Survival outcome assessed according to tumor burden and progression patterns in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung adenocarcinoma undergoing epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy

Clinical Impact of Osimertinib Dose Reduction in the First-Line Setting on EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Monocentric Study

Purpose

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In the FLAURA trial, osimertinib demonstrated longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to gefitinib or erlotinib. In the trial, dose reductions occurred in 5% of patients, primarily due to QT prolongation. However, various adverse events can also lead to dose reductions in clinical practice, and the efficacy of osimertinib after dose reduction remains unclear. The present study was conducted to evaluate the clinical impact of osimertinib dose reduction.

Patients and Methods

This monocentric retrospective study was conducted at Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital. Ninety patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer receiving osimertinib as their first-line therapy between August 2018 and December 2021 were included.

Results

Of the cohort, 23 patients had an osimertinib dose reduction during their clinical course. The dose reduction group tended to have a lower median body weight and a higher proportion of elderly patients aged 80 years or older. The median PFS was 21.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.22-34.18) in the dose reduction group and 18.6 (95% CI: 13.04-24.23) months in the regular-dose group. The median OS was 29.6 months (95% CI: 17.44-41.70) in the osimertinib dose-reduction group and 37.7 (95% CI: 27.10-48.23) months in the regular-dose group. Dose reduction did not significantly impact the time-dependent hazard ratio (HR) for PFS (HR 1.22 [95% CI: 0.55-1.89]) or OS (HR: 1.24 [95% CI: 0.64-2.42]). The adverse events leading to dose reduction were mainly rash, anorexia, and paronychia, and no fatal adverse events were observed after dose reduction.

Conclusion

The present study suggests that dose reduction may not compromise the efficacy of osimertinib. However, the clinical impact of dose reduction is not fully understood. Physicians should carefully weigh its benefits and risks before implementation.

Concomitant genomic features stratify prognosis to patients with advanced EGFR mutant lung cancer

This study aimed to explore the clinical significance of genomics features including tumor mutation burden (TMB) and copy number alteration (CNA) for advanced EGFR mutant lung cancer. We retrospectively identified 1378 patients with advanced EGFR mutant lung cancer and next-generation sequencing tests from three cohorts. Multiple co-occurring genomics alternations occurred in a large proportion (97%) of patients with advanced EGFR mutant lung cancers. Both TMB and CNA were predictive biomarkers for these patients. A joint analysis of TMB and CNA found that patients with high TMB and high CNA showed worse responses to EGFR-TKIs and predicted worse outcomes. TMBhighCNAhigh, as a high-risk genomic feature, showed predictive ability in most of the subgroups based on clinical characteristics. These patients had larger numbers of metastatic sites, and higher rates of EGFR copy number amplification, TP53 mutations, and cell-cycle gene alterations, which showed more potential survival gain from combination treatment. Furthermore, a nomogram based on genomic features and clinical features was developed to distinguish prognosis. Genomic features could stratify prognosis and guide clinical treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutant lung cancer.

LAPS score for individualized treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer receiving EGFR-TKIs with or without bevacizumab

BACKGROUND

To establish a risk stratification score to facilitate individualized treatment for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We enrolled 160 advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with or without bevacizumab. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

There were 107 patients in EGFR-TKI monotherapy (T group) and 53 patients in EGFR-TKI with bevacizumab (A + T group). The median PFS in the A + T group was significantly longer than that in the T group (p = 0.002). No difference in the median OS between the A + T and T groups (p = 0.721). The multivariate analyses showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and the pre-treatment lactate dehydrogenase-albumin ratio (LAR) were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. The LAR-ECOG PS (LAPS) score was constructed by combining the pre-treatment LAR and ECOG PS. We defined ECOG PS 2 and high pre-treatment LAR as a score of 1. Then, patients with a total LAPS score of 0 were categorized as low-risk and those with 1-2 scores were classified as high-risk. For patients in low-risk group, there was no significant difference in PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) among those who received EGFR-TKI with or without bevacizumab. However, patients in high-risk group had a significant benefit in PFS and DCR when treated with EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab compared to those who received EGFR-TKI alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel LAPS score may help to facilitate individualized treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI with or without bevacizumab.

