Association between immune-related side effects and efficacy and benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with autoimmune disease: Safety and efficacy

The utilization of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer immunotherapy frequently leads to the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), making it generally not recommended for patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis on safety and efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases to provide further insights. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until December 20, 2024. The main summary measures used were pooled rate and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidential interval (CI), which were analyzed using R statistic software. A total of 52 articles were included in the study. When cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases received ICIs treatment, the overall incidence was 0.610 (95% CI: 0.531-0.686) for any grade irAEs, 0.295 (95% CI: 0.248-0.343) for flares, 0.325 (95% CI: 0.258-0.396) for de novo irAEs, 0.238 (95% CI: 0.174-0.309) for grade ≥3 irAEs, and 0.143 (95% CI: 0.109-0.180) for discontinuation due to immunotoxicity. Compared with those without autoimmune diseases, cancer patients with autoimmune diseases experienced a higher risk of any-grade irAEs (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.12-1.35) and discontinuation due to immunotoxicity (1.40, 95% CI: 1.11-1.78). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of grade ≥3 irAEs, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. During ICIs treatment, irAEs are common among cancer patients with autoimmune diseases, but severe irAEs is relatively low. ICIs are effective in this population, but should be strictly monitored when used to avoid immunotoxicity.

Systemic immune characteristics predicting toxicity to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are among the most promising treatment options for cancer. However, frequent and sometimes life-threatening immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are associated with ICI treatment. Therefore, it is imperative to establish a model for predicting the risk of irAEs to identify high-risk groups, enable more accurate clinical risk‒benefit analysis for ICI treatment and decrease the incidence of irAEs. However, no ideal model for predicting irAEs has been applied in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to analyze the systemic immune characteristics of patients with irAEs and establish a model for predicting the risk of irAEs.

METHODS

We conducted a study to monitor irAEs in patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing immunotherapy during and following the treatment course. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected before and after two cycles of therapy. Mass cytometry time-of-flight (CyTOF) was employed to identify baseline and posttreatment immune cell subpopulations, and the relationships between the proportions of cells in these subpopulations and the occurrence of irAEs were explored. Additionally, we conducted subgroup analyses stratified by the anatomic location and time of onset of irAEs. Furthermore, we developed a logistic regression model to predict the risk of irAEs and validated this model using two independent validation cohorts from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (accession numbers GSE189125 and GSE186143).

RESULTS

By analyzing 106 blood samples and samples from two independent validation cohorts (n = 16 and 60 patients), we found that high proportions of CXCR3+CCR6+CD4+ T cells and CD38+CD86+CXCR3+CCR6+CD8+ T cells and a low proportion of CXCR3lowCD56dim natural killer (NK) cells at baseline were significantly correlated with the incidence of irAEs (P = 0.0029, P < 0.001, and P = 0.0017, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, we observed consistent results in patients with immune-related pneumonitis (ir-pneumonitis) and immune-related thyroiditis (ir-thyroiditis). In the early irAE group, the baseline proportion of CXCR3+CCR6+CD4+ T cells was greater than that in the late irAE group (P = 0.011). An analysis of PBMCs before and after ICI treatment revealed thatthe dynamic changes in the proportions of naïve CD4+ T cells and CXCR3lowCD56dim NK cells were closely related to irAE occurrence. Finally, we ultimately developed a model for predicting the risk of irAEs, which yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.79 in the training cohort and an AUROC of 0.75 in the single-cell validation cohort (GSE189125).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that different populations of immune cells are associated with different irAEs and that characterization of these cells may be used as biomarkers to predict the risk of specific toxicities. This will facilitate the management of irAEs and may lead to a reduction in the incidence of irAEs.

Thyroid dysfunction as a predictor of PD- 1/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy in advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the correlation between thyroid dysfunction (TD) and the efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in the treatment of advanced lung cancer, and the possible influencing factors for TD occurrence, providing insights that could guide individualized therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

The data of 120 advanced lung cancer patients from January 2019 to August 2024 were retrospectively collected. Then, the patients were divided into TD and non-TD subgroups according to whether TD occurred or not, to analyse the possible factors influencing the occurrence of TD and the correlation between TD and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy.

RESULTS

For all cases, the baseline TSH level was significantly higher in the TD subgroup than in the non-TD subgroup (median: 2.33 mIU/L vs. 1.58 mIU/L, p = 0.001). The progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the TD subgroup than in the non-TD subgroup (mPFS: 7.90 months vs. 4.87 months, p = 0.003), and the patients in the TD subgroup had a lower HR for progression (0.499, 95% CI (0.317-0.766)). For the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group, the baseline TSH level was also significantly higher in the TD subgroup than in the non-TD subgroup (median: 2.16 mIU/L vs. 1.52 mIU/L, p = 0.009). The PFS was also significantly longer in the TD subgroup than in the non-TD subgroup (mPFS: 8.83 months vs. 6.50 months, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

The baseline TSH level was the predictive factor for the occurrence of TD. The occurrence of TD was positively associated with a favorable prognosis for patients with advanced lung cancer.

Immunotherapy in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: advances and future directions

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare but aggressive malignancy that follows normal or aberrant pregnancies. Until the advent of immunotherapy in 2017, surgery and chemotherapy were the standard treatment modalities, with chemotherapy remaining the cornerstone. However, chemoresistance and high-risk disease present significant challenges in managing GTN. Recent advancements in immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have offered new hope for managing these difficult cases. This review provides the comprehensive overview of the mechanisms underlying ICIs in GTN, and explores the potential synergy of combining ICIs with targeted therapies, such as vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. We also provide an overview of the latest evidence on the use of ICIs in treating GTN, focusing on their effectiveness in both low- and high-risk cases, as well as in chemorefractory settings. In addition, we discuss ongoing clinical trials, immune-related adverse events associated with ICIs, biomarker-driven approaches, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments, and the challenges posed with ICIs resistance. The review also explores future directions, including the integration of ICIs into standard regimens, the potential for personalized treatment based on tumor biology, and the importance of fertility preservation in young patients with GTN. In conclusion, while challenges remain, immunotherapy represents a promising frontier in GTN treatment, with the potential to improve outcomes and provide a more personalized approach to care.

Immune-related adverse events among patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy: real-world data from the Neo-Real/GBECAM 0123 study

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) based on the KEYNOTE-522 trial. However, 13 % of patients experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of grade ≥3 in the trial. This study aims to describe patterns of irAEs in a real-world scenario during treatment with pembrolizumab for early-stage TNBC.

METHODS

Patients treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy across ten Brazilian cancer centers were evaluated in the Neo-Real/GBECAM0123 study. This analysis focuses on irAE evaluation, including time to onset, management, and association between irAEs and pathological complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

A total of 368 patients were included. Overall, 31 % of patients (n = 114) presented with any grade irAEs. Most of irAEs (72.8 %) occurred during the neoadjuvant phase while 28.1 % happened during the adjuvant period. The most frequent irAEs were endocrine (12.8 % of the entire cohort), cutaneous (7.6 %) and gastrointestinal (7.1 %). A total of 50 patients (13.6 %) experienced grade ≥3 irAEs, predominantly gastrointestinal (32 %). 58 patients (56 %) needed corticosteroids. Immunotherapy rechallenge was possible in 53 % of the cases; permanent discontinuation of pembrolizumab was necessary for 16 %. No significant association was observed between irAEs and clinic-pathologic features nor pCR status.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world analysis, we observed a similar incidence of irAEs as reported in the KEYNOTE-522 trial. Most patients experienced resolution of their irAEs, but some required permanent discontinuation of pembrolizumab. Additionally, there were lasting dysfunctions, particularly endocrine, demanding lifelong support. Careful monitoring and management of these events are essential.

Hepatic immune-related adverse event increased the overall survival of patients with malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Associations between the occurrence of abnormal liver function tests, an immune-related adverse event (irAE) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and treatment efficacy are unclear. We investigated the association between the incidence of these hepatic irAE occurrences and treatment response in patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

We studied 924 patients treated with ICIs to determine the relationship between the incidence of irAEs and overall survival (OS) with and without the continuation of ICIs due to hepatic irAEs.

