Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of Barrett's esophagus

Risk Factors for the Development of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the most widely established precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Despite current screening guidelines, more than 90% of EAC patients lack a previous diagnosis of BE. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the most important risk factors for the development of BE or EAC.

RECENT FINDINGS

PubMed.gov, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through March 15, 2024. Studies comparing characteristics of patients with endoscopically diagnosed BE or EAC to control groups satisfied our inclusion criteria. Dual extraction provided data for random-effects meta-analyses. Sufficient data were extracted from 54 included studies to perform our meta-analyses. There were five risk factors with significant associations for the development of BE: symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux at least once weekly (OR, 3.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-6.25; p = 0.004) tobacco smoking (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.30-1.51; p < 0.001); alcohol use (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.71; p = 0.008); male gender (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.57; p < 0.001); and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39; p = 0.003). Tobacco smoking was significantly associated with the diagnosis of EAC (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.85-2.43; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Five risk factors showed significant associations with the development of BE and one with the development of EAC, with over a three-fold increase in BE for patients with gastroesophageal reflux more than once weekly. These data could prove useful in developing diagnostic paradigms with higher emphasis on patients experiencing more frequent acid reflux.

Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is a metaplastic change of esophageal mucosa, which can be characterized by its salmon-colored lining and the presence of columnar epithelium with goblet cells. It is a well-established precancerous state of esophageal adenocarcinoma, a tumor with very poor survival rates, which incidence is rapidly growing. Despite numerous research, the debate about its diagnosis and management is still ongoing. This article aims to provide an overview of the current recommendations and new discoveries regarding the subject.

Lifestyle interventions can reduce the risk of Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 62 studies involving 250,157 participants

Background

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a well‐established risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on BE risk.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to 30 September 2020. The summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the highest versus lowest categories of exposure were assessed. Analyses of subgroup, dose–response, sensitivity, and publication bias were conducted.

Results

Sixty‐two studies were included that involved more than 250,157 participants and 22,608 cases. Seven lifestyle factors were investigated: smoking, alcohol, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, sleep time, medication, and diet. We observed statistically significant increased BE risks for smoking (RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.16–1.57), alcohol intake (RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.13–1.34), body fatness (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03–1.13), less sleep time (RR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.24–2.49), and proton pump inhibitors use (RR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.17–2.29). Reduced risks of BE were found for aspirin (RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.58–0.84) and the intake of vitamin C (RR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.44–0.80), folate (RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.31–0.71), and fiber (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93–0.97). The quality of most included studies was high and the subgroup analysis according to the quality score showed significant results (p < 0.05). There was no publication bias for smoking and alcohol. Although the analysis suggested significant evidence of publication bias for BMI, sensitivity analysis showed that the changes in the recalculated RRs were not significant.

Conclusions

The large meta‐analysis revealed that lifestyle modifications could reduce the risks of BE and, consequently, esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on Barrett's esophagus risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Conflicting evidence exists regarding the effect of NSAIDs on the risk of Barrett's esophagus. The purpose of this study is to systematically assess this effect through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Accordingly, clinical studies on NSAID use and Barrett's esophagus risk were searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Following this, meta-analyses were conducted using the RevMan 5.3 software. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as the effect size.

RESULTS

Seven eligible studies (one cohort study and six case-control studies) were included for the present meta-analysis by adopting a fixed-effect model, which demonstrated that NSAIDs could reduce Barrett's esophagus risk (OR: 0.84, 95%CI:0.75-0.94, P＜0.05). Moreover, subgroup analyses done according to sex showed that NSAIDs could reduce Barrett's esophagus risk in females (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.99; P = 0.04), without heterogeneity between studies (P = 1.00 and I² = 0%). However, this relationship was not evident in males (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.68-1.07; P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this meta-analysis provided high quality evidence that use of NSAIDs is associated with a reduced risk of Barrett's esophagus. However, the presence of a sex-dependent difference remains to be clarified.

