Persons with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome exhibit altered pelvifemoral coordination during weightbearing and non-weightbearing tasks

Posterior Pelvic Tilt Allows for Increased Hip Motion, While Anterior Pelvic Tilt Decreases Joint Stress: A Systematic Review of Biomechanical and Motion Analyses

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of pelvic tilt on hip joint contact forces and range of motion in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and acetabular dysplasia.

METHODS

A literature review querying the U.S. National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Databases using the key words ("Femoroacetabular Impingement" OR "Hip Dysplasia") AND ((((("Pelvic Tilt") OR (Joint Contact) OR (Kinetics) OR ("Pelvic Incidence") OR (Lumbar Lordosis)))). 14 studies were included in the review with methodological quality evaluated through the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies- of Interventions (ROBINS-I) criteria.

RESULTS

There were 474 total patients (577 hips) in the 14 studies reviewed. Two studies focused on hip joint contact forces and femoral head coverage in acetabular dysplasia. These found that posterior pelvic tilt was associated with decreased hip joint contact area (range: 490-581 mm2 vs 919-1094 mm2), increased joint contact pressure (range: 3.9-7.3 mPa vs 1.8-3.5 mPa), and decreased femoral head coverage (range: 30.2-43.4% vs 38.9-50.3%) in dysplastic subjects compared to control populations. Twelve studies evaluated the range of hip motion in FAI populations undergoing different functional maneuvers. Posterior pelvic tilt in FAI patients was found to increase hip range of motion to impingement on supine testing and biomechanical modeling (Internal rotation in flexion range: -6.5° to 15.5° with anterior tilt, 12.9° to 31.4° with posterior tilt). With dynamic maneuvers, FAI patients had decreased pelvic mobility (range: 7.2°-14.7° vs 12.7°-24.2°) and decreased posterior pelvic tilt (range: 3.4°-15.9° vs 9.8°-21.1°) compared to patients without FAI.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip joint stress is increased with posterior pelvic tilt in dysplastic patients, while increasing posterior pelvic tilt increases hip range of motion to impingement in patients with FAI. During weight-bearing exercises, the ability for FAI patients to posteriorly tilt the pelvis is restricted compared to a control population.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Spinopelvic kinematics and alignment affect composite hip motion and play a critical role in bipedal locomotion. The influence of spinopelvic parameters on treatment outcomes for acetabular dysplasia and FAI is controversial and currently limited by an imperfect understanding of the hip-spine relationship as it relates to nonarthritic hip disease. The present systematic review provides a summary of the results of biomechanical studies investigating pelvic tilt in this population.

Clinical presentation of anterior pelvic tilt and trunk muscle endurance among patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) significantly affects the physical function and quality of life of the young and middle-aged population. Pelvic tilt and trunk muscle endurance are physical features poorly studied in FAIS.

AIM

This study aimed to compare the anterior pelvic tilt and anterior, lateral, and posterior trunk muscles endurance between people with FAIS and healthy individuals, within FAIS sub types and between the symptomatic and asymptomatic hip in people with FAIS.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

Participants were recruited and screened for potential eligibility at the Rehabilitation, Sports Medicine, and Physiotherapy Unit between April 2021 and February 2022.

POPULATION

Sixty-nine patients with FAIS and 69 controls.

METHODS

A study adhering to STROBE guidelines recruited 138 participants (69 FAIS, 69 controls). The degree of pelvic tilt was measured by the palpation meter (PALM) tool. To assess trunk musculature endurance, isometric trunk tests described by McGill were performed (extension resistance test, flexion resistance test, and side plank test). Cases were classified based on FAIS subtypes. Differences between groups and subgroups were performed using t-tests and ANCOVA, respectively.

RESULTS

Significant differences in anterior pelvic tilt were observed between the control and FAIS groups (P<0.001, d=0.72). Participants with FAIS exhibited greater pelvic tilt (MD=1.57, 95% CI=0.83 to 2.3). Trunk muscle endurance showed statistically significant differences (P<0.001, d=0.72) for posterior muscles. In comparisons between symptomatic and asymptomatic hips, significant differences were found in pelvic tilt (P<0.001, d=0.26) and lateral trunk muscle endurance (P<0.001, d=0.43). FAIS subtypes demonstrated significant differences in lateral trunk muscle endurance (P=0.002, ηp2=0.209).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that patients with FAIS present large anterior pelvic tilt and lower posterior trunk muscle endurance. Although anterior pelvic tilt was comparable for all FAIS subtypes, Pincer-type with or without labral tear exhibited lower lateral trunk muscle endurance compared with Cam-type with or without labral tear. In addition, the symptomatic hip of FAIS patients showed lower lateral trunk muscle endurance compared to the asymptomatic hip.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Incorporating rehabilitation strategies that address pelvic tilt and trunk muscle strengthening in individuals with FAIS might be considered as a potential means to improve these physical impairments, pending careful evaluation of their effectiveness.

