Clinical trial designs for rare diseases: studies developed and discussed by the International Rare Cancers Initiative

Precision therapies for genetic epilepsies in 2025: Promises and pitfalls

By targeting the underlying etiology, precision therapies offer an exciting paradigm shift to improve the stagnant outcomes of drug-resistant epilepsies, including developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Unlike conventional antiseizure medications (ASMs) which only treat the symptoms (seizures) but have no effect on the underlying disease, precision therapies have the potential to suppress not only the seizures but also disabling comorbidities, including cognitive and behavioral abnormalities, which share the same causative mechanisms. Monogenic epilepsies are an attractive target for precision therapies because of their well-defined molecular mechanisms which can be tested in vitro and can be counteracted by specific drugs. Unfortunately, however, for the vast majority of proposed precision therapies, the evidence for their clinical efficacy is either non-existent or limited to uncontrolled observational accounts. Everolimus is the sole precision therapy with a seizure-related indication with class I evidence of efficacy, highlighting the practical and ethical challenges in obtaining high-level evidence. Here, we review the evidence landscape for candidate precision therapies, including repurposed and innovative treatments currently in development, discuss lessons learned from their use, and highlight strategies to improve their application and evaluation in the clinical setting. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Precision therapies offer a new approach to treat drug-resistant monogenic epilepsies, that is, epilepsies caused by a defect in a single gene. Unlike traditional antiseizure medications, precision therapies target the cause of the disease and have the potential to improve not only seizure control but also concomitant conditions such as cognitive and behavioral disorders. To date, the evidence derived from the clinical use of most proposed precision therapies is limited. This review explores current evidence and strategies to advance their development.

Clinical trials for patients with salivary gland cancers: A systematic review of worldwide registers and an evaluation of current challenges

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials (CT) are crucial for generating scientific evidence and improving clinical outcomes, but they can be challenging in the context of rare cancers. Salivary gland cancers (SGC) are rare and heterogeneous tumors, without standard-of-care approved systemic therapies. We analyzed completed and ongoing CTs to assess the current state of clinical research activity in the field.

METHODS

ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO-ICTRP, HealthCanadaCT were searched for antineoplastic pharmacological and interventional CT involving patients with SGC from the trials database creation until August 6th, 2024. CT characteristics and status were collected.

RESULTS

134 clinical trials met inclusion criteria. Of these, 78 % were sponsored by non-industry entities. 49 % were conducted at only one site, and 61 % at up to five centers. Only 25 trials (19 %) were multinational, being 15 industry-sponsored, a significantly higher proportion compared to non-industry-sponsored trials(p < 0.01). 16 % CTs were umbrella or basket, and 6 % were randomized, again predominantly industry-sponsored(p < 0.01). Regarding SGC-specific trials, 32 % were open to all patients with SGC, regardless of specific histology. Patients with adenoid cystic, salivary duct, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma had access to 92 %, 66 % and 62 % of trials, respectively. 88 % CT targeted palliative setting, and 38 % incorporated predictive biomarkers. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors were the most studied therapy(26 %), followed by immunotherapy(15 %), chemotherapy and antibody-drug conjugate(12 % each) and androgen-blockade(8 %), among others.

CONCLUSION

Clinical research for patients with SGC relies mainly in non-industry organisations, most of them limited to run trials in one to five sites, in a single country. Further collaboration between investigators is needed, as well as reconsidering inclusion criteria and trial designs.

Standardization of radiation therapy to Inguinal and Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Locally Advanced Cancer of the Penis, as Defined by the International Penile Advanced Cancer Trial (InPACT)

PURPOSE

InPACT addresses the optimal management of locally advanced penile cancer, aiming to prospectively evaluate the relative benefits and sequencing of surgery, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy. At trial inception, radiation therapy protocols for this rare cancer lacked consistency and standardization, necessitating multicenter, international collaboration to develop comprehensive radiation therapy planning, delivery, and quality assurance guidelines.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

InPACT has 2 main aims; to establish the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with macroscopically-involved inguinal nodes. Second, to compare prophylactic pelvic lymph node dissection plus chemoradiation to the inguinal and pelvic fields versus chemoradiation alone in patients whose inguinal node histology predicts a high risk of occult pelvic node involvement. The primary outcome measure for the trial is survival time. An international group was convened to achieve consensus on radiation therapy contouring, planning, dose, fractionation, and delivery for this rare cancer. These guidelines have been used throughout the conduct of the trial to date and form part of the radiation therapy quality assurance for each participating center.

RESULTS

International consensus radiation therapy guidelines were established, encompassing risk status assessment and indications for each treatment region based on radiological and pathologic risk status of nodal basins. Guidance provides a nodal contouring atlas, addresses prepubic fat coverage, and specifies dose fractionation for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, including recommendations for macroscopic disease. Trial recruitment is ongoing. Oncological and toxicity outcomes will be reported in due course.

CONCLUSIONS

The InPACT radiation therapy guidelines offer a step toward international consensus on contouring for inguino-pelvic radiation therapy in penile cancer.

Use of Bayesian approaches in oncology clinical trials: A cross-sectional analysis

Purpose

Bayesian approaches may improve the efficiency of trials and accelerate decision-making, but reluctance to depart from traditional frequentist statistics may limit their use. Because oncology trials generally involve severe conditions with no or limited therapeutic options, they are well-suited to applying Bayesian methodologies and are perceived as using these methods often in early phases.

Objectives

In this study, we aim to describe the use of Bayesian methods and designs in oncology clinical trials in the last 20 years.

Method

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted to identify oncology clinical trials using Bayesian approaches registered in clinicaltrials.gov between 2004 and 2024. Trials were searched in clinicaltrials.gov, PubMed, and through manual search of cross-references.

Results

Bayesian trials were retrieved, and their main characteristics were extracted using R and verified manually. Between 2004 and 2024, 384,298 trials were registered in clinicaltrials.gov; we identified 84,850 oncology clinical trials (22%), of which 640 (0.75%) used Bayesian approaches. The adoption of Bayesian trials increased significantly after 2011, but while half of all Bayesian studies started in the last 5 years, this paralleled the overall increase in oncology research rather than an increase in the proportion of Bayesian trials. The majority of Bayesian trials were phase 1 and phase 2 studies, and two-thirds of Bayesian trials with efficacy objectives had single-arm designs, often utilizing binary endpoints, such as overall response, as the primary measure.

Conclusion

The uptake of Bayesian methods in oncology clinical trials has flattened and is still scarce, and is mostly applied to the analysis of treatment efficacy in single-arm trials with binary endpoints. There is room for further uptake and use of their potential advantages in settings with small populations and severe conditions with unmet needs.

Prognostic value of total, free and lipoprotein fraction-bound plasma mitotane levels in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma: a prospective study of the ENDOCAN-COMETE-Cancer network

PURPOSE

Mitotane is the only approved treatment for metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Monitoring plasma levels is recommended, but its predictive value is insufficient.

