13/19) and 79% (23/29) countries, respectively. Availability of all POCTs varied between countries. In primary care, the country (MOR) varied from 1.61 (95%CI: 1.04-2.58) for lactate to 7.28 (95%CI: 3.04-24.35) for UD. In hospitals, the country MOR varied from 1.37 (95%CI:1.04-1.80) for lactate to 11.93 (95%CI:3.35-72.23) for UD. Most paediatricians in primary care (69%, 795/1154) and hospital (81%, 962/1188) would use a diagnostic test in the case scenario of an infant with undifferentiated fever. Multilevel regression modelling showed that the country of work was more important in predicting both the availability and use of POCTs than individual or workplace characteristics. CONCLUSION There is substantial variability in the adoption of POCTs for the management of acute infections in children across Europe. To inform future implementation of both existing and innovative tests, further research is needed to understand what drives the variation between countries, the needs of frontline clinicians, and the role of diagnostic tests in the management of acute childhood infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Emmanuel Dewez
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
| | - Lucy Pembrey
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ruud G. Nijman
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM)
| | - Stefano del Torso
- ChildCare WorldWide, Padova, Italy
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
| | - Zachi Grossman
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
- Pediatric Clinic, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Adamos Hadjipanayis
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Paediatric Department, Larnaca General Hospital, Larnaca, Cyprus
- Medical School, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Diego Van Esso
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Primary Care Paediatrician, Health Care Centre Pere Grau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Emma Lim
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Great North Children’s Hospital, Paediatric Immunology, Infectious Diseases & Allergy, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Marieke Emonts
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Great North Children’s Hospital, Paediatric Immunology, Infectious Diseases & Allergy, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - James Burns
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christèle Gras-LeGuen
- Centre d’Investigation Clinique CIC1413, INSERM-Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Daniela Kohlfuerst
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Hans Jürgen Dornbusch
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Karen Brengel-Pesce
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- BioMérieux, Lyon, France
| | - Francois Mallet
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- BioMérieux, Lyon, France
| | - Ulrich von Both
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Tsolia
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- P. and A. Kyriakou Children’s Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Irini Eleftheriou
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- P. and A. Kyriakou Children’s Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dace Zavadska
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Children Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - Ronald de Groot
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel van der Flier
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Henriëtte Moll
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM)
- Department of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke Hagedoorn
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Department of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dorine Borensztajn
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Department of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rianne Oostenbrink
- Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM)
- Department of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Taco Kuijpers
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marko Pokorn
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Katarina Vincek
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Federico Martinón-Torres
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Irene Rivero
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Philipp Agyeman
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Enitan D. Carrol
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Stéphane Paulus
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Department of Paediatrics, Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Aubrey Cunnington
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jethro Herberg
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Levin
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aida Mujkić
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Karin Geitmann
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Primary Care Paediatrician, BVKJ, Hagen, Germany
| | - Liviana Da Dalt
- Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM)
- Department of Woman’s and Child’s Health Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Arūnas Valiulis
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Vilnius University Medical Faculty, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Children’s Diseases, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Risto Lapatto
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Department of Paediatrics, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Garyfallia Syridou
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Attiko University Hospital, Chaidari, Greece
| | - Péter Altorjai
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Association of Hungarian Primary Care Paediatricians, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Paul Torpiano
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Health at Mater Dei Hospital, Valletta, Malta
| | - Ketil Størdal
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Paediatric Research Institute, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Károly Illy
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Dutch Society of Paediatrics NVK, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Artur Mazur
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Mateja Vintar Spreitzer
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Zdravstveni dom Domžale, Slovenian Paediatric Society, Burnaby, Slovenia
| | - Joana Rios
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal
| | - Corinne Wyder
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Kinderärzte KurWerk, Burgdorf, Switzerland
| | - Ivanna Romankevych
- European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Settings network (EAPRASnet)
- Ukrainian Academy of Pediatric Specialties, Ukraine
| | - Romain Basmaci
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Service de Pédiatrie-Urgences, AP-HP, Hôpital Louis-Mourier, Colombes, France
| | | | - Shunmay Yeung
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Personalised Risk Assessment in Febrile Illness to Optimise Real-Life Management Across the European Union (PERFORM)
- Department of Paediatrics, St Mary’s Imperial College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fawkner-Corbett D, Hayward G, Alkhmees M, Van Den Bruel A, Ordóñez-Mena JM, Holtman GA. Diagnostic accuracy of blood tests of inflammation in paediatric appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056854. [PMID: 36328382 PMCID: PMC9639107 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Possible childhood appendicitis is a common emergency presentation. The exact value of blood tests is debated. This study sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of four blood tests (white cell count (WCC), neutrophil(count or percentage), C reactive protein (CRP) and/or procalcitonin) for childhood appendicitis. DESIGN A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Central, Web of Science searched from inception-March 2022 with reference searching and authors contacted for missing/unclear data. Eligibility criteria was studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of the four blood tests compared to the reference standard (histology or follow-up). Risk of bias was assessed (QUADAS-2), pooled sensitivity and specificity were generated for each test and commonly presented cut-offs. To provide insight into clinical impact, we present strategies using a hypothetical cohort. RESULTS 67 studies were included (34 839 children, 13 342 with appendicitis), all in the hospital setting. The most sensitive tests were WCC (≥10 000 cells/µL, 53 studies sensitivity 0.85 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.89)) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (≥7500 cells/µL, five studies sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.94)). Combination of WCC or CRP increased sensitivity further(≥10 000 cells/µL or ≥10 mg/L, individual patient data (IPD) of 6 studies, 0.97 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.99)).Applying results to a hypothetical cohort(1000 children with appendicitis symptoms, of whom 400 have appendicitis) 60 and 40 children would be wrongly discharged based solely on WCC and ANC, respectively, 12 with combination of WCC or CRP.The most specific tests were CRP alone (≥50 mg/L, 38 studies, specificity 0.87 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.91)) or combined with WCC (≥10 000 cells/µL and ≥50 mg/L, IPD of six studies, 0.93 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.95)). CONCLUSIONS The best performing single blood tests for ruling-out paediatric appendicitis are WCC or ANC; with accuracy improved combining WCC and CRP. These tests could be used at the point of care in combination with clinical prediction rules. We provide insight into the best cut-offs for clinical application. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017080036.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Fawkner-Corbett
- NIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and IVD Co-operative, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
- Academic Paediatric Surgery Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
- MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK
| | - Gail Hayward
- NIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and IVD Co-operative, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Mohammed Alkhmees
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ann Van Den Bruel
- EPI-Centre, Academic Centre for Primary Care, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jose M Ordóñez-Mena
- NIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and IVD Co-operative, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Gea A Holtman
- NIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and IVD Co-operative, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Research on point-of-care tests in outpatient care in Germany: A scoping review and definition of relevant endpoints in evaluation studies. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 174:1-10. [PMID: 36055890 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The fast turnaround time and user-friendliness of point-of-care tests (POCTs) offer a great potential to improve outpatient health care where clinical decisions have to be made during the physician-patient encounter and time resources are limited. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the extent and nature as well as gaps in German research activities on POCT in outpatient care. In addition, we define research endpoints that should be addressed in the comprehensive evaluation of POCTs targeted for outpatient care. METHODS We performed a scoping review with a systematic literature search in Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Google Scholar for German publications on POCT with relevance to German outpatient care published from January 2005 to November 2020. RESULTS Our literature search identified 2,200 unique records. After literature selection 117 articles were included in this scoping review. Just over half of the articles (67/117, 57.3%) were primary research studies with original data, while one third of all the studies (33.3%) were secondary research articles (e.g., review articles). The remaining articles were clinical recommendations / position papers (7/117, 6.0%) and other types of articles (3.4%). The majority of articles focused on POCT use in infectious diseases (44/117, 37.6%), diabetic syndromes (15.4%), cardiac disease (12.0%) or coagulopathies and thrombosis (10.3%), while the remaining articles did not specify the disease (13.7%) or investigated other diseases (11.1%). Similar to international studies, most primary research studies investigated the diagnostic performance of POCT (e.g., sensitivity, specificity). Evidence beyond diagnostic accuracy remains scarce, such as the impact on therapeutic decisions and practice routines, clinical effectiveness, and user perspectives. In line with this, interventional studies (such as RCTs) on the effectiveness of POCT use in German outpatient care are limited. We define six endpoint domains that should be addressed in the evaluation of POCTs targeted for outpatient care: (i) diagnostic performance, (ii) clinical performance, (iii) time and costs, (iv) impact on clinical routines / processes, (v) perspectives of medical professionals and patients, and (vi) broader aspects. CONCLUSION There is considerable research activity on POCTs targeted for use in outpatient care in Germany. Data on their potential benefits beyond diagnostic accuracy is often lacking and should be addressed in future POCT research studies.
