1
|
Yao H, ZhuGe Y, Jin S, Chen S, Zhang H, Zhang D, Chen Z. The efficacy of coaxial percutaneous iodine-125 seed implantation combined with arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Radiat Biol 2024:1-10. [PMID: 38687687 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2024.2347357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of coaxial percutaneous Iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation in combination with arterial infusion chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) through a randomized controlled trial. METHODS A total of 101 patients with advanced PC were randomized into two groups: control group treated with systemic intravenous chemotherapy and experimental group that received 125I seed implantation in combination with arterial infusion chemotherapy. Outcomes, including tumor control, abdominal pain relief, and survival time were compared between these two groups (Trial Registration No. KYKT2018-65). RESULTS Pretreatment abdominal pain scores were comparable between the two groups, whereas the abdominal pain scores at 1- and 3-month post-treatment were significantly lower in the control group than those in the experimental group (1-month: 3.74 ± 1.54 vs. 4.48 ± 1.46, p = .015; 3-month: 3.64 ± 2.21 vs. 5.40 ± 1.56, p < .001). At 3-month post-treatment, computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a significantly higher disease control rate in the experimental group than that in the control group (94.0% vs. 74.5%, p = .007). The median survival time in the experimental group was significantly longer than that in the control group (15-month vs. 9-month, p < .001). CONCLUSION The combination of coaxial percutaneous 125I seed implantation with arterial infusion chemotherapy could significantly alleviate abdominal pain, improve tumor control rates, and prolong survival time in patients with advanced PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HongXiang Yao
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Ying ZhuGe
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - ShiXiang Jin
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - ShuiBing Chen
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - HengYiTing Zhang
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Dong Zhang
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - ZhiGang Chen
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Piątek M, Bieńkowski M, Kuśnierz K, Pilch-Kowalczyk J, Imielska-Zdunek D, Mrowiec S, Lampe P, Radecka B, Nawrocki S. Combination of modified FOLFIRINOX with stereotactic body radiotherapy as an induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma - a prospective single-arm study. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2024; 28:15-30. [PMID: 38800534 PMCID: PMC11117165 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2024.137760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, only a minor fraction of patients are eligible for resection. Induction therapy may be offered to patients, but the response rate in cases with significant vascular involvement is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy (mFFX) + stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination as induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The primary endpoints were the resection rate and one-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and quality of live (QoL). Material and methods Thirty patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with 6 cycles of mFFX, followed by SBRT and additional 3 cycles of mFFX. The response was measured prior to SBRT and after regimen completion. In the absence of disease progression, the patients were referred for surgery. The patients were requested to complete quality of life questionnaires (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 questionnaires biweekly. Results On the first evaluation, disease control was noted in 26 (86.7%) patients. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was performed in 20 patients. Twelve patients underwent laparotomy, with radical resection possible in 3 cases. The one-year OS rate was 63.3%. Overall, 11 grade ≥ 3 adverse events were noted. No deterioration in the overall QoL was observed. The median PFS was 7.53 months. Conclusions The expected resection rate of ≥ 30% was not achieved. However, the combination was associated with good local control, low adverse event rate, and good QoL, which advocate its further investigation in this clinical situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michał Piątek
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
| | - Michał Bieńkowski
- Department of Pathomorphology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Kuśnierz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Joanna Pilch-Kowalczyk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Dorota Imielska-Zdunek
- Radiotherapy Division, prof. K. Gibiński Memorial University Clinical Centre, Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland
| | - Sławomir Mrowiec
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Paweł Lampe
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Barbara Radecka
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
| | - Sergiusz Nawrocki
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salas B, Ferrera-Alayón L, Espinosa-López A, Vera-Rosas A, Salcedo E, Kannemann A, Alayon A, Chicas-Sett R, LLoret M, Lara P. Dose-escalated SBRT for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Feasibility, safety and preliminary clinical results of a multicenter study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100753. [PMID: 38433951 PMCID: PMC10907515 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) allows for the administration of a higher biologically effective doses (BED), that would be essential to achieve durable tumor control. Escalating treatment doses need a very accurate tumor positioning and motion control during radiotherapy.The aim of this study to assess the feasibility and safety of a Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) dose-escalated protocol at 45 Gy, 50 Gy and 55 Gy in 5 consecutive daily fractions, in Border Line Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (BRCP) /Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC) by means of a standard LINAC platform. Methods Patients diagnosed of BRPC/LAPC, candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT, in four university hospitals of the province of Las Palmas (Canary Islands, Spain) were included in this prospective study. Radiotherapy was administered using standard technology (LINACS) with advanced positioning (Lipiodol® and metallic stent used as fiducial markers) and tumor motion control (4D, DBH, Calypso®). There were 3 planned dose-escalated SIB groups, 45 Gy/5f (9 patients) 50 Gy/5f (9 + 9 patients) and 55 Gy/5f (9 patients). The defined primary end points of the study were the safety and feasibility of the proposed treatment protocol. Secondary endpoints included radiological tumor response after SBRT, local control and survival. Results From June 2017 to December 2022, sixty-two patients were initially assessed for eligibility in the study in the four participating centers, and 49 were candidates for chemotherapy (CHT). Forty-one were referred to radiotherapy after CHT and 33 finally were treated by escalated-dose SIB, 45 Gy (9 patients) 50 Gy (16 patients), 55 Gy(8 patients). All patients completed the scheduled treatment and no acute or late severe (≥grade3) gastrointestinal toxicity was observed.Local response was analyzed by CT/MRI two months after the end of SBRT. Ten patients (31,25 %) achieved objective response (2/9:45 Gy, 5/15:50 Gy, 3/8:55 Gy). Follow-up was closed as July 2023. Freedom from local progression at 1-2y were 89,3% (95 %CI:83,4-95,2%) and 66 % (95 %CI:54,6-77,4%) respectively. The 1-2y survival rates were 95,7% (95 %CI:91,4-100 % and 48,6% (95 %CI:37,7-59,5%) respectively. Conclusion These promising results should be confirmed by further studies with larger sample size and extended follow-up period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Salas
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Dr Negrín Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - L. Ferrera-Alayón
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Dr Negrín Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
- Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University (ULPGC) ,C. Juan de Quesada, 30, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria,Spain
| | - A. Espinosa-López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Carretera Madrid-Cartagena, S/N, 30120 El Palmar (Murcia), Spain
| | - A. Vera-Rosas
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Dr Negrín Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - E. Salcedo
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Dr Negrín Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - A. Kannemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Dr Negrín Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - A. Alayon
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Dr Negrín Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - R. Chicas-Sett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASCIRES GRUPO BIOMEDICO, Valencia, Spain
| | - M. LLoret
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Dr Negrín Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
- Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University (ULPGC) ,C. Juan de Quesada, 30, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria,Spain
- Instituto Canario de Investigacion del Cáncer ICIC
| | - P.C. Lara
- Instituto Canario de Investigacion del Cáncer ICIC
- Canarian Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology University Hospital San Roque, C. Dolores de la Rocha, 5, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
- Fernando Pessoa Canarias University, Calle la Juventud, s/n, 35450 Guía, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim K, Park HC, Yu JI, Park JO, Hong JY, Lee KT, Lee KH, Lee JK, Park JK, Heo JS, Shin SH, Min JH, Kim K, Han IW. Impact and optimal timing of local therapy addition in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100732. [PMID: 38317678 PMCID: PMC10840322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the efficacy and optimal timing of local treatment in patients with borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with upfront FOLFIRINOX. Method Between 2015 and 2020, 258 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were analysed. Treatment outcomes were compared between systemic treatment group (ST) and multimodality treatment groups (MT) using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. The MT were stratified as follows: FOLFIRINOX + radiation therapy (RT) (MT1), FOLFIRINOX + surgical resection (MT2), and FOLFIRINOX + RT + surgical resection (MT3). Results With median follow-up period of 18 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) for the ST was 22.0%, and it was significantly worse than MT (MT1, 46.3%; MT2, 65.7% and MT3; 90.2%; P < .001). The 2-year locoregional progression free survival (LRPFS) and overall PFS in ST were 10.7% and 7.0%, which were also significantly lower than those of MT (2-year LRPFS: MT1, 31.8%; MT2, 45.3%; MT3, 81.0%; 2-year overall PFS: MT1, 23.3%; MT2, 35.0%; MT3, 66.3%; P < .001). In time-varying multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, local treatment contributed to better treatment outcomes, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.568 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.398-0.811), 0.490 (95% CI, 0.331-0.726), and 0.656 (95% CI, 0.458-0.940) for OS, LRPFS, and overall PFS, respectively. The time window of 11-17 months after FOLFIRINOX appeared to demonstrate the maximal efficacy of local treatments in OS. Conclusions Adding local treatment in BR/LAPC patients treated with upfront FOLFIRINOX seemed to contribute in improved treatment outcomes, and it showed maximal efficacy in OS when applied 11-17 months after the initiation of FOLFIRINOX. We suggest that administration of sufficient period of upfront FOLFIRINOX may intensify the efficacy of local treatments, and well controlled prospective trials are expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kangpyo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joon Oh Park
