Tofacitinib for Biologic-Experienced Hospitalized Patients With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

A narrative literature review of the incidence and prevalence of safety outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Information on rates of safety outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] is helpful to better understand the benefit-risk profile of more recent therapies approved for UC.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review provides an updated examination of the incidence and prevalence of safety outcomes in the UC patient population. Incidence and prevalence estimates were determined for outcomes including cardiac conduction disorders, infections, and malignancies from published literature [2013-2023].

EXPERT OPINION

While information for certain outcomes was more frequently recorded, such as herpes viral infection (incidence rate [IR] 0.0-4.47 per 100 person-years [PY]) and malignancies [all; IR 0.0-1.77 per 100 PY], rarer outcome estimates such as bradycardia [IR 0.2 per 100 PY] and macular edema [IR 0.2 per 100 PY] were limited. Our knowledge of certain, uncommon safety outcomes and concomitant medical conditions in the UC population remains limited given the lack of data available. Even though larger cohorts with longer follow-up are warranted, estimates provided in this review will contribute to an improved understanding of the safety profile of UC therapies.

Postoperative Outcomes in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Undergoing Colectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Up to 30% of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) will require urgent colectomy despite initiation of intravenous corticosteroids and rescue therapies. Janus kinase inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, have emerged as an effective agent for ASUC; however, there are currently limited data evaluating the risk of postoperative complications among patients who received tofacitinib treatment for an episode of ASUC compared with infliximab.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of patients hospitalized with ASUC who underwent colectomy, comparing patients treated with tofacitinib prior to colectomy with infliximab-treated controls. The primary outcome was rate of serious postoperative complications within 30 days of colectomy. Outcomes were compared between the tofacitinib-treated cases and infliximab-treated controls using multivariable regression adjusted for open surgery and cumulative corticosteroid exposure.

RESULTS

Forty-one tofacitinib-treated patients were compared with 68 infliximab-treated patients with ASUC. Compared with tofacitinib-treated patients, infliximab-treated patients had higher overall rates of overall (44 [64.7%] vs 13 [31.7%]; P = .002) and serious (19 [27.9%] vs 3 [12%]; P = .019) postoperative complications. No significant different risk for developing serious postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.96; P = .061) was observed in multivariable analysis; however, a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.87; P = .023) was observed in tofacitinib-treated patients compared with infliximab-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative complications in ASUC patients treated with tofacitinib compared with infliximab; however, no difference was observed in the risk for serious postoperative complications. Larger prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Sequential rescue therapy with JAK inhibitors in corticosteroid and infliximab-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis: a case series

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency affecting over 20% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Up to 40% of patients are refractory to intravenous corticosteroids (IVCS) and require rescue medical therapy or immediate colectomy. The potent Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, upadacitinib and tofacitinib, have proven efficacy in a randomised control trial setting for moderate-to-severe UC, but not ASUC. We describe a case series of sequential rescue therapy with JAK inhibitors following the failure of dose-intensified infliximab in corticosteroid-refractory ASUC. Six adult (>16 years old) patients received sequential rescue therapy with a JAK inhibitor (upadacitinib n = 5, tofacitinib n = 1) following failure of IVCS and dose-intensified infliximab at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (QLD, Australia) between October 2023 and April 2024. All patients met the Truelove and Witts criteria for ASUC on admission. Data were captured during admission and at 90-days post-discharge. Co-primary outcomes were 90-day colectomy-free survival and inpatient clinical response (<4 non-bloody stools per day) 72 h after JAK-inhibitor initiation. Secondary outcomes included 90-day clinical (PRO-2 score < 1) and biochemical (faecal calprotectin (FCP) < 150 µg/g and C-reactive protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L) corticosteroid-free remission and adverse events. Median CRP on admission was 100 mg/L (interquartile range (IQR) 58-105), median FCP 3400 µg/g (IQR 910-4950) and median Mayo Endoscopic Score 3. Four out of six patients had a clinical response within 72 h of sequential JAK-inhibitor rescue therapy. Two patients underwent emergent inpatient colectomy for refractory disease - one of whom developed post-operative sepsis. Among the four JAK-responders at 90 days, all achieved corticosteroid-free clinical remission and three achieved biochemical remission. No other adverse events were recorded. There is a promising role for JAK inhibitors as sequential rescue therapy following the failure of dose-intensified infliximab in select patients with corticosteroid-refractory ASUC.

Intensified Upadacitinib Dosing for Adolescent Patients with Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Background/Objectives: In adolescent patients with ulcerative colitis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy, episodes of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) require hospitalization or surgery. Upadacitinib can be a potential colectomy-sparing agent in adult ASUC patients receiving intensified dosing. Methods: This case series evaluates clinical outcomes of intensified rescue upadacitinib dosing in adolescent patients with ASUC. We included adolescents admitted with anti-TNF refractory ASUC treated with 30 mg twice daily upadacitinib. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who remained colectomy-free at the most recent follow-up. Results: Five patients (aged 14-18) exhibited varying responses to upadacitinib; 2 responded rapidly, while 3 had partial response. All the patients remained on upadacitinib and were colectomy-free during follow-up (55-203 days). Three (60%) ultimately received dual advanced therapy with ustekinumab and upadacitinib. At most recent follow-up, 60% were in clinical/biochemical remission without corticosteroids. Conclusions: In select cases, intensified upadacitinib may be a potential colectomy-sparing option for adolescent ASUC patients refractory to anti-TNF therapy.

Tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis in Brazil: a multicenter observational study on effectiveness and safety

AIM

To assess the real-life, long-term effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in a large cohort of patients with refractory or difficult-to-treat ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study included patients with moderately to severely active UC who received tofacitinib for at least 8 weeks. Clinical remission and response, endoscopic response and remission, biochemical response and remission, steroid-free clinical remission, primary and secondary loss of response, drug discontinuation, the need for dose optimization, the need for colectomy, and adverse events were evaluated over up to 30 months.

