Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Upper Endoscopy While on Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

Perioperative management of patients taking glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) multidisciplinary consensus statement

The perioperative management of patients using glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists remains a topic of debate. While several multisociety statements have been published recently, the recommendations vary significantly in terms of medication management and preoperative fasting protocols for these patients. This document represents a multidisciplinary consensus statement led by the Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI). It provides updated recommendations based on a modified Delphi process and supported by a systematic review of the current literature. The recommendations address management of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists perioperatively, and preoperative fasting times for both solids and liquids. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023438624).

Low Rates of Aborted Endoscopy Due to Gastric Food Retention in Patients on Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use has dramatically increased with expanded indications for weight loss. Delayed gastric emptying due to these medications can lead to residual food in the stomach, which can increase the risk of periprocedural aspiration during endoscopic procedures. The aim of this study is to document rates of gastric food retention and aspiration events during upper endoscopy in patients on GLP-1 RA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients who underwent upper endoscopic procedures at two hospitals during 2018-2023. Procedure abortion due to the presence of food was taken as primary study endpoint. The secondary endpoint was aspiration events in patients with food noted on endoscopy.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 32,275 total upper endoscopic procedures performed during the study period, 1179 procedures were performed in patients taking GLP-1 RAs (GLP-1 cohort). In total, 37 endoscopies (0.1%) were aborted due to retained gastric food; 7 patients (0.6%) in the GLP-1 cohort vs 30 patients (0.096%) in the non GLP-1 cohort (p < 0.01). There were no episodes of aspiration in patients with retained food.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large retrospective cohort, GLP-1 RA use did increase rates of gastric food retention during upper endoscopy, though the absolute risk was minimal. There were no aspiration events related to gastric food retention. Because of the small number of events, there were no clear modifiable risk factors for gastric food retention. This study supports the practice of individualized periprocedural management in patients on GLP-1 RA.

Outcomes of retained gastrointestinal debris during upper endoscopy

Background and study aims

Gastrointestinal debris retention (GIDR) during endoscopy can result in aborted procedures, intubation, and aspiration. GIDR has increased significance with uptake of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use. Outcome analysis is vital to risk-stratify patients with GIDR during endoscopy. Our study evaluated the effect of GIDR on endoscopic complications.

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopy between May 2016 and December 2021 with documented GIDR. The study included 138 patients with GIDR and 275 controls. Propensity score matching between patients with GIDR and controls was performed in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. T-tests and chi square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables.

Results

The GIDR group was younger and had lower BMI, with no difference in sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, or use of monitored anesthesia care. GIDR was more frequently encountered when indications were abnormal imaging, pain, and pancreatico-biliary. Amount of GIDR was quantified as "large" in 37.7% of cases and size of debris was associated with rate of aborted procedures.

Conclusions

Our study did not demonstrate a significant increase in post-procedure complications in patients with GIDR. Further, the GIDR group had higher rates of opiate use, which can guide stratification of retention risk.

Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Limited evidence exists regarding the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on upper endoscopy. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively review the available evidence on this subject.

METHODS

A systematic bibliographic search was carried out until May 2024. Pooled estimates were analyzed using a random-effects model, with results presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcome assessed was the rate of retained gastric content (RGC), while secondary outcomes included rates of aborted and repeated procedures, adverse event rate, and rates of aspiration.

RESULTS

This analysis included 13 studies involving a total of 84,065 patients. Patients receiving GLP-1RA therapy exhibited significantly higher rates of RGC (OR, 5.56; 95% CI, 3.35 to 9.23), a trend that was consistent among patients with diabetes (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.23 to 3.02). Adjusted analysis, accounting for variables such as sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, and other therapies, confirmed the elevated rates of RGC in the GLP-1RA user group (adjusted OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 3.42 to 5.15). Furthermore, rates of aborted and repeated procedures were higher in the GLP-1RA user group (OR, 5.13; 95% CI, 3.01 to 8.75; and OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.35; respectively). However, no significant differences were found in AE and aspiration rates between the 2 groups (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 0.63 to 26.03; and OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 4.77; respectively).

CONCLUSION

Use of GLP-1RAs is associated with increased retention of gastric contents and more frequent aborted procedures during upper endoscopy. However, the adverse event and aspiration rates do not seem different; therefore, adjusting fasting time instead of routinely withholding GLP-1RAs could be reasonable in these patients.