- Divisions of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jung Yong Hong
- Divisions of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyu Taek Lee
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang Hyuck Lee
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Kyun Lee
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joo Kyung Park
- Divisions of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Seok Heo
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Shin
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Hye Min
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyunga Kim
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Data Convergence & Future Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - In Woong Han
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351 Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Del Chiaro M, Sugawara T, Karam SD, Messersmith WA. Advances in the management of pancreatic cancer. BMJ 2023; 383:e073995. [PMID: 38164628 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains among the malignancies with the worst outcomes. Survival has been improving, but at a slower rate than other cancers. Multimodal treatment, including chemotherapy, surgical resection, and radiotherapy, has been under investigation for many years. Because of the anatomical characteristics of the pancreas, more emphasis on treatment selection has been placed on local extension into major vessels. Recently, the development of more effective treatment regimens has opened up new treatment strategies, but urgent research questions have also become apparent. This review outlines the current management of pancreatic cancer, and the recent advances in its treatment. The review discusses future treatment pathways aimed at integrating novel findings of translational and clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Toshitaka Sugawara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sana D Karam
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van ‘t Land FR, Aziz MH, Michiels N, Mieog JSD, Bonsing BA, Luelmo SA, Homs MY, Groot Koerkamp B, Papageorgiou G, van Eijck CH. Increasing Systemic Immune-inflammation Index During Treatment in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer is Associated With Poor Survival: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study. Ann Surg 2023; 278:1018-1023. [PMID: 37010512 PMCID: PMC10631500 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A high systemic immune-inflammation index (SIII) at diagnosis of various cancers, including pancreatic cancer, is associated with poor prognosis. The impact of FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy on this index is unknown. In addition, the prognostic value of changes in the SIII during treatment is unclear. In this retrospective analysis, we aimed to find answers regarding patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy alone or with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy between 2015 and 2021 in 2 tertiary referral centers were included. Baseline characteristics, laboratory values at 3 time points during treatment, and survival outcomes were collected. The patient-specific evolutions of SIII and their association with mortality were assessed with joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data. RESULTS Data of 141 patients were analyzed. At a median follow-up time of 23.0 months (95% CI: 14.6-31.3), 97 (69%) patients had died. Median overall survival was 13.2 months (95% CI: 11.0-15.5). During treatment with FOLFIRINOX, the log (SIII) was reduced by -0.588 (95% CI: -0.0978, -0.197; P = 0.003). One unit increase in log (SIII) increased the hazard ratio of dying by 1.604 (95% CI: 1.068-2.409; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS In addition to carbohydrate antigen 19-9, the SIII is a reliable biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohammad H. Aziz
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nynke Michiels
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J. Sven D. Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A. Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia A.C. Luelmo
- Department of Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y.V. Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Grigorios Papageorgiou
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eijkelenkamp H, Grimbergen G, Daamen LA, Heerkens HD, van de Ven S, Mook S, Meijer GJ, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Paulson E, Erickson BA, Verkooijen HM, Hall WA, Intven MPW. Clinical outcomes after online adaptive MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1040673. [PMID: 37854684 PMCID: PMC10579578 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1040673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a promising treatment modality for pancreatic cancer and is being employed by an increasing number of centers worldwide. However, clinical outcomes have only been reported on a small scale, often from single institutes and in the context of clinical trials, in which strict patient selection might limit generalizability of outcomes. This study presents clinical outcomes of a large, international cohort of patients with (peri)pancreatic tumors treated with online adaptive MRgRT. Methods We evaluated clinical outcomes and treatment details of patients with (peri)pancreatic tumors treated on a 1.5 Tesla (T) MR-linac in two large-volume treatment centers participating in the prospective MOMENTUM cohort (NCT04075305). Treatments were evaluated through schematics, dosage, delivery strategies, and success rates. Acute toxicity was assessed until 3 months after MRgRT started, and late toxicity from 3-12 months of follow-up (FU). The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) at baseline and 3 months of FU. Furthermore, we used the Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate the cumulative overall survival. Results A total of 80 patients were assessed with a median FU of 8 months (range 1-39 months). There were 34 patients who had an unresectable primary tumor or were medically inoperable, 29 who had an isolated local recurrence, and 17 who had an oligometastasis. A total of 357 of the 358 fractions from all hypofractionated schemes were delivered as planned. Grade 3-4 acute toxicity occurred in 3 of 59 patients (5%) with hypofractionated MRgRT and grade 3-4 late toxicity in 5 of 41 patients (12%). Six patients died within 3 months after MRgRT; in one of these patients, RT attribution could not be ruled out as cause of death. The QLQ-C30 global health status remained stable from baseline to 3 months FU (70.5 at baseline, median change of +2.7 [P = 0.5]). The 1-year cumulative overall survival for the entire cohort was 67%, and that for the primary tumor group was 66%. Conclusion Online adaptive MRgRT for (peri)pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac could be delivered as planned, with low numbers of missed fractions. In addition, treatments were associated with limited grade 3-4 toxicity and a stable QoL at 3 months of FU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidde Eijkelenkamp
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Guus Grimbergen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Lois A. Daamen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hanne D. Heerkens
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Saskia van de Ven
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Stella Mook
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Gert J. Meijer
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Izaak Q. Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Eric Paulson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Beth Ann Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | | | - William Adrian Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Martijn P. W. Intven
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yao W, Chen X, Fan B, Zeng L, Zhou Z, Mao Z, Shen Q. Multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer: Current landscape and future prospects. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1077605. [PMID: 37007078 PMCID: PMC10050556 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1077605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer has not been completely clear, there is no highly sensitive and specific detection method, so early diagnosis is very difficult. Despite the rapid development of tumor diagnosis and treatment, it is difficult to break through in the short term and the overall 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is less than 8%. In the face of the increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer, in addition to strengthening basic research, exploring its etiology and pathogenesis, it is urgent to optimize the existing diagnosis and treatment methods through standard multidisciplinary team (MDT), and formulate personalized treatment plan to achieve the purpose of improving the curative effect. However, there are some problems in MDT, such as insufficient understanding and enthusiasm of some doctors, failure to operate MDT according to the system, lack of good communication between domestic and foreign peers, and lack of attention in personnel training and talent echelon construction. It is expected to protect the rights and interests of doctors in the future and ensure the continuous operation of MDT. To strengthen the research on the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer, MDT can try the Internet +MDT mode to improve the efficiency of MDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weirong Yao
- Department of Oncology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Xiaoliang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Bin Fan
- Department of Radiology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Lin Zeng
- Department of Oncology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhiyong Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhifang Mao
- Department of Oncology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Qinglin Shen
- Department of Oncology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
- *Correspondence: Qinglin Shen,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with intradermal heat-killed mycobacterium obuense (IMM-101) vaccination for non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer, after induction chemotherapy with (modified)FOLFIRINOX - The LAPC-2 trial. Radiother Oncol 2023; 183:109541. [PMID: 36813171 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In this phase I/II trial, non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients after (modified)FOLFIRINOX therapy were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with heat-killed mycobacterium (IMM-101) vaccinations. We aimed to assess safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this treatment approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS On five consecutive days, patients received a total of 40 Gray (Gy) of SBRT with a dose of 8 Gy per fraction. Starting two weeks prior to SBRT, they in addition received six bi-weekly intradermal vaccinations with one milligram of IMM-101. The primary outcomes were the number of grade 4 or higher adverse events and the one-year progression free-survival (PFS) rate. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were included and started study treatment. Median follow-up was 28.4 months (95 %CI 24.3 - 32.6). We observed one grade 5, no grade 4 and thirteen grade 3 adverse events, none related to IMM-101. The one-year PFS rate was 47 %, the median PFS was 11.7 months (95 %CI 11.0 - 12.5) and the median overall survival was 19.0 months (95 %CI 16.2 - 21.9). Eight (21 %) tumors were resected, of which 6 (75 %) were R0 resections. Outcomes were comparable with the outcomes of the patients from the previous LAPC-1 trial, in which LAPC patients were treated with SBRT, without IMM-101. CONCLUSION Combination treatment with IMM-101 and SBRT was safe and feasible for non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients after (modified)FOLFIRINOX. No improvement in the progression-free survival could be demonstrated by adding IMM-101 to SBRT.
