Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Prescription data and demographics: An explainable machine learning exploration of colorectal cancer risk factors based on data from Danish national registries

OBJECTIVES

Despite substantial advancements in both treatment and prevention, colorectal cancer continues to be a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. This study investigated the potential of using demographics and prescribed drug information to predict risk of colorectal cancer using a machine learning approach.

METHODS

Five different machine learning algorithms, including Logistic Regression, XGBoost, Random Forests, kNN, and Voting Classifier, were initially developed and evaluated for their predictive capabilities across various time horizons (3, 6, 12, and 36 months). To enhance transparency and interpretability, explainable techniques were employed to understand the model's predictions and identify the relative contributions of factors like age, sex, social status, and prescribed medications, promoting trust and clinical insights. While all developed models, including simpler ones such as Logistic Regression, demonstrated comparable performance, the Voting Classifier, as an ensemble model, was selected for further investigation due to its inherent diversity and generalizability. This ensemble model combines predictions from multiple base models, reducing the risk of overfitting and improving the robustness of the final prediction.

RESULTS

The model demonstrated consistent performance across these time horizons, achieving a precision consistently above 0.99, indicating high ability in identifying patients at risk. However, the recall remained relatively low (around 0.6), highlighting the model's limitations in comprehensively identifying all at risk patients, despite its high precision. This suggests additional investigations in future studies to further enhance the performance of the proposed model.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning models can identify individuals at higher risk for developing colorectal cancer, enabling earlier interventions and personalized risk management strategies. However, further studies are needed before implementation in clinical practice.

The Association Between Health Literacy and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Findings Using a Three-Question Health Literacy Measure

PURPOSE

Health literacy (HL) can impact health behaviors including colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Prior findings using extensive measures of HL suggested that low HL is associated with lower CRC screening rates. We hypothesized that low HL, when measured using a clinically applicable three-question measure, would also be associated with low CRC screening rates.

METHODS

Data collected from the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) was utilized from 17 states that included a three-question HL measure. Participants ages 50-75 were included. The HL scores were categorized as adequate, marginal, or limited HL. The primary outcome was United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation-concordant CRC screening. The relationship between HL and CRC screening was examined using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 38,044 participants who met inclusion criteria, 47.2% (n = 17,950), 49.9% (n = 18,989), and 2.9% (n = 1105) had adequate, marginal, and limited HL, respectively. Lower HL levels were associated with lower adherence to USPSTF CRC screening recommendations: 73.3% for adequate, 68.0% for marginal, and 48.9% for limited HL (p < 0.01). Respondents with limited HL were 45% less likely to undergo CRC screening (OR = 0.55; 95%CI: 0.48-0.63). A significant interaction (p < 0.01) between health literacy and sex was identified. CRC screening difference among HL levels was more pronounced for male (OR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.40-0.79) than female respondents (OR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.52-0.76).

CONCLUSION

Limited health literacy is associated with significantly lower rates of appropriate CRC screening, particularly for males. This three-question HL measure provides a clinically applicable tool to identify people at risk for lack of CRC screening.

The effect on colorectal cancer incidence and staging with population-based FOBT-screening in Sweden

AIM

To investigate colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and stage of disease in the population invited vs. not invited to the guaiac-based Fecal Occult Blood (gFOBT) and Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening program in Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden, 2008-2021, and to estimate the incidence rate by sex and localization in the colorectum.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of all 60-69-years-old residents of the Stockholm-Gotland region 2008-2012 according to the population register. Screening with biennial gFOBT was successively implemented in the region by randomly inviting birth cohorts of the target group to different year of start of screening from 2008 and replaced by FIT with cut-off level 40 µg/g in women and 80 µg/g in men for a positive test in 2015. Record linkage was made to the National Cancer Register and to the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register (SCRCR). The age-standardized CRC incidence ratio was compared in invited and non-invited during screening and in 70-75-year-olds and assessed overall and by sex, CRC stage and localization.

RESULTS

In total, 320,989 and 151,533 individuals were invited to a first screening and FIT round, and 5,972 CRCs were diagnosed. During screening, the overall age-adjusted incidence ratio for the gFOBT- and FIT-invited compared to the non-invited was 0.99 (95% CI 0.91-1.07) and 1.03 (95% CI 0.93-1.15), respectively. Post screening, 70-75 years of age, the overall incidence rate was 12% lower among the invited than the non-invited (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.97). During FIT screening, the incidence for stage I and proximal CRC was 38 and 23% higher than in the non-invited (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09-1.76 and RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.48 respectively). The incidence post screening was 22% lower regarding stage I CRC, 13% lower in women, and 17% lower for distal CRCs as compared to the non-invited (RR 95% CI 0.78 0.63-0.95, 0.87 0.76-1.00 and 0.83 0.74-0.94 respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the Stockholm-Gotland program, the FIT screening significantly increased the incidence rate in early staged and proximal CRCs as compared to the uninvited, and the significant decrease in the overall CRC incidence post screening was mainly seen in distal, early staged CRCs in women.

Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Switzerland - Quo Vadis?

Objectives

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most commonly diagnosed cancers in Switzerland. Supported by a solid evidence base for CRC screening, cantons have increasingly established organized screening programs. This report summarizes and discusses the state of this program landscape using findings from the Swiss Improving Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Implementation Science Study.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinical or administrative leads for Swiss CRC screening programs to understand key characteristics, including host organization, enrollment pathways, screening modalities, and program deliverers.

Results

Eleven out of 13 existing or planned programs in 2021 participated, eight of which have been developed since 2020. All programs offer mail invitations to citizens 50-69 years old and fecal immunochemical testing, though positivity thresholds vary. Access to colonoscopy and the role of healthcare providers vary between programs.

Conclusion

Cantonal influences on designing and implementing preventive services allow programs to adapt to local conditions. However, they also challenge opportunities for cross-program learning, efficiencies, and equity. Strengthening the infrastructure connecting programs for shared knowledge building and program improvement will be vital for sustaining Swiss organized CRC screening.

Cost effectiveness analysis of three colorectal cancer screening modalities in Kuwait

Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant health challenge in Kuwait, ranking as the second most common cancer with the incidence rate 13.2 cases per 100,000 people in year 2019. This study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of three colorectal cancer (CRC) screening methods in Kuwait from the perspective of Kuwait's healthcare providers. Using a Decision Tree Analysis Model, the study compared three screening modalities: Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) followed by colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy alone, sigmoidoscopy alone and alongside no screening. Over a 10-year period post-diagnosis, the model tracked costs and outcomes based on CRC patients' life expectancy, expressing results using Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs). Colorectal cancer screening using FOBT followed by colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy resulted in 7.7 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of USD 3,573. In contrast, no screening achieved 7.2 QALYs but was more expensive, costing USD 4,084. Screening with only sigmoidoscopy or only colonoscopy provided 6.8 QALYs each, at costs of USD 4,905 and USD 5,002, respectively. Sensitivity analyses explored uncertainties in cost and outcome estimates. FOBT followed by colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy can be considered as an efficient and effective approach towards early detection of CRC. This approach can be used by healthcare policymakers in Kuwait, in the development of population-based CRC screening programs to optimize resource allocation and improve public health outcomes.

Evaluating the implementation of a multicomponent intervention to improve faecal immunochemical test-based (FIT) colorectal cancer screening in primary care

Screening has proven effective at reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is recommended for screening people aged 50-74 years at average risk of CRC in Alberta, Canada. This project implemented a multicomponent intervention in real-world, primary care settings in Alberta to improve the FIT participation rate and evaluated the reach, effectiveness and implementation outcomes.The multicomponent intervention comprised of in-clinic FIT kit distribution, patient education and reminder calls, was implemented in four primary care clinics. Reach was measured as the proportion of patients receiving the intervention. Effectiveness was measured by comparing the proportion of patients completing FIT during preintervention and perintervention periods. Implementation was measured by the perceived acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of providers in implementing the intervention. Data were collected from electronic medical records and validated survey tools.Four clinics implemented the intervention during an 8-month study period (September 2021 to April 2022); 99% of eligible patients received a FIT kit. The baseline FIT completion rate across participating clinics was 62%, which increased by 13 percentage points to 75% during the intervention period. Of the 75% who completed the FIT, 56% did without a reminder call, whereas 19% did so after receiving one or more reminders. More than 90% of providers perceived the intervention implementation as acceptable, feasible and appropriate.The multicomponent FIT intervention was perceived as acceptable, feasible, and appropriate and improved the FIT screening rates in pilot clinics. An implementation guidance document has been developed and tested to communicate the implementation process for use by other primary care clinics and aid in the spread of the intervention across Alberta. Implementing this intervention in routine practice can help decrease the incidence and mortality of CRC.