Primary lesion radiotherapy during first-line icotinib treatment in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with multiple metastases and no brain metastases: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The most frequent mode of progression in the majority of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with  Epidermal growth factor - receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is failure to respond to treatment at the primary lesion, suggesting that concurrent radiotherapy (CRT) to the primary lesion (CPRT) during first-line treatment with EGFR-TKI may be a novel therapeutic approach with a potential of additional benefit for metastatic NSCLC. Therefore, this study investigated the progression-free survival (PFS) and safety of CPRT during first-line icotinib treatment in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

METHODS

EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients diagnosed with limited multiple metastases were treated with first-line icotinib. The decision to treat the primary lesions with radiation largely depended on the patient's preference. The study endpoints included PFS, toxicity, progression pattern, and acquisition of the T790M mutation.

RESULTS

The median PFS in the CPRT and Non-CPRT groups was 13.6 and 10.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.37, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the results were statistically significant with 14.7 and 11.5 months for the 19del mutation (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.10-0.40, P < 0.001) and 12.9 and 9.9 months for the L858R mutation (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.48, P < 0.001). There were no reports of interstitial pneumonia associated with treatment at grade 4 or above. Patients who received CPRT during first-line icotinib treatment had the potential to decrease the primary lesion progression (P < 0.05) without increasing newly metastatic lesions (P > 0.05). The proportion of acquired T790M mutations was 26.7% and 45.7% in both groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that CPRT is a viable option for patients with EGFR-sensitive mutations in NSCLC with limited multiple metastases during first-line icotinib treatment, which can significantly improve PFS with acceptable toxicities. Data on progression patterns and T790M mutations suggest the need to further investigate the benefits of radiation treatment from a molecular perspective.

Prognostic outcome of treatment modalities for epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced lung cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancer cases has shown remarkable development in the past two decades. However, there have been limited studies comparing the prognostic effects of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and other treatment modalities. Therefore, we compared the survival outcomes of patients treated with EGFR-TKIs versus those treated with other treatment modalities.

METHODS

Patient data were collected from the Korean National Health Insurance Database, National Health Insurance Service- National Sample Cohort 2002 to 2015, which was released by the Korean National Health Insurance Service in 2015. The lung cancer group included patients (n = 2,003) initially diagnosed with lung cancer between January 2010 and December 2013. The main outcome was all-cause mortality. A Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to calculate the relative risk of mortality.

RESULTS

Among the newly diagnosed lung cancer cases, 1,004 (50.1%) were included in the analysis. A 15.1-month median survival benefit was observed in the EGFR-TKI group than that of the multimodality therapy group. The risk of mortality was as follows: EGFR-TKI treatment group (n = 142; hazard ratio [HR], 5.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.57 to 7.86) and multimodality therapy group (n = 326; HR, 7.42; 95% CI, 5.19 to 10.63) compared to surgery only (n = 275).

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations treated with EGFR-TKIs showed better median survival and lower risk of mortality than those in the multimodality therapy group. In the case of EGFR-mutated advanced lung cancer, there is room for downstaging in the TNM classification.

"How Long Have I Got?" in Stage IV NSCLC Patients With at Least 3 Months Up to 10 Years Survival, Accuracy of Long-, Intermediate-, and Short-Term Survival Prediction Is Not Good Enough to Answer This Question

Background

Most lung cancer patients worldwide [stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC)] have a poor survival: 25%–30% die <3 months. Yet, of those surviving >3 months, 10%–15% (70,000–105,000 new patients worldwide per year) survive (very) long. Surprisingly, little scientific attention has been paid to the question, which factors cause the good prognosis in these NSCLC stage IV long survivors. Therefore, “How long do I still have?” currently cannot be accurately answered. We evaluated in a large group of 737 stage IV NSCLC patients surviving 3.2–120.0 months, the accuracies of short- and long-term survival predictive values of baseline factors, radiotherapy (RT), platinum-based chemotherapy (PBT), and tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeted therapy (TKI-TT).

Methods

This is a noninterventional study of 998 consecutive first-onset stage IV NSCLC patients. A total of 737 (74%) survived 3.2–120.0 months, 47 refused RT, PBT, and TKI-TT. Single and multivariate survival analysis and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis were used with dead of disease (DOD) or alive with disease (AWD) as endpoints.

