Association of APOE-C1 gene cluster polymorphisms with gallstone disease

Association of Common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of Candidate Genes with Gallstone Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between various candidate gene polymorphisms and gallbladder stone disease (GSD) across ethnic populations; however, the results are often inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate the influence of common ABCG8 T400K, ABCG8 D19H, ABCG8 C54Y, ApoB100 EcoRI, ApoB100 XbaI, ApoE HhaI, CETP TaqI, CYP7A1 Bsa, LRPAP1 I/D and TNF-α A308G polymorphisms on the risk of gallbladder stone disease. 33 Full-text articles with 9250 cases and 12,029 healthy controls (total 21,279 subjects) were analyzed using the RevMan software (V5.1) and the Comprehensive Meta-analysis software (Version 2.0, BIOSTAT, Englewood, NJ) a Random-effects model was applied. Begg's funnel plots, Fail-safe number, Egger's regression intercept and Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation tests were performed for the potential publication bias and sensitivity analysis. The studies were also sub-grouped into European and non-European groups to find out role of ethnicity, if any, on GSD risk. Studies included in quantitative synthesis were ABCG8 T400K rs4148217 (cases/controls, n = 671/1416) (4 studies), ABCG8 D19H rs11887534 (n = 1633/2306) (8 studies), ABCG8 C54Y rs4148211 (n = 445/1194) (3 studies), ApoB100 EcoRI rs1042031 (n = 503/390) (4 studies), ApoB100 XbaI rs693 (n = 1214/1389) (9 studies), ApoE HhaI rs429358 (n = 1335/1482) (12 studies), CETP TaqI rs708272 (n = 1038/1025) (5 studies), CYP7A1 Bsa rs3808607 (n = 565/514) (3 studies), LRPAP1 I/D rs11267919 (n = 849/900) (3 studies), TNF-α A308G rs1800629 (n = 997/1413) (3 studies). The combined results displayed significant association of ABCG8 D19H (GC + CC) [OR with 95%CI = 2.2(1.7-2.8); p < 0.00001], ABCG8 Y54C (GA + GG) [OR with 95%CI = 0.65(0.5-0.9); p = 0.01]. APOB100 EcoRI (GG vs. AA) [OR with 95%CI = 0.51(0.3-0.9); p = 0.05], (GG vs. GA) [OR with 95%CI = 0.6(0.4-0.9); p = 0.04], (GA + AA) [OR with 95%CI = 0.6(0.4-0.9); p = 0.006]. APOB Xba I (X- vs. X+) [OR with 95%CI = 0.53(0.3-0.8); p = 0.006. APOE Hha I (E4/E4 vs. E3/E3) [OR with 95%CI = 3.5(1.1-14.9); p = 0.04] and LRPAP1 I/D (ID + II) [OR with 95%CI = 1.27(1.0-1.6); p = 0.03] with the GSD risk. It was found that ABCG D19H was significantly associated with GSD in both European and Non-European populations. While APOB XbaI and LRPAP1 I/D markers were associated with gallstone disease only in Non- European population. Additionally, APOE HhaI and APOB 100 ECoRI were found to be associated with GSD only in European population. The results of quantitative synthesis suggest that the ABCG8 D19H polymorphism was associated with the increased risk of GSD in both European and Non-European populations, APOE Hha I and LRPAP1 I/D polymorphisms were associated with the increased risk of GSD in European and Non-European population respectively. However, no association was found in ABCG8 T400K, CETP Taq1, CYP7A1 Bsa and TNF-A308G polymorphisms with Gallstone Disease.

Apolipoprotein C1: Its Pleiotropic Effects in Lipid Metabolism and Beyond

Apolipoprotein C1 (apoC1), the smallest of all apolipoproteins, participates in lipid transport and metabolism. In humans, APOC1 gene is in linkage disequilibrium with APOE gene on chromosome 19, a proximity that spurred its investigation. Apolipoprotein C1 associates with triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and HDL and exchanges between lipoprotein classes. These interactions occur via amphipathic helix motifs, as demonstrated by biophysical studies on the wild-type polypeptide and representative mutants. Apolipoprotein C1 acts on lipoprotein receptors by inhibiting binding mediated by apolipoprotein E, and modulating the activities of several enzymes. Thus, apoC1 downregulates lipoprotein lipase, hepatic lipase, phospholipase A2, cholesterylester transfer protein, and activates lecithin-cholesterol acyl transferase. By controlling the plasma levels of lipids, apoC1 relates directly to cardiovascular physiology, but its activity extends beyond, to inflammation and immunity, sepsis, diabetes, cancer, viral infectivity, and-not last-to cognition. Such correlations were established based on studies using transgenic mice, associated in the recent years with GWAS, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. The presence of a duplicate gene, pseudogene APOC1P, stimulated evolutionary studies and more recently, the regulatory properties of the corresponding non-coding RNA are steadily emerging. Nonetheless, this prototypical apolipoprotein is still underexplored and deserves further research for understanding its physiology and exploiting its therapeutic potential.

