Neuromuscular responses in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament repair

Neurophysiology of ACL Injury

The neurophysiology of ACL injury extends beyond the mechanical rupture of the ligament to encompass profound alterations in the central and peripheral nervous systems, impacting sensorimotor integration and neuromuscular control. The ACL, densely populated with mechanoreceptors, plays a critical role in joint proprioception, dynamically regulating knee stability through complex neural circuits that connect to the spinal cord and brain. When disrupted by injury, these neural pathways contribute to delayed muscular activation, altered motor planning, and compromised joint stability. Such neuromechanical deficits increase the likelihood of reinjury and highlight the need for comprehensive neuroplastic rehabilitation. Neuroplastic therapy, employing tools like external focus strategies, stroboscopic glasses, smartboards, and virtual reality, aims to restore and enhance neural connectivity, sensory integration, and motor coordination. These advanced tools target distinct phases of motor learning, promoting automaticity and resilience in movement patterns. By integrating visual-cognitive, proprioceptive, and reflexive controls, this therapeutic approach not only accelerates recovery but also optimizes performance and reduces the risk of re-injury, representing a paradigm shift in ACL rehabilitation.

The Neuroplastic Outcomes from Impaired Sensory Expectations (NOISE) hypothesis: How ACL dysfunction impacts sensory perception and knee stability

BACKGROUND

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is integral to maintaining knee joint stability but is susceptible to rupture during physical activity. Despite surgical restoration of passive or mechanical stability, patients struggle to regain strength and prior level of function. Recent efforts have focused on understanding how ACL-related changes in the nervous system contribute to deficits in sensorimotor control following injury and reconstruction. We hypothesize that these challenges are partially due to an increase in sensorimotor uncertainty, a state that reduces the precision of movement control.

OBJECTIVES

This review proposes the ACL NOISE (Neuroplastic Outcomes from Impaired Sensory Expectations) hypothesis, reframing current literature to provide a case that increased sensory noise following ACL injury and reconstruction disrupts sensory predictions, which are anticipations of immediate sensory outcomes or motor commands. This disruption in sensory predictions may contribute to altered neurophysiology, such as cross-modal brain activity, and other persistent clinical deficits.

DESIGN

Narrative review RESULTS/FINDINGS: Following ACL injury and reconstruction, the knee and nervous system experience various neurophysiological alterations to overcome elevated sensory uncertainty and inaccurate sensory predictions, contributing to persistent motor deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a theoretical case based on compelling evidence that suggests prolonged impairment after ACL injury may be secondary to uncertainty in knee sensory perception. Future research should consider testing the NOISE hypothesis by creating a paradigm that examines dynamic joint stability in response to unexpected perturbations. This approach would help assess motor coordination errors and drive the development of clinical strategies aimed at reducing sensory uncertainty following ACL reconstruction.

Neurocognitive and Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Techniques after ACL Injury, Part 1: Optimizing Recovery in the Acute Post-Operative Phase- A Clinical Commentary

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury rates are on the rise, despite improved surgical techniques and prevention programs. While traditional rehabilitation emphasizes the restoration of motion, strength, and physical performance, emerging research highlights the importance of addressing neurocognitive deficits that can persist after injury. These deficits, including altered proprioception, impaired motor control and muscle recruitment, as well as heightened reliance on visual feedback, can significantly increase the risk of re-injury and impede return to sport. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to outline a proposed comprehensive approach to rehabilitation that challenges the neurocognitive system to optimize rehabilitation outcomes and reduce reinjury risk. Thus, this clinical commentary discusses the rationale for integrating neurocognitive training into all phases of ACLR rehabilitation, from initial injury to eight weeks post-surgery. It details the neurophysiological changes caused by ACL injury and presents evidence supporting the use of exercises that challenge visual attention, decision-making, and motor planning. A comprehensive rehabilitation framework incorporating both physical and neurocognitive components is proposed, aiming to improve long-term outcomes and reduce re-injury risk. Level of Evidence: 5.

Enhancing Return to Alpine Skiing: Integrating Perceptual-Motor-Cognitive Considerations in Testing and Progressions: A Clinical Commentary

Alpine skiing poses significant risks for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury at both recreational and professional levels, which is compounded by high rates of re-injury. Despite the existence of return to sport (RTS) and return to snow protocols, the frequency of ACL re-injury has not been mitigated, raising doubts about protocol effectiveness. Current RTS protocols primarily focus on biomechanical and neuromuscular factors in isolation, neglecting the important perceptual-motor-cognitive changes associated with ACL injuries and the high cognitive demands of skiing. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to address the perceptual-motor-cognitive demands specific to alpine skiing, evaluate RTS testing for skiers, and propose updated standards for testing and return to snow progressions that incorporate these considerations.

Level of Evidence

5.

Influence of the Menstrual Cycle and Training on the Performance of a Perturbed Single-Leg Squatting Task in Female Collegiate Athletes

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries often occur when an athlete experiences an unexpected disruption, or perturbation, during sports. ACL injury rates may also be influenced by the menstrual cycle.

Purpose

To determine whether training adaptations to knee control and muscle activity during a perturbed single-leg squatting (SLS) task depend on menstrual cycle phase in female athletes.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 21 healthy female collegiate athletes (current or former [<3 years]) who competed in 9 different sports performed an SLS task in which they attempted to match their knee position (user signal) to a target signal. The protocol consisted of a 9-condition pretest, 5 sets of 3 training trials, and a 9-condition posttest. One perturbation was delivered in each condition by altering the resistance of the device. Sagittal knee control (absolute error between the target signal and user signal) was assessed using a potentiometer. Muscle activity during perturbed squat cycles was normalized to maximal activation and to corresponding muscle activity during unperturbed squat cycles (%unperturbed) within the same test condition. Athletes performed the protocol during a distinct menstrual cycle phase (early follicular [EF], late follicular [LF], midluteal [ML]). Two-way mixed analysis of variance was used to determine the effects of the menstrual cycle and training on knee control and muscle activity during task performance. Venous blood was collected for hormonal analysis, and a series of health questionnaires and anthropometric measures were also assessed to determine differences among the menstrual cycle groups.

Results

After training, athletes demonstrated better knee control during the perturbed squat cycles (lower absolute error, P < .001) and greater soleus feedback responses to the perturbation (%unperturbed, P = .035). Better knee control was demonstrated in the ML phase versus the EF phase during unperturbed and perturbed squat cycles (P < .039 for both). Quadriceps activation was greater in the ML phase compared with the EF and LF phases, both immediately before and after the perturbation (P < .001 for all).

Conclusion

Athletes learned to improve knee control during the perturbed performance regardless of menstrual cycle phase. The best knee control and greatest quadriceps activation during the perturbed squatting task was found in the ML phase.

Clinical Relevance

These findings may correspond to a lower incidence of ACL injury in the luteal phase and alterations in exercise performance across the menstrual cycle.