RESULTS

Of 924 treated, 338 (36.6%) developed all types of irAEs. Median OS for patients with and without irAEs were 34.3 months (n = 338) and 13.1 months (n = 586), respectively (p = 2.49 × 10-14). Of 924, 62 (6.7%) patients developed hepatic irAE; 31 discontinued and 31 continued ICI. Of interest, median OS with and without the continuation of ICI therapy due to hepatic irAEs was 54.3 months and 11.5 months, respectively (p = 0.00589). We further compared the difference of liver function tests among the two groups. Although aminotransferases are higher among discontinued group, stigmata of impending hepatic failure were no different among these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who developed hepatic irAEs, OS was longer in the continued treatment group than in the discontinued treatment group. Most patients who developed hepatic irAEs and stopped the treatment had higher aminotransferase, but often lacks the stigmata of impending hepatic failure such as prothrombin time prolongation or gradual elevation of total bilirubin. Multi-disciplinary cooperation, including hepatologists, may be important for OS improvement by the prolonged use of ICIs.

Comparison of efficacy and adverse events by treatment cycles of nivolumab and ipilimumab in Japanese melanoma patients: A single-center, retrospective study

Combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) is highly effective in treating advanced malignant melanoma (MM) but it is associated with a high incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). This retrospective, cohort study evaluated the efficacy and TRAEs of NIVO+IPI in Japanese patients with unresectable stage III and IV MM, comparing outcomes based on the number of treatment cycles and the IPI dose. We reviewed data from 57 patients with advanced or recurrent MM who received NIVO+IPI at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between August 2015 and July 2024. Patients who received two or fewer NIVO + IPI cycles (NIVO+IPI ≤2 cycles) generally had worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and more advanced stages compared to those who received three or more cycles (NIVO+IPI ≥3 cycles). The analysis revealed that the NIVO+IPI ≥3 cycles group had significantly better overall survival compared to the NIVO+IPI ≤2 cycles group, although receiving three or more cycles was not an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference in the frequency or severity of TRAEs between the two groups, but the incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs increased significantly between the first and second cycles of NIVO+IPI. Additionally, reducing the IPI dose from 3 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg appeared to lower the risk of grade ≥3 TRAEs. In conclusion, further research is needed to determine the optimal number of NIVO+IPI cycles for Japanese patients with advanced MM. However, assessing efficacy after the second cycle may help avoid unnecessary NIVO+IPI administration. Reducing the IPI dose to 2 mg/kg may also offer a safer treatment approach for these patients.

First cycle toxicity and survival in patients with rare cancers treated with checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Associations between immune-related adverse events from checkpoint inhibitor therapy and outcomes have been previously evaluated, with most prior research finding a positive association between toxicity and survival. This prior research has generally reported on more common tumor types. We use a unique data resource of a federally funded basket trial (NCT02834013) for patients with rare cancers (n = 684) to evaluate associations between immune-related adverse events and overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

Patients were treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab; the trial was opened at more than 1000 sites. Landmark Cox regression models were used to assess first cycle immune-related adverse event associations with PFS and overall survival.

RESULTS

We found that grade 1-2 treatment-related immune-related adverse events in the first cycle of therapy were associated with longer overall survival (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.75; P < .001) compared with no treatment-related immune-related adverse event, while grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events were associated with shorter overall survival (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.90; P = .025). Similar but weaker associations were observed with PFS and grade 1-2 treatment-related immune-related adverse events (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.01; P = .067) and grade 3-4 (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.78; P = .037) compared with no treatment-related immune-related adverse events. Grade 1-2 dermatologic toxicity was associated with improved overall survival compared with other grade 1-2 toxicities (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.85; P = .002). There was no statistically significant overall survival difference between patients with grade 1-2 fatigue, gastrointestinal, metabolic, hepatic, endocrine, and thyroid toxicities vs other grade 1-2 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of patients with rare tumors receiving checkpoint inhibitor therapy, grade of immune-related adverse event in the first cycle was predictive for survival.

Adverse events associated with acute pancreatitis caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

BACKGROUND

The precise incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remains unclear. This pharmacovigilance study investigated acute pancreatitis (AP) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using real-world data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Disproportionality analysis employing reporting odds ratios (RORs) was conducted to detect AP signals in ICI-treated patients compared to the entire FAERS database.

RESULTS

A total of 152,042 individual patients were included in the dataset from which we identified a cohort of 921 acute pancreatitis adverse events (AEs). The severe outcome of acute pancreatitis was death, with a rate of 13.6% (125/921). Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related acute pancreatitis AEs were classified into two categories (pancreatitis and immune-mediated pancreatitis) based on the type of adverse event observed. ICI treatments were significantly correlated with the risk of ICIs-induced acute pancreatitis (AP) but varied among different drugs. The median time to AP onset was 57 days, with events occurring throughout the first year post-ICI initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide an enhanced understanding of potential acute pancreatitis related adverse events and provide actionable insights for the early detection and management of ICI related pancreatic adverse events.

Fixed-Dose Versus Weight-Adapted Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Melanoma: A Retrospective Monocentric Analysis of Efficacy and Immune-Related Adverse Events

Changes in the dosing schedules for immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically nivolumab and pembrolizumab, in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, were introduced based on pharmacokinetic data and analysis of pre-existing clinical trial data in the absence of new clinical trials. Therefore, we sought to provide real-world data examining whether fixed-dose therapy (FDT) or weight-adapted therapy (WAT) influenced progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The electronic case notes of all patients (n = 77) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (ICI) in the first-line setting for melanoma in the Department of Dermatology, University of Luebeck, between the 1 January 2017 and the 31 December 2020, were retrospectively analysed. Although a higher proportion of patients in the WAT cohort were treated in the palliative setting, there were no correlations between dosing schedule, renal function, or BMI and PFS. Moreover, there were no differences between the cohorts in terms of PFS, OS, or the number and nature of irAEs. An elevated serum S100 concentration was associated with a decreased mean PFS in the FDT cohort (p < 0.001). This study, although inherently limited by its retrospective and monocentric nature, provides reassuring evidence that dosing schedule and pre-existing comorbidities do not influence efficacy or the irAE profile of ICI therapy in the management of melanoma.

Quality of life, neurocognitive functioning, psychological issues, sexuality and comorbidity more than 2 years after commencing immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of patients diagnosed with advanced cancer survive long-term after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). To design adequate interventions for these survivors, knowledge regarding quality of life (QOL) and its association with long-term and late effects of ICI treatment is required. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate QOL, neurocognitive function, psychological issues, sexuality, and comorbidities in patients surviving at least 2 years after commencing ICI treatment.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study in patients with stage III-IV melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC), or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who survived at least 2 years after the start of ICIs. We assessed QOL, neurocognitive function, psychological issues, sexual function and comorbidity in survivors. Additionally, we evaluated QOL of informal caregivers.

RESULTS

132 survivors (70 melanoma, 50 NSCLC, 12 UCC or RCC) and 80 caregivers were included. Median age was 65 years (range 30-85) and 50 survivors were women (38%). Median time since start and cessation of ICI treatment was 33 (range 21-91) and 18 (range 0-68) months, respectively. Average survivor QOL was comparable to the reference population, but 37 (28%) survivors had poor QOL. Depression and anxiety were negatively correlated with all QOL domains. Although immune-related adverse events were common, there was no association with lower QOL. Caregiver and survivor QOL were only weakly related. Neurocognitive concerns and formally tested neurocognitive impairment were present in 22 (17%) and 13 (15%) survivors, respectively, and were not associated with a diagnosis of brain metastases. Men had a high prevalence of erectile dysfunction and low sexual satisfaction. Half of the survivors met the criteria for the metabolic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

At least 2 years after the start of ICI treatment, one-quarter of cancer survivors had a clinically relevant lower QOL. This was associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety, but not with immune-related adverse events. Sexual issues and metabolic syndrome are prevalent. Survivorship care should address these issues in this population.

Early termination does not negatively impact the outcome of adjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant treatment with anti-PD1 antibodies has been shown to effectively reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with resected metastatic melanoma. Whether a full 12-month duration of treatment is needed to achieve full clinical benefit is not known. This study investigated the survival outcome depending on the duration of adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy.

METHODS

From the prospective multicentre real-world skin cancer registry ADOREG data of 620 patients who finished adjuvant treatment with nivolumab or pembrolizumab for AJCCv8 stage III/IV resected melanoma was analyzed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with regular treatment duration (52 ± 4 weeks; n = 229) and no disease recurrence during therapy (A1) and patients with a premature end of treatment (<48 weeks; n = 214, B). Patients with disease recurrence during adjuvant treatment were included in cohort A2.

