Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Do Not Increase Aspiration During Upper Endoscopy in Patients With Diabetes

Perioperative management of patients taking glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) multidisciplinary consensus statement

The perioperative management of patients using glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists remains a topic of debate. While several multisociety statements have been published recently, the recommendations vary significantly in terms of medication management and preoperative fasting protocols for these patients. This document represents a multidisciplinary consensus statement led by the Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI). It provides updated recommendations based on a modified Delphi process and supported by a systematic review of the current literature. The recommendations address management of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists perioperatively, and preoperative fasting times for both solids and liquids. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023438624).

Low Rates of Aborted Endoscopy Due to Gastric Food Retention in Patients on Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use has dramatically increased with expanded indications for weight loss. Delayed gastric emptying due to these medications can lead to residual food in the stomach, which can increase the risk of periprocedural aspiration during endoscopic procedures. The aim of this study is to document rates of gastric food retention and aspiration events during upper endoscopy in patients on GLP-1 RA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients who underwent upper endoscopic procedures at two hospitals during 2018-2023. Procedure abortion due to the presence of food was taken as primary study endpoint. The secondary endpoint was aspiration events in patients with food noted on endoscopy.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 32,275 total upper endoscopic procedures performed during the study period, 1179 procedures were performed in patients taking GLP-1 RAs (GLP-1 cohort). In total, 37 endoscopies (0.1%) were aborted due to retained gastric food; 7 patients (0.6%) in the GLP-1 cohort vs 30 patients (0.096%) in the non GLP-1 cohort (p < 0.01). There were no episodes of aspiration in patients with retained food.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large retrospective cohort, GLP-1 RA use did increase rates of gastric food retention during upper endoscopy, though the absolute risk was minimal. There were no aspiration events related to gastric food retention. Because of the small number of events, there were no clear modifiable risk factors for gastric food retention. This study supports the practice of individualized periprocedural management in patients on GLP-1 RA.

Association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and peri-operative pulmonary aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are known to delay gastric emptying; however, the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and peri-operative pulmonary aspiration risk is not known. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarise the evidence on whether glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposure is associated with pulmonary aspiration or increased residual gastric content in fasted patients undergoing procedures requiring anaesthesia or sedation.

METHODS

We searched six databases for studies assessing peri-operative pulmonary aspiration or residual gastric contents in fasted patients or volunteers who were using any form of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. Pooled odds ratios were estimated for each outcome using random effects meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the GRADE framework.

RESULTS

Of 9010 screened studies, 28 observational studies were included. In a meta-analysis of nine studies involving 304,060 patients and 481 cases of pulmonary aspiration, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposure was not associated with pulmonary aspiration (OR 1.04, 95%CI 0.87-1.25, low certainty of evidence). In a meta-analysis of 18 studies involving 165,522 patients and 3831 cases of residual gastric contents, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposure was associated with an increased risk of residual gastric contents despite appropriate fasting (odds ratio 5.96, 95%CI 3.96-8.98, low certainty of evidence). In a meta-analysis of five studies involving 1706 patients and 208 cases of residual gastric contents, withholding at least one dose of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist before a procedure was associated with lower odds of residual gastric contents (odds ratio 0.51, 95%CI 0.33-0.81, very low certainty of evidence).

DISCUSSION

Patients using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are at increased risk of presenting for anaesthesia with residual gastric contents, though the available evidence does not indicate that this translates to an increased risk of pulmonary aspiration.

Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Limited evidence exists regarding the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on upper endoscopy. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively review the available evidence on this subject.

METHODS

A systematic bibliographic search was carried out until May 2024. Pooled estimates were analyzed using a random-effects model, with results presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcome assessed was the rate of retained gastric content (RGC), while secondary outcomes included rates of aborted and repeated procedures, adverse event rate, and rates of aspiration.

