Telemedicine for contraceptive counseling: Patient experiences during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City

Use of telemedicine to obtain contraception among young adults: Inequities by health insurance

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to describe the use of telemedicine for contraception in a sample of young adults and examine differences by health insurance coverage.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed survey data collected from May 2020 to July 2022 from individuals at risk of pregnancy aged 18 to 29 recruited at 29 community colleges in California and Texas. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models with random effects for site and individual to compare the use of telemedicine to obtain contraception by insurance status, sociodemographic characteristics, and state.

RESULTS

Our analytic sample included 6465 observations from 1630 individuals. Participants reported using a contraceptive method obtained through telemedicine in just 6% of observations. Uninsured participants were significantly less likely than those privately insured to use contraception obtained through telemedicine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.97), as were participants who did not know their insurance status (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29-0.99). Texas participants were less likely to use contraception obtained via telemedicine than those in California (aOR, 0.42; CI: 0.25-0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Few young people in this study obtained contraception through telemedicine, and insurance was crucial for access in both states.

IMPLICATIONS

Although telemedicine holds promise for increasing contraceptive access, we found that few young adults were using it, particularly among the uninsured. Efforts are needed to improve young adults' access to telemedicine for contraception and address insurance disparities.

Social determinants of choosing telemedicine for contraceptive care: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Compare demographic characteristics and contraception choices among individuals seeking contraception care via telemedicine versus in-person.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of contraception visits from June-September 2021 at Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest. We assessed demographics and contraception choices. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate effect of language, age, income, having children, and insurance type on choosing telemedicine.

RESULTS

We included 16,855 patients: 2383 (14.1%) telemedicine visits and 14,472 (85.9%) in-person visits; 149/2383 (6.3%) non-English speakers used telemedicine compared to 1194/14,472 (8.3%) who used in-person care. A higher proportion of the telemedicine cohort had public insurance compared to the in-person cohort (2312/2383 [97.0%] telemedicine vs 11,646/14,472 [80.5%] in-person). Among the telemedicine cohort, a higher proportion of patients chose a barrier method (691/2363 [29.2%] telemedicine vs 1564/14,215 [11.0%] in-person) and short-acting method (1248/2363 [52.8%] telemedicine vs 5834/14,215 [41.0%] in-person) compared to in-person. A higher proportion of in-person patients chose long-acting reversible contraception (2681/14,215 [18.9%] in-person vs 179/2363 [7.6%] telemedicine) and injection (3779/14,215 [26.6%] in-person vs 115/2363 [4.9%] telemedicine) compared to telemedicine. Speaking Spanish was associated with decreased odds of choosing telemedicine after adjusting for covariates (aOR 0.53 [95% CI 0.44-0.64], p < 0.001). Older age, having children, lower income, and public insurance were associated with increased odds of choosing telemedicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine for contraception visits was associated with language, age, parity, income, and insurance. Despite small absolute difference in the proportion of patients that speak Spanish, in adjusted multivariate analysis speaking Spanish was associated with lower odds of choosing telemedicine.

IMPLICATIONS

Increasing access for people with limited technology as well as those who prefer non-English languages is essential to promote equitable reproductive care. Prospective research that focuses on patient experience and preferences is needed to better guide access to equitable, person-centered contraception care.

Telemedicine for Adolescent and Young Adult Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Post-insertion Visits: Outcomes over 1 Year

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Telemedicine for long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) care is understudied given the rapid implementation of these services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared outcomes over 1 year of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) attending a LARC post-insertion visit via telemedicine vs in person.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Four academic adolescent medicine clinics in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

AYAs (ages 13-26 years) who received LARC between 4/1/20 and 3/1/21 and attended a post-insertion visit within 12 weeks.

INTERVENTIONS

none.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes over 1 year were compared between AYAs who completed this visit via telemedicine vs in person. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and regression models.

RESULTS

Of 194 AYAs (ages 13.9-25.7 years) attending a post-insertion visit, 40.2% utilized telemedicine. Menstrual management (odds ratio (OR) = 1.02; confidence interval (CI): 0.40-2.60), acne management (P = .28), number of visits attended (relative risk (RR) = 1.08; CI: 0.99-1.19), and LARC removal (P = .95) were similar between groups. AYAs attending via telemedicine were less likely than those attending in person to have STI testing (P = .001). Intrauterine device expulsion or malposition and arm symptoms with implant in situ were rare outcomes in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Roughly 40% of AYAs attended a post-insertion visit via telemedicine during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and had similar 1-year outcomes as those attending in person. The decreased likelihood of STI testing for those using telemedicine highlights the need to provide alternative options, when indicated, such as asynchronous or home testing. Our results support the use of telemedicine for AYA LARC post-insertion care and identify potential gaps in telemedicine care which can help improve clinic protocols.

Medical management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol in emergency departments compared to a Complex Family Planning office: Implementation of a COVID-19 institutional policy change

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the implementation of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical management of early pregnancy loss (EPL) in emergency departments (EDs) by comparing efficacy, complication, and follow-up rates for patients treated in EDs to the Complex Family Planning (CFP) outpatient office.

STUDY DESIGN

In COVID-19's first wave, we expanded medical management of EPL to our EDs. This retrospective study evaluated 72 patients receiving mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021, comparing treatment success, safety outcomes, and follow-up rates by location.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (46%) patients received care in the ED and 39 (54%) at CFP. Treatment success was lower in EDs (23, 70%) compared to CFP (34, 87%), but after adjusting for insurance status and pregnancy type (miscarriage, uncertain viability, unknown location), this was not significant: adjusted odds ratio 0.48 (95% CI 0.13-1.81). More ED patients underwent emergent interventions (3 vs 0) including two emergent uterine aspirations, one uterine artery embolization, and two blood transfusions. Two cases were attributed to misdiagnosis (cesarean scar and cervical ectopic pregnancies interpreted as incomplete miscarriages) and one to guideline nonadherence. No complications occurred in the CFP group. Follow-up rates were over 80% in both groups. More ED patients engaged in telehealth follow-up (67% vs 18%, p ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this small sample, we observed a trend toward less successful treatment in the ED compared to the CFP office. Both correctly making uncommon diagnoses and adhering to new guidelines presented implementation challenges.

