Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: An international multicenter study

Image-Guided Thermal Ablation for Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: A Multicenter Experience

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of image-guided thermal ablation in patients with hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective investigation of 18 patients (43.9 years [SD ± 14.8]; 6 men) who underwent image-guided thermal ablation for HEHE between January 2013 and February 2023. A total of 31 ablation sessions (24 involving microwave ablation and 7 involving radiofrequency ablation) were evaluated. The rates of technical success, adverse events, and outcomes were assessed. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. The risk factors affecting PFS were investigated using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 93.5% (29/31). No major adverse events occurred. Local tumor progression occurred after 2 sessions (6.5%, 2/31), and intrahepatic distant metastasis occurred after 16 sessions (51.6%, 16/31). During the medium follow-up time of 37.2 months (range, 3-117 months), the OS and PFS rates were 87.6% and 62.2%, respectively, at 1 year; 75.5% and 37.4%, respectively, at 3 years; and 75.5% and 37.4%, respectively, at 5 years. The median OS and PFS were 90.5 months (95% CI: 68.1-112.8) and 23.8 months (95% CI: 15.4-32.2), respectively. According to the multivariate analysis, a larger tumor size (P = .026) was associated with shorter PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided thermal ablation is a feasible and safe treatment option for patients with HEHE that resulted in local tumor control and a favorable long-term prognosis.

A rare case of hepatic epitheliod hemangioendothelioma

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is an extremely uncommon tumor of the liver. It typically lacks recognizable clinical signs and is diagnosed with the aid of imaging and histopathology combined with immunohistochemical analysis. We discuss the case of a 40-year-old woman with HEHE. The aim of this case report and literature review is to increase doctors' knowledge of HEHE and reduce the incidence of missed clinical diagnoses.

CT and MRI features of hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 15 cases and a literature review

OBJECTIVE

To improve the current imaging understanding of MRI or CT for hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (HEHE) to aid in its successful preoperative diagnosis.

METHODS

The imaging features of 15 patients (median age 38.6, range 20-71; 7 M/8 F) from eight institutions with pathologically confirmed HEHE were retrospectively analysed. Additionally, the CT/MR imaging features of 180 patients in 15 literature publications were collected, analysed and compared with our case series.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients underwent CT and MRI (n = 2), CT (n = 9) or MR (n = 8) scans. A total of 92.9% (13/14) of the patients were initially diagnosed with other lesions on imaging. A total of 86.7% (13/15) were multifocal. Nodules (11/15, 73.3%) were predominantly peripheral in distribution (12/15, 80.0%). Some cases were associated with hepatic capsular retraction (13/15, 86.7%), "target signs" (8/15, 53.3%) and "lollipop signs" (5/15, 33.3%). Peripheral enhancement of various shapes in the early phase with a progressive centripetal filling was the most common pattern of enhancement (12/15, 80.0%). Abnormal vascularity was seen in 50.7% (6/15) of the patients. Suspicious tumour thromboses in the inferior vena cava were seen in 3 (20.0%) of the patients. Two of the 15 patients (13.3%) had a history of smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

HEHEs have common distinctive features, including multifocal lesions that are predominantly peripheral, "target signs", "lollipop signs", hepatic capsular retraction and peripheral enhancement of various shapes in the early phase with progressive centripetal filling. Additional aggressive imaging features that may be valuable clues to the diagnosis can be identified by CT or MRI.

Treatment modalities and long-term outcomes of hepatic hemangioendothelioma in the United States

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the outcomes of patients with hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) in the United States after stratification by their most definitive treatment.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients with HEHE between 2004 and 2018. Patients were divided in four treatment groups: no surgical therapy, ablation, liver resection or liver transplantation. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared, and Kaplan Meier functions and Cox-regression were used for unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses.

RESULTS

Among a total of 334 patients, 218 (65.2%) were managed non-surgically, 74 (22.1%) underwent hepatic resections, 35 (10.4%) underwent liver transplantation and 7 (2.1%) underwent ablations. The overall median survival was 111 months (95%CI 73-149) after liver transplantation, 69 months (95%CI 45-92) after hepatic resection, 38 months (95%CI 0-78) after ablation and 80 months (95%CI 70-90) for patients managed by watchful waiting (P < 0.001). After adjustment, patients who underwent liver transplantation were found to have a better survival when compared to other therapies (Hazard Ratio: 0.61, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.38-0.97, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports the outcomes of the largest cohort of patients with HEHE. The longest survival was observed after liver transplantation, followed by non-surgical management and hepatic resection. Because of selection bias, future studies to better characterize what criteria should be used for the selection of treatment modalities for HEHE are urgently needed.

