Switching to or Add-on Peginterferon in Patients on Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B: The SWAP RCT

Impact of hepatitis B surface antigen quantification on achieving a functional cure in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels are associated with the likelihood of achieving HBsAg loss which defines the functional cure. However, optimal HBsAg cut-offs for predicting HBsAg loss have not been systematically investigated." Therefore, in this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the impact of baseline levels of HBsAg on achieving a functional cure in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023, to identify studies comparing combination therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and conventional/pegylated interferon (IFN) versus monotherapy. We pooled the proportion of HBsAg loss among studies stratified by different 75th percentile of baseline HBsAg levels and other clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

We included 24 studies with 3446 participants. At the end of treatment, studies recruiting patients with 75th percentile of baseline HBsAg below 500 and 1000 IU/mL had the highest proportions of HBsAg loss in the combination group, reaching 14 % (95 % CI: 9-21 %) and 17 % (95 % CI: 10-24 %), respectively. One-year IFN-NAs combination treatment achieved a higher proportion of HBsAg loss (9 %, 95 % CI: 6-12 %) than six-month IFN-NAs treatment (1 %, 95 % CI: 0-2 %). Patients with normal alanine transaminase (ALT) had higher HBsAg loss (11 %, 95 % CI: 6-17 %) than those with elevated ALT (4 %, 95 % CI: 2-7 %). Meta-regression indicated a positive association between male percentage in studies and HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal baseline HBsAg thresholds would be 500-1000 IU/mL, which represents high-response subpopulation for achieving functional cure with currently available therapy.

Current and emerging strategies for the prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with incident cases expected to rise from 905,700 in 2020 to 1.4 million by 2040. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for about 80% of all primary liver cancers. Viral hepatitis and chronic excessive alcohol consumption are major risk factors for HCC, but metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is also becoming a dominant cause. The increasing numbers of cases of HCC and changes in risk factors highlight the urgent need for updated and targeted prevention strategies. Preventive interventions encompass strategies to decrease the burden of chronic liver diseases and their progression to HCC. These strategies include nutritional interventions and medications that have shown promise in preclinical models. Although prevailing approaches focus on treating chronic liver disease, leveraging a wider range of interventions represents a promising area to safeguard at-risk populations. In this Review, we explore existing evidence for preventive strategies by highlighting established and potential paths to reducing HCC risk effectively and safely, especially in individuals with chronic liver diseases. We categorize the preventive strategies by the mechanism of action, including anti-inflammatory, antihyperglycaemic, lipid-lowering, nutrition and dietary, antiviral, and antifibrotic pathways. For each category, we discuss the efficacy and safety information derived from mechanistic, translational, observational and clinical trial data, pinpointing knowledge gaps and directions for future research.

Update on the treatment navigation for functional cure of chronic hepatitis B: Expert consensus 2.0

As new evidence emerges, treatment strategies toward the functional cure of chronic hepatitis B are evolving. In 2019, a panel of national hepatologists published a Consensus Statement on the functional cure of chronic hepatitis B. Currently, an international group of hepatologists has been assembled to evaluate research since the publication of the original consensus, and to collaboratively develop the updated statements. The 2.0 Consensus was aimed to update the original consensus with the latest available studies, and provide a comprehensive overview of the current relevant scientific literatures regarding functional cure of hepatitis B, with a particular focus on issues that are not yet fully clarified. These cover the definition of functional cure of hepatitis B, its mechanisms and barriers, the effective strategies and treatment roadmap to achieve this endpoint, in particular new surrogate biomarkers used to measure efficacy or to predict response, and the appropriate approach to pursuing a functional cure in special populations, the development of emerging antivirals and immunomodulators with potential for curing hepatitis B. The statements are primarily intended to offer international guidance for clinicians in their practice to enhance the functional cure rate of chronic hepatitis B.

Current status of drug therapy for chronic hepatitis B

In this editorial, we comment on the article by Meng et al. Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a significant global health problem, particularly in developing countries. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the most important risk factors for cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Prevention and treatment of HBV are key measures to reduce complications. At present, drug therapy can effectively control virus replication and slow disease progression, but completely eliminating the virus remains a challenge. Anti-HBV treatment is a long-term process, and there are many kinds of antiviral drugs with different mechanisms of action, it is essential to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these drugs to reduce side effects and improve patients' compliance. We will summarize the current status of CHB drug treatment, hoping to provide a reference for the selection of clinical antiviral drugs.

