Real-world safety of first-line immuno-oncology combination therapies for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Aim: Real-world adverse event (AE) data are limited for first-line (1L) treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Using Flatiron Health Spotlight data, information for a pre-specified list of AEs was abstracted and described among patients with advanced NSCLC receiving 1L nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI), NIVO + IPI + chemotherapy and other approved immuno-oncology (IO) therapy + chemotherapy combination therapies. Results: Fatigue, pain, dyspnea, weight loss, decreased appetite, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, cough, constipation and rash were the most common AEs. Rates of AEs were generally numerically similar across the three cohorts. The majority of patients received treatment for AEs and approximately one fourth of the patients had hospitalization due to their AEs. Conclusion: The real-world safety experiences of patients treated with 1L NIVO + IPI-based regimens were in general similar to those treated with other approved IO + chemotherapy combination therapies.

Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Characteristics of patients in clinical trials may differ from those of real-world patients. Our objective was to describe biomarker testing and outcomes among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥18 years old, diagnosed with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC, and in the TEMPUS oncology dataset from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. Patient characteristics associated with biomarker testing were evaluated in patients with positive biomarkers using univariate logistic regression models. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate median survival.

RESULTS

Of 9540 patients included, 41.7% had biomarker testing, and 2158 had a positive biomarker result. Men (vs women; odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74-0.91), Black patients (vs White; OR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72-0.97), patients with squamous (OR, 0.22; 95% CI: 0.19-0.25) or unknown histology (OR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.45-0.61) (vs non-squamous histology), and patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 2+ (OR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57-0.84) or missing (OR, 0.56; 95% CI: 0.48-0.66) (vs ECOG PS of 0) were less likely to undergo biomarker testing. Patients with positive biomarkers who received NCCN-recommended treatment options (55.7%) had significantly longer median overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) (HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62-0.75).

CONCLUSION

More than 50% of patients were untested for biomarkers. Patients who were less likely to be tested included men, Black patients, current smokers, patients with squamous aNSCLC, and patients with an ECOG PS of 2+. Patients with positive biomarkers who received NCCN-recommended treatment options had significantly longer OS and PFS.

Predictive value of CRP combined with peripheral blood cell ratio for the prognosis of advanced NSCLC

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for the vast majority. In recent years, the interaction between inflammation and tumorigenesis has become the focus of attention, which has also confirmed the importance of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) in prognosis. In this study, we explored the effects of CRP, systemic inflammatory immune index (SII), and monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR) on the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC. We conducted a retrospective study of 274 patients suffering from stage III/IV NSCLC. Among them, 224 patients served as the training set and 50 patients served as the validation set. The independent factors affecting PFS (Progression-Free Survival) and OS (Overall Survival) in the patients were analyzed by Cox regression. Our results showed that CPR (HR=1.691, P=0.004), SlI (HR=1.960, P<0.001), MLR (HR=1.578, P=0.003), CEA (HR=1.845, P=0.006), NSE (HR=2.138, P=0.003) and adrenal metastasis (HR=2.896, P<0.003) were independent factors affecting the PFS of NSCLC patients. SII (HR=1.645, P=0.004), CEA (HR=2.021, P=0.002) and brain metastasis (HR=2.899, P<0.001) were independent factors affecting the OS of NLSCL patients. The DCA curve demonstrated that the prediction model provided better clinical net benefit in predicting patients' 6-month PFS and 12-month OS under different threshold probabilities. DeLong test showed no significant difference between AUCs of SII and risk score (P>0.05). Compared with CEA, SII and risk score had higher predictive value for patients' 6-month PFS and 12-month OS (P<0.05). In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that serum inflammatory factor SII can be used as an independent indicator to evaluate 6-month PFS and 12-month OS in patients with advanced NSCLC, and its predictive value is similar to that of the nomogram model.

Novel nomogram for predicting survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy with or without antiangiogenic therapy

Background

This study aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram to predict survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus chemotherapy with or without antiangiogenic therapy.

Methods

A total of 271 patients with advanced NSCLC who received anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy with or without antiangiogenic therapy were enrolled in our center and randomized into the training cohort (n = 133) and the internal validation cohort (n = 138). Forty-five patients from another center were included as an independent external validation cohort. The nomogram was created based on the multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The performance of the nomogram was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), the time-dependent area under the receiver operating (ROC) curves (AUCs), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Four factors significantly associated with OS were utilized to create a nomogram to predict OS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, chemotherapy cycle, and pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase-albumin ratio (LAR). Six variables significantly associated with PFS were incorporated into the development of a nomogram for predicting PFS: ECOG PS, histology, PD-L1 expression, chemotherapy cycle, pretreatment platelet to lymphocyte (PLR), and pretreatment LAR. The C-indexes of the nomogram for predicting OS and PFS were 0.750 and 0.747, respectively. The AUCs for predicting the 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month OS and PFS were 0.847, 0.791, and 0.776 and 0.810, 0.787, and 0.861, respectively. The calibration curves demonstrated a good agreement between predictions and actual observations. The DCA curves indicated that the nomograms had good net benefits. Furthermore, the nomogram model was well-validated in the internal and external cohorts.

Conclusion

The novel nomogram for predicting the prognosis of advanced NSCLC receiving anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy with or without antiangiogenic therapy may help guide clinical treatment decisions.

Clinicogenomic factors and treatment patterns among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with or without brain metastases in the United States

BACKGROUND

This retrospective, real-world study evaluated the prevalence of brain metastases, clinicodemographic characteristics, systemic treatments, and factors associated with overall survival among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in the US. We also described the genomic characterization of 180 brain metastatic specimens and frequency of clinically actionable genes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

De-identified electronic health records-derived data of adult patients diagnosed with aNSCLC between 2011 and 2017 were analyzed from a US-nationwide clinicogenomic database.

RESULTS

Of 3257 adult patients with aNSCLC included in the study, approximately 31% (n = 1018) had brain metastases. Of these 1018 patients, 71% (n = 726) were diagnosed with brain metastases at initial NSCLC diagnosis; 57% (n = 583) of patients with brain metastases received systemic treatment. Platinum-based chemotherapy combinations were the most common first-line therapy; single-agent chemotherapies, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and platinum-based chemotherapy combinations were used in second line. Patients with brain metastases had a 1.56 times greater risk of death versus those with no brain metastases. In the brain metastatic specimens (n = 180), a high frequency of genomic alterations in the p53, MAPK, PI3K, mTOR, and cell-cycle associated pathways was observed.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of brain metastases at initial clinical presentation and associated poor prognosis for patients in this cohort underscores the importance of early screening for brain metastasis in NSCLC. Genomic alterations frequently identified in this study emphasize the continued need for genomic research and investigation of targeted therapies in patients with brain metastases.

Computed Tomography-Based Quantitative Texture Analysis and Gut Microbial Community Signatures Predict Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study aims to combine computed tomography (CT)-based texture analysis (QTA) and a microbiome-based biomarker signature to predict the overall survival (OS) of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients by analyzing their CT scans (n = 129) and fecal microbiome (n = 58). One hundred and five continuous CT parameters were obtained, where principal component analysis (PCA) identified seven major components that explained 80% of the data variation. Shotgun metagenomics (MG) and ITS analysis were performed to reveal the abundance of bacterial and fungal species. The relative abundance of Bacteroides dorei and Parabacteroides distasonis was associated with long OS (>6 mo), whereas the bacteria Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus faecium and the fungal taxa Cortinarius davemallochii, Helotiales, Chaetosphaeriales, and Tremellomycetes were associated with short OS (≤6 mo). Hymenoscyphus immutabilis and Clavulinopsis fusiformis were more abundant in patients with high (≥50%) PD-L1-expressing tumors, whereas Thelephoraceae and Lachnospiraceae bacterium were enriched in patients with ICI-related toxicities. An artificial intelligence (AI) approach based on extreme gradient boosting evaluated the associations between the outcomes and various clinicopathological parameters. AI identified MG signatures for patients with a favorable ICI response and high PD-L1 expression, with 84% and 79% accuracy, respectively. The combination of QTA parameters and MG had a positive predictive value of 90% for both therapeutic response and OS. According to our hypothesis, the QTA parameters and gut microbiome signatures can predict OS, the response to therapy, the PD-L1 expression, and toxicity in NSCLC patients treated with ICI, and a machine learning approach can combine these variables to create a reliable predictive model, as we suggest in this research.