Individuals early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction show intact motor learning of step length via the split-belt treadmill

BACKGROUND

Rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament is an orthopedic injury that results in neuromuscular impairments affecting sensory input to the central nervous system. Traditional physical therapy after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction aims to rehabilitate orthopedic impairments but fails to address asymmetric gait mechanics that are present post-operatively and are linked to the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. A first step towards developing gait interventions is understanding if individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have the capacity to learn new walking mechanics.

METHODS

The split-belt treadmill offers a task-specific approach to examine neuromuscular adaptations in patients after injury. The potential for changing spatiotemporal gait mechanics via split-belt treadmill adaptation has not been tested early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; nor has the ability to retain and transfer newly learned gait mechanics. Therefore, we used a split-belt treadmill paradigm to compare gait adaptation, retention, and transfer to overground walking between 15 individuals 3-9 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 15 matched control individuals.

FINDINGS

Results suggested individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were able to adapt and retain step length symmetry changes as well as controls. There was also evidence of partial transfer to overground walking, similar to controls.

INTERPRETATION

Despite disruption in afferent feedback from the joint, individuals early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can learn a new gait pattern using sensorimotor adaptation, retain, and partially transfer the learned gait pattern. This may be a critical time to intervene with gait-specific interventions targeting post-operative gait asymmetries.

Brain activity associated with quadriceps strength deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Prolonged treatment resistant quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) contributes to re-injury risk, poor patient outcomes, and earlier development of osteoarthritis. The origin of post-injury weakness is in part neurological in nature, but it is unknown whether regional brain activity is related to clinical metrics of quadriceps weakness. Thus, the purpose of this investigation was to better understand the neural contributions to quadriceps weakness after injury by evaluating the relationship between brain activity for a quadriceps-dominated knee task (repeated cycles of unilateral knee flexion/extension from 45° to 0°), , and strength asymmetry in individuals returned to activity after ACL-R. Forty-four participants were recruited (22 with unilateral ACL reconstruction; 22 controls) and peak isokinetic knee extensor torque was assessed at 60°/s to calculate quadriceps limb symmetry index (Q-LSI, ratio of involved/uninvolved limb). Correlations were used to determine the relationship of mean % signal change within key sensorimotor brain regions and Q-LSI. Brain activity was also evaluated group wise based on clinical recommendations for strength (Q-LSI < 90%, n = 12; Q-LSI ≥ 90%, n = 10; controls, all n = 22 Q-LSI ≥ 90%). Lower Q-LSI was related to increased activity in the contralateral premotor cortex and lingual gyrus (p < .05). Those who did not meet clinical recommendations for strength demonstrated greater lingual gyrus activity compared to those who met clinical recommendations Q-LSI ≥ 90 and healthy controls (p < 0.05). Asymmetrically weak ACL-R patients displayed greater cortical activity than patients with no underlying asymmetry and healthy controls.

Modified defense reaction reduces biomechanical and myoelectrical ACL injury risk factors in elite Judo

In judo, an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is the most severe injury an athlete could experience. Most ACL ruptures occur when defending against an osoto-gari attack. This study aims to identify ACL risk factors during osoto-gari defence and implement a modified osoto-gari defence reaction, which is assumed to improve myoelectric patterns and ameliorate critical biomechanical risk factors for ACL injuries. Twenty-six elite judokas were enrolled in the cross-over trial (female: 6; male: 20). 3D kinematics and force dynamometrics were combined with electromyographical recordings to assess the effects of the common and the modified osoto-gari defence reaction. Compared to the common osoto-gari defence reaction (maximal knee flexion: 29 ± 12°; maximal valgus: 10 ± 5°; maximal valgus moment: 58 ± 17 Nm; peak internal rotation: 9 ± 5°), the modified osoto-gari defence reaction showed significantly reduced knee angles (31 ± 10° p < 0.05; 1 ± 0° p < 0.05; 31 ± 9 Nm p < 0.05; 3 ± 0° p < 0.05). The myoelectric activity of the hamstring increased (+5±% to +27±%, p < 0.05) in the modified compared to common defence reaction. The modified osoto-gari defence reaction reduced critical biomechanical risk factors and increased hamstring myoelectric activity. We recommend the implementation of the modified osoto-gari defence reaction in judo practice and seek to evaluate its long-term effectiveness in decreasing ACL injury incidences in elite judo.

Which assessments are used to analyze neuromuscular control by electromyography after an anterior cruciate ligament injury to determine readiness to return to sports? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adequate neuromuscular control of the knee could be one element to prevent secondary injuries after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. To assess neuromuscular control in terms of time, amplitude and activity, electromyography (EMG) is used. However, it is unclear which assessments using EMG could be used for a safe return to sports (RTS). Therefore, we aimed to summarize EMG-related assessments for neuromuscular control of the knee in adult patients after an ACL injury to decide upon readiness for RTS.

METHODS

This systematic review followed guidelines of Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane recommendations. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), SPORTDiscus and the Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2019 and updated in November 2020. Studies identifying electromyographic assessments for neuromuscular control during dynamic tasks in adult, physically active patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury were eligible and qualitatively synthesized. Two independent reviewers used a modified Downs and Black checklist to assess risk of bias of included studies.

RESULTS

From initially 1388 hits, 38 mainly cross-sectional, case-controlled studies were included for qualitative analysis. Most studies provided EMG outcomes of thigh muscles during jumping, running or squatting. Outcomes measures described neuromuscular control of the knee in domains of time, amplitude or activity. Risk of bias was medium to high due to an unclear description of participants and prior interventions, confounding factors and incompletely reported results.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a wide range of EMG outcome measures for neuromuscular control, none was used to decide upon return to sports in these patients. Additional studies are needed to define readiness towards RTS by assessing neuromuscular control in adult ACL patients with EMG. Further research should aim at finding reliable and valid, EMG-related variables to be used as diagnostic tool for neuromuscular control. Moreover, future studies should aim at more homogenous groups including adequately matched healthy subjects, evaluate gender separately and use sport-specific tasks. Registration The protocol for this systematic review was indexed beforehand in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and registered as CRD42019122188.

Trunk Angle Modulates Feedforward and Feedback Control during Single-Limb Squatting

Trunk positioning and unexpected perturbations are high-risk conditions at the time of anterior cruciate ligament injury. The influence of trunk positioning on motor control responses to perturbation during dynamic performance is not known. We tested the influence of trunk position on feedforward and feedback control during unexpected perturbations while performing a novel single-limb squatting task. We also assessed the degree that feedforward control was predictive of feedback responses. In the flexed trunk condition, there were increased quadriceps (p < 0.026) and gluteus medius long-latency reflexes (p < 0.001) and greater quadriceps-to-hamstrings co-contraction during feedforward (p = 0.017) and feedback (p = 0.007) time bins. Soleus long-latency reflexes increased more than 100% from feedforward muscle activity regardless of trunk condition. Feedforward muscle activity differentially predicted long-latency reflex responses depending on the muscle (R²: 0.47-0.97). These findings support the concept that trunk positioning influences motor control responses to perturbation and that feedback responses may be invariant to the feedforward control strategy.

