Clinical efficacy and safety of limited internal fixation combined with external fixation for Pilon fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Computer-aided robotics for applications in fracture reduction surgery: Advances, challenges, and opportunities

The advancement of information technology and AI has boosted global economic and social development. Robot systems (RS) and computer-aided technology (CAT) are used in various domains, including social production and human existence. Traditional fracture reduction surgery relies on the expertise and surgical skills of surgeons to realign fractures in patients. Researchers have developed robotic and assisted systems to automate fracture reduction surgery in recent decades. Computer-aided fracture reduction robot system (CARS) is used to replace the manual reduction performed by conventional physicians. A partial CARS has been used successfully in clinical fracture reduction surgery. This study provides an overview of CARS. First, the RS and CAT used in fracture reduction surgery are overviewed. Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis of CARS is presented, encompassing their design, experimental validation, and clinical applications, while highlighting recent advancements and potential future directions in this domain. The suggested CARS for fracture reduction are compared in different ways. The learning curve and technical ethics of CARS are summarized. The paper addresses unresolved research gaps and technical challenges, providing recommendations to guide future study.

Effective Compression and a Minimally Invasive Rail Plate to Optimize Bone Transport in Distraction Osteogenesis: New Concepts

Background

Bone transport in distraction osteogenesis is an effective, well-known procedure. However, bone compression is an aspect of this technique for which there is no objective information. The lack of direct bone compression measurements may result in a lack of uniformity in the bone transport process, which can result in its ineffective application and may be contributing to its underutilization. This study describes the results of applying objectively measured compressions to achieve a distraction regeneration zone and docking site consolidation during bone transport in distraction osteogenesis.

Methods

This prospective study describes the results of a single cohort of 32 patients who underwent distraction osteogenesis with bone transport utilizing a combination of a minimally invasive rail plate and monolateral external fixation. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: (1) those with hypertrophic, atrophic, or infectious pseudarthrosis-nonunion (the pseudarthrosis-nonunion group), and (2) those with bone loss due to trauma or osteomyelitis (the bone loss group). The initial bone compression was measured during the latency phase, and the final compression was measured during the distraction phase. The healing index, external fixation index, healing time, consolidation time, and docking time were calculated for each patient. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons between and within groups.

Results

In this study, 28 (88%) of the patients were male. The mean patient age was 44.93 ± 16.21 years. The median values were 3.2 Nm for the initial compression and 3.4 Nm for the final compression, with no significant difference between or within groups of patients. The osseous results were excellent in 29 patients (91%), and the functional results were good or excellent in 31 patients (97%).

Conclusions

This study is the first to objectively measure compression in the bone transport process. Our findings showed that all patients who had an initial compression of ≥3.2 Nm achieved 100% consolidation of the distraction regeneration zone, and those who had a final compression of ≥2.9 Nm achieved complete docking site consolidation without complications. These 2 values thus represent effective compression and highlight the role of bone compression in bone transport.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes following minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) application in tibial pilon fractures - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review evaluates postoperative complications and functional outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for distal tibial pilon fractures. This paper aims to fill a key literature gap, as no previous reviews have specifically addressed MIPO for tibial pilon fractures or fractures other than those involving the humeral shaft.

METHODS

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was done using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from 2000 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were MIPO treatment in skeletally mature patients, while exclusion criteria were non-English papers, conference abstracts, papers with multiple treatment modalities that didn't analyze MIPO outcomes separately, skeletally immature patients, case reports, and cohorts smaller than five patients. Unpublished papers were also searched using Clinical Trials. Data extraction included general study information, injury specification, outcome measures, and complications. Finally, a risk of bias assessment (RoB) was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1732 studies were identified, of which 23 were included in this review, with 673 patients and 678 fractures analyzed. The mean follow-up ranged from 6 to 62.53 months, with most studies representing intermediate to long-term follow-up. Primary outcome measures showed that 87.33% achieved 'excellent to good' results, 8.67% achieved 'fair' results, and 4% achieved 'poor' results. Stratified by fracture type, 76.47%, 80.05%, and 76.92% of AO/OTA type A, B, and C fractures, respectively, achieved 'excellent to good' results. 35.06% of cases reported complications (236 in total). These included one case of deep infection (0.148%), 28 superficial wound infections (4.16%), 4 nonunion cases (0.59%), and 22 malunion instances (3.27%). RoB assessment showed that 52.17% had a moderate overall risk of bias, 39.13% had a serious overall risk of bias, and 8.7% had a critical overall risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