Analysis of Risk Factors, Treatment Patterns, and Survival Outcomes After Emergency Presentation With Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Nigeria

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prospective data on presentation and outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Nigeria are limited; however, emergency presentation with advanced disease is thought common.

METHODS

Consecutive CRC patients presenting at six sites over 6 years were included. Risk factors for emergency presentation were evaluated using logistic regression methods. Overall survival (OS) was compared between emergent and elective patients using Kaplan-Meier methods and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of 535 patients, 30.7% presented emergently. Median age was 56 years, 55% were men, and 5.0% reported a cancer family history. Emergency patients had more proximal cancers (42.1% vs. 24.0%), Stage IV disease (61.6% vs. 40.2%; p < 0.001), lower household income (₦35 000/month vs. ₦50 000/month), lower education levels (p = 0.008) and accessed care with nonmotorized transport (50.6% vs. 37.2%; p = 0.005). Median OS was shorter in the emergency group (6.4 vs. 17.4 months; p < 0.001). Across clinical stages, emergency presentation was associated with worse OS (Stage IV median OS 4.8 vs. 9.4 months; p = 0.002). Surgery improved survival in both groups, although emergency patients had higher 30-day postoperative mortality (23.2% vs. 9.1%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent Nigerian CRC patients have worse OS than elective patients. Cancer control efforts should focus on faster cancer detection, early presentation, diagnosis, and treatment.

A preliminary study of further attempt at the development, testing and application of an auxiliary equipment for electronic colonoscopy

Colonoscopy is a valuable tool for colorectal cancer screening and health checkups, with increasing utilization annually. Assisted entry is a standard procedure during electronic colonoscopy. In China, most clinically assisted colonoscopy procedures involve a nurse directly applying abdominal pressure to the patient's abdomen. This maneuver provides a fulcrum for the physician performing the procedure, facilitating smoother access to the colon. To reduce labor, optimize resource utilization, and enhance efficiency, this preliminary study aimed to develop and evaluate an adjunctive pressurized removable lap band for colonoscopy. This prospective randomized controlled trial randomized participants into control and experimental groups for observational comparison during follow-up, mitigating retrospective bias. Data were collected from 150 participants in a tertiary hospital endoscopy department between March and September 2023. Participants were evenly divided into groups using a randomized number table. Demographic data, including gender, age, height, weight, and abdominal circumference, were collected to ensure group representativeness and comparability. No significant pre-test differences were found between the groups. The experimental group demonstrated a significant reduction in examination-only insertion time compared to the control group (p < 0.001), median respectively 2.5, 3. Additionally, compared with control group (41.3%), the experimental group (24%) required fewer nurse assistance (p = 0.024). No significant differences were observed in systolic and diastolic blood pressure changes between the groups (p = 0.07, p = 0.43). However, compared with control group (0.89 ± 1.17), the experimental group (2.19 ± 0.94) reported lower pain scores (p < 0.001). Overall, this preliminary study validates the adjunctive pressurized removable lap band as an effective tool for improving colonoscopy efficiency, reducing patient pain, and conserving medical resources.Trial registration: Registration Authority: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR). Number: ChiCTR2400082664.

Detection of genetic determinants of potentially oncogenic representatives of the intestinal microbiota as biomarkers of colorectal cancer

Relevance. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Non-invasive diagnostic methods based on the determination of hidden blood in the stool (fecal immunochemical test, guaiac test), which have been proven to be effective in clinical studies, are used for CRC screening. However, a significant disadvantage of the available non-invasive diagnostic methods is the low sensitivity in detecting the oncological process at the early stages. A number of recent studies discuss the relationship between the disease and various potentially oncogenic microorganisms in the human intestinal tract, which can be used to expand the arsenal of non-invasive methods for diagnosing CRC based on molecular genetic examination of a stool sample to identify oncogenic microorganisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of using genetic determinants of potentially oncogenic microorganisms as markers for colorectal cancer, based on a comparison of their prevalence in groups of patients with colorectal cancer, facultative precancerous diseases and patients without intestinal pathology. Materials and methods. 215 participants were included in the "case–control" study: 70 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer, 70 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, 75 participants without diagnosed intestinal pathology. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to identify and detect genes of potentially oncogenic microorganisms. Results and discussion. An association was found between CRC and the presence of the Bacteroides fragilis fragilisin gene (OR 7.00; 95% CI: 2.55–22.50; p 0.001), species-specific genes of the periodontal pathogenic microorganisms Fusobacterium nucleatum (OR 5.61; 95% CI: 2.87–11.30; p 0.001) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (OR 16.3; 95% CI: 4.33–106.00; p 0.001), the clbB gene of pks pathogenicity island of the Enterobacteria (OR 3.44; 95% CI: 1.39–8.51; p = 0.010). Conclusion. The presence of genetic markers of potentially oncogenic bacterial species and genotypes in the gut microbiome is associated with colorectal cancer. The results obtained support the possibility of using molecular genetic detection of the studied potentially oncogenic microorganisms as a method for non-invasive diagnosis of CRC.

Video Interventions for Reducing Health Inequity in Cancer Screening Programmes: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Health equity can lead to disparities in cancer screening, treatment, and mortality. This systematic review aims to identify and describe interventions that used video or DVD formats to reduce health inequity in cancer screening and review the effectiveness of such interventions in increasing screening rates compared to usual care conditions.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) published until 18/01/2023 that compared intervention versus usual care control groups, with the percentage of cancer screening uptake during follow-up as an outcome. The risk of Bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool.

RESULTS

After screening 4201 abstracts, 192 full texts were assessed for eligibility and 18 were included that focused on colorectal (n = 9), cervical (n = 5), breast (n = 5), and prostate (n = 1) cancer screening. All were based in the USA except one and most focused on ethnicity/race, while some included low-income populations. Most of the video interventions used to increase cervical cancer screening reported positive results. Studies aimed at increasing mammography uptake were mostly effective only in specific groups of participants, such as low-income or less-educated African American women. Results for colorectal cancer screening were conflicting. Videos that were culturally tailored or used emotive format were generally more effective than information-only videos.

CONCLUSIONS

Video interventions to increase cancer screening among populations with low screening uptake show some positive effects, though results are mixed. Interventions that use individual and cultural tailoring of the educational material should be further developed and investigated outside of the USA.

Comparative effectiveness of two interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among females living in the rural Midwest

PURPOSE

To assess the comparative effectiveness of a tailored, interactive digital video disc (DVD) intervention versus DVD plus patient navigation (PN) intervention versus usual care (UC) on the uptake of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among females living in Midwest rural areas.

METHODS

As part of a larger study, 663 females (ages 50-74) living in rural Indiana and Ohio and not up-to-date (UTD) with CRC screening at baseline were randomized to one of three study groups. Demographics , health status/history, and beliefs and attitudes about CRC screening were measured at baseline. CRC screening was assessed at baseline and 12 months from medical records and self-report. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether females in each group were UTD for screening and which test they completed.

RESULTS

Adjusted for covariates, females in the DVD plus PN group were 3.5× more likely to complete CRC screening than those in the UC group (odds ratio [OR] 3.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.09, 6.47) and baseline intention to receive CRC screening (OR 3.45, CI: 2.21,5.42) at baseline. Adjusting for covariates, there was no difference by study arm whether females who became UTD for CRC screening chose to complete a colonoscopy or fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test.

CONCLUSIONS

Many females living in the rural Midwest are not UTD for CRC screening. A tailored intervention that included an educational DVD and PN improved knowledge, addressed screening barriers, provided information about screening test options, and provided support was more effective than UC and DVD-only to increase adherence to recommended CRC screening.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of double-negative T cells in colorectal cancer

Objective

To evaluate the T-lymphocyte subset distribution and the diagnostic and prognosis value of double-negative T (DNT) cells in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

This retrospective study compared the T-lymphocyte subsets and DNT of 114 patients with CRC with those of 107 healthy controls (HC). The diagnostic potential of DNT and T-lymphocyte subsets was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and prognostic values were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox regression model.