The Single Leg Squat Test: A "Top-Down" or "Bottom-Up" Functional Performance Test?

BACKGROUND

Medial knee deviation (MKD) during the single leg squat test (SLST) is a common clinical finding that is often attributed to impairments of proximal muscular structures. Investigations into the relationship between MKD and the foot and ankle complex have provided conflicting results, which may impact clinicians' interpretation of the SLST.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and foot posture in subjects that perform the SLST with MKD (fail) versus without MKD (pass).

HYPOTHESIS

There will be a difference in ankle dorsiflexion ROM and/or foot posture between healthy individuals that pass and fail the SLST for MKD.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Sixty-five healthy, active volunteers (sex = 50 female, 15 male; age = 25.2 +/- 5.6 years; height = 1.7 +/- .1 m; weight = 68.5 +/- 13.5 kg) who demonstrated static balance and hip abductor strength sufficient for performance of the SLST participated in the study. Subjects were divided into pass and fail groups based on visual observation of MKD during the SLST. Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) scores and measures of non-weight bearing and weight bearing active ankle dorsiflexion (ROM) were compared.

RESULTS

There were 33 individuals in the pass group and 32 in the fail group. The groups were similar on age (p = .899), sex (p = .341), BMI (p = .818), and Tegner Activity Scale score (p = .456). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups on the FPI-6 (pass group mean = 2.5 +/- 3.9; fail group mean = 2.3 +/- 3.5; p = .599), or any of the measures of dorsiflexion range of motion (non-weight bearing dorsiflexion with knee extended: pass group = 6.9o +/- 3.7o, fail group = 7.8o +/- 3.0o; non-weight bearing dorsiflexion with knee flexed: pass group = 13.5o +/- 5.6o, fail group = 13.9o +/- 5.3o; weight bearing dorsiflexion: pass group = 42.7o +/- 6.0o, 42.7o +/- 8.3o, p = .611).

CONCLUSIONS

Failure on the SLST is not related to differences in clinical measures of active dorsiflexion ROM or foot posture in young, healthy individuals. These findings suggest that clinicians may continue using the SLST to assess neuromuscular performance of the trunk, hip, and knee without ankle dorsiflexion ROM or foot posture contributing to results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Primes Feedback Control During a Novel Single Leg Task

FMRI studies support that neuromuscular electrical stimulation can modulate the excitability of the somatosensory cortex. We studied whether practice and electrical stimulation of the quadriceps would enhance learning during a weight-bearing task. 20 healthy individuals (10 male) and 8 control subjects participated in a 2-day study. Day 1 consisted of a pretest, a training session, and a post-test; day 2 consisted of a pretest, 2 bouts of electrical stimulation to the quadriceps muscles, and a post-test. The single limb squat task was performed at varying knee resistance and target velocities and a random unexpected perturbation was administered. Feedforward error was calculated during a 50 ms time window before the unexpected event. Feedback error was calculated during a 150 ms window after the unexpected event. Peak error score decreased by 2.98 degrees (p < 0.001) immediately following training. Error was improved by 1.78 degrees (p < 0.001) during the feedforward phase and 1.44 degrees (p < 0.001) during the feedback phase. All subjects plateaued after day 1; except for the electrical stimulation group that showed a decrease of 1.206 degrees during the perturbed cycles (p = 0.024). Electrical stimulation triggered additional learning, beyond practice, during the unexpected event at a latency associated with the transcortical reflex.

Neural activity for hip-knee control in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A task-based functional connectivity analysis

Anterior cruciate ligament injury may induce neurophysiological changes for sensorimotor control. Neuroimaging investigations have revealed unique brain activity patterns for knee movement following injury, indicating potential neural mechanisms underlying aberrant neuromuscular control that may contribute to heightened risk of secondary injury, altered movement patterns and poor patient outcomes. However, neuroimaging paradigms thus far have been limited to single joint, single motion knee tasks. Therefore, we sought to overcome prior limitations to understand the effects of injury on neural control of lower extremity movement by employing a multi-joint motor paradigm and determining differences in neural activity between ACL-reconstructed (ACLr) individuals relative to healthy matched controls. Fifteen patients with left anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and fifteen matched healthy controls participated in this study. Neural activity was examined using functional magnetic resonance imaging during a block-designed knee-hip movement paradigm (similar to a supine heel-slide). Participants for each group were monitored and task performance was controlled via a metronome to ensure the same spatial-temporal parameters. We observed that those with ACL reconstruction displayed increased activation within the intracalcarine cortex, lingual gyrus, occipital fusiform gyrus, lateral occipital cortex, angular gyrus, and superior parietal lobule relative to controls. A follow-up task-based functional connectivity analyses using seed regions identified from the group analysis revealed connectivity among fronto-insular-temporal and sensorimotor regions within the ACLr participants. The results of this fMRI investigation suggest ACLr individuals require increased activity and connectivity in areas responsible for visual-spatial cognition and orientation, and attention for hip and knee motor control.

Quadriceps muscle compensatory activations are delayed following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft

BACKGROUND

Compensatory and anticipatory quadriceps activation (CQA and AQA) in response to postural perturbations are essential for functional stability of the knee. This study aimed at investigating CQA and AQA before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hamstrings graft.

METHODS

Twelve participants with ACLR and 12 healthy controls were exposed to 10 either unpredictable or predictable perturbations of the knee before ACLR (T1), two months (T2) and six months (T3) after surgery. Latencies of CQA and AQA in vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF) and vastus medialis (VM) were measured.

RESULTS

Latency of CQA was delayed in ACLR compared to controls at T1 for VL (105 ± 25 vs. 57 ± 9 ms; P < .001), RF (102 ± 23 vs. 56 ± 9 ms; P < .001) and VM (107 ± 24 vs. 66 ± 16 ms; P < .001), at T2 for VL (68 ± 14 vs. 55 ± 10 ms; P < .01) and at T3 for VL (105 ± 22 vs. 58 ± 7 ms; P < .001), RF (102 ± 22 vs. 58 ± 12 ms; P < .001) and VM (106 ± 20 vs. 63 ± 8 ms; P < .001). AQA occurred earlier in ACLR than in controls at T1 for VL (-82 ± 64 vs. -14 ± 11 ms; P < .05) and VM (-105 ± 68 vs. -9 ± 12 ms; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

CQA are delayed following ACLR with hamstring graft and should be addressd by post-surgical rehabilitation.