Predictive factors for clinical cure in the treatment of HBeAg(-) chronic hepatitis B or compensated cirrhosis: a prospective observational study

Background

Sequential or combined treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) and pegylated interferon alpha-2b (Peg-IFN-α-2b) can improve the clinical cure rate. However, its clinical application is limited due to the adverse reactions associated with IFN.

Methods

A multi-center prospective observational study was conducted involving 59 NAs-treated chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who were treated with a combination therapy of NAs and Peg-IFN-α-2b for 48 weeks. Another 327 NAs-treated patients received NAs monotherapy for 48 weeks. At the end of the treatment, patients were classified into either the clinically cured group or the non-clinically cured group based on clinical efficacy. The study aimed to analyze the clinical cure rate and the predictive factors.

Results

After propensity score matching (PSM), a total of 104 patients were included in the exposure and the control groups. After 48 weeks of treatment, 13 patients in the exposed group achieved clinical cure, with a cure rate of 25%. In contrast, in the control group was 1.92%. The clinical cure rate was greater in the population with CHB or compensated cirrhosis treated with sequential or combined Peg-IFN-α-2b and NAs than in the control group (p < 0.001). Patients treated with Peg-IFN-α-2b were divided into a clinical cure group and a non-clinical cure group for single-factor regression and multi-factor binary logistic regression. The results showed that baseline qHBsAg [relative ratio (RR) = 0.997, 95%CI: [0.995, 0.999], p = 0.031] and △TBiL (RR = 0.698, 95%CI: [0.555, 0.879], p = 0.002) were independent influencing factors for achieving clinical cure in patients with CHB or compensated cirrhosis.

Conclusion

A lower baseline qHBsAg and decrease in TBiL at 24 weeks of treatment are independent influencing factors for achieving clinical cure. The lower the baseline qHBsAg and the higher the △TBiL levels after 24 weeks of treatment, the higher the probability of patients achieving clinical cure.

Multiomics Analyses Reveal that Fatty Acid Metabolism and TCA Cycle Contribute to the Achievement of Functional Cure in Chronic Hepatitis B

Peg-IFNα is one of the current therapeutic strategies for Hepatitis B virus (HBV) seroclearance. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms are not yet adequately understood. The objective of this study was to explore the potential mechanisms using multiomics approach. For the first time, we revealed the transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic characterizations of Peg-IFNα-induced HBsAg seroclearance. We found that Peg-IFNα caused significant changes during the treatment. Patients who achieved HBsAg seroclearance were characterized as having decreased transcriptional activity of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism and the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway, with up-regulated expression of fatty acid degradation-related proteins. Consistently, mitochondrial TCA cycle metabolites, including citric, isocitric, and malic acids, were significantly elevated in patients who achieved HBsAg seroclearance. We also observed up-regulated transcriptional activity of NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, positive regulation of B cell activation, immunoglobulin production, and T cell receptor complex in functional-cured patients. Conversely, the metabolites associated with unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis were increased in HBsAg persistent patients, and the transcriptional activity of immunoglobulin production and T cell receptor complex was down-regulated after 48 weeks of Peg-IFNα treatment. Our findings provided valuable resources to better understand the process of HBsAg seroclearance and shed new light on the pathways to facilitate higher functional cure rates for CHB.

