Maternally Inherited Stable Intronic Sequence RNA Triggers a Self-Reinforcing Feedback Loop during Development

The idiosyncrasies of oocytes

Animal oocytes face extreme challenges. They remain dormant in the body for long periods of time. To support offspring development and health, they need to store genetic material and maternal factors stably and at the same time manage cellular damage in a reliable manner. Recent studies have provided new insights on how oocytes cope with such challenges. This review discusses the many unusual or idiosyncratic nature of oocytes and how understanding oocyte biology can help us address issues of reproduction and intergenerational inheritance.

Circular RNAs in neurological conditions - computational identification, functional validation, and potential clinical applications

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have gained significant attention in recent years due to advancements in biotechnology, particularly high-throughput total RNA sequencing. These developments have led to new understandings of non-coding biology, revealing that approximately 80% of non-coding regions in the genome possesses biochemical functionality. Among ncRNAs, circular RNAs (circRNAs), first identified in 1976, have emerged as a prominent research field. CircRNAs are abundant in most human cell types, evolutionary conserved, highly stable, and formed by back-splicing events which generate covalently closed ends. Notably, circRNAs exhibit high expression levels in neural tissue and perform diverse biochemical functions, including acting as molecular sponges for microRNAs, interacting with RNA-binding proteins to regulate their availability and activity, modulating transcription and splicing, and even translating into functional peptides in some cases. Recent advancements in computational and experimental methods have enhanced our ability to identify and validate circRNAs, providing valuable insights into their biological roles. This review focuses on recent developments in circRNA research as they related to neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative conditions. We also explore their potential applications in clinical diagnostics, therapeutics, and future research directions. CircRNAs remain a relatively underexplored area of non-coding biology, particularly in the context of neurological disorders. However, emerging evidence supports their role as critical players in the etiology and molecular mechanisms of conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease. These findings suggest that circRNAs may provide a novel framework contributing to the molecular dysfunctions underpinning these complex neurological conditions.

Intron-Derived Lariat RNAs Go Stable

During pre-mRNA splicing, introns are removed by the spliceosome, and the flanking exons are ligated to form mature mRNA, which is subsequently translated into protein. Traditionally, intronic RNAs have been regarded as "junk", presumed to be degraded for nucleotide turnover. Notably, after debranching, some linearized lariat RNAs can be further processed into snoRNAs, miRNAs, and other long non-coding RNAs. However, recent studies have shown that many intron-derived lariat RNAs can escape degradation and remain stable across various eukaryotic organisms, indicating they may play significant roles in cellular processes. Moreover, these naturally retained lariat RNAs are frequently observed in circular forms in vivo, suggesting that their linear tails are highly susceptible to degradation. This highlights lariat RNAs as an important source of circular RNAs. Furthermore, many lariat-derived circRNAs have been detected in the cytoplasm, implying active nuclear export and potential roles in cytoplasmic processes. In this review, we provide an overview of the life cycle of intron-derived lariat RNAs, focusing on their biogenesis, degradation, and retention. We also discuss the mechanisms that enable their resistance to degradation and the biological functions of stable lariat RNAs, shedding light on these seemingly "nonsense" yet inevitably produced non-coding intronic RNAs.

Can stable introns and noncoding RNAs be harnessed to improve health through activation of mitohormesis?

Ever since their introduction a decade ago, stable introns, a type of noncoding (nc)RNAs, are found to be key players in different important cellular processes acting through regulation of gene expression and feedback loops to maintain cellular homeostasis. Despite being commonly regarded as useless byproducts, recent studies in yeast suggested that stable introns are essential for cell survivability under starvation. In Drosophila, we found that a stable intron, sisR-1, has a direct effect in regulating mitochondrial dynamics during short-term fasting and subsequently improved overall oocyte quality. We speculated that the beneficial effects implicated by sisR-1 is through the activation of mitohormesis, an interesting phenomenon in mitochondrial biology. Mitohormesis is suggested to improve health span and lifespan of cells and organisms, but the involvement of ncRNAs is not well-documented. Here, we discuss the potential role of sisR-1 and other ncRNAs in activating mitohormesis and the possible applications in improving cellular and organismal health.

Sequestration of DBR1 to stress granules promotes lariat intronic RNAs accumulation for heat-stress tolerance

Heat stress (HS) poses a significant challenge to plant survival, necessitating sophisticated molecular mechanisms to maintain cellular homeostasis. Here, we identify SICKLE (SIC) as a key modulator of HS responses in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). SIC is required for the sequestration of RNA DEBRANCHING ENZYME 1 (DBR1), a rate-limiting enzyme of lariat intronic RNA (lariRNA) decay, into stress granules (SGs). The sequestration of DBR1 by SIC enhances the accumulation of lariRNAs, branched circular RNAs derived from excised introns during pre-mRNA splicing, which in turn promote the transcription of their parental genes. Our findings further demonstrate that SIC-mediated DBR1 sequestration in SGs is crucial for plant HS tolerance, as deletion of the N-terminus of SIC (SIC1-244) impairs DBR1 sequestration and compromises plant response to HS. Overall, our study unveils a mechanism of transcriptional regulation in the HS response, where lariRNAs are enriched through DBR1 sequestration, ultimately promoting the transcription of heat stress tolerance genes.

A repertoire of intronic lariat RNAs reveals tissue-specific regulation and target mimicry potential in plants

Lariat RNA is concomitantly produced by excised intron during RNA splicing, which is usually debranched by DBR1, an RNA debranching enzyme. However, increasing evidence showed that some lariat RNA could escape debranching. Little is known about how and why these lariat RNAs could be retained. By comparing the atlas of lariat RNAs between the non-dividing cell (mature pollen) and three actively dividing tissues (young shoot apex, young seeds, and young roots), we identified hundreds to thousands of lariat RNA naturally retained in each tissue, and the incidence of lariat RNA retention is much less in shoot apex while much more in pollen. Many lariat RNAs derived from the same intron or different lariat RNAs from the same pre-mRNA could be retained in one tissue while degraded in the other tissues. By deciphering lariat RNA sequences, we identified an AG-rich (RAAAAVAAAR) motif and a UC-rich (UCUCUYUCUC) motif for pollen-specific and the other three tissues-retained lariat RNAs, respectively. Reconstitution of the pollen-specific AG-rich motif indeed enhanced lariat RNA retention in plants. Biologically, hundreds of lariat RNAs harbored miRNA binding sites, and dual-luciferase reporter assay showed that these natural lariat RNAs had the potential to protect expression of miRNA target genes. Collectively, our results uncover that selective retention of lariat RNA is an actively regulatory process, and provide new insights into understanding how lariat RNA metabolism may impact miRNA activity.

