Predictors of Response to Endobronchial Coil Therapy in Patients With Advanced Emphysema

Analysis of body composition with bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with severe COPD and pulmonary emphysema

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often suffer from cachexia and malnutrition. Less is known about body composition and nutritional behaviour in patients with advanced COPD and pulmonary emphysema.

METHODS

We performed a single-center prospective analysis of patients with COPD GOLD III/IV. Metabolic parameters, dietary and exercise behavior, lung function, exercise capacity and body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) were analyzed. Patients with severe emphysema (emphysema index [EI] >20%) were compared to patients with mild emphysema (EI ≤ 20%).

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients (45.5% female, mean age 64.8 ± 8.1 years, mean FEV1 31.0 ± 8.6%, mean RV 234.7 ± 50.6%) were analyzed, of whom 14.1% were underweight. Only 5% of the patients substituted protein and only about 1/3 performed regular exercise training. BIA showed an unfavourable body composition: body fat ↑, ECM/BCM-index ↑, phase angle ↓ (5.0 ± 0.9°), cell percentage ↓, FFMI (fat-free mass index) ↓. The 94 patients with severe emphysema (mean EI 36.6 ± 8.5%) had lower body-mass-index (22.8 ± 4.3 vs. 31.1 ± 5.8 kg/m2, p < 0.001), FFMI, body weight and body fat, but did not differ significantly in the quality of body composition (e.g. phase angle). Their lipid and glucose metabolism were even better than in mild emphysema patients.

CONCLUSION

The finding of significantly lower BMI but similar body composition and better metabolic status in severe emphysema patients needs further investigation. However, it should not distract from the necessity to implement dietary and exercise recommendations for advanced COPD patients.

Surgical and bronchoscopic pulmonary function-improving procedures in lung emphysema

COPD is a highly prevalent, chronic and irreversible obstructive airway disease without curative treatment. Standard therapeutic strategies, both non-pharmacological and pharmacological, have only limited effects on lung function parameters of patients with severe disease. Despite optimal pharmacological treatment, many patients with severe COPD still have a high burden of dyspnoea and a poor quality of life. If these patients have severe lung emphysema, with hyperinflation as the driver of symptoms and exercise intolerance, lung volume reduction may be an effective treatment with a significant impact on lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life. Currently, different lung volume reduction approaches, both surgical and bronchoscopic, have shown encouraging results and have been implemented in COPD treatment recommendations. Nevertheless, choosing the optimal lung volume reduction strategy for an individual patient remains challenging. Moreover, there is still room for improving durability of effect and safety in all available procedures. Ongoing and innovative research is essential to push this field forwards. This review provides an overview of results and limitations of the current lung volume reduction options for patients with severe lung emphysema and hyperinflation.

Bronchoscopic Management of COPD and Advances in Therapy

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a highly prevalent and morbid disease marked by irreversible structural changes in the lungs. Bronchoscopic therapies have significantly expanded the treatment armamentarium for patients with persistent symptoms by reducing the physiologic detriments of hyperinflation in a less invasive fashion than surgical lung volume reduction. The spectrum of bronchoscopic techniques to reduce hyperinflation includes endobronchial valves, coils, thermal ablation, and biologic sealants. Other therapies focus on reducing parasympathetic tone and mucus hypersecretion and include targeted lung denervation, bronchial rheoplasty, and cryospray techniques. In this article, we will review the variety of techniques for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, both established and investigational, along with their respective benefits and complications and will briefly review other investigational therapies for COPD.

CT-Based Commercial Software Applications: Improving Patient Care Through Accurate COPD Subtyping

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is heterogenous in its clinical manifestations and disease progression. Patients often have disease courses that are difficult to predict with readily available data, such as lung function testing. The ability to better classify COPD into well-defined groups will allow researchers and clinicians to tailor novel therapies, monitor their effects, and improve patient-centered outcomes. Different modalities of assessing these COPD phenotypes are actively being studied, and an area of great promise includes the use of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) techniques focused on key features such as airway anatomy, lung density, and vascular morphology. Over the last few decades, companies around the world have commercialized automated CT software packages that have proven immensely useful in these endeavors. This article reviews the key features of several commercial platforms, including the technologies they are based on, the metrics they can generate, and their clinical correlations and applications. While such tools are increasingly being used in research and clinical settings, they have yet to be consistently adopted for diagnostic work-up and treatment planning, and their full potential remains to be explored.