METHODS

This prospective study of the French ENDOCAN-COMETE network aimed to investigate the prognostic role of plasma mitotane levels pharmacokinetics and free or bound to lipoprotein fraction measurements during six consecutive months. Lipoprotein fractions were isolated by ultracentrifugation, and mitotane level was determined by HPLC-UV. Total, free, and lipoprotein fraction bound plasma mitotane were monitored every two months for six months with morphological assessment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

21 patients with metastatic ACC were included. Median overall survival was 23 months. The median free mitotane level per patient was 12% (± 7%), and the majority (88%) was bound to lipoprotein fractions. Several pharmacokinetics measures of total mitotane were related to OS: first level at one month (p = 0.026), mean level (p = 0.055), and area under the curve (AUC) (p = 0.048), with higher exposure associated to longer OS. Free mitotane (not bounded) and mitotane bounded to lipoprotein subfraction added no prognostic values. The relationship between the mitotane level and OS suggested a minimum "effective" threshold of 10-15 mg/L or an area under the curve above 100 mg/L/month with no individualized maximum value.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study did not identify any added prognostic value of free mitotane level over the total level. Early total mitotane level measurements (before 3-6 months) were related to OS with a higher and faster exposure related to more prolonged survival.

A randomized phase II trial on the addition of dutasteride to combined androgen blockade therapy versus combined androgen blockade therapy alone in patients with advanced or metastatic salivary duct carcinoma - the DUCT study protocol

BACKGROUND

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of salivary gland cancer, frequently associated with incurable recurrences and distant metastases (R/M). Proliferation of SDC relies on androgen receptor (AR) signalling, prompting the use of combined androgen blockade (CAB, i.e., luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist and/or AR antagonists) to R/M SDC patients. However, only a subset of patients benefits from such treatments. We have shown that response to CAB is associated with steroid 5α-reductase 1 (SRD5A1) mRNA expression. SRD5A1 catalyses the intracellular conversion of testosterone into the more potent AR-agonist dihydrotestosterone. This conversion can be inhibited by dutasteride, a potent SRD5A1-inhibitor, which is currently prescribed for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We hypothesize that repurposing dutasteride to target AR signalling in SDC could enhance therapeutic response and clinical outcome in SDC patients.

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial, is designed to investigate whether dutasteride as an adjunct drug to CAB improves response rate and clinical outcome in patients with AR-positive R/M SDC. Patients are divided in two cohorts based on their prior systemic treatments. In cohort A, CAB-naïve patients (n = 74) will be randomly assigned to either a control arm (Arm 1) receiving CAB (goserelin 10.8 mg/3m and bicalutamide 50 mg/OD) or an experimental arm (Arm 2) where dutasteride (0.5 mg/OD) is added to the CAB regimen. In cohort B, patients with disease progression after adjuvant or first-line palliative CAB therapy (max. n = 24) will receive goserelin, bicalutamide, and dutasteride to assess whether the addition of dutasteride can overcome therapy resistance. The primary endpoints are the objective response rate and duration of response. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate, quality of life, and safety. Translational research will be performed to explore molecular target expression differences and their correlation with clinical outcome.

DISCUSSION

The DUCT study addresses an unmet medical need by investigating the repurposing of dutasteride to enhance treatment response and improve clinical outcome for patients with R/M SDC, especially those with limited alternative treatment options, such as HER2-negative cases. By repurposing a registered low-cost drug, this trial's findings could be readily applied into clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05513365. Date of registration: August 24, 2022.

PROTOCOL VERSION

Current protocol version 4.0, February 21, 2024.

Safety and efficacy of ripasudil eye drops in preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity: phase 1/2, open label, single-arm trial

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of ripasudil for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

STUDY DESIGN

Phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, 12-week clinical trial.

METHODS

Infants born with gestational age (GA) of ≤ 32 weeks or weight of ≤ 1500 g with zone I or II, ≥ stage 1, ROP in both eyes were enrolled. Ripasudil eye drops were administered to patients in both eyes. Phase 1 was a dose-escalation study (once daily for 1 week, then twice daily for 2 weeks); an additional dosing up to 9 weeks was allowed if no safety issues occurred. In phase 2, ripasudil was administered twice daily for up to 12 weeks. Adverse events were assessed. The proportion of patients with type 1 ROP progression, number of days for type 1 ROP progression, and progression to the most advanced ROP stage were estimated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four infants were enrolled (phase 1, n = 3; phase 2, n = 21). Nineteen and four patients experienced systemic and ocular adverse events, respectively. Efficacy endpoints were not different between the ripasudil and historical control groups. However, in the GA ≤ 27 weeks subgroup, fewer patients progressed to type 1 ROP in the ripasudil than in the historical control group (P = 0.09). In the GA ≤ 27 weeks subgroups, the 25th percentile for the number of days for type 1 ROP progression was 22 days in the historical control group and 44 days in the ripasudil group.

CONCLUSION

Ripasudil was safe and inhibited/delayed type 1 ROP progression, especially in infants with short GA.

Clinical research in endometrial cancer: consensus recommendations from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup

The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Endometrial Cancer Consensus Conference on Clinical Research (ECCC) was held in Incheon, South Korea, Nov 2-3, 2023. The aims were to develop consensus statements for future trials in endometrial cancer to achieve harmonisation on design elements, select important questions, and identify unmet needs. All 33 GCIG member groups participated in the development, refinement, and finalisation of 18 statements within four topic groups, addressing adjuvant treatment in high-risk disease; treatment for metastatic and recurrent disease; trial designs for rare endometrial cancer subgroups and special circumstances; and specific methodology and adaptation for trials in low-resource settings. In addition, eight areas of unmet need were identified. This was the first GCIG Consensus Conference to include patient advocates and an expert on inclusion, diversity, equity, and access to take part in all aspects of the process and output. Four early-career investigators were also selected for participation, ensuring that they represented different GCIG member groups and regions. Unanimous consensus was obtained for 16 of the 18 statements, with 97% concordance for the remaining two. Using the described methodology from previous Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conferences, this conference did not require even one minority statement. The high acceptance rate following active involvement in the preparation, discussion, and refinement of the statements by all representatives confirmed the consensus progress within a global academic setting, and the expectation that the ECCC will lead to greater harmonisation, actualisation, inclusion, and resolution of unmet needs in clinical research for individuals living with and beyond endometrial cancer worldwide.

How to develop new systemic treatments in ultra-rare cancers with high unmet needs? The case of alveolar soft-part sarcoma

Developing new drugs or generating evidence for existing drugs in new indications for ultra-rare cancers is complex and carries a high-risk of failure. This gets even harder in ultra-rare tumours, which have an annual incidence of 1 per 1,000,000 population or less. Here, we illustrate the problem of adequate evidence generation in ultra-rare tumours, using Alveolar Soft-Part Sarcomas (ASPS) - an ultra-rare sarcoma newly diagnosed in approximately 60 persons a year in the European Union - as an exemplar case showing challenges in development despite being potentially relevant for classes of agents. We discuss some possible approaches for addressing such challenges, especially focussing on constructive collaboration between academic groups, patients and advocates, drug manufacturers, and regulators to optimise drug development in ultra-rare cancers. This article, written by various European stakeholders, proposes a way forward to ultimately get better options for patients with ultra-rare cancers.

Small intestinal adenocarcinoma accompanied by lynch syndrome: A case report

RATIONALE

Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations of DNA mismatch repair genes. A significant risk increase for several types of cancer is one of the characteristics of lynch syndrome.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 45-year-old female presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain that had persisted for a month.

