1
|
Talbot LJ, Schechter A, Mothi SS, Ragan M, Aldrink JH, Brungardt J, Dasgupta R, Lautz TB, Rajeswaran S, Moya-Mendez ME, Tracy ET, Temple M, Davidoff AM. Use of Palliative Site-Directed Ablation in Pediatric Oncology: A Retrospective Study From the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2025; 72:e31453. [PMID: 39582122 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.31453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Revised: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 11/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with end-stage solid tumors would benefit from established nonsurgical options for palliative site-directed local control with the intent of improving quality of life (QOL) and extending survival. We investigated the practice and tolerability of palliative ablation strategies in patients with pediatric solid tumors. METHODS Children and young adults with solid tumors ineligible for surgical site-directed control were treated with palliative ablative strategies between 2010 and 2020 at five institutions participating in the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative. Demographic, histologic, and clinical data were retrospectively evaluated, and assessment of patient reasons for choosing ablative strategies was qualitatively assessed. RESULTS A total of 69 patients underwent 89 ablative procedures for 132 lesions. More than 10 histologies were represented, the most common of which were Ewing sarcoma (n = 15 patients), osteosarcoma (n = 13 patients), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 9 patients). Ablation techniques included cryoablation (n = 9 procedures/16 lesions), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (n = 4 procedures/5 lesions), microwave ablation (MWA) (n = 5 procedures/12 lesions), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (n = 68 procedures/99 lesions). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) included pain requiring IV medication in cryoablation (three out of 12 procedures), RFA (one out of four procedures), and MWA (two out of five procedures), bleeding in MWA (two out of five procedures), and skin burns requiring surgical intervention in SBRT (one out of 68 procedures). Patients were generally hospitalized after percutaneous ablation (19 out of 21 cryoablation, RFA, and MWA procedures) but the hospital stay was short (mean/SD 1 ± 4 days). Only four patients who were already hospitalized experienced hospitalization extension due to undergoing an ablative procedure. The primary reason for pursuing ablative measures could be broadly categorized into four groups: treatment of unresectable disease either due to surgical inaccessibility or metastasis (n = 31), symptom relief, either pain or mass effect (n = 25), specific patient QOL concerns unrelated to pain or life prolongation (n = 5), and physiologic instability for otherwise resectable disease (n = 4). All patients undergoing treatment for symptom relief received SBRT. CONCLUSION In this cohort of patients undergoing palliative treatment of incurable or unresectable pediatric solid tumors, ablation strategies were well tolerated. Further research is needed to determine patient reported outcomes after ablation strategies are pursued and patient and family satisfaction with the choice for ablative strategies. An understanding of institutional availability and ability to employ these strategies would also be informative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay J Talbot
- Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ann Schechter
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Suraj Sarvode Mothi
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mecklin Ragan
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jennifer H Aldrink
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Joseph Brungardt
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Roshni Dasgupta
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy B Lautz
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shankar Rajeswaran
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mary E Moya-Mendez
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Duke Children's Hospital and Health Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elisabeth T Tracy
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Duke Children's Hospital and Health Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Temple
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Andrew M Davidoff
- Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bonvalot S, Tetreau R, Llacer-Moscardo C, Roland C. The Landmark Series: Multimodal Management of Oligometastatic Sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:7930-7942. [PMID: 39214938 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16103-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
The concept of "oligometastatic" disease suggests the presence of intermediate states between localized disease and widespread metastases, which may be potentially treatable with curative therapeutic strategies. Metastases local therapy (MLT) can be accomplished through various techniques such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation, or surgical metastasectomy. The incorporation of MLT in the multidisciplinary treatment of patients with metastatic sarcoma is complex. Retrospective studies support consideration of MLT for selected patients based on factors such as patient condition, disease biology, histologic type, and disease burden. Decisions regarding type and timing of MLT should be made after multidisciplinary discussion including radiation oncologists, surgical and orthopedic oncologists, medical oncologists, and interventional radiology to explore all options before treatment decsions. All MLT techniques have advantages and disadvantages and should be performed in centers specialized in the care of complex oncology patients where various options can be explored concurrently or sequentially for each patient. Future studies evaluating quality of life and patient-reported outcomes are necessary to adequately align patient goals and optimal outcomes. This article reviews the medical scenarios that may benefit the use of MLT, evaluates the distinct advantages and disadvantages associated with these various techniques, and analyzes the findings from pivotal series to provide a comprehensive understanding of its role in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Bonvalot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris University, Paris, France.