Effect of Endobronchial Coils on Exercise Tolerance and Lung Functions in Patients with Severe Emphysema - A Retrospective Cohort Study of 48 Patients

Background

Lung volume reduction with endobronchial coils treatment (ECT), for patients with severe emphysema, has shown modest improvement in exercise capacity and lung functions in clinical trials, yet the benefit of this procedure is still unclear.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including all patients who underwent ECT in Israel and a propensity score matched control group of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that were treated with usual care. The primary outcome was six-minute walk test distance (6MWTD), secondary outcomes were lung function tests and patient survival.

Results

Overall, 46 patients were included in the ECT group. Their mean 6MWTD at baseline and at 6 and at 24 months post procedure was 331.0±101.4, 372.9±76.8 and 338.8±104.8, respectively (overall P=0.04, pairwise comparison: baseline to 6 months (P=0.1), baseline to 24 months (P=1.0)). Mean FEV1 values at baseline and at 6 and at 24 months post procedure were 0.86±0.38, 0.92±0.37 and 0.82±0.36 liters, respectively (overall P=0.003, pairwise comparison: baseline to 6 months (P=0.04), baseline to 24 months (P=0.75)). The median 6MWTD for the ECT and control groups at 24 months were 333.0 (262.5–390) and 280 (210–405), respectively (P=0.16). There was no difference in overall survival (P=0.84). Heterogenous emphysema was a significant predictor of treatment success in univariate analysis (p=0.004).

Conclusion

Lung volume reduction with endobronchial coils may improve the exercise capacity and FEV1 of COPD patients. However, the majority of the effect was diminished after 24 months. The current state of evidence does not support regulatory approval of ECT and warrant its use only after consideration of the benefit-harm ratio in a highly selected patient population.

Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema

BACKGROUND

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial coils is a new treatment for patients with severe emphysema. To date, the benefits have been modest and have been suggested to be much larger in patients with severe hyperinflation and nonmulti-comorbidity.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endobronchial coil treatment in a randomized multicenter clinical trial using optimized patient selection.

METHOD

Patients with severe emphysema on HRCT scan with severe hyperinflation (residual volume [RV] ≥200% predicted and RV/total lung capacity [TLC] >55%) were randomized to coil treatment or control. Primary outcome measures were differences in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 6 months.

RESULTS

Due to premature study termination, a total of 120 patients (age 63 ± 7 years, FEV1 29 ± 7% predicted, RV 251 ± 41% predicted, RV/TLC 67 ± 6%, and SGRQ 58 ± 13 points), instead of 210 patients, were randomized. At study termination, 91 patients (57 coil and 34 control) had 6-month results available. Analyses showed significantly greater improvements in favor of the coil group. The increase in FEV1 was greater in the coil group than that in the control group by + 10.3 [+4.7 to +16.0] % and in SGRQ by -10.6 [-15.9 to -5.4] points. At study termination, there were 5 (6.8%) deaths in the coil cohort reported.

CONCLUSION

Despite early study termination, coil treatment compared to control results in a significant improvement in the lung function and quality of life benefits for up to 6 months in patients with emphysema and severe hyperinflation. These improvements were of clinical importance but were associated with a higher likelihood of serious adverse events.

Endoscopic lung volume reduction coils for patients with severe emphysema-a single-centre retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung emphysema may benefit from surgical or endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR). Previously reported outcomes of nitinol coil-based ELVR techniques have been ambiguous. The analysis was done to analyse outcomes of ELVR with nitinol coils in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema.

METHODS

From September 2013 to November 2014, our centre performed a total of 41 coil implantations on 29 patients with severe emphysema. Coils were bronchoscopically placed during general anaesthesia. Twelve out of 29 patients received staged contralateral treatments up to 112 days later to avoid bilateral pneumothorax. Lung function and 6-min walking distance were assessed 1 week prior, 1 week after as well as 6-12 months after the procedure. Patients were followed up to 48 months after ELVR and overall mortality was compared to a historic cohort.

