Anticholinergic versus botulinum toxin A comparison trial for the treatment of bothersome urge urinary incontinence: ABC trial

Comparing Impact of Overactive Bladder Therapies on Nocturia

IMPORTANCE

Nocturia is a significant symptom in overactive bladder with little data regarding the impact of overactive bladder treatments on nocturia.

OBJECTIVES

Compare the effect of anticholinergic (AC) medication, onabotulinum toxin A (BTX), and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) on nocturia.

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the ABC and ROSETTA trials using data from the National Institutes of Health Data and Specimen Hub database. Patients reporting mean ≥2 voids/night on 3-day diary were included and divided into cohorts by treatment: the ABC trial: (1) AC and (2) BTX 100 units, and the ROSETTA trial: (3) BTX 200 units and (4) SNM. Primary outcome was change in mean voids/night on 3-day diary from baseline to 6 months assessed by mixed-effects models for repeated-measures data with interaction between treatment cohort and time included in model.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients were included: 43 (22%) AC, 37 (19%) BTX 100 U, 63 (32%) BTX 200 U, and 54 (27%) SNM. There were no significant differences in baseline voids/night, demographics, or urodynamic values except for younger age in AC and BTX 100 U cohorts (P = 0.04). At 6 months, all cohorts demonstrated a mean 41% decrease in mean voids/night (2.7 ± 0.4 at baseline to 1.6 ± 0.5 at 6 months; P < 0.001), with no significant difference in change in mean voids/night between treatment cohorts (decrease of 44% in AC, 46% in 100 U BTX, 32% 200 in U BTX, and 33% in SNM; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For women with nocturia ≥2/night, treatment with AC, BTX 100 or 200 units, or SNM led to a significant decrease in voids/night at 6 months.

The impact of postinjection urinary tract infection on efficacy of intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA-A secondary analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare treatment response in women who did and did not develop a urinary tract infection (UTI) within 14 days after intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections for treatment of refractory urgency urinary incontinence (UUI).

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of women who received Onabotulinumtoxin A in the Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral Neuromodulation vs Botulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA) Trial. Participants were grouped by presence or absence of UTI within 14 days of injection. UTI was defined as symptomatic with positive urine culture per the primary ROSETTA protocol. Our primary outcome was change from baseline in mean number of UUI episodes based on monthly 3-day bladder diaries averaged over 6 months. We performed t tests and chi-square/Fisher's exact for continuous and categorical variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of 187 participants in the onabotulinumtoxinA arm, 10 (5.3%) experienced UTI within 14 days of injection, and 177 (94.7%) did not. At baseline, groups did not differ in demographics, mean UUI episodes per day (no UTI [5.37 ± 2.65] vs. UTI [6.40 ± 3.02], p = 0.24), or other diary parameters. For our primary outcome, groups did not differ in the change in mean daily UUI episodes at 1 month (no UTI [-4.29 ± 2.75] vs. UTI [-3.74 ± 2.01]; mean difference [95% confidence interval, CI] -0.55 [-2.39 to 1.28], p: 0.55) or 6 months (no UTI [-3.63 ± 2.89] vs. UTI [-2.15 ± 3.18]; mean difference [95% CI] -1.48 [-3.44 to 0.48], p: 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

UTI within 14 days after intravesical injection of onabotulinumtoxinA for refractory UUI was not significantly associated with inferior treatment response at 1 or 6 months.

Seminal papers in urology: anticholinergic therapy vs. onabotulinumtoxina for urgency urinary incontinence

In this critical review, we explore the study design, strengths, and limitations of landmark trial "Anticholinergic therapy vs. onabotulinumtoxinA for urgency urinary incontinence". This trial was the first to directly compare two key treatment options for urge urinary incontinence - anticholinergic medication and intravesical botox, and still influences clinical guidelines a decade after publication. This non-inferiority, double-blinded, multi-centre randomised controlled trial administered Solifenacin or intra-detrusor botox to women, measuring outcomes six months post-treatment. Non-inferiority of the treatments was established, though Botox had a higher rate of retention and infection, with side effect profile rising as the key discriminator in selecting first-line therapy.