Results

The median survival (16.1 months) of 47 patients who refused PBT, RT, and TKI-TT was significantly worse than those with RT, PBT, and/or TKI-TT (23.3 months, HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.06–2.42, p = 0.04). Of these latter 690 patients, 42% were females, 58% males, median age 63 years (range 27–85), 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 74%, 49%, 16%, and 5%. In total, 16% were alive with disease (AWD) at the last follow-up. Pathology subtype (adenocarcinoma vs. all others), performance score, TNM substage, the number of PBT cycles and TKI-TT had independent predictive value. However, with the multivariate combination of these features, identification results of short-term nonsurvivors and long-term survivors were poor.

Conclusions

In stage IV NSCLC patients with >3 months survival, baseline features, and systemic therapeutic modalities have strong survival predictive value but do not accurately identify short- and long-term survivors. The predictive value of other features and interventions discussed should be investigated in the worldwide very large group of stage IV NSCLC patients with >3 months survival.

Tumor Growth Rate After Nadir Is Associated With Survival in Patients With EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between tumor volume growth rate after the nadir and survival in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with erlotinib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with erlotinib were studied for computed tomography tumor volume kinetics during therapy. The tumor growth rate after nadir was obtained using a previously published analytic module for longitudinal volume tracking to study its relationship with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median tumor volume for the cohort was 19,842 mm3 at baseline and 4,083 mm3 at nadir. The median time to nadir was 6.2 months. The tumor growth rate after nadir for logeV (the natural logarithm of tumor volume measured in mm3) was 0.11/mo on average for the cohort (SE: 0.014), which was very similar to the previously validated reference value of 0.12/mo to define slow and fast tumor growth. The OS of 48 patients with slow tumor growth (≤ 0.12/mo) was significantly longer compared with 23 patients with fast tumor growth (> 0.12/mo; median OS: 37.8 v 25.0 months; P = .0012). In Cox models, tumor growth rate was also associated with survival (regression coefficient: 3.9903; P = .0024; faster rate leads to increased hazards), after adjusting for time to nadir (regression coefficient: -0.0863; P = .0008; longer time to nadir leads to decreased hazards) and smoking history.

CONCLUSION

In patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with erlotinib, slower tumor growth rates after nadir were associated with longer OS, providing a rationale for using tumor growth rates to guide precision therapy for lung cancer.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Afatinib, Erlotinib, and Gefitinib as First-Line Treatments for EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Ontario, Canada

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

This study used Ontario Cancer Registry-linked administrative data to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of lung cancer who received EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment between 1 January, 2014 and 31 August, 2019. A net benefit regression approach accounting for baseline covariates and propensity scores was used to estimate incremental net benefits and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Outcome measures were calculated over a 68-month period and were discounted with an annual rate of 1.5%. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess and characterize the uncertainties.

RESULTS

A total of 547 patients were included in the study, of whom 20.1%, 23.6%, and 56.3% received afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib, respectively. Erlotinib was dominated by afatinib and gefitinib. Compared to gefitinib, afatinib was associated with higher effectiveness (adjusted incremental quality-adjusted life-year: 0.21), higher total costs (adjusted incremental costs: $9745), and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $46,506 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Results from the sensitivity analyses indicated the findings of the base-case analysis were robust.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to previously published studies, our study established head-to-head comparisons of effectiveness and treatment-related costs of first-line EGFR-TKIs. Our findings suggest afatinib was the most cost-effective option among the three EGFR-TKIs.

Factors affecting treatment selection and overall survival for first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

Aim: To investigate the factors associated with treatment selection and overall survival for first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Materials & methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of linked administrative health databases in Ontario, Canada. Results: A total of 1011 patients received an EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy. Treatment selection and overall survival associated with these treatments were affected by age, sex, geographical residency, comorbidities and different sites of metastasis. Conclusion: Though recent approval of osimertinib offers a potential new standard of care in the first-line setting, earlier generation TKIs remain pillars in treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer therapeutic armamentarium. Our findings may contribute to optimizing treatment sequencing of EGFR-TKIs to maximize clinical benefits.

Clinical predictors of response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world multicentric cohort analysis from India

BACKGROUND

The development of various targeted therapies against Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) has been a major step in therapeutic advancements in lung cancer. However, the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) therapy in a real-world setting has not been well elucidated.

