Characteristics, clinical differences and outcomes of breast cancer patients with negative or low HER2 expression

Integrating attention networks into a hybrid model for HER2 status prediction in breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers amongst women, caused by uncontrolled cell growth in breast tissue. Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) proteins play a vital role in regulating normal breast cell development and division, and the status is crucial for determining prognosis and treatment strategies. Despite the availability of various techniques to identify the HER2 gene in tumors, the prediction accuracy of existing methods remains insufficient. This research aims to improve HER2 status prediction accuracy by proposing an Enhanced Hybrid Model with Optimized Attention Network (EHMOA-net) for histopathology image analysis. The methodology involves patch segmentation using an Encoder-Decoder-based hybrid weights alignment with Multi-Dilated U-net (EDMDU) model applied to the TCGA dataset, followed by preprocessing through enhanced Macenko stain normalization for segmented patches and images from the BCI dataset. Improved non-subsampled shearlet transform is utilized for feature extraction, and the Hybrid Enhanced Rough k-means clustering and Fuzzy C-Means (HERFCM) algorithm is employed to cluster neighboring image patches based on similar features. Finally, HER2 prediction is performed using nested graph neural networks integrated with a visual attention network. The proposed method, implemented in Python, achieves an accuracy of 97.85 %, surpassing existing techniques. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of EHMOA-net in improving HER2 prediction accuracy and its potential utility in clinical applications.

Menopausal status-dependent alterations in the transcript levels of genes encoding ERα, ERβ, PR and HER2 in breast tumors with different receptor status

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer has distinct causes and prognoses in patients with premenopausal and postmenopausal status. The expression status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to classify molecular subtypes of breast cancer among which large differences in prognosis exist.

METHODS

The mRNA expression of ESR1 (encoding ERα), ESR2 (encoding ERβ), PGR (encoding PR), and ERBB2 (encoding HER2) was analyzed based on menopausal status (pre- vs post-menopausal) in tumors from breast cancer patients with different receptor status, in R programming environment, using transcriptomics data from TCGA-BRCA project.

RESULTS

In ER-positive or PR-positive or HER2-negative breast tumors, ESR1 transcript levels were found to be higher in tumors from postmenopausal women than those from premenopausal women; in contrast, ESR2 transcript levels were lower in tumors from postmenopausal women than those from premenopausal women. Furthermore, PGR mRNA expression was lower in breast tumors from postmenopausal women than those from premenopausal women, only in those with ER + or PR + status. The expression of these genes between tumors from pre- and post-menopausal patients with breast cancer was also analyzed based on the combination of status of three receptors.

CONCLUSION

Together, the results suggest that mRNA expression of ESR1, ESR2, and PGR might differ depending on menopausal status in breast tumors with certain receptor status. More importantly, the change in the expression of ESR1 and ESR2 following menopause is in the opposite directions in breast cancer patients showing the need to identify particular molecular mechanisms regulating the expression of ER isoforms post-menopause in different directions in breast cancer patients, considering the high clinical importance of these receptors in terms of the prognosis of patients with breast cancer.

Incidence, Clinicopathologic Features, and Follow-Up Results of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-Ultralow Breast Carcinoma

The preliminary result of DESTINY-Breast06 trial demonstrated the effectiveness of antibody-drug conjugate in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-ultralow breast carcinoma (BC), defined by the presence of ≤10% of infiltrating cancer cells showing incomplete and faint/weak membrane staining on HER2 immunohistochemistry. In this study, we investigated the pathologic features and clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-ultralow, HER2-null, and HER2-low expression. The incidence of HER2 ultralow was 17.5% (260/1486). The incidence of other groups is as follows: 7.7% for HER2 null, 56.8% for HER2 low, and 18% for HER2 positive. HER2-ultralow cases showed similarity to HER2-low cases but a significant difference from HER2-null cases, including older age (61.1 vs 57.3 years; P = .0099), fewer grade 3 BCs (18.1% vs 53.9%; P < .0001), triple-negative BCs (16.2% vs 42.6%; P < .0001), estrogen receptor (ER)-negative BCs (16.5% vs 47.8%; P < .0001), and progesterone receptor-negative BCs (26.2% vs 54.8%; P < .0001). When cases were stratified based on ER positivity, these differences between HER2-null and HER2-ultralow groups were confined to ER+ but not ER- cases. There were no discernible differences in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 125) among HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low BCs. HER2-null/ER-BCs displayed a lower probability of overall survival than HER2-ultralow and HER2-low/ER-BCs, but no statistically significant difference was observed in disease-free survival among the 3 groups. HER2-ultralow BCs exhibit distinct features that align more closely with HER2-low BCs than HER2-null BCs. These findings contribute to the evolving classification of HER2 expression in BC and may have implications for refining treatment strategies in this subgroup.

From text to insight: A natural language processing-based analysis of burst and research trends in HER2-low breast cancer patients

With the intensification of population aging, the proportion of elderly breast cancer patients is continuously increasing, among which those with low HER2 expression account for approximately 45 %-55 % of all cases within traditional HER2-negative breast cancer. Concurrently, the significant therapeutic effect of T-DXd on patients with HER2-low tumors has brought this group into the public spotlight. Since the clinical approval of T-DXd in 2019, there has been a significant vertical surge in the volume of publications within this domain. We analyzed 512 articles on HER2-low breast cancer from the Web of Science Core Collection using bibliometrics, topic modeling, and knowledge graph techniques to summarize the current state and trends of research in this domain. Research efforts are particularly concentrated in the United States and China. Our analysis revealed six main research directions: HER2 detection, omics and clinical biomarkers, basic and translational research, neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis, progress of ADC drugs and clinical trials. To enhance the therapeutic efficacy and safety of antibodydrug conjugates (ADCs), researchers are actively exploring potential drug candidates other than T-DXd, with numerous ADC drugs emerging in clinical practice and trials. By incorporating emerging treatment strategies such as immunotherapy and employing circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection techniques, progress has been made toward improving the prognosis of patients with low HER2 expression. We believe that these research efforts hold promise as compelling evidence that HER2-low breast cancer may constitute a distinct and independent subtype.

Survival outcomes for HER2-low breast cancer: Danish national data

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We investigated the prognosis of breast cancer (BC) with low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), as previous studies have found varying impacts on survival of HER2-low BC compared with HER2 0 BC (HER2 IHC score of 0). HER2-low is defined as a score of 1+ or 2+ in an immunohistochemical (IHC) assay without HER2 gene amplification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with HER2 0 or HER2-low BC from the national Danish Breast Cancer Group database were examined by multivariable survival analysis in a retrospective noninterventional investigation. Patients were grouped as either HER2 0 or HER2-low. The primary endpoint was time to recurrence (TR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI).

