Evidence for interleukin 17 involvement in severe immune-related neuroendocrine toxicity

The pathogenesis of neurological immune-related adverse events following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has revolutionised cancer therapy, and patients who were previously incurable can now have excellent responses. These therapies work by blocking inhibitory immune pathways, like cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), its ligand PD-L1, and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3); which leads to increased anti-tumour immune responses. However, their use can lead to the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which may result in severe disability, interruption of cancer therapy, and even death. Neurological autoimmune sequelae occur in 1-10 % of patients treated with ICIs and can be fatal. They encompass a broad spectrum of diseases, may affect the central and the peripheral nervous system, and include syndromes like encephalitis, cerebellitis, neuropathy, and myositis. In some cases, neurological irAEs can be associated with autoantibodies recognising neuronal or glial targets. In this review, we first describe the key targets in ICI therapy, followed by a formulation of irAEs and their clinical presentations, where we focus on neurological syndromes. We comprehensively formulate the current literature evaluating cell surface and intracellular autoantibodies, cytokines, chemokines, leukocyte patterns, other blood derived biomarkers, and immunogenetic profiles; and highlight their impact on our understanding of the pathogenesis of neurological irAEs. Finally, we describe therapeutic pathways and patient outcomes, and provide an overview on future aspects of ICI cancer therapy.

Prediction, prevention, and precision treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor neurological toxicity using autoantibodies, cytokines, and microbiota

Cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized oncology, significantly improving survival across multiple cancer types. ICIs, such as anti-PD-1 (e.g. nivolumab, pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (e.g. atezolizumab, avelumab), and anti-CTLA-4 (e.g. ipilimumab), enhance T cell-mediated anti-tumor responses but can also trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Neurological irAEs (n-irAEs), affecting 1-3% of patients, predominantly involve the peripheral nervous system; less commonly, n-irAEs can present as central nervous system disorders. Although irAEs suggest a possible correlation with treatment efficacy, their mechanisms remain unclear, with hypotheses ranging from antigen mimicry to cytokine dysregulation and microbiome alterations. Identifying patients at risk for n-irAEs and predicting their outcome through biomarkers would be highly desirable. For example, patients with high-risk onconeural antibodies (such as anti-Hu or Ma2), and elevated neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels often respond poorly to irAE treatment. However, interpreting neuronal antibody tests in the diagnosis of n-irAEs requires caution: positive results must align with the clinical context, as some cancer patients (e.g., SCLC) may have asymptomatic low antibody levels, and false positive results are common without tissue-based confirmation. Also, the use of biomarkers (e.g. IL-6) may lead to more targeted treatments of irAEs, minimizing adverse effects without compromising the anti-tumor efficacy of ICIs. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest findings on n-irAEs associated with ICIs, with a focus on their prediction, prevention, as well as precision treatment using autoantibodies, cytokines, and microbiota. The most interesting data concern neuronal antibodies, which we explore in their pathogenic roles and as biomarkers of neurotoxicity. Most of the available data on cytokines, both regarding their role as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and their role in supporting therapeutic decisions for toxicities, refer to non-neurological toxicities. However, in our review, we mention the potential role of CXCL10 and CXCL13 as biomarkers of n-irAEs and describe the current evidence, as well as the need for further studies, on the use of cytokines in guiding selection of second-line therapies for n-irAEs. Finally, no specific microbiome-related microbial signature has been proven to be linked to n-irAEs specifically, leading to the need of more future research on the topic.

Reduced monocytic IL10 expression in PD1 inhibitor-treated patients is a harbinger of severe immune-related adverse events

BACKGROUND

Despite remarkable clinical efficacy, little is known about the system-wide immunological alterations provoked by PD1 blockade. Dynamics of quantitative immune composition and functional repertoire during PD1 blockade could delineate cohort-specific patterns of treatment response and therapy-induced toxicity.

METHODS

We longitudinally assessed therapy-induced effects on the immune system in fresh whole blood using flow cytometry-based cell quantifications, accompanied by analyses of effector properties of all major immune populations upon cell-type specific stimulations. 43 cancer patients undergoing PD1 blockade were recruited with assessments performed pre-treatment and before cycles 2/4/6, which resulted in the collection of more than 30,000 cytometric data values.

