Failed epilepsy surgery deserves a second chance

Factors associated with seizure recurrence in patients undergoing repeat epilepsy surgery: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy surgery is a crucial intervention for cases of drug-resistant epilepsy, aiming to achieve seizure freedom. Despite significant success rates, some patients continue to experience seizures post-surgery, leading to the need for repeat interventions.

METHODS

This study employed a retrospective observational design, focusing on patients who underwent repeat epilepsy surgery at our hospital. All patients underwent standardized evaluations, including electroencephalography (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and, in select cases, positron emission tomography (PET) and invasive intracranial electrode monitoring.

RESULTS

In a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who underwent repeat epilepsy surgery, with an average follow-up of 43.95 months, 53.5% achieved favorable outcomes based on ILAE Class 1 or 2 criteria. Preoperative MRI indicating lesions was associated with a better prognosis, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.049 (95% CI: 0.003 to 0.873, p = 0.040). Conversely, EEG showing multifocal epileptiform discharges predicted poorer outcomes, with an OR of 25.082 (95% CI: 1.726 to 364.533, p = 0.018). Surgical complications occurred in 30.2% of patients, with visual field defects, mild hemiparesis, and infections being the most common.

CONCLUSIONS

A thorough assessment involving imaging, EEG, and invasive evaluation indicates that repeat epilepsy surgery is a safe and selective option for patients who have not achieved seizure freedom after initial resective surgery.

Implications of intracranial hemorrhage associated with stereo-EEG

OBJECTIVE

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a known complication during stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) however true rates remain unknown. We provide a comprehensive review of ICH during sEEG regardless of clinical symptoms. Secondly, we analyzed sEEG recordings to identify electrographic correlates of ICH.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing sEEG between January 2016 and April 2022 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester. We reviewed medical records and imaging studies to identify ICH. We analyzed ICH by type, electrode trajectories, timing, sEEG findings and outcomes.

RESULTS

There were a total of 201 sEEG implants, of which 23 (11%) cases or 0.9% electrodes implanted had evidence of ICH. The majority of affected patients (82%) were either asymptomatic or had mild clinical neurological manifestations. In 90% of patients who proceeded with surgical treatments, outcomes were favorable. The most common sEEG finding in contacts in proximity of ICH was either focal slowing with interictal discharges or focal electrographic seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

ICH associated with sEEG is likely under-reported in literature. We present electroencephalographic correlates of ICH that may aid identification of ICH in the course of performing sEEG monitoring.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data provides clinically relevant information on potential risks and outcomes of ICH. Furthermore, our findings aid identification of ICH during sEEG.

Associated factors with stimulation induced seizures and the relevance with surgical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the associated factors with stimulation-induced seizures (SIS) and the relevant factors in predicting surgical outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 80 consecutive epilepsy patients explored by stereo-electroencephalography with routine electrical stimulation mapping (ESM). If seizures induced by ESM, patients were classified as SIS-positive (SIS-P); otherwise, SIS-negative (SIS-N). Patients received radical surgery were further classified as favorable (Engel I) and unfavorable (Engel II-IV) groups.

RESULTS

Of the 80 patients included, we identified 44 (55.0%) and 36(45.0%) patients in the SIS-P and SIS-N groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the seizure onset pattern (SOP) of preceding repetitive epileptiform discharges following LVFA (PRED→LVFA) (OR 3.319, 95% CI 1.200-9.183, P = 0.021) and pathology of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type II (OR 3.943, 95% CI 1.093-14.226, P = 0.036) were independent factors influencing whether the electrical stimulation can induce a seizure. Among the patients received radical surgery, there were 55 and 15 patients in the favorable and unfavorable groups separately. Multivariate analysis revealed that the SOP of PRED→LVFA induced seizures by stimulation (OR 11.409, 95% CI 1.182-110.161, P = 0.035) and bilateral implantation (OR 0.048, 95% CI 0.005-0.497, P = 0.011) were independent factors affecting surgical outcomes. The previous epilepsy surgery had a trend to be a negative factor with SIS (OR 0.156, 95% CI 0.028-0.880, P = 0.035) and surgical outcomes (OR 0.253, 95% CI 0.053-1.219, P = 0.087).

