Chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor failure in metastatic melanoma: a retrospective multicentre analysis

Attenuated Salmonella carrying IL-21 overexpression plasmid enhances radiotherapy efficacy in a preclinical model of melanoma

Melanoma, known for its aggressive behavior and tendency to metastasize to the brain and lungs, is a formidable challenge in oncology. Radiotherapy is a potent treatment for localized solid tumors, effective against both intracranial and extracranial metastases. Yet, some melanoma patients exhibit substantial resistance to radiotherapy, with the underlying mechanisms of this resistance remaining elusive. While radiotherapy can stimulate the infiltration of immune cells, thereby triggering a range of immunostimulatory effects, it can also suppress the tumor microenvironment (TME), limiting its effectiveness. In physiological conditions, cytokines inhibit the activity of immunosuppressive cells through paracrine and autocrine signaling, while also activating immune cells to boost antitumor responses. Here, we found that Interleukin (IL)-21 expression was higher in the mice with good radiotherapy response to melanoma than in the mice with poor radiotherapy response. Interestingly, we also observed the higher infiltration of M2 TAMs and lower CD8+ T cells in the group with poor radiotherapy response. To tackle this issue, we explored the therapeutic potential of a plasmid encoding IL-21, delivered via attenuated Salmonella, in mice bearing melanomas. Our findings revealed that IL-21 administration significantly reduced M2 TAMs infiltration and enhanced CD8+ T cells infiltration and granzyme B (GZMB) expression within melanoma tumors. Most importantly, the combination of IL-21 with radiotherapy led to markedly tumor reduction compared to either treatment alone. This research highlights the potential of IL-21 as a valuable adjunct to radiotherapy in the treatment of melanoma, presenting a promising strategy for enhancing antitumor immune responses and optimizing patient outcomes.

Treatment at the end of life in patients with advanced melanoma. A multicenter DeCOG study of 1067 patients from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOReg

Background

Although systemic therapies have improved considerably over the last decade, up to 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma still die due to disease progression. Oncological treatment at the end-of-life phase is challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and type of systemic therapy received by melanoma patients in their end-of-life phase.

Methods

Patients with metastatic melanoma who had died between January 1, 2018 and October 31, 2022 were identified from the prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOReg. Study endpoints were percentage of patients who had been treated with systemic therapy within the last three months of life, timepoint of initiation of the last-line therapy, overall survival, treatment benefit and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events.

Results

In total, 1067 patients from 46 skin cancer centers were included. Most of the patients (63%) had received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as last-line therapy, 22% targeted therapies (TT) and 12% chemotherapy (CTX). Comparing last-line ICI and TT, patients with TT were significantly more likely to benefit from treatment and had significantly fewer and milder treatment-related AE than patients with ICI. Even though two thirds of patients had received ICI as a last-line therapy, the majority of these patients (61%) had stopped therapy within the last 30 days of life, whereas the majority of patients with TT (66%) still continued their treatment to the end of life. We found markedly fewer patients with initiation of ICI within 30 days before their death (19%) compared to a historic cohort including patients who died in 2016 or 2017 (39%).

Conclusion

Treatment approaches near the end of life have markedly changed in skin cancer centers in Germany over recent years, with ICI prescribed less frequently in the end-of-life phase. In contrast, TT are frequently administered, even within the last 30 days of life. It should also be considered that discontinuation of TT can result in rapid tumor progression. Due to the oral administration and a low rate of severe toxicity, TT appear to be a suitable treatment option, even in the end-of-life situation of melanoma patients.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2024

A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with one to two-centimeter safety margins. For a correct stage classification and treatment decision, a sentinel lymph node biopsy shall be offered in patients with tumor thickness ≥ 1.0 mm or ≥ 0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("Tumor Board"). Adjuvant therapies can be proposed in completely resected stage IIB-IV. In stage II only PD-1 inhibitors are approved. In stage III anti-PD-1 therapy or dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with BRAFV600 mutated melanoma can be discussed. In resected stage IV, nivolumab can be offered, as well as ipilimumab and nivolumab, in selected, high-risk patients. In patients with clinically detected macroscopic, resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed complete surgical resection and adjuvant therapy according to pathological response and BRAF status can be offered. Neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab followed by complete surgical resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab is also recommended. For patients with disease recurrence after (neo) adjuvant therapy, further treatment should consider the type of (neo) adjuvant therapy received as well as the time of recurrence, i.e., on or off therapy. In patients with irresectable stage III/IV disease systemic treatment is always indicated. For first line treatment PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 or LAG-3 antibodies shall be considered. In stage IV melanoma with a BRAFV600 mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy, in selected cases. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harboring a BRAFV600 mutation, this therapy shall be offered as second line. Other second line therapies include therapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors not used in first line. This guideline is valid until the end of 2026.