MIPO technique for pilon fractures showed good functional outcomes and reliability, with low complication rates and should be considered in cases where proper indirect reduction is possible. However, while the evidence is promising, further high-quality studies with larger sample sizes, longer-term follow-up, and comparison to other techniques are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A Novel Approach Combined with MIPO Technique for the Treatment of Type C Pilon Fractures

Objective

Type C fracture is a complete intra-articular fracture, and the mainstay of treatment remains open reduction and internal fixation. The purpose of the study is to observe the clinical effect of an anterior ankle C approach (ankle-C) combined with minimal invasive plate osteosystems (MIPO) for tibial pilon fractures (AO/OTA 43C, combined with fibula fractures).

Methods

A retrospective comparative analysis was performed on the clinical data of 33 patients with C-type pilon fractures (combined fibula fractures) admitted to our department from July 2018 to July 2021, including 12 cases treated with ankle-C (a-C) approach and 21 cases with conventional approach (including combined approach). All patients were followed up for over 6 months. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS), wound healing time, fracture healing time, and complications were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy.

Results

The scores of VAS and AOFAS in the a-C group scored better than the conventional group (P < 0.05), especially in the extent of limited range of motion (LROM) of ankle dorsiflexion-plantarflexion in 1 month after operation and at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). Bone healing was achieved in both groups 6 months after operation, with no implant exposure or infection. Among them, 4 cases in the conventional approach group had wound healing time exceeding 2 weeks.

Conclusions

For type C pilon fractures (combined with fibula fractures), ankle-C approach combined with MIPO technique has certain advantages in ankle function recovery and soft tissue repair, which provides an alternative for the treatment of type C pilon fractures.

Ankle joint salvage and reconstruction by limited ORIF combined with an Ilizarov external fixator for complex open tibial pilon fractures (AO 43-C3.3) with segmental bone defects

Background

Open pilon fractures combined with sizeable segmental bone defects are rare, difficult to treat, and often result in the loss of ankle joint function. The purpose of this study was to determine clinical outcomes in patients with open pilon fractures and sizeable segmental bone defects treated by limited ORIF combined with an Ilizarov external fixator.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of open pilon fractures with sizeable segmental bone defects treated by limited ORIF combined with the Ilizarov external fixator strategy between July 2014 and August 2019. All patients were included for assessments of fracture healing and infection rates. Ankle functional outcomes were assessed in all patients according to the Paley criteria and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) at least 24 months post-injury.

Results

All patients were followed up for a mean of 41.09 months. The mean bone defect size was 5.64 ± 1.21 cm. The average EFI and BTI were 1.56 ± 0.28 months/cm and 11.12 ± 0.74 days/cm, respectively. According to the Paley evaluation system, the success rate of ankle joint reconstruction was 64% (7/11). The mean score based on the AOFAS functional assessment was 77.73 ± 8.87. Five patients showed posttraumatic arthritis, one of whom required ankle arthrodesis. Three patients developed pin site infections, and one patient developed a deep infection after bone grafting.

Conclusion

The strategy of limited ORIF combined with an Ilizarov external fixator can restore ankle function in most patients with complex open tibial pilon fractures. Ankle stiffness, pin tract infection, and traumatic arthritis were the most common complications associated with this therapy.

Treatment of pilon fractures with low profile plates

BACKGROUND

Treatments of pilon fracture is an important operative challenge due to high prevalence of post-operative complications. In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the complications of the use of low profile plates for pilon fractures.

METHODS

This clinical trial that was performed in 2017-2021 in Isfahan on 27 patients with pilon fractures. Demographic data of patients such as age, gender, type of pilon fracture and baseline pathology of pilon fractures were collected. Patients were treated using low profile plates under surgical procedures. Within 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgeries, patients were visited and assessed regarding superficial wound infections, deep wound infections, and evidence of osteomyelitis, vascular injuries, non-union and mal-union using both physical examinations and imaging studies via X-ray. We also measured the functions of cases using The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Most cases had 3 days (33.3%) and 5 days (33.3%) of hospitalization. Superficial wound infection was observed in 7 cases (26%). Deep surgical site infections were observed in 2 cases (7.4%) and we had only 1 case of osteomyelitis (3.7%). No vascular injuries were observed in this study. Evaluation of union among patients showed that 2 cases (7.4%) had non-union and 5 cases (18.5%) had malunion in the anterior-posterior axis, but none of the patients had malunion in the coronal axis. Based on AOFAS questionnaire, the mean score in patients was 88.36±14.20.

