Nephrotoxin Stewardship

KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline on evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: A primer on what pharmacists need to know

PURPOSE

To review the key updates in the 2024 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and highlight the essential role of pharmacists in implementing these recommendations.

SUMMARY

The updated guideline introduces significant changes in CKD management, including the use of validated equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for drug dosing, with incorporation of serum cystatin C into GFR estimates for specific patient populations, and an emphasis on a comprehensive approach to delay disease progression. The guideline recommends sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy for kidney disease with proteinuria, with or without diabetes, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) blood pressure control and proteinuria management, and statins to reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. New evidence supports the use of finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD, and GLP-1 receptor agonists for their kidney-protective effects. The guidelines also emphasize the importance of nephrotoxin stewardship and prevention of acute kidney injury through patient education on sick day medication management.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists play a crucial role in implementing these updated guidelines through comprehensive medication management, nephrotoxin stewardship, drug dosing adjustments, and patient education. Their involvement in interprofessional care teams is essential for optimizing health outcomes in patients with CKD.

The Acute Kidney Intervention and Pharmacotherapy (AKIP) List: Standardized List of Medications That Are Renally Eliminated and Nephrotoxic in the Acutely Ill

The objective of this project was to develop a standardized list of renally eliminated and potentially nephrotoxic drugs that will help inform initiatives to improve medication safety. Several available lists of medications from the published literature including original research articles and reviews, and from regulatory agencies, tertiary references, and clinical decision support systems were compiled, consolidated, and compared. Only systemically administered medications were included. Medication combinations were included if at least 1 active ingredient was considered renally dosed or potentially nephrotoxic. The medication list was reviewed for completeness and clinical appropriateness by a multidisciplinary team of individuals with expertise in critical care, nephrology, and pharmacy. An initial list of renally dosed and nephrotoxic drugs was created. After reconciliation and consensus from clinical experts, a standardized list of 681 drugs is proposed. The proposed evidence-based standardized list of renally dosed and potentially nephrotoxic drugs will be useful to harmonize epidemiologic and medication quality improvement studies. In addition, the list can be used for clinical purposes with surveillance in nephrotoxin stewardship programs. We suggest an iterative re-evaluation of the list with emerging literature and new medications on an approximately annual basis.

A Systematic Review of the Costs of Drug-Associated Acute Kidney Injury and Potential Cost Savings With Nephrotoxin Stewardship Prevention Strategies

There is a scarcity of information related to the financial impact of acute kidney injury (AKI), and even more so the economics of drug-associated AKI (D-AKI). Our goal was to provide a comprehensive summary of the economic burden of D-AKI by evaluating the costs of D-AKI compared to not developing AKI and cost savings associated with nephrotoxin stewardship approaches. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was conducted using PubMed to identify articles from database inception through November 2023. The main outcomes included AKI incidence, resource use, and cost of nephrotoxin stewardship programs/D-AKI event or no event. Key findings were summarized based on whether the study compared the cost of D-AKI vs. no AKI or identified potential cost savings associated with a nephrotoxin stewardship method to prevent D-AKI or worsening D-AKI. All costs were adjusted to USD2023. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies compared the cost of D-AKI to no AKI. Total admission costs of patients who developed D-AKI ranged from $47,696 to $173,569. Nineteen studies implemented nephrotoxin stewardship with 12 substituting a less nephrotoxic drug; five using therapeutic drug monitoring and two altering drug dosing to limit exposure. Overall, these prevention strategies ranged from $5,171 to $364,973 in total medical cost savings and $17 to $942 in total cost savings per patient-day. The in-hospital economic impact of D-AKI is substantial. Implementing nephrotoxin stewardship strategies to reduce D-AKI is associated with cost savings. Institutions should adopt strategic and efficient nephrotoxin stewardship programs to optimize patient care and reduce costs.