METHODS

As part of a retrospective analysis, patients with EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer at 4 tertiary care Institutions in North India between December 2007 and August 2018 were evaluated. The overall response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and factors affecting PFS were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 483 patients were included, including 52.4% males, with mean (±SD) age of 56.7 (±12.4) years. Majority (63.8%) had good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 or 1) and 77.4% were nonsmokers. Among the EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletion was the most common mutation detected (68.1%), followed by L858R mutation in exon 21 (26.9%). Extra-thoracic metastasis was present in 69.5% patients and majority of them had ≤ 2 metastatic sites (85.1%). TKIs were used as the first-line therapy in 64.8% patients, and gefitinib was the most frequently used TKI (67.3%), followed by erlotinib (26.7%). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 65.9% and 90.7% respectively. The median PFS was 9.3 months and brain was the exclusive site of progression in 18.0% patients. On univariate analysis, the factors that significantly affected PFS were, the number of metastatic sites and the type of EGFR mutation. On multivariate analysis, the number of metastatic sites was the only factor that affected the PFS [HR (95% CI): 2.5 (1.7-3.6); Pvalue <0.001]. Skin toxicity was the most common adverse event (32.3%), followed by involvement of the gastro-intestinal tract (22.5%).

CONCLUSION

In this one of the largest multicentric Indian study of treatment outcomes in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world setting, we found that increased tumor burden (number of metastatic sites > 2) was the only significant factor associated with a worse PFS.

The prognostic value of tumor mutation burden in EGFR-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma, an analysis based on cBioPortal data base

Background

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is novel biomarker of promising predict value in prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the distribution of TMB in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients and the impact on overall survival (OS) time are not well demonstrated.

Methods

Information regarding gene mutations and patients' survival time in advanced LUAD was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The diversity of TMB in different EGFR-mutant types was observed and the predicted value of TMB for OS as well as other co-mutations were analyzed. The diversity of TMB was also observed in another Chinese cohort of advanced LUAD patients.

Results

The median TMB values of EGFR wild-type, other types of EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletions and L858R were 6.12, 5.66, 3.77 and 4.72, differences between wild-type and EGFR sensitive mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R) were significant (P<0.001 and P<0.01). OS time of high TMB group was inferior to that of the low TMB group (24.03 months vs. not reached, P=0.0020). TMB and TP53 together will make more accurate prediction of OS in EGFR-mutant advanced LUAD patients. Distribution of TMB in another Chinese cohort had the same trend.

Conclusions

In advanced LUAD patients, TMB was lower in patients with EGFR-mutant group than EGFR wild group. TMB was a negative prognostic biomarker of OS in EGFR-mutant LUAD patients, especially when TP53 was mutated together.

Depression and inflammation among epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Depression is highly prevalent in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with elevated inflammation. However, certain subtypes of driver mutation-associated NSCLC such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC may be associated with less depression given the differences in their underlying biology and disease trajectories. Biological variables such as inflammation, measured by C-reactive protein (CRP), may provide insight into depression variability in EGFR mutant NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with EGFR mutant and wild-type metastatic NSCLC were evaluated for depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) on a continuous scale and meeting depression screening criteria (HADS ≥ 8). Inflammation was measured using CRP. A mediation model was created to understand how inflammation mediates EGFR wild-type associated depression.

RESULTS

One hundred out of 120 patients with NSCLC were recruited (83.3% response rate). The 20 participants with EGFR mutant NSCLC had less depression (HADS-D 3.0 versus 5.4) (P < .001), met depression screening criteria less often (P = .047), and exhibited less inflammation (CRP = 0.23 mg/mL versus 2.71 mg/mL) (P < .001) in comparison with EGFR wild-type NSCLC. Multivariate linear regression model revealed that only CRP predicted depression (P = .015) while controlling for age and sex. Mediation analysis found that lower CRP partially mediated less depression in EGFR mutant NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR mutant NSCLC is associated with less depression but the relationship is partially mediated by lower CRP-related inflammation, which is a stronger predictor of depression than EGFR status. Depression in lung cancer varies by subtype and is significantly related to inflammation.