| | - Raphael Tetreau
- Department of Radiology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Carmen Llacer-Moscardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Christina Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Awad A, Pal K, Yevich S, Kuban JD, Tam A, Odisio BC, Gupta S, Habibollahi P, Bishop AJ, Conley AP, Somaiah N, Araujo DM, Zarzour MA, Ratan R, Roland CL, Keung EZ, Huang SY, Sheth RA. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous image-guided ablation for soft tissue sarcoma metastases to the liver. Cancer 2024; 130:2703-2712. [PMID: 38642369 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate outcomes following percutaneous image-guided ablation of soft tissue sarcoma metastases to the liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with a diagnosis of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma who underwent percutaneous image-guided ablation of hepatic metastases between January 2011 and December 2021 was performed. Patients with less than 60 days of follow-up after ablation were excluded. The primary outcome was local tumor progression-free survival (LPFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival, liver-specific progression-free survival. and chemotherapy-free survival. RESULTS Fifty-five patients who underwent percutaneous ablation for 84 metastatic liver lesions were included. The most common histopathological subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (23/55), followed by gastrointestinal stromal tumor (22/55). The median treated liver lesions was 2 (range, 1-8), whereas the median size of metastases were 1.8 cm (0.3-8.7 cm). Complete response at 2 months was achieved in 90.5% of the treated lesions. LPFS was 83% at 1 year and 80% at 2 years. Liver-specific progression-free survival was 66% at 1 year and 40% at 2 years. The overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 98% and 94%. The chemotherapy-free holiday from the start of ablation was 71.2% at 12 months. The complication rate was 3.6% (2/55); one of the complications was Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or higher. LPFS subgroup analysis for leiomyosarcoma versus gastrointestinal stromal tumor suggests histology-agnostic outcomes (2 years, 89% vs 82%, p = .35). CONCLUSION Percutaneous image-guided liver ablation of soft tissue sarcoma metastases is safe and efficacious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Awad
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Koustav Pal
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Steven Yevich
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joshua D Kuban
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alda Tam
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sanjay Gupta
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony Paul Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dejka M Araujo
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Ravin Ratan
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Steven Y Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rahul A Sheth
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blank A, Fice MP. Challenges in the Management of Complex Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Clinical Scenarios. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32:e115-e124. [PMID: 37852242 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
With nearly 15,000 new cases of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in the United States each year, early diagnosis and therapeutic management is imperative for successful patient outcomes. Primary STS is conventionally treated with a combination of wide-margin resection, neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation therapy, and, in specific cases, adjuvant chemotherapy. However, in situations of complex disease presentation, guidelines for treatment are less clearly outlined. Limited metastatic disease, local recurrence, fungating STSs, and unplanned or incomplete resections of STSs present unique challenges for the multidisciplinary care team. The management of complex STS clinical scenarios usually involves limb-salvage resection or amputation as well as some combination of radiation therapy and/or ablative interventional radiology techniques. As a result, a multidisciplinary team approach is essential for treating patients in these challenging scenarios, with a recent focus on the integration of plastic and reconstructive surgery into the treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Blank
- From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Key BM, Callstrom MR, Filippiadis D. Musculoskeletal Interventional Oncology: A Contemporary Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221:503-516. [PMID: 37222277 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Musculoskeletal interventional oncology is an emerging field that addresses the limitations of conventional therapies for bone and soft-tissue tumors. The field's growth has been driven by evolving treatment paradigms, expanding society guidelines, mounting supportive literature, technologic advances, and cross-specialty collaboration with medical, surgical, and radiation oncology. Safe, effective, and durable pain palliation, local control, and stabilization of musculoskeletal tumors are increasingly achieved through an expanding array of contemporary minimally invasive percutaneous image-guided treatments, including ablation, osteoplasty, vertebral augmentation (with or without mechanical reinforcement via implants), osseous consolidation via percutaneous screw fixation (with or without osteoplasty), tumor embolization, and neurolysis. These interventions may be used for curative or palliative indications and can be readily combined with systemic therapies. Therapeutic approaches include the combination of different interventional oncology techniques as well as the sequential application of such techniques with other local treatments, including surgery or radiation. This article reviews the current practice of interventional oncology treatments for the management of patients with bone and soft-tissue tumors with a focus on emerging technologies and techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Key
