Trastuzumab beyond progression: overall survival analysis of the GBG 26/BIG 3-05 phase III study in HER2-positive breast cancer

Efficacy and safety of Trastuzumab Emtansine in treating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer in Chinese population: a real-world multicenter study

Background

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has been approved worldwide for treating metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in patients who have received first-line therapy, shown disease progression, and are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive. T-DM1 received approval in China to treat early-stage breast cancer (BC) in 2020 and for mBC in 2021. In March 2023, T-DM1 was included in medical insurance coverage, significantly expanding the eligible population.

Materials and methods

This post-marketing observational study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of T-DM1 in real-world clinical practice in China. This study enrolled 31 individuals with HER2-positive early-stage BC and 70 individuals with HER2-positive advanced BC from 8 study centers in Shandong Province, China. The T-DM1 dosage was 3.6 mg/kg injected intravenously every 3 weeks until the disease advanced or the drug toxicity became uncontrollable, whichever occurred earlier. Additionally, efficacy and safety information on T-DM1 were collected.

Results

During the 7-month follow-up period, no recurrence or metastases were observed in patients who had early-stage BC. The disease control rate was 31.43% (22/70) in patients with advanced BC. The most common adverse effect of T-DM1 was thrombocytopenia, with an incidence of 69.31% (70/101), and the probability of Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia was 11.88% (12/101).

Conclusion

This real-world study demonstrated that T-DM1 had good efficacy and was well tolerated by both HER2-positive early-stage BC and mBC patients.

Cetuximab Treatment beyond Progression in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study (THNS-2021-08)

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the association of cetuximab treatment beyond progression (TBP) with survival among patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now considered as first-line treatment, not all patients are suitable for ICIs.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the role of cetuximab TBP in patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with R/M HNSCC who had tumor progression after first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy were included into our study. Oncologic outcomes were estimated including time to cetuximab treatment discontinuation (TTD), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Multivariate cox regression analysis with survival were conducted. Subgroup analysis with P16 and programmed death ligand 1 expression were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 498 patients were eligible with 259 patients in the TBP group and 239 patients in the non-TBP group. The most common first-line chemotherapy was the EXTREME regimen in both groups. As for second-line treatment, the most common regimen were TPEx in the TBP group and taxane-based chemotherapy in the non-TBP group. Median TTD was 8.7 months in TBP and 5.5 months in non-TBP (p < 0.001). In terms of survival, median OS1 was significant longer in the TBP group than in the non-TBP group [14.1 months versus 10.9 months (p = 0.016)]. Multivariate analysis demonstrated cetuximab TBP was a factor independently associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective study suggests cetuximab TBP to be effective and to provide better survival for patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate the role of cetuximab TBP in R/M HNSCC.

Key Considerations for the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer in Older Adults: An Expert Consensus of the Canadian Treatment Landscape

The prevalence of breast cancer amongst older adults in Canada is increasing. This patient population faces unique challenges in the management of breast cancer, as older adults often have distinct biological, psychosocial, and treatment-related considerations. This paper presents an expert consensus of the Canadian treatment landscape, focusing on key considerations for optimizing selection of systemic therapy for advanced breast cancer in older adults. This paper aims to provide evidence-based recommendations and practical guidance for healthcare professionals involved in the care of older adults with breast cancer. By recognizing and addressing the specific needs of older adults, healthcare providers can optimize treatment outcomes and improve the overall quality of care for this population.

Anti-HER2 Drugs for the Treatment of Advanced HER2 Positive Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Approximately 15-20% of breast cancers (BC) demonstrate HER2 overexpression/gene amplification. Historically, before the era of HER2-directed therapies, this subtype was associated with poor prognosis. Anti-HER2 agents dramatically changed the natural course of disease and significantly prolonged patients' survival. In recent years, a number of new anti-HER2 therapies have been developed, and their approvals offer new therapeutic options for patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. At present, HER2 pathway blocking drugs used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer worldwide include trastuzumab and pertuzumab in the first-line treatment; trastuzumab deruxtecan and trastuzumab emtansine in the second line; and tucatinib, neratinib, lapatinib, and margetuximab in further lines of treatment of advanced HER2 positive breast cancer. Additionally, there are many clinical trials underway evaluating drugs blocking the HER2 pathway in advanced disease setting. This article presents new treatment options, discussing the most important findings from clinical trials and real-world reports, clinical benefits and risks of treatment, as well as efficacy of re-treatment with trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer. New data challenge the current standards, and a number of questions arise regarding the optimal sequence of anti-HER2 targeted therapies, the optimal combination, including endocrine agents in luminal HER2 positive tumors and treatment of special patient population such as patients with brain metastases (BM).

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-HER2 Targeted Therapy for Metastatic HR-Positive and HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Despite the development of HER2-targeted drugs, achieving favorable outcomes for patients with HR+/HER2+MBC remains challenging. This study utilized Bayesian Network Meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-HER2 combination regimens. The primary analysis focused on progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary analyses included objective response rate, overall survival (OS) and the incidence rate of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs). A comprehensive search across seven databases identified 25 randomized controlled trials for inclusion in this meta-analysis. For patients eligible for endocrinotherapy, our findings revealed that dual-target combined endocrine therapy, such as Her2-mAb+Her2-mAb+Endo (HR = 0.38; 95%CrI: 0.16-0.88) and Her2-mAb+Her2-tki+Endo (HR = 0.45; 95%CrI: 0.23-0.89), significantly improved PFS compared to endocrine therapy alone. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs), Her2-mAb+Her2-mAb+Endo and Her2-mAb+Her2-tki+Endo ranked highest in terms of PFS and OS, respectively. For patients unsuitable for endocrine therapy, anti-HER2 dual-target combined chemotherapy, such as Her2-mAb+Her2-mAb+Chem (HR = 0.76; 95%CrI: 0.6-0.96) and Her2-mAb+Her2-tki+Chem (HR = 0.48; 95%CrI: 0.29-0.81), demonstrated significant improvements in PFS compared to Her2-mAb+Chem. The results were the same when compared with Her2-tki+Chem. According to the SUCRAs, Her2-mAb+Her2-tki+Chem and Her2-mAb+Her2-mAb+Chem ranked highest for PFS and OS, respectively. Subgroup analyses consistently supported these overall findings, indicating that dual-target therapy was the optimal approach irrespective of treatment line.

Retrospective analysis of colorectal cancer patients with metachronous initially unresectable liver metastases (and no other) achieving no evidence of disease after first-line comprehensive therapy: a multicenter real-world study

PURPOSE

To explore the optimal timing of locoregional therapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence after radical resection and initially unresectable liver metastases but no other metastases and whether maintenance therapy should be performed after achieving no evidence of disease (NED).

METHODS

This study was jointly carried out in six medical institutions in China to collect the clinical data of patients with primary CRC from January 2015 to December 2021. Research participants were identified according to the inclusion criteria of this study for statistical analysis of the clinical characteristics and recurrence time.

