The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in nulliparous women

Use Patterns of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System among American Women

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) use is approved by the FDA for contraception and heavy menorrhagia. More importantly, it effectively treats endometrial hyperplasia, a precursor to endometrial cancer. Therefore, LNG-IUS use is associated with potential endometrial cancer risk reduction, but current use patterns in the United States are unknown. We analyzed LNG-IUS use prevalence among women ages 18 to 50 years using a weighted statistical analysis of the 2017 to 2019 National Survey of Family Growth. Summary statistics were stratified by race and ethnic group and known endometrial cancer sociodemographic and health risk factors and assessed statistically with bivariate Rao-Scott χ2 tests. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to explore LNG-IUS use predictors. Current LNG-IUS use in the United States was 6.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.9%-8.1%]. LNG-IUS use was lower in Hispanic women compared with White women [adjusted OR (AOR), 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-1.0]. Compared with women with ≤high school education, LNG-IUS use was higher for women with ≥college degree (AOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.1). Parous (AOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7-3.9) and insured (AOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-3.1) women had higher odds of LNG-IUS use, whereas women with diabetes (AOR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7) had lower odds of LNG-IUS use. No differences in LNG-IUS use were observed by endometrial cancer risk factors of women's body mass index, age of menarche, hypertension, and personal history of cancer. More research is needed to establish the potential benefits of LNG-IUS use on endometrial cancer, which will further highlight potential opportunities for population-level primary prevention to address the growing incidence of endometrial cancer. Prevention Relevance: This study describes the characteristics of American women using the LNG-IUS. Reproductive-age women (especially Hispanic, with lower education, nulliparous, uninsured, and with diabetes) have lower LNG-IUS use odds. These groups may benefit from LNG-IUS use for endometrial cancer primary prevention, conditioned that LNG-IUS use is proven effective in reducing endometrial cancer incidence.

Effectiveness of Levonorgestrel Releasing Intrauterine System in Perimenopausal Women with Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Prospective Study at a Teaching Hospital in India

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) on heavy menstrual bleeding in perimenopausal women.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational clinical study conducted on 42 perimenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding who met the study eligibility criteria. LNG-IUS was inserted in the postmenstrual phase following baseline evaluation. The patients were followed up at the 4, 12, and 24 weeks. Pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) score, hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels, and endometrial thickness were assessed before insertion and during the follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Two patients (4.8%) were lost to follow-up, three patients (7.1%) opted for hysterectomy, two women (4.8%) experienced spontaneous expulsion and 35 (83.3%) women continued the usage. Menstrual blood loss assessed using the median PBAC score (interquartile range) significantly reduced (P < 0.001) from the pre-insertion level of 280 (246-306) to 124 (60-200) at 4 weeks to 45 (34-76) at 12 weeks and further to 32 (20-50) at the end of 24 weeks. Simultaneously, a significant (P < 0.001) improvement in the mean hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels and a significant (P < 0.001) decrease in endometrial thickness were observed. The most common side effect was spotting (50.0%) and vaginal discharge (38.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

LNG-IUS causes a remarkable reduction in menstrual blood loss and marked improvement in dysmenorrhea. It also reduces anemia by improving the hemoglobin and ferritin levels. Thus, it can serve as an effective treatment option for heavy menstrual bleeding in perimenopausal women and prevent the need for a hysterectomy.

A systematic review of the views of healthcare professionals on the provision of long-acting reversible contraception

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the views of healthcare professionals outside of the general practice setting on long-acting reversible contraception?