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Rm 2803, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Matthew R Callstrom
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Rm 2803, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University General Hospital "Attikon" Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Papalexis N, Savarese LG, Peta G, Errani C, Tuzzato G, Spinnato P, Ponti F, Miceli M, Facchini G. The New Ice Age of Musculoskeletal Intervention: Role of Percutaneous Cryoablation in Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6744-6770. [PMID: 37504355 PMCID: PMC10377811 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving field of interventional oncology, minimally invasive methods, including CT-guided cryoablation, play an increasingly important role in tumor treatment, notably in bone and soft tissue cancers. Cryoablation works using compressed gas-filled probes to freeze tumor cells to temperatures below -20 °C, exploiting the Joule-Thompson effect. This cooling causes cell destruction by forming intracellular ice crystals and disrupting blood flow through endothelial cell damage, leading to local ischemia and devascularization. Coupling this with CT technology enables precise tumor targeting, preserving healthy surrounding tissues and decreasing postoperative complications. This review reports the most important literature on CT-guided cryoablation's application in musculoskeletal oncology, including sarcoma, bone metastases, and bone and soft tissue benign primary tumors, reporting on the success rate, recurrence rate, complications, and technical aspects to maximize success for cryoablation in the musculoskeletal system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Papalexis
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Leonor Garbin Savarese
- Department of Medical Imaging, Hematology and Clinical Oncology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-09, Brazil
| | - Giuliano Peta
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Costantino Errani
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Tuzzato
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Spinnato
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Ponti
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Miceli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Facchini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Efthymiou E, Charalampopoulos G, Velonakis G, Grigoriadis S, Kelekis A, Kelekis N, Filippiadis D. Ablative Techniques for Sarcoma Metastatic Disease: Current Role and Clinical Applications. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:485. [PMID: 36984486 PMCID: PMC10054887 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59030485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Sarcomas are heterogenous mesenchymal neoplasms with more than 80 different histologic subtypes. Lung followed by liver and bone are the most common sites of sarcoma metastatic disease. Ablative techniques have been recently added as an additional alternative curative or palliative therapeutic tool in sarcoma metastatic disease. When compared to surgery, ablative techniques are less invasive therapies which can be performed even in non-surgical candidates and are related to decreased recovery time as well as preservation of the treated organ's long-term function. Literature data upon ablative techniques for sarcoma metastatic disease are quite heterogeneous and variable regarding the size and the number of the treated lesions and the different histologic subtypes of the original soft tissue or bone sarcoma. The present study focuses upon the current role of minimal invasive thermal ablative techniques for the management of metastatic sarcoma disease. The purpose of this review is to present the current minimally invasive ablative techniques in the treatment of metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcoma, including local control and survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “ATTIKON”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mansur A, Garg T, Shrigiriwar A, Etezadi V, Georgiades C, Habibollahi P, Huber TC, Camacho JC, Nour SG, Sag AA, Prologo JD, Nezami N. Image-Guided Percutaneous Ablation for Primary and Metastatic Tumors. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12061300. [PMID: 35741109 PMCID: PMC9221861 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Image-guided percutaneous ablation methods have been further developed during the recent two decades and have transformed the minimally invasive and precision features of treatment options targeting primary and metastatic tumors. They work by percutaneously introducing applicators to precisely destroy a tumor and offer much lower risks than conventional methods. There are usually shorter recovery periods, less bleeding, and more preservation of organ parenchyma, expanding the treatment options of patients with cancer who may not be eligible for resection. Image-guided ablation techniques are currently utilized for the treatment of primary and metastatic tumors in various organs including the liver, pancreas, kidneys, thyroid and parathyroid, prostate, lung, bone, and soft tissue. This article provides a brief review of the various imaging modalities and available ablation techniques and discusses their applications and associated complications in various organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tushar Garg
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (T.G.); (C.G.)
| | - Apurva Shrigiriwar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA;
| | - Vahid Etezadi
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
| | - Christos Georgiades
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (T.G.); (C.G.)
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Timothy C. Huber
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA;
| | - Juan C. Camacho
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA;
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Radiology Associates of Florida, Sarasota, FL 34239, USA
| | - Sherif G. Nour
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Florida State University College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA;
