Improved Survival Outcomes for Kidney Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases

Management of Brain Metastases in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

The development of brain metastases is a poor prognostic indicator in renal cell carcinoma. Regular imaging and clinical examinations are necessary to monitor the brain before or during systemic therapy. Central nervous system-targeted radiation therapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiation therapy, and surgical resection, is a standard treatment option. Clinical trials are currently investigating the role of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in treating brain metastases and decreasing intracranial disease progression.

An Italian multicenter retrospective real-life analysis of patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma: the BMRCC study

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with brain-spread renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an unmet clinical need, although more recent therapeutic strategies have significantly improved RCC patients' life expectancy. Our multicenter, retrospective, observational study investigated a real-world cohort of patients with brain metastases (BM) from RCC (BMRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 226 patients with histological diagnosis of RCC and radiological evidence of BM from 22 Italian institutions were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate models were performed to investigate the impact of clinicopathological features and multimodal treatments on both overall survival (OS) from the BM diagnosis and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS).

RESULTS

The median OS from the BM diagnosis was 18.8 months (interquartile range: 6.2-43 months). Multivariate analysis confirmed the following as positive independent prognostic factors: a Karnofsky Performance Status >70% [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.92, P = 0.0026] and a single BM (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.86, P = 0. 0310); in contrast, the following were confirmed as worse prognosis factors: progressive extracranial disease (HR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.003-2.74, P = 0.00181) and only one line of systemic therapy after the BM occurrence (HR = 2.98, 95% CI 1.62-5.49, P = 0.029). Subgroup analyses showed no difference in iPFS according to the type of the first systemic treatment [immunotherapy (IT) or targeted therapy (TT)] carried out after the BM diagnosis (HR = 1.033, 95% CI 0.565-1.889, P = 0.16), and revealed that external radiation therapy (eRT) significantly prolonged iPFS when combined with IT (10.7 months, 95% CI 4.9-48 months, P = 0.0321) and not when combined with TT (9.01 months, 95% CI 2.7-21.2 months, P = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a potential additive effect in terms of iPFS for eRT combined with IT and encourage a more intensive multimodal therapeutic strategy in a multidisciplinary context to improve the survival of BMRCC patients.

Evaluating the impact of early identification of asymptomatic brain metastases in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been reported to be present in up to 25% of patients diagnosed with mRCC. There is limited published literature evaluating the role of routine intra-cranial imaging for the screening of asymptomatic BM in mRCC.

AIMS

To evaluate the potential utility of routine intra-cranial imaging, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to characterize the outcomes of mRCC patients who presented with asymptomatic BM, as compared to symptomatic BM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System (CKCis) database was used to identify mRCC patients diagnosed with BM. This cohort was divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of BM symptoms. Details regarding patient demographics, disease characteristics, systemic treatments, BM characteristics and survival outcomes were extracted. Statistical analysis was through chi-square tests, analysis of variance, and Kaplan-Meier method to characterize survival outcomes. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. A total of 267 mRCC patients with BM were identified of which 106 (40%) presented with asymptomatic disease. The majority of patients presented with multiple (i.e., >1) BM (75%) with no significant differences noted in number of BM or BM-directed therapy received in symptomatic, as compared to asymptomatic BM patients. Median [95% confidence interval (CI)] overall survival (OS) from mRCC diagnosis was 42 months (95% CI: 32-62) for patients with asymptomatic BM, and 39 months (95% CI: 29-48) with symptomatic BM (p = 0.10). OS from time of BM diagnosis was 28 months (95% CI: 18-42) for the asymptomatic BM group, as compared to 13 months (95% CI: 10-21) in the symptomatic BM group (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Given a substantial proportion of patients may present with asymptomatic BM, limiting intra-cranial imaging to patients with symptomatic BM, may be associated with a missed opportunity for timely diagnosis and treatment. The utility of routine intra-cranial imaging in patients with renal cell carcinoma, warrants further prospective evaluation.