BACKGROUND

Despite global sexual health organisations advocating for widespread prescription of long-acting reversible contraception, uptake in developed countries remains relatively low. The role of healthcare professionals outside of the general practice setting in long-acting reversible contraception provision requires further attention.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were searched for existing qualitative findings using terms related to long-acting reversible contraception and healthcare professional views for the period 2013-2018. A rigorous protocol was applied following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses checklist and flow diagram. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess the quality of studies. A total of six studies were included for thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three key themes emerged through analysis that had significant impact on healthcare professional views of long-acting reversible contraception: (a) contraceptive counselling practices and constraints; (b) knowledge and training about long-acting reversible contraception; and (c) concerns and personal beliefs about long-acting reversible contraception.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professional views on long-acting reversible contraception are shaped by practical time constraints, levels of knowledge and training, and personal beliefs and concerns. Further research is required to address these issues in order to improve clinical training and guidelines for all settings, not just general practice.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Settings outside of general practice need to be included within the scope of initiatives that aim to improve clinical practice around access to new and emerging contraceptive methods. Further research could inform models of clinical practice that enable healthcare professionals to take enough time to talk through all contraceptive options with patients in a way that both focuses on their individual needs and is fully informed by up-to-date evidence and training.

Postabortion and Postpartum Intrauterine Device Provision for Adolescents and Young Adults

Adolescents are at high risk for unintended pregnancy and rapid repeat pregnancy, both of which can be associated with negative health and social outcomes. Intrauterine device (IUD) use has been shown to decrease unintended pregnancy and rapid repeat pregnancy. Evidence supports IUD insertion postabortion and postpartum as safe and practical for nearly all women, including adolescent and young adult women. Providers of adolescent gynecology can play an important role in decreasing repeat and unintended pregnancy among adolescents by increasing access to IUDs, reducing barriers to care, and providing IUDs immediately postabortion and postpartum.

Can Pediatricians Provide Long-Acting Reversible Contraception?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

In the United States, 40% of high-school students have sex; few use highly effective and safe long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs): intrauterine devices and implants. Pediatricians are key health providers for many adolescents, yet few provide LARCs. Our objective was to understand the pragmatics of provision of LARCs (rather than beliefs or attitudes) and identify barriers to and opportunities for LARC provision by community-practicing pediatricians.

DESIGN

We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semistructured interviews. Qualitative methods are valuable for generating conceptual models of complex phenomena.

SETTING

Set in a midsized Midwestern city, our study was community-based.

PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We interviewed 23 pediatricians to understand their views about providing contraception (including LARCs) to adolescents. For analysis, we developed a coding schema and applied it using a priori and open coding.

RESULTS

Several inter-related themes regarding challenges to provision of LARC emerged: limited motivation for on-site LARC provision or referral streams, low pediatric patient interest in LARC, lack of pediatrician training about LARC provision, and inadequate structural elements for on-site placement of LARCs in pediatric offices. Each challenge could be remedied, because pediatricians were motivated to provide adolescent patients with high-quality care. Improvements in these inter-related conditions could facilitate pediatrician provision of LARC.

CONCLUSION

Pediatricians and their patients want to prevent pregnancy, but current practice norms limit LARC provision by pediatricians. To increase LARC access in pediatrician offices, we suggest training in LARC provision and patient education for medical students, residents, and pediatricians; communicating about LARC methods with adolescents to increase patient demand; and systemic changes to improve referral processes and/or allow on-site LARC placements.

Safety and efficacy of a 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with cardiovascular disease

AIM

We sought to examine the safety and efficacy of a 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), and to evaluate the changes in biomarkers of infection, anemia and cardiovascular conditions after LNG-IUS insertion in women with cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

We prospectively followed women with a cardiovascular disease in whom a 52-mg LNG-IUS was inserted between 2009 and 2015. The primary outcome was the frequency of cardiovascular and gynecologic side effects due to the LNG-IUS over the year after LNG-IUS insertion. The secondary outcomes were the changes in menstrual blood loss and biomarkers, e.g., white blood cell count and the levels of C-reactive protein, hemoglobin and brain natriuretic peptide. We also evaluated the 24-month continuation rate of LNG-IUS.

RESULTS

A total of 34 women were prospectively followed-up, including two women with pulmonary hypertension. No cardiovascular side effects were identified during the 1 year after LNG-IUS insertion, other than one case of mild vasovagal reaction at insertion. Neither the white blood cell count nor the C-reactive protein value increased after LNG-IUS insertion. The menstrual blood loss was decreased in most subjects and the median hemoglobin levels increased significantly within 1 year after insertion (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002). Moreover, brain natriuretic peptide levels tended to decrease in correspondence with the hemoglobin elevation (P = 0.074). The 24-month LNG-IUS continuation rate was 97% (95% confidence interval 85-100).