RESULTS

625 patients CRC with metachronous initially unresectable liver metastases but no other metastases were enrolled. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of metastases in the liver and the time from the start of first-line chemotherapy to locoregional therapy significantly affected the progression-free survival (PFS, P < 0.05) following the first-line treatment, and continued maintenance therapy reduced the risk of tumor progression in the patients (P < 0.05). Furthermore, stratified analysis showed that the median PFS of patients with 3-5 metastases in the liver was maximized when the time from the start of first-line chemotherapy to locoregional therapy was 3-4 months. Patients with > 6 metastases in the liver should extend the duration between the start of first-line chemotherapy and locoregional therapy to more than four months. Similarly, with the significant increase in the number of metastases in the liver, subsequent maintenance therapy significantly extended the PFS of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall therapeutic plan in patients with CRC recurrence after radical resection and initially unresectable liver metastases but no other metastases should consider the individual patients' situations, especially the number of metastases in the liver at initial recurrence.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Its Clinical Significance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Analysis

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a member of the tyrosine kinase receptor family. It has been identified as an oncogene and is associated with poor outcomes in multiple tumor types. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there are contradictory data regarding the HER2 expression and its role in tumor development and progression. Some studies have identified HER2 expression as an early event during tumorigenesis, which decreases with progression and metastasis. Additional data provided evidence that treatment with anti-HER2 therapy resulted in local response and reduction in the metastasis rate in HCC mice models.

METHODS

Patients with histological diagnoses of HCC between 2010 and 2020 were included. HER2 staining was performed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and scoring was done in accordance with the gastric cancer guidelines as 0, 1+, 2+, and 3+. Clinicopathological features were accessed by medical records. This study aims to evaluate HER2 expression by IHC in HCC and to correlate this expression with some clinicopathological features such as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging, number of hepatic lesions, alpha-fetoprotein level, underlying liver disease, presence of liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score, and tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 57 specimens from 54 patients were included. Of the patients, 85% were men, and the median age at diagnosis was 71 years (interquartile range: 59-75 years). Regarding stage, 61% were at stage 0-A of BCLC. Of the patients, 57% had a solitary HCC nodule. Concerning treatment, surgery was performed in 50% of the patients. HER2 expression was identified in seven patients: five in the membrane and two in the cytoplasm. Concerning the membrane staining, HER2 expression was scored as 1+/2+ in 7.4% (n = 4 patients). Of the patients with HER2 expression, four had a BCLC stage of 0-A and a single HCC nodule; alpha-fetoprotein was <400 ng/mL in all cases. There was no correlation to clinicopathological features. In one patient with HER2 2+ expression at diagnosis, this expression was not identified at tumor progression. Median disease-free survival in HER2 with IHC scores 1+/2+ and cytoplasmatic was 38 months versus 22 months in HER2 with a score of 0 (p = 0.604).

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 expression is a rare event in HCC. It was not possible to identify any relation to clinicopathological features. However, when we relate our data to previous trials, HER2 appears to be an early event in the course of HCC.

Pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a single-arm exploratory phase II trial

PURPOSE

A substantial need for effective and safe treatment options is still unmet for patients with heavily pre-treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Herein, we assessed the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy in patients with heavily treated HER2-positive MBC.

METHODS

In this single-arm exploratory phase II trial, patients with HER2-positive MBC previously treated with trastuzumab plus lapatinib or pertuzumab, received pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the total population (TP). Secondary end points included PFS in the subgroup with brain metastases (Sub-BrM), confirmed objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control rate (DCR), exploration of predictive factors of PFS, and safety.

RESULTS

Between November 1, 2018, and March 31, 2021, 40 patients were eligible for this study. The median PFS reached 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7 to 9.9 months) and 9.4 months (95% CI 6.6 to 12.1 months) in the TP and Sub-BrM, respectively. ORR was 50.5% (20/40). CBR was 75.5% (30/40) and DCR reached 97.5% (39/40). Cox univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that liver or/and lung metastases was the significant adverse prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.018; p = 0.026; respectively). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, neutropenia and leukopenia. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

Pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy offered a promising option with manageable safety profile for heavily pre-treated HER2-positive MBC, especially for those without liver or/and lung metastases.

The adverse effects of trastuzumab-containing regimes as a therapy in breast cancer: A piggy-back systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab is a valuable therapy option for women with ERBB2(HER2)+ breast cancer tumours, often used in combination with chemotherapy and alongside other therapies. It is known to have adverse effects, but these have proved difficult to separate from the effects of other concurrent therapies patients are usually taking. This study aims to assess the adverse effects specifically attributable to trastuzumab, and whether they vary by patient subgroup or concurrent therapies.

METHODS

As registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019146541), we used previous systematic reviews as well as the clinicaltrials.gov registry to identify randomised controlled trials in breast cancer which compared treatment regimes with and without trastuzumab. Neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic settings were examined. Data was extracted from those which had, as of July 2022, reported adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB2. Primary outcomes were adverse events of any type or severity (excluding death). A standard random-effects meta-analysis was performed for each outcome independently. In order to ascertain whether adverse effects differed by individual factors such as age or tumour characteristics, or by use of trastuzumab concurrently with hormone therapy, we examined individual-level patient data for one large trial, HERA.

RESULTS

79 relevant trials were found, of which 20 contained comparable arms of trastuzumab-containing therapy and corresponding matched therapy without trastuzumab. This allowed a comparison of 8669 patients receiving trastuzumab versus 9556 receiving no trastuzumab, which gave a list of 25 statistically and clinically significant adverse effects related to trastuzumab alone: unspecified pain, asthenia, nasopharyngitis, skin disorders (mainly rash), dyspepsia, paraesthesia, infections (often respiratory), increased lacrimation, diarrhoea, myalgia, oedema (limb/peripheral), fever, nose bleeds, cardiac events, insomnia, cough, back pain, dyspnoea, chills, dizziness or vertigo, hypertension, congestive heart failure, increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase, gastrointestinal issues and dehydration. Analysis of individual patient-level data from 5102 patients suggested that nausea is slightly more likely for women taking trastuzumab who are ER+ /also taking hormone therapy than for those who are ER-/not taking hormone therapy; no other potential treatment-subgroup interactions were detected. We found no evidence for significantly increased rates of neutropenia, anaemia or lymphopenia in patients on trastuzumab-containing regimes compared to those on comparable regimes without trastuzumab.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis should allow clinicians and patients to better identify and quantify the potential adverse effects of adding trastuzumab to their treatment regime for breast cancer, and hence inform their decision-making. However, limitations include serious risk of bias due to heterogeneity in reporting of the outcomes and the open-label nature of the trials.