RESULTS

This analysis included 13 studies involving a total of 84,065 patients. Patients receiving GLP-1RA therapy exhibited significantly higher rates of RGC (OR, 5.56; 95% CI, 3.35 to 9.23), a trend that was consistent among patients with diabetes (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.23 to 3.02). Adjusted analysis, accounting for variables such as sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, and other therapies, confirmed the elevated rates of RGC in the GLP-1RA user group (adjusted OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 3.42 to 5.15). Furthermore, rates of aborted and repeated procedures were higher in the GLP-1RA user group (OR, 5.13; 95% CI, 3.01 to 8.75; and OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.35; respectively). However, no significant differences were found in AE and aspiration rates between the 2 groups (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 0.63 to 26.03; and OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 4.77; respectively).

CONCLUSION

Use of GLP-1RAs is associated with increased retention of gastric contents and more frequent aborted procedures during upper endoscopy. However, the adverse event and aspiration rates do not seem different; therefore, adjusting fasting time instead of routinely withholding GLP-1RAs could be reasonable in these patients.

Evidence Report on the Safety of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients on Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are increasingly used worldwide for weight and hyperglycemia management. There is an ongoing debate on the presence of increased gastric residue, leading to complications such as aspiration and overall safety in patients receiving upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We aimed to study the effect of GLP-RAs on endoscopy outcomes. Methods: We conducted a detailed search of online databases to select the studies which provided details of the effects of GLP-RAs on patients undergoing endoscopy. The outcomes of interest were odds of retained gastric content (RGC), aspiration risk, and aborted and repeated procedures. A random effect model was used to calculate the pooled odds of outcomes with a 95% CI. We further calculated the pooled odds of predictive factors associated with an increased rate of retained gastric residues in the study population. Results: We included 12 studies with a total of 105,515 patients, of which 32,144 were on GLP-1 RAs and 73,273 were in the control group. A total of 234 (0.73%) aspiration events in GLP-RA users were noted compared to 257 (0.35%) events in the control group. No increased odds (1.26, 95% CI 0.86-1.87, I2 34%) of aspiration were found in GLP-1 users compared to the non-GLP-1 group. Patients on GLP-1 RA had increased RGC compared to the control group (OR 6.30, 95% CI 5.30-7.49, I2 0%). The pooled odds of aborted (OR 5.50, 95% CI 3.25-9.32, I2 0%) and repeated procedures (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.42-3.38, I2 0%) were significantly higher in GLP-1 RA users. Patients taking Tirazepatide had the highest percentage of RGC (18.9%), while exenatide users had the lowest rate (6.2%) of food retention. Patients undergoing concomitant colonoscopy were found to have significantly low pooled odds of RGC (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.04-0.48). GLP-1 RAs use was independently associated with increased odds of RGC (3.91, 95% CI 3.21-4.62, I2 0%). The results were homogenous and stayed consistent in the sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: Although the odds of RGC and aborted procedures are high in the GLP-1 RAs group compared to the control, no significant difference in the odds of aspiration was found between the two groups. Simple measures such as a clear liquid diet for 24 h, as routinely set for patients undergoing colonoscopy, may reduce the risk of retaining gastric residue in these patient populations.

Perioperative and periprocedural management of GLP-1 receptor-based agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors: narrative review and the STOP-GAP and STOP DKA-2 algorithms

The GLP-1 receptor-based agonists (GLP-1RAs) and SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are major twenty first century breakthroughs in diabetes and obesity medicine but there are important safety considerations regarding the perioperative and periprocedural management of individuals who are treated with these agents. GLP-1RAs have been linked to an increased risk of retained gastric contents and pulmonary aspiration while SGLT2i can be associated with diabetic ketoacidosis. This manuscript provides a narrative review of the available evidence for perioperative and periprocedural risks in people prescribed GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i. The authors provide expert opinion-driven recommendations and algorithms on how to safely manage GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i under perioperative/periprocedural settings.

Overview of diabetes agents in cardiovascular disease: it takes an orchestra to play Tchaikovsky in symphony

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review was to discuss the use and concerns of diabetes agents, clinical targets, and key aspects to be considered in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and at high risk or established cardiovascular disease (CVD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent European and American guidelines recommended SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists as the preferred first-line diabetes agents in patients with T2DM and CVD. This is a paradigm shift from using metformin as first-line therapy. Amid their widespread use, however, there are also concerns about their side effects. With the rapidly growing diabetes regimens available, questions arise about how best to approach the management of patients with T2DM and CVD.

