1
|
Hoff G, Bernklev T, Johnsen L, Reitsma L, Sina D, Lauzike A, Gibbs C, Hoel Lende T, Narvestad JK, Kildahl R, Omdal R, Kvaløy JT, Søiland H. Thyroidectomy for Euthyroid Patients with Hashimoto Disease and Persistent Symptoms: An Observational, Postrandomization Study. J Thyroid Res 2024; 2024:5518720. [PMID: 38606313 PMCID: PMC11008973 DOI: 10.1155/2024/5518720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Despite adequate hormone substitution in Hashimoto disease, some patients may have persistent symptoms with a possible autoimmune pathophysiology. A recent randomized trial (RCT) using patient-reported outcome measures as the primary endpoint showed benefit in total thyroidectomy, but at a cost of high complication rates. Objective To verify results from the RCT in an observational study including a wider range of patients and explore means of predicting who may benefit from such surgery. Design A total of 154 patients with Hashimoto disease, euthyroid with or without thyroid hormone substitution, and persistent Hashimoto-related symptoms were subjected to total thyroidectomy and followed for 18 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the General Health (GH) dimensional score in the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Results Eighteen months after surgery, a clinically significant improvement in GH was seen, similar to the findings in the previous RCT. Anti-TPO antibody titers were markedly reduced after surgery, but preoperative titers or other preoperative parameters could not predict the outcome of surgery. Three (1.9%) of 154 patients experienced permanent unilateral recurrent nerve palsy and six (3.9%) experienced hypoparathyroidism after surgery. Conclusions Thyroidectomy had a beneficial symptom-reducing effect in euthyroid patients with Hashimoto disease and persistent symptoms. The pathophysiology of residual symptoms remains unclear, and surgical complication rates are high. If thyroidectomy is considered as a treatment option, it should be performed in dedicated centers with experienced endocrine surgeons and as part of further studies on persistent symptoms. This trial is registered with NCT-02319538.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geir Hoff
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tomm Bernklev
- Department of Research, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Lene Johnsen
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Laurens Reitsma
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Campus Oslo, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Dirk Sina
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | - Andromeda Lauzike
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | | | - Tone Hoel Lende
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jon Kristian Narvestad
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | - Roald Omdal
- Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jan Terje Kvaløy
- Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Håvard Søiland
- Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nafisi S, Støer NC, Veierød MB, Randel KR, Hoff G, Löfling L, Bosetti C, Botteri E. Low-Dose Aspirin and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence From a Nationwide Registry-Based Cohort in Norway. Am J Gastroenterol 2024:00000434-990000000-01008. [PMID: 38300127 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To examine the association between low-dose aspirin use and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS In this nationwide cohort study, we identified individuals aged 50 years or older residing for 6 months or more in Norway in 2004-2018 and obtained data from national registers on drug prescriptions, cancer occurrence, and sociodemographic factors. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate the association between low-dose aspirin use and CRC risk. In addition, we calculated the number of CRC potentially averted by low-dose aspirin use. RESULTS We included 2,186,390 individuals. During the median follow-up of 10.9 years, 579,196 (26.5%) used low-dose aspirin, and 38,577 (1.8%) were diagnosed with CRC. Current use of aspirin vs never use was associated with lower CRC risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.90). The association was more pronounced for metastatic CRC (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.74-0.84) than regionally advanced (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.85-0.92) and localized CRC (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.87-1.00; P heterogeneity = 0.001). A significant trend was found between duration of current use and CRC risk: HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.95) for <3 years, HR 0.85 (0.80-0.91) for ≥3 and <5 years, and HR 0.84 (0.80-0.88) for ≥5 years of use vs never use ( P trend < 0.001). For past use, HR were 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) for <3 years, 0.90 (0.83-0.99) for ≥3 and <5 years, and 0.98 (0.91-1.06) for ≥5 years since last use vs never use ( P -trend < 0.001). We estimated that aspirin use averted 1,073 cases of CRC (95% CI 818-1,338) in the study period. DISCUSSION In this nationwide cohort, use of low-dose aspirin was associated with a lower risk of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Nafisi
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nathalie C Støer
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marit B Veierød
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin R Randel
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lukas Löfling
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cristina Bosetti
- Department of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Juul FE, Cross AJ, Schoen RE, Senore C, Pinsky PF, Miller EA, Segnan N, Wooldrage K, Wieszczy-Szczepanik P, Armaroli P, Garborg KK, Adami HO, Hoff G, Kalager M, Bretthauer M, Holme Ø, Løberg M. Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e240007. [PMID: 38421651 PMCID: PMC10905314 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Randomized clinical screening trials have shown that sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Colonoscopy has largely replaced sigmoidoscopy for CRC screening, but long-term results from randomized trials on colonoscopy screening are still lacking. Objective To estimate the additional screening benefit of colonoscopy compared with sigmoidoscopy. Design, Setting, and Participants This comparative effectiveness simulation study pooled data on 358 204 men and women randomly assigned to sigmoidoscopy screening or usual care in 4 randomized sigmoidoscopy screening trials conducted in Norway, Italy, the US, and UK with inclusion periods in the years 1993 to 2001. The primary analysis of the study was conducted from January 19 to December 30, 2021. Intervention Invitation to endoscopic screening. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were CRC incidence and mortality. Using pooled 15-year follow-up data, colonoscopy screening effectiveness was estimated assuming that the efficacy of colonoscopy in the proximal colon was similar to that observed in the distal colon in the sigmoidoscopy screening trials. The simulation model was validated using data from Norwegian participants in a colonoscopy screening trial. Results This analysis included 358 204 individuals (181 971 women [51%]) aged 55 to 64 years at inclusion with a median follow-up time ranging from 15 to 17 years. Compared with usual care, colonoscopy prevented an estimated 50 (95% CI, 42-58) CRC cases per 100 000 person-years, corresponding to 30% incidence reduction (rate ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.66-0.75]), and prevented an estimated 15 (95% CI, 11-19) CRC deaths per 100 000 person-years, corresponding to 32% mortality reduction (rate ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.61-0.76]). The additional benefit of colonoscopy screening compared with sigmoidoscopy was 12 (95% CI, 10-14) fewer CRC cases and 4 (95% CI, 3-5) fewer CRC deaths per 100 000 person-years, corresponding to percentage point reductions of 6.9 (95% CI, 6.0-7.9) for CRC incidence and 7.6 (95% CI, 5.7-9.6) for CRC mortality. The number needed to switch from sigmoidoscopy to colonoscopy screening was 560 (95% CI, 486-661) to prevent 1 CRC case and 1611 (95% CI, 1275-2188) to prevent 1 CRC death. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this comparative effectiveness study assessing long-term follow-up after CRC screening suggest that there was an additional preventive effect on CRC incidence and mortality associated with colonoscopy screening compared with sigmoidoscopy screening, but the additional preventive effect was less than what was achieved by introducing sigmoidoscopy screening where no screening existed. The results probably represent the upper limit of what may be achieved with colonoscopy screening compared with sigmoidoscopy screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik E. Juul
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Amanda J. Cross
- Cancer Screening & Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert E. Schoen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Carlo Senore
- University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paul F. Pinsky
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Eric A. Miller
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Nereo Segnan
- University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Kate Wooldrage
- Cancer Screening & Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paulina Wieszczy-Szczepanik
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paola Armaroli
- University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Kjetil K. Garborg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Health Trust, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Botteri E, Peveri G, Berstad P, Bagnardi V, Hoff G, Heath AK, Cross AJ, Vineis P, Dossus L, Johansson M, Freisling H, Matta K, Huybrechts I, Chen SLF, B Borch K, Sandanger TM, H Nøst T, Dahm CC, Antoniussen CS, Tin Tin S, Fournier A, Marques C, Artaud F, Sánchez MJ, Guevara M, Santiuste C, Agudo A, Bajracharya R, Katzke V, Ricceri F, Agnoli C, Bergmann MM, Schulze MB, Panico S, Masala G, Tjønneland A, Olsen A, Stocks T, Manjer J, Aizpurua-Atxega A, Weiderpass E, Riboli E, Gunter MJ, Ferrari P. Lifestyle changes in middle age and risk of cancer: evidence from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur J Epidemiol 2024; 39:147-159. [PMID: 38180593 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-023-01059-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to provide novel evidence on the impact of changing lifestyle habits on cancer risk. In the EPIC cohort, 295,865 middle-aged participants returned a lifestyle questionnaire at baseline and during follow-up. At both timepoints, we calculated a healthy lifestyle index (HLI) score based on cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index and physical activity. HLI ranged from 0 (most unfavourable) to 16 (most favourable). We estimated the association between HLI change and risk of lifestyle-related cancers-including cancer of the breast, lung, colorectum, stomach, liver, cervix, oesophagus, bladder, and others-using Cox regression models. We reported hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Median time between the two questionnaires was 5.7 years, median age at follow-up questionnaire was 59 years. After the follow-up questionnaire, we observed 14,933 lifestyle-related cancers over a median follow-up of 7.8 years. Each unit increase in the HLI score was associated with 4% lower risk of lifestyle-related cancers (HR 0.96; 95%CI 0.95-0.97). Among participants in the top HLI third at baseline (HLI > 11), those in the bottom third at follow-up (HLI ≤ 9) had 21% higher risk of lifestyle-related cancers (HR 1.21; 95%CI 1.07-1.37) than those remaining in the top third. Among participants in the bottom HLI third at baseline, those in the top third at follow-up had 25% lower risk of lifestyle-related cancers (HR 0.75; 95%CI 0.65-0.86) than those remaining in the bottom third. These results indicate that lifestyle changes in middle age may have a significant impact on cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Botteri
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Giulia Peveri
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | - Alicia K Heath
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Amanda J Cross
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paolo Vineis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Laure Dossus
- International Agency for Research On Cancer (IARC-WHO), World Health Organization, 25, Avenue Tony Garnier, CS 90627, 69366, Lyon Cedex 07, France
| | - Mattias Johansson
- International Agency for Research On Cancer (IARC-WHO), World Health Organization, 25, Avenue Tony Garnier, CS 90627, 69366, Lyon Cedex 07, France
| | - Heinz Freisling
- International Agency for Research On Cancer (IARC-WHO), World Health Organization, 25, Avenue Tony Garnier, CS 90627, 69366, Lyon Cedex 07, France
| | - Komodo Matta
- International Agency for Research On Cancer (IARC-WHO), World Health Organization, 25, Avenue Tony Garnier, CS 90627, 69366, Lyon Cedex 07, France
| | - Inge Huybrechts
- International Agency for Research On Cancer (IARC-WHO), World Health Organization, 25, Avenue Tony Garnier, CS 90627, 69366, Lyon Cedex 07, France
| | - Sairah L F Chen
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kristin B Borch
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Torkjel M Sandanger
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Therese H Nøst
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- HUNT Center for Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing , NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | - Sandar Tin Tin
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Agnès Fournier
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm "Exposome, Heredity, Cancer and Health" Team, CESP U1018, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Chloé Marques
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm "Exposome, Heredity, Cancer and Health" Team, CESP U1018, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Fanny Artaud
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm "Exposome, Heredity, Cancer and Health" Team, CESP U1018, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Maria-José Sánchez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Marcela Guevara
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Salud Pública y Laboral de Navarra, 31003, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarre Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carmen Santiuste
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Antonio Agudo
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology - ICO, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
- Nutrition and Cancer Group; Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute - IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Rashmita Bajracharya
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Verena Katzke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fulvio Ricceri
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, Centre for Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Claudia Agnoli
- Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Manuela M Bergmann
- German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Matthias B Schulze
- Department of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany
- Institute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Salvatore Panico
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Masala
- Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anja Olsen
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tanja Stocks
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jonas Manjer
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Amaia Aizpurua-Atxega
- Epidemiology of Chronic and Communicable Diseases Group, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastián, Spain
- Sub Directorate for Public Health and Addictions of Gipuzkoa, Ministry of Health of the Basque Government, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- International Agency for Research On Cancer (IARC-WHO), World Health Organization, 25, Avenue Tony Garnier, CS 90627, 69366, Lyon Cedex 07, France
| | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Marc J Gunter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- International Agency for Research On Cancer (IARC-WHO), World Health Organization, 25, Avenue Tony Garnier, CS 90627, 69366, Lyon Cedex 07, France
| | - Pietro Ferrari
- International Agency for Research On Cancer (IARC-WHO), World Health Organization, 25, Avenue Tony Garnier, CS 90627, 69366, Lyon Cedex 07, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoff G, Bernklev T, Johnsen L, Reitsma L, Sina D, Lauzike A, Gibbs C, Carlsen E, Lende TH, Narvestad JK, Kildahl R, Omdal R, Kvaløy JT, Søiland H. Thyroidectomy for Euthyroid Patients With Hashimoto Disease and Persisting Symptoms. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:101-103. [PMID: 38011703 DOI: 10.7326/m23-1593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Geir Hoff
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tomm Bernklev
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, and Department of Research, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Lene Johnsen
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Laurens Reitsma
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Campus Oslo, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Dirk Sina
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | - Andromeda Lauzike
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | | | - Eivind Carlsen
- Department of Pathology, Telemark Hospital Skien, Norway
| | - Tone Hoel Lende