RESULTS

We observed no intrinsic immune pattern correlating with clinical outcome before PD1 blockade initiation, but cohort-specific immune alterations emerged during therapy. The most striking evolving changes in therapy responders were an increase in activated T and NK cell subsets, which showed high IFNγ and TNFα expression upon ex vivo stimulation. Patients affected by severe immune-related adverse events (s-irAE) presented with an analogously increased number of activated CD4 + and CD8 + T cells compared to patients with no/mild irAE, but lacked the functional divergences observed between responders versus non-responders. Instead, their monocytes showed discriminatory functional deficits with less IL10 production upon stimulation, which led to an abrogated inhibition of T cell proliferation in vitro and thus may account for the observed T cell expansion in patients with s-irAE.

CONCLUSION

Our holistic explorative approach allowed the delineation of clinically relevant cohorts by treatment-triggered immune changes, potentially enabling better patient stratification and further revealed new mechanistic insights into the pathogenesis of s-irAE.

Central nervous system complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A comprehensive review

The ever-increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly improved cancer management, but at the cost of frequent immunologic side effects. Among them, neurologic immune-related adverse events (nirAEs) are less common but pose a challenge to clinicians due to their severity, heterogeneous nature and nonspecific clinical presentation, making diagnosis complex. The prognosis of these nirAEs, especially those related to the central nervous system (CNS), correlates with their rapid recognition and therapeutic management. Indeed, the therapeutic options are sometimes unfamiliar and may be further complicated by the lack of recommendations in the event of failure of a well-managed first-line treatment. Finally, the attribution of ICIs to certain CNS disorders is controversial and may lead to an incorrect decision to discontinue or contraindicate treatment, resulting in an irremediable loss of opportunity for the patient. Therefore, the aim of this review is to present known/suspected CNS nirAEs induced by ICI, their diagnostic approach and management through therapeutic advices for optimal treatment and rechallenge opportunities.

Predictive Biomarkers for Checkpoint Inhibitor Immune-Related Adverse Events

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antagonists of inhibitory receptors in the immune system, such as the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, the programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand PD-L1, and they are increasingly used in cancer treatment. By blocking certain suppressive pathways, ICIs promote T-cell activation and antitumor activity but may induce so-called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which mimic traditional autoimmune disorders. With the approval of more ICIs, irAE prediction has become a key factor in improving patient survival and quality of life. Several biomarkers have been described as potential irAE predictors, some of them are already available for clinical use and others are under development; examples include circulating blood cell counts and ratios, T-cell expansion and diversification, cytokines, autoantibodies and autoantigens, serum and other biological fluid proteins, human leucocyte antigen genotypes, genetic variations and gene profiles, microRNAs, and the gastrointestinal microbiome. Nevertheless, it is difficult to generalize the application of irAE biomarkers based on the current evidence because most studies have been retrospective, time-limited and restricted to a specific type of cancer, irAE or ICI. Long-term prospective cohorts and real-life studies are needed to assess the predictive capacity of different potential irAE biomarkers, regardless of the ICI type, organ involved or cancer site.

IL-17-induced HIF1α drives resistance to anti-PD-L1 via fibroblast-mediated immune exclusion