CONCLUSION

Treatments of pilon fractures by low profile plates have similar complications compared to other treatment options.

Efficacies and complications of internal fixations with PHILOS plate and intramedullary Multiloc® nails in the surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacies of internal fixations with proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate and intramedullary MultiLoc^® nails in the surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF).

METHODS

A total of 115 patients with PHF admitted to our hospital were selected as the research subjects, and were randomly divided into PHILOS group (n=57) and MultiLoc group (n=58). PHILOS group was treated with internal fixation with PHILOS plate, while MultiLoc group was treated with internal fixation with intramedullary MultiLoc^® nails.

RESULTS

MultiLoc group was superior to PHILOS group in the surgical duration and amount of intraoperative hemorrhage (P < 0.05). At 1 week after surgery, the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in MultiLoc group were lower than those in PHILOS group (P < 0.05). After surgery, MultiLoc group had a shorter time of occurrence of bony callus and disappearance of fracture line (P < 0.05) and a lower incidence of complications (0.00% vs. 3.51%) (P > 0.05) compared with PHILOS group. At 6 months after surgery, MultiLoc group had higher abduction and external rotation angles and higher scores of Constant-Murley and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) than PHILOS group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The internal fixations with PHILOS plate and intramedullary MultiLoc^® nails are effective in the treatment of PHF. However, the internal fixation with intramedullary MultiLoc^® nails is superior to the internal fixation with PHILOS plate in alleviating pain and expediting the postoperative restoration of joint function.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Distal Tibial Fracture Treated by Circular External Fixation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To examine clinical and functional outcomes in patients with intra- and extra-articular distal tibial fractures treated definitively by Ilizarov fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with tibial fractures extending within 1 Müller square of the ankle joint were identified from our Ilizarov database over a 5-year period. Data on treatment and outcome were assembled from this database and supplemented by a review of patient records. General measures of health-related quality of life and limb-specific functional outcome scores were recorded. Adverse events were documented according to Paley's classification.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-eight patients with 169 fractures were identified, 28% were open and 63% intra-articular. One hundred and sixty-five (98%) of the fractures united, two following bone grafting in their original frames, at a median of 166.5 days (range 104-537). Three patients with nonunions united with further treatment. One patient (an end-stage diabetic) elected to undergo amputation following multiple early complications during treatment. Closed fractures united more rapidly than open (median 157 vs 183 days; p = 0.005) and true Pilon (43C3) fractures took longer to unite than other fractures (median 157 vs 177 days; p = 0.01).Sixty-seven percent of patients completed functional outcome scores. Sixty-two percent reported good or excellent ankle scores at more than 6 months post frame removal, 38% fair and 10% poor. Patients with intra-articular fractures reported significantly worse ankle scores than those with extra-articular injuries. General measures of health-related quality of life (EuroQol-5D) revealed significant ongoing effects despite good clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a high union and low serious complication rate, suggesting that external ring fixation is a safe and effective treatment for these injuries.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Giannoudis VP, Ewins E, Taylor DM, et al. Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Distal Tibial Fracture Treated by Circular External Fixation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(2):86-95.

Definitive management of open pilon fractures with fine wire fixation

INTRODUCTION

The BOAST (British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma) guidelines advise that open pilon fractures amongst other open lower limb fractures need to be treated at a specialist centre with Orthoplastic care. The purpose of this study was to determine clinical outcomes in patients with open pilon fractures treated as per BOAST guidelines alongside a treatment protocol which consisted of early wound debridement and spanning external fixation, delayed soft tissue coverage with a flap when necessary and delayed definitive fixation with the use of a Fine Wire Fixator.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of open pilon fractures treated between 2014 and 2019. All patients were included for the assessment of the rate of infection and fracture healing. Functional outcome assessment was performed in all patients according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) at 12 months post injury.

