Weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus docetaxel as second- or third-line treatment in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of the IFCT-1103 ULTIMATE study

Strategies to reprogram anti-inflammatory macrophages towards pro-inflammatory macrophages to support cancer immunotherapies

Tumor-associated myeloid cells, including macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, can be highly prevalent in solid tumors and play a significant role in the development of the tumor. Therefore, myeloid cells are being considered potential targets for cancer immunotherapies. In this review, we focused on strategies aimed at targeting tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Most strategies were studied preclinically but we also included a limited number of clinical studies based on these strategies. We describe possible underlying mechanisms and discuss future challenges and prospects.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver alterations.

METHODS

This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Ten new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients without driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line versus second-line use of brigatinib followed by lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The ALTA-1 L trial and EXP-3B arm of NCT01970865 trial found that both brigatinib and lorlatinib showed durable and robust responses in treating ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, brigatinib and lorlatinib treatments are costly and need indefinite administration until the disease progression. Thus, it remains uncertain whether using brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy is cost-effective compared to reserving these two drugs until progression after chemotherapy.

Methods

We used a Markov model to assess clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of treating ALK-positive NSCLC individuals with brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy versus a strategy of reserving these drugs until progression after chemotherapy. Transition probabilities were estimated using parametric survival modeling based on multiple clinical trials. The drug acquisition costs, adverse events costs, administration costs were extracted from published studies before and publicly available data. We calculated lifetime direct healthcare costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the perspective of a United States payer.

Results

Our base-case analysis indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of using first-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib compared with second-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib is $-400,722.09/QALY which meant that second-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib had less costs and better outcomes. Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated the results were most sensitive to the cost of brigatinib. Probability sensitivity analysis revealed that using brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy had a 0% probability of cost-effectiveness versus delaying these two drugs until progression after chemotherapy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses conducted revealed the robustness of this result, as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios never exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold.

Conclusion

Using brigatinib as first-line treatment followed by lorlatinib for ALK-positive NSCLC may not be cost-effective given current pricing from the perspective of a United States payer. Delaying brigatinib followed by lorlatinib until subsequent lines of treatment may be a reasonable strategy that could limit healthcare costs without affecting clinical outcomes. More mature data are needed to better estimate cost-effectiveness in this setting.

Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Patients with Metastatic EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Progression on Osimertinib and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Podcast Discussion

Patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are widely treated with osimertinib, the preferred first-line treatment option. However, disease progression inevitably occurs, driven by EGFR-dependent or EGFR-independent mechanisms of resistance. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the recommended treatment following progression with osimertinib but responses to platinum-based chemotherapy are transient. Salvage therapies, which are used after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy, have poor clinical outcomes in addition to substantial toxicity. In this podcast, we discuss the current treatment landscape and emerging therapeutic options for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC whose disease has progressed following treatment with osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy.Podcast audio available for this article.

Current status and future of anti-angiogenic drugs in lung cancer

Lung cancer, as a malignant tumor with both high incidence and mortality in China, is one of the major causes of death in our population and one of the major public health problems in China. Effective treatment of lung cancer is a major public health task for all human beings. Angiogenesis plays an important role in the development of tumor, not only as a basic condition for tumor growth, but also as a significant factor to promote tumor metastasis. Therefore, anti-angiogenesis has become a vital means to inhibit tumor development, and anti-angiogenic drugs can rebalance pro- and anti-angiogenic factors to inhibit tumor cells. This article reviews the mechanism of blood vessel formation in tumor tissues and the mechanism of action of different anti-angiogenic drugs, the combination therapy of anti-angiogenic drugs and other anti-tumor drugs, and the mechanism of anti-angiogenic drug resistance.

Randomized open-label controlled study of cancer vaccine OSE2101 versus chemotherapy in HLA-A2-positive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with resistance to immunotherapy: ATALANTE-1

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) ultimately progress either rapidly (primary resistance) or after durable benefit (secondary resistance). The cancer vaccine OSE2101 may invigorate antitumor-specific immune responses after ICB failure. The objective of ATALANTE-1 was to evaluate its efficacy and safety in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ATALANTE-1 was a two-step open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OSE2101 compared to standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy (CT). Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-positive advanced NSCLC without actionable alterations, failing sequential or concurrent CT and ICB were randomized (2 : 1) to OSE2101 or SoC (docetaxel or pemetrexed). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Interim OS futility analysis was planned as per Fleming design. In April 2020 at the time of interim analysis, a decision was taken to prematurely stop the accrual due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Final analysis was carried out in all patients and in the subgroup of patients with ICB secondary resistance defined as failure after ICB monotherapy second line ≥12 weeks.

RESULTS

Two hundred and nineteen patients were randomized (139 OSE2101, 80 SoC); 118 had secondary resistance to sequential ICB. Overall, median OS non-significantly favored OSE2101 over SoC {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.86 [0.62-1.19], P = 0.36}. In the secondary resistance subgroup, OSE2101 significantly improved median OS versus SoC [11.1 versus 7.5 months; HR (95% CI) 0.59 (0.38-0.91), P = 0.017], and significantly improved post-progression survival (HR 0.46, P = 0.004), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status deterioration (HR 0.43, P = 0.006) and Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status compared to SoC (P = 0.045). Six-month disease control rates and progression-free survival were similar between groups. Grade ≥3 adverse effects occurred in 11.4% of patients with OSE2101 and 35.1% in SoC (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In HLA-A2-positive patients with advanced NSCLC and secondary resistance to immunotherapy, OSE2101 increased survival with better safety compared to CT. Further evaluation in this population is warranted.

Safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride capsules in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter, real-world study

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride capsules in stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: NSCLC patients received anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy. The primary end point was adverse reactions during anlotinib treatment and the secondary end point was progression-free survival. Results: During anlotinib treatement, 41.85% (167/399) of patients experienced adverse reactions, and the monotherapy group had a lower incidence than the combination group (36.89 vs 49.68%; p = 0.012). The median progression-free survival of patients in the monotherapy group was significantly lower than that in the combination group (5 vs 6 months; p = 0.0119). Conclusion: Compared with anlotinib monotherapy, combination therapy resulted in longer PFS and a higher incidence of adverse reactions in patients with NSCLC.

Identification of cardiotoxicity related to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatments: A systematic review

Introduction: In the last few decades, there has been a rapid development in cancer therapies and improved detection strategies, hence the death rates caused by cancer have decreased. However, it has been reported that cardiovascular disease has become the second leading cause of long-term morbidity and fatality among cancer survivors. Cardiotoxicity from anticancer drugs affects the heart's function and structure and can occur during any stage of the cancer treatments, which leads to the development of cardiovascular disease. Objectives: To investigate the association between anticancer drugs for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cardiotoxicity as to whether: different classes of anticancer drugs demonstrate different cardiotoxicity potentials; different dosages of the same drug in initial treatment affect the degree of cardiotoxicity; and accumulated dosage and/or duration of treatments affect the degree of cardiotoxicity. Methods: This systematic review included studies involving patients over 18 years old with NSCLC and excluded studies in which patients' treatments involve radiotherapy only. Electronic databases and registers including Cochrane Library, National Cancer Institute (NCI) Database, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Union Clinical Trials Register were systematically searched from the earliest available date up until November 2020. A full version protocol of this systematic review (CRD42020191760) had been published on PROSPERO. Results: A total of 1785 records were identified using specific search terms through the databases and registers; 74 eligible studies were included for data extraction. Based on data extracted from the included studies, anticancer drugs for NSCLC that are associated with cardiovascular events include bevacizumab, carboplatin, cisplatin, crizotinib, docetaxel, erlotinib, gemcitabine and paclitaxel. Hypertension was the most reported cardiotoxicity as 30 studies documented this cardiovascular adverse event. Other reported treatment-related cardiotoxicities include arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemia, left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial infarction, palpitations, and tachycardia. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review have provided a better understanding of the possible association between cardiotoxicities and anticancer drugs for NSCLC. Whilst variation is observed across different drug classes, the lack of information available on cardiac monitoring can result in underestimation of this association. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020191760, identifier PROSPERO CRD42020191760.

Continuation of anti-PD-1 therapy plus physician-choice treatment beyond first progression is not associated with clinical benefit in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

Few data are available on the optimal treatment options after disease progression from first-line treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of continuing ICIs beyond first progress disease (PD) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with NSCLC previously treated with first-line anti-PD-1 antibody plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy and hence had PD as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 were enrolled. For the subsequent line, patients received physician's choice (PsC) with or without an anti-PD-1 antibody. The primary outcome was progression-free survival after second-line treatment (PFS2). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) from the initiation of first-line treatment, post-second-progression survival (P2PS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety during second-line treatment.

Results

Between July 2018 and January 2021, 59 patients were included. A total of 33 patients received a physician-decided second-line regimen plus ICIs (PsC plus ICIs group), and 26 patients did not continue ICIs (PsC group). There was no significant difference in PFS2 between the PsC plus ICIs group and the PsC group (median, 6.5 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.46). median OS (28.8 vs. 29.2 months), P2PS (13.4 vs. 18.7 months), ORR (18.2% vs. 19.2%), and DCR (78.8% vs, 84.6%) were also similar between the two groups. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusion

In this real-world setting, patients treated with continued ICIs beyond their first disease progression did not experience clinical benefit but without compromising safety.

Chemotherapy for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after progression on EGFR-TKI's: Exploration of efficacy of unselected treatment in a multicenter cohort study

OBJECTIVES

In patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung (NSCLC) chemotherapy remains standard of care after progression on EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). With the development of anti-angiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors the landscape of systemic regimens has changed significantly. This cohort study aims to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy regimens after progression on EGFR-TKI in a European population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All consecutive patients treated with chemotherapy after progression on EGFR-TKI for EGFR-mutated NSCLC, were identified in two tertiary centers in the Netherlands. Data on best response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted from medical records.

RESULTS

In total, 171 lines of chemotherapy were identified: platinum/pemetrexed (PP, n = 95), carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab/atezolizumab (CPBA, n = 32), paclitaxel/bevacizumab (PB, n = 36) and carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab (CPB, n = 8). Of the 171 lines, 106 were given as first-line after EGFR-TKI. Median PFS did not differ significantly between the first-line regimens (p = 0.50), with the highest PFS in PP (5.2 months [95% CI 4.5-5.9]) and CPBA (5.9 months [95% CI 3.8-80]). The majority of the PB group (n = 32) received this regimen in a second- or later line with a median PFS of 4.9 months (95% CI 3.3-6.6). First-line regimens had a median OS of 15.3 months (95% CI 11.6-18.9) with no significant difference between regimens (p = 0.85).

