Colorectal cancer after orthotopic liver transplantation

Characteristics of de novo cancer in liver transplant recipients

Liver transplant recipients receive immunosuppressive treatment to avoid organ rejection, increasing the risk of developing de novo cancer after transplantation. We investigated the cumulative incidence of de novo cancer in a cohort of Danish liver transplant recipients. The study was a retrospective cohort study of adult liver transplant recipients transplanted at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. De novo cancer was defined as cancer arising at least 30 days after liver transplantation, excluding relapses from prior cancers and donor-derived cancers. We determined the incidence of de novo cancer in the cohort using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, with death and retransplantation as competing risks. We included 389 liver transplant recipients and identified 47 recipients (12%) with de novo cancer after liver transplantation, including 25 recipients with non-melanoma skin cancers. The cumulative incidences at 5 years after liver transplantation for all cancers and non-skin cancers were 10.7% and 4.9%, respectively. De novo cancer after liver transplantation is relatively common, with the majority being non-melanoma skin cancer. Future studies of sufficient size are needed to identify risk factors for de novo cancer after liver transplantation.

In-Situ-Sprayed Dual-Functional Immunotherapeutic Gel for Colorectal Cancer Postsurgical Treatment

Surgery remains the most preferred treatment options for colorectal cancer (CRC). Paradoxically, local recurrence and distant metastasis are usually accelerated postsurgery as a consequence of local and systemic immunosuppression caused by surgery. Therefore, modulating tumor postoperative immune microenvironment and activating systemic antitumor immunity are necessary supplementaries for CRC therapy. Here, an in-situ-sprayed immunotherapeutic gel loaded with anti-OX40 antibody (iSGels@aOX40) is reported for CRC postsurgical treatment. The iSGel is formed instantly after spraying with strong adhesion ability via crosslinking between tannic acid (TA) and poly(l-glutamic acid)-g-methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)/phenyl boronic acid (PLG-g-mPEG/PBA). TA not only serves as one component of the iSGel but also relieves the postsurgical immunosuppressive microenvironment by inhibiting the activity of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2). The aOX40 serves as an immune agonistic antibody and is released from the iSGel in a constant manner lasting for over 20 days. In a subcutaneous murine CRC model, the iSGels@aOX40 results in complete inhibition on tumor recurrence. In addition, the cured mice show resistance to tumor re-challenge, suggesting that immune memory effects are established after the iSGels@aOX40 treatment. In an orthotopic CRC peritoneal metastatic model, the iSGels@aOX40 also remarkably inhibits the growth of the abdominal metastatic tumors, suggesting great potential for clinical CRC therapy.

Characteristics and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer after Liver or Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and prognosis of de novo CRC patients who underwent liver or kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 66 de novo CRC patients selected from 8,734 liver transplant (LT) or kidney transplant (KT) recipients. We analyzed characteristics and survival outcomes of de novo CRC patients and sporadic CRC patients who underwent radical surgery with stage I-III in Asan Medical Center between 2005 and 2016. Survival outcomes were analyzed via the 1:4 matching method.

RESULTS

The standard incidence ratio (SIR) of de novo CRC in KT recipients is 1.67 in men and 2.54 in women. That in LT recipients is 3.10 in men and 2.25 in women. Compared with sporadic CRC patients, de novo CRC patients had more colon cancer than rectal cancer (p=0.041). In 9 patients (13.6%), CRC was diagnosed within one year after transplantation, 21 patients (31.8%) were diagnosed between 1-5 years, and the remaining 36 patients (54.6%) were diagnosed thereafter. There were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival and overall survival between the two groups (p=0.211 and p=0.324, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of developing de novo CRC in transplant recipients was higher than in the general population. The survival outcome of de novo CRC was no different compared with the sporadic CRC. Therefore, regular surveillance is essential for timely diagnosis and treatment for transplantation patients. A large prospective study for an intense CRC surveillance program in transplantation patients is needed.

Incidence and outcome of colorectal cancer in liver transplant recipients: A national, multicentre analysis on 8115 patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

De novo malignancies after liver transplantation represent one of the leading causes of death in the long-term. It remains unclear whether liver transplant recipients have an increased risk of colorectal cancer and whether this negatively impacts on survival, particularly in those patients affected by primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

In this national multicentre cohort retrospective study, the incidence of colorectal cancer in 8115 evaluable adult patients undergoing a liver transplantation between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2010 was compared to the incidence in the general population through standardised incidence ratios.

