The creeping Pearl: Why has the rate of contraceptive failure increased in clinical trials of combined hormonal contraceptive pills?

Regulatory challenges of new male contraceptive methods

INTRODUCTION

Progress in male contraception development faces the challenge of a lack of regulatory precedent and guidelines on the evidence (trial design and primary endpoint) required for marketing approval. Moreover, the development of a male contraceptive is complicated by the fact that the clinical treatment effect; prevention of pregnancy, is not measured in the patient receiving the intervention.

DISCUSSION

Regulatory precedent and guidelines exist for female hormonal contraceptives but their applicability to male contraceptive products likely varies based on the mode of action and the anticipated pharmacodynamic effects of the product. The unique attributes of male contraceptives, including the frequent delay between the intervention (e.g., vasectomy and hormonal methods) and ultimate contraceptive effect, sperm suppression near azoospermia, and pregnancy prevention need to be addressed.

CONCLUSION

This article describes the regulatory challenges faced by developers of male contraceptive products and offers proposals, paving the way for the development of both hormonal methods and non-hormonal approaches. Our article intends to suggest the directions but cannot substitute for the advice of regulatory agencies.

Practice and development of male contraception: European Academy of Andrology and American Society of Andrology guidelines

BACKGROUNDS

Despite a wide spectrum of contraceptive methods for women, the unintended pregnancy rate remains high (45% in the US), with 50% resulting in abortion. Currently, 20% of global contraceptive use is male-directed, with a wide variation among countries due to limited availability and lack of efficacy. Worldwide studies indicate that >50% of men would opt to use a reversible method, and 90% of women would rely on their partner to use a contraceptive. Additional reasons for novel male contraceptive methods to be available include the increased life expectancy, sharing the reproductive risks among partners, social issues, the lack of pharma industry involvement and the lack of opinion makers advocating for male contraception.

AIM

The present guidelines aim to review the status regarding male contraception, the current state of the art to support the clinical practice, recommend minimal requirements for new male contraceptive development and provide and grade updated, evidence-based recommendations from the European Society of Andrology (EAA) and the American Society of Andrology (ASA).

METHODS

An expert panel of academicians appointed by the EAA and the ASA generated a consensus guideline according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.

RESULTS

Sixty evidence-based and graded recommendations were produced on couple-centered communication, behaviors, barrier methods, semen analysis and contraceptive efficacy, physical agents, surgical methods, actions before initiating male contraception, hormonal methods, non-hormonal methods, vaccines, and social and ethical considerations.

CONCLUSION

As gender roles transform and gender equity is established in relationships, the male contribution to family planning must be facilitated. Efficient and safe male-directed methods must be evaluated and introduced into clinical practice, preferably reversible, either hormonal or non-hormonal. From a future perspective, identifying new hormonal combinations, suitable testicular targets, and emerging vas occlusion methods will produce novel molecules and products for male contraception.

Evaluating Pregnancy Rates in Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Family Planning: Simulated Comparison of Correct Use to Avoid, Method-Related, and Total Pregnancy Rates

Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs), also known as natural family planning (NFP), enable couples to identify the days of the menstrual cycle when intercourse may result in pregnancy ("fertile days"), and to avoid intercourse on fertile days if they wish to avoid pregnancy. Thus, these methods are fully dependent on user behavior for effectiveness to avoid pregnancy. For couples and clinicians considering the use of an FABM, one important metric to consider is the highest expected effectiveness (lowest possible pregnancy rate) during the correct use of the method to avoid pregnancy. To assess this, most studies of FABMs have reported a method-related pregnancy rate (a cumulative proportion), which is calculated based on all cycles (or months) in the study. In contrast, the correct use to avoid pregnancy rate (also a cumulative proportion) has the denominator of cycles with the correct use of the FABM to avoid pregnancy. The relationship between these measures has not been evaluated quantitatively. We conducted a series of simulations demonstrating that the method-related pregnancy rate is artificially decreased in direct proportion to the proportion of cycles with intermediate use (any use other than correct use to avoid or targeted use to conceive), which also increases the total pregnancy rate. Thus, as the total pregnancy rate rises (related to intermediate use), the method-related pregnancy rate falls artificially while the correct use pregnancy rate remains constant. For practical application, we propose the core elements needed to assess correct use cycles in FABM studies.

Summary

Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) can be used by couples to avoid pregnancy, by avoiding intercourse on fertile days. Users want to know what the highest effectiveness (lowest pregnancy rate) would be if they use an FABM correctly and consistently to avoid pregnancy. In this simulation study, we compare two different measures: (1) the method-related pregnancy rate; and (2) the correct use pregnancy rate. We show that the method-related pregnancy rate is biased too low if some users in the study are not using the method consistently to avoid pregnancy, while the correct use pregnancy rate obtains an accurate estimate.

Short Summary

In FABM studies, the method-related pregnancy rate is biased too low, but the correct use pregnancy rate is unbiased.

Long-acting intramuscular injections of ELQ-331, an antimalarial agent

The overarching premise of this investigation is that injectable, long-acting antimalarial medication would encourage adherence to a dosage regimen for populations at risk of contracting the disease. To advance support for this goal, we have developed oil-based formulations of ELQ-331 (a prodrug of ELQ-300) that perform as long-acting, injectable chemoprophylactics with drug loading as high as 160 mg/ml of ELQ-331. In a pharmacokinetic study performed with rats, a single intramuscular injection of 12.14 mg/kg maintained higher plasma levels than the previously established minimum fully protective plasma concentration (33.25 ng/ml) of ELQ-300 for more than 4 weeks. The formulations were well tolerated by the rats and the tested dose produced no adverse reactions. We believe that by extending the length of time between subsequent injections, these injectable oil-based solutions of ELQ-331 can offer a more accessible, low-cost option for long-acting disease prevention and reduced transmission in malaria-endemic regions and may also be of use to travelers.

NOMAC-E2 shows a better contraceptive effectiveness than LNG combined oral contraceptives in women under 25: real-world PRO-E2 study

Objective: To investigate unintended pregnancy and changes in mood, acne, and weight in NOMAC-E2 vs levonorgestrel-containing COC (COC_LNG) users under 25 years.Methods: In this large, observational study, new users (first-ever users of an eligible COC or restarting with the same or a new eligible COC after a break of at least 2 months) of NOMAC-E2 and COC_LNG were recruited in 12 countries in Europe, Australia, and Latin America and followed up via questionnaires for up to 2 years. Unintended pregnancy was expressed by the Pearl Index (PI; contraceptive failures/100 women-years). Crude (HR_crude) and adjusted hazard ratios (HR_adj) were calculated. Mood and acne changes were defined as change of score from baseline. Weight change was defined as percent change of body weight.Results: Overall, 12,829 NOMAC-E2 users and 17,095 COC_LNG users under 25 were followed-up. The risk of unintended pregnancy was statistically significantly lower in the NOMAC-E2 cohort; confirmed events: 30 NOMAC-E2 (PI 0.24; 95% CI, 0.16-0.35) vs 94 COC_LNG (PI 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.62). The HR_crude for unintended pregnancy comparing NOMAC-E2 to COC_LNG was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.31-0.71) and the HR_adj was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.34-0.78). No differential effect on acne, mood, and weight was observed between cohorts.Conclusions: NOMAC-E2 shows a significantly better contraceptive effectiveness in young women and has no differential effect on acne, mood, and weight compared to COC_LNG.