RESULTS

41,610 patients were included (12,981 with HER2 0 BC and 28,629 with HER2-low BC). HER2-low BC was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.92, p = 0.03). Regarding secondary endpoints, HER2-low disease was linked to improved overall OS (HR: 0.94, p = 0.02). No statistically significant effect of HER2-low was found for DRFI, along with no differential effect of HER2-low according to estrogen receptor (ER) status.

INTERPRETATION

HER2-low BC was found to show an improved HR for OS and DRFI compared with HER2 0 BC; however, further studies are need to establish whether it represents a separate biological entity.

Deciphering HER2-low breast cancer (BC): insights from real-world data in early stage breast cancer

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low has emerged as a potential new entity in breast cancer (BC). Data on this subset are limited, and prognostic results are controversial, evidencing the need of further data in a BC real-world cohort.

Methods

Patients with HER2-negative stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed in a single cohort from the Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona. Demographics and clinicopathological characteristics were examined via medical charts/electronic health records. We aim to describe and compare HER2-0/HER2-low populations through Chi-square or Fisher test, and explore its prognostic impact using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models.

Results

From a cohort of 1755 BC patients, 1401 invasive HER2-negative, stage I-III cases were evaluated. 87% were hormone receptor (HR)-positive versus 13% triple negative (TNBC). Overall, 43% were HER2-0 and 57% HER2-low (61% immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ and 39% IHC 2+). Comparing HER2-low versus HER2-0, HER2-low showed higher proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (91.6% vs 79.9%, p ⩽ 0.001) and progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (79.8% vs 68.9%, p ⩽ 0.001) cases. HER2-0 exhibited higher proportion of TNBC (20.1% vs 8.4%, p = 0.001), grade III tumors (28.8% vs 23.5%, p = 0.039), and higher Ki67 median value (26.47% vs 23.88%, p = 0.041). HER2-low was associated with longer time to distant recurrence (TTDR) compared to HER2-0 (67.8 vs 54.1 months; p = 0.015) and better BC-related survival (19.2 vs 16.3 years; p = 0.033). In the multivariable analysis, HER2-low was not an independent prognostic factor for TTDR and BC-related survival. ER expression showed a strong association with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.425, p ⩽ 0.001) and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.380, p ⩽ 0.001). PR expression was also associated with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.496, p ⩽ 0.001), and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.488, p ⩽ 0.001). Histological grade III was significantly associated with shorter TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 1.737, p = 0.002). Positive nodal status was the strongest factor correlated with worse BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 2.747, p ⩽ 0.001).

Conclusion

HER2-low was significantly associated with HR-positive disease, whereas HER2-0 group had higher incidence of TNBC, histological grade III and higher Ki67%. Although HER2-low group was associated with longer TTDR and improved BC-related survival, these findings could be explained by the greater proportion of favorable prognostic features in this subgroup compared to HER2-0.

Landscape of HER2-low breast cancer: Insights from a six-year study on prevalence and clinicopathological characteristics

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has emerged as a subtype of breast cancer, defined by HER2 1+/2+ in immunohistochemistry (IHC) and absence of ERBB2 gene amplification on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Recent trials showed marked response of HER2-low breast cancer to novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug-conjugates. Data on characteristics of HER2-low breast cancer subtype is limited. Real-world data from the Anatomic Pathology Department of Hotel-Dieu de France, spanning 2017-2023, was retrospectively collected. HER2-positive patients were excluded to compare HER2-low to HER2-zero breast cancer subtypes. Clinicopathological characteristics between the groups were compared using a Chi-Squared test. Out of 1195 patients, we observed 341 (28.5 %) HER2-low breast cancers cases. HER2-positive breast cancer cases (n = 178; 14.9 %) were excluded. There was no significant difference in age and sex between HER2-low and HER2-zero group (p = 0.33 and 0.79, respectively). HER2-low breast cancer was associated with positive estrogen receptor status and positive progesterone receptor status (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). Ductal adenocarcinomas were more commonly observed in HER2-low group (p < 0.001). When stratified by hormone (HR) status, 87.4 % of patients had HR-positive status and 12.6 % were HR-negative. Among the HR-negative group, HER2-low tumors tended to show lower proliferation index compared to HER2-zero tumors (25%vs.10 %, p = 0.04). This study showed that HER2-low is distinct from HER2-zero and is common among patients with breast cancer. Clinicopathological features such as histological type differ between HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer. Within HR-negative breast cancer, those with low HER2 expression exhibit a less aggressive profile compared to HER2-zero tumors.

Understanding the spectrum of HER2 status in breast cancer: From HER2-positive to ultra-low HER2

HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) status in breast cancer spans a spectrum from HER2-positive to ultra-low HER2, each category influencing prognosis and treatment decisions differently. Approximately 20 % of breast cancers overexpress HER2, correlating with aggressive disease and poorer outcomes without targeted therapy. HER2 status is determined through immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), guiding therapeutic strategies. HER2-positive breast cancer exhibits HER2 protein overexpression or gene amplification, benefiting from HER2-targeted therapies like trastuzumab and pertuzumab. In contrast, HER2-negative breast cancer lacks HER2 overexpression and amplification, treated based on hormone receptor status. HER2-low breast cancer represents a newly recognized category with low HER2 expression, potentially benefiting from evolving therapies. Ultra-low HER2 cancers, characterized by minimal expression without gene amplification, challenge conventional classifications and treatment paradigms. Their distinct molecular profiles and clinical behaviors suggest unique therapeutic approaches. Recent diagnostic guideline updates refine HER2 assessment, enhancing precision in identifying patients for targeted therapies. Challenges remain in accurately classifying HER2-low tumors and optimizing treatment efficacy, necessitating ongoing research and innovative diagnostic methods. Understanding the heterogeneity and evolving landscape of HER2 status in breast cancer is crucial for advancing personalized treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.

Prognosis in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer with HER2-low versus HER2-zero treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy: a meta-analysis

Background

The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) is currently the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+), and HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. However, the impact of HER2 status on the prognosis of patients receiving CDK4/6i and ET remains unclear. The meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate different outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients in advanced HR+ breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i and ET.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE databases for relevant published literature. Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled by fixed or random effects models.