Randomized open-label controlled study of cancer vaccine OSE2101 versus chemotherapy in HLA-A2-positive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with resistance to immunotherapy: ATALANTE-1

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) ultimately progress either rapidly (primary resistance) or after durable benefit (secondary resistance). The cancer vaccine OSE2101 may invigorate antitumor-specific immune responses after ICB failure. The objective of ATALANTE-1 was to evaluate its efficacy and safety in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ATALANTE-1 was a two-step open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OSE2101 compared to standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy (CT). Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-positive advanced NSCLC without actionable alterations, failing sequential or concurrent CT and ICB were randomized (2 : 1) to OSE2101 or SoC (docetaxel or pemetrexed). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Interim OS futility analysis was planned as per Fleming design. In April 2020 at the time of interim analysis, a decision was taken to prematurely stop the accrual due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Final analysis was carried out in all patients and in the subgroup of patients with ICB secondary resistance defined as failure after ICB monotherapy second line ≥12 weeks.

RESULTS

Two hundred and nineteen patients were randomized (139 OSE2101, 80 SoC); 118 had secondary resistance to sequential ICB. Overall, median OS non-significantly favored OSE2101 over SoC {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.86 [0.62-1.19], P = 0.36}. In the secondary resistance subgroup, OSE2101 significantly improved median OS versus SoC [11.1 versus 7.5 months; HR (95% CI) 0.59 (0.38-0.91), P = 0.017], and significantly improved post-progression survival (HR 0.46, P = 0.004), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status deterioration (HR 0.43, P = 0.006) and Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status compared to SoC (P = 0.045). Six-month disease control rates and progression-free survival were similar between groups. Grade ≥3 adverse effects occurred in 11.4% of patients with OSE2101 and 35.1% in SoC (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In HLA-A2-positive patients with advanced NSCLC and secondary resistance to immunotherapy, OSE2101 increased survival with better safety compared to CT. Further evaluation in this population is warranted.

Efficacy and safety of nintedanib and docetaxel in patients with previously treated lung non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective real-world analysis

BACKGROUND

The standard first-line systemic treatment for patients with non-oncogene addicted advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and/or chemotherapy (ChT). Therapy after failing ICI +/- ChT remains an open question, and docetaxel plus nintedanib represent a valid second line option.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective trial of real-life treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated with docetaxel plus nintedanib after the failure of ICI and/or ChT was performed. Patients from 2 Slovenian and 1 Croatian oncological center treated between June 2014 and August 2022 were enrolled. We assessed objective response (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and safety profile of treatment.

RESULTS

There were 96 patients included in the analysis, with ORR of 18.8%, DCR of 57.3%, median PFS of 3.0 months (95% CI: 3.0-5.0 months), and a median OS of 8.0 months (95% CI: 7.0-10.0 months). The majority of patients (n = 47,49%) received docetaxel plus nintedanib as third-line therapy. The ORR for this subset of patients was 19.1%, with a DCR of 57.4%. The highest response rate was observed in patients who received second-line docetaxel plus nintedanib after first-line combination of ChT-ICI therapy (n = 24), with an ORR of 29.2% and DCR of 66.7% and median PFS of 4.0 months (95% CI: 3.0-8.0 months). Fifty-three patients (55.2%) experienced adverse events (AEs), most frequently gastrointestinal; diarrhea (n = 29, 30.2%), and increased liver enzyme levels (n = 17, 17.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel and nintedanib can be considered an effective therapy option with an acceptable toxicity profile for patients with advanced NSCLC after the failure of ICI +/- ChT.

Genomic and immune characteristics of HER2-mutated non-small cell lung cancer and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy

The efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced HER2-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains incomprehensively studied. A total of 107 NSCLC patients with de novo HER2 mutations were retrospectively studied at Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute [GLCI cohort, exon 20 insertions (ex20ins): 71.0%], to compare clinical/molecular features and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy efficacy between patients with exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) and non-ex20ins. Two external cohorts (TCGA, n=21; META-ICI, n=30) were used for validation. In the GLCI cohort, 68.2% of patients displayed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression <1%. Compared to ex20ins patients, non-ex20ins patients had more concurrent mutations in the GLCI cohort (P<0.01) and a higher tumor mutation burden in the TCGA cohort (P=0.03). Under ICI-based therapy, advanced NSCLC patients with non-ex20ins had potentially superior progression-free survival [median: 13.0 vs 3.6 months, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11-0.83] and overall survival (median: 27.5 vs. 8.1 months, adjusted HR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.13-1.18) to ex20ins patients, consistent with findings in the META-ICI cohort. ICI-based therapy may serve as an option for advanced HER2-mutated NSCLC, with potentially better efficacy in non-ex20ins patients. Further investigations are warranted in clinical practice.

Telomere Status of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Offers a Novel Promising Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker

Telomere length appears to correlate with survival in early non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the prognostic impact of telomere status in advanced NSCLC remains undetermined. Our purpose was to evaluate telomere parameters as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in advanced NSCLC. In 79 biopsies obtained before treatment, we analyzed the telomere length and expression of TERT and shelterin complex genes (TRF1, TRF2, POT1, TPP1, RAP1, and TIN2), using quantitative PCR. Non-responders to first-line chemotherapy were characterized by shorter telomeres and low RAP1 expression (p = 0.0035 and p = 0.0069), and tended to show higher TERT levels (p = 0.058). In multivariate analysis, short telomeres were associated with reduced event-free (EFS, p = 0.0023) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.00041). TERT and TRF2 overexpression correlated with poor EFS (p = 0.0069 and p = 0.00041) and OS (p = 0.0051 and p = 0.007). Low RAP1 and TIN2 expression-levels were linked to reduced EFS (p = 0.00032 and p = 0.0069) and OS (p = 0.000051 and p = 0.02). Short telomeres were also associated with decreased survival after nivolumab therapy (p = 0.097). Evaluation of telomere status in advanced NSCLC emerges as a useful biomarker that allows for the selection of patient groups with different clinical evolutions, to establish personalized treatment.

LKB1 Loss Assessed by Immunohistochemistry as a Prognostic Marker to First-Line Therapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

(1) Background: Liver kinase B1 (LKB1) is a tumor suppressor gene involved in cell growth and metabolism. However, its alterations are not routinely assessed for guiding therapy in clinical practice. We assessed LKB1 expression by immunohistochemistry as a potential biomarker. (2) Methods: This bicentric retrospective cohort study analyzed data from patients with advanced NSCLC who initiated platinum-based chemotherapy or epidermal growth factor receptor- tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) between January 2016 and December 2020. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used for survival curves and multivariate analysis. (3) Results: 110 patients were evaluated, and the clinical stage IV predominated the lung adenocarcinoma histology. LKB1 loss was observed in 66.3% of cases. LKB1 loss was associated with non-smokers, the absence of wood smoke exposure and an EGFR wild-type status. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the population were 11.1 and 26.8 months, respectively, in the loss group, compared with cases exhibiting a positive expression. After an adjustment by age, smoking status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG-PS), EGFR status and type of administered therapy, LKB1 loss was significantly associated with worse PFS and OS. (4) Conclusion: Patients with an LKB1 loss had worse clinical outcomes. This study warrants prospective assessments to confirm the prognostic role of the LKB1 expression in advanced NSCLC.