Collapse
|
10
|
Jung JH, Song C, Jung IH, Ahn J, Kim B, Jung K, Lee JC, Kim J, Hwang JH. Induction FOLFIRINOX followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1050070. [PMID: 36620548 PMCID: PMC9812488 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1050070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction FOLFIRINOX (the combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) is the preferred systemic regimen for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Furthermore, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising treatment option for achieving local control in these patients. However, clinical outcomes in patients with LAPC treated using FOLFIRINOX followed by SBRT have not been clarified. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of induction FOLFIRINOX treatment followed by SBRT in patients with LAPC. Methods To this end, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with LAPC treated with induction FOLFIRINOX followed by SBRT in a single tertiary hospital. We evaluated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), resection rate, SBRT-related adverse events, and prognostic factors affecting survival. Results Fifty patients were treated with induction FOLFIRINOX for a median of 8 cycles (range: 3-28), which was followed by SBRT. The median OS and PFS were 26.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.4-30.3) and 16.7 months (95% CI: 13.0-20.3), respectively. Nine patients underwent conversion surgery (eight achieved R0) and showed better OS than those who did not (not reached vs. 24.1 months, p = 0.022). During a follow-up period of 23.6 months, three cases of grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding at the pseudoaneurysm site were noted, which were managed successfully. Analysis of the factors affecting clinical outcomes revealed that a high radiation dose (≥ 35 Gy) resulted in a higher rate of conversion surgery (25% [8/32] vs. 5.6% [1/18], respectively) and was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS in the adjusted analysis (hazard ratio: 2.024, 95% CI: 1.042-3.930, p = 0.037). Conclusion Our findings suggest that induction FOLFIRINOX followed by SBRT in patients with LAPC results in better survival with manageable toxicities. A high total SBRT dose was associated with a high rate of conversion surgery and could afford better survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hyup Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Changhoon Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - In Ho Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinwoo Ahn
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Bomi Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwangrok Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Chan Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaihwan Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Hyeok Hwang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea,*Correspondence: Jin-Hyeok Hwang,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Manderlier M, Navez J, Hein M, Engelholm JL, Closset J, Bali MA, Van Gestel D, Moretti L, Van Laethem JL, Bouchart C. Isotoxic High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (iHD-SBRT) Versus Conventional Chemoradiotherapy for Localized Pancreatic Cancer: A Single Cancer Center Evaluation. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235730. [PMID: 36497212 PMCID: PMC9741086 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Given the lack of direct comparative evidence, we aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated in the same tertiary cancer center with isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy (iHD-SBRT) or conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Biopsy-proven borderline/locally advanced patients treated with iHD-SBRT (35 Gy in 5 fractions with a simultaneous integrated boost up to 53 Gy) or CRT (45−60 Gy in 25−30 fractions) were retrospectively included from January 2006 to January 2021. The median overall survival (mOS) was evaluated trough uni- and multivariate analyses. The progression free survival (PFS) and the 1-year local control (1-yLC) were also reported. Eighty-two patients were included. The median follow-up was 19.7 months. The mOS was in favour of the iHD-SBRT group (22.5 vs. 15.9 months, p < 0.001), including after multivariate analysis (HR 0.39 [CI95% 0.18−0.83], p = 0.014). The median PFS and the 1-yLC were also significantly better for iHD-SBRT (median PFS: 16.7 vs. 11.5 months, p = 0.011; 1-yLC: 75.8 vs. 39.3%, p = 0.004). In conclusion, iHD-SBRT is a promising RT option and may offer an improvement in OS in comparison to CRT for localized PDAC. Further validation is required to confirm the exact role of iHD-SBRT and the optimal therapeutic sequence for the treatment of localized PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Manderlier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HUB Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylenmeersch 90, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Charleroi, Boulevard Zoé Drion 1, 6000 Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Julie Navez
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matthieu Hein
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Engelholm
- Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Hopitaux Iris Sud, 1190 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Closset
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maria Antonietta Bali
- Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HUB Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylenmeersch 90, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luigi Moretti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HUB Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylenmeersch 90, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Oncology, HUB Bordet Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christelle Bouchart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HUB Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Meylenmeersch 90, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hill CS, Rosati L, Wang H, Tsai HL, He J, Hacker-Prietz A, Laheru DA, Zheng L, Sehgal S, Bernard V, Le DT, Pawlik TM, Weiss MJ, Narang AK, Herman JM. Multiagent Chemotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:511-523. [PMID: 35306231 PMCID: PMC9516435 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In a prospective multicenter study, gemcitabine monotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was well tolerated with outcomes comparable to chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Recent trials have reported improved survival with multiagent chemotherapy (MA-CTX) alone. This prospective trial explored whether SBRT could be safely delivered after MA-CTX. Herein, we report the long-term outcomes of adding SBRT after MA-CTX in LAPC patients and evaluate whether genetic profiles of specimens obtained before SBRT influence outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS This prospective nonrandomized controlled phase 2 trial enrolled 44 LAPC and 4 locally recurrent patients after multidisciplinary evaluation between 2012 and 2015 at a high-volume pancreatic cancer center. For induction CTX, most received modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX), or gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) followed by 5-fraction SBRT for all. During fiducial placement, biopsies were obtained with DNA extracted for targeted sequencing using the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets platform. RESULTS Median induction CTX duration was ≥4 months, and 31 patients received mFFX (65%). Among 44 LAPC patients, 17 (39%) were surgically explored, and 12 of 16 (75%) achieved a R0 resection. Median overall survival (mOS) was 20.2 and 14.6 months from diagnosis and SBRT, respectively. One- and 2-year OS from SBRT was 58% and 28%. The mOS after resection was 28.6 and 22.4 months from diagnosis and SBRT, respectively. Median local progression-free survival was 23.9 and 15.8 months from diagnosis and SBRT, respectively. The mOS for pre-SBRT CA 19-9 ≤180 U/mL versus >180 was 23.1 and 11.3 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.53; P = .04). Only 1 patient (2.1%) had late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxic effects attributable to SBRT. Despite significant pretreatment with chemotherapy, 88% of tumor specimens were effectively sequenced; survival outcomes were not significantly associated with specific mutational patterns. Quality of life was prospectively collected pre- and post-SBRT with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and PAN26 questionnaires showing no significant change. CONCLUSIONS SBRT was safely administered with MA-CTX with minimal toxicity. A high proportion of LAPC patients underwent R0 resection with favorable survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin S Hill
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lauren Rosati
- University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Hao Wang
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hua-Ling Tsai
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amy Hacker-Prietz
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel A Laheru
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shuchi Sehgal
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vincent Bernard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dung T Le
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, New York
| | - Amol K Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success and Zucker School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Goor IWJM, Daamen LA, Besselink MG, Bruynzeel AME, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, Groot Koerkamp B, Haj Mohammed N, Heerkens HD, van Laarhoven HWM, Meijer GJ, Nuyttens J, van Santvoort HC, van Tienhoven G, Verkooijen HM, Wilmink JW, Molenaar IQ, Intven MPW. A nationwide randomized controlled trial on additional treatment for isolated local pancreatic cancer recurrence using stereotactic body radiation therapy (ARCADE). Trials 2022; 23:913. [PMID: 36307892 PMCID: PMC9617359 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06829-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease recurrence is the main cause of mortality after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In 20-30% of resected patients, isolated local PDAC recurrence occurs. Retrospective studies have suggested that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) might lead to improved local control in these patients, potentially having a beneficial effect on both survival and quality of life. The "nationwide randomized controlled trial on additional treatment for isolated local pancreatic cancer recurrence using stereotactic body radiation therapy" (ARCADE) will investigate the value of SBRT in addition to standard of care in patients with isolated local PDAC recurrence compared to standard of care alone, regarding both survival and quality of life outcomes. METHODS The ARCADE trial is nested within a prospective cohort (Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project; PACAP) according to the 'Trials within Cohorts' design. All PACAP participants with isolated local PDAC recurrence after primary resection who provided informed consent for being randomized in future studies are eligible. Patients will be randomized for local therapy (5 fractions of 8 Gy SBRT) in addition to standard of care or standard of care alone. In total, 174 patients will be included. The main study endpoint is survival after recurrence. The most important secondary endpoint is quality of life. DISCUSSION It is hypothesized that additional SBRT, compared to standard of care alone, improves survival and quality of life in patients with isolated local recurrence after PDAC resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT04881487 . Registered on May 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. W. J. M. van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands ,Nieuwegein, the Netherlands ,Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - L. A. Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands ,Nieuwegein, the Netherlands ,grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M. G. Besselink
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A. M. E. Bruynzeel
- grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ,grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O. R. Busch
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G. A. Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - B. Groot Koerkamp
