Planned organ preservation for early T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma: A French, multicentre study

ACO/ARO/AIO-22 - External beam radiotherapy combined with endorectal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer: A prospective multicentre trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group

Purpose

Rectal cancer disproportionately affects the elderly population, with more than half of cases diagnosed in individuals aged 70 years or older. Frail patients in this group often face significant challenges tolerating the standard treatment of total mesorectal excision (TME), due to elevated risks of surgical complications and perioperative morbidity. Advances in radiotherapy techniques offer a viable alternative, providing effective tumor control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Recent clinical trials, including OPERA and MORPEUS, have demonstrated that dose-escalated radiotherapy, which integrates external beam (chemo)radiotherapy (EBRT) with high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-BT) or contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB), can achieve high clinical response rates and facilitate organ preservation in younger, healthier patient cohorts. Building on these findings, the ACO/ARO/AIO-22 study seeks to adapt these innovative approaches to meet the needs of elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer.

Methods/Design

The ACO/ARO/AIO-22 trial is a prospective multicentre controlled trial. Elderly (age ≥70 years) and/or frail patients with non-metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma (cT1-3d N0/+ M0, mrCRM - / +) localized 0-16 cm from the ano-cutaneous line, unable to undergo radical surgery can be included. The initial treatment comprises an external beam radiation (EBRT) regime with 13 × 3 Gy (total: 39 Gy) over a period of two and a half weeks. Following initial restaging 6.5 weeks after completion of EBRT, endorectal HDR-BT will be delivered with 3 weekly fractions of 8 Gy to a total dose of 24 Gy (prescribed at the radial margin of the tumor; with a maximum prescription depth of 10 mm); alternatively, with CXB with 90 Gy in 3 weekly fractions. The primary objective is complete or near complete clinical response (cCR or ncCR) and the second primary endpoint is quality of life (QoL) measured with the EORTC QLQ-ELD14, both at 12 months after treatment start.

Discussion

The ACO/ARO/AIO-22 prospective multicentre trial will evaluate organ preservation rates and QoL after combining EBRT with endorectal HDR-BT in elderly and/or frail patients with rectal cancer.Trial Registration:Clinicialtrials.gov number: NCT06729645.

Management of immune-related myocarditis, myositis and myasthenia gravis (MMM) overlap syndrome: a single institution case series and literature review

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of various malignancies, particularly melanoma. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose significant challenges, particularly in cases of severe toxicity syndromes. One such life-threatening irAE is the myocarditis, myositis, and myasthenia gravis (MMM) overlap syndrome, which occurs in less than 1% of patients but has in-hospital mortality rates ranging from 40 to 60%. Due to its rarity and complexity, early recognition and a multidisciplinary approach are critical to improving outcomes.

Methods

We present a single-institution case series of four patients diagnosed with MMM overlap syndrome following ICI therapy. Clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging, and electrophysiological tests were analyzed to confirm the diagnosis. Therapeutic interventions-including corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), plasma exchange (PLEX), tocilizumab, and rituximab- were evaluated in terms of efficacy and clinical outcomes.

Results

The onset of MMM syndrome varied from 2 to 4 weeks after initiating ICI therapy. Patients presented with rapidly progressive symptoms, including ptosis, bulbar dysfunction, respiratory distress, myopathy, and cardiac conduction abnormalities. Immunosuppressive therapy with high-dose corticosteroids was initiated in all cases. Additional immunomodulatory treatments (IVIG, tocilizumab, PLEX, and rituximab) were administered based on clinical deterioration and autoimmune profile. Two patients achieved complete recovery, one remains on maintenance immunosuppression, and one died due to respiratory failure despite aggressive treatment.

Conclusion

MMM overlap syndrome is a severe and often fatal irAE associated with ICI therapy. Early identification, aggressive immunosuppressive treatment, and individualized therapeutic strategies are essential to optimize patient outcomes. Further research is needed to refine diagnostic criteria, identify predictive biomarkers, and establish standardized treatment protocols.

Contact X-ray brachytherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rectal cancer is a highly prevalent disease. Evidence presented in the 2025 phase-III OPERA randomised trial suggests that Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB), with external beam chemoradiotherapy, is a viable organ-preserving alternative to radical surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical effectiveness of CXB in the treatment of rectal cancer. This systematic review was prospectively registered (CRD42021284969) and reported following PRISMA guidelines. Multiple electronic databases were interrogated using the search terms "Rectal cancer", "Contact Brachytherapy", and synonym terms. Clinical complete response (cCR) was the primary outcome. Proportional meta-analyses were conducted and presented as forest plots with summary proportions and 95 % confidence intervals. The literature search identified 973 studies, of which 52 studies encompassing 5447 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of outcomes were as follows: cCR rate = 82 % (95 % CI 76-88 %), Local Regrowth rate = 20 % (95 % CI 15-25 %), regional metastasis rate = 3 % (95 % CI 2-4 %), salvage surgery rate = 14 % (95 % CI 11-18 %), long-term disease control post-salvage surgery rate = 88 % (95 % CI 78-96 %) and organ preservation = 81 % (95 % CI 74-88 %). CXB in the appropriately selected patient population can achieve long-term disease control and organ preservation whilst avoiding major surgery. Salvage surgery remains a viable option for patients who experience disease regrowth with excellent long-term disease control. Clinicians should discuss CXB with rectal cancer patients, presenting it as a viable and safe alternative to radical surgery. This is particularly pertinent for patients who are stoma-averse or older patients in frail health.

A phase III randomised trial on the addition of a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost to standard neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for organ preservation in early rectal adenocarcinoma: 5 year results of the OPERA trial

BACKGROUND

The OPERA trial has shown that a contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV (CXB) boost with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) can increase organ preservation (OP) rate for early rectal adenocarcinoma (ADK) of low-mid rectum. We report the results after 5 years of follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

OPERA was a multicentre, phase III trial that included operable patients (pts), with cT2-cT3b low-mid rectal ADK, tumours <5 cm, cN0 or cN1 <8 mm. All pts received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT): 45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent capecitabine. Pts were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a boost of EBRT in group A (9 Gy/5 fractions) or a boost with CXB (90 Gy/3 fractions) in group B. The primary end point was OP rate.

RESULTS

Out of 148 patients randomised, 141 were eligible. Between week 14-24, a clinical complete (or near) response was observed in 44 pts in group A (64%) versus 66 in group B (92%); P < 0.001. The 3-year OP rate was 59% in group A versus 81% in group B (P = 0.003). After update the median follow-up was 61.1 months [56.8-64.5]. The 5-year local regrowth was 39% in group A and 17% in group B (P = 0.1). The difference in OP was still highly significant between both groups: A 56% versus B 79% (P = 0.004). The difference was more significant if tumours <3 cm, with an OP rate of 93% in group B compared to 54% in group A. Of the 28 local regrowths, 3 occurred after 3 years of follow-up. Rectal bleeding (grade 1-2), which was the most prevalent toxicity during follow-up, disappeared most of the time after three years. Bowel function was not worsened by the CXB boost.

CONCLUSION

The OPERA trial was the first trial to demonstrate that CXB dose escalation was increasing the OP rate with good bowel function at 3 years. At 5 years, these results are sustained, especially in small early-stage tumours. The occurrence of some local regrowth after 3 years necessitates close surveillance of these pts during the 5-year period.

