EORTC Lung Cancer Group survey on the definition of NSCLC synchronous oligometastatic disease

Oligometastatic NSCLC: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a separate entity with a different biology and prognosis compared to stage IV NSCLC. Challenges range from the very definition of oligometastatic disease to the timing and techniques of local treatments, and their benefit in prolonging patient survival. Most of the international consensus and guidelines agree on the need for shared criteria, such as appropriate stadiation and even tissue biopsy if needed, in order to select patients that could really benefit from personalised strategies. Multidisciplinary evaluation is crucial in order to define if every lesion is amenable to radical local treatment, which appears to be the most important criterion across different guidelines. A distinction must be made depending on the time of oligo-disease detection, separating de novo oligometastatic disease from oligorecurrence, oligoprogression and oligoresidual disease. These separate entities imply a different biology and prognosis, and treatment strategies consequently must be tailored. Locoregional approaches are therefore often contemplated in order to ensure the best outcome for the patient. In non-oncogene-addicted disease, the advent of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) allows physicians to take into consideration consolidative treatments, but timing, technique and subsequent systemic treatment remain open issues. In oncogene-addicted NSCLC, local treatments are nowadays preferably reserved to cases of oligoprogression, but the advent of new, more potent drugs might challenge that. In this review, we summarised the current knowledge, consensuses and data from retrospective and prospective trials, with the aim of shedding some light on the topic and emphasising the unmet clinical need.

Management of patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer in the immunotherapy era: An Italian consensus through a Delphi approach

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy represented a turning point for treating extensive small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Although, many issues remain debated.

METHODS

A group of Italian medical and radiation oncologists with expertise in managing patients with ES-SCLC developed a list of statements divided in six areas of interest. The Delphi method was used to assess the consensus on the defined list of statements.

RESULTS

32 statements were included in the final list to be voted by the Delphi panel, and 26 reached a consensus on the agreement. A prompt involvement of a multidisciplinary team is a priority to provide an integrated treatment strategy. First-line recommended treatment is immunotherapy in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and etoposide for four cycles followed by maintenance immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

While awaiting new data from clinical trials and real-world studies, these recommendations can represent a useful tool to guide the management of ES-SCLC patients in daily practice.

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the M Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

This study analyzed all metastatic categories of the current TNM classification of NSCLC to propose modifications of the M component in the next edition (ninth) of the classification.

METHODS

A database of 124,581 patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2019 was established; of these, 14,937 with NSCLC in stages IVA to IVB were available for this analysis. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognosis was assessed using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

The eighth edition M categories revealed good discrimination in the ninth edition data set. Assessments revealed that an increasing number of metastatic lesions were associated with decreasing prognosis; because this seems to be a continuum and adjustment for confounders was not possible, no specific lesion number was deemed appropriate for stage classification. Among tumors involving multiple metastases, decreasing prognosis was found with an increasing number of organ systems involved. Multiple assessments, including after adjustment for potential confounders, revealed that M1c patients who had metastases to a single extrathoracic organ system were prognostically distinct from M1c patients who had involvement of multiple extrathoracic organ systems.

CONCLUSIONS

These data validate the eighth edition M1a and M1b categories, which are recommended to be maintained. We propose the M1c category be divided into M1c1 (involvement of a single extrathoracic organ system) and M1c2 (involvement of multiple extrathoracic organ systems).

Optimal Treatment Strategy for Oligo-Recurrence Lung Cancer Patients with Driver Mutations

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of local therapies for lung cancer patients with postoperative oligo-recurrence has been reported. However, whether local therapies should be chosen over molecular targeted therapies for oligo-recurrence patients with driver mutations remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the optimal initial treatment strategy for oligo-recurrence in lung cancer patients with driver mutations.

METHODS

Among 2152 patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection at our institute between 2008 and 2020, 66 patients with driver mutations who experienced cancer oligo-recurrence after surgery and were treated with local or molecularly targeted therapy as an initial therapy after recurrence were evaluated. Oligo-recurrence was characterized by the presence of 1 to 3 recurrent lesions. These patients were investigated, focusing on their post-recurrence therapies and prognoses.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 71 months. Local and molecular targeted therapies were administered to 41 and 25 patients, respectively. The number of recurrence lesions tended to be lower in the initial local therapy group than in the molecular targeted therapy group. In the initial local therapy group, 23 patients (56%) subsequently received molecular targeted therapies. The time from recurrence to the initiation of molecular targeted therapy was significantly longer in the local therapy group than in the molecular targeted therapy group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in post-recurrence overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.429; 95% confidence interval, 0.701-2.912; log-rank, p = 0.324) and post-recurrence progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.799; 95% confidence interval, 0.459-1.390; log-rank, p = 0.426) in the initial local ablative therapy group compared with the initial molecular targeted therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Local therapies as a first-line treatment did not show statistically significant differences in post-recurrence survival or progression-free survival compared with molecular targeted therapies. However, local therapies as an initial treatment should be considered preferably, as they can cure the recurrence and can delay the start of administration of molecular targeted therapies.