DIAGNOSES

The abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scan showed edematous and thickening of the proximal small bowel wall, as well as dilatation of the proximal bowel and stomach.

INTERVENTIONS

Tumor resection of the small bowel was performed, and adenocarcinoma was confirmed pathologically. Microsatellite instability was also confirmed.

OUTCOMES

Postoperative imaging revealed soft tissue lesions with potential for tumor seeding. Two months after the first surgery, a secondary surgery was performed as a result of cancer recurrence. The patient received chemotherapy with capecitabine. The latest computed tomography scan, performed 19 months after the cessation of chemotherapy, did not show any recurrence.

LESSONS

In the rare incidence of small bowel cancer genetic mutation testing and detailed family history should be actively considered.

Development of medicines for rare diseases and inborn errors of metabolism: Toward novel public-private partnerships

Medicine development for rare diseases, including inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) is challenging. Many academic innovations fail to reach the patient, either by stranding in the translational stage or due to suboptimal patient access related to pricing or uncertain effectiveness. Expanding and solidifying the role of the academic in public-private partnerships (PPPs) may present an innovative solution to help overcome these complexities. This narrative review explores the literature on traditional and novel collaborative approaches to medicine development for rare diseases and analyzes examples of PPPs, with a specific focus on IEMs. Several academic institutions have introduced guidelines for socially responsible licensing of innovations for private development. The PPP model offers a more integrative approach toward academic involvement of medicine development. By sharing risks and rewards, failures in the translational stage can be mutually absorbed. If socially responsible terms are not included, however, high pricing can impede patient access. Therefore, we propose a framework for socially responsible PPPs aimed at medicine development for metabolic disorders. This socially responsible PPP framework could stimulate successful and accessible medicine development for IEMs as well as other rare diseases if the establishment of such collaborations includes terms securing joint data ownership and evidence generation, fast access, and socially responsible pricing.

Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone as Induction and Extended Consolidation Improves Outcome in Ultra-High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

The multicenter OPTIMUM (MUKnine) phase II trial investigated daratumumab, low-dose cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (Dara-CVRd) before and after autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) in newly diagnosed patients with molecularly defined ultra-high-risk (UHiR) multiple myeloma (NDMM) or plasma cell leukemia (PCL). To provide clinical context, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were referenced to contemporaneous outcomes seen in patients with UHiR NDMM treated in the recent Myeloma XI (MyeXI) trial.

METHODS

Transplant-eligible all-comers NDMM patients were profiled for UHiR disease, defined by presence of ≥2 genetic risk markers t(4;14)/t(14;16)/t(14;20), del(1p), gain(1q), and del(17p), and/or SKY92 gene expression risk signature. Patients with UHiR MM/PCL were offered treatment with Dara-CVRd induction, V-augmented ASCT, extended Dara-VR(d) consolidation, and Dara-R maintenance. UHiR patients treated in MyeXI with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide, or lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide, ASCT, and R maintenance or observation were identified by mirrored molecular screening. OPTIMUM PFS at 18 months (PFS18m) was compared against MyeXI using a Bayesian framework, and patients were followed up to the end of consolidation for PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Of 412 screened NDMM OPTIMUM patients, 103 were identified as UHiR or PCL and subsequently treated on trial with Dara-CVRd; 117 MyeXI patients identified as UHiR formed the external comparator arm, with comparable clinical and molecular characteristics to OPTIMUM. Comparison of PFS18m per Bayesian framework resulted in a 99.5% chance of OPTIMUM being superior to MyeXI. At 30 months' follow-up, PFS was 77% for OPTIMUM versus 39.8% for MyeXI, and OS 83.5% versus 73.5%, respectively. Extended post-ASCT Dara-VRd consolidation therapy was highly deliverable, with limited toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that Dara-CVRd induction and extended post-ASCT Dara-VRd consolidation markedly improve PFS for UHiR NDMM patients over conventional management, supporting further evaluation of this strategy.

Exploring the feasibility of using the ICER Evidence Rating Matrix for Comparative Clinical Effectiveness in assessing treatment benefit and certainty in the clinical evidence on orphan therapies for paediatric indications

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of clinical evidence takes account of health benefit (efficacy and safety) and the degree of certainty in the estimate of benefit. In orphan indications practical and ethical challenges in conducting clinical trials, particularly in paediatric patients, often limit the available evidence, rendering structured evaluation challenging. While acknowledging the paucity of evidence, regulators and reimbursement authorities compare the efficacy and safety of alternative treatments for a given indication, often in the context of the benefits of other treatments for similar or different conditions. This study explores the feasibility of using the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) Evidence Rating Matrix for Comparative Clinical Effectiveness in structured assessment of both the magnitude of clinical benefit (net health benefit, NHB) and the certainty of the effect estimate in a sample of orphan therapies for paediatric indications.

RESULTS

Eleven systemic therapies with European Medicines Agency (EMA) orphan medicinal product designation, licensed for 16 paediatric indications between January 2017 and March 2020 were identified using OrphaNet and EMA databases and were selected for evaluation with the ICER Evidence Rating Matrix: burosumab; cannabidiol; cerliponase alfa; chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA); dinutuximab beta; glibenclamide; metreleptin; nusinersen; tisagenlecleucel; velmanase alfa; and vestronidase alfa. EMA European Public Assessment Reports, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Clinical Key, and conference presentations from January 2016 to April 2021 were searched for evidence on efficacy and safety. Two of the identified therapies were graded as "substantial" NHB: dinutuximab beta (neuroblastoma maintenance) and nusinersen (Type I SMA), and one as "comparable" NHB (CDCA). The NHB grade of the remaining therapies fell between "comparable" and "substantial". No therapies were graded as having negative NHB. The certainty of the estimate ranged from "high" (dinutuximab beta in neuroblastoma maintenance) to "low" (CDCA, metreleptin and vestronidase alfa). The certainty of the other therapies was graded between "low" and "high". The ICER Evidence Rating Matrix overall rating "A" (the highest) was given to two therapies, "B+" to 6 therapies, "C+" to five therapies, and "I" (the lowest) to three therapies. The scores varied between rating authors with mean agreement over all indications of 71.9% for NHB, 56.3% for certainty and 68.8% for the overall rating.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the ICER Matrix to grade orphan therapies according to their treatment benefit and certainty is feasible. However, the assessment involves subjective judgements based on heterogenous evidence. Tools such as the ICER Matrix might aid decision makers to evaluate treatment benefit and its certainty when comparing therapies across indications.

Delivering a Home-Based Exercise Program to Youth With Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Protocol for a Comparative-Approach Study

BACKGROUND

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare bone fragility disorder associated with muscle weakness. Individuals with OI may therefore benefit from exercise interventions aiming to improve muscle and bone strength. Given the rarity of OI, many patients do not have access to exercise specialists who are familiar with the disorder. As such, telemedicine, the provision of health care through technology to provide care at a distance, may be well suited for this population.

OBJECTIVE

The main objectives are (1) to investigate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of 2 telemedicine approaches for the delivery of an exercise intervention for youth with OI and (2) to assess the impact of the exercise intervention on muscle function and cardiopulmonary fitness in youth with OI.