Molecular mechanisms of circular RNA translation

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are covalently closed single-stranded RNAs without a 5' cap structure and a 3' poly(A) tail typically present in linear mRNAs of eukaryotic cells. CircRNAs are predominantly generated through a back-splicing process within the nucleus. CircRNAs have long been considered non-coding RNAs seemingly devoid of protein-coding potential. However, many recent studies have challenged this idea and have provided substantial evidence that a subset of circRNAs can associate with polysomes and indeed be translated. Therefore, in this review, we primarily highlight the 5' cap-independent internal initiation of translation that occurs on circular RNAs. Several molecular features of circRNAs, including the internal ribosome entry site, N6-methyladenosine modification, and the exon junction complex deposited around the back-splicing junction after back-splicing event, play pivotal roles in their efficient internal translation. We also propose a possible relationship between the translatability of circRNAs and their stability, with a focus on nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and nonstop decay, both of which are well-characterized mRNA surveillance mechanisms. An in-depth understanding of circRNA translation will reshape and expand our current knowledge of proteomics.

Genetic compensation between ribosomal protein paralogs mediated by a cognate circular RNA

Inter-regulation between related genes, such as ribosomal protein (RP) paralogs, has been observed to be important for genetic compensation and paralog-specific functions. However, how paralogs communicate to modulate their expression levels is unknown. Here, we report a circular RNA involved in the inter-regulation between RP paralogs RpL22 and RpL22-like during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Both paralogs are mutually regulated by the circular stable intronic sequence RNA (sisRNA) circRpL22(NE,3S) produced from the RpL22 locus. RpL22 represses itself and RpL22-like. Interestingly, circRpL22 binds to RpL22 to repress RpL22-like, but not RpL22, suggesting that circRpL22 modulates RpL22's function. circRpL22 is in turn controlled by RpL22-like, which regulates RpL22 binding to circRpL22 to indirectly modulate RpL22. This circRpL22-centric inter-regulatory circuit enables the loss of RpL22-like to be genetically compensated by RpL22 upregulation to ensure robust male germline development. Thus, our study identifies sisRNA as a possible mechanism of genetic crosstalk between paralogous genes.

Dynamics and regulatory role of circRNAs in Asian honey bee larvae following fungal infection

Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) plays a vital part in the regulation of immune responses, growth, and development in plants and animals. Here, the identification, characteristic analysis, and molecular verification of circRNAs in Apis cerana cerana worker larval guts were conducted, followed by in-depth investigation of the expression pattern of larval circRNAs during Ascosphaera apis infection and exploration of the potential regulatory part of differentially expressed circRNAs (DEcircRNAs) in host immune responses. A total of 3178 circRNAs in the larval guts of A. c. cerana were identified, with a length distribution ranging from 15 to 96,007 nt. Additionally, 155, 95, and 86 DEcircRNAs were identified in the in the 4-, 5-, and 6-day-old larval guts following A. apis infection. These DEcircRNAs were predicted to target 29, 25, and 18 parental genes relevant to 12, 20, and 17 GO terms as well as 144, 114, and 61 KEGG pathways, including 5 cellular and 4 humoral immune pathways. Complex competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) regulatory networks were detected as being formed among DEcircRNAs, DEmiRNAs, and DEmRNAs. The target DEmRNAs were engaged in 36, 47, and 47 GO terms as well as 331, 332, and 331 pathways, including 6 cellular and 6 humoral immune pathways. Further, 19 DEcircRNAs, 5 DEmiRNAs, and 3 mRNAs were included in the sub-networks relative to 3 antioxidant enzymes. Finally, back-splicing sites within 15 circRNAs and the difference in the 15 DEcircRNAs' expression between uninoculated and A. apis-inoculated larval guts were confirmed based on molecular methods. These findings not only enrich our understanding of bee host-fungal pathogen interactions but also lay a foundation for illuminating the mechanism underlying the DEcircRNA-mediated immune defense of A. c. cerana larvae against A. apis invasion. KEY POINTS: • The expression pattern of circRNAs was altered in the A. cerana worker larval guts following A. apis infection. • Back-splicing sites within 15 A. cerana circRNAs were verified using molecular approaches. DEcircRNAs potentially modulated immune responses and antioxidant enzymes in A. apis-challenged host guts.

Nutrient-dependent regulation of a stable intron modulates germline mitochondrial quality control

Mitochondria are inherited exclusively from the mothers and are required for the proper development of embryos. Hence, germline mitochondrial quality is highly regulated during oogenesis to ensure oocyte viability. How nutrient availability influences germline mitochondrial quality control is unclear. Here we find that fasting leads to the accumulation of mitochondrial clumps and oogenesis arrest in Drosophila. Fasting induces the downregulation of the DIP1-Clueless pathway, leading to an increase in the expression of a stable intronic sequence RNA called sisR-1. Mechanistically, sisR-1 localizes to the mitochondrial clumps to inhibit the poly-ubiquitination of the outer mitochondrial protein Porin/VDAC1, thereby suppressing p62-mediated mitophagy. Alleviation of the fasting-induced high sisR-1 levels by either sisR-1 RNAi or refeeding leads to mitophagy, the resumption of oogenesis and an improvement in oocyte quality. Thus, our study provides a possible mechanism by which fasting can improve oocyte quality by modulating the mitochondrial quality control pathway. Of note, we uncover that the sisR-1 response also regulates mitochondrial clumping and oogenesis during protein deprivation, heat shock and aging, suggesting a broader role for this mechanism in germline mitochondrial quality control.