SUMMARY

To reduce CVD morbidity and mortality in patients with T2DM and at high or very high risk for CVD, the two key diabetes agents SGLT2i and/or GLP1-based therapies should be offered. Although lacking cardiovascular benefit, other diabetes agents remain necessary for many patients with T2DM for their glucocentric effects; Metformin and pioglitazone are useful in severe insulin resistance, while insulin therapy is often necessary in advanced diabetes; GLP1-RA is cautioned in patients with active gastrointestinal and mental health conditions, while DPP4 inhibitor is likely a well tolerated option in a challenging psychosocial setting. Other important aspects that should be considered include obesity, chronic kidney disease, women's cardiovascular health, and psychosocial factors.

Clinical Consequences of Delayed Gastric Emptying With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Tirzepatide

CONTEXT

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) are established therapeutics for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Among other mechanisms, they slow gastric emptying and motility of the small intestine. This helps to limit postprandial glycemic excursions and reduce chylomicron formation and triglyceride absorption. Conversely, motility effects may have detrimental consequences, eg, retained gastric contents at endoscopy or general anesthesia, potentially complicated by pulmonary aspiration or bowel obstruction.

DATA ACQUISITION

We searched the PubMed database for studies involving GLP-1RA therapy and adverse gastrointestinal/biliary events.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Retained gastric contents at the time of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy are found more frequently with GLP-1 RAs but rarely are associated with pulmonary aspiration. Well-justified recommendations for the periprocedural management of GLP-1RAs (eg, whether to withhold these medications and for how long) are compromised by limited evidence. Important aspects to be considered are (1) their long half-lives, (2) the capacity of GLP-1 receptor agonism to slow gastric emptying even at physiological GLP-1 concentrations, (c) tachyphylaxis observed with prolonged treatment, and (d) the limited effect on gastric emptying in individuals with slow gastric emptying before initiating treatment. Little information is available on the influence of diabetes mellitus itself (ie, in the absence of GLP-1 RA treatment) on retained gastric contents and pulmonary aspiration.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged fasting periods regarding solid meal components, point-of-care ultrasound examination for retained gastric content, and the use of prokinetic medications like erythromycin may prove helpful and represent an important area needing further study to increase patient safety for those treated with GLP-1 RAs.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and risk of pulmonary aspiration or discontinuation of procedure: cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is associated with increased risk of pulmonary aspiration or discontinuation of the procedure compared with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Two deidentified US commercial healthcare databases.

PARTICIPANTS

43 365 adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes who used a GLP-1 receptor agonist or SGLT-2 inhibitor within 30 days before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was pulmonary aspiration on the day of or the day after endoscopy, defined using diagnostic codes. The secondary outcome was discontinuation of endoscopy. Risk ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated after fine stratification weighting based on propensity score.

RESULTS

After weighting, 24 817 adults used a GLP-1 receptor agonist (mean age 59.9 years; 63.6% female) and 18 537 used an SGLT-2 inhibitor (59.8 years; 63.7% female). Among users of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors, the weighted risk per 1000 people was, respectively, 4.15 and 4.26 for pulmonary aspiration and 9.79 and 4.91 for discontinuation of endoscopy. Compared with SGLT-2 inhibitor use, GLP-1 receptor agonist use was not associated with an increased risk of pulmonary aspiration (pooled risk ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.31), although it was associated with a higher risk for discontinuation of endoscopy (1.99, 1.56 to 2.53).

CONCLUSIONS

In this comparative cohort study, no increased risk of pulmonary aspiration during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was observed among adults with type 2 diabetes using GLP-1 receptor agonists compared with SGLT-2 inhibitors within 30 days of the procedure; however, GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with a higher risk of discontinuation of endoscopy, possibly owing to a higher risk of retained gastric content. In the absence of evidence from randomized trials, these findings could inform future practice recommendations on the preprocedural protocol for patients requiring endoscopy.