METHODS

Patients with OI type I (the mildest form of OI; n=12, aged 12-16 years) from a pediatric orthopedic tertiary hospital will be randomized to receive a 12-week remote exercise intervention in either (1) a supervised group (n=6), monitored every session, or (2) a follow-up group (n=6), receiving monthly progress update appointments. Participants will undergo the following pre- and postintervention evaluations: sit-to-stand test, push-up test, sit-up test, single-legged balance test, and a heel-rise test. Both groups will be given the same 12-week exercise regimen, which includes cardiovascular, resistance, and flexibility training. For each exercise training session involving the supervised group, a kinesiologist will provide instructions to participants through live video sessions using a teleconferencing application. On the other hand, the follow-up group will discuss their progress with the kinesiologist every 4 weeks over a teleconferencing video call. Feasibility will be assessed by recruitment, adherence, and completion rates. A cost-effectiveness analysis of both approaches will be computed. Changes in muscle function and cardiopulmonary fitness will be examined between the 2 groups, pre- and postintervention.

RESULTS

It is anticipated that the supervised group will have higher adherence and completion rates compared to the follow-up group, which may be associated with greater physiological benefits; however, it may not be as cost-effective compared to the follow-up approach.

CONCLUSIONS

By determining the most feasible telemedicine approach, this study may serve as a basis for providing increased access to specialized adjunct therapies for individuals with rare disorders.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/40262.

Challenging gestational trophoblastic disease cases and mimics: An exemplar for the management of rare tumours

OBJECTIVE

Rare tumour management is challenging for clinicians as evidence bases are limited and clinical trials are difficult to conduct. It is even more difficult for patients where self-reliance alone is insufficient to overcome the challenges of navigating care which is often poorly evidence based. In Ireland, a national Gestational Trophoblastic Disease (GTD) service was established as one of 3 initiatives for rare tumours by the National Cancer Control Programme. The service has a national clinical lead, a dedicated supportive nursing service and a clinical biochemistry liaison team. This study sought to assess the impact of a GTD centre using national clinical guidelines and integrating and networking with European and International GTD groups on the clinical management of challenging GTD cases and to consider the application of this model of care to other rare tumour management.

STUDY DESIGN

In this article, we analyse the impact of a national GTD service on five challenging cases, and review how the service affects patient management in this rare tumour type. These cases were selected from a cohort of patients who were voluntarily registered in the service based on the diagnostic management dilemma they posed.

RESULTS

Case management was impacted by the identification of GTD mimics, the provision of lifesaving treatment of metastatic choriocarcinoma with brain metastasis, networking with international colleagues, the identification of early relapse, the use of genetics to differentiate treatment pathways and prognosis, and supportive supervision of treatment courses of up to 2 years of therapy in a cohort of patients starting or completing families.

CONCLUSION

The National GTD service could be an exemplar for the management of rare tumours (such as cholangiocarcinoma) in our jurisdiction which could benefit from a similar constellation of supports. Our study demonstrates the importance of a nominated national clinical lead, dedicated nurse navigator support, registration of cases and networking. The impact of our service would be greater if registration was mandatory rather than voluntary. Such a measure would also ensure equity of access for patients to the service, assist in quantifying the need for resourcing and facilitate research to improve outcomes.

Improving outcomes of childhood and young adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma: 25 years of research and collaboration within the framework of the European Intergroup for Childhood Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

The European Intergroup for Childhood Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (EICNHL) was established 25 years ago with the goal to facilitate clinical trials and research collaborations in the field both within Europe and worldwide. Since its inception, much progress has been made whereby major improvements in outcomes have been achieved. In this Review, we describe the different diagnostic entities of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in children and young adults describing key features of each entity and outlining clinical achievements made in the context of the EICNHL framework. Furthermore, we provide an overview of advances in biopathology with an emphasis on the role of biological studies and how they have shaped available treatments. Finally, for each entity, we describe future goals, upcoming clinical trials, and highlight areas of research that require our focus going forward.

Accrual-Monitoring Practices for Various Disease Trials among AACI Member Cancer Centers

Progress in the management of rare diseases, including rare cancers, is dependent upon clinical trials; however, as many as 32% of rare-disease trials go uncompleted or unpublished due to insufficient accrual. Monitoring practices may differ between institutions. We sought to survey the regulatory standards for various trial types among major U.S. cancer centers. A 10-question survey was designed using Qualtrics assessment software. The survey was sent via email to an internal server of member institutions of the Association of American Cancer Institutes (AACI). Of 103 AACI centers, 31% completed the survey (n = 32). Respondents differed in their definitions of a rare disease, minimum expectations for rare tumor studies, and frequency of accrual monitoring by their institutional Protocol Review and Monitoring Committee. Seventy-three percent of respondents did not close trials based on low accrual. Strategies to optimize accrual included investigator incentives for high accrual and penalties for low accrual in 37% and 13% of respondents, respectively.

Rationale, Strengths, and Limitations of Real-World Evidence in Oncology: A Canadian Review and Perspective

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) continue to be the basis for essential evidence regarding the efficacy of interventions such as cancer therapies. Limitations associated with RCT designs, including selective study populations, strict treatment regimens, and being time-limited, mean they do not provide complete information about an intervention’s safety or the applicability of the trial’s results to a wider range of patients seen in real-world clinical practice. For example, recent data from Alberta showed that almost 40% of patients in the province’s cancer registry would be trial-ineligible per common exclusion criteria. Real-world evidence (RWE) offers an opportunity to complement the RCT evidence base with this kind of information about safety and about use in wider patient populations. It is also increasingly recognized for being able to provide information about an intervention’s effectiveness and is considered by regulators as an important component of the evidence base in drug approvals. Here, we examine the limitations of RCTs in oncology research, review the different types of RWE available in this area, and discuss the strengths and limitations of RWE for complementing RCT oncology data.

The first International Penile Advanced Cancer Trial (InPACT) opens in Canada! Why additional centers are needed

Penile Cancer is rare in Canada and the Western world. For this reason, penile cancer lags well behind most other malignancies in the development of evidence-based guidelines for management. This dilemma was the basis for the international cooperation to develop InPACT: the International Penile Advanced Cancer Trial  (NCT02305654), sponsored by both the National Cancer Institute (lead by ECOG-ACRIN Cooperative Group) and Cancer Research of the United Kingdom (CRUK). The aim of InPACT is to determine prospectively the potential benefits of chemotherapy or chemoradiation in addition to lymph node dissection in patients with clinical evidence of inguinal lymph node metastases. InPACT is now open in Canada. We will review the eligibility and randomizations.

Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Castration-Resistant, Androgen Receptor-Expressing Salivary Gland Cancer: A Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

The activity of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in androgen receptor-positive (AR+) salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) has been established in the past few years. Second-line treatment in castration-resistant patients is still unknown. We investigated the activity of abiraterone acetate as second-line treatment in ADT-resistant, AR+ patients with SGC.