Results

The percentages of CD8+ T cells and DNT cells, and value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), were remarkably higher in patients with CRC than in those with HC, but the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ was decreased. Using ROC curve analysis, DNT cell percentage, CEA, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio all had good diagnostic efficacy, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.865, 0.786 and 0.624, respectively. The combination of DNT cell percentage and CEA had an AUC of 0.905, which was significantly higher than that of any single biomarker (p < 0.05). In univariate analysis, the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) clinical stage, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and DNT cell percentage were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, TNM clinical staging (HR = 2.37, 95 % CI: 1.15-4.90), a decreased CD4+/CD8+ ratio (HR = 0.33, 95 % CI: 0.15-0.74), and an increased DNT cell percentage (HR = 2.29, 95 % CI: 1.11-4.73) were independent prognostic factors for CRC.

Conclusion

The percentage of DNT cells may be useful as an evaluation index for CRC diagnosis and prognosis, which was even better when combined with serum CEA.

Unraveling the MicroRNA tapestry: exploring the molecular dynamics of locoregional recurrent rectal cancer

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third most prevalent malignancy globally, with a concerning rise in incidence among young adults. Despite progress in understanding genetic predispositions and lifestyle risk factors, the intricate molecular mechanisms of CRC demand exploration. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) emerge as key regulators of gene expression and their deregulation in tumor cells play pivotal roles in cancer progression.

Methods

NanoString's nCounter technology was utilized to measure the expression of 827 cancer-related miRNAs in tumor tissue and adjacent non-involved normal colon tissue from five patients with locoregional CRC progression. These expression profiles were then compared to those from the primary colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) cohort in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).

Results and discussion

Intriguingly, 156 miRNAs showed a contrasting dysregulation pattern in reccurent tumor compared to their expression in the TCGA COAD cohort. This observation implies dynamic alterations in miRNA expression patterns throughout disease progression. Our exploratory study contributes to understanding the regulatory landscape of recurrent CRC, emphasizing the role of miRNAs in disease relapse. Notable findings include the prominence of let-7 miRNA family, dysregulation of key target genes, and dynamic changes in miRNA expression patterns during progression. Univariate Cox proportional hazard models highlighted miRNAs associated with adverse outcomes and potential protective factors. The study underscores the need for more extensive investigations into miRNA dynamics during tumor progression and the value of stage specific biomarkers for prognosis.

Screening for liver fibrosis: lessons from colorectal and lung cancer screening

Many countries have incorporated population screening programmes for cancer, such as colorectal and lung cancer, into their health-care systems. Cirrhosis is more prevalent than colorectal cancer and has a comparable age-standardized mortality rate to lung cancer. Despite this fact, there are no screening programmes in place for early detection of liver fibrosis, the precursor of cirrhosis. In this Perspective, we use insights from colorectal and lung cancer screening to explore the benefits, challenges, implementation strategies and pathways for future liver fibrosis screening initiatives. Several non-invasive methods and referral pathways for early identification of liver fibrosis exist, but in addition to accurate detection, screening programmes must also be cost-effective and demonstrate benefit through a reduction in liver-related mortality. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this. Future randomized screening trials should evaluate not only the screening tests, but also interventions used to halt disease progression in individuals identified through screening.

The impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare resources from discontinuing colonoscopy surveillance subsequent to low-risk adenoma removal: A simulation study using the OncoSim-Colorectal model

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare resource use from recommending that patients with 1-2 low-risk adenomas (LRAs) return to routine fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening instead of surveillance colonoscopy, from a Canadian provincial healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

The OncoSim-Colorectal microsimulation model simulated average-risk individuals eligible for FIT-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Alberta, Canada. We simulated two surveillance strategies that applied to individuals with 1-2 LRAs (<10 mm) removed as part of the average risk CRC screening program: (a) Surveillance colonoscopy (status quo) and (b) return to FIT screening (new strategy); both at 5 years after polypectomy. A 75 ng/mL FIT positivity threshold was used in the base case. The simulations projected average annual CRC outcomes and healthcare resource use from 2023 to 2042. We conducted alternative scenarios and sensitivity analyses on key variables.

RESULTS

Returning to FIT screening (versus surveillance colonoscopy) after polypectomy was projected to have minimal impact on long-term CRC incidence and deaths (not statistically significant). There was a projected decrease of one (4%) major bleeding event and seven (5%) perforation events per year. There was a projected increase of 4800 (1.5%) FIT screens, decrease of 3900 (5.1%) colonoscopies, and a decrease of $3.4 million (1.2%) in total healthcare costs per year, on average. The annual colonoscopies averted and healthcare cost savings increased over time. Results were similar in the alternative scenarios and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Returning to FIT screening would have similar clinical outcomes as surveillance colonoscopy but could reduce colonoscopy demand and healthcare costs.

Comparison of Fecal MicroRNA Isolation Using Various Total RNA Isolation Kits

Fecal specimens have long been regarded as promising sources for gastrointestinal cancer screening and have, thus, been extensively investigated in biomarker research. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNA molecules involved in regulating various biological processes. They are commonly dysregulated during tumor development and exhibit differential expression in feces. To assess the preanalytical feasibility of fecal miRNA analysis, we systematically compared the performance of commonly used total RNA extraction methods. Fecal samples from healthy subjects were utilized for this evaluation. Various methods, including miRNeasy, Universal, Trizol, RNeasy, and mirVana kits, were employed to isolate total RNA. MiRNA expression analyses were conducted using TaqMan or SYBR Green qRT-PCR for a subset of miRNAs, with externally spiked-in cel-miR-39 used for normalization. Most methods demonstrated similar performance in terms of the total RNA concentration and purity. Externally spiked cel-miR-39 and endogenous miRNAs (RNU6b, miR-16, and miR-21) exhibited comparable concentrations across the different RNA isolation methods, whereas the RNeasy mini kit consistently yielded lower values. Our findings suggest that various isolation methods produce reproducible and comparable miRNA expression results, supporting the potential comparability and translational applicability of miRNA-based biomarker research in the future.

Deaths and cardiopulmonary events following colorectal cancer screening-A systematic review with meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer screening programmes (CRCSPs) are implemented worldwide despite recent evidence indicating more physical harm occurring during CRCSPs than previously thought. Therefore, we aimed to review the evidence on physical harms associated with endoscopic diagnostic procedures during CRCSPs and, when possible, to quantify the risk of the most serious types of physical harm during CRCSPs, i.e. deaths and cardiopulmonary events (CPEs).

METHODS

Systematic review with descriptive statistics and random-effects meta-analyses of studies investigating physical harms following CRCSPs. We conducted a systematic search in the literature and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

We included 134 studies for review, reporting findings from 151 unique populations when accounting for multiple screening interventions per study. Physical harm can be categorized into 17 types of harm. The evidence was very heterogeneous with inadequate measurement and reporting of harms. The risk of bias was serious or critical in 95% of assessments of deaths and CPEs, and the certainty of the evidence was very low in all analyses. The risk of death was assessed for 57 populations with large variation across studies. Meta-analyses indicated that 3 to 23 deaths occur during CRCSPs per 100,000 people screened. Cardiopulmonary events were assessed for 55 populations. Despite our efforts to subcategorize CPEs into 17 distinct subtypes, 41% of CPE assessments were too poorly measured or reported to allow quantification. We found a tendency towards lower estimates of deaths and CPEs in studies with a critical risk of bias.

DISCUSSION

Deaths and CPEs during CRCSPs are rare, yet they do occur during CRCSPs. We believe that our findings are conservative due to the heterogeneity and low quality of the evidence. A standardized system for the measurement and reporting of the harms of screening is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Registration number CRD42017058844.

Association between iron deficiency anemia and subsequent stomach and colorectal cancer diagnosis in Germany

PURPOSE

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most common form of anemia worldwide, resulting in a high burden of disease. Accumulating evidence suggests that IDA is associated with the development of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.

