Intrasubject variability of gastric emptying in the critically ill using a stable isotope breath test

Short- and long-term reproducibility of body surface gastric mapping using the Gastric Alimetry® system

BACKGROUND

Many diagnostic tests for gastroduodenal symptoms, such as gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), gastric emptying breath tests (GEBT), and electrogastrography (EGG) show variable intra-individual reproducibility over time. This study investigated the short- and long-term reproducibility of body surface gastric mapping (BSGM), a non-invasive test for assessing gastric function, in controls and patients with chronic gastroduodenal disorders.

METHODS

Participants completed three standardized BSGM tests using Gastric Alimetry® (Alimetry, New Zealand). The test encompassed a fasting baseline (30 min), a 482 kCal standard meal, and a 4 h postprandial recording. The first two tests were >6 months apart and the last occurred ~1 week after the second test, to evaluate long and short-term reproducibility.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and 14 healthy controls were recruited. There were no significant differences in any BSGM metrics between the tests at short and long term (all p > 0.180). Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) for the primary metrics were high, ranging from 0.58 to 0.96, with intra-individual coefficients of variance (CVintra) ranging from 0.2% to 1.9%. Reproducibility was higher, and intra-individual variation lower, than in previous studies of GES (CCC = 0.54-0.83, CVintra = 3%-77%), GEBT (CVintra = 8%-11%), and EGG (CVintra = 3%-78%).

CONCLUSIONS

BSGM spectral metrics demonstrate high reproducibility and low intra-individual variation at both short and long term, with superior results to comparable tests. The high reproducibility of Gastric Alimetry supports its role as a diagnostic aid for gastric dysfunction and a reliable tool for evaluating treatment outcomes and disease progression over time.

Assessment of physiological barriers to nutrition following critical illness

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nutrition may be important for recovery from critical illness. Gastrointestinal dysfunction is a key barrier to nutrition delivery in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and metabolic rate is elevated exacerbating nutritional deficits. Whether these factors persist following ICU discharge is unknown. We assessed whether delayed gastric emptying (GE) and impaired glucose absorption persist post-ICU discharge.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted in mechanically ventilated adults at 3 time-points: in ICU (V1); on the post-ICU ward (V2); and 3-months after ICU discharge (V3); and compared to age-matched healthy volunteers. On each visit, all participants received a test-meal containing 100 ml of 1 kcal/ml liquid nutrient, labelled with 0.1 g ¹³C-octanoic acid and 3 g 3-O-Methyl-glucose (3-OMG), and breath and blood samples were collected over 240min to quantify GE (gastric emptying coefficient (GEC)), and glucose absorption (3-OMG concentration; area under the curve (AUC)). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and differences shown with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS

Twenty-six critically ill patients completed V1 (M:F 20:6; 62.0 ± 2.9 y; BMI 29.8 ± 1.2 kg/m²; APACHE II 19.7 ± 1.9), 15 completed V2 and eight completed V3; and were compared to 10 healthy volunteers (M:F 6:4; 60.5 ± 7.5 y; BMI 26.0 ± 1.0 kg/m²). GE was significantly slower on V1 compared to health (GEC difference: -0.96 (95%CI -1.61, -0.31); and compared to V2 (-0.73 (-1.16, -0.31) and V3 (-1.03 (-1.47, -0.59). GE at V2 and V3 were not different to that in health (V2: -0.23 (-0.61, 0.14); V3: 0.10 (-0.27, 0.46)). GEC: V1: 2.64 ± 0.19; V2: 3.37 ± 0.12; V3: 3.67 ± 0.10; health: 3.60 ± 0.13. Glucose absorption (3-OMG AUC_0-240) was impaired on V1 compared to V2 (-37.9 (-64.2, -11.6)), and faster on V3 than in health (21.8 (0.14, 43.4) but absorption at V2 and V3 did not differ from health. Intestinal glucose absorption: V1: 63.8 ± 10.4; V2: 101.7 ± 7.0; V3: 111.9 ± 9.7; health: 90.7 ± 3.8.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that delayed GE and impaired intestinal glucose absorption recovers rapidly post-ICU. This requires further confirmation in a larger population. The REINSTATE trial was prospectively registered at www.anzctr.org.au.

TRIAL ID

ACTRN12618000370202.