Results

Overall, 12 studies with 3567 patients were eligible for analysis. The pooled analysis suggested that no significant differences were observed in terms of ORR and OS between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients who underwent CDK4/6i and ET. Similarly, no significant difference in PFS was found between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients who underwent post-line CDK4/6i and ET or first-line Palbociclib and ET. However, in patients who received mixed-line (not a single treatment line) or first-line CDK4/6i and ET, the PFS was significantly shorter in the HER2-low subgroup than in the HER2-zero subgroup (mixed-line: HR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.11-1.65; P = 0.002; first-line: HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.01-1.28; P = 0.04). A similar phenomenon was observed in patients who received mixed-line or post-line Palbociclib and ET (mixed-line: HR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.09-2.34; P = 0.02; post-line: HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.03-2.00; P = 0.03).

Conclusion

These results indicated that HER2-low status did not have a significant association with ORR and OS, but it may have a worse impact on PFS in patients who received mixed-line or first-line CDK4/6i and ET, as well as mixed-line or post-line palbociclib plus ET.

The Prognostic Impact of HER2-Low and Menopausal Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

TNBC is noted for its aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Recently developed HER2 target agents have shown potential benefit even in HER2-low expressing breast cancers. This study retrospectively analyzed 2542 non-metastatic TNBC patients from 2008 to 2020, revealing that 26.0% were HER2-low. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed. The HER2-low group, compared to the HER2-0 group, showed significantly better DFS, DMFS, OS, BCSS (p = 0.0072, p = 0.0096, p = 0.0180, and p = 0.0001, respectively) with older age and higher rates of postmenopausal status (p < 0.0001). No significant differences in pCR rates were observed. Multivariate analyses identified HER2 status as a significant prognostic factor for DFS (p = 0.048), DMFS (p = 0.018), OS (p = 0.049), and BCSS (p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis revealed that these effects varied with menopausal status, showing more pronounced benefits in postmenopausal women. Our findings suggest that HER2-low TNBC patients exhibit a distinct clinical profile and improved survival compared to HER2-0 TNBC patients, especially in postmenopausal patients. Further research on estrogen and HER2 interaction is needed.

Prognostic factors in non-metastatic HER2 'low' and HER2 'negative' breast cancer: single institute experience

AIM

Comparison of prognosis and survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low and HER2-negative patients with early stage or locally advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective single center study, the patients with early stage or locally advanced stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive [estrogen receptor (ER) ≥ 1% and/or progesterone receptor (PR) ≥ 1%] and HER2 negative or HER2 low invasive breast cancer diagnosis were included. A total of 444 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: HER2 negative and HER2 low. There were 235 (53%) patients in the HER2 negative group and 209 (47%) patients in the HER2 low group.

RESULTS

The HER2 low group had significantly longer 5‑year disease-free survival (DFS) than the HER2 negative group. The patients with lower Ki67 (< 20%) also had a longer 5‑year DFS.

CONCLUSION

Nonmetastatic HR+/HER2 low breast cancer patients had better DFS than HR+/HER2 negative ones. The Ki67 level and HER2 low status were independent prognostic factors. Randomized clinical trials are needed in early stage HER2 low breast cancer patients.

Molecular and Clinical Portrait of HER2-low Invasive Lobular Carcinomas

Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) have a low frequency of ERBB2 amplification, therefore restricting the use of conventional anti-HER2 therapies for this histologic special type. Conversely, ILCs with low HER2 overexpression may represent a broader target for the use of emerging antibody drug conjugate therapies targeting HER2, since these treatments have proven effective in HER2-low breast cancers. Very scarce data about HER2-low ILCs have been so far published, although these tumors could have different prevalence and histomolecular specificities compared with invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST). Our aims in that context were to decipher the clinicopathological and molecular features of a large series of HER2-low ILCs. Comparative evaluation of HER2-low prevalence was done based on a retrospective series of 7970 patients from Institut Curie, with either primary invasive lobular (N = 1103) or no special type (N = 6867) invasive carcinoma. Clinicopathological and molecular analyses of HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive ILCs were performed on a subgroup of 251 patients who underwent surgery for a primary ILC between 2005 and 2008. The mutational profile of these 251 cases was determined from RNAseq data. Compared with HER2-negative IBC-NSTs, the HER2-negative ILCs were found to display a higher frequency of HER2-zero cases (59.4% vs 53.7%) and a lower frequency of HER2-low (40.6% vs 46.3%) (P < .001). Clinicopathological features associated with HER2-low status (vs HER2-zero) in ILC were older age, postmenopausal status, nonclassic ILC histological types, higher grade, proliferation, and estrogen receptor expression levels. Survival curve analysis showed a significantly lower risk of local recurrence for HER2-low (vs HER2-zero) ILCs, but no association was found between HER2 status and either breast cancer-specific survival or distant metastasis-free interval. ERBB3 was the unique mutated gene exclusively associated with HER2-low ILCs yet being mutated at a low frequency (7.1%) (false discovery rate < 0.05). In conclusion, HER2-low ILCs exhibit their own particularities, both on clinical-pathological and molecular levels. Our findings call for larger multicenter validation studies.

Survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remain unclear. The meta-analysis was conducted to summarize current evidence about the survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero BC.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies with 53,714 patients were included. Overall, 34,037 patients (63.37%) were HER2-low, and 19,677 patients (36.63%) were HER2-zero. Patients with HER2-low tumors had a significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) rate than patients with HER2-zero tumors, regardless of the hormone receptor status. Compared with HER2-zero breast cancer, the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of HER2-low BC were longer in the overall cohort (HR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.61-0.85; P < 0.0001; HR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.75-0.92; P = 0.0002); however, no differences were observed in terms of OS and DFS between HER2-low and HER2-zero BC in the HR-negative group. In the HR-positive group, HER2-low status had no significant impact on OS, while significantly associated with increased DFS (HR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.76-0.96; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that although HER2-low BC has a poor response to NACT, it is correlated with favorable OS and DFS after NACT in the overall cohort as well as longer DFS in the HR-positive group.

Do HER2-Low Tumors Have a Distinct Clinicopathologic Phenotype?

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer subtypes, distinguished by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status, have different clinicopathologic features. With recognition of the clinical relevance of HER2-low, there is debate as to whether this is a distinct subtype. Our study aimed to determine whether HER2-low breast cancers have specific clinicopathologic features that differ from those of HER2-negative and HER2-positive cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 11,072 patients undergoing upfront surgery from 1998 to 2010 were identified from a single-institution prospectively maintained database. HER2 status was classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC)/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as HER2 negative (41.2%), HER2 low (45%; IHC 1+ or 2+ with negative FISH), and HER2 positive (13.7%), and stratified by HR status. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis (MVA) were performed to determine associations among variables and subtypes.

