Genomic characterization of malignant pleural mesothelioma and associated clinical outcomes

Treatment of Pleural Mesothelioma: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of pleural mesothelioma (PM).

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pathology, cancer genetics, and advocacy experts to conduct an updated literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2016 through 2024. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 110 additional relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed for surgical cytoreduction, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, pathology, and germline testing in patients with PM.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

The genetic susceptibility in the development of malignant pleural mesothelioma: somatic and germline variants, clinicopathological features and implication in practical medical/surgical care: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a very aggressive primary tumor of the pleura whose main risk factor is exposure to asbestos. However, only a minority of exposed people develops MPM and the incidence of MPM cases without an apparent association with asbestos exposure has been increasing in recent years, suggesting that genetic predisposing factors may play a crucial role. In addition, several studies reported familial cases of MPM, suggesting that heredity may be an important and underestimated feature in MPM development. Several candidate genes have been associated with a predisposition to MPM and most of them play a role in DNA repair mechanisms: overall, approximately 20% of MPM cases may be related to genetic predisposition. A particular category of patients with high susceptibility to MPM is represented by carriers of pathogenic variants in the BAP1 gene. Germline variants in BAP1 predispose to the development of MPM following an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance in the familial cases. MPMs in these patients are significantly less aggressive, and patients require a multidisciplinary approach that involves genetic counseling, medical genetics, pathology, surgical, medical, and radiation oncology expertise. In the present narrative review, we presented a comprehensive overview of genetic susceptibility in the development of MPM.

Methods

The narrative review is based on a selective literature carried out in PubMed in 2023. Inclusion criteria were original articles in English language, and clinical trials (randomized, prospective, or retrospective).

Key Content and Findings

We summarized the somatic and germline variants and the differences in terms of clinicopathological features and prognosis between gene-related MPM (GR-MPM) and asbestos-related MPM (AR-MPM). We also discussed the indications for screening, genetic testing, and surveillance of patients with BAP1 germline variants.

Conclusions

In this narrative review, we have emphasized that the BAP1 gene's harmful germline variations are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner in familial cases. MPMs in individuals with these variations are less severe, and their medical care necessitates a collaborative effort. Additionally, we have outlined the current therapeutic prospects for MPM, including the possibility of gene-specific therapy, which is currently promising but still requires clinical validation.

Updates on grading mesothelioma

Mesothelioma is a rare disease with an historically poor prognosis. Over the past decade, a grading system has been developed that is a powerful prognostic tool in epithelioid mesothelioma. Grading of epithelioid mesothelioma is now required or strongly recommended by expert consensus, the College of American Pathologists, the World Health Organization, and the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. The original nuclear grading system for epithelioid mesothelioma, developed in the United States, split epithelioid mesotheliomas into three prognostic groups with marked differences in survival. Now, this three-tiered nuclear grading system has been combined with the presence or absence of necrosis to form the currently recommended two-tiered grading system of low- and high-grade epithelioid mesothelioma. This review will focus on the development of this grading system in mesothelioma, the grading system's shortcomings, and the application of the grading system to cytology specimens and other extra-pleural sites. Lastly, this review will briefly discuss alternative grading systems and future considerations.

A combination of intrinsic and extrinsic features improves prognostic prediction in malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a lung pleural cancer with very poor disease outcome. With limited curative MPM treatment available, it is vital to study prognostic biomarkers to categorise different patient risk groups.

METHODS

We defined gene signatures to separately characterise intrinsic and extrinsic features, and investigated their interactions in MPM tumour samples. Specifically, we calculated gene signature scores to capture the downstream pathways of major mutated driver genes (BAP1, NF2, SETD2 and TP53) as tumour-intrinsic features. Similarly, we inferred the infiltration levels for major immune cells in the tumour microenvironment to characterise tumour-extrinsic features. Lastly, we integrated these features with clinical factors to predict prognosis in MPM.