Prolonged Remission in Metastatic Ano-Rectal Malignant Melanoma With Single Agent Temozolomide

INTRODUCTION

With the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies, the clinical outcomes of metastatic melanoma have drastically improved. The current scenario has reduced the use of chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. We report an interesting case of a patient with stage IV ano-rectal canal malignant melanoma with an exceptional response to single-agent temozolomide.

CASE REPORT

We diagnosed a 55-year-old female with stage IV anorectal melanoma, BRAF V600 mutation negative. Owing to her poor performance status (PS) and non-affordability of immunotherapy, after informed decision-making, she was started on single agent, temozolomide. She achieved a complete metabolic response and sustained it for 3 years and continues to do so with the first-line single-agent temozolomide.

CONCLUSION

In a resource-limited setting, where access to ICIs and targeted therapies is not feasible, and in patients who fail to tolerate these therapies, oral chemotherapy continues to remain effective and is worth trying in patients with poor PS.

Weekly carboplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced melanoma patients resistant to anti-PD-1 inhibitors: a retrospective, monocentric experience

Immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies significantly improved the prognosis in advanced melanoma patients, but most of them develop primary or secondary resistance to the treatment. In this study, we evaluated efficacy and safety of a chemotherapy regimen with weekly carboplatin plus paclitaxel (wCP) in patients previously treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies. We retrospectively identified 30 patients with advanced melanoma treated at our Institute over the last eight years with wCP. The co-primary endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, we evaluated treatment tolerability. For this patient cohort, median PFS and OS were 3.25 and 7.69 months, respectively. All included patients had previously received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, most of them had ECOG PS 0-1, and only 5 patients had a BRAF V600 mutation. In univariable analysis, we observed shorter OS in patients with > 2 involved metastatic sites, superficial spreading histology, and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values above the median. Liver metastases were associated with worse outcomes, while radiotherapy treatment of brain metastases was associated with improved OS. However, in a multivariable Cox regression model, only LDH above the median, superficial spreading histology, and female sex were significantly associated with worse OS. We reported grade 3 and 4 treatment-related toxicities in 4 and 0 patients, respectively. In conclusion, chemotherapy with wCP is a valid palliative treatment in advanced melanoma who progressed with anti-PD-1 antibodies.

Benefit, recurrence pattern, and toxicity to adjuvant anti-PD-1 monotherapy varies by ethnicity and melanoma subtype: An international multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Anti-Program-Death-1 (PD-1) is a standard adjuvant therapy for patients with resected melanoma. We hypothesized that there are discrepancies in survival, recurrence pattern and toxicity to adjuvant PD-1 between different ethnicities and melanoma subtypes.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a multicenter cohort study incorporating 6 independent institutions in Australia, China, Japan, and the United States. The primary outcomes were recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were disease recurrence patterns and toxicities.

RESULTS

In total 534 patients were included. East-Asian/Hispanic/African reported significantly poorer RFS/OS. Nonacral cutaneous or melanoma of unknown primary reported the best RFS/OS, followed by acral, and mucosal was the poorest. Within the nonacral cutaneous or melanoma of unknown primary subtypes, East-Asian/Hispanic/African reported significantly poorer RFS/OS than Caucasian. In the multivariate analysis incorporating ethnicity/melanoma-subtype/age/sex/stage/lactate dehydrogenase/BRAF (v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B)-mutation/adjuvant radiotherapy, East-Asian/Hispanic/African had independently significantly poorer outcomes (RFS: HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.19-2.44 and OS: HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.39-3.95), as was mucosal subtype (RFS: HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.04-5.17 and OS: HR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.68-6.08). Mucosal melanoma was an independent risk factor for distant metastasis, especially liver metastasis. East-Asian/Hispanic/African had significantly lower incidence of gastrointestinal/musculoskeletal/respiratory/other-rare-type-toxicities; but higher incidences of liver toxicities.

LIMITATIONS

A retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnicity and melanoma subtype are associated with survival and recurrence pattern in melanoma patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1. Toxicity profile differs by ethnicity and may require a precision toxicity surveillance strategy.

The role of dacarbazine and temozolomide therapy after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in malignant melanoma patients: A case series and meta-analysis

Dacarbazine (DTIC) and its oral counterpart temozolomide (TMZ) have been the most used agents in advanced malignant melanoma (MM) patients and they are still used routinely. The preferred first line treatment, immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) might shape the tumor and the tumor microenvironment, possibly affecting the response to subsequent therapies. The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment effect of DTIC/TMZ in MM patients after CPI therapy in a consecutive patient cohort and through systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Thirty-five patients with advanced MM treated with DTIC/TMZ after previous CPI therapy in three Swedish regions between 2017 and 2021 were recognized and seven case series studies were identified through systematic database review. Pooled data from all 345 patients showed a median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) of 1.9 months and overall survival (OS) of 6.0 months. Three of these studies were included in a meta-analysis comparing DTIC/TMZ after CPI treatment, versus no previous immunotherapy, showing no statistically significant differences in rwPFS or OS but higher real-world response rate to chemotherapy for the prior-CPI treated group (Odds Ratio: 2.24; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.04-4.86). The current study supports consideration of DTIC/TMZ in later line of treatment in the immunotherapy era.

