Continuation versus discontinuation of first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic squamous cell oesophageal cancer: A randomised phase II trial (E-DIS)

Nivolumab in unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common cancer worldwide. In view of biology and anatomical restrictions, multimodality treatment strategies have been developed for EC. However, the prognosis of patients with advanced EC remains especially poor. Immunotherapy, such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4/B7 blockade, has emerged as a potent treatment for many types of cancer and has been approved in many countries. Based on the results of the ATTRACTION-3 trial, nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, was approved by the US FDA for patients with platinum-resistant, unresectable, recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The CheckMate 648 trial demonstrated that the combination of nivolumab with platinum-based fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy and combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, showed a survival benefit in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma compared with doublet chemotherapy. This review focuses on nivolumab-containing treatments for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

A case of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma accompanied by pancreatic and bile duct metastases: Successful treatment starts with an accurate diagnosis

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic and bile duct metastases from esophageal cancer are extremely rare. We report a case of advanced esophageal cancer successfully treated with chemotherapy, selected on the basis of an accurate pathologic diagnosis. A 69-year-old man with chronic renal dysfunction presented with persistent abdominal pain and anorexia. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed an irregular-shaped tumor in the lower esophagus. Computed tomography and ultrasonography revealed swollen para-aortic lymph nodes, a pancreatic mass, and distal bile duct stenosis. Histopathological examination showed that all of the lesions were squamous cell carcinoma with unique immunohistochemical characteristics of p40+ and cytokeratin 7+. The final diagnosis was esophageal squamous cell carcinoma accompanied by lymph node, pancreas, and bile duct metastases. Taking his renal dysfunction into consideration, modified FOLFOX was administered as the first-line chemotherapy. The patient survived for 15 months since his first presentation. The favorable outcome was attributed to the accurate diagnosis based on comprehensive tissue sampling.

Safety and short-term efficacy of preoperative FOLFOX therapy in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who are ineligible for cisplatin

BACKGROUND

The standard preoperative treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC) in Japan is docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil. However, patients with renal or cardiac dysfunction and elderly patients are ineligible for a CDDP-containing regimen because of toxicities. Oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) therapy has less renal toxicity than CDDP-containing regimens and does not require hydration. However, there are limited data on preoperative FOLFOX therapy in these patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed patients with resectable LAESCC who were aged ≥ 75 years or had renal or cardiac dysfunction and received preoperative FOLFOX between 2019 and 2021. FOLFOX was administered every 2 weeks for 3 or 4 cycles and was followed by surgery. Adverse events associated with chemotherapy, the complete resection (R0) rate, relative dose intensity (RDI), and histopathological response were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were eligible. Median age was 77 (range 65-89) years; 68.6% were aged ≥ 75 years, 74.3% had renal dysfunction, and 17.1% had cardiac dysfunction. The RDI was 70.2% and 87.1% for bolus and continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil, respectively and 85.2% for oxaliplatin. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (60.0%) and leucopenia (28.6%). Two patients (5.7%) had febrile neutropenia and grade 3 pneumonia. Thirty-one patients underwent surgery. The R0 resection rate was 87.1%, and there was no histopathological evidence of residual tumor in 16.1%. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative FOLFOX had a manageable safety profile and showed favorable short-term efficacy in patients with resectable LAESCC who were ineligible for CDDP-containing treatment.

Pembrolizumab: first anti-PD-1/L1-based regimen for first-line treatment of advanced esophageal cancer in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the ninth most common cancer in Japanese men. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the major histological type and accounts for 90% of EC cases in Japan. The prognosis of advanced ESCC remains poor. The standard treatment for advanced ESCC was palliative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy. After failure of first-line chemotherapy, taxanes were used as second-line chemotherapy. Recently, pembrolizumab monotherapy has demonstrated benefits as a second-line treatment in patients with advanced ESCC and a combined positive score of ≥10. Survival was found to be improved in patients with advanced EC who received first-line treatment with pembrolizumab plus doublet chemotherapy than in those who received doublet chemotherapy alone.

AREAS COVERED

This overview of immune checkpoint inhibitors focuses on pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy and shares key clinical data relevant to the treatment of patients with EC in Japan.

EXPERT OPINION

Pembrolizumab plus doublet chemotherapy is now an established first-line treatment for advanced EC in Japan. Recently, nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab have also become first-line treatment options for patients with advanced ESCC. Further investigations are needed to identify biomarkers that would be useful for selecting candidates for these treatments.

Pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer

The prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal cancer (EC) remains poor and there are limited effective therapeutic agents for EC. Pembrolizumab monotherapy exerts clinically meaningful benefits for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with a combined positive score of ≥10. Additionally, pembrolizumab plus doublet chemotherapy results in a significant survival benefit for patients with advanced EC as first-line treatment compared with chemotherapy alone. We provide an overview of immune checkpoint inhibitors and present important clinical data related to treatment for EC patients. In our opinion, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy should be the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced EC, regardless of histology and combined positive score. Biomarker studies to identify patient populations in which immune checkpoint inhibitors are expected to show efficacy are needed.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

First-line therapy for advanced oesophageal cancer is currently limited to fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer and Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer.

METHODS

We did a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study across 168 medical centres in 26 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer or Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 status), measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (chemotherapy), once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, histology, and performance status. Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to group assignment and PD-L1 biomarker status. Primary endpoints were overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719, and is closed to recruitment.

FINDINGS

Between July 25, 2017, and June 3, 2019, 1020 patients were screened and 749 were enrolled and randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=373 [50%]) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=376 [50%]). At the first interim analysis (median follow-up of 22·6 months), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (median 13·9 months vs 8·8 months; hazard ratio 0·57 [95% CI 0·43-0·75]; p<0·0001), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (12·6 months vs 9·8 months; 0·72 [0·60-0·88]; p=0·0006), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (13·5 months vs 9·4 months; 0·62 [0·49-0·78]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (12·4 months vs 9·8 months; 0·73 [0·62-0·86]; p<0·0001). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·54-0·78]; p<0·0001), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (7·5 months vs 5·5 months; 0·51 [0·41-0·65]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·55-0·76]; p<0·0001). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 266 (72%) patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 250 (68%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with previously untreated, advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients regardless of histology, and had a manageable safety profile in the total as-treated population.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Randomized phase II study of docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy: OGSG1201

BACKGROUND

There is no standard chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) refractory to first-line fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy. We therefore performed a randomized, selection-design phase II trial to compare docetaxel (DTX) and paclitaxel (PTX) in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either DTX (70 mg/m² on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) or PTX (100 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36 of each 49-day cycle). The primary end-point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), response rate (RR) and safety.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight eligible patients (N = 39 in each group) were included for efficacy analysis. OS was significantly longer in the PTX group than in the DTX group (median, 8.8 versus 7.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P = 0.047). A significant benefit of PTX over DTX was also apparent in PFS (median, 4.4 versus 2.1 months; HR, 0.49; P = 0.002) and TTF (median, 3.8 versus 2.1 months; HR, 0.45; P < 0.001). RR (25.6% versus 7.7%, P = 0.065) were higher in the PTX group than in the DTX group. Compared to the PTX group, neutropenia (28% versus 80%) and leukopenia (28% versus 76%) of grade ≥3 as well as febrile neutropenia (0% vs. 46%, P < 0.0001) occurred more frequently in the DTX group.

CONCLUSION

PTX showed a significantly better efficacy as well as a more manageable toxicity compared with DTX.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000007940.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Continuation Versus Discontinuation of First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Squamous-Cell Esophageal Cancer: Economic Evaluation Alongside the E-DIS Trial

OBJECTIVES

Continuous chemotherapy has been used to treat patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (mESCC), despite weak evidence supporting a clinical benefit, associated side effects for the patients, and unjustified medical costs. In the French setting, we conducted a cost-utility analysis alongside the randomized E-DIS trial (NCT01248299), which compared first-line fluorouracil/platinum-based chemotherapy continuation (CT-CONT) to CT discontinuation (CT-DISC) in progressive-free patients after an initial 6-week treatment phase.

METHODS

A partitioned survival analysis was performed using patient-level data collected during the trial for survival outcomes, quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), and medical costs. The mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and medical costs were estimated over an 18-month period to assess the incremental net monetary benefit and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Uncertainty was handled using the nonparametric bootstrap and univariate analysis. Sixty-seven patients with mESCC were randomized and included in the cost-utility analysis.

RESULTS

On average, CT-CONT slightly decreased the number of QALYs (-0.038) and increased the cost per patient (+ €1177). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50 000/QALY, the incremental net monetary benefit was negative (-€3077 [95% confidence interval: -6564; 4359]), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was -30 958€/QALY (CT-CONT dominated). The probability of the CT-CONT treatment option being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50 000/QALY, compared to CT-DISC, was 29%.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-DISC may be considered as an alternative therapeutic option to CT-CONT in patients with mESCC who have stable disease after an initial chemotherapy treatment phase. A continuous chemotherapy could indeed reduce the number of QALYs because of the disutility associated with the continuous treatment.