RESULTS

The gene signature scores were more prognostic than the corresponding genomic mutations, mRNA and protein expression. High immune infiltration levels were associated with prolonged survival. The integrative model indicated that tumour features provided independent prognostic values than clinical factors and were complementary with each other in survival prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

By using an integrative model that combines intrinsic and extrinsic features, we can more correctly predict the clinical outcomes of patients with MPM.

Clinical and molecular validation of BAP1, MTAP, P53, and Merlin immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma

BAP1 and MTAP immunostains play an important role in diagnosis of mesothelioma, but additional markers are needed to increase sensitivity. We analyzed 84 pleural mesotheliomas (51 epithelioid, 27 biphasic, 6 sarcomatoid) by a hybrid-capture next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel including complete coverage of coding and splicing regions for BAP1, CDKN2A/MTAP, NF2, and TP53 and correlated molecular findings with diagnostic immunostains for BAP1, MTAP, Merlin, and p53, respectively. Fifty-seven reactive mesothelial proliferations served as benign comparators. Loss of BAP1, MTAP, and Merlin protein expression were, respectively, 54%, 46%, and 52% sensitive and 100% specific for mesothelioma. Two-marker immunopanels of BAP1 + MTAP, BAP1 + Merlin, and MTAP + Merlin were 79%, 85%, and 71% sensitive for mesothelioma, while a three-marker immunopanel of BAP1 + MTAP + Merlin was 90% sensitive. Diffuse (mutant-pattern) p53 immunostaining was seen in only 6 (7%) tumors but represented the only immunohistochemical abnormality in 2 cases. Null-pattern p53 was not specific for malignancy. An immunopanel of BAP1 + MTAP + Merlin + p53 was 93% sensitive for mesothelioma, and panel NGS detected a pathogenic alteration in BAP1, MTAP, NF2, and/or TP53 in 95%. Together, 83 (99%) of 84 tumors showed a diagnostic alteration by either immunohistochemistry or panel NGS. Adding Merlin to the standard BAP1 + MTAP immunopanel increases sensitivity for mesothelioma without sacrificing specificity. p53 immunohistochemistry and panel NGS with complete coverage of BAP1, CDKN2A/MTAP, TP53, and NF2 may be useful in diagnostically challenging cases.

Current Management and Future Perspective in Pleural Mesothelioma

Pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy arising from pleural mesothelial cell lining, predominantly associated with prior exposure to asbestos. The ban on asbestos use has led to its lower incidence in many countries, but globally the disease burden is expected to rise. Therefore, well-planned research is needed to develop more effective, tolerable and affordable drugs. The development of novel treatment has been too slow, with only two regimens of systemic therapy with robust phase 3 data approved formally to date. The treatment scenario for resectable disease remains controversial. However, recent developments in the understanding of disease and clinical trials have been encouraging, and may add better treatment options in the coming years. In this review, we discuss the current treatment options for pleural mesothelioma and shed light on some recent studies and ongoing trials.

Significance of p53 immunostaining in mesothelial proliferations and correlation with TP53 mutation status

p53 immunohistochemistry has long been proposed for the separation of benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations, with the older literature suggesting that any degree of positivity supported a diagnosis of mesothelioma. However, using modern immunohistochemistry platforms in other organ systems, notably gynecologic tumors, it has become clear that p53 staining can represent wild-type protein, and only specific staining patterns (absent, overexpression, or cytoplasmic expression) are indicative of a TP53 mutation. We applied these principles to two tissue microarrays containing 94 mesotheliomas and 66 reactive mesothelial proliferations. Seven/65 (11%) epithelioid mesotheliomas showed aberrant staining (four absent and three overexpression patterns) as did 5/29 (17%) of sarcomatoid mesotheliomas (all overexpression patterns). We sequenced the TP53 gene (exons 2-11) in five of the epithelioid and three of the sarcomatoid cases with aberrant staining as well as 12 epithelioid and eight sarcomatoid mesotheliomas with wild-type staining. All three sarcomatoid cases with aberrant staining showed mutated TP53, as did three of the epithelioid cases; in two of the epithelioid cases no mutation was detected, most likely because of large deletions not detected by this assay. In contrast, none of the 20 mesotheliomas with wild-type staining contained mutated TP53. We conclude that absent or overexpression p53 staining patterns can be used as a marker of a malignant vs. a benign mesothelial proliferation. The sensitivity of p53 staining by itself is low, but here addition of p53 to BAP1/MTAP staining increased sensitivity from 72 to 81% for epithelioid and 38 to 50% for sarcomatoid mesotheliomas.

