Multiplexed drug-based selection and counterselection genetic manipulations in Drosophila

Establishment of pupal color as a screening marker and activity analysis of six U6 promoters in Zeugodacus cucurbitae using the white pupae gene

BACKGROUND

The genetic control method, which is environmentally friendly and species-specific, has effectively reduced or eliminated pests in many areas. One essential requirement to control a species is the identification of its genetic and molecular elements. Such elements, however, are rarely available in Zeugodacus cucurbitae, a very destructive insect pest worldwide.

RESULTS

In this study, we knocked out the white pupae (wp) gene in Z. cucurbitae and generated a wp(-) strain, which has a white pupae phenotype. The white puparium color was successfully restored to brown by inserting the wp gene rescue allele into the genome of the wp(-) strain using piggyBac transgenic technology. The potential wp promoter was then truncated to drive the expression of the wp gene and the puparium color was rescued even by the 605 bp sequence upstream of its transcription initiation site. Further fertility tests showed that knocking out or rescuing the wp gene had no effect on the reproduction of adult flies. In addition, we identified six U6 promoters and tested their promoter activities in the embryos of Z. cucurbitae. The ZcU6-2 and ZcU6-1 promoters exhibited significantly higher activity than the others and are suitable for use in CRISPR technology-based genetic control methods.

CONCLUSION

Our work first shows the success of applying piggyBac transgenic technology in Z. cucurbitae. Our results demonstrate a highly efficient transgenic screening marker by puparium color and the promoter activity of multiple ZcU6 promoters, facilitating the construction of transgenic strains that are used for genetic control of tephritid species. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.

Differential elimination of marked sex chromosomes enables production of nontransgenic male mosquitoes in a single strain

Diverse genetic strategies are being pursued to control mosquito-borne infectious diseases. These strategies often rely on the release of nonbiting males to either reduce the target mosquito population or render them resistant to pathogens. Male-only releases are important as any contaminating females can bite and potentially transmit pathogens. Despite significant efforts, it remains a major bottleneck to reliably and efficiently separate males from females, especially when nontransgenic males are preferred. In the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti, sex is determined by a pair of homomorphic sex chromosomes, with the dominant male-determining locus (the M locus) and its counterpart (the m locus) embedded in an M-bearing and an m-bearing chromosome 1, respectively. We utilized both naturally occurring and engineered sex-linked recessive lethal alleles (RLAs) to create sex separation strains for Ae. aegypti on the basis of differential elimination of marked sex chromosomes (DeMark). DeMark strains are self-sustaining and produce nontransgenic males that are readily separated from individuals carrying RLA- and transgene-marked m chromosomes. For example, the marked m chromosome in the heterozygous mother in some strains was only inherited by her female progeny due to RLA-mediated incompatibility with the M-bearing chromosome in the father, producing nontransgenic males and transgenic females, generation after generation. We further explore strategies to conditionally eliminate females that contain marked sex chromosomes. We also discuss DeMark designs that are applicable for efficient sex separation in organisms with well-differentiated X and Y chromosomes, such as the Anopheles mosquitoes.

Diversity of Drosophila egg patterning: The missing tools to explore embryonic axis formation

Focusing on selected model organisms to establish scientific communities and resources has greatly advanced our understanding of biological processes, including embryogenesis, and facilitated the translation of these data into developing human remedies. However, by restricting our research to a small number of model organisms, we risk overlooking the underlying mechanisms controlling animal diversity and speciation. Changes in cell signaling, protein compatibility, and genetic tinkering are often neglected due to the lack of molecular tools in non-traditional model organisms. The era of high-throughput genome sequencing, computational gene prediction, and emerging genome editing and imaging tools, offers an opportunity to explore novel mechanisms of organismal development and homeostasis. As we develop new model platforms, it is imperative to prioritize resources effectively. What criteria make an organism a "good" candidate for becoming a new model organism for exploring embryogenesis? The axis of the Drosophila embryo is set during eggshell patterning. Although species with a dorsal ridge exhibit dramatically different patterns of the dorsalization signal, epidermal growth factor receptor activation, compared to Drosophila melanogaster, the embryonic dorsal-ventral axis remains consistent. Despite the increasing number of sequenced fly species' genomes, the experimental tools necessary to study these species are still lagging. Here, we emphasize the need to further develop genetic and molecular tools for studying nontraditional model organisms to understand complex processes like evolution of maternal contribution and correct embryonic body axis. We address current challenges in achieving these goals, such as genetic markers, selectable markers, and the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genomic editing.