Nivolumab for the treatment of esophageal cancer

Introduction: Esophageal cancer (EC) is the seventh most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The prognosis for advanced EC patients remains poor and there are few effective therapeutic agents available. Nivolumab is a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that exerts antitumor activity by inhibiting the interaction of programmed cell death protein 1 on activated lymphocytes with its ligands. Nivolumab monotherapy showed significant benefit for overall survival of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) relative to taxane as a second-line treatment. Additionally, adjuvant nivolumab monotherapy showed significant disease-free survival benefit relative to placebo for resectable EC patients with residual pathologic disease who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery.Areas covered: Here, we provide an overview of checkpoint blockade with nivolumab and present the available clinical data related to its use in EC.Expert opinion: Nivolumab should be the standard second-line treatment for advanced ESCC patients and possibly adjuvant treatment of choice after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Trials assessing efficacy of a combination of cytotoxic agents and nivolumab as first-line treatment, nivolumab-containing chemoradiotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are ongoing. These trials should result in improved protocols for better clinical outcomes in EC.

Development of chemotherapeutics for unresectable advanced esophageal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has gradually improved due to efforts for the development of systemic chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

Chemotherapeutic agents such as cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, sometimes used with irradiation, lead in the treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC. Here, we review the latest treatment strategies for unresectable advanced ESCC and discuss future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Immunotherapeutic agents will be part of the treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC in the near future. However, definitive predictive biomarkers to determine good patient candidates remain unclear for immunotherapy in patients with ESCC. Further research is warranted to identify those biomarkers working individually and in combination. Moreover, genome-based therapeutics enable individualized and patient-specific treatment. The development of molecular-targeted drugs against actionable or druggable genes is in progress.

Pembrolizumab for the treatment of esophageal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the seventh most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer death. However, the prognosis of unresectable advanced or recurrent EC patients remains poor and there are few effective therapeutic agents for EC. Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that exerts anti-tumor activity by inhibiting the interaction of programmed cell death protein 1 with its ligand (PD-L1) on activated lymphocytes. Pembrolizumab monotherapy shows a significant survival benefit in metastatic or recurrent EC patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 as second-line treatment.

AREA COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of pembrolizumab as a compound and present the available clinical data related to EC treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

In our opinion, pembrolizumab is one of the standard treatment agents for second-line metastatic or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Trials assessing the efficacy of a combination of cytotoxic agents and pembrolizumab as first-line treatment and pembrolizumab-containing chemoradiation are ongoing. Their results may provide important data to improve clinical outcomes.

Investigative therapy for advanced esophageal cancer using the option for combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy

Aim: Advanced esophageal cancer has limited therapeutic options and a poor outcome. The efficacy of immunotherapy, as the first-line treatment of advanced esophageal cancer, is uncertain. Results: A stage IV advanced esophageal cancer patient received the first-line treatment with a combination of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. Partial response (PR) was achieved after three cycles, and the efficacy was evaluated as stable after six cycles of immunochemotherapy and two cycles of maintenance monotherapy. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were not obvious. The patient was followed up till November 2019 when he died of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Conclusion: The combination of an immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy is effective and safe for the initial treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. To confirm the evidence from this case, larger clinical trials are required in the future.

Nal-IRI/LV5-FU versus paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESIRI)-PRODIGE 62: A multicentre, randomised, non-comparative phase II study

Half of patients newly diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) have metastatic disease (mESCC) and therefore a poor prognosis. Furthermore, half of patients with initial loco-regional disease present disease recurrence after surgery and/or chemoradiation. In mESCC, the recommended first-line treatment combines 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, although this has not been validated by a phase III trial. Patients with disease progression or recurrence after platinum-based chemotherapy and good performance status probably benefit from second-line chemotherapy. Several molecules have been evaluated in phase I/II trials or retrospective studies (docetaxel, paclitaxel and irinotecan) but no randomised studies are available. OESIRI is a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase II trial designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-FU versus paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with mESCC. The main inclusion criteria are histologically proven mESCC in progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with initial resectable disease can be included if recurrence occurred within 6 months. The primary objective is to evaluate the percentage of patients alive 9 months after randomisation. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, safety and quality of life. In addition, circulating tumour DNA will be monitored to assess its prognostic value.