RESULTS

Compared with HER2-negative tumors, HER2 low was associated with lymphovascular invasion [odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.36; p = 0.003], multifocality (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.12-1.42; p < 0.001), nodal micrometastasis (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.31; p = 0.024), and lower rates of ≥ 3 positive nodes (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90, p = 0.001). When stratified by HR expression, in both HR-positive and HR-negative tumors, age and multifocality were associated with HER2 low on UVA. On MVA, no variables were independently associated with both HR-negative and HR-positive/HER2-low tumors compared with HER2-negative tumors. In contrast, HER2-positive tumors, regardless of HR status, were associated with multifocality and an extensive intraductal component.

CONCLUSION

Clinicopathologic features of HER2-low tumors appear to be primarily related to HR status. Our findings do not support the characterization of HER2 low as a separate subtype.

Open questions, current challenges, and future perspectives in targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low breast cancer

Approximately 60% of traditionally defined human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers express low levels of HER2 [HER2-low; defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH)-]. HER2-low breast cancers encompass a large percentage of both hormone receptor-positive (up to 85%) and triple-negative (up to 63%) breast cancers. The DESTINY-Breast04 trial established that HER2-low tumors are targetable, leading to the approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as the first HER2-directed therapy for the treatment of HER2-low breast cancer in the United States and Europe. This change in the clinical landscape results in a number of questions and challenges-including those related to HER2 assessment and patient identification-and highlights the need for careful assessment of HER2 expression to identify patients eligible for T-DXd. This review provides context for understanding how to identify patients with HER2-low breast cancer with respect to sample types, scoring and reporting HER2 status, and testing methods and assays. It also discusses management of important T-DXd-related adverse events. Available evidence supports the efficacy of T-DXd in patients with any history of IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH- scores; however, future research may further refine the population who could benefit from T-DXd or other HER2-directed therapies and identify novel methods for patient identification. Because HER2 expression can change with disease progression or treatment, and variability exists in scoring and interpretation of HER2 status, careful re-evaluation in certain scenarios may help to identify more patients who may benefit from T-DXd.

Neo-adjuvant therapies for ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancers: from chemotherapy to hormonal therapy, CDK inhibitors, and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy has been traditionally used as neo-adjuvant therapy in breast cancer for down-staging of locally advanced disease in all sub-types. In the adjuvant setting, genomic assays have shown that a significant proportion of ER positive/HER2 negative patients do not derive benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant endocrine therapy. An interest in hormonal treatments as neo-adjuvant therapies in ER positive/HER2 negative cancers has been borne by their documented success in the adjuvant setting. Moreover, cytotoxic chemotherapy is less effective in ER positive/HER2 negative disease compared with other breast cancer subtypes in obtaining pathologic complete responses.

AREAS COVERED

Neo-adjuvant therapies for ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancers and associated biomarkers are reviewed, using a Medline survey. A focus of discussion is the prediction of patients that are unlikely to derive extra benefit from chemotherapy and have the highest probabilities of benefiting from hormonal and other targeted therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

Predictive biomarkers of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapies are instrumental for selecting ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancer patients for each treatment. Chemotherapy remains the standard of care for many of those patients requiring neo-adjuvant treatment, but other neo-adjuvant therapies are increasingly used.

Prognostic value and relapse pattern of HER2-low in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

A new concept of HER2-low has emerged in recent years. However, the prognostic value and the relapse pattern of HER2-low is unclear.

METHODS

Our study included patients diagnosed with HER2-negative/hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to explore the differences in survival outcomes between the HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group. More importantly, we explored different recurrence patterns, including the comparison of metastatic sites and recurrence time curve between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 797 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were analyzed. Similar disease-free survival (DFS) was observed between the HER2-low group and HER2-zero group (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61-1.16, p = 0.290). There was also no significant difference in OS between the HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group (HR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.46-1.28, p = 0.310). When IHC 1+ and 0 were taken as a group, the IHC 2+ group had significantly better DFS than the IHC 1+ and 0 group in some subgroups. The risk of bone metastasis in patients with HER2 IHC 1+ and 0 was significantly higher than that of patients with HER2 IHC 2+ (12.7% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001). Compared with the HER2-zero group, we found that the HER2-low group had a more obvious peak in mortality at the time of postoperative 80th-100th month.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference in DFS and OS between the HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group was observed. Patients with HER2 IHC 1+ and 0 tend to develop bone metastasis. The HER2-low group had a more obvious second peak in mortality.

Prognostic implications of HER2NEU-low in metastatic breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

We explored characteristics and clinical outcomes of HER2-negative and HER2-low metastatic breast cancers using real-world data.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database to identify MBC patients that were HER2-low or HER2-negative per immunohistochemical staining. A binomial regression analysis identified demographic and clinical correlates of each subtype. A Cox multivariable regression analysis (MVA) and propensity-match analysis were performed to identify correlates of survival.

RESULTS

Excluding missing data, 24,636 MBC patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 were identified; 27.9% were HER2-negative and 72.1% were HER2-low. There were no relevant demographic differences between the groups. HER2-low tumors were half as likely to have concomitant hormone receptor-positive status (p < 0.01). The 3-year survival rate among hormone receptor-negative patients was 33.8% for HER2-low and 32.2% for HER2-negative (p < 0.05), and 60.9% and 55.6% in HER2-low and HER2-negative cases among hormone receptor-positive patients (p < 0.05), respectively. HER2-low cases were associated with better survival on MVA (HR =0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and remained superior with propensity-matching (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.96). In a subset analysis isolated to hormone receptor-positive cases, HER2-low remained correlated with improved survival (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.98) with propensity-matched MVA. Correlates of worse survival include older age as a continuous variable (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.02) and Black race (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.20-1.32) [all p < 0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest such analysis performed to date, our study demonstrates a small but statistically significant association with improved survival for HER2-low tumors compared to HER2-negative tumors in MBC.

The expression of O-linked glycosyltransferase GALNT7 in breast cancer is dependent on estrogen-, progesterone-, and HER2-receptor status, with prognostic implications

GALNT7 is a glycosyltransferase enzyme transferring N-acetylgalactosamine to initiate O-linked glycosylation in the Golgi apparatus. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women globally. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; ERBB2) are important biomarkers in the prognosis and molecular subtyping of breast cancer. Here, we showed that ER-positive, PR-positive or HER2-positive breast tumors have higher expression of GALNT7 compared to ER-negative, PR-negative or HER2-negative breast tumors, respectively. We found that CpG-aggregated methylation of GALNT7 gene is decreased, and in parallel, its transcript levels are increased in breast cancer compared to healthy breast tissue. We observed that the difference in the expression of GALNT7 between negative and positive status of the receptors is the highest for HER2, followed by ER and PR, pointing that HER2 might be relatively more influential than ER and PR on the expression of GALNT7 in breast cancer. We reported that basal-like breast tumors have decreased expression of GALNT7 compared to non-basal-like tumors, and that high GALNT7 expression is associated with favorable relapse-free and distant metastasis-free survival in HER2 status-dependent manner in breast cancer patients. Moreover, we showed that GALNT7 expression in breast cancer is cell type- (epithelial vs stromal cells), tumor grade- and ethnicity-dependent. Combined, we propose that GALNT7 might contribute to different clinical outcomes depending on the receptor status in breast cancer, and that a better understanding of GALNT7 and its function in the context of breast cancer is needed.