Nasopharyngeal Metastasis from Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Introduction

Managing uncommon metastatic sites from different solid tumors is challenging since no available guidelines define the best therapeutic approaches for these rare clinical events. Thus, malignancies giving rise to distant metastases involving infrequent anatomical regions are often associated with a poor prognosis.

Case Presentation

We present the case of a 75-year-old man who developed uncontrolled epistaxis following the detection of a metachronous nasopharyngeal metastasis from a previous lung adenocarcinoma. The lesion was identified with a computed tomography scan and its origin from the earlier non-small cell lung cancer was confirmed by a biopsy. The patient was successfully treated with radiation therapy and is currently continuing his oncological follow-up. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fifth reported case of a lung malignancy spreading to the nasopharyngeal region.

Conclusion

Meticulous patient monitoring and accurate radiological diagnosis followed by histological confirmation are of paramount importance for the management of uncommon metastatic sites. Likewise, a multidisciplinary approach is essential to devise the appropriate treatment strategy for each patient with locoregional interventions, such as radiation therapy, often playing a pivotal role for the management of symptomatic lesions in unusual anatomical sites.

Local control strategies for management of NSCLC with oligoprogressive disease

Progresses of systemic treatments in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), such as immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) and targeted therapies, led to the increased incidence of oligoprogressive disease (OPD). The OPD is a subtype of oligometastatic disease (OMD) defined as a progression of a limited number of lesions during systemic treatment exposure. The hypothesis was formulated that local radical treatments (LRT) could eradicate progressive lesions resulting from resistant clones, ultimately leading to systemic treatment sensitivity restoration. Recently published international consensuses and guidelines aim to obtain a uniform definition of OMD NSCLC, to standardize the inclusion of these patients in future clinical trials, as well as their management in daily practice. Although there is no specific definition of OPD, LRT strategies in OPD are supported after reporting promising results. Both retrospective and preliminary prospective randomized data of LRT for patients with OPD NSCLC are encouraging. More clinical and translational data are needed for selecting best scenarios where LRT should be delivered. In this review, we analyze the current available literature on LRT for patients with OPD in advanced NSCLC and discuss about future trial design and challenges.

[Olimetastatic disease: Current status and perspectives in non-small cell lung cancer]

The concept of oligometastatic disease was first introduced in the late 1990s to describe an situation more or less midway between locally advanced tumours and multifocal metastatic cancer. Four concepts are currently used: synchronous oligometastatic disease, metachronous oligometastatic disease (or oligo-recurrence), oligo-persistence and oligo-progression. Some phase II studies, randomised or not, have validated this concept in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and suggest the interest of adding local ablative therapy to systemic treatment. That said, numerous questions remain, and the impact of this therapeutic approach in the framework of immunotherapies and targeted therapies has yet to be assessed. Which of these new treatments offer hope of significantly improved long-term survival in stage IV NSCLC? This article appraises current knowledge and therapeutic regarding oligometastatic NSCLC.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for extra-cranial oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent small-cell lung cancer

Introduction

The role of local ablative treatments, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), is an area of active research in oligometastatic patients. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a poor prognosis, with common diffuse metastatic evolution. We evaluated the outcomes after SBRT in uncommon oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent SCLC presentation.

Methods

Data of SCLC patients who received SBRT for oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent metastatic disease at four centers were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with synchronous oligometastatic disease, SBRT for primary lung tumor and brain radiosurgery were not included. Relapse and survival rates were defined as the time between the date of SBRT and the first event.

Results

Twenty patients (60% with initially limited-disease [LD]) presenting 24 lesions were identified. Oligoprogression and oligorecurrence were observed in 6/20 (30%) and 14/20 (70%) patients, respectively. SBRT was delivered to one (n = 16) to two (n = 4) lesions (median size, 26 mm), mainly to lung [n = 17/24] metastases. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, no local relapse was observed and 15/20 patients experienced a distant relapse (DR). The median DR and OS were 4.5 months (95 %CI: 2.9-13.7 months) and 17.2 months (95 %CI: 7.5-65.2 months), respectively. The 3-year distant control and OS rates were 25% (95 %CI: 6-44%) and 37% (95 %CI: 15-59%), respectively. Initial LD (vs extensive-disease) was the only prognosis factor associated with a lower risk of post-SBRT DR (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0-0.88; p = 0.03). There was no severe observed SBRT-related toxicities.