Increasing evidence suggests that intratumoral inflammation has an outsized influence on antitumor immunity. Here, we report that IL-17, a proinflammatory cytokine widely associated with poor prognosis in solid tumors, drives the therapeutic failure of anti-PD-L1. By timing the deletion of IL-17 signaling specifically in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in late-stage tumors, we show that IL-17 signaling drives immune exclusion by activating a collagen deposition program in murine models of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Ablation of IL-17 signaling in CAFs increased the infiltration of cytotoxic T cells into the tumor mass and sensitized otherwise resistant cSCC to anti-PD-L1 treatment. Mechanistically, the collagen deposition program in CAFs was driven by IL-17-induced translation of HIF1α, which was mediated by direct binding of Act1, the adaptor protein of IL-17 receptor, to a stem-loop structure in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) in Hif1α mRNA. Disruption of Act1's binding to Hif1α mRNA abolished IL-17-induced collagen deposition and enhanced anti-PD-L1-mediated tumor regression.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Central Diabetes Insipidus: Looking for the Needle in the Haystack or a Very Rare Side-Effect to Promptly Diagnose?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved the survival in patients affected by an increasing number of malignancies, but they may also trigger various autoimmune side-effects, including endocrinopathies. Very rarely, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported to cause central diabetes insipidus. However, with their expanding use, the likelihood that oncologists will face this endocrine adverse event is expected to increase. By reviewing the limited literature on central diabetes insipidus induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, some inconsistencies emerge in the diagnosis and the management of patients presenting with this toxicity, together with difficulties related to classifying its severity. Until now, specific guidelines on the management of central diabetes insipidus induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors are lacking. In clinical practice, endocrinological consultation may relieve medical oncologists from difficulties in treating this side-effect; oncologists, however, remain responsible for its early diagnose and the management of the causative drugs. To this aim, some practical suggestions are advised for the multidisciplinary management of cancer patients presenting with central diabetes insipidus induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as a Threat to the Hypothalamus-Pituitary Axis: A Completed Puzzle

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) prolong the survival in an increasing number of patients affected by several malignancies, but at the cost of new toxicities related to their mechanisms of action, autoimmunity. Endocrine toxicity frequently occurs in patients on ICI, but endocrine dysfunctions differ based on the ICI-subclass, as follows: agents targeting the CTLA4-receptor often induce hypophysitis and rarely thyroid dysfunction, which is the opposite for agents targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Recently, few cases of central diabetes insipidus have been reported as an adverse event induced by both ICI-subclasses, either in the context of anterior hypophysitis or as selective damage to the posterior pituitary or in the context of hypothalamitis. These new occurrences demonstrate, for the first time, that ICI-induced autoimmunity may involve any tract of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. However, the related pathogenic mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated. Similarly, the data explaining the endocrine system susceptibility to primary and ICI-induced autoimmunity are still scarce. Since ICI clinical indications are expected to expand in the near future, ICI-induced autoimmunity to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis presents as a unique in vivo model that could help to clarify the pathogenic mechanisms underlying both the dysfunction induced by ICI to the hypothalamus-pituitary axis and primary autoimmune diseases affecting the same axis.

Neurologic Toxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of Literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have entailed a change of paradigm in the management of multiple malignant diseases and are acquiring a key role in an increasing number of clinical sceneries. However, since their mechanism of action is not limited to the tumor microenvironment, their systemic activity may lead to a wide spectrum of immune-related side effects. Although neurological adverse events are much less frequent than gastrointestinal, hepatic, or lung toxicity, with an incidence of <5%, their potential severity and consequent interruptions to cancer treatment make them of particular importance. Despite them mainly implying peripheral neuropathies, immunotherapy has also been associated with an increased risk of encephalitis and paraneoplastic disorders affecting the central nervous system, often appearing in a clinical context where the appropriate diagnosis and early management of neuropsychiatric symptoms can be challenging. Although the pathogenesis of these complications is not fully understood yet, the blockade of tumoral inhibitory signals, and therefore the elicitation of cytotoxic T-cell-mediated response, seems to play a decisive role. The aim of this review was to summarize the current knowledge about the pathogenic mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic recommendations regarding the main forms of neurotoxicity related to checkpoint inhibitors.

Safety of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Patients with Cancer Enrolled in Early-Phase Clinical Trials

Simple Summary

We investigated for the first time the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in patients receiving new antineoplastic agents in early-stage clinical trials, including new immuno-regulatory anti-cancer investigational compounds and drug combinations. We found that about three-quarters of the patients under active anticancer treatments experienced mild to moderate adverse effects (AEs) related to COVID-19 vaccines. Patients enrolled in early-phase trials or receiving experimental immunotherapy agents did not experience worse AEs related to the vaccine than patients with cancer not enrolled in these trials, receiving approved drugs. The safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials, including those treated with new immune checkpoint inhibitors, does not seem to differ from that of the general population of patients with cancer. Our data support the current vaccine prioritization of all cancer patients with active treatment and calls for data sharing from vaccinated patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials.