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jon Kristian Narvestad
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | - Roald Omdal
- Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, and Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jan Terje Kvaløy
- Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, and Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Håvard Søiland
- Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, and Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Birkeland E, Ferrero G, Pardini B, Umu SU, Tarallo S, Bulfamante S, Hoff G, Senore C, Rounge TB, Naccarati A. Profiling small RNAs in fecal immunochemical tests: is it possible? Mol Cancer 2023; 22:161. [PMID: 37789383 PMCID: PMC10546694 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01869-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Fecal microRNAs represent promising molecules with potential clinical interest as non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening based on the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is an effective tool for prevention of cancer development. However, due to the poor sensitivity of FIT especially for premalignant lesions, there is a need for implementation of complementary tests. Improving the identification of individuals who would benefit from further investigation with colonoscopy using molecular analysis, such as miRNA profiling of FIT samples, would be ideal due to their widespread use. In the present study, we assessed the feasibility of applying small RNA sequencing to measure human miRNAs in FIT leftover buffer in samples from two European screening populations. We showed robust detection of miRNAs with profiles similar to those obtained from specimens sampled using the established protocol of RNA stabilizing buffers, or in long-term archived samples. Detected miRNAs exhibited differential abundances for CRC, advanced adenoma, and control samples that were consistent for FIT and RNA-stabilizing buffers. Interestingly, the sequencing data also allowed for concomitant evaluation of small RNA-based microbial profiles. We demonstrated that it is possible to explore the human miRNome in FIT leftover samples across populations and envision that the analysis of small RNA biomarkers can complement the FIT in large scale screening settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Einar Birkeland
- Centre for Bioinformatics, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Giulio Ferrero
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Department of Computer Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Barbara Pardini
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine (IIGM), c/o IRCCS Candiolo, Turin, Italy
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Sinan U Umu
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sonia Tarallo
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine (IIGM), c/o IRCCS Candiolo, Turin, Italy
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Sara Bulfamante
- Epidemiology and Screening Unit-CPO, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for colorectal cancer screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | - Carlo Senore
- Epidemiology and Screening Unit-CPO, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Trine B Rounge
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
- Centre for Bioinformatics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Alessio Naccarati
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine (IIGM), c/o IRCCS Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bresalier RS, Senore C, Young GP, Allison J, Benamouzig R, Benton S, Bossuyt PMM, Caro L, Carvalho B, Chiu HM, Coupé VMH, de Klaver W, de Klerk CM, Dekker E, Dolwani S, Fraser CG, Grady W, Guittet L, Gupta S, Halloran SP, Haug U, Hoff G, Itzkowitz S, Kortlever T, Koulaouzidis A, Ladabaum U, Lauby-Secretan B, Leja M, Levin B, Levin TR, Macrae F, Meijer GA, Melson J, O'Morain C, Parry S, Rabeneck L, Ransohoff DF, Sáenz R, Saito H, Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S, Schoen RE, Selby K, Singh H, Steele RJC, Sung JJY, Symonds EL, Winawer SJ. An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles. Gut 2023; 72:1904-1918. [PMID: 37463757 PMCID: PMC10511996 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE New screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) are rapidly emerging. Conducting trials with mortality reduction as the end point supporting their adoption is challenging. We re-examined the principles underlying evaluation of new non-invasive tests in view of technological developments and identification of new biomarkers. DESIGN A formal consensus approach involving a multidisciplinary expert panel revised eight previously established principles. RESULTS Twelve newly stated principles emerged. Effectiveness of a new test can be evaluated by comparison with a proven comparator non-invasive test. The faecal immunochemical test is now considered the appropriate comparator, while colonoscopy remains the diagnostic standard. For a new test to be able to meet differing screening goals and regulatory requirements, flexibility to adjust its positivity threshold is desirable. A rigorous and efficient four-phased approach is proposed, commencing with small studies assessing the test's ability to discriminate between CRC and non-cancer states (phase I), followed by prospective estimation of accuracy across the continuum of neoplastic lesions in neoplasia-enriched populations (phase II). If these show promise, a provisional test positivity threshold is set before evaluation in typical screening populations. Phase III prospective studies determine single round intention-to-screen programme outcomes and confirm the test positivity threshold. Phase IV studies involve evaluation over repeated screening rounds with monitoring for missed lesions. Phases III and IV findings will provide the real-world data required to model test impact on CRC mortality and incidence. CONCLUSION New non-invasive tests can be efficiently evaluated by a rigorous phased comparative approach, generating data from unbiased populations that inform predictions of their health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Bresalier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carlo Senore
- Epidemiology and screening unit, Centro di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia e la Prevenzione Oncologica in Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Graeme P Young
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James Allison
- Internal Medicine/Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert Benamouzig
- Gastroenterology & Digestive Oncology Department, Hôpital Avicenne University Paris Nord La Sorbonne, Bobigny, France
| | - Sally Benton
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and NHS Bowel Cancer Screening South of England Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Patrick M M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luis Caro
- Carrera de especialista de Endoscopia Digestiva, Institución GEDYT (Gastroenterologia diagnostico y terapéutica), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn de Klaver
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clasine Maria de Klerk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology C2-310, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology C2-115, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sunil Dolwani
- Dept of Gastroenterology, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee School of Medicine, Dundee, UK
| | - William Grady
- Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lydia Guittet
- ERI3 Cancers & Populations, Normandie University, UNICAEN, Caen, France
| | - Samir Gupta
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Ulrike Haug
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany
| | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
- Department of CRC screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Steven Itzkowitz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tim Kortlever
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Beatrice Lauby-Secretan
- Section of Evidence Synthesis and Classification, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Mārcis Leja
- Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Bernard Levin
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Finlay Macrae
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The University of Melbourne Department of Medicine Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joshua Melson
- High-Risk Clinic for Gastrointestinal Cancers, University of Arizona Cancer Center Division of Gastroenterology, Banner University, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Colm O'Morain
- Gastroenterology, Trinity College Dublin Faculty of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susan Parry
- National Bowel Screening Programme, National Screening Unit, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David F Ransohoff
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Roque Sáenz
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Hiroshi Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | | | - Robert E Schoen
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kevin Selby
- Department of ambulatory Care, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Harminder Singh
- Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Joseph J Y Sung
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Erin Leigh Symonds
- Department of Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sidney J Winawer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nafisi S, Randel KR, Støer NC, Veierød MB, Hoff G, Holme Ø, Schult AL, Botteri E. Association between use of low-dose aspirin and detection of colorectal polyps and cancer in a screening setting. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1126-1132. [PMID: 36754644 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.01.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The possible protective effect of aspirin on risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is still highly debated. METHODS We used data from Bowel Cancer Screening in Norway, a trial randomizing individuals from general population, aged 50-74 years, to flexible sigmoidoscopy or faecal immunochemical test (FIT), to study the association between aspirin use and detection of CRC and two CRC precursors: adenomas and advanced serrated lesions (ASL). Prescriptions of low-dose aspirin were obtained from Norwegian prescription database. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Among 64,889 screening participants (24,159 sigmoidoscopy, 40,730 FIT), 314 (0.5%) had CRC, 6,208 (9.6%) adenoma and 659 (1.0%) ASL. Overall and short-term use (<3 years) of low-dose aspirin, versus no use, were not associated with any colorectal lesion. Long-term use (≥3 years) was associated with lower detection of CRC (overall OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.46-0.93; sigmoidoscopy: 0.56, 0.33-0.97; FIT: 0.72, 0.45-1.15), adenomas in sigmoidoscopy arm (overall OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.87-1.03; sigmoidoscopy: 0.89, 0.80-0.99; FIT: 1.03, 0.89-1.18), but not ASLs. We did not observe significant differences in the effect of aspirin according to the location of colorectal lesions. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that long-term use of aspirin might have a protective effect against adenomas and colorectal cancer, but not ASLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Nafisi
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin R Randel
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nathalie C Støer
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Norwegian Research Centre for Women's Health, Women's Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marit B Veierød
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway; Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna L Schult
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Botteri E, Peveri G, Berstad P, Bagnardi V, Chen SLF, Sandanger TM, Hoff G, Dahm CC, Antoniussen CS, Tjønneland A, Eriksen AK, Skeie G, Perez-Cornago A, Huerta JM, Jakszyn P, Harlid S, Sundström B, Barricarte A, Monninkhof EM, Derksen JWG, Schulze MB, Bueno-de-Mesquita B, Sánchez MJ, Cross AJ, Tsilidis KK, De Magistris MS, Kaaks R, Katzke V, Rothwell JA, Laouali N, Severi G, Amiano P, Contiero P, Sacerdote C, Goldberg M, Touvier M, Freisling H, Viallon V, Weiderpass E, Riboli E, Gunter MJ, Jenab M, Ferrari P. Changes in Lifestyle and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:702-711. [PMID: 36227801 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We investigated the impact of changes in lifestyle habits on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in a multicountry European cohort. METHODS We used baseline and follow-up questionnaire data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer cohort to assess changes in lifestyle habits and their associations with CRC development. We calculated a healthy lifestyle index (HLI) score based on smoking status, alcohol consumption, body mass index, and physical activity collected at the 2 time points. HLI ranged from 0 (most unfavorable) to 16 (most favorable). We estimated the association between HLI changes and CRC risk using Cox regression models and reported hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Among 295,865 participants, 2,799 CRC cases were observed over a median of 7.8 years. The median time between questionnaires was 5.7 years. Each unit increase in HLI from the baseline to the follow-up assessment was associated with a statistically significant 3% lower CRC risk. Among participants in the top tertile at baseline (HLI > 11), those in the bottom tertile at follow-up (HLI ≤ 9) had a higher CRC risk (HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.02-1.75) than those remaining in the top tertile. Among individuals in the bottom tertile at baseline, those in the top tertile at follow-up had a lower risk (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.59-1.00) than those remaining in the bottom tertile. DISCUSSION Improving adherence to a healthy lifestyle was inversely associated with CRC risk, while worsening adherence was positively associated with CRC risk. These results justify and support recommendations for healthy lifestyle changes and healthy lifestyle maintenance for CRC prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Giulia Peveri
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Sairah L F Chen
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Torkjel M Sandanger
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | - Guri Skeie
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Aurora Perez-Cornago
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - José María Huerta
- Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Paula Jakszyn
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sophia Harlid
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Björn Sundström
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Aurelio Barricarte
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA) Pamplona, Spain
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen W G Derksen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias B Schulze
- Department of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany
- Institute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Maria-Jose Sánchez
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Amanda J Cross
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Konstantinos K Tsilidis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | | | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Verena Katzke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joseph A Rothwell
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP U1018, "Exposome, Heredity, Cancer and Health" Team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Nasser Laouali
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP U1018, "Exposome, Heredity, Cancer and Health" Team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Gianluca Severi
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP U1018, "Exposome, Heredity, Cancer and Health" Team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications "G. Parenti" (DISIA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pilar Amiano
- Ministry of Health of the Basque Government, Sub Directorate for Public Health and Addictions of Gipuzkoa, San Sebastian, Spain
- Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Epidemiology of Chronic and Communicable Diseases Group, San Sebastián, Spain
- Spanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Contiero
- Environmental Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlotta Sacerdote
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza University-Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marcel Goldberg
- Population-based Epidemiologic Cohorts Unit, Inserrm UMS 11, Villejuif, France
| | - Mathilde Touvier
- Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Sorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, Inrae U1125, Cnam, Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center-University of Paris (CRESS), Bobigny, France
- Public Health Department, Avicenne Hospital, AP-HP, Bobigny, France
| | - Heinz Freisling
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Vivian Viallon
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Marc J Gunter
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Mazda Jenab
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Pietro Ferrari
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Berstad P, Schult AL, Hoff G, Ursin G, Randel KR. Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening uptake. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2023; 143:22-0760. [PMID: 36987894 DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.22.0760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