IMPLICATIONS

Implementing mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL in our EDs achieved lower rates of pregnancy resolution compared to outpatient management. Complex uncommon diagnoses and implementing new care pathways in EDs may have contributed to complications and highlighted opportunities for improvement. Additional studies are needed to further quantify safety outcomes for EPL management in EDs.

Changes in Commercial Insurance Claims for Contraceptive Services During the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic-United States, January 2019-September 2020

OBJECTIVE

We describe changes in commercial insurance claims for contraceptive services during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We analyzed commercial insurance claims using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus data from more than 9 million U.S. females aged 15-49 years, enrolled during any month, January 2019 through September 2020. We calculated monthly rates of outpatient claims for intrauterine devices (IUDs), implants, and injectable contraception and monthly rates of pharmacy claims for contraceptive pills, patches, and rings. We used Joinpoint regression analysis to identify when statistically significant changes occurred in trends of monthly claims rates for each contraceptive method. We calculated monthly percentages of claims for contraceptive counseling via telehealth.

RESULTS

Monthly claims rates decreased for IUDs (-50%) and implants (-43%) comparing February 2020 with April 2020 but rebounded by June 2020. Monthly claims rates for injectables decreased (-19%) comparing January 2019 with September 2020, and monthly claims rates for pills, patches, and rings decreased (-22%) comparing July 2019 with September 2020. The percentage of claims for contraceptive counseling occurring via telehealth was low (<1%) in 2019, increased to 34% in April 2020, and decreased to 9-12% in June-September 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial changes in commercial insurance claims for contraceptive services occurred during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, including transient decreases in IUD and implant claims and increases in telehealth contraceptive counseling claims. Contraceptive claims data can be used by decision makers to identify service gaps and evaluate use of interventions like telehealth to improve contraceptive access, including during public health emergencies.

Confidentiality and privacy considerations for adolescents receiving contraceptive health services via telemedicine: A narrative review

Confidential medical care for adolescent patients is essential as they are likely to forgo needed care if privacy cannot be maintained. The use of telemedicine for adolescent health has rapidly expanded due to the COVID-19 pandemic and can increase access to important services like reproductive care; however, it has raised challenges for providers, patients, and their parents/guardians related to confidentiality and privacy. Health care providers are often uncertain about the laws and regulations that govern confidential services including the 21st Century Cures Act. Through a narrative review of studies on confidentiality and telemedicine, this article seeks to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations on maintaining privacy during virtual encounters and identify current best practices for prescribing contraception via telemedicine.

Development of a communication-based virtual patient counseling objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for first year student pharmacists

Objective

This text seeks to describe a framework for delivering and executing a virtual patient counseling OSCE and compare student performance to the in-person alternative.

Methods

A communication-based virtual patient counseling objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was created to fulfill the educational outcomes of a previously held in-person OSCE in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The virtual nature of this OSCE simulated a telehealth encounter, which has increased in utilization since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. This OSCE was offered twice in one semester - once as a formative assessment and once as a summative assessment. Student performance was mapped to learning outcomes and compared the previous year's in person performance.

Results

The described virtual framework for executing the OSCE successfully decreased the time required and saw <1% change in overall performance from students when compared to the previous year in person which was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

This framework for a virtual communication-based OSCE reduces time with a negligible impact on student performance compared to the in person alternative.

Innovation

This work describes a telehealth virtual patient counseling model to replace the traditional patient counseling OSCE in pharmacy education with comparable outcomes.

Comparison of interpersonal quality of contraceptive counseling delivered via telehealth versus in person

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the interpersonal quality of contraceptive counseling between telehealth and in-person visits.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients at a single Title X-funded clinic selected their preferred counseling modality (in person or telehealth via video or telephone) when scheduling an appointment for contraception. After counseling, we invited patients to complete a survey and recorded their desired contraceptive method. We assessed the quality of counseling using the Interpersonal Quality in Family Planning scale. We reviewed the electronic medical record to identify any subsequent clinician visit. We performed between-group comparisons using Mann-Whitney U, χ2, and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

From March 2021 to June 2022, 360 patients were eligible to participate, and 296 (82%) completed the survey and were included in the analysis; 150 (51%) completed counseling in person, and 146 (49%) completed counseling via telehealth. In the telehealth group, 102 (70%) chose telephone, and 44 (30%) chose video. Respondent characteristics were similar between groups. The majority of respondents in both groups reported high quality of counseling, defined as a top score on the Interpersonal Quality in Family Planning scale (75.0% telehealth respondents and 80.0% in person, p = 0.30). Compared to respondents completing in-person counseling, telehealth respondents were less likely to have a subsequent clinician visit (89.0% versus 100.0%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of respondents reported high-quality contraceptive counseling without significant difference between the modalities. However, respondents choosing telehealth were less likely to have a subsequent clinician visit. Given the higher uptake of telephone compared to video, telehealth via telephone may be more accessible or acceptable to some patients.

IMPLICATIONS

Contraceptive counseling via telehealth has similar high interpersonal quality when compared to traditional, in-person visits. However, barriers may exist for patients who choose telehealth contraceptive counseling to access subsequent in-person care. Utilization of telehealth for contraceptive visits may provide opportunities for more equitable health care and to expand contraceptive access.