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - H. D. Heerkens
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - H. W. M. van Laarhoven
- grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ,grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G. J. Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J. Nuyttens
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H. C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands ,Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - G. van Tienhoven
- grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ,grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H. M. Verkooijen
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J. W. Wilmink
- grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ,grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I. Q. Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands ,Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - M. P. W. Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Salamekh S, Gottumukkala S, Park C, Lin MH, Sanford NN. Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Recent Developments and Advances on the Horizon. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:995-1009. [PMID: 36154787 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Current indications for radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer vary by surgical resectability status of the tumor. Radiation is generally not used pre-operatively for resectable tumors, but may be given adjuvantly particularly in settings of a close or positive surgical margin. For borderline resectable tumors, pre-operative radiation has been shown to improve surgical parameters including lowering nodal positivity and positive margin rates. For locally advanced unresectable tumors, radiation can improve local control, give patients an interval off of chemotherapy and provide symptomatic relief. Multidisciplinary discussion is critical for choosing the best modality and sequencing of care for patients with pancreatic cancer. Prospective trials with appropriately chosen endpoints and meticulous radiotherapy quality assurance are needed to best define populations with pancreatic cancer most likely to benefit from radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Salamekh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Sujana Gottumukkala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Chunjoo Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Nina N Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rapic S, Samuel T, Lindsay PE, Ansell S, Weersink RA, DaCosta RS. Assessing the Accuracy of Bioluminescence Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Orthotopic Pancreatic Tumors Using a Small Animal Irradiator. Radiat Res 2022; 197:626-637. [PMID: 35192719 DOI: 10.1667/rade-21-00161.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has shown promising results in the treatment of pancreatic cancer and other solid tumors. However, wide adoption of SBRT remains limited largely due to uncertainty about the treatment's optimal fractionation schedules to elicit maximal tumor response while limiting the dose to adjacent structures. A small animal irradiator in combination with a clinically relevant oncological animal model could address these questions. Accurate delivery of X rays to animal tumors may be hampered by suboptimal image-guided targeting of the X-ray beam in vivo. Integration of bioluminescence imaging (BLI) into small animal irradiators in addition to standard cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging improves target identification and high-precision therapy delivery to deep tumors with poor soft tissue contrast, such as pancreatic tumors. Using bioluminescent BxPC3 pancreatic adenocarcinoma human cells grown orthotopically in mice, we examined the performance of a small animal irradiator equipped with both CBCT and BLI in delivering targeted, hypo-fractionated, multi-beam SBRT. Its targeting accuracy was compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided targeting based on co-registration between CBCT and corresponding sequential magnetic resonance scans, which offer greater soft tissue contrast compared with CT alone. Evaluation of our platform's BLI-guided targeting accuracy was performed by quantifying in vivo changes in bioluminescence signal after treatment as well as staining of ex vivo tissues with γH2AX, Ki67, TUNEL, CD31 and CD11b to assess SBRT treatment effects. Using our platform, we found that BLI-guided SBRT enabled more accurate delivery of X rays to the tumor resulting in greater cancer cell DNA damage and proliferation inhibition compared with MRI-guided SBRT. Furthermore, BLI-guided SBRT allowed higher animal throughput and was more cost effective to use in the preclinical setting than MRI-guided SBRT. Taken together, our preclinical platform could be employed in translational research of SBRT of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Rapic
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy Samuel
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patricia E Lindsay
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steve Ansell
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert A Weersink
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto
| | - Ralph S DaCosta
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Michalet M, Bordeau K, Cantaloube M, Valdenaire S, Debuire P, Simeon S, Portales F, Draghici R, Ychou M, Assenat E, Dupuy M, Gourgou S, Colombo PE, Carrere S, Souche FR, Aillères N, Fenoglietto P, Azria D, Riou O. Stereotactic MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Tumors: Dosimetric Benefit of Adaptation and First Clinical Results in a Prospective Registry Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:842402. [PMID: 35356227 PMCID: PMC8959839 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.842402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) is an attractive modality of radiotherapy for pancreatic tumors. The objectives of this prospective registry study were to report the dosimetric benefits of daily adaptation of SMART and the first clinical results in pancreatic tumors. Materials and Methods All patients treated in our center with SMART for a pancreatic tumor were included. Patients were planned for five daily-adapted fractions on consecutive days. Endpoints were acute toxicities, late toxicities, impact of adaptive treatment on target volume coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing, local control (LC) rate, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Thirty consecutive patients were included between October 2019 and April 2021. The median dose prescription was 50 Gy. No patient presented grade > 2 acute toxicities. The most frequent grade 1–2 toxicities were asthenia (40%), abdominal pain (40%), and nausea (43%). Daily adaptation significantly improved planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage and OAR sparing. With a median follow-up of 9.7 months, the median OS, 6-month OS, and 1-year OS were 14.1 months, 89% (95% CI: 70%–96%), and 75% (95% CI: 51%–88%), respectively, from SMART completion. LC at 6 months and 1 year was respectively 97% (95% CI: 79–99.5%) and 86% (95% CI: 61%–95%). There were no grade > 2 late toxicities. With a median follow-up of 10.64 months, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) patients (22 patients) had a median OS, 6-month OS, and 1-year OS from SMART completion of 14.1 months, 76% (95% CI: 51%–89%), and 70% (95% CI: 45%–85%), respectively. Nine patients underwent surgical resection (42.1% of patients with initial LAPC and 33.3% of patients with BRPC), with negative margins (R0). Resected patients had a significantly better OS as compared to unresected patients (p = 0.0219, hazard ratio (HR) = 5.78 (95% CI: 1.29–25.9)). Conclusion SMART for pancreatic tumors is feasible without limiting toxicities. Daily adaptation demonstrated a benefit for tumor coverage and OAR sparing. The severity of observed acute and late toxicities was low. OS and LC rates were promising. SMART achieved a high secondary resection rate in LAPC patients. Surgery after SMART seemed to be feasible and might increase OS in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Michalet
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Karl Bordeau
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Cantaloube
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Simon Valdenaire
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Debuire
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Sebastien Simeon
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Fabienne Portales
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Roxana Draghici
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Marc Ychou
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Eric Assenat
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) St Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Dupuy
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) St Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Gourgou
- Biometrics Unit Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
- Digestive Surgery Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Sebastien Carrere
- Digestive Surgery Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - François-Regis Souche
- Surgical Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) St Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Norbert Aillères
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - David Azria
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Riou
- University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ Montpellier, INSERM U1194 Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hill CS, Rosati LM, Hu C, Fu W, Sehgal S, Hacker-Prietz A, Wolfgang CL, Weiss MJ, Burkhart RA, Hruban RH, De Jesus-Acosta A, Le DT, Zheng L, Laheru DA, He J, Narang AK, Herman JM. Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy After Upfront Chemotherapy Improves Pathologic Outcomes Compared With Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Borderline Resectable or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Without Increasing Perioperative Toxicity. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2456-2468. [PMID: 35129721 PMCID: PMC8933354 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11202-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are at high risk of margin-positive resection. Neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may help sterilize margins, but its additive benefit beyond neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) is unclear. The authors report long-term outcomes for BRPC/LAPC patients explored after treatment with either nCT alone or nCT followed by five-fraction SBRT (nCT-SBRT). METHODS Patients with BRPC or LAPC from 2011 to 2016 who underwent resection after nCT alone or nCT-SBRT were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics were compared, and the propensity score with inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to compare pathologic/survival outcomes. RESULTS Of 198 patients, 76 received nCT, and 122 received nCT-SBRT. The nCT-SBRT cohort had a higher proportion of LAPC (53% vs 22%; p < 0.001). The duration of nCT was longer for nCT-SBRT (4.6 vs 2.9 months; p = 0.03), but adjuvant chemotherapy was less frequently administered (53% vs 67.1%; p < 0.001). Adjuvant radiation was administered to 30% of the nCT patients. The nCT-SBRT regimen more frequently achieved negative margins (92% vs 70%; p < 0.001), negative nodes (59% vs 42%; p < 0.001), and pathologic complete response (7% vs 0%; p = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, nCT-SBRT remained associated with R0 resection (p < 0.001). The nCT-SBRT cohort experienced no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) (22.1 vs 24.5 months), local progression-free survival (LPFS) (13.5 vs. 15.4 months), or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (11.7 vs 16.3 months) after surgery. After SBRT, 1-year OS was 77.0% and 2-year OS was 50.4%. Perioperative Claven-Dindo grade 3 or greater morbidity did not differ significantly between the nCT and nCT-SBRT cohorts (p = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS Despite having more advanced disease, the nCT-SBRT cohort was still more likely to undergo an R0 resection and experienced similar survival outcomes compared with the nCT alone cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin S Hill
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lauren M Rosati