RESULTS

The median duration of follow-up was 26.0 months [interquartile range (IQR) 18.0-34.0] in group A1 [median treatment duration 51.3 weeks (IQR 50.0-52.1) and 19.0 months (IQR 13.0-29.0)] in group B [median treatment duration 22.2 weeks (IQR 10.0-34.8)]. Reasons for early discontinuation were treatment-related side effects in 45.3% (n = 97) and other reasons than toxicity in 54.7% (n = 117). The 2-year rate of RFS was 72.4% (95% CI, 68.5-76.3) for patients in group B and 51.5% (95% CI, 48.8-54.2) in patients with regular and intended regular treatment duration (A1 plus A2). When analysing the patients who did not relapse during adjuvant treatment (A1), there was a significantly higher RFS rate of 84.1% (95% CI, 81.5-86.7). When only assessing patients with a recurrence after more than 12 months after initiation of therapy, there was a trend towards better RFS in patients with regular treatment duration.

CONCLUSION

In patients with resected metastatic melanoma, shorter treatment duration with anti-PD1 antibodies is not associated with a worse outcome.

Receiving immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma is associated with higher burden of illness, coagulopathy, cardiac arrhythmia, and disparities

BACKGROUND

The adverse outcomes and costs of immunotherapy (IT) have yet to be fully explored. Our study aims to assess the association between the use of IT in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and the burden of illness (BOI), including coagulopathy, arrhythmia, and disparities.

METHODS

The study used US national data to investigate the association between the use of IT in the mRCC and the BOI. The BOI was measured by total charges and length of stay (LOS). Additionally, we examined coagulopathy, arrhythmia, and disparities in these outcomes. This investigation was conducted using generalized linear models (glm).

RESULTS

Of 28,535 patients who had mRCC, 230 had previously received IT. In the adjusted glm, after accounting for other variables, "IT" was found to be associated with higher total charges- (coeff = 7.67; 95% CI 4.86 - 12.09). There was no association with IT and LOS. Coagulopathy (aOR = 5.61; 95% CI 2.40 - 13.14) and arrhythmia (aOR = 4.34; 95% CI 2.20 - 8.55) were associated with IT treatment. Moreover, compared to males, females had a lower cardiac arrhythmia risk (aOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.98). Non-whites, compared to Whites, had a higher total charge (1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29), higher coagulopathies (aOR 1.25; 95% CI 1.01-1.54), but lower cardiac arrhythmia risk (aOR 0.57; 95% CI 0.47-0.69).

CONCLUSION

Although IT has become increasingly important in treating mRCC, this is the first time real-world data on the costs, negative consequences, and disparities of IT are examined. The results may have important implications for creating innovative, supportive care models for this population.

The impact of immune-related adverse events on survival outcomes in a racially diverse population, with a focus on non-Hispanic Black patients

INTRODUCTION

The development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has been associated with improved survival outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this association's extent across race and ethnicity remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between the development of irAEs and treatment outcomes across racially diverse groups treated at a safety net hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with advanced NSCLC treated between 2015 and 2020. The incidence of irAEs across racial subgroups was compared using logistic regression analysis. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the development of irAEs and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 138 NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), of whom 50% identified as non-Hispanic Black (NHB). Incidence of irAEs was 28%, with no significant difference between NHB and other racial groups. However, females [OR 2.3, 95% CI, (1.1-4.8)] and patients with Medicaid or MassHealth insurance had a higher incidence of irAEs [OR 2.7 (1.2-5.7)]. Additionally, patients with irAEs had a lower risk of disease progression (multivariable HR 0.46, 95% CI, 0.23-0.92) compared to those without irAEs. The association between irAEs and improved progression free survival (PFS) in NHB patients was similar to the other racial group [median PFS 246 vs 181 days; HR 0.87 (0.58-1.29)].

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated a similar incidence of irAEs in NHB patients with NSCLC as compared to other racial groups. Patients who developed irAEs experienced significantly improved survival outcomes. This association remained independent of race and ethnicity, underscoring the importance of providing unbiased treatment recommendations.

Remarkable Antitumor Effects and Serious Multiple Immune-Related Adverse Events in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Two Case Reports

We describe two patients who experienced serious multiple immune-related adverse events (irAEs), treatment interruption, and steroid administration. Despite these challenges, they achieved a remarkable antitumor effect beyond the expected. Various carcinomas demonstrated a possible correlation between the antitumor effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the intensity of irAEs, but few studies report on malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Our two cases exhibited much stronger irAEs than usual. These two cases still demonstrated a complete response (CR) or near CR partial response, indicating a correlation between irAEs and the antitumor effect in MPM.

Incidence and impact of immune combination therapies adverse events in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Immune (IO)-combination therapies have revolutionized the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) but are more frequently associated with adverse events (AEs) compared to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) alone. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prognostic significance of AEs in patients receiving combination therapies.

METHODS

We included patients treated with nivolumab/ipilimumab (NI), nivolumab/cabozantinib (NC), or pembrolizumab/axitinib (PA) at four Italian oncology centers between November 2023 and June 2024. The impact of AEs on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response, and disease control rate were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression.

RESULTS

AEs occurred in 78.8% of NI, 87.9% of NC, and 92.3% of PA patients. Grade 3-4 AEs were more common in IO-TKI vs. IO-IO combinations (32.9% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.05). Pruritus and pulmonary events were more frequent with IO-IO, while hypertension and mucositis were more common with IO-TKI. High-grade AEs did not impact PFS or OS, but TKI reduction due to AEs was associated with longer OS (p < 0.01). Steroid use also improved OS (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

AEs are common in ICI-based therapies for RCC. While they do not negatively affect survival, their management, especially through dose reductions or steroids, may improve outcomes.

Effectiveness and Safety of Second-line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors After Discontinuation of First-line Immune-oncology Combination Therapy Because of Adverse Events in the Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Effectiveness and safety of second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for whom first-line immuno-oncology (I-O) combination therapy was discontinued because of adverse events (AEs) remain to be determined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological data were retrospectively collected from 34 institutions between August 2018 and January 2022 for 243 patients with mRCC who received second-line TKIs after first-line I-O combination therapy. Two patients who requested discontinuation of first-line I-O combination therapy were excluded. Oncological outcomes and safety were compared between patients who discontinued first-line I-O combination therapy because of progressive disease (Group PD) and AEs (Group AE). First- and second-line overall survival (OS) were defined as the time from the start of first- and second-line therapy to death, respectively. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust prognostic factors between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were 179 patients in Group PD and 62 patients in Group AE. Objective response rate and disease control rate were similar between the 2 groups. Progression-free survival (PFS), second-line OS, and first-line OS were significantly longer in Group AE than in Group PD (median 13.6 months vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.005; median not reached [NR] vs. 19.5 months, P = .005; median NR vs. 30.8 months, P = .012, respectively). After propensity score matching, PFS and second-line OS were still significantly longer and first-line OS tended to be longer in Group AE than in Group PD. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of AEs of any grade, including severe grades of 3 or greater, between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Second-line TKIs are safe and at least as effective in patients with mRCC who discontinued first-line I-O combination therapy because of AEs as they are in patients who discontinued because of PD.

Clinical Characteristics of Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Their Impact on Efficacy in Solid Cancers: An Analysis of Real-World Data in Moroccan Patients

PURPOSE

Patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aimed to evaluate the toxicity induced by ICIs and explore the correlation between efficacy and toxicity in a Moroccan population.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of patients with solid tumors who received pembrolizumab or atezolizumab at the National Institute of Oncology, Rabat from July 2018 to December 2023. We identified irAEs according to ASCO 2021 guidelines and graded them according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Efficacy with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined. A Cox regression model was used to determine the association between irAEs and survival.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients with solid tumors who received ICIs were included. The primary tumor types were lung (40.7%), skin (29.1%), and GI cancer (14%). The ICIs most commonly used included pembrolizumab (67.4%) and atezolizumab (32.6%). ICIs were used as monotherapy (77.9%) or in combination (22.1%). A total of 58 (67.4%) patients presented any kind of irAEs. The most common toxicities in both the monotherapy and combination groups were GI, with rates of 25.3% and 31.5%, respectively. Patients with irAEs showed significantly longer median PFS compared with those without irAEs (9 v 3.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.5 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.99]; P = .04). The median OS was longer in patients with irAEs than in those without irAEs but was not statistically significant (19 v 10.3 months; HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.39 to 1.7]; P = .5).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that ICIs have the potential to induce irAEs in patients with solid tumors. These adverse effects were commonly GI. The development of irAEs was associated with improved effectiveness of ICI treatment across different malignancies.