RESULTS

We included 127 patients with UC, with a mean age of 40.3 ± 14.2 years; 58.2% were male, 75.6% had pancolitis, and 79.5% had previously failed at least one biological therapy, predominantly anti-TNF agents (70.1%). Clinical remission was observed in 31.5% of patients at weeks 12-16, 46.5% at 26 ± 4 weeks, and 37.0% at 1 year. Steroid-free clinical remission was achieved in 28.6%, 44.8%, and 37.1% of patients at the same time points, respectively. Biochemical remission was achieved in 33.6% of patients at 26 ± 4 weeks and 29.3% at 1 year. Endoscopic response and endoscopic remission within 1 year were observed in 46.0% and 15.3% of patients, respectively. Ten patients (7.9%) required colectomy, and 13 patients (10.2%) required hospitalization, all of whom had been previously exposed to biologics. The colectomy rate was significantly greater in patients with serum albumin levels ≤ 3.5 g/dL (21.4% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

In this large, long-term real-world study involving patients with predominantly biologically refractory UC, tofacitinib effectively induced clinical remission and endoscopic improvement and prevented colectomy for more than 30 months, with a favorable safety profile. Notably, baseline hypoalbuminemia was associated with higher colectomy rates.

A practical approach to positioning therapies in ulcerative colitis

The therapeutic landscape of ulcerative colitis (UC) has undergone significant change over the last 2 decades. While there are multiple new therapies for the management of UC, long-term remission rates remain low, and this may be in part due to the difficulty of navigating a successful treatment strategy. In this review, we propose a rational framework for treatment selection, sequencing, and optimization in patients with UC. We outline treatment goals and targets for UC, followed by a discussion of the challenges in treatment selection and considerations to help guide a sequencing strategy. These include an assessment of a therapy's efficacy and safety, the convenience in the delivery of the therapy, ease of access, and patient-related factors. We then provide an overview of the currently approved therapies for UC, with an in-depth analysis of their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we conclude with future directions in the management of UC, which include the use of naturopathic therapies, faecal microbiota therapy, the use of precision medicine, and other strategies such as combination therapy.

Small Molecules in the Treatment of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Review of Current Evidence

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease in which one-quarter of patients are at risk of developing a severe form of the disease known as acute severe UC (ASUC). This condition exposes patients to serious complications, including toxic megacolon, surgical intervention, and even death. The current therapeutic strategy relies on time-dependent, multi-step algorithms that integrate systemic corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and biologic agents (specifically infliximab) as medical therapy aimed at avoiding colectomy. Despite this approach, a significant proportion of patients fail to respond to either corticosteroids or infliximab and may require alternative therapeutic options if there is no urgent surgical necessity. These alternatives include other biologics or emerging small molecules, although the evidence supporting these treatments remains extremely low, even considering their well-documented and promising efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe UC. Conversely, it is necessary to investigate whether infliximab can be effectively replaced or surpassed by other approved biological agents and small molecules as first-line therapy after steroid resistance. This review aims to summarise the available evidence on small molecules, specifically Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators.

Janus kinase inhibitors in the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

One-third of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) are steroid-refractory. Cyclosporine and infliximab are currently the mainstays of salvage therapy. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) could play a role in the treatment of ASUC.

AIM

To review the evidence on JAKi in the management of ASUC.

METHODS

We performed a bibliographic search to identify studies focusing on the treatment of ASUC with JAKi.

RESULTS

Potential advantages of JAKi for the management of ASUC include their oral administration, rapid onset of action, short half-life, lack of immunogenicity, and effectiveness in patients with prior biologic exposure. Thirty studies (including 373 patients) have evaluated the efficacy of tofacitinib in ASUC, with a response rate (avoidance of colectomy) ranging between 43% and 100%, with a weighted mean of 82%. Experience with upadacitinib is more limited (only 10 studies and 74 patients are available) but also encouraging: mean colectomy-free rate ranging between 67% and 100%, with a weighted mean of 79%. However, experience with filgotinib in ASUC is currently nonexistent. Regarding safety, the available data does not reveal any new safety concerns when JAKi are used in ASUC, although follow-up periods are still short.

CONCLUSION

JAKi seems to be a promising treatment option for ASUC, with both tofacitinib and upadacitinib achieving colectomy-free rates of approximately 80%. Further studies are essential to define whether JAKi can replace cyclosporine/infliximab as second-line therapy for the medical management of ASUC, or whether they can even be used as initial treatment in place of intravenous corticosteroids.

US National Estimates of Contemporary Mortality Rates in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Undergoing Colectomy

INTRODUCTION

Despite a growing armamentarium of medical therapies for ulcerative colitis, colectomy remains an important therapeutic option. To better inform shared decision-making about surgery, we estimated the contemporary risk of mortality after colectomy.

METHODS

Mortality rates were estimated using the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020). Factors associated with postcolectomy death were evaluated in multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Postcolectomy mortality occurred in 1.2% (95% CI: 0.8%, 1.9%) of hospitalizations. Comorbidity burden, emergent laparotomy, and delays to surgery >5 days after admission were associated with mortality.

DISCUSSION

Colectomy may be associated with mortality; however, this risk is heterogeneous based on patient- and procedural-related factors.

Small Molecules, Big Results: How JAK Inhibitors Have Transformed the Treatment of Patients with IBD

Small molecule Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have revolutionized the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) through their low immunogenicity, safety, and consistent pharmacologic response that are superior to existing therapeutic options. In this perspective, we highlight existing evidence supporting the use of currently approved JAK inhibitors (upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and filgotinib) for UC or CD, additionally emphasizing the evidence for their use in related autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies. Our perspective concludes with a review of the existing comparative effectiveness literature, which positions JAK inhibitors, particularly upadacitinib, favorably compared with other biologic therapies. This perspective is paired with a companion publication highlighting the origins and development of JAK inhibitors and a more in-depth review of their pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Comprehensive care of ulcerative colitis: new treatment strategies

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon driven by aberrant immune activation. Although advanced medical therapies form the cornerstone of ulcerative colitis management, unmet needs include failure to induce and sustain remission in a substantial proportion of patients and in managing acute severe ulcerative colitis. We review new treatment strategies that might improve patient outcomes in the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database, including studies published from inception to October 2024, selected for their relevance. Recognizing current limitations, this article reviews strategies to improve treatment outcomes in ulcerative colitis using advanced therapies. These approaches include early treatment initiation, dose optimization, positioning newer agents as first-line therapies, combination therapy, targeting novel therapeutic endpoints, and the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis.

EXPERT OPINION

The strategies discussed may contribute to establishing new standards of care aimed at achieving long-term remission and enhancing patient outcomes. Personalized therapy, which tailors treatment based on individual disease characteristics and risk factors, is anticipated to become a critical aspect of delivering more effective care in the future.