Collapse
|
19
|
Miller WG, Myers G, Cobbaert CM, Young IS, Theodorsson E, Wielgosz RI, Westwood S, Maniguet S, Gillery P. Overcoming challenges regarding reference materials and regulations that influence global standardization of medical laboratory testing results. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022; 61:48-54. [PMID: 36239374 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standardized results for laboratory tests are particularly important when their interpretation depends on fixed medical practice guidelines or common reference intervals. The medical laboratory community has developed a roadmap for an infrastructure to achieve standardized test results described in the International Organization for Standardization standard 17511:2020 In vitro diagnostic medical devices - Requirements for establishing metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators, trueness control materials and human samples. Among the challenges to implementing metrological traceability are the availability of fit-for-purpose matrix-based certified reference materials (CRMs) and requirements for regulatory review that differ among countries. A workshop in December 2021 focused on these two challenges and developed recommendations for improved practices. DISCUSSION The participants agreed that prioritization of measurands for standardization should be based on their impact on medical decisions in a clinical pathway. Ensuring that matrix-based CRMs are globally available for more measurands will enable fit-for-purpose calibration hierarchies for more laboratory tests. Regulation of laboratory tests is important to ensure safety and effectiveness for the populations served. Because regulations are country or region specific, manufacturers must submit recalibration changes intended to standardize results for regulatory review to all areas in which a measuring system is marketed. RECOMMENDATIONS A standardization initiative requires collaboration and planning among all interested stakeholders. Global collaboration should be further developed for prioritization of measurands for standardization, and for coordinating the production and supply of CRMs worldwide. More uniform regulatory submission requirements are desirable when recalibration is implemented to achieve internationally standardized results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Greg Miller
- Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Christa M Cobbaert
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ian S Young
- Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Elvar Theodorsson
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Clinical Chemistry, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Robert I Wielgosz
- Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), Sèvres Cedex, France
| | - Steven Westwood
- Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), Sèvres Cedex, France
| | | | - Philippe Gillery
- Laboratory of Biochemistry-Pharmacology-Toxicology, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tebani A, Bekri S. [The promise of omics in the precision medicine era]. Rev Med Interne 2022; 43:649-660. [PMID: 36041909 DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2022.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
The rise of omics technologies that simultaneously measure thousands of molecules in a complex biological sample represents the core of systems biology. These technologies have profoundly impacted biomarkers and therapeutic targets discovery in the precision medicine era. Systems biology aims to perform a systematic probing of complex interactions in biological systems. Powered by high-throughput omics technologies and high-performance computing, systems biology provides relevant, resolving, and multi-scale overviews from cells to populations. Precision medicine takes advantage of these conceptual and technological developments and is based on two main pillars: the generation of multimodal data and their subsequent modeling. High-throughput omics technologies enable the comprehensive and holistic extraction of biological information, while computational capabilities enable multidimensional modeling and, as a result, offer an intuitive and intelligible visualization. Despite their promise, translating these technologies into clinically actionable tools has been slow. In this contribution, we present the most recent multi-omics data generation and analysis strategies and their clinical deployment in the post-genomic era. Furthermore, medical application challenges of omics-based biomarkers are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Tebani
- UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Department of Metabolic Biochemistry, Normandie University, CHU Rouen, 76000 Rouen, France.
| | - S Bekri
- UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Department of Metabolic Biochemistry, Normandie University, CHU Rouen, 76000 Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
van Duijl TT, Ruhaak R, Hoogeveen E, de Mutsert RE, Rosendaal F, le Cessie S, de Fijter J, Cobbaert C. Reference intervals of urinary kidney injury biomarkers for middle-aged men and women determined by quantitative protein mass spectrometry. Ann Clin Biochem 2022; 59:420-432. [PMID: 35957618 DOI: 10.1177/00045632221121780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There is an ongoing need to recognize early kidney injury and its progression in structural chronic pathologies. The proteins NGAL, IGFBP7, TIMP2, KIM-1, CXCL9, TGF-β1, SLC22A2, nephrin, cubilin and uromodulin have been proposed as early kidney injury biomarkers. To guide clinical interpretation, their urinary concentrations should be accompanied by reference intervals, which we here establish in a representative Dutch middle-aged population. MATERIALS AND METHODS The 24-h urine samples from 1443 Caucasian middle-aged men and women, were analyzed for the biomarkers by quantitative LC-MS/MS. Biomarker excretion per 24-h were calculated, and urine creatinine and osmolality were measured for dilution normalization. This population was characterized by demographic and anthropometric parameters, comorbid conditions, and conventional kidney function measures. RESULTS NGAL, IGFBP7, TIMP2, KIM-1 and uromodulin could be quantified in this population, whereas nephrin, SLC22A2 and CXCL9 were below their detection limits. Urine creatinine and osmolality ( r= -were correlated to urine volume (r = -0.71; -0.74) and to IGFBP7 (r = 0.73; 0.71) and TIMP2 (r = 0.71; 0.69). Crude and normalized biomarker concentrations were affected by sex, but not by age, BMI, smoking, kidney function or common comorbid conditions. The reference intervals (men; women) were 18-108; 21-131 pmol IGFBP7/mmol creatinine, 1- 63; 4-224 pmol NGAL/mmol creatinine, 7-48; 7- 59 pmol TIMP2/mmol creatinine, <1-9; <1-12 pmol KIM-1/mmol creatinine and 0.1-1.2; 0.1-1.7 mg uromodulin/mmol creatinine. CONCLUSION We present dilution-normalized and sex-stratified urinary reference intervals of kidney injury biomarkers in a middle-aged Caucasian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ellen Hoogeveen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology4501Leiden University Medical Center
| | - Renà E de Mutsert
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology4501Leiden University Medical Center
| | - Frits Rosendaal
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology4501Leiden University Medical Center
| | - Saskia le Cessie
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology4501Leiden University Medical Center
| | - Johan de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology4501Leiden University Medical Center
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Diaz-Uriarte R, Gómez de Lope E, Giugno R, Fröhlich H, Nazarov PV, Nepomuceno-Chamorro IA, Rauschenberger A, Glaab E. Ten quick tips for biomarker discovery and validation analyses using machine learning. PLoS Comput Biol 2022; 18:e1010357. [PMID: 35951526 PMCID: PMC9371329 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas ‘Alberto Sols’ (UAM-CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisa Gómez de Lope
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Rosalba Giugno
- Department of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Holger Fröhlich
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Bonn-Aachen International Centre for IT (b-it), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Petr V. Nazarov
- Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | | | - Armin Rauschenberger
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Enrico Glaab
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Multidisciplinary perspectives on the regulation of diagnostic technologies. Soc Sci Med 2022; 304:115059. [PMID: 35715015 PMCID: PMC9195643 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
24
|
Ahmad E, Ali A, Nimisha, Kumar Sharma A, Apurva, Kumar A, Dar GM, Sumayya Abdul Sattar R, Verma R, Mahajan B, Singh Saluja S. Molecular markers in cancer. Clin Chim Acta 2022; 532:95-114. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2022.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
|
25
|
Ahmad E, Ali A, Nimisha, Kumar Sharma A, Apurva, Kumar A, Mehdi G, Sumayya Abdul Sattar R, Verma R, Mahajan B, Singh Saluja S. Molecular markers in cancer. Clin Chim Acta 2022; 532:95-114. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
26
|
