Low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol versus azathioprine monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (AAUC): An investigator-initiated, open, multicenter, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial

The fate of thiopurine metabolites after switching to low-dose thiopurine with allopurinol or thioguanine in IBD patients: A retrospective analysis

AIMS

Shunting (hypermethylating) thiopurine metabolism, characterized by excessive 6-MMPR production and (sub)therapeutic 6-TGN levels, poses a significant challenge in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study evaluates the metabolic outcomes of switching to low-dose thiopurine with allopurinol (LDTA) or thioguanine (TG) in IBD patients with shunting metabolism.

METHODS

This retrospective study analysed demographic data, thiopurine metabolite profiles, and adverse event rates in shunting IBD patients before and after switching to LDTA or TG therapy. Metabolite variability was assessed by examining alterations in 6-MMPR and 6-TGN levels and their correlation before and after therapy switch.

RESULTS

Both therapies significantly reduced toxic 6-MMPR levels, with 100% of patients achieving non-toxic levels (6-MMPR-level below 7000 pmol/8 × 10E8 RBC) post-therapy. For TG, 93% of patients attained non-toxic 6-TGN levels (6-TGN < 1000 pmol/8 × 10E8 RBC). In contrast, LDTA showed greater variability in 6-TGN outcomes, with 50% of patients reaching therapeutic levels, 31% remaining subtherapeutic, and 19% within toxic range. The slope for LDTA was significantly positive (1.044, R2 = 0.4515, P = 0.004), reflecting proportional increases in 6-TGN levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to LDTA or TG therapy in shunting IBD patients resulted in favourable alterations in thiopurine metabolism. However, LDTA appears to have a slightly less favourable metabolite profile, with some residual 6-MMPR formation and fewer patients achieving normal 6-TGN levels compared to TG. Given the challenges associated with achieving optimal thiopurine metabolite levels with LDTA and the need for closer monitoring of 6-TGN levels, TG appears a more suitable option for thiopurine shunting IBD patients.

Contemporary and prospective use of azathioprine (AZA) in viral, rheumatic, and dermatological disorders: a review of pharmacogenomic and nanotechnology applications

Azathioprine (AZA) has been extensively used for immunomodulatory effects in autoimmune disorders and transplantation. This article is proposed to review the contemporary and prospective use of AZA in viral, rheumatic, and dermatological disorders. The primary objective is to draw attention to possible developments in regards to AZA application in recent years, with an emphasis on the use of pharmacogenomics and nanotechnology to improve its efficacy in practice. This study reveals that AZA, having the active metabolites 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and 6-thioguanine (6-TG), may be useful in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), pemphigus vulgaris, and psoriasis. Pharmacogenomic testing of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and Nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) genotypes minimizes the occurrence of myelosuppression. Furthermore, new formulations of AZA using biocompatible polymers and nanoparticles for drug delivery were reported to improve its efficacy and lower systemic toxicity. This paper aims to establish the multifunctional nature of AZA in modern medicine, thus emphasizing its potential for other applications. Through the combination of pharmacogenomic analysis along with nanotechnology application, AZA makes the promise of enhancing patients' treatment efficacy and extending the stock of medical information available. These advancements offer new possibilities for application of precision medicine and improvements in the use of AZA therapy.

Research progress in the combined treatment of ulcerative colitis

In recent years, more and more drugs have been used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis, but the efficacy of monotherapy is limited, especially for patients with refractory moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Combination therapy is mainly used for patients with a poor response or partial efficacy of monotherapy and has become a new direction for exploring the treatment strategy of ulcerative colitis. Therefore, the authors review the combined treatment options of ulcerative colitis in the context of the existing literature and discuss considerations for the practical application of combination therapy, hoping to provide new ideas for clinicians in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Quo vadis autoimmune hepatitis? - Summary of the 5th international autoimmune hepatitis group research workshop 2024