RESULTS

While coil-based ELVR led to significant short-term improvement of vital capacity (VC, +0.14 ± 0.39 l, P = 0.032) and hyperinflation (Δ residual volume/total lung capacity -2.32% ± 6.24%, P = 0.022), no significant changes were observed in 6-min walking distance or forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Benefits were short-lived, with only 15.4% and 14.3% of patients showing sustained improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s or residual volume after 6 months. Adverse events included haemoptysis (40%) and pneumothorax (3.4%), major complications occurred in 6.9% of cases. Overall survival without lung transplant was 63.8% after 48 months following ELVR, differing insignificantly from what BODE indices of patients would have predicted as median 4-year survival (57%) at the time of ELVR treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

ELVR with coils can achieve small and short-lived benefits in lung function at the cost of major complications in a highly morbid cohort. Treatment failed to improve 4-year overall survival. ELVR coils are not worthwhile the risk for most patients with severe emphysema.

Thermal Volume Reduction Surgery for Surgical Treatment of Pulmonary Bullae: A Single-Center Treatment Experience of 276 Cases Accompany With Primary Lung Cancer

Objective: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been regarded as an effective surgical procedure for severe emphysema (including pulmonary bullae). However, there still remain controversial that its applications limited that only patients with a specific clinical situation may benefit from LVRS, and so did other non-surgical treatments. The current study aims to introduce some initial experience of new technique for treating pulmonary bullae, including using thermal surgical instruments to reduce enlargement of lung tissue in a specific group that diagnosed with lung cancer accompany with pulmonary bullae. Methods: This retrospective study included 276 patients undergoing emphysema reducing surgery between 2010 and 2020. All procedure were performed by thermal volume reduction surgery of using thermal surgical instruments to reduce pulmonary bullae. Results: The average time required for operating single pulmonary bullae was <10 min. Median operative time was 106 min (range 85 to 191 min). No intraoperative air leak, massive blood loss, or other severe complications occurred. The estimated blood loss for TVRS was about 40 ml (range 15 to 120 ml). Postoperative complications included atelectasis (n = 8), pulmonary infection (n = 17), bleeding (n = 5), delayed air leak (n = 7) among the cohort. The postoperative lung function at 1-year post surgery in TVRS group recovered faster with a better recovery that achieving an FEV1 of 1.95 ± 0.46 L, TLC of 6.36 ± 0.79 L, RV of 3.56 ± 0.81 L, PO₂ of 60 ± 8 mmHg, PCO₂ of 37 ± 6 mmHg, and 6 MWD (6-min walk distant) of 305 ± 22 m. The 1-year QOL score was elevated comparing with preoperative period. Conclusion: This single-center study reported a new thermal-based surgical approach to treat pulmonary bullae by reducing abnormally enlarged lung tissue in specific patients diagnosed with lung cancer accompany with pulmonary bullae.

Identifying Responders and Exploring Mechanisms of Action of the Endobronchial Coil Treatment for Emphysema

BACKGROUND

So far, 3 randomized controlled trials have shown that the endobronchial treatment using coils is safe and effective. However, the more exact underlying mechanism of the treatment and best predictors of response are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to gain more knowledge about the underlying physiological mechanism of the lung volume reduction coil treatment and to identify potential predictors of response to this treatment.

METHODS

This was a prospective nonrandomized single-center study which included patients who were bilaterally treated with coils. Patients underwent an extensive number of physical tests at baseline and 3 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (29% male, mean age 62 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] 26% pred, residual volume (RV) 231% pred) were included. Three months after treatment, significant improvements were found in spirometry, static hyperinflation, air trapping, airway resistance, treated lobe RV and treated lobes air trapping measured on CT scan, exercise capacity, and quality of life. The change in RV and airway resistance was significantly associated with a change in FEV1, forced vital capacity, air trapping, maximal expiratory pressure, dynamic compliance, and dynamic hyperinflation. Predictors of treatment response at baseline were a higher RV, larger air trapping, higher emphysema score in the treated lobes, and a lower physical activity level.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that emphysema patients benefit from endobronchial coil treatment. The primary mechanism of action is decreasing static hyperinflation with improvement of airway resistance which consequently changes dynamic lung mechanics. However, the right patient population needs to be selected for the treatment to be beneficial which should include patients with severe lung hyperinflation, severe air trapping, and significant emphysema in target lobes.