Sajid IM, Frost K, Paul AK. 'Diagnostic downshift': clinical and system consequences of extrapolating secondary care testing tactics to primary care. BMJ Evid Based Med 2022; 27:141-148. [PMID: 34099498 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Numerous drivers push specialist diagnostic approaches down to primary care ('diagnostic downshift'), intuitively welcomed by clinicians and patients. However, primary care's different population and processes result in under-recognised, unintended consequences. Testing performs poorer in primary care, with indication creep due to earlier, more undifferentiated presentation and reduced accuracy due to spectrum bias and the 'false-positive paradox'. In low-prevalence settings, tests without near-100% specificity have their useful yield eclipsed by greater incidental or false-positive findings. Ensuing cascades and multiplier effects can generate clinician workload, patient anxiety, further low-value tests, referrals, treatments and a potentially nocebic population 'disease' burden of unclear benefit. Increased diagnostics earlier in pathways can burden patients and stretch general practice (GP) workloads, inducing downstream service utilisation and unintended 'market failure' effects. Evidence is tenuous for reducing secondary care referrals, providing patient reassurance or meaningfully improving clinical outcomes. Subsequently, inflated investment in per capita testing, at a lower level in a healthcare system, may deliver diminishing or even negative economic returns. Test cost poorly represents 'value', neglecting under-recognised downstream consequences, which must be balanced against therapeutic yield. With lower positive predictive values, more tests are required per true diagnosis and cost-effectiveness is rarely robust. With fixed secondary care capacity, novel primary care testing is an added cost pressure, rarely reducing hospital activity. GP testing strategies require real-world evaluation, in primary care populations, of all downstream consequences. Test formularies should be scrutinised in view of the setting of care, with interventions to focus rational testing towards those with higher pretest probabilities, while improving interpretation and communication of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran Mohammed Sajid
- NHS West London Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UK
- University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Kathleen Frost
- NHS Central London Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UK
| | - Ash K Paul
- NHS South West London Health and Care Partnership STP, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
de Hond AAH, van Calster B, Steyerberg EW. Commentary: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics: Just the Old Wine in New Wineskins? Front Digit Health 2022; 4:923944. [PMID: 35669357 PMCID: PMC9163296 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.923944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anne A. H. de Hond
- Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation and Research Lab, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Anne A. H. de Hond
| | - Ben van Calster
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ewout W. Steyerberg
- Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation and Research Lab, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ferraro S, Biganzoli EM, Castaldi S, Plebani M. Health Technology Assessment to assess value of biomarkers in the decision-making process. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022; 60:647-654. [PMID: 35245972 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2021-1291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on screening, surveillance, and treatment of several diseases recommend the selective use of biomarkers with central role in clinical decision-making and move towards including patients in this process. To this aim we will clarify the multidisciplinary interactions required to properly measure the cost-effectiveness of biomarkers with regard to the risk-benefit of the patients and how Health Technology Assessment (HTA) approach may assess value of biomarkers integrated within the decision-making process. HTA through the interaction of different skills provides high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs, and impact of health technologies, including biomarkers. The biostatistical methodology is relevant to HTA but only meta-analysis is covered in depth, whereas proper approaches are needed to estimate the benefit-risk balance ratio. Several biomarkers underwent HTA evaluation and the final reports have pragmatically addressed: 1) a redesign of the screening based on biomarker; 2) a de-implementation/replacement of the test in clinical practice; 3) a selection of biomarkers with potential predictive ability and prognostic value; and 4) a stronger monitoring of the appropriateness of test request. The COVID-19 pandemic has disclosed the need to create a robust and sustainable system to urgently deal with global health concerns and the HTA methodology enables rapid cost-effective implementation of diagnostic tests allowing healthcare providers to make critical patient-management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Ferraro
- Endocrinology Laboratory Unit, "Luigi Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elia Mario Biganzoli
- Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences L. Sacco, "Luigi Sacco" University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvana Castaldi
- Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Research Institute of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Plebani
- Department of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Briers PJ, Langlois MR. Concordance of apolipoprotein B concentration with the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson formulas for calculating LDL cholesterol. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2022; 32:010704. [PMID: 34955672 PMCID: PMC8672388 DOI: 10.11613/bm.2022.010704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Two new formulas, the Martin-Hopkins and the Sampson formula, were recently developed to overcome shortcomings of the Friedewald formula for calculating LDL-cholesterol. We aimed to compare the concordance of the two formulas with apolipoprotein B (apoB), a surrogate marker of the number of LDL particles. Materials and methods In a study of serum lipid data of 1179 patients who consulted the AZ St-Jan Hospital Bruges for cardiovascular risk assessment, the correlation and concordance of the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins and Sampson formulas with apoB concentration, measured by immunonephelometry, were determined and compared. Results The Martin-Hopkins formula showed significantly higher correlation coefficient than the Friedewald formula with apoB in the entire dataset and in patients with low LDL-cholesterol < 1.8 mmol/L. Both Martin-Hopkins and Sampson formulas yielded > 70% concordance of LDL-cholesterol with regard to treatment group classification based on population-equivalent thresholds of apoB in hypertriglyceridemic patients (2-4.5 mmol/L), with the highest concordance (75.6%) obtained using Martin-Hopkins formula vs. 60.5% with Friedewald formula. Conclusion The Martin-Hopkins (and, to a lesser extent, Sampson) formula is more closely associated with the number of LDL particles than Friedewald formula. This, in combination with literature evidence of lesser accuracy of the Friedewald formula, is an argument to switch from Friedewald to a modified, improved formula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter-Jan Briers
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ St-Jan Hospital, Brugge, Belgium
| | - Michel R Langlois
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ St-Jan Hospital, Brugge, Belgium.,Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Matthes A, Wolf F, Bleidorn J, Markwart R. "It Was Very Comforting to Find Out Right Away." - Patient Perspectives on Point-of-Care Molecular SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Primary Care. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:2031-2039. [PMID: 35975172 PMCID: PMC9375998 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s372366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of point-of-care tests (POCTs) has been a central strategy to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, evidence on the application and consequences of POCTs within medical settings is rare. PURPOSE To assess and understand patient perspectives on molecular point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 testing conducted in primary care. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey study among patients who were tested with a molecular SARS-CoV-2 rapid test (ID NOWTM COVID-19 rapid test, Abbott) in 13 primary care practices in the state of Thuringia (Germany) from February to April 2021. The following aspects were covered in the questionnaire through rating scales and open text formats: test characteristics, trust in test result, consequences of immediate result, cost amount willing to pay and expectations in the future. Open text answers were categorized; quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a Mann-Whitney U-test to reveal differences in cost contribution depending on the test result. RESULTS A total of 215 patients from nine family practices and one pediatric practice participated. The immediate availability of the test result was important to the majority of patients (94.3%). 95.7% of patients trusted in their test result. Personal consequences of the immediate test result referred to pandemic measures, certainty of action and reassurance. For further tests, patients were willing to pay between 0€ and 100€ (interquartile range = 10-25€) for the molecular SARS-CoV-2 POCT, regardless of the test result. Expectations of being offered the test again in case of renewed cold symptoms were reported by 96.2%. CONCLUSION Patients highly appreciated molecular SARS-CoV-2 rapid testing conducted in primary care practices. The immediate availability of the test result led to adjustments in patients' behavior and emotional wellbeing. However, potentially challenging for the implementation of POCTs in primary care practices may be the reimbursement of test costs and patients' expectations in future situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anni Matthes
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
- InfectoGnostics Research Campus Jena, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
- Correspondence: Anni Matthes, Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Bachstr. 18, Jena, Thuringia, 07743, Germany, Tel +49 3641 939 5824, Fax +49 3641 939 5802, Email
| | - Florian Wolf
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