Circular stable intronic RNAs possess distinct biological features and are deregulated in bladder cancer

Until recently, intronic lariats were regarded as short-lasting splicing byproducts with no apparent function; however, increasing evidence of stable derivatives suggests regulatory roles. Yet little is known about their characteristics, functions, distribution, and expression in healthy and tumor tissue. Here, we profiled and characterized circular stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs) using total RNA-Seq data from bladder cancer (BC; n = 457, UROMOL cohort), healthy tissue (n = 46), and fractionated cell lines (n = 5). We found that the recently-discovered full-length intronic circles and the stable lariats formed distinct subclasses, with a surprisingly high intronic circle fraction in BC (∼45%) compared to healthy tissues (0-20%). The stable lariats and their host introns were characterized by small transcript sizes, highly conserved BP regions, enriched BP motifs, and localization in multiple cell fractions. Additionally, circular sisRNAs showed tissue-specific expression patterns. We found nine circular sisRNAs as differentially expressed across early-stage BC patients with different prognoses, and sisHNRNPK expression correlated with progression-free survival. In conclusion, we identify distinguishing biological features of circular sisRNAs and point to specific candidates (incl. sisHNRNPK, sisWDR13 and sisMBNL1) that were highly expressed, had evolutionary conserved sequences, or had clinical correlations, which may facilitate future studies and further insights into their functional roles.

Intron dynamics reveal principles of gene regulation during the maternal-to-zygotic transition

The maternal-to-zygotic transition (MZT) is a conserved embryonic process in animals where developmental control shifts from the maternal to zygotic genome. A key step in this transition is zygotic transcription, and deciphering the MZT requires classifying newly transcribed genes. However, due to current technological limitations, this starting point remains a challenge for studying many species. Here, we present an alternative approach that characterizes transcriptome changes based solely on RNA-seq data. By combining intron-mapping reads and transcript-level quantification, we characterized transcriptome dynamics during the Drosophila melanogaster MZT. Our approach provides an accessible platform to investigate transcriptome dynamics that can be applied to the MZT in nonmodel organisms. In addition to classifying zygotically transcribed genes, our analysis revealed that over 300 genes express different maternal and zygotic transcript isoforms due to alternative splicing, polyadenylation, and promoter usage. The vast majority of these zygotic isoforms have the potential to be subject to different regulatory control, and over two-thirds encode different proteins. Thus, our analysis reveals an additional layer of regulation during the MZT, where new zygotic transcripts can generate additional proteome diversity.

Intron-capture RNA-seq reveals the landscape of intronic RNAs in Arabidopsis

Intronic RNAs have been overlooked for a long time: They are functional, but treated as "junk." In this work, we designed a new sequencing strategy to investigate intronic RNAs. By using intron-capture RNA-seq, we systematically analyzed the intronic RNAs in Arabidopsis by zooming into the intronic regions an order of magnitude deeper than in previous work. Our key findings include: (1) Intron-capture RNA-seq is a much more efficient approach to analyze intronic RNAs than total RNA-seq and mRNA-seq. (2) We identified three types of intronic RNAs, and found that the GC pattern differs significantly between the introns with and without intronic RNAs. (3) We detected many hidden elements in introns, including circular RNAs, splice junctions, and transcripts that have previously been overlooked. (4) The expression of these intronic RNAs varies during the time course of pathogen infection, which indicates that an unknown mechanism may exist for these RNAs. (5) We also demonstrated that most of intronic RNAs are detectable in both Arabidopsis and rice, suggesting that these non-coding molecules are conserved. Taken together, this work proposes an efficient strategy to analyze intronic RNAs, and provides an unprecedented view of this essential component in biological pathways.

Distinct biogenesis pathways may have led to functional divergence of the human and Drosophila Arglu1 sisRNA

Stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs) are stable, long noncoding RNAs containing intronic sequences. While sisRNAs have been found across diverse species, their level of conservation remains poorly understood. Here we report that the biogenesis and functions of a sisRNA transcribed from the highly conserved Arglu1 locus are distinct in human and Drosophila melanogaster. The Arglu1 genes in both species show similar exon-intron structures where the intron 2 is orthologous and positionally conserved. In humans, Arglu1 sisRNA retains the entire intron 2 and promotes host gene splicing. Mechanistically, Arglu1 sisRNA represses the splicing-inhibitory activity of ARGLU1 protein by binding to ARGLU1 protein and promoting its localization to nuclear speckles, away from the Arglu1 gene locus. In contrast, Drosophila dArglu1 sisRNA forms via premature cleavage of intron 2 and represses host gene splicing. This repression occurs through a local accumulation of dARGLU1 protein and inhibition of telescripting by U1 snRNPs at the dArglu1 locus. We propose that distinct biogenesis of positionally conserved Arglu1 sisRNAs in both species may have led to functional divergence.

Noncoding RNA Regulation of Hormonal and Metabolic Systems in the Fruit Fly Drosophila

The importance of RNAs is commonly recognised thanks to protein-coding RNAs, whereas non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) were conventionally regarded as 'junk'. In the last decade, ncRNAs' significance and roles are becoming noticeable in various biological activities, including those in hormonal and metabolic regulation. Among the ncRNAs: microRNA (miRNA) is a small RNA transcript with ~20 nucleotides in length; long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) is an RNA transcript with >200 nucleotides; and circular RNA (circRNA) is derived from back-splicing of pre-mRNA. These ncRNAs can regulate gene expression levels at epigenetic, transcriptional, and post-transcriptional levels through various mechanisms in insects. A better understanding of these crucial regulators is essential to both basic and applied entomology. In this review, we intend to summarise and discuss the current understanding and knowledge of miRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA in the best-studied insect model, the fruit fly Drosophila.

A guide to naming eukaryotic circular RNAs

Alternative splicing of eukaryotic transcripts often leads to production of multiple mature RNAs from a single gene locus. In addition to encoding linear RNAs, genes can produce stable circular RNAs (circRNAs) that are often co-expressed with their cognate linear RNAs. Multiple distinct circRNAs are frequently generated from a gene locus via back-splicing, with each mature transcript having a potentially unique function due to its distinct combination of exons and sometimes retained introns. However, names currently given to circRNAs are often ambiguous and lack consistency across studies. Here, we call on the community to embrace standards for naming circRNAs so that a common nomenclature is used to ensure clarity and reproducibility.