Quercetin as an anticancer agent: Focus on esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer (EC) is regarded as the sixth highest contributor to all cancer-related mortality, worldwide. In spite of advances in the treatment of EC, currently used methods remain ineffective. Quercetin, as a dietary antioxidant, is a plant flavonol from the flavonoid group of polyphenols, and can be found in numerous vegetables, fruits, and herbs. Quercetin can affect the processes of cancer-related diseases via cell proliferation inhibitory effects, potential apoptosis effects, and antioxidant properties. Of the various types of cancer, the use of quercetin has now become prominent in the treatment of EC. In this review, we discuss how quercetin may be an important supplement for the prevention, treatment, and management of EC, owing to its natural origin, and low-cost relative to synthetic cancer drugs. However, most findings cited in the current study are based on in vitro and in vivo studies, and thus, further human-based research is necessitated. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: In spite of advances in the treatment of esophageal cancer, currently used methods remain ineffective, therefore, an alternative or complementary therapy is required. Quercetin, as a dietary antioxidant, can affect the processes of cancer-related diseases via cell proliferation inhibitory effects, potential proapoptotic functions, and antioxidant properties. Quercetin may be an important supplement for the prevention, treatment, and management of EC, owing to its natural origin. The low cost of quercetin as supplement or dietary intake, relative to synthetic cancer drugs, is an advantage of the compound which should be considered.

Pathology, Chemoprevention, and Preclinical Models for Target Validation in Barrett Esophagus

Despite esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) being the most widespread among gastrointestinal cancers, with an 11-fold increase in the risk of cancer for patients with Barrett esophagus (BE), its prognosis is still poor. There is a critical need to better perceive the biology of cancer progression and identification of specific targets that are the hallmark of BE's progression. This review explores the established animal models of BE, including genetic, surgical and nonsurgical approaches, potential chemoprevention targets, and the reasoning behind their applications to prevent Barrett-related EAC. The key methodological features in the design feasibility of relevant studies are also discussed. Cancer Res; 78(14); 3747-54. ©2018 AACR.

Immunohistochemical features and staging of early gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to analyze the particularities of early gastric cancer (EGC) and their importance for staging, prognosis, and therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 338 GCs diagnosed and surgically removed in three medical institutes from Eastern Europe were retrospectively examined, and the EGCs were further examined. Besides the demographic factors and tumor characteristics, immunostains were performed with E-cadherin, HER-2, p53, Ki67, MLH-1, MSH-2, COX-2, VEGF-A, CD31, and CD105.

RESULTS

From the 338 GCs, 29 were EGCs, the average being similar in Poland and Hungary (12.37% and 13.33% respectively) but lower in Romania (5.61%). The rate of lymph node metastases was 20.69% (n = 6). Two of the cases presented liver metastases, both of them having a multifocal aspect. In 1 of these cases, limited to the mucosa, intramural carcinomatosis of the lymph vessels was seen in submucosa, muscularis propria, and subserosa. COX-2 positivity was observed in 14 (48.72%) cases. COX-2 was directly correlated with microvessel density determined with CD31 (p < 0.001) and CD105 (p = 0.03). Same correlation with CD31 and CD105 was seen for HER-2 (p = 0.03 and p = 0.0007). The only negative independent prognostic factors for overall survival were tumor localization at the proximal stomach and male gender, regardless of age.

CONCLUSIONS

In EGCs, intramural carcinomatosis of the lymph vessels and multifocality should be separately described in every surgical pathology report, as indicators of aggressiveness. Microsatellite status, E-cadherin, HER-2, p53, and Ki67 do not have prognostic value in EGC, but the highly angiogenic pattern is a possible therapeutic target.

The Annual Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Does Not Decrease Over Time in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic surveillance is recommended for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, it remains unclear if all BE patients benefit from long-term surveillance. We investigated the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in BE patients in relation to number of successive endoscopies, years of follow-up, and calendar year.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of male veterans with newly diagnosed BE during 2004-2009 with follow-up until 30 September 2011. EAC was verified using detailed structured electronic medical records reviews. We used Poisson regression to determine incidence rates, rate ratios (RR), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for EAC according to number of successive endoscopies, years of follow-up independent of number of follow-up endoscopies, and calendar year of BE diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 28,561 male patients with BE, 406 developed EAC during 140,499 person-years of follow-up (median 4.9 years). EAC incidence rates increased with each additional endoscopy following a previous negative endoscopy (RR per additional endoscopy, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.25-1.64). Compared to the EAC incidence rate at the 1st follow-up EGD, the EAC incidence rate at the 5th follow-up EGD was ninefold higher (adjusted RR, 8.82; 95% CI, 4.90-15.9). EAC incidence was highest at the first year of follow-up (5.34 per 1,000 person-years); however, EAC rates starting from the second follow-up year increased during successive years of follow up. Compared to the EAC incidence rate in the 2nd year of follow-up, the EAC incidence rate was 1.5-fold higher in EGDs conducted ≥5 years after the index BE date (adjusted RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.10). In contrast, we found no significant change in EAC incidence rates by calendar year.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence of non-neoplastic BE on multiple consecutive endoscopies was not associated with lower EAC risk. These findings argue against discontinuation of endoscopic surveillance in patients with persistent nondysplastic BE after multiple negative endoscopies.