Trastuzumab-based regimens beyond progression: A crucial treatment option for HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer

Upon its establishment for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC), continuing trastuzumab beyond disease progression was an important paradigm shift that became the recommendation by major guidelines. However, data supporting continuation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade with trastuzumab beyond the second-line setting are limited, resulting in a lack of approval of, or access to, this therapeutic strategy in many countries. This study aimed to provide additional data on the continued use of trastuzumab and trastuzumab-based therapies in combination with chemotherapy (CT) as third-line treatment for patients with mBC. This open-cohort, retrospective, observational study used deidentified patient-level data from an electronic health record-derived database that included patients with mBC who initiated third-line treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy combined with CT (Tras + CT; n = 288) or CT alone (CT; n = 49). Patients who received Tras + CT had a longer weighted median overall survival vs those who received CT only: 20.6 months (95% CI, 18.3-26.4 months) vs 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.8-12.3 months), respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16-0.53). This study provides additional support for maintaining trastuzumab-based therapies for patients with HER2+ mBC beyond second-line treatment. This treatment option should be available for all patients with mBC worldwide.

Austrian treatment algorithms in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a 2022 update

In the past 12 months a plethora of relevant novel data for the treatment of metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer were published. To bring this new evidence into a clinical perspective, a group of Austrian breast cancer specialists updated their previously published treatment algorithm for those patients. For this consensus paper a total of eight scenarios were developed in which treatment strategies appropriate for specific patient profiles were evaluated. Consensus was established by detailed discussions of each scenario and by reaching full consensus.

Current challenges and unmet needs in treating patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 oncogene (HER2-positive) overexpression/amplification occurs in less than 20% of breast cancers and has traditionally been associated with poor prognosis. Development of therapies that target HER2 has significantly improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). Currently available HER2-targeted agents include the monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and margetuximab, the small-molecule inhibitors lapatinib, tucatinib, neratinib, and pyrotinib, as well as the antibody-drug conjugates trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan. Optimal sequencing of these agents in the continuum of the disease is critical to maximize treatment outcomes. The large body of clinical evidence generated over the past 2 decades aids clinicians in treatment decision-making. However, patients with HER2-positive ABC and specific disease characteristics and/or comorbidities, such as leptomeningeal disease, brain metastases, or cardiac dysfunction, are generally excluded from large randomized clinical trials, and elderly or frail patients are often underrepresented. In addition, there is great inequality in the accessibility of approved drugs across countries. This article addresses various challenging clinical situations when treating patients with HER2-positive ABC. The objective is to provide guidance to clinicians on how and when HER2-targeted therapies and additional treatments can be best implemented in routine clinical practice, on the basis of existing clinical evidence and expert opinion where needed.

Pertuzumab retreatment for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: a randomized, open-label phase III study (PRECIOUS)

No standard options existed for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive advanced breast cancer that progresses after second‐line trastuzumab emtansine therapy before 2020. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of pertuzumab retreatment after disease progression following pertuzumab‐containing therapy for HER2‐positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer for the first time. This randomized, open‐label, multicenter phase III trial was undertaken in 93 sites in Japan. Eligible patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer who had received pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy as first‐ and/or second‐line therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to: (i) pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and physician's choice chemotherapy (PTC), or (ii) trastuzumab and physician's choice chemotherapy (TC). The primary end‐point was investigator‐assessed progression‐free survival (PFS). Between August 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018, 219 patients were randomized to PTC (n = 110) or TC (n = 109). Median follow‐up was 14.2 months (interquartile range, 9.0–22.2), and median PFS was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0–6.6) with PTC and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.2–4.8) with TC (stratified hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI upper limit 0.967]; p = 0.022). Progression‐free survival was improved by adding pertuzumab in all prespecified subgroups. The PTC arm showed a trend towards better overall survival and duration of response, but similar objective response and health‐related quality of life. The incidence of treatment‐related adverse events was similar between groups except for diarrhea. Pertuzumab retreatment contributes to disease control for HER2‐positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with pertuzumab‐containing regimens.

A phase III trial of alpelisib + trastuzumab ± fulvestrant versus trastuzumab + chemotherapy in HER2+ PIK3CA-mutated breast cancer

ALPHABET is a randomized phase III trial assessing alpelisib + trastuzumab with or without fulvestrant in previously treated HER2-positive PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer. Patients will be included in two cohorts according to hormone receptor (HR) status. In the experimental arms, patients in the HR-negative cohort will receive trastuzumab + alpelisib, and patients in the HR-positive cohort will receive the same treatment plus fulvestrant. Patients in the control arms will receive trastuzumab + physician's choice chemotherapy (eribuline, capecitabine or vinorelbine). Key eligibility criteria include 1-4 previous lines of anti-HER2 therapy and prior trastuzumab emtansine. The primary end point is investigator-assessed progression-free survival. The study aims to recruit a total of 300 patients.

Oral Etoposide and Trastuzumab Use for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study from the Institut Curie Hospitals

BACKGROUND

The TOP2A and ERBB2 genes are co-amplified in about 40% of HER2 positive (HER2+) breast cancers. Oral etoposide (VP16), an inhibitor of topoisomerase-II (encoded by TOP2A), has demonstrated clinical activity in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The benefit of oral VP16 combined with trastuzumab (VP16-T) in HER2+ MBC has not yet been evaluated.

METHODS

Patients treated at the Institut Curie Hospitals with VP16-T for HER2+ MBC were retrieved by an in silico search. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate, prolonged PFS (defined as at least 6 months), clinical benefit, and toxicity were assessed. The co-amplification of ERBB2 and TOP2A was assessed by shallow whole genome sequencing on tumor tissue whenever available.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients received VP16-T after a median number of six prior treatment lines for HER2+ MBC. Median PFS and OS were 2.9 months (95% CI [2.4-4.7]) and 11.3 months (95% CI [8.3-25.0]), respectively. Three patients had a complete response, while 12/40 (30%) experienced clinical benefit. Only three patients stopped treatment for toxicity. Seven (35%) patients displayed a TOP2A/ERBB2 co-amplification. No statistically significant correlation was found between outcome and TOP2A/ERBB2 co-amplification.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests a favorable efficacy and toxicity profile for VP16-T in patients with heavily pretreated HER2+ MBC.

Updated Austrian treatment algorithm in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer

A group of Austrian breast cancer specialists met in December 2020 to establish a comprehensive clinical benefit-risk profile of available HER2-targeted therapies based on recent data and to develop an updated treatment algorithm by consensus over several months in 2021. A total of four scenarios were developed in which treatment strategies appropriate for specific patient profiles were evaluated. Consensus was established by detailed discussions of each scenario and by reaching full consensus.

Real-World Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Irreversible HER2 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Pyrotinib in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background

As a novel irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor recently approved in China, pyrotinib has exhibited promising anticancer efficacy and acceptable safety profile in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The aim of this retrospective study was to estimate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib treatment in Chinese mBC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the real-world clinicopathological and treatment data of HER2-positive mBC patients receiving pyrotinib-based treatment from August 2018 to July 2019 in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and other medical centers of Shandong Province in China.