Achieving chronic hepatitis B functional cure: Factors and potential mechanisms

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a significant global health issue affecting approximately 254 million individuals worldwide. Achieving the loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), either with or without seroconversion to hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb), is regarded as a functional cure and the optimal goal for addressing CHB, and can be achieved through various approaches, including induction with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), induction with pegylated interferon alpha (PegIFNα), and spontaneous clearance of HBsAg. Spontaneous clearance of HBsAg is rare, while NAs can directly inhibit HBV DNA, they are unable to act on covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), hence inhibiting HBsAg production or clearing HBsAg is extremely challenging. On the other hand, functional cure based on PegIFNα shows good long-term durability, but over 10 % of patients still experience relapse, mostly within 48 weeks after functional cure. Factors related to CHB functional cure with antiviral therapy are complex, including host factors, viral factors, environmental factors, etc. The integration of HBV DNA into liver cells, persistence of HBV cccDNA, insufficient B cell responses and compromised T cell function pose significant barriers to HBV clearance. Therefore, this study systematically reviewed the relevant factors and potential mechanisms influencing functional cure CHB, which can provide a basis for personalized treatment, help predict treatment outcomes and assess prognosis, and provide theoretical support for the advancement of novel treatment strategies and medications.

Xalnesiran with or without an Immunomodulator in Chronic Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Xalnesiran, a small interfering RNA molecule that targets a conserved region of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome and silences multiple HBV transcripts, may have efficacy, with or without an immunomodulator, in patients with chronic HBV infection.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, controlled, adaptive, open-label platform trial that included the evaluation of 48 weeks of treatment with xalnesiran at a dose of 100 mg (group 1), xalnesiran at a dose of 200 mg (group 2), xalnesiran at a dose of 200 mg plus 150 mg of ruzotolimod (group 3), xalnesiran at a dose of 200 mg plus 180 μg of pegylated interferon alfa-2a (group 4), or a nucleoside or nucleotide analogue (NA) alone (group 5) in participants with chronic HBV infection who had virologic suppression with NA therapy. The primary efficacy end point was hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss (HBsAg level, <0.05 IU per milliliter) at 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Among 159 participants (30, 30, 34, 30, and 35 in groups 1 through 5, respectively), the primary end-point event occurred in 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1 to 22) of those in group 1, in 3% (95% CI, 0 to 17) of those in group 2, in 12% (95% CI, 3 to 28) of those in group 3, in 23% (95% CI, 10 to 42) of those in group 4, and in none (95% CI, 0 to 10) of those in group 5. In groups 1 through 5, respectively, HBsAg seroconversion occurred in 3%, none, 3%, 20%, and none of the participants at 24 weeks after the end of treatment. HBsAg loss with or without seroconversion occurred only in participants with a screening HBsAg level below 1000 IU per milliliter. In groups 1 through 5, respectively, grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 17%, 10%, 18%, 50%, and 6% of the participants, with the most frequent event being an elevated alanine aminotransferase level.

CONCLUSIONS

Among participants with chronic HBV infection who had virologic suppression with NA therapy, treatment with xalnesiran plus an immunomodulator resulted in HBsAg loss at 24 weeks after the end of treatment in a substantial percentage of participants. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were not uncommon. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; Piranga ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04225715.).

The efficacy and safety of addition of pegylated interferon to long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy on functional cure of chronic hepatitis B patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of adding pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) to long-term nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) treatment for achieving functional cure in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Methods

This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024519116). We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials that compared adding Peg-IFN to long-term NAs with NAs alone for the treatment of CHB. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

Seven trials with 692 participants were included. Compared to NAs monotherapy, sequential combination therapy significantly increased the HBsAg seroclearance rate (RR 4.37, 95%CI: 1.92-9.55; I2 = 0%) and HBsAg seroconversion rate (RR 3.98, 95%CI: 1.50-10.54; I2 = 0%), and the results reached statistical significance. Compared to NAs monotherapy, sequential combination therapy showed a significant increase in HBeAg seroclearance rate (RR 2.04; 95%CI: 0.47-8.82; I2 = 73%) and HBeAg seroconversion rate (RR 2.10; 95%CI: 0.41-10.71; I2 = 67%), but did not reach statistical significance. Sequential combination therapy was more likely to experience adverse events. Although most reactions are mild and reversible, vigilant monitoring for treatment-related adverse events is essential, with prompt intervention when needed.

Conclusion

For CHB patients on long-term NAs treatment, sequential combination therapy boosts HBsAg seroclearance and HBsAg seroconversion rates compared to monotherapy. However, it may increase adverse events. Additional studies are needed to thoroughly evaluate its clinical effectiveness, given the current limited research available.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024519116.

