Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphography in the assessment of lower limb lymphoedema

Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of Gadolinium-Based and Iron Oxide-Based Contrast Agents inside the Lymphatic Structure using Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography

PURPOSE

Gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents are primarily used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL). However, overcoming venous contamination issues remains challenging. This study aims to assess the MRL efficacy of the newly developed iron-based contrast agent (INV-001) that is specially designed to mitigate venous contamination issues. The study further explores the optimal dosage, including both injection volume and concentration, required to achieve successful visualization of the popliteal lymph nodes and surrounding lymphatic vessels.

PROCEDURES

All animals utilized in this study were male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats weighing between 250 and 300 g. The contrast agents prepared were injected intradermally in the fourth phalanx of both hind limbs using a 30-gauge syringe in SD rats. MRL was performed every 16 min on a coronal 3D time-of-flight sequence with saturation bands using a 9.4-T animal machine.

RESULTS

Contrary to Gd-DOTA, which exhibited venous contamination in most animals irrespective of injection dosages and conditions, INV-001 showed no venous contamination. For Gd-DOTA, the popliteal lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels reached peak enhancement 16 min after injection from the injection site and then rapidly washed out. However, with INV-001, they reached peak enhancement between 16 and 32 min after injection, with prolonged visualization of the popliteal lymph node and lymphatic vessels. INV-001 at 0.45 μmol (15 mM, 30 μL) and 0.75 μmol (15 mM, 50 μL) achieved high scores for qualitative image analysis, providing good visualization of the popliteal lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels without issues of venous contamination, interstitial space enhancement, or lymph node enlargement.

CONCLUSION

In MRL, INV-001, a novel T1 contrast agent based on iron, enables prolonged enhancement of popliteal lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels without venous contamination.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Post-Prostatectomy Lymphedema: What's New?

Lymphedema is a chronic progressive disorder that significantly compromises patients' quality of life. In Western countries, it often results from cancer treatment, as in the case of post-radical prostatectomy lymphedema, where it can affect up to 20% of patients, with a significant disease burden. Traditionally, diagnosis, assessment of severity, and management of disease have relied on clinical assessment. In this landscape, physical and conservative treatments, including bandages and lymphatic drainage have shown limited results. Recent advances in imaging technology are revolutionizing the approach to this disorder: magnetic resonance imaging has shown satisfactory results in differential diagnosis, quantitative classification of severity, and most appropriate treatment planning. Further innovations in microsurgical techniques, based on the use of indocyanine green to map lymphatic vessels during surgery, have improved the efficacy of secondary LE treatment and led to the development of new surgical approaches. Physiologic surgical interventions, including lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT), are going to face widespread diffusion. A combined approach to microsurgical treatment provides the best results: LVA is effective in promoting lymphatic drainage, bridging VLNT delayed lymphangiogenic and immunological effects in the lymphatic impairment site. Simultaneous VLNT and LVA are safe and effective for patients with both early and advanced stages of post-prostatectomy LE. A new perspective is now represented by the combination of microsurgical treatments with the positioning of nano fibrillar collagen scaffolds (BioBridgeTM) to favor restoring the lymphatic function, allowing for improved and sustained volume reduction. In this narrative review, we proposed an overview of new strategies for diagnosing and treating post-prostatectomy lymphedema to get the most appropriate and successful patient treatment with an overview of the main artificial intelligence applications in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of lymphedema.

Recent advancement of imaging strategies of the lymphatic system: Answer to the decades old questions

The role of the lymphatic system in maintaining tissue homeostasis and a number of different pathophysiological conditions has been well established. The complex and delicate structure of the lymphatics along with the limitations of conventional imaging techniques make lymphatic imaging particularly difficult. Thus, in-depth high-resolution imaging of lymphatic system is key to understanding the progression of lymphatic diseases and cancer metastases and would greatly benefit clinical decisions. In recent years, the advancement of imaging technologies and development of new tracers suitable for clinical applications has enabled imaging of the lymphatic system in both clinical and pre-clinical settings. In this current review, we have highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of different modern techniques such as near infra-red spectroscopy (NIRS), positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fluorescence optical imaging, that has significantly impacted research in this field and has led to in-depth insights into progression of pathological states. This review also highlights the use of current imaging technologies, and tracers specific for immune cell markers to identify and track the immune cells in the lymphatic system that would help understand disease progression and remission in immune therapy regimen.