Disseminated Chickenpox Following Live Varicella Vaccination in a Crohn's Disease Patient on Combination Immunosuppression

Novel therapeutics used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease pose an increased risk of viral reactivation in patients. We present a case of a patient with refractory Crohn's disease (CD) who developed primary varicella (chickenpox) of a vaccine-viral strain after receiving combination immunosuppression with high-dose corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), and a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) in the hospital. While this patient recovered and did not experience long term adverse effects, her case provides an opportunity for improvement. To improve safety, healthcare facilities should develop protocols that use electronic medical records enhanced with clinical decision support systems to identify and protect immunocompromised patients from inappropriate live vaccinations.

[Treatment of severe flares in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis]

BACKGROUND

In chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), severe flares are characterized by intense inflammatory activity and a high disease burden for patients. Treatment addresses both short-term goals (e.g., symptom reduction, prevention of complications) and long-term goals (sustained clinical steroid-free remission and healing of inflammatory lesions, known as "mucosal healing").

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

To present evidence-based, targeted diagnostics and stepwise treatment of severe flares in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), in order to prevent complications, including mortality, and to achieve rapid remission.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Selective literature review, including German and European guidelines for the treatment of severe flares.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

After ruling out complications (e.g., infections, strictures, abscesses, toxic megacolon), based on a structured assessment of disease severity, intravenous steroid therapy is indicated in severe acute flares for both CD and UC, which should lead to improvement within the first 72 h. If no improvement occurs, medical therapy must be intensified. Various therapeutics, including biologics targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, α4ß7 integrins, interleukin (IL)-12/23 or IL-23, as well as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, sphingosine 1‑phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators, and calcineurin inhibitors, are available today, but there is no clear algorithm preferring one drug for CD or UC. Instead, treatment should be selected based on approvals, the patient's medical history, prior treatment, risk profile, and potential complications. Surgical options must always be considered as part of close interdisciplinary care.

Filgotinib to Treat Acute Severe Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Introduction

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a serious complication affecting 9%-15% of patients with UC within 3 months of diagnosis and up to 28% of patients during the course of the disease. Despite the use of infliximab and calcineurin inhibitors, the rate of colectomy remains high both during the hospitalization and in the 5 years after an acute episode. We present a case of ASUC that was unresponsive to conventional therapies but was successfully treated with filgotinib.

Case Presentation

A 21-year-old male with a recent diagnosis of UC presented to our hospital with a severe flare. He received rescue therapy of high-dose intravenous steroids and 10 mg/kg infliximab. We observed little clinical and biochemical benefits. The patient declined the surgical option. Therefore, we decided to start a second rescue therapy with a new and rapid-acting Janus kinase inhibitor, filgotinib, due to its characteristics and pharmacokinetic profile of rapid absorption and metabolism. The patient showed an immediate clinical and biochemical response at 48 h, an endoscopic response at week 3, and an endoscopic remission at week 10. No recurrence was observed after 12 months of follow-up. The patient is in clinical remission with a good quality of life.

Conclusion

Filgotinib may be an effective second-line therapy in an emergency setting such as ASUC in patients unresponsive to conventional therapy.

Recent Advances in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Acute severe ulcerative colitis is a medical emergency requiring inpatient treatment with intravenous steroids. Approximately one-third of patients do not respond to steroids sufficiently and require medical rescue therapy. Infliximab and cyclosporine are equally effective rescue agents, though infliximab is often preferred by clinicians for ease of use and greater familiarity. The use of cyclosporine is becoming more frequent, however, in patients previously exposed to infliximab. Those patients not exhibiting an adequate response to rescue therapy require colectomy. There is increasing interest in modified medical treatment to rescue the need for surgery. Janus kinase inhibitors may provide benefits when used alongside steroids from admission or as a rescue agent, but further randomised trials are needed to clearly establish their role. Intensified dosing of infliximab when used as a rescue therapy has shown mixed results but seems sensible in patients with low albumin and high disease burden. In this review, we describe the current established treatment pathways and report newer developments and evolving concepts that may in the future improve the care of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Clinical Trial Design Considerations for Hospitalised Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Flares and Application to Study Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in the NIDDK HBOT-UC Consortium

BACKGROUND

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who are hospitalised for acute severe flares represent a high-risk orphan population.

AIM

To provide guidance for clinical trial design methodology in these patients.

METHODS

We created a multi-centre consortium to design and conduct a clinical trial for a novel therapeutic intervention (hyperbaric oxygen therapy) in patients with UC hospitalised for moderate-severe flares. During planning, we identified and addressed specific gaps for inclusion/exclusion criteria; disease activity measures; pragmatic trial design considerations within care pathways for hospitalised patients; standardisation of care delivery; primary and secondary outcomes; and sample size and statistical analysis approaches.

RESULTS

The Truelove-Witt criteria should not be used in isolation. Endoscopy is critical for defining eligible populations. Patient-reported outcomes should include rectal bleeding and stool frequency, with secondary measurement of urgency and nocturnal bowel movements. Trial design needs to be tailored to care pathways, with early intervention focused on replacing and/or optimising responsiveness to steroids and later interventions focused on testing novel rescue agents or strategies. The PRECIS-2 framework offers a means of tailoring to local populations. We provide standardisation of baseline testing, venous thromboprophylaxis, steroid dosing, discharge criteria and post-discharge follow-up to avoid confounding by usual care variability. Statistical considerations are provided given the small clinical trial nature of this population.

CONCLUSION

We provide an outline for framework decisions made for the hyperbaric oxygen trial in patients hospitalised for UC flares. Future research should focus on the remaining gaps identified.

Corticosteroids combined with infliximab vs. corticosteroids sequential infliximab for acute severe ulcerative colitis with mucosal deficiency: a retrospective study

Introduction

Mucosal deficiency is one of the most challenging conditions in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Intravenous corticosteroids (CS) are the first-line treatment, with infliximab (IFX) used as a rescue therapy. However, the efficacy remains unsatisfactory. We investigated whether CS combined with IFX as first-line therapy would improve outcomes in patients with ASUC with mucosal deficiency.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease center. The primary outcomes included clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, and endoscopic remission at week 14. The secondary outcomes included the colectomy rate within 90 days and durable clinical remission.