Optimal Treatment Based on Interferon No Longer Makes Clinical Cure of Chronic Hepatitis B Far Away: An Evidence-Based Review on Emerging Clinical Data

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a major global public health problem. The functional cure is the ideal therapeutic target recommended by the latest guidelines, and pursuing a functional cure has become the key treatment end point of current therapy and for upcoming clinical trials. In this review, based on the latest published clinical research evidence, we analyzed the concept and connotation of clinical cures and elaborated on the benefits of clinical cures in detail. Secondly, we have summarized various potential treatment methods for achieving clinical cures, especially elaborating on the latest research progress of interferon-based optimized treatment strategies in achieving clinical cures. We also analyzed which populations can achieve clinical cures and conducted a detailed analysis of relevant virological and serological markers in screening clinical cure advantage populations and predicting clinical cure achievement. In addition, we also introduced the difficulties that may be encountered in the current pursuit of achieving a clinical cure.

Predictive models for functional cure in patients with CHB receiving PEG-IFN therapy based on HBsAg quantification through meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The efficacy of achieving HBsAg clearance through pegylated interferon (PEG-IFNα) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains uncertain, especially regarding the probability of achieving functional cure among patients with varying baseline HBsAg levels. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of HBsAg quantification for HBsAg seroclearance in CHB patients undergoing PEG-IFNα treatment.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 11, 2022. Subgroup analyses were performed for HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, PEG-IFNα monotherapy and PEG-IFNα combination therapy, treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients, and patients with or without liver cirrhosis.

RESULTS

This predictive model incorporated 102 studies. The overall HBsAg clearance rates at the end of treatment (EOT) and the end of follow-up (EOF) were 10.6% (95% CI 7.8-13.7%) and 11.1% (95% CI 8.4-14.1%), respectively. Baseline HBsAg quantification was the most significant factor. According to the model, it is projected that when baseline HBsAg levels are 100, 500, 1500, and 10,000 IU/ml, the HBsAg clearance rates at EOF could reach 53.9% (95% CI 40.4-66.8%), 32.1% (95% CI 24.8-38.7%), 14.2% (95% CI 9.8-18.8%), and 7.9% (95% CI 4.2-11.8%), respectively. Additionally, treatment-experienced patients with HBeAg-negative status, and without liver cirrhosis exhibited higher HBsAg clearance rates after PEG-IFNα treatment.

CONCLUSION

A successful predictive model has been established to predict the achievement of functional cure in CHB patients receiving PEG-IFNα therapy.

Interim analysis of the PARADISE study: Benefits of add-on peginterferon-α in NA-treated patients with CHB

This study aimed to investigate whether peginterferon-α (IFN) add-on nucleos(t)ide analogs(NAs) can further reduce hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) risk compared with NAs monotherapy in NA-treated patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB). In this multi-center randomized controlled trial "PARADISE study" (NCT05671315), CHB patients with intermediate to high risk of HCC after more than 24-week NAs pretreatment were recruited, randomized to two groups at a ratio of 1:2 and followed up for 240 weeks. NAs group maintained NAs monotherapy, while IFN + NAs group received IFN add-on NAs therapy for 48 weeks, then switched to NAs monotherapy. Totally, 196 patients were included in interim analysis (NAs group 68, IFN + NAs group 128). The 96-week cumulative HCC incidence was lower in IFN + NAs group than NAs group (0% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.05). Compared with NAs group, IFN + NAs group had significantly higher rates of HBsAg loss at week 48 and 96 (22.7% vs. 0%; 16.7% vs. 0%, both p < 0.05). A new scoring system was established to predict HBsAg decline >2log10 IU/ml, HBsAg <10 IU/ml or HBsAg loss at the end of 48-week IFN treatment. The area under ROC curve was 0.914, 0.922 or 0.905 in the original cohort (n = 128) and 0.896, 0.896 or 0.864 in the external validation cohort (n = 162) for the aforementioned three outcomes, respectively. IFN add-on NAs therapy may suggest the dual benefits of reducing HCC development and facilitating HBsAg loss among NA-treated CHB patients with intermediate to high risk of HCC. The new scoring system helps to make the most of IFN treatment for a higher cost-effectiveness in healthcare.