| | - Alan Alper Sag
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA;
| | - John David Prologo
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA;
| | - Nariman Nezami
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
- Experimental Therapeutics Program, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
- Correspondence: or
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Patterson T, Li H, Chai J, Debruyns A, Simmons C, Hart J, Pollock P, Holloway CL, Truong PT, Feng X. Locoregional Treatments for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in British Columbia: A Retrospective Cohort Study from January 2008 to December 2017. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061477. [PMID: 35326632 PMCID: PMC8945875 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary It is not known if surgery, radiation treatment (RT) or other types of locolregional treatment (LRT) may be beneficial for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (mGIST) in addition to systemic treatment. Our study aims to address this question by analyzing a cohort of 127 mGIST patients in British Columbia over a decade (from January 2008 to December 2017). We showed that mGIST patients who underwent surgery and LRT seemed to have better survival when compared to patients who did not undergo surgery and LRT. However, this treatment strategy should only be considered in patients with limited volume metastatic disease or oligoprogression while the rest of the disease is well controlled with systemic treatment. In addition, RT can offer palliative benefits such as pain relief and bleeding control. Our study, consistent with other retrospective studies, supports LRT consideration in selected mGIST patients within a multidisciplinary setting. This approach is not considered as a “standard of care” due to lack of prospective clinical trials but may improve clinical outcome for some mGIST patients. Abstract Introduction: The role of surgery and non-surgical locoregional treatments (LRT) such as radiation therapy (RT) and local ablation techniques in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is unclear. This study examines LRT practice patterns in metastatic GIST and their clinical outcomes in British Columbia (BC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with either recurrent or de novo metastatic GIST from January 2008 to December 2017 were identified. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed in patients who underwent LRT, including surgical resection of the primary tumor or metastectomy, RT, or other local ablative procedures. Results: 127 patients were identified: 52 (41%) had de novo metastasis and 75 (59%) had recurrent metastasis. Median age was 67 (23–90 years), 58.2% were male, primary site was 33.1% stomach, 40.2% small intestine, 11% rectum/pelvis, and 15.7% others. 37 (29.1%) of patients received palliative surgery, the majority of which had either primary tumor removal only (43.3%) or both primary tumor removal and metastectomy (35.1%). A minority of patients underwent metastectomy only (21.6%). A total of 12 (9.5%) patients received palliative RT to metastatic sites only (58.3%) or primary tumors only (41.7%), mostly for symptomatic control (n = 9). A few patients (n = 3) received local ablation for liver metastatic deposits with 1 patient receiving microwave ablation (MWA) and 2 receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Most patients (n = 120, 94.5%) received some type of systemic treatment. It is notable that prolonged progression free survival (PFS) was observed for the majority of patients who underwent surgery in the metastatic setting with a median PFS of 20.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 14.29–40.74) months. In addition, significantly higher median overall survival (mOS) was observed in patients who underwent surgery (97.15 months; 95% CI: 77.7-not reached) and LRT (78.98 months; 95% CI: 65.58-not reached) versus no surgery (45.37 months; 95% CI: 38.7–64.69) and no LRT (45.27 months; 95% CI: 33.25–58.66). Almost all patients (8 out of 9) achieved symptomatic improvement after palliative RT. All 3 patients achieved partial response and 2 out of 3 patients had relatively durable responses of 1 year or more after local ablation. Discussion: This study is among the first to systematically examine the use of various LRT in metastatic GIST management. Integration of LRT with systemic treatments may potentially provide promising durable response and prolonged survival for highly selected metastatic GIST patients with low volume disease, limited progression and otherwise well controlled on systemic treatments. These observations, consistent with others, add to the growing evidence that supports the judicious use of LRT in combination with systemic treatments to further optimize the care of metastatic GIST patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Patterson
- Clinical Trials, BC Cancer—Vancouver Island Center, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada; (T.P.); (P.P.)
| | - Haocheng Li
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
| | - Jocelyn Chai
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada;
| | - Angeline Debruyns
- Department of Medicine, Island Medical Program, University of British Columbia, Victoria, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada;
| | - Christine Simmons
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer—Vancouver Center, Vancouver, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada;
| | - Jason Hart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer—Vancouver Island Center, Victoria, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada;
| | - Phil Pollock
- Clinical Trials, BC Cancer—Vancouver Island Center, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada; (T.P.); (P.P.)
| | - Caroline L. Holloway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer—Vancouver Island Center, Victoria, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada; (C.L.H.); (P.T.T.)
| | - Pauline T. Truong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer—Vancouver Island Center, Victoria, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada; (C.L.H.); (P.T.T.)