Magnetic resonance lymphangiography: with or without contrast?

Lymphedema is an important medical issue around the world, caused by an anomalous collection of fluid in soft tissue due to congenital malformations or stenosis or obstruction of lymphatic vessels. Magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) is an emerging technique focused on noninvasive or minimally invasive imaging of lymphatics with the goal to diagnose and treat lymphedema. This review will briefly discuss lymphatic imaging starting with lymphography and radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy up to the newest methods, focusing on MRL, a rising technique, and highlighting the technical aspects fundamental for achieving high-resolution MRL.

Lower limb lymphedema staging based on magnetic resonance lymphangiography

OBJECTIVE

Dermal backflow (DBF) and reduced lymphatic visualization are common findings of lymphedema on various imaging modalities. However, there is a lack of knowledge about how these findings vary with the anatomic location and severity of lymphedema, and previous reports using indocyanine green lymphography or lymphoscintigraphy show variable results. Magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) is expected to clarify this clinical question due to its superior ability for lymphatic visualization. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the following: (1) Are there any characteristic patterns for DBF and lymphatics' visualization, depending on the anatomic location within lower limbs and severity of lymphedema? (2) Is it possible to classify the severity of lymphedema based on MRL findings?

METHODS

Two radiologists performed consensus readings of MRL of 56 patients (112 limbs) with lower-limb lymphedema. The frequency of visualized DBF and lymphatics was analyzed in six regions in each lower limb. The results were compared with the International Society of Lymphology clinical stages and etiology of lymphedema. Characteristic findings were categorized and compared with the clinical stage and duration of lymphedema.

RESULTS

DBF and lymphatics were observed more frequently in the distal regions than the proximal regions of lower limbs. DBF appeared more frequently as the clinical stage increased, reaching statistical significance (P < 10^-3) between stages 0 or I and II. DBF above the knee joint was rarely observed (0.48%) in early stages (0 and I) but appeared more frequently (13.5%, P < 10^-5) in stage II. Lymphatics appeared less frequently as the stage progressed, with significant differences (P < .05) between stages I and II and between II and III. The frequency of lymphatics above the knee joint decreased significantly (P < .05) between stages I and II and between II and III as the stage progressed, reaching 0% in stage III. An MRL staging was proposed and showed significant positive correlations with the clinical stage (r = 0.79, P < .01) and the duration of lymphedema (r = 0.57, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

MRL-specific patterns of DBF and lymphatics that depended on the site within the lower limb and clinical stage were shown. The DBF pattern differed from those observed in previous studies with other imaging techniques. The proposed MRL staging based on these characteristic findings allows new stratification of patients with lymphedema. Combined with its excellent ability to visualize lymphatic anatomy, MRL could enable a more detailed understanding of individual patient's pathology, useful for determining the most appropriate treatment.

Systematic Review of Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography From a Technical Perspective

BACKGROUND

Clinical examination and lymphoscintigraphy are the current standard for investigating lymphatic function. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) facilitates three-dimensional (3D), nonionizing imaging of the lymphatic vasculature, including functional assessments of lymphatic flow, and may improve diagnosis and treatment planning in disease states such as lymphedema.

PURPOSE

To summarize the role of MRI as a noninvasive technique to assess lymphatic drainage and highlight areas in need of further study.

STUDY TYPE

Systematic review.

POPULATION

In October 2019, a systematic literature search (PubMed) was performed to identify articles on magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

No field strength or sequence restrictions.

ASSESSMENT

Article quality assessment was conducted using a bespoke protocol, designed with heavy reliance on the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for case series studies and Downs and Blacks quality checklist for health care intervention studies.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The results of the original research articles are summarized.