Comparison of Multiple Diagnostic Tests to Measure Dynamic Hyperinflation in Patients with Severe Emphysema Treated with Endobronchial Coils

Purpose

For this study, we aimed to compare dynamic hyperinflation measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), a six-minute walking test (6-MWT), and a manually paced tachypnea test (MPT) in patients with severe emphysema who were treated with endobronchial coils. Additionally, we investigated whether dynamic hyperinflation changed after treatment with endobronchial coils.

Methods

Dynamic hyperinflation was measured with CPET, 6-MWT, and an MPT in 29 patients before and after coil treatment.

Results

There was no significant change in dynamic hyperinflation after treatment with coils. Comparison of CPET and MPT showed a strong association (rho 0.660, p < 0.001) and a moderate agreement (BA-plot, 202 ml difference in favor of MPT). There was only a moderate association of the 6-MWT with CPET (rho 0.361, p 0.024).

Conclusion

MPT can be a suitable alternative to CPET to measure dynamic hyperinflation in severe emphysema but may overestimate dynamic hyperinflation possibly due to a higher breathing frequency.

HRCT characteristics of severe emphysema patients: Interobserver variability among expert readers and comparison with quantitative software

PURPOSE

For a successful bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment it is important to place the coils in the most emphysematous lobes. Therefore assessment of the lobe with greatest destruction is essential. Our aims were to investigate the level of agreement among expert reviewers of HRCT-scans in emphysema patients and the comparison with QCT (quantitative computed tomography) software.

METHOD

Five experienced CT-assessors, conducted a visual assessment of the baseline HRCT-scans of emphysema patients who participated in the RENEW bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil study. On the same HRCT-scans, a QCT analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In total 134 HRCT-scans were rated by all 5 experts. All 5 CT-assessors agreed on which was the most destructed lobe in 61 % of the left lungs (ƙ:0.459) and 60 % of the right lungs (ƙ:0.370). The consensus of the 5 assessors matched the QCT in the left lung for 77 % of the patients (ƙ:0.425) and in the right lung for 82 % (ƙ:0.524).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the interobserver agreement between five expert CT-assessors was only fair to moderate when evaluating the most destructed lobe. CT-assessor consensus improved matching with QCT determination of lobar destruction compared to individual assessor determinations. Because some CT-features are associated with treatment outcomes and important for optimal patient selection of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment, we recommend including more than one CT-reviewer and supported by QCT measurements.

Bronchoscopic management of asthma, COPD and emphysema

In recent years, many bronchoscopic techniques have been developed in chronic obstructive airway inflammatory diseases, including asthma, COPD and emphysema. The main techniques with available data from randomised controlled trials are: 1) bronchial thermoplasty in asthma; 2) valves, coils and thermal vapor ablation in emphysema; and 3) targeted lung denervation in COPD. The objectives of this article are to describe the levels of evidence for efficacy and safety, long-term follow-up results beyond 1 year, and current recommendations for clinical practice from international guidelines for each technique.

Joint Statement of the German Respiratory Society and German Society of Thoracic Surgery in Cooperation with the German Radiological Society: Structural Prerequisites of Centres for Interventional Treatment of Emphysema

Interventional treatment of emphysema offers a wide range of surgical and endoscopic options for patients with advanced disease. Multidisciplinary collaboration of pulmonology, thoracic surgery, and imaging disciplines in patient selection, therapy, and follow-up ensures treatment quality. The present joint statement describes the required structural and quality prerequisites of treatment centres. This is a translation of the German article "Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Thoraxchirurgie in Kooperation mit der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft: Strukturvoraussetzungen von Zentren für die interventionelle Emphysemtherapie" Pneumologie. 2020;74:17-23.