Hepatitis B: Model Systems and Therapeutic Approaches

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global health issue and ranks among the top causes of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although current antiviral medications, including nucleot(s)ide analogs and interferons, could inhibit the replication of HBV and alleviate the disease, HBV cannot be fully eradicated. The development of cellular and animal models for HBV infection plays an important role in exploring effective anti-HBV medicine. During the past decades, advancements in several cell culture systems, such as HepG2.2.15, HepAD38, HepaRG, hepatocyte-like cells, and primary human hepatocytes, have propelled the research in inhibiting HBV replication and expression and thus enriched our comprehension of the viral life cycle and enhancing antiviral drug evaluation efficacy. Mouse models, in particular, have emerged as the most extensively studied HBV animal models. Additionally, the present landscape of HBV therapeutics research now encompasses a comprehensive assessment of the virus's life cycle, targeting numerous facets and employing a variety of immunomodulatory approaches, including entry inhibitors, strategies aimed at cccDNA, RNA interference technologies, toll-like receptor agonists, and, notably, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). This review describes the attributes and limitations of existing HBV model systems and surveys novel advancements in HBV treatment modalities, which will offer deeper insights toward discovering potentially efficacious pharmaceutical interventions.

Prediction model for hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B with peginterferon-alfa treated based on a response-guided therapy strategy

BACKGROUND

Models for predicting hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) after nucleos(t)ide analog treatment are rare.

AIM

To establish a simple scoring model based on a response-guided therapy (RGT) strategy for predicting HBeAg seroconversion and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance.

METHODS

In this study, 75 previously treated patients with HBeAg-positive CHB underwent a 52-week peginterferon-alfa (PEG-IFNα) treatment and a 24-wk follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess parameters at baseline, week 12, and week 24 to predict HBeAg seroconversion at 24 wk post-treatment. The two best predictors at each time point were used to establish a prediction model for PEG-IFNα therapy efficacy. Parameters at each time point that met the corresponding optimal cutoff thresholds were scored as 1 or 0.

RESULTS

The two most meaningful predictors were HBsAg ≤ 1000 IU/mL and HBeAg ≤ 3 S/CO at baseline, HBsAg ≤ 600 IU/mL and HBeAg ≤ 3 S/CO at week 12, and HBsAg ≤ 300 IU/mL and HBeAg ≤ 2 S/CO at week 24. With a total score of 0 vs 2 at baseline, week 12, and week 24, the response rates were 23.8%, 15.2%, and 11.1% vs 81.8%, 80.0%, and 82.4%, respectively, and the HBsAg clearance rates were 2.4%, 3.0%, and 0.0%, vs 54.5%, 40.0%, and 41.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We successfully established a predictive model and diagnosis-treatment process using the RGT strategy to predict HBeAg and HBsAg seroconversion in patients with HBeAg-positive CHB undergoing PEG-IFNα therapy.

Guidance on treatment endpoints and study design for clinical trials aiming to achieve cure in chronic hepatitis B and D: Report from the 2022 AASLD-EASL HBV-HDV Treatment Endpoints Conference

Representatives from academia, industry, regulatory agencies, and patient advocacy groups convened under the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) in June 2022 with the primary goal of achieving consensus on chronic HBV and HDV treatment endpoints to guide clinical trials aiming to "cure" HBV and HDV. Conference participants reached an agreement on some key points. The preferred primary endpoint for phase II/III trials evaluating finite treatments for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a "functional" cure, defined as sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA less than the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) 24 weeks off-treatment. An alternate endpoint would be "partial cure" defined as sustained HBsAg level <100 IU/mL and HBV DNA Collapse

Key Words

• HBV
• HDV
• diagnosis

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy
• Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology
• Hepatitis B, Chronic/therapy
• Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
• Hepatitis D, Chronic/drug therapy
• Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics
• Research Design
• Clinical Trials as Topic/methods
• DNA, Viral/blood
• DNA, Viral/analysis
• Hepatitis B virus/genetics
• Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood
• Endpoint Determination/methods
• Treatment Outcome
• Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic/methods