Biogenesis and Regulatory Roles of Circular RNAs

Covalently closed, single-stranded circular RNAs can be produced from viral RNA genomes as well as from the processing of cellular housekeeping noncoding RNAs and precursor messenger RNAs. Recent transcriptomic studies have surprisingly uncovered that many protein-coding genes can be subjected to backsplicing, leading to widespread expression of a specific type of circular RNAs (circRNAs) in eukaryotic cells. Here, we discuss experimental strategies used to discover and characterize diverse circRNAs at both the genome and individual gene scales. We further highlight the current understanding of how circRNAs are generated and how the mature transcripts function. Some circRNAs act as noncoding RNAs to impact gene regulation by serving as decoys or competitors for microRNAs and proteins. Others form extensive networks of ribonucleoprotein complexes or encode functional peptides that are translated in response to certain cellular stresses. Overall, circRNAs have emerged as an important class of RNAmolecules in gene expression regulation that impact many physiological processes, including early development, immune responses, neurogenesis, and tumorigenesis.

SICKLE modulates lateral root development by promoting degradation of lariat intronic RNA

Plant lateral roots (LRs) play vital roles in anchorage and uptake of water and nutrients. Here, we reveal that degradation of lariat intronic RNAs (lariRNAs) modulated by SICKLE (SIC) is required for LR development in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Loss of SIC results in hyper-accumulation of lariRNAs and restricts the outgrowth of LR primordia, thereby reducing the number of emerged LRs. Decreasing accumulation of lariRNAs by over-expressing RNA debranching enzyme 1 (DBR1), a rate-limiting enzyme of lariRNA decay, restored LR defects in SIC-deficient plants. Mechanistically, SIC interacts with DBR1 and facilitates its nuclear accumulation, which is achieved through two functionally redundant regions (SIC1-244 and SIC252-319) for nuclear localization. Of the remaining amino acids in this region, six (SIC245-251) comprise a DBR1-interacting region while two (SICM246 and SICW251) are essential for DBR1-SIC interaction. Reducing lariRNAs restored microRNA (miRNA) levels and LR development in lariRNA hyper-accumulating plants, suggesting that these well-known regulators of LR development mainly function downstream of lariRNAs. Taken together, we propose that SIC acts as an enhancer of DBR1 nuclear accumulation by driving nuclear localization through direct interaction, thereby promoting lariRNA decay to fine-tune miRNA biogenesis and modulating LR development.

Role of circular RNAs in disease progression and diagnosis of cancers: An overview of recent advanced insights

Tumor microenvironment (TME) is a crucial regulator of tumor progression and cells in the TME release a number of molecules that are responsible for anaplasticity, invasion, metastasis of tumor, establishing stem cell niches, up-regulation and down-regulation of various pathways in cancer cells, interfering with immune surveillance and immune escape. Moreover, they can serve as diagnostic markers, and determine effective therapies. Among them, CircRNAs have gained special attention due to their involvement in mutated pathways in cancers. By functioning as a molecular sponge for miRNAs, binding with proteins, and directing selective splicing. CircRNAs modify the immunological environment of cancers to promote their growth. Besides of critical role in tumor growth, circRNAs are emerging as potential candidates as biomarkers for diagnosis cancer therapy. Also, circRNAs vaccination even offers a novel approach to tumor immunotherapy. Over the recent years, studies are advocating that circRNAs have tissue specific tumor specific expression patterns, which indicates their potential clinical utility. Especially, circRNAs have emerged as potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Although, there has been significant progress in deciphering the role of circRNA in cancers, literature lacks comprehensive overview on this topic. Keeping in view of these significant discoveries, this review systematically discusses circRNA and their role in the tumor in different dimensions.

Using Drosophila to uncover molecular and physiological functions of circRNAs

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a class of covalently closed RNA molecules generated by backsplicing. circRNAs are expressed in a tissue-specific manner, accumulate with age in neural tissues, and are highly stable. In many cases, circRNAs are generated at the expense of a linear transcript as back-splicing competes with linear splicing. Some circRNAs regulate gene expression in cis, and some circRNAs can be translated into protein. The advent of deep sequencing and new bioinformatic tools has allowed detection of thousands of circRNAs in eukaryotes. Studying the functions of circRNAs is done using a combination of molecular and genetic methods. The unique genetic tools that can be used in studies of Drosophila melanogaster are ideal for deciphering the functions of circRNAs in vivo. These tools include the GAL4-UAS system, which can be used to manipulate the levels of circRNAs with exquisite temporal and spatial control, and genetic interaction screening, which could be used to identify pathways regulated by circRNAs. Research performed in Drosophila has revealed circRNAs production mechanisms, details of their translation, and their physiological functions. Due to their short lifecycle and the existence of excellent neurodegeneration models, Drosophila can also be used to study the role of circRNAs in aging and age-related disorders. Here, we review molecular and genetic tools and methods for detecting, manipulating, and studying circRNAs in Drosophila.

Maternal starvation primes progeny response to nutritional stress

Organisms adapt to environmental changes in order to survive. Mothers exposed to nutritional stresses can induce an adaptive response in their offspring. However, the molecular mechanisms behind such inheritable links are not clear. Here we report that in Drosophila, starvation of mothers primes the progeny against subsequent nutritional stress. We found that RpL10Ab represses TOR pathway activity by genetically interacting with TOR pathway components TSC2 and Rheb. In addition, starved mothers produce offspring with lower levels of RpL10Ab in the germline, which results in higher TOR pathway activity, conferring greater resistance to starvation-induced oocyte loss. The RpL10Ab locus encodes for the RpL10Ab mRNA and a stable intronic sequence RNA (sisR-8), which collectively repress RpL10Ab pre-mRNA splicing in a negative feedback mechanism. During starvation, an increase in maternally deposited RpL10Ab and sisR-8 transcripts leads to the reduction of RpL10Ab expression in the offspring. Our study suggests that the maternally deposited RpL10Ab and sisR-8 transcripts trigger a negative feedback loop that mediates intergenerational adaptation to nutritional stress as a starvation response.

In the wild, animals need to adapt to frequent changes in the environment. Mothers who are exposed to nutritional stresses are known to produce offspring which are preconditioned to adapt to the mothers’ environment. However, it is unclear how such maternal “memory” is being passed on to the offspring. Here we show that Drosophila mothers exposed to starvation produce offspring which are more resistant to starvation during oogenesis. This process is mediated by maternally inherited RpL10Ab mRNA and a stable intronic sequence RNA (sisR-8), which collectively repress the splicing of RpL10Ab pre-mRNA, leading to lower RpL10Ab expression in the offspring ovaries. As a consequence, lower RpL10Ab expression results in higher TOR pathway activity, conferring greater resistance to starvation during oogenesis. Hence, maternally inherited transcripts may play a role as mediators in conferring intergenerational adaption to starvation.