Patient Experience of Antimuscarinic Treatment for Overactive Bladder: A Qualitative Exploration of Online Forum Content

IMPORTANCE

Antimuscarinic medications are often discontinued, and there is a paucity of data regarding patient experience of medications within this class.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to qualitatively explore patient experience of antimuscarinic medications used for overactive bladder using reviews on Drugs.com.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined reviews prior to February 2, 2020 (available since 2008) for oral antimuscarinic medications. User content was reviewed qualitatively via inductive content analysis. Investigators coded third-party impressions, categorizing each review as positive, mostly positive, mostly negative, or negative. The prevalence of side effects, themes, and impressions are described, with comparisons by drug using χ2, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, as appropriate. Correlation between ordinal and categorical variables was performed using Tau and Spearman correlation coefficients, respectively.

RESULTS

We analyzed 469 user reviews. 68.2% reported symptom improvement. The most common side effects were dry mouth (29%) and fatigue (10.7%). Fewer neurologic side effects were reported in the solifenacin (13.9%) and trospium (none) groups (P = 0.009). Tolterodine and trospium immediate release had lower rates of ears, nose, and throat side effects (22.5% and 26.2%, respectively, P = 0.001.) Analysis of themes suggested 2 domains driving overall satisfaction: improvement and side effects. Improvement was associated with a positive satisfaction score (ρ = 0.64, P < 0.001) and gestalt impression (ρ = 0.74, P < 0.001). The factors that most negatively affected these measures were persistent symptoms followed by gastrointestinal side effects (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest important differences within this class of medication both in terms of side effects and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, symptom improvement is the leading factor for patient satisfaction, whereas gastrointestinal side effects are associated with dissatisfaction.

Predicting outcomes after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxina for non-neurogenic urgency incontinence in women

AIMS

Develop models to predict outcomes after intradetrusor injection of 100 or 200 units of onabotulinumtoxinA in women with non-neurogenic urgency urinary incontinence (UUI).

METHODS

Models were developed using 307 women from two randomized trials assessing efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA for non-neurogenic UUI. Cox, linear and logistic regression models were fit using: (1) time to recurrence over 12 months, (2) change from baseline daily UUI episodes (UUIE) at 6 months, and (3) need for self-catheterization over 6 months. Model discrimination of Cox and logistic regression models was calculated using c-index. Mean absolute error determined accuracy of the linear model. Calibration was demonstrated using calibration curves. All models were internally validated using bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Median time to recurrence was 6 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-12) months. Increasing age, 200 units of onabotulinumtoxinA, higher body mass index (BMI) and baseline UUIE were associated with decreased time to recurrence. The c-index was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.67). Median change in daily UUIE from baseline at 6 months was -3.5 (IQR: -5.0, -2.3). Increasing age, lower baseline UUIE, 200 units of onabotulinumtoxinA, higher BMI and IIQ-SF were associated with less improvement in UUIE. The mean absolute error predicting change in UUIE was accurate to 1.6 (95% CI: 1.5, 1.7) UUI episodes. The overall rate of self-catheterization was 17.6% (95% CI: 13.6%-22.4%). Lower BMI, 200 units of onabotulinumtoxinA, increased baseline postvoid residual and maximum capacity were associated with higher risk of self-catheterization. The c-index was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.76). The three calculators are available at http://riskcalc.duke.edu.

CONCLUSIONS

After external validation, these models will assist clinicians in providing more accurate estimates of expected treatment outcomes after onabotulinumtoxinA for non-neurogenic UUI in women.

