Use of likelihood ratios improves clinical interpretation of IgG and IgA anti-DGP antibody testing for celiac disease in adults and children

Diagnostic accuracy of a fully automated multiplex celiac disease antibody panel for serum and plasma

Background

An automated multiplex platform using capillary blood can promote greater throughput and more comprehensive studies in celiac disease (CD). Diagnostic accuracy should be improved using likelihood ratios for the post-test probability of ruling-in disease.

Methods

The Ig_plex™ Celiac Disease Panel on the sqidlite™ automated platform measured IgA and IgG antibodies to tTG and DGP in n = 224 CD serum or plasma samples. Diagnostic accuracy metrics were applied to the combined multiplex test results for several CD populations and compared to conventional single antibody ELISA tests.

Results

With multiple positive antibody results, the post-test probability for ruling-in untreated and treated CD increased to over 90%. The number of samples positive for more than one antibody also increased in untreated CD to ≥90%. Measurement of all four CD antibodies generate cut-off dependent accuracy profiles that can monitor response to treatment with the gluten-free diet (GFD). Higher positive tTG and DGP antibodies are seen more frequently in confirmed CD without (81%–94%) than with GFD treatment (44%–64%). In CD lacking biopsy confirmation, overall agreement of plasma to serum was ≥98% for all antibodies, and 100% for venous to capillary plasma.

Conclusions

The Ig_plex Celiac Disease Panel increases the likelihood of confirming CD based on the post-test probability of disease results for multi-reactive markers. Specific positivity profiles and cut-off intervals can be used to monitor GFD treatment and likely disease progression. Using serum, venous and capillary plasma yield comparable and accurate results.

Next-Generation Autoantibody Testing by Combination of Screening and Confirmation-the CytoBead® Technology

Occurrence of autoantibodies (autoAbs) is a hallmark of autoimmune diseases, and the analysis thereof is an essential part in the diagnosis of organ-specific autoimmune and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), especially connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Due to the appearance of autoAb profiles in SARD patients and the complexity of the corresponding serological diagnosis, different diagnostic strategies have been suggested for appropriate autoAb testing. Thus, evolving assay techniques and the continuous discovery of novel autoantigens have greatly influenced the development of these strategies. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) analysis by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on tissue and later cellular substrates was one of the first tests introduced into clinical routine and is still an indispensable tool for CTD serology. Thus, screening for ANA by IIF is recommended to be followed by confirmatory testing of positive findings employing different assay techniques. Given the continuous growth in the demand for autoAb testing, IIF has been challenged as the standard method for ANA and other autoAb analyses due to lacking automation, standardization, modern data management, and human bias in IIF pattern interpretation. To address these limitations of autoAb testing, the CytoBead® technique has been introduced recently which enables automated interpretation of cell-based IIF and quantitative autoAb multiplexing by addressable microbead immunoassays in one reaction environment. Thus, autoAb screening and confirmatory testing can be combined for the first time. The present review discusses the history of autoAb assay techniques in this context and gives an overview and outlook of the recent progress in emerging technologies.

Diagnostic Yield of Isolated Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody Elevation for Celiac Disease

BACKGROUND

Serologic testing for celiac disease includes tissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibodies. In addition to these tools, assays for deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies have been shown to have sensitivity and specificity that are comparable to tissue transglutaminase testing, and are increasingly being used for celiac disease testing.

AIMS

The goal of this study is to evaluate the utility of deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) testing in the setting of a negative tissue transglutaminase (TTG) IgA test.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of all patients seen at two U.S. celiac disease referral centers and identified those who had an elevated DGP IgA and/or IgG in the setting of a negative TTG IgA. Of these patients, those who underwent duodenal biopsy while on a gluten-containing diet were included. Patients with prior biopsy-proven celiac disease or prior TTG IgA positivity were excluded. The results of the biopsy were used as the gold standard for celiac disease diagnosis, and patients with villous atrophy (Marsh class 3) on duodenal biopsy were considered to have celiac disease.