Outcomes and prognostic factors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with brain metastatic renal cell carcinoma (bmRCC).

METHODS

The data of 322 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, taken between 2012 and 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Forty (12.4%) of the patients had bmRCC. Seventeen (42.5%) of the patients were de novo metastatic, and nine (22.5%) of the patients had brain metastases at presentation. Twenty-four (60%) patients previously had received various therapies (tyrosine kinase inhibitor or checkpoint inhibitors). After brain metastases developed, 35 (87.5%) of the patients received brain radiotherapy (whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery), and twenty-five (62.5%) patients received different systemic therapies. Nine patients received sunitinib, nine received pazopanib, five received nivolumab, and two received axitinib. The median OS was 8.8 months (range: 2.9-14.6) for all patients with bmRCC. In univariate analysis, the number of brain metastasis (P = 0.35), the site of brain metastasis (left, right or bilateral) (P = 0.79), the largest size of brain metastasis (P = 0.45), the number of extracranial metastatic sites (P = 0.81), de novo metastatic disease (P = 0.17), primary tumor site (left or right) (P = 0.90), and tumor grade (P = 0.09) were not statistically significant factors on OS. However, age (P = 0.02), a history of nephrectomy (P < 0.001), receiving brain radiotherapy (P = 0.005), and type of systemic treatment (P = 0.04) were statistically significant. Only, the effect of brain radiotherapy on OS (P = 0.01) was confirmed in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed that the prognosis of patients with bmRCC was poor. Despite a small number of patients, we detected that the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and nivolumab was comparable, and receiving brain radiotherapy was a prognostic factor for OS.

An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma

Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454-489.

Improving Brain Metastases Outcomes Through Therapeutic Synergy Between Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Targeted Cancer Therapies

Brain metastases are the most common form of brain cancer. Increasing knowledge of primary tumor biology, actionable molecular targets and continued improvements in systemic and radiotherapy regimens have helped improve survival but necessitate multidisciplinary collaboration between neurosurgical, medical and radiation oncologists. In this review, we will discuss the advances of targeted therapies to date and discuss findings of studies investigating the synergy between these therapies and stereotactic radiosurgery for non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma brain metastases.

Reshaping Treatment Paradigms for Advanced Renal Cell Cancer Patients and Improving Patient Management : Optimal Management for Renal Cell Cancer Patients

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the great success stories in the field of oncology, which was revolutionized with the development of therapies aimed at disrupting crucial pathways. Tumor biology of RCC has provided insight into the disease through elucidation of the role of vascular endothelial growth-factor (VEGF) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Targeted agents against VEGF and mTOR, as well as agents targeting relevant immunomodulatory pathways, have shown clinical benefit for advanced disease. The targeted agents are highly effective in achieving a response and survival, particularly in high-risk patients. These include the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) axitinib and cabozantinib, and programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) nivolumab and pembrolizumab. There is a wealth of evidence investigating different therapeutic options and combinations for first-line treatment of advanced RCC including the CheckMate 214 study, KEYNOTE-426, JAVELIN Renal 101, and CheckMate 9ER. Dual ICI and combination agents targeting the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) and VEGF, began to demonstrate superiority over previously accepted standards in advanced clear-cell RCC. Data from a number of clinical studies are available to help physicians with evidence-based decisions for the sequence of second-line and future treatments for patients with progressive RCC. In this review, we focus on essentials for clinicians treating patients with clear-cell RCC.

Validation of the updated renal graded prognostic assessment (GPA) for patients with renal cancer brain metastases treated with gamma knife radiosurgery

INTRODUCTION

Prognosis of patients with brain metastasis (BM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is relevant for treatment decisions and can be estimated with the Renal Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). The aim of this study is to validate the updated version of this instrument in a cohort treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) without prior local intracerebral therapy.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2018, 106 RCC patients with BM were treated with GKRS. They were categorized according to the updated Renal GPA. Overall survival (OS), distant intracranial failure and local failure were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors were identified with Cox proportional hazard regressions.