Pharmacist prescribed hormonal contraceptives in New York State: Is there a need and an interest?

BACKGROUND

Hormonal contraceptives are a popular option for pregnancy prevention and other indications and require a prescription. Since 2013, 24 states have given pharmacists legal authority to initiate self-administered hormonal contraceptives, allowing for direct pharmacy access (DPA). New York State (NYS) did not allow for DPA of any hormonal contraceptives during the survey period, but passed a bill in 2023 allowing pharmacists to dispense hormonal contraceptives in accordance with a nonpatient-specific order.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize the experiences, perceptions, and knowledge of access to and DPA to hormonal contraceptives.

METHODS

A survey was developed to gather responses to demographic- and opinion-related questions and administered online using the Pollfish survey platform. Participants were women between the ages of 16 and 44 years who lived in NYS. To ensure geographic representation, at least one response was gathered from each of the 27 NYS congressional districts. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in hormonal contraceptive use by patient demographics.

RESULTS

Most of the 500 respondents reported past (76.2%) or current/planned (76.8%) use of hormonal contraceptives. Older age (P = 0.033) and higher income (P = 0.0016) were associated with significantly greater rates of use. The most common challenges when visiting a provider for birth control included needing to schedule an appointment and wait times at the provider. Almost three-quarters of respondents (72.6%) were not aware that pharmacists could initiate contraceptives in other states, and 74.2% reported feeling comfortable with a pharmacist prescribing and dispensing hormonal contraceptives.

CONCLUSION

Contraceptive initiation by pharmacists would be acceptable to most respondents, but there is room for increased acceptance based on patient education and experience. DPA to hormonal contraceptives may eliminate some of the barriers identified in this survey.

Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on contraception use in France

To limit the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19), sanitary restrictions have been established since March 2020 in France. These restrictions and the waves of contamination may have had consequences on the use of health products in general, and on the use of contraceptives in particular. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID 19 pandemic from March 16th 2020 to April 30th 2021 in France on reimbursed contraceptives. We analyzed data from the French national health insurance database (SNDS) by extracting all oral contraception (OC), emergency contraception (EC), levonorgestrel-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), copper-intrauterine device (C-IUD) and contraceptive implant dispensations in 2018, 2019, 2020 and to April 30th 2021. We computed the expected use of contraceptives in 2020 and 2021 without pandemic and its associated sanitary restrictions, by taking the annual trend into account. We assessed the evolution of dispensations by type of contraceptive and by age-groups (≤25 years old, between 25 and 35 and >35 years old) between observed and expected dispensations. After 15 months of pandemic, a decrease of all reimbursed contraceptives dispensations had been estimated, compared with what was expected: -2.0% for OC, -5.0% for EC, -9.5% for LNG-IUS, -8.6% for C-IUD, -16.4% for implant. Women under 25 years old were the most impacted by the decrease. This national study showed that the impact of the COVID 19 crisis was global on all reimbursed contraceptives, with different levels of impact depending on the type of contraceptive, the age-group and the severity of the restriction. OC dispensing decreased marginally compared with expectations. The decrease in long-acting contraceptives dispensing was more pronounced, especially for the implant. These results call for continued monitoring of contraceptive use over the long term and for prioritizing access to sexual health services during crises, especially among the youngest women who were most affected in this study.

Adolescent Perspectives on the Use of Telemedicine for Confidential Health Care: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study

PURPOSE

Telemedicine can improve access to adolescent health care, but adolescents may experience barriers to accessing this care confidentially. Gender-diverse youth (GDY) may especially benefit from telemedicine through increased access to geographically limited adolescent medicine subspecialty care but may have unique confidentiality needs. In an exploratory analysis, we examined adolescents' perceived acceptability, preferences, and self-efficacy related to using telemedicine for confidential care.

METHODS

We surveyed 12- to 17-year-olds following a telemedicine visit with an adolescent medicine subspecialist. Open-ended questions assessing acceptability of telemedicine for confidential care and opportunities to enhance confidentiality were qualitatively analyzed. Likert-type questions assessing preference for future use of telemedicine for confidential care and self-efficacy to complete components of telemedicine visits confidentially were summarized and compared across cisgender versus GDY.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 88) included 57 GDY and 28 cisgender females. Factors affecting the acceptability of telemedicine for confidential care related to patient location, telehealth technology, adolescent-clinician relationships, and quality or experience of care. Perceived opportunities to protect confidentiality included using headphones, secure messaging, and prompting from clinicians. Most participants (53/88) were likely or very likely to use telemedicine for future confidential care, but self-efficacy for completing components of telemedicine visits confidentially varied by component.

DISCUSSION

Adolescents in our sample were interested in using telemedicine for confidential care, but cisgender and GDY recognized threats to confidentiality that may reduce acceptability of telemedicine for these services. Clinicians and health systems should carefully consider youth's preferences and unique confidentiality needs to ensure equitable access, uptake, and outcomes of telemedicine.

Acceptability of telemedicine for follow up after contraceptive implant initiation at an obstetrics and gynecologic training center

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has become a popular adjunct to in-person visits, including for family planning services. This study determined the proportion of clients participated in telemedicine services and the association between sociodemographic factors and telemedicine participation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The adverse effects within the first seven days post-insertion were also reported.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study considered data from all women initiating contraceptive implantation between June 2020 and August 2021 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Clients were offered the following two options for follow-up visits: in-person or communication via an online LINE® Official Account (LINE® OA), a free chat application widely used among the Thais. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between socio-demographic factors and telehealth usage.

