Efficient treatment of mercury(Ⅱ)-containing wastewater in aerated constructed wetland microcosms packed with biochar

Management strategies to reduce microbial mercury methylation in constructed wetlands: Potential routes and future challenges

Constructed wetlands (CWs) are widely recognized as the potential hotspots for producing highly toxic methylmercury (MeHg). This presents an obstacle to the widespread application of CWs. A comprehensive discussion on strategies to control mercury methylation in CWs is currently lacking. This review highlighted the potential impacts of differences in oxygen supply and consumption in various CWs, the characteristics of influent quality, the interactions between different substrates and mercury (including mercury adsorption, reduction), and plants on microbial mercury methylation in CWs. We also proposed the potential strategies for human intervention in regulating or controlling microbial mercury methylation in CWs, including oxygenation, nitrate inhibition, selection of substrates with high adsorption capacity, weak reducibility and low organic matter release, and plant management. Knowledge summarized in this review would help achieve a comprehensive understanding of various research gaps in previous studies and point out future research directions by focusing on CWs types, influent quality, substrates selection and plants management, to reduce the mercury methylation in CWs.

Recent progress, challenges, and future prospects in constructed wetlands employing biochar as a substrate: a comprehensive review

Constructed wetlands (CWs) are a cost-effective, efficient, and long-term wastewater treatment solution in various countries. The efficacy and performance of constructed wetlands are greatly influenced by the substrate. Recently, biochar as a substrate, along with sand and gravel in constructed wetlands, has gained importance due to its various physical, chemical, and biological properties. This review presents a detailed study of biochar as a substrate in CWs and the mechanism involved in efficiency enhancement in pollutant removal. Different methods for producing biochar using various types of biomasses are also addressed. The effect of biochar in removing pollutants like biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrogen, heavy metals, and non-conventional pollutants (microcystin, phenanthrene, antibiotics, etc.) are also discussed. Furthermore, post-harvest utilization of constructed wetland macrophytic biomass via bioenergy production, biochar formation, and biosorbent formation is explained. Various challenges and future prospects in biochar-amended constructed wetlands are also discussed. Biochar proved to be an effective substrate in the removal of pollutants and proved to be a promising technique for wastewater treatment, especially for developing countries where the cost of treatment is a constraint. Biochar is an effective substrate; further modification in biochar with the right plant combination for different wastewater needs to be explored in the future. Future researchers in the field of constructed wetlands will benefit from this review during the utilization of biochar in constructed wetlands and optimization of biochar characteristics, viz., quantity, size, preparation method, and other biochar modifications.

Mercury's poisonous pulse: Blazing a new path for aquatic conservation with eco-friendly mitigation strategies

Many compounds and inorganic elements released from natural and anthropogenic origins contaminate the environment and are implicated in catastrophes involving most biologically driven ecological processes and public health. One such element is Mercury. Mercury exists in both inorganic elemental form and the more metabolically active molecular form e.g. methyl mercury. They enjoy wide applications in medicine and form key components of numerous electrical and electronic devices. Unfortunately, severe health and adverse physiological conditions have developed from the impacts of mercury on the flora and fauna of both aquatic and terrestrial organisms. Despite being present in tiny amounts in water bodies, mercury undergoes a process of trophic amplification where its concentration increases significantly as it moves up the food chain through processes like biomethylation, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification. Most current methods for removing mercury through physical and chemical means have significant drawbacks, including high costs, complex technical requirements, and harmful secondary effects on the environment. Therefore, only environmentally friendly and sustainable approaches are acceptable to mitigate the risks to public health and ecosystem damage. Bioremediation involves the use of biological systems, i.e., plants and microbes, to recover mercury from the environment. The application of microorganisms in remediation is the hallmark of all mitigation strategies targeted at mercury pollution in the soil and aquatic matrices. The present paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on mercury pollution in the environment (i.e., atmosphere, soil, water, and sediments). Many symptoms of mercury poisoning in fish, birds, and other animals, including man, were extensively treated. Information on the existing physico-chemical treatment methods, as well as the more ecologically friendly bioremediation measures available, was summarized. The importance of strengthening existing international policies, commitments, protocols, and alignments on the control of anthropogenic generation, treatment, and reduction of mercury discharges to the environment was highlighted.