Concurrent Retropubic Midurethral Sling and OnabotulinumtoxinA for Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether retropubic midurethral sling combined with onabotulinumtoxinA is more effective than sling alone in improving mixed urinary incontinence symptoms.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of women with mixed urinary incontinence, planning to undergo midurethral sling. Women were randomly assigned to receive 100 unites of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA or placebo during surgery. Participants completed the PGI-S (Patient Global Impression of Severity), the UDI-6 (Urinary Distress Inventory, Short Form), and the PFIQ-7 (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7) before and 3 months after surgery, and the primary outcome, PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement), 3 months postoperatively. Primary outcome was PGI-I score at 3 months for overall incontinence. We considered women "improved" with answers of "very much better" or "much better" on the PGI-I. Assuming a PGI-I response of "improved" in 66% of placebo and 93% of onabotulinumtoxinA participants, 68 women were needed to show a significant difference with 80% power at 0.05 significance level.

RESULTS

From March 2016 to November 2019, 78 women completed a 3-month follow-up (onabotulinumtoxinA: 41; placebo: 37). Mean age was 51 years (±10). On the PGI-I, the number who "improved" did not differ between groups at 3 months (83% vs 84%, P=1.0). The onabotulinumtoxinA group had less severe urgency symptoms as indicated by median urgency PGI-S scores (1 [interquartile range 1-2] vs 2 [interquartile range 1-3], P=.033) and greater improvement in urgency symptoms based on median urgency PGI-I score (1 [interquartile range 1-3] vs 2 [interquartile range 2-4], P=.028). At 3 months, median UDI-6, PFIQ-7, and PGI-S scores improved significantly from baseline in both groups. Similarly, UDI-6 and PFIQ-7 scores did not differ between groups. More women in the onabotulinumtoxinA arm initiated intermittent self-catheterization, (3% placebo; 12% onabotulinumtoxinA, P=.20) and experienced urinary tract infections (5% placebo; 22% onabotulinumtoxinA, P=.051), but these did not differ statistically.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection did not improve overall incontinence symptoms at 3 months compared with placebo among women with mixed urinary incontinence undergoing midurethral sling placement. Women with mixed urinary incontinence undergoing sling report significant improvement in overall incontinence symptoms, regardless of the addition of onabotulinumtoxinA injections, but those receiving concurrent onabotulinumtoxinA injections reported less urgency severity and greater improvement in urgency symptoms at 3 months.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02678377.

Comparison of 100 U With 200 U of Intradetrusor OnabotulinumToxinA for Nonneurogenic Urgency Incontinence

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and adverse events between 100 U and 200 U of onabotulinumtoxinA for 6 months in women with nonneurogenic urgency incontinence.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of 2 multicenter randomized controlled trials assessing efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA in women with nonneurogenic urgency incontinence; one compared 100 U to anticholinergics and the other 200 U to sacral neuromodulation. Of 307 women who received onabotulinumtoxinA injections, 118 received 100 U, and 189 received 200 U. The primary outcome was mean adjusted change in daily urgency incontinence episodes from baseline over 6 months, measured on monthly bladder diaries. Secondary outcomes included perceived improvement, quality of life, and adverse events. The primary outcome was assessed via a multivariate linear mixed model.

RESULTS

Women receiving 200 U had a lower mean reduction in urgency incontinence episodes by 6 months compared with 100 U (-3.65 vs -4.28 episodes per day; mean difference, 0.63 episodes per day [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05-1.20]). Women receiving 200 U had lower perceptions of improvement (adjusted odds ratio, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.14-0.75]) and smaller improvement in severity score (adjusted mean difference, 12.0 [95% CI, 5.63-18.37]). Upon subanalysis of only women who were treated with prior anticholinergic medications, these differences between onabotulinumtoxinA doses were no longer statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events in women receiving 200 U (catheterization, 32% vs 23%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.8-2.4]; urinary tract infection, 37% vs 27%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.5 [95% CI, 0.9-2.6]).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher dose of onabotulinumtoxinA may not directly result in improved outcomes, but rather baseline disease severity may be a more important prediction of outcomes.