RESULTS

From 612 identified articles, 43 articles were included and their protocols and results summarized. Field strength was 1.5 or 3.0 T in all studies, with 25/43 (58%) employing 3.0 T imaging. Most commonly, imaging of the peripheries, upper and lower limbs including the pelvis (32/43, 74%), and the trunk (10/43, 23%) is performed, including two studies covering both regions. Imaging protocols were heterogenous; however, T2 -weighted and contrast-enhanced T1 -weighted images are routinely acquired and demonstrate the lymphatic vasculature. Edema, vessel, quantity and morphology, and contrast uptake characteristics are commonly reported indicators of lymphatic dysfunction.

DATA CONCLUSION

MRL is uniquely placed to yield large field of view, qualitative and quantitative, 3D imaging of the lymphatic vasculature. Despite study heterogeneity, consensus is emerging regarding MRL protocol design. MRL has the potential to dramatically improve understanding of the lymphatics and detect disease, but further optimization, and research into the influence of study protocol differences, is required before this is fully realized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Analysis of collateral lymphatic circulation in patients with lower limb lymphedema using magnetic resonance lymphangiography

OBJECTIVE

Although the development of lymphatic collaterals is expected following lymphedema, little is known about the anatomic details of such compensatory pathways or their association with symptoms. Magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) has been shown to be superior to lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green lymphography in visualizing lymphatics. This study aimed to analyze MRL images of lower limbs to elucidate the patterns of lymphatic collateral formation and their association with the clinical stages of lymphedema.

METHODS

We enrolled 56 consecutive patients (112 lower limbs) with lymphedema who underwent MRL. Two radiologists performed a consensus reading of MRL images for the presence or absence of collateral lymphatic pathways, and the results were compared with the clinical stages. Furthermore, the frequency of abnormal MRL findings in 43 asymptomatic lower limbs of patients with unilateral lymphedema was analyzed and compared with that in the 69 symptomatic lower limbs of the patients. The imaging findings were also compared with the cause of lymphedema.

RESULTS

All three collateral pathways (anterolateral, deep, and posteromedial lymphatics) were visualized at a higher (P < .05) frequency in stage II than in stage 0 lower limbs. The frequency of visualization of the three collaterals was significantly higher in symptomatic (stages I-III) lower limbs than in asymptomatic (stage 0) lower limbs. Most (76.8%) of the symptomatic limbs exhibited at least one of these collaterals, and the frequency was significantly higher than in the asymptomatic limbs (P < .001). Most (81.4%) of the asymptomatic (stage 0) lower limbs had at least one abnormal finding in terms of lymphatic circulation, although this proportion was significantly lower compared with the symptomatic limbs (98.6%). The collaterals tended to appear less frequently in primary lymphedema than in secondary lymphedema, reaching statistical significance in the posteromedial lymphatics.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that the two superficial lymphatic groups and the deep lymphatic system act as major collaterals of the lower limbs in patients with lymphedema. Furthermore, MRL of most patients with unilateral lymphedema demonstrated abnormal findings, including collateral formation, not only in the affected lower limb but also in the asymptomatic lower limb. In primary lymphedema, the collaterals may appear less frequently than in secondary lymphedema. Collaterals should be taken into consideration in planning the site of lymphaticovenous anastomosis and assessing disease progression. MRL can visualize preclinical alterations in lymphatic flow and compensatory pathways; therefore, we expect that it will be useful for the early diagnosis of lymphedema.

Regional Patterns of Fluid and Fat Accumulation in Patients with Lower Extremity Lymphedema Using Magnetic Resonance Angiography

BACKGROUND

Fat accumulation is frequently observed in patients with lymphedema but is not accounted for in existing staging systems. In addition, the specific regional patterns of fat and fluid accumulation remain unknown and might affect outcomes following medical or surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate fluid and fat distribution in patients with lower extremity lymphedema using magnetic resonance angiography.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance angiographic examinations of patients with lower extremity lymphedema were reviewed. Fluid-fat grade and location were assessed by three observers. Three-point scales were developed to grade fluid (0 = no fluid, 1 = reticular pattern of fluid, and 2 = continuous stripe of subcutaneous fluid) and fat (0 = normal, 1 = subcutaneous thickness less than twice that of the unaffected side, and 2 = subcutaneous thickness greater than twice that of the unaffected side) accumulation.