CONCLUSION

No clinically significant cardiovascular event was identified during the 1 year after 52-mg LNG-IUS insertion among women with cardiovascular disease. The 52-mg LNG-IUS may have specific favorable effects by decreasing the risk of iron deficiency anemia in these women.

[Intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease: Myth or reality?]

INTRODUCTION

Intrauterine device (IUD) is a reliable contraceptive method that is long term reversible, and well tolerated. Numerous studies prove its efficiency and report rare complications that are attributed to it. However, its use is limited due to fear that it can cause a pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). This is based on historical data on infections related to the "Dalkon Shield", which was removed from the market in 1974.

METHOD

The analyzed articles were extracted from PUBMED database between 2000 and 2016. In total, 22 studies were retained. A meta-analysis was not possible due to the methodological diversity among the selected articles contributing to this narrative review of the literature.

RESULTS

After analysis, the following factors influence the risk of PID linked to IUDs: an advanced age and sexually transmitted infections.

CONCLUSION

The risk of PID linked to IUDs is lower than 1%. This is explained by new models of IUD, better screening tests, more frequent follow-up of the patients and the improvement of care PID patients. In the light of our results, the threat of pelvic inflammatory disease should not hinder the use of IUDs.

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device potentiates stress reactivity

BACKGROUND

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) is currently recommended as a first-line contraceptive with an exclusively local intrauterine influence. However, recent clinical trials have identified side effects of LNG-IUD that appear to be systemically mediated, including depressed mood and emotional lability.

METHODS

We performed two experimental studies and a cross-sectional study. For each study, women were included from three groups: LNG-IUD (0.02mg/24h), oral ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (0.03mg/0.15mg; EE30/LNG) and natural cycling (NC). Study 1-Salivary cortisol was measured at baseline and at defined intervals following the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Heart rate was monitored continuously throughout the TSST. Study 2-Salivary cortisol and serum total cortisol were evaluated relative to low-dose (1μg) adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) administration. Study 3-Hair cortisol was measured as a naturalistic index of long-term cortisol exposure.

RESULTS

Women using LNG-IUD had an exaggerated salivary cortisol response to the TSST (24.95±13.45 nmol/L, 95% CI 17.49-32.40), compared to EE30/LNG (3.27±2.83 nmol/L, 95% CI 1.71-4.84) and NC (10.85±11.03nmol/L, 95% CI 6.30-15.40) (P<0.0001). Heart rate was significantly potentiated during the TSST in women using LNG-IUD (P=0.047). In response to ACTH challenge, women using LNG-IUD and EE30/LNG had a blunted salivary cortisol response, compared to NC (P<0.0001). Women using LNG-IUD had significantly elevated levels of hair cortisol compared to EE30/LNG or NC (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that LNG-IUD contraception induces a centrally-mediated sensitization of both autonomic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis responsivity. LNG-IUD sensitization of HPA axis responsivity was observed acutely under standardized laboratory conditions, as well as chronically under naturalistic conditions.

Barriers and myths that limit the use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: a survey of Brazilian gynaecologists

OBJECTIVE

To understand the extent to which barriers and misperceptions about intrauterine contraception (IUC) remain among Brazilian gynaecologists, particularly for nulliparous women.

METHODS

An online survey was developed to assess Brazilian gynaecologists' knowledge and attitudes towards IUC. Data collected included demographic and professional data, main barriers when considering IUC for women in general and/or nulliparous women, attitudes towards inclusion of IUC in contraceptive counselling, and opinions on what could increase IUC prescription for nulliparous women. A question regarding knowledge about WHO medical eligibility criteria (WHO MEC) was also included in the survey.