Abstract

Pivotal trials of COVID-19 vaccines did not include cancer patients, with questions remaining about their safety and efficacy in this population. Patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials receive novel treatments with unknown efficacy and safety profiles. Studies on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in these patients are urgently required. This is a retrospective, real-world, cohort study of patients receiving anticancer treatments and COVID-19 vaccines between 1 February and 25 June 2021 at the Division of New Drugs Development for Innovative Therapies of the European Institute of Oncology. One hundred thirteen patients were enrolled, 40 in early-phase clinical trials, and 20 under novel immunotherapy agents. Nearly three-quarters of the patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE) after the first dose (1D) (74.3%) and second dose (2D) (72.6%). Most of the AEs were local (67.3% 1D and 61.9% after 2D), while 31.8% (1D) and 38.1% (2D) of the patients had systemic AEs. No AEs above grade 2 were observed. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccines appear to be safe in patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials, including patients receiving novel immunotherapy compounds. All cancer patients should be prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of ongoing treatments or enrollment in early-phase trials.

Effect of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Pneumonitis on Prognosis in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The correlation between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and prognosis remains controversial in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effect of irAEs, especially checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), on the survival and treatment response in advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Databases were searched for relevant studies, and meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan.

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies involving 12,600 participants were included. The development of irAEs had an advantageous effect on OS and ORR in advanced NSCLC (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.56 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46 to 0.67]; ORR: odds ratio [OR], 3.13 [2.41 to 4.06]). The occurrence of endocrine and skin irAEs had advantageous effects on both OS and ORR (endocrine OS, HR, 0.47 [-0.37 to 0.59]; endocrine ORR: OR, 1.90 [1.27 to 2.84]; skin OS: HR, 0.48 [0.38 to 0.61]; skin ORR: OR, 4.30 [2.68 to 6.91]). Severe-grade irAEs resulted in shorter OS than low-grade irAEs (HR, 1.49 [1.06, 2.09]), and multiple irAEs resulted in better ORR compared with 1 irAE (OR, 2.04 [1.41 to 2.94]). The occurrence of CIP had no significant effect on OS (HR, 1.14 [0.70 to 1.86]), but it was associated with better ORR (OR, 2.12 [1.06 to 4.25]). Severe-grade CIP had no effect on OS or ORR, but CIP leading to treatment discontinuation resulted in shorter OS (HR, 2.35 [1.17 to 4.72]).

CONCLUSION

The development of irAEs had advantageous effects on survival and response in advanced NSCLC. CIP had no effect on survival, but it predicted better response.

Neurological complications of cancer immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has emerged as a powerful therapeutic approach in many areas of clinical oncology and hematology. The approval of ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the immune cell receptor CTLA-4, has marked the beginning of the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In the meantime, numerous antibodies targeting the PD-1 pathway have expanded the class of clinically approved immune checkpoint inhibitors. Furthermore, novel antibodies directed against other immune checkpoints are currently in clinical evaluation. More recently, bispecific antibodies, which link T cells directly to tumor cells as well as adoptive T cell transfer with immune cells engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor, have been approved in certain indications. Neurological complications associated with the use of these novel immunotherapeutic concepts have been recognized more and more frequently. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may cause various neurological deficits mainly by alterations of the peripheral nervous system's integrity. These include radiculopathies, neuropathies, myopathies as well as myasthenic syndromes. Side effects involving the central nervous system are less frequent but may result in severe clinical symptoms and syndromes. The administration of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell is subject to rigorous patient selection and their use is frequently associated with neurological complications including encephalopathy and seizures, which require immediate action and appropriate therapeutic measures. Close clinical monitoring for neurological symptoms is key for early recognition of immunotherapy-related side effects. Comprehensive diagnostic work-up and adequate therapeutic measures are essential to avoid further clinical deterioration and residual neurological deficits.