Characterisation of luminal and triple-negative breast cancer with HER2 Low protein expression

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) expressing low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 Low) is an emerging category that needs further refining. This study aims to provide a comprehensive clinico-pathological and molecular profile of HER2 Low BC including response to therapy and patient outcome in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings.

METHODS

Two different independent and well-characterised BC cohorts were included. Nottingham cohort (A) (n = 5744) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) BC cohort (B) (n = 854). The clinical, molecular, biological and immunological profile of HER2 Low BC was investigated. Transcriptomic and pathway enrichment analyses were performed on the TCGA BC cohort and validated through next-generation sequencing in a subset of Nottingham cases.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of HER2 Low tumours were hormone receptor (HR) positive (HR+), enriched with luminal intrinsic molecular subtype, lacking significant expression of HER2 oncogenic signalling genes and of favourable clinical behaviour compared to HER2 negative (HER2-) BC. In HR+ BC, no significant prognostic differences were detected between HER2 Low and HER2- tumours. However, in HR- BC, HER2 Low tumours were less aggressive with longer patient survival. Transcriptomic data showed that the majority of HR- /HER2 Low tumours were of luminal androgen receptor (LAR) intrinsic subtype, enriched with T-helper lymphocytes, activated dendritic cells and tumour associated neutrophils, while most HR-/HER2- tumours were basal-like, enriched with tumour associated macrophages.

CONCLUSION

HER2 Low BC is mainly driven by HR signalling in HR+ tumours. HR-/HER2 Low tumours tend to be enriched with LAR genes with a unique immune profile.

The Impact of HER2-Low Expression on Oncologic Outcomes in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is a prevalent malignancy with increasing incidence, particularly in Asian countries. Classification based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is pivotal in determining treatment. Recent advances have challenged the traditional dichotomy in HER2 classification, prompting investigation into the HER2-low subtype's characteristics and outcomes. This retrospective study analyzed 10,186 non-metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer cases treated from 2008 to 2020. Data encompassed clinical, pathological, and treatment information. Oncologic outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). In total, 56.5% were HER2-low cases. Differences in patient characteristics were noted, with more BRCA1/2 mutations and higher mastectomy rates in the HER2-low group (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). Fewer received adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and fewer histologic and nuclear grade 1 tumors were identified (all p < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 64 months (range: 13-174), HER2-low cases exhibited better DFS, OS, and BCSS than HER2-0 cases (p = 0.012, p = 0.013, and p = 0.013, respectively). Notably, the prognosis differed between premenopausal and postmenopausal subgroups, with BCSS benefitting premenopausal patients (p = 0.047) and DFS and OS benefitting postmenopausal patients in the HER2-low group (p = 0.004, p = 0.009, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed HER2 status as an independent predictor of these outcomes (p = 0.010, p = 0.008, and p = 0.014, respectively). This extensive single-center study elucidates the favorable prognosis associated with HER2-low status in HR-positive breast cancer. However, this effect differs among premenopausal and postmenopausal patients, necessitating further research into the underlying tumor biology.

Prognosis difference between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is proposed to be a special population of patients with an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1 + or 2 + and non-amplified in situ hybridization (ISH) results. The role and prognostic impact of HER2-low BC is still controversial. This meta-analysis aims to explore the prognostic difference between of HER2-low and HER2-zero characteristic in BC patients.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and eligible studies were search in PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE databases. Quality assessment of included studies were performed by Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Furthermore, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and analysis for publication bias were conducted.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies comprising a total of 93,317 patients were included for meta-analysis. BC patients with HER2-low characteristic have longer OS (HRs 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.93, p < 0.0001) and DFS (HRs 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.93, p = 0.001) compared to those with HER2-zero characteristic. Subgroup analysis indicate that the source of heterogeneity may come from the hormone receptor (HR) status group. Although, the publication bias was detected, sensitivity analysis and the trim-and-fill method analysis demonstrated the stability and reliability of the results.

CONCLUSION

HER2-low BC patients have longer OS and DFS compared to HER2-zero BC patients, and its prognostic value is consistent among different HR status patients. Whether HER2-low breast cancer is an independent subtype of breast cancer is still a subject of ongoing research, and more studies are needed to fully understand the molecular and clinical features of this subtype.

Tumor characteristics and survival rate of HER2-low breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

HER2 is an important prognostic marker in breast cancer (BC) patients, which also plays a crucial role in their therapeutic plan. Consequently, a great desire is to thoroughly assess the patients based on their HER2 status. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate HER2-low breast cancer as a new subtype in the standard classification of BC patients and review its characteristics and survival rate in a tertiary center in Iran. We retrospectively evaluated disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and clinicopathological characteristics of BC patients referred to the Cancer Research Center in Tehran, Iran from 1991 to 2022. Patients' clinical characteristics, including HER2 status, which is classified as HER2-low, HER2-positive, or HER2-negative, were obtained from prospectively maintained registries. Among the total 3582 recruited patients, 60.2%, 13.6%, and 26.2% were HER2-negative, HER2-low, and HER2-positive, respectively. HER2-positive patients showed a significantly higher Hazard Ratio (HR) for DFS (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01-2.05) and OS (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31-3.20), compared to HER2-low. Moreover, HER2-low and HER2-negative were found to show the same proportion of high-grade tumors (28 and 28.4%), while 40% of the HER2-positive tumors were high-grade. Accordingly, HER2-low patients had a lower metastasis risk than the others (P-value = 0.01). The Ki67 percentage was significantly lower in the HER2-low group compared to the HER2-positive (P-value < 0.001). HER2-low, a new subtype of HER2-status classification with distinct biological and clinicopathological traits, represented the highest survival rate and less invasive characteristics. This difference was statistically significant when compared to HER2-positive, but not when compared to HER2-negative.Research registration unique identifying number: NCT05754047.