RESULTS

Fifty-two (0.6%) cases of colorectal cancer were identified at a median of 5.6 years postliver transplantation, predominantly grade 2 (76.9%) and stage T3 (50%) at diagnosis. The incidence rate of colorectal cancer in the whole liver transplant population was similar to the general UK population (SIR: 0.92), but significantly higher (SIR: 7.0) in the group of patients affected by primary sclerosing cholangitis/ulcerative colitis. One-, five- and ten-year survival rates from colorectal cancer diagnosis were 71%, 48% and 31%, respectively, and the majority of colorectal cancer patients died of cancer-specific causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation alone is not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer development. The primary sclerosing cholangitis/ulcerative colitis liver transplant population showed a significantly higher risk of colorectal cancer development than the general population, with a high proportion of advanced stage at diagnosis and a reduced patient survival.

Prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasm is higher in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with liver transplantation are at increased risk of developing new malignancy because of the prolonged immunosuppression after transplantation. The aims of this study were to investigate whether advanced colorectal neoplasms occurs more in liver transplant recipients compared to healthy individuals and to evaluate the effect of immunosuppression on advanced colorectal neoplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-centered, case-control study. We reviewed 348 liver transplant patients who had undergone a colonoscopy after liver transplantation from 1991 to 2012. Healthy controls from asymptomatic individuals who had undergone colonoscopy for screening purposes were randomly selected and reviewed.

RESULTS

Advanced colorectal neoplasms were identified in 17 of the 348 patients (4.9%). The risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia was 3.6 times greater in liver transplant patients (odds ratio [OR] 3.578; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.578-8.115; p=0.001). The risk of developing colon cancer was 8.4 times higher in transplant patients (OR 8.416; 95% CI 1.808-39.172; p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Liver transplant recipients were at a high risk of colorectal cancer. Therefore, colonoscopy surveillance after liver transplantation is recommended. Immunosuppressive therapy could facilitate carcinogenesis.

Liver metastasis from colorectal cancer 12 years after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for many liver diseases, with a 5-year survival of about 70 %. However, development of de novo malignancies in these immunocompromised patients is becoming a frequent complication medium term. The annual risk of developing a malignant tumor after a solid organ transplant is 2% . We report the case of a liver transplant patient who developed colorectal neoplasia at 12 years after transplantation , and then a metachronous metastases in the liver transplanted.

Primary Care of the Solid Organ Transplant Recipient

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is one of the major advances in medicine. Care of the SOT recipient is complex and continued partnership with the transplant specialist is essential to manage and treat complications and maintain health. The increased longevity of SOT recipients will lead to their being an evolving part of primary care practice, with ever more opportunities for care, education, and research of this rewarding patient population. This review discusses the overall primary care management of adult SOT recipients.

Is a stricter colonoscopy screening protocol necessary in liver transplant recipients? Comparison with an average-risk population

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology of colorectal neoplasm in liver transplantation recipients has not been fully determined.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of colorectal neoplasm in liver transplantation recipients and to compare it with that in the average-risk population.

DESIGN

This study was retrospective and observational.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

From January 2000 to December 2011, 257 liver transplantation recipients who had undergone posttransplant colonoscopy were enrolled. A total of 1028 control subjects matched for age, sex, and calendar year of the index colonoscopy were recruited from those who had undergone screening colonoscopy at our institution.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Colonoscopy findings were compared between the 2 groups. The prevalence of overall and advanced colorectal neoplasms and their risk factors were investigated.

RESULTS

The median age was 54 years, and each group consisted of approximately 75.5% men. The prevalence of overall and advanced colorectal neoplasm was 35.4% and 5.8% in liver transplantation recipients and 41.7% and 3.5% in controls (p = 0.07 and p = 0.11). The prevalence of invasive colorectal cancer was higher in liver transplantation recipients than in controls (0.8% versus 0.0%, p = 0.04). The prevalence of overall and advanced colorectal neoplasms in liver transplantation recipients younger than 40 years was higher than age-matched controls (p = 0.003 and p = 0.04).

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective design was a limitation of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of colorectal neoplasms may not increase in liver transplantation recipients compared with the general population. However, the prevalence of invasive colorectal cancer may be higher in liver transplantation recipients. A prospective study is warranted to determine an appropriate colorectal cancer screening strategy for liver transplantation recipients.