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society on Appropriate Use Criteria for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines

For patients with rectal cancer, the standard approach of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery (trimodality therapy) is associated with significant long-term toxicity and/or colostomy for most patients. Patient options focused on quality of life (QOL) have dramatically improved, but there remains limited guidance regarding comparative effectiveness. This systematic review and associated guidelines evaluate how various treatment strategies compare to each other in terms of oncologic outcomes and QOL. Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology were used to search for prospective and retrospective trials and meta-analyses of adequate quality within the Ovid Medline database between January 1, 2012, and June 15, 2023. These studies informed the expert panel, which rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 6 clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). The search process yielded 197 articles that advised voting. Increasing data have shown that nonoperative management (NOM) and primary surgery result in QOL benefits noted over trimodality therapy without detriment to oncologic outcomes. For patients with rectal cancer for whom total mesorectal excision would result in permanent colostomy or inadequate bowel continence, NOM was strongly recommended as usually appropriate. Restaging with tumor response assessment approximately 8 to 12 weeks after completion of radiation therapy/chemoradiation therapy was deemed a necessary component of NOM. The panel recommended active surveillance in the setting of a near-complete or complete response. In the setting of NOM, 54 to 56 Gy in 27 to 31 fractions concurrent with chemotherapy and followed by consolidation chemotherapy was recommended. The panel strongly recommends primary surgery as usually appropriate for a T3N0 high rectal tumor for which low anterior resection and adequate bowel function is possible, with adjuvant chemotherapy considered if N+. Recent data support NOM and primary surgery as important options that should be offered to eligible patients. Considering the complexity of multidisciplinary management, patients should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting, and therapy should be tailored to individual patient goals/values.

Sequence of Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) and External Beam Radiation (EBRT) in organ-preserving treatment for small rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) and vice versa are viable alternatives to surgery for selected rectal cancer patients who have small tumours (≤3 cm). However, the optimal sequence of treatment needs to be established. We compared two approaches using Propensity Score (PS) matching and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to investigate whether the sequence of treatment affected patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis (2008-2019) included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (cT1-3,N0-1,M0, grade 1-2, size ≤ 3 cm) who received both EBRT and CXB, irrespective of treatment sequence. PS matching and IPTW were conducted to balance covariate standardised mean differences between groups. Oncological outcomes and rate of post-treatment rectal bleeding were assessed.

RESULTS

Following PS matching and IPTW analyses from 251 eligible patients; 103 starting with EBRT (median follow-up: 37 [IQR:18-56] months) and 148 with CXB (median follow-up: 32 [IQR:16-54] months, a significant improvement in 3-year overall survival (77% vs 85%, p = 0.02, [HR:0.58 (95% CI:0.37-0.91)]) and a higher risk of post-treatment rectal bleeding (grade 1 (26%) and grade 2 (6%)) were found in patients who started with CXB (p = 0.08). No significant differences were observed in local regrowth (18% vs 12%, p = 0.47), distant relapse (10% vs 6%, p = 0.53), 3-year organ preservation rates (70% vs 75%, p = 0.20, [HR:0.66 (95% CI: 0.35-1.26)]), or disease-free survival (78% vs 82%, p = 0.17, [HR: 0.47 (95% CI: 0.16-1.38)]) CONCLUSION: In patients with rectal cancer (≤3 cm), commencing with CXB rather than EBRT, was associated with improved overall survival, but had a higher risk of G1/2 rectal bleeding. No statistically significant differences were observed in other oncological outcomes.

An International Expert-Based Consensus on the Definition of a Clinical Near-Complete Response After Neoadjuvant (Chemo)radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

A variety of definitions for a clinical near-complete response after neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy for rectal cancer are currently used. This variety leads to inconsistency in clinical practice, long-term outcome, and trial enrollment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to reach expert-based consensus on the definition of a clinical near-complete response after (chemo) radiotherapy.

DESIGN

A modified Delphi process, including a systematic review, 3 surveys, and 2 meetings, was performed with an international expert panel consisting of 7 surgeons and 4 radiologists. The surveys consisted of individual features, statements, and feature combinations (endoscopy, T2-weighted MRI, and diffusion-weighted MRI).

SETTING

The modified Delphi process was performed in an online setting; all 3 surveys were completed online by the expert panel, and both meetings were hosted online.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was to reach consensus (80% or more agreement).

RESULTS

The expert panel reached consensus on a 3-tier categorization of the near-complete response category based on the likelihood of the response to evolve into a clinical complete response after a longer waiting interval. The panelists agreed that a near-complete response is a temporary entity only to be used in the first 6 months after (chemo)radiotherapy. Furthermore, consensus was reached that the lymph node status should be considered when deciding on a near-complete response and that biopsies are not always needed when a near-complete response is found. No consensus was reached on whether primary staging characteristics have to be taken into account when deciding on a near-complete response.

LIMITATIONS

This 3-tier subcategorization is expert-based; therefore, there is no supporting evidence for this subcategorization. Also, it is unclear whether this subcategorization can be generalized into clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus was reached on the use of a 3-tier categorization of a near-complete response, which can be helpful in daily practice as guidance for treatment and to inform patients with a near-complete response on the likelihood of successful organ preservation. See Video Abstract.

UN CONSENSO INTERNACIONAL BASADO EN EXPERTOS ACERCA DE LA DEFINICIN DE UNA RESPUESTA CLNICA CASI COMPLETA DESPUS DE QUIMIORADIOTERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE CONTRA EL CNCER DE RECTO

ANTECEDENTES:Actualmente, se utilizan una variedad de definiciones para una respuesta clínica casi completa después de quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante contra el cáncer de recto. Esta variedad resulta en inconsistencia en la práctica clínica, los resultados a largo plazo y la inscripción en ensayos.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue llegar a un consenso de expertos sobre la definición de una respuesta clínica casi completa después de quimioradioterapia.DISEÑO:Se realizó un proceso Delphi modificado que incluyó una revisión sistemática, 3 encuestas y 2 reuniones con un panel internacional de expertos compuesto por siete cirujanos y 4 radiólogos. Las encuestas consistieron en características individuales, declaraciones y combinaciones de características (endoscopía, T2W-MRI y DWI).AJUSTE:El proceso Delphi modificado se realizó en un entorno en línea; el panel de expertos completó las tres encuestas en línea y ambas reuniones se realizaron en línea.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal fue llegar a un consenso (≥80% de acuerdo).RESULTADOS:El panel de expertos llegó a un consenso sobre una categorización de tres niveles de la categoría de respuesta casi completa basada en la probabilidad de que la respuesta evolucione hacia una respuesta clínica completa después de un intervalo de espera más largo. Los panelistas coincidieron en que una respuesta casi completa es una entidad temporal que sólo debe utilizarse en los primeros 6 meses después de la quimioradioterapia. Además, se llegó a un consenso en que se debe considerar el estado de los nódulos linfáticos al decidir sobre una respuesta casi completa y que no siempre se necesitan biopsias cuando se encuentra una respuesta casi completa. No se llegó a un consenso sobre si se deben tener en cuenta las características primarias de estadificación al decidir una respuesta casi completa.LIMITACIONES:Esta subcategorización de 3 niveles está basada en expertos; por lo tanto, no hay evidencia que respalde esta subcategorización. Además, no está claro si esta subcategorización puede generalizarse a la práctica clínica.CONCLUSIONES:Se alcanzó consenso sobre el uso de una categorización de 3 niveles de una respuesta casi completa que puede ser útil en la práctica diaria como guía para el tratamiento y para informar a los pacientes con una respuesta casi completa sobre la probabilidad de una preservación exitosa del órgano. (Traducción - Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez).