Antibiotic regimen and route of administration do not alter rates of urinary tract infection after intravesical botulinum toxin injection for overactive bladder

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Guidelines vary on antibiotic prophylaxis for onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) treatment for overactive bladder (OAB). Our primary objective was to determine whether any prophylactic regimen is more effective in preventing urinary tract infection (UTI) after Botox. The secondary objective was to identify prophylactic practice patterns among female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) providers of different training backgrounds as well as general urologists.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study on urinary retention after Botox injection in women with and without diabetes mellitus and OAB. Women > 18 years old who underwent Botox injection for OAB between January 2013 and September 2018 were included. Exclusion criteria were history of urinary retention and neuromuscular bladder dysfunction.

RESULTS

A total of 565 patients were included. Two hundred eighty (49.6%) were treated by OB-GYN FPMRS, 209 (37.0%) by urology FPMRS and 76 (13.5%) by general urologists. The majority (92.9%) received antibiotic prophylaxis: 44.4% received intravenous (IV) only, 8.9% received oral (PO) only, and 39.7% received combination IV and PO prophylaxis. Urology FPMRS used antibiotic prophylaxis less frequently (p = 0.003). Within 3 months, 171 patients developed UTI (30.4%). There was no difference in post-procedural UTI for any antibiotic regimen compared to no prophylaxis. No route of antibiotic administration was superior at preventing UTI.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, no route of antibiotic administration was more effective in the prevention of UTI. Antibiotic prophylaxis did not lower the rate of post-procedural UTI compared to no antibiotics.

Use of onabotulinumtoxinA for overactive bladder with concomitant warfarin

The symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) can be treated with oral medications using a variety of antimuscarinic medications and, more recently, mirabegron, a beta-3 agonist. However, the use of these medications may be limited for patients because of adverse drug reactions, contraindications, and those who are refractory to oral medications. Recently, intravesical injections of onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNTA) have been proven to be safe and effective as an alternative to oral OAB medications. Although this procedure is typically thought to be outside the realm of a consultant pharmacist, there are incidences in which a pharmacist can make a substantial impact on patient care. The patient, a 71-year old female, presents to her urologist for evaluation to assess appropriateness of intravesical onaBoNTA injections. She has failed multiple oral medications for the treatment of her OAB with urge incontinence. The procedure is further complicated by the patient's past medical history of atrial fibrillation (A fib), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE) that require anticoagulation with warfarin therapy. This case demonstrates the use of onaBoNTA for OAB in a patient concomitantly receiving warfarin for A fib, PE, and DVT. Specifically, it demonstrates discontinuation, bridge therapy, and reinitiation of warfarin on a patient undergoing intravesical injections of onaBoNTA for OAB, and a collaborative approach to care between a pharmacist and a urologist.

CE: Overactive Bladder in Women

: Overactive bladder is a term used to describe a group of lower urinary tract symptoms that are prevalent in women, particularly as they age. Those with overactive bladder often experience related physical and psychological symptoms or conditions and report a poorer quality of life than other women. Many factors that increase the risk of developing overactive bladder are modifiable; therefore, lifestyle and behavioral interventions are first-line treatments. More treatment options are becoming available to women as research provides new information about the underlying pathophysiology of overactive bladder. Nurses play a major role in its screening, assessment, and management in women, many of whom do not seek help and try to self-manage symptoms, leading to a continuing cycle of unpredictable urgency and incontinence.

Future Directions of Research and Care for Urinary Incontinence: Findings from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Summit on Urinary Incontinence Clinical Research in Women

PURPOSE

Female urinary incontinence is prevalent, costly and morbid. Participants in a NIDDK (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases) sponsored summit reviewed findings from NIH (National Institutes of Health) funded clinical research on urinary incontinence in women and discussed the future of urinary incontinence research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The NIDDK convened the Summit on Urinary Incontinence Clinical Research in Women on March 14, 2014. Participants representing a broad range of clinical expertise reviewed completed NIH sponsored urinary incontinence related studies, including results from community based epidemiological studies such as the BACH (Boston Area Community Health) Survey and from randomized clinical trials such as PRIDE (Program to Reduce Incontinence by Diet and Exercise), and studies conducted by the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network and the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network.

