Fragile X syndrome

Children With Fragile X Syndrome Display a Switch Towards Fast Fibres in Their Recruitment Strategy During Gait

BACKGROUND

Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is a genetic disorder caused by the lack of FMRP, a crucial protein for brain development and function. FMR1 mutations are categorized into premutation and full mutation (FXSFull), with somatic mosaicism (FXSMos) modulating the FXS phenotype. Recent studies identified muscle activity alterations during gait in FXS children. This study aims to explore the relationship between these muscle activity changes and motor fibre recruitment strategies during gait in FXS children.

METHODS

Fifty-four FXS children and fourteen healthy controls participated in the study. Gait trials at self-selected speeds were recorded using four synchronized cameras and a surface electromyography system that captured bilateral activity of Gastrocnemius lateralis, Tibialis anterior, Rectus and Biceps femoris muscles. The continuous wavelet transform, using the 'bump' mother wavelet, provided the percentage distribution of signal energy across nine frequency bands (50-Hz increments within a 450- to 10-Hz spectrum) and the Instantaneous MeaN Frequency (IMNF) time-frequency distribution.

RESULTS

Results indicated that both FXSFull and FXSMos children exhibit a distinct fibre recruitment strategy compared to controls, with a higher percentage of total energy and elevated IMNF (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This increased reliance on fast-twitch fibres may contribute to the observed fatigability and exercise intolerance in FXS children.

From Discovery to Innovative Translational Approaches in 80 Years of Fragile X Syndrome Research

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited cause of intellectual disability and a major genetic contributor to autism spectrum disorder. It is caused by a CGG trinucleotide repeat expansion in the FMR1 gene, resulting in gene silencing and the loss of FMRP, an RNA-binding protein essential for synaptic plasticity. This review covers over 80 years of FXS research, highlighting key milestones, clinical features, genetic and molecular mechanisms, the FXS mouse model, disrupted molecular pathways, and current therapeutic strategies. Additionally, we discuss recent advances including AI-driven combination therapies, CRISPR-based gene editing, and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) therapies. Despite these scientific breakthroughs, translating preclinical findings into effective clinical treatments remains challenging. Clinical trials have faced several difficulties, including patient heterogeneity, inconsistent outcome measures, and variable therapeutic responses. Standardized preclinical testing protocols and refined clinical trial designs are required to overcome these challenges. The development of FXS-specific biomarkers could also improve the precision of treatment assessments. Ultimately, future therapies will need to combine pharmacological and behavioral interventions tailored to individual needs. While significant challenges remain, ongoing research continues to offer hope for transformative breakthroughs that could significantly improve the quality of life for individuals with FXS and their families.

Therapeutic Effects of Pharmacological Modulation of Serotonin Brain System in Human Patients and Animal Models of Fragile X Syndrome

The brain serotonin (5-HT) system modulates glutamatergic and GABAergic transmission in almost every brain area, crucially regulating mood, food intake, body temperature, pain, hormone secretion, learning and memory. Previous studies suggest a disruption of the brain 5-HT system in Fragile X Syndrome, with abnormal activity of the 5-HT transporter leading to altered 5-HT brain levels. We provide an update on therapeutic effects exerted by drugs modulating serotonergic transmission on Fragile X patients and animal models. The enhancement of serotonergic transmission using Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) corrected mood disorders and language deficits in Fragile X patients. In Fmr1 KO mice, a model of Fragile X Syndrome, selective 5-HT7 receptor agonists rescued synaptic plasticity, memory and stereotyped behavior. In addition, drugs specifically acting on 5-HT1A, 5-HT2 and 5-HT5 receptor subtypes were able to correct, respectively, epilepsy, learning deficits and hyperactivity in different Fragile X animal models. In conclusion, the SSRI treatment of Fragile X patients improves mood and language; in parallel, studies on animal models suggest that compounds selectively acting on distinct 5-HT receptor subtypes might provide a targeted correction of other Fragile X phenotypes, and thus should be further tested in clinical trials for future therapy.