Survival prognostic in different age groups of patients undergoing local versus radical excision for rectal cancer: a study based on the SEER database

Age significantly affects the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer after radical excision (RE), and local excision (LE) is an alternative surgical procedure to RE. To compare the survival prognosis in different age groups of LE versus RE for rectal cancer. Patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma treated by LE or RE from 2010 to 2017 were obtained from the SEER database. The primary outcomes are 5-year OS and CSS. A total of 11,170 patients were eventually included, and there were 490 patients in LE and RE groups, respectively, after 1:1 propensity score matching. The 5-year OS and CSS after LE were significantly better in < 50 years and 50-66 years groups than in > 66 years group (5-year OS: 95.70% vs 88.40% vs 67.00%, P < 0.001; 5-year CSS: 95.70% vs 96.30% vs 82.60%, P < 0.001). No statistical significance was found for the differences in 5-year OS and CSS between LE and RE in < 50, 50-66, and > 66 years group (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed age > 66 years, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated (Grade III/IV), and tumor size 3 to 5 cm was independent risk factors for 5-year OS after LE; age > 66 years, perineural invasion, and tumor size 3 to 5 cm were the 5-year CSS independent risk factors for after LE. We found that the survival prognosis of younger rectal cancer patients treated with LE was significantly better than older (> 66 years) patients, and the survival prognosis of rectal cancer patients in the three age groups was similar between LE and RE.

Brachytherapy for rectal and anal cancer: Where are we and current perspectives?

Anal and rectal cancers were some of the first disease sites treated with brachytherapy due to the anatomic ease of implantation. As external beam radiotherapy grew in popularity the use of ano-rectal brachytherapy declined. However, the past few years have seen a steady resurgence in the use of brachytherapy in the ano-rectum supported by the use of large clinical series and randomized trials. The increasing acceptance by the surgical community of organ preservation as a valid treatment strategy for rectal cancer has encouraged the use of nonsurgical approaches and brachytherapy has shown itself to be a valuable tool for this. The current role of anal and rectal brachytherapy is presented with perspectives on its future use.

Treatment planning for patients with low rectal cancer in a multicenter prospective organ preservation study

BACKGROUND

Non-surgical management of rectal cancer relies on (chemo)radiotherapy as the definitive treatment modality. This study reports and evaluates the clinical high dose radiotherapy treatment plans delivered to patients with low resectable rectal cancer in a Danish multicenter trial.

METHODS

The Danish prospective multicenter phase II Watchful Waiting 2 trial (NCT02438839) investigated definitive chemoradiation for non-surgical management of low rectal cancer. Three Danish centers participated in the trial and committed to protocol-specified treatment planning and delivery requirements. The protocol specified a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the elective volume (CTV-/PTV-E) and a concomitant boost of 62 Gy in 28 fractions to the primary target volume (CTV-/PTV-T).

RESULTS

The trial included 108 patients, of which 106 treatment plans were available for retrospective analysis. Dose coverage planning goals for the main target structures were fulfilled for 94% of the treatment plans. However, large intercenter differences in doses to organs-at-risk (OARs) were seen, especially for the intestines. Five patients had a V60Gy>10 cm3 for the intestines and two patients for the bladder.

CONCLUSION

Prescribed planning goals for target coverage were fulfilled for 94% of the treatment plans, however analysis of OAR doses and volumes indicated intercenter variations. Dose escalation to 62 Gy (as a concomitant boost to the primary tumor) introduced no substantial high dose volumes (>60 Gy) to the bladder and intestines. The treatment planning goals may be used for future prospective evaluation of highdose radiotherapy for organ preservation for low rectal cancer.

Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Management of Colorectal cancer

This review article examines the evidence-based management of colorectal cancers, focusing on topics characterized by ongoing debates and evolving evidence. To contribute to the scientific discourse, we intentionally exclude subjects with established guidelines, concentrating instead on areas where the current understanding is dynamic. Our analysis encompasses a thorough exploration of critical themes, including the evidence surrounding complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy in colon cancers. Additionally, we delve into the evolving landscape of perioperative chemotherapy in both colon and rectal cancers, considering its nuanced role in the context of contemporary treatment strategies. Advancements in surgical techniques are a pivotal aspect of our discussion, with an emphasis on the utilization of minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery in both colon and rectal cancers, including advanced rectal cases. Moving beyond conventional radical procedures, we scrutinize the feasibility and implications of endoscopic resections for small tumors, explore the paradigm of organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancers, and assess the utility of total neoadjuvant therapy in the current treatment landscape. Our final segment reviews pivotal trials that have significantly influenced the management of colorectal liver and peritoneal metastasis.

Optimisation of Organ Preservation treatment strategies in patients with rectal cancer with a good clinical response after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy: Additional contact X-ray brachytherapy versus eXtending the observation period and local excision (OPAXX) - protocol for two multicentre, parallel, single-arm, phase II studies

INTRODUCTION

Standard treatment for patients with intermediate or locally advanced rectal cancer is (chemo)radiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery. In recent years, organ preservation aiming at improving quality of life has been explored. Patients with a complete clinical response to (chemo)radiotherapy can be managed safely with a watch-and-wait approach. However, the optimal organ-preserving treatment strategy for patients with a good, but not complete clinical response remains unclear. The aim of the OPAXX study is to determine the rate of organ preservation that can be achieved in patients with rectal cancer with a good clinical response after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy by additional local treatment options.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The OPAXX study is a Dutch multicentre study that investigates the efficacy of two additional local treatments aiming at organ preservation in patients with a good, but not complete response to neoadjuvant treatment (ie near-complete response or a small residual tumour mass <3 cm). The sample size will be 168 patients in total. Patients will be randomised (1:1) between two parallel single-arm phase II studies: study arm 1 involves additional contact X-ray brachytherapy (an intraluminal radiation boost), while in study arm 2 the observation period is extended followed by a second response evaluation and optional transanal local excision. The primary endpoint of the study is the rate of successful organ preservation at 1 year following randomisation. Secondary endpoints include toxicity, morbidity, oncological and functional outcomes at 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Finally, an observational cohort study for patients who are not eligible for randomisation is conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial protocol has been approved by the medical ethics committee of the Netherlands Cancer Institute (METC20.1276/M20PAX). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The trial results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05772923.

High-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer: A state-of-the-art review

Rectal cancer is a common malignancy that requires multidisciplinary treatment. By utilizing the dose-response relationship in rectal cancer radiotherapy, increasing the radiotherapy dose can improve clinical complete remission rates. High-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) is a novel technique that delivers high doses of radiotherapy directly to the tumor via an endorectal applicator, sparing the adjacent normal tissues from excessive radiation exposure. HDREBT includes contact X-ray brachytherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy. We introduce the latest developments in applicators and imaging techniques for HDREBT in rectal cancer and summarize the current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of HDREBT as a neoadjuvant, definitive, or palliative treatment option for all stages of rectal cancer patients. We also discuss the potential advantages and challenges of HDREBT in achieving organ preservation and improving the quality of life of rectal cancer patients. HDREBT has shown promising results in achieving high complete response rates, enabling nonoperative management, improving organ preservation rates, and providing effective palliation in rectal cancer patients. More studies are needed to optimize its dose and fractionation schemes in different clinical scenarios.

Organ Preservation in MSS Rectal Cancer

Rectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with complex genetic and molecular subtypes. Emerging progress of neoadjuvant therapy has led to increased pathological and clinical complete response (cCR) rates for microsatellite stable (MSS) rectal cancer, which responds poorly to immune checkpoint inhibitor alone. As a result, organ preservation of MSS rectal cancer as an alternative to radical surgery has gradually become a feasible option. For patients with cCR or near-cCR after neoadjuvant treatment, organ preservation can be implemented safely with less morbidity. Patient selection can be done either before the neoadjuvant treatment for higher probability or after with careful assessment for a favorable outcome. Those patients who achieved a good clinical response are managed with nonoperative management, organ preservation surgery, or radiation therapy alone followed by strict surveillance. The oncological outcomes of patients with careful selection and organ preservation seem to be noninferior compared with those of radical surgery, with lower postoperative morbidity. However, more studies should be done to seek better regression of tumor and maximize the possibility of organ preservation in MSS rectal cancer.