CONCLUSION

After progression on EGFR-TKI, patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC show substantial benefit on different chemotherapy regimens. In particular, favorable outcomes were seen in patients treated with PP and CPBA as first-line chemotherapy, and PB in further lines of chemotherapy.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer after progression on standard-of-care therapy in the United States

OBJECTIVES

Data to guide treatment selection in metastatic nonsquamous (mNSq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after progression on current standard-of-care (SoC) treatment are limited. We investigated patterns of treatment and clinical outcomes following one or more disease progressions on SoC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic medical records in the ConcertAI Patient360 NSCLC database were analyzed for US adults with mNSq NSCLC who initiated treatment between 2016 and 2021. Analyses were conducted separately for patients who had ≥1 prior lines of therapy and progression(s) without (Cohort 1) or with (Cohort 2) evidence of targetable genetic alterations (EGFR, ALK, or ROS1). Outcomes included real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS).

RESULTS

Cohorts 1 and 2 included 281 and 109 patients, respectively. In Cohort 1, subsequent treatment was most often with docetaxel monotherapy (18.5%) or docetaxel + ramucirumab (32.4%). Most patients in Cohort 2 received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with (22.9%) or without (34.9%) immunotherapy. Median rwPFS and rwOS were 2.9 and 7.2 months, respectively, in Cohort 1, and 3.2 and 10.4 months in Cohort 2. Neither the addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel in Cohort 1 nor the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy in Cohort 2 was associated with a marked improvement in additional survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with progressive mNSq NSCLC most commonly received later-line docetaxel for cancer without driver mutations, or platinum-based chemotherapy (following one or more lines of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy) for cancer with driver mutations, consistent with guideline recommendations. Median survival was poor regardless of subsequent treatment, highlighting the need for more effective options.

Bevacizumab/PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitor or bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). Methods: We retrospectively collected data for patients with advanced nsNSCLC who underwent first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitor or bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (IC and BC groups). Propensity score matching (PSM) was adopted to balance covariates. Results: 278 patients were enrolled, after PSM (n = 104/group), the objective response rate was 45.1% and 24.0% in the IC and BC groups (p = 0.001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.5 and 8.2 months (p = 0.007), and duration of response was 14.8 versus 8.1 months (p = 0.007), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the PFS for those patients with PD-L1≥1% (16.2 vs 6.8 months, p = 0.000) was significantly longer in the IC group than that in BC group, but not in the PD-L1<1% subgroup (8.9 vs12.7 months, p = 0.719). Conclusion: PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy was superior to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced nsNSCLC, which is debatable for patients with PD-L1<1%.

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a prognostic marker in III-IV NSCLC patients receiving first-line chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To investigate the prognostic impact of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 278 consecutive patients undergoing chemotherapy for stage III-IV NSCLC between May 2012 and July 2020. CONUT score was calculated by incorporating serum albumin, total cholesterol, and total lymphocyte count. The patients were divided into two groups: CONUT ≥ 3 and CONUT < 3, according to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The associations of CONUT with clinicopathological factors and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

A high CONUT score was significantly associated with older age(P = 0.003), worse ECOG-PS(P = 0.018), advanced clinical stage(P = 0.006), higher systematic inflammation index (SII) (P < 0.001)and lower prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (P < 0.001).The high CONUT group had a significantly shorter progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) than the low CONUT group. In the univariate analysis, higher SII, higher CONUT, advanced clinical stage and lower PNI were associated with worse PFS (P_all < 0.05). Worse ECOG-PS, higher SII, higher CONUT, advanced clinical stage and lower PNI were associated with worse OS (P_all < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, CONUT(HR, 2.487; 95%CI 1.818 ~ 3.403; P < 0.001) was independently associated with PFS, while PNI(HR, 0.676; 95%CI 0.494 ~ 0.927; P = 0.015) and CONUT(HR, 2.186; 95%CI 1.591 ~ 3.002; P < 0.001)were independently associated with OS. In ROC analysis, CONUT had a higher area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the prediction of 24-month PFS and OS than the SII or PNI. When the time-dependent AUC curve was used to predict PFS and OS, CONUT tended to maintain its predictive accuracy for long-term prognosis at a significantly higher level for an extended period after chemotherapy when compared with the other markers tested. The CONUT score showed better accuracy of predicting OS (C-index: 0.711) and PFS(C-index: 0.753).

CONCLUSION

CONUT score is an independent prognostic indicator of poor outcomes for patients with stage III-IV NSCLC and is superior to the SII and PNI in terms of prognostic ability.