RESULTS

Between the two institutions, 84 patients were identified with negative TTG IgA and positive DGP IgA or IgG who also had duodenal biopsies performed while maintaining a gluten-containing diet. Of these patients, 13 patients (15.5%; 95% CI 8.5-25.0%) were found to have celiac disease on duodenal biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

DGP antibody testing can identify cases of celiac disease in TTG-negative individuals, although the low positive predictive value suggests that the yield may be low.

Combining antibody tests and taking into account antibody levels improves serologic diagnosis of celiac disease

BACKGROUND

The European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition states that if IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) exceeds 10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), there is the possibility to diagnose celiac disease (CD) without duodenal biopsy, if supported by anti-endomysium testing and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing. We aimed to evaluate whether combining IgA tTG and IgG anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibody testing and taking into account the antibody levels improves clinical interpretation.

METHODS

We calculated likelihood ratios for various test result combinations using data obtained from newly diagnosed CD patients (n=156) [13 children <2 years, 45 children between 2 and 16 years, and 98 adults (>16 years)] and 974 disease controls. All patients and controls underwent duodenal biopsy. IgA anti-tTG and IgG anti-DGP assays were from Thermo Fisher and Inova.

RESULTS

Likelihood ratios for CD markedly increased with double positivity and increasing antibody levels of IgA anti-tTG and IgG anti-DGP. Patients with double positivity and high antibody levels (>3 times, >10 times ULN) had a high probability for having CD (likelihood ratio ≥649 for >3 times ULN and ∞ for >10 times ULN). The fraction of CD patients with double positivity and high antibody levels was 59%-67% (depending on the assay) for >3 ULN and 33%-36% (depending on the assay) for >10 ULN, respectively. This fraction was significantly higher in children with CD than in adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining IgG anti-DGP with IgA anti-tTG and defining thresholds for antibody levels improves the serologic diagnosis of CD.

Defining thresholds of antibody levels improves diagnosis of celiac disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition proposed guidelines for the diagnosis of celiac disease, stating that duodenal biopsy is no longer needed if patients have symptoms and levels of immunoglobulin A anti-tissue transglutaminase (IgA anti-tTG) more than 10-fold the cut-off value. We evaluated the accuracy of this guideline in a well-characterized population using different commercial assays.

METHODS

We analyzed levels of IgA anti-tTG in serum samples from 104 consecutive pediatric and adult patients who were not deficient in IgA and were diagnosed with celiac disease from August 1, 2000, to December 31, 2009. We also analyzed serum samples from 537 consecutive patients without celiac disease (controls), collected from May 1, 2004, to October 12, 2006, who underwent intestinal biopsy analysis. Serum levels of antibodies were quantified using assays from Bio-Rad, INOVA, Genesis, and Thermo Fisher.

RESULTS

The likelihood ratio (probability of a specific result in patients divided by the probability of the same result in controls) for celiac disease increased with levels of IgA anti-tTG in all assays. Depending on the assay, the likelihood ratio for levels greater than 10-fold the cut-off value ranged from 111 to 294. The percentage of patients with celiac disease with levels of IgA anti-tTG greater than 10-fold the cut-off value ranged from 41% to 61%, depending on the assay. For levels of anti-tTG greater than 10-fold the cut-off value, the post-test probabilities for celiac disease (probability of disease, based on pretest probability and test result) were, depending on the assay, 89%-96% and 53%-75% for pretest probabilities (probability of disease depending on symptoms) of 7% and 1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To diagnose celiac disease based on serologic factors, it might be best to define thresholds for levels of IgA anti-tTG based on a predefined likelihood ratio or post-test probability, instead of a multiple of a cut-off value. Patients with a high pretest probability and levels of anti-tTG greater than 10-fold the cut-off value have a high probability for having celiac disease, aiding clinical decision making.