Interventional Bronchoscopy

For over 150 years, bronchoscopy, especially flexible bronchoscopy, has been a mainstay for airway inspection, the diagnosis of airway lesions, therapeutic aspiration of airway secretions, and transbronchial biopsy to diagnose parenchymal lung disorders. Its utility for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules and therapeutic treatments besides aspiration of airway secretions, however, has been limited. Challenges to the wider use of flexible bronchoscopy have included difficulty in navigating to the lung periphery, the avoidance of vasculature structures when performing diagnostic biopsies, and the ability to biopsy a lesion under direct visualization. The last 10-15 years have seen major advances in thoracic imaging, navigational platforms to direct the bronchoscopist to lung lesions, and the ability to visualize lesions during biopsy. Moreover, multiple new techniques have either become recently available or are currently being investigated to treat a broad range of airway and lung parenchymal diseases, such as asthma, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis, or to alleviate recurrent exacerbations. New bronchoscopic therapies are also being investigated to not only diagnose, but possibly treat, malignant peripheral lung nodules. As a result, flexible bronchoscopy is now able to provide a new and expanding armamentarium of diagnostic and therapeutic tools to treat patients with a variety of lung diseases. This State-of-the-Art review succinctly reviews these techniques and provides clinicians an organized approach to their role in the diagnosis and treatment of a range of lung diseases.

Lung Volume Reduction in Pulmonary Emphysema

Severe emphysema with hyperinflation presents a therapeutic challenge. Inhaled medication has limited efficacy in individuals with mechanical constraints to the respiratory pump and impaired gas exchange. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) reestablishes some semblance of normal physiology, resecting grossly expanded severely diseased tissue to restore the function of compromised relatively healthy lung, and has been shown to significantly improve exercise capacity, quality of life, and survival, especially in individuals with upper-lobe predominant emphysema and low-baseline exercise capacity, albeit with higher early morbidity and mortality. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction achieved by deflating nonfunctioning parts of the lung is promoted as a less invasive and safer approach. Endobronchial valve implantation has demonstrated comparable outcomes to LVRS in selected individuals and has recently received approvals by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence in the United Kingdom and the Food and Drug Administration in the United States of America. Endobronchial coils are proving a viable treatment option in severe hyperinflation in the presence of collateral ventilation in selected cases of homogeneous disease. Modalities including vapor and sealant are delivered using a segmental strategy preserving healthier tissue within the same target lobe-efficacy and safety-data are, however, limited. This article will review the data supporting these novel technologies.

Patient Selection for Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction

Purpose

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a valuable treatment option for carefully selected patients with severe COPD. There is limited knowledge about the characteristics and outcomes of patients referred to a specialized center for BLVR. The study objectives were to investigate the selection rate for BLVR treatment in patients referred for this treatment and to investigate the differences between patients that were selected for BLVR and patients that were not.

Patients and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with severe COPD who were referred to our hospital to assess eligibility for BLVR treatment. Our parameters included demographics, comorbidity, chest computed tomography characteristics, reasons for rejection from BLVR treatment and patient survival.

Results

In total, 1500 patients were included (mean age 62 years, 50% female and forced expiratory volume in 1 s 33% of predicted). Out of this group, 282 (19%) patients were selected for BLVR treatment. The absence of a suitable target lobe for treatment, an unsuitable disease phenotype and insufficient lung hyperinflation were the most important factors for not being selected. Patients that were selected for any BLVR option lived significantly longer than the group of patients that were not selected for BLVR (median 3060 versus 2079 days, P<0.001).

Conclusion

We found that only a small proportion of patients that are referred for BLVR treatment is eligible for a BLVR treatment, indicating a need for both better referral tools and for the development of new therapies for this group of patients. Furthermore, our data suggest that selection for BLVR is associated with a significant survival benefit.

Endobronchial coils for emphysema: Dual mechanism of action on lobar residual volume reduction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The RENEW trial demonstrated that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial coils improves quality of life, pulmonary function and exercise performance. In this post hoc analysis of RENEW, we examine the mechanism of action of endobronchial coils that drives improvement in clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 78 patients from the RENEW coil-treated group who were treated in one or both lobes that were deemed as the most destroyed were included in this retrospective analysis. Expiratory and inspiratory HRCT scans were used to assess lobar volume change from baseline to 12 months post coil treatment in treated and untreated lobes.