Results

A total of 64 patients treated with pyrotinib were included for analysis, and the median follow-up duration was 260 days (interquartile range, 199.0 to 339.0 days). Fifty-nine (92.2%) patients had been previously treated with trastuzumab and/or T-DM1, while 11 (17.2%) patients had been exposed to lapatinib. The objective response rate (ORR) of all patients was 73.4%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 98.4%, with a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 87.5%. Patients with exposure to lapatinib responded well to pyrotinib-based treatment, although the ORR was significantly lower compared with that of patients without exposure to lapatinib (44.1% vs 77.5%, p=0.037). Previous lapatinib exposure was negatively associated with the objective response of pyrotinib treatment (odds ratio [OR]=0.248, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.063–0.970, p=0.045). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for patients with previous lapatinib exposure and patients with visceral metastasis was 299 days (95% CI 240.1–357.9 days) and 359 days (95% CI 258.3–459.7 days), respectively. But the mPFS of the whole cohort has not been reached until the cut-off date. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that only visceral metastasis was an independent predictor of significantly shorter PFS (p=0.041) but not previous exposure to lapatinib (p=0.092). Diarrhea (28.1%), hand-foot syndrome (17.2%), and neutropenia (9.4%) were the most common grade 3 adverse events associated with pyrotinib treatment.

Conclusion

Pyrotinib is highly beneficial to HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients, even in patients with previous lapatinib exposure. Pyrotinib is a feasible replacement of lapatinib in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs or as a monotherapy. Adverse effects are tolerable and easily manageable.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan and other HER2-targeting agents for the treatment of HER2-positive gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although various new drugs have been developed, the prognosis of therapeutic advances for metastatic gastric cancer is insufficient. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a new human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), has demonstrated promising results in clinical trials.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we review the history of anti-HER2 ADCs and focus on the efficacy and safety of T-DXd and describe the development of new anti-HER2 drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

So far, no other anti-HER2 ADCs have demonstrated efficacy in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer with two or more previous lines of chemotherapy, including trastuzumab. However, a new drug, T-DXd, has shown a significantly higher objective response rate and a longer overall survival and, thus, was approved in Japan. In the future, new anti-HER2 drugs and/or treatment strategies including T-DXd along with cytotoxic chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors will be developed.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-HER2 Agents in Combination With Chemotherapy for Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patient: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background

The presence of anti-HER2 agents, such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), significantly improved the prognosis of metastatic HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers (BC). However, drug resistance and disease progression are still common. In order to further improve the treatment efficacy, new clinical trials about anti-HER2 agents in combination with chemotherapy are growing rapidly. We conducted the network meta-analysis to synthesize evidences of clinical trials to identify the best therapy for metastatic HER2+ BC.

Methods

A systematic search of randomized controlled trials regarding anti-HER2 agents in combination with chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic breast cancers up to May 2020 was conducted in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the results and rank the therapies.

Results

Twenty-six studies, including 16 studies for first-line treatments and 10 studies for second- or later-line treatments were included in the network meta-analysis. For first-line studies, the THP (taxanes + trastuzumab + pertuzumab) regimen exhibited the highest probability to be the optimal treatment in all efficacy outcomes and moderate safety. For second- or later-line studies, the T-DM1 and XHTuC (capecitabine + trastuzumab + tucatinib) regimens ranked top two in all efficacy outcomes according to the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) results. T-DM1 ranked first in PFS and OS whereas XHTuC ranked first in ORR. The safety outcomes of T-DM1 and XHTuC were acceptable.

Conclusions

THP was still the optimal first-line treatment for metastatic HER2+ BC. T-DM1 and XHTuC were recommended for second-line treatments.

Systematic Review Registration

INPLASY.com, identifier (INPLASY202090086).

Efficacy of tucatinib for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after HER2-targeted therapy: a network meta-analysis

Aim: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients receiving therapy for HER2+ unresectable/metastatic breast cancer after ≥1 HER2-directed therapy was conducted to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Hazard ratios (HRs) and relative differences from fractional polynomials (FPs) for PFS and OS were assessed by Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results: For PFS, surface under the cumulative rankogram (SUCRA) ranked tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine as highest in both HR and FP analyses, followed by T-DM1 monotherapy and neratinib plus capecitabine. For OS, SUCRA ranked tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine as highest in both HR and FP analyses, followed by pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with capecitabine and T-DM1 monotherapy, with similar scores. Conclusion: Tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine, and T-DM1 monotherapy, consistently showed improved PFS and OS versus lapatinib/trastuzumab plus capecitabine and non-targeted treatments.

A phase II study of efficacy, toxicity, and the potential impact of genomic alterations on response to eribulin mesylate in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

There are limited data on trastuzumab-pertuzumab (HP)-based treatments beyond the first-line, HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) setting. We conducted a phase II study of eribulin mesylate, which extends survival in MBC, with HP in patients with previously treated HER2+ MBC to evaluate efficacy, toxicity, and genomic alterations driving therapeutic response.

METHODS

After a run-in phase for eribulin dosing, two cohorts were enrolled (Cohort A-no prior pertuzumab; Cohort B-prior pertuzumab). All patients received eribulin 1.4 mg/m² on days 1, 8 with standard-dose HP on day 1 (21-day cycles). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Genomic characterization via whole exome sequencing (WES) was completed on tumor DNA and matched germline DNA from 19 patients.

RESULTS

The six-patient run-in established a dose of eribulin 1.4 mg/m² with HP. Cohorts A and B enrolled 17 and 7 patients, respectively. Accrual stopped early due to an evolving treatment landscape and slow enrollment. The ORR was 26.3% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 9.2-51.2%) in Cohort A and 0% in Cohort B (95% CI 0-41.0%). WES revealed more frequent alterations in TP53 (p < 0.05, q > 0.05) in patients without clinical benefit (disease control for < 24 weeks) which was not significant after multiple hypothesis correction.

CONCLUSION

Eribulin-HP had manageable toxicity and modest clinical activity in patients without prior pertuzumab exposure. This study provides a preliminary landscape of somatic alterations in this patient cohort. Our data add to the literature on how genomic alterations may predict for therapy response/resistance, as we work to individualize choices in a quickly evolving HER2+ MBC treatment landscape.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01912963. Registered 24 July 2013.

Anti-HER2 antibody prolongs overall survival disproportionally more than progression-free survival in HER2-Positive metastatic breast cancer patients

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to test the hypothesis that the HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated with anti-HER2 antibodies in trial intervention arms have a greater prolongation of overall survival (OS) than of progression-free survival (PFS) and this extra-prolongation of median survival time in OS relates specifically to the anti-HER2 antibody.

Methods

The NCBI/Pubmed and Cochrane databases were searched systematically for HER2-positive or mBC trials published in English during January 1999–November 2017. Treatment arms with shorter PFS were considered as the “control” arm, whereas those with longer PFS as the “test” arm. The between-treatment drug differences were grouped into nine categories. Groups with or without anti-HER2 antibodies were pooled respectively for comparisons. The interrelationships between PFS and OS hazard ratios (HRs) and median survival time differences were investigated by conducting fixed-effects and mixed-effects linear meta-regression analyses.