Mosaicism in Short Tandem Repeat Disorders: A Clinical Perspective

Fragile X, Huntington disease, and myotonic dystrophy type 1 are prototypical examples of human disorders caused by short tandem repeat variation, repetitive nucleotide stretches that are highly mutable both in the germline and somatic tissue. As short tandem repeats are unstable, they can expand, contract, and acquire and lose epigenetic marks in somatic tissue. This means within an individual, the genotype and epigenetic state at these loci can vary considerably from cell to cell. This somatic mosaicism may play a key role in clinical pathogenesis, and yet, our understanding of mosaicism in driving clinical phenotypes in short tandem repeat disorders is only just emerging. This review focuses on these three relatively well-studied examples where, given the advent of new technologies and bioinformatic approaches, a critical role for mosaicism is coming into focus both with respect to cellular physiology and clinical phenotypes.

Advances on the Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies in Non-coding CGG Repeat Expansion Diseases

Non-coding CGG repeat expansions within the 5' untranslated region are implicated in a range of neurological disorders, including fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, oculopharyngeal myopathy with leukodystrophy, and oculopharyngodistal myopathy. This review outlined the general characteristics of diseases associated with non-coding CGG repeat expansions, detailing their clinical manifestations and neuroimaging patterns, which often overlap and indicate shared pathophysiological traits. We summarized the underlying molecular mechanisms of these disorders, providing new insights into the roles that DNA, RNA, and toxic proteins play. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for the development of targeted therapeutic strategies. These strategies include a range of approaches, such as antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference, genomic DNA editing, small molecule interventions, and other treatments aimed at correcting the dysregulated processes inherent in these disorders. A deeper understanding of the shared mechanisms among non-coding CGG repeat expansion disorders may hold the potential to catalyze the development of innovative therapies, ultimately offering relief to individuals grappling with these debilitating neurological conditions.

Synaptic cell adhesion molecules contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of fragile X syndrome

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common form of inherited intellectual disability and a monogenic cause of autism spectrum disorders. Deficiencies in the fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein, encoded by the FMR1 gene, lead to various anatomical and pathophysiological abnormalities and behavioral deficits, such as spine dysmorphogenesis and learning and memory impairments. Synaptic cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) play crucial roles in synapse formation and neural signal transmission by promoting the formation of new synaptic contacts, accurately organizing presynaptic and postsynaptic protein complexes, and ensuring the accuracy of signal transmission. Recent studies have implicated synaptic CAMs such as the immunoglobulin superfamily, N-cadherin, leucine-rich repeat proteins, and neuroligin-1 in the pathogenesis of FXS and found that they contribute to defects in dendritic spines and synaptic plasticity in FXS animal models. This review systematically summarizes the biological associations between nine representative synaptic CAMs and FMRP, as well as the functional consequences of the interaction, to provide new insights into the mechanisms of abnormal synaptic development in FXS.

From wings to whiskers to stem cells: why every model matters in fragile X syndrome research

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is caused by epigenetic silencing of the X-linked fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 (FMR1) gene located on chromosome Xq27.3, which leads to the loss of its protein product, fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein (FMRP). It is the most prevalent inherited form of intellectual disability and the highest single genetic cause of autism. Since the discovery of the genetic basis of FXS, extensive studies using animal models and human pluripotent stem cells have unveiled the functions of FMRP and mechanisms underlying FXS. However, clinical trials have not yielded successful treatment. Here we review what we have learned from commonly used models for FXS, potential limitations of these models, and recommendations for future steps.

Germline cell de novo mutations and potential effects of inflammation on germline cell genome stability

Uncontrolled pathogenic genome mutations in germline cells might impair adult fertility, lead to birth defects or even affect the adaptability of a species. Understanding the sources of DNA damage, as well as the features of damage response in germline cells are the overarching tasks to reduce the mutations in germline cells. With the accumulation of human genome data and genetic reports, genome variants formed in germline cells are being extensively explored. However, the sources of DNA damage, the damage repair mechanisms, and the effects of DNA damage or mutations on the development of germline cells are still unclear. Besides exogenous triggers of DNA damage such as irradiation and genotoxic chemicals, endogenous exposure to inflammation may also contribute to the genome instability of germline cells. In this review, we summarized the features of de novo mutations and the specific DNA damage responses in germline cells and explored the possible roles of inflammation on the genome stability of germline cells.