|
11
|
Schult AL, Hoff G, Holme Ø, Botteri E, Seip B, Ranheim Randel K, Darre-Næss O, Owen T, Nilsen JA, Nguyen DH, Johansen K, de Lange T. Colonoscopy quality improvement after initial training: A cross-sectional study of intensive short-term training. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E117-E127. [PMID: 36712907 PMCID: PMC9879657 DOI: 10.1055/a-1994-6084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims High-quality is crucial for the effectiveness of colonoscopy and can be achieved by high-quality training and verified with assessment of key performance indicators (KPIs) for colonoscopy such as cecum intubation rate (CIR), adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adequate polyp resection. Typically, trainees achieve adequate CIR after 275 procedures, but little is known about learning curves for KPIs after initial training. Methods This cross-sectional study includes work-up colonoscopies after a positive screening test with fecal occult blood testing (FIT) or sigmoidoscopy, performed by either trainees after 300 training colonoscopies or by consultants. Outcome measures were KPIs. We assessed inter-endoscopist variation in trainees and learning curves for trainees as a group. We also compared KPIs for trainees and consultants as a group. Results Data from 6,655 colonoscopies performed by 21 trainees and 921 colonoscopies performed by 17 consultants were included. Most trainees achieved target standards for main KPIs. With time, trainees shortened cecum intubation time and withdrawal time without decreasing their ADR, reduced the proportion of painful colonoscopies, and increased the adequate polyp resection rate (all P < 0.01). Compared to consultants, trainees had higher CIR (97.7 % vs. 96.3 %, P = 0.02), ADR after positive FIT (57.6 % vs. 50.3 %, P < 0.01), and proximal ADR after sigmoidoscopy screening (41.1 % vs. 29.8 %; P < 0.01), higher adequate polyp resection rate (94.9 % vs. 93.1 %, P = 0.01) and fewer serious adverse events (0.65 % vs. 1.41 %, P = 0.02). Conclusions Trainees performed high-quality colonoscopies and achieved international target standards. Several KPIs continuously improved after initial training. Trainees outperformed consultants on several KPIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lisa Schult
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway,Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway,Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway,Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Birgitte Seip
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway,Department of Medicine, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway
| | | | - Ole Darre-Næss
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Tanja Owen
- Department of Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway
| | - Jens Aksel Nilsen
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
| | | | - Kristin Johansen
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Department of Medicine and Emergencies Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Mölndal, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden,Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Medical Research, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bucher-Johannessen C, Birkeland EE, Vinberg E, Bemanian V, Hoff G, Berstad P, Rounge TB. Long-term follow-up of colorectal cancer screening attendees identifies differences in Phascolarctobacterium spp. using 16S rRNA and metagenome sequencing. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1183039. [PMID: 37182146 PMCID: PMC10172651 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1183039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The microbiome has been implicated in the initiation and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC) in cross-sectional studies. However, there is a lack of studies using prospectively collected samples. Methods From the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) trial, we analyzed 144 archived fecal samples from participants who were diagnosed with CRC or high-risk adenoma (HRA) at screening and from participants who remained cancer-free during 17 years of follow-up. We performed 16S rRNA sequencing of all the samples and metagenome sequencing on a subset of 47 samples. Differences in taxonomy and gene content between outcome groups were assessed for alpha and beta diversity and differential abundance. Results Diversity and composition analyses showed no significant differences between CRC, HRA, and healthy controls. Phascolarctobacterium succinatutens was more abundant in CRC compared with healthy controls in both the 16S and metagenome data. The abundance of Bifidobacterium and Lachnospiraceae spp. was associated with time to CRC diagnosis. Conclusion Using a longitudinal study design, we identified three taxa as being potentially associated with CRC. These should be the focus of further studies of microbial changes occurring prior to CRC diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilie Bucher-Johannessen
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Bioinformatics, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Elina Vinberg
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vahid Bemanian
- Department of Pathology, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital Skien, Skien, Norway
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trine B. Rounge
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Bioinformatics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- *Correspondence: Trine B. Rounge,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kirkøen B, Berstad P, Hoff G, Bernklev T, Randel KR, Holme Ø, de Lange T, Robb KA, Botteri E. Type and Severity of Mental Illness and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Prev Med 2023; 64:76-85. [PMID: 36216655 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programs depends on the participation rate. This study examined the association between type and severity of mental illness and colorectal cancer screening participation. METHODS Between 2012 and 2017, a total of 46,919 individuals were invited to sigmoidoscopy screening in Norway, and 70,019 were invited to fecal immunochemical testing. In 2022, logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between the use of antipsychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics, and antidepressants in the year preceding the screening invitation and screening participation, adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Defined daily doses of individual drugs were used to assess dose‒response relationships. RESULTS Overall, 19.2% (24.8% of women, 13.4% of men) of all invitees used at least 1 psychotropic medication. Nonparticipation in the 2 arms combined was associated with the use of anxiolytics (60.7% in users vs 43.2% in nonusers; OR=1.53; 95% CI=1.45, 1.62) and antipsychotics (64.3% vs 43.8%; OR=1.41; 95% CI=1.30, 1.53) and increased with higher doses for both drugs. Hypnotics and antidepressants were only weakly associated with nonparticipation in higher doses. Participation rates were 57.3%, 52.3%, 42.9%, and 35.4% in those prescribed 0, 1, 2, and 3-4 classes of psychotropic medications, respectively. The associations between the use of psychotropic medications and nonparticipation were similar for the 2 screening tests. CONCLUSIONS These findings show significant disparities in colorectal cancer screening participation for individuals with mental illness, independent of the screening method. Moreover, screening participation varied depending on the type and severity of mental illness. Targeted interventions are warranted to ensure that people with mental illness are supported to access the benefits of colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedicte Kirkøen
- From the Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (RBUP), Oslo, Norway.
| | - Paula Berstad
- From the Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- From the Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo, Norway
| | - Tomm Bernklev
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Kristin R Randel
- From the Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway; Institute of Health & Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Mölndal, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Medical Research, Bærum Hospital, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Kathryn A Robb
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- From the Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; and the Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Juul FE, Cross AJ, Schoen RE, Senore C, Pinsky P, Miller E, Segnan N, Wooldrage K, Wieszczy-Szczepanik P, Armaroli P, Garborg KK, Adami HO, Hoff G, Kalager M, Bretthauer M, Løberg M, Holme Ø. 15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality : A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175:1525-1533. [PMID: 36215714 DOI: 10.7326/m22-0835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) by sex and age in randomized trials is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the 15-year effect of sigmoidoscopy screening on CRC incidence and mortality. DESIGN Pooled analysis of 4 large-scale randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening. SETTING Norway, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy. PARTICIPANTS Women and men aged 55 to 64 years at enrollment. INTERVENTION Sigmoidoscopy screening. MEASUREMENTS Primary end points were cumulative incidence rate ratio (IRR) and mortality rate ratio (MRR) and rate differences after 15 years of follow-up comparing screening versus usual care in intention-to-treat analyses. Stratified analyses were done by sex, cancer site, and age at screening. RESULTS Analyses comprised 274 952 persons (50.7% women), 137 493 in the screening and 137 459 in the usual care group. Screening attendance was 58% to 84%. After 15 years, the rate difference for CRC incidence was 0.51 cases (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63 cases) per 100 persons and the IRR was 0.79 (CI, 0.75 to 0.83). The rate difference for CRC mortality was 0.13 deaths (CI, 0.07 to 0.19 deaths) per 100 persons, and the MRR was 0.80 (CI, 0.72 to 0.88). Women had less benefit from screening than men for CRC incidence (IRR for women, 0.84 [CI, 0.77 to 0.91]; IRR for men, 0.75 [CI, 0.70 to 0.81]; P = 0.032 for difference) and mortality (MRR for women, 0.91 [CI, 0.77 to 1.17]; MRR for men, 0.73 [CI, 0.64 to 0.83]; P = 0.025 for difference). There was no statistically significant difference in screening effect between persons aged 55 to 59 years and those aged 60 to 64 years. LIMITATION Data from the U.K. trial were less granular because of privacy regulations. CONCLUSION This pooled analysis of all large randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening demonstrates a significant and sustained effect of sigmoidoscopy on CRC incidence and mortality for 15 years. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Health Fund of South-East Norway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik E Juul
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.)
| | - Amanda J Cross
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (A.J.C., K.W.)
| | - Robert E Schoen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (R.E.S.)
| | - Carlo Senore
- University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy (C.S., N.S., P.A.)
| | - Paul Pinsky
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Rockville, Maryland (P.P., E.M.)
| | - Eric Miller
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Rockville, Maryland (P.P., E.M.)
| | - Nereo Segnan
- University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy (C.S., N.S., P.A.)
| | - Kate Wooldrage
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (A.J.C., K.W.)
| | - Paulina Wieszczy-Szczepanik
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland (P.W.)
| | - Paola Armaroli
- University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy (C.S., N.S., P.A.)
| | - Kjetil K Garborg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.)
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (H.O.A.)
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (G.H.)
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.)
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.)
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.)
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Health Trust, Kristiansand, Norway (Ø.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bretthauer M, Løberg M, Wieszczy P, Kalager M, Emilsson L, Garborg K, Rupinski M, Dekker E, Spaander M, Bugajski M, Holme Ø, Zauber AG, Pilonis ND, Mroz A, Kuipers EJ, Shi J, Hernán MA, Adami HO, Regula J, Hoff G, Kaminski MF. Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:1547-1556. [PMID: 36214590 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2208375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although colonoscopy is widely used as a screening test to detect colorectal cancer, its effect on the risks of colorectal cancer and related death is unclear. METHODS We performed a pragmatic, randomized trial involving presumptively healthy men and women 55 to 64 years of age drawn from population registries in Poland, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands between 2009 and 2014. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio either to receive an invitation to undergo a single screening colonoscopy (the invited group) or to receive no invitation or screening (the usual-care group). The primary end points were the risks of colorectal cancer and related death, and the secondary end point was death from any cause. RESULTS Follow-up data were available for 84,585 participants in Poland, Norway, and Sweden - 28,220 in the invited group, 11,843 of whom (42.0%) underwent screening, and 56,365 in the usual-care group. A total of 15 participants had major bleeding after polyp removal. No perforations or screening-related deaths occurred within 30 days after colonoscopy. During a median follow-up of 10 years, 259 cases of colorectal cancer were diagnosed in the invited group as compared with 622 cases in the usual-care group. In intention-to-screen analyses, the risk of colorectal cancer at 10 years was 0.98% in the invited group and 1.20% in the usual-care group, a risk reduction of 18% (risk ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 0.93). The risk of death from colorectal cancer was 0.28% in the invited group and 0.31% in the usual-care group (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.16). The number needed to invite to undergo screening to prevent one case of colorectal cancer was 455 (95% CI, 270 to 1429). The risk of death from any cause was 11.03% in the invited group and 11.04% in the usual-care group (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.04). CONCLUSIONS In this randomized trial, the risk of colorectal cancer at 10 years was lower among participants who were invited to undergo screening colonoscopy than among those who were assigned to no screening. (Funded by the Research Council of Norway and others; NordICC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00883792.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bretthauer
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Magnus Løberg
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Paulina Wieszczy
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Mette Kalager
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Louise Emilsson
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Kjetil Garborg
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Maciej Rupinski
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Evelien Dekker
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Manon Spaander
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Marek Bugajski
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Øyvind Holme
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Ann G Zauber
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Nastazja D Pilonis
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Andrzej Mroz
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Joy Shi
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Miguel A Hernán
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Jaroslaw Regula
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Geir Hoff
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) - all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education - both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) - both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) - all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoff G, Botteri E, Berstad P, Randel KR. Norway – a retarded country close to 20 years since EU recommended colorectal cancer screening? A failure or a success? Nor J Epidemiol 2022. [DOI: 10.5324/nje.v30i1-2.4982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
17
|