CONCLUSION

ESM is a highly valuable method for localizing the seizure onset zone. The SOP of PRED→LVFA and FCD type II were associated with elicitation of SIS by ESM, whereas a previous epilepsy surgery showed a negative association. Furthermore, the SOP of PRED→LVFA together with SIS in the same patient predicted favorable surgical outcomes, whereas bilateral electrode implantation predicted unfavorable outcomes.

Utility of adding electrodes in patients undergoing invasive seizure localization: A case series

Introduction

Surgery can be an effective treatment for epilepsy if the seizure onset is adequately localized. Invasive monitoring is used if noninvasive methods are inconclusive. Initial invasive monitoring may fail if the pre-surgical hypothesis regarding location of epileptic foci is wrong. At this point, a decision must be made whether to remove all electrodes without a clearly defined location of onset or to implant additional electrodes with the aim of achieving localization by expanding coverage.

Methods

Electrodes were placed according to a hypothesis derived from noninvasive monitoring techniques in adult patients with long term epilepsy. Seizure onset was not clearly localized at the end of the invasive monitoring period in ten patients, and additional electrodes were placed based on a new hypothesis that incorporated data from the invasive monitoring period.

Results

Successful localization was achieved in nine patients. There were no complications with adding additional electrodes. At final follow up, four patients were seizure free while four others had at least a 50% reduction in seizures after undergoing surgical intervention.

Conclusion

Seizure foci were localized safely in 90% of adult patients with long term epilepsy after implanting additional electrodes and expanding coverage. Patients undergoing invasive monitoring without clear localization should have additional electrodes placed to expand monitoring coverage as it is safe and effective.

Application of combined multimodal neuroimaging and video-electroencephalography in intractable epilepsy patients for improved post-surgical outcome prediction

AIM

To investigate the ability of a multidisciplinary approach that combines multimodal neuroimaging with video-electroencephalography (v-EEG) to predict post-surgical outcomes in patients with intractable epilepsy, and explore prognostic predictors for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with intractable epilepsy who underwent surgery between March 2016 and October 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic, clinical, v-EEG, neuroimaging, surgical, and regular follow-up seizure outcome data were collected. Forty-six patients with a follow-up of at least 12 months were graded by Engel scores. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to explore prognostic factors that could predict post-surgical seizure outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients, 28 were males. The median age was 27 years, the median age at first seizure was 11 years, and the median duration of seizures was 10 years. The Kaplan-Meier log-rank test showed that regardless of whether the follow-up duration was considered, epilepsy type, v-EEG, PET/CT, image post-processing methods, and a multidisciplinary approach that combined multimodal imaging with v-EEG were all correlated with seizure outcomes. Multivariate analysis found that the multidisciplinary approach was an independent predictor of post-surgical outcomes in patients with intractable epilepsy (hazard ratio = 11.400, 95% confidence interval = 2.249-57.787, p=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that the multidisciplinary approach could provide independent prognostic information for patients with intractable epilepsy undergoing surgery. This approach has strong potential for the easier selection of patients to undergo surgical treatment and accurate prognostication.

Surgery procedures in temporal lobe epilepsies

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common cause of refractory epilepsy amenable for surgical treatment and seizure control. Surgery for TLE is a safe and effective strategy. The seizure-free rate after surgical resection in patients with mesial or neocortical TLE is about 70%. Resective surgery has an advantage over stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of seizure outcomes for mesial TLE patients. Both techniques have similar results for safety, cognitive outcomes, and associated costs. Stereotactic radiosurgery should therefore be seen as an alternative to open surgery for patients with contraindications for or with reluctance to undergo open surgery. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has also shown promising results as a curative technique in mesial TLE but needs to be more deeply evaluated. Brain-responsive stimulation represents a palliative treatment option for patients with unilateral or bilateral MTLE who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or who have failed a prior mesial temporal lobe resection. Overall, despite the expansion of innovative techniques in recent years, resective surgery remains the reference treatment for TLE and should be proposed as the first-line surgical modality. In the future, ultrasound therapies could become a credible therapeutic option for refractory TLE patients.

Resective epilepsy surgery in patients aged 50years and older - a retrospective study regarding seizure outcome, memory performance, and psychopathology

PURPOSE

To assess clinical and demographic characteristics in two cohorts of elderly patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, undergoing resective epilepsy surgery (RES). Further, to determine seizure, neuropsychological, and mental health outcomes after RES and evaluate possible influencing factors.