RESULTS

In total, 574 of 947 (60.6%) clients participated in telemedicine follow-up services during the period considered. A significant association between telemedicine usage and the following were observed: the peak of second wave COVID-19 outbreak in Thailand, using the period preceding the second wave as a reference [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.96)]; participants receiving governmental benefits for contraceptive implant payment (aOR: 3.23, 95% CI: 1.86-5.60), and timing of contraceptive implant(s) initiation, using interval insertion as a reference for which aORs of postpartum and immediate postpartum insertions were 0.62 (95% CI: 0.43-0.90) and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.24-0.52), respectively. Significant ecchymosis at the insertion site was observed in 13.1% of participants.

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the significance of telemedicine during the COVID-19 epidemic, particularly in facilitating contraceptive implant initiation. Our data show a significant increase in the uptake and utilization of telemedicine during the pandemic's peak. The data also shows that during the period of Thailand's second COVID-19 epidemic, government benefits for contraceptive implant payment, and the timing of contraceptive implant initiation, are significantly associated with telemedicine use. This finding supports the continued use of telemedicine in healthcare, particularly for services like family planning, where remote follow-ups can provide safe, efficient, and timely care.

Contraceptive care in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: A social media survey of contraceptive access, telehealth use and telehealth quality

OBJECTIVES

To examine demographic, socioeconomic, and regional differences in contraceptive access, differences between telehealth and in-person contraception visits, and telehealth quality in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

STUDY DESIGN

We surveyed reproductive-age women about contraception visits during the COVID-19 pandemic via social media in July 2020 and January 2021. We used multivariable regression to examine relationships between age, racial/ethnic identity, educational attainment, income, insurance type, region, and COVID-19 related hardship, and ability to obtain a contraceptive appointment, telehealth vs in-person visits, and telehealth quality scores.

RESULTS

Among 2031 respondents seeking a contraception visit, 1490 (73.4%) reported any visit, of which 530 (35.6%) were telehealth. In adjusted analyses, lower odds of any visit was associated with Hispanic/Latinx and Mixed race/Other identity (aOR 0.59 [0.37-0.94], aOR 0.36 [0.22-0.59], respectively), the South, Midwest, Northeast (aOR 0.63 [0.47-0.85], aOR 0.64 [0.46-0.90], aOR 0.52 [CI 0.36-0.75], respectively), no insurance (aOR 0.63 [0.43-0.91]), greater COVID-19 hardship (aOR 0.52 [0.31-0.87]), and earlier pandemic timing (January 2021 vs July 2020 aOR 2.14 [1.69-2.70]). Respondents from the Midwest and South had lower odds of telehealth vs in-person care (aOR 0.63 [0.44-0.88], aOR 0.54 [0.40-0.72], respectively). Hispanic/Latinx respondents and those in the Midwest had lower odds of high telehealth quality (aOR 0.37 [0.17-0.80], aOR 0.58 [0.35-0.95], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We found inequities in contraceptive care access, less telehealth use for contraception visits in the South and Midwest, and lower telehealth quality among Hispanic/Latinx people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should focus on telehealth access, quality, and patients' preferences.

IMPLICATIONS

Historically marginalized groups have faced disproportionate barriers to contraceptive care, and telehealth for contraceptive care has not been employed equitably during the COVID-19 pandemic. Though telehealth has the potential to improve access to care, inequitable implementation could exacerbate existing disparities.

Remote Provision of Medication Abortion and Contraception Through Telemedicine

This Narrative Review describes the remote provision of family planning services, including medication abortion and contraception, through telemedicine. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was a catalyst to shift toward telemedicine to maintain and expand access to crucial reproductive health services when public health measures necessitated social distancing. There are legal and political considerations when providing medication abortion through telemedicine, along with unique challenges, even more so after the Dobbs decision starkly limited options for much of the country. This review includes the literature describing the logistics of telemedicine and modes of delivery for medication abortion and details special considerations for contraceptive counseling. Health care professionals should feel empowered to adopt telemedicine practices to provide family planning services to their patients.

A review of questionnaires used for the assessment of telemedicine

INTRODUCTION

Telemedicine is the exchange of medical information from one site to another via electronic communications with the goal of improving a patient's clinical health status. Prior studies have identified the absence of a standardized assessment tool for evaluating telemedicine encounters. This study aims to collect and to analyze questionnaires used for the assessment of audiovisual telemedicine encounters from a patient perspective and aims to identify reasons driving the use of self-developed questionnaires.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in PubMed for studies that used survey questionnaires to assess synchronous audiovisual telemedicine encounters from 2016 to 2021. We categorized questionnaires used into validated and non-validated types, and for each of them, collected questions, response format, author, year, specialty, and country of publication.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We analyzed a total of 71 articles. We found that only 16 studies used three validated questionnaires. The remaining 55 studies used non-validated questionnaires. Non-validated questionnaires had a high variability in length and used Likert scales, binary responses, multiple choice, and open-ended answers. We found only eight studies in which the authors gave a reason for resorting to designing their own questionnaires. This review reveals insufficient standardized survey questionnaires to be used for the assessment of audiovisual telemedicine encounters. Future research initiatives should focus on developing a standardized and validated instrument well accepted by researchers.

Pharmacists' role in detection and evaluation of adverse drug reactions: Developing proactive systems for pharmacosurveillance

PURPOSE

To identify current challenges in detection of medication-related symptoms, and review technology-based opportunities to increase the patient-centeredness of postmarketing pharmacosurveillance to promote more accountable, safer, patient-friendly, and equitable medication prescribing.

SUMMARY

Pharmacists have an important role to play in detection and evaluation of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The pharmacist's role in medication management should extend beyond simply dispensing drugs, and this article delineates the rationale and proactive approaches for pharmacist detection and assessment of ADRs. We describe a stepwise approach for assessment, best practices, and lessons learned from a pharmacist-led randomized trial, the CEDAR (Calling for Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions) project.