Clinical Genetic Features and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in HER2-Low Breast Cancers: A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this work is to reveal differences in clinical and genetic features, as well as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response, between HER2-low and HER2-zero or HER2-positive breast cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 245 female patients with breast cancer were retrospectively enrolled from seven hospitals. Core needle biopsy (CNB) samples were collected before NAC and used for next-generation sequencing by a commercial gene panel. Clinical and genetic features, as well as NAC response, were compared between HER2-low and HER2-zero or HER2-positive breast cancers. The nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) method was applied to cluster the C-Score of enrolled cases to reveal the intrinsic features of each HER2 subgroup.

RESULTS

A total of 68 (27.8%) cases are HER2-positive, 117 (47.8%) cases are HER2-low, and 60 (24.5%) cases are HER2-zero. HER2-low breast cancers have a significantly lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rate than HER2-positive and HER2-zero breast cancers (p < 0.050 for all comparisons). Compared with HER2-low breast cancers, HER2-positive cases have higher rates of TP53 mutation, TOP2A amplification, and ERBB2 amplification, as well as lower rates of MAP2K4 mutation, ESR1 amplification, FGFR1 amplification, and MAPK pathway alteration (p < 0.050 for all comparisons). After clustering HER2-low cases by the NMF method, 56/117 (47.9%) are in cluster 1, 51/117 (43.6%) are in cluster 2, and 10/117 (8.5%) are in cluster 3. HER2-low cases in cluster 2 have the lowest pCR rate among the three clusters (p < 0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low breast cancers have significant genetic differences from HER2-positive cases. Genetic heterogeneity exists in HER2-low breast cancers and impacts on NAC response in this subgroup.

Molecular features and clinical implications of the heterogeneity in Chinese patients with HER2-low breast cancer

The molecular heterogeneity and distinct features of HER2-low breast cancers, particularly in the Chinese population, are not well understood, limiting its precise management in the era of antibody‒drug conjugates. To address this issue, we established a cohort of 434 Chinese patients with HER2-low breast cancer (433 female and one male) and integrated genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling data. In this cohort, HER2-low tumors are more distinguished from HER2-0 tumors in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup. Within HER2-low tumors, significant interpatient heterogeneity also exists in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup: basal-like tumors resemble HER2-0 disease, and non-basal-like HER2-low tumors mimic HER2-positive disease. These non-basal-like HER2-low tumors are enriched in the HER2-enriched subtype and the luminal androgen receptor subtype and feature PIK3CA mutation, FGFR4/PTK6/ERBB4 overexpression and lipid metabolism activation. Among hormone receptor-positive tumors, HER2-low tumors show less loss/deletion in 17q peaks than HER2-0 tumors. In this work, we reveal the heterogeneity of HER2-low breast cancers and emphasize the need for more precise stratification regarding hormone receptor status and molecular subtype.

Prognostic value of HER2-low status in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low expression in breast cancer has been recently identified as a new therapeutic target. However, it is unclear if HER2-low status has an independent impact on prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature research was carried out to identify studies comparing survival outcomes of patients affected by HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer. Using random-effects models, pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the metastatic setting as well as disease-free survival (DFS), OS and pathological complete response (pCR) in the early setting. Subgroup analyses by hormone receptor (HoR) status were carried out. The study protocol is registered on PROSPERO (n.CRD42023390777).

RESULTS

Among 1916 identified records, 42 studies including 1 797 175 patients were eligible. In the early setting, HER2-low status was associated with significant improved DFS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.92, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95, P < 0.001) when compared to HER2-zero status. Improved OS was observed for both HoR-positive and HoR-negative HER2-low populations, while DFS improvement was observed only in the HoR-positive subgroup. HER2-low status was significantly associated with a lower rate of pCR as compared to HER2-zero status both in the overall population (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, P = 0.001) and in the HoR-positive subgroup (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.90, P = 0.001). In the metastatic setting, patients with HER2-low breast cancers showed better OS when compared with those with HER2-zero tumours in the overall population (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, P = 0.008), regardless of HoR status. No significant PFS differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HER2-zero status, HER2-low status appears to be associated with a slightly increased OS both in the advanced and early settings, regardless of HoR expression. In the early setting, HER2-low tumours seem to be associated to lower pCR rates, especially if HoR-positive.

Incidence, Clinicopathologic Features, HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Profile, and Oncotype DX Results of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Breast Cancers: Experience From a Single Academic Center

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer, defined by an immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization, is emerging as a predictive marker for the use of the antibody-drug conjugate. To understand how this category differs from HER2-zero cases, we investigated clinicopathological characteristics and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization results in a large cohort of 1309 continuous HER2-negative invasive breast carcinomas from 2018 to 2021 evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration-approved HER2 IHC test. Additionally, we compared Oncotype DX recurrence scores and HER2 mRNA expression between HER-low and HER2-zero cases in a separate cohort of 438 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early-stage breast carcinoma cases from 2014 to 2016. Based on the cohort from 2018 to 2021, the incidence of HER2-low breast cancers was approximately 54%. HER2-low cases had less frequent grade 3 morphology, less frequent triple-negative results, ER and progesterone receptor negativity, and a higher mean HER2 copy number and HER2/CEP17 ratio than HER2-zero cases (P < .0001). Among ER+ cases, HER2-low cases showed significantly less frequent Nottingham grade 3 tumors. In the cohort from 2014 to 2016, HER2-low cases showed significantly higher ER+ percentages, fewer progesterone receptor-negative cases, lower Oncotype DX recurrence scores, and higher HER2 mRNA expression scores than HER2-zero cases. In summary, this is the first study, to our knowledge, using a large cohort of continuous cases evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration-approved HER2 IHC companion diagnostic test for HER2-low expression and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization profile in a real-world setting. Although HER2-low cases showed a higher HER2 copy number, ratio, and mRNA level than HER2-zero cases statistically, such small differences are unlikely to be biologically or clinically meaningful. However, our study suggests that HER2-low/ER+ early-stage breast carcinoma may represent a less aggressive group of breast carcinoma, given its association with a lower Nottingham grade and Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Survival differences between HER2-0 and HER2-low-expressing breast cancer - A meta-analysis of early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

HER2-low (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) breast cancer takes up 40-50% in all breast cancer subtypes. The survival difference between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers remain uncertain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare survival outcome of the two subtypes and to explore the impact of hormone receptor status.

METHODS

A comprehensive medical literature search was performed by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries up to August 2022. We included observational studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results of individual studies were pooled by random-effects models using Stata 16.0. Seventeen articles with a total of 78984 breast cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We observed a statistically significant association between low HER2 expression and better breast cancer survival outcomes (OS: HR: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.90; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.91). In a subgroup analysis, we found that HER2-low patients had better survival outcomes relative to hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients (OS: HR: 0.87; 95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.93; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.85, 0.96). Similarly, in triple-negative breast cancer patients, we also observed a positive association between HER2 low expression and better survival (OS: HR: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.98; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.74, 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that HER2-low breast cancer had better survival outcomes compared to HER2 negative breast cancer in patients with early stage breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status.