METHODS

Data from the IDA database (IQVIA) of primary care practices in Germany of adult patients first diagnosed with IDA between January 2005 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with a 1:1 propensity score-adjusted cohort without IDA. Study outcomes were first stomach cancer or colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis up to 10 years after the index date as a function of IDA.

RESULTS

A total of 122,502 individuals with IDA and 122,502 individuals without IDA were included. The 10-year cumulative incidence of CRC was 1.4% in the IDA patients compared to 0.8% in the cohort without IDA (p < 0.001). Regression analysis revealed a significant association between IDA and subsequent CRC (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.83-2.30). Stomach cancer was diagnosed in 0.3% of IDA patients compared to 0.2% in the non-IDA cohort during the 10-year follow-up period (p = 0.002). However, this was significant only in the age group > 80 years (HR 2.73; 95% CI 1.60-4.67) and in men (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.38-2.61).

CONCLUSION

These findings add to the literature and suggest an association between IDA and GI cancers. The extent to which this association is due to GI bleeding or other pathophysiological processes that may be caused by IDA requires further investigation, particularly experimental studies.

Effective strategies for Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) programs to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake among populations with limited access to the healthcare system: a rapid review

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death globally. CRC screening can reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. However, socially disadvantaged groups may disproportionately benefit less from screening programs due to their limited access to healthcare. This poor access to healthcare services is further aggravated by intersecting, cumulative social factors associated with their sociocultural background and living conditions. This rapid review systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence on the effectiveness of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) programs in increasing CRC screening in populations who do not have a regular healthcare provider or who have limited healthcare system access.

METHODS

We used three databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and EBSCOhost CINAHL. We searched for systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and quantitative and mixed-methods studies focusing on effectiveness of FIT programs (request or receipt of FIT kit, completion rates of FIT screening, and participation rates in follow-up colonoscopy after FIT positive results). For evidence synthesis, deductive and inductive thematic analysis was conducted. The findings were also classified using the Cochrane Methods Equity PROGRESS-PLUS framework. The quality of the included studies was assessed.

RESULTS

Findings from the 25 included primary studies were organized into three intervention design-focused themes. Delivery of culturally-tailored programs (e.g., use of language and interpretive services) were effective in increasing CRC screening. Regarding the method of delivery for FIT, specific strategies combined with mail-out programs (e.g., motivational screening letter) or in-person delivery (e.g., demonstration of FIT specimen collection procedure) enhanced the success of FIT programs. The follow-up reminder theme (e.g., spaced out and live reminders) were generally effective. Additionally, we found evidence of the social determinants of health affecting FIT uptake (e.g., place of residence, race/ethnicity/culture/language, gender and/or sex).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this rapid review suggest multicomponent interventions combined with tailored strategies addressing the diverse, unique needs and priorities of the population with no regular healthcare provider or limited access to the healthcare system may be more effective in increasing FIT screening. Decision-makers and practitioners should consider equity and social factors when developing resources and coordinating efforts in the delivery and implementation of FIT screening strategies.

Identification and characterization of colorectal-cancer-associated SNPs on the SMAD7 locus

PURPOSE

Genome-wide association studies have identified SMAD7 as a colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility gene. However, its underlying mechanism has not yet been characterized. This study screened functional SNPs (fSNPs) related to colorectal cancer through Reel-seq and obtained regulatory proteins on functional SNPs.

METHODS

The candidate fSNPs on the SMAD7 locus were screened by Reel-seq method. Eight SNPs such as rs8085824 were identified as functional SNPs by luciferase reporter assay and EMSA, SDCP-MS and AIDP-WB revealed that HNRNPK can specifically bind to the rs8085824-C allele. The knockdown of HNRNPK by RNAi proved that HNRNPK could affect cell function by regulating SMAD7.

RESULTS

Eight functional SNPs was found on the SMAD7 locus in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with R2 > 0.8, i.e., rs12953717, rs7227023, rs34007497, rs58920878, rs8085824, rs4991143, rs4939826, and rs7227023. We also identified allele-imbalanced binding of HNRNPK to rs8085824, H1-3 to rs12953717, THOC6 to rs7227023, and DDX21 to rs58920878. Further functional analysis revealed that these proteins are the regulatory proteins that modulate the expression of SMAD7 in the human colorectal cancer cell line DLD1. In particular, we discovered that siRNA knockdown of HNRNPK inhibits cell proliferation and cell clonal formation by downregulating SMAD7, as the decreased cell proliferation and cell clonal formation in the siRNA HNRNPK knockdown cells was restored by SMAD7 overexpression.

CONCLUSION

Our findings reveal a mechanism which underlies the contribution of the fSNP rs8085824 on the SMD7 locus to CRC susceptibility.

The risk of bleeding and perforation from sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analyses

INTRODUCTION

Physical harm from Colorectal Cancer Screening tends to be inadequately measured and reported in clinical trials. Also, studies of ongoing Colorectal Cancer Screening programs have found more frequent and severe physical harm from screening procedures, e.g., bleeding and perforation, than reported in previous trials. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to systematically review the evidence on the risk of bleeding and perforation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.

DESIGN

Systematic review with descriptive statistics and random-effects meta-analyses.

METHODS

We systematically searched five databases for studies investigating physical harms related to Colorectal Cancer Screening. We assessed the internal and the external validity using the ROBINS-I tool and the GRADE approach. Harm estimates was calculated using mixed Poisson regression models in random-effect meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We included 89 studies. Reporting and measurement of harms was inadequate in most studies. In effect, the risk of bias was critical in 97.3% and serious in 98.3% of studies. All GRADE ratings were very low. Based on severe findings with not-critical risk of bias and 30 days follow-up, the risk of bleedings per 100,000 people screened were 8 [2;24] for sigmoidoscopy, 229 [129;408] for colonoscopy following fecal immunochemical test, 68 [39;118] for once-only colonoscopy, and 698 [443;1045] for colonoscopy following any screening tests. The risk of perforations was 88 [56;138] for colonoscopy following fecal immunochemical test and 53 [25;112] for once-only colonoscopy. There were no findings within the subcategory severe perforation with long-term follow-up for colonoscopy following any screening tests and sigmoidoscopy.

DISCUSSION

Harm estimates varied widely across studies, reporting and measurement of harms was mostly inadequate, and the risk of bias and GRADE ratings were very poor, collectively leading to underestimation of harm. In effect, we consider our estimates of perforation and bleeding as conservative, highlighting the need for better reporting and measurement in future studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017058844.

Perspective; recommendations for improved patient participation in decision-making for geriatric patients in acute surgical settings

Geriatric patients often present to the hospital in acute surgical settings. In these settings, shared decision-making as equal partners can be challenging. Surgeons should recognize that geriatric patients, and frail patients in particular, may sometimes benefit from de-escalation of care in a palliative setting rather than curative treatment. To provide more person-centred care, better strategies for improved shared decision-making need to be developed and implemented in clinical practice. A shift in thinking from a disease-oriented paradigm to a patient-goal-oriented paradigm is required to provide better person-centred care for older patients. We may greatly improve the collaboration with patients if we move parts of the decision-making process to the pre-acute phase. In the pre-acute phase appointing legal representatives, having goals of care conversations, and advance care planning can help give physicians an idea of what is important to the patient in acute settings. When making decisions as equal partners is not possible, a greater degree of physician responsibility may be appropriate. Physicians should tailor the "sharedness" of the decision-making process to the needs of the patient and their family.

Effect of a FIT-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program on Mortality Estimated by the Regression Discontinuity Design

The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been implemented in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs, but effect evaluations are lacking. We evaluated the effect of a positive FIT on all-cause and CRC mortality using the regression discontinuity design. The Danish CRC screening program invites all residents 50-74 years old, using a 20-μg hemoglobin/g feces cutoff for colonoscopy referral. In this cohort study, we followed all first-time screening participants from 2014-2019 until 2020. We estimated the local effect of screening results, of just above the cutoff vs. just below, as hazard ratios (HRs) between models fitted at each side of the cutoff. We conducted the analysis within a narrow hemoglobin range (≥17 and <23, n = 16,428) and a wider range (≥14 and <26, n = 35,353). Those screened just above the cutoff had lower all-cause mortality compared with below (HR = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.69; 1.10), estimated from the narrow range. The CRC mortality analysis had few outcomes. In the wider range, those with a FIT just above the cutoff had a lower hazard of CRC mortality compared with just below the cutoff (HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.17; 1.41). A FIT result just above the cutoff, leading to referral to colonoscopy, pointed towards reduced all-cause and CRC mortality compared with just below the cutoff.