Interleukin-6 and Leukocyte Cell Population Data in Newly Diagnosed Sepsis-A Prospective Study

Background and Objectives: Sepsis still represents a syndrome with a high mortality. A timely sepsis diagnosis and an early intervention are crucial for the disease outcomes. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) is highly prevalent but often diagnosed late. We aimed to investigate whether serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and leukocyte cell population data (CPD) could be adequate biomarkers for the prediction of survival and SA-AKI development. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a medical intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital centre in Zagreb, Croatia from June 2020 to October 2023. Adult patients with newly diagnosed sepsis were included and classified as immunocompetent or immunocompromised. Blood samples were collected upon admission. Results: A total of 150 patients were included in the study. Ninety-six (64%) patients were immunocompetent and fifty-four (36%) were immunocompromised. The median SOFA score was 8 (6-11). SA-AKI was diagnosed in 108 (72%) patients. ICU and hospital mortality was 27.3% and 37.3%, with no significant difference between groups. Significantly higher serum IL-6 levels were noted in the immunocompromised group, while neutrophil granularity intensity was higher in the immunocompetent group. According to logistic regression analyses, elevated IL-6 levels predicted a lethal ICU outcome, while elevated IL-6 levels and neutrophil reactivity intensity were predictors of SA-AKI development. A cluster analysis revealed two patient groups with different IL-6 concentrations, and further studies indicated that the group with higher IL-6 values had significantly higher SA-AKI occurrence and increased lethal outcomes. Conclusions: An early serum IL-6 measurement regardless of the patients' immune status indicates disease severity. Its measurement in the early phase of disease presentation, potentially in the emergency department, might facilitate ICU admission. Further research is warranted in the field of leukocyte CDP application.

An Integrated Approach for Representing Knowledge on the Potential of Drugs to Cause Acute Kidney Injury

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The recent rise in acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence, with approximately 30% attributed to potentially preventable adverse drug events (ADEs), poses challenges in evaluating drug-induced AKI due to polypharmacy and other risk factors. This study seeks to consolidate knowledge on the drugs with AKI potential from four distinct sources: (i) bio(medical) peer-reviewed journals; (ii) spontaneous reporting systems (SRS); (iii) drug information databases (DIDs); and (iv) NephroTox website. By harnessing the potential of these underutilised sources, our objective is to bridge gaps and enhance the understanding of drug-induced AKI.

METHODS

By searching Medline, studies with lists of drugs with AKI potential established through consensus amongst medical experts were selected. A final list of 63 drugs was generated aggregating the original studies. For these 63 drugs, the AKI reporting odds ratios (RORs) using three SRS databases, the average frequency of ADEs from four different DIDs and the number of published studies identified via NephroTox was reported.

RESULTS

Drugs belonging to the antivirals, antibacterials, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory pharmacological classes exhibit substantial consensus on AKI potential, which was also reflected in strong ROR signals, frequent to very frequent AKI-related ADEs and a high number of published studies reporting adverse kidney events as identified via NephroTox. Renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors and diuretics also display comparable signal strengths, but this can be attributed to expected haemodynamic changes. More variability is noted for proton-pump inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

By integrating four disjointed sources of knowledge, we have created a novel, comprehensive resource on drugs with AKI potential, contributing to kidney safety improvement efforts.

New perspectives of drug related kidney diseases and disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide a discussion of new perspectives for up-to-date definitions, a contemporary classification system, and the potential role of stress and damage biomarkers in the context of drug related kidney diseases and disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

Acute kidney disease (AKD) is a term recently introduced in the literature describing an abnormality in kidney structure and function that lasts for less than 3 months. Drugs in the context of AKD is described as a new perspective; referred to as drug induced AKD. A framework that includes drugs into the 2X2 classification schema for acute kidney injury (AKI) is provided. Finally, stress and damage biomarkers are examined to assess risk of drug associated AKI (D-AKI), differentiate which drugs cause AKI, differentiate drugs from other etiologies and assess the prognosis of D-AKI.