Resolution of SLC6A1 variable expressivity in a multi-generational family using deep clinical phenotyping and Drosophila models

Purpose

Variants in SLC6A1 result in a rare neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a variable clinical presentation of symptoms including developmental delay, epilepsy, motor dysfunction, and autism spectrum disorder. SLC6A1 haploinsufficiency has been confirmed as the predominant pathway of SLC6A1-related neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), however, the molecular mechanism underlying the variable clinical presentation remains unclear.

Methods

Here, through work of the Undiagnosed Diseases Network, we identify an undiagnosed individual with an inherited p.(A334S) variant of uncertain significance. To resolve this case and better understand the variable expressivity with SLC6A1, we assess the phenotypes of the proband with a cohort of cases diagnosed with SLC6A1-related NDDs. We then create an allelic series in the Drosophila melanogaster to functionally characterize case variants.

Results

We identify significant clinical overlap between the unsolved case and confirmed cases of SLC6A1-related NDDs and find a mild to severe clinical presentation associated with missense variants. We confirm phenotypes in flies expressing SLC6A1 variants consistent with a partial loss-of-function mechanism.

Conclusion

We conclude that the p.(A334S) variant is a hypomorphic allele and begin to elucidate the underlying variability in SLC6A1-related NDDs. These insights will inform clinical diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and inform therapeutic design for those living with SLC6A1-related NDDs.

Redesigning the Drosophila histone gene cluster: an improved genetic platform for spatiotemporal manipulation of histone function

Mutating replication-dependent (RD) histone genes is an important tool for understanding chromatin-based epigenetic regulation. Deploying this tool in metazoans is particularly challenging because RD histones in these organisms are typically encoded by many genes, often located at multiple loci. Such gene arrangements make the ability to generate homogenous histone mutant genotypes by site-specific gene editing quite difficult. Drosophila melanogaster provides a solution to this problem because the RD histone genes are organized into a single large tandem array that can be deleted and replaced with transgenes containing mutant histone genes. In the last ∼15 years several different RD histone gene replacement platforms were developed using this simple strategy. However, each platform contains weaknesses that preclude full use of the powerful developmental genetic capabilities available to Drosophila researchers. Here we describe the development of a newly engineered platform that rectifies many of these weaknesses. We used CRISPR to precisely delete the RD histone gene array (HisC), replacing it with a multifunctional cassette that permits site-specific insertion of either one or two synthetic gene arrays using selectable markers. We designed this cassette with the ability to selectively delete each of the integrated gene arrays in specific tissues using site-specific recombinases. We also present a method for rapidly synthesizing histone gene arrays of any genotype using Golden Gate cloning technologies. These improvements facilitate the generation of histone mutant cells in various tissues at different stages of Drosophila development and provide an opportunity to apply forward genetic strategies to interrogate chromatin structure and gene regulation.