Bevacizumab versus Ramucirumab in EGFR-Mutated Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Real-World Observational Study

The combination of bevacizumab or ramucirumab with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations could have survival benefits. However, no study, to date, has been conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of these two antiangiogenic therapies (AATs). Stage IIIB to IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who received first-line EGFR-TKIs between January 2014 and May 2022 were enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups: those receiving bevacizumab and those receiving ramucirumab as a combination therapy in any line of treatment. Ninety-six patients were enrolled in this study's final analysis. The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who received front-line AATs combined with EGFR-TKI therapy was longer than that of patients receiving later-line AATs combined with other therapies (19.6 vs. 10.0 months, p < 0.001). No difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between front-line and later-line therapy (non-reach vs. 44.0 months, p = 0.261). Patients who received these two different AATs did not differ in PFS (24.1 vs. 15.7 months, p = 0.454) and OS (48.6 vs. 43.0 months, p = 0.924). In addition, these two AATs showed similar frequencies of the T790M mutation (43.6% vs. 38.2%; p = 0.645). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated several AAT cycles as an independent good prognostic factor in OS. The incidence of some adverse events such as bleeding and hepatitis was higher for bevacizumab than for ramucirumab but it was not significant. Front-line AAT and EGFR-TKI combination therapy improved the PFS of stage IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. The effectiveness and safety of the two AATs were similar.

Efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads for bronchial arterial chemoembolization for refractory non-small-cell lung cancer and its impact on quality of life: A multicenter prospective study

Objective

This study aimed to prospectively observe the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) for refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

The interventional therapy plan was as follows: 300-500 μm CalliSpheres drug-loaded microspheres were loaded with epirubicin, and then slow embolization of tumor supplying artery was performed after microcatheter superselection. Chest enhanced computed tomography and related hematological examination were reviewed after 2 months of DEB-BACE, and the tumor response after the first interventional therapy was evaluated using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. The overall survival (OS) of patients was determined, and the quality of life and the incidence rate of adverse reactions were observed.

Results

From January 2019 to January 2021, 43 patients with refractory NSCLC were enrolled. The patients were followed up until June 2022. All 43 patients underwent DEB-BACE 1.79 ± 0.69 times on average. The 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month survival rates were 100%, 86.0%, 41.9%, and 11.8%, respectively. The median OS was 11.5 months. After the first interventional treatment, cough and wheezing significantly improved in 31 patients, hemoptysis was effectively controlled in 12 patients, and superior vena cava compression disappeared in 2 patients after 2 times of treatment. The general health status of the patients after treatment significantly improved compared with that before treatment, including the improvement in physical and emotional functions. Fatigue, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, and insomnia improved significantly after treatment. No serious adverse events, such as spinal cord injury and cerebral embolism, were observed during the perioperative period. The main adverse reaction after DEB-BACE was chest pain (13/43, grade 1) followed by fever (10/43, grade 1-2), which was significantly relieved within 3-5 days after symptomatic treatment. Other adverse reactions included irritating cough, nausea and vomiting, and bone marrow suppression, and the incidence was less than 20%.

Conclusions

DEB-BACE was effective and safe in treating refractory NSCLC, which could significantly improve patients' quality of life and was worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Sotorasib in KRASG12C mutated lung cancer: Can we rule out cracking KRAS led to worse overall survival?

The KRAS oncogene is present in up to 25% of solid tumors and for decades had been undruggable. Sotorasib was the first-in-class KRAS inhibitor to reach the US and European market, and its pharmacological inhibition is restricted to the KRAS p.G12C mutation. Sotorasib showed activity (tumor shrinkage) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring this specific mutation, and efficacy was tested in the CodeBreaK 200, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT04303780). The results were presented in the ESMO 2022 meeting. CodeBreaK 200 found an improvement in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS), but overall survival, a key secondary endpoint, was not improved. However, critical questions about the trial's design may limit inferences regarding the reported results. The control arm treatment was inferior to the best standard of care. A late protocol modification (which lowered the sample size and allowed a problematic crossover) prohibited the trial from making a determination regarding overall survival. Imbalance in censoring rates, with potential informative censoring, makes PFS estimates unreliable. Quality-of-life data were also limited. Ultimately, CodeBreaK 200 does not clarify how this therapy should be used in practice, and while we maintain cautious enthusiasm for this and other Ras inhibitors, we await more informative trials.

PD-1 inhibitor versus bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective-real world study

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy or anti-vascular therapy is both recommended by guidelines for first-line treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. However, no head-to-head clinical trial has ever compared which strategy is the optimal choice. This real-world retrospective study was done to compare the efficacy and treatment-related adverse events of immunotherapy and bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2018 to March 2021, we retrospectively collected 276 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma managed with chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab or PD-1 inhibitors at our center. Among them, 139 patients were treated with chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab, while 137 patients were treated with chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitors. After receiving four cycles of combination therapy, all patients received maintenance therapy until disease progression. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AE) were analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared to patients who received anti-vascular therapy, patients who underwent immunotherapy achieved better PFS (7.3 months vs. 10 months, p = 0.002) while ORR (40.9% vs. 51.1%, p = 0.093), as well as OS (18 months vs. 24 months, p = 0.060), had no statistical difference between the two groups. In the PD-L1-negative population, there was no statistical difference in PFS and OS between the two groups. (8.0 months VS. 6.0 months, p = 0.738; and 19 months vs. 13 months, p = 0.274). In the PD-L1-positive population, there was a significant benefit in PFS in the population receiving immunotherapy (7.0 months vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.009). Proteinuria and hypertension occurred more frequently in the bevacizumab-treated group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002), whereas immune-related pneumonia and hypothyroidism occurred more frequently in the immunotherapy-treated group (p = 0.007 and p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a PD-1 inhibitor was superior to bevacizumab in terms of PFS among patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. PD-L1-positive patients appeared to exhibit better PFS, OS, and ORR. Toxic reactions were manageable in both groups.