SUMMARY

Consistent definitions should be adopted with consideration to drug related diseases and disorders. Drug management can be guided using novel biomarkers to isolate a possible drug cause in the presence of more than one nephrotoxin or a nondrug cause, assisting with the diagnosis of pseudo-AKI, and deciding the likelihood AKI recovery. Furthermore, stress and damage kidney biomarkers provide the opportunity to detect subclinical AKI for early intervention in patients at high-risk for severe AKI.

Effect of Difference in Serum Creatinine between Jaffe and Enzymatic Methods in Outpatient Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background: Deviations in serum creatinine (SCr), due to its determination using a Jaffe or an enzymatic method, have an effect on kidney disease detection and staging. It is not yet clear how large this effect is in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). SCr measurement differences are of particular importance here to evaluate the graft function. Methods: The results of all parallel SCr measurements (Jaffe and enzymatic method) of adult outpatient KTRs in the same serum sample at the University Hospital Essen (Germany) between January 2020 and October 2023 were evaluated. A Bland-Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) was used to assess the difference between the Jaffe and the enzymatic SCr (eSCr). For all patients, we used the CKD-EPI 2009 and EKFC formula, and for patients ≥ 70 years, we also used the BIS1 formula for the determination of eGFR. Results: A total of 12,081 parallel SCr measurements from 1243 KTRs were analyzed, where 61% were male and the median age was 53 years. On average, Jaffe SCr was 0.03 mg/dL higher than eSCr (LoA -0.16; 0.21 mg/dL). On average, the eGFR determined by Jaffe SCr was 1.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower than the eGFR determined by eSCr (LoA -9.5; 5.7 mL/min/1.73 m2). The comparison of eGFR between the two SCr methods revealed a different CKD stage in 1589 (13%) of all analyzed measurements, most frequently between G2/G3a (41%) and G3a/G3b (24%). When using the EKFC and BIS1 formulas, there were approximately the same number of measurements leading to a different CKD stage. Conclusions: In more than every tenth SCr determination in outpatient KTRs, the difference between the Jaffe and enzymatic methods had an influence on the assignment to a CKD stage. This effect was comparably pronounced for all eGFR formulas applied.

Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) and International Club of Ascites (ICA) joint multidisciplinary consensus meeting

Patients with cirrhosis are prone to developing acute kidney injury (AKI), a complication associated with a markedly increased in-hospital morbidity and mortality, along with a risk of progression to chronic kidney disease. Whereas patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk of developing any phenotype of AKI, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), a specific form of AKI (HRS-AKI) in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites, carries an especially high mortality risk. Early recognition of HRS-AKI is crucial since administration of splanchnic vasoconstrictors may reverse the AKI and serve as a bridge to liver transplantation, the only curative option. In 2023, a joint meeting of the International Club of Ascites (ICA) and the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) was convened to develop new diagnostic criteria for HRS-AKI, to provide graded recommendations for the work-up, management and post-discharge follow-up of patients with cirrhosis and AKI, and to highlight priorities for further research.

Advances in pediatric acute kidney injury pharmacology and nutrition: a report from the 26th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) consensus conference

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, there have been substantial advances in our understanding of pediatric AKI. Despite this progress, large gaps remain in our understanding of pharmacology and nutritional therapy in pediatric AKI.

METHODS

During the 26th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) Consensus Conference, a multidisciplinary group of experts reviewed the evidence and used a modified Delphi process to achieve consensus on recommendations for gaps and advances in care for pharmacologic and nutritional management of pediatric AKI. The current evidence as well as gaps and opportunities were discussed, and recommendations were summarized.