Nanomaterials Solutions for Contraception: Concerns, Advances, and Prospects

Preventing unintentional pregnancy is one of the goals of a global public health policy to minimize effects on individuals, families, and society. Various contraceptive formulations with high effectiveness and acceptance, including intrauterine devices, hormonal patches for females, and condoms and vasectomy for males, have been developed and adopted over the last decades. However, distinct breakthroughs of contraceptive techniques have not yet been achieved, while the associated long-term adverse effects are insurmountable, such as endocrine system disorder along with hormone administration, invasive ligation, and slowly restored fertility after removal of intrauterine devices. Spurred by developments of nanomaterials and bionanotechnologies, advanced contraceptives could be fulfilled via nanomaterial solutions with much safer and more controllable and effective approaches to meet various and specific needs for women and men at different reproductive stages. Nanomedicine techniques have been extended to develop contraceptive methods, such as the targeted drug delivery and controlled release of hormone using nanocarriers for females and physical stimulation assisted vasectomy using functional nanomaterials via photothermal treatment or magnetic hyperthermia for males. Nanomaterial solutions for advanced contraceptives offer significantly improved biosafety, noninvasive administration, and controllable reversibility. This review summarizes the nanomaterial solutions to female and male contraceptives including the working mechanisms, clinical concerns, and their merits and demerits. This work also reviewed the nanomaterials that have been adopted in contraceptive applications. In addition, we further discuss safety considerations and future perspectives of nanomaterials in nanostrategy development for next-generation contraceptives. We expect that nanomaterials would potentially replace conventional materials for contraception in the near future.

Is There a Need for a Dedicated Pharmacokinetic Trial for a Drug in Obese Populations? A Drug Prioritization Decision Tree Framework

Obesity is a growing global health concern associated with high comorbidity rates, leading to an increasing number of patients who are obese requiring medication. However, clinical trials often exclude or under-represent individuals who are obese, creating the need for a methodology to adjust labeling to ensure safe and effective dosing for all patients. To address this, we developed a 2-part decision tree framework to prioritize drugs for dedicated pharmacokinetic studies in obese subjects. Leveraging current drug knowledge and modeling techniques, the decision tree system predicts expected exposure changes and recommends labeling strategies, allowing stakeholders to prioritize resources toward the drugs most in need. In a case study evaluating 30 drugs from literature across different therapeutic areas, our first decision tree predicted the expected direction of exposure change accurately in 73% of cases. We conclude that this decision tree system offers a valuable tool to advance research in obesity pharmacology and personalize drug development for patients who are obese, ensuring safe and effective medication.

The benefits of estetrol addition to drospirenone for contraception

Ethinylestradiol and drospirenone combined oral contraceptive formulations have been marketed for >20 years. Drospirenone has antimineralocorticoid and anti-androgenic effects that may offer several health benefits. Recently, 2 new drospirenone-containing oral contraceptives entered the market, 1 as a progestin-only pill containing 4 mg drospirenone and the other as a combined oral contraceptive containing 15 mg estetrol and 3 mg drospirenone. Estetrol has a unique differential effect on nuclear and membrane estrogen α-receptors when compared with other estrogens, leading to low impact on the liver, breast, and hemostasis parameters and a beneficial effect on the endometrium, vagina, cardiovascular system, bone, and brain. Phase 3 clinical studies demonstrated that the Pearl Index (pregnancies per 100-woman-years) for drospirenone alone is 4.0 in the United States and 0.93 in the European Union and for the estetrol-drospirenone combination it is 2.65 and 0.44, respectively. Drospirenone alone demonstrates high rates of unscheduled bleeding and low rates of scheduled bleeding, whereas the estetrol-drospirenone combination demonstrates a predictable and regular bleeding profile for most users with a high stable rate of scheduled bleeding and a low rate of unscheduled bleeding, reported primarily as spotting only. The adverse event profiles and discontinuation rates owing to adverse events are comparable, and no clinically significant effects were observed on metabolic parameters with either product. Hemostatic assays for drospirenone do not fully evaluate all parameters although the testing that is available suggests negligible effects, whereas validated hemostatic assays demonstrate that the estetrol-drospirenone combination has limited impact on hemostasis. The introduction of 4 mg drospirenone and 15 mg estetrol with 3 mg drospirenone are valuable additions to the contraceptive market. Adding estetrol to 3 mg drospirenone provides advantages of contraceptive efficacy and a regular, predictable bleeding profile with minimal impact on hemostasis parameters.

Drospirenone and estetrol: evaluation of a newly approved novel oral contraceptive

INTRODUCTION

Estetrol (E4) is a native estrogen produced only by the fetal liver during pregnancy. E4 is the first new estrogen to be used in hormonal contraception since the introduction of oral contraceptives in 1960. Ethinyl estradiol, the most commonly used estrogen in oral contraceptives today, increases the risks of thromboembolism and has other significant hepatic impacts, which induce important drug-drug interactions. On the other hand, Phase 2 E4 characterization studies demonstrated that E4 has negligible impacts on liver, breast, and vascular endothelium due to its distinct tissue selectivity. Combined with drospirenone (DRSP), E4 offers an improved safety profile for oral contraception.

AREAS COVERED

This paper briefly highlights the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features of E4. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability results from the Phase 2 and 3 studies of the E4/DRSP pill are discussed to provide the reader with a thorough understanding of E4 and information to use when counseling potential users.

EXPERT OPINION

The estetrol/drospirenone oral contraceptive is effective and well tolerated and provides good cycle control. In the future, estetrol may be the estrogen of choice if subsequent evidence verifies that it reduces the risks associated with current estrogens, such as venous thromboembolism and drug-drug interactions.

Combined Oral Contraceptive Adherence and Pregnancy Rates

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship of adherence and pregnancy in participants using an estetrol and drospirenone combined oral contraceptive.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis for which we pooled data from two parallel, multicenter, phase 3 trials (United States and Canada, Europe and Russia) that enrolled participants 16-50 years of age to receive estetrol 15 mg and drospirenone 3 mg in a 24 hormone and four placebo pills regimen for up to 13 cycles. Participants reported pill intake, sexual intercourse, and other contraceptive use on paper diaries. We limited this efficacy analysis to at-risk cycles (one or more reported acts of intercourse and no other contraceptive use) in participants 16-35 years of age at screening. We excluded cycles with other contraceptive use unless pregnancy occurred in that cycle. We assessed primarily the relationship between number of pills not taken per cycle and pregnancies and, secondarily, when pregnancies occurred during product use with a test for trend and χ2 analyses as appropriate.

RESULTS

Among 2,837 participants in this analysis, 31 on-treatment pregnancies occurred during 26,455 at-risk cycles. Pregnancies occurred in 0.09%, 0.25%, 0.83%, and 1.6% of cycles in which participants reported they took all hormone pills (n=25,613 cycles) or did not take one (n=405 cycles), two (n=121 cycles), and more than two (n=314 cycles) hormone-containing pills, respectively (P<.001). No pregnancies occurred in 2,216 cycles when one or more pills were missed and missed-pill instructions were followed. All pregnancies related to not taking pills occurred in the first three cycles. Pregnancy rates ranged from 0% to 0.21% per cycle with no significant trend by cycle (P=.45).

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy occurs more frequently when combined oral contraceptive users report not taking all hormone-containing pills per 28-day cycle and exceeds 1% only when more than two pills are not taken. Pregnancies in participants who reported missed pills occurred only when missed-pill instructions were not followed. A 0.09% pregnancy risk per cycle among users of a 24 hormone and four placebo pills formulation who report taking all pills likely approximates a true method-failure rate.

FUNDING SOURCE

Estetra SRL, an affiliate company of Mithra Pharmaceuticals.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02817828 and NCT02817841.