Loading Behaviors Do Not Match Loading Abilities Postanterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Strategies that underload the surgical limb after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) are observed in submaximal tasks. It is not known what underlies these strategies in early rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to determine if underloading can be attributed to the inability to meet task demands with and without attention to limb loading or learned behavior.

METHODS

Twenty individuals (110.6 [18.1] days) post-ACLr and 20 healthy individuals (CTRL) participated in this study. Participants performed standing, sit-to-stand, and squat tasks under natural, instructed, and feedback conditions. Limb-loading symmetry was calculated as the between-limb ratio of vertical ground reaction force impulse during each task. General Linear Model repeated-measures analysis, 2 (group) × 3 (condition), determined the effects of group and condition on limb-loading symmetry for each task.

RESULTS

Significant interactions were observed for each task (all P < 0.001). Compared with CTRL, ACLr exhibited greater asymmetry during natural (deficits: standing, 10%, P = 0.001; sit-to-stand, 25%, P < 0.001; squat, 15%, P < 0.001) and instructed (deficits: sit-to-stand, 13%, P = 0.001; squat, 8%, P = 0.04), but not feedback conditions. The CTRL maintained symmetry across conditions and tasks. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction exhibited greater asymmetry in natural compared with instructed (deficits: standing, 11%, P < 0.001; sit-to-stand, 14%, P < 0.001; squat, 8%, P = 0.001) and feedback (deficits: standing, 10%, P = 0.001; sit-to-stand, 21%, P < 0.001; squat, 15%, P < 0.001) conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of loading asymmetries in natural but not feedback conditions indicates that individuals 3 months post-ACLr shift loading away from surgical limb despite the ability to meet task demands which may be suggestive of nonuse behavior. Even when instructed to load symmetrically, individuals continued to exhibit some degree of asymmetry.

Conditioning Brain Responses to Improve Quadriceps Function in an Individual With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Persistent quadriceps weakness and activation failure are common in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. A growing body of evidence indicates that this chronic quadriceps dysfunction could be partly mediated due to reduced corticospinal excitability. However, current rehabilitation approaches do not directly target corticospinal deficits, which may be critical for restoring optimal clinical outcomes after the surgery. This case study tested the feasibility of operant conditioning of torque responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to improve quadriceps function after ACL reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

Operant conditioning of motor evoked torque responses would improve quadriceps strength, voluntary activation, and corticospinal excitability.

STUDY DESIGN

Case study and research report.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

METHODS

A 24-year-old male with an ACL reconstruction (6 months postsurgery) trained for 20 sessions (2-3 times per week for 8 weeks) to increase his TMS-induced motor evoked torque response (MEP torque) of the quadriceps muscles using operant conditioning principles. Knee extensor strength, voluntary quadriceps muscle activation, and quadriceps corticospinal excitability were evaluated at 3 time points: preintervention (pre), 4 weeks (mid), and immediately after the intervention (post).

RESULTS

The participant was able to successfully condition (ie, increase) the quadriceps MEP torque after 1 training session, and the conditioned MEP torque gradually increased over the course of 20 training sessions to reach about 500% of the initial value at the end of training. The participant's control MEP torque values and corticospinal excitability, which were measured outside of the conditioning paradigm, also increased with training. These changes were paralleled by improvements in knee extensor strength and voluntary quadriceps muscle activation.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that operant conditioning of MEP torque is a feasible approach to improving quadriceps corticospinal excitability and quadriceps function after ACL reconstruction and encourages further testing in a larger cohort of ACL-reconstructed individuals.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Operant conditioning may serve as a potential therapeutic adjuvant for ACL rehabilitation.

Knee sensorimotor control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison between reconstruction techniques

The sensorimotor system helps to maintain functional joint stability during movement. After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction, several sensorimotor deficits may arise, including altered proprioception and changes in neuromuscular control. It is still unknown whether the type of autograft used in the reconstruction may influence knee sensorimotor impairments. The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the effects of the hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) ACL reconstruction techniques on knee sensorimotor control 6–12 months post-operation. A total of 83 male subjects participated in this study: 27 healthy participants, 30 BPTB-operated patients and 26 HT-operated patients. Active joint position sense in 3 ranges of motion (90–60°, 60–30°, and 30–0° of knee flexion), isometric steadiness, and onset of muscle activation were used to compare sensorimotor system function between groups. Both operated groups had a small (< 5°) but significant joint position sense error in the 30–0° range when compared to the healthy group. No significant differences were found between the operated and the control groups for isometric steadiness or onset of muscle activation. The results of this study suggest that operated patients present knee proprioceptive deficits independently of surgical technique. Nevertheless, the clinical implications of this impairment are still unknown. It seems that selected surgical approach for ACL reconstruction do not affect functioning of the sensorimotor system to a large degree.

Ankle perturbation generates bilateral alteration of knee muscle onset times after unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare muscle activation onset times of knee muscles between the involved and uninvolved knee of patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and the uninjured knees of healthy subjects after a controlled perturbation at the ankle level.

METHODS

Fifty male amateur soccer players, 25 with unilateral ACLR using semitendinosus-gracilis graft (age = 28.36 ± 7.87 years; time after surgery = 9 ± 3 months) and 25 uninjured control subjects (age = 24.16 ± 2.67 years) participated in the study. Two destabilizing platforms (one for each limb) generated a controlled perturbation at the ankle of each participant (30°of inversion, 10°plantarflexion simultaneously) in a weight bearing condition. The muscle activation onset times of semitendinosus (ST) and vastus medialis (VM) was detected through an electromyographic (EMG) analysis to assess the neuromuscular function of knee muscles.

RESULTS

Subjects with ACLR had significant delays in EMG onset in the involved (VM = 99.9 ± 30 ms; ST = 101.7 ± 28 ms) and uninvolved knee (VM = 100.4 ± 26 ms; ST = 104.7 ± 28 ms) when compared with the healthy subjects (VM = 69.1 ± 9 ms; ST = 74.6 ± 9 ms). However, no difference was found between involved and uninvolved knee of the ACLR group.

DISCUSSION

The results show a bilateral alteration of knee muscles in EMG onset after a unilateral ACLR, responses that can be elicited with an ankle perturbation. This suggests an alteration in the central processing of proprioceptive information and/or central nervous system re-organization that may affect neuromuscular control of knee muscles in the involved and uninvolved lower limbs.

Does brain functional connectivity contribute to musculoskeletal injury? A preliminary prospective analysis of a neural biomarker of ACL injury risk

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to present a unique prospective neurological dataset for participants who experienced an ACL injury.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal case-control.

METHODS

High school female soccer athletes were evaluated using functional magnetic resonance imaging to capture resting-state brain connectivity prior to their competitive season. Two of these athletes later experienced an ACL injury (ACLI). We matched these ACLI participants with eight teammates who did not go on to sustain an ACL injury (uninjured controls, Con) based on age, grade, sex, height, and weight to examine differences in preseason connectivity. Knee-motor regions of interest (ROIs) were created based on previously published data from which five specific areas were selected as seeds for analysis. Independent-samples t-tests with a false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons determined differences in connectivity between the ACLI and Con.