RESULTS

Two consensus statements were developed. (1) High-value, kidney-eliminated medications should be selected for a detailed characterization of their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmaco-"omics" in sick children across the developmental continuum. This will allow for the optimization of real-time modeling with the goal of improving patient care. Nephrotoxin stewardship will be identified as an organizational priority and supported with necessary resources and infrastructure. (2) Patient-centered outcomes (functional status, quality of life, and optimal growth and development) must drive targeted nutritional interventions to optimize short- and long-term nutrition. Measures of acute and chronic changes of anthropometrics, body composition, physical function, and metabolic control should be incorporated into nutritional assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Neonates and children have unique metabolic and growth parameters compared to adult patients. Strategic investments in multidisciplinary translational research efforts are required to fill the knowledge gaps in nutritional requirements and pharmacological best practices for children with or at risk for AKI.

Optimum Care of AKI Survivors Not Requiring Dialysis after Discharge: An AKINow Recovery Workgroup Report

AKI survivors experience gaps in care that contribute to worse outcomes, experience, and cost.Challenges to optimal care include issues with information transfer, education, collaborative care, and use of digital health tools.Research is needed to study these challenges and inform optimal use of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to promote recovery AKI affects one in five hospitalized patients and is associated with poor short-term and long-term clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Among those who survive to discharge, significant gaps in documentation, education, communication, and follow-up have been observed. The American Society of Nephrology established the AKINow taskforce to address these gaps and improve AKI care. The AKINow Recovery workgroup convened two focus groups, one each focused on dialysis-independent and dialysis-requiring AKI, to summarize the key considerations, challenges, and opportunities in the care of AKI survivors. This article highlights the discussion surrounding care of AKI survivors discharged without the need for dialysis. On May 3, 2022, 48 patients and multidisciplinary clinicians from diverse settings were gathered virtually. The agenda included a patient testimonial, plenary sessions, facilitated small group discussions, and debriefing. Core challenges and opportunities for AKI care identified were in the domains of transitions of care, education, collaborative care delivery, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, and digital health applications. Integrated multispecialty care delivery was identified as one of the greatest challenges to AKI survivor care. Adequate templates for communication and documentation; education of patients, care partners, and clinicians about AKI; and a well-coordinated multidisciplinary posthospital follow-up plan form the basis for a successful care transition at hospital discharge. The AKINow Recovery workgroup concluded that advancements in evidence-based, patient-centered care of AKI survivors are needed to improve health outcomes, care quality, and patient and provider experience. Tools are being developed by the AKINow Recovery workgroup for use at the hospital discharge to facilitate care continuity.

Acute kidney injury associated with nephrotoxic drugs in critically ill patients: a multicenter cohort study using electronic health record data

Background

Nephrotoxic drugs frequently cause acute kidney injury (AKI) in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, there is a lack of large pharmaco-epidemiological studies investigating the associations between drugs and AKI. Importantly, AKI risk factors may also be indications or contraindications for drugs and thereby confound the associations. Here, we aimed to estimate the associations between commonly administered (potentially) nephrotoxic drug groups and AKI in adult ICU patients whilst adjusting for confounding.

Methods

In this multicenter retrospective observational study, we included adult ICU admissions to 13 Dutch ICUs. We measured exposure to 44 predefined (potentially) nephrotoxic drug groups. The outcome was AKI during ICU admission. The association between each drug group and AKI was estimated using etiological cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models and adjusted for confounding. To facilitate an (independent) informed assessment of residual confounding, we manually identified drug group-specific confounders using a large drug knowledge database and existing literature.

Results

We included 92 616 ICU admissions, of which 13 492 developed AKI (15%). We found 14 drug groups to be associated with a higher hazard of AKI after adjustment for confounding. These groups included established (e.g. aminoglycosides), less well established (e.g. opioids) and controversial (e.g. sympathomimetics with α- and β-effect) drugs.

Conclusions

The results confirm existing insights and provide new ones regarding drug associated AKI in adult ICU patients. These insights warrant caution and extra monitoring when prescribing nephrotoxic drugs in the ICU and indicate which drug groups require further investigation.

Community pharmacists' perspectives on assessing kidney function and medication dosing for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework

Background

The kidneys are responsible for the elimination of many drugs. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common, and medications may require adjustment to avoid adverse outcomes. Despite the availability of kidney drug dosing resources, people with CKD are at risk of inappropriate drug prescribing. Community pharmacists are in the ideal position to mitigate harm from inappropriate prescribing in this population.