Effectiveness and efficacy rates of progestin-only pills: A comprehensive literature review

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize published literature on POP effectiveness and efficacy.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched PubMed Central, PubMed, and the Cochrane library through March 07, 2022. We included articles written in English reporting a Pearl Index or life table rate for pregnancy. We excluded articles only assessing formulations that: were never marketed globally, are only sold in combination with estrogen, are currently sold only for noncontraceptive purposes, or were not given to participants continuously. Four researchers independently extracted data and two analyzed data using Excel and R.

RESULTS

We included 54 studies. Among studies at low or moderate risk of bias, the median Pearl Index rate (the failure rate during typical use) was 1.63 (range 0.00-14.20, IQR 4.03) and the median method failure Pearl Index rate (the failure rate during perfect use) was 0.97 (range 0.40-6.50, IQR 0.68). Excluding the newer formulations, Desogestrel and Drospirenone, which are closer to combined oral contraceptives in that they prevent pregnancy by inhibiting ovulation, the median Pearl Index rate is 2.00 (range 0.00-14.12, IQR 2.5) and the median method failure Pearl Index rate is 1.05 (range 0.00-10.90, IQR 1.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Among studies at low or moderate risk of bias, the median Pearl Index rate during typical POP use was much lower than currently estimated (7.00), while the median perfect use rate was similar to current estimates.

IMPLICATIONS

Future research should investigate the possibility that POPs may be much more effective during typical use than currently believed.

Pooled efficacy results of estetrol/drospirenone combined oral contraception phase 3 trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate overall and subgroup efficacy of an estetrol (E4) 15 mg drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg oral contraceptive in a 24/4-day regimen.

STUDY DESIGN

We pooled efficacy outcomes from 2 pivotal phase 3 contraceptive trials with E4/DRSP conducted in the United States/Canada and Europe/Russia. We assessed Pearl Index (PI; pregnancies per 100 participant-years) and 13-cycle life-table pregnancy rates in at-risk cycles (confirmed intercourse and no other contraceptive use) among participants 16 to 35 years. We calculated PI by age and further subcategorization (contraceptive history and body mass index [BMI]). We performed multivariable analysis using Cox regression to assess impact of potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Analyses included 3027 participants, of whom 451 (14.9%) had a BMI ≥30 kg/m². The pooled PI was 1.52 (95% confidence interval 1.04-2.16) and the 13-cycle life-table pregnancy rate was 1.28% (0.83%-1.73%). We calculated unadjusted pooled PI in participants 16 to 25 years and 26 to 35 years of 1.61 (0.94-2.57) and 1.43 (0.78-2.40), respectively; in new starters and switchers of 1.88 (1.09-3.00) and 1.24 (0.68-2.08), respectively; and by BMI <25 kg/m², 25 to 29.9 kg/m², and ≥30 kg/m² of 1.14 (0.64-1.88), 2.19 (1.05-4.03), and 2.27 (0.83-4.94), respectively. In multivariable analysis, we found associations of prior pregnancy (hazard ratio [HR] 3.61[1.56-8.38]), Black race (HR 4.61[1.97-10.80]), age 16 to 25 years (HR 2.37[1.09-5.15]) and compliance <99% of expected pills (HR 4.21[2.04-8.66]) with conception.

CONCLUSION

E4/DRSP is an effective oral contraceptive overall and across subgroups stratified by age, contraceptive history, and BMI. Other than compliance, predictors of contraceptive failure are nonmodifiable.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

Pooled results from two phase 3 trials demonstrate high contraceptive efficacy of the novel estetrol-drospirenone oral contraceptive. Several non-modifiable risk factors, including prior pregnancy, race, and age, are associated with higher pregnancy risk. Additional research is needed to better understand predictors of combined oral contraceptive failure.

Natural Family Planning, An Option in Reproductive Healthcare: A Qualitative Study on Clinicians' Perceptions

Natural family planning (NFP) empowers women to control their reproductive health and approach fertility as a normal biological process. Although substantive literature supports their comparative effectiveness with contraceptive methods, there is a paucity of this knowledge amongst clinicians and users. This study aimed to understand clinicians' perceptions regarding offering NFP to patients as part of reproductive health care. It explored clinicians' knowledge of NFP, described their perceptions of their effectiveness, and identified enabling and deterring factors to their use. Basic Interpretive qualitative research design was appropriate in obtaining an in-depth description of this phenomenon. It was conducted in 2018 in two hospitals and clinics in Ekurhuleni health district, located East of Gauteng Province, South Africa. Fifteen doctors and nurses from diverse cultural and educational backgrounds were purposefully selected and interviewed. Transcribed data were analyzed, coded, and recurrent themes identified. Training that empowers clinicians on NFP methods and their effectiveness will improve their willingness to advocate for it and promote patient autonomy by providing comprehensive counseling on family planning methods. Further, a pro-NFP policy would drive training in undergraduate and postgraduate programs and increase public awareness, including early education of male and female children.

Profile of estetrol, a promising native estrogen for oral contraception and the relief of climacteric symptoms of menopause

INTRODUCTION

Estrogens used in women's healthcare have been associated with increased risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and breast cancer. Estetrol (E4), an estrogen produced by the human fetal liver, has recently been approved for the first time as a new estrogenic component of a novel combined oral contraceptive (E4/drospirenone [DRSP]) for over a decade. In phase 3 studies, E4/DRSP showed good contraceptive efficacy, a predictable bleeding pattern, and a favorable safety and tolerability profile.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review discusses E4's pharmacological characteristics, mode of action, and the results of preclinical and clinical studies for contraception, as well as for menopause and oncology.

EXPERT OPINION

Extensive studies have elucidated the properties of E4 that underlie its favorable safety profile. While classical estrogens (such as estradiol) exert their actions via both activation of nuclear and membrane estrogen receptor α (ERα), E4 presents a specific profile of ERα activation: E4 binds and activates nuclear ERα but does not induce the activation of membrane ERα signaling pathways in specific tissues. E4 has a small effect on normal breast tissue proliferation and minimally affects hepatic parameters. This distinct profile of ERα activation, uncoupling nuclear and membrane activation, is unique.

New Contraception Update - Annovera, Phexxi, Slynd, and Twirla

Purpose of Review

In this review, we discuss the efficacy, safety, and benefits of four new contraceptive products available in the USA, specifically Annovera, Phexxi, Slynd, and Twirla.

Recent Findings

Annovera is a vaginal ring releasing ethinyl estradiol and segesterone acetate that can be used for up to one year (13 cycles), offering patients an effective, user-controlled option that may improve contraceptive access for those in low-resource settings or those with barriers to retrieving monthly prescriptions; however, given limited efficacy and safety data in people with body mass index (BMI) > 29 kg/m2, clinicians may consider whether Annovera is an appropriate contraceptive method for obese patients if there are other acceptable alternatives. Phexxi prescription-only vaginal gel is a user-controlled, non-hormonal, on-demand contraceptive method that represents a novel addition to the market with its additional uses as a personal lubricant and as a potential microbicide for urogenital infection prevention. Slynd, a drospirenone-only pill, provides more flexibility for delayed or missed pills while maintaining efficacy and a more favorable bleeding profile compared with previously available progestin-only pills. Lastly, Twirla is a transdermal patch releasing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel that offers users an additional option for a user-controlled, combined hormonal contraceptive method without daily dosing; however, prescription is limited to patients with BMI < 30 kg/m2 due to decreased efficacy and VTE events in people with obesity.

Summary

The addition of these products expands the available options for pregnancy prevention to address unmet contraceptive needs.