| | - Xiaolan Feng
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada;
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Strauss SJ, Frezza AM, Abecassis N, Bajpai J, Bauer S, Biagini R, Bielack S, Blay JY, Bolle S, Bonvalot S, Boukovinas I, Bovee JVMG, Boye K, Brennan B, Brodowicz T, Buonadonna A, de Álava E, Dei Tos AP, Garcia Del Muro X, Dufresne A, Eriksson M, Fagioli F, Fedenko A, Ferraresi V, Ferrari A, Gaspar N, Gasperoni S, Gelderblom H, Gouin F, Grignani G, Gronchi A, Haas R, Hassan AB, Hecker-Nolting S, Hindi N, Hohenberger P, Joensuu H, Jones RL, Jungels C, Jutte P, Kager L, Kasper B, Kawai A, Kopeckova K, Krákorová DA, Le Cesne A, Le Grange F, Legius E, Leithner A, López Pousa A, Martin-Broto J, Merimsky O, Messiou C, Miah AB, Mir O, Montemurro M, Morland B, Morosi C, Palmerini E, Pantaleo MA, Piana R, Piperno-Neumann S, Reichardt P, Rutkowski P, Safwat AA, Sangalli C, Sbaraglia M, Scheipl S, Schöffski P, Sleijfer S, Strauss D, Sundby Hall K, Trama A, Unk M, van de Sande MAJ, van der Graaf WTA, van Houdt WJ, Frebourg T, Ladenstein R, Casali PG, Stacchiotti S. Bone sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS-ERN PaedCan Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1520-1536. [PMID: 34500044 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 226] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S J Strauss
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH), London, UK
| | - A M Frezza
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - N Abecassis
- Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - J Bajpai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - S Bauer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - R Biagini
- Department of Oncological Orthopedics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - S Bielack
- Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - J Y Blay
- Centre Leon Berard and UCBL1, Lyon, France
| | - S Bolle
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Bonvalot
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - J V M G Bovee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K Boye
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - B Brennan
- Paediatric Oncology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - T Brodowicz
- Vienna General Hospital (AKH), Medizinische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Buonadonna
- Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Aviano, Italy
| | - E de Álava
- Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBiS), Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, CSIC, University of Sevilla, CIBERONC, Seville, Spain; Department of Normal and Pathological Cytology and Histology, School of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - A P Dei Tos
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - A Dufresne
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - M Eriksson
- Skane University Hospital-Lund, Lund, Sweden
| | - F Fagioli
- Paediatric Onco-Haematology Department, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - A Fedenko
- P.A. Herzen Cancer Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - V Ferraresi
- Sarcomas and Rare Tumors Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - A Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - N Gaspar
- Department of Oncology for Child and Adolescents, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - S Gasperoni
- Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F Gouin
- Centre Leon-Berard Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - G Grignani
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - A Gronchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - R Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A B Hassan
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - N Hindi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fundación Jimenez Diaz, University Hospital, Advanced Therapies in Sarcoma Lab, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Hohenberger
- Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany
| | - H Joensuu
- Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - R L Jones
- Sarcoma Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Jungels
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - P Jutte
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - L Kager
- St. Anna Children's Hospital and Children's Cancer Research Institute (CCRI), Department of Pediatrics and Medical University Vienna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | - B Kasper
- Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany
| | - A Kawai
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Kopeckova
- University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - D A Krákorová
- Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - A Le Cesne
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - F Le Grange
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH), London, UK
| | - E Legius
- Department for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Leithner
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - A López Pousa
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Martin-Broto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fundación Jimenez Diaz, University Hospital, Advanced Therapies in Sarcoma Lab, Madrid, Spain
| | - O Merimsky
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Ichilov), Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - C Messiou
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A B Miah
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - O Mir
- Department of Ambulatory Cancer Care, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M Montemurro
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - B Morland
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - C Morosi
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - E Palmerini
- Department of Osteoncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Innovative Therapies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - M A Pantaleo
- Division of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Piana
- Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Cita della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - P Reichardt
- Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A A Safwat
- Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - C Sangalli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - M Sbaraglia
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - S Scheipl
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - P Schöffski
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Strauss
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - K Sundby Hall
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Trama
- Department of Research, Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - M Unk
- Institute of Oncology of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - M A J van de Sande
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - W T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Frebourg
- Department of Genetics, Normandy Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245 and Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - R Ladenstein
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - P G Casali
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - S Stacchiotti