RESULTS

101 gynaecologists completed the survey. The insertion rate in nulliparous women was 79.2%. Brazilian gynaecologists were more likely to consider IUC in counselling or provide it on request for parous than for nulliparous women (p<0.05) and perceived more complications in nulliparous women. 74.2% of gynaecologists recognised a higher risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)/infertility associated with IUC use in nulliparous women than in parous women. Difficult and painful insertion were also relevant for 83.2% and 77.3% of the gynaecologists, respectively. Respondents showed a high level of awareness of the WHO MEC classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The three most commonly reported barriers to considering IUC as a contraceptive option for nulliparous woman were concerns about PID and difficult or painful insertion. The challenge is to ensure that gynaecologists understand the evidence and do not disregard IUC as a potential option for nulliparous women.

Barriers and Misperceptions Limiting Widespread Use of Intrauterine Contraception Among Canadian Women

Unintended pregnancy is a major social and public health problem with adverse effects on neonatal and developmental outcomes, as well as maternal health and wellbeing. Traditionally, family planning policies have focused on increasing contraceptive uptake in non-users; however, rates of non-use are low in many developed nations. A high proportion of unintended pregnancies are attributable to contraceptive failure, particularly when using barrier and short-acting hormonal contraceptives. Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) are highly effective and have been shown to reduce unintended pregnancy rates. Despite this, global utilization rates are low, and IUCD uptake in Canada has been particularly low. In this review we explore why IUCDs are not more widely used, and specifically focus on barriers and misperceptions that may influence IUCD uptake, particularly in Canada. We reviewed relevant articles published in English between 1990 and 2014, through searches of PubMed and Medline, including primary studies of any design containing information on the knowledge and attitudes of health care providers and women. Providing education to care providers, women, and policy makers may help overcome misperceptions about the use of IUCDs, and may facilitate greater use. Increased support from federal and provincial health programs may also encourage the use of IUCDs in Canadian women, and help to reduce unintended pregnancy rates.

The Effect of Age, Parity and Body Mass Index on the Efficacy, Safety, Placement and User Satisfaction Associated With Two Low-Dose Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Contraceptive Systems: Subgroup Analyses of Data From a Phase III Trial

Objective

Two low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive systems (LNG-IUSs; total content 13.5 mg [average approx. 8 μg/24 hours over the first year; LNG-IUS 8] and total content 19.5 mg [average approx. 13 μg/24 hours over the first year; LNG-IUS 13]) have previously been shown to be highly effective (3-year Pearl Indices: 0.33 and 0.31, respectively), safe and well tolerated. The present subgroup analyses evaluated whether or not outcomes were affected by parity, age (18–25 vs 26–35 years), or body mass index (BMI, <30 vs ≥30 kg/m²).

Methods

Nulliparous and parous women aged 18‒35 years with regular menstrual cycles (21‒35 days) requesting contraception were randomized to 3 years of LNG-IUS 8 or LNG-IUS 13 use.

Results

In the LNG-IUS 8 and LNG-IUS 13 groups, 1432 and 1452 women, respectively, had a placement attempted and were included in the full analysis set; 39.2%, 39.2% and 17.1% were 18–25 years old, nulliparous and had a BMI ≥30 kg/m², respectively. Both systems were similarly effective regardless of age, parity or BMI; the subgroup Pearl Indices had widely overlapping 95% confidence intervals. Placement of LNG-IUS 8 and LNG-IUS 13 was easier (p < 0.0001) and less painful (p < 0.0001) in women who had delivered vaginally than in women who had not. The complete/partial expulsion rate was 2.2–4.2% across all age and parity subgroups and higher in parous than in nulliparous women (p = 0.004). The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease was 0.1–0.6% across all age and parity subgroups: nulliparous and younger women were not at higher risk than parous and older women, respectively. The ectopic pregnancy rate was 0.3–0.4% across all age and parity subgroups. Across all age and parity subgroups, the 3-year completion rate was 50.9–61.3% for LNG-IUS 8 and 57.9–61.1% for LNG-IUS 13, and was higher (p = 0.0001) among older than younger women in the LNG-IUS 8 group only.

Conclusions

LNG-IUS 8 and LNG-IUS 13 were highly effective, safe and well tolerated regardless of age or parity.