The use of serum segesterone acetate levels to assess adherence of trial participants with a contraceptive vaginal ring

OBJECTIVE(S)

To determine the incidence of out-of-range segesterone acetate (NES) concentrations in participants of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic trial of a continuous use contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) releasing NES and estradiol (E2). We hypothesized that out-of-range concentrations reflect nonadherent ring use and predict ovulation risk.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a prospective, multi-centered, randomized, Phase IIa dose-finding trial for a CVR releasing NES and E2. Our primary outcome was the risk of ovulation associated with out-of-range NES events. We calculated the 5th and 95th percentile NES concentrations of subjects at steady state to determine high and low cutoffs. We used a Fisher's exact test to determine group differences, and calculated the relative risk of ovulation for each group.

RESULTS

We analyzed available serum NES data from cycles 2 (n=172), 3 (n=156) and 7 (n=115) to determine the 5th and 95th percentile of all NES concentrations (64, 296 pg/mL). In the 443 cycles of observation, no ovulations occurred in participants with NES concentrations within the expected range. In contrast, we found ovulatory elevations of progesterone in 21 cycles with out-of-range values. Of these, 15 (71%) cycles had evidence of one or more nonadherent low and 6 (29%) one or more unexpected peak. The relative risk of ovulation increased with evidence of multiple non-adherent levels.

CONCLUSION(S)

We found out-of-range NES concentrations, suggestive of improper use of a CVR associated with an increased risk of ovulation, with a direct relationship between the number of out-of-range events and the relative risk.

IMPLICATIONS

The results of this study support the use of out-of-range serum NES values as a marker of adherence in contraceptive clinical trials of continuous vaginal rings, and suggest that non-adherence occurs even in early phase clinical trials with close monitoring.

Antiseizure medications and oral contraceptives: Impact of enzyme inducers on pregnancy outcomes and costs

PURPOSE

To show the impact of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) associated with co-administration of enzyme-inducing (EI) antiseizure medications and oral contraceptives (OCs) on the annual number of unintended pregnancies, their outcomes, and their associated costs in the United States (US).

METHODS

A Microsoft Excel pregnancy-outcomes model was developed to determine the impact of DDIs in women who take an OC as well as an EI antiseizure medication known to lower the effectiveness of the OC in preventing pregnancy. The model compared the number of unintended pregnancies, the expected pregnancy outcomes, and associated costs in women taking an OC and an EI medication with a matched cohort of women who took an OC and an enzyme-neutral (EN) antiseizure medication that is known not to interact with OCs. The model perspectives were patients and third-party payers in the US. Unintended pregnancy rates, pregnancy outcomes, and cost inputs for the model were taken from published studies.

RESULTS

The results of the analysis showed an estimated increase in the annual number of unintended pregnancies in the US of 503 (a change from 1151 to 1654), an increase of 44.7%, for the estimated 71,922 women currently taking an OC plus an EI medication in the US when compared with a matched cohort taking an OC plus an EN medication. This resulted in an estimated annual healthcare cost increase of $3 million, which is an increase of 5.5% in the annual costs for contraception and pregnancy care. A scenario analysis showed that the annual number of unintended pregnancies could be lower (575 vs 1654) for a matched cohort of women taking EI medications and using a copper intrauterine device, a highly effective and nonhormonal form of contraception, rather than an OC.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians treating women of reproductive age for epilepsy who wish to avoid pregnancy should consider the potential for DDIs that might result in unintended pregnancies. Thus, physicians should alert women using EI medications for epilepsy control to the increased potential for unintended pregnancies if they use OCs for contraception.

Variability in Contraceptive Clinical Trial Design and the Challenges in Making Comparisons Across Trials

Clinical trials of contraceptives have often differed in their study designs, making cross-trial comparisons difficult. This brief report outlines some of the technical design features that can vary from trial to trial. For example, the overall number of menstrual cycles in a study has substantial impact on the final efficacy determination; however, the rules related to qualifying cycles can differ based on the length of the study and the statistical analysis plan. In two commonly used methods of calculating efficacy, the Pearl Index and the time-to-event analysis, inclusion of fewer menstrual cycles results in higher calculated failure rates. Statistical analysis plans for contraceptive trials have sometimes excluded menstrual cycles because of an absence of documented vaginal intercourse and the concomitant use of another birth control method. Other design features that have varied between contraceptive trials relate to body mass index inclusion/exclusion criteria and the definition of "on-treatment" pregnancy. In addition, study designs of non-hormonal products can differ from those of hormonal products in their length and rules for qualifying cycles. The Draft Guidance for Hormonal Contraception, published in 2019 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), will hopefully lead to more uniform trial design in the future, particularly for hormonal products. In the meantime, health care providers and patients should be aware of the nuances in trial design that make direct comparisons about relative efficacy challenging.

Determining the Exposure Threshold for Levonorgestrel Efficacy Using an Integrated Model Based Meta-Analysis Approach

Combined oral contraceptive pills are the most commonly used hormonal contraceptives for the prevention of unintended pregnancies in United States. They consist of a progestin (e.g., levonorgestrel (LNG)) and an estrogen component, typically ethinyl estradiol (EE). In addition to adherence issues, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and obesity (women with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² ) are prime suspects for decreased LNG efficacy. Therefore, we developed an integrated physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling and model-based meta-analysis approach to determine LNG's efficacy threshold concentrations and to evaluate the impact of DDIs and obesity on the efficacy of LNG-containing hormonal contraceptives (HCs). Based on this approach, co-administration of strong CYP3A4 inducers and LNG-containing HCs (LNG150: LNG 150 µg + EE 30 µg and LNG100: LNG 100 µg + EE 20 µg) resulted in a predicted clinically relevant decrease of LNG plasma exposure (women with BMI < 25 kg/m² : 50-65%; obese women: 70-75%). Following administration of LNG150 or LNG100 in the presence of a CYP3A4 inducer, there was an increase in mean Pearl Index of 1.2-1.30 and 1.80-2.10, respectively, in women with BMI < 25 kg/m² (incidence rate ratios (IRRs): 1.7-2.2), whereas it ranged from 1.6-1.80 and 2.40-2.85 in obese women (IRR: 2.2-3.0), respectively. Our results suggest that the use of backup or alternate methods of contraception is not necessarily required for oral LNG + EE formulations except within circumstances of both obesity and strong CYP3A4 inducer concomitance following administration of LNG100.

Unintended pregnancy in users of nomegestrol acetate and 17β-oestradiol (NOMAC-E2) compared with levonorgestrel-containing combined oral contraceptives: final results from the PRO-E2 study

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the risk of unintended pregnancy in NOMAC-E2 users with levonorgestrel-containing COC (COC_LNG) users in clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

In this observational study, new users¹ of NOMAC-E2 and COC_LNG were recruited in Europe, Australia, and Latin America and followed for up to 2 years. Unintended pregnancy was expressed by the Pearl Index (contraceptive failures per 100 women-years [WY]), crude hazard ratios (HR_crude) and adjusted hazard ratios (HR_adj).

RESULTS

Overall, 44,559 and 46,754 users were recruited to the NOMAC-E2 and COC_LNG user cohorts, respectively. There were 64 unintended pregnancies in NOMAC-E2 users (0.15 per 100 WY; 95% CI, 0.11-0.19) and 200 in COC_LNG users (0.41 per 100 WY; 95% CI, 0.35-0.47). The unintended pregnancy risk was statistically significantly lower in the NOMAC-E2 cohort (p<.0001) compared to the COC_LNG user cohort. The HR_adj of NOMAC-E2 vs COC_LNG was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.34-0.60; adjusted for age, body mass index, gravidity, COC user status, education level).