REGISTRATION

This meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022335704) on June 10, 2022.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Incidence, Clinicopathologic Features, and Survival Outcomes From Real-World Data of a Large Nationwide Cohort

Patients with breast cancer (BC) with low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression (HER2-low) could benefit from novel antibody-drug conjugates. However, there is conflicting information regarding the characteristics of HER2-low BC and its outcome. We assessed the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of HER2-low BC using real-world data from the Dutch National Pathology Registry. This retrospective study incorporated all patients with primary invasive BC, without neoadjuvant therapy, reported in the Dutch National Pathology Registry synoptic reporting module between 2014 and 2022. HER2 status was categorized as HER2-0 (defined as an immunohistochemistry score of 0 according to the current American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines) or HER2-low (immunohistochemistry score 1+ or 2+ without amplification). Clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival of HER2-low BC were compared with HER2-0, adjusted for estrogen receptor (ER) status. We included 65,035 patients with BC, resulting in 69,424 tumors. The proportion of HER2-low BC was 62% in the ER+ cohort and 38% in the ER- cohort. A substantial number of patients had a different HER2 category between the needle biopsy and the corresponding surgical resection (28%) or among multiple tumors (28%). After multivariable logistic analysis, HER2-low tumors were significantly associated with histologic subtype, a higher ER, and lower progesterone receptor expression in the ER+ cohort, whereas within the ER-cohort, HER2-low tumors were associated with a lower tumor grade. However, the absolute differences were limited, and there was no significant difference in overall survival between HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors within the ER+ or ER- cohort. The classification of HER2 expression (HER2-0 vs HER2-low) varies between biopsies and corresponding resection specimens and within multiple tumors in the same patient, which could affect clinical decision making in case only HER2-low cases are eligible for novel HER2-targeting agents. The limited follow-up time and the lack of substantial clinicopathologic differences between HER2-low and HER2-0-cases could explain the lack of differences in overall survival.

Discordance of HER2-Low between Primary Tumors and Matched Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer

We examined differences in HER2 expression between primary tumors and distant metastases, particularly within the HER2-negative primary breast cancer cohort (HER2-low and HER2-zero). The retrospective study included 191 consecutive paired samples of primary breast cancer and distant metastases diagnosed between 1995 and 2019. HER2-negative samples were divided into HER2-zero (immunohistochemistry [IHC] score 0) and HER2-low (IHC score 1+ or 2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]-negative). The main objective was to analyze the discordance rate between matched primary and metastatic samples, focusing on the site of distant metastasis, molecular subtype, and de novo metastatic breast cancer. The relationship was determined by cross-tabulation and calculation of Cohen's Kappa coefficient. The final study cohort included 148 paired samples. The largest proportion in the HER2-negative cohort was HER2-low [primary tumor 61.4% (n = 78), metastatic samples 73.5% (n = 86)]. The discordance rate between the HER2 status of primary tumors and corresponding distant metastases was 49.6% (n = 63) (Kappa -0.003, 95%CI -0.15-0.15). Development of a HER2-low phenotype occurred most frequently (n = 52, 40.9%), mostly with a switch from HER2-zero to HER2-low (n = 34, 26.8%). Relevant HER2 discordance rates were observed between different metastatic sites and molecular subtypes. Primary metastatic breast cancer had a significantly lower HER2 discordance rate than secondary metastatic breast cancer [30.2% (Kappa 0.48, 95%CI 0.27-0.69) versus 50.5% (Kappa 0.14, 95% CI -0.03-0.32)]. This highlights the importance of evaluating potentially therapy-relevant discordance rates between a primary tumor and corresponding distant metastases.

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic significance of HER2-low expression in patients with early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

HER2-low expression breast cancer (BC) accounts for approximately 45%-55% of all BC cases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic difference between patients with HER2-low expression and HER2-zero BC.

Methods

An electronic search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was performed to screen studies that included prognostic comparisons between HER2-zero and HER2-low expression groups. A total of 14 studies involving 52106 patients were included.

Results

Our results indicated that HER2-low expression was associated with a significant benefit in OS among all patients with early BC (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88), patients with hormone-receptor positive BC (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89), and patients with TNBC (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87). HER2-low expression was associated with a significant benefit in DFS among all patients (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93), patients with hormone receptor-positive BC (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90), but no significant difference in DFS was found in patients with TNBC (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.17). HER2-low expression was associated with a significant benefit in RFS among all patients (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95), patients with hormone receptor-positive BC (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96), but no significant difference in RFS was found in patients with TNBC (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.55-1.16).

Conclusions

Among patients with early-stage BC, patients with HER2-low expression BC had better OS in the overall population, hormone receptor-positive and TNBC subgroups. Besides, favorable DFS and RFS were observed in both the overall population and hormone receptor-positive subgroup.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier (CRD 42022349458).

[Triple-negative breast cancer : Classification, current concepts, and therapy-related factors]

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for about 10% of all breast cancer cases and is defined by the lack of expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors and the lack of overexpression or amplification of HER2. It differs with regard to the younger age of the patients, an increased association with a mutation of BRCA1 and a mostly low differentiation from hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The spectrum of triple-negative breast cancer shows considerable heterogeneity both at the morphological and at the molecular level. It includes most commonly TNBC of no special type, with and without basal phenotype, triple-negative metaplastic breast carcinomas, triple-negative breast carcinomas with apocrine differentiation and rare triple-negative tumor types. At the gene-expression level, TNBC most commonly is associated with a basal phenotype, with rarer molecular variants of TNBC involving the Claudin-low, molecular apocrine types, and other rarer subtypes. Therefore, a critical use of the term TNBC, considering the histopathological tumor differentiation, is recommended.

HER2-low-positive and response to NACT and prognosis in HER2-negative non-metastatic BC

PURPOSE

With the release of promising data from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates, there is a new therapeutic direction in HER2-low expression breast cancer (BC). This study aims to evaluate the differences in clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-low-positive and HER2-zero BC, including response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and prognosis.