Assessment of CircRNA Expression Profiles and Potential Functions in Brown Adipogenesis

Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is specialized for energy expenditure, thus a better understanding of the regulators influencing BAT development could provide novel strategies to defense obesity. Many protein-coding genes, miRNAs, and lncRNAs have been investigated in BAT development, however, the expression patterns and functions of circRNA in brown adipogenesis have not been reported yet. This study determined the circRNA expression profiles across brown adipogenesis (proliferation, early differentiated, and fully differentiated stages) by RNA-seq. We identified 3,869 circRNAs and 36.9% of them were novel. We found the biogenesis of circRNA was significantly related to linear mRNA transcription, meanwhile, almost 70% of circRNAs were generated by alternative back-splicing. Next, we examined the cell-specific and differentiation stage-specific expression of circRNAs. Compared to white adipocytes, nearly 30% of them were specifically expressed in brown adipocytes. Further, time-series expression analysis showed circRNAs were dynamically expressed, and 117 differential expression circRNAs (DECs) in brown adipogenesis were identified, with 77 upregulated and 40 downregulated. Experimental validation showed the identified circRNAs could be successfully amplified and the expression levels detected by RNA-seq were reliable. For the potential functions of the circRNAs, GO analysis suggested that the decreased circRNAs were enriched in cell proliferation terms, while the increased circRNAs were enriched in development and thermogenic terms. Bioinformatics predictions showed that DECs contained numerous binding sites of functional miRNAs. More interestingly, most of the circRNAs contained multiple binding sites for the same miRNA, indicating that they may facilitate functions by acting as microRNA sponges. Collectively, we characterized the circRNA expression profiles during brown adipogenesis and provide numerous novel circRNAs candidates for future brown adipogenesis regulating studies.

Stable lariats bearing a snoRNA (slb-snoRNA) in eukaryotic cells: A level of regulation for guide RNAs

Small nucleolar (sno)RNAs guide posttranscriptional modifications essential for the biogenesis and function of their target. The majority of snoRNAs in higher eukaryotes are encoded within introns. They are first released from nascent transcripts in the form of a lariat and rapidly targeted by the debranching enzyme and nuclear exonucleases for linearization and further trimming. In this study, we report that some snoRNAs are encoded within unusually stable intronic RNAs. These intronic sequences can escape the debranching enzyme and accumulate as lariats. Stable lariats bearing a snoRNA, or slb-snoRNA, are associated with snoRNA binding proteins but do not guide posttranscriptional modification. While most slb-snoRNAs accumulate in the nucleus, some can be exported to the cytoplasm. We find that this export competes with snoRNA maturation. Slb-snoRNAs provide a previously unknown layer of regulation to snoRNA and snoRNA binding proteins.

The Role of N6 -Methyladenosine Modified Circular RNA in Pathophysiological Processes

Circular RNA (circRNA) is a type of covalently closed and endogenous non-coding RNA (ncRNA) with tissue- and cell-specific expression patterns generated by a non-canonical splicing event. Previous reports have indicated that circRNAs exert their functions in different ways, thereby participating in various pathophysiological processes. N6 -methyladenosine (m6A) methylation occurs in the N6-position, which is the most abundant and conserved internal transcriptional modification in eukaryotes, including mRNA and ncRNAs. Accumulating evidences confirm that m6A modification also exists in the circRNA and greatly affects the biological functions of circRNA. Their dysregulated expression can be a cause of various pathophysiological processes, such as spermatogenesis, myoblast differentiation, cancer, cardiovascular disease, mental illness and so on. Understanding the role of m6A-modified circRNAs in pathophysiological processes may contribute to better understanding the physiological mechanisms and develop new biomarkers. This review summarizes the regulatory mechanism of m6A modification on circRNA metabolism and the role of m6A-modified circRNAs in pathophysiological processes. This article may pave the way for a better understanding of the role of epigenetically modified circRNAs in pathophysiological process.

Circular sisRNA identification and characterisation

Stable Intronic Sequence RNA (sisRNA) is a relatively new class of non-coding RNA. Found in many organisms, these sisRNA produced from their host genes are generally involved in regulatory roles, controlling gene expression at multiple levels through active involvement in regulatory feedback loops. Large scale identification of sisRNA via genome-wide RNA sequencing has been difficult, largely in part due to its low abundance. Done on its own, RNA sequencing often yields a large mass of information that is ironically uninformative; the potential sisRNA reads being masked by other highly abundant RNA species like ribosomal RNA and messenger RNA. In this review, we present a practical workflow for the enrichment of circular sisRNA through the use of transcriptionally quiescent systems, rRNA-depletion, and RNase R treatment prior to deep sequencing. This workflow allows circular sisRNA to be reliably detected. We also present various methods to experimentally validate the circularity and stability of the circular sisRNA identified, as well as a few methods for further functional characterisation.

Identification of Intronic Lariat-Derived Circular RNAs in Arabidopsis by RNA Deep Sequencing

Lariat RNAs are well-known by-products of pre-mRNA splicing in eukaryotes, which are produced by the excised introns when the 5' splice site (5' ss) joins with the branchpoint (BP) during splicing. In general, most of lariat RNAs are usually linearized by RNA debranching enzyme 1 (DBR1), followed by degradation for intron turnover. However, with the high-throughput RNA sequencing technology and bioinformatics methods, increasing evidences have shown that many lariat RNAs can stably accumulate under physiological conditions in both animals and plants. Here, we describe a large-scale analysis to systematically identify the lariat RNAs (i.e., intronic circular RNAs) in Arabidopsis by utilizing the RNA-sequencing data.