The association between apolipoprotein E and gallstone disease: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gallstone disease (GSD) is a common biliary tract disease worldwide. Previous studies have investigated the association of apolipoprotein E (APOE) E4 with GSD and reported inconsistent results.

METHODS

In this paper, we conducted meta-analyses to examine whether APOE E4 is associated with the risk of GSD. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar using the following inclusion criteria: 1) Studies on human subjects; 2) subjects in the control group must undergo ultrasound GSD screening, and presence of GSD in the experiment group can be clearly determined, e.g., diagnosis of GSD through ultrasound screening or a previous history of cholecystectomy or cholelithiasis; 3) the studies reported APOE genotype data (APOE E4+ vs. E4-) for subjects with and without GSD. In all the meta-analyses, we used random-effects models to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) as a measure of association as well as the corresponding confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Our literature search found 13 publications with 14 studies, including a total of 1632 GSD patients and 5001 controls, that met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analyses. We did not find a significant association between APOE E4 and risk of GSD (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.89-1.68; p = 0.205). No significant associations were observed in subgroup analyses by gender and mean age. We obtained similar insignificant findings if an additive model was used, if subjects who had E2E4 genotype were excluded, or if low-quality studies were excluded.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis found insufficient evidence for the effect of APOE E4 on GSD risk. Future studies with large sample sizes that control for important confounding/risk factors are needed to validate our findings and to explore other genetic loci that might affect GSD risk.

Association of FXR gene variants with cholelithiasis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Impairment of bile acid homeostasis is the most important risk factor of gallstone disease. Thereby the bile acid sensor farnesoid X receptor (FXR) plays a pivotal role in hepatic and intestinal bile acid metabolism. In this explorative study, the FXR gene was investigated to identify gene variants, associated with gallstone formation in a Caucasian population.

METHODS

Sequencing of the FXR gene was conducted in a randomly selected cohort of gallstone carriers (n=30) and control subjects (n=16) from Stuttgart, Germany. Genomic DNA was obtained from blood leukocytes. Genotype frequencies were established in the total cohort (controls: n=133, gallstone carriers: n=74). For expression analysis, total RNA and protein were isolated from ileal biopsies.

RESULTS

The sequencing showed the sole appearance of 10 SNPs in gallstone carriers. Further genotype analysis revealed significant gender- and weight-dependent frequency differences of 3 SNPs between gallstone carriers and controls in males (rs35724: OR=4.73, P=0.022) and normal weight subjects (rs11110385: OR=3.67, P=0.027; rs11110386: OR=3.67, P=0.027) applying the 11+12<>22 allele model. Furthermore, rs11110385 carriers showed a significantly decreased FXR protein expression (11+12<>22: P=0.003). Significant mRNA expression differences between lean rs11110385 carriers and non-carriers were observed in FXR target genes (decrease: ILBP: P=0.042, OSTalpha: P=0.071, FGF19: P=0.011. Increase: LRH1: P=0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Three FXR gene variants (rs35724, rs11110385, rs11110386) were identified as potential susceptibility factors for cholelithiasis in a German cohort in gender- and weight-dependent manners. Thereby the tag SNP rs11110385 seemed to influence the activation of the FXR gene.

Genetics of gallstone disease

Gallstone disease (GSD) is one of the most common biliary tract disorders worldwide. The prevalence, however, varies from 5.9-21.9% in Western society to 3.1-10.7% in Asia. Most gallstones (75%) are silent. Approximately half of symptomatic gallstone carriers experience a second episode of biliary pain within 1 year. These individuals are at increased risk of developing acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, and biliary pancreatitis. As can be expected, these complications burden health care systems because of their invasive nature and surgical cost. Factors that contribute to gallstone formation include supersaturation of cholesterol in bile, gallbladder hypomotility, destabilization of bile by kinetic protein factors, and abnormal mucins. Epidemiologic studies have implicated multiple environmental factors and some common genetic elements in gallstone formation. Genetic factors that influence gallstone formation have been elaborated from linkage studies of twins, families, and ethnicities. Accumulating evidence suggests that genetic factors play a role in GSD.

A meta-analysis of apolipoprotein E gene ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphism for gallbladder stone disease

Background

Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between apolipoprotein (Apo) E gene polymorphisms and gallbladder stone disease (GSD) across ethnic populations; however, the results are often inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate the influence of a common ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphism in Apo E gene on the risk of gallbladder stone disease.