Redesigning the Drosophila histone gene cluster: An improved genetic platform for spatiotemporal manipulation of histone function

Mutating replication-dependent (RD) histone genes is an important tool for understanding chromatin-based epigenetic regulation. Deploying this tool in metazoan models is particularly challenging because RD histones in these organisms are typically encoded by many genes, often located at multiple loci. Such RD histone gene arrangements make the ability to generate homogenous histone mutant genotypes by site-specific gene editing quite difficult. Drosophila melanogaster provides a solution to this problem because the RD histone genes are organized into a single large tandem array that can be deleted and replaced with transgenes containing mutant histone genes. In the last ∼15 years several different RD histone gene replacement platforms have been developed using this simple strategy. However, each platform contains weaknesses that preclude full use of the powerful developmental genetic capabilities available to Drosophila researchers. Here we describe the development of a newly engineered platform that rectifies many of these weaknesses. We used CRISPR to precisely delete the RD histone gene array ( HisC ), replacing it with a multifunctional cassette that permits site-specific insertion of either one or two synthetic gene arrays using selectable markers. We designed this cassette with the ability to selectively delete each of the integrated gene arrays in specific tissues using site-specific recombinases. We also present a method for rapidly synthesizing histone gene arrays of any genotype using Golden Gate cloning technologies. These improvements facilitate generation of histone mutant cells in various tissues at different stages of Drosophila development and provide an opportunity to apply forward genetic strategies to interrogate chromatin structure and gene regulation.

Expanding the Drosophila toolkit for dual control of gene expression

The ability to independently control gene expression in two different tissues in the same animal is emerging as a major need, especially in the context of inter-organ communication studies. This type of study is made possible by technologies combining the GAL4/UAS and a second binary expression system such as the LexA system or QF system. Here, we describe a resource of reagents that facilitate combined use of the GAL4/UAS and a second binary system in various Drosophila tissues. Focusing on genes with well-characterized GAL4 expression patterns, we generated a set of more than 40 LexA-GAD and QF2 insertions by CRISPR knock-in and verified their tissue specificity in larvae. We also built constructs that encode QF2 and LexA-GAD transcription factors in a single vector. Following successful integration of this construct into the fly genome, FLP/FRT recombination is used to isolate fly lines that express only QF2 or LexA-GAD. Finally, using new compatible shRNA vectors, we evaluated both LexA and QF systems for in vivo gene knockdown and are generating a library of such RNAi fly lines as a community resource. Together, these LexA and QF system vectors and fly lines will provide a new set of tools for researchers who need to activate or repress two different genes in an orthogonal manner in the same animal.

A classic screening marker does not affect antennal electrophysiology but strongly regulates reproductive behaviours in Bactrocera dorsalis

The key phenotype white eye (white) has been used for decades to selectively remove females before release in sterile insect technique programs and as an effective screening marker in genetic engineering. Bactrocera dorsalis is a representative tephritid pest causing damage to more than 150 fruit crops. Yet, the function of white in important biological processes remains unclear in B. dorsalis. In this study, the impacts of the white gene on electrophysiology and reproductive behaviour in B. dorsalis were tested. The results indicated that knocking out Bdwhite disrupted eye pigmentation in adults, consistent with previous reports. Bdwhite did not affect the antennal electrophysiology response to 63 chemical components with various structures. However, reproductive behaviours in both males and females were significantly reduced in Bdwhite-/- . Both pre-copulatory and copulation behaviours were significantly reduced in Bdwhite-/- , and the effect was male-specific. Mutant females significantly delayed their oviposition towards γ-octalactone, and the peak of oviposition behaviour towards orange juice was lost. These results show that Bdwhite might not be an ideal screening marker in functional gene research aiming to identify molecular targets for behaviour-modifying chemicals. Instead, owing to its strong effect on B. dorsalis sexual behaviours, the downstream genes regulated by Bdwhite or the genes from white-linked areas could be alternate molecular targets that promote the development of better behavioural modifying chemical-based pest management techniques.