Investigational Approaches for Treatment of Melanoma Patients Progressing After Standard of Care

ABSTRACT

The advent of effective immunotherapy, specifically cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 and programmed cell death 1 inhibitors, as well as targeted therapy including BRAF/MEK inhibitors, has dramatically changed the prognosis for metastatic melanoma patients. Up to 50% of patients may experience long-term survival currently. Despite these advances in melanoma treatment, many patients still progress and die of their disease. As such, there are many studies aimed at providing new treatment options for this population. Therapies currently under investigation include, but are not limited to, novel immunotherapies, targeted therapies, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and other cellular therapies, oncolytic viral therapy and other injectables, and fecal microbiota transplant. In this review, we discuss the emerging treatment options for metastatic melanoma patients who have progressed on standard of care treatments.

Is There a Current Role for Combination Chemotherapy or High-Dose Interleukin 2 in Melanoma?

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint inhibition and targeted therapies have revolutionized the treatment of melanoma. However, chemotherapy and interleukin 2 (IL-2) therapy may still have a role in the later-line treatment of patients who do not have durable responses to other treatments. Chemotherapy can work transiently in patients whose disease has progressed on immune checkpoint inhibitors and for whom there are no appropriate targeted therapy options. High-dose IL-2 therapy can still be effective for a very small number of patients following progression on other therapies. In addition, modified IL-2 agents and IL-2 in combination with tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy may play a role in future treatments for melanoma.

Plasmid co-expressing siRNA-PD-1 and Endostatin carried by attenuated Salmonella enhanced the anti-melanoma effect via inhibiting the expression of PD-1 and VEGF on tumor-bearing mice

Melanoma, the most perilous form of skin cancer, is known for its inherent resistance to chemotherapy. Even with advances in tumor immunotherapy, the survival of patients with advanced or recurrent melanomas remains poor. Over time, melanoma tumor cells may produce excessive angiogenic factors, necessitating the use of combinations of angiogenesis inhibitors, including broad-spectrum options, to combat melanoma. Among these inhibitors, Endostatin is one of the most broad-spectrum and least toxic angiogenesis inhibitors. We found Endostatin significantly increased the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and reduced the infiltration of M2 tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the melanoma tumor microenvironment (TME). Interestingly, we also observed high expression levels of programmed death 1 (PD-1), an essential immune checkpoint molecule associated with tumor immune evasion, within the melanoma tumor microenvironment despite the use of Endostatin. To address this issue, we investigated the effects of a plasmid expressing Endostatin and PD-1 siRNA, wherein Endostatin was overexpressed while RNA interference (RNAi) targeted PD-1. These therapeutic agents were delivered using attenuated Salmonella in melanoma-bearing mice. Our results demonstrate that pEndostatin-siRNA-PD-1 therapy exhibits optimal therapeutic efficacy against melanoma. We found that pEndostatin-siRNA-PD-1 therapy promotes the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and the expression of granzyme B in melanoma tumors. Importantly, combined inhibition of angiogenesis and PD-1 significantly suppresses melanoma tumor progression compared with the inhibition of angiogenesis or PD-1 alone. Based on these findings, our study suggests that combining PD-1 inhibition with angiogenesis inhibitors holds promise as a clinical strategy for the treatment of melanoma.

Molecular Imaging of Melanoma VEGF-expressing Tumors through [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-Fab(Bevacizumab)

BACKGROUND

Angiogenesis is a process that many tumors depend on for growth, development, and metastasis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the major players in tumor angiogenesis in several tumor types, including melanoma. VEGF inhibition is achieved by bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to VEGF and prevents its function. In order to successfully enable in vivo VEGF expression imaging in a murine melanoma model, we previously labeled bevacizumab with [99mTc]Tc. We observed that this was feasible, but it had prolonged blood circulation and delayed tumor uptake.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a radiolabeled Fab bevacizumab fragment, [99mTc]Tc-HYNICFab( bevacizumab), for non-invasive in vivo VEGF expression molecular imaging.

METHODS

Flow cytometry was used to examine VEGF presence in the murine melanoma cell line (B16-F10). Bevacizumab was digested with papain for six hours at 37°C to produce Fab(bevacizumab), which was then conjugated to NHS-HYNIC-Tfa for radiolabeling with [99mTc]Tc. Stability and binding affinity assays were also evaluated. Biodistribution and single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) were performed at 1, 3, and 6 h (n = 4) after injection of [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-Fab(Bevacizumab) in normal and B16-F10 tumor-bearing C57Bl/6J mice.