Method

Data were analyzed using the RevMan software (V5.1) and a random-effects model was applied irrespective of between-study heterogeneity. Publication bias was weighed using the fail-safe number.

Results

There were 17 study populations totaling 1773 cases and 2751 controls for ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphism of Apo E gene. Overall comparison of alleles ε2 with ε3 in all study populations yielded a 16% decreased risk for GSD (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.68–1.05; P = 0.31; I² = 13%), and comparison of alleles ε4 with ε3 yielded a 25% increased risk (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.97–1.61; P = 0.0003; I² = 63%). Subgroup analysis by study design indicated that the magnitude of association in hospital-based studies was largely significantly strengthened for ε4 allelic model (odds ratio [OR]  = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.05–2.02; p = 0.0007; I² = 65%). Subgroup analysis by age of controls indicated a remarkably significant elevation in the magnitude of association in age >50 subgroups in ε4 allelic model (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.03–2.19; p = 0.0009; I² = 72%). Moreover, subgroup analysis by cases gender indicated a reduction in the magnitude of association in male<30% studies for E2/2 genotypic model (OR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.07–1.49; p = 0.16; I² = 45%).

Conclusions

Our results reveal that Apo E gene ε4 allele is a risk factor of gallbladder stone disease, especially in elder people and Chinese population.

Effects of SLC10A2 variant rs9514089 on gallstone risk and serum cholesterol levels- meta-analysis of three independent cohorts

Background

Recently, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs9514089 in SLC10A2 (apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter gene) has been identified as a susceptibility variant for cholelithiasis in humans.

Methods

Here we assessed the effects of rs9514089 on gallstone risk and related phenotypes of the metabolic syndrome in the self-contained population of Sorbs (183 cases with gallstones/826 controls). Furthermore, we performed a meta-analysis for effects of rs9514089 on susceptibility for cholelithiasis in three independent cohorts (Stuttgart: 56 cases/71 controls, Aachen: 184 cases/184 controls and Sorbs).

Results

There was no significant association of rs9514089 with gallstone risk, serum lipid parameters and BMI in the Sorbs and in the meta-analysis of all three cohorts (p > 0.05). There was an effect trend in the subgroup of lean subjects but based on different effect directions in the three cohorts there was no significant association in the meta-analysis.

Conclusions

We were not able to replicate the effect of rs9514089 on gallstone risk in the Sorbs. Further analyses in larger cohorts are required to finally assess the role of genetic variants in SLC10A2 in human gallstone development and lipid metabolism.

APOE and FABP2 Polymorphisms and History of Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, Diabetes, and Gallbladder Disease

Dysfunctional lipid metabolism plays a central role in pathogenesis of major chronic diseases, and genetic factors are important determinants of individual lipid profiles. We analyzed the associations of two well-established functional polymorphisms (FABP2 A54T and APOE isoforms) with past and family histories of 1492 population samples. FABP2-T54 allele was associated with an increased risk of past history of myocardial infarction (odds ratio (OR) = 1.51). Likewise, the subjects with APOE4, compared with E2 and E3, had a significantly increased risk of past history myocardial infarction (OR = 1.89). The OR associated with APOE4 was specifically increased in women for past history of myocardial infarction but decreased for gallstone disease. Interactions between gender and APOE isoforms were also significant or marginally significant for these two conditions. FABP2-T54 allele may be a potential genetic marker for myocardial infarction, and APOE4 may exert sex-dependent effects on myocardial infarction and gallbladder disease.

The genetic background of gallstone formation: an update

Gallstone disease is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal diseases with a substantial burden to health care systems that is expected to increase in ageing populations at risk. This review summarizes recent data on the genetic background of cholesterol gallstones and the role of biliary lipid composition. Three previously unknown non-synonymous mutations in the ABCB4 gene encoding the hepatobiliary phospholipid-flippase MDR3 are presented.

Determinants of transhepatic cholesterol flux and their relevance for gallstone formation

Cholesterol available for bile secretion is controlled by a wide variety of proteins that mediate lipoprotein cholesterol uptake and cholesterol transport and metabolism in the liver. From a disease perspective, abnormalities in the transhepatic traffic of cholesterol from plasma into the bile may influence the risk of cholesterol gallstone formation. This review summarizes some recent progress in understanding the hepatic determinants of biliary cholesterol secretion and its potential pathogenic implications in cholesterol gallstone disease. This information together with new discoveries in this field may lead to improved risk evaluation, novel surrogate markers and earlier diagnosis, better preventive approaches and more effective pharmacological therapies for this prevalent human disease.