CONCLUSIONS

NOMAC-E2 demonstrated superior contraceptive effectiveness compared to COC_LNG, likely due to the comparatively short hormone-free interval and possibly reinforced by the long half-life of NOMAC.

A review of the effectiveness of a progestogen-only pill containing norgestrel 75 µg/day

OBJECTIVES

To review published data on the effectiveness of a progestogen-only pill containing norgestrel 75 µg/day which should be under consideration by the FDA in 2022 for sale over the counter in the US.

STUDY DESIGN

A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE REVIEWS using specified search terms and adding related cross-references.

RESULTS

We identified a total of thirteen relevant studies of women using norgestrel 75 µg/day. None were reported with the rigor characteristic of trial reporting today. Nevertheless, six studies provided data on 3,184 women who were not breastfeeding, followed for over of 35,000 months and reported a range of overall failure rates during typical use of norgestrel 75 µg/day from 0 to 2.4/hundred woman-years giving an aggregate Pearl Index of 2.2. Seven additional studies involved 5,445 women some of whom were breastfeeding for at least part of the period of follow-up. More than 36,000 months of use yielded 12-month life table cumulative pregnancy rates for norgestrel 75 µg/day ranging from 0 to 3.4. We were unable to calculate an aggregate Pearl Index for the breastfeeding studies because of lack of crucial data.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support that norgestrel 75 µg/day is highly effective in clinical use, with similar estimates of failure in breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding women, providing support to the case for approval without the need to see a healthcare provider.

Advances in long-acting injectables, implants, and vaginal rings for contraception and HIV prevention

Worldwide, women face compounding reproductive health risks, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), sexually-transmitted infections (STIs), and unintended pregnancy. Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) offer combined protection against these overlapping risks in singular prevention products that offer potential for simplified use, lower burden, higher acceptability, and increased public health benefits. Over the past decade, substantial progress has been made in development of extended-release MPTs, which have further potential to grant sexual and reproductive health autonomy to women globally and to offer choice for women to accommodate varying needs during their reproductive lives. Here, we highlight the advances made in injectable, implant, and ring delivery forms, and the importance of incorporating end-user preferences early in the research and development of these products.

The new low-dose transdermal contraceptive system (Twirla®): results from preclinical and Phase III trials

A new low-dose, once-a-week contraceptive transdermal delivery system (TDS) with 2.3-mg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 2.6-mg levonorgestrel (LNG; Twirla^®) has recently been approved by the US FDA for contraception of women with BMI <30 kg/m². The rationale for developing this new patch, the preclinical study results and the results from two innovative Phase III clinical trials demonstrate that this patch has an acceptable Pearl index (4.3%) for its indicated users and has safety and tolerability comparable to other similar dose oral combined hormonal contraceptives. This new TDS provides an improvement over the existing TDS products, with significantly lower steady-state estrogen exposure, a level equal to that with 30-µg EE containing oral contraceptives.

Estetrol-drospirenone combination oral contraceptive: North American phase 3 efficacy and safety results

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy, cycle control, and safety of an oral contraceptive containing estetrol (E4) 15 mg and drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg.

STUDY DESIGN

Women aged 16 to 50 years with a body mass index ≤35 kg/m² enrolled in this multicenter, open-label, 13-cycle, phase 3 trial evaluating E4/DRSP in a 24-active/4-placebo regimen. Follow-up was scheduled at Cycles 2, 4, 7, and 10 and within 3 weeks of completing Cycle 13. Participants used daily diaries to record pill use and vaginal bleeding. We evaluated efficacy outcomes in women 16 to 35 years and bleeding patterns and safety (adverse events [AEs]) in all participants. We assessed overall and method-failure pregnancy rates using the Pearl index (PI) and life-table analysis. Scheduled bleeding included spotting or bleeding starting during the 4-day placebo period or first 3 days of the next cycle.

RESULTS

We enrolled 1864 women of whom 1674 were 16 to 35 years. Women 16 to 35 years had a PI of 2.65 (95% CI 1.73-3.88), method-failure PI of 1.43 (95% CI 0.7-2.39) and 13-cycle life-table pregnancy rate of 2.1%. Scheduled bleeding occurred in 82.9% to 87.0% of women per cycle; median duration was 4.5 days. Unscheduled bleeding decreased from 30.3% in Cycle 1 to 21.3% to 22.1% during Cycles 2 to 4 and remained stable (15.5% to 19.2%) thereafter. The most frequently reported AEs were headache (5.0%) and metrorrhagia (4.6%). One-hundred thirty-two (7.1%) women discontinued the study early for an AE, most commonly for metrorrhagia (0.9%) and menorrhagia (0.8%). No thromboembolic events occurred.

CONCLUSION

E4/DRSP is an effective oral contraceptive with a predictable bleeding pattern for most women and low AE rates.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

A new oral contraceptive with a novel estrogen, estetrol, combined with drospirenone has efficacy and safety within the range of other available oral contraceptives. Large phase 4 studies will be needed to confirm if this combination is associated with an improved adverse event profile or lower thrombosis risk.

Natural Cycles app: contraceptive outcomes and demographic analysis of UK users

PURPOSE

Digital fertility awareness-based contraception offers an alternative choice for women who do not wish to use hormonal or invasive methods. The aim of this study was to investigate the key demographics of current users of the Natural Cycles app and assess the contraceptive outcomes of women preventing pregnancy in a UK cohort of women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a real world observational prospective observational study. The typical-use effectiveness of the method was calculated using both 13-cycle cumulative probability of pregnancy (life table analysis) and Pearl Index for the entire study cohort. Perfect-use PI was calculated using data from cycles where sexual intercourse during the fertile window was marked as protected and no unprotected sex was recorded on fertile days.

RESULTS

12,247 women were included in the study and contributed an average of 9.9 months of data for a total of 10,066 woman years of exposure. The mean age of the cohort was 30, mean BMI 23.4, the majority were in a stable relationship (83.2%) and had a university degree or higher (83%). The one year typical use, PI was 6.1 (95% CI: 5.6, 6.6) and with perfect-use was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.8). 13 cycle pregnancy probability was 7.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study which describes the use of a digital contraceptive by women in the UK. It describes the demographics of users and how they correlate with the apps effectiveness at preventing pregnancy.

Contraceptive Effectiveness of an FDA-Cleared Birth Control App: Results from the Natural Cycles U.S. Cohort

Background: Digital fertility awareness-based methods of birth control are an attractive alternative to hormonal or invasive birth control for modern women. They are also popular among women who may be planning a pregnancy over the coming years and wish to learn about their individual menstrual cycle. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the Natural Cycles app at preventing pregnancy for a cohort of women from the United States and to describe the key demographics of current users of the app in such a cohort. Materials and Methods: This prospective real-world cohort study included users who purchased an annual subscription to prevent pregnancy. Demographics were assessed through answers to in-app questionnaires. Birth control effectiveness estimates for the entire cohort were calculated using 1-year pearl index (PI) and 13-cycle cumulative pregnancy probability (Kaplan-Meier life table analysis). Results: The study included 5879 women who contributed an average of 10.5 months of data for a total of 5125 woman-years of exposure. The average user was 30 years old with a body mass index of 24 and reported being in a stable relationship. With typical use, the app had a 13-cycle cumulative pregnancy probability of 7.2% and a 1-year typical use PI of 6.2. When the app was used under perfect use, the PI was 2.0. Conclusions: The data presented in this study give insights into the cohort of women using this app in the United States, and provide country-specific effectiveness estimates. The contraceptive effectiveness of the app was in line with previously published figures from Natural Cycles (PI of seven for typical use and two for perfect use).