RESULTS

There was significantly greater connectivity between the left primary sensory cortex (a brain region responsible for proprioception) and the right posterior lobe of the cerebellum (a brain region responsible for balance and coordination) for the Con relative to ACLI, t (8)=4.53, p=0.03 (false discovery rate corrected).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data indicate that those who do not later sustain an ACL injury exhibit a stronger functional connection between a cortical sensory-motor region and a cerebellar region responsible for balance and coordination. These findings may help to guide development of brain-driven biofeedback training that optimizes and promotes adaptive neuroplasticity to reduce motor coordination errors and injury risk.

Cognitive Performance and Locomotor Adaptation in Persons With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background. Persons with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) show deficits in gait and neuromuscular control following rehabilitation. This altered behavior extends to locomotor adaptation and learning, however the contributing factors to this observed behavior have yet to be investigated. Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess differences in locomotor adaptation and learning between ACLR and controls, and identify underlying contributors to motor adaptation in these individuals. Methods. Twenty ACLR individuals and 20 healthy controls (CON) agreed to participate in this study. Participants performed four cognitive and dexterity tasks (local version of Trail Making Test, reaction time test, electronic pursuit rotor test, and the Purdue pegboard). Three-dimensional kinematics were also collected while participants walked on a split-belt treadmill. Results. ACLR individuals completed the local versions of Trails A and Trails B significantly faster than CON. During split-belt walking, ACLR individuals demonstrated smaller step length asymmetry during EARLY and LATE adaptation, smaller double support asymmetry during MID adaptation, and larger stance time asymmetry during DE-ADAPT compared with CON. Conclusions. ACLR individuals performed better during tasks that required visual attention and task switching and were less perturbed during split-belt walking compared to controls. Persons with ACLR may use different strategies than controls, cognitive or otherwise, to adapt locomotor patterns.

Visual-Motor Control of Drop Landing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CONTEXT

  Visual feedback is crucial in the control of human movement. When vision is obstructed, alterations in landing neuromuscular control may increase movements that place individuals at risk for injury. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury may further alter the motor-control response to alterations in visual feedback. The development of stroboscopic glasses that disrupt visual feedback without fully obscuring it has enabled researchers to assess visual-motor control during movements that simulate the dynamic demands of athletic activity.

OBJECTIVE

  To investigate the effect of stroboscopic visual-feedback disruption (SVFD) on drop vertical-jump landing mechanics and to determine whether injury history influenced the effect.

DESIGN

  Cohort study.

SETTING

  Movement-analysis laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

  A total of 15 participants with ACL reconstruction (ACLR; 7 men, 8 women; age = 21.41 ± 2.60 years, height = 1.72 ± 0.09 m, mass = 69.24 ± 15.24 kg, Tegner Activity Scale score = 7.30 ± 1.30, time since surgery = 36.18 ± 26.50 months, hamstrings grafts = 13, patellar tendon grafts = 2) and 15 matched healthy control participants (7 men, 8 women; age = 23.15 ± 3.48 years, height = 1.73 ± 0.09 m, mass = 69.98 ± 14.83 kg, Tegner Activity Scale score = 6.77 ± 1.48).

INTERVENTION(S)

  Drop vertical-jump landings under normal and SVFD conditions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

  The SVFD effect for knee sagittal- and frontal-plane excursions, peak moments, and vertical ground reaction force were calculated during landing and compared with previously established measurement error and between groups.

RESULTS

  The SVFD altered knee sagittal-plane excursion (4.04° ± 2.20°, P = .048) and frontal-plane excursion (1.98° ± 1.53°, P = .001) during landing above within-session measurement error. Joint-moment difference scores from full vision to the SVFD condition were not greater than within-session error. We observed an effect of ACLR history only for knee flexion (ACLR group = 3.12° ± 3.76°, control group = -0.84° ± 4.45°; P = .001). We did not observe an effect of side or sex.

CONCLUSIONS

  The SVFD altered sagittal- and frontal-plane landing knee kinematics but did not alter moments. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may induce alterations in sagittal-plane visual-motor control of the knee. The group SVFD effect was on a level similar to that of an in-flight perturbation, motor-learning intervention, or plyometric-training program, indicating that visual-motor ability may contribute to knee neuromuscular control on a clinically important level. The individual effects of the SVFD indicated possible unique sensorimotor versus visual-motor movement strategies during landing.

Poor knee function after ACL reconstruction is associated with attenuated landing force and knee flexion moment during running

PURPOSE

Poor knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may increase the risk of future knee symptoms and knee osteoarthritis via abnormal knee joint loading patterns, particularly during high-impact activity. This study aimed to assess the relationship between poor self-reported or clinically measured knee function and knee moments/vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) in individuals following ACLR.

METHODS

61 participants (mean 16.5 ± 3 months following ACLR, 23 women) completed a patient-reported knee function questionnaire and three hop tests (% of uninvolved limb). Participants were divided into satisfactory and poor knee function groups (poor < 85% patient-reported knee function and/or < 85% hop test symmetry). The knee biomechanics of both groups were assessed with three-dimensional motion analysis during the stance phase of overland running at self-selected speeds, and the association between knee function and knee moments was assessed using analysis of covariance with running speed as a covariate.

RESULTS

Participants with poor knee function (n = 30) ran with significantly smaller peak knee flexion moments (moderate effect size 0.7, p = 0.03) and significantly smaller peak vGRFs (large effect size 1.0, p = 0.002) compared to those with satisfactory knee function (n = 31). No significant differences were observed for knee adduction and knee external rotation moments or knee kinematics.

CONCLUSION

Individuals following ACLR with poor self-reported knee function and/or hop test performance demonstrate knee moments during running that may be associated with lower knee joint contact forces. These findings provide greater understanding of the relationship between knee biomechanics during running and clinical assessments of knee function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Cross-sectional study.

Effect of Surgery on Gait and Sensory Motor Performance in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common disease of aging that leads to gait instability resulting from loss of leg sensory and motor functions. The results of surgical intervention have been studied using a variety of methods, but no test has been reported that objectively measures integrative leg motor sensory functions in CSM patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of using a novel single leg squat (SLS) test to measure integrative motor sensory functions in patients with CSM before and after surgery.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with CSM were enrolled in this prospective study. Clinical data and scores from standard outcomes questionnaires were obtained before and after surgery. Patients also participated in experimental test protocols consisting of standard kinematic gait testing, the Purdue pegboard test, and the novel SLS test.