CONCLUSION

Health systems need to be redesigned to more fully utilize health information technologies and pharmacists in detecting and responding to ADRs.

Is the COVID-19 Pandemic Continuing to Impact Sexual and Reproductive Health Services for Adolescents? Findings From a 2021 Survey of US Physicians

PURPOSE

We examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Fall 2021 on sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services among physicians whose practice provided these services to adolescents just before the pandemic.

METHODS

Data were from the DocStyles online panel survey administered September-November 2021 to US physicians who reported their practice provided SRH services to adolescent patients before the pandemic (n = 948). We calculated prevalence of service delivery challenges (e.g., limited long-acting reversible contraception services) and use of strategies to support access (e.g., telehealth) in the month prior to survey completion, compared these estimates with prevalence "at any point during the COVID-19 pandemic", and examined differences by physician specialty and adolescent patient volume.

RESULTS

Fewer physicians reported their practice experienced service delivery challenges in the month prior to survey completion than at any point during the pandemic. About 10% indicated limited long-acting reversible contraception and sexually transmitted infection testing services in the prior month overall; prevalence varied by physician specialty (e.g., 26% and 17%, respectively by service, among internists). Overall, about 25% of physicians reported reductions in walk-in hours, weekend/evening hours, and adolescents seeking care in the prior month. While most practices that initiated strategies supporting access to services during the pandemic used such strategies in the prior month, some practices (22%-37% depending on the strategy) did not.

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest some physicians who serve adolescents continued to experience challenges providing SRH services in the Fall 2021, and some discontinued strategies to support access that had been initiated during the pandemic.

Telemedicine for Adolescent and Young Adult Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Follow-Up Care amidst a Global Pandemic

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe adolescent and young adult (AYA) long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) follow-up care via telemedicine in the year following the COVID-19 pandemic onset DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study SETTING: Three academic adolescent medicine clinics in the United States PARTICIPANTS: AYAs using LARC INTERVENTIONS: None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were patient characteristics, visit information (frequency, timing, and modality), patient-reported symptoms, and outcomes for those presenting for LARC follow-up care between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample. χ² tests and t tests were used to compare groups. Adjusted logistic regression models using general estimating equations were applied to assess factors associated with telemedicine visits and to examine visit outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 319 AYAs (ages 13.6-25.7 years), 40.1% attended at least one LARC telemedicine visit. Patients attending any telemedicine encounter vs only in-person visits had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Of the 426 follow-up visits, 270 (63.4%) were conducted in person and 156 (36.6%) were performed via telemedicine. Most visits (62.7%) occurred within 12 months of device insertion. Reports of bothersome uterine bleeding beyond patient expectations (OR = 1.26; 95% CI, 0.80-1.96), any symptom (OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.94-2.10), or 2 or more symptoms (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.67-2.22) at follow-up was not associated, positively or negatively, with mode of follow-up. Management of bleeding (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 0.56-2.89), management of acne (P = .46), and need for rapid follow-up (P = .33) were similar between follow-up modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient demographic/clinical characteristics and visit outcomes were similar between telemedicine and in-person LARC follow-up. Telemedicine could play an important role in AYA LARC care.

Perceived Access to Contraception via Telemedicine Among Young Adults: Inequities by Food and Housing Insecurity

BACKGROUND

Telemedicine expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, including for contraceptive services. Data are needed to understand whether young people can access telemedicine for contraception, especially in underserved populations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare young people's perceived access to telemedicine visits for contraception during the COVID-19 pandemic by food and housing insecurity.

DESIGN

Supplementary study to a cluster randomized controlled trial in 25 community colleges in California and Texas. Online surveys were administered May 2020 to April 2021. Mixed-effects logistic regression models with random effects for site were used to examine differences in access to contraception through telemedicine by food and housing insecurity status, controlling for key sociodemographic characteristics, including race/ethnicity, non-English primary language, health insurance status, and state of residence, and contraceptive method used.

PARTICIPANTS

1,414 individuals assigned female at birth aged 18-28.

MAIN MEASURES

Survey measures were used to capture how difficult it would be for a participant to have a telemedicine visit (phone or video) for contraception.

KEY RESULTS

Twenty-nine percent of participants were food insecure, and 15% were housing insecure. Nearly a quarter (24%) stated that it would be difficult to have a phone or video visit for contraception. After accounting for sociodemographic factors and type of method used, food insecure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62-2.91) and housing insecure (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.13-2.33) participants were significantly more likely to report that it would be difficult to use telemedicine for contraception during the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Underserved patients are those who could benefit most from the expansion of telemedicine services, yet our findings show that young people experiencing basic needs insecurity perceive the greatest difficulty accessing these services for essential reproductive care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03519685.

Telehealth for Women's Preventive Services for Reproductive Health and Intimate Partner Violence: a Comparative Effectiveness Review

BACKGROUND

Telehealth delivery of preventive health services may improve access to care; however, its effectiveness and adverse effects are unknown. We conducted a comparative effectiveness review on the effectiveness and harms of telehealth interventions for women's reproductive health and intimate partner violence (IPV) services.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus for English-language studies (July 2016 to May 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of telehealth strategies for women's reproductive health and IPV versus usual care. Two investigators identified studies and abstracted data using a predefined protocol. Study quality was assessed using study design-specific standardized methods; disagreements were resolved through consensus.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs, 1 nonrandomized trial, and 7 observational studies (n=10 731) were included (7 studies of contraceptive care and 9 of IPV services). Telehealth interventions to supplement contraceptive care demonstrated similar rates as usual care for contraceptive use, sexually transmitted infections, and pregnancy (low strength of evidence [SOE]); evidence on abortion was insufficient. Outcomes were also similar between telehealth interventions to replace or supplement IPV services and comparators for repeat IPV, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, fear of partner, coercive control, self-efficacy, and safety behaviors (low SOE). In these studies, telehealth barriers included limited internet access, digital literacy, technical challenges, and confidentiality concerns. Strategies to ensure safety increased telehealth use for IPV services. Evidence on access, health equity, or harms was lacking.