Interactive or tailored digital interventions to increase uptake in cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening to reduce health inequity: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Significant health inequities exist in screening uptake for certain types of cancer. The review question was to identify and describe interactive, tailored digital, computer, and web-based interventions to reduce health inequity in cancer screening and review the effectiveness of such interventions in increasing screening rates versus usual care.

METHODS

We searched four medical literature databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) published until 12 January 2023 that evaluated interventions aimed at increasing the percentage of breast, prostate, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening uptake. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity among studies.

RESULTS

After screening 4200 titles and abstracts, 17 studies were included. Studies focused on colorectal ( n  = 10), breast ( n  = 4), cervical ( n  = 2), and prostate ( n  = 1) cancer screening. All were based in the USA except two. Most studies focused on ethnicity/race, while some included low-income populations. Intervention types were heterogeneous and used computer programs, apps, or web-based methods to provide tailored or interactive information to participants about screening risks and options. Some studies found positive effects for increasing cancer screening uptake in the intervention groups compared to usual care, but results were heterogeneous.

CONCLUSION

Interventions that use individual and cultural tailoring of cancer screening educational material should be further developed and investigated outside of the USA. Designing effective digital intervention strategies, with components that can be adapted to remote delivery may be an important strategy for reducing health inequities in cancer screening during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Perceived Importance of the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Best-Worst Scaling Study

OBJECTIVES

To elicit the relative importance of the benefits and harms of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among potential screening participants in the Dutch population.

METHODS

In a consensus meeting with 11 experts, risk reduction of CRC and CRC deaths (benefits) and complications from colonoscopy, stress of receiving positive fecal immunological test (FIT) results, as well as false-positive and false-negative FIT results (harms) were selected as determinant end points to consider during decision making. We conducted an online best-worst scaling survey among adults aged 55 to 75 years from the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel of The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research to elicit preference values for these outcomes. The preference values were estimated using conditional logit regression.

RESULTS

Of 265 participants, 234 (89%) had ever participated in CRC screening. Compared with the stress of receiving a positive FIT result, the outcome perceived most important was the risk of CRC death (odds ratio [OR] 4.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9-5.1), followed by risk of CRC (OR 4.1; 95% CI 3.6-4.7), a false-negative FIT result (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.7-3.5), colonoscopy complications (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4-1.8), and a false-positive FIT result (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.3-1.6). The magnitude of these differences in perceived importance varied according to age, educational level, ethnic background, and whether the individual had previously participated in CRC screening.

CONCLUSION

Dutch men and women eligible for FIT-based CRC screening perceive the benefits of screening to be more important than the harms.

Transcriptional Dysregulations of Seven Non-Differentially Expressed Genes as Biomarkers of Metastatic Colon Cancer

Background: Colon cancer (CC) is common, and the mortality rate greatly increases as the disease progresses to the metastatic stage. Early detection of metastatic colon cancer (mCC) is crucial for reducing the mortality rate. Most previous studies have focused on the top-ranked differentially expressed transcriptomic biomarkers between mCC and primary CC while ignoring non-differentially expressed genes. Results: This study proposed that the complicated inter-feature correlations could be quantitatively formulated as a complementary transcriptomic view. We used a regression model to formulate the correlation between the expression levels of a messenger RNA (mRNA) and its regulatory transcription factors (TFs). The change between the predicted and real expression levels of a query mRNA was defined as the mqTrans value in the given sample, reflecting transcription regulatory changes compared with the model-training samples. A dark biomarker in mCC is defined as an mRNA gene that is non-differentially expressed in mCC but demonstrates mqTrans values significantly associated with mCC. This study detected seven dark biomarkers using 805 samples from three independent datasets. Evidence from the literature supports the role of some of these dark biomarkers. Conclusions: This study presented a complementary high-dimensional analysis procedure for transcriptome-based biomarker investigations with a case study on mCC.

Defining the road map to a UK national lung cancer screening programme

Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT was recommended by the UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) in September, 2022, on the basis of data from trials showing a reduction in lung cancer mortality. These trials provide sufficient evidence to show clinical efficacy, but further work is needed to prove deliverability in preparation for a national roll-out of the first major targeted screening programme. The UK has been world leading in addressing logistical issues with lung cancer screening through clinical trials, implementation pilots, and the National Health Service (NHS) England Targeted Lung Health Check Programme. In this Policy Review, we describe the consensus reached by a multiprofessional group of experts in lung cancer screening on the key requirements and priorities for effective implementation of a programme. We summarise the output from a round-table meeting of clinicians, behavioural scientists, stakeholder organisations, and representatives from NHS England, the UKNSC, and the four UK nations. This Policy Review will be an important tool in the ongoing expansion and evolution of an already successful programme, and provides a summary of UK expert opinion for consideration by those organising and delivering lung cancer screenings in other countries.

Increasing the accuracy of colorectal cancer screening

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health issue, being responsible for nearly 10% of all cancer-related deaths. Since CRC is often an asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic disease until it reaches advanced stages, screening is crucial for the diagnosis of preneoplastic lesions or early CRC.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to summarize the literature evidence on currently available CRC screening tools, with their pros and cons, focusing on the level of accuracy reached by each test over time. We also provide an overview of novel technologies and scientific advances that are currently being investigated and that in the future may represent real game-changers in the field of CRC screening.

EXPERT OPINION

We suggest that best screening modalities are annual or biennial FIT and colonoscopy every 10 years. We believe that the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI)-tools in the CRC screening field could lead to a significant improvement of the screening efficacy in reducing CRC incidence and mortality in the future. More resources should be put into implementing CRC programmes and support research project to further increase accuracy of CRC screening tests and strategies.

Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening on All-Cause and CRC-Specific Mortality Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to pool and compare all-cause and colorectal cancer (CRC) specific mortality reduction of CRC screening in randomized control trials (RCTs) and simulation models, and to determine factors that influence screening effectiveness. (2) Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library were searched for eligible studies. Multi-use simulation models or RCTs that compared the mortality of CRC screening with no screening in general population were included. CRC-specific and all-cause mortality rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by a bivariate random model. (3) Results: 10 RCTs and 47 model studies were retrieved. The pooled CRC-specific mortality rate ratios in RCTs were 0.88 (0.80, 0.96) and 0.76 (0.68, 0.84) for guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) and single flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening, respectively. For the model studies, the rate ratios were 0.45 (0.39, 0.51) for biennial fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), 0.31 (0.28, 0.34) for biennial gFOBT, 0.61 (0.53, 0.72) for single FS, 0.27 (0.21, 0.35) for 10-yearly colonoscopy, and 0.35 (0.29, 0.42) for 5-yearly FS. The CRC-specific mortality reduction of gFOBT increased with higher adherence in both studies (RCT: 0.78 (0.68, 0.89) vs. 0.92 (0.87, 0.98), model: 0.30 (0.28, 0.33) vs. 0.92 (0.51, 1.63)). Model studies showed a 0.62-1.1% all-cause mortality reduction with single FS screening. (4) Conclusions: Based on RCTs and model studies, biennial FIT/gFOBT, single and 5-yearly FS, and 10-yearly colonoscopy screening significantly reduces CRC-specific mortality. The model estimates are much higher than in RCTs, because the simulated biennial gFOBT assumes higher adherence. The effectiveness of screening increases at younger screening initiation ages and higher adherences.