METHODS

Consecutive patients aged ≥50 years with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who underwent curative RES in the Hamburg epilepsy surgery program (2004-2017) were identified. Data were retrospectively analyzed. Seizure outcome was classified according to ILAE and Engel outcome scales in patients with first-time surgeries and with reoperations. Previously reported predictors of the seizure outcome were evaluated using regression analyses. Changes in verbal memory were assessed for patients with complete pre- and postoperative datasets (n=30) using repeated-measures analysis of variance. For evaluation of possible predictors of psychopathologic changes after RES a regression analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Fifty-one elderly patients underwent RES of the temporal lobe, including twelve aged ≥60 years, and five with reoperations. After one year, 65% of the patients with first-time surgeries were seizure free and 91% had a favorable outcome. At last follow-up, 49% were seizure free since surgery. Three reoperated patients had an Engel I outcome. Seizure outcome was not dependent on age at surgery, duration of epilepsy, or other evaluated variables. There was no significant decline in the memory performance after surgery. Significant improvements in mental health were found.

CONCLUSION

RES for drug-resistant TLE is safe, effective, and improves mental health also in patients aged ≥ 50 years. Thus, it should be evaluated as the treatment of choice also in this age group.

Advantages of magnetoencephalography, neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI in epilepsy surgery re-operations

Objective: Management of patients after failed epilepsy surgery is still challenging. Advanced diagnostic and intraoperative tools including magneto-encephalography (MEG) as well as neuronavigation and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iopMRI) may contribute to a better postoperative seizure outcome in this patient group.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients after reoperation of failed epilepsy surgery for medically refractory epilepsy at the University of Erlangen between 1988 and 2017. Inclusion criteria for patients were available MEG, neuronavigation and iopMRI data. The Engel scale was used to categorize seizure outcome.Results: We report on 27 consecutive patients (13 female/14 male mean age at first surgery 29.4 years) who had operative revision of the first resection after failed epilepsy surgery. An improved seizure outcome postoperatively was observed in 78% of patients (p < 0.001) with 55% seizure free (Engel I) patients after a mean follow-up time of 4.9 years. In detail, 80% of lesional cases were seizure free compared to 59% of MRI negative patients. Localizing MEG spike activity in the vicinity of the first resection cavity was present in 12 of 27 patients (44%) corresponding to 83% (10/12) of MEG localizing spike patients having advanced seizure outcome after operative revision.Conclusion: Re-operation after failed surgery in refractory epilepsy may lead to a better seizure outcome in the majority of patients. Preoperative MEG may support the decision for surgery and may facilitate targeting epileptogenic tissue for re-resection by employing navigation and iopMR imaging.

Lost in Transition: The Long and Winding Road Toward Epilepsy Surgery—An Analysis of Obstacles Prior to Surgery and Call for Orchestrated Health Care Efforts in Epilepsy

Difficult-to-treat epilepsy is defined as ongoing seizures despite adequate pharmacological treatment. This condition is affecting a significant percentage of epilepsy patients and is estimated to be as high as one-third of all patients. Epilepsy surgery, targeting the removal of the key parts of cerebral convolutions responsible for seizure generation and often including a structural lesion, can be a very successful approach. However, this necessitates careful patient selection by comprehensive investigations, proving the localization of the epileptogenic zone as well as measures to make such surgeries safe. With careful selection as a prerequisite, the percentage of patients achieving seizure freedom by neurosurgical intervention is high, approximating two-thirds of all epilepsy surgeries performed. In contrast, the average duration of a patient's pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy prior to surgery anywhere around the globe is around 20 years. Given that typical patients are ∼30 to 40 years of age at the time of surgery, many patients have been living with chronic seizures since childhood or adolescence. This means that most of these patients have been going through several stages of medical care for years or even decades, both as children and adults, without ever being fully investigated and/or selected for surgery which is concerning. Yet, there is no set standard for a timeline leading toward successful surgery in epilepsy. It is obvious that the average transit period from the moment of first seizure manifestation until the day of successful surgery takes much too long. This is the reason why we see these patients lost in transition.

Response to antiepileptic drugs after unsuccessful epilepsy surgery: A multivariate analysis of 103 patients

OBJECT

Epilepsy patients may still have seizures after surgery, and there have been few studies on the response to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) after surgery failure. The purpose of this study was to analyze the response to AEDs after unsuccessful epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent unsuccessful epilepsy surgery between January 1999 and January 2019 were evaluated. Patient demographics, etiology, factors related to surgery and AED use patterns were assessed.