Clinical Application of Anlotinib Combined with Docetaxel: Safe and Effective Treatment for Lung Carcinoma

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy and long-term survival between anlotinib monotherapy and anlotinib plus docetaxel in patients with lung carcinoma.

Methods

Between October 2019 and December 2021, 84 patients with lung cancer diagnosed and treated at our hospital were enrolled and randomly allocated to the control (n = 42) and experimental (n = 42) groups. Patients in the control group only received anlotinib, whereas those in the experimental group were administered both anlotinib and docetaxel. The clinical effectiveness, long-term survival, and other associated variables of the two groups were compared.

Results

There were no CR cases, 7 PR cases, 22 SD cases, and 13 PD cases in the control group. In the experimental group, there were 4 cases of CR, 20 cases of CR, 11 cases of SD, and 7 cases of PD. The overall clinical effectiveness of the experimental group was much higher than that of the control group. There were 3 cases of anemia, 5 cases of pyrexia, 6 cases of proteinuria, 9 cases of nausea and vomiting, and 4 cases of abnormal liver and renal function in the control group. (P < 0.05). In the experimental group, there were 2 cases of anemia, 3 cases of pyrexia, 1 case of proteinuria, 5 cases of nausea and vomiting, and 1 case of abnormal liver and kidney function. The incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (64.29%) (P < 0.05). According to the two-year follow-up results, the survival rate was 19.05% in the control group and 54.76% in the experimental group, and the mortality rate was 80.95% in the control group and 45.24% in the experimental group. The experimental group had a significantly higher survival rate than the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with docetaxel is a safe and effective treatment for lung carcinoma to reduce the incidence of adverse reactions and improve the long-term survival rate. These benefits make it worthy of a broader clinical application. Although pharmacological treatment was applied in this study based on the mechanism, specific bioeffective markers are yet to be identified, presenting a direction for future research.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations updating the 2020 ASCO and Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) guideline on systemic therapy for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer without driver alterations.

METHODS

ASCO updated recommendations on the basis of an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials from 2018 to 2021.

RESULTS

This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous update. Five randomized clinical trials provide the evidence base. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety.

RECOMMENDATIONS

In addition to 2020 options for patients with high programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 50%), nonsquamous cell carcinoma (non-SCC), and performance status (PS) 0-1, clinicians may offer single-agent atezolizumab. With high PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 50%), non-SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilumumab alone or nivolumab and ipilimumab plus chemotherapy. With negative (0%) and low positive PD-L1 expression (TPS 1%-49%), non-SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilimumab alone or nivolumab and ipilimumab plus chemotherapy. With high PD-L1 expression, SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer single-agent atezolizumab. With high PD-L1 expression, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilimumab alone or in combination with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. With negative and low positive PD-L1 expression, SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilimumab alone or in combination with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. With non-SCC who received an immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy as first-line therapy, clinicians may offer second-line paclitaxel plus bevacizumab. With non-SCC, who received chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, clinicians should offer the options of third-line single-agent pemetrexed, docetaxel, or paclitaxel plus bevacizumab.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Paclitaxel–bevacizumab combination in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): AVATAX, a retrospective multicentric study

Introduction:

Compared with docetaxel, the phase-III trial, ULTIMATE, showed a significant improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) with paclitaxel–bevacizumab combination (PB) as second- or third-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the increase of immunotherapy treatment in first-line settings, the optimal treatment after first-line failure must be redefined.

Methods:

This multicentric retrospective study identified all advanced NSCLC patients treated with PB as second-line therapy and beyond. The main efficacy outcomes assessed were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), PFS, and overall survival (OS). The adverse events were reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

Results:

From January 2010 to February 2020, 314 patients in 16 centers received the PB combination. Most patients were male (55%), with a median age of 60 years (19–82), 95% had adenocarcinoma, 27% had a performance status ⩾2, 45% had brain metastases at the time of inclusion. They mostly received the PB combination either in second (20%) or in third-line (39%), and 28% were treated just after ICI failure. ORR and DCR were 40% and 77%, respectively; median PFS and OS were 5.7 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.2–9.6] and 10.8 [IQR: 5.3–19.6] months, respectively. All grade adverse events concerned 82% of patients, including 53% asthenia and 39% neurotoxicity, and 25% of patients continued monotherapy (mostly with bevacizumab) alone due to toxicity. Median PFS for patients treated after ICI failure (ICI+) was significantly superior compared with those not previously treated with ICI (ICI−): 7.0 [IQR: 4.2–11.0] versus 5.2 [IQR: 2.9–8.8] months, p = 0.01, without statistically significant difference for OS between these two groups. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with superior PFS were previous ICI treatment and performance status of 0–1. Only a performance status of 0–1 was associated with superior OS.