| | - Jutta Bleidorn
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
| | - Robby Markwart
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
- InfectoGnostics Research Campus Jena, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
From lab to field: Surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based sensing strategies for on-site analysis. Trends Analyt Chem 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
32
|
Olsen M, Fischer K, Bossuyt PM, Goetghebeur E. Evaluating the prognostic performance of a polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk stratification. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1351. [PMID: 34930164 PMCID: PMC8691010 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08937-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polygenic risk scores (PRS) could potentially improve breast cancer screening recommendations. Before a PRS can be considered for implementation, it needs rigorous evaluation, using performance measures that can inform about its future clinical value. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prognostic performance of a regression model with a previously developed, prevalence-based PRS and age as predictors for breast cancer incidence in women from the Estonian biobank (EstBB) cohort; to compare it to the performance of a model including age only. METHODS We analyzed data on 30,312 women from the EstBB cohort. They entered the cohort between 2002 and 2011, were between 20 and 89 years, without a history of breast cancer, and with full 5-year follow-up by 2015. We examined PRS and other potential risk factors as possible predictors in Cox regression models for breast cancer incidence. With 10-fold cross-validation we estimated 3- and 5-year breast cancer incidence predicted by age alone and by PRS plus age, fitting models on 90% of the data. Calibration, discrimination, and reclassification were calculated on the left-out folds to express prognostic performance. RESULTS A total of 101 (3.33‰) and 185 (6.1‰) incident breast cancers were observed within 3 and 5 years, respectively. For women in a defined screening age of 50-62 years, the ratio of observed vs PRS-age modelled 3-year incidence was 0.86 for women in the 75-85% PRS-group, 1.34 for the 85-95% PRS-group, and 1.41 for the top 5% PRS-group. For 5-year incidence, this was respectively 0.94, 1.15, and 1.08. Yet the number of breast cancer events was relatively low in each PRS-subgroup. For all women, the model's AUC was 0.720 (95% CI: 0.675-0.765) for 3-year and 0.704 (95% CI: 0.670-0.737) for 5-year follow-up, respectively, just 0.022 and 0.023 higher than for the model with age alone. Using a 1% risk prediction threshold, the 3-year NRI for the PRS-age model was 0.09, and 0.05 for 5 years. CONCLUSION The model including PRS had modest incremental performance over one based on age only. A larger, independent study is needed to assess whether and how the PRS can meaningfully contribute to age, for developing more efficient screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Olsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Krista Fischer
- Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Tartu, Narva mnt 18, 51009, Tartu, Estonia.,Estonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Patrick M Bossuyt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Els Goetghebeur
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Institute for Continuing Education Center for Statistics, Campus Sterre, S9, Krijgslaan 281, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ansems S, Berger M, Rheenen PV, Vermeulen K, Beugel G, Couwenberg M, Holtman G. Effect of faecal calprotectin testing on referrals for children with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045444. [PMID: 34301652 PMCID: PMC8311316 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Children with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms are frequently seen in primary care, yet general practitioners (GPs) often experience challenges distinguishing functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) from organic disorders. We, therefore, aim to evaluate whether a test strategy that includes point-of-care testing (POCT) for faecal calprotectin (FCal) can reduce the referral rate to paediatric specialist care among children with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms. The study findings will contribute to improving the recommendations on FCal use among children in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In this pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, we will randomise general practices into intervention and control groups. The intervention group will use FCal-POCT when indicated, after completing online training about its indication, interpretation and follow-up as well as communicating an FGID diagnosis. The control group will test and treat according to Dutch GP guidelines, which advise against FCal testing in children. GPs will include children aged 4-18 years presenting to primary care with chronic diarrhoea and/or recurrent abdominal pain. The primary outcome will be the referral rate for children with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms within 6 months after the initial assessment. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated by questionnaires completed at baseline and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. These outcomes will include parental satisfaction and concerns, gastrointestinal symptoms, impact of symptoms on daily function, quality of life, proportion of children with paediatrician-diagnosed FGID referred to secondary care, health service use and healthcare costs. A sample size calculation indicates that we need to recruit 158 GP practices to recruit 406 children. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) of the University Medical Center Groningen (The Netherlands) approved this study (MREC number: 201900309). The study results will be made available to patients, GPs, paediatricians and laboratories via peer-reviewed publications and in presentations at (inter)national conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The Netherlands Trial Register: NL7690 (Pre-results).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Ansems
- General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Berger
- General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick van Rheenen
- Paediatric Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Groningen Beatrix Childrens Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Vermeulen
- Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gina Beugel
- General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Couwenberg
- General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gea Holtman
- General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sajid IM, Parkunan A, Frost K. Unintended consequences: quantifying the benefits, iatrogenic harms and downstream cascade costs of musculoskeletal MRI in UK primary care. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 10:e001287. [PMID: 34215659 PMCID: PMC8256731 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The largest proportion of general practitioner (GP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is musculoskeletal (MSK), with consistent annual growth. With limited supporting evidence and potential harms from early imaging overuse, we evaluated practice to improve pathways and patient safety. METHODS Cohort evaluation of routinely collected diagnostic and general practice data across a UK metropolitan primary care population. We reviewed patient characteristics, results and healthcare utilisation. RESULTS Of 306 MSK-MRIs requested by 107 clinicians across 29 practices, only 4.9% (95% CI ±2.4%) appeared clearly indicated and only 16.0% (95% CI ±4.1%) received appropriate prior therapy. 37.0% (95% CI ±5.5%) documented patient imaging request. Most had chronic symptoms and half had psychosocial flags. Mental health was addressed in only 11.8% (95% CI ±6.3%) of chronic sufferers with psychiatric illness, suggesting a solely pathoanatomical approach to MSK care. Only 7.8% (95% CI ±3.0%) of all patients were appropriately managed without additional referral. 1.3% (95% CI ±1.3%) of scans revealed diagnoses leading to change in treatment (therapeutic yield). Most imaged patients received pathoanatomical explanations to their symptoms, often based on expected age or activity-related changes. Only 16.7% (95% CI ±4.2%) of results appeared correctly interpreted by GPs, with spurious overperception of surgical targets in 65.4% (95% CI ±5.3%) who suffered 'low-value' (ineffective, harmful or wasteful) post-MRI referral cascades due to misdiagnosis and overdiagnosis. Typically, 20%-30% of GP specialist referrals convert to a procedure, whereas MRI-triggered referrals showed near-zero conversion rate. Imaged patients experienced considerable delay to appropriate care. Cascade costs exceeded direct-MRI costs and GP-MSK-MRI potentially more than doubles expenditure compared with physiotherapist-led assessment services, for little-to-no added therapeutic yield, unjustifiable by cost-consequence or cost-utility analysis. CONCLUSION Unfettered GP-MSK-MRI use has reached unaccceptable indication creep and disutility. Considerable avoidable harm occurs through ubiquitous misinterpretation and salient low-value referral cascades for two-thirds of imaged patients, for almost no change in treatment. Any marginally earlier procedural intervention for a tiny fraction of patients is eclipsed by negative consequences for the vast majority. Only 1-2 patients need to be scanned for one to suffer mismanagement. Direct-access imaging is neither clinically, nor cost-effective and deimplementation could be considered in this setting. GP-MSK-MRI fuels unnecessary healthcare utilisation, generating nocebic patient beliefs and expectations, whilst appropriate care is delayed and a high burden of psychosocial barriers to recovery appear neglected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran Mohammed Sajid
- NHS West London Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UK