RESULTS

BACH Survey results improved our understanding of precursors, incidence, prevalence and natural history of urinary incontinence in a diverse group of women. The Pelvic Floor Disorders Network study found that anticholinergic medications and onabotulinumtoxinA are efficacious for treating urge urinary incontinence, and Burch colposuspension and retropubic mid urethral polypropylene slings are efficacious for decreasing stress urinary incontinence following pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women with potential stress urinary incontinence. The Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network study found that fascial slings were better than colposuspension, and that retropubic and transobturator mid urethral polypropylene slings were equivalent for stress urinary incontinence. In patients with stress urinary incontinence a preoperative urodynamic study was noninferior to basic office examinations for surgical outcome. The addition of behavioral intervention did not allow female patients to discontinue antimuscarinics for urge urinary incontinence. PRIDE showed that modest weight reductions significantly decreased urinary incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies for future research on urinary incontinence should include a focus on early disease, risk factor identification, better phenotyping, incorporation of new technologies, patient centered research and prevention.

Indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of medical therapies for an overactive bladder

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is a chronic and prevalent condition which has a negative impact on Quality of Life. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence issued two documents which give slightly varying algorithms of pharmacotherapy for OAB, offering mirabegron as a possible treatment in certain circumstances. In the absence of trials involving a direct comparison of therapies, an indirect comparison can provide useful information on the difference in treatment effects between competing interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To compare effectiveness of available medical therapies for OAB using Bucher indirect treatment comparison (ITC) model.

METHODS

A systematic literature search identified randomised controlled trials (RCT) assessing effectiveness of drugs for OAB versus placebo. Then indirect comparisons of the treatments effects were made, preserving the randomisation of the originally assigned patient groups, using Bucher method.

MAIN RESULTS

25 RCTs met inclusion criteria. In keeping with ITC method validity, four assessments were undertaken of mirabegron against anticholinergics, which were number of incontinence episodes, micturition episodes, urgency episodes in 24 h and volume of micturition. This indirect treatment analysis suggests that mirabegron is as effective as anticholinergics in managing of OAB, except for solifenacin which appears to be superior.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that work looking into treatment choice should be individualized to patient characteristics rather than fitting patients to a treatment. Further work is required to identify what patient characteristics may be crucial and indicate that studies exploring the most effective sequence of managing treatment naïve patients and those with refractory disease.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anticholinergics Versus Botox for Urgency Urinary Incontinence: Results From the Anticholinergic Versus Botox Comparison Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of Botox and anticholinergic (AC) medications for the management of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI).

METHODS

Cost and effectiveness data were analyzed from participants in the Anticholinergic versus Botox Comparison randomized trial of daily AC medication versus 100 U of intradetrusor Botox injection. Societal costs included the following: treatment costs, patient costs, and medical and nonmedical utilization during the 6-month trial. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated based on questionnaire-derived utility measures and annualized based on data collected at baseline through 6 months. We also estimated the average direct costs for each treatment through 9 months - the duration of time when approximately half the Botox participants maintained adequate symptom control.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed on the 231 women who completed a 6-month follow-up in the Anticholinergic versus Botox Comparison trial (119 AC and 112 Botox). The mean reduction in UUI episodes per day was not significantly different per group. The cumulative mean direct costs through the first 6 months also were similar: $1339 for the AC group and $1266 for the Botox group with AC costs exceeding Botox costs after 5 months. Both groups had considerable QALY gains. Annualizing the 6-month trial results to a 12-month measure, the AC and Botox groups averaged 0.702 and 0.707 QALYs, respectively. Estimates through 9 months favored Botox, showing that AC participants incurred a higher cost per month of adequate symptoms control ($305) compared with Botox participants ($207).

CONCLUSIONS

Botox and AC medications have similar costs and effectiveness in the first 6 months of UUI treatment. If costs and outcomes are considered through 9 months, Botox may have significantly lower costs but similar UUI symptom control as AC.