Comparison of Hepatectomy and Hemangiomas Stripping on Patients with Giant Hepatic Hemangiomas

Objective. To compare the value of a hepatectomy and hemangioma stripping on patients with giant hepatic hemangiomas. Methods. Seventy-four patients with giant hepatic hemangiomas were retrospectively analyzed from data collected from their hepatobiliary surgeries performed from June 2010 to June 2015 at the People’s Hospital of Ningxia and the general hospital affiliated with Ningxia Medical University. The patients were divided into a hepatectomy group (37 patients) and a hemangioma-stripping group (37 patients). Conditions of each group were compared before and after surgery and comprised of surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, duration of hepatic blood occlusion, and hospital stay. Any complications after surgery, such as pleural effusions, bile leakage, and abdominal hemorrhage, were also observed. Results. In the hemangioma-stripping group, the surgery time was 2.38 ± 0.93 h, intraoperative blood loss was 889.19 ± 756.37, blood transfusion amount was 723.78 ± 801.14, the duration of hepatic blood occlusion 26.84 ± 17.30 min, and hospital stay was 16.19 ± 5.01 d. In the hepatectomy group, surgery time was 3.26 ± 1.16 h, intraoperative blood loss was 1551.35 ± 1755.88 mL blood transfusion amount was 1693.24 ± 2117.72 mL, duration of hepatic blood occlusion was 26.84 ± 17.30 min, and hospital stay was 16.19 ± 5.01 d. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The pleural effusion incident rate in the former group was lower than that of the latter group, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusions. Hemangiomas stripping is an effective method by which to cure hepatic hemangioma, with the advantages being a relatively easy surgery with less patient trauma, rapid recovery, and fewer complications. This method should be used more often in clinical settings.

Three cases of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma evaluated using conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Case reports

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a very rare vascular endothelial cell tumor, which lacks typical clinical manifestations and specificity of imaging features. Whether the background of fatty liver and the difference in Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) characteristics between large and small lesions has not been well defined. In this case reports, we described the ultrasound image features of three patients with HEHE. These three patients with HEHE have certain similar characteristics of conventional ultrasound and CEUS. CEUS imaging features include large nodules show earlier perfusion than liver parenchyma, with rim-enhancement, nonenhancing regions in the center, while small nodules show earlier perfusion than liver parenchyma, with hyperenhancement. All nodules show faster washout than hepatic parenchyma, showing heterogeneous hypoenhancement, and more washout lesions can be found in the PVP and LP. Conventional ultrasound and CEUS not only help to improve the diagnostic confidence of HEHE of rare liver tumors, but also can guide the biopsy area, making it easier to make accurate pathological diagnosis.

Liver Transplant Oncology: Towards Dynamic Tumor-Biology-Oriented Patient Selection

While liver transplantation was initially considered as a curative treatment modality only for hepatocellular carcinoma, the indication has been increasingly extended to other tumor entities over recent years, most recently to the treatment of non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. Although oncologic outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) are consistently good, organ shortage forces stringent selection of suitable candidates. Dynamic criteria based on tumor biology fulfill the prerequisite of an individual oncological prediction better than traditional morphometric criteria based on tumor burden. The availability of specific (neo-)adjuvant therapies and customized modern immunosuppression may further contribute to favorable post-transplantation outcomes on the one hand and simultaneously open the path to LT as a curative option for advanced stages of tumor patients. Herein, we provide an overview of the oncological LT indications, the selection process, and expected oncological outcome after LT.

Novel and Specific MRI Features Indicate the Clinical Features of Patients With Rare Hepatic Tumor Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma

Objective

To investigate the MRI features and clinical significance of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE).

Methods

Clinical records and MRI findings were retrospectively evaluated in nine HEHE patients from May 2010 to January 2020.

Result

There were 121 lesions in nine patients with a predominantly peripheral distribution. Five lesions (4.13%) in two patients (22.22%) had evidence of capsular retraction, and three patients had lung metastasis (33.33%). Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI showed progressive enhancement, mainly in two ways: ring enhancement with hypovascularity in four patients (44.44%) and ring enhancement with hypervascularity in five patients (55.56%). Imaging demonstrated a multilayer ring appearance, which was typically observed on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). The most common appearance consisted of two layers of varying signal, with some images displaying up to four layers. There were significant differences in the size of lesions between different layers of multilayer ring appearance (p < 0.001). All lesions exhibited a two-layer appearance on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), with hyperintensity at the periphery and a slightly high signal at the center (except for those with a single layer on T2WI). The “vascular penetration sign” was observed in most lesions, and the blood vessels of 112 lesions (92.56%) were portal vein branches, and five (4.13%) were hepatic vein branches. Pulmonary metastasis was found in three patients with the “vascular penetration sign” of hepatic vein branches.

Conclusion

The multilayer ring appearance on T2WI, the “vascular penetration sign”, and the two enhancement patterns may be of great significance in the diagnosis and treatment of HEHE. The “vascular penetration sign” of hepatic vein branches may indicate extrahepatic metastasis.

Clinical characteristics and CT features of hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma and comparison with those of liver metastases

BACKGROUND

To analyse clinical characteristics and computer tomography (CT) findings of hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (HEH) and to determine differential features compared with liver metastasis (LM).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 80 patients with histopathologically confirmed HEH (n = 20) and LM (n = 60) of different primary tumours who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CT scans. CT findings included the location, contour, size, number, margin, and density of lesions, the patterns and degree of contrast enhancement of lesions, vascular invasion and changes in other organs. The enhancement ratio (ER) and tumour-to-normal parenchyma ratio (TNR) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were used to determine areas under the curve (AUCs).