NDUFS4 regulates cristae remodeling in diabetic kidney disease

The mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) is a highly adaptive process to meet metabolic demands of the cell, and its dysregulation has been associated with diverse clinical pathologies. However, the role and nature of impaired ETC in kidney diseases remains poorly understood. Here, we generate diabetic mice with podocyte-specific overexpression of Ndufs4, an accessory subunit of mitochondrial complex I, as a model investigate the role of ETC integrity in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). We find that conditional male mice with genetic overexpression of Ndufs4 exhibit significant improvements in cristae morphology, mitochondrial dynamics, and albuminuria. By coupling proximity labeling with super-resolution imaging, we also identify the role of cristae shaping protein STOML2 in linking NDUFS4 with improved cristae morphology. Together, we provide the evidence on the central role of NDUFS4 as a regulator of cristae remodeling and mitochondrial function in kidney podocytes. We propose that targeting NDUFS4 represents a promising approach to slow the progression of DKD.

NDUFS4 Regulates Cristae Remodeling in Diabetic Kidney Disease

The mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) is a highly adaptive process to meet metabolic demands of the cell, and its dysregulation has been associated with diverse clinical pathologies. However, the role and nature of impaired ETC in kidney diseases remains poorly understood. Here, we generated diabetic mice with podocyte-specific overexpression of Ndufs4, an accessory subunit of mitochondrial complex I, as a model to investigate the role of ETC integrity in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). We find that these conditional mice exhibit significant improvements in cristae morphology, mitochondrial dynamics, and albuminuria. By coupling proximity labeling with super-resolution imaging, we also identify the role of cristae shaping proteins in linking NDUFS4 with improved cristae morphology. Taken together, we discover the central role of NDUFS4 as a powerful regulator of cristae remodeling, respiratory supercomplexes assembly, and mitochondrial ultrastructure in vitro and in vivo. We propose that targeting NDUFS4 represents a promising approach to slow the progression of DKD.

split-intein Gal4 provides intersectional genetic labeling that is repressible by Gal80

The split-Gal4 system allows for intersectional genetic labeling of highly specific cell types and tissues in Drosophila. However, the existing split-Gal4 system, unlike the standard Gal4 system, cannot be repressed by Gal80, and therefore cannot be controlled temporally. This lack of temporal control precludes split-Gal4 experiments in which a genetic manipulation must be restricted to specific timepoints. Here, we describe a split-Gal4 system based on a self-excising split-intein, which drives transgene expression as strongly as the current split-Gal4 system and Gal4 reagents, yet which is repressible by Gal80. We demonstrate the potent inducibility of "split-intein Gal4" in vivo using both fluorescent reporters and via reversible tumor induction in the gut. Further, we show that our split-intein Gal4 can be extended to the drug-inducible GeneSwitch system, providing an independent method for intersectional labeling with inducible control. We also show that the split-intein Gal4 system can be used to generate highly cell type-specific genetic drivers based on in silico predictions generated by single-cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) datasets, and we describe an algorithm ("Two Against Background" or TAB) to predict cluster-specific gene pairs across multiple tissue-specific scRNA datasets. We provide a plasmid toolkit to efficiently create split-intein Gal4 drivers based on either CRISPR knock-ins to target genes or using enhancer fragments. Altogether, the split-intein Gal4 system allows for the creation of highly specific intersectional genetic drivers that are inducible/repressible.

split-intein Gal4 provides intersectional genetic labeling that is fully repressible by Gal80

The split-Gal4 system allows for intersectional genetic labeling of highly specific cell-types and tissues in Drosophila . However, the existing split-Gal4 system, unlike the standard Gal4 system, cannot be repressed by Gal80, and therefore cannot be controlled temporally. This lack of temporal control precludes split-Gal4 experiments in which a genetic manipulation must be restricted to specific timepoints. Here, we describe a new split-Gal4 system based on a self-excising split-intein, which drives transgene expression as strongly as the current split-Gal4 system and Gal4 reagents, yet which is fully repressible by Gal80. We demonstrate the potent inducibility of "split-intein Gal4" in vivo using both fluorescent reporters and via reversible tumor induction in the gut. Further, we show that our split-intein Gal4 can be extended to the drug-inducible GeneSwitch system, providing an independent method for intersectional labeling with inducible control. We also show that the split-intein Gal4 system can be used to generate highly cell-type specific genetic drivers based on in silico predictions generated by single cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) datasets, and we describe a new algorithm ("Two Against Background" or TAB) to predict cluster-specific gene pairs across multiple tissue-specific scRNA datasets. We provide a plasmid toolkit to efficiently create split-intein Gal4 drivers based on either CRISPR knock-ins to target genes or using enhancer fragments. Altogether, the split-intein Gal4 system allows for the creation of highly specific intersectional genetic drivers that are inducible/repressible.