Circular RNA: an important player with multiple facets to regulate its parental gene expression

Circular RNAs (circRNAs), a novel type of endogenous RNAs with covalently closed-loop structures, have become a new research hotspot in the RNA world. Their diversity, stability, evolutionary conservation, and cell type- or tissue-specific expression patterns endow circRNAs with various important biological functions. As a consequence, circRNAs are emerging as important regulators of physiological development and disease pathogenesis. Growing evidence has shown that circRNAs can regulate parental gene expression through diverse mechanisms, such as transcription and splicing regulation, microRNA (miRNA) sponges, mRNA traps, translational modulation, and post-translational modification. The study of circRNAs and how circRNAs regulate the expression of parental genes will facilitate a deeper understanding of their biological functions and provide new perspectives on their clinical application. Herein, we review the biogenesis of circRNAs, with a particular focus on the molecular mechanisms of circRNAs regulating their parental gene expression and the biological significance of such regulation.

Maternally inherited intron coordinates primordial germ cell homeostasis during Drosophila embryogenesis

Primordial germ cells (PGCs) give rise to the germline stem cells (GSCs) in the adult Drosophila gonads. Both PGCs and GSCs need to be tightly regulated to safeguard the survival of the entire species. During larval development, a non-cell autonomous homeostatic mechanism is in place to maintain PGC number in the gonads. Whether such germline homeostasis occurs during early embryogenesis before PGCs reach the gonads remains unclear. We have previously shown that the maternally deposited sisRNA sisR-2 can influence GSC number in the female progeny. Here we uncover the presence of a homeostatic mechanism regulating PGCs during embryogenesis. sisR-2 represses PGC number by promoting PGC death. Surprisingly, increasing maternal sisR-2 leads to an increase in PGC death, but no drop in PGC number was observed. This is due to ectopic division of PGCs via the de-repression of Cyclin B, which is governed by a genetic pathway involving sisR-2, bantam and brat. We propose a cell autonomous model whereby germline homeostasis is achieved by preserving PGC number during embryogenesis.

A machine learning framework for accurately recognizing circular RNAs for clinical decision-supporting

Background

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are those RNA molecules that lack the poly (A) tails, which present the closed-loop structure. Recent studies emphasized that some circRNAs imply different functions from canonical transcripts, and further associated with complex diseases. Several computational methods have been developed for detecting circRNAs from RNA-seq data. However, the existing methods prefer to high sensitivity strategies, which always introduce many false positives. Thus, in clinical decision-supporting system, a comprehensive filtering approach is needed for accurately recognizing real circRNAs for decision models.

Methods

In this paper, we first reviewed the detection strategies of the existing methods. According to the features from RNA-seq data, we showed that any single feature (data signal) selected by the existing strategies cannot accurately distinguish a circRNA. However, we found that some combinations of those features (data signals) could be used as signatures for recognizing circRNAs. To avoid the high computational complexity of the combinational optimization problem, we present CIRCPlus2, which adopts a machine learning framework to recognize real circRNAs according to multiple data signals captured from RNA-seq data. By comparing multiple machine learning frameworks, CIRCPlus2 adopts a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) framework.

Results

Given a set of candidate circRNAs, reported by any existing detection tool(s), the features of each candidate are extracted from the aligned reads. The GBDT framework can be trained by a training dataset. By applying the selected features on the framework, the predictions on true/false positives are reported. To verify the performance of the proposed approach, we conducted several groups of experiments on both real RNA-seq datasets and a series of simulation datasets with different preset configurations. The results demonstrated that CIRCPlus2 clearly improved the specificities, while it also maintained high levels of sensitivities.

Conclusions

Filtering false positives is quite important in RNA-seq data analysis pipeline. Machine learning framework is suitable for solving this filtering problem. CIRCPlus2 is an efficient approach to identify the false positive circRNAs from the real ones.

Circular RNAs regulate its parental genes transcription in the AD mouse model using two methods of library construction

Circular RNA (circRNA) is an important class of noncoding RNA. Current, protocols to detected circRNAs have utilized nonpolyadenylated RNAs, ribosomal RNA-depleted RNA samples (rRNA- library), and rRNA-depleted RNA that has been treated with RNase R to digest linear RNA (rRNA- RNase R+ library). Accumulating evidence suggests the participation of circRNAs in Alzheimer's disease (AD)-associated pathophysiology, but the details remain largely unknown. Here, we elucidated the brain circRNAs profiles of AD-model and WT mice using two methods of library construction (rRNA- RNase R+ libraries and rRNA- libraries). We focused on the construction of libraries that best allow the identification of circRNAs from next-generation RNA sequencing data. We obtained a significantly higher abundance of circRNAs in the rRNA- RNase R+ libraries than in the rRNA- libraries. Additionally, the rRNA- RNase R+ libraries more clearly revealed differentially expressed circRNAs. We performed a correlation analysis between differentially expressed circRNAs and their parental genes and performed KEGG analysis of the parental genes to explore the role of circRNA in AD. Our results identified significantly dysregulated circRNAs and KEGG analysis revealed that the identified circRNAs are involved in regulating AD development from distinct origins, including cAMP signaling, MAPK signaling, insulin secretion, Axon guidance, Long-term potentiation, dopaminergic synapse, and ErBb signaling pathways. Following rigorous selection, we identified several important circRNAs and mRNAs and propose the circRNAs regulate parental gene transcription or affect variable splicing, which were discovered to be mainly involved in Aβ production and cognitive performance (TRPC6) and neuronal differentiation and development (NME7). These newly identified circRNAs should serve as a valuable resource for the future development of potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for AD.

Stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs) are selected regions in introns with distinct properties

Background

Stable introns and intronic fragments make up the largest population of RNA in the oocyte nucleus of the frog Xenopus tropicalis. These stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs) persist through the onset of zygotic transcription when synchronous cell division has ended, and the developing embryo consists of approximately 8000 cells. Despite their abundance, the sequence properties and biological function of sisRNAs are just beginning to be understood.

Results

To characterize this population of non-coding RNA, we identified all of the sisRNAs in the X. tropicalis oocyte nucleus using published high-throughput RNA sequencing data. Our analysis revealed that sisRNAs, have an average length of ~ 360 nt, are widely expressed from genes with multiple introns, and are derived from specific regions of introns that are GC and TG rich, while CpG poor. They are enriched in introns at both ends of transcripts but preferentially at the 3′ end. The consensus binding sites of specific transcription factors such as Stat3 are enriched in sisRNAs, suggesting an association between sisRNAs and transcription factors involved in early development. Evolutionary conservation analysis of sisRNA sequences in seven vertebrate genomes indicates that sisRNAs are as conserved as other parts of introns, but much less conserved than exons.