Methods

In this qualitative study, community pharmacists were interviewed on their perspective on kidney function assessment and dose adjustment in people with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). The theoretical domains framework for targeting behavioural change was used to inform the interview guide and analysis. Purposeful sampling was employed until data saturation. Semistructured virtual interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and uploaded into NVIVO 12 Pro to facilitate thematic analysis. Deductive and inductive iterative coding approaches were employed to determine categories and themes.

Results

Twelve pharmacists were interviewed, with a mean age of 42 years and 16 years of experience. Four themes comprising 10 categories were identified to influence kidney function assessment and dosing, including resources (information access, technology, references), environment (pharmacy infrastructure, practice setting), reflection (triggers, experience and training, collaboration) and leadership and governance (pharmacist role, advocacy). Feedback on an optimal CKD tool was collected, and enabling themes (categories) for implementation included knowledge and skills (education, training) and reflection (role, support, integration).

Conclusions

Findings will inform the interventions needed to improve implementation of kidney assessment and dosing of high-risk medications in people with kidney impairment into community pharmacy practice. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2023;156:xx-xx.

Medication Management in the Critically Ill Patient with Acute Kidney Injury

ABSTRACT

AKI occurs frequently in critically ill patients. Patients with AKI, including those who require KRT, experience multiple pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perturbations that dynamically influence medication effectiveness and safety. Patients with AKI may experience both subtherapeutic drug concentrations, which lead to ineffective therapy, and supratherapeutic drug concentrations, which increase the risk for toxicity. In critically ill patients with AKI not requiring KRT, conventional GFR estimation equations, especially those based on serum creatinine, have several limitations that can limit the accuracy when used for medication dosing. Alternative methods to estimate kidney function may be informative, including use of measured urinary creatinine clearance, kinetic eGFR, and equations that integrate novel kidney biomarkers. For critically ill patients with AKI requiring KRT, physicochemical properties of the drug, the KRT prescription and circuit configuration, and patient-specific factors each contribute to medication clearance. Evidence-based guidance for medication dosing during AKI requiring KRT is often limited. A working knowledge of the basic tenets of drug elimination during KRT can provide a framework for how to approach decision making when the literature is lacking. Iterative re-evaluation of a patient's progress toward therapeutic goals with a medication must occur over the arc of critical illness, including and especially in the setting of dynamic kidney function.

Expert Consensus on the Nephrotoxic Potential of 195 Medications in the Non-intensive Care Setting: A Modified Delphi Method

INTRODUCTION

Nephrotoxin exposure is significantly associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) development. A standardized list of nephrotoxic medications to surveil and their perceived nephrotoxic potential (NxP) does not exist for non-critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study generated consensus on the nephrotoxic effect of 195 medications used in the non-intensive care setting.

METHODS

Potentially nephrotoxic medications were identified through a comprehensive literature search, and 29 participants with nephrology or pharmacist expertise were identified. The primary outcome was NxP by consensus. Participants rated each drug on a scale of 0-3 (not nephrotoxic to definite nephrotoxicity). Group consensus was met if ≥ 75% of responses were one single rating or a combination of two consecutive ratings. If ≥ 50% of responses indicated "unknown" or not used in the non-intensive care setting, the medication was removed for consideration. Medications not meeting consensus for a given round were included in the subsequent round(s).

RESULTS

A total of 191 medications were identified in the literature, with 4 medications added after the first round from participants' recommendations. NxP index rating consensus after three rounds was: 14 (7.2%) no NxP in almost all situations (rating 0); 62 (31.8%) unlikely/possibly nephrotoxic (rating 0.5); 21 (10.8%) possibly nephrotoxic (rating 1); 49 (25.1%) possibly/probably nephrotoxic (rating 1.5); 2 (1.0%) probably nephrotoxic (rating 2); 8 (4.1%) probably/definite nephrotoxic (rating 2.5); 0 (0.0%) definitely nephrotoxic (rating 3); and 39 (20.0%) medications were removed from consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

NxP index rating provides clinical consensus on perceived nephrotoxic medications in the non-intensive care setting and homogeneity for future clinical evaluations and research.