Quantitative Assessment of Levonorgestrel Binding Partner Interplay and Drug-Drug Interactions Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling

Levonorgestrel (LNG) is the active moiety in many hormonal contraceptive formulations. It is typically coformulated with ethinyl estradiol (EE) to decrease intermenstrual bleeding. Due to its widespread use and CYP3A4‐mediated metabolism, there is concern regarding drug‐drug interactions (DDIs), particularly a suboptimal LNG exposure when co‐administered with CYP3A4 inducers, potentially leading to unintended pregnancies. The goal of this analysis was to determine the impact of DDIs on the systemic exposure of LNG. To this end, we developed and verified a physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for LNG in PK‐Sim (version 8.0) accounting for the impact of EE and body mass index (BMI) on LNG’s binding to sex‐hormone binding globulin. Model parameters were optimized following intravenous and oral administration of 0.09 mg LNG. The combined LNG‐EE PBPK model was verified regarding CYP3A4‐mediated interaction by comparing to published clinical DDI study data with carbamazepine, rifampicin, and efavirenz (CYP3A4 inducers). Once verified, the model was applied to predict systemic LNG exposure in normal BMI and obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) with and without co‐administration of itraconazole (competitive CYP3A4 inhibitor) and clarithromycin (mechanism‐based CYP3A4 inhibitor). Total and free LNG exposures, when co‐administered with EE, decreased 2‐fold in the presence of rifampin, whereas they increased 1.5‐fold in the presence of itraconazole. Although changes in total and unbound exposure were decreased in obese women compared with normal BMI women, the relative impact of DDIs on LNG exposure was similar between both groups.

A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial

Objective

The objective was to evaluate the contraceptive effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of a novel vaginal pH regulator over seven cycles of use.

Study design

A single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted across 112 sites in the United States in sexually active 18–35-year-old women at risk of pregnancy. Women administered the study treatment ≤ 1 h before each episode of intercourse. Women recorded use of study drug, coital information, and any symptoms experienced in electronic diaries. The primary outcome was the seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy rate as calculated using the Kaplan–Meier methodology; secondary outcomes included safety. Overall satisfaction was assessed via written questionnaires.

Results

A total of 1384 women were enrolled in the study from July 2017 to November 2018. Mean age was 27.7 ± 4.4 years; most women were white (69.0%). The seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy percentage was 13.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.0%–17.5%], meeting the prespecified primary endpoint of having the upper bound 95% CI ≤ 21%. Most common adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥ 2% of women were vulvovaginal burning sensation, vulvovaginal pruritus, urinary tract infection, vulvovaginal pain, mycotic infection, bacterial vaginosis, and nasopharyngitis. Of 1330 women who used the study drug at least once, fewer than 2% of women discontinued due to any AEs, and < 1% of women discontinued due to genitourinary symptoms. Overall, > 80% of women reported being “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with study treatment.

Conclusions

In this phase 3 study, the novel vaginal pH regulator demonstrated 86.3% contraceptive effectiveness, was safe and well tolerated, and was highly acceptable.

Implications

This novel vaginal pH regulator is a safe, nonhormonal, woman-controlled method of contraception that expands women's options.

A 1-year prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 3 trial of the contraceptive efficacy and safety of the oral progestin-only pill drospirenone 4 mg using a 24/4-day regimen

Objectives

To evaluate contraceptive effectiveness and safety of oral drospirenone 4 mg 24/4-day regimen in the United States.

Study design

We performed a prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase 3 trial in sexually active women for up to thirteen 28-day treatment cycles. Primary outcome was the Pearl index, calculated using confirmed on-drug pregnancies and evaluable cycles in nonbreastfeeding women aged ≤ 35 years. We assessed adverse events (AEs), including hyperkalemia and venous thromboembolism.

Results

Of 1006 women who received at least one dose of drospirenone, 352 women (35.0%) completed the trial and 654 (65.0%) women discontinued before trial end. Most participants (92.2%) were ≤ 35 years; one third had a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m². Among nonbreastfeeding women aged ≤ 35 years, there were 17 pregnancies (Pearl index: 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-6.4; n = 953), of which three were unconfirmed and two were from sites excluded from the main analysis for major breaches of Food and Drug Administration regulations. The Pearl index was 2.9 (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for confirmed pregnancies among 915 nonbreastfeeding women aged ≤ 35 years from sites with no protocol violations. Nearly all (95.4%) treatment-emergent AEs were mild or moderate in intensity. No cases of venous thromboembolism were reported. The frequency of hyperkalemia was 0.5%. Women with baseline systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg had a mean reduction from baseline in blood pressure at exit visit (- 8.5/- 4.9 mmHg; n = 119). No other clinically relevant changes were observed. Participant satisfaction was high.

Conclusion

Drospirenone 4 mg 24/4 regimen provides effective contraception with a good safety/tolerability profile in a broad group of women, including overweight or obese women.

Implications

This new progestin-only contraceptive, drospirenone 4 mg in a 24/4 regimen, provides a contraceptive option for the majority of women regardless of blood pressure or BMI.

Contraception in female travellers: challenges and solutions

Contraception is an important issue for female travelers, but one that is often neglected in the pre-travel consult. Options have expanded in the 21st century. Travel medicine practitioners should have a basic understanding of the choices available to their female patients, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each. This paper will review the contraceptive methods available to female travelers, including newer methods, and discuss emergency contraception options.

Efficacy of the 1-year (13-cycle) segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system: results of two multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials

Background

A ring-shaped, contraceptive vaginal system designed to last 1 year (13 cycles) delivers an average of 0·15 mg segesterone acetate and 0·013 mg ethinylestradiol per day. We evaluated the efficacy of this contraceptive vaginal system and return to menses or pregnancy after use.

Methods

In two identically designed, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials (one at 15 US academic and community sites and one at 12 US and international academic and community sites), participants followed a 21-days-in, 7-days-out segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system schedule for up to 13 cycles. Participants were healthy, sexually active, non-pregnant, non-sterilised women aged 18–40 years. Women were cautioned that any removals during the 21 days of cyclic use should not exceed 2 h, and used daily paper diaries to record vaginal system use. Consistent with regulatory requirements for contraceptives, we calculated the Pearl Index for women aged 35 years and younger, excluding adjunctive contraception cycles, as the primary efficacy outcome measure. We also did intention-to-treat Kaplan-Meier life table analyses and followed up women who did not use hormonal contraceptives or desired pregnancy after study completion for 6 months for return to menses or pregnancy. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00455156 and NCT00263341.

Findings

Between Dec 19, 2006, and Oct 9, 2009, at the 15 US sites, and between Nov 1, 2006, and July 2, 2009, at the 12 US and international sites we enrolled 2278 women. Our overall efficacy analysis included 2265 participants (1130 in the US study and 1135 in the international study) and 1303 (57·5%) participants completed up to 13 cycles. The Pearl Index for the primary efficacy group was 2·98 (95% CI 2·13–4·06) per 100 woman-years, and was well within the range indicative of efficacy for a contraceptive under a woman's control. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the contraceptive vaginal system was 97·5% effective, which provided further evidence of efficacy. Pregnancy occurrence was similar across cycles. All 290 follow-up participants reported return to menses or became pregnant (24 [63%] of 38 women who desired pregnancy) within 6 months.

Interpretation

The segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system is an effective contraceptive for 13 consecutive cycles of use. This new product adds to the contraceptive method mix and the 1-year duration of use means that women do not need to return to the clinic or pharmacy for refills every few months.