Phase 1, pharmacogenomic, dose-expansion study of pegargiminase plus pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with ASS1-deficient non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

We evaluated the arginine‐depleting enzyme pegargiminase (ADI‐PEG20; ADI) with pemetrexed (Pem) and cisplatin (Cis) (ADIPemCis) in ASS1‐deficient non‐squamous non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) via a phase 1 dose‐expansion trial with exploratory biomarker analysis.

Methods

Sixty‐seven chemonaïve patients with advanced non‐squamous NSCLC were screened, enrolling 21 ASS1‐deficient subjects from March 2015 to July 2017 onto weekly pegargiminase (36 mg/m²) with Pem (500 mg/m²) and Cis (75 mg/m²), every 3 weeks (four cycles maximum), with maintenance Pem or pegargiminase. Safety, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and efficacy were determined; molecular biomarkers were annotated by next‐generation sequencing and PD‐L1 immunohistochemistry.

Results

ADIPemCis was well‐tolerated. Plasma arginine and citrulline were differentially modulated; pegargiminase antibodies plateaued by week 10. The disease control rate was 85.7% (n = 18/21; 95% CI 63.7%–97%), with a partial response rate of 47.6% (n = 10/21; 95% CI 25.7%–70.2%). The median progression‐free and overall survivals were 4.2 (95% CI 2.9–4.8) and 7.2 (95% CI 5.1–18.4) months, respectively. Two PD‐L1‐expressing (≥1%) patients are alive following subsequent pembrolizumab immunotherapy (9.5%). Tumoral ASS1 deficiency enriched for p53 (64.7%) mutations, and numerically worse median overall survival as compared to ASS1‐proficient disease (10.2 months; n = 29). There was no apparent increase in KRAS mutations (35.3%) and PD‐L1 (<1%) expression (55.6%). Re‐expression of tumoral ASS1 was detected in one patient at progression (n = 1/3).

Conclusions

ADIPemCis was safe and highly active in patients with ASS1‐deficient non‐squamous NSCLC, however, survival was poor overall. ASS1 loss was co‐associated with p53 mutations. Therapies incorporating pegargiminase merit further evaluation in ASS1‐deficient and treatment‐refractory NSCLC.

The Updating of Biological Functions of Methyltransferase SETDB1 and Its Relevance in Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma

SET domain bifurcated 1 (SETDB1) is a histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methyltransferase that exerts important effects on epigenetic gene regulation. SETDB1 complexes (SETDB1-KRAB-KAP1, SETDB1-DNMT3A, SETDB1-PML, SETDB1-ATF7IP-MBD1) play crucial roles in the processes of histone methylation, transcriptional suppression and chromatin remodelling. Therefore, aberrant trimethylation at H3K9 due to amplification, mutation or deletion of SETDB1 may lead to transcriptional repression of various tumour-suppressing genes and other related genes in cancer cells. Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer worldwide in which SETDB1 amplification and H3K9 hypermethylation have been indicated as potential tumourigenesis markers. In contrast, frequent inactivation mutations of SETDB1 have been revealed in mesothelioma, an asbestos-associated, locally aggressive, highly lethal, and notoriously chemotherapy-resistant cancer. Above all, the different statuses of SETDB1 indicate that it may have different biological functions and be a potential diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target in lung cancer and mesothelioma.