The potential role of ribonucleic acid methylation in the pathological mechanisms of fragile X syndrome

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a common inherited cause of intellectual disabilities and single-gene cause of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), resulting from the loss of functional fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein (FMRP), an RNA-binding protein (RBP) encoded by the fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 (FMR1) gene. Ribonucleic acid (RNA) methylation can lead to developmental diseases, including FXS, through various mechanisms mediated by 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, 5-methylcytosine, N6-methyladenosine, etc. Emerging evidence suggests that modifications of some RNA species have been linked to FXS. However, the underlying pathological mechanism has yet to be elucidated. In this review, we reviewed the implication of RNA modification in FXS and summarized its specific characteristics for facilitating the identification of new therapeutic targets.

Evaluation of the role of FMR1 CGG repeat allele in Parkinson's disease from the Chinese population

Objective

There is controversial evidence that FMR1 premutation or "gray zone" (GZ) allele (small CGG expansion, 45-54 repeats) was associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to explore further the association between FMR1 CGG repeat expansions and PD in a large sample of Chinese origin.

Methods

We included a cohort of 2,362 PD patients and 1,072 controls from the Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Multicenter Database and Collaborative Network in China (PD-MDCNC) in this study and conducted repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction (RP-PCR) for the size of FMR1 CGG repeat expansions.

Results

Two PD patients were detected with FMR1 premutation (61 and 56 repeats), and the other eleven PD patients were detected with the GZ allele of FMR1 CGG repeat expansions. Those thirteen PD patients responded well to levodopa and were diagnosed with clinically established PD. Specifically, one female PD patient with GZ allele was also found with premature ovarian failure. However, compared to healthy controls, we found no significant enrichment of GZ allele carriers in PD patients or other subgroups of PD cases, including the subgroups of female, male, early-onset, and late-onset PD patients. Furthermore, we did not find any correlation between the FMR1 gene CGG repeat sizes and age at onset of PD.

Conclusion

It suggested that FMR1 premutation was related to PD, but the GZ allele of FMR1 CGG repeat expansions was not significantly enriched in PD cases of Chinese origin. Further larger multiple ethnic studies are needed to determine further the role of the FMR1 GZ allele in PD.

What Have Organoids and Assembloids Taught Us About the Pathophysiology of Neuropsychiatric Disorders?

Neuropsychiatric research has been impeded by limited access to human brain tissue, especially from early stages of neurodevelopment when the pathophysiology of many childhood-onset disorders is initiated. Neural organoids are 3-dimensional, self-organizing, multicellular structures generated from pluripotent stem cells that recapitulate some of the cell diversity, cytoarchitecture, and functional features of domains of the developing nervous system. Assembloids are 3-dimensional, self-organizing cultures created by the combination of two or more distinctly patterned organoids or an organoid plus additional cell or tissue type(s) that are used to model cell migration and connectivity. Here we review recent advances in neuropsychiatric disorder research using organoid and assembloid models to study the role of disease-relevant genes and mutations, as well as the impact of environmental risk factors on neural development. We also highlight some of the advantages and limitations of these model systems in bringing insights into the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders.