RESULTS

About 65% of HEH lesions were located in submarginal areas. Significant differences were observed between HEH and LM patients in age, sex, and tumour marker positivity (p < 0.05). HEH showed minimal to slight enhancement, thin ring-like enhancement in arterial phase, and slight, homogeneous, progressive enhancement in the portal phase. HEH presented capsule retraction, and the "target" sign and the "lollipop" sign were significantly more frequent than in LM (p < 0.05). The ER and TNR in the arterial phase of HEH were lower than those of LM (p < 0.05). AUCs of ER and TNR in the arterial phase were 0.74 and 0.73, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lesions in subcapsular locations, capsular retraction, slight and thin ring-like enhancement, "target" and "lollipop" signs and lower ER and TNR in the arterial phase may represent important features of HEH compared with LM.

Tumor Biology Impacts Survival in Surgically Managed Primary Hepatic Vascular Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Hepatic angiosarcoma (AS) and hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) are rare primary hepatic vascular malignancies (PHVM) that remain poorly understood. To guide management, we sought to identify factors and trends predicting survival after surgical intervention using a national database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database patients with a diagnosis of PHVM were identified. Clinicopathologic factors were extracted and compared. Overall survival (OS) was estimated and predictors of survival were identified.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninty patients with AS and 216 with HEHE were identified. Only 16% of AS and 36% of HEHE patients underwent surgery. The median OS for patients who underwent surgical intervention was 97 months, with 5-year OS of 30% for AS versus 69% for HEHE patients (P< 0.001). Tumor biology strongly impacted OS, with AS histology (Hazard Ratio [HR] of 3.61 [1.55-8.42]), moderate/poor tumor differentiation (HR = 3.86 [1.03-14.46]) and tumor size (HR = 1.01 [1.00-1.01]) conferring worse prognosis. The presence of metastatic disease in the surgically managed cohort (HR = 5.22 [2.01-13.57]) and involved surgical margins (HR = 3.87 [1.59-9.42]), were independently associated with worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national cohort of PHVM, tumor biology, in the form of angiosarcoma histology, tumor differentiation and tumor size, was strongly associated with worse survival after surgery. Additionally, residual tumor burden after resection, in the form of positive surgical margins or the presence of metastasis, was also negatively associated with survival. Long-term clinical outcomes remain poor for patients with the above high-risk features, emphasizing the need to develop effective forms of adjuvant systemic therapies for this group of malignancies.

Metastatic Hepatic Epitheloid Hemangioendothelioma in a Young Male: A Rare Presentation

Hepatic EHE (epithelioid hemangioendothelioma) is an uncommon entity of vascular origin and a low-grade malignant tumor. Primary hepatic EHE is rare. These tumors can be multifocal at presentation like in the soft tissues, bones, brain, liver, and small intestine. First described by Weiss and Enzinger in 1982 as a malignant vascular neoplasm with indolent behavior. We report the case of a 23-year-old male, known case of chronic liver disease, who presented with incisional hernia following exploratory laparotomy 8 months back, performed for intestinal obstruction. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography abdomen revealed an incisional hernia with a large defect along with multiple lesions in the liver (suspected metastases) and peritoneal deposits and a few discrete lung nodules. Some areas of interloop collections were also noted. Biopsies were taken from the liver which revealed benign cirrhotic lesion. Relevant to the findings, multiple biopsies were performed and fluid was sent for evaluation. The liver biopsy came out positive for borderline vascular malignancy (epithelioid hemangioendothelioma). This was confirmed with the immunohistochemistry report. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma occurs mostly in soft tissues of extremity and lungs. The involvement of the liver may be seen as metastasis or rarely as a primary tumor. The incidence of primary malignant hepatic hemangioendothelioma is about 0.1/100,000; the mean age at the time of diagnosis is 41.7 years, and male:female ratio is 2:3. Liver transplantation, hepatectomy, chemoembolization, radiotherapy, and chemotherapeutic agents are reported treatment regimens. Malignant EHE of liver presents as multiple hepatic nodules. Being locally aggressive, it can invade the peritoneum, gut, and lungs. Orthoptic liver transplantation appears to be the only remedy because of the multifocal nature of the disease. Partial hepatectomy is possible for localized tumors.

New insights into the pathophysiology and clinical care of rare primary liver cancers

Hepatocholangiocarcinoma, fibrolamellar carcinoma, hepatic haemangioendothelioma and hepatic angiosarcoma represent less than 5% of primary liver cancers. Fibrolamellar carcinoma and hepatic haemangioendothelioma are driven by unique somatic genetic alterations (DNAJB1-PRKCA and CAMTA1-WWTR1 fusions, respectively), while the pathogenesis of hepatocholangiocarcinoma remains more complex, as suggested by its histological diversity. Histology is the gold standard for diagnosis, which remains challenging even in an expert centre because of the low incidences of these liver cancers. Resection, when feasible, is the cornerstone of treatment, together with liver transplantation for hepatic haemangioendothelioma. The role of locoregional therapies and systemic treatments remains poorly studied. In this review, we aim to describe the recent advances in terms of diagnosis and clinical management of these rare primary liver cancers.