RESULTS

Using flow cytometry, it was shown that the B16-F10 murine melanoma cell line has intracellular VEGF expression. Papain incubation resulted in the complete digestion of bevacizumab with good purity and homogeneity. The radiolabeling yield of [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-Fab(bevacizumab) was 85.00 ± 6.06%, with a specific activity of 291.87 ± 18.84 MBq/mg (n=3), showing in vitro stability. Binding assays demonstrated significant intracellular in vitro VEGF expression. Fast blood clearance and high kidney and tumor uptake were observed in biodistribution and SPECT/CT studies.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the development and evaluation of [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-Fab(bevacizumab), a novel molecular VEGF expression imaging agent that may be used for precision medicine in melanoma and potentially in other VEGF-expressing tumors.

The features and management of acquired resistance to PD1-based therapy in metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD-1 therapy (PD1) either alone or with anti-CTLA-4 (CTLA4), has high initial response rates, however 20% of patients (pts) with complete response (CR) and 30% with partial response (PR) within 12 months of treatment experience subsequent disease progression by 6 years. The nature and optimal management of this acquired resistance (AR) remains unknown.

METHODS

Pts from 16 centres who responded to PD1-based therapy and who later progressed were examined. Demographics, disease characteristics and subsequent treatments were evaluated.

RESULTS

299 melanoma pts were identified, median age 64y, 44% BRAFV600m. 172 (58%) received PD1 alone, 114 (38%) PD1/CTLA4 and 13 (4%) PD1 and an investigational drug. 90 (30%) pts had CR, 209 (70%) PR. Median time to AR was 12.6 mo (95% CI, 11.3, 14.2). Most (N = 193, 65%) progressed in a single organ site, and in a solitary lesion (N = 151, 51%). The most frequent sites were lymph nodes (38%) and brain (25%). Management at AR included systemic therapy (ST, 45%), local therapy (LT) +ST (31%), LT alone (21%), or observation (3%). There was no statistical difference in PFS2 or OS based on management, however, PFS2 was numerically superior for pts treated with ST alone who progressed off PD1 therapy than those who progressed on PD1 (2-year PFS2 42% versus 25%, p = 0.249). mOS from AR was 38.0 months (95% CI, 29.5-NR); longer in single-site versus multi-site progression (2-year OS 70% vs 54%, p < 0·001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acquired resistance to PD1 therapy in melanoma is largely oligometastatic, and pts may have a favorable survival outcome following salvage treatment.

Characteristics of long-survivor metastatic melanoma after polychemotherapy and interferon: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The development of immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors dramatically improved the prognosis of metastatic melanoma. Consequently, chemotherapy is now rarely used. Here, we describe the characteristics of long-surviving patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunochemotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrieved retrospective clinical and pathological data for patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma between January 1993 and December 2015 who received the CVD-INF (cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, and interferon α-2b) regimen at the Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève. We estimated their progression-free survival and overall survival. This ad hoc study's primary aim was to describe the clinical and biological characteristics of long-term survivors, defined as patients surviving more than two years after immunochemotherapy initiation. The spatial distribution pattern of CD8+ T cells (inflamed, excluded, or desert) was immunohistochemically determined.

RESULTS

Ninety patients received CVD-INF. Their median age at metastatic melanoma diagnosis was 55 years (20-75). Their median progression-free survival was 2.8 months, and median overall survival was 7.2 months. Eleven (12%) patients were long-term survivors. In multivariate analysis, central nervous system metastases (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-4.95; p = 0.001), multiple metastases (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.01-3.29; p = 0.047), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.12-3.30; p = 0.016) were independently associated with shorter survival. Most long-survivors (6/8; 75%) had a tumour-inflamed pattern compared to 25% of non-long survivors (5/20; Fisher's test p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of patients with metastatic melanoma and a tumour-inflamed phenotype treated with CVD-INF survived over two years. Factors associated with prolonged survival are consistent with those previously reported in metastatic melanoma.

Successful treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel in melanoma progression after immune-related adverse events

The overall survival of melanoma patients has improved using antibodies targeting immune checkpoints (anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4 and anti-LAG-3). Systemic chemotherapy was administered in melanoma for many years with limited effectiveness. Here we report a case of a patient who experienced immune-mediated adverse effects from checkpoint blockade therapy and subsequently responded to chemotherapy. The patient presented with melanoma and paraneoplastic digital ischemia. She received a combination of ipilimumab/nivolumab and experienced G3 myocarditis, followed by melanoma progression after a steroid taper. This patient achieved a partial and durable response with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy. This report suggests the possibility of a subset of patients who experience progression after immune-based side effects where chemotherapy may be effective in the modern age of melanoma treatment.

The benefit of treatment beyond progression with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Treatment beyond progression (TBP) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is an evolving field due to the limitations of conventional imaging in response evaluation. However, real-life data on the benefit of TBP is scarce, especially from the limited resource settings and patients treated in the later lines. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the survival benefit of TBP with ICIs in patients with advanced tumors from a limited resource setting.