Funding

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health, the US Agency for International Development, and the WHO Reproductive Health Research Department.

Published analysis of contraceptive effectiveness of Daysy and DaysyView app is fatally flawed

BACKGROUND

In March 2018, Dr. Martin C. Koch and colleagues published an analysis purporting to measure the effectiveness of the Daysy device and DaysyView app for the prevention of unintended pregnancy. Unfortunately, the analysis was flawed in multiple ways which render the estimates unreliable. Unreliable estimates of contraceptive effectiveness can endanger public health.

MAIN BODY

This commentary details multiple concerns pertaining to the collection and analysis of data in Koch et al. 2018. A key concern pertains to the inappropriate exclusion of all women with fewer than 13 cycles of use from the Pearl Index calculations, which has no basis in standard effectiveness calculations. Multiple additional methodological concerns, as well as prior attempts to directly convey concerns to the manufacturer regarding marketing materials based on prior inaccurate analyses, are also discussed.

CONCLUSION

The Koch et al. 2018 publication produced unreliable estimates of contraceptive effectiveness for the Daysy device and DaysyView app, which are likely substantially higher than the actual contraceptive effectiveness of the device and app. Those estimates are being used in marketing materials which may inappropriately inflate consumer confidence and leave consumers more vulnerable than expected to the risk of unintended pregnancy. Prior attempts to directly convey concerns to the manufacturer of this device were unsuccessful in preventing publication of subsequent inaccurate analyses. To protect public health, concerns with this analysis should be documented in the published literature, the Koch et al. 2018 analysis should be retracted, and marketing materials on contraceptive effectiveness should be subjected to appropriate oversight.

Improving usability and pregnancy rates of a fertility monitor by an additional mobile application: results of a retrospective efficacy study of Daysy and DaysyView app

BACKGROUND

Daysy is a fertility monitor that uses the fertility awareness method by tracking and analyzing the individual menstrual cycle. In addition, Daysy can be connected to the application DaysyView to transfer stored personal data from Daysy to a smartphone or tablet (IOS, Android). This combination is interesting because as it is shown in various studies, the use of apps is increasing patients´ focus on their disease or their health behavior. The aim of this study was to investigate if by the additional use of an App and thereby improved usability of the medical device, it is possible to enhance the typical-use related as well as the method-related pregnancy rates.

RESULT

In the resultant group of 125 women (2076 cycles in total), 2 women indicated that they had been unintentionally pregnant during the use of the device, giving a typical-use related Pearl-Index of 1.3. Counting only the pregnancies which occurred as a result of unprotected intercourse during the infertile (green) phase, we found 1 pregnancy, giving a method-related Pearl-Index of 0.6. Calculating the pregnancy rate resulting from continuous use and unprotected intercourse exclusively on green days, gives a perfect-use Pearl-Index of 0.8.

CONCLUSION

It seems that combining a specific biosensor-embedded device (Daysy), which gives the method a very high repeatable accuracy, and a mobile application (DaysyView) which leads to higher user engagement, results in higher overall usability of the method.

An update on new orally administered contraceptives for women

INTRODUCTION

The focus in contraception is shifting from oral contraceptives to more effective methods, such as implants and intrauterine devices. Generics are favored by third-party payors. As a result, potentially exciting developments in branded pills to increase safety or to reduce side effects may have gone unnoticed.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the features of each of the four new oral contraceptives that have been introduced in the United States and/or Europe in the last few years. The motivation for the development of each product is outlined as is its efficacy, safety, tolerability and the noncontraceptive applications that have been explored are described.

EXPERT OPINION

The hypothesis that using estradiol in place of ethinyl estradiol would reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism is still to be proven. However, the stronger progestogens used in these formulations may offer other tangible benefits for selected women. The new products for extended cycle pill use may have less impact. The flexible regimen can be adopted using any pill, but the approved product does provide convenience to patients. Cost will continue to be the determining factor in the acceptance of these new products, unless substantial health benefits can be conclusively proven.

Efficacy and safety of a 21/7-active combined oral contraceptive with continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol

OBJECTIVE

Substituting low-dose ethinyl estradiol (EE) for the hormone-free interval in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) may enhance ovarian suppression and improve tolerability. This noncomparative phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 21/7-active COC regimen including 21days of desogestrel (DSG)/EE followed by 7days of EE.

STUDY DESIGN

This multicenter, open-label, phase 3, single-arm study enrolled sexually active women aged 18-40years at risk for pregnancy. Women received up to 1year, or 13 consecutive 28-day cycles, of DSG 150mcg/EE 20mcg for 21days and EE 10mcg alone for 7days. Participants kept diaries to record compliance, bleeding/spotting and other contraceptive use. Efficacy was measured using the Pearl Index (PI) and life-table approach. Safety and tolerability were assessed primarily through reported adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 2858 women enrolled and 1680 completed the study. Forty-six pregnancies in 2401 women aged 18-35years occurred after COC initiation and up to 7days after last DSG/EE or EE-only tablet was taken. When cycles in which another contraceptive method was used were excluded, the PI was 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-3.57]. The cumulative pregnancy rate after 1year of treatment was 2.47% (95% CI, 1.85-3.29) for all users aged 18-35years. When only cycles during which women considered compliant were included, the PI was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.39-2.80). AEs were similar to those seen with other oral contraceptives.

CONCLUSIONS

This 21/7-active DSG/EE COC with 7days of low-dose EE was efficacious and well tolerated for pregnancy prevention.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

This phase 3 open-label study demonstrated that a 21/7-active COC regimen including 21days of DSG 150mcg/EE 20mcg and 7days of EE 10mcg was efficacious and well tolerated for pregnancy prevention.

Differences in reporting Pearl Indices in the United States and Europe: Focus on a 91-day extended-regimen combined oral contraceptive with low-dose ethinyl estradiol supplementation

BACKGROUND

Regulatory agencies in the United States (US) and Europe differ in requirements for defining pregnancies after the last dose of oral contraceptive, sometimes resulting in discrepant Pearl Indices (PIs) for the same product despite identical clinical data. This brief report highlights one such example, a 91-day extended-regimen combined oral contraceptive (COC).

METHODS

The US- and European-based PI methodologies were compared for a 91-day extended-regimen COC consisting of 84 days of active levonorgestrel/EE 150 μg/30 μg tablets, followed by seven days of EE 10 μg tablets in place of placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

At the times of approval of the 91-day extended-regimen COC in the US and Europe, the requirements for defining 'on-treatment' pregnancies differed (14-day vs. 2-day rule, respectively). This difference resulted in a higher PI in the US- vs. European-based calculation (1.34 and 0.76, respectively). The differences in the PI should not be interpreted as the extended-regimen COC being less effective in preventing pregnancy in the US compared with Europe.

Extended-Cycle Levonorgestrel/Ethinylestradiol and Low-Dose Ethinylestradiol (Seasonique(®)): A Review of Its Use as an Oral Contraceptive

A 91-day extended-cycle oral contraceptive (OC) consisting of levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol 150/30 µg for 84 days and ethinylestradiol 10 µg for 7 days (Seasonique(®)) has recently been approved for the prevention of pregnancy in adult women in the EU. This regimen allows for a reduction in the number of withdrawal bleeding episodes to four per year, compared with 13 episodes per year with conventional 28-day regimens. Seasonique(®) was effective in preventing pregnancy in a large (n = 1006), noncomparative trial of healthy, sexually active women. In this trial, the overall Pearl index (pregnancies per 100 woman-years of use) in women aged 18-35 years (n = 621) was 0.76 and the Pearl index for method-failure (compliant use) was 0.26. Scheduled (withdrawal) bleeding and/or spotting remained fairly constant over time, with a mean of 2 days of bleeding and 1 day of spotting per each 91-day cycle. Unscheduled bleeding and unscheduled spotting was highest during the first few cycles of use and decreased thereafter. Seasonique(®) was generally well tolerated, with a tolerability profile in line with that expected for OCs. Seasonique(®) extends the contraceptive options currently available to women, particularly in those who desire fewer withdrawal bleeding episodes.