Collapse

Grants

• 001 World Health Organization

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Marc G Ghany Liver Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Maria Buti Liver Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and CIBEREHD del Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
Pietro Lampertico Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milan, Italy; CRC "A. M. and A. Migliavacca" Center for Liver Disease, Milan, Italy
Hannah M Lee Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Stravitz Sanyal Institute for Liver Disease and Metabolic Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA

Collapse

Immunomodulatory and Antiviral Therapy Improved Functional Cure Rate in CHB Patients with High HBsAg Level Experienced NA

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A functional cure, or hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, is difficult to achieve in patients with hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B. The HBV vaccine and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have been reported to help reduce HBsAg levels and promote HBsAg loss. In this prospective randomized trial, we evaluated HBsAg loss in patients receiving pegylated interferon-α2b (PEGIFN-α2b) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), with and without GM-CSF and HBV vaccination.

METHODS

A total of 287 patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B and seroconversion after nucleot(s)ide analog treatment were assigned randomly to three treatment groups for 48 weeks, TDF alone (control), PEGIFN-α2b + TDF, and PEGIFN-α2b + TDF + GM-CSF + HBV vaccine. The primary endpoints were the proportions of patients with HBsAg loss and seroconversion at 48 and 72 weeks.

RESULTS

The cumulative HBsAg loss rates in the control, PEGIFN-α2b + TDF, and PEGIFN-α2b + TDF + GM-CSF + HBV vaccine groups at week 48 were 0.0%, 28.3%, and 41.1%, respectively. The cumulative HBsAg seroconversion rates in these groups at week 48 were 0.0%, 21.7%, and 33.9%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis showed that GM-CSF use plus HBV vaccination was significantly associated with HBsAg loss (p=0.017) and seroconversion (p=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B and seroconversion after nucleot(s)ide analog treatment, immunomodulatory/antiviral treatment regimens effectively improved HBsAg loss, and the regimen including GM-CSF and HBV vaccination was most effective.

Past, present, and future of long-term treatment for hepatitis B virus

The estimated world prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is 316 million. HBV infection was identified in 1963 and nowadays is a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) despite universal vaccination programs, and effective antiviral therapy. Long-term administration of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) has been the treatment of choice for chronic hepatitis B during the last decades. The NA has shown a good safety profile and high efficacy in controlling viral replication, improving histology, and decreasing the HCC incidence, decompensation, and mortality. However, the low probability of HBV surface antigen seroclearance made necessary an indefinite treatment. The knowledge, in recent years, about the different phases of the viral cycle, and the new insights into the role of the immune system have yielded an increase in new therapeutic approaches. Consequently, several clinical trials evaluating combinations of new drugs with different mechanisms of action are ongoing with promising results. This integrative literature review aims to assess the knowledge and major advances from the past of hepatitis B, the present of NA treatment and withdrawal, and the future perspectives with combined molecules to achieve a functional cure.

The scientific basis of combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B functional cure

Functional cure of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) - or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss after 24 weeks off therapy - is now the goal of treatment, but is rarely achieved with current therapy. Understanding the hepatitis B virus (HBV) life cycle and immunological defects that lead to persistence can identify targets for novel therapy. Broadly, treatments fall into three categories: those that reduce viral replication, those that reduce antigen load and immunotherapies. Profound viral suppression alone does not achieve quantitative (q)HBsAg reduction or HBsAg loss. Combining nucleos(t)ide analogues and immunotherapy reduces qHBsAg levels and induces HBsAg loss in some patients, particularly those with low baseline qHBsAg levels. Even agents that are specifically designed to reduce viral antigen load might not be able to achieve sustained HBsAg loss when used alone. Thus, rationale exists for the use of combinations of all three therapy types. Monitoring during therapy is important not just to predict HBsAg loss but also to understand mechanisms of HBsAg loss using viral and immunological biomarkers, and in selected cases intrahepatic sampling. We consider various paths to functional cure of CHB and the need to individualize treatment of this heterogeneous infection until a therapeutic avenue for all patients with CHB is available.