Adherence to Oral Therapy for Urgency Urinary Incontinence: Results from the Anticholinergic Versus Botox Comparison (ABC) Trial

OBJECTIVES

Medication adherence with urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) treatment is challenging and the best assessment methodology is uncertain. We sought to describe adherence with anticholinergic (AC) versus placebo (P) by comparing pill counts and MEMSCAP event data and to identify factors associated with adherence.

METHODS

The randomized controlled AC versus Botox Comparison trial of women with moderate to severe idiopathic UUI included 126 participants initiating AC plus P bladder injection and 121 receiving P pills plus Botox injection. Adherence data on 243 participants (124 AC and 119 P) were calculated by pill count and MEMSCAP data for each 2-month interval during the 6-month study that allowed for dose escalation/drug change. Overall composite adherence estimates were calculated using the average of both methods and weighted by the duration of each 2-month interval.

RESULTS

Treatment groups had no significant differences in dosing duration (P = 0.76) or mean adherence (AC, 83.3% [16.8] vs. P, 84.8% [13.8]). Only 53% of women met the dichotomous outcome of more than 80% adherence during all intervals. Correlation between adherence by pill counts versus MEMSCAP decreased over time with pill counts demonstrating higher adherence than MEMSCAP (r = 0.53, 0.50, and 0.36 for each 2-month interval). Lower adherence was associated with higher baseline incontinence severity and better UUI quality of life for the AC group and with current smoking status in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence using pill counts and MEMSCAP was reasonably correlated and similar in both the AC and P groups. In the AC group, higher baseline incontinence severity and better UUI Quality of Life were associated with decreased adherence. Smokers were less adherent.

The female urinary microbiome in urgency urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to characterize the urinary microbiota in women who are planning treatment for urgency urinary incontinence and to describe clinical associations with urinary symptoms, urinary tract infection, and treatment outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Catheterized urine samples were collected from multisite randomized trial participants who had no clinical evidence of urinary tract infection; 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing was used to dichotomize participants as either DNA sequence-positive or sequence-negative. Associations with demographics, urinary symptoms, urinary tract infection risk, and treatment outcomes were determined. In sequence-positive samples, microbiotas were characterized on the basis of their dominant microorganisms.

RESULTS

More than one-half (51.1%; 93/182) of the participants' urine samples were sequence-positive. Sequence-positive participants were younger (55.8 vs 61.3 years old; P = .0007), had a higher body mass index (33.7 vs 30.1 kg/m(2); P = .0009), had a higher mean baseline daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes (5.7 vs 4.2 episodes; P < .0001), responded better to treatment (decrease in urgency urinary incontinence episodes, -4.4 vs -3.3; P = .0013), and were less likely to experience urinary tract infection (9% vs 27%; P = .0011). In sequence-positive samples, 8 major bacterial clusters were identified; 7 clusters were dominated not only by a single genus, most commonly Lactobacillus (45%) or Gardnerella (17%), but also by other taxa (25%). The remaining cluster had no dominant genus (13%).

CONCLUSION

DNA sequencing confirmed urinary bacterial DNA in many women with urgency urinary incontinence who had no signs of infection. Sequence status was associated with baseline urgency urinary incontinence episodes, treatment response, and posttreatment urinary tract infection risk.

Expert consensus on scientific evidence available on the use of botulinum toxin in overactive bladder

OBJECTIVES

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a pathology impairing patients' quality of life and with a high percentage of patients who are refractory to medication. In this paper, technical opinion of an «expert panel» is assessed in order to gain the most reliable professional consensus on scientific evidence available on the criteria of use of Onabotulinumtoxin A (OnabotA) in OAB.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

according to DELPHI method, 42 panelists answered a survey of 93 items divided into four strategic areas including clinical criteria and recommendations in order to improve, at different levels, the current approach to patients with OAB. The recent advances in the field, areas of controversy and their real application possibilities in the different areas of our health care system were taken into consideration.

RESULTS

Two rounds of the questionnaire were completed by all experts. In the first round, a criteria consensus was reached for 64 of 93 (68.8%) questions analyzed; in the second round the consensus reached was for 83 items evaluated (89.25%). An agreement among panelist was reached for: 1) definition, classification, detection and differential diagnosis; 2) medical treatment; 3) surgical treatment; 4) role of OnabotA in the treatment of OAB.