RESULTS

There were 20 patients including 16 males and 4 females. The mean age was 50.45 years. Initial wound with bone debridement and application of a spanning external fixator was performed within an average of 13.5 hours. The mean time from primary surgery to definitive fixation was 24.5 days. There were 3 patients with Gustilo Type I injuries, 6 with Type II, 4 Type with type IIIa and 7 with Type IIIb injuries. Average time to bone union was 10.4 (Range: 2-18) months. The mean AOFAS score was 74.2 (Range: 28-97). A Taylor Spatial Frame was used on 18 patients, while 2 patients had an Ilizarov frame. A corticotomy was performed on 4 patients with critical bone defect post debridement. There was 1 case of deep infection and 9 cases of superficial infection. There were also 4 cases of delayed union which required bone grafting from their femur using a RIA (Reamer Irrigation Aspirator).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the use of staged wound debridement including relatively aggressive bone debridement in conjunction with systemic and local antibiotics, external fixators and patient tailored conversion from spanning external fixator to fine wire frame achieves low rates of wound infection and complications for patients with open pilon fractures.

Large autologous ilium with periosteum for tibiotalar joint reconstruction in Rüedi-Allgöwer III or AO/OTA type C3 pilon fractures: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Management of Rüedi-Allgöwer III or AO/OTA type C3 pilon fracture presents numerous challenges to the orthopaedic surgeon. A joint preservation technique using a large autologous ilium with periosteum in combination with internal implant fixation was reported to improve the outcome of reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients according to Tscherne/Oestern FxCO-I closed fracture and FxOI open fractures classification after Rüedi-Allgöwer III or AO/OTA type C3 pilon fracture received a large autologous ilium with periosteum for tibiotalar joint reconstruction and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), between March 2015 and September 2018. The visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Burwell and Charnley criteria were used for outcome analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with an average age of 45.2 years were followed for an average of 18.3 months. The VAS and AOFAS scores, and Burwell and Charnley ratings were recorded at the last follow-up after reconstructive surgery. Two patients developed redness and swelling at the wound site, but recovered after local care and dressing changes. No patient displayed deep surgical site infection, donor site complication, non-union or local complication during the final follow-up. The average bone union time was 18.3 months (range 3-36).

CONCLUSIONS

Large autologous ilium with periosteum in combination with ORIF can be performed for tibiotalar joint reconstruction. This experimental procedure reduces the risk of post-operative complications following articular reconstruction for Rüedi-Allgöwer III or AO/OTA type C3 pilon fractures in short follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The biology and treatment of acute long-bones diaphyseal fractures: Overview of the current options for bone healing enhancement

Diaphyseal fractures represent a complex biological entity that could often end into impaired bone-healing, with delayed union and non-union occurring up to 10% of cases. The role of the modern orthopaedic surgeon is to optimize the fracture healing environment, recognize and eliminate possible interfering factors, and choose the best suited surgical fixation technique. The impaired reparative process after surgical intervention can be modulated with different surgical techniques, such as dynamization or exchange nailing after failed intramedullary nailing. Moreover, the mechanical stability of a nail can be improved through augmentation plating, bone grafting or external fixation techniques with satisfactory results. According to the "diamond concept", local therapies, such as osteoconductive scaffolds, bone growth factors, and osteogenic cells can be successfully applied in "polytherapy" for the enhancement of delayed union and non-union of long bones diaphyseal fractures. Moreover, systemic anti-osteoporosis anabolic drugs, such as teriparatide, have been proposed as off-label treatment for bone healing enhancement both in fresh complex shaft fractures and impaired unions, especially for fragility fractures. The article aims to review the biological and mechanical principles of failed reparative osteogenesis of diaphyseal fractures after surgical treatment. Moreover, the evidence about the modern non-surgical and pharmacological options for bone healing enhancement will discussed.

Reconstruction of Severe Ankle and Pilon Fracture Malunions

Malunion of ankle and pilon fractures has significant detrimental effect on function and development of post-trauma osteoarthritis. Unfortunately, the incidence of malunion has been reported to be increasing. It is important to assess the ankle for congruency, because this determines the level where correction will occur. A plethora of techniques are available, with low-level evidence supporting each, and therefore it is important that the treating surgeon is fully prepared and comfortable in the techniques they are to use. Supplementary procedures are common and should be expected. This article provides a review of current methods of treatment and their outcomes.