Significance statement

The split-Gal4 system allows Drosophila researchers to drive transgene expression with extraordinary cell type specificity. However, the existing split-Gal4 system cannot be controlled temporally, and therefore cannot be applied to many important areas of research. Here, we present a new split-Gal4 system based on a self-excising split-intein, which is fully controllable by Gal80, as well as a related drug-inducible split GeneSwitch system. This approach can both leverage and inform single-cell RNAseq datasets, and we introduce an algorithm to identify pairs of genes that precisely and narrowly mark a desired cell cluster. Our split-intein Gal4 system will be of value to the Drosophila research community, and allow for the creation of highly specific genetic drivers that are also inducible/repressible.

Synthetic Assembly DNA Cloning to Build Plasmids for Multiplexed Transgenic Selection, Counterselection or Any Other Genetic Strategies Using Drosophila melanogaster

We recently described a drug-based selectable and counterselectable genetic platform for the animal model system Drosophila melanogaster, consisting of four resistance and two sensitivity markers that allow direct selection for, or counterselection against, a desired genotype. This platform eliminates the need to identify modified progeny by traditional laborious screening using the dominant eye and body color markers, white+ and yellow+ , respectively. The four resistance markers permit selection of animals using G418 sulfate, puromycin HCl, blasticidin S, or hygromycin B, while the two sensitivity markers allow counterselection of animals against ganciclovir or acyclovir and 5-fluorocytosine. The six markers can be used alone or in combination to perform co-selection, combination selection, and counterselection, as well as co-counterselection. To make this novel selection and counterselection genetics platform easily accessible to and rapidly implementable by the scientific community, we used a synthetic assembly DNA cloning platform, GoldenBraid 2.0 (GB2.0). GB2.0 relies on two Type IIs restriction enzymes that are alternatingly used during successive cloning steps to make increasingly complex genetic constructs. Here we describe, as an example, how to perform synthetic assembly DNA cloning using GB2.0 to build such complex plasmids via the assembly of both components of the binary LexA/LexA-Op overexpression system, a G418 sulfate-selectable LexA transactivator plasmid, and a blasticidin S-selectable LexA-Op responder plasmid. We demonstrate the functionality of these plasmids by including the expression pattern obtained after co-injection, followed by co-selection using G418 sulfate and blasticidin S, resulting in co-transgenesis of both plasmids. Protocols are provided on how to obtain, adapt, and clone DNA parts for synthetic assembly cloning after de novo DNA synthesis or PCR amplification of desired DNA parts and how to assemble those DNA parts into multipartite transcription units, followed by how to further assemble multiple transcription units into genetic constructs of increasing complexity to perform multiplexed transgenic selection and counterselection, or any other genetic strategies using Drosophila melanogaster. The protocols we present can be easily adapted to incorporate any of the six selectable and counterselectable markers, or any other, markers, to generate plasmids of unmatched complexity for various genetic applications. A protocol on how to generate transgenic animals using these synthetically assembled plasmids is described in an accompanying Current Protocols article (Venken, Matinyan, Gonzalez, & Dierick, 2023). © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Obtaining and cloning a de novo-synthesized DNA part for synthetic assembly DNA cloning Basic Protocol 2: Obtaining and cloning a DNA part amplified by PCR from existing DNA resources for synthetic assembly DNA cloning Alternate Protocol: Obtaining, adapting, and cloning a DNA part amplified by PCR from existing DNA resources for synthetic assembly DNA cloning Basic Protocol 3: Synthetic assembly DNA cloning of individual DNA parts into a multipartite transcription unit Basic Protocol 4: Synthetic assembly DNA cloning of multiple transcription units into genetic constructs of increasing complexity.