PEOPLE (NCT03447678), a first-line phase II pembrolizumab trial, in negative and low PD-L1 advanced NSCLC: clinical outcomes and association with circulating immune biomarkers

BACKGROUND

The PEOPLE trial aimed to identify new immune biomarkers in negative and low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (0%-49%) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab. Here we report the main outcomes and the circulating immune biomarkers analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary endpoint of this phase II trial was the identification of immune biomarkers associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and safety were secondary endpoints. Absolute cell counts for 36 subsets belonging to innate and adaptive immunity were determined by multiparametric flow cytometry in peripheral blood at baseline and at first radiologic evaluation. An orthoblique principal components-based clustering approach and multivariable Cox regression model adjusted for clinical variables were used to analyze immune variables and their correlation with clinical endpoints.

RESULTS

From May 2018 to October 2020, 65 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 26.4 months, the median PFS was 2.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.6 months] and median OS was 12.1 months (95% CI 8.7-17.1 months). The ORR was 21.5%, DCR was 47.7% and median DoR was 14.5 months (95% CI 6.4-24.9 months). Drug-related grade 3-4 adverse events were 9.2%. Higher T cell and natural killer (NK) cell count at baseline and at the first radiologic evaluation were associated with improved PFS, DCR and OS. On the contrary, higher myeloid cell count at baseline or at the first radiologic evaluation was significantly associated with worse OS and DCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating immune biomarkers can contribute to predict outcomes in negative and low PD-L1 aNSCLC patients treated with first-line single-agent pembrolizumab.

Associations between Measured and Patient-Reported Physical Function and Survival in Advanced NSCLC

Background: There is a lack of tools for selecting patients with advanced lung cancer who benefit the most from systemic treatment. Patient-reported physical function (PRPF) has been identified as a prognostic factor in this setting, but little is known about the prognostic value in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to investigate if measured physical performance was an independent or stronger prognostic factor than PRPF in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed patients from a randomized trial comparing immediate and delayed pemetrexed therapy in stage III/IV NSCLC (n = 232) who performed timed up and go (TUG) and 5 m walk test (5 mWT) and reported physical function on the EORTC QLQ-C30 before chemotherapy commenced. Results: Overall, 208 patients performed TUG and 5 mWT and were included in the present study. Poor physical function was significantly associated with poor survival (TUG: HR 1.05, p < 0.01, 5 mWT: HR 1.05, p = 0.03, PRPF: 1.01, p < 0.01), but only PRPF remained an independent prognostic factor in multivariable analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics (HR 1.01, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patient-reported, but not measured, physical performance was an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-doublet chemotherapy.

Thyroid function impairment after chemo-immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC: a single institutional retrospective report

Introduction: Aims of the study were to explore outcomes and toxicities of chemotherapy-immunotherapy (CT-IT) for patients (pts) with metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) in a real-world population. Materials & methods: Clinical data of 26 pts with mNSCLC treated with CT-IT at our institution from January 2020 to January 2021 were collected retrospectively. Results: Median follow-up time was 7.7 months. Median progression-free survival was 9.5 months. The most frequent immune-related adverse event was thyroid dysfunction (ThD): 30.7%. Conclusion: There was a higher rate of ThD in this study population compared with the literature, with a possible correlation with clinical outcomes.

Modelling an evaluation of the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with platinum in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Gemcitabine combined with platinum is currently the recommended first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to quantitatively compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-platinum combinations in the treatment of advanced NSCLC under different dosing regimens based on extensive literature data.

METHODS

The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for clinical trials in patients with NSCLC treated with a gemcitabine-platinum regimen. A parametric survival function was used to analyse the time course of overall survival (OS). The objective response rate (ORR) and the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events were summarized using the random-effects model of a single-arm meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 63 arms from 47 publications, with a total sample size of 4344 patients for analysis. The model revealed that East Asians has a better survival benefit than non-East Asians, with a median OS of 16.4 (95% CI: 14.3-19.0) and 9.9 (95% CI: 8.1-12.4) months, respectively. Moreover, the OS of patients that underwent a 6-cycle treatment was significantly longer than those that had a 4-cycle treatment in non-East Asians, with a median OS of 10.2 (95% CI: 9.5-11.1) and 8.4 (95% CI: 7.7-9.3) months, respectively. However, the incidence of neutropenia, nausea and vomiting also increased after 6 cycles of treatment. When the dose of gemcitabine increased from 1000 mg/m² to 1250 mg/m² , the median OS was extended by approximately 1 month, but the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions did not increase.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Race is an important factor affecting OS in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, which should be considered when conducting international multicentre clinical trials. Additionally, this study found that the OS increased with an increase in gemcitabine exposure, so it is necessary to construct an exposure-response model to obtain the best benefit-risk ratio for patients.

Real-World Time on Treatment with First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression ≥ 50%: 3-Year Follow-Up Data

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States (US), and real-world studies are needed to understand effectiveness of cancer therapies for patients treated outside of cancer clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent that aids the body’s immune system in fighting cancer, is administered for up to 2 years when treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the real-world time on treatment (rwToT), a surrogate indicator that has been associated with survival in NSCLC studies, for over 1000 patients with advanced NSCLC treated initially with pembrolizumab at US oncology clinics. The median rwToT for patients with good performance status (similar to those in clinical trials) was 7.4 months, consistent with the median treatment duration in the KEYNOTE-024 trial (7.9 months). Our findings suggest long-term benefit of first-line pembrolizumab for patients with advanced NSCLC and good performance status at the start of therapy who are treated in real-world settings.

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate real-world time on treatment (rwToT), overall and by KRAS mutation status, with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world oncology practice in the US. rwToT is a readily available, intermediate-range endpoint that is moderately to highly correlated with overall survival in clinical trials and real-world data. Using deidentified electronic medical record data, we studied patients with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2 who initiated pembrolizumab (1 November 2016 to 31 March 2020) for advanced NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% and without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 genomic alterations. The data cutoff was 31 March 2021, and the median study follow-up was 34 months. The Kaplan–Meier median rwToT with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy was 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.3–8.1) for 807 patients with PS 0–1, which was consistent with the median treatment duration in the KEYNOTE-024 trial (7.9 months). The median rwToT for 237 patients with PS 2 was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.4–2.8). For those with KRAS-mutated and KRAS wild-type nonsquamous NSCLC and PS 0–1, the median rwToT was 7.6 months and 7.0 months, respectively. Our findings suggest long-term benefit of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% in real-world settings in the US, particularly for patients with good performance status at the start of therapy, irrespective of KRAS status.

Cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer as a second line in Taiwan

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: A Markov model was constructed to simulate the clinical outcomes and costs of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Clinical outcomes data were derived from randomized clinical trials. Drug acquisition cost and other health resource use were obtained from the claim data of a tertiary hospital and the National Health Insurance. The outcome was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the uncertainty of the model parameters. Results: In the base case, patients treated with immunotherapies in the second line were associated with higher costs and higher mean survival. The incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year gained for pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab compared to docetaxel were NT$416,102, NT$1,572,912 and NT$1,580,469, respectively. Conclusion: The results showed that pembrolizumab was more cost effective than nivolumab and atezolizumab compared with docetaxel as a second-line regimen for patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer at willingness to pay threshold in Taiwan.

Real-world data prognostic model of overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors as second-line monotherapy

Background and aim

The objective of this retrospective, observational, noninterventional cohort study was to investigate prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and to develop a novel prognostic model.

Methods

A total of 4049 patients with aNSCLC diagnosed between January 2011 and February 2020 who received atezolizumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab as second‐line monotherapy were selected from a real‐world deidentified database to build the cohort. Patients could not have received first‐line treatment with clinical study drug(s) nor immune checkpoint inhibitors including anti‐programmed cell death 1 (PD‐1)/programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1), and anti‐cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated protein 4 therapies.