DISCUSSION

Telehealth interventions for contraceptive care and IPV services demonstrate equivalent clinical and patient-reported outcomes versus in-person care, although few studies are available. Effective approaches for delivering these services and how to best mobilize telehealth, particularly for women facing barriers to care remain uncertain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021282298.

Client experiences with telehealth using LINE for consultation and assessment of adverse effects of contraceptive implants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand

Objective

This study aimed to examine clients' experiences with telehealth use for contraceptive implant consultation.

Methods

An online, self-administered survey was conducted with women who used contraceptive implants and faced adverse effects, inquired about side effects, or had concerns. Clients received consultations via LINE, which is a free chat application widely used in Thailand. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding their experiences and satisfaction within 7 days after using the service and a follow-up questionnaire to inquire about the need for in-person services 30 days after using the service.

Results

The participants were 200 women, with a response rate of 82%. Overall, 94% of participants were satisfied with the consultation. Moreover, 37.5% received a message response within 6 hours, and most (89.5%) got a response within 24 hours. The three most frequently reported symptoms were abnormal bleeding or spotting, mood swings, and itching or pain at the surgical site. Most adverse effects were managed through online consultation. Approximately one-third of the participants required in-person visits 30 days after telehealth consultation.

Conclusions

Telehealth consultation for contraceptive implant follow-up resulted in high client satisfaction. Most adverse effects could be managed using telehealth services. Therefore, telehealth could ensure sustained accessibility to reproductive healthcare during and post-COVID-19.

Publicly Funded Family Planning Organizations' Response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Texas

INTRODUCTION

After the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the use of family planning services decreased, but there are limited data on how safety net providers were affected.

METHODS

Between November 2020 and March 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with administrators at health departments, federally qualified health centers and specialized family planning organizations across Texas about pandemic-related changes in family planning services. We analyzed interview transcripts using an inductive thematic approach.

RESULTS

Administrators at the 19 participating organizations described pervasive service disruptions. Some organizations closed for 6-8 weeks at the pandemic's onset owing to safety uncertainties and difficulty interpreting Texas' March 2020 executive order prohibiting "nonessential" medical services; others later suspended services after staff exposures. Health departments and federally qualified health centers commonly decreased family planning services to focus on coronavirus disease 2019 response, leaving specialized family planning organizations to absorb displaced reproductive health care clients. Some of the advantages of service delivery modifications-including telehealth, curbside and drive-through prescription pickup, and medication by mail-were difficult to realize; barriers included low reimbursement, necessary patient examinations, and clients' confidentiality concerns and lack of technological resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Texas' diverse network of family planning organizations illustrated a range of responses to the pandemic, and organizations often focused on their core missions-public health, primary care, or family planning.

A Content Analysis of Reddit Users' Posts about Challenges to Contraceptive care-seeking during COVID-19-related Restrictions in the United States

The COVID-19 pandemic in the United States caused disruptions in care seeking and delivery during the spring of 2020, including for contraceptive care. We examined how some individuals experienced and responded to barriers to accessing contraceptive care by conducting a content analysis of relevant Reddit posts. We collected 2666 posts by scraping relevant subreddits from February 1, 2020, to April 15, 2020, and filtering by selected keywords. Among the 101 posts on contraception and the COVID-19 pandemic, we explored three main themes: barriers to accessing general healthcare during the early pandemic, problems and concerns specific to contraceptive use, and attempts to navigate the obstacles to contraceptive care or use-related concerns. The Reddit posts demonstrated the disruptive force the early pandemic had on contraceptive care and provided a unique window into the concerns posters expressed on Reddit during this time. Many posters asked questions related to accessing contraception and side effects and sought reassurance from these online forums. Our results suggest that there were barriers to accessing reliable, high-quality, and evidence-based information about contraception during this disruption in care. The findings also underscore that conversational and interactive means of seeking out information are important modes for learning about and discussing contraception for some and may be especially helpful during clinic closures and other restrictions on access.

"I totally didn't need to be there in person": New York women's preferences for telehealth consultations for sexual and reproductive healthcare in primary care

BACKGROUND

Expanding telehealth in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic supported patients with needed sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH) for continuity of care and reproductive autonomy. While telehealth for SRH is feasible and acceptable, studies have not explored patient preferences towards telehealth SRH from primary care settings.

OBJECTIVE

We explore New York women's preferences for telehealth SRH in primary care.

METHODS

In 2021, we conducted 5 focus groups and 8 interviews with New York women of reproductive age who had a consultation with a primary care provider in the last year as part of a larger study on assessing SRH quality in primary care. We queried on experiences with telehealth for SRH and perceptions of measuring SRH quality in primary care telehealth consultations. We employed reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We recruited 30 participants. They preferred telehealth for "basic" SRH conversations, such as contraceptive counselling, and desired in-person consultations for "complex" topics, like pregnancy and preconception, especially if nulliparous. Telehealth benefits included convenience, simplicity of some SRH needs, and alleviating power dynamics in patient-provider relationships. Challenges included lack of one-on-one connection, seriousness of pregnancy discussions, privacy, and internet access. Measuring quality of telehealth SRH should include fostering positive and engaging environments.

CONCLUSION

Participants find telehealth SRH in primary care preferable, underscoring the importance of offering and expanding this care. As telehealth SRH expands, providers should strengthen quality by building rapport to facilitate conversations on "serious" topics and their ability to help patients remotely.

Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendations: Contraceptive Care in the Context of Pandemic Response

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed a burden to healthcare systems around the world and has changed the way people access health services, including contraception. This document sets forth guidance from the Society of Family Planning for providing contraceptive care in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, including when access to healthcare is restricted due to pandemic response. It also outlines the role of telehealth for providing contraceptive care beyond the pandemic. Clinicians can use synchronous telemedicine visits and other forms of telehealth to provide many aspects of contraceptive care. Both audio-video and audio-only visits are acceptable forms of telemedicine. Access to permanent contraception should be maintained, especially in the postpartum period. Combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) users who have asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection may continue their contraceptive method, while those admitted to the hospital with severe infection should suspend CHC use until they are clinically recovered. CHC users who take Paxlovid for mild-moderate COVID-19 infection can consider a back-up contraceptive method for the duration of therapy, but clinically relevant drug interactions are unlikely. Future research should examine contraceptive outcomes in people who receive care via telemedicine; and access to telemedicine among historically excluded populations such as adolescents, people of color, people of low socioeconomic status, disabled people, or people who do not speak English as a primary language.

"This has definitely opened the doors": Provider perceptions of patient experiences with telemedicine for contraception in Illinois

CONTEXT

The COVID-19 pandemic increased the provision of contraception through telemedicine. This qualitative study describes provider perceptions of how telemedicine provision of contraception has impacted patient care.

METHODS

We interviewed 40 obstetrics-gynecology and family medicine physicians, midwives, nurse practitioners, and support staff providing contraception via telemedicine in practices across Illinois, including Planned Parenthood of Illinois (PPIL) health centers. We analyzed interview content to identify themes around the perceived impact of telemedicine implementation on contraception access, contraceptive counseling, patient privacy, and provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

RESULTS

Participants perceived that telemedicine implementation improved care by increasing contraception access, increasing focus on counseling while reducing bias, and allowing easier method switching. Participants thought disparities in telemedicine usage and limitations to the technological interface presented barriers to patient care. Participants' perceptions of how telemedicine implementation impacts patient privacy and LARC provision were mixed. Some participants found telemedicine implementation enhanced privacy, while others felt unable to ensure privacy in a virtual space. Participants found telemedicine modalities useful for counseling patients considering methods of LARC, but they sometimes presented an unnecessary extra step for those sure about receiving one at a practice offering same day insertion.

CONCLUSION

Providers felt telemedicine provision of contraception positively impacted patient care. Improvements to counseling and easier access to method switching suggest that telemedicine implementation may help reduce contraceptive coercion. Our findings highlight the need to integrate LARC care with telemedicine workflows, improve patient privacy protections, and promote equitable access to all telemedicine modalities.

Assessment of Saudi Women's Adherence and Experience with Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Cesarean Section Delivery Using Telemedicine Technology

Background

Telemedicine technology is widely used especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. It can be used to give medical advice as well as follow up with the patients at home in the outpatient setting. Low molecular weight heparin, such as enoxaparin, decreases the risk of venous thromboembolism after cesarean delivery.

Objective

assessing postcesarean women's adherence and experience to enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis regimens in the outpatient setting via telephone calls.

Methods

prospective cohort study was conducted in the Maternity and Children Hospital (MCH). Postcesarean women were interviewed at the postnatal ward in the MCH. The participants were followed up for 10 days of the delivery to assess their adherence to and experience with enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis. Suboptimal adherence was defined as the missing of one or more doses of enoxaparin.

Results

170 women participated in this study. The majority of them (78.8%) were fully adherent to enoxaparin while 21.2% missed at least one dose. The most-reported causes for suboptimal adherence were perceived lack of necessity (44.4%), forget to take the injection (30.6%), feeling of high load going to the primary care unit to take injection (27.8%), and fear of injection (11.1%).

Conclusion

Telemedicine technology could be used to assess patients' adherence. The study results showed that the majority of participants were fully adherent to postcesarean enoxaparin but more than 20% of the participants were suboptimal adherent. Proper patient education techniques could influence patients' adherence and potentially decrease the risk of DVT in those populations.

An exploratory study comparing the quality of contraceptive counseling provided via telemedicine versus in-person visits

OBJECTIVE

Telemedicine for contraceptive services is purported to improve contraceptive access, yet few studies assess the quality of contraceptive counseling provided remotely. We assessed the quality of contraceptive counseling during telemedicine and office visits.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional study at Cleveland Clinic Women's Health Institute to compare contraceptive counseling quality between telemedicine (synchronous video) and office visits. We identified eligible patients through ambulatory encounters with primary contraceptive management or counseling ICD-10 codes. Respondents completed a survey assessing demographics, quality of contraceptive counseling, contraceptive method choice, affinity for technology, and attitudes toward telemedicine. We used the validated Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning (IQFP) scale to assess counseling quality. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test, Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact test to compare baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Of all eligible patients, 110/380 (29%) completed the survey. Of those who were successfully contacted by phone or mail, 110/201 (55%) completed the survey. The IQFP scores were 'high quality' for 28/52 (54%) of telemedicine-visit respondents versus 37/58 (64%) of office-visit respondents (p = 0.29). The birth control pill was the most popular method, chosen by 27/52 (52%) of telemedicine-visit respondents and 24/58 (41%) of office-visit respondents (p = 0.27). Telemedicine respondents identified ease of communication and less scheduling difficulty as factors that promote telemedicine use. Office-visit respondents identified privacy and communication concerns as factors that deter telemedicine use.

CONCLUSION

When patients self-select the encounter type, their assessment of the quality of contraceptive counseling among telemedicine and office visits is similar, with no statistically significant differences in contraceptive method chosen. Results from this single-center study support the integration of telemedicine in contraceptive service provision.