Serial Recombineering Cloning to Build Selectable and Tagged Genomic P[acman] BAC Clones for Selection Transgenesis and Functional Gene Analysis using Drosophila melanogaster

Transgenes with genomic DNA fragments that encompass genes of interest are the gold standard for complementing null alleles in rescue experiments in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Of particular interest are genomic DNA clones available as bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) or fosmids from publicly available genomic DNA libraries. Genes contained within BAC and fosmid clones can be easily modified by recombineering cloning to insert peptide or protein tags to localize, visualize, or manipulate gene products, and to create point mutations or deletions for structure-function analysis of the inserted genes. However, since transgenesis efficiency is inversely correlated with transgene size, obtaining transgenic animals for increasingly larger BAC and fosmid clones requires increasingly laborious screening efforts using the transgenesis marker commonly used for these transgenes, the dominant eye color marker white+ . We recently described a drug-based selectable genetic platform for Drosophila melanogaster, which included four resistance markers that allow direct selection of transgenic animals, eliminating the need to identify transgenic progeny by laborious phenotypic screening. By integrating these resistance markers into BAC transgenes, we were able to isolate animals containing large transgenes by direct selection, avoiding laborious screening. Here we present procedures on how to upgrade BAC clones by serial recombineering cloning to build both selectable and tagged BAC transgenes, for selection transgenesis and functional gene analysis, respectively. We illustrate these procedures using a BAC clone encompassing the gene encoding the synaptic vesicle protein, cysteine string protein. We demonstrate that the modified BAC clone, serially recombineered with a selectable marker for selection transgenesis and an N-terminal green fluorescent protein tag for gene expression analysis, is functional by showing the expression pattern obtained after successful selection transgenesis. The protocols cover: (1) cloning and preparation of the recombineering templates needed for serial recombineering cloning to incorporate selectable markers and protein tags; (2) preparing electrocompetent cells needed to perform serial recombineering cloning; and (3) the serial recombineering workflow to generate both selectable and tagged genomic BAC reporter transgenes for selection transgenesis and functional gene analysis in Drosophila melanogaster. The protocols we describe can be easily adapted to incorporate any of four selectable markers, protein tags, or any other modification for structure-function analysis of the genes present within any of the BAC or fosmid clones. A protocol for generating transgenic animals using serially recombineered BAC clones is presented in an accompanying Current Protocols article (Venken, Matinyan, Gonzalez, & Dierick, 2023a). © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Cloning and preparation of recombineering templates used for serial recombineering cloning. Basic Protocol 2: Making electrocompetent cells of the bacterial strains used to perform serial recombineering cloning or induction of plasmid copy number. Basic Protocol 3: Serial recombineering cloning to generate both selectable and tagged genomic P[acman] BAC reporter transgenes for selection transgenesis and gene expression analysis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Multiplexed Transgenic Selection and Counterselection Strategies to Expedite Genetic Manipulation Workflows Using Drosophila melanogaster