Pedersen IB, Rawa-Golebiewska A, Calderwood AH, Brix LD, Grode LB, Botteri E, Bugajski M, Kaminski MF, Januszewicz W, Ødegaard H, Kleist B, Kalager M, Løberg M, Bretthauer M, Hoff G, Medhus A, Holme Ø. Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2022; 54:961-969. [PMID: 35008112 DOI: 10.1055/a-1734-7952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic screening with polypectomy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). Incomplete polyp removal may attenuate the effect of screening. This randomized trial compared cold snare polypectomy (CSP) with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) in terms of complete polyp resection. METHODS We included patients ≥ 40 years of age at eight hospitals in four countries who had at least one non-pedunculated polyp of 4-9 mm detected at colonoscopy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to CSP or HSP. Biopsies from the resection margins were obtained systematically after polypectomy in both groups. We hypothesized that CSP would be non-inferior to HSP, with a non-inferiority margin of 5 %. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify the factors explaining incomplete resection. RESULTS 425 patients, with 601 polyps, randomized to either CSP or HSP were included in the analysis. Of 318 polyps removed by CSP and 283 polyps removed by HSP, 34 (10.7 %) and 21 (7.4 %) were incompletely resected, respectively, with an adjusted risk difference of 3.2 % (95 %CI -1.4 % to 7.8 %). There was no difference between the groups in terms of post-polypectomy bleeding, perforation, or abdominal pain. Independent risk factors for incomplete removal were serrated histology (odds ratio [OR] 3.96; 95 %CI 1.63 to 9.66) and hyperplastic histology (OR 2.52; 95 %CI 1.30 to 4.86) in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSION In this randomized trial, non-inferiority for CSP could not be demonstrated. Polyps with serrated histology are more prone to incomplete resection compared with adenomas. CSP can be used safely for small polyps in routine colonoscopy practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina B Pedersen
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna Rawa-Golebiewska
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Audrey H Calderwood
- Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Lone D Brix
- Department of Anesthesiology, Surgery and Intensive Care, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Louise B Grode
- Department of Medicine, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marek Bugajski
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wladyslaw Januszewicz
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Britta Kleist
- Department of Pathology, Sørlandet hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital Skien, Skien, Norway
| | - Asle Medhus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kværner AS, Birkeland E, Vinberg E, Hoff G, Hjartåker A, Rounge TB, Berstad P. Associations of red and processed meat intake with screen-detected colorectal lesions. Br J Nutr 2022:1-11. [PMID: 36069337 DOI: 10.1017/s0007114522002860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Limited data exist regarding the role of meat consumption in early-stage colorectal carcinogenesis. We examined associations of red and processed meat intake with screen-detected colorectal lesions in immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FIT)-positive participants, enrolled in the Norwegian CRCbiome study during 2017-2021, aged 55-77 years. Absolute and energy-adjusted intakes of red and processed meat (combined and individually) were assessed using a validated, semi-quantitative FFQ. Associations between meat intake and screen-detected colorectal lesions were examined using multinomial logistic regression analyses with adjustment for key covariates. Of 1162 participants, 319 presented with advanced colorectal lesions at colonoscopy. High v. low energy-adjusted intakes of red and processed meat combined, as well as red meat alone, were borderline to significantly positively associated with advanced colorectal lesions (OR of 1·24 (95 % CI 0·98, 1·57) and 1·34 (95 % CI 1·07, 1·69), respectively). A significant dose-response relationship was also observed for absolute intake levels (OR of 1·32 (95 % CI 1·09, 1·60) per 100 g/d increase in red and processed meat). For processed meat, no association was observed between energy-adjusted intakes and advanced colorectal lesions. A significant positive association was, however, observed for participants with absolute intake levels ≥ 100 v. < 50 g/d (OR of 1·19 (95 % CI 1·09, 1·31)). In summary, high intakes of red and processed meat were associated with presence of advanced colorectal lesions at colonoscopy in FIT-positive participants. The study demonstrates a potential role of dietary data to improve the performance of FIT-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ane Sørlie Kværner
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Einar Birkeland
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elina Vinberg
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | | | - Trine B Rounge
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hoff G. Quality assurance in colonoscopy: is case mix a problem? Endoscopy 2022; 54:463-464. [PMID: 34905790 DOI: 10.1055/a-1690-6488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Geir Hoff
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway.,Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Botteri E, Hoff G, Randel KR, Holme Ø, de Lange T, Bernklev T, Aas E, Berthelsen M, Natvig E, Kirkøen B, Knudsen MD, Kvaerner AS, Schult AL, Ursin G, Jørgensen A, Berstad P. Characteristics of non-participants in a randomized colorectal cancer screening trial comparing sigmoidoscopy and faecal immunochemical testing. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:361-371. [PMID: 35411554 PMCID: PMC9324830 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Public health systems should guarantee universal access to health care services, including cancer screening. We assessed whether certain population subgroups were underrepresented among participants in colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy and faecal immunochemical testing (FIT). Between 2012 and 2019, about 140 000 individuals aged 50 to 74 years were randomly invited to once‐only sigmoidoscopy or first round of FIT screening. Our study included 46 919 individuals invited to sigmoidoscopy and 70 019 to FIT between 2012 and 2017. We used logistic regression models to evaluate if demographic and socioeconomic factors and use of certain drugs were associated with participation. Twenty‐four thousand one hundred and fifty‐nine (51.5%) individuals attended sigmoidoscopy and 40 931 (58.5%) FIT screening. Male gender, young age, low education and income, being retired or unemployed, living alone, being an immigrant, long driving time to screening centre, and use of antidiabetic and psychotropic drugs were associated with low participation in both screening groups. Many of these factors also predicted low acceptance of colonoscopy after positive FIT. While male gender, young age and living alone were more strongly associated with nonparticipation in FIT than sigmoidoscopy, low education and income, being retired or immigrant and long driving time were more strongly associated with nonparticipation in sigmoidoscopy than FIT. In conclusion, participation was lower in sigmoidoscopy than FIT. Predictors of nonparticipation were similar between arms. However, low socioeconomic status, being an immigrant and long driving time affected participation more in sigmoidoscopy screening, suggesting that FIT may guarantee more equal access to screening services than sigmoidoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin R Randel
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.,Institute for Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital- Mölndal, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.,Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Medical Research, Baerum Hospital, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Tomm Bernklev
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research and Innovation, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Eline Aas
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mona Berthelsen
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erik Natvig
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Benedicte Kirkøen
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (RBUP), Oslo, Norway
| | - Markus D Knudsen
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Norwegian PSC Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ane S Kvaerner
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna L Schult
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medical Research, Baerum Hospital, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anita Jørgensen
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Knudsen MD, Kvaerner AS, Botteri E, Holme Ø, Hjartåker A, Song M, Thiis-Evensen E, Randel KR, Hoff G, Berstad P. Lifestyle predictors for inconsistent participation to fecal based colorectal cancer screening. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:172. [PMID: 35168592 PMCID: PMC8848967 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09287-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consistent participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with repeated fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is important for the success of the screening program. We investigated whether lifestyle risk factors for CRC were related to inconsistent participation in up to four rounds of FIT-screening. METHOD We included data from 3,051 individuals who participated in up to four FIT-screening rounds and returned a lifestyle questionnaire. Using logistic regression analyses, we estimated associations between smoking habits, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, alcohol consumption, diet and a healthy lifestyle score (from least favorable 0 to most favorable 5), and inconsistent participation (i.e. not participating in all rounds of eligible FIT screening invitations). RESULTS Altogether 721 (24%) individuals were categorized as inconsistent participants Current smoking and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 were associated with inconsistent participation; odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 1.54 (1.21-2.95) and 1.54 (1.20-1.97), respectively. A significant trend towards inconsistent participation by a lower healthy lifestyle score was observed (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Lifestyle behaviors were associated with inconsistent participation in FIT-screening. Initiatives aimed at increasing participation rates among those with the unhealthiest lifestyle have a potential to improve the efficiency of screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Dines Knudsen
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304, Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Norwegian PSC Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, 0424, Rikshospitalet, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway. .,Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Ane Sørlie Kvaerner
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304, Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304, Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304, Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, P.O. Box 416, 4604, Lundsiden, Kristiansand, Norway.,Department of Health Management and Health Economis, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anette Hjartåker
- Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1046, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mingyang Song
- Departments of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.,Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, 02114, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, 02114, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, MA, Boston, USA
| | - Espen Thiis-Evensen
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Norwegian PSC Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, 0424, Rikshospitalet, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin Ranheim Randel
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304, Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304, Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Health Management and Health Economis, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Ulefossvegen 55, 3710, Skien, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304, Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hoff G, Botteri E, Huppertz-Hauss G, Kvamme JM, Holme Ø, Aabakken L, Dahler S, Medhus AW, Blomgren I, Sandvei P, Darre-Næss O, Kjellevold Ø, Seip B. The effect of train-the-colonoscopy-trainer course on colonoscopy quality indicators. Endoscopy 2021; 53:1229-1234. [PMID: 33622001 DOI: 10.1055/a-1352-4583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic training in colonoscopy is highly recommended; however, we have limited knowledge of the effects of "training-the-colonoscopy-trainer" (TCT) courses. Using a national quality register on colonoscopy performance, we aimed to evaluate the effects of TCT participation on defined quality indicators. METHODS This observational study compared quality indicators (pain, cecal intubation, and polyp detection) between centers participating versus not participating in a TCT course. Nonparticipating centers were assigned a pseudoparticipating year to match their participating counterparts. Results were compared between first year after and the year before TCT (pseudo)participation. Time trends up to 5 years after TCT (pseudo)participation were also compared. Generalized estimating equation models, adjusted for age, sex, and bowel cleansing, were used. RESULTS 11 participating and 11 nonparticipating centers contributed 18 555 and 10 730 colonoscopies, respectively. In participating centers, there was a significant increase in detection of polyps ≥ 5 mm, from 26.4 % to 29.2 % (P = 0.035), and reduction in moderate/severe pain experienced by women, from 38.2 % to 33.6 % (P = 0.043); no significant changes were found in nonparticipating centers. Over 5 years, 20 participating and 18 nonparticipating centers contributed 85 691 and 41 569 colonoscopies, respectively. In participating centers, polyp detection rate increased linearly (P = 0.003), and pain decreased linearly in women (P = 0.004). Nonparticipating centers did not show any significant time trend during the study period. CONCLUSIONS Participation in a TCT course improved polyp detection rates and reduced pain experienced by women. These effects were maintained during a 5-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geir Hoff
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital Skien, Skien, Norway.,University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Jan Magnus Kvamme
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Medicine, University Hospital, North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Lars Aabakken
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein Dahler
- Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital Notodden, Notodden, Norway
| | - Asle W Medhus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingrid Blomgren
- Department of Medicine, Helse Fonna Hospital Trust, Haugesund, Norway
| | - Per Sandvei
- Department of Gastroenterology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes, Norway
| | - Ole Darre-Næss
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway
| | | | - Birgitte Seip
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schult AL, Botteri E, Hoff G, Holme Ø, Bretthauer M, Randel KR, Gulichsen EH, El-Safadi B, Barua I, Munck C, Nilsen LR, Svendsen HM, de Lange T. Women require routine opioids to prevent painful colonoscopies: a randomised controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:1480-1489. [PMID: 34534048 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1969683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women are at high risk for painful colonoscopy. Pain, but also sedation, are barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation. In a randomised controlled trial, we compared on-demand with pre-colonoscopy opioid administration to control pain in women at CRC screening age. METHODS Women, aged 55-79 years, attending colonoscopy at two Norwegian endoscopy units were randomised 1:1:1 to (1) fentanyl on-demand, (2) fentanyl prior to colonoscopy, or (3) alfentanil on-demand. The primary endpoint was procedural pain reported by the patients on a validated four-point Likert scale and further dichotomized for the study into painful (moderate or severe pain) and non-painful (slight or no pain) colonoscopy. Secondary endpoints were: willingness to repeat colonoscopy, adverse events, cecal intubation time and rate, and post-procedure recovery time. RESULTS Between June 2017 and May 2020, 183 patients were included in intention-to-treat analyses in the fentanyl on-demand group, 177 in the fentanyl prior to colonoscopy group, and 179 in the alfentanil on-demand group. Fewer women receiving fentanyl prior to colonoscopy reported a painful colonoscopy compared to those who were given fentanyl on-demand (25.2% vs. 44.1%, p < .001). There was no difference in the proportion of painful colonoscopies between fentanyl on-demand and alfentanil on-demand (44.1% vs. 39.5%, p = .40). No differences were observed for adverse events or any of the other secondary endpoints between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS Fentanyl prior to colonoscopy provided better pain control than fentanyl or alfentanil on-demand. Fentanyl before colonoscopy should be recommended to all women at screening age. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01538550). Norwegian Medicines Agency (16/16266-13). EU Clinical Trials Register (EUDRACTNR. 2016-005090-13).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lisa Schult
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Baerum, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin Ranheim Randel
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Badboni El-Safadi
- Department of Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ishita Barua
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Baerum, Gjettum, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Carl Munck
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Baerum, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Linn Rosén Nilsen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway
| | | | - Thomas de Lange