Results

Patients had a median age of 69 years; 45% were female, 75% White, 70% had stage IV at initial diagnosis, and 70% had nonsquamous histology. A Cox proportional hazards model with lasso regularization was used to build a prognostic model for OS using 18 baseline demographic and clinical factors based on the real‐world data cohort. The risk‐increasing prognostic factors were abnormally low albumin and chloride levels, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score ≥ 2, and abnormally high levels of alkaline phosphatase and white blood cells. The risk‐decreasing prognostic factors were PD‐L1 positivity, longer time from advanced diagnosis to start of first‐line therapy, and higher systolic blood pressure. The performance of the model was validated using data from the OAK trial, and the c‐index for the OAK trial validation cohort was 0.65 and 0.67 for the real‐world data cohort.

Conclusions

Based on baseline demographic and clinical factors from a real‐world setting, this prognostic model was developed to discriminate the risk of death in patients with aNSCLC treated with checkpoint inhibitors as second‐line monotherapy, and it performed well in the real‐world data and clinical trial cohorts.

The Association between Pretreatment anemia and Overall Survival in Advanced Non-small Cell lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Propensity Score Matching

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether pretreatment anemia was an independent risk factor for survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after adjusting for other covariates. Methods: We used propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize the influence of confounding factors and used χ2 (categorical variables), Student's t-test (normal distribution), or Mann-Whitney U test (skewed distribution) to analyze the differences among the Hb groups. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the association between anemia and survival. P values < 0.05 (two-sided) were considered statistically significant. Results: The average age of the 758 selected participants was 58.2±11 years, and 210 patients (27.7%) had anemia. In the multivariate analysis, anemia was associated with a poor prognosis in the unmatched cohort (Hazards ratio (HR)=1.3, 95% (confidence interval (CI): 1.1-1.6; p= 0.008), and the matched cohort (HR=1.7, 95% CI: 1.3-2.3; p <0.001), emerging as an independent risk and prognostic factor in advanced NSCLC patients. In the Kaplan-Meier curve, the average survival time of anemic and non-anemic patients was 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.9-11.4 months) vs. 14.1 months (95% CI: 12-16.3 months) (p=0.0073) in the unmatched cohort. After propensity score matching, the average survival time of anemic and non-anemic patients was 10.9 months (95% CI: 8.8-12.9. months) vs. 17.8 months (95% CI: 16.0-23.3 months) (p <0.001). Conclusion: Pretreatment anemia was an independent risk and prognostic factor for survival in patients with advanced NSCLC. Large-scale studies are required to confirm our findings.

Predictable Roles of Peripheral IgM Memory B Cells for the Responses to Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy Against Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Tumor-infiltrating B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures have been identified to predict the responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer immunotherapy. Considering the feasibility of sample collection, whether peripheral B cell signatures are associated with the responses to ICI therapy remains unclear. Herein, we have defined peripheral B cell signatures in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy and investigated their associations with clinical efficacy. It was found that the percentages of B cells before the treatment (baseline) were significantly higher (P = 0.004) in responder (R, n = 17) than those in non-responder (NonR, n = 33) NSCLC patients in a discovery cohort. Moreover, the percentages of baseline IgM⁺ memory B cells were higher (P < 0.001) in R group than those in NonR group, and associated with a longer progression free survival (PFS) (P = 0.003). By logistic regression analysis peripheral baseline IgM⁺ memory B cells were identified as an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002) for the prediction of the responses to anti-PD-1 monotherapy with the AUC value of 0.791, which was further validated in another anti-PD-1 monotherapy cohort (P = 0.011, n = 70) whereas no significance was observed in patients receiving anti-PD-L1 monotherapy (P = 0.135, n = 30). Therefore, our data suggest the roles of peripheral IgM⁺ memory B cells in predicting the responses to anti-PD-1 treatment in Chinese advanced NSCLC patients.

Aidi injection as adjunctive treatment to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Aidi injection is one of the most commonly use antitumor Chinese medicine injections for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is made from the extraction of Astragalus, Eleutherococcus senticosus, Ginseng, and Cantharis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Aidi injection in combination with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (GBC) for advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biological Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Aidi injection plus GBC treatment with GBC alone in NSCLC, from inception up to October 2020. The primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Secondary outcomes were quality of life (QOL) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The quality of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. This study was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42021221225.

RESULTS

In total, 54 RCTs involving 4318 NSCLC patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with GBC alone, Aidi injection plus GBC significantly improve ORR (risk ratios [RR] = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.48), DCR (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.12-1.19), QOL (RR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.54-1.89), and reduced the risk of gastrointestinal toxicity, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, liver injury, renal injury, and anaemia. The evaluation results of the evidence ranged from moderate to low.

CONCLUSIONS

Current moderate evidence revealed that Aidi injection as an adjunctive treatment to GBC was associated with superior benefits in patients with advanced NSCLC and alleviate toxicities. High-quality RCTs are needed to further confirm the results.

Salvage surgery following downstaging of advanced non-small cell lung cancer by targeted therapy

BACKGROUND

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for a high proportion of lung cancer cases. Targeted therapy improve the survival in these patients, but acquired drug resistance will inevitably occur. If tumor downstaging is achieved after targeted therapy, could surgical resection before drug resistance improve clinical benefits for patients with advanced NSCLC? Here, we conducted a clinical trial showing that for patients with advanced driver gene mutant NSCLC who did not progress after targeted therapy, salvage surgery (SS) could improve progression-free survival (PFS). Herein, we retrospectively reviewed our former clinical trial and thoracic cancer database in our medical institutions.

METHODS

We identified patients with advanced driver gene mutant NSCLC treated with targeted therapy plus SS or targeted therapy alone in our former clinical trial and our thoracic cancer database from July 2016 to July 2019. PFS was compared between the targeted therapy plus SS group and the targeted therapy only group using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

We identified 73 patients with driver gene mutant NSCLC who were treated with targeted therapy and 18 treated with targeted therapy plus SS.Among the 18 patients treated with targeted therapy plus SS, there were no obvious perioperative complications and deaths. Targeted therapy followed by SS resulted in a significantly longer PFS compared with targeted therapy alone (23.4 months VS 12.9 months, p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery after tumor downstaging is a promising therapeutic strategy for some patients with advanced (stage IIIB-IV) NSCLC and may offer a new therapeutic option for multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment of lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib versus anlotinib alone as third-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus anlotinib versus anlotinib alone to provide guidance for clinical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients & methods: The records of 139 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who received at least one dose of ICIs plus anlotinib (IA group) or single-agent anlotinib (AA group) were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy of the treatments, survival outcomes and adverse events were analyzed. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Result: The IA group had a significantly prolonged median PFS (mPFS: 5.8 vs 4.2 months; p = 0.022) compared with the AA group (hazard ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.68-0.97). In patients with brain metastases, the IA group exhibited improved efficacy (mPFS: 6.0 vs 3.8 months; p = 0.034) compared with the AA group (hazard ratio: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.23-1.05). Conclusion: ICIs plus anlotinib significantly improved efficacy compared with anlotinib alone and showed substantial potential for the control of intracranial lesions.