Interventions, Barriers, and Proposed Solutions Associated With the Implementation of a Protocol That Uses Clinical Decision Support and a Stress Biomarker Test to Identify ICU Patients at High-Risk for Drug Associated Acute Kidney Injury

BACKGROUND

Damage biomarkers are helpful in early identification of patients who are at risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI). Investigations are ongoing to identify the optimal role of stress/damage biomarkers in clinical practice regarding AKI risk prediction, surveillance, diagnosis, and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of utilizing a clinical decision support system (CDSS) to guide stress biomarker testing in intensive care unit (ICU) patients at risk for drug-induced acute kidney injury (D-AKI).

METHODS

A protocol was designed utilizing a clinical decision support system (CDSS) alert to identify patients that were ordered 3 or more potentially nephrotoxic medications, suggesting risk for progressing to AKI from nephrotoxic burden. Once alerted to these high-risk patients, the pharmacist determined if action was needed by ordering a stress biomarker test, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2-insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (TIMP-2•IGFBP7). If the biomarker test result was elevated, the pharmacist provided nephrotoxin stewardship recommendations to the team. Pharmacists recorded the response to the clinical decision support alert, ordering, and interpreting the TIMP-2•IGFBP7, and information regarding clinical interventions. An alert in conjunction with TIMP-2•IGFBP7 as a strategy for AKI risk prediction and stimulant for patient care management was assessed. In addition, barriers and solutions to protocol implementation were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 394 total activities recorded by pharmacists for 345 unique patients. Ninety-three (93/394; 23.6%) actionable alerts resulted in a TIMP-2•IGFBP7 test being ordered. Thirty-one TIMP-2•IGFBP7 results were >0.3 (31/81; 38.3%), suggesting a high-risk of progression to AKI, which prompted 191 pharmacist/team interventions. On average, there were 1.64 interventions per patient in the low-risk patients, 3.43 in high-risk patients, and 3.75 in the highest-risk patients.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Stress biomarkers can be used in conjunction with CDSS alerts to affect therapeutic decisions in ICU patients at high-risk for D-AKI.

Case presentations of medication management for patients at risk for drug-associated acute kidney injury identified with a CDS system and a novel biomarker

PURPOSE

Traditional methods used to evaluate changes in kidney function to identify acute kidney injury (AKI) have significant limitations. Damage biomarkers can identify patients at risk for AKI prior to changes in kidney function. While clinical trials have shown that biomarker-guided treatment can improve outcomes, whether these biomarkers can influence providers' choice of treatment strategy for risk prediction, surveillance, or diagnostic evaluation in clinical practice is uncertain.

SUMMARY

This case series describes 4 patients at an academic medical center whose care was informed by kidney biomarker utilization in conjunction with a clinical decision support system (CDSS). Though each patient's clinical presentation was unique, kidney biomarkers were successfully employed as clinical tools in evaluating the risks and benefits of nephrotoxic medications.

CONCLUSION

This case series demonstrates 4 scenarios in which a kidney injury biomarker used in conjunction with CDSS and consideration of the patients' clinical presentation informed treatment strategies with the intent to prevent AKI.

Prevalence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and its predictors in critically ill adult patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity is a major safety concern in clinical practice due to long-term adverse outcomes and high mortality.