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tang F, Tie Y, Wei YQ, Tu CQ, Wei XW. Targeted and immuno-based therapies in sarcoma: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2021; 1876:188606. [PMID: 34371128 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Sarcomas represent a distinct group of rare malignant tumors with high heterogeneity. Limited options with clinical efficacy for the metastatic or local advanced sarcoma existed despite standard therapy. Recently, targeted therapy according to the molecular and genetic phenotype of individual sarcoma is a promising option. Among these drugs, anti-angiogenesis therapy achieved favorable efficacy in sarcomas. Inhibitors targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, mTOR, NTRK, metabolisms, and epigenetic drugs are under clinical evaluation for sarcomas bearing the corresponding signals. Immunotherapy represents a promising and favorable method in advanced solid tumors. However, most sarcomas are immune "cold" tumors, with only alveolar soft part sarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cellular therapies with TCR-engineered T cells, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and nature killer cells transfer show therapeutic potential. Identifying tumor-specific antigens and exploring immune modulation factors arguing the efficacy of these immunotherapies are the current challenges. This review focuses on the mechanisms, advances, and potential strategies of targeted and immune-based therapies in sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Tang
- Laboratory of Aging Research and Cancer Drug Target, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Orthopeadics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Tie
- Laboratory of Aging Research and Cancer Drug Target, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu-Quan Wei
- Laboratory of Aging Research and Cancer Drug Target, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chong-Qi Tu
- Department of Orthopeadics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Xia-Wei Wei
- Laboratory of Aging Research and Cancer Drug Target, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tetta C, Carpenzano M, Algargoush ATJ, Algargoosh M, Londero F, Maessen JG, Gelsomino S. Non-surgical Treatments for Lung Metastases in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA). Curr Med Imaging 2021; 17:261-275. [PMID: 32819261 DOI: 10.2174/1573405616999200819165709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radio-frequency ablation (RFA) and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) are two emerging therapies for lung metastases. INTRODUCTION Aliterature review was performed to evaluate the outcomes and complications of these procedures in patients with lung metastases from soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS After selection, seven studies were included for each treatment encompassing a total of 424 patients: 218 in the SBRT group and 206 in the RFA group. RESULTS The mean age ranged from 47.9 to 64 years in the SBRT group and from 48 to 62.7 years in the RFA group. The most common histologic subtype was, in both groups, leiomyosarcoma. In the SBRT group, median overall survival ranged from 25.2 to 69 months and median disease- free interval was from 8.4 to 45 months. Two out of seven studies reported G3 and one G3 toxicity, respectively. In RFA patients, overall survival ranged from 15 to 50 months. The most frequent complication was pneumothorax. Local control showed a high percentage for both procedures. CONCLUSION SBRT is recommended in patients unsuitable to surgery, in synchronous bilateral pulmonary metastases, in case of deep lesions and patients receiving high-risk systemic therapies. RFA is indicated in case of a long disease-free interval, in oligometastatic disease, when only the lung is involved, in small size lesions far from large vessels. Further large randomized studies are necessary to establish whether these treatments may also represent a reliable alternative to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Tetta
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Carpenzano
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht - CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Areej T J Algargoush
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht - CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marwah Algargoosh
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht - CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Francesco Londero
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht - CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jos G Maessen
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht - CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Sandro Gelsomino
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht - CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Facchini G, Ceccarelli L, Tomà P, Bartoloni A. Recent Imaging Advancements for Lung Metastases in Children with Sarcoma. Curr Med Imaging 2021; 17:236-243. [PMID: 33371858 DOI: 10.2174/1573405616666201228125657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
In children and adolescents affected by musculoskeletal sarcomas (both soft tissue and bone sarcomas), the presence of lung metastases is a frequent complication, that should be known since the patient's prognosis, as management, and treatment depend on it. During the staging phase, the detection of lung metastases should be sensitive and specific, and it should be carried out by minimizing the radiation exposure. To deal with this problem, imaging has reached important goals in recent years, thanks to the development of cone-beam CT or low-dose computed tomography, with some new iterative reconstruction methods, such as Veo and ASIR. Imaging is also fundamental for the possibility to perform lung biopsies under CT guidance, with less morbidity, less time-consumption, and shorter recovery time, compared to surgical biopsies.Moreover, important results have also been demonstrated in the treatment of lung metastases, due to the improvement of new mini-invasive image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation procedures, which proved to be safe and effective also in young patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Facchini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Ceccarelli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Tomà
- Department of Imaging, IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anatomic Imaging of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Sarcoma 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-9414-4_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
15
|
Dalili D, Isaac A, Cazzato RL, Åström G, Bergh J, Mansour R, Weber MA, Garnon J, Gangi A. Interventional Techniques for Bone and Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: Current Practices and Future Directions - Part II. Stabilization. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2020; 24:710-725. [PMID: 33307586 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Percutaneous image-guided oncologic interventions have rapidly evolved over the last two decades as an independent strategy or used within a first-, second-, or even third-line strategy in the treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) tumors. Abundant mostly nonrandomized publications have described the safety, efficacy, and reproducibility of implementing percutaneous therapies both with curative and palliative intent. In this article, we continue to share our experience in bone and MSK soft tissue interventions focusing on stabilization and combined ablation and stabilization. We propose a pathway and explore future directions of image-guided interventional oncology related to skeletal disease. We reflect on the advantages and limitations of each technique and offer guidance and pearls to improve outcomes. Representing patterns from our practices, we demonstrate the role of collaborative working within a multidisciplinary team, ideally within a dedicated tumor treatment center, to deliver patient-specific therapy plans that are value based and favored by patients when given the choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danoob Dalili