Health Services Research in Brachytherapy: Current Understanding and Future Challenges

Brachytherapy is an integral component of cancer care. Widespread concerns have been expressed though about the need for greater brachytherapy availability across many jurisdictions. Yet, health services research in brachytherapy has lagged behind that in external beam radiotherapy. Optimal brachytherapy utilisation, to help inform expected demand, have not been defined beyond the New South Wales region in Australia, with few studies having reported observed brachytherapy utilisation. There is also a relative lack of robust cost and cost-effectiveness studies, making investment decisions in brachytherapy even more uncertain and challenging to justify, despite its key role in cancer control. As the range of indications for brachytherapy expands, providing organ/function preservation for a wider range of diagnoses, there is an urgent need to redress this balance. By outlining the work undertaken in this area to date, we highlight its importance and explore where further study is required.

Organ preservation strategy: new therapeutic alternative in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic modalities for nonmetastatic rectal cancer are presently undergoing major changes. The standard treatment is multidisciplinary, combining radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery. The aim of this minireview is to provide an update on the place of organ preservation in the treatment of nonmetastatic rectal cancer in 2022.

MAIN TEXT

The multimodal strategy based on initial radiochemotherapy followed by radical surgery with excision of the mesorectum has improved oncological results but at the expense of morbidity and sequelae altering life quality. The strategy of rectal preservation has been proposed since the 2000s after the publication of the results of the Brazilian study that proposed a simple surveillance after radiochemotherapy without surgery in good responders. In fact, preoperative radiochemotherapy was able to obtain a complete histological response in 10 to 30% of case. In view of this non-negligible percentage of tumor sterilization, which may well increase with the standardization of total neoadjuvant treatment, a strategy of organ preservation can be proposed in these patients to avoid morbidity and postoperative sequelae.

SHORT CONCLUSION

This nonoperative approach is currently widely studied in certain patients who have a complete response (clinical, endoscopic, and radiological). However, the selection of these patients is not simple and still complex.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with radiation dose escalation with contact x-ray brachytherapy boost or external beam radiotherapy boost for organ preservation in early cT2-cT3 rectal adenocarcinoma (OPERA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Organ preservation after reaching clinical complete response on neoadjuvant therapy is gaining interest for rectal cancers, although the role of radiation dose escalation is still not known. We aimed to determine whether a contact x-ray brachytherapy boost, following or preceding neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, increases the probability of 3-year organ preservation for patients with early rectal cancers.

METHODS

OPERA was a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial done at 17 cancer centres that included operable patients, aged 18 years or older, with cT2, cT3a, or cT3b adenocarcinoma of low-mid rectum, tumours of less than 5 cm in diameter, and cN0 or cN1 smaller than 8 mm. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 45 Gy external beam radiotherapy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with concurrent oral capecitabine (825 mg/m² twice a day). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a boost of external beam radiotherapy at 9 Gy in five fractions (group A) or a boost with contact x-ray brachytherapy (90 Gy in three fractions; group B). Randomisation was done centrally using an independent web-based system and stratified by trial centre, tumour classification (cT2 vs cT3a or cT3b), tumour distance from rectum (<6 cm from anal verge vs ≥6 cm), and tumour diameter (<3 cm vs ≥3 cm). Treatment in group B was stratified by tumour diameter, with the contact x-ray brachytherapy boost given before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with tumours smaller than 3 cm. The primary outcome was organ preservation at 3 years, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02505750, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between June 14, 2015, and June 26, 2020, 148 patients were assessed for eligibility and were randomly assigned to group A (n=74) or group B (n=74). Seven patients withdrew their consent (five in group A and two in group B). 141 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis, including 69 assigned to group A (29 with tumours <3 cm in diameter and 40 with tumours ≥3 cm) and 72 assigned to group B (32 with tumours <3 cm and 40 with tumours ≥3 cm). After a median follow-up of 38·2 months (IQR 34·2-42·5), the 3-year organ preservation rate was 59% (95% CI 48-72) in group A versus 81% (72-91) in group B (hazard ratio [HR] 0·36, 95% CI 0·19-0·70; p=0·0026). For patients with tumours less than 3 cm in diameter, 3-year organ preservation rates were 63% (95% CI 47-84) in group A versus 97% (91-100) in group B (HR 0·07, 95% CI 0·01-0·57; p=0·012). For patients with tumours of 3 cm or larger, 3-year organ preservation rates were 55% (95% CI 41-74) in group A versus 68% (54-85) in group B (HR 0·54, 95% CI 0·26-1·10; p=0·11). 21 (30%) patients in group A and 30 (42%) in group B had an early grade 2-3 adverse event (p=1·0). The most common early grade 2-3 adverse events were proctitis (four [6%] in group A, nine [13%] in group B) and radiation dermatitis (seven [10%] in group A, two [3%] in group B). The main late side-effect was grade 1-2 rectal bleeding due to telangiectasia, which was more frequent in group B (37 [63%] of 59) than in group A (five [12%] of 43; p<0·0001) and subsided after 3 years.

INTERPRETATION

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with a contact x-ray brachytherapy boost significantly improved the 3-year organ preservation rate, particularly for patients with tumours smaller than 3 cm who were treated with contact x-ray brachytherapy first, compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with a boost via external beam radiotherapy. This approach could be discussed and offered to operable patients with early cT2-cT3 disease who are keen to avoid surgery and seek organ preservation.

FUNDING

The French Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Cinique.

Watch-and-Wait is an Option in Rectal Cancer Patients: From Controversy to Common Clinical Practice

Overview of the introduction of organ preservation in rectal cancer patients and future challenges.

Radiotherapy dose escalation using endorectal brachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer unsuitable for surgery: Lessons from studies in fit patients and future perspectives

Epidemiological data indicate that more than 50 % of patients with newly-diagnosed rectal cancer are older than 70 years, with rising numbers expected over the next decades. Treatment decision-making is challenging in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer, whereas standardized treatment guidelines for this patient cohort are lacking. Elderly and frail rectal cancer patients are often considered by surgeons as unfit to undergo radical surgery as the risk of surgical complications and postoperative mortality rises with increasing age and comorbidity. Furthermore, these patients often receive no treatment at all, resulting in local and/or systemic disease progression with associated symptoms and impaired quality of life (QoL). Recent data from randomized trials in young fit patients with early stage rectal cancer indicate that RT dose escalation can be safely delivered using external beam (chemo)radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by endoluminal radiotherapeutic modalities, such as contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or high-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-BT). However, prospective studies testing this therapeutic concept in elderly and frail patients remain limited. Here, we review the current evidence in the epidemiology and the management of elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer. We summarize the potential of RT dose escalation to achieve long-term local control of the primary tumour, prevent disease-related morbidity, improve QoL and even organ preservation. Future perspectives and open questions will be discussed as well.

Quality-of-life outcomes in older patients with early-stage rectal cancer receiving organ-preserving treatment with hypofractionated short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TREC): non-randomised registry of patients unsuitable for total mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND

Older patients with early-stage rectal cancer are under-represented in clinical trials and, therefore, little high-quality data are available to guide treatment in this patient population. The TREC trial was a randomised, open-label feasibility study conducted at 21 centres across the UK that compared organ preservation through short-course radiotherapy (SCRT; 25 Gy in five fractions) plus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with standard total mesorectal excision in adults with stage T1-2 rectal adenocarcinoma (maximum diameter ≤30 mm) and no lymph node involvement or metastasis. TREC incorporated a non-randomised registry offering organ preservation to patients who were considered unsuitable for total mesorectal excision by the local colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team. Organ preservation was achieved in 56 (92%) of 61 non-randomised registry patients with local recurrence-free survival of 91% (95% CI 84-99) at 3 years. Here, we report acute and long-term patient-reported outcomes from this non-randomised registry group.