RESULTS

After excluding the 5 patients who were lost to follow-up and the 2 patients who died, the records of 103 consecutive patients were analyzed. Ninety patients (87.4 %) had seizure recurrence within one year after surgery, 2 (1.9 %) patients had recurrence from one year to two years after surgery, and 11 (10.7 %) patients had recurrence two or more years after surgery (2-10 years). After surgery failure, the patients tried at least 2 kinds of AEDs with different mechanisms for more than 2 years. The average total number of AEDs used was 5.97, the average number of AEDs used before surgery was 3.21, and the average number of AEDs used after surgery was 4.02. After retreatment with AEDs, 10 patients (9.7 %) were seizure-free, 18 patients' (17.5 %) seizures were alleviated, and 75 patients (72.8 %) had seizures as they did prior to the adjustments. The number of AEDs used before and after surgery and the total number of AEDs were not significantly different among the seizure free group, alleviated seizure group and no change group. There were no significant differences in seizure onset age, surgery age, etiology, time between seizure onset and surgery, magnetic resonance imaging, seizure type, localization and lateralization of the surgery site among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that a small percentage of patients (27.2 %) who undergo unsuccessful epilepsy surgery benefit from AED adjustments; however, the vast majority of patients (72.8 %) do not benefit from AED adjustments.

Long-term outcomes of reoperations in epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

To analyze longitudinal seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery, including reoperations, in patients with intractable focal epilepsy.

METHODS

Clinicoradiological characteristics of patients who underwent epilepsy surgery from 1995 to 2016 with follow-up of ≥1 year were reviewed. In patients undergoing reoperations, the latest resection was considered the index surgery. The primary outcome was complete seizure freedom (Engel I) at last follow-up. Potentially significant outcome variables were first identified using univariate analyses and then fit in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 898 patients fulfilling study criteria, 110 had reoperations; 92 had one resection prior to the index surgery and 18 patients had two or more prior resective surgeries. Two years after the index surgery, 69% of patients with no prior surgeries had an Engel score of I, as opposed to only 42% of those with one prior surgery, and 33% of those with two or more prior resections (P < .001). Among surgical outcome predictors, the number of prior epilepsy surgeries, female sex, lesional initial magnetic resonance imaging, no prior history of generalization, and pathology correlated with better seizure outcomes on univariate analysis. However, only sex (P = .011), history of generalization (P = .016), and number of prior surgeries (P = .002) remained statistically significant in the multivariate model.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although long-term seizure control is possible in patients with failed prior epilepsy surgery, the chances of success diminish with every subsequent resection. Outcome is additionally determined by inherent biological markers (sex and secondary generalization tendency), rather than traditional outcome predictors, supporting a hypothesis of "surgical refractoriness."

Refractory seizures: Prediction of outcome of surgical intervention based on results from PET-CT, PET-MRI and electroencephaolography

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the effectiveness of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) and PET-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with scalp and intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) in predicting surgical outcomes in patients with refractory seizures.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PET-CT and MRI fusion, scalp and intracranial EEG, and subsequent surgical intervention were retrospectively included. PET-CT were fused with MRI and interpreted by an experienced blinded reader. An area of hypometabolism on PET was identified as the location of the epileptic focus. The site of seizure focus was correlated with scalp and intracranial EEG findings. Surgical outcomes were evaluated. Thirty-six patients were included; all had presurgical PET-CT, scalp EEG, and PET-MRI fusion, and 28 of these patients had intracranial EEGs.

RESULTS

PET-CT showed concordance of epileptic foci with scalp EEG in 7/36 patients (19%) and with intracranial EEG in 9/28 patients (32%). PET-MRI was concordant with scalp EEG in 6/36 patients (17%) and with intracranial EEG in 8/28 patients (29%). All patients with concordance of epileptic foci between PET-CT and PET-MRI and scalp EEG had improvement or resolution of seizures postintervention, and 89% of patients had concordance between intracranial EEG and PET studies. However, 45% of patients with discordant PET-CT and scalp EEG, 37% with discordance PET-CT and intracranial EEG, 43% with discordant PET-MRI and scalp EEG, and 35% of patients with discordant PET-MRI and intracranial EEG did not improve postsurgically.