AIM

To conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and potential predictors of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Reference Citation Analysis database were searched for relevant studies from inception through May 30, 2022. The pooled prevalence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and pooled risk ratios of associated factors were analysed using a random-effects or fixed-effects model by Stata SE ver. 12.1. Additionally, subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 89 studies involving 12234 critically ill adult patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled incidence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity was 34.8%. The pooled prevalence of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity was not higher than that of polymyxin B (PMB)-induced nephrotoxicity. The subgroup analyses showed that nephrotoxicity was significantly associated with dosing interval, nephrotoxicity criteria, age, publication year, study quality and sample size, which were confirmed in the univariable meta-regression analysis. Nephrotoxicity was significantly increased when the total daily dose was divided into 2 doses but not 3 or 4 doses. Furthermore, older age, the presence of sepsis or septic shock, hypoalbuminemia, and concomitant vancomycin or vasopressor use were independent risk factors for polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity, while an elevated baseline glomerular filtration rate was a protective factor against colistin-induced nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that the incidence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity among ICU patients was high. It emphasizes the importance of additional efforts to manage ICU patients receiving polymyxins to decrease the risk of adverse outcomes.

Pharmacy Practice Standards for Outpatient Nephrology Settings

Patients with kidney disease represent a medically complex group of patients with high medication burdens that could benefit from clinical pharmacy services as part of the interdisciplinary care team to optimize medication use. The "Advancing American Kidney Health" executive order includes new value-based reimbursement models to be tested by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation beginning January 2021 and January 2022. Advancing American Kidney Health executive order poses opportunities for the inclusion of comprehensive medication management. Following an iterative process integrating input from a diverse expert panel, published standards, clinical practice guidelines, peer review, and stakeholder feedback, our group developed practice standards for pharmacists caring for patients with kidney disease in health care settings. The standards focus on activities that are part of direct patient care and also include activities related to public health and advocacy, population health, leadership and management, and teaching, education and dissemination of knowledge. These standards are intended to be used by a variety of professionals, from pharmacists starting new practices to practice managers looking to add a pharmacist to the clinical team, to create standardization in services provided.

Antimicrobial safety considerations in critically ill patients: part I: focused on acute kidney injury

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic prescription is a challenging issue in critical care settings. Different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, polypharmacy, drug interactions, and high incidence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms in this population can influence the selection, safety, and efficacy of prescribed antibiotics.

AREAS COVERED

In the current article, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for estimating renal function in acute kidney injury, nephrotoxicity of commonly used antibiotics, and nephrotoxin stewardship in intensive care units.

EXPERT OPINION

Early estimation of kidney function with an accurate method may be helpful to optimize antimicrobial treatment in critically ill patients. Different antibiotic dosing regimens may be required for patients with acute kidney injury. In many low-resource settings, therapeutic drug monitoring is not available for antibiotics. Acute kidney injury may influence treatment effectiveness and patient outcome.

Consensus Obtained for the Nephrotoxic Potential of 167 Drugs in Adult Critically Ill Patients Using a Modified Delphi Method

Introduction

The approach to evaluating nephrotoxins in studies of drug-associated acute kidney injury varies. Some studies use a list of under ten drugs for evaluation whereas others include over 100 drugs. Drugs are typically assigned a binary classification, nephrotoxic or not nephrotoxic. This oversimplifies the nephrotoxic potential of the drugs under investigation.

Objective

This study aimed to assign a nephrotoxin potential for 167 drugs used in the adult critical care setting.

Methods

A three-round, international, interdisciplinary, web-based modified-Delphi study was used to evaluate nephrotoxins used in adult critically ill patients. Twenty-four international experienced clinicians were identified through the Acute Disease Quality Initiative group and professional affiliations. Included individuals represented the fields of intensive care, nephrology, and pharmacy. One hundred and fifty-nine medications were identified from the literature, with eight additional medications added after the first round, for a total of 167 medications. The primary outcome was consensus achieved for nephrotoxicity ratings. Scores were evaluated each round to determine if a consensus was met.

Results

Our nephrotoxin potential index rating indicated that 20 drugs were nephrotoxicity probable or probable/definite per consensus. Nephrotoxic potential was assessed based on the standard use of medications in intensive care and the following consensus scores: 0 = no nephrotoxic potential, 1 = possible nephrotoxic potential, 2 = probable nephrotoxic potential, 3 = definite nephrotoxic potential.