Conclusion

In total, our results indicate sisRNAs are selected intron regions with distinct properties and may play a role in gene expression regulation.

Exogenously overexpressed intronic long noncoding RNAs activate host gene expression by affecting histone modification in Arabidopsis

Involvement of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the regulation of gene expression in cis has been well studied in eukaryotes but relatively little is known whether and how lncRNAs affect gene expression in tans. In Arabidopsis thaliana, COLDAIR, a previously reported lncRNA, is produced from the first intron of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), which encodes a repressor of flowering time. Our results indicated that the exogenously overexpressed COLDAIR enhances the expression of FLC in trans, resulting in a late-flowering phenotype. In 35S-COLDAIR lines, the enhanced expression of FLC is correlated with the down-regulation of the repressive histone mark H3K27me3 and with the up-regulation of the active histone mark H3K4me3 at the FLC chromatin. Furthermore, we demonstrated that overexpression of intronic lncRNAs from several other H3K27me3-enriched MADS-box genes also activates the expression of their host genes. This study suggests that the involvement of overexpressed intronic lncRNAs in gene activation may be conserved in H3K27me3-enriched genes in eukaryotes.

SON protects nascent transcripts from unproductive degradation by counteracting DIP1

Gene expression involves the transcription and splicing of nascent transcripts through the removal of introns. In Drosophila, a double-stranded RNA binding protein Disco-interacting protein 1 (DIP1) targets INE-1 stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs) for degradation after splicing. How nascent transcripts that also contain INE-1 sequences escape degradation remains unknown. Here we observe that these nascent transcripts can also be bound by DIP1 but the Drosophila homolog of SON (Dsn) protects them from unproductive degradation in ovaries. Dsn localizes to the satellite body where active decay of INE-1 sisRNAs by DIP1 occurs. Dsn is a repressor of DIP1 posttranslational modifications (primarily sumoylation) that are assumed to be required for efficient DIP1 activity. Moreover, the pre-mRNA destabilization caused by Dsn depletion is rescued in DIP1 or Sumo heterozygous mutants, suggesting that Dsn is a negative regulator of DIP1. Our results reveal that under normal circumstances nascent transcripts are susceptible to DIP1-mediated degradation, however intronic sequences are protected by Dsn until intron excision has taken place.

Intronic RNA: Ad'junk' mediator of post-transcriptional gene regulation

RNA splicing, the process through which intervening segments of noncoding RNA (introns) are excised from pre-mRNAs to allow for the formation of a mature mRNA product, has long been appreciated for its capacity to add complexity to eukaryotic proteomes. However, evidence suggests that the utility of this process extends beyond protein output and provides cells with a dynamic tool for gene regulation. In this review, we aim to highlight the role that intronic RNA plays in mediating specific splicing outcomes in pre-mRNA processing, as well as explore an emerging class of stable intronic sequences that have been observed to act in gene expression control. Building from underlying flexibility in both sequence and structure, intronic RNA provides mechanisms for post-transcriptional gene regulation that are amenable to the tissue and condition specific needs of eukaryotic cells. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: RNA structure and splicing regulation edited by Francisco Baralle, Ravindra Singh and Stefan Stamm.

Long Noncoding RNAs and Repetitive Elements: Junk or Intimate Evolutionary Partners?

Our recent ability to sequence entire genomes, along with all of their transcribed RNAs, has led to the surprising finding that only ∼1% of the human genome is used to encode proteins. This finding has led to vigorous debate over the functional importance of the transcribed but untranslated portions of the genome. Currently, scientists tend to assume coding genes are functional until proven not to be, while the opposite is true for noncoding genes. This review takes a new look at the evidence for and against widespread noncoding gene functionality. We focus in particular on long noncoding RNA (noncoding RNAs longer than 200 nucleotides) genes and their 'junk' associates, transposable elements, and satellite repeats. Taken together, the suggestion put forward is that more of this junk DNA may be functional than nonfunctional and that noncoding RNAs and transposable elements act symbiotically to drive evolution.

Biogenesis and ceRNA role of circular RNAs in skeletal muscle myogenesis

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are novel endogenous non-coding RNAs that are generated by reverse-splicing of precursor mRNA derived from various genes in mammals. Despite low expression, recent studies have shown that circRNA plays an important role in skeletal muscle myogenesis with competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) functions. However, the potential regulatory role of circRNAs and interactions with miRNAs remain largely unexplored, and the function of circRNAs as miRNA sponges is not yet generally accepted. In this review, we outline the biogenesis and ceRNA mechanisms of circRNAs as well as their involvement in skeletal muscle myogenesis and discuss the conflicting conclusions of recent circRNA-ceRNA studies.

Stable Intronic Sequence RNAs (sisRNAs): An Expanding Universe

Intronic sequences are often regarded as 'nonsense' transcripts that are rapidly degraded. We highlight here recent studies on intronic sequences that play regulatory roles as long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) which are classified as sisRNAs. Interestingly, sisRNAs come in different forms and are produced via a variety of ways. They regulate genes at the DNA, RNA, and protein levels, and frequently engage in autoregulatory feedback loops to ensure cellular homeostasis under normal and stress conditions. Future directions, evolutionary insights, and potential implications of dysregulated sisRNAs are also discussed, especially in relation to human pathogenesis.

An Efficient Algorithm for Sensitively Detecting Circular RNA from RNA-seq Data

Circular RNA (circRNA) is an important member of non-coding RNA family. Numerous computational methods for detecting circRNAs from RNA-seq data have been developed in the past few years, but there are dramatic differences among the algorithms regarding the balancing of the sensitivity and precision of the detection and filtering strategies. To further improve the sensitivity, while maintaining an acceptable precision of circRNA detection, a novel and efficient de novo detection algorithm, CIRCPlus, is proposed in this paper. CIRCPlus accurately locates circRNA candidates by identifying a set of back-spliced junction reads by comparing the local similar sequence of each pair of spanning junction reads. This strategy, thus, utilizes the important information provided by unbalanced spanning reads, which facilitates the detection especially when the expression levels of circRNA are unapparent. The performance of CIRCPlus was tested and compared to the existing de novo methods on the real datasets as well as a series of simulation datasets with different configurations. The experiment results demonstrated that the sensitivities of CIRCPlus were able to reach 90% in common simulation settings, while CIRCPlus held balanced sensitivity and reliability on the real datasets according to an objective assessment criteria based on RNase R-treated samples. The software tool is available for academic uses only.