CONCLUSION

Concordance of epileptic foci localization between PET imaging and EEG yields favorable postoperative outcome in nearly all patients, whereas discordance has an equal probability of favorable vs unfavorable outcomes.

The Concept of Drug-Resistant Epileptogenic Zone

Resective surgery is the most effective way to treat drug-resistant epilepsy. Despite extensive pre-surgical evaluation, only 30–70% patients would become seizure-free after surgery. New approaches and strategies are needed to improve the outcome of epilepsy surgery. It is commonly observed in clinical practice that antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) could maintain seizure freedom in a large proportion of patients after surgery, who were uncontrolled before the operation. In some patients cessation of AEDs leads to seizure recurrence which, in most cases, can be controlled by resuming AEDs. These observations suggest that the surgery has converted the epilepsy from drug-resistant to drug-responsive, implying that the operation has removed the brain tissue accounting for pharmacoresistance, rather than the pathological substrate of epilepsy (at least not completely). Based on these observations, it is hypothesized that there is a drug-resistant epileptogenic zone (DREZ) which overlaps with the epileptogenic zone (EZ), and has both epileptogenic and drug-resistant properties. DREZ is necessary and sufficient to cause drug-resistant epilepsy, and its remove would render the epilepsy drug-responsive. Testing the hypothesis requires the development of new methods to define the DREZ, which may be used to guide surgical planning when the epileptogenic zone cannot be completely excised. This concept can also help understand the mechanisms of drug-resistant epilepsy, leading to new therapeutic strategies.

PET and ictal SPECT can be helpful for localizing epileptic foci

Purpose of review

Functional neuroimaging with PET and SPECT is a commonly used tool in presurgical evaluation. The following article reviews the literature of PET and SPECT in presurgical assessment of epilepsies published in the last year.

Recent findings

FDG-PET adds concomitant information in temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy in adults and children. The pattern of hypometabolism in FDG-PET is a good additional predictor or seizure outcome in TLE with mesial temporal sclerosis or negative MRI. There is growing evidence that diagnostic value of FDG-PET increases with postprocessing. Although several methods were applied in the reviewed literature, all of them seem to outperform the visual analysis. Imaging of the epileptic focus with ictal SPECT is depending on short injection latencies. It is particularly useful in patients with nonlesional MRI and mostly of extratemporal localization. Areas of hyperperfusion remote of SOZ are reflecting the epileptic network. Combining more concordant investigations including PET and SPECT in MRI-negative evaluation adds to better presurgical stratification and therefore, better postsurgical outcome. FET-PET shows increased uptake in status epilepticus.

Summary

PET and SPECT are important investigations to localize the epileptic focus in temporal lobe and nonlesional extratemporal epilepsies. Postprocessing for both modalities is important to increase diagnostic value.

Preliminary report: Late seizure recurrence years after epilepsy surgery may be associated with alterations in brain tissue transcriptome

We recently proposed that the maturation of a new epileptic focus (epileptogenesis) may explain late seizure recurrences, starting months to years after resective epilepsy surgery. We explore here the hypothesis that inherent transcriptomic changes may distinguish such “late relapsers.” An in‐depth clinical review of 2 patients with recurrent seizures starting years after surgery is contrasted to 4 controls who remained seizure‐free postoperatively. This clinical analysis is combined with RNA sequencing from the resected brain tissue, followed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering, independent pathway analysis, and multidimensional scaling analysis. Late‐recurrence patients clustered apart from seizure‐free patients, with late recurrence patients clustering together in the central space, whereas the seizure‐free patients clustered together in the periphery. We utilized RNA‐seq to identify differentially expressed genes between late‐recurrence and seizure‐free samples. We found 29 annotated genes with statistically significant differential expression (q < 0.05). The top canonical pathways identified as distinctly separating the late‐recurrence patients from the seizure‐free patients included the intrinsic prothrombin activation pathway (p = 1.55E‐06), the complement system (p = 4.57E‐05), and the atherosclerosis signaling pathway (p = 4.57E‐05). Our observations suggest that late recurrences after epilepsy surgery may be influenced partly by differences in gene expression in neuroinflammatory and brain healing/remodeling pathways. Such a hypothesis needs to be validated in the future.