High-resolution phenotyping of early acute rejection reveals a conserved alloimmune signature

Biomarkers from subcutaneous engineered tissues predict acute rejection of organ allografts

Invasive graft biopsies assess the efficacy of immunosuppression through lagging indicators of transplant rejection. We report on a microporous scaffold implant as a minimally invasive immunological niche to assay rejection before graft injury. Adoptive transfer of T cells into Rag2-/- mice with mismatched allografts induced acute cellular allograft rejection (ACAR), with subsequent validation in wild-type animals. Following murine heart or skin transplantation, scaffold implants accumulate predominantly innate immune cells. The scaffold enables frequent biopsy, and gene expression analyses identified biomarkers of ACAR before clinical signs of graft injury. This gene signature distinguishes ACAR and immunodeficient respiratory infection before injury onset, indicating the specificity of the biomarkers to differentiate ACAR from other inflammatory insult. Overall, this implantable scaffold enables remote evaluation of the early risk of rejection, which could potentially be used to reduce the frequency of routine graft biopsy, reduce toxicities by personalizing immunosuppression, and prolong transplant life.

Application of Mass Cytometry Platforms to Solid Organ Transplantation

Transplantation serves as the cornerstone of treatment for patients with end-stage organ disease. The prevalence of complications, such as allograft rejection, infection, and malignancies, underscores the need to dissect the complex interactions of the immune system at the single-cell level. In this review, we discuss studies using mass cytometry or cytometry by time-of-flight, a cutting-edge technology enabling the characterization of immune populations and cell-to-cell interactions in granular detail. We review the application of mass cytometry in human and experimental animal studies in the context of transplantation, uncovering invaluable contributions of the tool to understanding rejection and other transplant-related complications. We discuss recent innovations that have the potential to streamline and standardize mass cytometry workflows for application to multisite clinical trials. Additionally, we introduce imaging mass cytometry, a technique that couples the power of mass cytometry with spatial context, thereby mapping cellular interactions within tissue microenvironments. The synergistic integration of mass cytometry and imaging mass cytometry data with other omics data sets and high-dimensional data platforms to further define immune dynamics is discussed. In conclusion, mass cytometry technologies, when integrated with other tools and data, shed light on the intricate landscape of the immune response in transplantation. This approach holds significant potential for enhancing patient outcomes by advancing our understanding and facilitating the development of new diagnostics and therapeutics.

Intragraft regulatory T cells in the modern era: what can high-dimensional methods tell us about pathways to allograft acceptance?

Replacement of diseased organs with transplanted healthy donor ones remains the best and often only treatment option for end-stage organ disease. Immunosuppressants have decreased the incidence of acute rejection, but long-term survival remains limited. The broad action of current immunosuppressive drugs results in global immune impairment, increasing the risk of cancer and infections. Hence, achievement of allograft tolerance, in which graft function is maintained in the absence of global immunosuppression, has long been the aim of transplant clinicians and scientists. Regulatory T cells (Treg) are a specialized subset of immune cells that control a diverse array of immune responses, can prevent allograft rejection in animals, and have recently been explored in early phase clinical trials as an adoptive cellular therapy in transplant recipients. It has been established that allograft residency by Tregs can promote graft acceptance, but whether intragraft Treg functional diversification and spatial organization contribute to this process is largely unknown. In this review, we will explore what is known regarding the properties of intragraft Tregs during allograft acceptance and rejection. We will summarize recent advances in understanding Treg tissue residency through spatial, transcriptomic and high-dimensional cytometric methods in both animal and human studies. Our discussion will explore properties of intragraft Tregs in mediating operational tolerance to commonly transplanted solid organs. Finally, given recent developments in Treg cellular therapy, we will review emerging knowledge of whether and how these adoptively transferred cells enter allografts in humans. An understanding of the properties of intragraft Tregs will help lay the foundation for future therapies that will promote immune tolerance.

The Value of Single-cell Technologies in Solid Organ Transplantation Studies

Single-cell technologies open up new opportunities to explore the behavior of cells at the individual level. For solid organ transplantation, single-cell technologies can provide in-depth insights into the underlying mechanisms of the immunological processes involved in alloimmune responses after transplantation by investigating the role of individual cells in tolerance and rejection. Here, we review the value of single-cell technologies, including cytometry by time-of-flight and single-cell RNA sequencing, in the context of solid organ transplantation research. Various applications of single-cell technologies are addressed, such as the characterization and identification of immune cell subsets involved in rejection or tolerance. In addition, we explore the opportunities for analyzing specific alloreactive T- or B-cell clones by linking phenotype data to T- or B-cell receptor data, and for distinguishing donor- from recipient-derived immune cells. Moreover, we discuss the use of single-cell technologies in biomarker identification and risk stratification, as well as the remaining challenges. Together, this review highlights that single-cell approaches contribute to a better understanding of underlying immunological mechanisms of rejection and tolerance, thereby potentially accelerating the development of new or improved therapies to avoid allograft rejection.

Classic and Current Opinions in Human Organ and Tissue Transplantation

Graft tolerance is a pathophysiological condition heavily reliant on the dynamic interaction of the innate and adaptive immune systems. Genetic polymorphism determines immune responses to tissue/organ transplantation, and intricate humoral and cell-mediated mechanisms control these responses. In transplantation, the clinician's goal is to achieve a delicate equilibrium between the allogeneic immune response, undesired effects of the immunosuppressive drugs, and the existing morbidities that are potentially life-threatening. Transplant immunopathology involves sensitization, effector, and apoptosis phases which recruit and engages immunological cells like natural killer cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and monocytes. Similarly, these cells are involved in the transfer of normal or genetically engineered T cells. Advances in tissue transplantation would involve a profound knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that underpin the respective immunopathology involved and the design of precision medicines that are safe and effective.

New insights on the monitoring of solid-organ allografts based on immune cell signatures

Attaining a fair long-term allograft survival remains a challenge for allogeneic transplantation worldwide. Although the emergence of immunosuppressants has caused noticeable progress in the management of immunologic rejection, proper application of these therapeutics and dose adjustments require delicate and real-time monitoring of recipients. Nevertheless, the majority of conventional allograft monitoring approaches are based on organ damage or functional tests that render them unable to predict the rejection events in early time points before the establishment of a functional alloimmune response. On the other hand, biopsy-based methods include invasive practices and are accompanied by serious complications. In recent years, there have been a myriad of attempts on the discovery of reliable and non-invasive approaches for the monitoring of allografts that regarding a close relationship between allografts and hosts' immune system, most of the attempts have been devoted to the studies on the immune response-associated biomarkers. The discovery of gene and protein expression patterns in immune cells along with their phenotypic characterization and secretome analysis as well as tracking the immune responses in allograft tissues and clinical specimens are among the notable attempts taken to discover the non-invasive predictive markers with a proper coincidence to the pathologic condition. Collectively, these studies suggest a list of candidate biomarkers with ideal potentials for early and non-invasive prediction of allograft rejection and shed light on the way towards developing more standardized and reproducible approaches for monitoring the allograft rejection.