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare chronic liver disease with an increasing incidence in many countries. Chronic autoimmune responses against the liver can cause hepatic and extrahepatic symptoms, decreased quality of life and reduced liver transplant-free survival if inadequately treated. Although standard treatment with corticosteroids and thiopurines improves the life expectancy of patients with AIH, remission rates and tolerability are generally overestimated and the development of alternative first-line and salvage therapies has been disappointingly slow compared to in rheumatological diseases or inflammatory bowel disease. Other gaps include the lack of disease-specific diagnostic markers for AIH. Similarly, the new entity of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis underscores the need to re-evaluate previous diagnostic criteria. The International AIH Group (IAIHG) has initiated a series of research workshops over the last decade to promote the identification of research gaps and subsequently improve the pace of scientific progress by stimulating collaboration between expert centres. This review reports on the results of the 5th Research Workshop, held in Hannover, Germany in June 2024, and summarises the progress made since the 4th Workshop in 2022. Patient representatives from the European Reference Network (ERN) Rare Liver Youth Panel participated in the workshop. The specific objectives of this year's 5th Workshop were: (1) To further improve diagnostics. (2) Initiate clinical trials including knowledge transfer on drugs from extrahepatic immune-mediated diseases, including B cell-depleting CAR T cells. (3) Utilisation of multi-omics approaches to improve the understanding of disease pathogenesis. (4) Application of machine learning-based approaches established in oncology or transplantation medicine to improve diagnosis and outcome prediction in AIH.

Drug Interaction-Informed Approaches to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex and chronic condition that requires the use of various pharmacological agents for its management. Despite advancements in IBD research, the multifaceted mechanisms involved continue to pose significant challenges for strategic prevention. Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize safe and effective treatment strategies using the currently available pharmacological agents. Given that patients with IBD often require multiple medications due to combination therapy or other underlying conditions, a comprehensive understanding of drug interactions is essential for optimizing treatment regimens. In this review, we examined the pharmacological treatment options recommended in the current IBD management guidelines and provided a comprehensive analysis of the known pharmacokinetic interactions associated with these medications. In particular, this review includes recent research results for the impact of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) on the concentrations of biological agents used in IBD treatment. By leveraging detailed interaction data and employing personalized dosing strategies, healthcare providers can improve therapeutic outcomes and minimize adverse effects, ultimately improving the quality of care for patients with IBD.

The Effectiveness and Safety of First-Line Thioguanine in Thiopurine-Naïve Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

Currently thioguanine is solely used as treatment for inflammatory bowel disease after azathioprine and/or mercaptopurine failure. This study aimed to determine the safety, effectiveness, and 12-month drug survival of thioguanine in thiopurine-naïve patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in thiopurine-naïve patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with thioguanine as first thiopurine derivate. Clinical effectiveness was defined as the continuation of thioguanine without the (re)initiation of concurrent biological therapy, systemic corticosteroids, or a surgical intervention. All adverse events were categorized by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients (male 39%, Crohn's disease 53%) were included with a median treatment duration of 25 months and a median thioguanine dosage of 20 mg/d. Clinical effectiveness at 12 months was observed in 53% of patients, and 78% of these responding patients remained responsive until the end of follow-up. During the entire follow-up period, 26 patients were primary nonresponders, 8 had a secondary loss of response, and 11 patients were unable to cease therapy with systemic corticosteroids within 6 months and were therefore classified as nonresponders. After 12 months, thioguanine was still used by 86% of patients. Fifty (44%) patients developed adverse events (grade 1 or 2) and 9 (8%) patients ceased therapy due to the occurrence of adverse events. An infection was documented in 3 patients, none of them requiring hospitalization and pancytopenia occurred in 2 other patients. No signs of nodular regenerative hyperplasia or portal hypertension were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

At 12 months, first-line thioguanine therapy was clinically effective in 53% of thiopurine-naïve inflammatory bowel disease patients with an acceptable safety profile.

Multicentre study and systematic review: Allopurinol exposure during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Data about the safety of allopurinol in pregnant women are sparsely reported.

AIMS

To investigate the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome and congenital abnormalities after in utero exposure to allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pregnancies and in general.

METHODS

We collected safety data of patients with IBD who were treated with allopurinol during pregnancy between January 2013 and March 2022. Additionally, we performed a systematic review about the teratogenic potential of allopurinol.