Observed appetite and nutrient intake three months after ICU discharge

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Oral intake is diminished immediately after ICU discharge, yet factors affecting nutritional intake after hospital discharge have not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate dietary intake and factors which may influence intake - appetite and gastric emptying - 3-months after ICU discharge.

METHODS

Inception cohort study with ICU survivors compared to healthy subjects. Following an overnight fast, all participants consumed a standardized carbohydrate drink, containing ¹³C-octanoic acid, to measure gastric emptying. Dietary intake was assessed by recall of the preceding day and a standard weighed buffet meal 4-h post-drink. Appetite was assessed pre-drink (fasting) and pre- and post-buffet using visual analogue scales.

RESULTS

Fifty-one ICU survivors (82% male; 70 ± 9 y; BMI 28 ± 6 kg/m²) and 25 healthy subjects (60% male; 67 ± 12 y; BMI 27 ± 4 kg/m²) were evaluated. From the 24-h recall ICU survivors consumed less calories (ICU 1876 (708) vs. healthy subjects 2291 (834) kcal; p = 0.025) with no difference in macronutrient intake, however reported a lower preference for fat (p < 0.001). Calorie and macronutrient intake from the weighed buffet was similar between groups: calories (ICU: 658 (301) vs. healthy subjects: 736 (325) kcal; p = 0.149); protein (ICU: 37 (19) vs. healthy subjects: 40 (17) g; p = 0.275); fat (ICU: 23 (12) vs healthy subjects: 26 (13) g; p = 0.261); and carbohydrates (ICU: 69 (35) vs. healthy subjects: 79 (42) g; p = 0.141). ICU survivors reported feeling less full regardless of time-point (p = 0.041). There was no difference in the rate of gastric emptying between the two groups (p = 0.216).

CONCLUSIONS

ICU survivors reported less preference for fat and less calorie consumption than healthy subjects. However, intake of calories and macronutrients at a weighed meal was similar in the two groups, as was the rate of gastric emptying. ICU survivors reported being less full after the test meal, suggesting factors other than appetite may influence intake.

Associations of hyperosmolar medications administered via nasogastric or nasoduodenal tubes and feeding adequacy, food intolerance and gastrointestinal complications amongst critically ill patients: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Adequate nutrition is essential during critical illness. However, providing adequate nutrition is often hindered by gastro-intestinal complications, including feeding intolerance. It is suggested that hyperosmolar medications could be causally involved in the development of gastro-intestinal complications. The aims of the present study were 1) to determine the osmolality of common enterally administered dissolved medications and 2) to study the associations between nasogastric and nasoduodenal administered hyperosmolar medications and nutritional adequacy as well as food intolerance and gastro-intestinal symptoms.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study was performed in a medical-surgical ICU in the Netherlands. Adult critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition and admitted for a minimum ICU duration of 7 days were eligible. The osmolalities of commonly used enterally administrated medications were measured using an osmometer. Patients were divided in two groups: Use of hyperosmolar medications (>500 mOsm/kg) on at least one day during the first week versus none. The associations between the use of hyperosmolar medications and nutritional adequacy were assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. The associations between hyperosmolar medication and food intolerance as well as gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed using ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total 443 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the assessed medications, only three medications were found hyperosmolar. We observed no associations between the use of hyperosmolar medications and nutritional adequacy in the first week of ICU admission (caloric intake β -0.27 95%CI -1.38; 0.83, protein intake β 0.32 95%CI -0.90; 1.53). In addition, no associations were found for enteral feeding intolerance, diarrhea, obstipation, gastric residual volume, nausea and vomiting in ICU patients receiving hyperosmolar medications via a nasogastric tube. A subgroup analysis of patients on duodenal feeding showed that postpyloric administration of hyperosmolar medications was associated with increased risk of diarrhea (OR 138.7 95%CI 2.33; 8245).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that nasogastric administration of hyperosmolar medication via a nasogastric tube does not affect nutritional adequacy, development of enteral feeding intolerance and other gastro-intestinal complications during the first week after ICU admission. During nasoduodenal administration an increased diarrhea incidence may be encountered.