Medizinische Evidenz kompetent kommunizieren

Wie alle Patienten in Deutschland sollen auch jene in der Herzchirurgie, soweit wie möglich, in die klinische Entscheidungsfindung eingebunden werden. Was möglich ist, hängt – neben Patientenvoraussetzungen – maßgeblich von den kommunikativen Fähigkeiten und Werkzeugen ab, die der beratende Arzt einsetzt, um informiertes Entscheiden auf Basis der besten verfügbaren medizinischen Erkenntnisse zu ermöglichen. Anhand von Schlüsselherausforderungen strukturiert dieser narrative Überblick Lösungsansätze für die Nutzung medizinischer Evidenz in Entscheidungsprozessen: unbestimmte Bezugsrahmen, relative Risiken, komplexe Informationen zu Entscheidungsoptionen bis hin zur Interpretation vorangehender diagnostischer Testergebnisse. Die dargestellten Lösungsansätze stellen in die Versorgung integrierbare Werkzeuge dar. Sie erfordern eine Kompetenzstärkung des Fachpersonals und qualitätsgesicherte medizinische Informationsangebote.

Behavior of general physicians about lung cancer screening in a French region hosting a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in France and has a 5-year survival rate of 20%. Recent prospective randomized controlled trials revealed that lung cancer-specific mortality decreased in patients who underwent screening using low-dose chest computed tomography (low-dose CT). The DEP KP80 pilot study conducted in 2016 showed that an organized lung cancer screening campaign involving general practitioners was feasible.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We conducted a descriptive observational study of screening practices by sending a self-reported questionnaire to 1013 general practitioners practicing in the Hauts-de-France region. Our study's primary aim was to investigate the knowledge and practices of general practitioners in the Hauts-de-France region of France regarding lung cancer screening using low-dose CT. The secondary endpoint was to compare practices between general practitioners in the Somme department who had experience of experimental screening and their colleagues in the rest of the region.

RESULTS

The response rate was 18.8% (190 completed questionnaires). Even though 69.5% of the physicians were unaware of the potential benefits of organized low-dose CT screening for lung cancer, 76% proposed screening tests for individual patients. Despite its proven ineffectiveness, chest radiography was still the most widely recommended screening modality. Half of the physicians stated that they had already prescribed chest CT to screen for lung cancer. Additionally, only 36.3% proposed chest CT screening for patients aged over 50 years with a history of more than 30 pack-years. The physicians working in the Somme department (61% had participated in the DEP KP80 pilot study) were more aware of low-dose CT as a screening modality, and offered it significantly more than their colleagues in the other departments (61.1% vs 13.4% p<0.01). All the physicians were in favor of an organized screening program.

CONCLUSION

More than a third of general practitioners in the Hauts-de-France region offered for lung cancer screening using chest CT, although only 18% specified low-dose CT. Before an organized screening program can be set up, good practice guidelines must be made available about lung cancer screening.

Subsequent participation in organized FIT based screening following screen-derived colonoscopy - A Danish nationwide cohort study

Introduction

In the Danish National Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening program, participants with screen-detected low-risk adenomas are invited to a new faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening after two years. However, participation rate in next FIT screening is unknown. We aimed to investigate this subsequent participation rate within the Danish CRC screening program.

Methods

This nationwide register-based study included participants aged 50-72 years registered with FIT screening in the Danish CRC screening program between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017. Participants were included if their index FIT was negative or if it was positive and the subsequent colonoscopy detected low-risk adenomas. Invitees were categorized as subsequent participants if they returned a FIT within 135 days following the invitation to screening. We estimated the relative risk for participation depending on screening outcome, age, and sex.

Result

415,107 with a negative result and 5,550 with low-risk adenomas were included. 86.0% (85.9;86.1) of the invitees with a negative result participated in the subsequent screening, while 71.8% (70.6;73.0) of the invitees with low-risk adenomas participated subsequently. The risk of participation in the subsequent screening was significantly lower among all age groups of men and women with low-risk adenomas compared to similar groups with negative results.

Conclusion

Invitees with low-risk adenomas detected at their initial colonoscopy are less likely to participate in the subsequent screening than invitees with negative results. This association was found in all age groups and for both sexes. Further studies are necessary to assess whether non-attendance is more pronounced in specific subgroups.

Interventions to reduce cancer screening inequities: the perspective and role of patients, advocacy groups, and empowerment organizations

BACKGROUND

Health inequities lead to low rates of cancer screening in certain populations, such as low-income and ethnic minority groups. Different interventions to address this have been developed with mixed results. However, interventions are not always developed in collaboration with the people they target. The aim of our article is to present the viewpoint of patients, survivors, advocates, and lay persons on interventions to increase cancer screening from a health inequity perspective.

METHODS

We prepared talking points to guide discussions between coauthors, who included representatives from nine patient and survivor advocacy groups, organizations working for citizen/patient empowerment, and health equity experts. Perspectives and opinions were first collected through video conferencing meetings and a first draft of the paper was prepared. All authors, read through, revised, and discussed the contents to reach an agreement on the final perspectives to be presented.

RESULTS

Several themes were identified: it is important to not view screening as a discrete event; barriers underlying an individual's access and willingness to undergo screening span across a continuum; individually tailored interventions are likely to be more effective than a one-size fits-all approach because they may better accommodate the person's personal beliefs, knowledge, behaviors, and preferences; targeting people who are unknown to medical services and largely unreachable is a major challenge; including professional patient advocacy groups and relevant lay persons in the cocreation of interventions at all stages of design, implementation, and evaluation is essential along with relevant stakeholders (healthcare professionals, researchers, local government and community organizations etc).

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to address cancer screening inequity currently do not adequately solve the issue, especially from the viewpoint of patients, survivors, and lay persons. Several core pathways should be focused on when designing and implementing interventions: advancing individually tailored interventions; digital tools and social media; peer-based approaches; empowerment; addressing policy and system barriers; better design of interventions; and collaboration, including the involvement of patients and patient advocacy organizations.

Outcomes of upper endoscopy screening in Lynch syndrome: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lynch syndrome (LS) predisposes affected individuals to a high lifetime risk of malignancies, including colorectal, endometrial, gastric, and duodenal cancers. The role of upper GI (UGI) cancer screening in LS has been uncertain, but recent studies have evaluated its utility.

METHODS

Databases were queried through December 2021 to identify studies that examined upper endoscopy screening in LS using EGD. Mantel-Haenszel pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes were constructed using a random-effects model to identify pooled odds of endoscopic findings in persons with LS. Event rates for detection of gastric and duodenal cancers, high-risk lesions, and clinically actionable findings were calculated. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

RESULTS

Nine studies were identified with 2356 LS patients undergoing approximately 7838 EGDs. In total, 47 LS-associated UGI cancers (18 gastric and 29 duodenal cancers), 237 high-risk lesions, and 335 clinically actionable findings were identified. The pooled event rate for detection of any UGI cancer, high-risk lesions, and clinically actionable findings during screening were .9% (95% CI, .3-2.1; I² = 89%), 4.2% (95% CI, 1.6-10.9; I² = 98%), and 6.2% (95% CI, 2.2-16.5; I² = 99%), respectively. There was no difference between LS-associated gene and gastric or duodenal cancer detection.

CONCLUSIONS

In LS, there is evidence that endoscopic screening detects UGI cancers, precancerous lesions, and other clinically actionable findings that favor its use as a part of cancer risk management in LS.

Global and national trends in years of life lost and years lived with disability caused by three common gastrointestinal cancers from 1990 to 2019

Background

Gastrointestinal cancers are a critical global cancer burden, and tracking their trends would inform the health policies.

Methods

Trends of years of life lost (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs) caused by three common gastrointestinal cancers were estimated using annual percentage change (EAPC) and age-standardized rate (ASR). Data was extracted from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019.

Results

The ASR per 100,000 population-year of YLLs caused by esophageal cancer, stomach cancer, and colorectal cancer were 137.98, 264.15, and 282.51 in 2019, respectively. Their overall trends of YLLs declined during 1990–2019, with the respective EAPCs being − 1.42 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: − 1.71 to − 1.13), − 2.13 (95%CI: − 2.29 to − 1.96), and − 0.25 (95%CI: − 0.30 to − 0.19). Meanwhile, decreasing trends of YLDs caused by esophageal cancer and stomach cancer were observed, in which the EAPCs were − 0.67 (95%: − 0.94 to − 0.40) and − 0.85 (95%CI: − 0.97 to − 0.73), respectively. However, an increasing trend was seen in that of colorectal cancer (EAPC = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.77 to 0.89). Among countries, the largest decrease in trend of YLLs was that of stomacher cancer in the Republic of Korea (EAPC =  − 5.88, 95%CI: − 6.07 to − 5.69). However, pronounced increasing trend of YLDs caused by colorectal cancer occurred in China (EAPC = 4.40, 95%CI: 4.07 to 4.72).