RESULTS

We collected data from 42 allopurinol-exposed pregnancies, including one twin pregnancy; in all women, allopurinol was combined with a thiopurine. Six pregnancies (14.3%) resulted in miscarriage and one in stillbirth at 32 weeks. A congenital anomaly was observed in one newborn (coarctation of the aorta discovered postpartum). Three pregnancies, including the twin pregnancy, ended in moderate preterm delivery and one in very preterm delivery. Five neonates (15.2%) were small for gestational age. From our literature search, we identified an additional 102 allopurinol-exposed pregnancies resulting in 129 live births, including 36 infants from our cohort. Ten infants (7.8%) were born with a congenital anomaly. Two (1.6%) had a comparable pattern of multiple anomalies. The systematic review sub-analysis including only infants born to mothers with IBD (n = 76) revealed that 2.6% of infants had congenital anomalies after in utero exposure to a low dose of allopurinol.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the teratogenicity of allopurinol remains inconclusive. Children conceived by mothers treated for IBD with allopurinol/thiopurine co-therapy do not seem to have an increased risk of congenital anomalies.

Efficacy of optimised thiopurine therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: retrospective long-term follow-up from two randomised trials

OBJECTIVE

The long-term outcome of thiopurine therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) enrolled in prospective trials have not been evaluated. We aimed to assess the effects of optimised thiopurine maintenance therapy for UC.

METHODS

Long-term data were obtained from patients from our center enrolled in two randomised, prospective, open-label, controlled studies comprising 66 thiopurine-naïve moderate-to-severe patients with UC consisting of a low dose azathioprine (AZA)/allopurinol combination or AZA monotherapy. Following the randomised trials, treatment was adjusted according to adverse effects and metabolites. Patients requiring optimisation initially on AZA monotherapy treatment were switched to low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol, low dose 6-mercaptopurin in combination with allopurinol, or 6-mercaptopurin treatment alone, and those treated with low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol were switched to low dose 6-mercaptopurin in combination with allopurinol or 6-mercaptopurin alone.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were included in the analysis; 31 were initially treated with AZA monotherapy and 31 with low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol. Initial treatment was tolerated by 67% patients (7 AZA monotherapy and 28 low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol), increasing to 94% (58 patients) post-adjustment. After a median 52-month follow-up period, 38 (93%) out of the 41 primary responding patients-maintained clinical remission without steroids, biologics or surgery. The four intolerant patients and the 17 not responding to optimisation were more likely to require colectomy (odds ratio 16.36; 95% confidence interval 3.08-87.03, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Optimised thiopurine therapy demonstrated effective long-term treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis.

Editorial: Towards optimal thiopurine therapy for inflammatory bowel disease

This article is linked to Vasudevan et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17831 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17895

Uphill battle: Innovation of thiopurine therapy in global inflammatory bowel disease care

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that encompasses two major conditions: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Historically, IBD has been primarily reported in western countries, but over the past decades, its prevalence is rapidly increasing, especially in lower and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as India and China and also in Sub-Saharan Africa. The prevalence of IBD in LMICs has been the subject of growing concern due to the impact of access to public healthcare and the burden it places on healthcare resources. The classical thiopurines face significant challenges due to cessation of therapy in approximately half of patients within one year due to side effects or ineffectiveness. In this article, we highlight innovating thiopurine treatment for IBD patients in downregulating side effects and improving efficacy.

Clinical trial: Combination allopurinol-thiopurine versus standard thiopurine in patients with IBD escalating to immunomodulators (the DECIDER study)

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines are established treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet concerns remain regarding their safety.

AIM

To evaluate the use of thiopurine-allopurinol combination therapy compared to standard thiopurine therapy in IBD.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of thiopurine-allopurinol versus thiopurine with placebo for adults commencing a thiopurine for IBD. Patients had active disease at baseline; dosing of therapy was based on a pre-specified regimen and subsequent metabolites. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a composite of symptomatic disease activity remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index <5 for Crohn's disease, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index <4 for ulcerative colitis) and a faecal calprotectin <150 μg/g after 26 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

The trial was terminated early due to slow recruitment. We randomised 102 participants (54 thiopurine-allopurinol, 48 thiopurine with placebo) with similar age (median 42 vs 48 years) and sex distribution (46% women per group). A higher proportion achieved the primary outcome in the thiopurine-allopurinol group (50% vs 35%, p = 0.14) and fewer participants stopped their allocated therapy due to adverse events (11% vs 29%, p = 0.02). Also, within the thiopurine-allopurinol group, thiopurine dose adjustments were less frequent (69% vs 92%, p = 0.03), a higher proportion achieved an early therapeutic 6-TGN level at week 6 (71% vs 53%, p = 0.19), and adverse events attributed to therapy were less frequent (15% vs 44%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Thiopurine-allopurinol therapy is safe and mitigates thiopurine adverse effects, thus enhancing tolerability without compromising efficacy (ACTRN12613001347752).