- University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Anand Parkunan
- Healthshare Community NHS Musculoskeletal Services, London, UK
| | - Kathleen Frost
- NHS Central London Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Langlois MR, Nordestgaard BG, Langsted A, Chapman MJ, Aakre KM, Baum H, Borén J, Bruckert E, Catapano A, Cobbaert C, Collinson P, Descamps OS, Duff CJ, von Eckardstein A, Hammerer-Lercher A, Kamstrup PR, Kolovou G, Kronenberg F, Mora S, Pulkki K, Remaley AT, Rifai N, Ros E, Stankovic S, Stavljenic-Rukavina A, Sypniewska G, Watts GF, Wiklund O, Laitinen P. Quantifying atherogenic lipoproteins for lipid-lowering strategies: consensus-based recommendations from EAS and EFLM. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021; 58:496-517. [PMID: 31855562 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-1253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The joint consensus panel of the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) recently addressed present and future challenges in the laboratory diagnostics of atherogenic lipoproteins. Total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), LDL cholesterol (LDLC), and calculated non-HDLC (=total - HDLC) constitute the primary lipid panel for estimating risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and can be measured in the nonfasting state. LDLC is the primary target of lipid-lowering therapies. For on-treatment follow-up, LDLC shall be measured or calculated by the same method to attenuate errors in treatment decisions due to marked between-method variations. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]-cholesterol is part of measured or calculated LDLC and should be estimated at least once in all patients at risk of ASCVD, especially in those whose LDLC declines poorly upon statin treatment. Residual risk of ASCVD even under optimal LDL-lowering treatment should be also assessed by non-HDLC or apolipoprotein B (apoB), especially in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia (2-10 mmol/L). Non-HDLC includes the assessment of remnant lipoprotein cholesterol and shall be reported in all standard lipid panels. Additional apoB measurement can detect elevated LDL particle (LDLP) numbers often unidentified on the basis of LDLC alone. Reference intervals of lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins are reported for European men and women aged 20-100 years. However, laboratories shall flag abnormal lipid values with reference to therapeutic decision thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel R Langlois
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ St-Jan, Ruddershove 10, 8000 Brugge, Belgium.,University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Børge G Nordestgaard
- Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Langsted
- Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M John Chapman
- National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Paris, France.,Endocrinology-Metabolism Service, Pitié-Salpetriere University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Kristin M Aakre
- Hormone Laboratory, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hannsjörg Baum
- Institute for Laboratory Medicine, Mikrobiologie und Blutdepot, Regionale Kliniken Holding RKH GmbH, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Jan Borén
- Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eric Bruckert
- Department of Endocrinology and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Pitié-Salpetriere University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alberico Catapano
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy
| | - Christa Cobbaert
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Collinson
- Department of Clinical Blood Sciences, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and St George's University of London, London, UK.,Department of Cardiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Olivier S Descamps
- Department of Internal Medicine, Centres Hospitaliers Jolimont, Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgium.,Department of Cardiology, UCL Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christopher J Duff
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | | | | | - Pia R Kamstrup
- Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Genovefa Kolovou
- Cardiology Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Florian Kronenberg
- Department of Medical Genetics, Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Samia Mora
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kari Pulkki
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Alan T Remaley
- Lipoprotein Metabolism Section, Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nader Rifai
- Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emilio Ros
- Lipid Clinic, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.,Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sanja Stankovic
- Center for Medical Biochemistry, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Grazyna Sypniewska
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Collegium Medicum, NC University, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Gerald F Watts
- Lipid Disorders Clinic, Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Olov Wiklund
- Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Päivi Laitinen
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jülicher P, O'Kane M, Price CP, Christenson R, John AS. Health economic evaluations of medical tests: Translating laboratory information into value - A case study example. Ann Clin Biochem 2021; 59:23-36. [PMID: 33874738 DOI: 10.1177/00045632211013852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Health-care providers and funders are focused on identifying value in all their services and that includes laboratories. This means that in order to gain a share of scarce resources, laboratory professionals must also understand and assess the value of tests and that includes their economic impact. This can be assessed using health economic modelling tools which, when used in conjunction with a detailed value proposition for the test, can translate laboratory information into value. While a variety of health economic assessment tools are available, this review will focus on the use of decision analytic models which essentially compare the outcomes from pathways with and without the new test, the value of which is being assessed. A step-by-step framework is provided to guide laboratory professionals through the essential steps of conducting the evaluation. Initial steps include mapping the clinical pathway, understanding the goal of the evaluation, identifying the key stakeholders and their needs and determining a suitable analytical model. Following collection of the actual data, the validity of the model must be checked, and the robustness of the outcomes tested through sensitivity analysis. The last step is to translate the findings into measures of value which can then inform appropriate decisions by the stakeholders. This review of basic health economic modelling should enable laboratory professionals to have an understanding of how modelling can be applied to tests in their own environment and help deliver their potential value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Jülicher
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Medical Affairs, Abbott Laboratories, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Maurice O'Kane
- Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Altnagelvin Hospital, Londonderry, UK
- Centre for Personalised Medicine: Clinical Decision Making and Patient Safety, C-TRIC, Altnagelvin Hospital, Londonderry, UK
| | - Christopher P Price
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Christenson
- Laboratories of Pathology, University of Maryland Medical Centre, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Li E, Dewez JE, Luu Q, Emonts M, Maconochie I, Nijman R, Yeung S. Role of point-of-care tests in the management of febrile children: a qualitative study of hospital-based doctors and nurses in England. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044510. [PMID: 33972339 PMCID: PMC8112413 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of rapid point-of-care tests (POCTs) has been advocated for improving patient management and outcomes and for optimising antibiotic prescribing. However, few studies have explored healthcare workers' views about their use in febrile children. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of hospital-based doctors and nurses regarding the use of POCTs in England. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative in-depth interviews with purposively selected hospital doctors and nurses. Data were analysed thematically. SETTING Two university teaching hospitals in London and Newcastle. PARTICIPANTS 24 participants (paediatricians, emergency department doctors, trainee paediatricians and nurses). RESULTS There were diverse views about the use of POCTs in febrile children. The reported advantages included their ease of use and the rapid availability of results. They were seen to contribute to faster clinical decision-making; the targeting of antibiotic use; improvements in patient care, flow and monitoring; cohorting (ie, the physical clustering of hospitalised patients with the same infection to limit spread) and enhancing communication with parents. These advantages were less evident when the turnaround for results of laboratory tests was 1-2 hours. Factors such as clinical experience and specialty, as well as the availability of guidelines recommending POCT use, were also perceived as influential. However, in addition to their perceived inaccuracy, participants were concerned about POCTs not resolving diagnostic uncertainty or altering clinical management, leading to a commonly expressed preference for relying on clinical skills rather than test results solely. CONCLUSION In this study conducted at two university teaching hospitals in England, participants expressed mixed opinions about the utility of current POCTs in the management of febrile children. Understanding the current clinical decision-making process and the specific needs and preferences of clinicians in different settings will be critical in ensuring the optimal design and deployment of current and future tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmond Li
- Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Disease, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Juan Emmanuel Dewez
- Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Disease, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Queena Luu
- Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Disease, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Marieke Emonts
- Department of Paediatric Immunology, Infectious Diseases & Allergy, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ian Maconochie
- Paediatric Emergency Department, St Mary's Hospital Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ruud Nijman
- Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Shunmay Yeung
- Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Disease, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Disease, St Mary's Hospital Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lubbers BR, Schilhabel A, Cobbaert CM, Gonzalez D, Dombrink I, Brüggemann M, Bitter WM, van Dongen JJ. The New EU Regulation on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices: Implications and Preparatory Actions for Diagnostic Laboratories. Hemasphere 2021; 5:e568. [PMID: 33898932 PMCID: PMC8061679 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bart R. Lubbers
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anke Schilhabel
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christa M. Cobbaert
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - David Gonzalez
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Isabel Dombrink
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Monika Brüggemann
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - W. Marieke Bitter
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Smit NPM, Ruhaak LR, Romijn FPHTM, Pieterse MM, van der Burgt YEM, Cobbaert CM. The Time Has Come for Quantitative Protein Mass Spectrometry Tests That Target Unmet Clinical Needs. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY 2021; 32:636-647. [PMID: 33522792 PMCID: PMC7944566 DOI: 10.1021/jasms.0c00379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Protein mass spectrometry (MS) is an enabling technology that is ideally suited for precision diagnostics. In contrast to immunoassays with indirect readouts, MS quantifications are multiplexed and include identification of proteoforms in a direct manner. Although widely used for routine measurements of drugs and metabolites, the number of clinical MS-based protein applications is limited. In this paper, we share our experience and aim to take away the concerns that have kept laboratory medicine from implementing quantitative protein MS. To ensure added value of new medical tests and guarantee accurate test results, five key elements of test evaluation have been established by a working group within the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Moreover, it is emphasized to identify clinical gaps in the contemporary clinical pathways before test development is started. We demonstrate that quantitative protein MS tests that provide an additional layer of clinical information have robust performance and meet long-term desirable analytical performance specifications as exemplified by our own experience. Yet, the adoption of quantitative protein MS tests into medical laboratories is seriously hampered due to its complexity, lack of robotization and high initial investment costs. Successful and widespread implementation in medical laboratories requires uptake and automation of this next generation protein technology by the In-Vitro Diagnostics industry. Also, training curricula of lab workers and lab specialists should include education on enabling technologies for transitioning to precision medicine by quantitative protein MS tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico P. M. Smit
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and
Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical
Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L. Renee Ruhaak
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and
Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical
Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fred P. H. T. M. Romijn
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and
Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical
Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mervin M. Pieterse
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and
Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical
Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yuri E. M. van der Burgt
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and
Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical
Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christa M. Cobbaert
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and
Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical
Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
van Duijl TT, Soonawala D, de Fijter JW, Ruhaak LR, Cobbaert CM. Rational selection of a biomarker panel targeting unmet clinical needs in kidney injury. Clin Proteomics 2021; 18:10. [PMID: 33618665 PMCID: PMC7898424 DOI: 10.1186/s12014-021-09315-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The pipeline of biomarker translation from bench to bedside is challenging and limited biomarkers have been adopted to routine clinical care. Ideally, biomarker research and development should be driven by unmet clinical needs in health care. To guide researchers, clinical chemists and clinicians in their biomarker research, the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) has developed a structured questionnaire in which the clinical gaps in current clinical pathways are identified and desirable performance specifications are predefined. In kidney injury, the high prevalence of the syndrome acute kidney injury (AKI) in the hospital setting has a significant impact on morbidity, patient survival and health care costs, but the use of biomarkers indicating early kidney injury in daily patient care remains limited. Routinely, medical labs measure serum creatinine, which is a functional biomarker, insensitive for detecting early kidney damage and cannot distinguish between renal and prerenal AKI. The perceived unmet clinical needs in kidney injury were identified through the EFLM questionnaire. Nephrologists within our tertiary care hospital emphasized that biomarkers are needed for (1) early diagnosis of in-hospital AKI after a medical insult and in critically ill patients, (2) risk stratification for kidney injury prior to a scheduled (elective) intervention, (3) kidney injury monitoring in patients scheduled to receive nephrotoxic medication and after kidney transplantation and (4) differentiation between prerenal AKI and structural kidney damage. The biomarker search and selection strategy resulted in a rational selection of an eleven-protein urinary panel for kidney injury that target these clinical needs. To assess the clinical utility of the proposed biomarker panel in kidney injury, a multiplexed LC-MS test is now in development for the intended translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T T van Duijl
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone E2-P, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - D Soonawala
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - J W de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L R Ruhaak
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone E2-P, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C M Cobbaert
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone E2-P, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Loh TP, Lord SJ, Bell K, Bohn MK, Lim CY, Markus C, Fares Taie H, Adeli K, Lippi G, Sandberg S, Horvath A. Setting minimum clinical performance specifications for tests based on disease prevalence and minimum acceptable positive and negative predictive values: Practical considerations applied to COVID-19 testing. Clin Biochem 2021; 88:18-22. [PMID: 33227233 PMCID: PMC7678449 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Several guidelines for the evaluation of laboratory tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have recommended establishing an a priori definition of minimum clinical performance specifications before test selection and method evaluation. METHODS Using positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), we constructed a spreadsheet tool for determining the minimum clinical specificity (conditional on NPV or PPV, sensitivity and prevalence) and minimum clinical sensitivity (conditional on NPV or PPV, specificity and prevalence) of tests. RESULTS At a prevalence of 1%, there are no minimum sensitivity requirements to achieve a desired NPV of 60%-95% for a given clinical specificity above 20%. It is not possible to achieve 60-95% PPV even with 100% clinical sensitivity, except when the clinical specificity is near 100%. The opposite trend is seen in high prevalence settings (60%), where a relatively low minimum clinical sensitivity is required to achieve a desired PPV for a given clinical specificity, and a higher minimum clinical specificity is required to achieve a desired NPV for a given clinical sensitivity. DISCUSSION The selection of laboratory tests and the testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 involves delicate trade-offs between NPV and PPV based on prevalence and clinical sensitivity and clinical specificity. Practitioners and health authorities should carefully consider the clinical scenarios under which the test result will be used and select the most appropriate testing strategy that fulfils the a priori defined clinical performance specification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tze Ping Loh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.