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use is Not Associated With Reduced Risk of Barrett's Esophagus

OBJECTIVES

Regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with a reduced risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Epidemiological studies examining the association between NSAID use and the risk of the precursor lesion, Barrett's esophagus, have been inconclusive.

METHODS

We analyzed pooled individual-level participant data from six case-control studies of Barrett's esophagus in the Barrett's and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium (BEACON). We compared medication use from 1,474 patients with Barrett's esophagus separately with two control groups: 2,256 population-based controls and 2,018 gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) controls. Study-specific odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models and were combined using a random-effects meta-analytic model.

RESULTS

Regular (at least once weekly) use of any NSAIDs was not associated with the risk of Barrett's esophagus (vs. population-based controls, adjusted OR=1.00, 95% CI=0.76-1.32, I²=61%; vs. GERD controls, adjusted OR=0.99, 95% CI=0.82-1.19, I²=19%). Similar null findings were observed among individuals who took aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs. We also found no association with highest levels of frequency (at least daily use) and duration (≥5 years) of NSAID use. There was evidence of moderate between-study heterogeneity; however, associations with NSAID use remained non-significant in "leave-one-out" sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of NSAIDs was not associated with the risk of Barrett's esophagus. The previously reported inverse association between NSAID use and esophageal adenocarcinoma may be through reducing the risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Determination of risk for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma and its precursor, Barrett's esophagus, have increased greatly over the past 40 years and continue to rise. This report summarizes the most recent data on the risk factors for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Other factors, highly correlated with increasing trends for obesity, are the dominant driver of the increase in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma, interacting with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Abdominal obesity, independently of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, is associated with increased risk of Barrett's esophagus and this association is likely mediated by high levels of leptin and insulin. Use of aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins, and proton pump inhibitors are associated with a reduced risk of Barrett's esophagus as well as lower risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus. An increasing number of genetic loci have been associated with risk of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

SUMMARY

Recent advances in identifying risk factors and reporting of more precise estimates of effect for the main risk factors will positively impact clinical risk stratification efforts for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Large pooling studies are underway to derive and validate reliable clinical risk models.

Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease, a common disease of the digestive tract that can be caused by various factors, seriously harms the patients' life quality due to the repeated episodes. Here we discuss the risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease, in order to assist in the prevention and treatment of the disease.

Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: The Influence of Medications Used to Treat Comorbidities on Cancer Prognosis

Esophageal adenocarcinoma has undergone a continuous rise in incidence since the early 1970s and is the fastest rising cancer among white men in the United States. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that medications commonly used to treat multiple chronic conditions (for example, aspirin, non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and statins) as well as powerful acid suppressants such as proton pump inhibitors are associated with a reduced risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The chemopreventive potential of these classes of medications appears to be especially applicable to persons with Barrett's esophagus, the only known premalignant condition for esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, it is not known whether these medications also influence cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in persons diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma. This is an important question because most patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma have 1 or more comorbid conditions at the time of their cancer diagnosis and are receiving medication to treat these conditions. This article summarizes the evidence on the associations between 4 commonly used classes of medications and (1) risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus and (2) risk of cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Recent developments in pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of Barrett's esophagus

The burden of illness from esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to rise in the Western world, and overall prognosis is poor. Given that Barrett’s esophagus (BE), a metaplastic change in the esophageal lining is a known cancer precursor, an opportunity to decrease disease development by screening and surveillance might exist. This review examines recent updates in the pathogenesis of BE and comprehensively discusses known risk factors. Diagnostic definitions and challenges are outlined, coupled with an in-depth review of management. Current challenges and potential solutions related to screening and surveillance are discussed. The effectiveness of currently available endoscopic treatment techniques, particularly with regards to recurrence following successful endotherapy and potential chemopreventative agents are also highlighted. The field of BE is rapidly evolving and improved understanding of pathophysiology, combined with emerging methods for screening and surveillance offer hope for future disease burden reduction.