Immune-related adverse events with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: insights from a real-world cohort of 2523 patients

Purpose

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly changed cancer therapy, improving patient survival rates and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aims to investigate the prevalence and associated risk factors of irAEs in a real-world setting, as well as to assess their effects on optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis involved 2523 patients with cancer who received inpatient PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors treatment between January 2018 and December 2022. We documented patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, treatment modalities, incidences, timing, and severity of irAEs, and efficacy outcomes by reviewing inpatient records. Patients were categorized into an irAEs group and a non-irAEs group, with the former further subdivided into a multiple irAEs group and a single irAE group. Chi-square tests were employed to evaluate differences in baseline characteristics and efficacy outcomes between the irAEs and non-irAEs groups, as well as between the multiple and single irAE groups. Additionally, logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify risk factors linked to irAEs.

Results

Among 2523 eligible patients, 1096 reported 1802 irAEs, with an incidence incidence of 43.4%. Among 1096 individuals, 92.1% were classified as grade 1-2, while 7.9% were grade 3 or higher. IrAEs affected various organ systems, with endocrine toxicity (17.7%), hepatic toxicity (17.2%), and hematologic toxicity (11.4%) being the most common. 20.5% patients experienced multi-system irAEs. The average time for patients to develop irAEs was within four treatment cycles. Significant differences in patient gender, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS), comorbidities, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, and treatment modalities were observed between the irAEs and non-irAEs groups, but not between the multiple irAEs and single irAE groups. Compared to the non-irAEs group, the irAEs group exhibited a higher objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), and the multiple irAEs group also showed a higher ORR than the single irAE group.

Conclusion

This real-world study indicated that the occurrence of irAEs is related to patient gender, age, ECOG PS, comorbidities, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and treatment modalities. The occurrence of irAEs may be associated with better treatment benefits.

Organ-specific immune-related adverse events and prognosis in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Patients who developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) could benefit more from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) than those who did not develop irAEs. This study was designed to assess whether the occurrence of irAEs or their characteristics are correlated with survival in advanced patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled a panel of cancer patients who received ICIs at a single institute. Kaplan‒Meier curves were generated to describe progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with irAEs or specific irAE characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients were enrolled, 83 (34.9%) of whom developed at least one irAE. Overall, irAE development was associated with prolonged OS (not reached vs. 17.8 months, P < 0.001), PFS (8.7 vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.003), and an improved objective response rate (24.1% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.005). Furthermore, only skin or endocrine toxicities were associated with improved OS and PFS. On the basis of the results from organ-specific irAEs, the first development of skin or endocrine toxicities as protective irAEs rather than other irAEs was an independent indicator for predicting OS (P < 0.001) and PFS (P < 0.001). A protective irAE burden score based on organ-specific irAEs was further developed to show the significant protective effect of total irAEs on patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Not all irAEs are associated with prolonged survival. The identification of organ-specific irAEs is useful for stratifying patients who actually respond to and benefit from ICIs across different cancer types.

Efficacy and safety of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo-Ipi) combination therapy is an effective first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its effectiveness and feasibility in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line Nivo-Ipi therapy in elderly patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 57 patients with NSCLC (52 men and 5 women), aged ≥ 75 years (range: 75-86) who received first-line Nivo-Ipi therapy from December 2020 to November 2022 at four institutes in Japan. Patient characteristics, therapeutic efficacy, and the incidence and severity of adverse events (AE) were assessed.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 42.1%, the disease control rate was 73.6%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 14.1 months. Common Grade ≥ 3 AEs included pneumonitis, elevated aspartate transaminase, elevated alanine transaminase, adrenal insufficiency, and colitis. No treatment-related deaths were reported. PFS and OS were longer in patients who experienced treatment-related AEs. Patients with and without AEs had a median PFS of 11.7 and 2.8 months, respectively. Similarly, the median OS of patients with and without AEs was 20.4 and 9.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

First-line Nivo-Ipi therapy is effective in elderly patients with NSCLC. Although there was an increased incidence of pneumonitis, the treatment was manageable and presented as a viable treatment option. Notably, the occurrence of treatment-related AEs was associated with improved clinical outcomes, suggesting a potential prognostic value of AEs in this population.

Cancer type-specific adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The distribution of adverse events (AEs) triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across different cancer types has never been demonstrated.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials exclusively assessing ICI monotherapy in cohorts of over 100 patients were considered. Our primary outcome was a comprehensive summary of the distribution of all-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) as well as serious TRAEs (CTCAE grade 3 or higher) across different malignancies. The study is registered with PROSPERO CRD42023387934.

FINDINGS

75 trials that enrolled over 100 patients were included. While investigating the incidence of each TRAE across various cancers, we found special linkages existed between certain TRAEs and particular cancer types. In anti-PD-1 monotherapy group, melanoma patients experienced the most frequent fatigue (31.1 %, 95 % CI 29.7%-32.5 %); the incidences of severe pneumonitis and other respiratory disorders were highest in Hodgkin lymphoma (4.1 %, 95 % CI 1.5%-8.6 %; 4.1 %, 95 % CI 1.5%-8.6 %, respectively). Among individuals undergoing single-agent anti-PD-L1, higher frequency of all-grade pruritus occurred in 19.0 % of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients (95 % CI 15.2%-23.2 %), and the highest probability of developing other severe musculoskeletal disorders was observed in patients with RCC (6.2 %, 95 % CI 4.0%-9.0 %). In anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, the incidences of both all-grade and severe diarrhea occurred most frequently in prostate cancer patients (41.9 %, 95 % CI 37.9%-47.9; 14.8 %, 95 % CI 11.5%-18.7 %, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

This is the first comprehensive study addressing the distribution of various TRAEs across cancer types. Our research emphasizes the significance of considering cancer-specific TRAEs when using ICIs for treatment.

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) Following Immune Checkpoint Therapy (ICT)

In the past decade, the use of immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has increased across many malignancies, including metastatic renal cell carcinoma as an option for frontline and subsequent lines of therapy. Despite the many therapeutic benefits of ICT, its use is complicated by the potential risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). One rare but potentially life-threatening irAE is hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). HLH is a systemic inflammatory disorder resulting in multiorgan failure. The diagnosis of HLH is a challenge due to nonspecific symptoms and overlap with other systemic conditions, which can lead to delays in receiving appropriate treatment and potentially poor patient outcomes. This case illustrates the management of HLH caused by nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy through the use of corticosteroids and tocilizumab in a patient with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

CMV IgG in the blood is not associated with hepatitis but correlates with poor outcomes in immunotherapy treated melanoma patients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection or reactivation in immune-compromised individuals can lead to a wide range of severe complications including hepatitis. However, its relation with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) induced hepatitis (ICI-hepatitis) and tumor responses in advanced melanoma patients remains unclear. Hundred and ninety metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients (mCM) who received ICI treatment, with CMV IgG or IgM information available at baseline, were included in the study (Cohort 1). Clinical characteristics and immune cell count in the blood were retrieved from medical records. In addition, anti-CMV IgG and IgM were measured in pre and on-treatment serum samples from 49 advanced skin cancer patients using ELISA (Cohort 2). In the event of a positive anti-CMV IgM, further analysis with PCR was performed. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to assess the relationship between CMV IgG or IgM and ICI-hepatitis tumor outcomes. Twenty-one patients (11%) developed hepatitis during ICI treatment (Cohort 1). ICI-hepatitis was significantly associated with disease control rate (DCR; p = 0.017) and longer progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.008) in mCM patients. Detection of CMV IgG or IgM antibodies were not associated with ICI-hepatitis (p > 0.05). However, increased CMV IgG values at baseline correlated with disease progression (p = 0.047) and shorter PFS (p = 0.081). In addition, increased CMV IgG values were associated with reduced levels of monocytes (p = 0.005), eosinophils (p = 0.062), and neutrophils (p = 0.065) in the blood. In summary, anti-CMV IgG or IgM in the blood may not be associated with ICI-hepatitis, but high anti-CMV IgG at baseline indicates poor outcomes in ICI-treated mCM patients.