Comparison of lorlatinib, alectinib and brigatinib in ALK inhibitor-naive/untreated ALK-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Because of lacking of head-to-head comparison among lorlatinib, alectinib and brigatinib for patients with ALK inhibitor-naive or untreated (ALK inhibitor-naive and chemotherapy-naive) ALK-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal option for these patients still remains undefined. We searched published reports that described the activity and safety of those novel ALK inhibitors (lorlatinib, alectinib and brigatinib) for ALK inhibitor-naive or untreated (ALK inhibitor-naive and chemotherapy-naive) ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. Five randomized controlled trials were identified, covering 1111 subjects. In the network meta-analysis, lorlatinib seemed to prolong progression free survival than brigatinib (Hazard Ratio: 0.57, P = 0.03) and alectinib (Hazard ratio: 0.65, P = 0.05) for previously untreated patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC as assessed by the independent review committee. Meanwhile, lorlatinib significantly improved significant progression free survival than brigatinib (Hazard ratio: 0.57, P = 0.03) and alectinib (Hazard ratio: 0.59, P = 0.03) for ALK inhibitor-naive patients. Among lorlatinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and crizotinib, lorlatinib had the highest probability to reach the best overall confirmed response rates (probability of 48%) and intracranial confirmed response rates (probability of 44%). No significant difference was found among them in overall survival and adverse events analysis. In terms of progression free survival, our results indicated that lorlatinib was the best treatment choice for patients with ALK inhibitor-naive or untreated (ALK inhibitor-naive and chemotherapy-naive) ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. The future head-to-head trials assessing the relative efficacy of lorlatinib, alectinib and brigatinib were warranted.

Observation on the Clinical Effect of Apatinib Combined with Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objectives:

To evaluate the clinical effect of apatinib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods:

Eighty patients with advanced NSCLC treated in Hebei General Hospital from January 2017 to July 2020 were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group, each with 40 cases. Patients in the control group were treated with conventional paclitaxel combined with cisplatin chemotherapy, while patients in the experimental group were treated with apatinib mesylate tablets based on the treatment of the control group. After treatment, tumor efficacy evaluation was conducted on all patients every two cycles, and the therapeutic effect, adverse drug reactions, improvement of quality-of-life scores prior to and after treatment, and changes of indicators such as tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 153(CA153) were compared and analyzed between the two groups.

Results:

The total effective rate of the experimental group was 67.5%, which was significantly better than the 45% of the control group (p=0.04); The incidence of adverse drug reactions in the experimental group was 25%, while that in the control group was 37.5%, with no significant difference (p=0.23); Moreover, the improvement rate of quality of life scores in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p=0.03), and the levels of CEA and CA153 in the experimental group were significantly lower after treatment than those in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (p=0.01).

Conclusion:

Apatinib combined with conventional chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer, the quality of life can be significantly improved, tumor markers can be significantly reduced, and adverse reactions will not be significantly increased.

Peripheral CD4+ T cell signatures in predicting the responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy for Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Limited benefit population of immune checkpoint inhibitors makes it urgent to screen predictive biomarkers for stratifying the patients. Herein, we have investigated peripheral CD4⁺ T cell signatures in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments. It was found that the percentages of IFN-γ and IL-17A secreting naïve CD4⁺ T cells (Tn), and memory CD4⁺ T cells (Tm) expressing PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 were significantly higher in responder (R) than non-responder (NonR) NSCLC patients associated with a longer progression free survival (PFS). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the baseline IFN-γ-producing CD4⁺ Tn cells and PD-1⁺CD4⁺ Tm cells were the most significant signatures with the area under curve (AUC) value reaching 0.849. This was further validated in another anti-PD-1 monotherapy cohort. Conversely, high percentage of CTLA-4⁺CD4⁺ Tm cells was associated with a shorter PFS in patients receiving anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. Our study therefore elucidates the significance of functional CD4⁺ Tn and Tm subpopulations before the treatment in predicting the responses to anti-PD-1 treatment in Chinese NSCLC patients. The fact that there display distinct CD4⁺ T cell signatures in the prediction to anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monotherapy from our study provides preliminary evidence on the feasibility of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 combination therapy for advanced NSCLC patients.

Metronomic therapy in advanced breast cancer and NSCLC: vinorelbine as a paradigm of recent progress

INTRODUCTION

Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is based on frequent dosing of the drug. . This leads to pharmacologically active but low plasma concentrations that reduce toxicity. MCT seems to work primarily via indirect effects on tumor cells and their microenvironment, rather than direct antitumor effects. Oral vinorelbine is one of the most widely studied MCT approaches in both advanced breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

MCT with vinorelbine has proven efficacy, tolerability and quality of life benefits both as monotherapy and in combination with other MCTs or targeted agents, in first-line therapy and in previously treated patients. Key populations are emerging who may be particularly well suited to metronomic vinorelbine, including those with indolent disease, older individuals, and those with multiple comorbidities and/or bone metastases. Ongoing trials should help to further delineate these target groups. Additional work is needed to better understand the optimal vinorelbine regimen, particularly when used in combination or in non-Caucasian patients. Markers are also required to help identify individuals who are most likely to respond. Nonetheless, the efficacy and tolerability of MCT, allied to improved patient convenience, reduced need for medical engagement and lower cost, make it an appealing option - particular in resource-constrained healthcare environments.

Establishment and Validation of Nomogram Model Integrated With Inflammation-Based Factors for the Prognosis of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objects:

Inflammation is one of the hallmarks of cancer. Tumor-associated inflammatory response plays a crucial role in enhancing tumorigenesis. This study aimed to establish an effective predictive nomogram based on inflammation factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated 887 patients with advanced NSCLC between November 2004 and December 2015 and randomly divided them into primary (n = 520) and validation cohorts (n = 367). Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors for building the nomogram. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined using a concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis and were compared to the TNM staging system.

Results:

The nomogram was established using independent risk factors (P < 0.05): age, TNM stage, C reaction protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), and neutrophils (NEU). The C-index of the model for predicting OS had a superior discrimination power compared to that of the TNM staging system both in the primary [0.711 (95% CI: 0.675-0.747) vs 0.531 (95% CI: 0.488-0.574), P < 0.01] and validation cohorts [0.703, 95% CI: 0.671 -0.735 vs 0.582, 95% CI: 0.545-0.619, P < 0.01]. Decision curves also demonstrated that the nomogram had higher overall net benefits than that of the TNM staging system. Subgroup analyses revealed that the nomogram was a favorable prognostic parameter in advanced NSCLC (P < 0.05). The results were internally validated using the validation cohorts.

Conclusions:

The proposed nomogram with inflammatory factors resulted in an accurate prognostic prediction in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Immune-Related Adverse Events and Corticosteroid Use for Cancer-Related Symptoms Are Associated With Efficacy in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Blockade Agents

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been associated with improved efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 blockade agents, while the concurrent use of corticosteroids seems to worsen it. We evaluated outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 blockade agents in relation to the presence of irAEs and the reasons for using corticosteroids: whether for palliative cancer-related reasons or for the management of irAEs. Methods: Clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 blockade agents were calculated with regard to the presence of irAEs and the use of corticosteroids. A landmark analysis was performed to avoid immortal time bias due to the time-dependent nature of irAEs. Results: Out of a total of 267 patients, the 56.9% of patients who experienced irAEs had significantly improved outcomes. In the landmark analysis, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months for patients with irAEs vs. 4.1 months for patients without irAEs (p < 0.001), while median overall survival (OS) was 28.2 vs. 12.5 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Likewise, objective response and disease control rates were significantly higher in patients experiencing irAEs: 48.6 vs. 22.8% and 77.1 vs. 39.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. Median OS was significantly shorter for patients receiving ≥10 mg of prednisone equivalent daily for cancer-related symptoms than for the rest of patients (<10 mg prednisone equivalent daily or for management of irAEs): 6 vs. 15.9 months (p < 0.001). Conclusions: IrAEs were associated with improved efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients when a landmark analysis was applied. Patients receiving corticosteroids had significantly poorer outcomes when they were used for cancer-related symptoms.