Exposure to non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and suppressing hydrogen sulfide synthesis leads to altered structure and impaired function of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction

INTRODUCTION

The non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the drugs that can commonly cause injury in the esophagus, such as non-reflux oesophagitis, with important clinical consequences. This injury may be 'silent' and therefore often overlooked. Recently, we established that hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a critical mediator of esophageal mucosal protection and repair. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of naproxen, the most commonly used NSAIDs, on the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction and its relation with suppression or stimulation of endogenous H2S synthesis during naproxen-induced oesophageal injury.

METHODS

Rats were treated with vehicle (control) or naproxen, with or without being subjected to water immersion restricted stress (Takagi et al. Chem Pharm Bul 12:465-472, 1964). Subgroups of rats were pre-treated with an inhibitor of H2S synthesis cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE) or cystathionine β-synthase (CBS), or with the Sodium sulphide (NaHS), which spontaneously generates H2S in solution. Damage of the oesophageal mucosa and oesophagogastric junction was estimated and scored using a histological damage index.

RESULTS

Treatment with naproxen increased the thickness of the corneal and epithelial layers of the oesophagus, as well as producing disorganization of the muscle plate and irregular submucosal oedema. Both injury factors, stress and suppression of H2S synthesis resulted in the development of severe esophagitis and damage to the oesophagogastric junction. The damage was exacerbated by inhibitors of H2S biosynthesis, and attenuated by treatment with NaHS.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of endogenous H2S synthesis provides a novel experimental model that can be useful in preclinical studies NSAID-related non-reflux oesophagitis. H2S contributes significantly to mucosal defence in the oesophagus.

A review of the epidemiology of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma

While the incidence rates of many cancers have decreased in past decades, the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma continues to increase. The only known precursor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma is Barrett's oesophagus. Studies conducted have identified white race, male sex, GORD, cigarette smoking, obesity, and the absence of Helicobacter pylori status as risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Other potential associations include dietary factors and the absence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Many individual studies have been limited by sample size and several meta-analyses have pooled data from studies to address this limitation. In this review we present a synthesis of these studies and summarize current knowledge of risk factors for both oesophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's oesophagus.

Esophageal COX-2 expression is increased in Barrett's esophagus, obesity, and smoking

BACKGROUND

Increased esophageal cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression has been associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE); however, it is unknown whether COX-2 expression varies among patient groups with different clinical or socio-demographic factors.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study among eligible patients scheduled for elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy and patients eligible for screening colonoscopy recruited from primary clinics. We compared 39 BE tissue samples and 47 squamous tissue samples from BE cases and 240 squamous tissue samples from controls. Clinical and socio-demographic data were prospectively collected. Immunohistochemical staining for esophageal COX-2 was performed and scored.

RESULTS

The median COX-2 score was significantly higher in BE tissue than squamous tissue from cases or controls (p < 0.001). Median COX-2 expression levels were higher in tissue samples from participants with a waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in the 2nd tertile [unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.04; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 1.17-3.57] and 3rd tertile (unadjusted OR 2.24; 95 % CI 1.20-4.16) compared with the 1st tertile and from current smokers compared with former or non-smokers (unadjusted OR 1.68; 95 % CI 1.03-2.75). In the multivariate analysis, WHRs in the 2nd tertile (OR 1.92; 95 % CI 1.07-3.45) and the 3rd tertile (OR 2.14; 95 % CI 1.10-4.16) were associated with high COX-2 compared with the 1st tertile, as was current smoking (OR 1.78; 95 % CI 1.06-2.97) compared with former and non-smoking.

CONCLUSION

We found a significant association between elevated esophageal mucosa COX-2 levels and the presence of BE tissue, as well as between elevated COX-2 levels and high WHR and current tobacco smoking. This information may assist in identifying patients likely to benefit from chemoprevention with COX-2 inhibitors.