Conclusions

Decreasing trends in YLLs and YLDs caused by esophageal cancer, stomach cancer, and colorectal cancer were observed in most countries and regions, indicating that the great progress had been achieved over the past decades. However, the cancer burden was geographical heterogeneity, and cost-effective measures were still required to decline the burden caused by gastrointestinal cancers.

Feasibility of Support by Family Practitioners in Reducing Colorectal Cancer-Related Death among Outpatients Who Have Not Undergone Colorectal Cancer Screening

We aimed to clarify the effectiveness of interventions in outpatients who did not undergo colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. From September 2012 to August 2013, we conducted a project, which showed that the immunological fecal occult blood test (FOBT) was actively recommended for outpatients who were ≥40 years of age, attended the Marumori Hospital regularly, and were not screened for CRC in the previous two years. We evaluated the detection rate of CRC and the disease specific survival ratio in February 2021 among patients with positive FOBT results during the retrospective cohort study. Overall, 388 (91%) out of the 425 outpatients submitted their stool samples. Among 388 outpatients, 66 tested positive for FOBT. While both the positive rate of FOBT and the detection rate of CRC (17% and 0.77%, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the nationwide administrative examination (5.7% and 0.13%, respectively) (p < 0.05), there was no statistically significant difference in the detection rate, compared with the group aged 65 years and older in the nationwide administrative examination. The 7-year CRC-specific survival ratio was 98.5%. Active promotion of FOBT at primary care institutions for outpatients who did not undergo CRC screening may contribute to reducing the frequency of CRC-related deaths.

Impact of CT screening in lung cancer: Scientific evidence and literature review

The treatment of lung cancer has improved significantly in recent years however, lung cancer remains as a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Lung cancer screening has been explored, over the past several decades, as a means of reducing lung cancer mortality, to identify asymptomatic disease when it is potentially curable. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) established that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans of the chest can be instrumental in reducing lung cancer mortality but the criteria for screening implemented in this trial may not be equitably sensitive across racial and sex subpopulations. Furthermore, the high false detection rate reported in this trial has raised concerns regarding overdiagnosis with LDCT alone. The aim of this review is to summarize the history of lung cancer screening trials, limitations of lung cancer screening, the impact of alternative risk prediction models in reducing disparities, and the use of biomarkers in conjunction with imaging to improve diagnostic authenticity.

Screening for Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. 2021 US Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines and available evidence support routine screening from ages 45 to 75, and individualized consideration of screening ages 76 to 85. USPSTF guidelines recommend annual guaiac fecal occult blood testing, annual fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), annual to every 3-year multitarget stool DNA-FIT, every 5-year sigmoidoscopy, every 10-year sigmoidoscopy with annual FIT, every 5-year computed tomographic colonography, and every 10-year colonoscopy as options for screening. The "best test is the one that gets done."

Patient experience, satisfaction and shared decision-making in colorectal cancer screening: protocol of the mixed-methods study CyDESA

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes can reduce incidence and mortality from this condition if adherence to them is high. As patient experience and satisfaction are key factors in determining adherence to screening programmes, they need to be measured. Furthermore, to promote highly patient-centred healthcare, the perception of patients regarding shared decision-making during CRC screening needs to be known. This study aims to assess the experience, satisfaction and participation in decision-making of participants in a CRC screening programme and of patients diagnosed with CRC through this programme in relation to the diagnostic and therapeutic processes of cancer.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The CyDESA study is a mixed-methods study with a four phase sequential design. In phase 1, we will conduct a systematic review of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) for patient experience or satisfaction with CRC screening. In case no located PREM can be applied, in phase 2, we will develop a new PREM. We will use the Delphi methodology to reach consensus among experts and patients and will conduct a pilot test of the developed PREM. Phase 3 is a multicentric cross-sectional study based on self-reported questionnaires that will be conducted at three Spanish hospitals (n=843). The objective is to find out about the experience, satisfaction and participation in decision-making of participants in the CRC screening programme who have had a positive screening test result according to their final screening diagnosis: false positives, colorectal polyps or CRC. Phase 4 is a qualitative phenomenological study based on individual interviews. It will explore the experiences of participants in the CRC screening programme and of those diagnosed with CRC.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval by the Ethics Committees of Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Hospital de Sant Pau and Parc de Salut Mar. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04610086.

Colorectal cancer mortality after randomized implementation of FIT-based screening - a nationwide cohort study

Objective

Evidence of reduction in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality following CRC screening based on the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is insufficient. This study aimed to analyse if CRC mortality was reduced after implementing FIT-based screening.

Setting

The Danish national CRC screening programme.

Methods

This nationwide cohort study included residents aged 50–71 years invited to the prevalence round of the screening programme. Invitation order was decided by randomising on birth month; the first two birth months to be invited were classified as invited and the five last were classified as not-yet-invited and given a pseudo invitation data. Follow-up was from (pseudo)invitation date until 31 December 2017, emigration or death. Relative risk (RR) of CRC death was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 897,812 residents were included (29% invited and 71% not-yet-invited). The median follow-up was 3.3 years. The RR of CRC death at end of follow-up was 0.83 (95% CI 0.66; 1.03) among those invited to screening compared with those not yet invited. For men aged 60–71 years, this RR was 0.68 (95% CI 0.49; 0.94). For those participating in screening compared with a similar group of not-yet-invited residents, the RR was 0.71 (95% CI 0.46–1.08). For male participants aged 60–71 years, this RR was 0.49 (95% CI 0.27−0.89). For women and men aged 50–59 years, RRs were small and statistically non-significant.

Conclusion

This nationwide study showed that even within a median follow-up of only 3.3 years, implementing FIT-based CRC screening reduced CRC mortality among older men.

High expression of miR-17-5p and miR-20a-5p predicts favorable disease-specific survival in stage I-III colon cancer

In many types of cancer, microRNAs (miRs) are aberrantly expressed. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic impact of miR-17-5p and miR-20a-5p in colon cancer. Tumor tissue from 452 stage I-III colon cancer patients was retrospectively collected and tissue microarrays constructed. miR-17-5p and miR-20a-5p expression was evaluated by in situ hybridization and analyzed using digital pathology. Cell line experiments, using HT-29 and CACO-2, were performed to assess the effect of miR-17-5p and miR-20a-5p over expression on viability, invasion and migration. In multivariate analyses, high miR-17-5p expression in tumor (HR = 0.43, CI 0.26–0.71, p < 0.001) and high expression of miR-20a-5p in tumor (HR = 0.60, CI 0.37–0.97, p = 0.037) and stroma (HR = 0.63, CI 0.42–0.95, p = 0.027) remained independent predictors of improved disease-specific survival. In cell lines, over expression of both miRs resulted in mitigated migration without any significant effect on viability or invasion. In conclusion, in stage I-III colon cancer, high expression of both miR-17-5p and miR-20a-5p are independent predictors of favorable prognosis.

An Assessment of Physicians’ Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening and International Guidelines Awareness and Adherence: Results From a Thai National Survey

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake is generally low in the Asia Pacific and physicians’ recommendations affect the screening participation.

Objective

The study aimed to assess Thai physicians’ recommendations for CRC screening, and the awareness of and adherence to international guidelines.

Methods

A survey containing questions assessing physicians’ demographic data, screening recommendations, and awareness of the international CRC screening guidelines assessed by clinical vignettes. Independent predictors of physicians’ recommendations for CRC screening were determined by logistic regression analysis.

Results

Five hundred and eighty-sixth of 1,286 (46%) physicians completed the survey, and 58% of them offered CRC screening. The majority of colorectal surgeons (91%) and gastroenterologists (86%) endorsed screening, whereas 35% of primary care physicians recommended screening. The patient’s age was the only factor influencing the physician’s decision to offer CRC screening (OR, 2.75: 95% CI, 1.61–4.67). Colonoscopy was the most recommended modality among specialists, whereas 60% of primary care physicians offered fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs). The guidelines awareness was noted in 81% of participants, with the highest rates among gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons. Gastroenterologists were more likely to adhere to the guidelines than surgeons, but both recommended shorter interval surveillance colonoscopy than guidelines recommendations in cases of small hyperplastic rectosigmoid polyps.