METHODS

For this multi-center retrospective cohort study, we included 282 patients treated with ICIs and had radiological progression according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. We evaluated post-progression survival according to the use of TBP (TBP and non-TBP groups) with univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The cohort's median age was 61, and 84.4% were treated in the second or later lines. 82 (29.1%) of 282 patients continued on ICIs following the initial progression. In multivariate analyses, patients in the TBP group had improved post-progression survival compared to non-TBP (13.18 vs. 4.63 months, HR: 0.500, 95% CI: 0.349-0.717, p < 0.001). The benefit of the TBP was independent of the tumor type, treatment line, and age. Furthermore, TBP with ICIs remained associated with improved post-progression survival (HR: 0.600, 95% CI: 0.380-0.947, p = 0.028) after excluding the patients with no further treatment after progression in the non-TBP arm.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed that patients receiving ICIs beyond progression had considerably longer survival. Continuation of ICIs after progression should be considered a reasonable management option for patients with advanced cancer, specifically for patients with limited alternative options.

Tumor Microenvironment as a Therapeutic Target in Melanoma Treatment

The role of the tumor microenvironment in tumor growth and therapy has recently attracted more attention in research and drug development. The ability of the microenvironment to trigger tumor maintenance, progression, and resistance is the main cause for treatment failure and tumor relapse. Accumulated evidence indicates that the maintenance and progression of tumor cells is determined by components of the microenvironment, which include stromal cells (endothelial cells, fibroblasts, mesenchymal stem cells, and immune cells), extracellular matrix (ECM), and soluble molecules (chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, and extracellular vesicles). As a solid tumor, melanoma is not only a tumor mass of monolithic tumor cells, but it also contains supporting stroma, ECM, and soluble molecules. Melanoma cells are continuously in interaction with the components of the microenvironment. In the present review, we focus on the role of the tumor microenvironment components in the modulation of tumor progression and treatment resistance as well as the impact of the tumor microenvironment as a therapeutic target in melanoma.

The Benefits and Challenges of the Multimodal Treatment in Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Melanoma

Currently, the treatment of malignant melanoma offers the longest and the most studied experience of innovative treatments in malignant pathology. The algorithm of the therapeutic decision in advanced or metastatic melanoma must comprise: the timing of the therapeutic initiation, the sequencing of the specific oncological treatment (radiotherapy and chemotherapy still being therapeutic alternatives in selected cases), the diagnosis and the management of adverse reactions. We present the case of a patient diagnosed with metastatic malignant melanoma in November 2019, who progressed successively under new systemic treatment throughout the 3 years of treatment and experienced skin reactions of various degrees of severity. The comprehensive response to secondary hilar pulmonary lymphatic determinations under subsequent chemotherapy was specific to the presented case. The occurrence of vitiligo secondary to immunotherapy is a favorable prognostic factor, but the occurrence of secondary cerebral determinations is an extremely severe prognostic factor in malignant melanoma and a challenge in making the therapeutic decision. Previous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors may trigger a favorable response to systemic chemotherapy. The early and accurate diagnosis of the adverse events of the new therapies requires a multidisciplinary approach, because it can radically change the therapeutic decision.

Chemotherapy postimmunotherapy for recurrent metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical data on salvage chemotherapy used after checkpoints inhibitors in oncology are reviewed, with a special focus on recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Converging evidence is emerging about high response and/or disease control rates associated with salvage chemotherapy after immunotherapy failure in advanced solid tumours. This phenomenon is mainly reported in retrospective studies for "hot tumours" such as R/M HNSCC, melanoma, lung, urothelial or gastric cancers, but also in haematological malignancies. Some physiopathological hypotheses have been raised.

SUMMARY

Several independent series show increased response rates associated with postimmuno chemotherapy when compared with retrospective series in similar settings. Several mechanisms could be involved such as a "carry-over" allowed by a persistence of the checkpoint inhibitor, a modulation of tumour microenvironment components but also an intrinsic immunomodulatory effect of chemotherapy, increased by a specific immunologic state induced by the therapeutic pressure of checkpoint inhibitors. These data establish a rationale for prospectively evaluating the features of postimmunotherapy salvage chemotherapy.

Protocatechuic aldehyde acts synergistically with dacarbazine to augment DNA double-strand breaks and promote apoptosis in cutaneous melanoma cells

BACKGROUND

Despite rapid developments in immunotherapy and targeted therapy, dacarbazine (DTIC)-based chemotherapy still has been placed at the first-line for advanced melanoma patients who are after failure of immunotherapy or targeted therapy. However, the limited response rate and survival benefit challenge the DTIC-based chemotherapy for advanced melanoma patients.