Trial Registration

Clinical trials.gov NCT00528112

Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena): An emerging tool for conservative treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding

Introduction:

To study the efficacy of levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena) in conservative management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).

Materials and Methods:

Seventy women between 30 and 55 years with AUB were included in a study conducted over a period of 3 years. Response was assessed monthly for first 4 months and then yearly for maximum 2 years.

Results:

Mirena caused a 80% decrease in median menstrual blood loss (MBL) at 4 months, 95% decrease in MBL by 1 year, and 100% decrease (amenorrhea) by 2 years. Mean hemoglobin (Hb) % showed a significant rise of 7.8% from baseline 4 months post Mirena insertion. Mirena acted as an effective contraceptive in women not using any other form of contraception. Hysterectomy could be avoided in most of the women.

Conclusion:

Mirena provides an incredible nonsurgical alternative in treatment of menorrhagia. Its effects are reversible and it is an excellent fertility-sparing device. It is also an effective contraceptive.

Roles of the pharmacist in the use of safe and highly effective long-acting reversible contraception: an opinion of the women's health practice and research network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy

The U.S. population continues to experience an alarmingly high rate of unintended pregnancies that have an impact on individual families and society alike. Lack of effective contraception accounts for most unintended pregnancies, along with incorrect use of contraceptives. The most common reversible contraceptive method used in the United States is the oral contraceptive pill, which has significant failure and discontinuation rates. Use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods has been increasing in recent years after efforts to educate providers and patients. Women are more likely to use LARC methods when barriers such as access and cost are removed. An uptake in the use of LARC methods would allow for markedly reduced contraception failure rates and higher user satisfaction and thus higher continuation rates than those seen with current contraception use. Promoting the use of LARC methods is an important strategy in improving both individual and public health outcomes by reducing unintended pregnancies. The pharmacist's role in family planning is expanding and can contribute to these efforts. Although knowledge regarding LARC has not been studied among pharmacists, a knowledge deficit exists among health care professionals in general. Thus pharmacist education and training should include LARC methods along with other contraceptives. The American College of Clinical Pharmacy Women's Health Practice and Research Network advocates for the pharmacist's role in the use of safe and highly effective LARC methods. These roles include educating patients, informing providers, facilitating access by providing referrals, and modifying institutional procedures to encourage provision of LARC methods.

Experience and levels of satisfaction with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in China: a prospective multicenter survey

BACKGROUND

Although surveys conducted in Western countries have shown that the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena(®)) is well accepted by European women, its acceptance by Chinese women is not yet clearly known. The purpose of this study was to analyze the experiences and levels of satisfaction with Mirena among Chinese women living in 12 different cities.

METHODS

In total, 1,021 women who attended 21 medical centers for insertion of Mirena were invited to complete a questionnaire regarding their contraceptive decision at baseline (preinsertion), and two further questionnaires on their experience and satisfaction with Mirena at 3-6 months and 1 year after insertion.

RESULTS

At baseline, 36% of women self-reported heavy or very heavy menstrual bleeding, while 41% reported normal bleeding. The majority of women (98%) were satisfied with the preinsertion counseling, during which contraceptive reliability was identified as the most important reason for considering Mirena. Continuation rates for Mirena were 99% at 3-6 months and 93% at 12 months after insertion, and most women (92% and 93%, respectively) had less bleeding at these times. The percentage of women who rated Mirena as better than their previous contraceptive method was 63%. Overall, around 90% of respondents were very satisfied or rather satisfied with Mirena, and 64% stated that they would recommend it to their friends.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that continuation and satisfaction rates with Mirena were very high, and that the device is well accepted by Chinese women.

IUDs: beyond the basics

This article reviews the changes in patient selection for intrauterine devices (IUDs) and evidence-based practices regarding counseling and management of common IUD issues. Where evidence-based research is lacking, expert opinion and common standards of practice are reviewed, and current clinical resources are identified.