A comprehensive review of circRNA: from purification and identification to disease marker potential

Circular RNA (circRNA) is an endogenous noncoding RNA with a covalently closed cyclic structure. Based on their components, circRNAs are divided into exonic circRNAs, intronic circRNAs, and exon-intron circRNAs. CircRNAs have well-conserved sequences and often have high stability due to their resistance to exonucleases. Depending on their sequence, circRNAs are involved in different biological functions, including microRNA sponge activity, modulation of alternative splicing or transcription, interaction with RNA-binding proteins, and rolling translation, and are a derivative of pseudogenes. CircRNAs are involved in the development of a variety of pathological conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, neurological diseases, and cancer. Emerging evidence has shown that circRNAs are likely to be new potential clinical diagnostic markers or treatments for many diseases. Here we describe circRNA research methods and biological functions, and discuss the potential relationship between circRNAs and disease progression.

The Biogenesis, Functions, and Challenges of Circular RNAs

Covalently closed circular RNAs (circRNAs) are produced by precursor mRNA back-splicing of exons of thousands of genes in eukaryotes. circRNAs are generally expressed at low levels and often exhibit cell-type-specific and tissue-specific patterns. Recent studies have shown that their biogenesis requires spliceosomal machinery and can be modulated by both cis complementary sequences and protein factors. The functions of most circRNAs remain largely unexplored, but known functions include sequestration of microRNAs or proteins, modulation of transcription and interference with splicing, and even translation to produce polypeptides. However, challenges exist at multiple levels to understanding of the regulation of circRNAs because of their circular conformation and sequence overlap with linear mRNA counterparts. In this review, we survey the recent progress on circRNA biogenesis and function and discuss technical obstacles in circRNA studies.

A sisRNA/miRNA Axis Prevents Loss of Germline Stem Cells during Starvation in Drosophila

Animal reproduction responds to nutritional status. During starvation, Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans enter a period of reproductive diapause with increase apoptosis, while maintaining a stable pool of germline stem cells (GSCs). How GSCs are protected is not understood. Here, we show that a sisRNA/miRNA axis maintains ovarian GSCs during starvation in Drosophila. Starvation induces the expression of an ovary-enriched sisRNA sisR-2, which negatively regulates GSC maintenance via a fatty acid metabolism gene dFAR1. sisR-2 promotes the expression of bantam, which in turn inhibits the activity of sisR-2, forming a negative feedback loop. Therefore, bantam acts as a buffer to counteract sisR-2 activity to prevent GSC loss during starvation. We propose that the sisR-2/bantam axis confers robustness to GSCs in Drosophila.

•

sisR-2 regulates the number of GSCs

•

sisR-2 regulates GSC maintenance by repressing dFAR1

•

bantam regulates GSC maintenance by repressing sisR-2 activity

•

sisR-2/bantam axis protects GSCs from starvation

Generation of Drosophila sisRNAs by Independent Transcription from Cognate Introns

Although stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs) are conserved in plants and animals, their functional significance is still unclear. We identify a pool of polyadenylated maternally deposited sisRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster. These sisRNAs can be generated by independent transcription from the cognate introns. The ovary-specific poly(A) polymerase Wispy mediates the polyadenylation of maternal sisRNAs and confers their stability as maternal transcripts. A developmentally regulated sisRNA sisR-3 represses the expression of a long noncoding RNA CR44148 and is required during development. Our results expand the pool of sisRNAs and suggest that sisRNAs perform regulatory functions during development in Drosophila.

•

Identification of polyadenylated sisRNAs

•

sisRNAs can be produced from independent transcription

•

sisR-3 regulates a long noncoding RNA

•

sisR-3 is required during development

Human regulatory proteins associate with non-coding RNAs from the EBV IR1 region

Objective

The function of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) stable intronic sequence (sis)RNAs, non-coding RNAs transcribed from a region required for EBV-mediated cellular transformation, remain unknown. To better understand the function of ebv-sisRNA-1 and ebv-sisRNA-2 from the internal repeat (IR)1 region of EBV, we used a combination of bioinformatics and biochemistry to identify associated RNA binding proteins. The findings reported here are part of ongoing studies to determine the functions of non-coding RNAs from the IR1 region of EBV.

Results

Human regulatory proteins HNRNPA1 (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1), HNRNPC, HNRNPL, HuR (human antigen R), and protein LIN28A (lin-28 homolog A) were predicted to bind ebv-sisRNA-1 and/or ebv-sisRNA-2; FUS (fused in sarcoma) was predicted to associate with ebv-sisRNA-2. Protein interactions were validated using a combination of RNA immunoprecipitation and biotin pulldown assays. Both sisRNAs also precipitated with HNRNPD and NONO (non-POU domain-containing octamer-binding protein). Interestingly, each of these interacting proteins also precipitated non-spliced non-coding RNA sequences transcribed from the IR1 region. Our findings suggest interesting roles for sisRNAs (through their interactions with regulatory proteins) and provide further evidence for the existence of non-spliced stable non-coding RNAs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3250-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

DIP1 modulates stem cell homeostasis in Drosophila through regulation of sisR-1

Stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs) are by-products of splicing and regulate gene expression. How sisRNAs are regulated is unclear. Here we report that a double-stranded RNA binding protein, Disco-interacting protein 1 (DIP1) regulates sisRNAs in Drosophila. DIP1 negatively regulates the abundance of sisR-1 and INE-1 sisRNAs. Fine-tuning of sisR-1 by DIP1 is important to maintain female germline stem cell homeostasis by modulating germline stem cell differentiation and niche adhesion. Drosophila DIP1 localizes to a nuclear body (satellite body) and associates with the fourth chromosome, which contains a very high density of INE-1 transposable element sequences that are processed into sisRNAs. DIP1 presumably acts outside the satellite bodies to regulate sisR-1, which is not on the fourth chromosome. Thus, our study identifies DIP1 as a sisRNA regulatory protein that controls germline stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila.

Stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs) are by-products of splicing from introns with roles in embryonic development in Drosophila. Here, the authors show that the RNA binding protein DIP1 regulates sisRNAs in Drosophila, which is necessary for germline stem cell homeostasis.