Results

A total of 43 patients with ASUC with mucosal deficiency were included in the analysis (25 in the CS combined with the IFX group and 18 in the CS sequential IFX group). At week 14, endoscopic improvement was observed in 21 of 25 patients (84.0%) receiving the CS combined with the IFX regimen, compared to 9 of 18 (50.0%) patients receiving the CS sequential IFX regimen (p = 0.017). Durable clinical remission rates were significantly higher in the combined group than in the sequential group (85.7% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinical and endoscopic remission at week 14 or colectomy rate within 90 days. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the CS combined with the IFX regimen was an independent predictive factor for a higher endoscopic improvement rate at week 14 (odds ratio (OR) 8.428, 95%confidence interval (CI) 1.539-46.153, p = 0.014) and a higher durable clinical remission rate (OR 10.800, 95%CI 2.095-55.666, p = 0.004).

Conclusion

CS combined with IFX as first-line therapy may be an effective induction strategy in patients with ASUC with mucosal deficiency. Further large-scale, multicenter prospective studies are needed.

2D4, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD132, is a promising treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus

Current therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus that target a particular factor or cell type exhibit limited effectiveness. To address this limitation, our focus was on CD132, a subunit common to six inflammatory factor receptors implicated in SLE. Our study revealed heightened CD132 expression in SLE patients' lymphocytes, contributing to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and immunoglobulins. We developed a novel humanized anti-CD132 monoclonal antibody, named as 2D4. 2D4 efficiently blocked IL-21 and IL-15, with limited effectiveness against IL-2, thereby suppressing T and B cells without disrupting immune tolerance. In the mouse immunization model, 2D4 virtually inhibited T cell-dependent, antigen-specific B-cell response. In lupus murine models, 2D4 mitigated inflammation by suppressing multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines and anti-dsDNA antibody titers, also diminishing proteinuria and glomerulonephritis. Compared to Belimumab, 2D4 exhibited superior efficacy in ameliorating the inflammatory state and preserving renal function. Moreover, 2D4 exhibited the ability to inhibit the production of pro-inflammatory factors and autoantibodies in PBMCs from individuals with SLE, highlighting its therapeutic potential for SLE individuals. Potent, 2D4 has the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes in SLE and other complex autoimmune disorders.

Upadacitinib as salvage therapy in adolescents with acute severe ulcerative colitis refractory to conventional treatments

Objectives

Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults. Current standard management for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) involves intravenous corticosteroids (IVCS) followed by infliximab (IFX) salvage therapy. Limited data exist on the utility of UPA in ASUC, particularly in adolescents. This case series reports the use of UPA as salvage therapy in hospitalized adolescents experiencing ASUC refractory to IFX.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients with ASUC who received UPA as salvage therapy after initiation of IVCS and failure of IFX.

Results

Three adolescents were hospitalized with ASUC for which IFX infusion treatments were unsuccessful. Initiation of UPA enabled patients to improve their Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index scores to ≤35 and be discharged home. Hospitalization course, complications, and follow-up information are provided.

Conclusion

UPA is a promising short-term salvage therapy in adolescent ASUC cases resistant to conventional treatments. Prospective studies are warranted to elucidate its long-term efficacy and safety in this specific population. These findings provide a novel therapeutic avenue for managing ASUC in adolescents, offering hope for those encountering treatment challenges.

Tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis: A promising treatment option

A single center retrospective clinical study revealed the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). This study has clinical reference value but also has some limitations. Previous studies, including this clinical trial, have shown that tofacitinib could be a promising treatment option for UC, but further clinical research is required to prove this point.

Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Infliximab-Experienced Patients

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening complication of ulcerative colitis (UC) that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality, with a substantial number of patients needing colectomy. Infliximab (IFX) has been increasingly used as a rescue therapy for patients who have failed intravenous steroids and has been more frequently used as an induction and maintenance therapy in moderate-to-severe UC. Therefore, the number of patients admitted with ASUC previously exposed to IFX has been increasing, raising additional challenges in the medical management of these patients to avoid emergent colectomy. This narrative review intends to summarise the most recent evidence in the medical management of steroid-refractory ASUC patients previously exposed to IFX and to propose a treatment algorithm for approaching this difficult-to-treat group of patients.

Defining management strategies for acute severe ulcerative colitis using predictive models: a simulation-modeling study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Robust management algorithms are required to reduce the residual risk of colectomy in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) refractory to standard infliximab salvage therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and benefits of alternative ASUC management strategies using simulated prediction models of varying accuracy.

METHODS

This was a simulation-based modeling study using a hypothetical cohort of 5,000 steroid-refractory ASUC patients receiving standard infliximab induction. Simulated predictive models were used to risk-stratify patients and escalate treatment in patients at high risk of failing standard infliximab induction. The main outcome of interest was colectomy by 3 months.

RESULTS

The 3-month colectomy rate in the base scenario where all 5,000 patients received standard infliximab induction was 23%. The best-performing management strategy assigned high-risk patients to sequential Janus kinase inhibitor inhibition and mediumrisk patients to accelerated infliximab induction. Using a 90% area under the curve (AUC) prediction model and optimistic treatment efficacy assumptions, this strategy reduced the 3-month colectomy rate to 8% (65% residual risk reduction). Using an 80% AUC prediction model with only modest treatment efficacy assumptions, the 3-month colectomy rate was reduced to 15% (35% residual risk reduction). Overall management strategy efficacy was highly dependent on predictive model accuracy and underlying treatment efficacy assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to simulate predictive model-based management strategies in steroid-refractory ASUC and evaluate their effect on short-term colectomy rates. Future studies on predictive model development should incorporate simulation studies to better understand their expected benefit.

Utility of Tofacitinib in Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

In recent years, tofacitinib has been used in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) as a rescue therapy with encouraging success rates. We present details of four patients with steroid-refractory ASUC treated with tofacitinib. All the patients were biologics-naive. Tofacitinib was initiated in a dose of 10 mg three times daily in three patients and 10 mg twice daily in the remaining patient. Three of the four patients improved and were discharged in clinical remission. These patients continue to be in colectomy-free and steroid-free remission on follow-up. The remaining patient did not respond to tofacitinib and required a colectomy. No adverse event related to tofacitinib use was noted in any of these four patients.