We recently described a set of four selectable and two counterselectable markers that provide resistance and sensitivity, respectively, against their corresponding drugs using the model organism Drosophila melanogaster. The four selectable markers provide animals with resistance against G418 sulfate, puromycin HCl, blasticidin S, or hygromycin B, whereas the two counterselection markers make animals sensitive to ganciclovir/acyclovir or 5-fluorocytosine. Unlike classical phenotypic markers, whether visual or fluorescent, which require extensive screening of progeny of a genetic cross for desired genotypes, resistance and sensitivity markers eliminate this laborious procedure by directly selecting for, or counterselecting against, the desired genotypes. We demonstrated the usefulness of these markers with three applications: 1) generating dual transgenic animals for binary overexpression (e.g., GAL4/UAS) analysis in a single step through the process of co-injection, followed by co-selection resulting in co-transgenesis; 2) obtaining balancer chromosomes that are both selectable and counterselectable to manipulate crossing schemes for, or against, the presence of the modified balancer chromosome; and 3) making both selectable and fluorescently tagged P[acman] BAC transgenic animals for gene expression and proteomic analysis. Here, we describe detailed procedures for how to use these drug-based selection and counterselection markers in the fruit fly D. melanogaster when making dual transgenic animals for binary overexpression as an example. Dual transgenesis integrates site-specifically into two sites in the genome in a single step, namely both components of the binary GAL4/UAS overexpression system, via a G418 sulfate-selectable GAL4 transactivator plasmid and a blasticidin S-selectable UAS responder plasmid. The process involves co-injecting the two plasmids, followed by co-selection using G418 sulfate and blasticidin S, resulting in co-transgenesis of the two plasmids in the fly genome. We demonstrate the functionality of the procedure based on the expression pattern obtained after dual transgenesis of the two plasmids. We provide protocols on how to prepare drugged fly food vials, determine the effective drug concentration for markers used during transgenic selection and counterselection strategies, and prepare and confirm plasmid DNA for microinjection, followed by the microinjection procedure itself and setting up crossing schemes to isolate desired progeny through selection and/or counterselection. These protocols can be easily adapted to any combination of the six selectable and counterselectable markers we described or any new marker that is resistant or sensitive to a novel drug. Protocols on how to build plasmids by synthetic-assembly DNA cloning or modify plasmids by serial recombineering to perform a plethora of selection, counterselection, or any other genetic strategies are presented in two accompanying Current Protocols articles. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparing drugged fly food vials for transgenic selection and counterselection strategies using D. melanogaster Basic Protocol 2: Determining the effective drug concentration for resistance and sensitivity markers used during transgenic selection and counterselection strategies using D. melanogaster Basic Protocol 3: Preparing and confirming plasmid DNA for microinjection to perform transgenic selection and counterselection strategies using D. melanogaster Basic Protocol 4: Microinjecting plasmid DNA into fly embryos to perform transgenic selection and counterselection strategies using D. melanogaster Basic Protocol 5: Crossing schemes to isolate desired progeny through transgenic selection and counterselection strategies using D. melanogaster.

Genetic and viral approaches to record or manipulate neurons in insects

The development of genetically encoded tools to record and manipulate neurons in vivo has greatly increased our understanding of how neuronal activity affects behavior. Recent advances enable the use of these tools in species not typically considered genetically tractable. This progress is revolutionizing neuroscience in general, and insect neuroethology in particular. Here we cover the latest innovations and some of their applications in phylogenetically diverse insect species. We discuss the importance and implications of these approaches for both basic and translational research. We focus on genetically encoded and virally encoded tools used for calcium imaging, optogenetics, and synaptic silencing. Finally, we discuss potential future developments of universally applicable, modular, and user-friendly genetic toolkits for neuroethological studies of insect behavior.

Determining effective drug concentrations for selection and counterselection genetics in Drosophila melanogaster

We recently integrated into fly genetics a set of four selection and two counterselection markers and their corresponding drugs that can be used individually or in combination. These markers eliminate the need to visually screen progeny. Before using these markers in new genetic backgrounds, effective selection/counterselection concentrations should be established for each marker/drug combination. This protocol describes how to set up, perform, and analyze a drug titration curve to determine the effective selection/counterselection drug concentrations for their corresponding markers.

For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Matinyan et al., 2021.

•

Selection/counterselection in Drosophila melanogaster

•

Establish a drug titration curve for a selection/counterselection marker

•

Identify the optimal drug concentration for a selection/counterselection marker