Clinical outcomes of endocrine and other disorders induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors in Japanese patients

The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy of treatment and survival after administration of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in Japanese patients and had endocrine-related and/or other immune-related adverse events (irAEs), as well as irAEs in multiple organs. This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study of 571 Japanese patients treated with ICI at our hospital. We evaluated the occurrence of Grade 3 or higher irAEs and the life expectancy and treatment efficacy after ICI administration. Endocrine-related irAE (E-irAE), other irAE (O-irAE), endocrine-related and other irAE (EO-irAE), and multiple endocrine-related irAE (ME-irAE) were evaluated in groups. 80.8% of patients had an irAE, with the highest incidence of irAE with ipilimumab plus PD-1 inhibitor, followed by atezolizumab 59.0%, pembrolizumab 53.7%, avelumab 50.0%, and nivolumab 47.3%, Durvamumab 26.7% followed; Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed higher survival rates in patients with irAE compared to non-irAE, and higher survival rates in EO-irAE and ME-irAE compared to E-irAE and O-irAE (p < 0.001). The COX proportional hazard ratios for overall survival were E-irAE 0.611 (0.480-0.772), O-irAE 0.758 (0.597-0.957), EO-irAE 0.622 (0.466-0.819) and ME-irAE 0.463 when non-irAE was set at 1.000 (0.257-0.775). When grade 3 or higher irAEs appeared, regardless of their type, there was a trend toward higher survival and post-treatment remission rates after ICI administration. In addition to this, patients with irAEs in multiple endocrine tissues and patients with irAEs in both endocrine and other organs had a better response to treatment after ICI administration.

First-in-Human Study of 23ME-00610, an Antagonistic Antibody for Genetically Validated CD200R1 Immune Checkpoint, in Participants with Advanced Solid Malignancies

PURPOSE

In this phase 1 portion of a first-in-human phase 1/2a study (NCT05199272), 23ME-00610 was evaluated in participants with advanced solid malignancies to determine its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD). Exploratory biomarkers were evaluated to examine potential correlates of efficacy and safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible participants (≥18 years) were administered 23ME-00610 intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W) using an accelerated titration design followed by a traditional 3 + 3 design, with an initial dose level of 2 mg.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight participants were enrolled across seven cohorts and received a median of four cycles of 23ME-00610. No treatment-related serious adverse events (AE) were observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Overall, the PK of 23ME-00610 was linear and dose proportional for doses ≥60 mg, with a median terminal half-life of 13 days at 1,400 mg. Peripheral saturation of CD200R1 was observed for doses ≥60 mg. Immune-related AEs, including rash, pruritus, and hypothyroidism, were predicted by phenome-wide association studies and observed for doses ≥60 mg. A confirmed partial response was observed in a participant with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer whose tumor was among those with the highest tumor CD200 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

23ME-00610 has mild-to-moderate on-target AEs and PK/PD consistent with tumor target saturation and dosing every 3 weeks. The trend for clinical benefit in participants with tumor CD200 expression suggests that 23ME-00610 inhibits CD200R1 signaling and may reverse CD200-mediated immune evasion. Based on PK/PD, safety, and preliminary antitumor activity, 1,400 mg Q3W was selected as the dose for further study.

SIGNIFICANCE

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of the 23andMe genetic database identified CD200R1 as a promising therapeutic target for cancer. This phase 1 study of 23ME-00610, a CD200R1 antagonist IgG1, showed acceptable safety and tolerability, PK supporting Q3W dosing, and PD and preliminary clinical activity supporting an initial recommended phase 2 dose of 1,400 mg.

Oral and cutaneous immune-related adverse events in cancer patients: Prevalence and overall survival

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence of cutaneous and oral immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in cancer patients, risk factors for its development, and overall survival (OS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study which included 748 medical records of cancer patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Most patients were male (59.4%), with stage IV cancer (65%) and received pembrolizumab (46.7%). Four hundred fourteen (55.34%) patients developed cutaneous lesions, 84 (11.2%) developed oral mucosal lesions, and 70 (9.3%) developed xerostomia. The median time for irAEs development was 11 weeks for cutaneous and oral mucosal lesions, and 21.5 weeks for xerostomia. Patients who received PD-1 + CTLA-4 had a higher risk for developing cutaneous irAEs (p = 0.001), while those who underwent ICI and concurrent chemotherapy had a higher risk (p = 0.008) for developing oral mucosal lesions. Patients who presented oral and cutaneous irAEs had better OS than those who did not present (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Cutaneous effects affected more than half of the patients, while oral effects and xerostomia were found in around 11% and 9% of patients, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy and PD-1 + CTLA-4 were more associated with oral and cutaneous irAEs, respectively. Patients who developed such irAEs had better overall survival.

Survival impact of immune-related adverse events in extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prior research indicates a connection between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer. However, limited data exists for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

This study included all ES-SCLC patients who received at least one dose of an immune checkpoint inhibitor between 2 January 2011 and 4 July 2022 using a large retrospective registry from a single institution. PFS and OS were right-censored at the date of last follow-up and were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in PFS and OS between irAE groups were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among 245 patients with ES-SCLC; 56 (23%) experienced irAEs, 24 (42.9%) of which were high-grade (3-4). High-grade irAEs occurred at a median of 1.2 months (interquartile range [IQR] 0.45-2.5), while low-grade irAE occurred at 2.8 months (1.3-5.2). PFS was significantly longer among any irAE vs none (HR = 0.49; [95%CI 0.32-0.77]) as was OS (HR = 0.49; [95%CI 0.34-0.72]).

CONCLUSIONS

In ES-SCLC patients treated with immunotherapy, those who experienced any irAE demonstrated a two-fold increase in both PFS and OS compared to those without an irAE. This is consistent with other tumor primaries.

Safety and efficacy of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients following immune-related adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after experiencing immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies investigating the safety and efficacy of restarting ICIs in NSCLC patients after irAEs. Outcome measures, including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after ICI restarting, were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using the R meta-package.

RESULTS

Four studies involving a total of 326 subjects were included, comprising 137 patients who restarted ICI treatment after irAEs and 189 patients who did not restart ICI treatment. The results revealed that ICI restarting was associated with an increased ORR (OR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.49-3.84), prolonged PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.86), and prolonged OS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.99) compared to non-restarting. The incidence of irAEs after ICI restarting was 45% (95% CI 0.27-0.63).

CONCLUSION

Restarting ICI treatment after discontinuation due to previous irAEs appears to be a reasonable option for NSCLC patients. However, a comprehensive assessment of the potential benefits and risks to individual patients is crucial, and close monitoring of irAEs is warranted.

The role of tumor types in immune-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that block inhibitors of T cell activation and function. With the widespread use of ICIs in cancer therapy, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have gradually emerged as urgent clinical issues. Tumors not only exhibit high heterogeneity, and their response to ICIs varies, with "hot" tumors showing better anti-tumor effects but also a higher susceptibility to irAEs. The manifestation of irAEs displays a tumor-heterogeneous pattern, correlating with the tumor type in terms of the affected organs, incidence, median onset time, and severity. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the pathogenic patterns of irAEs can provide novel insights into the prevention and management of irAEs, guide the development of biomarkers, and contribute to a deeper understanding of the toxicological characteristics of ICIs. In this review, we explore the impact of tumor type on the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs and further elucidate how these tumor types influence the occurrence of irAEs. Finally, we assess key candidate biomarkers and their relevance to proposed irAE mechanisms. This paper also outlines management strategies for patients with various types of tumors, based on their disease patterns.

Hepatotoxicity in Cancer Immunotherapy: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Perspectives

Cancer immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has positively impacted oncological treatments. Despite its effectiveness, immunotherapy is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ, including the liver. Hepatotoxicity primarily manifests as immune-related hepatitis and, less frequently, cholangitis. Several risk factors, such as pre-existing autoimmune and liver diseases, the type of immunotherapy, and combination regimens, play a role in immune-related hepatotoxicity (irH), although reliable predictive markers or models are still lacking. The severity of irH ranges from mild to severe cases, up to, in rare instances, acute liver failure. Management strategies require regular monitoring for early diagnosis and interventions, encompassing strict monitoring for mild cases to the permanent suspension of immunotherapy for severe forms. Corticosteroids are the backbone of treatment in moderate and high-grade damage, alone or in combination with additional immunosuppressive drugs for resistant or refractory cases. Given the relatively low number of events and the lack of dedicated prospective studies, much uncertainty remains about the optimal management of irH, especially in the most severe cases. This review presents the main features of irH, focusing on injury patterns and mechanisms, and provides an overview of the management landscape, from standard care to the latest evidence.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Cutaneous Adverse Events: Mechanisms of Occurrence

Immunotherapy, particularly that based on blocking checkpoint proteins in many tumors, including melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), triple-negative breast (TNB cancer), renal cancer, and gastrointestinal and endometrial neoplasms, is a therapeutic alternative to chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies have the potential to target different pathways leading to the destruction of cancer cells. Although ICIs are an effective treatment strategy for patients with highly immune-infiltrated cancers, the development of different adverse effects including cutaneous adverse effects during and after the treatment with ICIs is common. ICI-associated cutaneous adverse effects include mostly inflammatory and bullous dermatoses, as well as severe cutaneous side reactions such as rash or inflammatory dermatitis encompassing erythema multiforme; lichenoid, eczematous, psoriasiform, and morbilliform lesions; and palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia. The development of immunotherapy-related adverse effects is a consequence of ICIs' unique molecular action that is mainly mediated by the activation of cytotoxic CD4+/CD8+ T cells. ICI-associated cutaneous disorders are the most prevalent effects induced in response to anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents. Herein, we will elucidate the mechanisms regulating the occurrence of cutaneous adverse effects following treatment with ICIs.