Prognosis of EGFR-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with different intrathoracic metastatic patterns

Introduction: Lung cancer diagnosed solely with the presence of intrathoracic metastases is classified as M1a. However, intrathoracic metastases can be further divided into different patterns. The objective of our study was to analyze the differences in survival between the different metastatic patterns of intrathoracic metastases in lung adenocarcinoma patients who have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Materials and Methods: Patients who were diagnosed only with intrathoracic metastasis between March 2011 and October 2016 and had EGFR-mutations were selected for this study. Prognosis was determined based on metastatic patterns by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 137 patients (60 patients who only had pleural metastasis [Group A], 44 patients who only had contralateral lung metastasis [Group B] and 33 patients who had both pleural and contralateral lung metastasis with or without pericardial effusion [Group C]) were selected for this in the study. The median OS (overall survival) time was 38.1 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 27.8-48.4), 35.7(95%CI: 23.4-48.0), and 29.7(95%CI: 22.8-36.6) months for Group A, Group B, and Group C, respectively (p=0.037). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Group A and Group B had higher OS compared to Group C (hazard ratio [HR]=0.524, 95%CI: 0.307-0.894, p=0.018; HR=0.473, 95%CI: 0.241-0.931, p=0.030, respectively) among lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations. With regard to patients with pleural or contralateral metastasis only, OS benefit (p=0.579) was not significant between the two groups. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that OS benefit in Group A was significant in patients with N0-1 disease and 21L858R mutations but not in EGFR exon 19 deletions, N2-3 stage or T3-4 stage patients. Conclusion: The prognosis of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients diagnosed only with intrathoracic metastasis was different, indicating that M1a staging should be refined.

Larger tumors are associated with inferior progression-free survival of first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and a lower abundance of EGFR mutation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of primary tumor size on the therapeutic outcomes of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation remains unclear.

METHODS

A total of 291 consecutive patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC administered first-line EGFR-TKIs were enrolled. Computed tomography was used to assess primary tumor diameter. The amplification refractory mutation system plus was used to quantitatively evaluate the abundance of EGFR mutations. Associations between depth of response, abundance of EGFR mutations, and tumor size was investigated.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into three groups according to T classification: ≤ 3 cm (n = 109), 3-5 cm (n = 121), and > 5 cm (n = 61). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the ≤ 3 cm and 3-5 cm groups compared to the > 5 cm group (10.8 vs. 10.5 vs. 7.1 months; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed a consistent result in patients with exon 19 deletion and 21 L858R mutation. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size was an independent predictive factor for PFS (hazard ratio 1.528, 95% confidence interval 1.104-2.115; P = 0.010). Larger tumors (> 5 cm) were marginally significantly less EGFR-mutant abundant than smaller tumors (≤ 5 cm) (mean ± standard deviation 30.5 ± 29.5% vs. 45.8 ± 43.1%; P = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Larger tumors (> 5 cm) were associated with inferior PFS of first-line EGFR-TKI therapy in advanced NSCLC patients with activating EGFR mutations. A potential explaination might be that EGFR mutations are less abundant in larger tumors.

Prognostic model of survival outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients initiated on afatinib: pooled analysis of clinical trial data

Objective

Several predictors of survival have been identified in EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first generation EGFR inhibitors. Prognostic models of survival outcomes with afatinib have not been evaluated.

Methods

A prognostic tool for overall survival (OS)/ progression free survival (PFS) based on pre-treatment clinicopathological factors was developed for EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line afatinib using penalised regression of individual-participant data from LUX-Lung 3 and 6 (n = 468). Favourable, intermediate and poor risk groups were identified and externally validated using LUX-Lung 1 (n = 390) and LUX-Lung 2 (n = 129) trials that initiated afatinib following previous chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitor treatment.

Results

Discriminative performance was good in the development and validation cohorts. For patients treated with first-line afatinib, the median OS for the favourable, intermediate and poor risk groups were > 47.7, 29.3 and 16.4 months, respectively, and the median PFS were 17.3, 13.2 and 8.3 months, respectively. The improvement in median OS with afatinib use compared to chemotherapy was > 12.4 months for the favourable risk group, whereas no OS benefit was apparent for the poor risk group. The improvement in median PFS with afatinib use compared to chemotherapy was 10.2 months for the favourable risk group and 3.2 months for the poor risk group.

Conclusions

A prognostic tool was developed and validated to identify favourable, intermediate and poor risk groups for OS/PFS in EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC patients treated with afatinib. The prognostic groups can inform the likely absolute OS/PFS benefit expected from afatinib compared to chemotherapy in first-line treatment.

Characteristics of progression to tyrosine kinase inhibitors predict overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring an EGFR mutation

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations has a distinct biology and heterogeneous clinical behavior. We evaluated the characteristics to progression such as clinical patterns of progression (dramatic, gradual, and local) with the prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Methods

We reviewed 123 advanced-NSCLC patients with an EGFR-sensitizing mutation treated with TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib). We assessed patients according to clinical factors and progression pattern to TKIs at three centers.