- Department of Radiology, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.,School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda Isaac
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roberto Luigi Cazzato
- Imagerie Interventionnelle, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Gunnar Åström
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology (Oncology) and Department of Surgical Sciences (Radiology), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jonas Bergh
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ramy Mansour
- Department of Radiology, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Marc-André Weber
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Paediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Julien Garnon
- Imagerie Interventionnelle, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Afshin Gangi
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.,Imagerie Interventionnelle, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pushpam D, Garg V, Ganguly S, Biswas B. Management of Refractory Pediatric Sarcoma: Current Challenges and Future Prospects. Onco Targets Ther 2020; 13:5093-5112. [PMID: 32606731 PMCID: PMC7293381 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s193363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Paediatric sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of disorders constituting bone sarcoma and various soft tissue sarcomas. Almost one-third of these presents with metastasis at baseline and another one-third recur after initial curative treatment. There is a huge unmet need in this cohort in terms of curative options and/or prolongation of survival. In this review, we have discussed the current treatment options, challenges and future strategies of managing relapsed/refractory paediatric sarcomas. Upfront risk-adapted treatment with multidisciplinary management remains the main strategy to prevent future recurrence or relapse of the disease. In the case of limited local and/or systemic relapse or late relapse, initial multimodality management can be administered. In treatment-refractory cases or where cure is not feasible, the treatment options are limited to novel therapeutics, immunotherapeutic approach, targeted therapies, and metronomic therapies. A better understanding of disease biology, mechanism of treatment refractoriness, identifications of driver mutation, the discovery of novel targeted therapies, cellular vaccine and adapted therapies should be explored in relapsed/refractory cases. Close national and international collaboration for translation research is needed to fulfil the unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vikas Garg
- Department of Medical Oncology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandip Ganguly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| | - Bivas Biswas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mandair GS, Oest ME, Mann KA, Morris MD, Damron TA, Kohn DH. Radiation-induced changes to bone composition extend beyond periosteal bone. Bone Rep 2020; 12:100262. [PMID: 32258252 PMCID: PMC7125315 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas are often at risk of post-irradiation (post-RTx) bone fragility fractures, but our understanding of factors controlling radiation-induced bone injury is limited. Previous studies have evaluated post-RTx changes to cortical bone composition in the periosteum of irradiated tibiae, but have not evaluated effects of irradiation in deeper tissues, such as endosteal or mid-cortical bone, and whether there are differential spatial effects of irradiation. In this study, we hypothesize that post-RTx changes to cortical bone composition are greater in endosteal compared to mid-cortical or periosteal bone. METHODS A pre-clinical mouse model of limited field hindlimb irradiation was used to evaluate spatial and temporal post-RTx changes to the metaphyseal cortex of irradiated tibiae. Irradiation was delivered unilaterally to the hindlimbs of 12-wk old female BALB/cJ mice as 4 consecutive daily doses of 5 Gy each. RTx and non-RTx tibiae were obtained at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 wks post-RTx (n = 9 mice/group/time). Raman spectroscopy was used to evaluate spatial and temporal post-RTx changes to cortical bone composition in age-matched RTx and non-RTx groups. RESULTS Significant early spatial differences in mineral/matrix and collagen crosslink ratios were found between endosteal and periosteal or mid-cortical bone at 2-wks post-RTx. Although spatial differences were transient, mineral/matrix ratios significantly decreased and collagen crosslink ratios significantly increased with post-RTx time throughout the entire tibial metaphyseal cortex. CONCLUSIONS Irradiation negatively impacts the composition of cortical bone in a spatially-dependent manner starting as early as 2-wks post-RTx. Long-term progressive post-RTx changes across all cortical bone sites may eventually contribute to the increased risk of post-RTx bone fragility fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan E. Oest
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth A. Mann
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | - Timothy A. Damron
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - David H. Kohn
- School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Reproducibility of Ablated Volume Measurement Is Higher with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound than with B-Mode Ultrasound after Benign Thyroid Nodule Radiofrequency Ablation-A Preliminary Study. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9051504. [PMID: 32429487 PMCID: PMC7291258 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The reproducibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and standard B-mode ultrasound in the assessment of radiofrequency-ablated volume of benign thyroid nodules was compared. A preliminary study was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of benign thyroid nodules between 2014 and 2016, with available CEUS and B-mode post-ablation checks. CEUS and B-mode images were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists to assess inter- and intra-observer agreement in the assessment of ablated volume (Bland–Altman test). For CEUS, the mean inter-observer difference (95% limits of agreement) was 0.219 mL (-0.372–0.809 mL); for B-mode, the mean difference was 0.880 mL (-1.655–3.414 mL). Reproducibility was significantly higher for CEUS (85%) than for B-mode (27%). Mean intra-observer differences (95% limits of agreement) were 0.013 mL (0.803–4.097 mL) for Reader 1 and 0.031 mL (0.763–3.931 mL) for Reader 2 using CEUS, while they were 0.567 mL (-2.180–4.317 mL, Reader 1) and 0.759 mL (-2.584–4.290 mL, Reader 2) for B-mode. Intra-observer reproducibility was significantly higher for CEUS (96% and 95%, for the two readers) than for B-mode (21% and 23%). In conclusion, CEUS had higher reproducibility and inter- and intra-observer agreement compared to conventional B-mode in the assessment of radiofrequency-ablated volume of benign thyroid nodules.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ridouani F, Srimathveeravalli G. Percutaneous image-guided ablation: From techniques to treatments. Presse Med 2019; 48:e219-e231. [PMID: 31447333 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2019.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Image-guided ablation is performed by percutaneously introducing ablation probes to deliver energy into a tumor to destroy it in a controlled and localized fashion. Ablation modalities can be broadly classified as thermal or non-thermal based on the mechanism of tumor destruction and are performed using different types of image guidance for planning, delivering and follow-up of the treatment. Ablation is performed in a minimally invasive fashion, providing greater residual organ preservation with minimal morbidity to the patient. Image-guided ablation is being used in the clinic for the treatment of primary and metastatic tumors, and this article reviews state of the art for the treatment of malignancies in the liver, lung, kidney and musculoskeletal tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fourat Ridouani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, USA
| | - Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli
- University of Massachusetts, Institute for Applied Life Sciences, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Amherst, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Casali PG, Bielack S, Abecassis N, Aro HT, Bauer S, Biagini R, Bonvalot S, Boukovinas I, Bovee JVMG, Brennan B, Brodowicz T, Broto JM, Brugières L, Buonadonna A, De Álava E, Dei Tos AP, Del Muro XG, Dileo P, Dhooge C, Eriksson M, Fagioli F, Fedenko A, Ferraresi V, Ferrari A, Ferrari S, Frezza AM, Gaspar N, Gasperoni S, Gelderblom H, Gil T, Grignani G, Gronchi A, Haas RL, Hassan B, Hecker-Nolting S, Hohenberger P, Issels R, Joensuu H, Jones RL, Judson I, Jutte P, Kaal S, Kager L, Kasper B, Kopeckova K, Krákorová DA, Ladenstein R, Le Cesne A, Lugowska I, Merimsky O, Montemurro M, Morland B, Pantaleo MA, Piana R, Picci P, Piperno-Neumann S, Pousa AL, Reichardt P, Robinson MH, Rutkowski P, Safwat AA, Schöffski P, Sleijfer S, Stacchiotti S, Strauss SJ, Sundby Hall K, Unk M, Van Coevorden F, van der Graaf WTA, Whelan J, Wardelmann E, Zaikova O, Blay JY. Bone sarcomas: ESMO-PaedCan-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:iv79-iv95. [PMID: 30285218 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 365] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- P G Casali
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - S Bielack
- Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - N Abecassis
- Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - H T Aro
- Turku University Hospital (Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala), Turlu, Finland
| | - S Bauer
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - R Biagini
- Department of Oncological Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IFO, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - J V M G Bovee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - B Brennan
- Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - T Brodowicz
- Vienna General Hospital (AKH), Medizinische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria
| | - J M Broto
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio-CIBERONC, Seville, Spain
| | - L Brugières
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - A Buonadonna
- Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Aviano
| | - E De Álava
- Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBiS), Virgen del Rocio University Hospital /CSIC/University of Sevilla/CIBERONC, Seville, Spain
| | - A P Dei Tos
- Ospedale Regionale di Treviso "S.Maria di Cà Foncello", Treviso, Italy
| | - X G Del Muro
- Integrated Unit ICO Hospitalet, HUB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Dileo
- Sarcoma Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - C Dhooge
- Ghent University Hospital (Pediatric Hematology-Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation), Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Eriksson
- Skane University Hospital-Lund, Lund, Sweden
| | - F Fagioli
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Division, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - A Fedenko
- N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - V Ferraresi
- Department of Oncological Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IFO, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - A Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan
| | - S Ferrari
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna
| | - A M Frezza
- Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - N Gaspar
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Gasperoni
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi Firenze, Florence, Italy
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T Gil
- Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - G Grignani
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - A Gronchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - R L Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam and Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - B Hassan
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - R Issels
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Joensuu
- Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH), Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - I Judson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P Jutte
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | - S Kaal
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L Kager
- St. Anna Children's Hospital & Children's Cancer Research Institute, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - B Kasper
- Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim
| | | | - D A Krákorová
- Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - R Ladenstein
- St. Anna Children's Hospital & Children's Cancer Research Institute, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Le Cesne
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - I Lugowska
- Maria Sklodowska Curie Institute-Oncology Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - O Merimsky
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Ichilov), Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - M Montemurro
- Medical Oncology University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - B Morland
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - M A Pantaleo
- Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Piana
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Division, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - P Picci
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna
| | | | - A L Pousa
- Fundacio de Gestio Sanitaria de L'Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Reichardt
- Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - M H Robinson
- YCRC Department of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - P Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska Curie Institute-Oncology Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A A Safwat
- Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Finland
| | - P Schöffski
- Department of General Medical Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Stacchiotti
- Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - S J Strauss
- Sarcoma Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - K Sundby Hall
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Unk
- Institute of Oncology of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - F Van Coevorden
- Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W T A van der Graaf
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Whelan
- Sarcoma Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - E Wardelmann
- Gerhard-Domagk-Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - O Zaikova
- Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Y Blay
- Centre Leon Bernard and UCBL1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|