Synergetic effect of pyrrhotite and zero-valent iron on Hg(Ⅱ) removal in constructed wetland: Mechanisms of electron transfer and microbial reaction

Effective removal of mercury (Hg) from wastewater is significant due to its high toxicity, especially methylmercury (MeHg). Reducing of Hg(II) to Hg(0) in constructed wetlands (CWs) using iron-based materials is an effective strategy for preventing the formation of MeHg. However, the surface passivation of zero-valent iron (ZVI) limits its application. Herein, synergetic ZVI and pyrrhotite were utilized to enhance Hg removal in CWs. Results indicated that the removal of total Hg, dissolved Hg, and particulate Hg in CWs with ZVI and pyrrhotite were improved by 21.68 ± 0.76 %, 13.02 ± 0.88 %, and 22.27 ± 0.76 % compared to that with single ZVI or pyrrhotite. Pyrrhotite increased the surface corrosion of ZVI, thereby facilitating the process of iron reduction. The redox of iron promoted the generation of EPS, which could provide electrons for Hg(II) reduction. The sulfur also participates in electron transfer by driving the methylation of Hg and provides sulfides to form FeS-Hg complexes and HgS precipitation. The abundance of key enzymes that involved in iron reduction and Hg transformation was enhanced with the addition of ZVI and pyrrhotite. The synergetic of pyrrhotite and ZVI enhances the removal of Hg in CW, offering a promising technology for high-efficiency treatment of Hg.

Cadmium removal by constructed wetlands containing different substrates: performance, microorganisms and mechanisms

This study compared the cadmium (Cd) removal performance of constructed wetlands (CWs), including gravel (G-CW), magnetite (M-CW), coconut shell (C-CW) and biochar (B-CW). C-CW exhibited superior removal efficiencies for Cd compared to other CWs, with efficiencies of 93.18 %.C-CW benefited from the rich organic matter of coconut shells and enhanced DO consumption levels, which facilitated microbial and plant removal of Cd. The total accumulation of Cd in the substrate increased from 9.16 mg/kg to 30.66 mg/kg. Concurrently, the percentage of Cd in the organic matter-bound and residue states increased from 20.52 % to 37.56 %, which effectively reduced the bioavailability of Cd. All CWs can ensure that the plant antioxidant system is not subjected to Cd stress. Saccharimonadales and Micropruina became the dominant genera in all CWs, exhibiting a high tolerance to Cd. This study provides new understanding and theoretical support for selecting substrates to effectively treat heavy metals wastewater with CWs.

Comparing Conventional and Advanced Approaches for Heavy Metal Removal in Wastewater Treatment: An In-Depth Review Emphasizing Filter-Based Strategies

Various industrial activities release heavy metal ions into the environment, which represent one of the major toxic pollutants owing to their severe effects on the environment, humans, and all living species. Despite several technological advances and breakthroughs, wastewater treatment remains a critical global issue. Traditional techniques are dedicated to extracting heavy metal ions from diverse wastewater origins, encompassing coagulation/flocculation, precipitation, flotation, and ion exchange. Their cost, side toxicity, or ineffectiveness often limit their large-scale use. Due to their adaptable design, simple operation, and reasonable cost, membrane filtration and adsorption have proven their efficiency in removing metals from wastewater. Recently, adsorption-based filters have appeared promising in treating water. Within this range, filters incorporating natural, synthetic, or hybrid adsorbents present an appealing alternative to conventional approaches. This review aims to list and describe the conventional and advanced wastewater treatment methods by comparing their efficiency, cost, and environmental impact. Adsorption-based filters were highlighted due to the significant advantages they can provide.

Enhanced efficiencies on purifying acid mine drainage in constructed wetlands based on synergistic adsorption of attapulgite-soda residue composites and microbial sulfate reduction

Constructed wetlands (CWs) are a promising approach for treating acid mine drainage (AMD). However, the extreme acidity and high loads of heavy metals in AMD can easily lead to the collapse of CWs without proper pre-treatment. Therefore, it is considered essential to maintain efficient and stable performance for AMD treatment in CWs. In this study, pre-prepared attapulgite-soda residue (ASR) composites were used to improve the substrate of CWs. Compared with CWs filled with gravel (CWs-G), the removal efficiencies of sulfate and Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn Cd and Pb in CWs filled with ASR composites (CWs-ASR) were increased by 30% and 10-70%, respectively. These metals were mainly retained in the substrate in stable forms, such as carbonate-, Fe/Mn (oxide)hydroxide-, and sulfide-bound forms. Additionally, higher levels of photosynthetic pigments and antioxidant enzyme activities in plants, along with a richer microbial community, were observed in CWs-ASR than in CWs-G. The application of ASR composites alleviated the adverse effects of AMD stresses on wetland plants and microorganisms. In return, the increased bacteria abundance, particularly SRB genera (e.g., Thermodesulfovibrionia and Desulfobacca), promoted the formation of metal sulfides, enabling the saturated ASR adsorbed with metals to regenerate and continuously capture heavy metals. The synergistic adsorption of ASR composites and microbial sulfate reduction maintained the stable and efficient operation of CWs. This study contributes to the resource utilization of industrial alkaline by-products and promotes the breakthrough of new techniques for low-cost and passive treatment systems such as CWs.