Conclusion

Prognosis was poor, with DR occurring in most patients. However, local control was excellent and long term response after SBRT may rarely occur in patients with oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent SCLC. Local ablative treatments should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting on well-selected cases.

Prognostic factors in nonsmall cell lung cancer: insights from the German CRISP registry

INTRODUCTION

Understanding prognosis, especially long-term outcome, in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial to inform patients, guide treatment and plan supportive and palliative care.

METHODS

Prognostic factors influencing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 2082 patients with wild-type (WT)-NSCLC (629 M1a, 249 M1b, 1204 M1c) are reported. Patients were included in the prospective German CRISP registry recruiting in >150 centres. Analysis for pre-therapeutic factors was based on results from Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Current M-descriptors of the Union for International Cancer Control-8 staging system were validated: M1a and M1b patients had significantly longer median time to events compared to M1c (OS/PFS 16.4/7.2 months, 17.8/6.7 months and 10.9/5.4 months, respectively). OS and PFS were influenced by number and location of metastatic organ systems. M1c and four or more metastatic organs involved had shorter OS and PFS than M1c with one to three organs (OS hazard ratio (HR) 1.69, p<0.001; PFS HR 1.81, p<0.001). M1b-liver metastases had shorter OS/PFS than M1b involving other organs (OS HR 2.70, p=0.006; PFS HR 2.48, p=0.007). Based on number of involved organs (orgsys) and liver metastases, two risk groups (low-risk: M1a, M1b-non-liver, M1c-1-3-orgsys-non-liver; high-risk: M1c-liver, M1b-liver, M1c-4+-orgsys) with significantly different prognoses could be amalgamated (median OS/PFS 14.3/6.5 months and 7.7/4.1 months, respectively). Other favourable factors were female gender and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group stage 0, with age showing no impact. Those with T1- or N0-status were associated with longer OS than T2-4 or N2-3.

CONCLUSION

In this large observational dataset, we further defined factors for outcome in WT-NSCLC, including increased number of involved metastatic organ systems and liver metastases, as those with overall poorer prognosis and reduced survival chance.

Safety and Efficacy of Concurrent or Sequential Radiotherapy Plus (PD-1) Inhibitors in Oligometastatic Esophageal Cancer

Purpose

We assess real-world outcomes, including safety and efficacy, of concurrent or sequential treatment with radiotherapy plus programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in patients with oligometastatic esophageal cancer (OMEC).

Methods

This cohort study retrospectively collected clinical data of patients with synchronous or metachronous OMEC. All patients underwent concurrent or sequential treatment with radiotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitors. Each patient had up to five measurable metastatic lesions and up to three organs involved. Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related toxicities, locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Description statistics and Kaplan-Meier models were used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 86 patients were included, most of whom were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma histology (98%) and presented with synchronous OMEC (64%). The median follow-up period was 17 months (range: 6-32 months), the median PFS was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval: 12.1-18.2 months); and the 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 61.4% and 26.7%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year LRPFS were 91.3% and 57.3%, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 46.5% and 91.8%, respectively. Forty-two patients (48.8%) experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); a grade 5 treatment-related adverse event was observed in one patient (1.2%) who died of immune-related pneumonitis.

Conclusion

Combining radiotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with OMEC. No new safety concerns were identified in this study. However, due to the potential risk of cumulative toxicity, an individual risk-benefit assessment for each patient is required prior to treatment initiation.

Local therapy treatment conditions for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Standard treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include palliative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but with limited survival rates. With the development of improved immunotherapy and targeted therapy, NSCLC prognoses have significantly improved. In recent years, the concept of oligometastatic disease has been developed, with randomized trial data showing survival benefits from local ablation therapy (LAT) in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC (OM-NSCLC). LAT includes surgery, stereotactic ablation body radiation therapy, or thermal ablation, and is becoming an important treatment component for OM-NSCLC. However, controversy remains on specific management strategies for the condition. In this review, we gathered current randomized trial data to analyze prognostic factors affecting patient survival, and explored ideal treatment conditions for patients with OM-NSCLC with respect to long-term survival.

Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Practical Review of Prospective Trials

Simple Summary

A significant number of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will have a metastatic Stage IV disease at presentation. Among those, patients with limited number of metastases are referred to as oligometastatic, and their treatment will combine systemic and possible local therapy. The aim of this article is to review the current definition of oligometastatic cancer, a historic perspective of lung cancer leading to modern oligometastatic disease and to present available prospective evidence for treatment of oligometastatic NSCLC. We describe trials exploring role of local therapy in oligometastatic NSCLC with actionable mutation in combination with TKI or without any actionable mutation and in combination with chemo-immunotherapy. We also discuss general treatment approaches adopted based on limited data. Finally, we discuss the on-going clinical trials for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive NSCLC.

Abstract

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an intermediate state between localized and widely metastatic NSCLC, where systemic therapy in combination with aggressive local therapy when feasible can yield a favorable outcome. While different societies have adopted different definitions for oligometastatic NSCLC, the feasibility of curative intent treatment remains a major determinant of the oligometastatic state. The management involves a multidisciplinary approach to identify such patients with oligometastatic stage, including the presence of symptomatic or potentially symptomatic brain metastasis, the presence of targetable mutations, and programmed death-ligand (PD-L1) expression. Treatment requires a personalized approach with the use of novel systemic agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy, and addition of local ablative therapy via surgery or stereotactic radiation therapy when appropriate.

International consensus on radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for most cases. While radiotherapy has historically served as a palliative modality in metastatic NSCLC, considerable advances in its technology and the continuous development of cutting-edge therapeutic agents, such as targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are increasing its role in the multi-disciplinary management of the disease.

METHODS

International radiotherapy experts were convened to consider and reach consensuses on the clinical utilities of radiotherapy in metastatic NSCLC, with the aim to provide patient-focused, up to date, evidence-based, recommendations to assist cancer specialists in the management of patients with metastatic NSCLC worldwide.

RESULTS

Timely radiotherapy can offer rapid symptom alleviation and allow subsequent aggressive treatment approaches in patients with heavy tumor burden and/or oncologic emergencies. In addition, appropriate incorporation of radiotherapy as concurrent, consolidation, or salvage therapy makes it possible to achieve long-term survival, or even cure, for patients with oligo-metastatic disease. Cranial radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of brain metastasis, potentially augmenting the response and prolonging survival associated with targeted agents and ICIs. However, key questions remain, such as the appropriate choice of radiation techniques, optimal sequence of systemic therapies and radiotherapy, and optimal patient selection for such combination strategies. Although a strong rationale for combining radiotherapy and ICIs exists, its optimal parameters in this setting remain to be established.

CONCLUSIONS

In the modern era, radiotherapy serves not only as a palliative tool in metastatic NSCLC, but also plays active roles in patients with oligo-focal disease, CNS metastasis and receiving ICIs.

Clinical value of PET/CT in identifying patients with oligometastatic/oligoprogressive disease among first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor-treated advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Implications from survival comparisons

OBJECTIVE

Local therapy (LT) could potentially prolong the survival of patient with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and harboring oligometastatic/oligoprogressive disease (OMD/OPD). However, the optimal imaging method for identifying patients with OMD/OPD remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical value of incorporating PET/CT in detecting patients with OMD/OPD.

METHODS

Consecutive cases with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC undergoing first-line EGFR-TKI treatment were retrospectively screened and those receiving baseline PET/CT and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or complete conventional imaging (CIM), including brain MRI, chest computed tomography (CT), abdomen ultrasound or CT and bone scintigraphy were included. OMD/OPD was defined as metastases/progressions documented at a maximum of five lesions and three organs, otherwise was defined as multiple metastatic/progressive disease (MMD/MPD). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 392 patients evaluated, baseline OMD was detected in 22.7% (53/233) of patients by PET/CT and in 18.2% (29/159) of patients by CIM (p = 0.171). Among the patients evaluated with baseline PET/CT, patients with OMD had longer PFS (p = 0.016) and tendency of improved OS (p = 0.058) than those with MMD. However, this result was not observed with patients evaluated using baseline CIM. With a median follow-up of 24.2 (range, 1.1-124.6) months, 297 patients had their first disease progression (FPD), of whom 164 (55.2%) had adequate imaging scans to analyze the tumor distributions at FPD comprehensively. OPD was detected in 63.0% (34/54) and 35.0% (39/110) of patients among the PET/CT and CIM assessed group (p = 0.003), respectively. Among the PET/CT assessed group, patients with OPD had significantly longer post-progressive overall survival (OS2) than those with MPD (p = 0.011). However, no significant difference of OS2 in the CIM assessed group was found.

CONCLUSION

Patients with OMD/OPD, evaluated by PET/CT but not CIM, generally had more favorable survival outcomes than those with MMD/MPD among patients with metastatic NSCLC undergoing first-line EGFR-TKI treatment.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

PET/CT seems to affect the survival of patients under first-line EGFR-TKI treated metastatic NSCLC with OMD/OPD.