- University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Chen Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wei Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shuchi Sehgal
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy Hacker-Prietz
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ana De Jesus-Acosta
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dung T Le
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel A Laheru
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amol K Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Daamen LA, Dorland G, Brada LJH, Groot VP, van Oosten AF, Besselink MG, Bosscha K, Bonsing BA, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, van Dam RM, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, Haj Mohammad N, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Intven MPW, Kazemier G, Los M, de Meijer VE, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Roos D, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, Verdonk RC, Verkooijen HM, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC. Preoperative predictors for early and very early disease recurrence in patients undergoing resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:535-546. [PMID: 34642090 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify predictors for early and very early disease recurrence in patients undergoing resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS Included were patients who underwent PDAC resection (2014-2016). Multivariable multinomial regression was performed to identify preoperative predictors for manifestation of recurrence within 3, 6 and 12 months after PDAC resection. RESULTS 836 patients with a median follow-up of 37 (interquartile range [IQR] 30-48) months and overall survival of 18 (IQR 10-32) months were analyzed. 670 patients (80%) developed recurrence: 82 patients (10%) <3 months, 96 patients (11%) within 3-6 months and 226 patients (27%) within 6-12 months. LogCA 19-9 (OR 1.25 [95% CI 1.10-1.41]; P < 0.001) and neoadjuvant treatment (OR 0.09 [95% CI 0.01-0.68]; P = 0.02) were associated with recurrence <3 months. LogCA 19-9 (OR 1.23 [95% CI 1.10-1.38]; P < 0.001) and 0-90° venous involvement on CT imaging (OR 2.93 [95% CI 1.60-5.37]; P < 0.001) were associated with recurrence within 3-6 months. A Charlson Age Comorbidity Index ≥4 (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.09-2.16]; P = 0.02) and logCA 19-9 (OR 1.24 [95% CI 1.14-1.35]; P < 0.001) were related to recurrence within 6-12 months. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates preoperative predictors that are associated with the manifestation of early and very early recurrence after PDAC resection. Knowledge of these predictors can be used to guide individualized surveillance and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lois A Daamen
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Galina Dorland
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lilly J H Brada
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent P Groot
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - A Floortje van Oosten
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Dept. of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Dept. of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Dept. of Medical Oncology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Martijn P W Intven
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Dept. of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Daphne Roos
- Dept. of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, the Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Dept. of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Dept. of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Imaging Division, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands; Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Dept. of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Dept. of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Quality of life of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients after FOLFIRINOX treatment. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:2407-2415. [PMID: 34762217 PMCID: PMC8794891 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06648-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Quality of life in cancer patients might be affected by chemotherapy-induced toxicity. Especially in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a short life expectancy, fear of poor quality of life is often a reason for both patients and medical oncologists to refrain from further treatment. In this study, we investigated quality of life (QoL), pain, sleep, and activity levels in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients after FOLFIRINOX treatment. Methods A total of 41 LAPC patients with stable disease or partial response were included after completion of at least four cycles of FOLFIRINOX. QoL was measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and NRS pain scores. Patients completed the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) for five consecutive nights and wore a GENEActiv tri-axial accelerometer (Actiwatch) for 7 days, registering sleep duration, efficiency, and activity. Results Mean EORTC QLQ-C30 score for global health status was 78.3 (± 17.3), higher than reference values for cancer patients (P < 0.001) and general population (P = 0.045). LAPC patients reported few disease-related symptoms. Two patients (5%) reported pain scores > 3. Mean sleep duration was 8 h/night (± 1.2 h) and sleep efficiency 70% (± 9%) with high patient-reported quality of sleep (mean RCSQ score 72.0 ± 11.4). Mean duration of moderate-vigorous activity was 37 min/week (± 103 min/week). Conclusions QoL is very good in most LAPC patients with disease control after FOLFIRINOX, measured with validated questionnaires and Actiwatch registration. The fear of clinical deterioration after FOLFIRINOX is not substantiated by this study and should not be a reason to refrain from treatment. Trial registration Dutch trial register NL7578. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06648-1.
Collapse
|
20
|
Li M. Clinical practice guidelines for the interventional treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (5th edition). J Interv Med 2021; 4:159-171. [PMID: 35586384 PMCID: PMC8947992 DOI: 10.1016/j.jimed.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer has become a major disease affecting people's health because of its insidiousness, rapid progression and poor prognosis. Based on the practical needs of clinical work, combined with domestic multi-center research and experience, this guideline provides constructive suggestions for the interventional treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maoquan Li
- China Alliance of Cellular and Interventional Therapy Techniques for Diabetic Foot, China
- Technical Committee on Interventional Medicine and Bioengineering of Chinese Intervention Physicians Branch, China
- National Centre for Clinical Medical Research on Radiation and Treatment, China
- Department of Interventional and Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, China
- Interventional Vascular Institute of Tongji University, Shanghai, 200072, China
- China Alliance of Cellular and Interventional Therapy Techniques for Diabetic Foot, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bouchart C, Engelholm JL, Closset J, Navez J, Loi P, Gökburun Y, De Grez T, Mans L, Hendlisz A, Bali MA, Eisendrath P, Van Gestel D, Hein M, Moretti L, Van Laethem JL. Isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy integrated in a total multimodal neoadjuvant strategy for the treatment of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211045860. [PMID: 34691244 PMCID: PMC8529314 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211045860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of isotoxic high-dose (iHD) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in a total neoadjuvant sequence for the treatment of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Materials and methods Biopsy-proven borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer (BR/LAPC) patients were included in this observational prospective analysis from August 2017 to April 2020 without excluding tumours showing a radiological direct gastrointestinal (GI) invasion. An induction chemotherapy by modified fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin was performed for a median of six cycles. In case of non-progression, an isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy (iHD-SBRT) was delivered in 5 fractions followed by a surgical exploration. The primary endpoint was acute/late gastrointestinal grade ⩾3 toxicity. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC). Results A total of 39 consecutive patients (21 BR and 18 LAPC) were included: 34 patients (87.2%, 18 BR and 16 LAPC) completed the planned neoadjuvant sequence. After iHD-SBRT, 19 patients [55.9% overall, 13/18 BR (72.2%) and 6/16 LAPC (37.5%)] underwent an oncological resection among the 25 patients surgically explored (73.5%). The median follow up was 18.2 months. The rates of acute and late GI grade 3 toxicity were, respectively, 2.9% and 4.2%. The median OS and PFS from diagnosis were, respectively, 24.5 and 15.6 months. The resected patients had improved median OS and PFS in comparison with the non-resected patients (OS: 32.3 versus 18.2 months, p = 0.02; PFS: 24.1 versus 7.1 months, p < 0.001). There was no survival difference between the BR and LAPC patients. The 1-year LC from SBRT was 74.1% and the median locoregional PFS was not reached for both BR and LAPC patients. Conclusions iHD-SBRT displays an excellent toxicity profile, also for potentially high-risk patients with radiological direct GI invasion at diagnosis and can be easily integrated in a total neoadjuvant strategy. The oncological outcomes are promising and emphasise the need for further exploration of iHD-SBRT in phase II/III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christelle Bouchart
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Boulevard de Waterloo, 121, Brussels 1000, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Engelholm
- Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Closset
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julie Navez
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrizia Loi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yeter Gökburun
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHR Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | | | - Laura Mans
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Oncology, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alain Hendlisz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maria Antonietta Bali
- Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Eisendrath
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU St Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet,Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matthieu Hein
- Sleep Laboratory, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luigi Moretti
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet,Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Oncology, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Huguet F, Dabout V, Rivin Del Campo E, Gaujoux S, Bachet JB. The role of radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210044. [PMID: 34374297 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
At diagnosis, about 15% of patients with pancreatic cancer present with a resectable tumour, 50% have a metastatic tumour, and 35% a locally advanced tumour, non-metastatic but unresectable due to vascular invasion, or borderline resectable. Despite the technical progress made in the field of radiation therapy and the improvement of the efficacy of chemotherapy, the prognosis of these patients remains very poor. Recently, the role of radiation therapy in the management of pancreatic cancer has been much debated. This review aims to evaluate the role of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Huguet
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Victoire Dabout
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Chirurgie digestive et hépato-bilio-pancréatique, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jean Baptiste Bachet