Novel anterior curved incision combined with MIPO for Pilon fracture treatment

Backgrounds

Poor prognosis was reported for complex Pilon fractures involving severe soft tissue damage. It is therefore useful to explore the evolution of different treatment strategies in an effort to reconstruct the axial alignment and articular surface, while minimizing additional damage to the surrounding soft tissues.

Methods

Seventeen patients with Pilon fractures were enrolled in this retrospective study from December 2009 to October 2014. The injuries were graded according to AO Classification and the Gustilo-Anderson system. Patients were treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) combined with curved incision on the anterior area of ankle. The ankle function and radiological outcome were assessed by the modified Mazur ankle score and Burwell-Charnley criteria, respectively. Visual analogue score (VAS) score was used to assess the degree of patient’s ankle pain, and related complications were also recorded.

Results

The mean time for fracture healing was 3.6 months (range: 3–6 months). According to Mazur’s criteria, surgical treatment achieved good or excellent outcome in 15 (88.2%) cases, and the average VAS score was 1.19 ± 0.52. On the basis of Burwell-Charnley score, 12 (70.5%) patients achieved anatomic recovery, 4 (23.5%) obtained good reduction, and only 1 (5.9%) patient was diagnosed with valgus deformity. Additionally, 1 (5.9%) patient developed a superficial infection around incision, and 2 (11.8%) experienced superficial peroneal nerve damage. In addition, 2 (11.8%) patients showed radiographic evidence of existing ankle osteoarthritis at the final follow-up.

Conclusions

This retrospective study is the first to assess the application of a curved incision on the anterior area of ankle with MIPO for the treatment of Pilon fractures, which achieves high functional recovery with a low complication rate. However, large randomized controlled trials comparing different approaches and fixation methods are still needed to conclusively identify the optimal treatment protocol.

Evolution in Management of Tibial Pilon Fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tibial plafond, or pilon, fractures can be some of the most difficult fractures to manage. As they are often associated with high-energy trauma, both the soft tissue involvement and the comminuted fracture pattern pose challenges to fixation. Furthermore, the complex anatomy and trauma to the cartilage at the time of injury predispose pilon fractures to poor functional outcomes and high rates of posttraumatic arthritis. This review will discuss the recent developments in the treatment of tibial pilon fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Historically, surgical management of pilon fractures has been associated with high rates of complications, including wound complications, infections, nonunions, and even the need for amputation. In response, staged protocols were created. However, recent studies have called this into question, demonstrating low wound complications with early definitive fixation. Additional studies are evaluating adjuvants to minimize wound complications, including the use of vancomycin powder and oxygen supplementation, while another study challenges the 7-cm myth regarding the distance needed between skin incisions. Additional research has been focused on alternative methods of managing these complex, and sometimes non-reconstructable, injuries with the use of external fixation, minimally invasive internal fixation, and primary arthrodesis. Tibial pilon fractures remain difficult to treat for even the most skilled orthopedic trauma surgeons. With improvements in surgical techniques and implants, complication rates have declined and outcomes have improved; however, the overall prognosis for these injuries often remains poor.

Two-stage open reduction and internal fixation versus limited internal fixation combined with external fixation: a meta-analysis of postoperative complications in patients with severe Pilon fractures

Objectives Two-stage open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and limited internal fixation combined with external fixation (LIFEF) are two widely used methods to treat Pilon injury. However, which method is superior to the other remains controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to quantitatively compare two-stage ORIF and LIFEF and clarify which method is better with respect to postoperative complications in the treatment of tibial Pilon fractures. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively compare the postoperative complications between two-stage ORIF and LIFEF. Eight studies involving 360 fractures in 359 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Results The two-stage ORIF group had a significantly lower risk of superficial infection, nonunion, and bone healing problems than the LIFEF group. However, no significant differences in deep infection, delayed union, malunion, arthritis symptoms, or chronic osteomyelitis were found between the two groups. Conclusion Two-stage ORIF was associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications with respect to superficial infection, nonunion, and bone healing problems than LIFEF for tibial Pilon fractures. Level of evidence 2.