RESULTS

The SLS test protocol was well tolerated by CSM patients and generated objective performance data over short test periods. In patients who participated in postoperative testing, the group measures of mean SLS errors decreased following surgery. Gait velocity measures followed a similar pattern of group improvement postoperatively. Practical barriers to implementing this extensive battery of tests resulted in subject attrition over time. Compared with kinematic gait testing, the SLS protocol required less space and could be effectively implemented more efficiently.

CONCLUSIONS

The SLS test provides a practical means of obtaining objective measures of leg motor sensory functions in patients with CSM. Additional testing with a larger cohort of patients is required to use SLS data to rigorously examine group treatment effects.

ABBREVIATIONS

BW, body weightCSM, cervical spondylotic myelopathymJOA, modified Japanese Orthopedic AssociationSLS, single leg squat.

Impaired voluntary quadriceps force control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: relationship with knee function

PURPOSE

Impairments in quadriceps force control and altered quadriceps and hamstring muscle activation strategies have been observed following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; however, the functional implications of these impairments are unclear. This study examined the cross-sectional associations between quadriceps force control, quadriceps activation, hamstring coactivation and clinically assessed knee function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a hamstring graft.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients (18 ± 3 months following surgery) and 41 uninjured individuals participated. Quadriceps force control was assessed using an isometric knee extension task. Participants cyclically increased and decreased quadriceps force at slow speeds between 5 and 30 % maximum voluntary isometric contraction matching a moving target displayed on a screen. Quadriceps activation and hamstring coactivation were assessed concurrently using surface electromyography. Knee function was assessed with the Cincinnati Knee Rating Scale and three single-leg hop tests.

RESULTS

The reconstructed group completed the task with 48 % greater root-mean-square error (RMSE), indicating significantly worse quadriceps force control (p < 0.001). In a multivariable model adjusted for sex, greater RMSE and greater lateral hamstring coactivation were significantly associated with worse knee function that is greater odds of scoring <85 % on one or more knee functional assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Less-accurate quadriceps force output and greater hamstring coactivation are associated with worse knee joint function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and may contribute to irregular knee joint loading and the onset or progression of knee osteoarthritis. Impairments in quadriceps force control and altered muscle activation strategies may be modifiable through neuromuscular training, and this is an area for future research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control study, Level III.

Improving ACL Reconstruction Outcomes

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common and predominantly successful surgical intervention. But are there specific preoperative patient characteristics or intraoperative surgeon decisions that lead to better or worse outcomes? And can understanding brain function changes of patients after ACL reconstruction reveal insights into the ways that postsurgical rehabilitation can be improved to further enhance outcomes? These intriguing and clinically applicable questions are addressed in this webinar titled "Improving ACL Reconstruction Outcomes," hosted jointly by JOSPT and JBJS. The webinar is based on 2 published research articles-one from JBJS and the other from JOSPT. Participants in this continuing education activity are asked to read both articles carefully before watching the webinar. JBJS co-author Kurt Spindler, MD, discusses findings from a longitudinal analysis that identified certain baseline patient characteristics and intraoperative choices that predicted higher and lower SF-36 Physical Component scores after ACL reconstruction. JOSPT co-author Dustin Grooms, PhD, ATC, shares recently published results of a controlled laboratory study that employed functional MRI to investigate brain-activation differences between patients who did and did not undergo ACL reconstruction. Moderated by Kevin Wilk, PT, DPT, FAPTA, a leading authority on rehabilitation of sports injuries, the webinar includes additional insights from expert commentators Eric McCarty, MD, and Karin Grävare Silbernagel, PT, PhD, ATC.

Neuroplasticity Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Background Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury may result in neuroplastic changes due to lost mechanoreceptors of the ACL and compensations in neuromuscular control. These alterations are not completely understood. Assessing brain function after ACL injury and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with functional magnetic resonance imaging provides a means to address this gap in knowledge. Objective To compare differences in brain activation during knee flexion/extension in persons who have undergone ACLR and in matched controls. Methods Fifteen participants who had undergone left ACLR (38.13 ± 27.16 months postsurgery) and 15 healthy controls matched on age, sex, height, mass, extremity dominance, education level, sport participation, and physical activity level participated. Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were obtained during a unilateral knee motor task consisting of repeated cycles of knee flexion and extension. Results Participants who had undergone ACLR had increased activation in the contralateral motor cortex, lingual gyrus, and ipsilateral secondary somatosensory area and diminished activation in the ipsilateral motor cortex and cerebellum when compared to healthy matched controls. Conclusion Brain activation for knee flexion/extension motion may be altered following ACLR. The ACLR brain activation profile may indicate a shift toward a visual-motor strategy as opposed to a sensory-motor strategy to engage in knee movement. Level of Evidence Cohort, level 3. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(3):180-189. Epub 5 Nov 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7003.

Speed, resistance, and unexpected accelerations modulate feed forward and feedback control during a novel weight bearing task

We developed a method to investigate feed-forward and feedback movement control during a weight bearing visuomotor knee tracking task. We hypothesized that a systematic increase in speed and resistance would show a linear decrease in movement accuracy, while unexpected perturbations would induce a velocity-dependent decrease in movement accuracy. We determined the effects of manipulating the speed, resistance, and unexpected events on error during a functional weight bearing task. Our long term objective is to benchmark neuromuscular control performance across various groups based on age, injury, disease, rehabilitation status, and/or training. Twenty-six healthy adults between the ages of 19-45 participated in this study. The study involved a single session using a custom designed apparatus to perform a single limb weight bearing task under nine testing conditions: three movement speeds (0.2, 0.4, and 0.6Hz) in combination with three levels of brake resistance (5%, 10%, and 15% of individual's body weight). Individuals were to perform the task according to a target with a fixed trajectory across all speeds, corresponding to a∼0 (extension) to 30° (flexion) of knee motion. An increase in error occurred with speed (p<0.0001, effect size (eta²): η²=0.50) and resistance (p<0.0001, η²=0.01). Likewise, during unexpected perturbations, the ratio of perturbed/non-perturbed error increased with each increment in velocity (p<0.0014, η²=0.08), and resistance (p<0.0001, η²=0.11). The hierarchical framework of these measurements offers a standardized functional weight bearing strategy to assess impaired neuro-muscular control and/or test the efficacy of therapeutic rehabilitation interventions designed to influence neuromuscular control of the knee.