The efficacy and safety of adding on or switching to peginterferon α-2b in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term entecavir treatment: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The strategies of adding on or switching to peginterferon (PEG-IFN) improved the serological response rates in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who had previously experienced treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues. However, robust data on which combination strategy is more effective remain lacking.

METHODS

In this multicentre, parallel, open-label, randomised, controlled trial, patients with HBeAg-positive CHB who were treated with entecavir ≥2 years, and had hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) <3000 IU/ml, HBeAg <200S/CO and HBV DNA <50 IU/ml were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to add on PEG-IFN, switch to PEG-IFN or continue entecavir monotherapy for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was HBeAg seroconversion at week 48.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were randomised into three treatment arms (50 in add-on, 52 in switch-to and 51 in monotherapy). Compared with continuous entecavir monotherapy, both add-on and switch-to strategies achieved higher rates of HBeAg seroconversion (18.0% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.007; 19.2% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.005, respectively), HBeAg loss (24.0% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.010; 23.1% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.013, respectively), HBsAg < 100 IU/ml (30.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001; 34.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.001, respectively), and higher HBsAg reduction (-0.90 vs. -0.06 log₁₀ IU/ml, p < 0.001; -0.92 vs. -0.06 log₁₀ IU/ml, p < 0.001, respectively) at week 48. The efficacy was comparable between add-on and switch-to arms (p > 0.05). Adverse events were mainly related to PEG-IFN but generally tolerable.

CONCLUSION

In patients with CHB who achieved virological response with long-term entecavir, both adding on and switching to PEG-IFN are alternative strategies resulting in higher rates of HBeAg seroconversion and HBsAg reduction than continuous entecavir.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-17012055).

An optimized mode of interferon intermittent therapy help improve HBsAg disappearance in chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effect of intermittent interferon therapy mode on the disappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study in CHB patients who were suspended from pegylated interferon α (PEG-IFNα) therapy due to a plateau in HBsAg decline during the initial treatment period, and resumed interferon therapy after an interval of 3-6 months. Patients received entecavir or tenofovir during the interval period. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) virological and serological indexes, clinical biochemical indexes, and blood routine tests were performed at the baseline and every 3 months during follow-up of initial interferon treatment. A functional cure was analyzed as a primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 304 patients treated with intermittent PEG-IFNα were included in the statistical analysis, including 215 men and 89 women, aged 37.97 ± 8.53 years, and 73 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative and 231 HBeAg positive patients. In total 59 patients (19.41%) achieved HBsAg disappearance through the initial, intermittent, and retreatment of PEG-IFNα treatment, of whom 43 patients (14.14%) achieved HBsAg seroconversion. Early HBsAg response to initial treatment was significantly associated with HBsAg response at 12 and 24 weeks of retreatment. After the intermission period, the incidence of HBsAg disappearance in patients with early HBsAg response in the retreatment period was 43.87%. The baseline HBsAg and 12-week HBsAg response in the retreatment period had higher predictive value than the initial treatment HBsAg response.

CONCLUSION

The initial, intermittent, and retreatment mode of interferon can help to improve the HBsAg disappearance rate in CHB patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

[www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04028856].

Dynamic Changes of Cytokine Profiles and Virological Markers Associated With HBsAg Loss During Peginterferon Alpha-2a Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Objective

To explore dynamic changes of cytokines and virological markers associated with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss during peginterferon alpha-2a (PEG-IFN α-2a) treatment in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

Methods

It was a single-center prospective cohort study. HBeAg-positive CHB patients were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Cytokines were detected at baseline, week 12 and 24 of PEG-IFN treatment. HBsAg disappearance rate was the primary evaluation index at 48 weeks of PEG-IFN treatment.