Outcomes of colorectal cancer arising in solid organ transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of colorectal cancer posttransplantation is unclear. Limited reports exist and have conflicting conclusions. We aimed to review the clinical features and oncologic outcomes of colorectal cancer in transplant recipients at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer after solid organ transplantation between 2000 and 2011 was conducted. Clinical features and outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty of 3,946 patients were identified. The most common single organ transplanted was the kidney (n = 8). Six patients had multiorgan transplantation. Median age of diagnosis of cancer was 64.3 years, and median time from transplant to diagnosis of cancer was 8.7 years. Ten patients were symptomatic at presentation. Cancer was identified on routine colonoscopy in seven patients. Tumors were most commonly found in the right colon (n = 14, 70%). Six patients had stage IV disease at presentation. Short-term morbidity was identified in 11 patients. Postoperative mortality occurred in one patient. Median follow-up was 2.47 years. Overall survival at 5 years was 69%, and disease-free survival was 68 %. Distant recurrence was seen in 3 (15%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Colorectal cancer in these patients is rare, and surgery can be done safely. Vigilant screening must be maintained in this patient population.

Diarrhea in solid-organ transplant recipients: a review of the evidence

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of the literature as it relates to diarrhea in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. In this article, we review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and management of diarrhea in SOT recipients and discuss recent advances and challenges.

METHODS

Two investigators conducted independent literature searches using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus until January 1st, 2013. All databases were searched using a combination of the terms diarrhea, solid organ transplant, SOT, transplant associated diarrhea, and transplant recipients. Articles that discussed diarrhea in SOT recipients were reviewed and relevant cross-references also read and evaluated for inclusion. Selection bias could be a possible limitation of the approach used in selecting or finding articles for this article.

FINDINGS

Post-transplant diarrhea is a common and distressing occurrence in patients, which can have significant deleterious effects on the clinical course and well-being of the organ recipient. A majority of cases are due to infectious and drug-related etiologies. However, various other etiologies including inflammatory bowel disease must be considered in the differential diagnosis. A step-wise, informed approach to post-transplant diarrhea will help the clinician achieve the best diagnostic yield. The use of diagnostic endoscopy should be preceded by exclusion of an infectious or drug-related cause of diarrhea. Empiric management with antidiarrheal agents, probiotics, and lactose-free diets may have a role in managing patients for whom no cause can be determined even after an extensive investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should be familiar with the common etiologies that result in post-transplant diarrhea. A directed approach to diagnosis and treatment will not only help to resolve the diarrhea but also prevent potentially life-threatening consequences including loss of the graft as well. Prospective studies are required to determine the etiology of post-transplant diarrhea in different clinical and geographic settings.

De novo malignancies after adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation with a malignancy surveillance program: comparison with a Japanese population-based study

BACKGROUND

Organ transplant recipients have an increased incidence of malignancy. Race differences in a variety of malignancies are observed among the general population, but de novo malignancies after adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have not been compared with those from a Japanese population-based study.

METHODS

The subjects were 360 adult LDLT recipients who survived more than 1 year after transplantation. An annual medical checkup and screening examinations were performed as follows: abdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and total colonoscopy and immunochemical fecal occult blood test every 1 to 2 years. Complete blood count, liver function tests, and several tumor markers were checked every 1 to 3 months after LDLT.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up period was 7.5±3.4 years. During the follow-up period, 27 de novo malignancies were diagnosed in 26 recipients. Colorectal cancer was the most commonly detected malignancy. The overall mortality of the recipients with de novo malignancies was similar to the findings of the Japanese general population-based study (standardized mortality ratio=0.9). Overall, the incidence of cancer was significantly higher in transplant recipients than in the Japanese general population (standardized incidence ratio=1.8). The 5-year estimated survival rate of recipients with de novo malignancies was 81% and those of recipients without malignancies was 93% (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Colorectal malignancies predominated in Japanese liver transplant recipients. Although de novo malignancies correlated with a poor prognosis, the standardized mortality ratio was 0.9 compared with that of subjects of a Japanese population-based study.

Colonic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a liver transplant patient with historically very low tacrolimus levels

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) comprise a wide spectrum of hematologic malignancies that are found increasingly in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) patients given the rising frequency of these surgeries and their long-term success. PTLDs are highly correlated with both the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and the degree of immunosuppression involved. Herein is reported a case of a 53-year-old male with successfully treated hepatitis C virus genotype 4 and hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent OLT and developed symptoms of weakness and poor appetite 4 years later while on tacrolimus 3 mg b.i.d. with historically very low plasma levels. He was found to be anemic and colonoscopy revealed a 4.5 cm cecal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Further workup revealed mesenteric lymph node enlargement consistent and nodal DLBCL dissemination. He was treated with cyclophosphamide-hydroxyldaunorubicin-oncovin-prednisone-rituximab (CHOP-R) chemotherapy and his tacrolimus dose was lowered. Additionally, he manifested PTLD-associated cryoglobulinemia leading to acute kidney injury. After a prolonged hospitalization he was discharged with close followup.