METHODS

Two melanoma cell lines, A375 and SK-MEL-28 were cultured with PA and DTIC over a range of concentrations for 72 h and the cell viabilities were detected by CCK8 assay. The Bliss model and ZIP model were used for calculating the synergistic effect of PA and DTIC. DNA double-strand breaks in the two cell lines were examined by the Comet assay, and cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry. The short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown, Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot were performed for molecular analysis.

RESULTS

In the present study, we report that Protocatechuic aldehyde (PA) synergistically enhances the cytotoxicity of DTIC to two melanoma cell lines, A375 and SK-MEL-28. The combination of PA and DTIC augments DNA double-strand breaks and increases cell apoptosis. Further mechanism study reveals that PA destabilizes MGMT protein (O-6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase) through the ubiquitin-proteasome process and directly repairs DTIC-induced genetic lesions. Knockdown of MGMT compromises the synergistic effect between PA and DTIC.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the bioactive compound, Protocatechuic aldehyde, synergistically promotes the cytotoxicity of DTIC to melanoma cells through destabilization of MGMT protein. It could be a potential candidate for melanoma chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy in Cutaneous Melanoma: Is There Still a Role?

Purpose of Review

In the preceding decade, the management of metastatic cutaneous melanoma has been revolutionised with the development of highly effective therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (specifically CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors) and targeted therapies (BRAF and MEK inhibitors). The role of chemotherapy in the contemporary management of melanoma is undefined.

Recent Findings

Extended analyses highlight substantially improved 5-year survival rates of approximately 50% in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with first-line therapies. However, most patients will progress on these first-line treatments. Sequencing of chemotherapy following failure of targeted and immunotherapies is associated with low objective response rates and short progression-free survival, and thus, meaningful benefits to patients are minimal.

Summary

Chemotherapy has limited utility in the contemporary management of cutaneous melanoma (with a few exceptions, discussed herein) and should not be the standard treatment sequence following failure of first-line therapies. Instead, enrolment onto clinical trials should be standard-of-care in these patients.

Nanodelivery systems for cutaneous melanoma treatment

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is a multifactorial disease whose treatment still presents challenges: the rapid progression to advanced CM, which leads to frequent recurrences even after surgical excision and, notably, the low response rates and resistance to the available therapies, particularly in the case of unresectable metastatic CM. Thereby, alternative innovative therapeutic approaches for CM continue to be searched. In this review we discuss relevant preclinical research studies, and provide a broad-brush analysis of patents and clinical trials which involve the application of nanotechnology-based delivery systems in CM therapy. Nanodelivery systems have been developed for the delivery of anticancer biomolecules to CM, which can be administered by different routes. Overall, nanosystems could promote technological advances in several therapeutic modalities and can be used in combinatorial therapies. Nevertheless, the results of these preclinical studies have not been translated to clinical applications. Thus, concerted and collaborative research studies involving basic, applied, translational, and clinical scientists need to be performed to allow the development of effective and safe nanomedicines to treat CM.

Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer Drug Resistance: Implications on Melanoma Therapy

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are involved in the pathogenesis of neoplastic diseases. Their role in mediating drug resistance has been widely described in several types of cancers, including melanoma. EVs can mediate drug resistance through several different mechanisms, such as drug-sequestration, transfer of pro-survival proteins and RNA, induction of cancer stem cell-like features and interaction with cells of the tumor microenvironment and immune-system. Melanoma is a highly immunogenic tumor originating from the malignant transformation of melanocytes. Several therapeutic strategies currently used in the treatment of melanoma and the combination of BRAF and MEK-inhibitors, as well as immune check-point inhibitors (ICI), have consistently improved the overall survival time of melanoma patients. However, the development of resistance is one of the biggest problems leading to a poor clinical outcome, and EVs can contribute to this. EVs isolated from melanoma cells can contain "sequestered" chemotherapeutic drugs in order to eliminate them, or bioactive molecules (such as miRNA or proteins) that have been proven to play a crucial role in the transmission of resistance to sensitive neoplastic cells. This leads to the hypothesis that EVs could be considered as resistance-mediators in sensitive melanoma cells. These findings are a pivotal starting point for further investigations to better understand EVs' role in drug resistance mechanisms and how to target them. The purpose of this review is to summarize knowledge about EVs in order to develop a deeper understanding of their underlying mechanisms. This could lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies able to bypass EV-mediated drug-resistance in melanoma, such as by the use of combination therapy, including EV release inhibitors.

Focal adhesion alterations in G0 ‐positive melanoma cells

BACKGROUND

Melanoma is a highly heterogeneous malignant tumor that exhibits various forms of drug resistance. Recently, reversal transition of cancer cells to the G₀ phase of the cell cycle under the influence of therapeutic drugs has been identified as an event associated with tumor dissemination. In the present study, we investigated the ability of chemotherapeutic agent dacarbazine to induce a transition of melanoma cells to the G₀ phase as a mechanism of chemoresistance.