- Department of Medical Research, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Baerum, Gjettum, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Mölndal, Mølndal, Sweden.,Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Knudsen MD, Hoff G, Tidemann-Andersen I, Bodin GE, Øvervold S, Berstad P. Public Awareness and Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Prevention: a Cross-Sectional Survey. J Cancer Educ 2021; 36:957-964. [PMID: 32112366 PMCID: PMC8520865 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01721-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to investigate awareness of colorectal cancer (CRC) lifestyle risk factors, willingness to participate in CRC screening, and preferences concerning channels for information on CRC prevention in the general population, including the target age of the upcoming Norwegian national CRC screening program. The present study was a cross-sectional online survey of adults aged 39 to 55 years registered as Kantar Web Panel respondents in Norway. The survey included demographic characteristics, multiple choice knowledge questions of lifestyle risk factors for CRC, attitudes towards CRC screening, and preferred channels for receiving information on CRC prevention. Of 4375 participants invited, 2007 (46%) answered the survey. The average number of correctly identified lifestyle risk factors for CRC was 7.3 of ten. Women were significantly more likely than men, and those with university or college education more likely than those with lower education to correctly identify at least eight risk factors (odds ratio, OR = 1.53, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.25-1.87, and OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.23-1.86, respectively). The number of correctly identified risk factors was positively associated with willingness to participate in CRC screening (P for trend < 0.001). The national public work force and the Norwegian Cancer Society were selected by 76% and 69% of the participants, respectively, to be trustworthy sources of information on CRC prevention. Awareness of CRC risk factors was associated with willingness to participate in CRC screening. The national public work force and Cancer Society can be generally accepted sources of CRC preventive information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Dines Knudsen
- Section of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
- The Norwegian Cancer Society, P.O. Box 4, Centrum, 0101, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ida Tidemann-Andersen
- The Norwegian Cancer Society, P.O. Box 4, Centrum, 0101, Oslo, Norway
- Western Norway Research Institute, Sogndal, Norway
| | - Gry Ekeberg Bodin
- The Norwegian Cancer Society, P.O. Box 4, Centrum, 0101, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sissel Øvervold
- The Norwegian Cancer Society, P.O. Box 4, Centrum, 0101, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kværner AS, Birkeland E, Bucher-Johannessen C, Vinberg E, Nordby JI, Kangas H, Bemanian V, Ellonen P, Botteri E, Natvig E, Rognes T, Hovig E, Lyle R, Ambur OH, de Vos WM, Bultman S, Hjartåker A, Landberg R, Song M, Blix HS, Ursin G, Randel KR, de Lange T, Hoff G, Holme Ø, Berstad P, Rounge TB. The CRCbiome study: a large prospective cohort study examining the role of lifestyle and the gut microbiome in colorectal cancer screening participants. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:930. [PMID: 34407780 PMCID: PMC8371800 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08640-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. However, current screening methods are either hampered by invasiveness or suboptimal performance, limiting their effectiveness as primary screening methods. To aid in the development of a non-invasive screening test with improved sensitivity and specificity, we have initiated a prospective biomarker study (CRCbiome), nested within a large randomized CRC screening trial in Norway. We aim to develop a microbiome-based classification algorithm to identify advanced colorectal lesions in screening participants testing positive for an immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FIT). We will also examine interactions with host factors, diet, lifestyle and prescription drugs. The prospective nature of the study also enables the analysis of changes in the gut microbiome following the removal of precancerous lesions. METHODS The CRCbiome study recruits participants enrolled in the Bowel Cancer Screening in Norway (BCSN) study, a randomized trial initiated in 2012 comparing once-only sigmoidoscopy to repeated biennial FIT, where women and men aged 50-74 years at study entry are invited to participate. Since 2017, participants randomized to FIT screening with a positive test result have been invited to join the CRCbiome study. Self-reported diet, lifestyle and demographic data are collected prior to colonoscopy after the positive FIT-test (baseline). Screening data, including colonoscopy findings are obtained from the BCSN database. Fecal samples for gut microbiome analyses are collected both before and 2 and 12 months after colonoscopy. Samples are analyzed using metagenome sequencing, with taxonomy profiles, and gene and pathway content as primary measures. CRCbiome data will also be linked to national registries to obtain information on prescription histories and cancer relevant outcomes occurring during the 10 year follow-up period. DISCUSSION The CRCbiome study will increase our understanding of how the gut microbiome, in combination with lifestyle and environmental factors, influences the early stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. This knowledge will be crucial to develop microbiome-based screening tools for CRC. By evaluating biomarker performance in a screening setting, using samples from the target population, the generalizability of the findings to future screening cohorts is likely to be high. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01538550 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ane Sørlie Kværner
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Einar Birkeland
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Bucher-Johannessen
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elina Vinberg
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Inge Nordby
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Harri Kangas
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Vahid Bemanian
- Department of Multidisciplinary Laboratory Science and Medical Biochemistry, Genetic Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Pekka Ellonen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erik Natvig
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torbjørn Rognes
- Department of Informatics, Centre for Bioinformatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivind Hovig
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, Centre for Bioinformatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Robert Lyle
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Herman Ambur
- Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Department of Natural Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Willem M de Vos
- Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Human Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Scott Bultman
- Department of Genetics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Rikard Landberg
- Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Division of Food and Nutrition Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mingyang Song
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit and Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hege Salvesen Blix
- Department of Drug Statistics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Thomas de Lange
- Medical Department, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Research, Bærum Hospital, Bærum, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
- Institute for Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Trine B Rounge
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Informatics, Centre for Bioinformatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schult AL, Botteri E, Hoff G, Randel KR, Dalén E, Eskeland SL, Holme Ø, de Lange T. Detection of cancers and advanced adenomas in asymptomatic participants in colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048183. [PMID: 34210732 PMCID: PMC8252874 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess detection rates for colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenomas in asymptomatic CRC screening participants and bowel symptoms in association with CRC and advanced adenoma. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Two screening centres. PARTICIPANTS 42 554 men and women, aged 50-74 years, participating in a randomised CRC screening trial. 36 059 participants underwent a sigmoidoscopy (and follow-up colonoscopy if positive sigmoidoscopy) and 6495 underwent a colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Proportion of asymptomatic participants diagnosed with CRC or advanced adenomas. Prevalence of bowel symptoms (rectal bleeding, change in bowel habits, diarrhoea, constipation, bloating, alternating bowel habits, general symptoms, other bowel symptoms) recorded by the endoscopist and their association with CRC and advanced adenomas. RESULTS Among sigmoidoscopy participants, 7336 (20.3%) reported at least one symptom. 120 (60%) out of 200 individuals with screen-detected CRC and 1301 (76.5%) out of 1700 with advanced adenoma were asymptomatic. Rectal bleeding was associated with detection of CRC and advanced adenoma (OR 4.3, 95% CI 3.1 to 6.1 and 1.8, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.1, respectively), while change in bowel habits only with CRC detection (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.4 to 6.1). Among the FIT positives, 2173 (33.5%) reported at least one symptom. Out of 299 individuals with screen-detected CRC and 1639 with advanced adenoma, 167 (55.9%) and 1 175 (71.7%) were asymptomatic, respectively. Detection of CRC was associated with rectal bleeding (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.3), change in bowel habits (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.5) and abdominal pain (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.7). CONCLUSIONS Some bowel symptoms increased the likelihood of being diagnosed with CRC or advanced adenoma. However, the majority of individuals with these findings were asymptomatic. Asymptomatic individuals should be encouraged to participate in CRC screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01538550.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lisa Schult
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Research Department, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway
| | - Kristin R Randel
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirin Dalén
- Department of Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway
| | | | - Øyvind Holme
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Trust Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital - Mölndal, Mölndal, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden
- Department of Medical Research, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pedersen IB, Bretthauer M, Kalager M, Løberg M, Hoff G, Matapour S, Hugin S, Frigstad SO, Seip B, Kleist BA, Løvdal L, Botteri E, Holme Ø. Incomplete endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps: a prospective quality assurance study. Endoscopy 2021; 53:383-391. [PMID: 32961579 DOI: 10.1055/a-1243-0379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic screening with polypectomy has been shown to reduce colorectal cancer incidence in randomized trials. Incomplete polyp removal and subsequent development of post-colonoscopy cancers may attenuate the effect of screening. This study aimed to quantify the extent of incomplete polyp removal. METHODS We included patients aged 50-75 years with nonpedunculated polyps ≥ 5 mm removed during colonoscopy at four hospitals in Norway. To evaluate completeness of polyp removal, biopsies from the resection margins were obtained after polypectomy. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify factors explaining incomplete resection. RESULTS 246 patients with 339 polyps underwent polypectomy between January 2015 and June 2017. A total of 12 polyps were excluded due to biopsy electrocautery damage, and 327 polyps in 246 patients (mean age 67 years [range 42-83]; 52 % male) were included in the analysis. Overall, 54 polyps (15.9 %) in 54 patients were incompletely resected. Histological diagnosis of the polyp (sessile serrated lesions vs. adenoma, odds ratio [OR] 10.9, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.9-30.1) and polyp location (proximal vs. distal colon, OR 2.8, 95 %CI 1.0-7.7) were independent risk factors for incomplete removal of polyps 5-19 mm. Board-certified endoscopists were not associated with lower rates of incomplete resection compared with trainees (14.0 % vs. 14.2 %), OR 1.0 (95 %CI 0.5-2.1). CONCLUSION Incomplete polyp resection was frequent after polypectomy in routine clinical practice. Serrated histology and proximal location were independent risk factors for incomplete resection. The performance of board-certified gastroenterologists was not superior to that of trainees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina B Pedersen
- Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital Skien, Skien, Norway
| | - Senaria Matapour
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Silje Hugin
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Svein O Frigstad
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Birgitte Seip
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Britta A Kleist
- Department of Pathology, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Leif Løvdal
- Department of Pathology, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Randel KR, Schult AL, Botteri E, Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Ursin G, Natvig E, Berstad P, Jørgensen A, Sandvei PK, Olsen ME, Frigstad SO, Darre-Næss O, Norvard ER, Bolstad N, Kørner H, Wibe A, Wensaas KA, de Lange T, Holme Ø. Colorectal Cancer Screening With Repeated Fecal Immunochemical Test Versus Sigmoidoscopy: Baseline Results From a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:1085-1096.e5. [PMID: 33227280 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The comparative effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is unknown. METHODS Individuals aged 50-74 years living in Southeast Norway were randomly invited between 2012 and 2019 to either once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy or FIT screening every second year. Colonoscopy was recommended after sigmoidoscopy if any polyp of ≥10 mm, ≥3 adenomas, any advanced adenomas, or CRC was found or, subsequent to, FIT >15 μg hemoglobin/g feces. Data for this report were obtained after complete recruitment in both groups and included 2 full FIT rounds and part of the third round. Outcome measures were participation, neoplasia detection, and adverse events. Age-standardized detection rates and age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. RESULTS We included 139,291 individuals: 69,195 randomized to sigmoidoscopy and 70,096 to FIT. The participation rate was 52% for sigmoidoscopy, 58% in the first FIT round, and 68% for 3 cumulative FIT rounds. Compared to sigmoidoscopy, the detection rate for CRC was similar in the first FIT round (0.25% vs 0.27%; OR, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.13) but higher after 3 FIT rounds (0.49% vs 0.27%; OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.54-2.27). Advanced adenoma detection rate was lower in the first FIT round compared to sigmoidoscopy at 1.4% vs 2.4% (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.53-0.62) but higher after 3 cumulative FIT rounds at 2.7% vs 2.4% (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23). There were 33 (0.05%) serious adverse events in the sigmoidoscopy group compared to 47 (0.07%) in the FIT group (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS Participation was higher and more CRC and advanced adenomas were detected with repeated FIT compared to sigmoidoscopy. The risk of perforation and bleeding was comparable. Clinicaltrials.gov, Number: NCT01538550.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin R Randel
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway; Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Anna L Schult
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo; Norway Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Erik Natvig
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Jørgensen
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Marie Ek Olsen
- Department of Pathology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway
| | - Svein Oskar Frigstad
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Darre-Næss
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Espen R Norvard
- Department of Pathology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Drammen, Drammen, Norway
| | - Nils Bolstad
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hartwig Kørner
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Arne Wibe
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Department of Surgery, St. Olav's hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Knut-Arne Wensaas