Clinical impact of tumour burden on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy (ICI + Chemo) is the standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of tumour burden on the efficacy of ICI + Chemo remains unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 92 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI + Chemo. Tumour burden was assessed as the sum of the longest diameter of the target lesion (BSLD) and number of metastatic lesions (BNMLs). We categorised the patients into three groups based on the combined BSLD and BNML values.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients (74%) had progressive disease or died. Forty-four patients (48%) in the low-BSLD group had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.5 months, whereas patients in the high-BSLD group had a median PFS of 4.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54, p = 0012). Twenty-five patients (27%) in the low-BNML group had a median PFS of 9.6 months, whereas patients in the high-BNML group had a median PFS of 6.5 months (HR = 0.51, p = 0.029). Low-BSLD and low-BNML were associated independently with improved PFS in multivariate analysis. Analysis of the tumour burden combined with BSLD and BNML revealed a trend towards improved PFS as the tumour burden decreased, with median PFS of 22.3, 8.7, and 3.9 months in the low- (N = 13), medium- (N = 42) and high-burden (N = 37) groups respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated that a high tumour burden negatively impacts the efficacy of ICI + Chemo in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Risk Prediction Model for Synchronous Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Thoracic Radiotherapy May Not Prolong Survival in High-Risk patients

Background and Purpose

On the basis of the promising clinical study results, thoracic radiotherapy (TRT)¹ has become an integral part of treatment of synchronous oligometastatic non–small cell lung cancer (SOM-NSCLC). However, some of them experienced rapid disease progression after TRT and showed no significant survival benefit. How to screen out such patients is a more concerned problem at present. In this study, we developed a risk-prediction model by screening hematological and clinical data of patients with SOM-NSCLC and identified patients who would not benefit from TRT.

Materials and Methods

We investigated patients with SOM-NSCLC between 2011 and 2019. A formula named Risk-Total was constructed using factors screened by LASSO-Cox regression analysis. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weight analysis was used to match the clinical characteristics between TRT and non-TRT groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results

We finally included 283 patients divided into two groups: 188 cases for the training cohort and 95 for the validation cohort. Ten prognostic factors included in the Risk-Total formula were age, N stage, T stage, adrenal metastasis, liver metastasis, sensitive mutation status, local treatment status to metastatic sites, systemic inflammatory index, CEA, and Cyfra211. Patients were divided into low- and high-risk groups based on risk scores, and TRT was found to have improved the OS of low-risk patients (46.4 vs. 31.7 months, P = 0.083; 34.1 vs. 25.9 months, P = 0.078) but not that of high-risk patients (14.9 vs. 11.7 months, P = 0.663; 19.4 vs. 18.6 months, P = 0.811) in the training and validation sets, respectively.

Conclusion

We developed a prediction model to help identify patients with SOM-NSCLC who would not benefit from TRT, and TRT could not improve the survival of high-risk patients.

Predicting the efficacy of first-line immunotherapy by combining cancer cachexia and tumor burden in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Cancer cachexia and tumor burden predict efficacies of programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1)/programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitors and chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are no predictive models that simultaneously assess cancer cachexia and tumor burden.

Methods

In the present retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC who received cancer immunotherapy as first‐line systemic therapy. Clinical immune predictive scores were defined according to multivariate analysis of progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 157 patients were included in the present study (75 treated with PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors + chemotherapy; 82, pembrolizumab monotherapy). Multivariate analysis for PFS revealed that PD‐L1 tumor proportion scores <50%, a total target lesion diameter ≥76 mm, and cancer cachexia were independently associated with poor PFS. Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that ≥4 metastases and cancer cachexia were significantly associated with poor OS. In the immune predictive model, the median PFS was 21.7 months in the low‐risk group (N = 41); 7.6 in the medium‐risk group (N = 64); and 3.0 in the high‐risk group (N = 47). The median OS were not reached, 22.4 and 9.1 months respectively. Our immune predictive model was significantly associated with PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

We proposed the immune predictive model, including tumor burden and cancer cachexia, which may predict the efficacy and survival outcome of first‐line immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastases in the lymph nodes

Even though systemic therapy is standard treatment for lymph node metastases, metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) seems to be a valid option in oligometastatic patients with a low disease burden.