RESULTS

In total, 76 magnetic resonance angiographic examinations were evaluated. Using the proposed grading system, there was good interobserver agreement for fat and fluid accumulation location (91.5 percent; κ = 0.9), fluid accumulation grade (95.7 percent; κ = 0.95), and fat accumulation grade (87.2 percent; κ = 0.86). Patients with International Society of Lymphology stage 2 lymphedema had a wide range of fluid and fat grades (normal to severe). The most common location of fluid accumulation was the lateral lower leg, whereas the most common location of fat accumulation was the medial and lateral lower leg.

CONCLUSION

The proposed magnetic resonance angiographic grading system may help stratify patients with International Society of Lymphology stage 2 lymphedema on the basis of tissue composition.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, IV.

Development and Themes of Diagnostic and Treatment Procedures for Secondary Leg Lymphedema in Patients with Gynecologic Cancers

Patients with leg lymphedema sometimes suffer under constraint feeling leg heaviness and pain, requiring lifelong treatment and psychosocial support after surgeries or radiation therapies for gynecologic cancers. We herein review the current issues (a review of the relevant literature) associated with recently developed diagnostic procedures and treatments for secondary leg lymphedema, and discuss how to better manage leg lymphedema. Among the currently available diagnostic tools, indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-LG) can detect dermal lymph backflow in asymptomatic legs at stage 0. Therefore, ICG-LG is considered the most sensitive and useful tool. At symptomatic stage ≥1, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging-lymphography/computed tomography-lymphography (MRI-LG/CT-LG) and lymphosintiography are also useful. For the treatment of lymphedema, complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP) including manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), compression therapy, exercise and skin care, is generally performed. In recent years, CDP has often required effective multi-layer lymph edema bandaging (MLLB) or advanced pneumatic compression devices (APCDs). If CDP is not effective, microsurgical procedures can be performed. At stage 1–2, when lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is performed, lymphaticovenous side-to-side anastomosis (LVSEA) is principally recommended. At stage 2–3, vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is useful. These ingenious procedures can help maintain the patient’s quality of life (QOL) but unfortunately cannot cure lymphedema. The most important concern is the prevention of secondary lymphedema, which is achieved through approaches such as skin care, weight control, gentle limb exercises, avoiding sun and heat, and elevation of the affected leg.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Edema and Lymphedema in the Cancer Patient

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema occurs commonly in cancer survivors. It is crucial to properly assess cancer patients in order to distinguish lymphedema from general edema and to initiate evidence based treatment.

PURPOSE

To provide evidence based recommendations for screening, evaluating, and treating lymphedema and to establish the role of the nurse in the care of patients with lymphedema.

METHODOLOGY

Comprehensive overview with narrative literature review of evidence based lymphedema diagnosis and treatment.

FINDINGS

Cancer-related edema represents numerous complex conditions. A variety of interventions are needed to address prevention, early detection, patient education, and effective treatment.

CONCLUSION

Lymphedema treatment is complex and multimodal, and is provided by an interdisciplinary team of properly trained professionals. Nurses play a major role in evaluating, treating and educating patients on the signs and symptoms of cancer-related edema and patient self-management.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Evidence-based assessment and treatment should be initiated early to improve outcomes and quality of life in patients with cancer-related lymphedema.

Microsurgery guided by sequential preoperative lymphography using 68Ga-NEB PET and MRI in patients with lower-limb lymphedema

OBJECTIVE

The popularity of contemporary microsurgical techniques in treatment of lower-limb lymphedema calls for better visualization of the lymphatic system, both preoperatively and intra-operatively. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the feasibility of a novel combination of ⁶⁸Ga-NEB positron emission tomography (PET) with magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) in evaluating lymphedema and guiding surgical intervention.

METHODS

A total of 11 patients (F 9, M 2, age range 29-69 y) with lower-limb lymphedema classified into stage I to III were recruited. PET acquisition was performed at 30, 60 and 90 min after subcutaneous injection of the albumin-binding radiotracer ⁶⁸Ga-NEB into the bilateral first web spaces of the feet. All the patients were also subjected to ^99mTc-sulfur colloid (SC) lymphoscintigraphy for comparison. Gd-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed using sequences specialized for lymphatic vessel scans. All the patients underwent surgical interventions within a week. The surgical approach includes the use of a linear marker for edema localization and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography with a near-infrared surgical navigation system intra-operatively.