CONCLUSIONS

the consensus is broadly in line with the latest scientific evidence on OAB. The panelists believe that it is necessary to propose a change in the current definition of OAB and that it seems necessary to improve the screening tools too. Medical treatment of OAB must be tailored to each patient, staged and progressive. The use of OnabotA (Botox(®)) could imply therapeutic advantages with respect to other treatments, and positions itself as a safe and effective alternative to treat drug refractory OAB.

Urinary bacteria in adult women with urgency urinary incontinence

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This study's aims were to detect and quantify bacterial DNA in the urine of randomized trial participants about to undergo treatment for urinary urgency incontinence (UUI) without clinical evidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) and to determine if the presence of bacterial DNA in baseline urine relates to either baseline urinary symptoms or UTI risk after urinary tract instrumentation.

METHODS

Women without clinical evidence of baseline UTI were randomized to cystoscopic onabotulinum toxin A injection and oral placebo medication versus cystoscopic placebo injection and active oral medication. Bacterial DNA in participants' catheterized urine was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).

RESULTS

Bacterial DNA was detected in the urine of 38.7 % of participants (60 out of 155). In these 60 qPCR-positive participants, baseline daily UUI episodes were greater than in the 95 qPCR-negative participants (5.71 [±2.60] vs 4.72 [±2.86], p = 0.004). Neither symptom severity by questionnaire nor treatment outcome was associated with qPCR status or with qPCR level in qPCR-positive subjects. In contrast, the presence of urinary bacterial DNA was associated with UTI risk: only 10 % of the qPCR-positive women developed a UTI post-treatment, while 24 % of the qPCR-negative women did so. The median qPCR level for qPCR-positive samples did not differ significantly by UTI status (UTI 2.58 × 10(5) vs no UTI 1.35 × 10(5) copies/mL, p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

These results may indicate a urinary bacterial contribution to both baseline UUI and the risk of post-treatment UTI.

Anticholinergic therapy vs. onabotulinumtoxina for urgency urinary incontinence

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic medications and onabotulinumtoxinA are used to treat urgency urinary incontinence, but data directly comparing the two types of therapy are needed.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind, double-placebo-controlled, randomized trial involving women with idiopathic urgency urinary incontinence who had five or more episodes of urgency urinary incontinence per 3-day period, as recorded in a diary. For a 6-month period, participants were randomly assigned to daily oral anticholinergic medication (solifenacin, 5 mg initially, with possible escalation to 10 mg and, if necessary, subsequent switch to trospium XR, 60 mg) plus one intradetrusor injection of saline or one intradetrusor injection of 100 U of onabotulinumtoxinA plus daily oral placebo. The primary outcome was the reduction from baseline in mean episodes of urgency urinary incontinence per day over the 6-month period, as recorded in 3-day diaries submitted monthly. Secondary outcomes included complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence, quality of life, use of catheters, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 249 women who underwent randomization, 247 were treated, and 241 had data available for the primary outcome analyses. The mean reduction in episodes of urgency urinary incontinence per day over the course of 6 months, from a baseline average of 5.0 per day, was 3.4 in the anticholinergic group and 3.3 in the onabotulinumtoxinA group (P=0.81). Complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence was reported by 13% and 27% of the women, respectively (P=0.003). Quality of life improved in both groups, without significant between-group differences. The anticholinergic group had a higher rate of dry mouth (46% vs. 31%, P=0.02) but lower rates of catheter use at 2 months (0% vs. 5%, P=0.01) and urinary tract infections (13% vs. 33%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral anticholinergic therapy and onabotulinumtoxinA by injection were associated with similar reductions in the frequency of daily episodes of urgency urinary incontinence. The group receiving onabotulinumtoxinA was less likely to have dry mouth and more likely to have complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence but had higher rates of transient urinary retention and urinary tract infections. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01166438.).