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Chirurgie digestive et hépato-bilio-pancréatique, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service d'Hépato - Gastro - Entérologie, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Passardi A, Rapposelli IG, Scarpi E, Sullo FG, Bartolini G, Neri E, Ghigi G, Tontini L, Ercolani G, Monti M, Ruscelli S, Matteucci L, Valgiusti M, Frassineti GL, Romeo A. Multimodal Treatment with GEMOX Plus Helical Tomotherapy in Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 2 Studies. Biomolecules 2021; 11:biom11081200. [PMID: 34439866 PMCID: PMC8393939 DOI: 10.3390/biom11081200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
In locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is a widely used treatment option. We performed a pooled analysis, including an exploratory analysis for prognostic and predictive factors, of two phase 2 trials including 73 patients with LAPC, treated with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) and hypofractionated tomotherapy. With a median follow-up of 36 months (range 1–65), median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8–13.2) and 14.3 (95% CI 12.0–18.1) months, respectively. The overall resectability rate was 23.3% (95% CI 13.6–33.0), and the R0 resection rate was 13.7% (95% CI 5.8–21.6). In the multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status (PS) 0 and low levels of CA 19–9 were associated with improved OS and PFS. Concerning OS, log(CA19–9) resulted in a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.20 (95% CI 1.02–1.42), p = 0.027. For ECOG PS 0, HR was 1.00; for PS 1, HR was 2.69 (95% CI 1.46–4.96); for PS 2, HR was 4.18 (95% CI 0.90–19.46); p = 0.003. Low CA19–9 levels were also predictive for resection, with an odds ratio of 0.71 (95% CI 0.52–0.97), p = 0.034. In conclusion, GEMOX and hypofractionated radiotherapy is a treatment option in LAPC. Further studies are needed to identify differences in tumor biology, which may help to predict resectability and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Passardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (A.P.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (M.M.); (S.R.); (L.M.); (M.V.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (A.P.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (M.M.); (S.R.); (L.M.); (M.V.); (G.L.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0543-739100
| | - Emanuela Scarpi
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Francesco Giulio Sullo
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (A.P.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (M.M.); (S.R.); (L.M.); (M.V.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Giulia Bartolini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (A.P.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (M.M.); (S.R.); (L.M.); (M.V.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Elisa Neri
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (E.N.); (G.G.); (L.T.); (A.R.)
| | - Giulia Ghigi
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (E.N.); (G.G.); (L.T.); (A.R.)
| | - Luca Tontini
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (E.N.); (G.G.); (L.T.); (A.R.)
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy;
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Manlio Monti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (A.P.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (M.M.); (S.R.); (L.M.); (M.V.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Silvia Ruscelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (A.P.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (M.M.); (S.R.); (L.M.); (M.V.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Laura Matteucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (A.P.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (M.M.); (S.R.); (L.M.); (M.V.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Martina Valgiusti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (A.P.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (M.M.); (S.R.); (L.M.); (M.V.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Giovanni Luca Frassineti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (A.P.); (F.G.S.); (G.B.); (M.M.); (S.R.); (L.M.); (M.V.); (G.L.F.)
| | - Antonino Romeo
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”—IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (E.N.); (G.G.); (L.T.); (A.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Griffioen IPM, Rietjens JAC, Melles M, Snelders D, Homs MYV, van Eijck CH, Stiggelbout AM. The bigger picture of shared decision making: A service design perspective using the care path of locally advanced pancreatic cancer as a case. Cancer Med 2021; 10:5907-5916. [PMID: 34328273 PMCID: PMC8419747 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Solutions to improve the implementation of shared decision making (SDM) in oncology often focus on the consultation, with limited effects. In this study, we used a service design perspective on the care path of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We aimed to understand how experiences of patients, their significant others, and medical professionals over the entire care path accumulate to support their ability to participate in SDM. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS We used qualitative interviews including design research techniques with 13 patients, 13 significant others, and 11 healthcare professionals, involved in the diagnosis or treatment of LAPC. The topic list was based on the literature and an auto-ethnography of the illness trajectory by a caregiver who is also a service design researcher. We conducted a thematic content analysis to identify themes influencing the ability to participate in SDM. RESULTS We found four interconnected themes: (1) Decision making is an ongoing and unpredictable process with many decision moments, often unannounced. The unpredictability of the disease course, tumor response to treatment, and consequences of choices on the quality of life complicate decision making; (2) Division of roles, tasks, and collaboration among professionals and between professionals and patients and/or their significant others is often unclear to patients and their significant others; (3) It involves "work" for patients and their significant others to obtain and understand information; (4) In "their disease journey," patients are confronted with unexpected energy drains and energy boosts, that influence their level of empowerment to participate in SDM. CONCLUSION The service design perspective uncovered how the stage for SDM is often set outside the consultation, which might explain the limited effect currently seen of interventions focusing on consultation itself. Our findings serve as a starting point for (re)designing care paths to improve the implementation of SDM in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingeborg P M Griffioen
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Judith A C Rietjens
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marijke Melles
- Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk Snelders
- Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
The first real-time intrafraction target position monitoring in pancreas SBRT on an Elekta linear accelerator. Phys Eng Sci Med 2021; 44:625-638. [PMID: 34019228 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01007-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
To perform implanted fiducial based real-time target position monitoring in pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the x-ray imaging system available in a Elekta linear accelerator. An in-house system was developed and clinically utilised for real-time target position monitoring of pancreas SBRT delivery. The developed system was used for the target position monitoring of a pancreas cancer patient treated in free breathing treatment within the study entitled 'Mfolfirinox And STEreotactic Radiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced paNcreas cancer (MASTERPLAN): a feasibility study' (ACTRN 12617001642370) consisting of five treatment fractions. The clinical efficacy of the system was studied by performing a retrospective cumulative dose assessment of delivered dose using observed position deviations. The developed system identified two events of baseline shifts in target position that exceeded the accepted tolerance level of ± 3 mm from reference planned position. The retrospective dose assessment study showed that if the position deviations were not detected and corrected for, the maximum dose to duodenum would have increased from 34.6 to 38.8 Gy. The first real-time position monitoring in pancreas SBRT on an Elekta linear accelerator was successfully performed. The developed system was shown to improve the safety and accuracy of SBRT delivery.
Collapse
|
26
|
Clinical Phase I/II Study: Local Disease Control and Survival in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Electrochemotherapy. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10061305. [PMID: 33810058 PMCID: PMC8005134 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective. To assess local disease control rates (LDCR) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with electrochemotherapy (ECT). Methods. Electrochemotherapy with bleomycin was performed in 25 LAPC patients who underwent baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and/or Computed Tomography (CT) and Position Emission Tomography (PET) scans before ECT and 1 and 6 months post ECT. LDCR were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) and Choi criteria. Needle electrodes with fixed linear (N-30-4B) or fixed hexagonal configurations (N-30-HG or I-40-HG or H-30-ST) or variable geometry (VGD1230 or VGD1240) (IGEA S.p.A., Carpi, Italy) were used to apply electric pulses. Pain evaluation was performed pre-ECT, after 1 month and after 6 months with ECT. Overall survival estimates were calculated by means of a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results. At 1 month after ECT, 76% of patients were in partial response (PR) and 20% in stable disease (SD). Six months after ECT, 44.0% patients were still in PR and 12.0% in SD. A LDCR of 56.0% was reached six months after ECT: 13 patients treated with fixed geometry had a LDCR of 46.1%, while for the 12 patients treated with variable geometry, the LDCR was 66.7%. The overall survival median value was 11.5 months: for patients treated with fixed geometry the OS was 6 months, while for patients treated with variable geometry it was 12 months. Electrochemotherapy was well-tolerated and abdominal pain was rapidly resolved. Conclusions. Electrochemotherapy obtained good results in terms of LDCR and OS in LAPC. Multiple needle insertion in a variable geometry configuration optimized by pre-treatment planning determined an increase in LDCR and OS compared to a fixed geometry configuration.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cusumano D, Boldrini L, Yadav P, Casà C, Lee SL, Romano A, Piras A, Chiloiro G, Placidi L, Catucci F, Votta C, Mattiucci GC, Indovina L, Gambacorta MA, Bassetti M, Valentini V. Delta Radiomics Analysis for Local Control Prediction in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated Using Magnetic Resonance Guided Radiotherapy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11010072. [PMID: 33466307 PMCID: PMC7824764 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11010072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the role of Delta Radiomics analysis in the prediction of one-year local control (1yLC) in patients affected by locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and treated using Magnetic Resonance guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT). A total of 35 patients from two institutions were enrolled: A 0.35 Tesla T2*/T1 MR image was acquired for each case during simulation and on each treatment fraction. Physical dose was converted in biologically effective dose (BED) to compensate for different radiotherapy schemes. Delta Radiomics analysis was performed considering the gross tumour volume (GTV) delineated on MR images acquired at BED of 20, 40, and 60 Gy. The performance of the delta features in predicting 1yLC was investigated in terms of Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The most significant feature in predicting 1yLC was the variation of cluster shade calculated at BED = 40 Gy, with a p-value of 0.005 and an AUC of 0.78 (0.61-0.94). Delta Radiomics analysis on low-field MR images might play a promising role in 1yLC prediction for LAPC patients: further studies including an external validation dataset and a larger cohort of patients are recommended to confirm the validity of this preliminary experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Cusumano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Poonam Yadav
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792, USA; (P.Y.); (M.B.)