Results

Twenty-eight trials (10,928 patients) from 438 articles were collected, and four with missing data were excluded in meta-regression analysis. Overall median PFS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.68–0.78) and median OS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77–0.87) weakly favored the longer PFS arm with a weak correlation between the PFS and OS HRs. However, the between-treatment drug difference was anti-HER2 antibody, the absolute increment in median OS time was double that of median PFS time (p < 0.001) and linearly correlated, which was not found with any non-anti-HER2 antibody drug differences.

Conclusions

Anti-HER2 antibody in patients with HER2-positive mBC prolonged OS more than PFS and mandates further investigation.

•

Our study dissected the overall survival benefit over progression-free survival in HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer treated with anti-HER2 antibody by meta-analysis.

•

Use of anti-HER2 antibodies, but not other anticancer drugs, to treat HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer independently predicted the OS compared with PFS.

•

The design of future clinical trials should consider anti-HER2 antibodies carefully in the treatment armamentarium for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Treating Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Spotlight on Tucatinib

The management of HER2 positive breast cancer has been transformed by the development of targeted therapies. Dual blockade with the monoclonal antibodies, trastuzumab and pertuzumab, added to first-line taxane chemotherapy and second-line therapy with the antibody-drug conjugate, T-DM1, are internationally agreed standards of care for advanced HER2 positive breast cancer, where available. However, until recently, options for patients for third-line therapy and beyond were of modest efficacy or limited by toxicity. In 2019, the results of trials of two exciting new agents for this space were presented. A third-generation HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, tucatinib, combines the efficacy of the second-generation drug, neratinib, with a more manageable toxicity profile and has become a new standard of care after T-DM1, in combination with capecitabine and trastuzumab. The antibody-drug conjugate, trastuzumab deruxtecan, demonstrated remarkable efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients and received accelerated approval in the United States, whilst confirmatory Phase 3 trials are completed. This review will discuss the available data for the post-T-DM1 setting, focusing on tyrosine kinase inhibitors including tucatinib.

Eribulin in combination with bevacizumab as second-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer progressing after first-line therapy with paclitaxel and bevacizumab: a multicenter, phase II, single arm trial (GIM11-BERGI)

Background

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the nontaxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor eribulin plus the humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab in a novel second-line chemotherapy scheme in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients progressing after first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

Patients and methods

This is a multicenter, single-arm, Simon's two-stage, phase II study. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate, considered as the sum of partial and complete response based on the best overall response rate (BORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical benefit rate.

Results

A total of 58 of the 61 patients enrolled in the study were evaluable for efficacy. The BORR was 24.6% (95% CI 14.5-37.3). The clinical benefit rate was 32.8% (95% CI 21.3-46.0). The median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.0-7.8), and median OS was 14.8 months (95% CI 12.6-22.8). Overall, adverse events (AEs) were clinically manageable and the most common AEs were fatigue, paresthesia, and neutropenia. Quality of life was well preserved in most patients.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that second-line therapy with bevacizumab in combination with eribulin has a meaningful clinical activity and may represent a potential therapeutic option for patients with HER2-negative MBC.

•

Bevacizumab + chemotherapy improved progression-free survival in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.

•

Eribulin monotherapy improved overall survival in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC.

•

The GIM11-BERGI trial assessed the efficacy and safety of eribulin + bevacizumab as second-line treatment for HER2-MBC.

•

Eribulin + bevacizumab showed to be a safe and active treatment after progression to first-line paclitaxel + bevacizumab.

Efficacy of second-line treatments for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer after trastuzumab-based treatment: a systematic review and bayesian network analysis

Purpose: Different second-line treatments of patients with trastuzumab-resistant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer were examined in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A network meta-analysis is helpful to evaluate the comparative survival benefits of different options. Methods: We performed a bayesian network meta-analysis using R-4.0.0 software and fixed consistency model to compare the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits of different second-line regimens. Results: 13 RCTs (19 publications, 4313 patients) remained for qualitative synthesis and 12 RCTs (17 publications, 4022 patients) were deemed eligible for network meta-analysis. For PFS, we divided network analysis into two parts owing to insufficient connections among treatments. The first part involved 8 treatments in 9 studies and we referred it as PFS (#1). Amid the following 8 interventions: pyrotinib + capecitabine, T-DM1 + atezolizumab, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + capecitabine, T-DM1, trastuzumab + capecitabine, lapatinib + capecitabine, neratinib, and capecitabine, we found consistent benefits between the first three interventions; moreover, pyrotinib + capecitabine was most likely to be associated with the best benefits; capecitabine monotherapy was associated with the worst PFS. The second part included 3 treatments in 2 studies and we referred it as PFS (#2): everolimus + trastuzumab + vinorelbine had better PFS benefits versus trastuzumab + vinorelbine and afatinib + vinorelbine. For OS, we analyzed 7 treatments in 7 studies, and observed T-DM1 + atezolizumab, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + capecitabine, and T-DM1 had similar effectiveness, and the first had the highest probability to yield the longest OS; capecitabine or neratinib alone yielded the worst OS benefits. Conclusions: Our work comprehensively summarized and analyzed current available RCT-based evidence of the second-line treatments for trastuzumab-treated, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer. These results provide clinicians and oncologists meaningful references for clinical drug administration and the development of novel effective therapies.

Therapy Algorithms for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early and Advanced Breast Cancer

Background

In order to offer optimal treatment approaches based on available evidence, the Commission Breast of the Working Group Gynecologic Oncology (AGO) of the German Cancer Society developed therapy algorithms for eight complex treatment situations in primary and advanced breast cancer.

Summary

Therapy algorithms for the following complex treatment situations are outlined in this paper: (neo)adjuvant therapy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer; axillary surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy; adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients; adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients; hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: strategies; HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: endocrine-based first-line treatment; HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: first to third-line; metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Key Messages

The therapy options shown in these algorithms are based on the current AGO recommendations updated in January 2020 but cannot represent all evidence-based treatment options. Prior therapies, performance status, comorbidities, patient preference, etc. must be taken into account for the actual treatment choice. Therefore, in individual cases, other evidence-based treatment options not listed here may also be appropriate and justified.

Combination efficacy of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for trastuzumab emtansine-resistant cells exhibiting attenuated lysosomal trafficking or efflux pumps upregulation

Purpose

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is the standard treatment in the current second-line therapy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. However, a useful therapy after T-DM1 resistance has not been established. In this study, we established two different HER2-positive T-DM1-resistant cancer cells and evaluated the antitumor effect of trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab (TRAS + PER).