Applying emerging science to contraception research: implications for the clinic

Emerging science will make an important contribution towards the development of improved contraceptives. While long-acting reversible contraceptives remain the most effective method, new user-controlled, mid-acting methods will avoid the need for procedures requiring trained providers. Contraceptives combined with other agents may bring additional health benefits, such as dual protection against both pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. Emerging research areas in proteomics allowed the discovery of new reproductive targets that may lead to non-hormonal contraceptives for both men and women. Current research objectives include the improvement of existing contraceptive methods, as well as discovery of new materials able to deliver new molecules more specifically to their target without systemic actions.

Self-reported and verified compliance in a phase 3 clinical trial of a novel low-dose contraceptive patch and pill

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancy rates in US contraceptive clinical trials are increasing due to decreased treatment compliance. This study compared compliance with a new low-dose levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) contraceptive patch (CP, Twirla™) with that of a low-dose combination oral contraceptive (COC) in a demographically diverse population.

STUDY DESIGN

This analysis was part of an open-label, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3 study that randomized healthy sexually active women (17-40years) to 13cycles of LNG/EE CP or 6cycles of COC, then 7cycles of LNG/EE CP. We defined self-reported compliance as cycles that, according to diaries, show 21days of patch wear without missed days or any patch worn >7days or 21days of pill-taking without missed pill days. We verified compliance by detectable plasma presence of LNG and EE at cycles 2, 6, and 13.

RESULTS

Of the intention-to-treat population with diary information (N=1328, mean age 26.4years, 46% minorities, 33% obese), 10.0% of the CP (n=998) versus 21.2% of the COC group (n=330) self-reported noncompliance after 6cycles (p<.001). Laboratory assessments verified 10-14% of participants in both groups as noncompliant. Self-reported perfect use did not vary between obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥30kg/m(2)] versus nonobese (BMI <30kg/m(2)) participants in both groups or when stratified by age, education, or race/ethnicity in the CP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported compliance was significantly greater in the CP than COC group and did not vary by obesity status. Discrepancies between self-reported and verified compliance question reliability of patient diaries.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

This paper, based on an analysis of a phase 3 trial, shows that compliance was significantly greater with a new weekly transdermal CP than with a once-daily COC in obese as well as nonobese participants. Discrepancies between self-reported compliance and laboratory-verified compliance raise questions regarding the reliability of patient diaries.

We should really keep in touch: predictors of the ability to maintain contact with contraception clinical trial participants over 12 months

OBJECTIVES

This study assesses the ability to maintain contact with participants enrolled in an emergency contraception (EC) trial with 12 months of follow-up based on the modes of contact they provided at enrollment.

STUDY DESIGN

Data came from a clinical trial offering women the copper intrauterine device or oral levonorgestrel for EC. A modified Poisson regression was used to assess predictors associated with the ability to contact study participants 12 months after enrollment.

RESULTS

Data were available for 542 participants; 443 (82%) could be contacted at 12 months. Contact at 12 months was greatest for those whose preferred the method of contact was text messaging, e-mail or any (62/68; 91% contacted) and worst for the 18 who had a landline phone (only 7 contacted; 39%). After controlling for age, having an e-mail address, text messaging, language preference, type of EC chosen and insurance, preferred contact other than phone increased the likelihood of follow-up by 10% [risk ratio (RR) 1.1 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.2], while having a landline reduced a woman's likelihood of being contacted at 12 months by 50% compared to women with a contract cell (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-1.0).

CONCLUSION

The few women with a landline for contact had poor follow-up at 1 year, while women who preferred e-mail or text had the highest rate of follow-up.

IMPLICATIONS

Understanding how best to reduce loss to follow-up is an essential component of conducting a contraceptive clinical trial. Improved participant retention maximizes internal validity and allows for important clinical outcomes, such as pregnancy, to be assessed.

Zoely: a new combined oral contraceptive

▼Zoely is the second estradiol-containing oral contraceptive formulated as an 'extended regimen' (pill-free interval <7 days) to be licensed in the UK. However, unlike the quadraphasic estradiol-containing contraceptive Qlaira, it is a monophasic preparation.1,2 It is postulated that combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing synthetic estradiol, which is structurally identical to endogenous oestrogen,3 are potentially safer and better tolerated than those containing ethinylestradiol, the synthetic oestrogen most commonly used in COCs.4 The progestogen in Zoely is nomegestrol acetate, which is structurally related to progesterone,5 in contrast to the majority of progestogens in COCs that are derived from 19-nortestosterone6 and associated with androgenic effects.7 It is suggested that nomegestrol acetate, with its greater specificity for progesterone receptors, may minimise the potential for androgenic, oestrogenic and glucocorticoid effects.7 The company considers Zoely an option for women "who want a contraceptive with hormones similar to her own", and claims that it has a high level of contraceptive efficacy, produces shorter, lighter periods compared with a 21-day regimen of drospirenone 3mg/ethinylestradiol 30µg (Yasmin) and that most women report no negative impact on weight and skin.8 Here we review the effectiveness and place of Zoely.

Different Pearl Indices in studies of hormonal contraceptives in the United States: impact of study population

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of subject characteristics on efficacy as measured by the Pearl Index (PI) in clinical trials and to make study populations similar by matching.

METHODS

Our analysis used US data from four large Phase III studies. We compared results from one fertility control patch study with pooled data from three studies with virtually identical design on oral hormonal contraceptives. First, we identified three characteristics that had the most impact on the PI. Second, we used these three variables and matched subjects from the patch study with those from the oral contraceptive (OC) studies. Finally, we calculated the PIs for matched and unmatched subjects from both the patch study and the OC studies.

RESULTS

A total of 3706 subjects were included in our analysis. The variables 'Hispanic ethnicity', 'previous pregnancy' and 'previous use of hormonal contraceptives' had the most impact on the PI. The PIs for the matched patch cohort and the matched OC cohort were 2.97 and 2.48, respectively. Those for the unmatched patch cohort and the unmatched OC cohort were 10.17 and 0.90, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Subject characteristics strongly influence the PI in clinical studies of hormonal contraceptives. In particular, Hispanic ethnicity, previous pregnancies and no previous use of hormonal contraceptives result in a higher PI.

IMPLICATIONS

PIs from different clinical trials cannot be meaningfully compared unless subject characteristics that have most impact on the PI are similar or are made to be similar statistically as we did here by matching.

Comparison of rates of and charges from pregnancy complications in users of extended and cyclic combined oral contraceptive (COC) regimens: a brief report

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate pregnancy complication rates and related charges in users of 84/7, 21/7 and 24/4 combined oral contraceptives (COCs).

STUDY DESIGN

Data were obtained from the i3 InVision Data Mart™ retrospective claims database. Subjects were aged 15-40 years, first prescribed a COC between 1/1/2006 and 4/1/2011 and continuously insured for ≥1 year. 84/7 users were matched 1:1 to 21/7 and 24/4 users.

RESULTS

Pregnancy-related complication rates and associated charges were significantly lower with 84/7 vs. 21/7 and 24/4 regimens.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary data suggest 84/7 regimens may be associated with fewer pregnancy complications and lower related charges.