| | - Calogero Casà
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-06-3015-5226
| | - Sangjune Laurence Lee
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, 1331 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
| | - Angela Romano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Antonio Piras
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Francesco Catucci
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Claudio Votta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Luca Indovina
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| | - Michael Bassetti
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792, USA; (P.Y.); (M.B.)
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (L.B.); (A.R.); (A.P.); (G.C.); (L.P.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (G.C.M.); (L.I.); (M.A.G.); (V.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Brada LJH, Walma MS, van Dam RM, de Vos-Geelen J, de Hingh IH, Creemers GJ, Liem MS, Mekenkamp LJ, de Meijer VE, de Groot DJA, Patijn GA, de Groot JWB, Festen S, Kerver ED, Stommel MWJ, Meijerink MR, Bosscha K, Pruijt JF, Polée MB, Ropela JA, Cirkel GA, Los M, Wilmink JW, Haj Mohammad N, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Molenaar IQ. The treatment and survival of elderly patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter registry. Pancreatology 2021; 21:163-169. [PMID: 33309624 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment options for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) have improved in recent years and consequently survival has increased. It is unknown, however, if elderly patients benefit from these improvements in therapy. With the ongoing aging of the patient population and an increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer, this patient group becomes more relevant. This study aims to clarify the association between increasing age, treatment and overall survival in patients with LAPC. METHODS Post-hoc analysis of a multicenter registry including consecutive patients with LAPC, who were registered in 14 centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (April 2015-December 2017). Patients were divided in three groups according to age (<65, 65-74 and ≥75 years). Primary outcome was overall survival stratified by primary treatment strategy. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to adjust for possible confounders. RESULTS Overall, 422 patients with LAPC were included; 162 patients (38%) aged <65 years, 182 patients (43%) aged 65-74 and 78 patients (19%) aged ≥75 years. Chemotherapy was administered in 86%, 81% and 50% of the patients in the different age groups (p<0.01). Median overall survival was 12, 11 and 7 months for the different age groups (p<0.01).Patients treated with chemotherapy showed comparable median overall survival of 13, 14 and 10 months for the different age groups (p=0.11). When adjusted for confounders, age was not associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION Elderly patients are less likely to be treated with chemotherapy, but when treated with chemotherapy, their survival is comparable to younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J H Brada
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M S Walma
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R M van Dam
- Dept. of Surgery, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J de Vos-Geelen
- Dept. of Internal Medicine, Div. of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - I H de Hingh
- Dept. of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Dept. of Epidemiology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - G J Creemers
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M S Liem
- Dept. of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - L J Mekenkamp
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - V E de Meijer
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - D J A de Groot
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G A Patijn
- Dept. of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - S Festen
- Dept. of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E D Kerver
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Dept. of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M R Meijerink
- Dept. of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Dept. of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - J F Pruijt
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - M B Polée
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - J A Ropela
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, St Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, the Netherlands
| | - G A Cirkel
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Los
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N Haj Mohammad
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mazzarotto R, Simoni N, Guariglia S, Rossi G, Micera R, De Robertis R, Pierelli A, Zivelonghi E, Malleo G, Paiella S, Salvia R, Cavedon C, Milella M, Bassi C. Dosimetric Feasibility Study of Dose Escalated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC) Patients: It Is Time to Raise the Bar. Front Oncol 2020; 10:600940. [PMID: 33392093 PMCID: PMC7773844 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.600940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective To assess the dosimetric feasibility of a stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) dose escalated protocol, with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and a simultaneous integrated protection (SIP) approach, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Material and Methods Twenty LAPC lesions, previously treated with SBRT at our Institution, were re-planned. The original prescribed and administered dose was 50/30/25 Gy in five fractions to PTVsib (tumor-vessel interface [TVI])/PTVt (tumor volume)/PTVsip (overlap area between PTVt and planning organs at risk volume [PRVoars]), respectively. At re-planning, the prescribed dose was escalated up to 60/40/33 Gy in five fractions to PTVsib/PTVt/PTVsip, respectively. All plans were performed using an inspiration breath hold (IBH) technique and generated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Well-established and accepted OAR dose constraints were used (D0.5cc < 33 Gy for luminal OARs and D0.5cc < 38 Gy for corresponding PRVoars). The primary end-point was to achieve a median dose equal to the prescription dose for the PTVsib with D98≥ 95% (95% of prescription dose is the minimum dose), and a coverage for PTVt and PTVsip of D95≥95%, with minor deviations in OAR dose constraints in < 10% of the plans. Results PTVsib median (± SD) dose/D95/conformity index (CI) were 60.54 (± 0.85) Gy/58.96 (± 0.86) Gy/0.99 (± 0.01), respectively; whilst PTVt median (± SD) dose/D95 were 44.51 (± 2.69) Gy/38.44 (± 0.82) Gy, and PTVsip median (± SD) dose/D95 were 35.18 (± 1.42) Gy/33.01 (± 0.84) Gy, respectively. With regard to OARs, median (± SD) maximum dose (D0.5cc) to duodenum/stomach/bowel was 29.31 (± 5.72) Gy/25.29 (± 6.90) Gy/27.03 (± 5.67) Gy, respectively. A minor acceptable deviation was found for a single plan (bowel and duodenum D0.5cc=34.8 Gy). V38 < 0.5 cc was achieved for all PRV luminal OARs. Conclusions In LAPC patients SBRT, with a SIB/SIP dose escalation approach up to 60/40/33 Gy in five fractions to PTVsib/PTVt/PTVsip, respectively, is dosimetrically feasible with adequate PTVs coverage and respect for OAR dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renzo Mazzarotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Nicola Simoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefania Guariglia
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriella Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Renato Micera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessio Pierelli
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Zivelonghi
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Cavedon
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Milella
- Department of Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
A phase II study of stereotactic radiotherapy after FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC-1 trial): Long-term outcome. Radiother Oncol 2020; 155:232-236. [PMID: 33217500 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the long-term outcome of a multicenter phase II study with FOLFIRINOX followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (LAPC-1 trial) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with histological confirmation of LAPC inoperable at diagnosis were enrolled. Induction therapy with 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX was administered. If no disease progression was found after chemotherapy, patients received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) at a total dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. RESULTS In LAPC-1 trial, 50 patients were included, but due to disease progression in 11 patients under chemotherapy, 39 patients received stereotactic SBRT after FOLFIRINOX treatment. In whole population, the 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) were 62% and 10%, respectively. Median follow-up was 13 months. The SBRT group had median OS of 18 months (95% CI 13.2-21.5) versus 5 months (95% CI 4.1-6.7) in non-SBRT group (p<0.001). After chemoradiotherapy, seven patients underwent surgery achieving a radical resection. Patients who underwent surgery had a 3-years OS of 43% compared to 6.5% in the unresected group (p=0.03). Four patients developed grade ≥ 3 adverse events during SBRT. CONCLUSIONS Long-term survival has been found in patients with LAPC underwent FOLFIRINOX followed by SBRT. This approach increased the probability of a radical surgery. The resected patients achieved a significant better survival compared to unresected group.