"Corp-Osa-Mente", a Combined Psychosocial-Neuropsychological Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults with Fragile X Syndrome: An Explorative Study

Fragile X Syndrome is the most known inherited form of intellectual disability due to an expansion in the full mutation range (>200 CGG repeats) of the promoter region of the FMR1 gene located on X chromosomes leading to gene silencing. Despite clear knowledge of the cognitive-behavioral phenotype of FXS and the necessity of tailored interventions, empirical research on the effectiveness of behavioral treatments among patients with FXS is still lacking, with studies on adolescents and young adults even more insufficient. Here we present "Corposamente", a combined psychosocial-neuropsychological intervention conducted with a group of ten adolescents/young adults with FXS, who are non-ASD and without significant behavioral problems. In total, 20 sessions were performed, alternating between online and face-to-face meetings. At the end of the intervention, participants, family members and participants' educators anonymously completed a survey that was designed around key areas of improvement as well as treatment satisfaction. The survey results indicated that participants improved mostly in their ability to cope with negative emotions and that occupational intervention was considered the most effective technique both from families and participants. Our exploratory study suggests that group therapy for the management of the FXS cognitive-behavioral phenotype may be a promising approach to continue to pursue, mostly in adolescence when the environmental demands increase.

Hemispheric Utilization of Alpha Oscillatory Dynamics as a Unique Biomarker of Neural Compensation in Females with Fragile X Syndrome

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by a trinucleotide expansion on the FMR1 gene and characterized by intellectual disability, sensory hypersensitivity, executive function difficulties, and social anxiety. Recently, efforts to define neural biomarkers for FXS have highlighted disruptions to power in the alpha frequency band; however the dynamic mechanisms supporting these findings are poorly understood. The current study aimed to explore the temporal and hemispheric dynamics supporting alpha phenotypes in FXS and their relationship with neural phenotypes related to auditory processing using electroencephalography during an auditory evoked task. Adolescents and adults (N = 36) with FXS and age/sex matched typically developing controls (N = 40) completed an auditory chirp task. Frontal alpha power in the prestimulus period was decomposed into "bursts" using percentile thresholding, then assessed for number of bursts per second (burst count) and burst length. Data were compared across left and right hemispheres to assess lateralization of neural activity. Individuals with FXS showed more differences in alpha power compared to TDC primarily in the right hemisphere. Notably, alpha hemisphere outcomes in males with FXS were driven by the number of times they entered a dynamically relevant period of alpha (burst count) rather than length of time spent in alpha. Females with FXS showed reduced burst counts but remained in sustained high alpha states for longer periods of time. Length of time spent in alpha may reflect a modulatory or compensatory mechanism capable of recovering sensory processing abilities in females with FXS resulting in a less severe clinical presentation. Right hemisphere abnormalities may impact sensory processing differences between males and females with FXS. The relationship between alpha burst length, count, sex, and hemisphere may shed light on underlying mechanisms for previously observed alpha power abnormalities in FXS and their variation by sex.

Across Dimensions: Developing 2D and 3D Human iPSC-Based Models of Fragile X Syndrome

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. FXS is caused by a cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) trinucleotide repeat expansion in the untranslated region of the FMR1 gene leading to the functional loss of the gene's protein product FMRP. Various animal models of FXS have provided substantial knowledge about the disorder. However, critical limitations exist in replicating the pathophysiological mechanisms. Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) provide a unique means of studying the features and processes of both normal and abnormal human neurodevelopment in large sample quantities in a controlled setting. Human iPSC-based models of FXS have offered a better understanding of FXS pathophysiology specific to humans. This review summarizes studies that have used hiPSC-based two-dimensional cellular models of FXS to reproduce the pathology, examine altered gene expression and translation, determine the functions and targets of FMRP, characterize the neurodevelopmental phenotypes and electrophysiological features, and, finally, to reactivate FMR1. We also provide an overview of the most recent studies using three-dimensional human brain organoids of FXS and end with a discussion of current limitations and future directions for FXS research using hiPSCs.

The second-tier status of fragile X syndrome testing for unexplained intellectual disability/global developmental delay in the era of next-generation sequencing

OBJECTIVE

Although many unexplained intellectual disability/global developmental delay (ID/GDD) individuals have benefited from the excellent detection yield of copy number variations and next-generation sequencing testing, many individuals still who suffer from ID/GDD of unexplained etiology. In this study, we investigated the applicability of fragile X syndrome (FXS) testing in unexplained ID/GDD individuals with negative or absent genetic testing.