Association between programmed death protein 1-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms and immune-related adverse events induced by programmed death protein 1 inhibitors-a pilot study

Programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have potent anti-tumor activities. However, they often result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of varying severity. Therefore, the factors affecting the incidence of irAEs warrant urgent investigation. This study aimed to identify specific and sensitive predictors of irAEs in a Chinese population. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) comprising 80 patients with malignant tumors to evaluate single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci associated with the incidence of irAEs. The SNP rs2157775 on the LOC339166 gene had the lowest P value but did not reach the significance threshold after Bonferroni correction. Therefore, potentially associated SNPs were further investigated through the mechanism-related PD-1 pathway using the ImmPort and PathCards Human Gene Databases. A binary logistic regression model revealed that CD3E (rs3782040) A/A was associated with a lower incidence of irAEs in patients with malignant tumors who received PD-1 inhibitors. In contrast, PTPN11 (rs143894582) C/CA was associated with a higher incidence of irAEs. These findings provide a basis for the verification and identification of new loci to provide insight into the etiology of irAEs.

HOMA-beta independently predicts survival in patients with advanced cancer on treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective cancer drugs, ICI-induced diabetes is a rare but a life-threatening adverse event for patients. The deleterious action of ICI on pancreatic beta-cell function is a concern. However, the influence of ICI on insulin synthesis and secretion in patients with cancer without diabetes remains unknown.

Methods

This study included 87 patients diagnosed with advanced cancer. Glucose metabolism markers (HbA1c, HOMA-IR) and indicators of insulin secretory capacity (HOMA-beta, C-peptide) were prospectively evaluated in patients with ICI-treated cancers to determine their association with cancer prognosis.

Results

Patients with overall survival (OS) ≥ 7 months had substantially higher HOMA-beta levels at baseline (p=0.008) and 1 month after ICI administration (p=0.006) compared to those with OS <7 months. The median OS was significantly longer in patients with HOMA-beta ≥ 64.24 (13 months, 95%CI: 5.849-20.151, 37 events) than in those with HOMA-beta < 64.24 (5 months, 95%CI: 3.280-6.720, 50 events) (p=0.013). Further, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in patients with HOMA-beta ≥ 66.43 (4 months, 95%CI: 3.073-4.927, 33 events) than in those with HOMA-beta < 66.43 (2 months, 95%CI: 1.410-2.590, 54 events) (p=0.025). Additionally, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that a HOMA-beta value ≥ 64.24 independently predicted longer OS in ICI-treated patients.

Conclusions

Pre-ICI HOMA-beta level is linked to longer OS in ICI-treated patients. This connection is significant and shows that insulin secretory capacity may predict ICI efficacy.

Immune checkpoint inhibition of metastatic melanoma: achieving high efficacy in the face of high toxicity

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have advanced the treatment of metastatic melanoma by blocking immune system down-regulators enhancing T-cell-mediated anti-tumor responses. However, many ICIs induce immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) that can impact many organ systems.

AREAS COVERED

Strategies used to manage irAEs include corticosteroids, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) agents, other biological therapies, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and emerging regimens. In this review, we describe current evidence for the efficacy of ICIs, acute and chronic immune toxicities, and strategies to manage toxicities for patients treated with ICIs.

EXPERT OPINION

IrAE management will likely evolve by developing more tailored approaches to prevent toxicities, improving non-steroidal management strategies and tailoring the dose of steroids, and identifying biomarkers of severe toxicities.

Clinical significance of early kinetics of C‑reactive protein in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab: Flare response and baseline levels predict oncological outcomes

Data on the C-reactive protein (CRP) flare response in patients with metastatic and unresectable urothelial carcinoma (mUC) are limited. The present study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of the CRP flare response in patients with mUC who received pembrolizumab. Between March 2018 and December 2022, patients with mUC who received pembrolizumab following chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the early kinetics of CRP: i) Flare-responders, in which CRP levels increased >2-fold from baseline (BL) within 1 month after pembrolizumab administration (CRP flare) and decreased to below-BL levels within 3 months; ii) responders, in which CRP levels decreased ≥30% from baseline within 3 months without CRP flare; and iii) non-responders, which included the remaining patients. Tumor response, survival and incidence of immune-related adverse events (AEs) were compared between the groups. Of the 108 eligible patients, 17 (16%), 27 (25%) and 64 (59%) were classified as CRP flare-responders, CRP responders and CRP non-responders, respectively. Objective response rate was higher in CRP flare-responders and CRP responders than in CRP non-responders. Progression-free survival and overall survival were longer in CRP flare-responders and CRP responders than in CRP non-responders. Among CRP flare-responders, patients with low BL CRP levels had a better tumor response and survival than patients with high BL CRP levels. Notably, there was no difference in the incidence of immune-related AEs. In patients with mUC who received pembrolizumab, CRP flare-responders showed favorable oncological outcomes; therefore, BL CRP levels could predict oncological outcomes in CRP flare-responders.

Correlation between thyroid dysfunction and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently the first line of tumor immunotherapy for the treatment of a wide range of tumors. However, the main side effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors is that they cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients. The relationship between the occurrence of immune side effects in patients and efficacy is controversial. The objective of this study was to confirm the relationship between patients who develop thyroid dysfunction after immune checkpoint inhibitors and efficacy.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective real-world clinical study, and a total of 50 patients with advanced tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at Anqing People's Hospital from 2020.8 to 2022.5 were retrospectively collected. Among them, 30 patients with hypothyroidism and 20 patients with normal or hyperthyroidism occurred, and the treatment effects and prognostic differences between the two groups were compared.

FINDING

After PD1 treatment in all patients, there were 10 cases of partial remission(PR), 18 cases of stable disease(SD) and 2 cases of progressive disease(PD) in patients who developed hypothyroidism, with a disease control rate(DCR) of 93.3% and objective remission rate(ORR) of 33.3%. There were 0 complete remission (CR) patient, 3 PR patients, 11 SD patients, 6 PD patients, 70.0% DCR and 15.0% ORR in patients who did not develop hypothyroidism. The DCR and ORR of patients who developed hypothyroidism were better than those of non-hypothyroid patients, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that progression-free survival (PFS) reached 9.2 months (95% CI 7.726-10.779) in patients who developed hypothyroidism and did not hypothyroidism patients have a PFS of 7.3 months (95% CI 5.604-8.505), with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0341 < 0.05). Further subgroup analysis revealed that among patients who developed hypothyroidism, PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI 0.630-5.440) in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, 6.89 months (95% CI 5.604-8.505) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, > 12 months in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and 11.05 months (95% CI 9.308-12.792) in patients with esophageal cancer months and PFS for patients with gastric cancer was 9.74 months (95% CI 6.979-12.502).

INTERPRETATION

When patients with advanced tumors were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, DCR and ORR were higher in patients who developed hypothyroidism, and patients had better PFS. The benefits were greater in patients with gastric, esophageal, and hepatocellular carcinomas.

Correlation of safety and efficacy of atezolizumab therapy across indications

BACKGROUND

The association between safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is known, but the correlation between severity and impact of specific organ involvement by immune-related adverse events (irAE) and cancer outcomes is poorly understood. Most irAEs are mild-to-moderate but severe irAEs may pose clinical management challenges and affect patient outcomes.

METHODS

We assessed the association between irAE grade (G) and specific organ involvement with overall survival (OS) in 9,521 patients across 14 studies involving atezolizumab as mono (IO) or with chemo/targeted (C-IO) therapy as compared with chemo/targeted therapy (C) in advanced non-small cell lung, small-cell lung, renal cell, urothelial, and triple-negative breast cancers. We used a mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model for time-varying covariates to address immortal-time bias; adjusted for baseline factors associated with irAEs and OS to control for confounding bias; and focused on five common irAEs (dermatologic, thyroid dysfunction, hepatitis, pneumonitis, and colitis) to avoid low statistical power for rare events.