- Research Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Research, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway; Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo; Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hoff G, Streck EE, Lai A, Fanti V, Golosio B, Nascimento CD, Souza EG. Using Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit to evaluate a low power X-ray tube generator configuration. Appl Radiat Isot 2020; 168:109487. [PMID: 33339703 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Monte Carlo technique has been widely used as an important tool to develop new irradiation equipment, prototype medical equipment parts, and test methodologies for dosimetry. In this manuscript, we present a methodology to design a low power X-ray tube generator using the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit. The simulations were performed considering a large number of variables, namely, the material composition of the target track, the window thickness, and the air pressure of the X-ray tube. The X-ray production was simulated considering monoenergetic electron beams impinging on targets of tungsten and copper with incident kinetic energies ranging from 20 keV to 60 keV and initial divergences from 5° to 30°. For the polyenergetic emission, a conservative approach with Gaussian energy distribution was adopted. The analysis indicates that among the evaluated parameters, the incident kinetic energy, and the target material produced the most notable changes in the spectra shape and conversion efficiency (CE), significantly impacting the X-ray tube design. The studies provide a reliable methodology to explore general configurations for X-ray tube generators, defining the best geometry, material compositions, and thicknesses to be used on spectroscopy applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Hoff
- Physics Department, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy; Department of Cagliary, National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Monserrato, Italy; Medical Physics and Radioprotection Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
| | - E E Streck
- Physics College at Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (retired professor), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - A Lai
- Physics Department, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy; Department of Cagliary, National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Monserrato, Italy
| | - V Fanti
- Physics Department, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy; Department of Cagliary, National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Monserrato, Italy
| | - B Golosio
- Physics Department, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy; Department of Cagliary, National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Monserrato, Italy
| | - C D Nascimento
- Graduate Program in Computer and Electronic Engineering at Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
| | - E G Souza
- Graduate Program in Computer and Electronic Engineering at Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Silva R, Denyak V, Hoff G, Paschuk S, Schelin H, Setti J. GEANT4 simulation in proton medical imaging: A transport models comparison. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
31
|
Joranger P, Nesbakken A, Sorbye H, Hoff G, Oshaug A, Aas E. Survival and costs of colorectal cancer treatment and effects of changing treatment strategies: a model approach. Eur J Health Econ 2020; 21:321-334. [PMID: 31707584 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01130-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
New and emerging advances in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment combined with limited healthcare resources highlight the need for detailed decision-analytic models to evaluate costs, survival and quality-adjusted life years. The objectives of this article were to estimate the expected lifetime treatment cost of CRC for an average 70-year-old patient and to test the applicability and flexibility of a model in predicting survival and costs of changing treatment scenarios. The analyses were based on a validated semi-Markov model using data from a Norwegian observational study (2049 CRC patients) to estimate transition probabilities and the proportion resected. In addition, inputs from the Norwegian Patient Registry, guidelines, literature, and expert opinions were used to estimate resource use. We found that the expected lifetime treatment cost for a 70-year-old CRC patient was €47,300 (CRC stage I €26,630, II €38,130, III €56,800, and IV €69,890). Altered use of palliative chemotherapy would increase the costs by up to 29%. A 5% point reduction in recurrence rate for stages I-III would reduce the costs by 5.3% and increase overall survival by 8.2 months. Given the Norwegian willingness to pay threshold per QALY gained, society's willingness to pay for interventions that could result in such a reduction was on average €28,540 per CRC patient. The life years gained by CRC treatment were 6.05 years. The overall CRC treatment costs appear to be low compared to the health gain, and the use of palliative chemotherapy can have a major impact on cost. The model was found to be flexible and applicable for estimating the cost and survival of several CRC treatment scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paal Joranger
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
- Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Department of Oncology and Department of Clinical Science, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- University of Bergen, 5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
- The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- University of Oslo, 0316, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arne Oshaug
- Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eline Aas
- Institute of Health and Society, Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hoff G, Ursin G, Løberg M, de Lange T, Skovlund E, Holme Ø. Continuous development of colorectal cancer screening programs. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:822-823. [PMID: 30939973 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1588475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs are far from perfect. Many crucial questions remain, yet expensive CRC screening services are implemented throughout the world without a plan on how to evaluate and improve the service. The time is ripe for improving the design of CRC screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geir Hoff
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva Skovlund
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Randel KR, Botteri E, Romstad KMK, Frigstad SO, Bretthauer M, Hoff G, de Lange T, Holme Ø. Effects of Oral Anticoagulants and Aspirin on Performance of Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:1642-1649.e1. [PMID: 30689972 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is the tool most frequently used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening worldwide. It is unclear how the use of aspirin and oral anticoagulants in the screening population affects the diagnostic performance of FIT. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study in an ongoing CRC screening trial in Norway. Participants aged 50-74 years with a positive result from an FIT (>15 μg hemoglobin/g feces) and subsequent colonoscopy (reference standard) were included. Those who used regular aspirin, warfarin, or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were defined as users. Non-users were matched according to age, sex, screening center, and screening round. The primary outcomes were the positive predictive value (PPV) for CRC and advanced adenoma. RESULTS Among 4908 eligible participants, 1008 used aspirin, 147 used warfarin, 212 used DOACs, and 3541 were non-users. CRCs were found in 234 individuals and advanced adenomas in 1305 individuals. The PPV for CRC was 3.8% for aspirin users vs 6.4% for matched non-users (P = .006), The PPV for advanced adenoma in aspirin users was 27.2% vs 32.6% for matched non-users (P = .011). For DOAC, the PPV for CRC was 0.9% in users vs 6.8% in matched non-users (P = .001). The PPV for advanced adenoma in DOAC users was 20.5% vs 32.4% in matched non-users (P = .002). There was no significant difference in PPV for CRC or advanced adenoma in warfarin users compared to non-users. CONCLUSIONS In a large screening cohort in Norway, regular use of aspirin and particularly DOACs, were associated with lower PPV of FIT for detection of CRCs and advanced adenomas. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01538550.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Ranheim Randel
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway; Department of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Department of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Norwegian National Advisory Unit for Women's Health, Women's Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Svein Oskar Frigstad
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Bærum Hospital, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway; Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway; Department of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Guldvog I, Reitsma LC, Johnsen L, Lauzike A, Gibbs C, Carlsen E, Lende TH, Narvestad JK, Omdal R, Kvaløy JT, Hoff G, Bernklev T, Søiland H. Thyroidectomy Versus Medical Management for Euthyroid Patients With Hashimoto Disease and Persisting Symptoms: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170:453-464. [PMID: 30856652 DOI: 10.7326/m18-0284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hashimoto disease is a chronic autoimmune thyroiditis. Despite adequate hormone substitution, some patients have persistent symptoms that may be the result of immunologic pathophysiology. OBJECTIVE To determine whether thyroidectomy improves symptoms in patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis who still have symptoms despite having normal thyroid gland function while receiving medical therapy. DESIGN Randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02319538). SETTING Secondary care hospital in Norway. PATIENTS 150 patients aged 18 to 79 years with persistent Hashimoto-related symptoms despite euthyroid status while receiving hormone replacement therapy and with serum antithyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) antibody titers greater than 1000 IU/mL. INTERVENTION Total thyroidectomy or medical management with hormone substitution to secure euthyroid status in both groups. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was general health score on the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) at 18 months. Secondary outcomes were adverse effects of surgery, the other 7 SF-36 subscores, fatigue questionnaire scores, and serum anti-TPO antibody titers at 6, 12, and 18 months. RESULTS During follow-up, only the surgical group demonstrated improvement: Mean general health score increased from 38 to 64 points, for a between-group difference of 29 points (95% CI, 22 to 35 points) at 18 months. Fatigue score decreased from 23 to 14 points, for a between-group difference of 9.3 points (CI, 7.4 to 11.2 points). Chronic fatigue frequency decreased from 82% to 35%, for a between-group difference of 39 percentage points (CI, 23 to 53 percentage points). Median serum anti-TPO antibody titers decreased from 2232 to 152 IU/mL, for a between-group difference of 1148 IU/mL (CI, 1080 to 1304 IU/mL). In multivariable regression analyses, the adjusted treatment effects remained similar to the unadjusted effects. LIMITATION Results are applicable only to a subgroup of patients with Hashimoto disease, and follow-up was limited to 18 months. CONCLUSION Total thyroidectomy improved health-related quality of life and fatigue, whereas medical therapy did not. This improvement, along with concomitant elimination of serum anti-TPO antibodies, may elucidate disease mechanisms. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Telemark Hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivar Guldvog
- Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway (I.G., L.C.R., A.L., C.G., E.C., G.H.)
| | | | - Lene Johnsen
- Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway (L.J., J.K.N.)
| | - Andromeda Lauzike
- Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway (I.G., L.C.R., A.L., C.G., E.C., G.H.)
| | - Charlotte Gibbs
- Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway (I.G., L.C.R., A.L., C.G., E.C., G.H.)
| | - Eivind Carlsen
- Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway (I.G., L.C.R., A.L., C.G., E.C., G.H.)
| | - Tone Hoel Lende
- Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway, and University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (T.H.L., R.O., H.S.)
| | | | - Roald Omdal
- Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway, and University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (T.H.L., R.O., H.S.)
| | - Jan Terje Kvaløy
- University of Stavanger and Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway (J.T.K.)
| | - Geir Hoff
- Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway (I.G., L.C.R., A.L., C.G., E.C., G.H.)
| | - Tomm Bernklev
- Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway, and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (T.B.)
| | - Håvard Søiland
- Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway, and University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (T.H.L., R.O., H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bugajski M, Wieszczy P, Pisera M, Rupinski M, Hoff G, Huppertz-Hauss G, Regula J, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF. Effectiveness of digital feedback on patient experience and 30-day complications after screening colonoscopy: a randomized health services study. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E537-E544. [PMID: 31041371 PMCID: PMC6447395 DOI: 10.1055/a-0830-4648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims European guidelines (ESGE) recommend measuring patient experience and 30-day complication rate after colonoscopy. We compared digital and paper-based feedback on patients' experience and 30-day complications after screening colonoscopy. Patients and methods Screenees attending for primary screening colonoscopies in two centers from September 2015 to December 2016 were randomized (1:1) to an intervention arm (choice of feedback method) or control arm (routine paper-based feedback). Participants in the intervention arm could choose preferred feedback method (paper-based, automated telephone or online survey) and were contacted by automated telephone 30 days after colonoscopy to assess complications. Control group participants self-reported complications. Primary and secondary endpoints were response rates to feedback and complications questionnaire, respectively. Results There were 1,281 and 1,260 participants in the intervention and control arms, respectively. There was no significant difference in response rate between study groups (64.8 % vs 61.5 %; P = 0.08). Free choice of feedback improved response for participants identified as poor responders: younger than 60 years (60.8 % vs 54.7 %; P = 0.031), male (64.0 % vs 58.6 %; P = 0.045) and in small non-public center (56.2 % vs 42.5 %; P = 0.043). In the intervention arm, 1,168 participants (91.2 %) answered the phone call concerning complications. A total of 79 participants (6.2 %) reported complications, of which two (0.2 %) were verified by telephone as clinically relevant. No complications were self-reported in the control group. Conclusion The overall response rate was not significantly improved with digital feedback, yet the technology yielded significant improvement in participants defined as poor responders. Our study demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of digital patient feedback about complications after colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Bugajski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - P. Wieszczy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland,Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M. Pisera
- Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M. Rupinski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - G. Hoff
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | | | - J. Regula
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M. Bretthauer
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M. F. Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland,Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hoff G, Botteri E, Høie O, Garborg K, Wiig H, Huppertz-Hauss G, Moritz V, Bretthauer M, Holme Ø. Polyp detection rates as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E195-E202. [PMID: 30705953 PMCID: PMC6338539 DOI: 10.1055/a-0796-6477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates (ADR and PDR) are advocated as general performance measures for screening and clinical colonoscopy, but their evidence is largely derived from screening data. This study compares PDRs in colonoscopy for screening versus clinical indications.
Methods Consecutive patients at two Norwegian centers were examined by eight endoscopists either for colonoscopy screening in a randomized colonoscopy screening trial (Nordic-European Initiative on Colorectal Cancer, NordICC) or for clinical indications during the same time period (January 2013 to December 2014). PDR-5 mm, defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with detection of at least one polyp with diameter ≥ 5 mm, was measured prospectively. We fitted multivariable logistic regression models and calculated the adjusted odds ratios (OR) to evaluate factors for differences in PDR-5 mm between screening and clinical colonoscopies.
Results The study included 2939 clinical and 771 screening colonoscopies. The PDR-5 mm was 26 % and 31 %, respectively (P = 0.005). Among sex, age, cecum intubation, bowel cleansing, and endoscopist, only the latter explained the higher PDR-5 mm in screening compared to routine colonoscopy. In the fully adjusted logistic regression model, the detection of polyps ≥ 5 mm was not associated with indication for colonoscopy. The OR for polyp detection in screening vs. routine colonoscopy was 1.04; 95 % confidence interval 0.85 – 1.27.