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT ) is the gold standard for assessing metastases to the lymph nodes; co-registration of PET-CT images and planning CT images are the basis for gross tumor volume (GTV ) delineation. Appropriate techniques are needed to overcome target motion. SRT schedules depend on the irradiation site, target volume and dose constraints to the organs at risk (OARs) of toxicity. Although several fractionation schemes were reported, total doses of 48–60 Gy in 4–8 fractions were proposed for mediastinal lymph node SRT, with the spinal cord, esophagus, heart and proximal bronchial tree being the dose limiting OAR s. Total doses ranged from 30 to 45 Gy, with daily fractions of 7–12 Gy for abdominal lymph nodes, with dose limiting OARs being the liver, kidneys, bowel and bladder. SRT on lymph node metastases is safe; late side effects, particularly severe, are rare.

Imaging of Oligometastatic Disease

Simple Summary

The imaging of oligometastatic disease (OMD) is challenging as it requires precise loco-regional staging and whole-body assessment. The combination of imaging modalities is often required. The more accurate imaging tool will be selected according to tumor type, the timing with regard to measurement and treatment, metastatic location, and the patient’s individual risk for metastasis. The most commonly used modalities are contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging and metabolic and receptor-specific imaging, particularly, ¹⁸F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT, used alone or in combination.

Abstract

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) is an emerging state of disease with limited metastatic tumor burden. It should be distinguished from polymetastatic disease due the potential curative therapeutic options of OMD. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with OMD. The imaging tools needed in the case of OMD will differ according to different parameters, which include primary tumor type, timing between measurement and treatment, potential metastatic location and the patient’s individual risk for metastasis. In this article, OMD is defined and the use of different imaging modalities in several oncologic situations are described in order to better understand OMD and its specific implication for radiologists.

Surgical Survival Benefits With Different Metastatic Patterns for Stage IV Extrathoracic Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A SEER-Based Study

Background:

With the knowledge of oligometastases, primary surgery plays an increasingly vital role in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. We aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of primary surgery based on metastatic patterns.

Materials and Methods:

The selected patients with stage IV extrathoracic metastatic (m1b) non-small cell lung cancer between 2010 and 2015 were included in a retrospective cohort study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multiple imputation was used for the missing data. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether surgery was performed. After covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) weighting, multivariate Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were built to identify the survival benefit of different metastatic patterns.

Results:

Surgery can potentially increase the overall survival (OS) (adjusted HR: 0.68, P < 0.001) of non-small cell lung cancer. The weighted 3-year OS in the surgical group was 16.9%, compared with 7.8% in the nonsurgical group. For single organ metastasis, surgery could improve the survival of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Meanwhile, no significant survival improvements in surgical group were observed in patients with multiple organ metastases.

Conclusion:

The surgical survival benefits for extrathoracic metastatic non-small cell lung cancer could be divided by metastatic pattern.

Radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

Preclinical and early clinical evidence suggest that radical radiotherapy of oligometastatic disease in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients can impact outcomes with relatively limited toxicity. Whilst data from phase 2 randomized trials suggesting an improved overall survival (OS) with this treatment is promising, it has also illustrated the heterogeneity in this patient population and treatment. Oligometastatic disease in itself comprises a broad spectrum of patients, in terms of tumor load and location, stage of the disease and treatment history. This real-life variety in patient characteristics is often reflected in studies to a certain extent, hinting to the fact that all might benefit from radical radiotherapy to limited metastatic disease, yet leaving the question unanswered as to whom the ideal candidate is. Furthermore, differences between and within studies with regards to treatment modality, timing, radiation technique, and radiation dose are substantial. Also, preclinical and early clinical trials suggest that radiotherapy can work synergistically with checkpoint inhibitors by acting as an in situ cancer vaccine, therefore the combination of these two treatments in oligometastatic patients might entail the largest benefit. Ongoing randomized controlled phase 3 trials and prospective registry trials will further elucidate the true extent of benefit of this local treatment strategy and aid in identifying the ideal patient population and therapy. The current narrative review summarizes the clinical evidence on radiotherapy for oligometastatic NSCLC and highlights the remaining unknowns.

Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review

Objective

This review aims to summarize the possibilities of recently discovered molecular diagnostic techniques in lung cancer, by evaluating their impact on diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis in oligometastatic disease.

Background

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (OM-NSCLC) is currently defined based on morphological rather than biological features. Major advances in the detection of molecular biomarkers in cell-free tumoral DNA and the models of oncogene addiction make as feasible an early diagnosis and guide the therapeutic decision-making progress to improve the prognosis.