Conclusions

Recommendations for CRC screening and awareness of guidelines vary among different specialties. A low proportion of primary care physicians recommended screening and colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists recommended shorter intervals for surveillance of small hyperplastic polyp than suggested by guidelines.

Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening in Spain: Results of the 2017 National Health Survey

This study aimed to determine the CRC screening coverage of people aged between 50 and 69 years who were living in Spain in 2017 and describe the factors associated with not having had a faecal occult blood test (FOBT). A cross-sectional study was performed using data from the Spanish National Health Survey 2017. We analysed 7568 individuals between the ages of 50 and 69 years. The proportion of respondents between 50 and 69 years old who had had an FOBT was 29.0% (n = 2191). The three autonomous communities with the lowest proportion of respondents who had had an FOBT were Extremadura (8.7%, n = 16), Ceuta-Melilla (10.4%, n = 3), and Andalucia (14.1%, n = 186). The variables associated with not having had an FOBT were being 50-54 years old (PR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.14), having been born outside of Spain (PR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.06-1.16), not having been vaccinated against the flu (PR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.15), never having had a colonoscopy (PR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.40-1.59), not having had an ultrasound scan in the last year (PR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.14), and not having seen a primary care physician in the last month (PR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.04-1.12). The factors associated with not getting an FOBT were young age, having been born outside of Spain, not having been vaccinated against the flu in the last campaign, and not making frequent use of healthcare services.

Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge and Perceived Barriers Among US Physicians

Introduction

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and has historically been detected late in its course. Low-dose computed tomography scan (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality by 20% and is currently recommended by clinical practice guidelines. However, compared with other cancer screening modalities, LDCT utilization remains low. This study surveyed office-based primary care physicians across the United States to better understand LDCT utilization.

Methods

A total of 1500 family and internal medicine physicians selected from the American Medical Association’s physician master file were surveyed between April and July 2019 regarding LDCT practices, eligibility, clinical scenarios, and perceived barriers.

Results

The American Association for Public Opinion Research response rate 3 was 59% (652 respondents); 599 completed supplemental questions regarding lung cancer screening. A total of 88% of respondents discussed LDCT in the previous year, and 78% had ordered at least one LDCT. Most (59%) knew the tobacco exposure criteria for LDCT and correctly identified appropriate clinical scenarios (49%–86% responded correctly). Less than half of respondents correctly identified the age eligibility criteria (44%–45% responded correctly). In general, male physicians, those who graduated after 1990, and family medicine physicians were more likely to report accurate knowledge regarding LDCT eligibility. The top perceived barriers to LDCT were cost to the patient (48% identified as a major barrier), insurance not covering screening (46% major), and patients being unaware of lung cancer screening (40% major).

Conclusion

Knowledge and practices about lung cancer screening are improving, though remain suboptimal. The most common barriers remain cost or insurance-based and suggest the need for a systems-based response to increase awareness and reduce the underutilization of LDCT.

Implementing lung cancer screening in Europe: taking a systems approach

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Europe. Screening by means of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can shift detection to an earlier stage and reduce lung cancer mortality in high-risk individuals. However, to date, Poland, Croatia, Italy, and Romania are the only European countries to commit to large-scale implementation of targeted LDCT screening. Using a health systems approach, this article evaluates key factors needed to enable the successful implementation of screening programs across Europe. Recent literature on LDCT screening was reviewed for 10 countries (Belgium, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom) and complemented by 17 semistructured interviews with local experts. Research findings were mapped against a health systems framework adapted for lung cancer screening. The European policy landscape is highly variable, but potential barriers to implementation are similar across countries and consistent with those reported for other cancer screening programs. While consistent quality and safety of screening must be ensured across all screening centers, system factors are also important. These include appropriate data infrastructure, targeted recruitment methods that ensure equity in participation, sufficient capacity and workforce training, full integration of screening with multidisciplinary care pathways, and smoking cessation programs. Stigma and underlying perceptions of lung cancer as a self-inflicted condition are also important considerations. Building on decades of implementation research, governments now have a unique opportunity to establish effective, efficient, and equitable lung cancer screening programs adapted to their health systems, curbing the impact of lung cancer on their populations.

Polygenic risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Risk prediction models incorporating single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) could lead to individualized prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the added value of incorporating SNPs into models with only traditional risk factors is still not clear. Hence, our primary aim was to summarize literature on risk prediction models including genetic variants for CRC, while our secondary aim was to evaluate the improvement of discriminatory accuracy when adding SNPs to a prediction model with only traditional risk factors.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review on prediction models incorporating multiple SNPs for CRC risk prediction. We tested whether a significant trend in the increase of Area Under Curve (AUC) according to the number of SNPs could be observed, and estimated the correlation between AUC improvement and number of SNPs. We estimated pooled AUC improvement for SNP-enhanced models compared with non-SNP-enhanced models using random effects meta-analysis, and conducted meta-regression to investigate the association of specific factors with AUC improvement.

RESULTS

We included 33 studies, 78.79% using genetic risk scores to combine genetic data. We found no significant trend in AUC improvement according to the number of SNPs (p for trend = 0.774), and no correlation between the number of SNPs and AUC improvement (p = 0.695). Pooled AUC improvement was 0.040 (95% CI: 0.035, 0.045), and the number of cases in the study and the AUC of the starting model were inversely associated with AUC improvement obtained when adding SNPs to a prediction model. In addition, models constructed in Asian individuals achieved better AUC improvement with the incorporation of SNPs compared with those developed among individuals of European ancestry.

CONCLUSIONS

Though not conclusive, our results provide insights on factors influencing discriminatory accuracy of SNP-enhanced models. Genetic variants might be useful to inform stratified CRC screening in the future, but further research is needed.

Patterns of up-to-date status for colorectal cancer screening in Alberta: a cross-sectional study using survey data

BACKGROUND

Regular screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces its mortality. We explored patterns of use of different CRC screening modalities and quantified the association between having a regular primary care provider and being up to date for CRC screening in a community-based population in Alberta, Canada.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults between 50 and 74 years of age in Alberta, using Canadian Community Health Survey data (2015-2016). We defined being up to date for CRC screening as having completed a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) within the previous 2 years, or having a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy in the previous 5 years before the survey. We analyzed data using multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of 4600 surveyed adults, 62.6% were up to date for CRC screening, with 45.1% having completed a FIT or FOBT (45.1%), and 34.1% having undergone a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. The adjusted odds ratio of being up to date for CRC screening was 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.17-0.38) and the absolute probability of being up to date for CRC screening was 34.4% lower for adults who had no regular primary care provider, compared with those who had. This pattern was observed in both male and female subgroups.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest a suboptimal uptake of CRC screening overall in Alberta, with high disparity between adults with and without a regular primary care provider. The use of customized, multicomponent intervention strategies that are shown to be effective in increasing participation in CRC screening may address this issue.

Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Identification of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) carries significant therapeutic implications. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of PE in patients with AECOPD.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase. We registered the protocol at the PROSPERO (CRD42021230481). Two authors independently evaluated whether titles and abstracts met the eligibility criteria, which were as follows: (1), prospective study or cross-sectional study in case the protocol for workup of PE was specified in advance, (2) patients with AECOPD aged ≥ 18 years, and (3) investigated the prevalence of PE or venous thromboembolism (VTE). Two authors independently extracted the selected patient and study characteristics and outcomes. We presented the results of all analyses with the use of random-effects models. The primary outcome was the prevalence of PE.

RESULTS

We included 16 studies (N = 4093 patients) in this meta-analysis. The prevalence of PE in patients with AECOPD was 12% [95% confidence interval (CI), 9 to 16%]. Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I² = 94.8%). The pooled mortality was higher in patients with PE than those without (odds ratio 5.30, 95%CI: 2.48-11.30, p-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, the prevalence of PE in patients with AECOPD was 12% and the mortality of patients with PE was higher than those without. This suggests an acute necessity to develop validated diagnostic strategies for identifying PE in patients with AECOPD.