RESULTS

For patients treated with IO or C-IO, G1-2 irAEs were associated with improved OS (HR=0.65, p<0.01) and G3-4 irAEs showed a slight increased risk of death (HR=1.18, p=0.10) versus patients without irAEs. By specific irAE, G1-2 cutaneous irAEs, thyroid dysfunction, or pneumonitis were associated with improved OS (p<0.05), while G3-4 pneumonitis and colitis were associated with worse OS (p<0.01). There was no association between hepatitis and OS by any grade. Findings were consistent across indications.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates a correlation between irAEs and improved OS with atezolizumab by severity grade and the most common irAEs by organ involvement. Low-grade irAEs are significantly associated with improved OS, while specific high-grade irAEs are associated with poorer OS, underscoring the importance of early recognition and management of toxicity to optimize benefit/risk balance.

Phenotypic insights into genetic risk factors for immune-related adverse events in cancer immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose substantial challenges in the realm of cancer immunotherapy, frequently affecting treatment efficacy and patient safety. To address the urgent need for identifying risk factors associated with irAEs, we conducted a comprehensive phenotype-wide Mendelian randomization analysis (MR-PheWAS).

METHODS

Utilizing publicly accessible genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, this investigation evaluated the impact of over 5000 exposure variables on susceptibility to irAEs using univariate Mendelian randomization (MR). We categorized these correlations and further explored potential mechanisms by which associated traits might influence irAEs through multivariate MR.

RESULTS

MR-PheWAS identified numerous risk factors for irAEs, encompassing both previously documented and novel associations. Specifically, we identified 105 traits with probable causal relationships to all-grade irAEs and 119 traits with suggestive associations. For high-grade irAEs, we categorized 122 traits as probably associated and 141 as suggestively associated. Notably, multivariate MR analyses uncovered intricate interactions, particularly highlighting how diabetes impacts all-grade irAEs through mediators such as body mass index and sex hormone-binding globulin.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has not only identified new risk factors for irAEs but also confirmed several well-established ones. Further investigation is crucial to validate and assess these identified risk factors within clinical trials. A mechanistic understanding of these causal factors is essential for improving the management and prevention of irAEs.

Gut microbiome metabolites, molecular mimicry, and species-level variation drive long-term efficacy and adverse event outcomes in lung cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

The influence of the gut microbiota on long-term immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is poorly understood, as are the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

We performed gut metagenome and metabolome sequencing of gut microbiotas from patients with lung cancer initially treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and explored the underlying mechanisms mediating long-term (median follow-up 1167 days) ICI responses and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Results were validated in external, publicly-available datasets (Routy, Lee, and McCulloch cohorts).

FINDINGS

The ICI benefit group was enriched for propionate (P = 0.01) and butyrate/isobutyrate (P = 0.12) compared with the resistance group, which was validated in the McCulloch cohort (propionate P < 0.001, butyrate/isobutyrate P = 0.002). The acetyl-CoA pathway (P = 0.02) in beneficial species mainly mediated butyrate production. Microbiota sequences from irAE patients aligned with antigenic epitopes found in autoimmune diseases. Microbiotas of responsive patients contained more lung cancer-related antigens (P = 0.07), which was validated in the Routy cohort (P = 0.02). Escherichia coli and SGB15342 of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii showed strain-level variations corresponding to clinical phenotypes. Metabolome validation reviewed more abundant acetic acid (P = 0.03), propionic acid (P = 0.09), and butyric acid (P = 0.02) in the benefit group than the resistance group, and patients with higher acetic, propionic, and butyric acid levels had a longer progression-free survival and lower risk of tumor progression after adjusting for histopathological subtype and stage (P < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

Long-term ICI survivors have coevolved a compact microbial community with high butyrate production, and molecular mimicry of autoimmune and tumor antigens by microbiota contribute to outcomes. These results not only characterize the gut microbiotas of patients who benefit long term from ICIs but pave the way for "smart" fecal microbiota transplantation. Registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000032088).

FUNDING

This work was supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7232110), National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-A-072, 2023-PUMCH-C-054), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2022-I2M-C&T-B-010).

Development of a prognostic nomogram for advanced non-small cell lung cancer using clinical characteristics

This retrospective study demonstrated that patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who experienced any-grade or grade 1-2 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy (ICI+Chemo) as first-line treatment regimen had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS; p < 0.05) compared with patients without any irAE. Three variables were identified as predictors of favorable PFS and OS: absence of baseline brain metastasis (p < 0.05), receiving first-line ICI+Chemo (p < 0.01), and occurrence of any grade adverse events (p < 0.001). Using these three variables, two nomograms were generated to predict PFS and OS, which were validated using two independent cohorts treated with Chemo or ICI+Chemo (n = 161) or ICI monotherapy (n = 109). Patients with low scores in discovery and validation cohorts consistently had significantly longer PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.05) than those with high scores. Our findings provide preliminary evidence of the clinical utility of a nomogram in prognosticating ICI-treated patients.

Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life in Japanese patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma receiving immune check point inhibitors

Real-world data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. This study included 42 patients with aUC who received second-line or later pembrolizumab (n = 19), maintenance avelumab followed by first-line chemotherapy (n = 13), or adjuvant nivolumab after radical surgery (n = 10). Time-course changes in the domains and scales related to HRQoL were evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-G, and SF-8 questionnaires during ICI therapy. Anchor-based approaches for minimally important differences were determined as 'improved', 'stable', and 'deteriorated'. We found significant improvements after the start of pembrolizumab treatment on many scales. Almost none of the scales changed significantly in the avelumab and nivolumab groups. Approximately 80% of the pembrolizumab group had deteriorated social/family well-being in FACT-G. Approximately 60% of the patients in the avelumab group had deteriorated general health and vitality in SF-8. In the nivolumab group, none of the scales deteriorated in > 50% of the patients. Deterioration of physical function in the SF-8 was associated with occurrence of treatment-related adverse events ≥ grade 2 during ICI therapy (P = 0.013). Our findings demonstrated that majority of patients with aUC who received ICI therapy had a stable HRQoL, which was consistent with evidence from clinical trials.

Novel FABP4+C1q+ macrophages enhance antitumor immunity and associated with response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in NSCLC via AMPK/JAK/STAT axis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) immunotherapy facilitates new approaches to achieve precision cancer treatment. A growing number of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have benefited from treatment with neoadjuvant ICIs combined with chemotherapy. However, the mechanisms and associations between the therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy (NAPC) and macrophage subsets are still unclear. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and identified a novel FABP4+C1q+ macrophage subtype, which exhibited stronger proinflammatory cytokine production and phagocytic ability. This subtype was found to be more abundant in tumor tissues and lymph nodes of major pathological response (MPR) patients compared to non-MPR patients, and was associated with a good efficacy of NAPC. Multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemical (mIHC) staining was subsequently used to verify our findings. Further mechanistic studies indicated that FABP4 and C1q regulate the expression of proinflammatory cytokines synergistically. In addition, FABP4 and C1q promote fatty acid synthesis, enhance anti-apoptosis ability and phagocytic ability of macrophage via the interaction of AMPK/JAK/STAT axis. This study provides novel insights into the underlying mechanisms and predictive biomarkers of NAPC. Our findings contribute to improving the prognosis of patients with NSCLC by potentially guiding more precise patient selection and treatment strategies. NOVELTY & IMPACT STATEMENTS: We identified a group of macrophages (FABP4+C1q+ macrophages) related to the therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. FABP4+C1q+ macrophages highly expressed proinflammatory cytokines-related genes and had a strong cytokine production and phagocytic ability. We believe that our study provides a novel insight into the synergistic mechanism of neoadjuvant ICI combined with chemotherapy and may lead to improved clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC in the future.

Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related severe cardiac adverse event: based on FAERS and TCGA databases

Combining the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases, we aim to explore the factors that influence anti-programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors/programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) related severe cardiac adverse events (cAEs). We obtained anti-PD-1/PD-L1 adverse event reports from January 2014 to December 2022 from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis was performed to find anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related cAEs using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). We were exploring influencing factors based on multivariate logistic regression analysis. Finally, we utilized a strategy that combines FAERS and TCGA databases to explore the potential immune and genetic influencing factors associated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related severe cAEs. Reports of severe cAEs accounted for 7.10% of the overall anti-PD-1/PD-L1 adverse event reports in the FAERS database. Immune-mediated myocarditis (PRR = 77.01[59.77-99.23]) shows the strongest toxic signal. The elderly group (65-74: OR = 1.34[1.23-1.47], ≥ 75: OR = 1.64[1.49-1.81]), male (OR = 1.14[1.05-1.24]), anti-PD-L1 agents (OR = 1.17[1.03-1.33]), patients with other adverse events (OR = 2.38[2.17-2.60]), and the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitor (OR = 1.29[1.17-1.43]), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR = 1.17[1.04-1.31]), or antibiotics (OR = 1.24[1.08-1.43]) may increase the risk of severe cAEs. In addition, PD-L1 mRNA (Rs = 0.71, FDR = 2.30 × 10- 3) and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 3 (LRP3) (Rs = 0.82, FDR = 2.17 × 10- 2) may be immune and genetic influencing factors for severe cAEs. Severe cAEs may be related to antigen receptor-mediated signalling pathways. In this study, we found that age, gender, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, concomitant other adverse events, concomitant medication, PD-L1 mRNA, and LRP3 may be influencing factors for anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related severe cAEs. However, our findings still require a large-scale prospective cohort validation.

Learning about and living with toxicity: a qualitative study of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma or lung cancer and their caregivers

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment for melanoma and lung cancer and are in widespread use. This study aims to describe how patients and caregivers learn about ICI toxicities and their perceptions and experiences of toxicity.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study of 42 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n = 16) or melanoma (n = 26) who were initiating or discontinuing an ICI and their caregivers (n = 9). We conducted in-depth interviews to explore patients' and caregivers' experiences learning about and living with ICI side effects. We audio-recorded the first oncology visit after enrollment. We used a framework approach to code interview and visit transcripts and synthesized codes into themes.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 67; 68% were male. Themes of participant interviews and clinician-patient dialogue included: (i) Patients initiating an ICI received extensive information about side effects, which some patients found overwhelming or scary and difficult to absorb; (ii) patients who were deterred by fear of toxicity ultimately proceeded with treatment because of oncologist encouragement or the sense of no alternative; (iii) participants found hope in the association between toxicity and ICI efficacy; (iv) caregivers helped patients navigate the deluge of information and uncertainty related to ICIs. Participants suggested ways to improve ICI side effect education, such as incorporating patient stories.

CONCLUSION

Patients perceived that ICI toxicity counseling was overwhelming yet were encouraged by oncologists' reassurance that serious side effects were manageable and by the framing of toxicity as a sign of efficacy. We identified opportunities to improve communication of ICI risks and benefits.

Machine learning modeling of patient health signals informs long-term survival on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

System-level patient health signals, as captured by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), might contain correlates of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy response. Using all TEAEs and a novel machine learning modeling approach, we derived a composite signature predictive of, and potentially specific to, the response to the anti-PD-L1 ICI durvalumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We trained on data from the durvalumab arm and chemotherapy arm in the MYSTIC clinical trial and tested on data from four independent durvalumab-containing NSCLC trials using only the first 60 days' TEAEs. We directly compared our signature performance against that of three different definitions of immune-related adverse events. Only our signature was predictive and identified longer survivors in patients treated with durvalumab but not in patients treated with chemotherapy or placebo. It also identified durvalumab-treated long survivors with stable disease at their first RECIST evaluation and a set of PD-L1-negative long survivors.

Recent Advancements in Cell-Based Therapies in Melanoma

Malignant melanoma outcomes have drastically changed in recent years due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, many patients still experience intolerable side effects, therapy resistance, and disease progression on ICI therapy. Therefore, there remains a need for novel therapeutics that address this gap in treatment options. Cell-based therapies have gained wide attention as a therapeutic option that could address this gap in treatment options for advanced melanoma. These therapies work by extracting certain cell types produced in the human body such as T-cells, modifying them based on a specific target, and transfusing them back into the patient. In the realm of cancer therapy, cell-based therapies utilize immune cells to target tumor cells while sparing healthy cells. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the usage of lifileucel, a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, in advanced melanoma. This came following recent results from the C-144-01 study (NCT02360579), which demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TILs in metastatic melanoma patients who otherwise failed on standard ICI/targeted therapy. Thus, the results of this trial as well as the recent FDA approval have proven the viability of utilizing cell-based therapies to fill the gap in treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of major cell-based therapies that have been utilized in melanoma by delineating results of the most recent multi-center phase II/ III clinical trials that evaluate the efficacy and safety of major cell-based therapies in melanoma. Additionally, we provide a summary of current limitations in each cell-based therapeutic option as well as a future direction of how to further extrapolate these cell-based therapies in advanced melanoma.

The correlation between immune-related adverse events and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment by targeting the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and programmed death-1/ligand-1. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors show promising therapeutic efficacy, they often cause immune-related adverse events. Immune-related adverse events differ from the side effects of conventional chemotherapy and require vigilant monitoring. These events predominantly affect organs, such as the colon, liver, lungs, pituitary gland, thyroid and skin, with rare cases affecting the heart, nervous system and other tissues. As immune-related adverse events result from immune activation, indicating the reinvigoration of exhausted immune cells that attack both tumors and normal tissues, it is theoretically possible that immune-related adverse events may signal a better response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Recent retrospective studies have explored the link between immune-related adverse event development and clinical efficacy; however, the predictive value of immune-related adverse events in the immune checkpoint inhibitor response remains unclear. Additionally, studies have focused on immune-related adverse events, timing of onset and immunosuppressive treatments. This review focuses on pivotal studies of the association between immune-related adverse events and outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Clinical and Molecular Variables Associated With Early Progression to Checkpoint Inhibitors in MSI-High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

About one third of patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer (dMMR/MSI-H mCRC) experience primary resistance or early progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), while others benefit from exceptionally long-lasting responses. In this single-centre retrospective study, we aimed to identify variables associated with improved overall survival (OS) as well as early disease progression.

METHODS

All dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients treated with ICI between 2014 and 2022 were included. Baseline patient demographics, tumour characteristics as well response and outcome data were recorded. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Uni- and multivariate cox regression analysis was used to identify parameters associated with improved OS. Clinicopathological factors associated with early progression (≤ 12 months after treatment initiation) were assessed using uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

About 84 ICI-treated dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients were included. Progressive disease occurred in 37 (44%) patients, but only in 11 (19%) patients with disease control at 12 months. Median OS was 80 months and improved outcome was associated with a lower neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P = .004) and the presence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (P = .015). Early progression was associated with poor performance status (P = .036), a higher blood CRP level (P = .033) and absence of irAEs (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Disease progression in ICI-treated dMMR/MSI-H mCRC rarely occurs in patients experiencing disease control for at least 12 months. Performance status, presence of immune-related adverse events, CRP levels, CEA levels and NLR can be helpful to identify those patients that may benefit from ICI treatment, guiding clinicians in therapeutic decisions.

Aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas: medical treatment beyond temozolomide

Aggressive pituitary tumors are a subset of pituitary neoplasms, characterized by unusually fast growth rate, invasiveness and overall resistance to optimized standard treatment. When metastases are present, the term pituitary carcinoma is employed. After failure of standard treatments, current guidelines recommend first-line temozolomide monotherapy. However, a significant number of patients do not respond to temozolomide, or experience disease progression following its discontinuation; in these latter cases, re-challenge with temozolomide is generally advised, although the reported outcomes have been less satisfactory. Although no alternative therapies have been formally recommended after temozolomide failure, growing evidence regarding potential second- or third-line therapeutic strategies has emerged. In the present work, we reviewed the available evidence published up to April 2023 involving the most relevant therapies employed so far, namely immune checkpoint inhibitors, bevacizumab, peptide radionuclide receptor therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors. For each treatment, we report efficacy and safety outcomes, along with data regarding potential predictors of response. Overall, immune checkpoint inhibitors and bevacizumab are showing the most promise as therapeutic options after temozolomide failure. The former showed better responses in pituitary carcinomas. Peptide radionuclide receptor therapy has also showed some efficacy in these tumors, while tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors have exhibited so far limited or no efficacy. Further studies, as well as an individualized, patient-tailored approach, are clearly needed. In addition, we report an unpublished case of a silent corticotroph pituitary carcinoma that progressed under dual immunotherapy, and then showed stable disease under a combination of lomustine and bevacizumab.