A National Assessment of Diagnostic Test Use for Patients with Advanced NSCLC and Factors Influencing Physician Decision-Making

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic tests, including US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved tests and laboratory-developed tests, are frequently used to guide care for patients with cancer, and, recently, have been the subject of several policy discussions and insurance coverage determinations. As the use of diagnostic testing has evolved, stakeholders have raised questions about the lack of standardized test performance metrics and the risk this poses to patients.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the use of diagnostic testing for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), to analyze the utilization of FDA-approved versus laboratory-developed diagnostic tests, and to evaluate the impact of existing regulatory and coverage frameworks on diagnostic test ordering and physician treatment decision-making for patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

We conducted a 2-part study consisting of an online survey and patient chart review from March 1, 2019, to March 25, 2019, of physicians managing patients with advanced NSCLC. Respondents qualified for this study if they managed at least 5 patients with advanced NSCLC per month and had diagnosed at least 1 patient with advanced NSCLC in the 12 months before the survey. A total of 150 physicians completed the survey; before completing the survey, they were instructed to review between 4 and 8 charts of patients with stage IV NSCLC from their list of active patients.

RESULTS

A total of 150 practicing oncologists who manage patients with advanced NSCLC responded to the survey and reviewed a total of 815 patient charts. Of these 815 patients, 812 (99.6%) were tested for at least 1 biomarker, including 73% of patients who were tested for EGFR, 70% tested for ALK, 58% tested for BRAF V600E, and 38% of patients tested for ROS1, by FDA-approved diagnostic tests. In all, 185 (83%) patients who tested positive for EGFR and 60 (83%) patients who tested positive for ALK received an FDA-approved targeted therapy for their biomarker. A total of 98 (65%) physicians responded that the patient's insurance coverage factored into their decision to order diagnostic tests and 69 (45%) physicians responded that cost or the patient's insurance coverage could influence them not to prescribe an indicated targeted therapy.

CONCLUSION

The survey results indicate that diagnostic testing has become routine in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC, the use of FDA-approved diagnostic tests has increased, and insurance coverage and cost influence patient access to diagnostic testing as well as to targeted treatment options.

Does progress achieved in the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer reach the elderly population? A cohort study from a cancer centre from Eastern Switzerland

OBJECTIVE

Treatment options for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been evolving. The goal of our study was to evaluate whether novel therapeutics are used in the elderly population and improve outcomes to a similar extent as in young patients.

METHODS

We enrolled patients registered in the Cancer Registry of Eastern Switzerland and grouped them into four cohorts: Elderly patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed 2005-2007 and 2015-2016 (elderly cohorts 1,2) were compared to cohorts of patients < 70 years diagnosed during the same time periods (young cohorts 1,2).

RESULTS

499 individuals were analysed. Median cancer-specific survival in the elderly cohorts 1 and 2 was 3.9 months and 6.3 months, respectively, and 8.0 and 12.7 months in the young cohorts 1 and 2. 12-month survival significantly improved over ten years only in younger patients (35.6% and 54.9%), however not in the elderly cohorts (20% vs. 35%). Proportion of patients receiving any line of systemic treatment remained lower in the elderly cohorts (53% vs. 78%).

CONCLUSION

Despite the increase in median cancer-specific survival in both cohorts, a significant and clinically meaningful improvement of 12-month cancer-specific survival was only seen in young patients. The adoption of novel treatment approaches is lagging behind in the elderly population.

Outcome of uncommon EGFR mutation positive newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a single center retrospective analysis

Background

The significance of uncommon EGFR mutations in newly diagnosed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is incompletely known. We aimed to analyze the demographic profile, outcome, and treatment attributes of these patients.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively surveyed 5,738 advanced NSCLC patients who underwent EGFR testing in our center from 2013 to 2017 by in-house primer probes on real time PCR platform. Descriptive data were accumulated from electronic medical records. Survival plot was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using log-rank test.

Results

Out of 1,260 EGFR mutation-positive patients, 83 (6.58%) had uncommon mutations in isolation or in various combinations. Uncommon mutations were more frequent in men, never-smokers, and adenocarcinomas. Overall, exon 18 G719X, exon 20 insertion, exon 20 T790M, exon 20 S768I, and exon 21 (L858R/L861Q) were present in 9.6%, 19.3%, 12%, 3.6%, and 3.6% patients, respectively. Dual mutation positivity was found in 50.6% patients. On classifying patients as per tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity, it was found that majority of the patients had a combination TKI sensitive and insensitive mutations. The median duration of follow-up was 13 months. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Median progression-free survival on first line therapy was 6.7 months (95% CI: 4.8-8.5). Median overall survival (OS) of patients who received TKI during the course of their disease was 20.2 months (95% CI: 11.4-28.9). Median overall survival (mOS) of the entire cohort was 15.8 months (95% CI: 10.1-21.5). Among all uncommon mutations, patients with dual mutations did better, with an mOS time of 22.6 months (95% CI: 8.2-37.0, P=0.005). It was observed that TKI sensitive/TKI insensitive dual mutations had a superior OS of 28.2 months (95% CI: 15.2-41.2, P=0.039) as compared to TKI sensitive and TKI insensitive EGFR mutations.

Conclusion

Uncommon EGFR mutations constitute a heterogeneous group, hence, it is imperative to understand each subgroup more to define optimal treatment.

Total lymphocyte count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with chemoradiotherapy

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance and the efficacy evaluation of total lymphocyte count (TLC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Patients and methods

A total of 389 advanced NSCLC patients who received chemoradiotherapy from 2011 to 2016 were enrolled in this retrospective study. TLC, NLR, and PLR were analyzed with overall survival (OS). Survival data were identified with the Kaplan-Meier method and optimal cutoff values with receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results

The median OS for all patients was 18.37 months. Pretreatment and median baseline TLC was 2.47×10³/μL (±0.78); NLR, 3.15 (±3.96); and PLR, 143.82 (±91.77); corresponding cutoffs were 2.4, 3.4, and 136.1. Higher TLC was associated with superior median OS (21.78 vs 15.66 months, P<0.001), and higher NLR and PLR with worse median OS (NLR: 14.13 vs 23.8 months, P<0.001; PLR: 15.49 vs 22.04 months, P<0.001).

Conclusion

The lymphopenia indicators (TLC, NLR, and PLR) were significant prognostic indicators of survival in advanced NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Real-World Use and Outcomes of ALK-Positive Crizotinib-Treated Metastatic NSCLC in US Community Oncology Practices: A Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction: Around 3–5% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are ALK-positive. Crizotinib was the first approved ALK inhibitor from clinical trials. However, there are less data on the utilization and patient outcomes associated with crizotinib in real-world clinical practice. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study of adult crizotinib-treated ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC patients who received treatment between 1 September 2011 and 31 October 2014, with follow up through 31 December 2015. Data were obtained via programmatic queries of the US Oncology Network/McKesson Specialty Health electronic health record database, supplemented with chart abstraction. Overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were estimated from crizotinib initiation using the Kaplan–Meier (KM) method. Results: Of the n = 199 ALK-positive crizotinib-treated patients meeting eligibility criteria, crizotinib was prescribed as first line (1 L) in n = 123 (61.8%). The majority (88.9%) had confirmed adenocarcinoma histology and 32.2% had brain metastases at initial diagnosis. Median age at crizotinib initiation was 60.2 years (range 27.1–88.2); 54.8% were never smokers, 33.7% were former smokers. Treatment of 250 mg, twice daily, was most commonly prescribed (89.5%) with the dose unchanged from an initial dose in 79.4% of patients. The primary discontinuation reason was progression (n = 91, 58.7%). Patients (3.2%) were identified as discontinuing crizotinib as a result of treatment-related toxicity. With median follow-up time of 13.0 months (min–max = 0.03–46.6), median OS from crizotinib initiation was 33.8 months (95% CI = 24.3–38.8). Median TTF was 10.4 months. Conclusions: Crizotinib usage evaluated within the real-world setting is consistent with prior phase III clinical trial data, and illustrates the real-world effectiveness of crizotinib.