What to do when traditional rescue therapies fail in acute severe ulcerative colitis

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency that affects approximately 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis at some point in time in their lives. Outcomes of ASUC are highly variable. Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to corticosteroids and up to 50% of patients do not respond to rescue therapy (infliximab or cyclosporin) and require emergency colectomy. Data are emerging on infliximab dosing strategies, use of cyclosporin as a bridge to slower acting biologic agents and Janus kinase inhibition as primary and sequential therapy. In this review, we outline contemporary approaches to clinical management of ASUC in the setting of failure to respond to traditional rescue therapies.

Understanding the Perspectives and Experiences of Patients with Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Hospital: A Qualitative Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-treating presentation of ulcerative colitis (UC) that requires prompt initiation of treatment to avoid complication. Unfortunately, outcomes for ASUC are suboptimal, with as many as 20-30% of patients requiring colectomy. This can be challenging for patients and highlights the need to understand patient experiences and perspectives navigating ASUC.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study utilizing semi-structured interviews was conducted to understand perspectives and experiences of patients navigating ASUC. Adult patients hospitalized for ASUC between January 2017 and March 2024 were eligible. Interviews were conducted both retrospectively among patients with a recent hospitalization and prospectively among patients within 24 h of hospitalization for ASUC. Interviews were analyzed using a well-established hybrid inductive-deductive approach.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (44.2% response rate) hospitalized for ASUC were interviewed. Hybrid thematic analysis uncovered five major themes: (1) the pervasive impact of UC on QoL and mental health, (2) challenges associated with navigating uncertainty, (3) prioritizing colon preservation, (4) bridging the divide between outpatient expectations and inpatient realities, and (5) balancing rapid symptom improvement with steroid safety. Our findings advocate for transparent approach to care, emphasizing the need for effective communication, education, and better alignment with patient values and expectations.

CONCLUSION

Five key themes were identified, each with significant implications for developing a more patient-centered approach to ASUC care. These themes captured meaningful insight into patient perceptions and experiences, identifying multiple areas for actionable interventions to improve care.

Clinical settings with tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis

There are aspects of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, specifically tofacitinib, that distinguish them from other drugs used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), such as their oral administration, their short half-life and their lack of immunogenicity. With the available evidence, we can highlight tofacitinib's quick action and flexibility of use, and its efficacy in patients, irrespective of whether or not they have previously been exposed to TNF inhibitors (anti-TNF drugs) and other biologic agents. Moreover, their safety profile is known and manageable, with certain considerations and precautions being factored in before and during treatment. In this review, we have defined various scenarios pertaining to this drug, e.g. its use in the event of failure or intolerance to previous treatment with biologics, when a quick response is required or in patients with other concurrent immune-mediated diseases.

Efficacy of Upadacitinib As a Second-line JAK Inhibitor in Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Series

Upadacitinib, a recently approved Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor specific for JAK1, may be a promising candidate in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who present no response or intolerance to first-line JAK inhibitors. We assessed the therapeutic impact of upadacitinib on six UC patients who demonstrated an inadequate response or intolerance to tofacitinib or filgotinib. After 2 months of treatment, 5 patients (83.3%) achieved clinical remission, and all patients experienced decreased levels of C-reactive protein. One patient had coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia and showed a mild increase in transaminase levels. This case series highlights the potential utility of a rotation strategy among JAK inhibitors.

Tofacitinib in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (TACOS): A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment of patients hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). However, 30%-40% of the patients are refractory to corticosteroids. We investigated whether addition of tofacitinib to corticosteroids improved the treatment responsiveness in patients with ASUC.

METHODS

This single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized adult patients with ASUC (defined by the Truelove Witts severity criteria) to receive either tofacitinib (10 mg thrice daily) or a matching placebo for 7 days while continuing intravenous corticosteroids (hydrocortisone 100 mg every 6 hours). The primary end point was response to treatment (decline in the Lichtiger index by >3 points and an absolute score <10 for 2 consecutive days without the need for rescue therapy) by day 7. The key secondary outcome was the cumulative probability of requiring initiation of infliximab or undergoing colectomy within 90 days following randomization. All analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group (53 to tofacitinib and 51 to placebo). At day 7, response to treatment was achieved in 44/53 (83.01%) patients receiving tofacitinib vs 30/51 (58.82%) patients receiving placebo (odds ratio 3.42, 95% confidence interval 1.37-8.48, P = 0.007). The need for rescue therapy by day 7 was lower in the tofacitinib arm (odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.78, P = 0.01). The cumulative probability of need for rescue therapy at day 90 was 0.13 in patients who received tofacitinib vs 0.38 in patients receiving placebo (log-rank P = 0.003). Most of the treatment-related adverse effects were mild. One patient, receiving tofacitinib, developed dural venous sinus thrombosis.

DISCUSSION

In patients with ASUC, combination of tofacitinib and corticosteroids improved treatment responsiveness and decreased the need for rescue therapy.

Colombian experience with the use of tofacitinib in severe acute ulcerative colitis: A case series study

INTRODUCTION

Tofacitinib is indicated in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC); however, given its rapid onset of action, it may constitute an alternative in patients with hospitalized severe acute UC. There are few data on this indication in the literature. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the management of patients with hospitalized UC, as well as its clinical characteristics and other treatment patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Descriptive observational study of adults and children with CUAG treated with tofacitinib between June 2019 and December 2022 in Colombia. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected, therapeutic response was evaluated in different periods of time and descriptive analysis of quantitative and qualitative variables was performed.

RESULTS

Six patients (five adults and one pediatric), mean age 33.2 (SD: 8.5) years, with CUAG. Symptom remission was obtained in 100% of patients at day 7 after tofacitinib initiation. In three patients information was obtained beyond 6 months, with 100% clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission and without requiring colectomy. In the case of the pediatric patient, symptom remission was achieved one week after starting tofacitinib, remaining in clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission beyond 6 months. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib represents a rescue therapeutic alternative in CUAG, with rapid clinical response, adequate tolerance and less need for colectomy, being sustained for periods beyond 6 months.

Real-Life Efficacy of Tofacitinib in Various Situations in Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Worldwide Multicenter Collaborative Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Tofacitinib (TFB) appears to be effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC); however, available real-world studies are limited by cohort size. TFB could be an option in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). We aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of TFB in moderate-to-severe colitis and ASUC.