RESULTS

Median OS was 8.6 months. Median OS for GPA categories 0.0-1.0 (15%), 1.5-2.0 (12%), 2.5-3.0 (35%) and 3.5-4.0 (29%) was 2.9, 5.5, 8.1 and 20.4 months, respectively. Karnofsky performance status < 90, serum hemoglobin ≤ 12.5 g/dL, age > 65 years and time from primary diagnosis to brain metastasis < 1 year were significantly related with shorter survival, while presence of extracranial disease, the volume and total number of BM had no significant impact on OS. A total count of > 4 BM was the only predictive factor for distant intracranial failure, while none of the investigated factors predicted local failure.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the updated Renal GPA in an independent cohort as a valuable instrument to estimate survival in patients with BM from RCC treated with GKRS.

Multidiscipline Immunotherapy-Based Rational Combinations for Robust and Durable Efficacy in Brain Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma

Advanced imaging techniques for diagnosis have increased awareness on the benefits of brain screening, facilitated effective control of extracranial disease, and prolonged life expectancy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Brain metastasis (BM) in patients with mRCC (RCC-BM) is associated with grave prognoses, a high degree of morbidity, dedicated assessment, and unresponsiveness to conventional systemic therapeutics. The therapeutic landscape of RCC-BM is rapidly changing; however, survival outcomes remain poor despite standard surgery and radiation, highlighting the unmet medical needs and the requisite for advancement in systemic therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are one of the most promising strategies to treat RCC-BM. Understanding the role of brain-specific tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is important for developing rationale-driven ICI-based combination strategies that circumvent tumor intrinsic and extrinsic factors and complex positive feedback loops associated with resistance to ICIs in RCC-BM via combination with ICIs involving other immunological pathways, anti-antiangiogenic multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and radiotherapy; therefore, novel combination approaches are being developed for synergistic potential against RCC-BM; however, further prospective investigations with longer follow-up periods are required to improve the efficacy and safety of combination treatments and to elucidate dynamic predictive biomarkers depending on the interactions in the brain TIME.

Phase II trial of hippocampal-sparing whole brain irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost for metastatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Advanced radiotherapeutic treatment techniques limit the cognitive morbidity associated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastasis through avoidance of hippocampal structures. However, achieving durable intracranial control remains challenging.

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution single-arm phase II trial of hippocampal-sparing whole brain irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost (HSIB-WBRT) to metastatic deposits in adult patients with brain metastasis. Radiation therapy consisted of intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivering 20 Gy in 10 fractions over 2-2.5 weeks to the whole brain with a simultaneous integrated boost of 40 Gy in 10 fractions to metastatic lesions. Hippocampal regions were limited to 16 Gy. Cognitive performance and cancer outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients, median age 60 years (interquartile range, 54-65), were enrolled. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-4.0) and overall survival was 9 months. As expected, poor survival and end-of-life considerations resulted in a high exclusion rate from cognitive testing. Nevertheless, mean decline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised delayed recall (HVLT-R DR) at 3 months after HSIB-WBRT was only 10.6% (95% CI: -36.5‒15.3%). Cumulative incidence of local and intracranial failure with death as a competing risk was 8.8% (95% CI: 2.7‒19.6%) and 21.3% (95% CI: 10.7‒34.2%) at 1 year, respectively. Three grade 3 toxicities consisting of nausea, vomiting, and necrosis or headache were observed in 3 patients. Scores on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory 20 remained stable for evaluable patients at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

HVLT-R DR after HSIB-WBRT was significantly improved compared with historical outcomes in patients treated with traditional WBRT, while achieving intracranial control similar to patients treated with WBRT plus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This technique can be considered in select patients with multiple brain metastases who cannot otherwise receive SRS.