Feasibility of LNG-IUS in a baboon model

BACKGROUND

The baboon (Papio hamadryas anubis) is an attractive model for intrauterine contraception research due to anatomic similarity to the human. Although non-human primates have previously been used for intrauterine contraception research, it was unknown whether modern intrauterine devices (IUDs) can be placed in an anatomically similar position in the baboon. This study sought to determine whether human-use IUDs could be seated correctly in the uterus of the baboon.

STUDY DESIGN

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) was placed ex vivo into two baboon uteri collected at necropsy and in three living, reproductively proven baboons.

RESULTS

Correct placement of human-use IUDs in the baboon was confirmed by both MRI and ultrasound. This study establishes that a LNG-IUS can be inserted into the baboon uterus and maintained without clinically adverse effects for at least 6 months. The positioning of the device is similar to positioning found in women.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide important support for studying IUD safety and efficacy in the baboon.

Immediate post-abortion insertion of intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) in a diverse urban population

Ethnic minority women have a higher incidence of unintended pregnancy and abortion than Caucasian women, with significant individual and social implications. Post-abortion intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) use may reduce future unintended pregnancy. This was a retrospective review of 265 women undergoing abortion at a Los Angeles County Reproductive Options Clinic. Demographic factors, reproductive history, and post-abortion contraceptive choice were evaluated and analyzed. The population was predominantly Latina (73%) and single, with a mean age of 27. Immediate post-abortion IUC insertion was chosen by 48% overall and more frequently by Latinas (55%) than by African Americans (33%) or Asians (43%) (p = 0.02). IUC use increased with age, undesired future fertility, increasing gravidity, and history of previous abortion in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, IUC use increased with Latina ethnicity and increasing gravidity. In a clinic serving low-income urban women in Los Angeles, post-abortal IUC uptake is highest among Latinas and those with prior pregnancies. Future research should examine reasons for and barriers to IUC uptake in diverse communities and methods to improve post-abortion IUC uptake to prevent subsequent unintended pregnancies.

Duration of use of a levonorgestrel IUS amongst nulliparous and adolescent women

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine devices are cost-effective if used for 2 or more years. Early discontinuation may lead to reduced cost-effectiveness of this method and unintended pregnancy if other contraceptives are not used. This study sought to examine rates and reasons for discontinuation of IUS use in adolescents versus older women and nulliparous versus parous women, as these groups may be more likely to discontinue use.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of women receiving a levonorgestrel IUS between June 2005 and April 2008 was conducted. Medical records were reviewed for all visits following placement of the IUS; rates and reasons for IUS discontinuation were calculated and categorized. Data were examined under two scenarios: (1) assuming that all women not seen for follow-up continued IUS use and (2) only including women with follow-up visits. Cox regression was used to control for age, parity, race and marital status in comparing rates of IUS discontinuation and expulsion in nulliparous versus parous women and adolescents versus older women.

RESULTS

Of the 828 women included in this analysis, 104 (12.6%) were nulliparous, and 131 (15.8%) were ≤20 years of age. Nulliparous women were not more likely than parous women to have expelled their IUS [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 1.40 (0.57, 3.43)]. Adolescent women were more likely to experience expulsion than older women, although this did not reach statistical significance [hazard ratio, 1.49 (0.76, 2.92)]. When we looked at reasons for IUS removal, we found that nulliparous women were not more likely than parous women to have their IUS removed because of dissatisfaction with the contraceptive method (6.7% vs. 11.5%, p=.15) or desire to become pregnant (1.9% vs. 2.6%, p=.50). Similarly, adolescents were not more likely than older women to have their IUS removed because of dissatisfaction with the contraceptive method (10.7% vs. 10.9%, p=.94) or desire to become pregnant (3.1% vs. 2.4%, p=.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents and nulliparous women are not more likely to prematurely discontinue use of their IUS than adult or parous women.

Effect of shared contraceptive experiences on IUD use at an urban abortion clinic

BACKGROUND

We studied the effect of contraceptive social networking on postabortion intrauterine device (IUD) uptake. This study explores whether women who have heard personal stories of IUD use are more likely to use an IUD for postabortion contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

We surveyed 299 women undergoing induced abortion at San Francisco General Hospital's Women's Options Center before and after contraceptive counseling. Both English- and Spanish-speaking women, aged 15 years and older, were surveyed.