METHODS

This retrospective, international cohort study enrolling UC patients with ≥6-week follow-up period was conducted from February 1 to July 31, 2022. Indications were categorized as ASUC and chronic activity (CA). Baseline demographic and clinical data were obtained. Steroid-free remission (SFR), colectomy, and safety data were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 391 UC patients (median age 38 [interquartile range, 28-47] years; follow-up period 26 [interquartile range, 14-52] weeks) were included. A total of 27.1% received TFB in ASUC. SFR rates were 23.7% (ASUC: 26.0%, CA: 22.8%) at week 12 and 41.1% (ASUC: 34.2%, CA: 43.5%) at week 52. The baseline partial Mayo score (odds ratio [OR], 0.850; P = .006) was negatively associated with week 12 SFR, while biologic-naïve patients (OR, 2.078; P = .04) more likely achieved week 52 SFR. The colectomy rate at week 52 was higher in ASUC group (17.6% vs 5.7%; P < .001) and decreased with age (OR, 0.94; P = .013). A total of 67 adverse events were reported, and 17.9% resulted in cessation of TFB. One case of thromboembolic event was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

TFB is effective in both studied indications. TFB treatment resulted in high rates of SFR in the short and long terms. Higher baseline disease activity and previous biological therapies decreased efficacy. No new adverse event signals were found.

Effectiveness and safety of a third-line rescue treatment for acute severe ulcerative colitis refractory to infliximab or ciclosporin (REASUC study)

BACKGROUND

The advent of new therapeutic agents and the improvement of supporting care might change the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) and avoid colectomy.

AIMS

To evaluate the colectomy-free survival and safety of a third-line treatment in patients with ASUC refractory to intravenous steroids and who failed either infliximab or ciclosporin.

METHODS

Multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients with ASUC refractory to intravenous steroids who had failed infliximab or ciclosporin and received a third-line treatment during the same hospitalisation. Patients who stopped second-line treatment due to disease activity or adverse events (AEs) were eligible. We assessed short-term colectomy-free survival by logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for long-term assessment.

RESULTS

Among 78 patients, 32 received infliximab and 46 ciclosporin as second-line rescue treatment. Third-line treatment was infliximab in 45 (58%), ciclosporin in 17 (22%), tofacitinib in 13 (17%) and ustekinumab in 3 (3.8%). Colectomy was performed in 29 patients (37%) during follow-up (median 21 weeks). Of the 78 patients, 32 and 18 were in clinical remission at, respectively, 12 and 52 weeks. At the last visit, 25 patients were still on third-line rescue treatment, while 12 had stopped it due to clinical remission. AEs were reported in 26 (33%) patients. Two patients died (2.6%), including one following colectomy.

CONCLUSION

Third-line rescue treatment avoided colectomy in over half of the patients with ASUC and may be considered a therapeutic strategy.

Upadacitinib as Rescue Therapy for the Treatment of Acute Severe Colitis in an Acute Care Setting

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic, relapsing, and remitting inflammatory disorder that despite advances in medical therapy often requires hospitalization for treatment of acute flares with intravenous corticosteroids. Many patients will not respond to corticosteroids and require infliximab or cyclosporine as rescue therapy. If medical therapy fails, definitive surgical management is required. Recently, Janus Kinase inhibitors, including upadacitinib, have been proposed as an alternative rescue therapy.

AIMS

We hypothesized that upadacitinib may be effective in treating acute severe colitis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 12 inflammatory bowel disease patients admitted for acute severe colitis who received upadacitinib induction therapy was performed. The rates of surgery, repeat or prolonged steroid use, and re-admission within 90 days of index hospitalization were measured. The need for re-induction with upadacitinib, change in medical therapy, rates of clinical remission, change in 6-point partial Mayo score, and laboratory markers of inflammation were measured as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Five patients met the primary composite endpoint including four patients requiring surgery and one additional patient being unable to withdraw steroids within 90 days of hospital discharge. One patient required re-induction with upadacitinib within 90 days and no patients required change in medical therapy within 90 days. Most patients who did not undergo surgery were in clinical remission within 90 days and showed clinical improvement with decreased 6-point partial Mayo scores.

CONCLUSION

Upadacitinib may be effective salvage therapy for acute severe colitis, but larger controlled trials are required to validate these results.

Effectiveness of Upadacitinib for Patients With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter Experience

INTRODUCTION

A significant proportion of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) require colectomy.

METHODS

Patients with ASUC treated with upadacitinib and intravenous corticosteroids at 5 hospitals are presented. The primary outcome was 90-day colectomy rate. Secondary outcomes included frequency of steroid-free clinical remission, adverse events, and all-cause readmissions.

RESULTS

Of the 25 patients with ASUC treated with upadacitinib, 6 (24%) patients underwent colectomy, 15 (83%) of the 18 patients with available data and who did not undergo colectomy experienced steroid-free clinical remission (1 patient did not have complete data), 1 (4%) patient experienced a venous thromboembolic event, while 5 (20%) patients were readmitted.

DISCUSSION

Upadacitinib along with intravenous corticosteroids may be an effective treatment for ASUC.

Biologics, Small Molecules and More in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Present and the Future

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of heterogeneous chronic inflammatory diseases of the gut presenting with intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations. Most cases fit in predominantly two types, namely, ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. The incidence of IBD has been increasing steadily in the past three decades. Focused research has resulted in many therapeutic options. Biologics (derived from humans or animals) and small molecules have emerged as the cornerstone in the management of IBD and have become widely available. Currently, monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab), integrins (vedolizumab and natalizumab), and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 antagonists (ustekinumab), along with small molecules (tofacitinib), are approved for use. This article summarizes various aspects of these drugs, like clinical pharmacology, indications for use in IBD, safety in pregnancy and lactation, and the adverse effects profile based on the studies leading to their approval. This review also focuses on the recent advances and future perspectives specific to biologics in IBD.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis management: unanswered questions and latest insights

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a distinctive ulcerative colitis flare presentation characterised by the presence of systemic inflammation as well as bloody diarrhoea, and occurs at least once in 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their disease course. Each episode carries a risk of complications, need for colectomy, and mortality. Little is known about ASUC pathogenesis, although impaired host-microbiota crosstalk involving pathobionts is suspected. In this Review, we discuss unanswered questions and results from the latest research on the medical-first-line, second-line, and potential third-line therapies-and surgical management of ASUC. We detail promising options for management, such as the use of enteral nutrition in combination with intravenous steroids, the ability to predict early failure of first-line or second-line therapies, and the emerging role of JAK inhibitors. An optimal framework to personalise therapy on the basis of multiomics tools is yet to be developed.