Conclusion:

PB combination as second-line treatment or beyond for advanced non-squamous NSCLC had acceptable toxicity and a clinically relevant efficacy and is an option as salvage treatment for these patients, more particularly after ICI progression.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a third‑line treatment of advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials

Anlotinib is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which has been indicated to inhibit both tumor angiogenesis and signal transduction pathways associated with proliferation. The main proposed mechanism of anlotinib inhibiting tumor angiogenesis is that anlotinib inhibits the activation of VEGFR2, PDGFRβ and FGFR1, and downstream ERK signal transduction. The aim of the present study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of third-line treatment with anlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To meet this aim, studies published up to February 2022 were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and several Chinese databases. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included and a metaanalysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 18 RCTs were identified and included in the present study, comprising 1,658 patients. The anlotinib treatment group was indicated to be better than the control group at prolonging progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR), 0.33; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.28-0.37] and overall survival (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.81). Anlotinib also provided a significant improvement in the disease control rate [risk ratio (RR), 1.51; 95% CI, 1.27-1.79], objective response rate (1.75, 95% CI, 1.51-2.03) and Karnofsky performance status (mean difference, 9.85; 95% CI, 6.26-13.43). Compared with the control group, the incidence of adverse events (AEs), such as hypertension and hemoptysis, was increased by anlotinib. Through subgroup analysis, it was determined that, compared with the placebo, the incidence of AEs was increased by anlotinib, although compared with other therapeutic drugs, no significant differences were observed. In conclusion, the findings of the present study suggested that the thirdline treatment of advanced NSCLC with anlotinib is more effective compared with other control measures and that the AEs are also controllable. However, given the limitations of the quantity and the quality of the included studies, further studies are required to gain a more complete understanding of the effects of anlotinib.

[Anti-angiogenesis in Lung Cancer: Current Situation, Progress and Confusion]

Lung cancer is a highly vascular tumors, over the past ten years, anti-angiogenes is has been proved to be an effective and highly promising combinational treatment. The data of the combination of anti-angiogenesis with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy has been constantly updating. Advanced lung cancer patients, no matter different groups or different stages of the disease, are benefited from anti-angiogenes. In this paper, based on the clinical status and unsolved problems, combined with the latest clinical and translational research data, we reviewed the current anti-angiogenesis treatment of lung cancer.
.

Effect of prior immunotherapy on the efficacy of chemotherapy in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

Background

The effect of the sequential combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens administered after ICIs in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared to the same regimens administered without previous ICIs.

Methods

We retrospectively included all patients treated between 2015 and 2019 for an advanced NSCLC, receiving a salvage chemotherapy just after ICI (CAI group) comparing them to ICI naive patients (CWPI group) undergoing the same chemotherapy at Bordeaux University Hospital. The primary outcome was the time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR).

Results

A total of 152 patients were included, with 34/23 (CAI/CWPI) receiving paclitaxel/bevacizumab (PB), 24/11 paclitaxel (P), 27/12 gemcitabine (G) and 6/15 pemetrexed (PE). Characteristics were comparable, except for CAI treated with PB (more patients with an ECOG PS ≤1 [p <0.001]). Median number of lines received was higher in CAI for all groups. There was no difference between CAI and CWPI for TTD, OS and ORR. However, PB was associated with a nonsignificant increase in OS in the CAI group (HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.38–1.2, p = 0.17].

Conclusion

Our data showed no difference in TTD, OS and ORR regardless of chemotherapy, but a trend towards an increased OS with PB when given after an ICI, while patients received chemotherapy later in the CAI group. This suggests that a sequential combination of ICI followed by chemotherapy could be an interesting strategy in advanced NSCLC for selected patients.

Combination of Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring HER2 Mutations: Results From the IFCT-1703 R2D2 Trial

PURPOSE

HER2 exon 20 insertions and point mutations are oncogenic drivers found in 1%-2% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No targeted therapy is approved for this subset of patients. We prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of the combination of two antibodies against human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2 [HER2] trastuzumab and pertuzumab with docetaxel; trastuzumab and pertuzumab) and docetaxel.

METHODS

The IFCT 1703-R2D2 trial is a multicenter, nonrandomized phase II study. Patients with HER2-mutated, advanced NSCLC who progressed after ≥ 1 platinum-based treatment were enrolled. Patients received pertuzumab at a loading dose of 840 mg and 420 mg thereafter; trastuzumab at an 8 mg/kg loading dose and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). Other end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety (NCT03845270).

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled and treated. The median age was 64.5 years (range, 31-84 years), 35% were smokers, 72% were females, 15% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, and 30% had brain metastases. The objective response rate was 29% (n = 13), and 58% had stable disease (n = 26). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 8.5). The median duration of response in patients with a confirmed response (n = 13) was 11 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 14.9). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 64% of the patients. No patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (33%), diarrhea (13%), and anemia (9%).

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel is feasible and effective for HER2-mutated pretreated advanced NSCLC. These results highlight the effectiveness of the HER2 antibody-based strategy, which should be considered for these patients.