Squatting biomechanics following physiotherapist-led care or hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial

Background

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) can cause hip pain and chondrolabral damage that may be managed non-operatively or surgically. Squatting motions require large degrees of hip flexion and underpin many daily and sporting tasks but may cause hip impingement and provoke pain. Differential effects of physiotherapist-led care and arthroscopy on biomechanics during squatting have not been examined previously. This study explored differences in 12-month changes in kinematics and moments during squatting between patients with FAIS treated with a physiotherapist-led intervention (Personalised Hip Therapy, PHT) and arthroscopy.

Methods

A subsample (n = 36) of participants with FAIS enrolled in a multi-centre, pragmatic, two-arm superiority randomised controlled trial underwent three-dimensional motion analysis during squatting at baseline and 12-months following random allocation to PHT (n = 17) or arthroscopy (n = 19). Changes in time-series and peak trunk, pelvis, and hip biomechanics, and squat velocity and maximum depth were explored between treatment groups.

Results

No significant differences in 12-month changes were detected between PHT and arthroscopy groups. Compared to baseline, the arthroscopy group squatted slower at follow-up (descent: mean difference -0.04 m∙s-1 (95%CI [-0.09 to 0.01]); ascent: -0.05 m∙s-1 [-0.11 to 0.01]%). No differences in squat depth were detected between or within groups. After adjusting for speed, trunk flexion was greater in both treatment groups at follow-up compared to baseline (descent: PHT 7.50° [-14.02 to -0.98]%; ascent: PHT 7.29° [-14.69 to 0.12]%, arthroscopy 16.32° [-32.95 to 0.30]%). Compared to baseline, both treatment groups exhibited reduced anterior pelvic tilt (descent: PHT 8.30° [0.21-16.39]%, arthroscopy -10.95° [-5.54 to 16.34]%; ascent: PHT -7.98° [-0.38 to 16.35]%, arthroscopy -10.82° [3.82-17.81]%), hip flexion (descent: PHT -11.86° [1.67-22.05]%, arthroscopy -16.78° [8.55-22.01]%; ascent: PHT -12.86° [1.30-24.42]%, arthroscopy -16.53° [6.72-26.35]%), and knee flexion (descent: PHT -6.62° [0.56- 12.67]%; ascent: PHT -8.24° [2.38-14.10]%, arthroscopy -8.00° [-0.02 to 16.03]%). Compared to baseline, the PHT group exhibited more plantarflexion during squat ascent at follow-up (-3.58° [-0.12 to 7.29]%). Compared to baseline, both groups exhibited lower external hip flexion moments at follow-up (descent: PHT -0.55 N∙m/BW∙HT[%] [0.05-1.05]%, arthroscopy -0.84 N∙m/BW∙HT[%] [0.06-1.61]%; ascent: PHT -0.464 N∙m/BW∙HT[%] [-0.002 to 0.93]%, arthroscopy -0.90 N∙m/BW∙HT[%] [0.13-1.67]%).

Conclusion

Exploratory data suggest at 12-months follow-up, neither PHT or hip arthroscopy are superior at eliciting changes in trunk, pelvis, or lower-limb biomechanics. Both treatments may induce changes in kinematics and moments, however the implications of these changes are unknown.

Trial registration details

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry reference: ACTRN12615001177549. Trial registered 2/11/2015.

A New Clinical Examination Algorithm to Prescribe Conservative Treatment in People with Hip-Related Pain

Hip-related pain is a common issue in active adults affecting their quality of life, mobility, and overall function, and it can lead to persistent disability. However, diagnosing hip-related pain is challenging due to the many potential sources and causes, including intra-articular and extra-articular pathology, and referred pain from other areas (lumbar or groin related pain). To address this, there is a need for a clinical algorithm based on the best available evidence and expert consensus. This algorithm could guide healthcare professionals in assessing and managing patients with hip-related pain, during the diagnosis, test selection, intervention, monitoring, and promoting collaboration among various healthcare providers. This clinical algorithm for hip-related pain is a comprehensive, flexible, adaptable to different settings, and regularly updated to incorporate new research findings. This literature review aims to establish a clinical algorithm specifically for prescribing exercise treatment to patients with hip-related pain, addressing their individual needs and enhancing their overall care.