Comparison of Muscle Activation Levels Between Healthy Individuals and Persons Who Have Undergone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction During Different Phases of Weight-Bearing Exercises

Study Design Cross-sectional, controlled laboratory study. Background Quantification of muscular activation during different phases of functional activities is important to understand activation deficits in individuals who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Objectives To compare activation levels of the vastus medialis (VM), medial hamstrings (MH), and gluteus medius (GMed) muscles during the different phases of weight-bearing tasks between individuals who had undergone ACLR and healthy controls. Methods Surface electromyography was used to measure the activation levels of the VM, MH, and GMed muscles in 16 participants who had undergone ACLR (average time since surgery, 4 years) and 15 healthy participants during the reach and return phases of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) and the ascending and descending phases of a step-down task (SDT). Repeated-measures analyses of variance were performed to determine whether muscle activation levels differed between groups during different phases of the tasks. Results There were significant group-by-phase interactions for the GMed during both the SEBT and SDT. Gluteus medius activation was lower for the ACLR group during the return phase of the posteromedial direction of the SEBT compared to the control group (P = .03). During the SDT, GMed activation was higher for the ACLR group during the ascending phase than during the descending phase (P<.001), while the control group showed no difference between phases (P = .71). Conclusion Individuals who had undergone ACLR have similar VM and MH activation compared to healthy individuals during different phases of the SDT and SEBT. However, phase differences for GMed activity and decreased GMed activity relative to healthy individuals were observed among ACLR participants. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(11):984-992. Epub 11 Oct 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.5896.

Motion Task Selection for Kinematic Evaluation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To examine the different motion tasks and the protocols used to objectively quantify dynamic stability in terms of knee kinematics at different stages of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) recovery.

METHODS

A systematic search was done using OVID in Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PsychINFO, and AMED. A combination of the following keywords and their variations were used: anterior cruciate ligament, motion tasks (e.g., jump, hop, gait), and stability. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) ACLR subjects were recruited, (2) at least 1 motion task was performed and kinematics data were recorded, and (3) uninjured subjects or the contralateral uninjured limbs were included as a control group. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) non-English language publications, (2) retrospective studies and review articles, (3) animal studies, and (4) cadaveric studies.

RESULTS

The search returned 2,195 studies, and 56 were included in this review according to the criteria. A total of 1,086 ACLR subjects were included. Pivoting, landing, walking, running, stair negotiation, and squats were assessed using optoelectronic motion capture, electrogoniometry, or video-radiography.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate selection of motion tasks is an integral factor in dynamic stability testing as it evokes different kinematic outcomes in relation to the different stages of ACLR recovery. Stair negotiation and landing tasks are best performed during the early stages of recovery, and landing and pivoting are recommended 6 months after ACLR surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Brain Activation for Knee Movement Measured Days Before Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Neuroimaging in Musculoskeletal Medicine

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has multifactorial causes encompassing mechanical, hormonal, exposure, and anatomical factors. Alterations in the central nervous system also play a role, but their influence after injury, recovery, and recurrent injury remain unknown. Modern neuroimaging techniques can be used to elucidate the underlying functional and structural alterations of the brain that predicate the neuromuscular control adaptations associated with ACL injury. This knowledge will further our understanding of the neural adaptations after ACL injury and rehabilitation and in relation to injury risk. In this paper, we describe the measurement of brain activation during knee extension-flexion after ACL injury and reconstruction and 26 days before a contralateral ACL injury.

METHODS

Brain functional magnetic resonance imaging data for an ACL-injured participant and a matched control participant were collected and contrasted.

RESULTS

Relative to the matched control participant, the ACL-injured participant exhibited increased activation of motor-planning, sensory-processing, and visual-motor control areas. A similar activation pattern was present for the contralateral knee that sustained a subsequent injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral neuroplasticity after ACL injury may contribute to the risk of second injury, or aspects of neurophysiology may be predisposing factors to primary injury.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Sensory-visual-motor function and motor-learning adaptations may provide targets for rehabilitation.

PROPRIOCEPTION, BODY BALANCE AND FUNCTIONALITY IN INDIVIDUALS WITH ACL RECONSTRUCTION

OBJECTIVE

: To evaluate and compare proprioception, body balance and knee functionality of individuals with or without unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

: Forty individuals were divided in two groups: Experimental group, 20 individuals with ACL reconstruction at six months postoperative, and control group, 20 individuals with no history of lower limb pathologies. In the experimental group, we assessed lower limbs with reconstructed ACL and contralateral limb; in the control group the dominant and the non-dominant lower limbs were assessed. All subjects were submitted to joint position sense test to evaluate proprioception, postural control measure in single-limb, and step up and down (SUD) test for functional assessment.

RESULTS

: There were no deficits in proprioception and postural control. In the SUD test, a 5% decrease in lift up force was found in reconstructed ACL lower limbs, however, a statistically not significant difference. The impact and step down force during the course of test were 30% greater in anatomic ACL than in control lower limbs.

CONCLUSION

: The individuals with ACL reconstruction at six months postoperative did not show changes in proprioception and postural control, but showed motor control changes, influencing knee functionality. Level of Evidence IV, Prognostic Studies.

Adaptation Strategies of Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Despite the strong implications for rehabilitation design, the capability of individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to adapt and store novel gait patterns have not been well studied.

Purpose:

To investigate how reconstructive surgery may affect the ability to adapt and store novel gait patterns in persons with ACLR while walking on a split-belt treadmill.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Gait adaptation was compared between 20 participants with ACLR and 20 healthy controls during split-belt treadmill walking. Gait adaptation was assessed in slow- and fast-adapting parameters by (1) the magnitude of symmetry during late adaptation and (2) the amount of the asymmetry during de-adaptation.

Results:

Healthy individuals adapted a new walking pattern and stored the new walking pattern equally in both the dominant and nondominant limbs. Conversely, individuals with ACLR displayed impairments in both slow-adapting and fast-adapting derived gait adaptation and significant differences in behavior between the reconstructed and uninjured limb.

Conclusion:

While surgical reconstruction and physical therapy are aimed at improving mechanical stability to the knee, the study data suggest that fundamental features of motor control remain altered. After ACLR, participants display an altered ability to learn and store functional gait patterns.

Whole body heat stress increases motor cortical excitability and skill acquisition in humans

OBJECTIVE

Vigorous systemic exercise stimulates a cascade of molecular and cellular processes that enhance central nervous system (CNS) plasticity and performance. The influence of heat stress on CNS performance and learning is novel. We designed two experiments to determine whether passive heat stress (1) facilitated motor cortex excitability and (2) improved motor task acquisition compared to no heat stress.

METHODS

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) were collected before and after 30 min of heat stress at 73 °C. A second cohort of subjects performed a motor learning task using the FDI either following heat or the no heat condition.

RESULTS

Heat stress increased heart rate to 65% of age-predicted maximum. After heat, mean resting MEP amplitude increased 48% (p<0.05). MEP stimulus-response amplitudes did not differ according to stimulus intensity. In the second experiment, heat stress caused a significant decrease in absolute and variable error (p<0.05) during a novel movement task using the FDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Passive environmental heat stress (1) increases motor cortical excitability, and (2) enhances performance in a motor skill acquisition task.

SIGNIFICANCE

Controlled heat stress may prime the CNS to enhance motor skill acquisition during rehabilitation.

