Editorial overview: Germinal centers and memory B-cells: from here to eternity

Lentinan-functionalized graphene oxide hydrogel as a sustained antigen delivery system for vaccines

Hydrogel has been proven to have the ability to deliver antigens continuously to achieve slow vaccine delivery, which makes it a promising candidate for an adjuvant delivery platform. Meanwhile, graphene oxide (GO) has garnered significant attention due to its good biosafety, excellent surface area and easy modification. However, GO exists as weak colloidal particles and poses challenges in self-assembling into a hydrogel structure. Here, we propose an innovative strategy involving self-assembling lentinan-functionalized graphene oxide hydrogel ((LNT-GO Gel) by simply mixing lentinan (LNT)-functionalized GO with polyethylene imide (PEI), which can simultaneously encapsulate antigens, achieve long-lasting release of antigens and generate excellent adjuvant activity. The results indicated that the LNT-GO Gel can control the release of OVA at the injection site and confer targeted delivering capacity to lymph nodes. And the date demonstrates that LNT-GO Gel displays favorable safety and biodegradability in vivo. Moreover, LNT-GO Gel can enhance the activation and maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) in lymph node, induce stronger OVA-specific antibody response, and promote spleen T lymphocyte differentiation, which underscores that LNT-GO Gel has ability to generate stronger antigen-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. Collectively, these results demonstrate the adjuvant potential of the lentinan-functionalized graphene oxide hydrogel (LNT-GO Gel) for subunit vaccine.

Isotype Specific Assembly of B Cell Antigen Receptors and Synergism With Chemokine Receptor CXCR4

Expression of the membrane-bound form of the immunoglobulin (Ig) as part of the antigen receptor is indispensable for both the development and the effector function of B cells. Among five known isotypes, IgM and IgD are the common B cell antigen receptors (BCRs) that are co-expressed in naïve B cells. Despite having identical antigen specificity and being associated with the same signaling heterodimer Igα/Igβ (CD79a/CD79b), IgM and IgD-BCR isotypes functionally differ from each other in the manner of antigen binding, the formation of isolated nanoclusters and in their interaction with co-receptors such as CD19 and CXCR4 on the plasma membrane. With recent developments in experimental techniques, it is now possible to investigate the nanoscale organization of the BCR and better understand early events of BCR engagement. Interestingly, the cytoskeleton network beneath the membrane controls the BCR isotype-specific organization and its interaction with co-receptors. BCR triggering results in reorganization of the cytoskeleton network, which is further modulated by isotype-specific signals from co-receptors. For instance, IgD-BCR is closely associated with CXCR4 on mature B cells and this close proximity allows CXCR4 to employ the BCR machinery as signaling hub. In this review, we discuss the functional specificity and nanocluster assembly of BCR isotypes and the consequences of cross-talk between CXCR4 and IgD-BCR. Furthermore, given the role of BCR and CXCR4 signaling in the development and survival of leukemic B cells, we discuss the consequences of the cross-talk between CXCR4 and the BCR for controlling the growth of transformed B cells.

Isotype Specific Assembly of B Cell Antigen Receptors and Synergism With Chemokine Receptor CXCR4

Expression of the membrane-bound form of the immunoglobulin (Ig) as part of the antigen receptor is indispensable for both the development and the effector function of B cells. Among five known isotypes, IgM and IgD are the common B cell antigen receptors (BCRs) that are co-expressed in naïve B cells. Despite having identical antigen specificity and being associated with the same signaling heterodimer Igα/Igβ (CD79a/CD79b), IgM and IgD-BCR isotypes functionally differ from each other in the manner of antigen binding, the formation of isolated nanoclusters and in their interaction with co-receptors such as CD19 and CXCR4 on the plasma membrane. With recent developments in experimental techniques, it is now possible to investigate the nanoscale organization of the BCR and better understand early events of BCR engagement. Interestingly, the cytoskeleton network beneath the membrane controls the BCR isotype-specific organization and its interaction with co-receptors. BCR triggering results in reorganization of the cytoskeleton network, which is further modulated by isotype-specific signals from co-receptors. For instance, IgD-BCR is closely associated with CXCR4 on mature B cells and this close proximity allows CXCR4 to employ the BCR machinery as signaling hub. In this review, we discuss the functional specificity and nanocluster assembly of BCR isotypes and the consequences of cross-talk between CXCR4 and IgD-BCR. Furthermore, given the role of BCR and CXCR4 signaling in the development and survival of leukemic B cells, we discuss the consequences of the cross-talk between CXCR4 and the BCR for controlling the growth of transformed B cells.

New insights into the development of B cell responses: Implications for solid organ transplantation

A resurgent interest in the role of B cells following solid organ transplantation is being driven by clinical data suggesting that antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is a major cause of dysfunction and organ transplant failure. These observations suggest that, in a subset of patients, current immunotherapies are failing to control the development of alloantibody responses, and/or failing to reverse the production or the effects of alloantibodies. Quantification of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has proven to be an imperfect predictor of AMR, and efforts to improve DSA quantification anticipate that this will result in improved predictive power. At the same time, attempts to control of ABMR have focused on the non-specific elimination of B cells, plasma cells (PCs) or circulating antibodies. In the past decade, there has been an improvement in our understanding of the processes that drive B cell differentiation into germinal center (GC)-dependent or GC-independent memory B cells and antibody-secreting PC. These insights are suggesting new ways to more specifically target the DSA response, which may lead to better long-term allograft survival outcomes while preserving protective immunity. In this review, new insights into processes that lead to antibody production upon primary and secondary antigen encounter are discussed, and the potential implications to DSA production as well as future areas of investigation to control AMR are discussed.

Heterogeneity of memory B cells

Potential solid organ transplant recipients broadly sensitized to HLA have long wait times, low transplant rates and poor outcomes. The new kidney allocation system has improved access to the most highly sensitized recipients; however, their long-term outcomes are unknown. Emerging data suggest that memory B cell repertoire is broader than the plasma cell repertoire, therefore, despite refinements in anti-HLA antibody detection technology, donor-specific HLA- specific memory B cells may in fact be present in some, if not most, highly sensitized recipients with no detectable donor-specific antibodies. In addition, new findings have underscored the heterogeneity in memory B cell generation, and in the signals that determine memory versus plasma cell fate during primary antigen encounter, as well as memory B cell differentiation upon antigen reencounter into plasma cells or reentry into germinal centers to subsequently emerge as higher affinity and class-switched plasma cells. Thus, heterogeneity memory B cells generation may affect the efficacy of specific immunomodulation during the recall response. We propose that the ability to quantify donor-specific B cell in transplant recipients is urgently required to provide insights into the mechanisms of sensitization and recall, and for the early detection of acute and chronic AMR.