| | - Sarah J Lord
- School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Katy Bell
- Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Mary Kathryn Bohn
- Clinical Biochemistry, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Chun Yee Lim
- Engineering Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.
| | - Corey Markus
- Metabolic Laboratory, Genetics and Molecular Pathology Directorate, SA Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital Site, South Australia, Australia.
| | | | - Khosrow Adeli
- Clinical Biochemistry, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Giuseppe Lippi
- Section of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Sverre Sandberg
- Norwegian Organization for Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (Noklus), Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Norwegian Porphyria Centre, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Institute of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen Norway.
| | - Andrea Horvath
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, New South Wales Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Badrick T. Biological variation: Understanding why it is so important? Pract Lab Med 2021; 23:e00199. [PMID: 33490349 PMCID: PMC7809190 DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This Review will describe the increasing importance of the concepts of biological variation to clinical chemists. The idea of comparison to 'reference' is fundamental in measurement. For the biological measurands, that reference is the relevant patient population, a clinical decision point based on a trial or an individual patient's previous results. The idea of using biological variation to set quality goals was then realised for setting Quality Control (QC) and External Quality Assurance (EQA) limits. The current phase of BV integration into practice is using Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control (PBRTQC) and Patient Based Quality Assurance (PBQA) to detect a change in assay performance. The challenge of personalised medicine is to determine an individual reference interval. The Athletes Biological Passport may provide the solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Badrick
- Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, St Leonards Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dirks NF, Ackermans MT, Martens F, Cobbaert CM, de Jonge R, Heijboer AC. We need to talk about the analytical performance of our laboratory developed clinical LC-MS/MS tests, and start separating the wheat from the chaff. Clin Chim Acta 2020; 514:80-83. [PMID: 33359058 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
With the upcoming EU regulation on the use of in-vitro diagnostic devices, a critical evaluation of the current status of our in-house developed LC-MS/MS methods is timely and of great relevance. Recently, much attention has been devoted to the need for better specification of analytical and clinical performance. Appropriate reporting of the actual achieved analytical performance is an important determinant of the clinical performance and subsequent clinical effectiveness of a test. We advocate for the application of CLSI C62-A guidelines for method validation and suggest some adaptations for analytical validation of in-house developed LC-MS/MS methods for endogenous substances. Additionally, we underline the importance of well-equipped reviewers and standardized method description, including the presentation of figural evidence of obtained method performance. Achieving this ensures future quality of our in-house developed LC-MS/MS methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niek F Dirks
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Endocrine Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mariëtte T Ackermans
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Endocrine Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frans Martens
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Endocrine Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christa M Cobbaert
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Robert de Jonge
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Endocrine Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Endocrine Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annemieke C Heijboer
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Endocrine Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Endocrine Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ruhaak L, Cobbaert C. Quantifying apolipoprotein(a) in the era of proteoforms and precision medicine. Clin Chim Acta 2020; 511:260-268. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
45
|
de Haan N, Wuhrer M, Ruhaak L. Mass spectrometry in clinical glycomics: The path from biomarker identification to clinical implementation. CLINICAL MASS SPECTROMETRY (DEL MAR, CALIF.) 2020; 18:1-12. [PMID: 34820521 PMCID: PMC8600986 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinms.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decades, the genome and proteome have been widely explored for biomarker discovery and personalized medicine. However, there is still a large need for improved diagnostics and stratification strategies for a wide range of diseases. Post-translational modification of proteins by glycosylation affects protein structure and function, and glycosylation has been implicated in many prevalent human diseases. Numerous proteins for which the plasma levels are nowadays evaluated in clinical practice are glycoproteins. While the glycosylation of these proteins often changes with disease, their glycosylation status is largely ignored in the clinical setting. Hence, the implementation of glycomic markers in the clinic is still in its infancy. This is for a large part caused by the high complexity of protein glycosylation itself and of the analytical techniques required for their robust quantification. Mass spectrometry-based workflows are particularly suitable for the quantification of glycans and glycoproteins, but still require advances for their transformation from a biomedical research setting to a clinical laboratory. In this review, we describe why and how glycomics is expected to find its role in clinical tests and the status of current mass spectrometry-based methods for clinical glycomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. de Haan
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M. Wuhrer
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L.R. Ruhaak
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kavsak PA, Edge T, Roy C, Malinowski P, Bamford K, Clark L, Lamers S, Hill S, Worster A. Analytical assessment of ortho clinical diagnostics high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020; 59:749-755. [PMID: 33079697 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To analytically evaluate Ortho Clinical Diagnostics VITROS high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay in specific matrices with comparison to other hs-cTn assays. Methods The limit of detection (LoD), imprecision, interference and stability testing for both serum and lithium heparin (Li-Hep) plasma for the VITROS hs-cTnI assay was determined. We performed Passing-Bablok regression analyses between sample types for the VITROS hs-cTnI assay and compared them to the Abbott ARCHITECT, Beckman Access and the Siemens ADVIA Centaur hs-cTnI assays. We also performed Receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses with the area under the curve (AUC) determined in an emergency department (ED)-study population (n=131) for myocardial infarction (MI). Results The VITROS hs-cTnI LoD was 0.73 ng/L (serum) and 1.4 ng/L (Li-Hep). Stability up to five freeze-thaws was observed for the Ortho hs-cTnI assay, with the analyte stability at room temperature in serum superior to Li-Hep with gross hemolysis also affecting Li-Hep plasma hs-cTnI results. Comparison of Li-Hep to serum concentrations (n=202), yielded proportionally lower concentrations in plasma with the VITROS hs-cTnI assay (slope=0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.83-0.88). In serum, the VITROS hs-cTnI concentrations were proportionally lower compared to other hs-cTnI assays, with similar slopes observed between assays in samples frozen <-70 °C for 17 years (ED-study) or in 2020. In the ED-study, the VITROS hs-cTnI assay had an AUC of 0.974 (95%CI:0.929-0.994) for MI, similar to the AUCs of other hs-cTn assays. Conclusions Lack of standardization of hs-cTnI assays across manufacturers is evident. The VITROS hs-cTnI assay yields lower concentrations compared to other hs-cTnI assays. Important differences exist between Li-Hep plasma and serum, with evidence of stability and excellent clinical performance comparable to other hs-cTn assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Kavsak
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Core Laboratory, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Edge
- Clinical Research Laboratory and Biobank, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Chantele Roy
- Clinical Research Laboratory and Biobank, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Malinowski