Long-term management of the liver transplant recipient: pearls for the practicing gastroenterologist

Liver transplantation is becoming more common and patients are surviving longer after transplantation. Special care must be paid to the long-term management of these patients because they are at increased risk for medical problems, malignancies, and adverse effects from immunosuppression. A stable and continuing relationship must be developed between the physician and the patient to optimize the long-term outcomes for these individuals.

Colorectal cancer in post-liver transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Several malignancies have been reported to occur more often after liver transplantation. Whether this is also true for colorectal carcinoma is controversial. Our aims were 1) to compare the observed rate of colorectal carcinoma in a post-liver transplantation cohort with incidence data from the general Dutch population, and 2) to stratify for patients with and without primary sclerosing cholangitis, because primary sclerosing cholangitis is well established as a risk factor for colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

We searched the medical records of liver transplantation patients who had a liver transplantation in our center between 1986 and 2007 with a follow-up of at least 3 months. Incidence data from the general population were retrieved from the Dutch Comprehensive Cancer Registry. Outcome measures were defined as standardized incidence ratio and incidence rate per 100,000 person-years.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-four patients (58% men; mean age at liver transplantation, 46.6 y) were included in the 1986 to 2007 period. Bowel investigation before liver transplantation had been performed in 73% of patients. Median follow-up was 5.1 years (range, 0.25-20 y). The mean age at the end of follow-up was 52 years (SD, 13 y). Colorectal carcinoma was diagnosed in four patients (1%) during follow-up. The overall standardized incidence ratio for colorectal carcinoma in post-liver transplant recipients was 2.16 (95% CI: 0.81-5.76) compared with the general population and 1.26 (95% CI: 0.31-5.03) for nonprimary sclerosing cholangitis post-liver transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the incidence of colorectal carcinoma is not increased in non-primary sclerosing cholangitis post-liver transplantation compared with the general population. A more intense colorectal carcinoma surveillance program based on this result remains controversial in nonprimary sclerosing cholangitis post-liver transplant recipients.

Risk of colorectal carcinoma in post-liver transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liver transplant patients (LTx) have an increased risk for developing de novo malignancies, but for colorectal cancer (CRC) this risk is less clear. We aimed to determine whether the CRC risk post-LTx was increased. A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and Cochrane databases to identify studies published between 1986 and 2008 reporting on the risk of CRC post-LTx. The outcomes were (1) CRC incidence rate (IR per 100,000 person-years (PY)) compared to a weighted age-matched control population using SEER and (2) relative risk (RR) for CRC compared to the general population. If no RR data were available, the RR was estimated using SEER. Twenty-nine studies were included. The overall post-LTx IR was 119 (95% CI 88-161) per 100,000 PY. The overall RR was 2.6 (95% CI 1.7-4.1). The non-primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) IR was 129 per 100,000 PY (95% CI 81-207). Compared to SEER (71 per 100,000 PY), the non-PSC RR was 1.8 (95% CI 1.1-2.9). In conclusion, the overall transplants and the subgroup non-PSC transplants have an increased CRC risk compared to the general population. However, in contrast to PSC, non-PSC transplants do not need an intensified screening strategy compared to the general population until a prospective study further defines recommendations.

Cancer incidence and risk factors after solid organ transplantation

Iatrogenic immunosuppression is a unique setting for investigating immune-related mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Solid organ transplant recipients have a 3-fold excess risk of cancer relative to the age- and sex-matched general population. Population-based studies utilizing cancer registry records indicate that a wide range of cancers, mostly those with a viral etiology, occur at excess rates. To date, cancer risk has predominantly been examined in adult kidney transplant recipients in Western countries. It is yet to be established whether a similar incidence profile exists in the long-term for other solid organ, pediatric and non-Western transplant recipients. The cancer incidence profile before and after kidney transplantation strongly suggests a relatively minor contribution by both preexisting cancer risk factors and the conditions underlying end-stage kidney disease, and points to a causal role for immunosuppression. Within-cohort risk factor analyses have largely been performed on cohorts with voluntary cancer notification, and very few have incorporated biomarkers of the level of immunosuppression, the current receipt of immunosuppressive agents, or genetic risk factors. Because of their markedly high risk of certain cancers, findings from comprehensive studies in transplant recipients have the potential to raise new avenues for investigation into causal mechanisms and preventive measures against immune-related and infectious causes of cancer.