Evidence Report on the Safety of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients on Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are increasingly used worldwide for weight and hyperglycemia management. There is an ongoing debate on the presence of increased gastric residue, leading to complications such as aspiration and overall safety in patients receiving upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We aimed to study the effect of GLP-RAs on endoscopy outcomes. Methods: We conducted a detailed search of online databases to select the studies which provided details of the effects of GLP-RAs on patients undergoing endoscopy. The outcomes of interest were odds of retained gastric content (RGC), aspiration risk, and aborted and repeated procedures. A random effect model was used to calculate the pooled odds of outcomes with a 95% CI. We further calculated the pooled odds of predictive factors associated with an increased rate of retained gastric residues in the study population. Results: We included 12 studies with a total of 105,515 patients, of which 32,144 were on GLP-1 RAs and 73,273 were in the control group. A total of 234 (0.73%) aspiration events in GLP-RA users were noted compared to 257 (0.35%) events in the control group. No increased odds (1.26, 95% CI 0.86-1.87, I2 34%) of aspiration were found in GLP-1 users compared to the non-GLP-1 group. Patients on GLP-1 RA had increased RGC compared to the control group (OR 6.30, 95% CI 5.30-7.49, I2 0%). The pooled odds of aborted (OR 5.50, 95% CI 3.25-9.32, I2 0%) and repeated procedures (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.42-3.38, I2 0%) were significantly higher in GLP-1 RA users. Patients taking Tirazepatide had the highest percentage of RGC (18.9%), while exenatide users had the lowest rate (6.2%) of food retention. Patients undergoing concomitant colonoscopy were found to have significantly low pooled odds of RGC (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.04-0.48). GLP-1 RAs use was independently associated with increased odds of RGC (3.91, 95% CI 3.21-4.62, I2 0%). The results were homogenous and stayed consistent in the sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: Although the odds of RGC and aborted procedures are high in the GLP-1 RAs group compared to the control, no significant difference in the odds of aspiration was found between the two groups. Simple measures such as a clear liquid diet for 24 h, as routinely set for patients undergoing colonoscopy, may reduce the risk of retaining gastric residue in these patient populations.

Perioperative and periprocedural management of GLP-1 receptor-based agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors: narrative review and the STOP-GAP and STOP DKA-2 algorithms

The GLP-1 receptor-based agonists (GLP-1RAs) and SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are major twenty first century breakthroughs in diabetes and obesity medicine but there are important safety considerations regarding the perioperative and periprocedural management of individuals who are treated with these agents. GLP-1RAs have been linked to an increased risk of retained gastric contents and pulmonary aspiration while SGLT2i can be associated with diabetic ketoacidosis. This manuscript provides a narrative review of the available evidence for perioperative and periprocedural risks in people prescribed GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i. The authors provide expert opinion-driven recommendations and algorithms on how to safely manage GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i under perioperative/periprocedural settings.

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on endoscopy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are known to cause delayed gastric emptying; however, the effect on clinical outcomes during upper endoscopy and colonoscopy remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to reconcile the data.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for studies evaluating GLP-1RAs versus a control group (no GLP-1RAs) in patients undergoing endoscopy. The outcomes of interest were rate of retained gastric contents (RGCs), aborted procedures, aspiration events, and subjective bowel preparation quality. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies with 77,152 patients (4449 in the GLP-1RA arm and 72,703 in the control arm) were included. Mean patient age ranged from 47.6 to 72 years, and 58.4% were women. As compared with the control group, the GLP-1RA group had higher odds of RGCs (OR, 15.39; 95% CI, 4.65-50.99; P < .01) and aborted procedures (OR, 13.86; 95% CI, 4.42-43.43; P < .01). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of aspiration events (OR, 21.06; 95% CI, .13-3379.01; P = .24) and subjective bowel preparation quality (OR, .94; 95% CI, .67-1.31; P = .83).

CONCLUSIONS

Although statistical significance was reached in terms of visible RGCs and early termination of endoscopies in patients on GLP-1RAs, these events were overall rare. GLP-1RAs do not appear to pose significant risk, as the odds of developing aspiration were comparable in the 2 groups.