METHODS

We used the flow cytometry to analyze cell distribution within cell cycle phases after dacarbazine treatment as well as to identifyG₀ -positive cells population. Transcriptome profiling was provided to determine genes associated with dacarbazine resistance. We evaluated the activity of β-galactosidase in cells treated with dacarbazine by substrate hydrolysis. Cell adhesion strength was measured by centrifugal assay application with subsequent staining of adhesive cells with Ki-67 monoclonal antibodies. Ability of melanoma cells to metabolize dacarbazine was determined by expressional analysis of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2E1 followed by CYP1A1 protein level evaluation by the ELISA method.

RESULTS

The present study determined that dacarbazine treatment of melanoma cells could induce an increase in the percentage of cells in G₀ phase without alterations of β-galactosidase positive cells which corresponded to the fraction of the senescent cells. Transcriptomic profiling of cells under dacarbazine induction of G₀ -positive cells percentage revealed that 'VEGFA-VEGFR2 signaling pathway' and 'Cell cycle' signaling were mostly enriched by dysregulated genes. 'Focal adhesion' signaling was also found to be triggered by dacarbazine. In melanoma cells treated with dacarbazine, an increase in G₀ -positive cells among adherent cells was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Dacarbazine induces the alteration in a percentage of melanoma cells residing in G₀ phase of a cell cycle. The altered adhesive phenotype of cancer cells under transition in the G₀ phase may refer to a specific intercellular communication pattern of quiescent/senescent cancer cells.

The role of angiogenesis in melanoma: Clinical treatments and future expectations

The incidence of melanoma has increased rapidly over the past few decades, with mortality accounting for more than 75% of all skin cancers. The high metastatic potential of Melanoma is an essential factor in its high mortality. Vascular angiogenic system has been proved to be crucial for the metastasis of melanoma. An in-depth understanding of angiogenesis will be of great benefit to melanoma treatment and may promote the development of melanoma therapies. This review summarizes the recent advances and challenges of anti-angiogenic agents, including monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, human recombinant Endostatin, and traditional Chinese herbal medicine. We hope to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms, clinical research progress, and future research directions of melanoma.

Efficacy and safety of lifileucel, a one-time autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy, in patients with advanced melanoma after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies: pooled analysis of consecutive cohorts of the C-144-01 study

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced melanoma have limited treatment options after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Lifileucel, a one-time autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy, demonstrated an investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) of 36% in 66 patients who progressed after ICI and targeted therapy. Herein, we report independent review committee (IRC)-assessed outcomes of 153 patients treated with lifileucel in a large multicenter Phase 2 cell therapy trial in melanoma.

METHODS

Eligible patients had advanced melanoma that progressed after ICI and targeted therapy, where appropriate. Melanoma lesions were resected (resected tumor diameter ≥1.5 cm) and shipped to a central good manufacturing practice facility for 22-day lifileucel manufacturing. Patients received a non-myeloablative lymphodepletion regimen, a single lifileucel infusion, and up to six doses of high-dose interleukin-2. The primary endpoint was IRC-assessed ORR (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1).

RESULTS

The Full Analysis Set consisted of 153 patients treated with lifileucel, including longer-term follow-up on the 66 patients previously reported. Patients had received a median of 3.0 lines of prior therapy (81.7% received both anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and anti-cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated protein 4) and had high disease burden at baseline (median target lesion sum of diameters (SOD): 97.8 mm; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >upper limit of normal: 54.2%). ORR was 31.4% (95% CI: 24.1% to 39.4%), with 8 complete responses and 40 partial responses. Median duration of response was not reached at a median study follow-up of 27.6 months, with 41.7% of the responses maintained for ≥18 months. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 13.9 and 4.1 months, respectively. Multivariable analyses adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status demonstrated that elevated LDH and target lesion SOD >median were independently correlated with ORR (p=0.008); patients with normal LDH and SOD <median had greater likelihood of response than those with either (OR=2.08) or both (OR=4.42) risk factors. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (≥30%) were thrombocytopenia (76.9%), anemia (50.0%), and febrile neutropenia (41.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Investigational lifileucel demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced melanoma and high tumor burden. Durable responses and a favorable safety profile support the potential benefit of one-time lifileucel TIL cell therapy in patients with limited treatment options in ICI-refractory disease.

pH-sensitive nanomedicine of novel tubulin polymerization inhibitor for lung metastatic melanoma