Gallstone disease: from genes to evidence-based therapy

The number of gallstone patients is increasing in ageing populations with a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome and obesity. Recently variants of hepatic ATP binding cassette transporters have been identified as genetic susceptibility factors for gallstone disease, pointing to novel means for risk assessment and prevention. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the mainstay of therapy for symptomatic gallbladder stones, the clinical management of gallstone disease is changing rapidly, with an increase in day case surgery and the advent of transluminal endoscopic surgery. Here, we summarize the molecular and genetic mechanisms of gallstone formation as well as the current evidence-based algorithms for diagnosis and therapy of gallbladder and bile duct stones.

Genetics of biliary tract diseases: new insights into gallstone disease and biliary tract cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic biliary diseases are due to complex interactions between environmental and genetic factors. Here we summarize the current knowledge of genetic factors that contribute to common biliary diseases, focusing on gallstones and carcinogenesis, and review the recent association studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since most studies were based on small sample sizes, replication of the findings is mandatory. Recently a large twin study confirmed a genetic predisposition to gallstones and a genome-wide association scan identified the hepatocanalicular cholesterol transporter ABCG8 as the common susceptibility factor for gallstone disease. Genetic studies in patients with cholangiocarcinoma indicate that genes controlling the metabolism and transport of xenobiotics or modulating chronic inflammation may determine individual susceptibility.

SUMMARY

Genetic studies have identified the first susceptibility factors for gallstones and biliary tract cancers, but most results have yet to be replicated. In the future, genome-wide studies in different populations are likely to identify the entire set of genes contributing to chronic biliary diseases. Since the disease phenotypes result from the manifestation of susceptibility factors under the influence of environmental triggers, the discovery of these genes will open avenues to control environmental challenges and lead to novel strategies for risk assessment ('gene signatures') and prevention.

Haplotype analysis of signal peptide (insertion/deletion) and XbaI polymorphisms of the APOB gene in gallbladder cancer

PURPOSE

The incidence of gallbladder cancer (GBC) is usually paralleled by the prevalence of gallstone disease, and genes of cholesterol metabolism have been implicated in gallstone disease. The XbaI and insertion/deletion (ins/del) polymorphism of Apolipoprotein B (APOB) appears to influence cholesterol homoeostasis and possibly risk for gallstone disease. We examined the effect of these polymorphisms individually as well as their haplotypes on GBC and gallstone patients in North Indian population.

METHODS

The study comprises 123 consecutive cases of proven GBC, 172 cases of gallstone and 232 healthy subjects of similar age and sex. The genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leucocytes and genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

RESULTS

In a case-control study, APOB XbaI and ins/del polymorphisms were not significantly associated with risk of GBC. Using the expectation maximization algorithm, four haplotypes were obtained, and haplotype X(+),D was found to be significantly higher in GBC patients without stone in comparison with healthy subjects [odds ratio (OR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.2-6.6 P=0.012].

CONCLUSIONS

The X(+),D haplotype of APOB is associated with increased risk for development of GBC and the risk is not modified in the presence of gallstones.

Genetic evidence that apolipoprotein E4 is not a relevant susceptibility factor for cholelithiasis in two high-risk populations

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) isoforms are genetic determinants of interindividual variations in lipid metabolism. To assess whether apoE is a genetic risk factor for cholesterol gallstone disease (GD), we analyzed apoE variants in populations from Chile and Germany, two countries with very high prevalence rates of this disease. ApoE genotypes were determined in Chilean gallstone patients (n = 117) and control subjects (n = 122) as well as in German gallstone patients (n = 184) and matched controls (n = 184). In addition, we studied apoE variants in subgroups of Chilean patients with strong differences in their susceptibility to acquire gallstones: 50 elderly subjects without gallstones in spite of well-known risk factors for this disease (gallstone-resistant) and 32 young individuals with gallstones but without risk factors (gallstone-susceptible). Furthermore, correlation analysis of apoE genotypes with cholesterol crystal formation times, biliary cholesterol saturation index (CSI), and gallstone cholesterol contents was performed in 81 cholecystectomized patients. In this study analyzing the largest sample set available, apoE4 genotype was not associated with an increased frequency of GD in either population. Moreover, in the Chilean population after adjusting for risk factors such as gender, age, body mass index, serum lipids, and glucose, the odds ratio for the association of the apoE4 allele and GD was significantly (P < 0.05) <1. Also, genotypes were not correlated with cholesterol crystal formation time, CSI, or gallstone cholesterol content. In contrast to previous smaller studies, apoE polymorphisms were not associated with susceptibility to cholesterol GD in high-risk populations.