Methods

Single-cell-cloned OE19 and BT-474 cells were cultured with increasing concentrations of T-DM1 to generate T-DM1-resistant OE19bTDR and BT-474bTDR cells, respectively. HER2 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Multidrug resistance proteins (MDR1 and MRP1) were evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. Intracellular trafficking of T-DM1 was examined by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence staining. Efficacy of TRAS + PER was evaluated by cell proliferation assay, HER3 and AKT phosphorylation, caspase 3/7 activity, and antitumor activity.

Results

HER2 expression of both resistant cells was equivalent to that of the parent cells. Overexpression of MDR1 and MRP1 was observed and affected the T-DM1 sensitivity in the OE19bTDR cells. Abnormal localization of T-DM1 into the lysosomes was observed in the BT-474bTDR cells. In BT-474bTDR cells, TRAS + PER inhibited the phosphorylation of AKT involved in HER2–HER3 signaling, and apoptosis induction and cell proliferation inhibition were significantly higher with TRAS + PER than with the individual drugs. TRAS + PER significantly suppressed tumor growth in the OE19bTDR xenograft model compared with each single agent.

Conclusions

The results suggest that the TRAS + PER combination may be effective in T-DM1-resistant cancer cells where HER2 overexpression is maintained.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-020-04138-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Is There a Role for Multiple Lines of Anti-HER2 Therapies Administered Beyond Progression in HER2-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? A Case Report and Literature Review

Oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises a number of distinct disease subtypes, each of which is characterised by druggable genetic alterations. Among them, the receptor tyrosine kinase protein human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2) is occasionally found deregulated via gene mutation and/or amplification and/or protein overexpression. HER2 mutation, in particular, is a relatively rare condition which occurs in 1-4% of NSCLC patients, especially in those with adenocarcinoma histology and a never/light smoking history. However, the clinical relevance of a HER2 mutation in NSCLC relies on the fact that this genetic alteration has been associated with sensitivity to anti-HER2 therapies such as the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab or the pan-HER-tyrosine kinase inhibitor poziotinib. Here we describe the case of a NSCLC patient with an activating exon 20 G776VinsC mutation in the HER2 gene who responded well to multiple lines of trastuzumab-based therapies administered beyond progression and poziotinib given sequentially. In this specific case, the discovery of a druggable genetic alteration such as a mutation in the HER2 gene allowed for long-term control of the disease through the use of highly effective anti-HER2 therapies.

Anti-HER2 antibody therapy using gene-transduced adipocytes for HER2-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

Although recent advances in molecular target therapy have improved the survival of breast cancer patients, high cost and frequent hospital visits result in both societal and individual burden. To reduce these problems, it has been proposed to produce antibodies in vivo. Here, we constructed gene-transduced human ceiling culture-derived proliferative adipocytes secreting anti-HER2 antibody (HER2-ccdPAs) and evaluated their ability to secrete antibody and mediate an anti-tumor effect.

METHODS

Plasmid lentivirus was used as a recipient for anti-HER2 antibody cDNA and transduced into human proliferative adipocyte. Secretory antibody expression was evaluated by ELISA and western blot. Specific binding of secretory antibody to HER2 was examined by immunofluorescence analysis. Direct and indirect anti-tumor effects of supernatants from HER2-ccdPAs were evaluated using BT474 (HER2+) and MDA-MB-231 (HER2-) breast cancer cell lines. Additionally, whether adipocyte differentiation affects antibody secretion was investigated using supernatant collected from different cell maturation states.

RESULTS

Anti-HER2 antibody was identified in the supernatant from HER2-ccdPAs and its production increased with the differentiation into mature adipocyte. Antibodies in supernatants from HER2-ccdPAs bound to HER2-positive breast cancer cells similar to trastuzumab. Supernatant from HER2-ccdPAs inhibited the proliferation of BT474 but not MDA-MB-231 cells, and downregulated AKT phosphorylation in BT474 cells compared with controls. Supernatants from HER2-ccdPAs also had an indirect anti-tumor effect on BT474 cells through ADCC. Additionally, Single inoculation of HER2-ccdPAs showed an anti-tumor effect in BT474 xenograft model.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-ccdPAs might be useful for cell-based gene therapy. This system could be a platform for various antibody therapies.

The emerging role of CDK4/6i in HER2-positive breast cancer

Prior to the advent of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, human epidermal growth-factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) was associated with an aggressive clinical course and poor survival outcomes. In the era of effective HER2-directed therapies, median survival rates for patients with metastatic HER2+ BC now approach 5 years. Despite these improvements, the majority of affected patients unfortunately die from disease. Therapies to overcome treatment resistance are being actively pursued. One strategy has been to target the cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6), as they are downstream of HER2 and many of the cellular pathways driving resistance to HER2-targeted therapies, and play a key role in proliferation by controlling transition through the G1 restriction point to the S phase of the cell cycle. In this article, we review the published literature with regard to the rationale for CDK4/6-directed therapies in HER2+ BC and discuss ongoing clinical research and new challenges in the field.

Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab Emtansine for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Contemporary Population-Based Outcomes

Background

Real-world outcomes for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with pertuzumab in combination with taxane chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (TaxTP) in the first line setting and trastuzumab emtansine (TE) in any line of treatment are lacking.

Methods

Cohorts of patients treated with (1) TaxTP and (2) TE from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2016 were retrospectively obtained from a population-based database. Cohorts were described according to age, hormone receptor (HR) status, prior systemic therapies, event-free survival (EFS) defined as time from start of treatment to start of next line of treatment or death, and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 122 patients were treated with TaxTP and 104 with TE. In the TaxTP cohort, EFS was significantly longer in the trastuzumab-naïve group compared with the adjuvant trastuzumab group (median EFS = 27.0 vs 12.4 months; P = .002). In the TaxTP cohort, median OS was not reached. In the TE cohort, EFS was significantly longer in the pertuzumab-naïve group compared with pertuzumab-exposed group (median time to treatment failure [TTF] = 18.7 vs 5.5 months; P < .001). Overall survival was also significantly longer in the pertuzumab-naïve group compared with the pertuzumab-exposed group (median OS = 23.2 vs 14.1 months; P = .022). In multivariable analyses, adjuvant trastuzumab and prior pertuzumab exposure in the metastatic setting remained significant predictors of inferior EFS for patients treated with TaxTP and TE, respectively.

Conclusions

New anti-HER2 therapies appear to be clinically relevant in the real-world.

Targeted therapeutic options and future perspectives for HER2-positive breast cancer

Over the past 2 decades, there has been an extraordinary progress in the regimens developed for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) are commonly recommended anti-HER2 target agents by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This review summarizes the most significant and updated research on clinical scenarios related to HER2-positive breast cancer management in order to revise the guidelines of everyday clinical practices. In this article, we present the data on anti-HER2 clinical research of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic studies from the past 2 decades. We also highlight some of the promising strategies that should be critically considered. Lastly, this review lists some of the ongoing clinical trials, findings of which may soon be available.