METHODS

This was a single-institution phase II trial. A two-stage Simon's design was applied. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate. Secondary end points were disease control rate, safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Patients were eligible when the following criteria were met: histologic diagnosis of AR-overexpressing SGC, measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1, clinical and/or radiologic progression on ADT, suppressed serum testosterone, and no limits for the number of previous chemotherapy lines. All patients received abiraterone 1 g daily plus prednisone 10 mg and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist until progression or unacceptable toxicities.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2019, 24 AR+ patients with SGC (23 men; median age 65.8 years) were treated within the study. The overall response rate was 21% (5 partial responses), with a disease control rate of 62.5%. The median duration of response was 5.82 months. Median progression-free survival was 3.65 months (95% CI, 1.94 to 5.89), and median overall survival was 22.47 months (95% CI, 6.74 to not reached). Objective response to previous ADT did not correlate with the activity of abiraterone. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 22 cases (92%) with grade 3 AEs in six patients (25%): fatigue (two), flushing (one), supraventricular tachycardia (one), and two non-drug-related AEs. No drug-related grade 4 or 5 AEs were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Abiraterone plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist is active and safe as a second-line option in AR-expressing, castration-resistant SGC.

Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus, Unresolved Areas and Future Perspectives for Research: Perspectives of Research Needs in Anal Cancer

Anal cancer is a relatively rare, mostly HPV-related cancer. The curative treatment consists of concurrent chemoradiation delivered with modern radiotherapy techniques. The prognosis for most patients with early localized disease is very favourable; however patients with locally advanced disease and/or HPV negative tumours are at higher risk of locoregional and distant treatment failure. Tailored approaches are presently being investigated to determine the most suitable regimen in terms of radiotherapy dose prescription, target volume selection, normal tissue avoidance, and combination therapy. Metastatic anal cancer is treated with chemotherapy aiming at prolonged survival. The role of immune therapy in the clinical setting is being investigated. There is little knowledge on the biology of anal cancer, and an urgent need for more clinical and translational research dedicated to this disease. In this article, the evidence-base for the current treatment is briefly reviewed, and perspectives on future research needs are high-lighted.

Importance of guidelines and networking for the management of rare gynecological cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Guidelines are essential to support appropriate medical management. The objective of our paper is to highlight the need for such recommendations, to reinforce strategies in place and to promote the creation of multidisciplinary networks to provide the most appropriate care to patients and to improve it.

RECENT FINDINGS

Gynecological rare cancers are not that rare since they represent around 50% of all gynecological cancers. Surgery remains the cornerstone of management for all subtypes. Apart from malignant ovarian germ-cell tumors for which conventional chemotherapy was proven to be efficient, response to standard systemic treatment for other gynecological cancers are disappointing. Better understanding of these pathologies is needed and requires more adapted management.

SUMMARY

Rare cancers are substantially heterogeneous but raise the need of integrating new cases in dedicated networks to enhance and homogenize medical practices. Centralized diagnosis, improved medical practice based on regularly updated international guidelines, and inclusion in innovative clinical trials linked to preclinical studies are essential to contribute to the promotion of improvement in patient care.

Using Telerehabilitation to Deliver a Home Exercise Program to Youth With Arthrogryposis: Single Cohort Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) is characterized by joint contractures and muscle weakness, which limit daily activities. Youths with AMC require frequent physical therapeutic follow-ups to limit the recurrence of contractures and maintain range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength; however, access to specialized care may be limited because of geographical distance. Telerehabilitation can offer a potential solution for delivering frequent follow-ups for youth with AMC, but research on the use of telerehabilitation in children with musculoskeletal disorders is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to evaluate the feasibility of delivering a home exercise program (HEP) by using telerehabilitation for youth with AMC. We also aim to explore the effectiveness of the HEP as a secondary aim.

METHODS

Youths aged between 8 and 21 years with AMC were recruited at the Shriners Hospitals for Children-Canada. The participants completed baseline and post-HEP questionnaires (the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents, Pediatrics Outcomes Data Collection Instrument, and Adolescent and Pediatric Pain Tool), and clinicians assessed their active ROM using a virtual goniometer. Clinicians used the Goal Attainment Scale with the participants to identify individualized goals to develop a 12-week HEP and assess the achievement of these goals. Follow-ups were conducted every 3 weeks to adjust the HEP. Data on withdrawal rates and compliance to the HEP and follow-ups were collected to assess the feasibility of this approach. The interrater reliability of using a virtual goniometer was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and associated 95% CI. Nonparametric tests were used to evaluate feasibility and explore the effectiveness of the HEP.

RESULTS

Of the 11 youths who were recruited, 7 (median age: 16.9 years) completed the HEP. Of the 47 appointments scheduled, 5 had to be rescheduled in ≤24 hours. The participants performed their HEP 2.04 times per week (95% CI 1.25-4.08) and reported good satisfaction with the approach. A general intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.985 (95% CI 0.980-0.989) was found for the web-based ROM measurement. Individualized goals were related to pain management; endurance in writing, standing, or walking; sports; and daily activities. In total, 12 of the 15 goals set with the participants were achieved. Statistically significant improvements were observed in the pain and comfort domain of the Pediatrics Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (preintervention: median 71; 95% CI 34-100; postintervention: median 85; 95% CI 49-100; P=.08) and Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents (preintervention: median 1.62; 95% CI 1.00-2.82; postintervention: median 2.32; 95% CI 1.00-3.45; P=.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The remote delivery of an HEP for youth with AMC is feasible. Promising results were found for the effectiveness of the HEP in helping youths with AMC to achieve their goals. The next step will be to assess the effectiveness of this exercise intervention in a randomized controlled trial.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.2196/18688.

The Future of Clinical Trial Design in Oncology

Clinical trials represent a fulcrum for oncology drug discovery and development to bring safe and effective medicines to patients in a timely manner. Clinical trials have shifted from traditional studies evaluating cytotoxic chemotherapy in largely histology-based populations to become adaptively designed and biomarker-driven evaluations of molecularly targeted agents and immune therapies in selected patient subsets. This review will discuss the scientific, methodological, practical, and patient-focused considerations to transform clinical trials. A call to action is proposed to establish the framework for next-generation clinical trials that strikes an optimal balance of operational efficiency, scientific impact, and value to patients. SIGNIFICANCE: The future of cancer clinical trials requires a framework that can efficiently transform scientific discoveries to clinical utility through applications of innovative technologies and dynamic design methodologies. Next-generation clinical trials will offer individualized strategies which ultimately contribute to globalized knowledge and collective learning, through the joint efforts of all key stakeholders including investigators and patients.

Radiomics analysis for predicting pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancers

BACKGROUND

We present a radiomics-based model for predicting response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced rare cancers.

METHODS

The study included 57 patients with advanced rare cancers who were enrolled in our phase II clinical trial of pembrolizumab. Tumor response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST). Patients were categorized as 20 "controlled disease" (stable disease, partial response, or complete response) or 37 progressive disease). We used 3D-slicer to segment target lesions on standard-of-care, pretreatment contrast enhanced CT scans. We extracted 610 features (10 histogram-based features and 600 second-order texture features) from each volume of interest. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was used to detect the most discriminatory features. Selected features were used to create a classification model, using XGBoost, for the prediction of tumor response to pembrolizumab. Leave-one-out cross-validation was performed to assess model performance.