Construction and Validation of a Convenient Clinical Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Brain Metastasis in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients

Brain metastasis (BM) is a typical type of metastasis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. The early detection of BM is likely a crucial step for RCC patients to receive appropriate treatment and prolong their overall survival. The aim of this study was to identify the independent predictors of BM and construct a nomogram to predict the risk of BM. Demographic and clinicopathological data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for RCC patients between 2010 and 2015. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors, and then, a visual nomogram was constructed. Multiple parameters were used to evaluate the discrimination and clinical value. We finally included 42577 RCC patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that histological type, tumor size, bone metastatic status, and lung metastatic status were independent BM-associated risk factors for RCC. We developed a nomogram to predict the risk of BM in patients with RCC, which showed favorable calibration with a C-index of 0.924 (0.903-0.945) in the training cohort and 0.911 (0.871-0.952) in the validation cohort. The calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) also demonstrated the reliability and accuracy of the clinical prediction model. The nomogram was shown to be a practical, precise, and personalized clinical tool for identifying the RCC patients with a high risk of BM, which not only will contribute to the more reasonable allocation of medical resources but will also enable a further improvements in the prognosis and quality of life of RCC patients.

Patterns of Initial Metastatic Recurrence After Surgery for High-Risk Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate postoperative recurrence patterns for high-risk nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to identify prognostic factors associated with site-specific metastatic recurrence using a multi-institutional contemporary cohort.

METHODS

Data for nonmetastatic ≥pT3a RCC patients treated with surgery at 4 independent centers was analyzed. Initial recurrence locations were identified, and imaging templates were defined by anatomic landmarks using radiologic definitions. Prognostic factors for site specific recurrence were evaluated with univariate and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 1057 patients were treated surgically for ≥pT3a RCC. Initial recurrence location was in a single site for 160 (59.3%) patients and at multiple locations in 110 (41.7%) patients. The most common sites of metastatic recurrence were lung (144/270, 53.3%), liver (54/270, 20.0%), and bone (48/270, 17.8%). Recurrence was identified in 52 of 270 (19.3%) patients outside the chest/abdomen template, most commonly in the pelvis (25/270, 9.3%). Bone and brain metastases were the most common organs for metastases outside chest/abdomen. Patients with tumor diameter >10 cm and grade 4 were more likely to recur in the bone (HR 3.61, P <.001) and brain (HR 16.5, P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Metastatic progression outside chest/abdomen imaging templates was present in 1 of 5 high risk patients at initial metastatic RCC diagnosis, most commonly in the pelvis. Patients with large (>10 cm) tumors and grade 4 histology are at highest risk for bone and brain metastases.

The Evolving Role of Metastasectomy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Surgical metastasectomy continues to be utilized for patients with solitary or low-volume metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although few high-quality data are available to evaluate outcomes, local treatment is recommended when feasible because it may allow a subset of patients to delay or avoid systemic treatments. With the development of improved mRCC therapies, utilization of metastasectomy has increased because most patients have incomplete responses to systemic treatment of their metastases. This review discusses the rationale and history of metastasectomy, trends in utilization, prognostic factors for patient selection, site-specific considerations, alternatives for nonsurgical local treatment, and risk of morbidity associated with metastasectomy.

Appliance of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) provides noninvasive visualization of eloquent brain areas. The nTMS is usually applied in presurgical planning to minimize the risk of surgery-related neurological deterioration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of nTMS data for GammaKnife treatment planning for patients suffering from brain metastases.

METHODS

Motor cortex mapping with nTMS was performed in eight patients with brain metastases within or adjacent to the precentral gyrus. The nTMS data set was imported into the planning software and fused with anatomical MRI. Then contouring of the target and critical structures was performed. Treatment plans with and without visualization of the functional structures by nTMS were analyzed and compared by neurosurgeon and medical physicist.