Clinical benefit from EGFR-TKI plus ginsenoside Rg3 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR active mutation

Purpose

Acquired resistance is a bottleneck that restricts the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) for lung cancer. Ginsenoside Rg3 is an antiangiogenic agent which can down-regulate the expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and EGFR. Combination of EGFR-TKI and ginsenoside Rg3 may be a promising strategy to delay acquired resistance. This retrospective study explored the efficacy and safety of this combined regimen in patients with EGFR mutation and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Results

By the deadline of March 31^th 2016, the median follow-up period reached 22.9 months. The median PFS was significantly longer in group A than in group B (12.4 months vs 9.9 months, P = 0.017). In addition, ORR was significantly higher in group A than in group B (59.6% vs 41.7%, P = 0.049). The median OS in group A showed no extended tendency compared with that in group B (25.4 months vs 21.4 months, P = 0.258). No significant difference in side effects was found between the two groups.

Methods

A total of 124 patients with advanced NSCLC and EGFR active mutation were collected and analyzed. All of them were treated with first-line EGFR-TKI and divided into two groups. In group A (n=52), patients were administered EGFR-TKI plus ginsenoside Rg3 at standard doses. In group B (n=72), patients received EGFR-TKI alone. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and side effects were analyzed.

Conclusions

Ginsenoside Rg3 improves median PFS and ORR of first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients, thus providing a new regimen to delay acquired resistance of EGFR-TKI.

Combination of immunotherapy with targeted therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been significantly improved in recent years with the incorporation of drugs targeting antiangiogenesis and more specifically genomic alterations such as the EGFR mutations and ALK translocations. However, most patients invariably progress and die. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the pathways involved in tumor-induced immunosuppression have redefined the management of the disease, achieving significant long-lasting responses with manageable safety profiles, regardless of histology. Still, response rates with immunotherapy are deemed suboptimal. Current efforts are focusing on new potential combination strategies with synergistic antitumor activity, using immune checkpoint blockade as a partner for targeted agents. Herein we discuss the available data on the combined use of immunotherapy, including PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, with EGFR and ALK inhibitors and comment on the current status of immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic drugs for molecularly unselected advanced NSCLC.

Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) combined with computational analysis to unravel relevant prognostic factors in non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a pilot study

In this work high throughput technology and computational analysis were used to study two stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with standard chemotherapy with markedly different survival (128 months vs 6 months, respectively) and whose tumor samples exhibit a dissimilar protein activation pattern of the signal transduction. Tumor samples of the two patients were subjected to Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA) analysis to explore the expression/activation levels of 51 signaling proteins. We selected the most divergent proteins based on the ratio of their RPPA values in the two patients with short (s-OS) and long (l-OS) overall survival (OS) and tested them against a EGFR-IGF1R mathematical model. The model with RPPA data showed that the activation levels of 19 proteins were different in the two patients. The four proteins that most distinguished the two patients were BADS155/136 and c-KITY703/719 having a higher activation level in the patient with short survival and p70S6S371/T389 and b-RAFS445 that had a lower activation level in the s-OS patient. The final model describes the interactions between the MAPK and PI3K-mTOR pathways, including 21 nodes. According to our model mTOR and ERK activation levels were predicted to be lower in the s-OS patient than the l-OS patient, while the AMPK activation level was higher in the s-OS patient. Moreover, KRAS activation was predicted to be higher in the l-OS KRAS-mutated patient. In accordance with their different biological properties, the Moment Independent Robustness Indicator in s-OS and l-OS predicted the interaction of MAPK and mTOR and the crosstalk AKT with p90RSK as candidates to be prognostic factors and drug targets.

Can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A meta-analysis

Background

Apply peripheral blood as a surrogate for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in tumor, also called liquid biopsy, has been reported to be a feasible method in patients with advanced non-small lung cancer. But the diagnostic yield varies in different studies.

Methods

A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of peripheral blood in detection epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small lung cancer patients. Publications up to October 2016 were searched using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases. Sensitivity, specificity and other parameters were pooled using the bivariate mixed-effects regression model.

Results

Fifteen studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.59~0.78), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94~0.99), 23.1 (95% CI: 11.6~46.1), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.23~0.44), 73 (95% CI: 33~159), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95).

Discussion

Detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in peripheral blood is a reliable and non-invasive method in patients with advanced non-small lung cancer. More sensitive detection methods are required to increase the sensitivity of liquid biopsy of ctDNA.

The resistance mechanisms and treatment strategies for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) have been established as the standard therapy for EGFR-sensitizing mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients ultimately develop resistance to these drugs. There are several mechanisms of both primary and secondary resistance to EGFR-TKIs. The primary resistance mechanisms include point mutations in exon 18, deletions or insertions in exon 19, insertions, duplications and point mutations in exon 20 and point mutation in exon 21 of EGFR gene. Secondary resistance to EGFR-TKIs is due to emergence of T790M mutation, activation of alternative signaling pathways, bypassing downstream signaling pathways and histological transformation. Strategies to overcome these intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms are complex. With the development of the precision medicine for advanced NSCLC, available systemic and local treatment options have expanded, requiring new clinical algorithms that take into account resistance mechanism. Though combination therapy is emerging as the standard of to overcome resistance mechanisms. Personalized treatment modalities based on molecular diagnosis and monitoring is essential for disease management. Emerging data from the ongoing clinical trials on combination therapy of third generation TKIs and antibodies in EGFR mutant NSCLC are promising for better survival outcomes.

Australian recommendations for EGFR T790M testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

First-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used as first-line therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a sensitizing mutation in the EGFR gene. Unfortunately, resistance to these therapies often occurs within 10 months of commencing treatment and is mostly commonly due to the development of the EGFR T790M mutation. Treatment with the third-generation EGFR TKI, osimertinib can prolong progression free survival in patients with the T790M mutation, so it is important to determine the resistance mechanism in order to plan ongoing therapeutic strategies. Here we review the evidence and make recommendations for the timing of T790M mutation testing, the most appropriate specimens to test and the available testing methods in patients progressing during treatment with first line EGFR TKIs for NSCLC.

Retrospective Analysis of Different Treatment Schemes After Gefitinib Resistance in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to assess the survival of patients with acquired resistance to gefitinib who underwent different subsequent treatments.

METHODS

From September 2007 to July 2014, a total of 103 patients with pathologically confirmed advanced non-small cell lung cancer and acquired resistance to gefitinib were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-eight (56%) patients received chemotherapy; 36 were treated with chemotherapy and gefitinib continuation (CT + G), and 22 patients received chemotherapy (CT) alone. Twenty-two patients (22%) received continued gefitinib medication and local therapy (LT + G), and 23 (22%) received best supportive care (BSC).

FINDINGS

The median age of the patients was 62 years and 99 (96%) were diagnosed with adeno-carcinoma and 93 (90%) were stage IV cases. In the chemotherapy groups, patients had high objective response rates and disease control rates (CT + G, 16.7% and 42.7%; CT, 9.1% and 40.9%, respectively). The median progression-free survival times from the beginning of gefitinib resistance was 5.3 months in the CT + G group, 3.6 months in the CT group, 3.1 months in the LT + G group, and 1.4 months in the BSC group (P < 0.005). Moreover, the median overall survival time after gefitinib resistance in the CT + G group was 11.6 months, which was significantly longer than for CT (9.6 months), LT + G (8.1 months), and BSC (3.7 months) patients (P < 0.001).

IMPLICATIONS

Subsequent chemotherapy after acquired gefitinib resistance led to better survival rates, particularly when combined with continued gefitinib treatment. Local treatment combined with continued gefitinib is an alternative therapy when local progression has occurred. However, larger sample size studies in similar or other population groups are necessary to validate these findings.