RESULTS

Fifty percent of women surveyed chose to use an IUD for postabortion contraception. Women choosing IUDs were more likely than women choosing other contraceptives or no contraceptives to be multiparous, Latina and interested in IUDs prior to contraceptive counseling. Disclosure of personal IUD use by a clinic staff member was independently associated with the decision to use an IUD (odds ratio 8.1, 95% confidence interval 3.8-17.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Women undergoing abortion in an urban clinic have knowledge and high acceptance of IUDs, and sharing of contraceptive experiences is common among women of all demographics. Controlling for demographics and prior knowledge of IUDs, sharing of personal IUD experiences by providers is significantly associated with IUD use.

The wandering Mirena: laparoscopic retrieval

Levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine contraceptive devices, marketed as Mirena (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Australia) are widely used in contemporary gynecology, primarily as an effective method for contraception and for control of menstrual disorders like menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea. In this article, the authors report 2 cases of Mirena migration following intrauterine insertion by general practitioners (family physicians). In the first case, the contraceptive device had moved to the patient's right iliac fossa just anterior to the cecum and, in the second, within the peritoneal cavity close to the left leaf of the diaphragm. Both patients underwent uneventful laparoscopic retrieval of the devices.

Vaginal flora changes on Pap smears after insertion of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device

BACKGROUND

The levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) combines a uterine foreign body and the continuous release of low-dose levonorgestrel for contraception. Its influence on the rate of vulvovaginal infections and flora disturbance is insufficiently known, but important for contraceptive advice in women, especially those who develop recurrent vaginosis or Candida vulvovaginitis.

STUDY DESIGN

Slides of 286 women who had a Pap smear taken before and 1 to 2 years after placement of a LNG-IUS were blindly reviewed for the presence of abnormal vaginal flora (AVF), bacterial vaginosis (BV), aerobic vaginitis (AV) and Candida vaginitis (CV).

RESULTS

Prior to insertion, there were no differences in vaginal flora abnormalities between women using different kinds of contraception. LNG-IUS users did not have different rates of AVF, BV, AV or CV, but the general risk to develop any infection was increased. Uterine bleeding after insertion did not seem to predict a different flora type.

CONCLUSION

We found that Pap smears suggested more vaginal infections after 1 year of LNG-IUS use than prior to insertion of the device.

[Contraception, therapeutic abortion, and pulmonary arterial hypertension]

Despite therapeutic advances, maternal mortality is high in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). PAH treatment may interfere with the proposed method of contraception. Moreover, some treatments (endothelin receptor antagonists, anti-vitamin K) are teratogenic. If pregnancy is strictly not recommended in PAH, few specific contraceptive guidelines are available. The contraceptive method must be discussed on a case by case basis with the patient, the reference team for PAH, and the gynecology department.The advantages of the intrauterine device (IUD) with progesterone (reliability, simplicity, compliance, few contraindications and interactions, possibility of use in the nulliparous patient, reimbursement by the healthcare system) make it a good contraceptive choice in these circumstances. Therapeutic abortion is a situation of contraceptive failure, it must always be performed in hospitals. It must lead to effective contraceptive advice.

Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System: A First-Line Medical Treatment for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Chronic heavy menstrual bleeding is a common gynecologic condition that causes significant health problems and negatively impacts a woman's quality of life. Surgical treatments should be reserved for women who have pelvic pathology and for those who fail medical therapy. The recent US FDA approval of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system as an indicated treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding in women who want to use intrauterine devices for birth control highlights the potential that this top tier contraceptive method offers as a first-line therapy for treatment of this problem in women of any reproductive age, without sacrificing their future fertility.