METHODS

Patients considered by the local colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team to be at high risk of complications from total mesorectal excision on the basis of frailty, comorbidities, and older age were included in a non-randomised registry to receive organ-preserving treatment. These patients were invited to complete questionnaires on patient-reported outcomes (the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life [EORTC-QLQ] questionnaire core module [QLQ-C30] and colorectal cancer module [QLQ-CR29], the Colorectal Functional Outcome [COREFO] questionnaire, and EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Level [EQ-5D-3L]) at baseline and at months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 postoperatively. To aid interpretation, data from patients in the non-randomised registry were compared with data from those patients in the TREC trial who had been randomly assigned to organ-preserving therapy, and an additional reference cohort of aged-matched controls from the UK general population. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN14422743, and is closed.

FINDINGS

Between July 21, 2011, and July 15, 2015, 88 patients were enrolled onto the TREC study to undergo organ preservation, of whom 27 (31%) were randomly allocated to organ-preserving therapy and 61 (69%) were added to the non-randomised registry for organ-preserving therapy. Non-randomised patients were older than randomised patients (median age 74 years [IQR 67-80] vs 65 years [61-71]). Organ-preserving treatment was well tolerated among patients in the non-randomised registry, with mild worsening of fatigue; quality of life; physical, social, and role functioning; and bowel function 3 months postoperatively compared with baseline values. By 6-12 months, most scores had returned to baseline values, and were indistinguishable from data from the reference cohort. Only mild symptoms of faecal incontinence and urgency, equivalent to less than one episode per week, persisted at 36 months among patients in both groups.

INTERPRETATION

The SCRT and TEM organ-preservation approach was well tolerated in older and frailer patients, showed good rates of organ preservation, and was associated with low rates of acute and long-term toxicity, with minimal effects on quality of life and functional status. Our findings support the adoption of this approach for patients considered to be at high risk from radical surgery.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK.

Features on Endoscopy and MRI after Treatment with Contact X-ray Brachytherapy for Rectal Cancer: Explorative Results

After neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer, contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) can be applied aiming at organ preservation. This explorative study describes the early features on endoscopy and MRI after CXB. Patients treated with CXB following (chemo)radiotherapy and a follow-up of ≥12 months were selected. Endoscopy and MRI were performed every 3 months. Expert readers scored all the images according to structured reporting templates. Thirty-six patients were included, 15 of whom obtained a cCR. On endoscopy, the most frequently observed feature early in follow-up was an ulcer, regardless of whether patients developed a cCR. A flat, white scar and tumor mass were common at 6 months. Focal tumor signal on T2W-MRI and mass-like high signal on DWI were generally absent in patients with a cCR. An ulceration on T2W-MRI and "reactive" mucosal signal on DWI were observed early in follow-up regardless of the final tumor response. The distinction between a cCR and a residual tumor generally can be made at 6 months. Features associated with a residual tumor are tumor mass on endoscopy, focal tumor signal on T2W-MRI, and mass-like high signal on DWI. Early recognition of these features is necessary to identify patients who will not develop a cCR as early as possible.

MORPHEUS Phase II–III Study: A Pre-Planned Interim Safety Analysis and Preliminary Results

Background: We explored image-guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy patients electing non-operative management for rectal cancer. We present the first pre-planned interim analysis. Methods: In this open-label phase II–III randomized study, patients with operable cT2-3ab N0 M0 rectal cancer received 45 Gy in 25 fractions of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with 5-FU/Capecitabine. They were randomized 1:1 to receive either an EBRT boost of 9 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm A) or three weekly adaptive brachytherapy (IGAEBT) boosts totaling 30 Gy (Arm B). Patient characteristics and toxicity are presented using descriptive analyses; TME-free survival between arms with the intention to treat the population is explored using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: A total of 40 patients were in this analysis. Baseline characteristics were balanced; acute toxicities were similar. Complete clinical response (cCR) was 50% (n = 10/20) in Arm A and 90% in Arm B (n = 18/20). Median follow-up was 1.3 years; 2-year TME-free survival was 38.6% (95% CI: 16.5–60.6%) in the EBRT arm and 76.6% (95% CI: 56.1–97.1%) in the IGAEBT arm. Conclusions: Radiation intensification with IGAEBT is feasible. This interim analysis suggests an improvement in TME-free survival when comparing IGAEBT with EBRT, pending confirmation upon completion of this trial.

A Multidisciplinary Approach for the Personalised Non-Operative Management of Elderly and Frail Rectal Cancer Patients Unable to Undergo TME Surgery

Despite it being the optimal curative approach, elderly and frail rectal cancer patients may not be able to undergo a total mesorectal excision. Frequently, no treatment is offered at all and the natural course of the disease is allowed to unfold. These patients are at risk for developing debilitating symptoms that impair quality of life and require palliative treatment. Recent advancements in non-operative treatment modalities have enhanced the toolbox of alternative treatment strategies in patients unable to undergo surgery. Therefore, a proposed strategy is to aim for the maximal non-operative treatment, in an effort to avoid the onset of debilitating symptoms, improve quality of life, and prolong survival. The complexity of treating elderly and frail patients requires a patient-centred approach to personalise treatment. The main challenge is to optimise the balance between local control of disease, patient preferences, and the burden of treatment. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is a crucial element within the multidisciplinary dialogue. Since limited knowledge is available on the optimal non-operative treatment strategy, these patients should be treated by dedicated multidisciplinary rectal cancer experts with special interest in the elderly and frail. The aim of this narrative review was to discuss a multidisciplinary patient-centred treatment approach and provide a practical suggestion of a successfully implemented clinical care pathway.

Image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy for rectal cancer: technical note and first clinical experience on an organ-preserving approach

PURPOSE

As the population ages, the incidence of rectal cancer among elderly patients is rising. Due to the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality, alternative nonoperative treatment options have been explored in elderly and frail patients who are clinically inoperable or refuse surgery.

METHODS

Here we present technical considerations and first clinical experience after treating a cohort of six rectal cancer patients (T1‑3, N0‑1, M0; UICC stage I-IIIB) with definitive external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by image-guided, endorectal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Patients were treated with 10-13 × 3 Gy EBRT followed by HDR-BT delivering 12-18 Gy in two or three fractions. Tumor response was evaluated using endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis.

RESULTS

Median age was 84 years. All patients completed EBRT and HDR-BT without any high-grade toxicity (> grade 2). One patient experienced rectal bleeding (grade 2) after 10 weeks. Four patients (67%) demonstrated clinical complete response (cCR) or near cCR, there was one partial response, and one residual tumor and hepatic metastasis 8 weeks after HDR-BT. The median follow-up time for all six patients is 42 weeks (range 8-60 weeks). Sustained cCR without evidence of local regrowth has been achieved in all four patients with initial (n)cCR to date.

CONCLUSION

Primary EBRT combined with HDR-BT is feasible and well tolerated with promising response rates in elderly and frail rectal cancer patients. The concept could be an integral part of a highly individualized and selective nonoperative treatment offered to patients who are not suitable for or refuse surgery.