The effect of camicinal (GSK962040), a motilin agonist, on gastric emptying and glucose absorption in feed-intolerant critically ill patients: a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

Background

The promotility agents currently available to treat gastroparesis and feed intolerance in the critically ill are limited by adverse effects. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of single doses of the novel gastric promotility agent motilin agonist camicinal (GSK962040) in critically ill feed-intolerant patients.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, study was performed in mechanically ventilated feed-intolerant patients [median age 55 (19–84), 73 % male, APACHE II score 18 (5–37) with a gastric residual volume ≥200 mL]. Gastric emptying and glucose absorption were measured both pre- and post-treatment after intragastric administration of 50 mg (n = 15) camicinal and placebo (n = 8) using the ¹³C-octanoic acid breath test (BTt_1/2), acetaminophen concentrations, and 3-O-methyl glucose concentrations respectively.

Results

Following 50 mg enteral camicinal, there was a trend to accelerated gastric emptying [adjusted geometric means: pre-treatment BTt_1/2 117 minutes vs. post- treatment 76 minutes; 95 % confidence intervals (CI; 0.39, 1.08) and increased glucose absorption (AUC_240min pre-treatment: 28.63 mmol.min/L vs. post-treatment: 71.63 mmol.min/L; 95 % CI (1.68, 3.72)]. When two patients who did not have detectable plasma concentrations of camicinal were excluded from analysis, camicinal accelerated gastric emptying (adjusted geometric means: pre-treatment BTt_1/2 121 minutes vs. post-treatment 65 minutes 95 % CI (0.32, 0.91) and increased glucose absorption (AUC_240min pre-treatment: 33.04 mmol.min/L vs. post-treatment: 74.59 mmol.min/L; 95 % CI (1.478, 3.449). In those patients receiving placebo gastric emptying was similar pre- and post-treatment.

Conclusions

When absorbed, a single enteral dose of camicinal (50 mg) accelerates gastric emptying and increases glucose absorption in feed-intolerant critically ill patients.

Trial registration

The study protocol was registered with the US NIH clinicaltrials.gov on 23 December 2009 (Identifier NCT01039805).

Measurement of gastric emptying in the critically ill

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Enteral nutrition is important in critically ill patients and is usually administered via a nasogastric tube. As gastric emptying is frequently delayed, and this compromises the delivery of nutrient, it is important that the emptying rate can be quantified.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE/PubMed, of English articles, from inception to 1 July 2014. References of included manuscripts were also examined for additional studies.

RESULTS

A number of methods are available to measure gastric emptying and these broadly can be categorised as direct- or indirect-test and surrogate assessments. Direct tests necessitate visualisation of the stomach contents during emptying and are unaffected by liver or kidney metabolism. The most frequently used direct modality is scintigraphy, which remains the 'gold standard'. Indirect tests use a marker that is absorbed in the proximal small intestine, so that measurements of the marker, or its metabolite measured in plasma or breath, correlates with gastric emptying. These tests include drug and carbohydrate absorption and isotope breath tests. Gastric residual volumes (GRVs) are used frequently to quantify gastric emptying during nasogastric feeding, but these measurements may be inaccurate and should be regarded as a surrogate measurement. While the inherent limitations of GRVs make them less suitable for research purposes they are often the only technique that is available for clinicians at the bedside.

CONCLUSIONS

Each of the available techniques has its strength and limitations. Accordingly, the choice of gastric emptying test is dictated by the particular requirement(s) and expertise of the investigator or clinician.

Gastrointestinal dysfunction relating to the provision of nutrition in the critically ill

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

During critical illness, enteral nutrition remains central to clinical care and an understanding of gut dysfunction is therefore important. Contemporary data have contributed to our knowledge in this area and this review will concentrate on recently published studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is difficult to precisely measure gastric emptying and nutrient absorption as part of routine clinical care. However, techniques for the measurement of these parameters for research purposes have been refined, studied and validated. These methodologies allow the evaluation of novel treatments that modulate gastric emptying. Quantification and an understanding of the mechanisms of nutrient malabsorption may facilitate the development of therapeutic agents to improve absorption and/or formulae, which are more readily absorbed, thereby improving nutritional and clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY

Improved understanding of gut pathophysiology in critical illness provides opportunities for the development and testing of novel and targeted treatment strategies, with the objective to improve clinical outcomes in this group.

Gastrointestinal motility problems in critical care: a clinical perspective

Advances in surgery, anesthesia and intensive care have led to a dramatic increase in the number of patients who spend time in our intensive care units (ICU). Gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders are common complications in the intensive care setting and are predictors of increased mortality and length of the stay in the ICU. Several risk factors for developing GI motility problems in the ICU setting have been identified and include sepsis, being on mechanical ventilation and the use of vasopressors, opioids or anticholinergic medications. Our focus is on the most common clinical manifestations of GI motor dysfunction in the ICU patient: gastroesophageal reflux, gastroparesis, ileus and acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon.