Results

For all patients, 58.5%, 31.7% and 9.8% harbored exon19 deletion, exon21 L858R mutation and other-sensitivity mutations, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.9-9.7). Sixty percent of patients were asymptomatic. Dramatic-progression was the most frequent pattern (50.4%), followed by gradual-progression (32.5%), and local-progression (17.1%). Median overall survival (OS) was 23.1 months (95% CI: 17.4-28.9). In the univariate analysis, factors associated to a longer OS included pattern [gradual-progression (32.1), dramatic (19.5) and local (18.8 months), P=0.008], and the time to progression to TKI [>12 months (38.5), 6-12 months (19.1), <6 months (9.6), P<0.001]. Multivariate analysis showed that only time to progression to TKI was independently associated to OS and PFS.

Conclusions

Factors at TKI progression associated to a longer OS can define a subset of patients who may benefit from continued TKI therapy, as well as from local-ablative therapy in progression sites, especially in patients without T790M or who lack access to third-generation TKI.

Survival-associated factors of first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor responders and non-responders in lung adenocarcinoma patients with common EGFR mutations

The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to elucidate the clinical presentation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) responders and non-responders in lung adenocarcinoma patients with common EGFR mutations. The cohort included 131 lung adenocarcinoma patients with common exon 19 or exon 21 EGFR mutations, who were receiving first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The patient characteristics, treatment regimen and outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Of the 131 patients, 104 (79.3%) responded to treatment, while 27 (20.7%) did not. A significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) [14.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 12.2-18.4 vs. 5.7, 95% CI: 2.7-9.9 months; P<0.001] and overall survival (OS) (42.2, 95% CI: 28.1-58.1 vs. 11.5, 95% CI: 8.3-19.7 months; P<0.001) were observed in responders compared with non-responders. In responders, bone [hazard ratio (HR)=1.87, 95% CI: 1.11-3.20, P=0.021] and pleural (HR=2.40, 95% CI: 1.37-4.22, P=0.002) metastasis were independent factors of PFS. Exon 19 mutations (HR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.19-0.76, P=0.006), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score ≥2 (HR=3.53, 95% CI: 1.42-8.75, P=0.007) and bone metastasis (HR=2.01, 95% CI: 1.05-3.85, P=0.034), were independent factors of OS. In non-responders, smoking (HR=3.97, 95% CI: 1.13-13.91, P=0.031) was an independent factor of PFS. Different survival-associated factors were observed between EGFR-TKI responders and non-responders. The development of new treatment strategies should be advocated in EGFR-TKI non-responders.

Adverse Prognostic CT Findings for Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate adverse prognostic CT findings in patients with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma who are receiving epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy as first-line therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 199 patients (71 men and 128 women; mean ± SD age, 64.3 ± 11.2 years) with stage IIIB or IV lung adenocarcinoma who received first-line EGFR-TKI therapy between January 2009 and December 2015. Clinical findings and imaging parameters on CT images obtained before TKI therapy were analyzed, including tumor size, TNM category according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer lung cancer TNM staging system, tumor type, the presence of cavity or necrosis, pleural effusion, and metastasis to pleura, lung, and distant organs. Response evaluation was performed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1 guidelines. Correlation of clinical and radiologic findings with durations of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Pleural effusion (hazard ratio [HR], 2.095; 95% CI, 1.394-3.147; p < 0.001) and an N2 or N3 tumor category (HR, 2.145; 95% CI, 1.280-3.594; p = 0.004) were significantly associated with a short PFS duration in multivariate analysis. Older age (HR, 1.040; 95% CI, 1.014-1.067; p = 0.002), an N2 or N3 tumor category (HR, 2.427; 95% CI, 1.068-5.518; p = 0.034), pleural effusion (HR, 1.903; 95% CI, 1.105-3.276; p = 0.020), and distant metastasis (HR, 2.795; 95% CI, 1.356-5.765; p = 0.005) were associated with a short OS duration in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Pre-TKI therapy CT findings of pleural effusion and high N-category tumors are associated with short durations of PFS and OS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma who are receiving EGFR-TKI therapy.