Targeted Radiotherapy Using Contact X-ray Brachytherapy 50 kV

Rectal adenocarcinoma is a quite radioresistant tumor. In order to achieve non-operative management (NOM) radiotherapy plays a major role. Targeted radiotherapy aiming at high precision 3D radiotherapy uses stereotactic image-guided external beam radiotherapy machines. To further safely increase the tumor dose, endocavitary brachytherapy (ECB) is an original approach. There are two different ways to perform such an ECB: contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) using a 50 kV X-ray generator with an X-ray tube positioned under eye guidance into the rectal cavity and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) using iridium-192 sources positioned into the rectal cavity under image guidance. This study focused on CXB. CXB uses a small mobile generator that produces 50 kV X-rays with limited penetration. This technique is well adapted to accessible tumors of limited size and especially needs a high dose rate (≥15 Gy/minutes) for rectal tumors. It is performed on an ambulatory basis. A total dose between 80−110 Gy is delivered in 3−4 fractions over 3 to 6 weeks into a small volume (5 cm3). CXB was pioneered in the 1970s by Papillon using the Philips RT 50TM. Since 2009, the Papillon P50TM has been used in 11 institutions in Europe. The OPERA Phase III trial tested the hypothesis that a CXB boost (90 Gy/3 fr) compared to an EBRT boost (9 Gy/5 fr) for T2−T3 ab < 5 cm and N0−N1 < 8 mm will increase the 3-year organ preservation (OP) rate when combined with 45 Gy/5 weeks with concomitant capecitabine. Out of more than 300 patients with tumors < 3 cm (1962−1992), Papillon reported a long-term local control close to 85%. Similar results were published in Europe and USA at that time. The Lyon R96-2 Phase III trial (2004) demonstrated that, when combined with preoperative EBRT, a CXB boost (90 Gy/3 fr) significantly increased the rate of clinical complete response (cCR) and sphincter preservation, with some patients having OP at 10 years. With more than 2000 patients treated in Europe (2010−2020) using the Papillon 50TM, organ preservation appears possible in close to 80% of cases in selected early T2−T3. The OPERA trial closed after 141 inclusions (2015−2020) after an independent data monitoring committee recommendation because of promising results. At the 2-year follow-up (blinded data), the rate of cCR and OP were 77% and 72%, respectively, for the 141 tumors, and for T < 3 cm (61 pts), they were 86% and 85%, respectively, with good bowel function. The final results should be available in 2022. Organ preservation using NOM appears to be a promising approach for rectal cancer. A CXB boost with chemoradiotherapy in selected early T2−T3 could become an attractive option to achieve a planned OP. This approach should be proposed to well-informed patients after discussion in an MDT.

Propensity score analysis of radical proctectomy versus organ preservation using contact X-ray brachytherapy for rectal cancer

•

Key objective: the goal provides data to evaluate the oncological risk of performing a planned- conservative strategy in selected patients presenting early T2-T3 rectal adenocarcinoma.

•

Knowledge generated: This propensity score analysis on 72 patients, comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery with planned organ preservation using combined chemoradiotherapy and contact X-ray brachytherapy boost, showed no detrimental oncological safety results after 5 year follow-up.

•

Relevance: This study supplies additional arguments in favor of organ preservation for selected early rectal T2-T3.

Introduction

Radical proctectomy (RP-TME) with neo adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains the standard treatment for T2-T3 rectal cancer. Organ preservation (OP) using CRT and a “watch and wait” strategy (W&W) is a field of research. Planned organ preservation can be proposed for early T1-T3 using contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB). We compared the oncological outcomes of both approaches using a propensity score matched-cohort analysis.

Material and methods

For comparative analyses between patients with nCRT + RP-TME and patients with CXB + CRT, propensity scores were calculated with logistic regression and multiple imputations for missing data. The variables included in the propensity score model were PS status, T-N stage and rectal circumference extension. Patients were matched 1:1 using the nearest neighbor method with a 0.1 caliper restriction. The 5-year Cancer Specific survival was the primary end point.

Results

The Accord 12 phase III trial included 584 patients who treated with nCRT + RP-TME. The CXB cohort included 71 patients with a planned OP. To select OP patient candidate, T4, tumor with extension >66% circumference were eliminated and only patients treated with CXB + CRT were analyzed in the CXB cohort resulting in a total of 374 patients. A one to one paired cohort with 36 patients in each group was derived. These two cohorts were well matched for all confounding factors except for age. The 5-year cancer specific rate showed no significant difference between the two groups (89% in Accord 12 vs 82% in CXB; p = 0.84). At 5 years, rate of metastasis (15% vs 22%, p = 0.54) showed no significant difference. In the CXB group 33/36 patients preserved their rectum.

Conclusion

The organ preservation strategy using CXB boost yielded a 5-year cancer specific survival rate similar to patients treated with RP-TME. In selected early T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma an organ preservation strategy could be offered as a reasonable option.

GEC ESTRO ACROP consensus recommendations for contact brachytherapy for rectal cancer

•

CXB appears to be an efficacious technique for rectal cancer treatment and may allow rectal preservation in selected patients.

•

These GEC ESTRO ACROP recommendations recommend dose schemes in for rectal CXB.

•

These recommendations advise reporting of tumour depth to enable future refinement of dose prescription and target definition.

•

The routine collection and publication of outcome data including patient reported outcomes (PROs) is recommended.

Purpose

To issue consensus recommendations for contact X-Ray brachytherapy (CXB) for rectal cancer covering pre-treatment evaluation, treatment, dosimetric issues and follow-up. These recommendations cover CXB in the definitive and palliative setting.

Methods

Members of GEC ESTRO with expertise in rectal CXB issued consensus-based recommendations for CXB based on literature review and clinical experience. Levels of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence based medicine guidance are presented where possible.

Results

The GEC ESTRO ACROP consensus recommendations support the use of CXB to increase the chances of clinical complete remission and cure for patients who are elderly with high surgical risk, surgically unfit or refusing surgery. For palliative treatment, the use of CXB is recommended for symptomatic relief and disease control. The use of CXB in an organ-preservation setting in surgically fit patients is recommended within the setting of a clinical trial or registry.

Conclusions

The GEC ESTRO ACROP recommendations for CXB are provided. Recommendations towards standardisation of reporting and prescription are given. Practitioners are encouraged to follow these recommendations and to develop further clinical trials to examine this treatment modality and increase the evidence base for its use. The routine collection of outcomes both clinical and patient-reported is also encouraged.

The "Immunoscore" in rectal cancer: could we search quality beyond quantity of life?

Because of the function and anatomical environment of the rectum, therapeutic strategies for local advanced rectal cancer (LARC) must deal with two challenging stressors that are a high-risk of local and distal recurrences and a high-risk of poor quality of life (QoL). Over the last three decades, advances in screening tests, therapies, and combined-modality treatment options and strategies have improved the prognosis of patients with LARC. However, owing to the heterogeneous nature of LARC and genetic status, the patient may not respond to a specific therapy and may be at increased risk of side-effects without the life-prolonging benefit. Indeed, each therapy can cause its own side-effects, which may worsen by a combination of treatments resulting in long-term poor QoL. In LARC, QoL has become even more essential with the increasing incidence of rectal cancer in young individuals. Herein, we analyzed the value of the Immunoscore-Biopsy (performed on tumor biopsy at diagnosis) in predicting outcomes, alone or in association with clinical and imaging data, for each therapy used in LARC.

Contact X-ray Brachytherapy for Older or Inoperable Rectal Cancer Patients: Short-Term Oncological and Functional Follow-Up

Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is a major operation associated with morbidity and mortality. For older or inoperable patients, alternatives are necessary. This prospective study evaluated the oncological and functional outcome and quality of life of older or inoperable rectal cancer patients treated with a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost to avoid major surgery. During follow-up, tumor response and toxicity on endoscopy were scored. Functional outcome and quality of life were assessed with self-administered questionnaires. Additionally, in-depth interviews regarding patients' experiences were conducted. Nineteen patients were included with a median age of 80 years (range 72-91); nine patients achieved a clinical complete response and in another four local control of the tumor was established. The 12 month organ-preservation rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 88%, 78%, and 100%, respectively. A transient decrease in quality of life and bowel function was observed at 3 months, which was generally restored at 6 months. In-depth interviews revealed that patients' experience was positive despite the side-effects shortly after treatment. In older or inoperable rectal cancer patients, contact X-ray brachytherapy can be considered an option to avoid total mesorectal excision. Contact X-ray brachytherapy is well-tolerated and can provide good tumor control.