METHODS

Records of HER2-negative (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0, + 1, or + 2 non-amplified by in situ hybridization [ISH]) patients who received NACT at our cancer center between January 2017 and December 2017 were retrospectively collected. HER2-low-positive was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1 + or IHC2 + /in-situ hybridization negative and HER2-zero was defined as IHC0. The coprimary objectives were to compare pathological complete response (pCR) and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models and Cox-proportional hazards models were performed for analysis of the endpoints pCR, RFS, and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 239 [84.5%] of 283 tumors were HER2-low-positive (including 132 [55.2%] HER2-1 + and 107 [44.8%] HER2-2 + /ISH non-amplified) and 44 [15.5%] were HER2-zero. Patients in the HER2-low-positive group had more commonly hormone receptor positivity than HER2-zero patients (188 [78.7%] vs. 19 [43.2%], P = 0.000), but there was no difference between HER2-1 + and HER2-2 + / ISH non-amplified (99 [75.0%] vs. 89 [83.2%], P = 0.125). HER2-zero tumors had a significantly higher pCR rate than HER2-low-positive tumors (15 [34.1%] of 44 vs. 22 [9.2%] of 239, P = 0.000). Pathological complete response was also significantly higher in HER2-zero tumors versus HER2-low-positive tumors in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup (13 [52.0%] of 25 vs. 14 [27.5%] of 51, P = 0.036), but not in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup (2 [10.5%] of 19 vs 8 [4.3%] of 188, P = 0.231). No significant difference was observed in 5-year RFS between the two groups (HR 0.577, 95% CI 0.298-1.118, P = 0.103). However, HER2-low-positive tumors showed significantly better OS than HER2-zero tumors (HR 0.280, 95% CI 0.122-0.697, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that HER2-low-positive tumors have specific biological characteristics according to the hormone receptor status and exhibit different responses to NACT and prognosis.

Current Biological, Pathological and Clinical Landscape of HER2-Low Breast Cancer

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is a newly defined subset of HER2-negative BC that has HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or score of 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) negative phenotype. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant clinical benefits of novel HER2 directing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in treating this group of tumors. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd), a HER2-directing ADC was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as the first targeted therapy to treat HER2-low BC. However, HER2-low BC is still not well characterized clinically and pathologically. This review aims to update the current biological, pathological and clinical landscape of HER2-low BC based on the English literature published in the past two years and to propose the future directions on clinical management, pathology practice, and translational research in this subset of BC. We hope it would help better understand the tumor biology of HER2-low BC and the current efforts for identifying and treating this newly recognized targetable group of BC.

Efficacy evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-low expression breast cancer: A real-world retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To characterize the clinicopathological features and evaluate the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) efficacy of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 905 breast cancer patients who received 4 cycles of thrice-weekly standard NACT in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were retrospectively enrolled, including 685 cases with HER2-low expression and 220 cases with HER2-negative expression. Clinicopathological features were compared between patients with HER2-negative and HER2-low expression. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to find the independent factors of achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after NACT.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in stage_N (P = 0.014), histological grade (P = 0.001), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P < 0.001), progesterone receptor (PgR) status (P < 0.001), NACT regimens (P = 0.032) and NACT efficacy (P = 0.037) between patients with HER2-negative and HER2-low expression breast cancer. In subgroup analysis, histological grade (P = 0.032), ER (P = 0.002), Ki-67 (P < 0.001) and HER2 status (P = 0.025) were independent predictors of achieving a pCR in ER-positive breast cancer. And the nomogram for pCR in ER-positive breast cancer showed great discriminatory ability with an AUC of 0.795. The calibration curve also showed that the predictive ability of the nomogram was a good fit to actual observations. Then, in the analysis of ER-negative breast cancer, only stage_N (P = 0.001) and Ki-67 (P = 0.018) were independent influencing factors of achieving a pCR in ER-negative breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

HER2-low breast cancer was a different disease from HER2-negative breast cancer in clinicopathological features. Moreover, the NACT efficacy of HER2-low breast cancer patients was poorer.

Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer

Novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) showed its effect in previously-treated HER2-low metastatic breast cancer, suggesting a promising future in HER2-low breast cancer. We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of 325 patients with stage I-III HER2 negative breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2016 to June 2021. In general, 91 patients (28.0%) were HER2-zero, and 234 patients (72.0%) were HER2-low. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate of the entire cohort was 17.3%. The pCR rate was 16.7% in HER2-low group, and 18.9% in HER2-zero group, showing no significant difference. Patients with HER2-low tumors had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than patients with HER2-zero tumors. ER status was the affecting factor of OS in HER2-low patients in both univariate and multivariate analysis. In conclusion, evidence for HER2-low BC as a distinct entity is insufficient, and more efforts are needed to standardize the scoring of HER2-low breast cancer.

Targeted Approaches to HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Current Practice and Future Directions

Simple Summary

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) accounts for more than half of breast cancer patients. Anti-HER2 therapy has been ineffective in HER2-low BC, for which palliative chemotherapy is the main treatment modality. The definitive efficacy of T-Dxd in HER2-low BC breaks previous treatment strategies, which will redefine HER2-low and thus reshape anti-HER2 therapy. This review summarizes detection technologies and novel agents for HER2-low BC, and explores their possible role in future clinics, to provide ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of HER2-low BC.

Abstract

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) has a poor prognosis, making the development of more suitable treatment an unmet clinical need. While chemotherapy is the main method of treatment for HER2-low BC, not all patients benefit from it. Antineoplastic therapy without chemotherapy has shown promise in clinical trials and is being explored further. As quantitative detection techniques become more advanced, they assist in better defining the expression level of HER2 and in guiding the development of targeted therapies, which include directly targeting HER2 receptors on the cell surface, targeting HER2-related intracellular signaling pathways and targeting the immune microenvironment. A new anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate called T-DM1 has been successfully tested and found to be highly effective in clinical trials. With this progress, it could eventually be transformed from a disease without a defined therapeutic target into a disease with a defined therapeutic molecular target. Furthermore, efforts are being made to compare the sequencing and combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and HER2-targeted therapy to improve prognosis to customize the subtype of HER2 low expression precision treatment regimens. In this review, we summarize the current and upcoming treatment strategies, to achieve accurate management of HER2-low BC.

HER2-low breast cancers: Current insights and future directions

In light of the significant clinical benefits of novel HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates in advanced HER2-low expressing breast cancers in recent phases I and III clinical trials, particularly trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd), the new "HER2-low" category in breast cancers (breast cancer with a HER2 IHC score of 1+, or 2+ without gene amplification) has gained increasing attention. In the past year, "HER2-low" breast cancers have been under active investigation by both oncologists and pathologists. In this current review, we update the recent cutting-edge research on HER2-low breast cancers, with a focus on the biology of HER2-low breast cancers, the issues on the identification of HER2-low breast cancers by immunohistochemistry in current practice of pathology, and the future directions in this emerging category in breast cancers.