Conclusions

The nephrotoxin potential index rating allows for prioritization of targeted drugs with greater nephrotoxic potential for institutional nephrotoxin stewardship programs. Furthermore, the nephrotoxin potential index rating provides homogeneity for research and guidance on detailed assessments by severity for each drug.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-022-01173-4.

Nephrotoxin Exposure in the 3 Years following Hospital Discharge Predicts Development or Worsening of Chronic Kidney Disease among Acute Kidney Injury Survivors

INTRODUCTION

Survivors of acute kidney injury (AKI) are at high risk of progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD), for which drugs may be a modifiable risk factor.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study of Olmsted County, MN residents who developed AKI while hospitalized between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2014, using Rochester Epidemiology Project data. Adults with a hospitalization complicated by AKI who survived at least 90 days after AKI development were included. Medical records were queried for prescription of potentially nephrotoxic medications over the 3 years after discharge. The primary outcome was de novo or progressive CKD defined by either a new diagnosis code for CKD or ≥30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline. The composite of CKD, AKI readmission, or death was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 2,461 AKI survivors, 2,140 (87%) received a potentially nephrotoxic medication during the 3 years following discharge. When nephrotoxic medication use was analyzed in a time-dependent fashion, those actively prescribed at least one of these drugs experienced a significantly higher risk of de novo or progressive CKD (HR 1.38: 95% CI: 1.24, 1.54). Similarly, active potentially nephrotoxic medication use predicted a greater risk of the composite endpoint of CKD, AKI readmission, or death within 3 years of discharge (HR 1.41: 95% CI: 1.28, 1.56).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based cohort study, AKI survivors actively prescribed one or more potentially nephrotoxic medications were at significantly greater risk for de novo or progressive CKD. An opportunity exists to reassess nephrotoxin appropriateness following an AKI episode to improve patient outcomes.

[Treatment and progression management of acute kidney injury]

Acute kidney injury (AKI) represents one of the greatest global health challenges and is associated with high mortality. The often multifactorial etiology and complex pathophysiological mechanisms have so far hampered the development of causal therapeutic options. The treatment should be stage-adapted according to the current KDIGO guideline: avoid nephrotoxicity, optimize volume status and perfusion pressure, monitor serum creatinine, urine output and proteinuria. New insights into the influence of mitochondrial dysfunction and cellular senescence in AKI, well-defined study endpoints, and innovations through nanotechnology may enable targeted drug-based AKI therapy in the future. Especially the weeks following an AKI are a vulnerable phase and crucial for progression management.

Health system perspectives in acute kidney injury: commitment to kidney health and planning implementation interventions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss a deliberate commitment by health systems to optimize kidney health and outcomes of patients who are at risk for or develop acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization.

RECENT FINDINGS

In 2019, the US Department of Health and Human Services set national goals targeted at improving the care and outcomes of patients with kidney disease including prevention by reducing the number of Americans who develop end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by 25% by 2030. In response to this call to action, there is a need to focus on education to identify patients at high-risk for kidney disease development and progression, active surveillance methods to ensure timely identification, offering better follow-up care after an episode of AKI. A strategic approach to determining the health systems level of commitment and developing a plan for organizational change is discussed in this commentary. Items for consideration are structuring sound implementation projects and selecting implementation interventions. Clinical interventions to consider for implementation include the use of clinical decision support for detecting patients with AKI, novel biomarkers to determine patients at high-risk for AKI and nephrotoxin stewardship to prevent medication safety complications and drug-associated AKI.

SUMMARY

There is a national call to action to improve the care and outcomes of patients with kidney disease. Health systems have an opportunity to respond by providing a high level of commitment towards ensuring the best kidney health for all patients equally. Deliberate change that is sustainable and scalable should be considered by all health systems.