Use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: an Austrian perspective

Approximately 12 million women worldwide use the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS), with approximately 180,000 users of this IUS currently reported in Austria. A patient satisfaction study of 591 women in Austria revealed a high number of 'very satisfied' (79%) and 'satisfied' (19%) patients. Reliability, comfort, excellent compatibility and less severe, shorter and less painful monthly periods were the most frequently named advantages of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS. Medication-induced cervical priming before insertion can be carried out on a routine or selective basis (for example in nullipara, in women who have undergone cervical conisation or in women who have previously experienced painful insertion). There is, at present, no evidence of an increased rate of breast cancer through use of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS. A directly comparative study with oral contraceptives in young nullipara showed excellent results for the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS, with no perforations, inflammation or pregnancies.

User satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS): data from an international survey

OBJECTIVES

To identify the characteristics of an international population of women using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and their experiences with this contraceptive.

METHODS

Women who had used the LNG-IUS for six months or more completed a standardised questionnaire on reasons for use, user satisfaction and other aspects.

RESULTS

A total of 8680 questionnaires were completed by survey participants in 18 countries across Europe and the Near East. The average woman using the LNG-IUS was 38 years old, was married or lived with her partner, and had two children. Overall, 95% of patients were satisfied with the LNG-IUS; the percentage rose to 99% among those using their second LNG-IUS. Reasons mentioned for using the LNG-IUS included the need for contraception (68%), its high efficacy (59%) and the shorter/lighter menstrual bleeding (55%). Of the women with prior bleeding problems, 93% reported an improvement in their symptoms with the LNG-IUS. Participants also rated the reliability, tolerability and convenience of the method highly.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provides insight into the profiles of LNG-IUS users. High levels of satisfaction with this method of contraception were reported by both first and second-time users. Our data suggest that the LNG-IUS is well accepted and that it provides considerable benefits beyond contraception alone.

Antigonadotropic progestogens as contraceptive agents in women with contraindication to combined pill

Synthetic progestogens belong to different pharmacological classes and are mixed steroids. They display different properties due to their various affinities to the different steroid receptors. In addition, the dosage used can modify their side effects. Normethyltestosterone used at minimal doses, also called progestogen only pill (POP), constitute the standard recommended hormonal contraception for women with vascular and metabolic contraindications to combined pill (COC). However, POP efficacy and gynecological tolerance are limited. We have developed for more than 20 years in France the use of two pregnane derivatives as contraceptive agents in women with contraindication to COC. Chlormadinone acetate and cyproterone acetate have different antigonadotropic potencies but remain neutral on vascular risk. We have analyzed the efficacy, vascular and gynecological tolerances in 187 women with systemic lupus erythematous with or without antiphospholipids. Venous thrombosis and arterial events rates were lower than those reported in the literature. The current experience in women with thrombophilia is similar as reported in a series of 150 patients. In addition, we have also used antigonadotropic progestins in women with hereditary angioedema (HAE) types I, II or III. HAE symptoms can be induced or worsened by COC. We could demonstrate a significant improvement of the symptoms in most women with HAE under antigonadotropic progestins. Gynecological and general tolerances were satisfactory. In conclusion, antigonadotropic progestins could have clinical positive benefits as contraceptive agents in women with contraindication to COC.

Contraception for cancer survivors

Women who have survived cancer may need guidance in choosing a method of contraception. This paper reviews the evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of available methods of contraception for cancer survivors and concludes that the Copper T380A intrauterine device (IUD), a highly effective, reversible, long-acting, hormone-free method should be considered a first-line contraceptive option for women with a history of a hormonally mediated cancer. However, the levonorgestrel-containing IUD may be preferable for women being treated with tamoxifen and women who have survived non-hormonally mediated cancers. Women with IUDs can undergo all forms of imaging, including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Expanding access to intrauterine contraception

The intrauterine device is a safe, highly effective, long-lasting, yet reversible method of contraception. Expanding access to intrauterine contraception is an important measure to reduce the rate of unintended pregnancy in the United States. Clinicians should consider intrauterine contraception in appropriate candidates, including women who are nulliparous, adolescent, immediately postpartum or postabortal, and desiring emergency contraception, and as an alternative to permanent sterilization. Barriers to intrauterine contraception such as requiring cervical cancer screening before insertion, routine testing for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection in low-risk women, or scheduling insertion only during menses are unnecessary.