Dynamic monitoring of EGFR mutations in circulating cell-free DNA for EGFR-mutant metastatic patients with lung cancer: Early detection of drug resistance and prognostic significance

Detecting genetic mutations in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising approach of liquid biopsy. Between June 2014 and May 2015, 168 plasma samples were collected monthly from 20 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation receiving gefitinib therapy. Clinically relevant EGFR mutations, including exon 19 deletion, L858R and T790M, were quantified using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. In baseline samples, 19 (95.0%) patients had the same mutation with the matched tumors, and pretreatment T790M mutations were also detected in 3 (15.0%) patients. The dynamics of EGFR mutations were generally associated with treatment response for patients with or without measurable disease. For patients with immeasurable tumor deposits, monitoring disease evolution using cfDNA-based mutation quantification appeared to be more reliable compared with measuring the diameters of target tumor lesions. In addition, molecular progressive disease, defined as a ≥20% increase of EGFR mutation concentration compared with the lowest concentration recorded during treatment, was tracked up to 8 months prior to objective progression. In survival analysis, sex (P=0.005), pretreatment T790M mutation status (P=0.006), T790M mutation status at the disease progression (P=0.043) and growth rate of EGFR mutations (P=0.023), had a significant impact on median progression-free survival. In conclusion, dynamic monitoring of EGFR mutations in cfDNA is feasible and appears to be useful in early prediction of drug resistance for patients with lung cancer receiving EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The impact of smoking status on radiologic tumor progression patterns and response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung adenocarcinoma with activating EGFR mutations

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of smoking on the treatment outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, with consideration of other factors including radiologic tumor progression pattern according to patient smoking status.

METHODS

A total of 224 patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinomas that were treated with EGFR-TKIs were retrospectively reviewed. Radiologic tumor progression pattern and treatment outcomes were evaluated according to smoking history.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in radiologic tumor progression pattern based on smoking status. There were no significant differences in survival between never-smokers and smokers or among never-, former-, and current-smokers, but there was a trend of shorter progression free survival (PFS) and poorer overall survival (OS) in smokers compared with never-smokers. In multivariate analysis, long-term smokers had shorter PFS and poorer OS than those who had never smoked.

CONCLUSIONS

A history of smoking had no significant effect on radiologic tumor progression pattern; however, smoking history is a negative predictive factor of survival in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma undergoing EGFR-TKI therapy.

A Survival Scoring System for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with De Novo Bone Metastases

In the pre-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) era, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with de novo bone metastases had a worse prognosis than those without. However, whether epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs affect the outcomes of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients with de novo bone metastases has not been well studied thus far. We retrospectively studied the effect of EGFR mutation status and first-line EGFR-TKIs on patient outcomes and created a survival scoring system for NSCLC patients with de novo bone metastases. This retrospective study evaluated 1510 NSCLC patients diagnosed between November 2010 and March 2014. Among these patients, 234 patients had de novo bone metastases. We found that 121 of these 234 patients (51.7%) had positive EGFR mutation tests, and a positive EGFR mutation test significantly affected overall survival (OS) (EGFR mutant: 15.2 months, EGFR wild type: 6.5 months; p < 0.001). Other prognostic factors significant in the multivariable analysis for NSCLC with de novo bone metastases included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) (OS; PS 0–2: 11.2 months, PS 3–4: 4.9 months; p = 0.002), presence of extraosseous metastases (OS; with extraosseous metastases: 8.8 months, without extraosseous metastases: 14.0 months; p = 0.008), blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (OS; LMR > 3.1: 17.1months, LMR ≤ 3.1: 6.9months; p < 0.001). A positive EGFR mutation status reversed the poor outcomes of NSCLC patients with de novo bone metastases. A simple and useful survival scoring system including the above clinical parameters was thus created for NSCLC patients with de novo bone metastases.

Metformin: A Novel but Controversial Drug in Cancer Prevention and Treatment

Metformin, a biguanide derivative that is widely used for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, has recently been shown to exert potential anticancer effects. Many retrospective data and laboratory studies suggest the idea that metformin has antineoplastic activity, but some other studies reach conflicting conclusions. Although the precise molecular mechanisms by which metformin affects various cancers have not been fully elucidated, activation of AMPK-dependent and AMPK-independent pathways along with energy metabolism aberration, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis or autophagy induction have emerged as crucial regulators in this process. In this Review, we describe the role of metformin in the prevention and treatment of a variety of cancers and summarize the molecular mechanisms that are currently well documented in the ability of metformin as an anticancer agent. In addition, the scientific and clinical hurdles regarding the potential role of metformin in cancer will be discussed.