Cardiac outcomes of trastuzumab therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

PURPOSE

Asymptomatic decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or heart failure (HF) occurs in up to 25% of patients treated with trastuzumab and can result in incomplete breast cancer therapy. The cardiac safety of continuing trastuzumab in patients with asymptomatic LVEF decline is unknown. We report the cardiac outcomes of patients treated with trastuzumab after a significant asymptomatic LVEF decline.

METHODS

Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and asymptomatic LVEF decline to < 50% during trastuzumab were identified from an institutional echocardiogram database. Patients who received trastuzumab with a LVEF < 50% were classified as the continued group, whereas patients who had trastuzumab held until LVEF improved to ≥ 50% or who had trastuzumab permanently discontinued were classified as the interrupted group. Cardiac events were defined as HF (New York Heart Association class III-IV) or cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included; the median age was 54 years. In 23 patients who continued trastuzumab, 14 (61%) tolerated trastuzumab without a cardiac event, 6 (26%) developed worsening LVEF (range 25-42%) leading to trastuzumab discontinuation, and three (13%) developed a cardiac event (1 HF, 2 possible/probable cardiovascular deaths). In 37 patients with interrupted trastuzumab, 15 (41%) were re-challenged with trastuzumab after LVEF improved to > 50%, 21 (57%) were not re-challenged, and one (3%) developed HF. More patients in the continued trastuzumab group had metastatic disease (39% vs. 5%, p = 0.002). The final LVEF after median follow-up of 633 days was similar between patients with trastuzumab continuation versus interruption (54% vs. 56%, p = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Continuation of trastuzumab after an asymptomatic LVEF decline to < 50% in patients who are expected to benefit from additional anti-HER2 therapy is a promising approach that warrants further investigation.

Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in the first-line treatment: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Purpose

Numerous HER2-targeted therapy clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy and safety in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the direct or indirect comparison of these drugs is unclear. This network meta-analysis can solve this issue to some extent.

Materials and methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for Phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer for first-line treatment up to December 16, 2017. Paired meta-analyses were performed to compare the regimens directly with the TP (trastuzumab plus taxane) regimen. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to synthesize available evidence of direct or indirect comparison.

Results

The database search identified 1,935 articles, among which 13 articles (10 RCTs) were eligible for the analysis involving 5,177 patients treated with 11 different regimens. The progression-free survival (PFS) in the Bayesian network meta-analysis suggested that the PTP (pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus taxane) regimen had the highest probability to be the preferred treatment (surface under the cumulative ranking [SUCRA]: 0.967) followed by the TPC (carboplatin and trastuzumab plus taxane) regimen (SUCRA: 0.923). The PTP regimen (SUCRA: 0.926) was similarly preferred for overall survival (OS). For objective response rate (ORR), the PTC regimen might be the optimal treatment (SUCRA: 0.935), followed by the PTP regimen.

Conclusion

Overall, PTP might be the optimal first-line treatment for HER-2-positive MBC to improve the PFS and OS. Meanwhile, TPC might be most effective treatment in terms of the ORR. Regarding safety, the two regimens showed acceptable grade 3 or greater hematologic toxicity and heart failure.

Patients who achieved long-term clinical complete response and subsequently terminated multidisciplinary and anti-HER2 therapy for metastatic breast cancer: A case series

•

Breast cancers that are positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are aggressive and typically associated with a poor prognosis.

•

Novel anti-HER2 therapies have recently improved the outcomes in these cases.

•

We report a case series in which women were treated for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer using trastuzumab and various chemotherapies.

•

These patients ultimately achieved clinical complete response, and subsequently terminated their systemic therapy after maintenance therapy.

•

Our findings indicate that select patients may be suitable for treatment termination if they have achieved a prolonged period of complete response.

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive breast cancers tend to be more aggressive and more likely to recur than HER2-negative breast cancers. However, novel anti-HER2 therapies have dramatically improved the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Case report

We review the cases of 4 women with metastatic breast cancer who achieved clinical complete response (cCR) and terminated their systemic therapy. Two patients had de novo metastatic disease and two patients experienced relapse after adjuvant therapy. All patients achieved cCR using multidisciplinary therapy, experienced prolonged complete remission, and subsequently terminated their systemic therapy without experiencing secondary recurrence.

Conclusion

There is no evidence that systemic therapy can be safely terminated after a specific time period, although adverse events (e.g., cardiotoxicity) and unnecessary treatment should be avoided. Thus, it is possible that select patients may be suitable for termination of systemic therapy after they have achieved a prolonged period of cCR.

Adherence to prescribing restrictions for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in Australia: A national population-based observational study (2001-2016)

BACKGROUND

Targeted cancer therapy is often complex, involving multiple agents and chemotherapeutic partners. In Australia, prescribing restrictions are put in place to reflect existing evidence of cost-effectiveness of these medicines. As therapeutic options continue to expand, these restrictions may not be perceived to align with best practice and it is not known if their use in the real-world clinic adheres to these restrictions. We examined the treatment of women receiving trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+MBC) to determine the extent to which treatment adhered to national prescribing restrictions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our population-based, retrospective cohort study used dispensing records for every Australian woman initiating publicly-subsidised trastuzumab for HER2+MBC between 2001-2013, followed through 2016. We used group-based trajectory models (GBTMs) to cluster patients, first on their patterns of trastuzumab exposure, and then on their patterns of lapatinib and chemotherapy exposure. We described the characteristics of patients within each cluster, and examined their treatments and combinations of treatments to determine restriction adherence.

RESULTS

Of 5,052 patients initiating trastuzumab, 1,795 (36%) received at least one non-adherent HER2-targeted treatment. The most common non-adherent treatments were trastuzumab combinations involving vinorelbine (24% of non-adherent treatments); capecitabine (24%); and anthracyclines (10%). Non-adherent lapatinib use was observed in 4% of patients. GBTM identified three trastuzumab exposure clusters, each containing three further sub-clusters. The largest proportions of non-adherent treatments were in sub-clusters with longer trastuzumab exposure and more non-taxane chemotherapy. Patients in these sub-clusters were younger than those in sub-clusters with less non-adherent treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights that, even during the relatively simpler treatment era of our study period, a substantial amount of treatment did not adhere to prescribing restrictions. As more trials are conducted exploring pertuzumab and T-DM1 in combination with different chemotherapies and other HER2-targeted therapies, the regulation and funding of HER2-targeted treatment will become more challenging.

Meeting the needs of breast cancer: A nucleolin's perspective

A major challenge in the management of breast cancer disease has been the development of metastases. Finding new molecular targets and the design of targeted therapeutic approaches to improve the overall survival and quality of life of these patients is, therefore, of great importance. Nucleolin, which is overexpressed in cancer cells and tumor-associated blood vessels, have been implicated in various processes supporting tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. Additionally, its overexpression has been demonstrated in a variety of human neoplasias as an unfavorable prognostic factor, associated with a high risk of relapse and low overall survival. Hence, nucleolin has emerged as a relevant target for therapeutic intervention in cancer malignancy, including breast cancer. This review focus on the contribution of nucleolin for cancer disease and on the development of therapeutic strategies targeting this protein. In this respect, it also provides a critical analysis about the potential and pitfalls of nanomedicine for cancer therapy.