RESULTS

The primary motor cortex was successfully delineated even in all cases despite significant peritumoral edema. Beam shaping and combined isocenters were used for conformal dose distribution and steeper dose fall-off near the identified eloquent zone. Compared with plans without nTMS data, treatment plans with integration of cortical nTMS mapping data showed a 2% to 78% (mean, 35.2% ± 22.7%) lower 12-Gy volume within the motor cortex without reduction of the dose applied to the tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented approach allows the easy and reliable integration of neurophysiological mapping data into GammaKnife treatment plans by the standard GammaPlan software. Diminishing the dose to critical structures might help to minimize side effects and therefore improve quality of life for brain metastasis patients.

Impact of Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Patients With Synchronous and Metachronous Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND

Modern radiation techniques have led to significant improvements in intracranial disease control and overall survival (OS) for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients diagnosed with brain metastases (BM). The impact of systemic therapy in patients developing mRCC BM remains undercharacterized.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of mRCC patients diagnosed with BM. Patients were grouped as having either metachronous BM (ie, ≥ 3 months from mRCC diagnosis) or synchronous BM (ie, < 3 months from mRCC diagnosis). Details of patient demographics, BM, systemic therapy, and outcomes were extracted. Statistical analysis comprised chi-square tests, analysis of variance, and Kaplan-Meier method to characterize survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were identified (40 at ≥ 3 months from mRCC diagnosis and 34 at < 3 months from mRCC diagnosis) of which 72 (97%) received local therapy for their BM. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration while first line treatment was longer at 7.8 (3.6-17.0) versus 5.1 (3.3-12.6) in patients with metachronous BM versus patients with synchronous BM (P = 0.6), respectively. After BM diagnosis, the metachronous BM cohort continued to receive the same systemic therapy for a median (IQR) duration of 1.9 (0.4-5.5) months, with eventual change most commonly the result of extracranial disease progression. Median (IQR) OS from mRCC diagnosis favored metachronous BM patients versus synchronous BM patients, at 64.2 (31.4-not yet reached) versus 22.4 (9.7-34.1) months (P = .003), respectively. However, this was not significantly different from the time of BM diagnosis, with median (IQR) survival of 20.6 (9.2-31.2) versus 15.7 (11.6-not yet reached) months (P = .95), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged OS was found for mRCC patients with BM that presented either metachronously or synchronously. For patients diagnosed with metachronous BM, the development of BM may be an early sign of systemic therapy failure.

Site of extranodal metastasis impacts survival in patients with testicular germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND

Using a large, nationally representative, population-based cancer registry, this study systematically evaluated the impact of the location and burden of extranodal testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) metastases on survival.

METHODS

Men with stage III TGCTs captured by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry from 2010 to 2015 with distant extranodal metastases were identified. Clinicopathologic information was collected, and patients were subdivided according to the specific organ site or sites of metastatic involvement (lung, liver, bone, and/or brain). Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression were used to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS), and model performance was assessed with Harrell's C statistic.

RESULTS

Nine hundred sixty-nine patients with stage III TGCTs were included with predominantly nonseminomatous histology (84%). Most patients (91%) had pulmonary metastases, whereas 20%, 10%, and 10% had liver, bone, and brain metastases, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 21 months, 19% of these men died of TGCTs. When they were grouped by the primary site of metastasis, patients with more than 1 extrapulmonary metastasis exhibited the worst CSS (hazard ratio [HR] vs isolated pulmonary involvement, 4.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.60-7.00; P < .01). Among patients with isolated extrapulmonary involvement, those with brain metastases had the poorest survival (HR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.98-5.28; P < .01), and they were followed by patients with liver (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.56-3.35; P < .01) and bone metastases (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.11-3.50; P = .02). Harrell's C statistic (multivariable) was 0.71.

CONCLUSIONS

The site of metastatic involvement affects survival outcomes for patients with TGCTs, and this may reflect both the aggressive biology and the challenging treatment of these tumors. Further incorporation of organotropism into current prognostic models for metastatic TGCTs warrants attention.