Hypertension Induced by Combination Therapy of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Global Clinical Trials

Background: Nowadays, due to the limitation of single therapy, combination therapy for cancer treatments has become important strategy. With the advancement of research on cardiotoxicities induced by anti-cancer treatment, among which cancer treatment-induced hypertension is the most frequent case. However, due to the small sample size and the absence of comparison (single-arm study alone), these studies have limitations to produce a feasible conclusion. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out a meta-analysis focusing on hypertension caused by cancer combination therapy.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI, from database inception to November 31, 2020, with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) associated with hypertension induced by cancer combination drugs. The main endpoint of which was to assess the difference in the incidence of hypertension in cancer patients with monotherapy or combination therapy. We calculated the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CIs) according to the random effect model and evaluated the heterogeneity between different groups.

Results: According to the preset specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 23 eligible RCTs have been included in the present meta-analysis, including 6,241 patients (Among them, 2872 patients were the control group and 3369 patients were the experimental group). The results showed that cancer patients with combination therapy led to a higher risk of hypertension (All-grade: RR 2.85, 95% CI 2.52∼3.22; 1∼2 grade: RR 2.43, 95% CI 2.10∼2.81; 3∼4 grade: RR 4.37, 95% CI 3.33∼5.72). Furthermore, compared with the control group who received or did not receive a placebo, there was a higher risk of grade 3-4 hypertension caused by cancer combination treatment.

Conclusion: The present meta-analysis carries out a comprehensive analysis on the risk of patients suffering from hypertension in the process of multiple cancer combination therapies. Findings in our study support that the risk of hypertension may increase significantly in cancer patients with multiple cancer combination therapies. The outcomes of this meta-analysis may provide a reference value for clinical practice and may supply insights in reducing the incidence of hypertension caused by cancer combined treatment.

The Safety and Effectiveness of Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

Bevacizumab was currently available for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSqNSCLC) patients and has been studied in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for treatment of these patients. This meta-analysis summarizes the most up-to-date evidences regarding the effects and adverse reactions of bevacizumab in the treatment of NSqNSCLC patients.

Methods

The authors searched for RCTs from electronic database including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Experimental arm was defined as the bevacizumab-containing group and the control arm as the bevacizumab-free group. Data of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse reactions were synthetically extracted. A protocol for this meta-analysis has been registered on PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).

Results

Ten RCTs that involved a total of 3134 patients were included. The experimental group was associated with significant superior ORR (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.14, P < 0.001), OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99, P < 0.001), and prolonged PFS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.74, P < 0.001) compared to the control. No significant difference was observed regarding DCR (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.30, P = 0.08). The experimental group showed higher rate of hypertension (RR 6.91, 95% CI 4.62 to 10.35, P < 0.00001) and hemorrhagic events (RR 3.07, 95% CI 1.78 to 5.30, P < 0.0001) than the control group. The experimental group showed lower rate of anemia (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.96, P = 0.02) than the control group. No significant difference was observed regarding treatment-related adverse event grade 3-5 (TRAE3-5) (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.53, P = 0.06), thrombocytopenia (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.33, P = 0.29), and neutropenia (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.40, P = 0.36).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed that bevacizumab could increase ORR, OS, and prolonged PFS for treatment of NSqNSCLC patients. However, no significant improvement in DCR was observed and bevacizumab could increase the rate of hypertension and hemorrhagic events. Bevacizumab was an acceptable option for NSqNSCLC patients. This trial is registered with PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021226790.

Identification of Key Genes and Pathways Associated With Paclitaxel Resistance in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Bioinformatics Analysis

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in China. Although paclitaxel has been shown to be effective in treating ESCC, the prolonged use of this chemical will lead to paclitaxel resistance. In order to uncover genes and pathways driving paclitaxel resistance in the progression of ESCC, bioinformatics analyses were performed based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database including GSE86099 and GSE161533. Differential expression analysis was performed in TCGA data and two GEO datasets to obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Based on GSE161533, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was conducted to identify the key modules associated with ESCC tumor status. The DEGs common to the two GEO datasets and the genes in the key modules were intersected to obtain the paclitaxel resistance-specific or non-paclitaxel resistance-specific genes, which were subjected to subsequent least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) feature selection, whereby paclitaxel resistance-specific or non-paclitaxel resistance-specific key genes were selected. Ten machine learning models were used to validate the biological significance of these key genes; the potential therapeutic drugs for paclitaxel resistance-specific genes were also predicted. As a result, we identified 24 paclitaxel resistance-specific genes and 18 non-paclitaxel resistance-specific genes. The ESCC machine classifiers based on the key genes achieved a relatively high AUC value in the cross-validation and in an independent test set, GSE164158. A total of 207 drugs (such as bevacizumab) were predicted to be alternative therapeutics for ESCC patients with paclitaxel resistance. These results might shed light on the in-depth research of paclitaxel resistance in the context of ESCC progression.

Chemotherapy and peripheral neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is a major dose-limiting side effect of many anti-cancer agents, including taxanes, platinums, vinca alkaloids, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and antibody-drug conjugates. The resultant symptoms often persist post treatment completion and continue to impact on long-term function and quality of life for cancer survivors. At present, dose reduction remains the only strategy to prevent severe neuropathy, often leading clinicians to the difficult decision of balancing maximal treatment exposure and minimal long-lasting side effects. This review examines the clinical presentations of CIPN with each class of neurotoxic treatment, describing signs, symptoms, and long-term outcomes. We provide an update on the proposed mechanisms of nerve damage and review current data on clinical and genetic risk factors contributing to CIPN development. We also examine recent areas of research in the treatment and prevention of CIPN, with specific focus on current clinical trials and consensus recommendations for CIPN management.