Collapse
|
31
|
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Treatments and Outcomes of Pancreatic Cancer Among Different Treatment Facility Types. Pancreas 2020; 49:1355-1363. [PMID: 33122525 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate racial and socioeconomic disparities for patients with pancreatic cancer across different facility types. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for pancreatic cancer cases from 2004 to 2015. Along with propensity score matching analysis, multivariate logistic and Cox model were used to assess effects of facility type, race, elements of socioeconomics on receipt of treatment, time to treatment, and overall survival, separately. RESULTS Among 223,465 patients, 44.6%, 42.1%, and 13.3% were treated at academic, community, and integrated facilities, respectively. Private insurance was associated with more treatment (odds ratio, 1.41; P < 0.001) and better survival [hazards ratio (HR), 0.84; P < 0.001]. Higher education was associated with earlier treatment (HR, 1.09; P < 0.001). African Americans had less treatment (odds ratio, 0.97; P = 0.04) and delayed treatment (HR, 0.89; P < 0.001) despite later stage at diagnosis. After adjusting for socioeconomic status, African Americans had similar survival (HR, 0.99; P = 0.11) overall and improved survival (HR, 0.95; P = 0.016) at integrated facilities. CONCLUSIONS Higher socioeconomic status was associated with better treatment and survival. After adjusting for socioeconomic disparities, race did not affect survival. Less racial disparity was observed at integrated facilities.
Collapse
|
32
|
Hypofractionated sequential radiotherapy boost: a promising strategy in inoperable locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 147:661-667. [PMID: 33001271 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03411-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the potential benefits of a hypofractionated radiotherapy boost (HRB) after chemotherapy (CT) and concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. Primary endpoints were early and late toxicity, local control (LC) and pain-free progression (PFP) assessment. Two-years overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were secondary endpoints. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients (pts) affected by unresectable non-metastatic LAPC, previously treated with CT and CRT in upfront or sandwich setting, were selected for sequential HRB. Total prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 5 fractions (fr) to pancreatic primary lesion. Dose de-escalation was allowed in case of failure in respecting organs at risk constraints. Early and late toxicity were assessed according to CTCAE v.4.0 classification. The Kersh-Hazra scale was used for pain assessment. Local Control, PFP, MFS and DFS were calculated from the date of HRB to the date of relapse or the date of the last follow-up. RESULTS Thirty-one pts affected by unresectable, non-metastatic LAPC were consecutively enrolled from November 2004 to October 2019. All pts completed the planned HRB. Total delivered dose varied according to duodenal dose constraint: 20 Gy in 5 fr (N: 6; 19.4%), 20 Gy in 4 fr (N: 5; 16.2%), 25 Gy in 5 fr (N: 18; 58.0%) and 30 Gy in 6 fr (N: 2; 6.4%). Early and late toxicity were assessed in all pts: no Grade 3 or 4 acute gastrointestinal toxicity and no late gastrointestinal complications occurred. Median LC was 19 months (range 1-156) and 1- and 2-year PFP were 85% and 62.7%, respectively (median 28 months; range 2-139). According to the Kersh-Hazra scale, four pts had a Grade 3 and four pts had a Grade 1 abdominal pain before HRB. At the last follow-up only 3/31 pts had residual Grade 1 abdominal pain.Median MFS was 18 months (range 1-139). The 2-year OS after HRB was 57.4%, while 2-year OS from diagnosis was 77.3%. CONCLUSION Treatment intensification with hypofractionated radiotherapy boost is well tolerated in pts affected by unresectable LAPC previously treated with CT/CRT. Its rates of local and pain control are encouraging, supporting its introduction in clinical practice. Timing, schedule and dose of HRB need to be further investigated to personalize therapy and optimize clinical advantages.
Collapse
|
33
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary pancreas surgery with arterial resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:903-919. [PMID: 32894339 PMCID: PMC7541389 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01972-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Objective Advances in multimodality treatment paralleled increasing numbers of complex pancreatic procedures with major vascular resections. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the current outcomes of arterial resection (AR) in pancreatic surgery. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out from January 2011 until January 2020. MOOSE guidelines were followed. Predefined outcomes were morbidity, pancreatic fistula, postoperative bleeding and delayed gastric emptying, reoperation rate, mortality, hospital stay, R0 resection rate, and lymph node positivity. Duration of surgery, blood loss, and survival were also analyzed. Results Eight hundred and forty-one AR patients were identified in a cohort of 7111 patients. Morbidity and mortality rates in these patients were 66.8% and 5.3%, respectively. Seven studies (579 AR patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall morbidity (48% vs 39%, p = 0.1) and mortality (3.2% vs 1.5%, p = 0.27) were not significantly different in the groups with or without AR. R0 was less frequent in the AR group, both in patients without (69% vs 89%, p < 0.001) and with neoadjuvant treatment (50% vs 86%, p < 0.001). Weighted median survival was shorter in the AR group (18.6 vs 32 months, range 14.8–43.1 months, p = 0.037). Conclusions Arterial resections increase the complexity of pancreatic surgery, as demonstrated by relevant morbidity and mortality rates. Careful patient selection and multidisciplinary planning remain important. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00423-020-01972-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
34
|
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Protection in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:e31-e38. [PMID: 32682686 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the safety and feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and simultaneous integrated protection (SIP) in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients receiving SBRT following induction chemotherapy from January 2017 to December 2018 were included in this observational analysis. SBRT was delivered in five consecutive daily fractions by administering 30 Gy to the planning target volume while simultaneously delivering a 50 Gy SIB to the tumour-vessel interface. SIP was created by lowering the dose to 25 Gy on the overlap area between the planning target volume and the planning organ at risk volume. The primary end point was acute and late gastrointestinal grade ≥3 toxicity. Secondary end points were freedom from local progression, overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Fifty-nine consecutive patients (27 borderline resectable and 32 locally advanced) were included. Fifty-eight patients (98.3%) completed the SBRT planned treatment and 35 patients (59.4%) received surgical resection following SBRT. No acute or late grade ≥3 SBRT-related adverse events were observed. The median follow-up time was 15.1 months in the overall cohort and 18.1 months in censored patients. One- and 2-year freedom from local progression rates were 85% and 80% versus 79.7% and 60.6% in resected and unresected patients, respectively (P = 0.33). The median overall survival and PFS were 30.2 months and 19 months from diagnosis and 19.1 months and 10.7 months from SBRT in the entire cohort. Resected patients had improved 2-year overall survival rates (72.5% versus 49%, P = 0.012) and median PFS (13 months versus 5 months; P < 0.001) relative to unresected patients. There was no survival difference between borderline resectable and locally advanced patients. CONCLUSIONS SBRT with SIB/SIP had an excellent toxicity profile and could be administered safely on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients, even in a total neoadjuvant setting.
Collapse
|
35
|
Bouchart C, Navez J, Closset J, Hendlisz A, Van Gestel D, Moretti L, Van Laethem JL. Novel strategies using modern radiotherapy to improve pancreatic cancer outcomes: toward a new standard? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920936093. [PMID: 32684987 PMCID: PMC7343368 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920936093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most aggressive solid tumours with an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 7% for all stages combined. In this highly resistant disease that is located in the vicinity of many radiosensitive organs, the role of radiotherapy (RT) and indications for its use in this setting have been debated for a long time and are still under investigation. Although a survival benefit has yet to be clearly demonstrated for RT, it is the only technique, other than surgery, that has been demonstrated to lead to local control improvement. The adjuvant approach is now strongly challenged by neoadjuvant treatments that could spare patients with rapidly progressive systemic disease from unnecessary surgery and may increase free margin (R0) resection rates for those eligible for surgery. Recently developed dose-escalated RT treatments, designed either to maintain full-dose chemotherapy or to deliver a high biologically effective dose, particularly to areas of contact between the tumour and blood vessels, such as hypofractionated ablative RT (HFA-RT) or stereotactic body RT (SBRT), are progressively changing the treatment landscape. These modern strategies are currently being tested in prospective clinical trials with encouraging preliminary results, paving the way for more effective treatment combinations using novel targeted therapies. This review summarizes the current literature regarding the use of RT for the treatment of primary PDAC, describes the limitations of conventional RT, and discusses the emerging role of dose-escalated RT and heavy-particle RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christelle Bouchart
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Boulevard de Waterloo, 121, Brussels, 1000, Belgium
| | - Julie Navez
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Closset
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alain Hendlisz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luigi Moretti
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|