IgA antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides in patients with chronic liver diseases

BACKGROUND/AIMS

IgA antibodies against tissue-transglutaminase (anti-tTG-IgA) and IgA and IgG antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides (anti-DGP-IgA and anti-DGP-IgG) are considered specific for celiac disease (CD) whereas, patients with chronic liver disorders have an increased risk of latent CD development. We investigated the prevalence and clinical significance of anti-DGP-IgA, anti-DGP-IgG and anti-tTG-IgA in a large cohort of patients with chronic liver diseases.

METHODS

668 patients without gastrointestinal symptoms (426 viral hepatitis, 94 autoimmune liver diseases, 61 alcoholic disease, 46 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, 41 with other liver disorders) were investigated by ELISAs (INOVA Diagnostics). Patients positive for at least one autoantibody invited for a small-intestinal biopsy and HLA-DQ typing.

RESULTS

Anti-DGP-IgA were detected in 8.5%, anti-DGP-IgG in only one (0.15%, P<0.001) and anti-tTG-IgA in 5.8% of patients (P=0.05). Fifty-two were anti-DGP-IgA(+)/anti-tTG-IgA(-), 34 anti-DGP-IgA(-)/anti-tTG-IgA(+), and 5 anti-DGP-IgA(+)/anti-tTG-IgA(+). Anti-DGP-IgA positivity was associated with older age (P<0.05), cirrhosis (P<0.05) and increased IgA (P<0.05) whereas, anti-tTG-IgA only with cirrhosis (P<0.05). Histology and HLA-typing compatible with CD was revealed in 4/14 anti-DGP-IgA(+)/anti-tTG-IgA(-), 0/13 anti-DGP-IgA(-)/anti-tTG-IgA(+) and 2/2 anti-DGP-IgA(+)/anti-tTG-IgA(+). All 6 patients diagnosed with CD were anti-DGP-IgA(+) and only 2 anti-tTG-IgA(+).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a significant number of patients had detectable CD-related autoantibodies, anti-DGP-IgA test seems better than anti-tTG-IgA for unmasking occult forms of CD in patients with chronic liver disorders. The known good performance for CD diagnosis of anti-DGP-IgG test was not confirmed in this specific group of patients.

Prevalence of celiac disease in healthy Turkish school children

OBJECTIVES

Epidemiological studies of celiac disease (CD) in Turkey have been performed only within some regions of the country. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of CD in Turkish school children.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2008, serum samples were collected from 20,190 students (age range, 6-17 years) in 139 schools in 62 cities from different regions of Turkey. CD was screened using IgA antitissue transglutaminase (IgA-tTG) and total serum IgA. Subjects with selective IgA deficiency were further tested for IgG-tTG. Serum samples positive for IgA or IgG-tTG were further tested for IgA antiendomysial antibodies (IgA-EMAs) using an indirect immunofluorescence method. Small-intestinal biopsy was offered to all subjects with tTG antibody positivity.

RESULTS

Of the 20,190 subjects, 489 were antibody positive (IgA-tTG only in 270, both IgA-tTG and IgA-EMA in 215, and IgG-tTG in 4). Selective IgA deficiency was detected in 108 patients, and 4 of them were positive for IgG-tTG. An intestinal biopsy was conducted in 215 subjects (IgA-tTG positive in 110, IgA-tTG and IgA-EMA positive in 104, and IgG-tTG positive in 1). The biopsy findings of 95 children were consistent with CD. Thus, the estimated biopsy-proven prevalence was 1:212 children. The positive predictive value (PPV) for IgA-tTG plus EMA was 75.9%. PPV was 44.3% when only IgA-tTG was used.

CONCLUSIONS

We estimate that the prevalence of CD is at least 0.47% in healthy Turkish school children. Screening for IgA-tTG plus EMA provided better results for diagnosis when compared with testing for IgA-tTG alone.