Neuroplasticity following anterior cruciate ligament injury: a framework for visual-motor training approaches in rehabilitation

SYNOPSIS

The neuroplastic effects of anterior cruciate ligament injury have recently become more evident, demonstrating underlying nervous system changes in addition to the expected mechanical alterations associated with injury. Interventions to mitigate these detrimental neuroplastic effects, along with the established biomechanical changes, need to be considered in the rehabilitation process and return-to-play progressions. This commentary establishes a link between dynamic movement mechanics, neurocognition, and visual processing regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury adaptations and injury risk. The proposed framework incorporates evidence from the disciplines of neuroscience, biomechanics, motor control, and psychology to support integrating neurocognitive and visual-motor approaches with traditional neuromuscular interventions during anterior cruciate ligament injury rehabilitation. Physical therapists, athletic trainers, strength coaches, and other health care and performance professionals can capitalize on this integration of sciences to utilize visual-training technologies and techniques to improve on already-established neuromuscular training methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapy, level 5.

The effects of knee injury on skeletal muscle function, Na+, K+-ATPase content, and isoform abundance

While training upregulates skeletal muscle Na(+), K(+)-ATPase (NKA), the effects of knee injury and associated disuse on muscle NKA remain unknown. This was therefore investigated in six healthy young adults with a torn anterior cruciate ligament, (KI; four females, two males; age 25.0 ± 4.9 years; injury duration 15 ± 17 weeks; mean ± SD) and seven age- and BMI-matched asymptomatic controls (CON; five females, two males). Each participant underwent a vastus lateralis muscle biopsy, on both legs in KI and one leg in CON. Muscle was analyzed for muscle fiber type and cross-sectional area (CSA), NKA content ([(3)H]ouabain binding), and α1-3 and β1-2 isoform abundance. Participants also completed physical activity and knee function questionnaires (KI only); and underwent quadriceps peak isometric strength, thigh CSA and postural sway assessments in both injured and noninjured legs. NKA content was 20.1% lower in the knee-injured leg than the noninjured leg and 22.5% lower than CON. NKA α2 abundance was 63.0% lower in the knee-injured leg than the noninjured leg, with no differences in other NKA isoforms. Isometric strength and thigh CSA were 21.7% and 7.1% lower in the injured leg than the noninjured leg, respectively. In KI, postural sway did not differ between legs, but for two-legged standing was 43% higher than CON. Hence, muscle NKA content and α2 abundance were reduced in severe knee injury, which may contribute to impaired muscle function. Restoration of muscle NKA may be important in rehabilitation of muscle function after knee and other lower limb injury.

Isokinetic Quadriceps and Hamstring Muscle Strength after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between Single-bundle and Double-bundle Reconstruction

Introduction

Clinical studies have not yet proven whether single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is superior. Nonetheless, quadriceps and hamstring muscle deficit is common after ACL reconstruction and it may affect the final outcome. The purpose of this study was to compare the isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength after SB-ACL and DB-ACL reconstruction.

Materials and methods

We recruited 40 patients with ACL reconstruction (20 SB and 20 DB) by the same team of surgeons from 2006 to 2009. Demographic data of both groups were comparable. Lower extremity concentric isokinetic peak extension and flexion torques were assessed at angular velocities of 60°/second, 180°/second, and 300°/second preoperatively and at least 1 year postoperatively. Clinical evaluation was performed, including anterior stability with an arthrometer (model KT-1000), Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, single leg hop test, and International Knee Documentation Committee score. Data were analysed statistically.

Results

The isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring peak torque values in both the SB and DB groups did not show any significant difference. The maximum displacement upon KT-1000 arthrometer measurement appeared lower in the DB group but the difference was not significant. The side-to-side percentage deficits in quadriceps and hamstring peak torque at postoperative assessment were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion

Isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength after SB-ACL or DB-ACL reconstruction was comparable.

Return to play following ACL reconstruction: survey among experienced arthroscopic surgeons (AGA instructors)

PURPOSE

There is a lack of consensus regarding appropriate criteria attesting patient's unrestricted sports activities after ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to perform a survey among experienced arthroscopic surgeons regarding their return to play guidelines in these patients.

METHODS

A six-item questionnaire was distributed among experienced arthroscopic surgeons (instructors of the German speaking society of arthroscopy, AGA). Study participants were asked to choose from multiple choice answers and had the possibility answering in an open discussion field.

RESULTS

The response rate of the survey was 85.7 %. A total of 83.5 % used autologous hamstring grafts for ACL reconstruction in athletes followed by BPTB (37.2 %) and quadriceps tendon graft (12 %). Approximately 63.5 % recommended a time point later than 6 months allowing return to play after ACL reconstruction in the athlete (after 4 and 6 months 2.3 and 35.3 %, respectively). 76.6 % recommended starting with sports specific rehabilitation after 4 months (21.6 % after 6 months). The most frequent criterion (multiple answers) to allow return to play was negative Lachman test (81.7 % positive answers) followed by free range of motion (78.4 %), negative pivot shift (60.1 %), anterior drawer (45.4 %), proprioception test (43.1 %), muscular strength analysis (40.8 %), single-leg hop jump test (39.0 %), KT 1000 measurement (16.1 %), and MRI (4.1 %). Of the surgeons 85.8 % did not use any of the given scores as criterion to allow return to competitive sports (subjective IKDC score 10.6 %, Lysholm score 8.3 %, objective IKDC score 7.4 %, Tegner activity scale 3.7 %).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the majority of surgeons do not consider muscle function, jump tests, alignment tests, and proprioception as relevant return to sports criterion. However, these are two crucial parameters for return to sports.

Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is commonly performed in athletes, with the goal of return to sports activities. Unfortunately, this operation may fail, and the rates of either reinjuring an ACL-reconstructed knee or sustaining an ACL rupture to the contralateral knee range from 3% to 49%. One problem that exists is a lack of information and consensus regarding the appropriate criteria for releasing patients to unrestricted sports activities postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine the published criteria used to allow athletes to return to unrestricted sports activities after ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to identify the factors investigators used to determine when return to athletics was allowed after primary ACL reconstruction. Inclusion criteria were English language, publication within the last 10 years, clinical trial, all adult patients, primary ACL reconstruction, original research investigation, and minimum 12 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 716 studies identified, 264 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 105 (40%) failed to provide any criteria for return to sports after ACL reconstruction. In 84 studies (32%) the amount of time postoperatively was the only criterion provided. In 40 studies (15%) the amount of time along with subjective criteria were given. Only 35 studies (13%) noted objective criteria required for return to athletics. These criteria included muscle strength or thigh circumference (28 studies), general knee examination (15 studies), single-leg hop tests (10 studies), Lachman rating (1 study), and validated questionnaires (1 study).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review show noteworthy problems and a lack of objective assessment before release to unrestricted sports activities. General recommendations are made for quantification of muscle strength, stability, neuromuscular control, and function in patients who desire to return to athletics after ACL reconstruction, with acknowledgment of the need for continued research in this area.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.