METHODS

In this study, we used the triplet repeat primed polymerase chain reaction to evaluate the value and application of fragile X testing in unexplained ID/GDD individuals with negative or absent genetic testing (n = 681) from three hospitals.

RESULTS

Of the 681 ID/GDD individuals with negative or absent genetic testing results detected by FXS testing, 12 men and one woman were positive. This corresponded to a diagnostic yield of 1.9% for FXS testing in our cohort. All FXS individuals had either a family history of ID/GDD or suggestive clinical features. The detection yield of FXS testing in ID/GDD individuals who completed genetic testing (2.70%, 12/438) was significantly higher than in individuals without any genetic testing (0.40%, 1/243).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of FXS testing in ID/GDD individuals who lacked previous genetic testing, which promotes standardization of the FXS diagnostic process. These results highlight the utility of FXS testing of unexplained ID/GDD individuals with negative results from standard genetic testing. In the era of next-generation sequencing, FXS testing is more suitable as a second-tier choice and provides clinicians and geneticists with auxiliary references for tracing the etiology of ID/GDD.

Phenotypic Trade-Offs: Deciphering the Impact of Neurodiversity on Drug Development in Fragile X Syndrome

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common single-gene cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Individuals with FXS present with a wide range of severity in multiple phenotypes including cognitive delay, behavioral challenges, sleep issues, epilepsy, and anxiety. These symptoms are also shared by many individuals with other neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Since the discovery of the FXS gene, FMR1, FXS has been the focus of intense preclinical investigation and is placed at the forefront of clinical trials in the field of NDDs. So far, most studies have aimed to translate the rescue of specific phenotypes in animal models, for example, learning, or improving general cognitive or behavioral functioning in individuals with FXS. Trial design, selection of outcome measures, and interpretation of results of recent trials have shown limitations in this type of approach. We propose a new paradigm in which all phenotypes involved in individuals with FXS would be considered and, more importantly, the possible interactions between these phenotypes. This approach would be implemented both at the baseline, meaning when entering a trial or when studying a patient population, and also after the intervention when the study subjects have been exposed to the investigational product. This approach would allow us to further understand potential trade-offs underlying the varying effects of the treatment on different individuals in clinical trials, and to connect the results to individual genetic differences. To better understand the interplay between different phenotypes, we emphasize the need for preclinical studies to investigate various interrelated biological and behavioral outcomes when assessing a specific treatment. In this paper, we present how such a conceptual shift in preclinical design could shed new light on clinical trial results. Future clinical studies should take into account the rich neurodiversity of individuals with FXS specifically and NDDs in general, and incorporate the idea of trade-offs in their designs.

Diagnostic Approach to Macrocephaly in Children

Macrocephaly affects up to 5% of the pediatric population and is defined as an abnormally large head with an occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) >2 standard deviations (SD) above the mean for a given age and sex. Taking into account that about 2-3% of the healthy population has an OFC between 2 and 3 SD, macrocephaly is considered as "clinically relevant" when OFC is above 3 SD. This implies the urgent need for a diagnostic workflow to use in the clinical setting to dissect the several causes of increased OFC, from the benign form of familial macrocephaly and the Benign enlargement of subarachnoid spaces (BESS) to many pathological conditions, including genetic disorders. Moreover, macrocephaly should be differentiated by megalencephaly (MEG), which refers exclusively to brain overgrowth, exceeding twice the SD (3SD-"clinically relevant" megalencephaly). While macrocephaly can be isolated and benign or may be the first indication of an underlying congenital, genetic, or acquired disorder, megalencephaly is most likely due to a genetic cause. Apart from the head size evaluation, a detailed family and personal history, neuroimaging, and a careful clinical evaluation are crucial to reach the correct diagnosis. In this review, we seek to underline the clinical aspects of macrocephaly and megalencephaly, emphasizing the main differential diagnosis with a major focus on common genetic disorders. We thus provide a clinico-radiological algorithm to guide pediatricians in the assessment of children with macrocephaly.