Methods

This narrative review EXAMINES current approaches of diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis of OM-NSCLC and describes the fast-evolving therapeutic scenario of this disease. We provide an overview of the powerful capability of liquid biopsy techniques applied to blood and fluid and we focus on the technological advancement of circulant biomolecular factors in OM NSCLC pathology, starting from apparently simpler models such as oncogene addicted tumors to evaluate themselves in the light of treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Conclusions

A better understanding of spatial and temporal evolution of oligometastatic diseases would contribute to a more accurate diagnosis and tailored treatment. Data from prospective clinical trials in the early stage of disease, coupled with knowledge of genetic characteristics of lung tumors, are warranted. These efforts would lead to improving the possibility to eradicate the residual disease in these low burden tumoral settings, thus enhancing the definitive cure perspectives.

The role of the surgeon in the management of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we aim to summarize the most recent data on the surgical management of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND

Approximately 60-70% of all patients with NSCLC initially present with advanced stages of cancer at time of diagnosis. These patients are generally treated with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of these modalities. Patients with late-stage disease are usually not considered to be amenable for curative-intent treatments due to poor prognoses. Despite advances in systemic therapies, 5-year overall survival rates in these patients remain poor. However, technological advances in imaging modalities and new imaging strategies have substantially increased tumor detection rates and have resulted in a shift towards earlier diagnosis of NSCLC, possibly in stages in which metastatic disease is limited and still treatable. Studies in recent years have shown that there is a distinct group of patients with metastatic lesions at one or a few sites, often referred to as oligometastatic disease, that may have better survival outcomes compared to patients with more disseminated diseases. Furthermore, it is suggested that these patients may benefit from a combination of systemic treatment and local treatment aimed at the metastatic site(s). However, the role of surgery in this setting remains a controversial subject, with many unanswered questions.

METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE database and the Cochrane database were searched to find relevant articles regarding oligometastatic NSCLC. Specifically, articles regarding definitions of oligometastatic disease, oligometastatic tumor biology, diagnosis, and the treatment of oligometastatic disease were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Oligometastatic NSCLC represents a wide spectrum of diseases and encompasses a heterogeneous patient population. Current data suggests that local ablative treatment of oligometastatic lesions with surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy may result in improved overall survival and progression-free survival rates. However, more data from multi-center prospective trials are necessary to shed light on which therapeutic modalities are most suitable for the treatment of oligometastatic NSCLC. Integration of clinical and molecular staging data is necessary to allow for more personalized treatment approaches.

Local ablative therapy in oncogenic-driven oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: present and ongoing strategies-a narrative review

Oligometastatic (OM) disease is defined by a low metastatic tumor spread. OM non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment aims to improve the patient's prognosis and quality of life, in an attempt-to-cure objective. Oncogenic-driven metastatic NSCLC accounts for about 20-25% of NSCLCs, with an ever-increasing number of potentially druggable molecular alterations. Due to specific targeted therapy, the care and prognosis of mutated NSCLC is quite different from non-oncogenic-driven NSCLC. However, OM-NSCLC treatment guidelines do not specifically discuss oncogenic-driven OM-NSCLC patients. We conducted a narrative review regarding retrospective and prospective studies published from inception to May 2020 dealing with oncogenic-driven OM-NSCLC in order to: (I) describe the specific patterns of metastatic spread of oncogenic-driven NSCLC (i.e., bone and pleural tropism in EGFR mutated NSCLC and serous and brain metastases in ALK NSCLC); (II) review the low level of current evidence for local ablative therapy (LAT) strategies in patients with oncogenic-driven OM-NSCLC, focusing on the benefit/risk of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and LATs combination and (III) present strategies to help to select the best candidate for an attempt-to-cure approach. Finally, the optimal strategy may be to introduce a targeted therapy, then treat all tumor sites with LAT, and finally continue TKI for unknown prolonged duration in an attempt to prolong progression free survival in most patients, improve overall survival for some patients, and potentially lead to a cancer cure for a few patients.

[Radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients]

The oligometastatic disease concept suggests that patients with a limited number of metastases have a favorable prognosis. Radical local treatment of oligometastatic patients has then increased given developments in imaging (mainly positron emission tomography and brain magnetic resonance imaging) and access to effective and better tolerated treatments. Stereotactic radiotherapy has the advantage of being noninvasive, allowing a good rate of local control and a limited number of side effects. A better definition of oligometastatic disease, particularly for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), has recently been published. For patients with NSCLC, two randomized phase II trials also suggested that the addition of a radical local treatment results in encouraging survival data, with a good safety profile. A single-arm phase II finally showed a benefit when combining a radical local treatment with an anti-PD1 immunotherapy. This review describes the definitions of oligometastatic disease, the main prospective findings including radiation therapy, and prospects for oligometastatic NSCLC patients.