Metronomic Chemotherapy Modulates Clonal Interactions to Prevent Drug Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Despite recent advances in deciphering cancer drug resistance mechanisms, relapse is a widely observed phenomenon in advanced cancers, mainly due to intratumor clonal heterogeneity. How tumor clones progress and impact each other remains elusive. In this study, we developed 2D and 3D non-small cell lung cancer co-culture systems and defined a phenomenological mathematical model to better understand clone dynamics. Our results demonstrated that the drug-sensitive clones inhibit the proliferation of the drug-resistant ones under untreated conditions. Model predictions and their experimental in vitro and in vivo validations indicated that a metronomic schedule leads to a better regulation of tumor cell heterogeneity over time than a maximum-tolerated dose schedule, while achieving control of tumor progression. We finally showed that drug-sensitive and -resistant clones exhibited different metabolic statuses that could be involved in controlling the intratumor heterogeneity dynamics. Our data suggested that the glycolytic activity of drug-sensitive clones could play a major role in inhibiting the drug-resistant clone proliferation. Altogether, these computational and experimental approaches provide foundations for using metronomic therapy to control drug-sensitive and -resistant clone balance and highlight the potential of targeting cell metabolism to manage intratumor heterogeneity.

Beyond First-Line Immunotherapy: Potential Therapeutic Strategies Based on Different Pattern Progressions: Oligo and Systemic Progression

First-line immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy has deeply changed the treatment landscape and prognosis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients with no targetable alterations. Nonetheless, a percentage of patients progressed on ICI as monotherapy or combinations. Open questions remain on patients' selection, the identification of biomarkers of primary resistance to immunotherapy and the treatment strategies to overcome secondary resistance to first-line immunotherapy. Local ablative approaches are the main therapeutic strategies in oligoprogressive disease, and their role is emerging in patients treated with immunotherapy. Many therapeutic strategies can be adapted in aNSCLC patients with systemic progression to personalize the treatment approach according to re-characterization of the tumors, previous ICI response, and type of progression. This review's aim is to highlight and discuss the current and potential therapeutic approaches beyond first-line ICI-based therapy in aNSCLC patients based on the pattern of disease progression (oligoprogression versus systemic progression).

Progress in Natural Compounds/siRNA Co-delivery Employing Nanovehicles for Cancer Therapy

Chemotherapy using natural compounds, such as resveratrol, curcumin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, etoposide, doxorubicin, and camptothecin, is of importance in cancer therapy because of the outstanding therapeutic activity and multitargeting capability of these compounds. However, poor solubility and bioavailability of natural compounds have limited their efficacy in cancer therapy. To circumvent this hurdle, nanocarriers have been designed to improve the antitumor activity of the aforementioned compounds. Nevertheless, cancer treatment is still a challenge, demanding novel strategies. It is well-known that a combination of natural products and gene therapy is advantageous over monotherapy. Delivery of multiple therapeutic agents/small interfering RNA (siRNA) as a potent gene-editing tool in cancer therapy can maximize the synergistic effects against tumor cells. In the present review, co-delivery of natural compounds/siRNA using nanovehicles are highlighted to provide a backdrop for future research.

The optimal timing and courses of bevacizumab added to chemotherapy for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: revelations from the real-world experience in a single Chinese cancer center

Background

Bevacizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy has been approved in the first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver genes, but this regimen for second-line or later-line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC remains to be further tested. Our study aimed to provide data on the safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab (Bev)-containing chemotherapy in different-line settings for patients with NSCLC in the Chinese real-world clinical routine practice and to explore predictors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of 194 patients with non-squamous NSCLC who received Bev plus chemotherapy as the first-, second- or third- or later-line treatment between December 2009 and January 2020 at Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center. Clinical characteristics, treatment history, clinical evaluation, and adverse effects of each patient were deeply analyzed. PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to find predictors of longer PFS and OS.

Results

One hundred ninety-four patients were enrolled in this study, including 102 (52.6%), 58 (29.9%) and 34 (17.5%) patients received Bev in combination with the first-line chemotherapy (Bev + Che1), second-line chemotherapy (Bev + Che2) and third-/later-line chemotherapy (Bev + Che3), respectively. Administration of Bev in combination with the first-line chemotherapy and >6 courses were independent predictors of significantly prolonged PFS. Whereas, patients older than 65 years or with ECOG PS ≥2 may not benefit more from Bev added to the first-line chemotherapy compared to second-/later-line chemotherapy. PFS of patients received treatment with/without chemotherapy as maintenance therapy showed no significant difference (P=0.354) in >6 courses Bev cohort. As for OS, Bev plus the first-line chemotherapy and number of metastatic sites <3 were independent predictors. The most common adverse effects (AE) were leukopenia, neutropenia, hypertension, and proteinuria. Twenty patients suffered from AE ≥ Grade 3.

Conclusions

Bev, in combination with the front-line chemotherapy, is proven beneficial for survival well-tolerated.