Microtubule binding agents such as paclitaxel and vincristine have activity in metastatic melanoma. However, even responsive tumors develop resistance, highlighting the need to investigate new drug molecules. Here, we showed that a new compound, CH-2-102, developed by our group, has high anti-tumor efficacy in human and murine melanoma cells. We confirmed that CH-2-102 robustly suppresses the microtubule polymerization process by directly interacting with the colchicine binding site. Our results unveil that CH-2-102 suppresses microtubule polymerization and subsequently induces G2 phase cell arrest as one of the possible mechanisms. Notably, CH-2-102 maintains its efficacy even in the paclitaxel resistance melanoma cells due to different binding sites and a non-Pgp substrate. We developed a pH-responsive drug-polymer Schiff bases linker for high drug loading into nanoparticles (NPs). Our CH-2-102 conjugated NPs induced tumor regression more effectively than Abraxane® (Nab-paclitaxel, N-PTX), free drug, and non-sensitive NPs in B16-F10 cell-derived lung metastasis mouse model. Furthermore, our results suggest that the formulation has a high impact on the in vivo efficacy of the drug and warrants further investigation in other cancers, particularly taxane resistant. In conclusion, the microtubule polymerization inhibitor CH-2-102 conjugated pH-responsive NPs induce tumor regression in lung metastasis melanoma mice, suggesting it may be an effective strategy for treating metastatic melanoma.

Dacarbazine in the management of metastatic melanoma in the era of immune checkpoint therapy: a valid option or obsolete?

Despite the dramatic improvement in both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, up to 60% will develop treatment resistance and 50% will die from their disease. Therefore, although dacarbazine is no longer a mainstay of modern melanoma management, we examined the extent to, and in which context, it may still play a role. A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of patients who had received dacarbazine treatment between October 2014 and October 2021, following innate or acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors; Nine patients with locally advanced (n = 1) or metastatic melanoma (n = 8) were identified (average age: 74 years, 4 males and 5 females). The number of cycles of dacarbazine ranged from 2 to 45 (mean = 12). One-third of patients developed a complete (n = 2) or partial (n = 1) response, two-thirds did not respond to treatment. The median PFS time was 90 days. Common adverse events included blood dyscrasias; one patient developed a grade 3 hepatitis, although it was unclear if this was due to the chemotherapy or the preceding combined immunotherapy. Dacarbazine may still be a valid option in the setting of treatment for refractory, relapsed, or progressive disease. Future studies should focus on the immunomodulatory effects of dacarbazine on the tumor microenvironment, which could be harnessed to potentially restore sensitivity to immune checkpoint-based therapy.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2022

A unique collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on the systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with one to 2-cm safety margins. Sentinel lymph node dissection shall be performed as a staging procedure in patients with tumor thickness ≥1.0 mm or ≥0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions in stage III/IV patients should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("tumor board"). Adjuvant therapies can be proposed in stage III/completely resected stage IV patients and are primarily anti-PD-1, independent of mutational status, or alternatively dabrafenib plus trametinib for BRAF mutant patients. In distant metastases (stage IV), either resected or not, systemic treatment is always indicated. For first-line treatment particularly in BRAF wild-type patients, immunotherapy with PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 antibodies shall be considered. In stage IV melanoma with a BRAF-V600  E/K mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harboring a BRAF-V600  E/K mutation, this therapy shall be offered as second-line therapy. Systemic therapy in stage III/IV melanoma is a rapidly changing landscape, and it is likely that these recommendations may change in the near future.

Nanoparticle-Based Combination Therapy for Melanoma

Melanoma is a cutaneous carcinoma, and its incidence is rapidly increasing with every year. The treatment options for melanoma have been comprehensively studied. Conventional treatment methods (e.g., radiotherapy, chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy) with surgical removal inevitably cause serious complications; moreover, resistance is common. Nanoparticles (NPs) combined with conventional methods are new and promising options to treat melanoma, and many combinations have been achieving good success. Due to their physical and biological features, NPs can help target intended melanoma cells more efficiently with less damage. This creates new hope for a better treatment strategy for melanoma with minimum damage and maximum efficacy.

Successful treatment with dacarbazine against a parathyroid hormone-related protein-producing melanoma causing hypercalcemia after immune checkpoint inhibitor failure

Cancer-associated hypercalcemia commonly occurs through abnormal secretions of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) from cancer cells. Several cases of PTHrP-producing melanoma causing hypercalcemia have been reported; however, effective management of PTHrP-producing BRAF wild-type melanoma causing hypercalcemia after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) failure is unclear. We report a case of PTHrP-producing BRAF wild-type melanoma leading to oncological emergency by hypercalcemia that was successfully treated with dacarbazine after ICI failure. A 65-year-old Japanese woman had advanced BRAF wild-type melanoma that was refractory to ICI, and then led to hypoxia through exacerbated lung metastases and pleural effusion. Moreover, hypercalcemia appeared in parallel with increase of the serum PTHrP level. Dacarbazine was administered, and after the first administration, the pleural effusion was gradually decreased and hypoxia rapidly disappeared, and the serum calcium and PTHrP levels were improved within normal limits. Dacarbazine after ICI failure is potentially a useful option for oncological emergency due to progression of BRAF wild-type melanoma including PTHrP-producing types. Dacarbazine should be reevaluated as a therapeutic option for oncological emergency in patients with BRAF wild-type melanoma after ICI failure.