Modern practical management of acute severe colitis

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is one of life-threatening complications that occur in one-fifth of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with significant morbidity and an estimated mortality rate up to 1%. There are no validated clinical scoring systems for ASUC. Intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone for the management of ASUC patients However, one-third of patients are steroid refractory and require colectomy in the pre-biologic era or salvage therapy in the post-biologic era. The currently available predictors of non-response to steroids and salvages therapy are sub-optimal. Furthermore, there is a need for the development of clear outcome measures for ASUC patients. Although infliximab and cyclosporin are both effective as salvage therapy, they still carry a rate of treatment failure. Hence, there is an unmet need to explore alternative therapeutic options before colectomy particularly in prior infliximab-exposed patients. This may include the introduction of small molecules with rapid onset of action as a salvage or sequential therapy and the use of slow-onset other biological therapy after "bridging" with cyclosporine. In this article, we explore the current best evidence-based practice and detail the gaps in knowledge in the management of ASUC.

Long-term outcomes of cyclosporin induction and ustekinumab maintenance combination therapy in patients with steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Effective management of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a major challenge and there remains a paucity of available maintenance treatment options after efficacious cyclosporin induction therapy.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the long-term effectiveness and safety of cyclosporin and ustekinumab combination therapy in patients with steroid refractory ASUC.

DESIGN

Monocentric, prospective study.

METHODS

We included patients with steroid refractory ASUC with multiple failed prior advanced therapies, who were treated with cyclosporin and ustekinumab combination therapy.

RESULTS

Among the 11 included patients, 10 had prior failure to infliximab and 8 failed at least three previous biological therapies. The mean baseline Mayo and Lichtiger scores were 10.9 (9-12) and 13.3 (11-14), respectively. Ustekinumab was initiated 3.2 weeks (1-8) after initiation of cyclosporin treatment and combination therapy was continued for a mean of 11.5 (4-20) weeks. Clinical response was achieved in six patients at week 16 and clinical steroid-free clinical remission in five patients at week 48. Endoscopic remission was achieved in five patients at week 16 and together with histological remission in five patients at week 52. Intestinal ultrasound demonstrated mean bowel wall thickening in the sigmoid colon of 5.5 mm at baseline and 3.5 mm at week 52, respectively. Two patients had to undergo colectomy (mean 4.5 months, range 3-6) and three stopped ustekinumab therapy due to ineffectiveness. Overall, combination therapy was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Combination of cyclosporin and ustekinumab therapy allowed nearly half of ASUC patients to reach clinical and endoscopic remission after 52 weeks, warranting further studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Upadacitinib Salvage Therapy for Infliximab-Experienced Patients with Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] is a medical emergency treated with intravenous steroids followed by infliximab or cyclosporin in the case of steroid failure with emergent colectomy required in refractory or severe cases. Case series have reported on the effectiveness of tofacitinib for refractory disease, but data regarding the effectiveness of upadacitinib in this setting have not been previously reported. We describe the use of upadacitinib therapy for steroid-refractory ASUC in patients with prior loss of response to infliximab.

METHODS

Six patients who received upadacitinib for steroid-refractory ASUC were identified at two Australian tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centres. Patients were followed for up to 16 weeks after discharge with clinical, biochemical and intestinal ultrasound [IUS] outcomes.

RESULTS

All six patients demonstrated clinical response to upadacitinib induction during their inpatient admission. Four patients achieved corticosteroid-free clinical remission by week 8, including complete resolution of rectal bleeding and transmural healing assessed by IUS, and sustained clinical remission at week 16. One patient proceeded to colectomy at week 15 due to refractory disease. No adverse events directly attributable to upadacitinib were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Upadacitinib may have a role as a safe and effective salvage therapy for steroid-refractory ASUC in patients who have previously failed to respond to infliximab therapy. Prospective studies are required to determine the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib use in this setting before routine use can be recommended.

Are All Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Inflammatory Bowel Disease the Same?

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are chronic, progressive inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) and are without a known cure. Janus kinase (JAK) is a family of cytosolic tyrosine kinases that mediate signal transduction in response to extracellular stimuli. Abrogating the proinflammatory cytokine signaling cascades using JAK inhibitors (jakinibs) has been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of numerous inflammatory diseases, including IBD. Jakinibs currently licensed for moderate-to-severe IBD include the first-generation, nonselective tofacitinib and the second-generation JAK1-selective inhibitors filgotinib (licensed outside of the United States) and upadacitinib; several other jakinibs in the therapeutic pipeline are in various stages of clinical development. The jakinib class of small-molecule drugs share numerous commonalities such as their oral administration, nonimmunogenicity, short half-life, rapid onset of action, and the same class-wide regulatory restrictions owing to safety concerns. However, jakinibs differ on several fronts, translating into important clinical practice points for health care providers managing IBD patients. This article provides an overview of the jakinib class in IBD, examines how each drug differs in terms of pharmacology as well as efficacy and safety, and offers perspectives on challenges that remain and future opportunities.

Real-world efficacy and safety of advanced therapies in hospitalized patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

This multicenter observational cohort study aimed to evaluate the utilization and short-term efficacy of advanced therapy (AT) in hospitalized patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC).

METHODS

In total, 221 patients with ASUC were enrolled between August 2020 and July 2021. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (CR, defined as a patient-reported outcome score < 2 with no blood in the stool) rate on Day 7 and 14 in hospitalized patients who received corticosteroids (CS) and AT.

RESULTS

Among patients with ASUC, 120 and 101 patients received CS or any AT as first-line treatment, respectively. The CR rates on Day 7 and 14 were 22.5% and 35.0%, respectively, in hospitalized patients who received CS as first-line treatment. Most patients who used ATs had CS-dependent or frequent recurrences. Eight different ATs (apheresis, tacrolimus, infliximab, golimumab, tofacitinib, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and cyclosporine) were used as first-line treatment in patients with ASUC, and the CR rates on Day 7 and 14 were 16.8% and 29.7%, respectively. Twenty-five patients received the second ATs after hospitalizations, and the CR rates on Day 7 and 14 were 0% and 12%, respectively. The CR rates on Day 14 were significantly higher in patients who changed to AT than in those whose dose of CS increased (34.0% vs 10.7%, p = 0.020) among patients who had already used CS before hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Most first-use ATs were effective for patients with ASUC, while second-use ATs might have had limited benefits in inducing CR. These findings may contribute to considerations for the management of hospitalized patients.