FINDINGS

The 10 most relevant radiomics features were selected; XGBoost-based classification successfully differentiated between controlled disease (complete response, partial response, stable disease) and progressive disease with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in patients assessed by RECIST (94.7%, 97.3%, and 90%, respectively; p<0.001) and in patients assessed by irRECIST (94.7%, 93.9%, and 95.8%, respectively; p<0.001). Additionally, the common features of the RECIST and irRECIST groups also highly predicted pembrolizumab response with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and p value of 94.7%, 97%, 90%, p<0.001% and 96%, 96%, 95%, p<0.001, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our radiomics-based signature identified imaging differences that predicted pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancer.

INTERPRETATION

Our radiomics-based signature identified imaging differences that predicted pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancer.

Value of Adaptive Trials and Surrogate Endpoints for Clinical Decision-Making in Rare Cancers

Despite high-level endorsement, the number of adaptive Phase II/III trials in rare cancers needs to be improved, with better understanding of their value for clinical decisions in daily practice. This paper describes approaches to trial design in rare cancers, which has been supplemented by a search of ClinicalTrials.gov for adaptive trial designs in rare cancer. In addition, an online survey of 3,200 oncologists was conducted. Practicing physicians were questioned on the importance of different evidence levels, types of adaptive trial design, and categories of surrogate endpoints for clinical decision making. The results of the online survey revealed that evidence from Phase II/III trials with an adaptive design and relatively small sample size was considered high value in rare cancer by 97% of responders, similar to the randomized controlled trial rating (82%). Surrogate clinical endpoints were considered valuable alternatives to overall survival by 80% of oncologists. Preferred adaptive designs were futility analysis, interim analysis, adaptive sample size, and adaptive randomization. In conclusion, rare cancer oncologists rate evidence from adaptive clinical trials with as high a value and importance for clinical decision making processes as conventional randomized controlled trials. All stakeholders have a vested interest in advances in clinical trial designs to ensure efficient and timely development of innovative medicinal products to allow more patients faster access to the pivotal treatment.

Strategies for improving access to clinical trials by teenagers and young adults with cancer: A qualitative study of health professionals' views

OBJECTIVE

Few teenagers and young adults (TYA) with cancer participate in clinical trials. Lack of opportunity has been identified as a major barrier. We canvassed health professionals' views on how TYA's access to trials might be improved.

METHODS

We interviewed 35 professionals with responsibility for delivering or facilitating cancer care and/or clinical trials. We analysed data using a qualitative descriptive approach.

RESULTS

Interviewees viewed improving TYA's access to trials as challenging, but possible. They reframed the problem as one of rare disease and surmised that modifying the organisation, administration and resourcing of research (and care) might expand opportunities for both TYA and other patients with low volume conditions. Proposals coalesced around four themes: consolidating the pool of patients; streamlining bureaucratic requirements; investing in the research workforce; and promoting pragmatism in trial design.

CONCLUSION

Accounts suggest there is scope to improve access to trials by TYA with cancer and other patients with rare diseases. Though re-configuring care, research and resource frameworks would present substantial challenges, doing nothing would also have costs. Change will require the support of a range of stakeholders, and agreement as to the best way forward. Further work, such as priority setting exercises, may be necessary to reach a consensus.

Stakeholder perspectives on clinical research related to therapies for rare diseases: therapeutic misconception and the value of research

Background

For many rare diseases, few treatments are supported by strong evidence. Patients, family members, health care providers, and policy-makers thus have to consider whether to accept, recommend, or fund treatments with uncertain clinical effectiveness. They must also consider whether and how to contribute to clinical research that may involve receiving or providing the therapy being evaluated.

Objective

To understand why and how patients and families with rare metabolic diseases, specialist metabolic physicians, and health policy advisors choose whether to participate in studies and how they use and value research.

Methods

We conducted separate focus group interviews with each stakeholder group (three groups in total); two groups were conducted by telephone and the third was held in-person. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling. We analyzed each interview transcript sequentially using a qualitative description approach to inductively identify key themes. Several strategies to ensure credibility and trustworthiness were used including debriefing sessions after each focus group and having multiple team members review transcripts.

Results

Four patients/caregivers, six physicians, and three policy advisors participated. Our findings did not support conventional perspectives that therapeutic misconception (gaining access to treatment) is the main motivating factor for patients/caregivers to participate in clinical research. Rather, patients’/caregivers’ expressed reasons for participating in research included advancing science for the next generation and having an opportunity to share their experiences. Patients/caregivers and physicians described the difficulties in weighing risks versus benefits of accepting treatments not well-supported by evidence. Physicians also reported feeling conflicted in their dual role as patient advisor/advocate and evaluator of the evidence. Policy advisors were primarily focused on critically appraising the evidence to make recommendations for the health system.

Conclusions

Stakeholders differ in their perspectives on rare disease research but share concerns about the risks versus benefits of therapies when making individual- and population-level decisions.

Transforming approaches to treating TRK fusion cancer: historical comparison of larotrectinib and histology-specific therapies

OBJECTIVE

The results from basket trials utilized to gain regulatory approval of tumor-agnostic therapies can be difficult to interpret without the context of a comparator arm. We describe the role and efficacy of histology-based treatments to provide a historical comparison with larotrectinib.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted on the clinical outcomes of current histology-based standard of care treatments used in non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, thyroid cancer, gliomas, soft tissue sarcoma, salivary gland cancer, and infantile fibrosarcoma (7 of the 21 tumor histologies in the larotrectinib trials). The review focused on advanced stage/metastatic disease to make a historical comparison with larotrectinib.

RESULTS

Larotrectinib provides positive outcomes in both adult and pediatric patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors known to harbor NTRK gene fusions across a wide range of tumor types. Although the numbers of patients per tumor type are limited, the results of this historical comparison demonstrated that larotrectinib is an efficacious treatment option when naïvely indirectly compared with historical treatments across all 7 reviewed tumor types, especially in comparison to later lines of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing larotrectinib as a case example across these types of historical comparisons shows that larotrectinib provides positive efficacy outcomes in TRK fusion cancer across tumor histologies known to harbor NTRK gene fusions that may be preferable to historical treatments.

The design of a Bayesian platform trial to prevent and eradicate inhibitors in patients with hemophilia

Among individuals with the rare congenital bleeding disorder hemophilia A, the major challenge is inhibitor formation, which is associated with significant morbidity and cost. Yet, as the optimal approach to prevent and eradicate inhibitors is not known, we are at equipoise. Because classic trial design is not practical in a rare disease setting, we designed 2 48-week randomized trials comparing ELOCTATE and emicizumab to prevent and eradicate inhibitors. To achieve statistical efficiency, we incorporated historic data (Bayesian priors) on inhibitor formation to allow preferential randomization to emicizumab, piecewise exponential survival models to determine mean and 95% confidence interval for inhibitor formation in each arm, and simulations to determine the best model design to optimize power. To achieve administrative efficiency, the trials will be performed with the same sites, staff, visit frequency, blood sampling, laboratories, and laboratory assays, with streamlined enrollment so patients developing inhibitors in the first trial may be enrolled on the second trial. The primary end point is the probability of inhibitor formation or inhibitor eradication, respectively. The design indicates early stopping rules for overwhelming evidence of superiority of the emicizumab arms. Simulations indicate that, with 66 subjects, the Prevention Trial will have 84% power to detect noninferiority of emicizumab to ELOCTATE with a margin of 10% if emicizumab is truly 10% superior to ELOCTATE; with 90 subjects, the Eradication Trial will have 80% power to detect 15% superiority of ELOCTATE immune tolerance induction with vs without emicizumab. Thus, a platform design provides statistical and administrative efficiency to conduct INHIBIT trials.