- Clinical Research Laboratory and Biobank, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Karen Bamford
- Clinical Research Laboratory and Biobank, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Lorna Clark
- Core Laboratory, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Shana Lamers
- Clinical Research Laboratory and Biobank, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen Hill
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Core Laboratory, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bossuyt PM. Testing COVID-19 tests faces methodological challenges. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 126:172-176. [PMID: 32622902 PMCID: PMC7332449 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
In battling the COVID-19 pandemic, testing is essential. The detection of viral RNA allows the identification of infected persons, whereas the detection of antibodies may reveal a response to a previous infection. Tests for coronavirus should be rigorously evaluated in terms of their analytical and clinical performance. This poses not only logistic challenges, but also methodological ones. Some of these are generic for the diagnostic accuracy paradigm, whereas others are more specific for tests for viruses. Problematic for evaluations of the clinical performance of tests for viral RNA is the absence of an independent reference standard. Many studies lack rigor in terms of the recruitment of study participants. Study reports are often insufficiently informative, which makes it difficult to assess the applicability of study findings. Attempts to summarize the performance of these tests in terms of a single estimate of the clinical sensitivity fail to do justice to the identifiable sources of the large heterogeneity in mechanisms for generating false negative results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Room J1B-214, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Horgan D, Ciliberto G, Conte P, Baldwin D, Seijo L, Montuenga LM, Paz-Ares L, Garassino M, Penault-Llorca F, Galli F, Ray-Coquard I, Querleu D, Capoluongo E, Banerjee S, Riegman P, Kerr K, Horbach B, Büttner R, Van Poppel H, Bjartell A, Codacci-Pisanelli G, Westphalen B, Calvo F, Koeva-Balabanova J, Hall S, Paradiso A, Kalra D, Cobbaert C, Varea Menendez R, Maravic Z, Fotaki V, Bennouna J, Cauchin E, Malats N, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Gannon B, Mastris K, Bernini C, Gallagher W, Buglioni S, Kent A, Munzone E, Belina I, Van Meerbeeck J, Duffy M, Sarnowska E, Jagielska B, Mee S, Curigliano G. Bringing Greater Accuracy to Europe's Healthcare Systems: The Unexploited Potential of Biomarker Testing in Oncology. Biomed Hub 2020; 5:182-223. [PMID: 33564664 DOI: 10.1159/000511209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Rapid and continuing advances in biomarker testing are not being matched by take-up in health systems, and this is hampering both patient care and innovation. It also risks costing health systems the opportunity to make their services more efficient and, over time, more economical. This paper sets out the potential of biomarker testing, the unfolding precision and range of possible diagnosis and prediction, and the many obstacles to adoption. It offers case studies of biomarker testing in breast, ovarian, prostate, lung, thyroid and colon cancers, and derives specific lessons as to the potential and actual use of each of them. It also draws lessons about how to improve access and alignment, and to remedy the data deficiencies that impede development. And it suggests solutions to outstanding issues - notably including funding and the tangled web of obtaining reimbursement or equivalent coverage that Europe's fragmented health system implies. It urges a European evolution towards an initial minimum testing scenario, which would guarantee universal access to a suite of biomarker tests for the currently most common conditions, and, further into the future, to an optimum testing scenario in which a much wider range of biomarker tests would be introduced and become part of a more sophisticated health system articulated around personalised medicine. For exploiting genomics to the full, it argues the need for a new policy framework for Europe. Biomarker testing is not an issue that can be treated in isolation, since the purpose of testing is to improve health. Its use is therefore always closely linked to specific health challenges and needs to be viewed in the broader policy context in the EU and more widely. The paper is the result of extensive engagement with experts and decision makers to develop the framework, and consequently represents a wide consensus of views on how healthcare systems should respond from push and pull factors at local, national and cross-border and EU level. It contains strong views and clear recommendations springing from the convictions of patients, clinicians, academics, medicines authorities, HTA bodies, payers, the diagnostic, pharmaceutical and ICT industries, and national policy makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Horgan
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - David Baldwin
- University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Luis Seijo
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, CIBERES, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis M Montuenga
- Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra and CIBERONC and IdisNa, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Luis Paz-Ares
- Hospital Doce de Octubre and CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Susana Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Keith Kerr
- Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Benedikt Westphalen
- Grosshadern University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Dipak Kalra
- The European Institute for Innovation through Health Data (i∼HD), Gent, Belgium
| | - Christa Cobbaert
- European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nuria Malats
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO) and CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea
- EuroScan International Network, Cologne, Germany.,BIOEF, Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research, Barakaldo, Spain
| | | | | | - Chiara Bernini
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Alastair Kent
- Independent Patient Advocate, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ivica Belina
- Coalition of Healthcare Association, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Jan Van Meerbeeck
- Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | - Beata Jagielska
- Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Sarah Mee
- AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Giusepi I, John AS, Jülicher P. Who Conducts Health Economic Evaluations of Laboratory Tests? A Scoping Review. J Appl Lab Med 2020; 5:954-966. [DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundHealth economic evaluations (HEEs) are effectively used to inform decision making in healthcare. We sought to assess the level of involvement of laboratory professionals (LPs) in HEEs of laboratory tests.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in Medline (2013 to November 28, 2018) for original articles reporting HEEs of medical laboratory tests. Eligible studies were characterized by indication, utilization, region, setting, study design, primary outcome measures, and sponsorship. Authors were classified based on stated affiliation as clinician, scientist, public health expert, or LP.ResultsIn total, 140 HEEs were included in the study, of which 24 (17.1%) had contributions from LPs. Studies were primarily focused on infectious disease (n = 68), oncology (n = 23), and cardiovascular disease (n = 16). Cost-utility or cost-effectiveness analyses (n = 117) were the most frequent study types, with effectiveness measured mainly in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (n = 57) and detected cases (n = 41). Overall, 76% of HEEs followed a social or health system perspective, whereas 15% took a hospital viewpoint. Partial or full funding was received from public health organizations or industry in 39% and 16% of studies, respectively. The involvement of LPs was associated with test utilization, secondary care, analytic perspective, and an immediate time horizon (all P < 0.05). Quality of studies was found to be lower in HEEs coauthored by LPs.ConclusionMultidisciplinary collaboration is essential to understanding the complexity of clinical pathways. HEEs are used effectively to inform healthcare decision making. The involvement of LPs in HEEs is low. This implies that laboratory expertise is frequently not considered in decision processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Giusepi
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Abbott Diagnostics, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Paul Jülicher
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Abbott Diagnostics, Wiesbaden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
John AS. Determining value – Do laboratory professionals need to learn more about the ‘dismal science’? Ann Clin Biochem 2020; 57:337-338. [DOI: 10.1177/0004563220946073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|