Rectal cancer radiotherapy

We present the updated recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy for rectal cancer radiotherapy. The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer consists in chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery with total mesorectal resection and adjuvant chemotherapy according to nodal status. Although this strategy efficiently reduced local recurrences rates below 5% in expert centres, functional sequelae could not be avoided resulting in 20 to 30% morbidity rates. The early introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has proven beneficial in recent trials, in terms of recurrence free and metastasis free survivals. Complete pathological responses were obtained in 15% of tumours treated by chemoradiation, even reaching up to 30% of tumours when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated to chemoradiotherapy. These good results question the relevance of systematic radical surgery in good responders. Personalized therapeutic strategies are now possible by improved imaging modalities with circumferential margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, by intensity modulated radiotherapy and by refining surgical techniques, and contribute to morbidity reduction. Keeping the same objectives, ongoing trials are now evaluating therapeutic de-escalation strategies, in particular rectal preservation for good responders after neoadjuvant treatment, or radiotherapy omission in selected cases (Greccar 12, Opera, Norad).

International consensus recommendations on key outcome measures for organ preservation after (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer

Multimodal treatment strategies for patients with rectal cancer are increasingly including the possibility of organ preservation, through nonoperative management or local excision. Organ preservation strategies can enable patients with a complete response or near-complete clinical responses after radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy to safely avoid the morbidities associated with radical surgery, and thus to maintain anorectal function and quality of life. However, standardization of the key outcome measures of organ preservation strategies is currently lacking; this includes a lack of consensus of the optimal definitions and selection of primary end points according to the trial phase and design; the optimal time points for response assessment; response-based decision-making; follow-up schedules; use of specific anorectal function tests; and quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. Thus, a consensus statement on outcome measures is necessary to ensure consistency and facilitate more accurate comparisons of data from ongoing and future trials. Here, we have convened an international group of experts with extensive experience in the management of patients with rectal cancer, including organ preservation approaches, and used a Delphi process to establish the first international consensus recommendations for key outcome measures of organ preservation, in an attempt to standardize the reporting of data from both trials and routine practice in this emerging area.

[Rectal Cancer: Organ preservation and neoadjuvant treatment escalation]

Standard treatment consisting of chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery with total mesorectal excision, results in good oncologic local control but high morbidity and poor functional results. Since chemoradiotherapy results in 15% pathological complete response, even reaching up to 30% in case of association with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radical surgery has been recently debated for good responders. Therefore, a de-escalation strategy, by omitting radical surgery in good responders, has recently been developed with two different options: a watch and wait strategy, requiring an accurate clinical and radiological definition of complete response and a local excision strategy including patients with sub-complete response. Ongoing trials focus on response optimization by chemotherapy intensification or radiotherapy dose escalation. However, many questions are still to be answered regarding definition of complete response, follow-up strategy, morbidity of salvage surgery in case of recurrence as well as long-term oncological and functionnal results.

Stereotactic Ablative Brachytherapy: Recent Advances in Optimization of Radiobiological Cancer Therapy

Brachytherapy (BT), a type of focal anti-cancer radiotherapy, delivers a highly focused radiation dose to localized tumors, sparing surrounding normal tissues. Recent technological advances have helped to increase the accuracy of BT and, thus, improve BT-based cancer treatment. Stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (SABT) was designed to improve the ablative effect of radiation, which was achieved via improved image guidance, and calculation of ablative dose, shorter treatment duration, and better organ preservation. Recently collected data characterized SABT as having the potential to cure various early-stage cancers. The method provides higher tumor control rate levels that were previously achievable only by surgical resection. Notably, SABT is suitable for application with unresectable malignancies. However, the pathological assessment of SABT irradiated tumors is limited due to difficulties in specimen acquisition. Prostate, lung, liver, and gynecological cancers are the most commonly reported SABT-treated malignancies. This study will give an overview of SABT, focusing on the advances in SABT optimization, and provide insights on the future benefits of the combined application of SABT with cancer immunotherapies.

[Rectal cancer: Towards personalized medicine]

The standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer has recently changed and is now based on the concept of total neoadjuvant therapy with the association of radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy before radical surgery. The addition of noeadjuvant systemic chemotherapy before or after radiotherapy during preoperative course significantly decreased the risk of distant metastases and prolonged disease-free survival after surgery. The risk of recurrence varies among patients and the standard management associating chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery may expose many patients to overtreatment and can negatively affect quality of life. In this setting, several ongoing trials evaluate the possibility of less aggressive individually tailored approach based on omission of one of three treatments. In particular, NORAD and PROSPECT trials evaluate whether irradiation could be safely omitted in patients who are good responders to induction chemotherapy and have locally advanced primarily resectable tumor with large predictive circumferential resection margin. In the other hand, the total neoadjuvant therapy had significantly improved the pathological complete response rate, up to 30%, leading the concept of non-operative management and organ-preserving strategies. The phase III GRECCAR 12 study has therefore evaluated the potential benefit of intensification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy whereas OPERA and MORPHEUS trials assessed radiotherapy dose escalation by contact X-ray or brachytherapy for organ-preserving strategies. To date, total neoadjuvant therapy following by radical surgery remains the standard of care but probably less aggressive approach with omission of radiotherapy or surgery will become a new standard in selected patients in next future.

Contact X-ray brachytherapy for rectal cancer: Past, present, and future

The Papillon experience and the Lyon R96-02 trial have shown that contact X-ray brachytherapy of 50kV is efficient and safe to achieve long term local control and organ preservation for cT1 and early cT2-3 rectal cancers. The OPERA trial, using the Papillon 50™ machine, brings further support to this preservation strategy for selected T2T3ab lesions. Future trials using a contact X-ray boost will try to consolidate and enlarge its place in organ preservation for rectal cancers.

Efficacy and safety of wait and see strategy versus radical surgery and local excision for rectal cancer with cCR response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy can shrink tumors, increase anus preservation rate, and protect anal function. Radical surgery need cut off the diseased bowel, clean up the lymph nodes, and then restore bowel function. It could bring traumatic effect and poor postoperative quality of life to the patient. Local resection requires removal of the diseased bowel with circular negative margin. The surgical trauma is small, and the postoperative quality of life is good. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety between wait and see strategy (WS), radical surgery (RS), and local excision (LE) of rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response (cCR) response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and Wanfang databases to compare wait and see strategy with radical surgery and local excision for rectal cancer with cCR response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy up to March 2020. We collected the data of local recurrence, distant metastasis, cancer-related death, overall survival, and disease-free survival and used RevMan 5.0 to carry out the meta-analysis. Continuous data were evaluated by the standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and dichotomous data were evaluated by relative risks (ORs or RRs) with 95% CIs. We aimed to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the three groups.

Results

Eleven English studies with 1131 patients were included. There were 412 patients in WS group, 678 patients in RS group, and 41 patients in LE group. WS group had a higher local recurrence rate than RS group (OR 7.32, 95% CI 3.58 to 14.95, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the other data between the three groups.

Conclusion

Compared with the RS group, the WS group had an increased risk of local recurrence. However, the WS group had a similar DFS and OS compared with the RS group and the local excision group. Hence, we speculated that the WS group would have similar results as the surgery group for patients with cCR status.