JC virus infection in colorectal neoplasia that develops after liver transplantation

PURPOSE

Liver transplant recepients (LTRs) have an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. The mechanism responsible for this is unknown. JCV encodes for TAg and has been implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis. We hypothesized that the use of immunosuppression in LTRs facilitates activation of JCV and is responsible for the increased risk of neoplasia.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

JCV TAg DNA and protein expression were determined in normal colonic epithelium (n = 15) and adenomatous polyps (n = 26) from LTRs and compared with tissue samples from control patients (normal colon, n = 21; adenomas, n = 40). Apoptosis and proliferation were determined by M30 and Ki-67 immunoreactivity, respectively.

RESULTS

JCV TAg DNA was found in 10 of 15 (67%) of normal colonic mucosa from LTRs compared with 5 of 21 (24%) of control normal mucosa (P = 0.025). JCV TAg DNA was detected in 16 of 26 (62%) of the adenomas from LTRs and in 20 of 40 (50%) of control adenomas. JCV TAg protein was expressed in 13 of 26 (50%) adenomas from LTRs versus 2 of 40 (5%) of adenomas from controls (P < 0.001). In adenomas from LTRs, the mean proliferative activity was higher compared with controls (60.3 +/- 3.2% versus 42.7 +/- 2.8%, P < 0.001), whereas mean apoptotic indices were lower in LTRs (0.29 +/- 0.08% versus 0.39 +/- 0.06%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of JCV in the colorectal mucosa and adenomas from LTRs, in concert with the use of immunosuppressive agents, suggests that JCV may undergo reactivation, and the subsequent TAg protein expression might explain the increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in LTRs.

Incidence and management of colorectal cancer in liver transplant recipients

Liver transplant recipients are at an increased risk of developing de novo malignancies because of the prolonged immunosuppression necessary to avoid acute and chronic rejections. Skin cancers and lymphoproliferative diseases are the most common malignancies, but the overall incidence of colon cancer in this patient population does differ from that of the general population. Therefore, colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health concern in liver transplant recipients. Furthermore, there are unique subsets of liver transplant recipients, such as those with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease, who are at an increased risk for developing CRC after liver transplantation and might require special screening/surveillance strategies. The similar principles for management of colon cancer can be applied to transplant recipients if the adjustment to maintain the need for the long-term immunosuppression is made. Colectomy can be performed safely during the posttransplantation period. Prophylactic colectomy at the time of liver transplantation has been performed in some patients at high risk or with known premalignant conditions. Chemotherapy with 5- fluorouracil and oxaliplatin has been used in transplant recipients for the treatment of metastatic CRC; however, further research is required to examine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combination chemotherapy and biologic agents in this patient population. This review summarizes the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of de novo CRC in liver transplant recipients.

Effects of different immunosuppressive regimens on regulatory T-cells in noninflamed colon of liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Regulatory T-cells (Treg) are natural suppressors of autoimmunity. Previous studies indicate that immunosuppressive drugs, especially calcineurin-inhibitors, may interfere with Treg homeostasis. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can relapse or develop de novo after liver transplantation. IBD is associated with a relative deficiency of Treg. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of long-term immunosuppression on the presence of Treg in the noninflamed colonic mucosa of liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Colonic biopsies of normal mucosa of 36 liver transplant recipients on different types of immunosuppression and 11 controls were studied. Treg marker Foxp3 and Treg products transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were studied by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) and immunohistochemistry. TGF-beta-induced Smad-protein 3 and 7 were studied by Q-PCR.

RESULTS

No significant differences between controls and patients were observed in IL-10, TGF-beta, and Smad expression. Mucosal Foxp3 mRNA levels and Foxp3+CD3+ cells were significantly reduced in transplant recipients using prednisone/azathioprine/tacrolimus compared with controls but no direct relationship between Foxp3 expression and 1 specific drug was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

These results challenge the hypothesis that calcineurin-induced reduction of Treg or TGF-beta expression predisposes nontransplanted tissue to inflammation, but indicate that combined immunosuppression hampers Treg development in the intestine.