Short Time to Market and Forward Planning Will Enable Cell Therapies to Deliver R&D Pipeline Value

There is considerable industry excitement about the curative potential of cell and gene therapies, but significant challenges remain in designing cost-effective treatments that are accessible globally. We have taken a modeling-based approach to define the cost and value drivers for cell therapy assets during pharmaceutical drug development. We have created a model development program for a lentiviral modified ex vivo autologous T cell therapy for Oncology indications. Using internal and external benchmarks, we have estimated the total out-of-pocket cost of development for an Oncology cell therapy asset from target identification to filing of marketing application to be $500-600 million. Our model indicates that both clinical and Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) cost of development for cell therapies are higher due to unique considerations of ex vivo autologous cell therapies. We have computed a threshold revenue-generating patient number for our model asset that enables selection of assets that can address high unmet medical need and generate pipeline value. Using statistical approaches, we identified that short time to market (<5 years) and reduced commercial cost of goods (<$65,000 per dose) will be essential in developing competitive assets and we propose solutions to reduce both. We emphasize that teams must proactively plan alternate development scenarios with clear articulation of path to value generation and greater patient access. We recommend using a modeling-based approach to enable data driven go/no-go decisions during multigenerational cell therapy development.

How Cancer Patients Perceive Clinical Trials (CTs) in the Era of CTs: Current Perception and Its Differences Between Common and Rare Cancers

Perception has recently been highlighted as a critical determinant for participation in clinical trials (CTs) among cancer patients. We evaluated cancer patients' current perceptions of CTs using the PARTAKE questionnaires, focusing on differences between patients with common and rare cancers. From November 2015 to May 2017, we prospectively surveyed patients who had received anti-cancer treatment at Asan Medical Center. Among 333 respondents, 70.9% had common and 29.1% had rare cancers. In the cohort, 87.7% of patients with common cancers and 75.3% of patients with rare cancers answered that they heard of and knew about CTs. However, willingness to participate in CTs was expressed only in approximately 56% of patients, although it was significantly associated with awareness and perception. Surprisingly, patients with rare cancers when compared with patients with common cancers showed significantly lower levels of awareness and perception (64.2% vs 79.9%, p = 0.003 and 77.3% vs 91.9%, p < 0.001), and consequently less willingness to participate in CTs (47.4% vs 58.9%, p = 0.06). In addition, cancer patients still harbored fear and concerns about safety and reward of CTs, and demonstrated substantial lack of knowledge about the voluntary nature of CTs, which was more obvious in patients with rare cancers. We identified relatively modest willingness of cancer patients to participate in CTs regardless of generally favorable perception. These findings are highlighted by the more negative perception of CTs among patients with rare cancers relative to those with common cancers. Further education and encouragement by research and public entities seem essential to improve motivation of CTs in cancer patients beyond good perception, especially for patients with rare cancers.

Chemotherapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is no standard chemotherapy available for unresectable or metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) because of its rarity. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic SBA.

METHODS

In accordance with the PRISMA statements, literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The included studies were prospective randomized, nonrandomized, or observational studies. Risk of bias was assessed the ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

Seven prospective single-arm Phase II studies were included in this review. Six of them were assessed as having a moderate risk of bias and one as having a serious risk of bias. A meta-analysis was not performed, because the studies were single-arm. Systemic chemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidine regimens achieved favorable outcomes with acceptable adverse effects as a first therapy; however, the regimens differed in each study. The object response rate was 18-50%, and the disease control rate was 29-87%. With 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, and mitomycin-C regimen, one treatment-related death occurred. A second line of therapy including chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel also showed favorable efficacy. The object response rate was 20%, and the disease control rate was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic chemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidine regimens was mainly used for unresectable or metastatic SBA. While it may achieve favorable outcomes with acceptable adverse effects, further evidence is needed.

Examining the Use of Real-World Evidence in the Regulatory Process

The 21st Century Cures Act passed by the United States Congress mandates the US Food and Drug Administration to develop guidance to evaluate the use of real-world evidence (RWE) to support the regulatory process. RWE has generated important medical discoveries, especially in areas where traditional clinical trials would be unethical or infeasible. However, RWE suffers from several issues that hinder its ability to provide proof of treatment efficacy at a level comparable to randomized controlled trials. In this review article, we summarized the advantages and limitations of RWE, identified the key opportunities for RWE, and pointed the way forward to maximize the potential of RWE for regulatory purposes.

Sample size calculation in randomised phase II selection trials using a margin of practical equivalence

Background

In rare cancers or subtypes of common cancers, a comparison of multiple promising treatments may be required. The selected treatment can then be assessed against the standard of care (if it exists) or used as a backbone for combinations with new, possibly targeted, agents. There could be different experimental therapies or different doses of the same therapy, and either can be done in combination with standard treatments. A ’pick-the-winner’ design is often used, which focuses on efficacy to select the most promising treatment. However, a treatment with a slightly lower efficacy compared to another treatment may actually be preferred if it has a better toxicity or quality of life profile, is easier to administer, or cheaper.

Methods

By pre-defining a margin of practical equivalence in order to calculate the sample size, a more flexible assessment can be made of whether the treatments have very different effects or are sufficiently close so that other factors can be used to choose between them. Using exact binomial probabilities, we calculated the sample size for two- and three-arm randomised selection trials including a margin of practical equivalence with a variety of input parameters.

Results

We explain conceptually the margin of practical equivalence in this paper, and provide a free user-friendly web application to calculate the required sample size for a variety of input parameters.

Conclusion

The web application should help promote the randomised selection design with a margin of practical equivalence, which provides greater flexibility than the ’pick-the-winner’ approach in assessing the results of selection trials.

Phase II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil in patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma (ESMMO): rationale and design of the ESMMO trial

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes of patients with osteosarcoma remain unsatisfactory, with little improvement in a 5-year overall survival over the past three decades. There is a substantial need for further research and development to identify and develop more efficacious agents/regimens in order to improve clinical outcomes of patients for whom the prognosis is unfavorable. Recently, mycophenolate mofetil, a prodrug of mycophenolic acid, has been found to have anticancer activity against osteosarcoma in both in vitro and animal experiments, so that further investigation in humans is warranted.

METHODS

A total of 27 patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma will be enrolled into this phase II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm, two-stage clinical trial. The main objectives of this study are to determine the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the patients. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 16 weeks; the secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate, safety parameters, pharmacokinetic parameters, biomarkers, pain score, and quality of life. Mycophenolate mofetil at the initial dose of 5 g/day or lower will be administered for 4 cycles (28 days/cycle) or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dose of mycophenolate mofetil may be reduced by 1-2 g/day or withheld for some Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicities whenever clinically needed. The duration of study participation is approximately 4-5 months, with a minimum of 12 study visits. If mycophenolate mofetil proves beneficial to some patients, as evidenced by stable disease or partial response at 16 weeks, administration of mycophenolate mofetil will continue in the extension period.