Conclusion In this study, the differences in PDR-5 mm between clinical and screening colonoscopies could be explained by the endoscopist. Accordingly, PDR-5 mm benchmarks may be similar for clinical and screening colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. Hoff
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway,Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway,Clinical Effectiveness Research group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - O. Høie
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Arendal, Norway
| | - K. Garborg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - H. Wiig
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | | | - V. Moritz
- Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | - M. Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ø. Holme
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway,Clinical Effectiveness Research group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hoff G, de Lange T, Bretthauer M, Dahler S, Halvorsen FA, Huppertz-Hauss G, Høie O, Kjellevold Ø, Mortiz V, Sandvei P, Seip B, Holme Ø. Registration bias in a clinical quality register. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E90-E98. [PMID: 30652120 PMCID: PMC6333534 DOI: 10.1055/a-0806-7006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aims The quality of medical quality registers is poorly defined and lack of trust in data due to low completeness may be a major barrier against their use in quality improvement interventions. The aim of the current observational study was to explore how selective reporting may influence adverse events registered in the Norwegian quality register for colonoscopy (Gastronet). Materials and methods Gastronet's database includes data provided by endoscopists, nurses and patients. All outpatient colonoscopies reported to Gastronet in 2015 were included and compared to the total number of colonoscopies performed in Norway as retrieved from the National Patient Registry. Hospitals were categorized into four groups according to reporting completeness < 50 %, 50 % to 69 %, 70 % to 89 % and ≥ 90 %. The number of recorded adverse events (AEs) and procedure time were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to explore independent factors for selection bias. Results A total of 22,364 colonoscopies were reported to the National Patient Register of which 15,855 (71 %) were registered in Gastronet. Feedback was received from 11,079 patients (50 %). The frequency of AEs increased from 0.6 % in completeness group < 50 % to 1.6 % in completeness group ≥ 90 % ( P < 0.001). Long colonoscopy procedure time was associated with low reporting completeness. Patient feedback was associated with older age, cecal intubation success and sedation-free colonoscopy. Conclusion Incomplete registration in a colonoscopy quality register is associated with underreporting of AEs. Longer procedure time, a surrogate marker for time constraint, is associated with low completeness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geir Hoff
- Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway,University of Oslo, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway,Corresponding author Geir Hoff Telemark Hospital – Dept. of ResearchUlefossveien 55 Skien 3710Norway+35004132
| | - Thomas de Lange
- University of Oslo, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway,Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- University of Oslo, Institute of Health and Society, Oslo, Norway,Frontier Science Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | | | | | | | - Ole Høie
- Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jodal HC, Løberg M, Holme Ø, Adami HO, Bretthauer M, Emilsson L, Ransohoff DF, Hoff G, Kalager M. Mortality From Postscreening (Interval) Colorectal Cancers Is Comparable to That From Cancer in Unscreened Patients-A Randomized Sigmoidoscopy Trial. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:1787-1794.e3. [PMID: 30165051 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Revised: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is performed at longer time intervals than the fecal occult blood test or screenings for breast or prostate cancer. This causes concerns about interval cancers, which have been proposed to progress more rapidly. We compared outcomes of patients with interval CRCs after sigmoidoscopy screening vs outcomes of patients with CRC who had not been screened. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized sigmoidoscopy screening trial in Norway with 98,684 participants (age range, 50-64 years) who were randomly assigned to groups that were (n = 20,552) or were not (n = 78,126) invited for sigmoidoscopy screening from 1999 through 2001; participants were followed up for a median 14.8 years. We compared CRC mortality and all-cause mortality between individuals who underwent screening and were diagnosed with CRC 30 days or longer after screening (interval cancer group, n = 163) and individuals diagnosed with CRC in the nonscreened group (controls, n = 1740). All CRCs in the control group were identified when they developed symptoms (clinically detected CRCs). Analyses were stratified by cancer site. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratio (HRs), adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS Over the follow-up period, 43 individuals in the interval cancer group died from CRC; among controls, 525 died from CRC. CRC mortality (adjusted HR, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.35; P = .92), rectosigmoid cancer mortality (adjusted HR, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.92; P = .74), and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.27; P = .91) did not differ significantly between the interval cancer group and controls. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized sigmoidoscopy screening trial, mortality did not differ significantly between individuals with interval CRCs and unscreened patients with clinically detected CRCs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00119912.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henriette C Jodal
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine and K. G. Jebsen Center for Colorectal Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine and K. G. Jebsen Center for Colorectal Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine and K. G. Jebsen Center for Colorectal Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Frontier Science, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Louise Emilsson
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and Centre for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Sweden
| | - David F Ransohoff
- Gastroenterology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Research Unit, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway; Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Kalager
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine and K. G. Jebsen Center for Colorectal Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rounge TB, Meisal R, Nordby JI, Ambur OH, de Lange T, Hoff G. Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples. BMC Gastroenterol 2018; 18:171. [PMID: 30409123 PMCID: PMC6225565 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-018-0896-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Associations between colorectal cancer and microbiota have been identified. Archived fecal samples might be valuable sample sources for investigating causality in carcinogenesis and biomarkers discovery due to the potential of performing longitudinal studies. However, the quality, quantity and stability of the gut microbiota in these fecal samples must be assessed prior to such studies. We evaluated i) cross-contamination during analysis for fecal blood and ii) evaporation in stored perforated fecal immunochemical tests (iFOBT) samples, iii) temperature stability as well as iv) comparison of the gut microbiota diversity and composition in archived, iFOBT and fresh fecal samples in order to assess feasibility of large scale microbiota studies. METHODS The microbiota profiles were obtained by sequencing the V3-V4 region of 16S rDNA gene. RESULTS The iFOBT does not introduce any cross-sample contamination detectable by qPCR. Neither could we detect evaporation during freeze-thaw cycle of perforated iFOBT samples. Our results confirm room temperature stability of the gut microbiome. Diverse microbial profiles were achieved in 100% of fresh, 81% of long-term archived and 96% of iFOBT samples. Microbial diversity and composition were comparable between fresh and iFOBT samples, however, diversity differed significantly between long-term archived, fresh and iFOBT samples. CONCLUSION Our data showed that it is feasible to exploit archived fecal sample sets originally collected for testing of fecal blood. The advantages of using these sample sets for microbial biomarker discovery and longitudinal observational studies are the availability of high-quality diagnostic and follow-up data. However, care must be taken when microbiota are profiled in long-term archived fecal samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine B Rounge
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Roger Meisal
- Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Jan Inge Nordby
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Herman Ambur
- Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Department of Life Sciences and Health, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Section for Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
- Øyvind Holme
- University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ø.H., M.L., M.K., M.B.)
| | - Magnus Løberg
- University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ø.H., M.L., M.K., M.B.)
| | - Mette Kalager
- University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ø.H., M.L., M.K., M.B.)
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ø.H., M.L., M.K., M.B.)
| | - Geir Hoff
- Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway (G.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Knudsen MD, Hjartåker A, Robb KA, de Lange T, Hoff G, Berstad P. Improving Cancer Preventive Behaviors: A Randomized Trial of Tailored Lifestyle Feedback in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018; 27:1442-1449. [PMID: 30389802 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-0268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Revised: 05/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer screening provides an opportunity to increase awareness of cancer-preventive lifestyle behaviors such as nonsmoking, physical activity, low alcohol consumption, and a healthy diet. We tested the effect of standardized, individually tailored written feedback (TF), and a standard leaflet (SL) on 1-year lifestyle behaviors in a colorectal cancer screening setting. METHODS A total of 3,642 men and women aged 50-74 years invited to sigmoidoscopy screening were randomly assigned to: (i) TF; (ii) SL for cancer-preventive lifestyle behaviors; or (iii) control. Participants were mailed two self-reported lifestyle questionnaires (LSQ) 1 year apart. The TF intervention was based on the prescreening LSQ answers. We analyzed differences [with 95% confidence intervals (CI)] by comparing prescreening to 1-year follow-up of single cancer-preventive factors and the number of cancer-preventive lifestyle behaviors (range 0-4) between the groups by multivariable logistic regression and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). RESULTS A total of 1,054 screening participants without neoplastic findings (29% of those invited to screening) were included in this study. Participants in the TF group increased their number of cancer-preventive lifestyle behaviors significantly compared with those in the control group by 0.11 (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.19). Overweight/obese individuals in the TF group had a -0.84 kg (95% CI, -1.47 to -0.22) larger reduction in body weight compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS TF at sigmoidoscopy screening led to small improvements in cancer-preventive behaviors. IMPACT Colorectal cancer screening is a suitable setting for increasing awareness of cancer-preventive behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Dines Knudsen
- Department of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norway.
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Norway
- Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anette Hjartåker
- Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kathryn A Robb
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Department of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Norway
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Department of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bugajski M, Wieszczy P, Hoff G, Rupinski M, Regula J, Kaminski MF. Modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after screening colonoscopy. Gut 2018; 67:1958-1964. [PMID: 28970289 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Revised: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 09/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pain associated with colonoscopy is a major burden for patients. We investigated modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after colonoscopy. DESIGN This cross-sectional analysis included database records from 23 centres participating in a population-based colonoscopy screening programme in Poland. Colonoscopies were performed under three sedation modalities: none, benzodiazepine-opioid sedation or propofol sedation. We used Gastronet (a validated tool) to assess patients' pain during and after colonoscopy; pain was scored on a four-point scale (no, little, moderate or severe pain), with moderate to severe defined as painful. We used multivariate logistic regression models to estimate ORs for painful colonoscopy and calculated risk-adjusted ratios of painful colonoscopies per endoscopist and compared it to the mean rate. RESULTS Of 35 216 screening colonoscopies in 2014 and 2015 included in our study, 22 725 (64.5%) patients returned valid Gastronet questionnaires. The proportion of examinations described as causing pain during (after) the procedure was 22.5% (14.2%) for unsedated, 19.9% (13.5%) for benzodiazepine-opioid sedation and 2.5% (7.5%) for propofol sedation. Propofol sedation, higher case volume of endoscopists, newest endoscope generation and adequate bowel preparation were significantly associated with lower odds of painful colonoscopy. Pain scores after colonoscopy showed similar associations. Adjusted pain rates during and after colonoscopy varied 11 and over 23-fold, respectively, between endoscopists. CONCLUSION We identified several independent, modifiable factors associated with pain during and after colonoscopy, of which individual endoscopist was the most important. Dedicated training should be considered to decrease variability among endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Bugajski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paulina Wieszczy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway.,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maciej Rupinski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jaroslaw Regula
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michal Filip Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pinsky PF, Loberg M, Senore C, Wooldrage K, Atkin W, Bretthauer M, Cross AJ, Hoff G, Holme O, Kalager M, Segnan N, Schoen RE. Number of Adenomas Removed and Colorectal Cancers Prevented in Randomized Trials of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:1059-1068.e2. [PMID: 29935150 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2018] [Revised: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) with sigmoidoscopy reduces CRC incidence by detecting and removing adenomas. The number needed to screen is a measure of screening efficiency, but is not directly associated with adenoma removal. We propose the following 2 new metrics for quantifying the relationship between adenoma removal and CRC prevented: number of adenomas needed to remove (NNR) and adenoma dwell time avoided (DTA). METHODS We collected data from 4 randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening (1 in the United States and 3 in Europe) to assess NNR and DTA. For each trial, NNR was computed as the number of adenomas removed from subjects in the intervention group, divided by the number of CRCs prevented. DTA was computed similarly but taking into account the timing of adenoma removal. Combined results across trials were assessed using standard meta-analytic techniques. RESULTS The estimated NNR for the PLCO (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian) trial was 74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 56-110), for the NORCCAP (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention) trial was 71 (95% CI, 44-174), for the SCORE (Screening for Colon Rectum) trial was 27 (95% CI, 14-135), and for the UKFSST (UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial) was 36 (95% CI, 28-52). The combined estimate (meta-analysis) of NNR was 52 (95% CI, 36-93) assuming heterogeneity (P for heterogeneity = .014). DTA estimates among trials ranged from 278 to 730 years, with a combined estimate of 500 (95% CI, 344-833) years assuming heterogeneity (P for heterogeneity = .035), or 2 CRC cases prevented per 1000 adenoma dwell years avoided. The combined estimates of NNR and DTA restricted to advanced adenomas were 13 (95% CI, 9-22) and 122 (95% CI, 90-190) years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We collected data from 4 randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening for CRC to develop metrics of endoscopic efficiency, NNR and DTA, which are directly linked to adenoma detection and removal. They can be used to compare screening among endoscopic modalities and to more precisely measure adenoma to carcinoma transition rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul F Pinsky
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael Bretthauer
- University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Oyvind Holme
- University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | | | | | - Robert E Schoen
- Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Holme Ø, Pedersen IB, Medhus AW, Aabakken L, Glomsaker T, Kvamme JM, Løberg M, Bretthauer M, Seip B, Kjellevold Ø, Jørgensen A, Furholm S, Hoff G, de Lange T. Endoscopy assistants influence the quality of colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2018; 50:871-877. [PMID: 29444529 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonoscopy performance varies between endoscopists, but little is known about the impact of endoscopy assistants on key performance indicators. We used a large prospective colonoscopy quality database to perform an exploratory study to evaluate differences in selected quality indicators between endoscopy assistants. METHODS All colonoscopies reported to the Norwegian colonoscopy quality assurance register Gastronet can be used to trace individual endoscopy assistants. We analyzed key quality indicators (cecum intubation rate, polyp detection rate, colonoscopies rated as severely painful, colonoscopies with sedation or analgesia, and satisfaction with information) for colonoscopies performed between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014. Differences between individual assistants were analyzed by fitting multivariable logistic regression models, with the best performing assistant at each participating hospital as reference. All models were adjusted for the endoscopist. RESULTS 63 endoscopy assistants from 12 hospitals assisted in 15 365 colonoscopies. Compared with their top performing peers from the same hospital, one assistant was associated with cecum intubation failure, four with poor polyp detection, nine with painful colonoscopy, 16 with administration of sedation or analgesics during colonoscopy, and three with patient dissatisfaction about information given relating to the colonoscopy. The number of procedures during the study period or lifetime experience as an endoscopy assistant were not associated with any quality indicator. CONCLUSION In this exploratory study, there was little variation on important colonoscopy quality indicators between endoscopy assistants. However, there were differences among assistants that may be clinically important. Endoscopy assistants should be subject to quality surveillance similarly to endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Øyvind Holme
- Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ina Borgenheim Pedersen
- Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Asle W Medhus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars Aabakken
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tom Glomsaker
- Department of Abdominal and Pediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Magnus Kvamme
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Transplantation Medicine and K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Transplantation Medicine and K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Birgitte Seip
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | | | - Anita Jørgensen
- Department of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siv Furholm
- Department of Transplantation Medicine and K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Department of Bowel Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Thomaz R, Louette P, Hoff G, Müller S, Pireaux JJ, Trautmann C, Papaléo RM. Bond-Breaking Efficiency of High-Energy Ions in Ultrathin Polymer Films. Phys Rev Lett 2018; 121:066101. [PMID: 30141670 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.066101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Thin films of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(vinyl chloride) of different thickness are used to investigate the effect of spatial confinement on the efficiency of bond breaking induced by 2 MeV H^{+} and 2.1 GeV Bi ions. Effective cross sections for oxygen and chlorine loss are extracted for films down to a thickness of about 5 nm and are compared to theoretical estimations based on radial energy density profiles simulated with geant-dna. The cross sections are to a large extent thickness independent, indicating that bond breaking is dominated by short-range processes. This is in contrast to the strongly reduced efficiencies found recently for cratering induced by high-energy ions in similar ultrathin polymer films [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 118302 (2015)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.114.118302].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Thomaz
- Interdisciplinary Center of Nanoscience and Micro-Nanotechnology, School of Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - P Louette
- Université de Namur, Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur, Belgium
| | - G Hoff
- Università di Cagliari and IFN Sex. Di Cagliari- Dipartimento di Fisica, I-09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy
| | - S Müller
- Interdisciplinary Center of Nanoscience and Micro-Nanotechnology, School of Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - J J Pireaux
- Université de Namur, Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur, Belgium
| | - C Trautmann
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstrasse 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, Alarich-Weiss-Strasse 2, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - R M Papaléo
- Interdisciplinary Center of Nanoscience and Micro-Nanotechnology, School of Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Pedersen IB, Løberg M, Hoff G, Kalager M, Bretthauer M, Holme Ø. Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway - a nationwide survey. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6:E812-E820. [PMID: 29977999 PMCID: PMC6031440 DOI: 10.1055/a-0607-0727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Incomplete polyp removal has been estimated to cause 27 % of all colorectal cancers detected soon after colonoscopy. There is limited information regarding polypectomy techniques among endoscopists. The article is a nationwide survey of polypectomy techniques among Norwegian endoscopists. MATERIALS AND METHODS We invited all board-certified gastroenterologists in Norway to complete a web-based questionnaire about their polypectomy technique. Inadequate polypectomy techniques were defined as using biopsy forceps for polyps larger than 3 mm in diameter, using hot biopsy forceps for polypectomy, and using the same electrocautery output irrespective of polyp size and morphology. RESULTS Twenty-six of 30 Norwegian gastroenterology departments participated in the study. A total of 119 endoscopists received the survey, and 70 (59 %) responded. Mean duration of endoscopy practice was 11.5 years, and 95 % had performed more than 1,000 colonoscopies during their career. Twenty-eight endoscopists (40 %) used one or more inadequate polypectomy techniques: 10 (14.3 %) used biopsy forceps for removal of polyps larger than 3 mm in diameter, five (7.1 %) used hot biopsy for polypectomy, and 17 (24 %) used the same electrocautery output for all polypectomies. Five (7 %) endoscopists reported that they did not remove polyps smaller than 4 mm. CONCLUSION A substantial number of Norwegian endoscopists use inadequate polypectomy techniques. Improved training and certification of endoscopists is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina B. Pedersen
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway,Institute of Health and Society, Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Corresponding author Ina B. Pedersen Sørlandet HospitalPost box 416, N-4604KristiansandNorway+47 370 83551
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Institute of Health and Society, Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Transplantation Medicine and K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Institute of Health and Society, Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Transplantation Medicine and K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway,Department of research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway,Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Kalager
- Institute of Health and Society, Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Transplantation Medicine and K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Institute of Health and Society, Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Transplantation Medicine and K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway,Frontier Science, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway,Institute of Health and Society, Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Holme Ø, Løberg M, Kalager M, Bretthauer M, Hernán MA, Aas E, Eide TJ, Skovlund E, Lekven J, Schneede J, Tveit KM, Vatn M, Ursin G, Hoff G. Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168:775-782. [PMID: 29710125 PMCID: PMC6853067 DOI: 10.7326/m17-1441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term effects of sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in women and men are unclear. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 15 years of follow-up in women and men. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00119912). SETTING Oslo and Telemark County, Norway. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 50 to 64 years at baseline without prior CRC. INTERVENTION Screening (between 1999 and 2001) with flexible sigmoidoscopy with and without additional fecal blood testing versus no screening. Participants with positive screening results were offered colonoscopy. MEASUREMENTS Age-adjusted CRC incidence and mortality stratified by sex. RESULTS Of 98 678 persons, 20 552 were randomly assigned to screening and 78 126 to no screening. Adherence rates were 64.7% in women and 61.4% in men. Median follow-up was 14.8 years. The absolute risks for CRC in women were 1.86% in the screening group and 2.05% in the control group (risk difference, -0.19 percentage point [95% CI, -0.49 to 0.11 percentage point]; HR, 0.92 [CI, 0.79 to 1.07]). In men, the corresponding risks were 1.72% and 2.50%, respectively (risk difference, -0.78 percentage point [CI, -1.08 to -0.48 percentage points]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [CI, 0.57 to 0.78]) (P for heterogeneity = 0.004). The absolute risks for death from CRC in women were 0.60% in the screening group and 0.59% in the control group (risk difference, 0.01 percentage point [CI, -0.16 to 0.18 percentage point]; HR, 1.01 [CI, 0.77 to 1.33]). The corresponding risks for death from CRC in men were 0.49% and 0.81%, respectively (risk difference, -0.33 percentage point [CI, -0.49 to -0.16 percentage point]; HR, 0.63 [CI, 0.47 to 0.83]) (P for heterogeneity = 0.014). LIMITATION Follow-up through national registries. CONCLUSION Offering sigmoidoscopy screening in Norway reduced CRC incidence and mortality in men but had little or no effect in women. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Norwegian government and Norwegian Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Øyvind Holme
- Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway, and University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ø.H., M.L., M.B., T.J.E.)
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway, and University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ø.H., M.L., M.B., T.J.E.)
| | - Mette Kalager
- University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts (M.K., M.A.H.)
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway, and University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ø.H., M.L., M.B., T.J.E.)
| | - Miguel A Hernán
- University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts (M.K., M.A.H.)
| | - Eline Aas
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts; University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society, Oslo, Norway (E.A.)
| | - Tor J Eide
- Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway, and University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ø.H., M.L., M.B., T.J.E.)
| | - Eva Skovlund
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; orwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (E.S.)
| | - Jon Lekven
- University of Bergen Surgical Research Laboratory, Bergen, Norway (J.L.)
| | - Jörn Schneede
- Umeå University Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Umeå, Sweden (J.S.)
| | - Kjell Magne Tveit
- Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway (K.M.T., M.V.)
| | - Morten Vatn
- Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway (K.M.T., M.V.)
| | - Giske Ursin
- University of Oslo Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway; Cancer Registry of Norway and University of Oslo Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Oslo, Norway, and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California (G.U.)
| | - Geir Hoff
- University of Oslo Institute of Clinical Medicine and Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway, and Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway (G.H.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hoff G, Filipov D, Paschuk S, Schelin HR, Denyak V. Monte Carlo Simulation Used to Calculate Energy Correction Factor for Thermoluminescent Dosimeters Used by Occupational Workers on Pediatric Exams. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2017; 177:223-242. [PMID: 28419323 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The main objective of this work is to simulate the X-ray scattered spectra by different pediatric phantoms (simulation of children subjected to barium meal procedures) to calculate an energy correction factor (ECF) to the reading of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). To perform this evaluation, the TLDs were positioned over three areas in two occupational workers: eyes, thyroid and hands. The Geant4 toolkit was used to define the spectra collected by TLDs, making possible to calculate the ECF. This work was developed in two stages: (1) evaluation of scattered spectra by different standard phantoms (newborn, 1, 5 and 10 years old); (2) definition of the ECF to the absorbed energy by each TLD. Geant4 shows to be a good toolkit to calculate the ECF and among the different characteristics evaluated, in this work, the TLD position and acceleration voltages are the most significant parameters that may influence the ECF calculated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Hoff
- Polytechnic Institute-IPRJ, University of State of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Bonfim, 25-Vila Amelia, Nova Friburgo-RJ, 28625-570, Brazil
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Cagliari, I-09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy
| | - D Filipov
- Federal University of Technology-Paraná (UTFPR), Av. Sete de Setembro, 3165-Rebouças, Curitiba-PR, 80230-901, Brazil
| | - S Paschuk
- Federal University of Technology-Paraná (UTFPR), Av. Sete de Setembro, 3165-Rebouças, Curitiba-PR, 80230-901, Brazil
| | - H R Schelin
- Federal University of Technology-Paraná (UTFPR), Av. Sete de Setembro, 3165-Rebouças, Curitiba-PR, 80230-901, Brazil
| | - V Denyak
- Pelé Pequeno Príncipe Research Institute (IPPPP), Av. Silva Jardim, 1632-Rebouças, Curitiba-PR, 80250-060, Brazil
- National Science Center-Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kirkøen B, Berstad P, Botteri E, Dalén E, Nilsen JA, Hoff G, de Lange T, Bernklev T. Acceptability of two colorectal cancer screening tests: pain as a key determinant in sigmoidoscopy. Endoscopy 2017; 49:1075-1086. [PMID: 28938500 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-117400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Participants' experience with a screening test can influence adherence, and therefore the efficacy of screening programs. We compared screening with unsedated flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for participants' satisfaction with the decision and for willingness to repeat colorectal cancer screening. Methods In a prospective, randomized trial 3257 individuals (50 - 74 years) were invited to either flexible sigmoidoscopy or FIT (1:1), of whom 1650 took up the offer (52.6 %). In total, 1497 screening participants completed at least one questionnaire, either before screening, and/or at three time points in the following year, that measured willingness to repeat screening, willingness to recommend screening, and satisfaction with decision to attend. There were 769 and 728 responders in the flexible sigmoidoscopy and FIT group, respectively. Additionally, 581 flexible sigmoidoscopy participants also completed a pain questionnaire. Results 1 year later, 10 % of the flexible sigmoidoscopy participants were not willing to repeat screening, compared to 5 % of FIT participants. A higher percentage of women compared to men would not repeat flexible sigmoidoscopy screening (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.52, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 1.48 to 4.28). Notably, 22 % of women reported pain during flexible sigmoidoscopy compared to 5 % of men. When we added pain to the statistical model, pain was significantly associated with unwillingness to repeat flexible sigmoidoscopy (OR 3.15, 95 %CI 1.68 to 5.87), while gender was no longer associated (OR 1.53, 95 %CI 0.82 to 2.88). Conclusion Acceptability for flexible sigmoidoscopy and for FIT was high among Norwegian screening participants, though FIT participants were more willing to repeat screening. Women were less willing to repeat screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy compared to men. This gender difference seemed partly due to pain, and therefore preventable.This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01538550.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedicte Kirkøen
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Edoardo Botteri
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,National Advisory Unit for Women's Health, Women's Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Jens Aksel Nilsen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum Hospital, Drammen, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,R&D Department, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway.,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Internal Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum Hospital, Drammen, Norway
| | - Tomm Bernklev
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,R&D Department, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Knudsen MD, Berstad P, Hjartåker A, Gulichsen EH, Hoff G, de Lange T, Bernklev T, Botteri E. Lifestyle predictors for non-participation and outcome in the second round of faecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening. Br J Cancer 2017; 117:461-469. [PMID: 28704841 PMCID: PMC5558680 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Revised: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality through population-based screening programmes using faecal tests, it is important that individuals continue to participate in the repeated rounds of screening. We aimed to identify lifestyle predictors for discontinuation of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening after the first round, as well as lifestyle predictors for colorectal neoplasia detected in the second-round FIT screening. METHODS In this longitudinal study, we invited 6959 individuals aged 50-74 years from south-east Norway for a first round of FIT screening and to complete a self-reported lifestyle questionnaire on demographic factors, body mass index (BMI, kg m-2), smoking habits, physical activity, consumption of alcohol and dietary items. Two years later, we estimated the associations between these factors, non-participation and screening results in the second round of FIT screening using adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Of the 3114 responders to the questionnaire who completed the first-round FIT and who were invited to participate in second-round FIT screening, 540 (17%) did not participate. The OR and (95% CI) for discontinuation of FIT screening after the first round was 1.61 (1.24-2.10) for current smoking compared with non-smoking; 2.01 (1.25-3.24) for BMI⩾35 kg m-2 compared with BMI 16.9-24.9 kg m-2 and 0.70 (0.52-0.94) for physical activity in the third quartile vs the first. Among participants, smoking, high BMI and high alcohol consumption were associated with an increased odds of detecting colorectal neoplasia (n=107). CONCLUSIONS These results may indicate that Norwegian FIT screening participants who discontinue after the first round have lifestyle behaviours associated with increased risk of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Dines Knudsen
- Department of Bowel cancer screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, Majorstuen, Oslo 0304, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Ulefosseveien 55, Skien 3710, Norway
- Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1046, Oslo 0317, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Department of Bowel cancer screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, Majorstuen, Oslo 0304, Norway
| | - Anette Hjartåker
- Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1046, Oslo 0317, Norway
| | | | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Bowel cancer screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, Majorstuen, Oslo 0304, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Ulefosseveien 55, Skien 3710, Norway
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Blindern P.O. Box 1089, Oslo 0317, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Department of Bowel cancer screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, Majorstuen, Oslo 0304, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Sandvika, P.O. Box 800, Drammen 3004, Norway
| | - Tomm Bernklev
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Ulefosseveien 55, Skien 3710, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Blindern P.O. Box 1171, Oslo 0318, Norway
- Research and Development, Vestfold Hospital, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, P. O. 2168, Tønsberg 3103, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Department of Bowel cancer screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, Majorstuen, Oslo 0304, Norway
- National Advisory Unit for Women's Health, Women’s Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0424, Norway
| |
Collapse
|