RESULTS

Reduction in lobar RV in treated lobes was significantly associated with favourable clinical improvement. Independent predictor of the change in RV and FEV₁ was the change in lobar RV reduction in the treated lobes and for change in 6MWD the absence of cardiac disease and the change in SGRQ, while the independent predictor of change in SGRQ was the change in 6MWD.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that residual lobar volume reduction in treated lobes measured by QCT is the driving mechanism of action of endobronchial coils leading to positive clinical outcomes. However, the improvement in exercise capacity and quality of life seems to be affected by the presence of cardiac disease.

Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction in COPD: The Impact of Coil Implantation on Patients' Physical Activity

Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) is an emerging therapy option for the treatment of severe emphysema in COPD. To which extent patients profit from lung volume reduction via coils (LVRC) regarding morbidity, mortality, and quality of life is not clear yet. In this monocentric prospective cohort study, 13 COPD patients with severe emphysema (residual volume [RV] >225%) were enrolled at the University Hospital of Bonn. Activity measurements were assessed by a validated accelerometer wristband. By LVRC, RV could be reduced by 0.13 L to 5.54 ± 1.29 L. We could show a clinically relevant improvement in patients' physical activity after LVRC, measured as daily step count (497.7 ± 72.6 vs. 1,913.7 ± 182.7 steps/day, p = 0.03) and mean daily active energy expenditure (714.4 ± 73.6 vs. 2,321.3 ± 163.9 joules, p = 0.03). This improvement in physical activity is possibly associated with a positive effect on patients' morbidity and mortality.

Interventional Bronchoscopy in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

Background:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by airflow limitation, hyperinflation and reduced gas exchange that lead to progressive dyspnea. Pulmonary rehabilitation, lifestyle changes, pharmacotherapy, long-term oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation and surgical therapeutic approaches are the basic management strategies.

Purpose:

In the last 15 years, various bronchoscopic therapeutic modalities have emerged for severe COPD. The aim of this review is to summarize the effects of these bronchoscopic treatments compared with lung rehabilitation and pharmacological therapies.

Methods:

A PubMed search for the eligible studies and reviews on interventional bronchoscopy and COPD has been conducted.

Results:

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (LVR) techniques are targeted to reduce hyperinflation. The efficacy of reversible valve implantation has been confirmed in several randomized controlled trials. It provides clinical benefit in the absence of interlobar collateral ventilation. Nonblocking bronchoscopic LVR with coils, thermal vapor or sealants is independent of collateral ventilation but has not been studied sufficiently. Partially irreversible coil implantation leads to parenchymal compression while irreversible LVR with thermal vapor or sealants induce an inflammatory reaction. Targeted lung denervation ablates parasympathetic pulmonary nerves in COPD for sustainable bronchodilation, and liquid nitrogen metered cryospray destroys hyperplastic goblet cells and excessive submucous glands in the central airways to induce mucosal regeneration in chronic bronchitis.

Conclusion:

The best-examined bronchoscopic LVR method is the valve therapy. The data from the other modalities are still limited. Further studies are required to select the patients that will optimally benefit from a particular treatment and to predict and treat the procedure-related complications.

Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Study of the PneumRx Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema (ELEVATE)

BACKGROUND

The PneumRx endobronchial coil system for patients with severe emphysema has been shown to improve quality of life, exercise capacity, and pulmonary function in patients with emphysema. A post hoc analysis of the RENEW trial has identified patient characteristics and lobar selection methods associated with improved outcomes, which have to be confirmed prospectively.

METHODS

The ELEVATE trial is a prospective, multicenter, open label, randomized (2:1), controlled trial comparing outcomes in patients treated with endobronchial coils (treatment) to a medically managed control group (control). The trial aims to enroll 210 patients (140 in the treatment group and 70 in the control group) with severe emphysema. Control patients will be eligible to crossover to coil treatment after 6 months of follow-up. The co-primary effectiveness endpoints are percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s and quality of life measured by change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire from baseline to 6 months. Secondary objectives are determination of responder rates of clinical endpoints and mean change in other functional and physiologic endpoints. All patients will be followed for 24 months after initial treatment. Adverse events will be collected on an ongoing basis throughout the trial.

DISCUSSION

The primary objective of the ELEVATE trial is to prospectively confirm the safety and effectiveness profile of the coil system for the treatment of severe emphysema in consideration of the findings of previous randomized controlled trials. Secondary objectives are the determination of responder rates in all clinical endpoints and mean change in physiologic endpoints.