Biochar imparted constructed wetlands (CWs) for enhanced biodegradation of organic and inorganic pollutants along with its limitation

The remediation of polluted soil and water stands as a paramount task in safeguarding environmental sustainability and ensuring a dependable water source. Biochar, celebrated for its capacity to enhance soil quality, stimulate plant growth, and adsorb a wide spectrum of contaminants, including organic and inorganic pollutants, within constructed wetlands, emerges as a promising solution. This review article is dedicated to examining the effects of biochar amendments on the efficiency of wastewater purification within constructed wetlands. This comprehensive review entails an extensive investigation of biochar's feedstock selection, production processes, characterization methods, and its application within constructed wetlands. It also encompasses an exploration of the design criteria necessary for the integration of biochar into constructed wetland systems. Moreover, a comprehensive analysis of recent research findings pertains to the role of biochar-based wetlands in the removal of both organic and inorganic pollutants. The principal objectives of this review are to provide novel and thorough perspectives on the conceptualization and implementation of biochar-based constructed wetlands for the treatment of organic and inorganic pollutants. Additionally, it seeks to identify potential directions for future research and application while addressing prevailing gaps in knowledge and limitations. Furthermore, the study delves into the potential limitations and risks associated with employing biochar in environmental remediation. Nevertheless, it is crucial to highlight that there is a significant paucity of data regarding the influence of biochar on the efficiency of wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands, with particular regard to its impact on the removal of both organic and inorganic pollutants.

Seasonal purification efficiency, greenhouse gas emissions and microbial community characteristics of a field-scale surface-flow constructed wetland treating agricultural runoff

Controlling nonpoint source pollution (NPSP) is very important for protecting the water environment, and surface-flow constructed wetlands (SFCWs) have been widely established to mitigate NPSP loads. In this study, the pollutant removal efficiencies, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and chemical and microbial community properties of the sediment in a large-scale SFCW established beside a plateau lake (Qilu Lake) in southwestern China to treat agricultural runoff were evaluated over a year. The SFCW performed best in terms of nitrogen removal in autumn (average efficiency of 63.5% at influent concentrations of 9.3-35.4 mg L-1) and demonstrated comparable efficiency in other seasons (23.7-40.0%). The removal rates of total phosphorus (TP) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were limited (18.6% and 12.4% at influent concentrations of 1.1 and 45.5 mg L-1 on average, respectively). The SFCW was a hotspot of CH4 emissions, with an average flux of 31.6 mg m-2·h-1; moreover, CH4 emissions contributed the most to the global warming potential (GWP) of the SFCW. Higher CH4 and N2O fluxes were detected in winter and in the front-end section of the SFCW with high pollutant concentrations, and plant presence increased CH4 emissions. Significant positive relationships between nutrient and heavy metal contents in the SFCW sediment were detected. The microbial community compositions were similar in autumn and winter, with Thiobacillus, Lysobacter, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas dominating, and this distribution pattern was clearly distinct from those in spring and summer, with high proportions of Spirochaeta_2 and Denitratisoma. The microbial co-occurrence network in spring was more complex with stronger positive correlations than those in winter and autumn, while it was more stable in autumn with more keystone taxa. Optimization of the construction, operation and management of SFCWs treating NPSP in lake watersheds is necessary to promote their environmental benefits.

Mercury sources, contaminations, mercury cycle, detection and treatment techniques: A review

Mercury is considered a toxic pollutant harmful to our human health and the environment. Mercury is highly persistent, volatile and bioaccumulated and enters into the food chain, destroying our ecosystem. The levels of mercury in the water bodies as well as in the atmosphere are affected by anthropogenic and natural activities. In this review, the mercury species as well as the mercury contamination towards water, soil and air are discussed in detail. In addition to that, the sources of mercury and the mercury cycle in the aquatic system are also discussed. The determination of mercury with various methods such as with modified electrodes and nanomaterials was elaborated in brief. The treatment in the removal of mercury such as adsorption, electrooxidation and photocatalysis were explained with recent ideologies and among them, adsorption was considered one of the efficient techniques in terms of cost and mercury removal.