[Seeking colleagues' advice when facing complex clinical situations]

Seeking a second medical advice as a medical practitioner is a frequent situation that should be facilitated to best suit patients' expectations, while maintaining medical confidentiality. The patient and his relatives need to be involved with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The radiation oncologist should accept and help a patient who seeks a second advice, and patients will always appreciate when the physician helps them to seek such an advice. Examples that each practitioner should know include tertiary centers tumor boards, centers with access to innovation or clinical research, or with special teams to take care of specific populations such as adolescents and young adults. In some situations, no treatment can also be the best treatment, and it takes time to explain and discuss such watchful waiting strategies to patients. In case of recurrent disease after radiotherapy, salvage reirradiation must be discussed at a tertiary tumor board and weighed against other options, especially for rare and complex cases. Radiation oncology has gained multiple options with technological advances, such as proton therapy, brachytherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy with respiratory tracking or contact therapy. Radiation oncologists must know the benefits associated with each option in terms of survival, local control or organ preservation in order to address patients to the best practitioner.

Watch and wait approach in rectal cancer: Current controversies and future directions

According to the main international clinical guidelines, the recommended treatment for locally-advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. However, doubts have been raised about the appropriate definition of clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy and the role of surgery in patients who achieve a cCR. Surgical resection is associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life (QoL), which is especially relevant given the favourable prognosis in this patient subset. Accordingly, there has been a growing interest in alternative approaches with less morbidity, including the organ-preserving watch and wait strategy, in which surgery is omitted in patients who have achieved a cCR. These patients are managed with a specific follow-up protocol to ensure adequate cancer control, including the early identification of recurrent disease. However, there are several open questions about this strategy, including patient selection, the clinical and radiological criteria to accurately determine cCR, the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, the role of dose intensification (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy), optimal follow-up protocols, and the future perspectives of this approach. In the present review, we summarize the available evidence on the watch and wait strategy in this clinical scenario, including ongoing clinical trials, QoL in these patients, and the controversies surrounding this treatment approach.

Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence

•

Treatment initiation of T2-T3 rectal cancers with Contact (CXB) provides a fast clinical complete response.

•

In T2N0< 3 cm tumors, CXB first with chemoradiotherapy can achieve local control in more than 85%.

•

The Phase III OPERA trial should bring robust data in favor of CXB as initial treatment of T2N0< 3 cm.

Introduction

A neoadjuvant treatment aimed at rectal preservation should achieve a clinical complete response. This study comparing neoadjuvant treatment initiated with Contact X-ray (CXB) or External Beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is evaluating the influence of the time/dose parameter on clinical response during the first six months.

Materials and methods

This retrospective consecutive series included T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma staged using digital examination (DRE), endoscopy, magnetic radiation imaging and/or endorectal ultrasound. All patients were treated with organ preservation intent. Treatment protocol combined CXB (80–110 Gy/3–4 fractions) and EBRT ± concurrent capecitabine. In tumor exceeding 3.5 cm treatment was often initiated using EBRT. Clinical response was assessed (DRE, proctoscopy ± imaging) at very close interval between 2 weeks and 6 months after treatment initiation.

Results

Between 2002 and 2017, 61 patients (T2: 31; T3: 30) M0 (median age: 76 years) were treated. Treatment was initiated in 40 patients (T2: 28, T3: 12) with contact X-ray and in 21 (T2: 4, T3: 17) with EBRT. Using contact X-ray or EBRT first treatment, clinical complete (or near complete) response at week 14(±1) was respectively 88% [95CI:74–96] and 33% [95CI:15–57]. In multivariate analysis the treatment chronology was the most significant factor influencing cCR (OR: 7.53). At 6 months, with contact X-ray first all patients were in clinical complete response and five with EBRT remained in partial response. With 61 months median follow-up time, the local recurrence rate was 10% [95% CI: 6–16] at 5 years. T3 and fungating tumors were at higher risk of local recurrence. Organ preservation with good function was achieved in 95% of cases.

Conclusion

This non randomized study tends to show that in early T2-3 tumors, a strategy using upfront contact therapy, which is reducing the overall treatment time, is an option allowing a more favorable outcome than EBRT first.

A brief history of contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kVp

Contact X ray brachytherapy 50 kVp was initiated in the 1930s with the Siemens unit and popularized with the Philips unit in the 1950s. A renaissance was seen in the early 2000s with the Intrabeam™ unit for breast IORT. Presently the Papillon™ systems thanks to its high dose rate (>10Gy/mn) can be used to treat breast (IORT), skin, eyelid and rectal cancers. Future developments are expected to consolidate the place of contact radiotherapy as a safe and efficient treatment for accessible early tumors.

Unintended consequences of treating early rectal cancers for complete clinical response with chemoradiotherapy

The aim was to examine the current trend in rectal cancer, which is to extend ’watch-and-wait’ to earlier-stage tumors, not normally treated with chemoradiotherapy, to define the up-side and down-side regarding quality of life (QOL) and anorectal/sexual/urinary function from this approach. We reviewed the literature regarding a ‘watch-and-wait’ strategy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was complete clinical response. Secondary measures included colostomy rate, functional outcomes and QOL. There is a trend to use chemoradiotherapy in earlier tumors using dose-escalation of radiation and/or additional chemotherapy, resulting in high rates of complete clinical response, which may impact adversely on QOL if radical surgery is subsequently required. Focusing on organ-preservation as the primary goal of treatment rather than overall functional outcomes and QOL for the whole population, may not provide patients with sufficient information for optimal decision-making.

Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer in older patients

Striking a balance between cancer treatment and patient-centred care is becoming ever more important in older patients with rectal cancer as the population is ageing. The treatment decision made by the modern multidisciplinary colorectal team will recommend pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery for advance rectal cancer and surgery alone for early rectal cancer, as the "standard of care" is surgery. However, an alternative non-surgical treatment option should be consider for older patients with rectal cancer as the surgical harm can far outweigh the potential benefits. There is published evidence that mortality is higher with increasing age. An alternative treatment option to surgery when patients are not suitable or refusing surgery is to offer them external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or chemo radiotherapy (EBCRT). A proportion of these patients can achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) which enable adoption of 'watch and wait' strategy to avoid surgery. However, a third of patients who achieved initial cCR can develop local regrowth within the first two years. This require salvage surgery which reduces their chance of organ preservation. Contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or High Dose Rate Endo Brachy Therapy (HDREBT) boost following external beam radiotherapy can improve the initial cCR rate and reduce the risk of local regrowth. Those patients with persistent residual cancer or regrowth after brachytherapy boost following EBCRT or EBRT can have salvage surgery later without compromising their chance of cure. Therefore, patients should be fully aware of their treatment options and have 'a choice' when deciding and consenting their treatment.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer management

Thirty per cent of all colorectal tumours develop in the rectum. The location of the rectum within the bony pelvis and its proximity to vital structures presents significant therapeutic challenges when considering neoadjuvant options and surgical interventions. Most patients with early rectal cancer can be adequately managed by surgery alone. However, a significant proportion of patients with rectal cancer present with locally advanced disease and will potentially benefit from down staging prior to surgery. Neoadjuvant therapy involves a variety of options including radiotherapy, chemotherapy used alone or in combination. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer has been shown to be effective in reducing tumour burden in advance of curative surgery. The gold standard surgical rectal cancer management aims to achieve surgical removal of the tumour and all draining lymph nodes, within an intact mesorectal package, in order to minimise local recurrence. It is critically important that all rectal cancer cases are discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting represented by all relevant specialties. Pre-operative staging including CT thorax, abdomen, pelvis to assess for distal disease and magnetic resonance imaging to assess local involvement is essential. Staging radiology and MDT discussion are integral in identifying patients who require neoadjuvant radiotherapy. While Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is potentially beneficial it may also result in morbidity and thus should be reserved for those patients who are at a high risk of local failure, which includes patients with nodal involvement, extramural venous invasion and threatened circumferential margin. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in the management of rectal cancer.