The Role of the Antiangiogenetic Ramucirumab in the Treatment of Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Angiogenesis is one of the most important phenomena sustaining tumor development and metastatization, including for non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A dominant role in angiogenesis is played by the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its signaling pathway. Ramucirumab, is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds to the extracellular domain of the VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) with high specificity and affinity blocking the interaction of VEGFR-2 and VEGF ligands, thus inhibiting their signaling pathways and the consequential endothelial proliferation and migration. A recent phase III randomized trial named REVEL, demonstrated the efficacy of ramucirumab in combination with docetaxel as second line treatment of advanced NSCLC, leading to its FDA and EMA approval in this clinical setting. In the REVEL trial advanced NSCLC patients whose disease had progressed after first line platinum-based chemotherapy, were administered ramucirumab plus docetaxel or placebo plus docetaxel. More than 1,250 patients were treated and patients randomized to the treatment with ramucirumab plus docetaxel showed a significant longer median overall survival compared to those randomized to chemotherapy only. Ramucirumab is the first antiangiogenetic agent approved in the treatment both of squamous and non squamous NSCLC. In fact, it is not associated with increased risk of respiratory bleeding in the squamous histology, and also has demonstrated efficacy in both histology types. The role of ramucirumab, already cleared in the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, needs to be clarified further and is currently being explored also in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

The End of Nihilism: Systemic Therapy of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and many other parts of the world. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises 85-90% of lung cancers. Historically, the expected survival of patients with advanced disease has been estimated in months. In recent years, however, lung cancer has come to be seen as a treatable disease with multiple therapeutic options. Enormous advances in the understanding of its pathways and mechanisms have enabled personalized therapy in NSCLC. The evolving approach to therapy focuses on genomic profiling of the tumors to find molecular targets and develop specific agents for individualized therapy. In addition, maintenance therapy has emerged as a valid approach, and the choice of chemotherapy now varies by histology. Most recently, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has shown promising results, with impressive durations of response and a tolerable toxicity profile. Together, these discoveries have improved overall survival substantially in patient populations that have access to these advancements. We review the clinical data surrounding these impressive improvements.

Safety and efficacy of targeted agents monotherapy in advanced NSCLC

The emergence of targetted therapy has revolutionised the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Increasing numbers of driver genes and related targetted agents have supplied more powerful weapons for conquering NSCLC. Depending on whether there are clear targets and therapeutic effects, we can now rank targetted agents into three categories: agents with explicit targets and pure effects, agents with theoretical targets but with no effective biomarkers, agents with vague targets and lower effects. The latest clinical data on the safety and efficacy of monotherapy with three kinds of agents will be reviewed respectively in this article.

A randomized phase II study of ganetespib, a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, in combination with docetaxel in second-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (GALAXY-1)

BACKGROUND

This trial was designed to evaluate the activity and safety of ganetespib in combination with docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify patient populations most likely to benefit from the combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with one prior systemic therapy for advanced disease were eligible. Docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) on day 1) was administered alone or with ganetespib (150 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15) every 3 weeks. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) in two subgroups of the adenocarcinoma population: patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (eLDH) and mutated KRAS (mKRAS).

RESULTS

Of 385 patients enrolled, 381 were treated. Early in the trial, increased hemoptysis and lack of efficacy were observed in nonadenocarcinoma patients (n = 71); therefore, only patients with adenocarcinoma histology were subsequently enrolled. Neutropenia was the most common grade ≥3 adverse event: 41% in the combination arm versus 42% in docetaxel alone. There was no improvement in PFS for the combination arm in the eLDH (N = 114, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77, P = 0.1134) or mKRAS (N = 89, adjusted HR = 1.11, P = 0.3384) subgroups. In the intent-to-treat adenocarcinoma population, there was a trend in favor of the combination, with PFS (N = 253, adjusted HR = 0.82, P = 0.0784) and overall survival (OS) (adjusted HR = 0.84, P = 0.1139). Exploratory analyses showed significant benefit of the ganetespib combination in the prespecified subgroup of adenocarcinoma patients diagnosed with advanced disease >6 months before study entry (N = 177): PFS (adjusted HR = 0.74, P = 0.0417); OS (adjusted HR = 0.69, P = 0.0191).

CONCLUSION

Advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with ganetespib in combination with docetaxel had an acceptable safety profile. While the study's primary end points were not met, significant prolongation of PFS and OS was observed in patients >6 months from diagnosis of advanced disease, a subgroup chosen as the target population for the phase III study.

Multicenter randomized, open-label phase II trial of sequential erlotinib and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine monotherapy as first-line therapy in elderly or ECOG PS two patients with advanced NSCLC

AIM

The potential beneficial interaction between erlotinib and chemotherapy may require sequencing or pharmacodynamic separation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of sequential erlotinib and gemcitabine versus gemcitabine monotherapy as first-line therapy in elderly or ECOG PS-2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma.

METHODS

The primary objective of this multicenter randomized Phase II study was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives were overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, response duration, overall survival and safety. Patients were randomized to either gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2 Day 1, 8 q28 days) followed by erlotinib (150 mg/day on day 15 through day 28), (EG-arm), or gemcitabine monotherapy (1000 mg/m2 Days 1, 8, 15 q28 days), (G-arm) for up to six cycles.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were recruited, 28 G-arm and 26 EG-arm. Overall, efficacy results were not significantly different between study arms. Median PFS and ORR for the G- versus EG-arms were 8.0 versus 10.3 weeks (hazard ratio 1.3; 95% confidence interval [0.63;2.68]; P=0.48) and 7.1 versus 3.8 percent respectively (difference -3.30; 95% confidence interval [-17.5;10.9]). The majority of adverse events (AEs) in both arms were Grade 1-2. The commonest AEs recorded in the EG- and G-arms were rash-like events (65 percent) and nausea (42 percent) respectively. Four patients (17 percent) in EG-arm and five (16 percent) in G-arm experienced at least one treatment-related serious AE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma at ECOG PS-2 or aged ≥70 years derived no efficacy advantage from sequential erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine relative to gemcitabine alone. No unexpected safety findings were noted.

Survival outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib: expanded access programme data from Belgium (the TRUST study)

Erlotinib has been shown to prolong progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report here on effectiveness data on the subsample of 261 patients from 40 centres in Belgium involved in the TRUST study. Median age was 63 years. Most (69.0%) were male and current/former smokers (84.7%); with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 (74.3%), stage IV disease (75.1%) and adenocarcinoma by histology (54.0%). Erlotinib was administered mainly as second- (47.1%) or third-line treatment (48.3%). Response rate was 6.5%; disease control rate 58.3%. Median PFS was 2.2 months. Better PS (P = 0.0384), stage IIIB disease (P = 0.0018) and presence of rash (P < 0.0001) were associated with longer PFS. OS rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 26.4%, 10.9% and 6.4% respectively. Median OS was 5.9 months. Female gender (P = 0.007), better PS (P < 0.0001), stage IIIB disease (P = 0.0355) and presence of rash (P < 0.0001) were associated with longer OS. The findings confirm the therapeutic benefit of erlotinib in a broad range of patients in a sample from a country with a historically high lung cancer morbidity and mortality burden. Several determinants of PFS and OS are identified.

Optimizing the use of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in advanced non-small-lung cancer (NSCLC)

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in US and Europe. Treatment with a platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care, however with modest effect on quality of life and overall survival which seldom reaches 1 year. Recently, several classes of targeted agents have emerged showing promising results. In particular, agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) showed impressive clinical activity both in the first line and salvage settings. However, it is evident that these drugs are not effective in all patients. Putting into consideration the very high cost of these agents, there is an urgent need to provide reliable tools to identify those patients that would derive the maximum benefit from these drugs. Several predictive biomarkers were developed to identify those patients who would derive the maximal benefit of these drugs. In this review we will discuss the recent updates on the role of EGFR inhibitors in the treatment of advanced NSCLC and the role of predictive bio-markers in patient selection.