Endogenous amylin and glucagon-like peptide-1 concentrations are not associated with gastric emptying in critical illness

BACKGROUND

In health, the hormones amylin and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) slow gastric emptying (GE) and modulate glycaemia. The aims of this study were to determine amylin and GLP-1 concentrations in the critically ill and their relationship with GE, glucose absorption and glycaemia.

METHODS

In fasted critically ill and healthy subjects (n = 26 and 23 respectively), liquid nutrient, containing 100 mg (13) C-sodium octanoate and 3 g 3-O-methlyglucose (3-OMG), was administered via a nasogastric tube. Amylin, GLP-1, glucose and 3-OMG concentrations were measured in blood samples taken during fasting, and 30 min and 60 min after the 'meal'. Breath samples were taken to determine gastric emptying coefficient (GEC). Intolerance to intragastric feeding was defined as a gastric residual volume of ≥ 250 ml and/or vomiting within the 24 h prior to the study.

RESULTS

Although GE was slower (GEC: critically ill 2.8 ± 0.9 vs. health, 3.4 ± 0.2; P = 0.002), fasting blood glucose was higher (7.0 ± 1.9 vs. 5.7 ± 0.2 mmol/l; P = 0.005) and overall glucose absorption was reduced in critically ill patients (3-OMG: 9.4 ± 8.0 vs. 17.7 ± 4.9 mmol/l.60 min; P < 0.001), there were no differences in fasting or postprandial amylin concentrations. Furthermore, although fasting [1.7 (0.4-7.2) vs. 0.7 (0.3-32.0) pmol/l; P = 0.04] and postprandial [3.0 (0.4-8.5) vs. 0.8 (0.4-34.3) pmol/l; P = 0.02] GLP-1 concentrations were increased in the critically ill and were greater in feed intolerant when compared with those tolerating feed [3.7 (0.4-7.2) vs. 1.2 (0.7-4.6) pmol/l; P = 0.02], there were no relationships between GE and fasting amylin or GLP-1 concentrations.

CONCLUSION

In the critically ill, fasting GLP-1, but not amylin, concentrations are elevated and associated with feed intolerance. Neither amylin nor GLP-1 appears to substantially influence the rate of GE.

Gastroesophageal reflux in critically ill patients

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a common occurrence in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Reflux can lead to pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents and subsequent pneumonia. Several characteristics of patients, interventions provided in the intensive care unit setting, and factors associated with feeding increase a patient's risk for reflux. Critical care nurses and clinical nurse specialists can identify patients at highest risk for GER by utilizing the patient's history, reviewing the medications, and assessing the current status to provide interventions to reduce the risk of GER and its sequelae of aspiration pneumonia. This article reviews the physiology of GER, risk factors, and interventions to decrease GER in the critically ill patient.

Reproducibility of gastric emptying in overweight and obese males

BACKGROUND & AIM

To understand whether any change in gastric emptying (GE) is physiologically relevant, it is important to identify its variability. Information regarding the variability of GE in overweight and obese individuals is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the reproducibility of GE in overweight and obese males.

METHODS

Fifteen overweight and obese males [body mass index 30.3 (4.9) kg/m(2)] completed two identical GE tests 7 days apart. GE of a standard pancake breakfast was assessed by (13)C-octanoic acid breath test. Data are presented as mean (±SD).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in GE between test days (half time (t1/2): 179 (15) and 176 (19 min), p = 0.56; lag time (tlag): 108 (14) and 104 (8) min, p = 0.26). Mean intra-individual coefficient of variation for t1/2 was 7.9% and tlag 7.5%. Based on these findings, to detect a treatment effect in a paired design with a power of 80% and α = 0.05, minimum mean effect sizes for t1/2 would need to be ≥14.4 min and tlag ≥ 8.1 min.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that GE is reproducible in overweight and obese males and provide minimum mean effect sizes required to detect a hypothetical treatment effect in this population.

Gastric emptying measurement of liquid nutrients using the (13)C-octanoate breath test in critically ill patients: a comparison with scintigraphy

PURPOSE

Scintigraphy is considered the most accurate technique for the measurement of gastric emptying (GE) but, for patients in the intensive care unit, it is technically demanding, involves radiation and can interfere with care. The (13)C-octanoate breath test ((13)C-OBT) is a simple, non-invasive technique that does not involve radiation exposure.