Current Therapies for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

The median survival of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has more than doubled, since the discovery of HER2-targeted treatments: it rose from less than 2 years in 2001 (prior introduction of trastuzumab) to more than 4 years in 2017. The initial generation of HER2-targeted therapies included trastuzumab with taxanes in the first line, followed by the addition of lapatinib and by a switch to another cytotoxic agent after progression. Results of CLEOPATRA, EMILIA, and TH3RESA trials have changed this clinical practice. The current consensus includes horizontal dual blockade (trastuzumab + pertuzumab) with taxanes or vinorelbine in the first line, followed by trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in the second line, with addition of lapatinib in the later lines of treatment. However, the fast and simultaneous development of new drugs led to a relative shortage of clinical evidence to support this sequence. Triple-positive breast cancers (TPBC), which express both hormonal receptors and HER2, constitute nearly half of HER2-positive cases. For these tumors, the current consensus is to add endocrine therapy after completion of cytotoxic treatment. Again, this consensus is not fully evidence-based. In view of the recent progress in treatment of estrogen-receptor positive breast cancers, a series of trials is evaluating addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors, aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant to HER2-targeted and cytotoxic chemotherapy in TPBC patients. Despite the remarkable progress in treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, metastatic disease is still incurable in the majority of patients. A wide range of novel therapies are under development to prevent and overcome resistance to current HER2-targeted agents. This review discusses pivotal clinical trials that have shaped current clinical practices, the current consensus recommendations, and the new experimental treatments in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.

Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Lapatinib with a Prolonged Benefit: A Case Report and a Review of Therapeutic Options Available

A 53-year-old woman was treated, after trastuzumab progression of HER2-positive metastatic disease, with capecitabine plus lapatinib and subsequently with lapatinib alone. To date, she has had persistent remission of disease since 2009.

Efficacy of trastuzumab beyond progression in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective observational cohort study

Introduction

Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy is the standard first-line regimen in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but lack of data in post-progression treatment. So, it is worth evaluating the efficacy of continuing trastuzumab after failure of the first-line trastuzumab based treatment.

Methods

59 patients were enrolled from Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Peking University Cancer Hospital between September 2012 and Oct 2015. Patients were divided into two groups according to the second line regimens: with or without trastuzumab. The primary endpoint was progression free survival of second line therapy (PFS2). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate, and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Baseline factors were well balanced between two groups. 32 patients treated with trastuzumab plus second line chemotherapy (group A) and 27 patients received chemotherapy alone (group B). The median follow-up time was 7.60 months (range 1.50-32.50). Longer median PFS2 was observed in group A than in group B (3.1 vs 2.0 months, P=0.008). There was no significant differences of median OS2 calculating from the second line therapy (10.5 vs 6.5 months, P=0.172) between two groups. Response rate was 9.3% in group A compared with 3.7% in group B (P=0.617). AEs were similar in two groups including cardiac safety. Subgroup analysis showed that factors of male, age<65, good performance status, HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) 2+ and poor response to first line indicated superior PFS2 in patients continuing trastuzumab to those treated with chemotherapy alone.

Conclusion

Continuing treatment of trastuzumab beyond first line therapy progression showed effective and safe in AGC.

Outcomes of re-treatment with first-line trastuzumab plus a taxane in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients after (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab: A prospective multicenter study

Trastuzumab is the backbone of HER2-positive early breast cancer (eBC) and metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treatment, but limited data exist as to re-treatment in relapsed patients. In this prospective, single arm, multicenter trial, we assessed efficacy and safety of trastuzumab and taxane combination in Chinese patients with HER2-positive mBC relapsed after prior (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Patients with previous (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab treatment for≥9 weeks and a relapse-free interval ≥6 months were assigned to trastuzumab treatment with paclitaxel or docetaxel. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and safety profile. Thirty-two patients were enrolled and treated for a median duration of 33.5 weeks. The median PFS was 9.9 months (95% CI, 6.28 - 13.63 months). The ORR was 81.3% (95% CI, 63.6% - 92.8%) and CBR (CR+PR+SD≥6months) was 81.3% (95% CI, 63.6% - 92.8%). The median DOR was 9.8 months (95% CI, 5.82 - 11.60 months) and median TTP was 9.9 months (95% CI, 6.28-13.63 months). OS median follow-up time was 20.1 months and 25% OS time was 25.5 months. The safety profile was acceptable with common adverse events including leukopenia (59.4%), neutropenia (56.3%), hypoaesthesia (34.4%) and granulocytopenia (31.3%). In conclusion, re-treatment with trastuzumab plus a taxane as first-line therapy is an effective regimen for patients with HER2-positive mBC relapsed after (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. The safety profile was good and the adverse reactions were tolerable and manageable.

Remarkable response with pembrolizumab plus albumin-bound paclitaxel in 2 cases of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have failed to multi-anti-HER2 targeted therapy

In clinical practice, one subgroup patients of breast cancer might have developed resistance to multi-anti-HER2 targeted drugs(trastuzumab, lapatinib and/or T-DM1) and can not benefit from the anti-HER2 targeted therapy continuously. We attempt to change the next therapic way for these patients. Two patients with metastatic breast cancer who have failed to multi-anti-HER2 targeted therapy were treated with pembrolizumab (2 mg/Kg, day1) plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (125 mg/m², day1,8) every 3 weeks. CT evaluation and HER2 ECD test were performed every 2 cycles. Both of the two patients achieved remarkable response with Partial Remission (PR), meanwhile serum HER2 ECD levels (the upper normal limit is 15 ng/ml) showed a remarkable decreases(compared to the base line decreases 75% and 60% respectively). The results indicate that regimen of pembrolizumab combination with albumin-bound paclitaxel might produce response in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have failed to multi-anti-HER2 targeted therapy.

Adding Pertuzumab to Trastuzumab and Taxanes in HER2 positive breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has improved the median disease free and overall survival of patients with early stage breast cancer that overexpresses the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Despite this advance, some patients experience cancer relapse and novel approaches are always needed. One such advance is the monoclonal antibody pertuzumab, which prevents dimerisation between members of the HER family of transmembrane glycoprotein receptors.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors analyse recent research which has focused on the development of new HER2 targeting agents for HER2-positive breast cancer, particularly pertuzumab, and its addition to trastuzumab and taxanes.

EXPERT OPINION

Pertuzumab has significantly improved disease control in patients with advanced HER2 positive breast cancer when added to chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Although pertuzumab has also increased response rates in the preoperative setting, this has not yet translated into increased overall survival. The authors believe that future research should focus on improvements in novel biomarkers to select patients for new treatments.