Biomechanical measures of clinician-defined unsteadiness during a forward stepdown task in individuals post-arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

BACKGROUND

Patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome can present with aberrant movement patterns including unsteady balance. Balance training is included in rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy and may improve quality of movement; however, specific biomechanical measures associated with clinician-defined balance impairments are unknown. We aimed to understand these associations as they may inform targeted rehabilitative interventions.

METHODS

The forward stepdown is a clinical test used to evaluate movement quality, including balance. 23 individuals at least one-year post-arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and 15 healthy comparisons performed the forward stepdown, recorded by 3-dimensional motion capture and 2-dimensional video. Three physical therapists graded the 2-dimensional video for steadiness. Two-way analyses of variance were used to evaluate the interaction of group (post-arthroscopy/healthy comparison) by steadiness (steady/unsteady), for center of pressure medial-lateral excursion, center of pressure path length, and lateral trunk, pelvis, and lower extremity joint excursions.

FINDINGS

Six (26.1%) participants post-arthroscopy and five (33.3%) healthy comparisons were categorized as unsteady. The odds of being categorized as unsteady were not greater for participants post-arthroscopy (P = 0.72). There were no significant interactions; however, participants with clinician-defined unsteady balance, regardless of group, had significantly greater frontal plane trunk excursion, greater hip excursion, and greater center of pressure path length than those with steady balance (P ≤ 0.006).

INTERPRETATION

The odds of being categorized as unsteady were not greater for individuals post-arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Clinician-defined unsteadiness was associated with greater frontal plane trunk and hip motion which may be rehabilitation targets to improve balance during a dynamic single-leg task.

Clinical Measures of Pelvic Tilt in Physical Therapy

Pelvic tilt refers to the spatial position or motion of the pelvis about a frontal horizontal axis on the rest of the body in the sagittal plane. It is relevant for several musculoskeletal conditions commonly seen in physical therapist practice, particularly conditions affecting the hip and groin. Despite the relevance of pelvic tilt identified in biomechanical studies, and the historical precedence for assessing pelvic tilt, there is a lack of clarity regarding the utility of clinical measures that are practical in a rehabilitation setting. There are several options available to assess pelvic tilt which are discussed in detail in this commentary. All of these options come with potential benefits and considerable limitations. The purpose of this commentary is to provide an overview of the relevance of understanding pelvic tilt in the pathology and rehabilitation of conditions affecting the hip joint, with a focus applying evidence towards identifying clinical measures that may be useful in the rehabilitation setting and considerations that are needed with these measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

In Vivo Pelvic and Hip Joint Kinematics in Patients With Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Dual Fluoroscopy Study

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) may alter the kinematic function of the hip, resulting in pain and tissue damage. Previous motion analysis studies of FAIS have employed skin markers, which are prone to soft tissue artifact and inaccurate calculation of the hip joint center. This may explain why the evidence linking FAIS with deleterious kinematics is contradictory. The purpose of this study was to employ dual fluoroscopy (DF) to quantify in vivo kinematics of patients with cam FAIS relative to asymptomatic, morphologically normal control participants during various activities. Eleven asymptomatic, morphologically normal controls and seven patients with cam FAIS were imaged with DF during standing, level walking, incline walking, and functional range of motion activities. Model-based tracking calculated the kinematic position of the hip by registering projections of three-dimensional computed tomography models with DF images. Patients with FAIS stood with their hip extended (mean [95% confidence interval], -2.2 [-7.4, 3.1]°, flexion positive), whereas controls were flexed (5.3 [2.6, 8.0]°; p = 0.013). Male patients with cam FAIS had less peak internal rotation than the male control participants during self-selected speed level-walking (-0.2 [-6.5, 6.1]° vs. -9.8 [-12.2, -7.3]°; p = 0.007) and less anterior pelvic tilt at heel-strike of incline (5°) walking (3.4 [-1.0, -7.9]° vs. 9.8 [6.4, 13.2]°; p = 0.032). Even during submaximal range of motion activities, such as incline walking, patients may alter pelvic motion to avoid positions that approximate the cam lesion and the acetabular labrum. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:823-833, 2020.