IMPLICATIONS

The quality of contraceptive counseling is similar among telemedicine and office visits. Telemedicine visits for contraceptive counseling should be routinely offered, and existing services should be expanded.

Factors related to delays in obtaining contraception among pregnancy-capable adults in New York State during the COVID-19 pandemic: The CAP study

Objectives

To investigate factors associated with delays to obtaining contraception during the COVID-19 pandemic among pregnancy-capable adults in New York State.

Study Design

We administered a cross-sectional survey in June-July 2020 to female/transgender male New York State residents aged 18–44 years (n = 1,525). This analysis focused on respondents who were not pregnant and sought contraception (n = 953). We conducted bivariate and multinomial logistic regression analyses to assess sociodemographic, social, and health characteristics, by the outcome of delays to obtaining birth control (delayed due to COVID-19, delayed due to other reasons, no delay). We also analyzed a sub-sample who reported COVID-19 as a reason for delays (n = 317) and report the frequencies of type of contraceptive methods/procedures delayed and availability of telemedicine visits.

Results

Half of respondents had no contraceptive delays, 39% reported delays due to COVID-19, and 11% reported delays due to reasons other than COVID-19. In adjusted analyses, those who missed a rent/mortgage payment during the pandemic (aOR: 2.23; CI: 1.55, 3.22), participated in a supplemental government program in 2019 (aOR: 1.88; CI: 1.36, 2.60), and themselves/household member had COVID-19 (aOR: 1.48; CI: 1.04, 2.12) were more likely to report delays to contraception due to COVID-19 (versus no delays). In the sub-sample, 63% reported available virtual contraceptive visits, 28% unavailable, and 9% not sure. The most frequently (42%) reported delays were new prescriptions for the pill, patch, or ring.

Conclusions

Reducing financial barriers that help individuals maintain their housing and living necessities, and promoting telemedicine visits, may help increase access to contraception.

Telehealth for contraceptive care: Lessons from staff and clinicians for improving implementation and sustainability in Illinois

Objective

To solicit Illinois staff and clinician perspectives on rapid implementation of telehealth for contraceptive counseling and recommendations to improve and sustain it in the long term.

Study design

Researchers recruited and interviewed clinicians (n = 20) in primary care and obstetrics/gynecology clinics across 13 health care systems in Illinois, as well as clinicians (n = 11), leadership (n = 6) and staff (n = 7) from Planned Parenthood of Illinois clinics. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we coded and analyzed interview transcripts in Dedoose with a focus on themes regarding steps to improve quality and sustainability of telehealth.

Results

Participants expressed generally positive attitudes towards telehealth, noting that it increased access to care and time for patient education. Still, many highlighted areas of implementation that needed improvement. Clinic operations were complicated by gaps in telehealth training and the logistical needs of balancing telehealth and in-person appointments. Clinics had difficulty ensuring patient awareness of telehealth as an option for care, in addition to deficiencies with the telehealth technology itself. Finally, innovative resources for telehealth patients, while existent, have not been evenly offered across clinics. This includes the use of self-injection birth control, as well as providing medical equipment such as blood pressure cuffs in community settings. Some themes reflect issues specific to contraceptive counseling while others reflect issues with telehealth implementation in general, including confusion about reimbursement.

Conclusion

Illinois contraceptive care providers and staff wish to sustain telehealth for the long term, while also recommending specific improvements to patient communications, clinic operations, and access to supportive resources.

Implications

Our study highlights considerations for clinics to optimize implementation of telehealth services for contraceptive care. Providers described the value of clear workflows to balance in-person and telehealth visits, streamlined communications platforms, targeted patient outreach, training on providing virtual contraceptive care, and creative approaches to ensuring patient access to resources.

Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) On Contraception Use in 2020 and up until the end of April 2021 in France

Objectives

To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of reimbursed contraceptives in France after 15 months of the pandemic, according to age-group and updating previous data only pertaining to the first lockdown (2 months).

Study design

We conducted a national register-based study by extracting all reimbursements of oral contraceptives (OC), emergency contraception (EC), intrauterine devices (IUD), and implants from the French National Health Insurance database (SNDS), which includes and covers 99.5% of the French population, in 2018, 2019, 2020 and from January 1, 2021 to April30, 2021. We calculated the expected use of contraceptives in 2020 and 2021 in the absence of the pandemic, based on 2018 and 2019 usage and taking annual trends into account. We assessed the difference between observed and expected dispensing rates by contraceptive type and by age-group (≤18 years old, 18< age ≤25, 25< age ≤35, >35).

Results

Dispensing of all contraceptives decreased compared to expect dispensing numbers: −2.0% for OC, −5.3% for EC, −9.5% for LNG-IUS, −8.6% for C-IUD, and −16.4% for implant. This decrease in the dispensing of contraceptives was observed in all age-groups, but mainly concerned women under the age of 18 years (−22% for OC, −10% for EC, −37.2% for LNG-IUS, −36.4% for C-IUD, −26.4% for implant) and those aged 18 to 25 (−5.1% for OC, −11.9% for EC, −18.1% for LNG-IUS, −15.9% for C-IUD, −17.6% for implants).

Conclusions

Our study showed that the dispensing of contraceptives in France was markedly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Prescriptions for long-acting contraceptive use and women under the age of 25 years were the most substantially impacted. Ensuring access to contraceptive methods during health emergencies must be a public health policy priority.

Implications

The COVID-19 pandemic strongly impacted the dispensing of contraceptives in France with varying degrees of decreased dispensing according to the type of contraceptive, the age-group and the level of pandemic-related restrictions. The impact of these restrictions on unintended pregnancy at the population level remains undetermined.