Results

Among 100 patients who completed the 48-week PEG-IFN α-2a treatment, 38 patients achieved serum HBeAg disappearance, 25 patients achieved HBeAg seroconversion, 9 patients achieved functional cure, 37 patients had HBsAg decline of ≥1 log IU/ml, and 8 patients produced hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb). Albumin (ALB), fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (FLT3-L) and interferon-alpha2 (IFN-α2) in the clinical cure group were significantly lower than those in the non-clinical-cure group at baseline. After 12 weeks of treatment, HBsAg in the clinical cure group was significantly lower than that in the non-clinical-cure group (median 1.14 vs. 3.45 log10IU/ml, Z=-4.355, P < 0.001). The decrease of HBsAg and hepatitis B virus desoxyribose nucleic acid (HBV DNA) in the clinical cure group was significantly higher than that in non-clinical-cure group (median: HBsAg 1.96 vs. 0.33 log10IU/ml, Z=-4.703, P< 0.001; HBV DNA 4.49 vs.3.13 log₁₀IU/ml, Z=-3.053, P=0.002). The increase of IFN-α2 in the cure group was significantly higher than that in the non-clinical-cure group (497.89 vs. 344.74, Z=-2.126, P=0.034). After 24 weeks of treatment, HBsAg, HBeAg, Flt3-L, and IL-10 in the clinical cure group were significantly lower than those in the non-clinical-cure group (median: HBsAg 0.70 vs. 3.15 log₁₀IU/ml, Z=-4.535, P< 0.001; HBeAg 1.48 vs. 13.72 S/CO, Z = 2.512, P = 0.012; Flt3-l 0.00 vs 2.24 pg/ml, Z = 3.137, P=0.002; IL-10 0.70 vs. 2.71 pg/ml, Z=-4.067, P < 0.001). HBsAg decreased significantly in the clinical cure group compared with non-clinical-cure group (median 3.27 vs. 0.45, Z=-4.463, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Dynamic changes of cytokines and virology markers during early PEG IFN α-2a treatment were associated with HBsAg loss in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.

Aiming for Functional Cure With Established and Novel Therapies for Chronic Hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains difficult to cure due to the persistent, self-replenishing nature of the viral genome and impaired host immune responses. Current treatment goals for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are to prevent or significantly delay liver-related adverse outcomes and death, and two types of treatments are available: nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and interferons (IFNs). NAs effectively suppress HBV replication, and IFNs improve serological response rates, thereby decreasing the risk of adverse outcomes. However, their efficacy in attaining serological responses, especially functional cure (i.e., loss of serum hepatitis B surface antigen), is very limited. Various strategies such as stopping antiviral therapy or combining therapies have been investigated to enhance response, but efficacy is only modestly improved. Importantly, the development of novel direct-acting antivirals and immunomodulators is underway to improve treatment efficacy and enhance rates of functional cure. The present review provides an overview of the treatment goals and indications, the possibility of expanding indications, and the safety and efficacy of different treatment strategies involving established and/or novel therapies as we continue our search for a cure.

Prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing the seroclearance of HBsAg between combination therapy of peg-interferon alpha and tenofovir with tenofovir monotherapy in nucleos(t)ide analogue-experienced patients with HBV-related liver fibrosis: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Combination antiviral therapy of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) and pegylated interferon alpha (peg-IFN alpha) decrease hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) levels to achieve functional cure and improve long-term prognosis in chronic hepatitis B patients. However, for hepatitis B-related liver fibrosis, studies on combination of these two medicines are limited. This study was designed to compare the efficacy between peg-IFN alpha combined with tenofovir (TDF) and TDF monotherapy for the clearance of HBsAg in NA-experienced patients with HBV-related liver fibrosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study was designed to be a prospective, multicentre, open, randomised controlled study. A total of 272 patients with HBV-related liver fibrosis will be randomised into the combination therapy group or the monotherapy group at a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the combination group will receive subcutaneous injections of peg-IFN alpha 180 µg per week for 48 weeks combined with oral TDF 300 mg daily. Participants in the monotherapy group will receive 300 mg oral TDF daily alone. All participants will undergo long-term treatment with TDF and will be followed up at the outpatient department for 144 weeks after randomisation. Clinical symptoms, laboratory tests and examination indicators will be collected at each follow-up time point, and adverse events will be recorded. The primary endpoint is serological clearance rate of HBsAg at 48 weeks.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ethics committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital at Sun Yat-sen University approved this study (Approval Number: (2020)02-183-01). The results of the study will be presented at relevant meetings and published in an appropriate journal after the completion of the trial and the analysis of the data.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04640129.