AIM

To evaluate the performance of the (13)C-OBT in the assessment of GE in critically ill patients.

METHODS

The GE was assessed in 33 mechanically ventilated patients (23 M; 54.3 ± 3.0 yrs; APACHE II: 22.0 ± 1.1). Following test meal administration (100 ml Ensure(®)), concurrent scintigraphic measurement and breath samples ((13)C-OBT) were collected over 4 h. Scintigraphic meal retention was determined and the gastric emptying coefficient (GEC) and half emptying time [t50(BT)] were calculated for the (13)C-OBT. Delayed GE was defined as meal retention >13 % at 180 min.

RESULTS

Delayed GE was identified in 27/33 patients. Meal retention correlated modestly with t50(BT) (r = 0.55-0.66; P < 0.001) and well with GEC (r = -0.63 to -0.74; P < 0.0001). The strength of agreement between the two techniques was highest between GEC and retention at 120 min. The best cut-off GEC for defining delayed GE was 3.25 (AUC = 0.75; 95 % CI = 0.52-0.99; P = 0.05), with 89 % sensitivity and 67 % specificity to detect delayed GE. The GE was delayed in all (23/23) patients with feed intolerance (GRV > 250 ml) on scintigraphy and 91 % (21/23) patients on (13)C-OBT.

CONCLUSION

In critical illness, there was a correlation between (13)C-OBT and gastric scintigraphy, with GEC performing as a better and more sensitive marker of detecting delayed GE than t50. However the relatively wide 95 % confidence intervals suggest that (13)C-OBT is more suitable as a technique to assess GE in a group setting for research studies rather than for individual patients in clinical practice.

Gastrointestinal dysmotility: evidence and clinical management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastrointestinal dysmotility and dysfunction underlie our difficulties in providing adequate nutrition by the enteral route to our critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have quantified gastric emptying and nutrient absorption. Slow gastric emptying is common and probably mediated by cholecystokinin and reduced active ghrelin concentrations. The cause of impaired nutrient absorption is not yet fully understood but may be related to small intestinal blood flow and/or mucosal factors. The absorption of the different macronutrients may be affected in different ways both by critical illness and by therapies. A better understanding of this may optimize the design of nutrient formulations in the future. New treatment modalities for gastrointestinal dysfunction are being investigated and include small intestinal feeding, nonpharmacological options such as acupuncture, and drugs including novel motilin receptor agonists, and opioid antagonists.

SUMMARY

We are gradually developing a better understanding of how the gut works during critical illness, which has implications for optimizing the delivery of nutrition and thereby improving nutritional and clinical outcomes.

[Glucose variability in intensive care unit]

Hyperglycemia is significantly associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients and then, strict control of blood glucose (BG) concentration is important. Lowering of BG levels with intensive insulin therapy (IIT) was recommended in order to improve patient outcomes. But recently, some recent prospective trials failed to confirm the initial data, showing conflicting results (significantly increased mortality with IIT, more hypoglycemic episodes). So there is no consensus about efficiency and safety of IIT. Significant associations between glucose variability and mortality have been confirmed by several recent studies. A difference in variability of BG control could explain why the effect of IIT varied from beneficial to harmful. Managing and decreasing this BG variability could be an important goal of BG control in critically ill patients. Clinicians have to consider definitions, physiopathology and impacts of glucose variability, in order to improve patient outcomes.

Motility disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract in the intensive care unit: pathophysiology and contemporary management

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility, an entity commonly found in the intensive care unit setting, can lead to insufficient nutrient intake while increasing the risk of infection and mortality. Further, overcoming the altered motility with early enteral feeding is associated with a reduced incidence of infectious complications in intensive care unit patients. Upper GI dysmotility in critical care patients is a common occurrence, and there are many causes for this problem, which affects a very heterogenous population with a multitude of underlying medical abnormalities. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to identify this widespread problem and subsequently institute a proper therapy as rapidly as possible. Prokinetic pharmacotherapies are currently the mainstay for the management of disordered upper GI motility. Future therapies, aimed at the underlying pathophysiology of this complex problem, are under investigation. These aim is to reduce the side effects of the currently available options, while improving on nutrition delivery in the critically ill. This review discusses the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of upper GI motility disturbances in the critically ill.