Risk-stratified monitoring for thiopurine toxicity in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: prognostic model development, validation, and, health economic evaluation

Background

Patients established on thiopurines (e.g., azathioprine) are recommended to undergo three-monthly blood tests for the early detection of blood, liver, or kidney toxicity. These side-effects are uncommon during long-term treatment. We developed a prognostic model that could be used to inform risk-stratified decisions on frequency of monitoring blood-tests during long-term thiopurine treatment, and, performed health-economic evaluation of alternate monitoring intervals.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study set in the UK primary-care. Data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum and Gold formed development and validation cohorts, respectively. People age ≥18 years, diagnosed with an immune mediated inflammatory disease, prescribed thiopurine by their general practitioner for at-least six-months between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2019 were eligible. The outcome was thiopurine discontinuation with abnormal blood-test results. Patients were followed up from six-months after first primary-care thiopurine prescription to up to five-years. Penalised Cox regression developed the risk equation. Multiple imputation handled missing predictor data. Calibration and discrimination assessed model performance. A mathematical model evaluated costs and quality-adjusted life years associated with lengthening the interval between blood-tests.

Findings

Data from 5982 (405 events over 16,117 person-years) and 3573 (269 events over 9075 person-years) participants were included in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Fourteen candidate predictors (21 parameters) were included. The optimism adjusted R2 and Royston D statistic in development data were 0.11 and 0.76, respectively. The calibration slope and Royston D statistic (95% Confidence Interval) in the validation data were 1.10 (0.84-1.36) and 0.72 (0.52-0.92), respectively. A 2-year period between monitoring blood-test was most cost-effective in all deciles of predicted risk but the gain between monitoring annually or biennially reduced in higher risk deciles.

Interpretation

This prognostic model requires information that is readily available during routine clinical care and may be used to risk-stratify blood-test monitoring for thiopurine toxicity. These findings should be considered by specialist societies when recommending blood monitoring during thiopurine prescription to bring about sustainable and equitable change in clinical practice.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Commensal bacteria promote azathioprine therapy failure in inflammatory bowel disease via decreasing 6-mercaptopurine bioavailability

Azathioprine (AZA) therapy failure, though not the primary cause, contributes to disease relapse and progression in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the role of gut microbiota in AZA therapy failure remains poorly understood. We found a high prevalence of Blautia wexlerae in patients with IBD with AZA therapy failure, associated with shorter disease flare survival time. Colonization of B. wexlerae increased inflammatory macrophages and compromised AZA's therapeutic efficacy in mice with intestinal colitis. B. wexlerae colonization reduced 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) bioavailability by enhancing selenium-dependent xanthine dehydrogenase (sd-XDH) activity. The enzyme sd-XDH converts 6-MP into its inactive metabolite, 6-thioxanthine (6-TX), thereby impairing its ability to inhibit inflammation in mice. Supplementation with Bacillus (B.) subtilis enriched in hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) effectively mitigated B. wexlerae-induced AZA treatment failure in mice with intestinal colitis. These findings emphasize the need for tailored management strategies based on B. wexlerae levels in patients with IBD.

The cost of inflammatory bowel disease in high-income settings: a Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission

The cost of caring for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to increase worldwide. The cause is not only a steady increase in the prevalence of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in both developed and newly industrialised countries, but also the chronic nature of the diseases, the need for long-term, often expensive treatments, the use of more intensive disease monitoring strategies, and the effect of the diseases on economic productivity. This Commission draws together a wide range of expertise to discuss the current costs of IBD care, the drivers of increasing costs, and how to deliver affordable care for IBD in the future. The key conclusions are that (1) increases in health-care costs must be evaluated against improved disease management and reductions in indirect costs, and (2) that overarching systems for data interoperability, registries, and big data approaches must be established for continuous assessment of effectiveness, costs, and the cost-effectiveness of care. International collaborations should be sought out to evaluate novel models of care (eg, value-based health care, including integrated health care, and participatory health-care models), as well as to improve the education and training of clinicians, patients, and policy makers.