Clinical Consequences of Delayed Gastric Emptying With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Tirzepatide

CONTEXT

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) are established therapeutics for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Among other mechanisms, they slow gastric emptying and motility of the small intestine. This helps to limit postprandial glycemic excursions and reduce chylomicron formation and triglyceride absorption. Conversely, motility effects may have detrimental consequences, eg, retained gastric contents at endoscopy or general anesthesia, potentially complicated by pulmonary aspiration or bowel obstruction.

DATA ACQUISITION

We searched the PubMed database for studies involving GLP-1RA therapy and adverse gastrointestinal/biliary events.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Retained gastric contents at the time of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy are found more frequently with GLP-1 RAs but rarely are associated with pulmonary aspiration. Well-justified recommendations for the periprocedural management of GLP-1RAs (eg, whether to withhold these medications and for how long) are compromised by limited evidence. Important aspects to be considered are (1) their long half-lives, (2) the capacity of GLP-1 receptor agonism to slow gastric emptying even at physiological GLP-1 concentrations, (c) tachyphylaxis observed with prolonged treatment, and (d) the limited effect on gastric emptying in individuals with slow gastric emptying before initiating treatment. Little information is available on the influence of diabetes mellitus itself (ie, in the absence of GLP-1 RA treatment) on retained gastric contents and pulmonary aspiration.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged fasting periods regarding solid meal components, point-of-care ultrasound examination for retained gastric content, and the use of prokinetic medications like erythromycin may prove helpful and represent an important area needing further study to increase patient safety for those treated with GLP-1 RAs.

Impact of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: An Updated Review

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become one of the most popular medications for patients with diabetes and obesity. Due to their effects on gut motility via central or parasympathetic pathways, there have been concerns about an increased incidence of retained gastric contents and risk of aspiration in the perioperative period. Hence, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) recommends holding GLP-1 RAs on the procedure day or a week before the elective procedure based on the respective daily or weekly formulations, regardless of the dose, indication (obesity or diabetes), or procedure type. On the contrary, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) advises an individualized approach, stating that more data are needed to decide if and when the GLP-1 RAs should be held prior to elective endoscopy. Several retrospective and prospective studies, along with meta-analyses, have been published since then evaluating the role of GLP-1 RAs in patients scheduled for endoscopic procedures. In this review, we discuss the current clinical guidelines and available studies regarding the effect of GLP-1 RAs on GI endoscopies.

Real-World Impact of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Endoscopic Patient Outcomes in an Ambulatory Setting: A Retrospective Study at a Large Tertiary Center

Background: Glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are associated with delayed gastric emptying and may increase the risk of aspiration due to retained gastric contents. There are no guidelines on peri-endoscopic use of GLP-1 RAs, and real-world outcomes in an ambulatory setting remain unknown. This study reports real-world data from an ambulatory center associated with a large tertiary hospital. Methods: A retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted for patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at a hospital-based outpatient center from January to June 2023. Exclusions included non-elective procedures, current opioid use, altered foregut anatomy, and known gastroparesis. All patients were on GLP-1 RAs before endoscopy and followed standard fasting protocols. Adverse event rates were recorded, and patients were divided into cohorts based on GLP-1 RA use. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified risk factors for food retention and complications. Results: A total of 1438 patients underwent elective EGD during the study period. Among the 1046 patients included, 73 (7%) were on GLP-1 RAs. The procedure was aborted in four patients (0.4%) due to gastric food retention, with two (50%) on GLP-1 RAs. Independent risk factors for food retention included GLP-1 RA use (OR: 9.19; 95% CI: 2.73-30.8; p = 0.0003) and diabetes (OR 5.6; 95% CI: 1.72-18.2; p = 0.004). Tirzepatide showed the strongest association (p = 0.0056). Factors that did not impact food retention included A1c, BMI, and gender. Protective factors were age (OR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.99; p = 0.02) and same-day colonoscopy (OR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.58; p = 0.003). Conclusions: GLP-1 RA use in diabetics increases the risk of retained gastric contents during elective EGD, particularly with tirzepatide, without increasing aspiration risk. Patients undergoing simultaneous colonoscopy had a lower risk of retained gastric contents. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of GLP-1 RAs on gastric food retention and procedural risk.