DISCUSSION

This trial is the first step in the translation of therapeutic potential of mycophenolate mofetil emerging from in vitro and animal studies into the clinical domain. It is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma. The results will provide important information about whether or not mycophenolate mofetil is worth further development.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was prospectively registered on Thai Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: TCTR20190701001). The posted information will be updated as needed to reflect protocol amendments and study progress.

Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604)

Background

Up to 50% of men with poor prognosis, non-seminoma germ cell tumours (GCTs) die with standard BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) chemotherapy. An intensive regimen, CBOP/BEP (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/BEP), met response targets in a randomised, phase II trial (74% complete response or partial response marker negative, 90% confidence interval (CI) 61%–85%).

Aim

To assess long-term outcomes and late toxicity associated with CBOP/BEP.

Methods

Patients with poor prognosis extracranial GCT were randomised to 4xBEP or CBOP/BEP (2xCBOP, 2xBO, 3xBEP with 15,000iu of bleomycin). Low-dose, stabilising chemotherapy before entry was permitted. Response rates (primary outcome) were reported previously. Here, we report secondary outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and late toxicity. Prognostic factors and the impact of marker decline are assessed in exploratory analysis.

Results

Eighty-nine patients (43 CBOP/BEP) were randomised. After median 63 months follow-up, 3-year PFS is 55.7% (95% CI: 39.7%, 69.0%) for CBOP/BEP and 38.7% (95% CI: 24.7%, 52.4%) for BEP (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59 (0.33, 1.06), p = 0.079). Three-year OS is 65.0% (48.8%, 77.2%) and 58.5% (43.0%, 71.2%), respectively (HR: 0.79 (0.41, 1.52), p = 0.49). Twelve-month toxicity was affected by subsequent treatments, with no clear differences between arms. Stabilising chemotherapy was associated with poorer PFS (HR: 2.09 (1.14, 3.81), p = 0.017), whereas unfavourable marker decline, in 60 (70%) patients, was not.

Conclusion

Although not powered for PFS, results for CBOP/BEP are promising. Impact on OS was less clear (and will be affected by subsequent therapy). Further study in an international phase III trial is warranted.

Trial registration

ISRCTN 53643604.

•

Intensive induction chemotherapy met response targets in poor prognosis germ cell tumours.

•

Three-year progression-free survival was 56% for CBOP/BEP and 39% for BEP.

•

Impact on survival was less clear and will be affected by subsequent therapy.

•

Further study in an international phase III trial is warranted.

Trial Design Challenges and Approaches for Precision Oncology in Rare Tumors: Experiences of the Children's Oncology Group

In the United States, cancer remains the leading cause of disease-related death in children. Although survival from any pediatric cancer has improved dramatically during past decades, a number of cancers continue to yield dismal prognoses, which has motivated the continued study of novel therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, even patients cured of pediatric cancer often experience severe adverse effects of treatment and other long-term health implications, such as cardiotoxicity or loss of fertility. For these patients, improved risk stratification to identify those who could safely receive alternate or less-intensive therapy without affecting prognosis is a key objective. Fortunately, pediatric cancers are rare overall, but even among patients with the same narrow cancer type, there is often broad heterogeneity in terms of prognosis, molecular features or pathology, current treatment strategies, and scientific objectives. As a result, the design of clinical trials in the pediatric cancer setting is challenged by a number of practical issues that must be addressed to ensure trial feasibility for this vulnerable group of patients. In this review, we discuss some of the unique trial design considerations often encountered in any rare tumor setting through the lens of our experiences as faculty statisticians for the Children's Oncology Group, the largest organization in the world dedicated exclusively to pediatric cancer research and clinical trials. These topics include risk stratification within individual trials, relaxation of trial operating characteristics and parameters, use of historical controls, and address of noninferiority-type objectives in small cohorts. We review each in terms of practical motivation, present challenges, and potential solutions described in the literature and implemented in selected example trials from the Children's Oncology Group.

The International Penile Advanced Cancer Trial (InPACT): Rationale and Current Status

The historic international penile cancer trial InPACT is now open and accruing patients in the UK and USA. The trial is geared to answer important questions for patients with evidence of inguinal lymph node disease at presentation. This clinical trial update provides an overview of the study and progress to date.

Group sequential adaptive designs in series of time-to-event randomised trials in rare diseases: A simulation study

In rare diseases, fully powered large trials may not be doable in a reasonable time frame even with international collaborations. In a previous work, we proposed an approach based on a series of smaller parallel group two-arm randomised controlled trials (RCT) performed over a long research horizon. Within the series of trials, the treatment selected after each trial becomes the control treatment of the next one. We concluded that running more trials with smaller sample sizes and relaxed α-levels leads in the long term and under reasonable assumptions to larger survival benefits with a moderate increase of risk as compared to traditional designs based on larger but fewer trials designed to meet stringent evidence criteria. We now extend this quantitative framework with more 'flexible' designs including interim analyses for futility and/or efficacy, and three-arm adaptive designs with treatment selection at interim. In the simulation study, we considered different disease severities, accrual rates, and hypotheses of how treatments improve over time. For each design, we estimated the long-term survival benefit as the relative difference in hazard rates between the end and the start of the research horizon, and the risk defined as the probability of selecting at the end of the research horizon a treatment inferior to the initial control. We assessed the impact of the α-level and the choice of the stopping rule on the operating characteristics. We also compared the performance of series based on two- vs. three-arm trials. We show that relaxing α-levels within the limit of 0.1 is associated with larger survival gains and moderate increase of risk which remains within acceptable ranges. Including an interim analysis with a futility rule is associated with an additional survival gain and a better risk control as compared to series with no interim analysis, when the α-level is below or equal to 0.1, whereas the benefit of including an interim analysis is rather small for higher α-levels. Including an interim analysis for efficacy yields almost no additional gain. Series based on three-arm trials are associated with a systematic improvement in terms of survival gain and risk control as compared to series of two-arm trials.

Orphan drug development: the increasing role of clinical pharmacology

Over the last few decades there has been a paradigm shift in orphan drug research and development. The development of the regulatory framework, establishment of rare disease global networks that support drug developments, and advances in technology, has resulted in tremendous growth in orphan drug development. Nevertheless, several challenges during orphan drug development such as economic constraints; insufficient clinical information; fewer patients and thus inadequate power; etc. still exist. While the standard regulatory requirements for drug approval stays the same, applications of scientific judgment and regulatory flexibility is significantly important to help meeting some of the immense unmet medical need in rare diseases. Clinical pharmacology presents a vital role in accelerating orphan drug development and overcoming some of these challenges. This review highlights the critical contributions of clinical pharmacology in orphan drug development; for example, dose finding, optimizing clinical trial design, indication expansion, and population extrapolation. Examples of such applications are reviewed in this article.

The Statistical Evaluation of Treatment and Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Clinical Trials

The purpose of this article is two-fold: to help statisticians confronted with the design, implementation and analysis of clinical trials and new to the field of head and neck cancer; but also to sensitize research physicians with the role, the tasks and the challenges faced by the medical statisticians. These two purposes altogether will hopefully encourage and enable fluid communication between the research physician and the medical statistician and the understanding of each other's field and concerns. In particular, the methodological challenges resulting from the heterogeneity of the head and neck cancer, the complexity of the treatments and the associated comorbidities are presented with examples borrowed from medical literature and from the practical experience of the authors in this field.