Systematic review: The effectiveness of 6-thioguanine nucleotide-based dose optimisation of thiopurines in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Introduction: Clinical guidelines highlight the potential utility of metabolite-based thiopurine dose optimisation strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this review was to summarise the evidence of effectiveness and safety of a 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) metabolite-based dosing strategy for maintenance of remission using azathioprine or mercaptopurine in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Methods: We searched the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO international clinical trials registry platform, and relevant grey literature, up to 1 December 2021. Inclusion criteria were: all randomised (active comparator) controlled trials of azathioprine or mercaptopurine used for the purposes of maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis where the dose in the intervention arm was optimised based on 6-TGN metabolite assay results. Studies of any duration were eligible for inclusion, and no age restrictions were applied. Results: No studies met the eligibility criteria for this review. Four randomised controlled studies (two of which are currently underway) were identified that assessed the effectiveness of metabolite-based dose optimisation for thiopurine therapy, but were not eligible either because they did not differentiate between induction and maintenance therapy or because of a lack of an appropriate active comparator. Conclusions: There is no RCT-based evidence for dose optimisation using a 6-TGN metabolite-based dosing strategy for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. Where evidence is available from combination induction and maintenance trials, it suggests that such a strategy is no better than weight-based dosing. Cochrane protocol registration: CD014795

Maintenance therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: basic science and clinical translations

Maintenance therapy (MT) with oral methotrexate (MTX) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) is essential for the cure of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). MTX and 6-MP interfere with nucleotide synthesis and salvage pathways. The primary cytotoxic mechanism involves the incorporation of thioguanine nucleotides (TGNs) into DNA (as DNA-TG), which may be enhanced by the inhibition of de novo purine synthesis by other MTX/6-MP metabolites. Co-medication during MT is common. Although Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis appears safe, the benefit of glucocorticosteroid/vincristine pulses in improving survival and of allopurinol to moderate 6-MP pharmacokinetics remains uncertain. Numerous genetic polymorphisms influence the pharmacology, efficacy, and toxicity (mainly myelosuppression and hepatotoxicity) of MTX and thiopurines. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (encoded by TPMT) decreases TGNs but increases methylated 6-MP metabolites (MeMPs); similarly, nudix hydrolase 15 (encoded by NUDT15) also decreases TGNs available for DNA incorporation. Loss-of-function variants in both genes are currently used to guide MT, but do not fully explain the inter-patient variability in thiopurine toxicity. Because of the large inter-individual variations in MTX/6-MP bioavailability and metabolism, dose adjustments are traditionally guided by the degree of myelosuppression, but this does not accurately reflect treatment intensity. DNA-TG is a common downstream metabolite of MTX/6-MP combination chemotherapy, and a higher level of DNA-TG has been associated with a lower relapse hazard, leading to the development of the Thiopurine Enhanced ALL Maintenance (TEAM) strategy-the addition of low-dose (2.5-12.5 mg/m²/day) 6-thioguanine to the 6-MP/MTX backbone-that is currently being tested in a randomized ALLTogether1 trial (EudraCT: 2018-001795-38). Mutations in the thiopurine and MTX metabolism pathways, and in the mismatch repair genes have been identified in early ALL relapses, providing valuable insights to assist the development of strategies to detect imminent relapse, to facilitate relapse salvage therapy, and even to bring about changes in frontline ALL therapy to mitigate this relapse risk.

Low-Dose Azathioprine in Combination with Allopurinol: The Past, Present and Future of This Useful Duo

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are complex immune-mediated inflammatory diseases that are associated with significant morbidity around the world. As our understanding of IBD, and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, advances the number of therapeutic targets has increased which has rapidly driven the development and introduction of new therapies. While these new therapies have shown promise they come with the significant drawback of high costs. For many IBD patients around the world the cost of newer therapies is prohibitive which means treating clinicians often need to turn to optimising simpler, older, and inexpensive medications. The concept of optimising well established cheaper medications is not unique to the management of IBD as health systems all over the world look to reduce costs while simultaneously improving patient outcomes. Despite thiopurines being used in the management IBD for over 60 years, many clinicians are still hesitant to use them due to perceptions around limited efficacy and poor tolerance. One method identified to potentially increase utilisation of thiopurines involves the coadministration of allopurinol. In this review we will explore the history, pharmacology, recent studies and give recommendations for the utilisation of the usual duo of azathioprine combined with allopurinol.