Systematic review: Scores used to predict outcomes in acute severe ulcerative colitis

Predictive scores for ASUC outcomes according to time of application.

Infliximab Induction Strategies in Corticosteroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Series and Literature Review

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is an emergent medical condition and particularly challenging to treat efficaciously. Infliximab is one of the medical salvage treatment options after corticosteroid refractoriness, but the best induction strategy is not yet defined. With this case series, the authors intend to describe three corticosteroid-refractory ASUC cases with different intensified/accelerated infliximab induction approaches and review the literature on this topic. The first case describes an 18-year-old girl with ASUC at disease onset with rapid progression to toxic megacolon, complicated also with anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and coagulopathy. After corticosteroid failure, both accelerated and intensified (10 mg/kg) infliximab regimen was completed within 11 days, with solid clinical response and colon imaging normalization. Second, we present a 26-year-old male with left-sided ulcerative colitis known for 2 years, under mesalazine, who developed a moderate flare and was started on infliximab after partial and inconsistent response to corticosteroids. During the induction period, he presented this time an ASUC episode, which motivated an early and intensified third dose with good clinical response. Finally, we describe the case of a 78-year-old man with ulcerative proctitis for 12 years presenting ASUC with proximal disease extension as well. After unsatisfactory response to corticosteroids, infliximab was initiated on an accelerated induction regimen, completed in 13 days, with the standard dose, achieving clinical remission. Accelerated or intensified infliximab induction plans are becoming current clinical practice in corticosteroid-refractory ASUC. Current guidelines refer to the possibility of this type of strategies, not determining the optimal regimen due to lack of solid evidence. Literature is mainly based on retrospective studies, not randomized, with heterogeneous groups according to disease severity, and the effect on colectomy rates, mainly on the long term, is not clear. Additional well-supported studies are needed on this subject in order to seek a more widely uniform approach.

The current role of Tofacitinib in acute severe ulcerative colitis in adult patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite rescue therapy, acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is associated with a high risk of colectomy, while treatment options remain limited. Tofacitinib, a rapidly acting Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is gaining ground as an effective alternative treatment option for the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis, which may prevent emergency colectomy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase was undertaken for studies of adult patients with ASUC treated with tofacitinib.

RESULTS

In total, two observational studies, seven case series and five case reports incorporating 134 patients who received tofacitinib in ASUC were identified with a follow-up period ranging from 30 days to 14 months. Overall, the pooled colectomy rate was 23.9% (95% CI 16.6-31.2). The pooled 90-day and 6-month colectomy free rate were 79.9% (95% CI 73.1-86.7) and 71.6% (95% CI 64-79.2) respectively. The most frequent adverse event was C. Difficile infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib appears to be a promising option for the treatment of ASUC. Randomized clinical trials are required to further access the efficacy, safety and optimal dose of tofacitinib in cases of ASUC.

Review article: Updated management of acute severe ulcerative colitis: From steroids to novel medical strategies

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) occurs in up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Therapeutic approaches have evolved during the past years with the increasing bio exposure of admitted patients and the extension of the number of approved drugs for UC. In this review, we aimed to summarize the latest evidence in short-term and long-term medical strategies for ASUC. In addition to general principles such as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, screening for triggering and worsening factors and close monitoring, first-line therapy for ASUC remains intravenous corticosteroids. In naive patients, the optimum maintenance strategy for steroid-responding patients does not necessarily include biologics. Second-line therapy includes infliximab or calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) with similar short- and long-term colectomy rates. Despite its pathophysiological relevance, there is insufficient evidence to promote intensified induction with infliximab. Prior treatment exposure is a cornerstone for guiding therapeutic choice of short- and long-term therapies in the context of ASUC: in anti-TNF exposed patients, CNIs may be favored as a bridge therapy to vedolizumab or ustekinumab. Third-line salvage therapy could be a therapeutic option in selected patients referred to expert centers. Additionally, evidence is accumulating regarding the use of tofacitinib in ASUC.

Ulcerative Colitis in Adults: A Review

Importance

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon, with a prevalence exceeding 400 per 100 000 in North America. Individuals with UC have a lower life expectancy and are at increased risk for colectomy and colorectal cancer.

Observations

UC impairs quality of life secondary to inflammation of the colon causing chronic diarrhea and rectal bleeding. Extraintestinal manifestations, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, occur in approximately 27% of patients with UC. People with UC require monitoring of symptoms and biomarkers of inflammation (eg, fecal calprotectin), and require colonoscopy at 8 years from diagnosis for surveillance of dysplasia. Risk stratification by disease location (eg, Montreal Classification) and disease activity (eg, Mayo Score) can guide management of UC. First-line therapy for induction and maintenance of remission of mild to moderate UC is 5-aminosalicylic acid. Moderate to severe UC may require oral corticosteroids for induction of remission as a bridge to medications that sustain remission (biologic monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor [eg, infliximab], α4β7 integrins [vedolizumab], and interleukin [IL] 12 and IL-23 [ustekinumab]) and oral small molecules that inhibit janus kinase (eg, tofacitinib) or modulate sphingosine-1-phosphate (ozanimod). Despite advances in medical therapies, the highest response to these treatments ranges from 30% to 60% in clinical trials. Within 5 years of diagnosis, approximately 20% of patients with UC are hospitalized and approximately 7% undergo colectomy. The risk of colorectal cancer after 20 years of disease duration is 4.5%, and people with UC have a 1.7-fold higher risk for colorectal cancer compared with the general population. Life expectancy in people with UC is approximately 80.5 years for females and 76.7 years for males, which is approximately 5 years shorter than people without UC.

Conclusions and Relevance

UC affects approximately 400 of every 100 000 people in North America. An effective treatment for mild to moderate UC is 5-aminosalicylic acid, whereas moderate to severe UC can be treated with advanced therapies that target specific inflammation pathways, including monoclonal antibodies to tumor necrosis factor, α4β7 integrins, and IL-12 and IL-23 cytokines, as well as oral small molecule therapies targeting janus kinase or sphingosine-1-phosphate.