Role of Surgical Intervention in Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

With the development of systemic treatments with high response rates, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, some patients with unresectable lung cancer now have a chance to undergo radical resection after primary treatment. Although there is no general consensus regarding the definition of “unresectable” in lung cancer, the term “resectable” refers to technically resectable and indicates that resection can provide a favorable prognosis to some extent. Unresectable lung cancer is typically represented by stage III and IV disease. Stage III lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and in some patients with technically resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), multimodality treatments, including induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, are the treatments of choice. The representative surgical intervention for unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC is salvage surgery, which refers to surgical treatment for local residual/recurrent lesions after definitive non-surgical treatment. Surgical intervention is also used for an oligometastatic stage IV NSCLC. In this review, we highlight the role of surgical intervention in patients with unresectable NSCLC, for whom an initial complete resection is technically difficult. We further describe the history of and new findings on salvage surgery for unresectable NSCLC and surgery for oligometastatic NSCLC.

Efficacy of local therapy for oligoprogressive disease after programmed cell death 1 blockade in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the strategy used to treat patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the vast majority of patients eventually develop progressive disease (PD) and acquire resistance to ICIs. Some patients experience oligoprogressive disease. Few retrospective studies have evaluated clinical efficacy in patients with oligometastatic progression who received local therapy after ICI treatment. We conducted a retrospective analysis of advanced NSCLC patients who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab to evaluate the effects of ICIs on the patterns of progression and the efficacy of local therapy for oligoprogressive disease. Of the 307 patients treated with ICIs, 148 were evaluated in our study; 42 were treated with pembrolizumab, and 106 were treated with nivolumab. Thirty-eight patients showed oligoprogression. Male sex, a lack of driver mutations, and smoking history were significantly correlated with the risk of oligoprogression. Primary lesions were most frequently detected at oligoprogression sites (15 patients), and 6 patients experienced abdominal lymph node (LN) oligoprogression. Four patients showed evidence of new abdominal LN oligometastases. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the local therapy group and the switch therapy group (reached vs. not reached, P = .456). We summarized clinical data on the response of oligoprogressive NSCLC to ICI therapy. The results may help to elucidate the causes of ICI resistance and indicate that the use of local therapy as the initial treatment in this setting is feasible treatment option.

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) combined with immunotherapy (L19-IL2) versus standard of care in stage IV NSCLC patients, ImmunoSABR: a multicentre, randomised controlled open-label phase II trial

BACKGROUND

About 50% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have metastatic disease at initial diagnosis, which limits their treatment options and, consequently, the 5-year survival rate (15%). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have become standard of care (SOC) for most good performance status patients. However, most patients will not obtain long-term benefit and new treatment strategies are therefore needed. We previously demonstrated clinical safety of the tumour-selective immunocytokine L19-IL2, consisting of the anti-ED-B scFv L19 antibody coupled to IL2, combined with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

METHODS

This investigator-initiated, multicentric, randomised controlled open-label phase II clinical trial will test the hypothesis that the combination of SABR and L19-IL2 increases progression free survival (PFS) in patients with limited metastatic NSCLC. One hundred twenty-six patients will be stratified according to their metastatic load (oligo-metastatic: ≤5 or poly-metastatic: 6 to 10) and randomised to the experimental-arm (E-arm) or the control-arm (C-arm). The C-arm will receive SOC, according to the local protocol. E-arm oligo-metastatic patients will receive SABR to all lesions followed by L19-IL2 therapy; radiotherapy for poly-metastatic patients consists of irradiation of one (symptomatic) to a maximum of 5 lesions (including ICI in both arms if this is the SOC). The accrual period will be 2.5-years, starting after the first centre is initiated and active. Primary endpoint is PFS at 1.5-years based on blinded radiological review, and secondary endpoints are overall survival, toxicity, quality of life and abscopal response. Associative biomarker studies, immune monitoring, CT-based radiomics, stool collection, iRECIST and tumour growth rate will be performed.

DISCUSSION

The combination of SABR with or without ICI and the immunocytokine L19-IL2 will be tested as 1st, 2nd or 3rd line treatment in stage IV NSCLC patients in 14 centres located in 6 countries. This bimodal and trimodal treatment approach is based on the direct cytotoxic effect of radiotherapy, the tumour selective immunocytokine L19-IL2, the abscopal effect observed distant from the irradiated metastatic site(s) and the memory effect. The first results are expected end 2023.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ImmunoSABR Protocol Code: NL67629.068.18; EudraCT: 2018-002583-11; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03705403; ISRCTN ID: ISRCTN49817477; Date of registration: 03-April-2019.