RESULTS

Lymph transport in lymphatic channels was clearly observed by visualization of ⁶⁸Ga-NEB activity in the lymphatic vessels and within lymph nodes for all 11 patients as well as the visualization of the edema section plane with dermal backflow (DB), abnormally increased and disconnected uptake along the lymphatic channels. Preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-NEB PET combined with MRL provides advantageous three-dimensional images, higher temporal resolution, significantly shorter time lapse before image acquisition after tracer injection and more accurate pathological lymphatic vessel distribution than ^99mTc-SC lymphoscintigraphy combined with MRI.

CONCLUSION

This study documented an effective imaging pattern to combine ⁶⁸Ga-NEB PET and MRL in patients with lower-limb lymphedema. This strategy demonstrated significant advantage over ^99mTc-SC lymphoscintigraphy/MRL in the evaluation of lymphedema severity, staging and pathological location of lymph vessels to make an individualized treatment plan. Dual ⁶⁸Ga-NEB PET/MRL is thus recommended before the operation for staging and therapy planning.

MR Lymphangiography: A Practical Guide to Perform It and a Brief Review of the Literature from a Technical Point of View

We propose a practical approach for performing high-resolution MR lymphangiography (MRL). We shall discuss and illustrate the technical approach for the visualization of lymphatic vessels in patients suffering from lymphedema, how to distinguish lymphatic vessels from veins, and MRL role in supermicrosurgery treatment planning. A brief review of literature, from a technical point of view, is also reported.

Tumor-induced lymph node alterations detected by MRI lymphography using gadolinium nanoparticles

Contrast-enhanced MRI lymphography shows potential to identify alterations in lymph drainage through lymph nodes (LNs) in cancer and other diseases. MRI studies have typically used low molecular weight gadolinium contrast agents, however larger gadolinium-loaded nanoparticles possess characteristics that could improve the specificity and sensitivity of lymphography. The performance of three gadolinium contrast agents with different sizes and properties was compared by 3T MRI after subcutaneous injection. Mice bearing B16-F10 melanoma footpad tumors were imaged to assess tumor-induced alterations in lymph drainage through tumor-draining popliteal and inguinal LNs versus contralateral uninvolved drainage. Gadolinium lipid nanoparticles were able to identify tumor-induced alterations in contrast agent drainage into the popliteal LN, while lower molecular weight or albumin-binding gadolinium agents were less effective. All of the contrast agents distributed in foci around the cortex and medulla of tumor-draining popliteal LNs, while they were restricted to the cortex of non-draining LNs. Surprisingly, second-tier tumor-draining inguinal LNs exhibited reduced uptake, indicating that tumors can also divert LN drainage. These characteristics of tumor-induced lymph drainage could be useful for diagnosis of LN pathology in cancer and other diseases. The preferential uptake of nanoparticle contrasts into tumor-draining LNs could also allow selective targeting of therapies to tumor-draining LNs.

Lymphatic mapping and lymphedema surgery in the breast cancer patient

Upper limb lymphedema can be an unfortunate sequela following the oncologic treatment of breast cancer. The surgical treatment of lymphedema has had a recent renewed clinical interest paralleling innovative descriptions of surgical techniques and imaging modalities. In addition, an improved understanding of the physiology and pathophysiology of lymphedema has allowed improved translation to the clinical condition. Various surgical options exist to decrease the symptom-burden of upper limb lymphedema, including vascularized lymph node (VLN) transfer, lymphovenous bypass (LVB), liposuction, lymphatic grafting, and excisional procedures. Modern imaging techniques help to improve the consistency and accuracy of these surgical treatment options. A multi-modal treatment plan utilizing non-operative and surgical therapies has the potential to improve various factors related to overall patient quality of life. This review details all of the current operative treatment strategies and modern imaging modalities used in the treatment of lymphedema.